UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPO RT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended: June 6, 2017

 

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from __________ to _________

 

Commission file number 1-12454

 

RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

GEORGIA

 

63-0475239

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

333 East Broadway  Avenue, Maryville, Tennessee 37804
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(865) 379-5700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ☐  No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ☐  No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ☒  No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ☒  No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, emerging growth company, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ☐

Accelerated filer  

Non-accelerated filer  ☐ ( Do not check if a smaller reporting company )

Smaller reporting company  ☐

          Emerging growth company ☐     

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐  

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  ☐  No  ☒

 

The aggregate market value of the voting stock (which consists solely of shares of common stock) held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last day of the second fiscal quarter ended November 29, 2016 was $184,147,115 based on the closing stock price of $3.04 on November 29, 2016.

 

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of August 16, 2017, was 60,943,588 .

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant ’s definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K .

 

 

 

 

Index

PART I

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Business

4-10

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

10-17

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

17

Item 2.

Properties

17-19

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

19

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures  

19

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

20-21

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

22-23

Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

24-41

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

41

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4 2-88

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

89

I tem 9A.

Controls and Procedures

89

Item 9B.

Other Information

89

 

 

 

PART III

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

90

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

90

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

90

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

90

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

90

 

 

 

PART IV

 

 

 

 

 

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

9 1

Signatures

 

9 2

 

 

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events, including one or more of the following:   future financial performance (including our estimates of changes in same-restaurant sales, average unit volumes, operating margins, expenses, and other items), future capital expenditures, the effect of strategic initiatives (including statements relating to cost savings initiatives and the benefits of our marketing), the opening or closing of restaurants by us or our franchisees, sales of our real estate or purchases of new real estate, future borrowings and repayments of debt, availability of financing on terms attractive to the Company, compliance with financial covenants in our debt instruments, payment of dividends, stock and bond repurchases, restaurant acquisitions and dispositions, and changes in senior management and in the Board of Directors. We caution the reader that a number of important factors and uncertainties could, individually or in the aggregate, cause our actual results to differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors included in Part I, Item A of this Form 10-K and the following:

 

 

general economic conditions;

 

 

changes in promotional, couponing and advertising strategies;

 

 

changes in our customers ’ disposable income;

 

 

consumer spending trends and habits;

 

 

increased competition in the restaurant market;

 

 

laws and regulations, including those affecting labor and employee benefit costs, such as further potential increases in state and federally mandated minimum wages and healthcare reform;

 

 

the impact of pending litigation;

 

 

customers ’ acceptance of changes in menu items;

 

 

changes in the availability and cost of capital;

 

 

potential limitations imposed by debt covenants under our debt instruments;

 

 

weather conditions in the regions in which Company-owned and franchised restaurants are operated;

 

 

costs and availability of food and beverage inventory, including supply and delivery shortages or interruptions;

 

 

significant fluctuations in energy prices;

 

 

security breaches of our customers ’ or employees’ confidential information or personal data or the failure of our information technology and computer systems;

 

 

our ability to attract and retain qualified managers, franchisees and team members;

 

 

impact of adoption of new accounting standards;

 

 

impact of food-borne illnesses resulting from an outbreak at either one of our restaurant concepts or other competing restaurant concepts; and

 

 

effects of actual or threatened future terrorist attacks in the United States.

 

PART I
Item 1. Business

 

Background
The first Ruby Tuesday® restaurant was opened in 1972 in Knoxville, Tennessee near the campus of the University of Tennessee. The Ruby Tuesday concept, which at the time consisted of 16 restaurants, was acquired by Morrison Restaurants Inc. (“Morrison”) in 1982. During the following years, Morrison grew the concept to over 300 restaurants. In a spin-off transaction that occurred on March 9, 1996, shareholders of Morrison approved the distribution of two separate businesses of Morrison to its shareholders, Morrison Fresh Cooking, Inc. (“MFC”) and Morrison Health Care, Inc. (“MHC”). In conjunction with the spin-off, Morrison was reincorporated in the State of Georgia and changed its name to Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are sometimes referred to herein as “RTI,” the “Company,” “we” and/or “our.”

