Item 4.01    Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

On September 18, 2017, the Board of Directors of Contact Minerals Corp., a Nevada corporation (“we” or “us”), approved the dismissal Manning Elliott LLP (“Manning”) as our independent registered public accountant., effective immediately. Except as noted in the paragraph immediately below, the reports of Manning on the Company’s financial statements for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and such reports were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principle.

The reports of Manning on the Company’s financial statements as of and for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 contained explanatory paragraphs which noted that there was substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as the Company has not generated any revenues and has incurred operating losses since inception, which raised doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

During the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 and through September 15, 2017, the Company has not had any disagreements with Manning on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to Manning’s satisfaction, would have caused them to make reference thereto in their reports on the Company’s financial statements for such periods.

During the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 and through September 15, 2017, there were no reportable events, as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

We have requested that Manning furnish us with a letter addressed to the Commission stating whether it agrees with the above statements. A copy of this letter is included herewith as Exhibit 16.1.

Concurrently therewith, we retained the firm of KCCW Accountancy Corp. (“KCCW”), to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2017.

During the fiscal years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, and through the date of this Form 8-K, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted KCCW regarding (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and KCCW did not provide either a written report or oral advice to the Company that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (2) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement with Manning on accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Manning, would have caused Manning to make reference to the matter in their report, or a “reportable event” as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K of the SEC’s rules and regulations.