 

We began our franchise program in 1997 with the opening of one domestic and two international franchised Ruby Tuesday restaurants. We do not own any equity in entities that hold franchises under our franchise programs. As of June 6, 2017, we had 22 Ruby Tuesday concept franchisees, comprised of five domestic and 17 international franchisees. We have signed agreements for the development of new franchised Ruby Tuesday restaurants with seven of the international franchisees. These seven international franchisees hold rights as of June 6, 2017 to develop Ruby Tuesday restaurants in 16 countries.

 

  Operations

We own, operate, and franchise the Ruby Tuesday casual dining restaurant chain and operate in the bar and grill segment of the casual dining industry. As of June 6, 2017, we owned and operated 543, and franchised 62, Ruby Tuesday restaurants. Of the  62 franchised Ruby Tuesday restaurants, 17 were operated by our domestic franchisees and 45 were operated by our international franchisees. Ruby Tuesday restaurants can be found in 41 states, 14 foreign countries, and Guam. Our Company-owned and operated restaurants are concentrated primarily in the Southeast, Northeast, Mid-Atlantic and Midwest of the United States, which we consider to be our core markets. A listing of the states and countries in which our franchisees operate is set forth below in Item 2 entitled “Properties.”

 

 

Ruby Tuesday restaurants offer a wide variety of menu options, including handcrafted classic burgers made with 100% USDA choice beef, fresh chicken options, our signature  baby-back ribs, as well as steaks, seafood, and appetizers. Our Garden Bar has been a significant point of differentiation for our brand and an enduring favorite of our customers. With up to 55 fresh, high quality salad ingredients, our Garden Bar exemplifies our key brand attributes of variety, freshness, and quality. Our Classic Burger choices include beef, turkey, and chicken offerings. Entree selections typically range in price from $8.99 to $20.99. We also offer our RubyTueGo® curbside service and a delivered-meals catering program for businesses, organizations, and group events at both Company-owned and franchised restaurants.

 

Overview and Strategies

The bar and grill segment of the casual dining industry in which we primarily operate is intensely competitive with respect to prices, services, convenience, locations, employees, advertising and promotion, and the types and quality of food. We compete with other food service operations, including locally-owned restaurants, and other national and regional restaurant chains that offer similar types of services and products as we do. We continue to believe there are opportunities to grow our same-restaurant sales, strengthen our competitive position, enhance our profitability, and create value through the execution of the following strategies:

 

Review of Strategic Alternatives

On March 13, 2017, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized an exploration of   strategic alternatives in order to maximize shareholder value.  We are considering all strategic alternatives including, but not limited to, a potential sale or merger of the Company, and have retained a financial advisor to assist in the process.  The strategic alternatives process is ongoing and entering its final phase. 

 

Fresh Start Initiatives

In August 2016, we announced the launch of our Fresh Start initiatives which are intended to streamline our organization, improve financial profitability and ultimately create long-term value for our shareholders. The Fresh Start initiatives were developed to drive more significant top line growth and profitability over time.  The key components of the Fresh Start initiatives include:

 

 

A new menu which is intended to provide culinary innovation and value to our guests while simplifying recipes and procedures for our kitchen. As consumer preference continues to migrate toward healthier food options, we will continue to make meaningful improvements in our core menu that will incorporate hand-crafted American favorites but will contain more lean proteins and fresh vegetables.

 

A new Garden Bar which we restaged and improved to offer over 50 items in order to provide more  desirable offering in a cost effective way. The Garden Bar is a key brand differentiator that we believe sets us apart from our competition and is the most important item on our menu. Approximately half our guests utilize the Garden Bar when they dine with us, either as an add-on or as a main course.

 

A Fresh New Experience which is focused on revitalizing our brand through improving our service and overall guest experience. As part of our work in this area, we completed 13 store remodels in two test markets. Additionally, we are working with our teams at the restaurant level with service initiatives to improve the pace of meals and attentiveness, particularly through menu simplification. We have placed a hold on further remodels while measuring the combined results from our  new menu, new Garden Bar, and Fresh New Experience.

 

 

Franchising
As previously noted, as of June 6, 2017, we had franchise arrangements with 22 franchise groups which operate Ruby Tuesday restaurants in 11 states, Guam, and 14 foreign countries. Our Ruby Tuesday franchisees opened two Ruby Tuesday restaurants in fiscal year 2017, five restaurants in fiscal year 2016, and six restaurants in fiscal year 2015.

 

Generally, Ruby Tuesday concept franchise arrangements consist of a development agreement and a separate franchise agreement for each restaurant. Under a development agreement, a franchisee is granted the exclusive right and undertakes the obligation to develop multiple restaurants within a specifically-described geographic territory. The term of a domestic franchise agreement is generally 15 years, with two five-year renewal options.

 

For each Ruby Tuesday concept restaurant developed under a domestic development agreement, a franchisee is currently obligated to pay a development fee of $10,000 per restaurant (at the time of signing a development agreement), an initial license fee (which typically is $35,000 per restaurant to be developed for domestic franchisees), and a royalty fee equal to 4.0% of the restaurant ’s monthly gross sales, as defined in the franchise agreement. Development and operating fees for international franchise restaurants vary. 

 

All domestic Ruby Tuesday concept franchisees are required to pay a marketing and purchasing fee of 1.5% of monthly gross sales. At times of economic downturn, we have occasionally chosen to temporarily lower these fees. Additionally, under the terms of the franchise agreements, we also require all domestic Ruby Tuesday concept franchisees to pay a national advertising fee of up to 3% of monthly gross sales to cover their pro rata portion of the costs associated with our national advertising campaigns.  As of June 6, 2017 this national advertising fee was 1.5% of monthly gross sales.

 

We provide ongoing training and assistance to our franchisees in connection with the operation and management of each restaurant through our training facility, meetings, computer-based training, and by written or other material.

 

 

Research and Development
We do not engage in any material research and development activities. However, we do engage in ongoing studies to assist with food and menu development and the design of our restaurant prototypes. Additionally, we conduct extensive consumer research to determine our customers’ preferences, trends, and opinions, as well as to better understand other competitive brands.

 

Raw Materials
We negotiate directly with our suppliers for the purchase of raw and processed materials and maintain contracts with select suppliers for both our Company-owned and franchised restaurants. These contracts may include negotiations for distribution of raw materials under a cost plus delivery fee basis and/or specifications that maintain a term-based contract with a renewal option. If any major supplier or distributor is unable to meet our supply needs, we would negotiate and enter into agreements with alternative providers to supply or distribute products to our restaurants.

 

We use purchase commitment contracts to stabilize the potentially volatile prices of certain food commodities. Because of the relatively short storage life of inventories, limited storage facilities at the restaurants, our requirement for fresh products and the numerous sources of goods, a minimum amount of inventory is maintained at our restaurants. In the event of a disruption of supply, all essential food, beverage and operational products can be obtained from secondary vendors and alternative suppliers. We believe these alternative suppliers can provide, upon short notice, items of comparable quality.

 

From time to time, we purchase lobster inventory in advance of our needs and store it in third-party facilities prior to our distributor taking possession of the inventory. Once the lobster is moved to our distributor ’s facilities, we transfer ownership to the distributor. We later reacquire the inventory from our distributor upon its subsequent delivery to our restaurants.

 

Trade and Service Marks of the Company
We and our affiliates have registered certain trade and service marks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including the name “Ruby Tuesday.” RTI holds a license to use all such trade and service marks from our affiliates, including the right to sub-license the related trade and service marks. We believe that these and other related marks are of material importance to our business. Registration of the Ruby Tuesday trademark expires in our 2025 fiscal year, unless renewed. We expect to renew this registration at the appropriate time.

 

Seasonality
Our business is moderately seasonal. Average unit volumes of our mall-based restaurants, which represent approximately 8% of our total restaurants as of June 6, 2017, are slightly higher during the winter holiday season. Freestanding restaurant sales are generally higher in the spring and summer months.

 

Competition
Our business is subject to intense competition with respect to prices, services, convenience, locations, employees, advertising, promotions, and the types and quality of food. We are in competition with other food service operations, with locally-owned restaurants, and other national and regional restaurant chains that offer the same or similar types of services and products as we do. In times of economic uncertainty, restaurants also compete with grocery retailers as customers may choose to limit spending and eat at home. Some of our competitors may be more established in the markets where our restaurants are or may be located. Changes in consumer tastes, national, regional or local economic conditions, demographic trends, traffic patterns, and the types, numbers and locations of competing restaurants often affect the restaurant business. There is active competition for personnel and for attractive commercial real estate sites suitable for restaurants.

 

Government Regulation
We and our franchisees are subject to various licensing requirements and regulations at both the state and local levels, related to zoning, land use, sanitation, alcoholic beverage control, and health and fire safety. We have not encountered significant difficulties or failures in obtaining the required licenses or approvals that could delay the opening of a new restaurant or the operation of an existing restaurant nor do we presently anticipate the occurrence of any such difficulties in the future. Our business is subject to various other regulations by federal, state and local governments, such as compliance with various minimum wage, overtime, health care, food safety, citizenship, and fair labor standards.

 

 

Compliance with these regulations has not had, and is not expected to immediately have, a material adverse effect on our operations.

 

We are subject to a variety of federal, state, and international laws governing franchise sales and the franchise relationship. In general, these laws and regulations impose certain disclosure and registration requirements prior to the offer and sale of franchises. Rulings of several state and federal courts and existing or proposed federal and state laws demonstrate a trend toward increased protection of the rights and interests of franchisees against franchisors. Such decisions and laws may limit the ability of franchisors to enforce certain provisions of franchise agreements or to alter or terminate franchise agreements. Due to the scope of our business and the complexity of franchise regulations, we may encounter minor compliance issues from time to time. We do not believe, however, that any of these issues will have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

See Item 1A “Risk Factors” below for a discussion of risks related to federal, state, and local regulation of our business.

 

Environmental Compliance
We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that have been enacted or adopted, including those regulating the discharge of hazardous and other materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. Compliance with these laws and regulations has not had and is not expected to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

Personnel
As of June 6, 2017, we employed approximately 25,000 employees, including approximately 200 support center management and staff personnel. We believe that our employee relations are good and that working conditions and employee compensation are comparable with our major competitors. Our employees are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

 

Available Information
Through the “Investors” section of our website www.rubytuesday.com , we make available free of charge, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as it is reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our reports and other materials filed with the SEC are also available at www.sec.gov. We are not including the information contained on or available through the aforementioned websites as a part of, or incorporating such information into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K unless specifically noted in the exhibits section in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, copies of corporate governance materials, including Audit Committee Charter, Governance Committee Charter, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and Whistleblower Policy are available on our web site, free of charge. We will make available on our web site any waiver of or substantive amendment to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics within four business days following the date of such waiver or amendment.

 

A copy of the aforementioned documents will be made available in print without charge to all shareholders upon written request to the Company. Shareholders are encouraged to direct such requests to our Secretary at the Restaurant Support Services Center, 333 East Broadway Avenue, Maryville, Tennessee 37804.

 

 

Executive Officers
Our executive officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Information regarding our executive officers as of August 1, 2017, is provided below.

 

Name

Age

Position

 

 

 

James F. Hyatt, II  

6 1

President and Chief Executive Officer

Sue Briley

54

Chief Financial Officer

Mike K. Ellis

55

Chief Development Officer

Rhonda J. Parish

61

Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

David W. Skena

47

Chief Marketing Officer

Thomas A. Williams

55

Chief People Officer

 

Mr. Hyatt  joined the Company in April 2017 as President and Chief Executive Officer.  Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hyatt served as Chief Executive Officer of Church's Chicken from September 2011 to November 2016 and remains a member of its Board of Directors.  Prior to Church's Chicken, Mr. Hyatt served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cosi, Inc. from September 2007 through September 2011.  Prior to Cosi, Inc., Mr. Hyatt spent 31 years with Burger King Corporation, including serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer responsible for over 13,000 restaurants, after 11 years as one of the company's most successful multi-unit franchisees.

 

Ms. Briley joined the Company in July 2014 and was named  Chief Financial Officer in September 2016.  Ms. Briley served as Interim Chief Financial Officer from June 2016 to September 2016 and Vice President of Finance from July 2014 to June 2016.  Prior to joining the Company, she was sole proprietor of Symmetry Financial Consulting from July 2013 to July 2014, Director of Financial Planning and Analysis at Margaritaville Enterprises from November 2012 to July 2013 and, prior to that, held a variety of progressively responsible positions in finance, accounting, and treasury at Darden Restaurants, Inc. 

 

Mr. Ellis joined the Company in February 2016 as Chief Development Officer, assuming additional duties for oversight of the Company's supply chain in March 2017.  Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ellis served as Chief Development Officer for Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. from March 2014 to February 2015, and served as Executive Vice President, Franchise & Restaurant Development for Einstein from March 2011 to March 2014. Prior to his tenure with Einstein, Mr. Ellis held a number of executive positions, including Chief Development Officer for O’Charley’s, Inc. and Burger King Corporation, and Senior Vice President of Development for Darden Restaurants, Inc.

 

Ms. Parish joined the Company in March 2015 as Chief Legal Officer and Secretary. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Parish served as Chief Legal, People and Risk Officer for Einstein Noah Restaurant Group from January 2010 to January 2015, and served as Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary for Denny ’s Corporation from July 1998 to July 2008. Prior to her tenure with Denny’s Corporation, Ms. Parish held a number of executive positions, including Assistant General Counsel for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

 

Mr. Skena joined the Company in July 2015 as Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Skena served in various roles of increasing responsibility with PepsiCo, Inc. for the past nine years, most recently serving as Vice President of Premium and Value Brands. Prior to his tenure with PepsiCo, Inc., among other positions, Mr. Skena served over six years at Kraft Foods, Inc. in brand management for multiple product lines.

 

 

Mr. Williams joined the Company in April 2016 as Chief People Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Williams served in various roles of increasing responsibility with Jo-Ann Stores for the past 18 years, most recently serving as Chief Human Resources Officer. Prior to his tenure with Jo-Ann Stores, Mr. Williams served over sixteen years at Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in benefit planning.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

Our business and operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of those risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations would suffer. The risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

We cannot assure you that our exploration of strategic alternatives will result in a transaction or that any such transaction would be successful, and the process of exploring strategic alternatives or its conclusion could adversely impact our business an d our stock price.

 

On March 13, 2017, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized an exploration of   strategic alternatives in order to maximize shareholder value.  We are considering all strategic alternatives including, but not limited to, a potential sale or merger of the Company, and have retained a financial advisor to assist in the process.  The strategic alternatives process is ongoing and entering its final phase. 

 

There can be no assurances that the strategic alternatives process will r esult in the announcement or consummation of any strategic transaction, or that any resulting plans or transactions will yield additional value for shareholders.  Any potential transaction would be dependent on a number of factors that may be beyond our control, including, among other things, market conditions, industry trends, the interest of third parties in a potential transaction with the Company and the availability of financing to potential buyers on reasonable terms. 

 

The process of exploring strate gic alternatives could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.  We have incurred costs related to the strategic alternatives process of $3.3 million during fiscal year 2017 and have spent an additional $0.4 million during the first two months of fiscal year 2018.  We could continue to incur substantial expenses associated with identifying and evaluating potential strategic alternatives, including those related to employee retention payments, equity compensation, severance pay and legal, accounting and financial advisory fees.  In addition, the process may be time consuming and disruptive to our business operations, could divert the attention of management and the Board of Directors from our  business, could negatively impact the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees, and could expose us to potential litigation in connection with this process or any resulting transaction.  The public announcement of a strategic alternative may also yield a negative impact on operating results if prospective or existing service providers are reluctant to commit to new or renewal contracts or if existing customers decide to shift their business to a competitor.

 

Further, we do not intend to disclose detailed developm ents or provide regular updates on the progress or status of the strategic alternatives process until our Board of Directors deems further disclosure is appropriate or required.  Accordingly, speculation regarding any developments related to the review of strategic alternatives and perceived uncertainties related to the future of our Company could cause our stock price to fluctuate significantly.

 

Our business could be negatively affected as a result of the actions of activist shareholders.

Publicly traded c ompanies have increasingly become subject to campaigns by activist investors advocating corporate actions such as financial restructuring, increased borrowing, special dividends, stock repurchases or even sales of assets or the entire company. It is possible that activist shareholders may attempt to effect such changes or acquire control over the Board of Directors. Responding to proxy contests and other actions by activist shareholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations and divert the attention of our Board of Directors and senior management from the pursuit of business strategies, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction as a result of shareholder activism or changes to the composition of the Board of Directors may lead to the perception of a change in the direction of the business, instability or lack of continuity.  This may be exploited by our competitors, cause concern to our current or potential customers, and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel.

 

We may be unsuccessful in driving short- and long-term profitable sales growth, which may negatively impact our financial results.

 

We are in the process of executing  strategic initiatives which are designed to address our sales and operational challenges, improve financial profitability, and enhance long-term value for our shareholders.  We believe the execution of these initiatives provides opportunities for increased same-restaurant customer counts, sales growth, and increased shareholder value.  These initiatives involve numerous risks, and we may not be able to maintain the brand relevance and restaurant operating excellence required to achieve sustainable growth objectives. For example, short-term sales growth and profitability could be negatively affected if we are unable to drive near term customer count growth, and long-term sales growth and profitability could be negatively affected if we fail to extend our brand in ways that are relevant to our customers. A failure to define and deliver a clear, relevant brand that generates sustainable same-restaurant traffic growth and produces sales and earnings growth opportunities, or a failure to evolve in-restaurant and brand support cost structures so that competitively strong sales growth results in stable and improving profit margins could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and on our ability to identify adequate sources of capital to fund the strategic initiatives related to our brand transformation.

 

Competition may adversely affect our operations and financial results.

 

The restaurant industry is intensely competitive with respect to prices, services, convenience, locations, employees, advertising, promotions, and types and quality of food. We compete within each market with national and regional restaurant chains and locally-owned restaurants. We also face growing competition as a result of the trend towards convergence in grocery, deli, and restaurant services, particularly in the supermarket industry which offers “convenient meals” in the form of improved entrées and side dishes from the deli section. Some of our competitors may be better established in the markets where our restaurants are or may be located. We also actively compete for management personnel and for attractive commercial real estate sites suitable for restaurants. Difficulties in our ability to compete with other restaurants and retail businesses for desirable development sites, construction contractors, management personnel, hourly employees, and other resources could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

 

We may not be successful at operating profitable restaurants, which could lead to impairment charges and other losses.

 

Our success is dependent upon operating profitable restaurants. The profitability of our restaurants is dependent on numerous factors, including the following:

 

 

the ability to provide menu items with strong customer preference at attractive prices;

 

the ability to create and implement an effective marketing/advertising strategy;

 

the ability to adapt our brand in such a way that consumers see us as relevant to their needs;

 

the ability to timely and effectively meet customer demands and maintain our customer base;

 

the hiring, training, and retention of excellent restaurant managers and staff;

 

the ability to manage costs and prudently allocate capital resources;

 

the ability to achieve and/or maintain projected cost savings in a number of key areas, including labor, procurement, occupancy, and maintenance costs; and

 

the ability to increase sales and improve margins following the opening of new or newly remodeled restaurants.

 

If we are unable to successfully manage these challenges, we could face increased costs and lower than anticipated sales, cash flows, and earnings in future periods. Declining cash flows in particular can have an unfavorable impact on the carrying value of our long-lived assets, which, under generally accepted accounting principles, are required to be reviewed whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment.

 

Impairment charges recorded in fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015 are discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Further, restaurants with rolling 12-month negative cash flows are discussed within the Critical Accounting Policies section of our Management ’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

If market conditions deteriorate at either the restaurant level or system-wide, or if our operating results decline further, we may be required to record additional impairment charges.

 

Litigation could have an adverse impact on our business and our financial performance.

 

We are subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, and claims that arise in the regular course of business. These matters typically involve claims by customers, team members, and others regarding issues such as food-borne illness, food safety, premises liability, “dram shop” statute liability, compliance with wage and hour requirements, work-related injuries, discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, disability, and other operational issues common to the foodservice industry, as well as contract disputes, securities claims, and intellectual property infringement matters. We could be adversely affected by negative publicity and litigation costs resulting from these claims, regardless of their validity. Significant legal fees and costs in complex class action litigation or an adverse judgment or settlement that is not insured or is in excess of our insurance coverage can have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. 

 

Food safety and food-borne illness concerns in our restaurants or throughout the industry or supply chain may have an adverse effect on our business by reducing demand and/or increasing costs.

 

Regardless of the source or cause, any report of food-borne illnesses and other food safety issues, whether at one of our restaurants or in the industry or supply chain generally, could have a negative impact on our traffic and sales and adversely affect our suppliers and distributors and, as a result, be out of our control. Health concerns or outbreaks of disease in a food product could also reduce demand for particular menu offerings. Even in instances of food-borne illness, food tampering or food contamination occurring solely at restaurants of our competitors could result in negative publicity about the restaurant industry generally and adversely affect our sales. The occurrence of food-borne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, resulting in higher costs and lower margins.

 

 

The potential for increases in key food, labor, energy, real estate and other costs may adversely affect our results of operations.    

 

The performance of our restaurants depends on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in the price and availability of food, utilities, labor, marketing, insurance, real estate, and other commodities. Prices may be affected due to supply, market changes, increased competition, the general risk of inflation, changes in laws, shortages or interruptions in supply due to weather, disease or other conditions beyond our control, or other reasons. Increased prices or shortages could affect the cost and quality of the items we buy or require us to raise prices, limit our menu options, or implement alternative processes or products.

 

Our business could also be adversely affected by increased labor costs or labor shortages. We devote significant resources to recruiting and training our managers and hourly employees. Increased labor costs due to changes in federal and state laws governing such matters as minimum wages, overtime, working conditions, and tip credits, competition, unionization, state unemployment rates, employee benefits costs, or otherwise, could adversely impact our operating expenses. Moreover, we could suffer from significant indirect costs, including restaurant disruptions due to management or hourly labor turnover or adverse guest reactions to inadequate guest service levels due to staff shortages. A shortage in the labor pool could also cause our restaurants to be required to operate with reduced staff, which could negatively impact our ability to provide adequate service levels to our guests. In addition, our success depends on our ability to attract, motivate and retain qualified employees, including restaurant managers and staff.

 

We cannot provide any assurance that we would be able to successfully offset increased costs by increasing menu prices or by other measures, as our ability to do so depends on a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. As a result, these events, alone or in combination with other more general economic and demographic conditions, could impact our pricing and negatively affect our sales and profit margins.

 

Any material failure, weakness, interruption or security breach of our information technology systems could prevent us from effectively operating our business .

 

We rely heavily on information systems across our operations and corporate functions, including point-of-sale processing in our restaurants, management of our supply chain, payment of obligations, collection of cash, data warehousing to support analytics, finance and accounting systems and other various processes and procedures, some of which are handled by third parties. Our ability to efficiently and effectively manage our business depends significantly on the reliability and capacity of these systems. Information systems are vulnerable to security breaches by computer hackers, cyber terrorists, employee error or misconduct, viruses, power outages and other catastrophic events. The failure of these systems to operate effectively, maintenance problems, upgrading or transitioning to new platforms, or a breach in security of these systems could result in delays in consumer service, reduce efficiency in our operations and potentially expose us to litigation. These problems could adversely affect our results of operations, and remediation could result in significant unplanned capital investments. Additionally, our corporate systems and processes and corporate support for our restaurant operations are handled primarily at our Restaurant Support Services Center. We have disaster recovery procedures and business continuity plans in place to address events of a crisis nature, including tornadoes and other natural disasters, and back up and off-site locations for recovery of electronic and other forms of data and information. However, if we are unable to fully implement our disaster recovery plans, we may experience delays in recovery of data, inability to perform vital corporate functions, tardiness in required reporting and compliance, failures to adequately support field operations and other breakdowns in normal communication and operating procedures that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operation and exposure to administrative and other legal claims.

 

Unfavorable publicity or a failure to respond effectively to adverse publicity, particularly on social media platforms, could harm our reputation and adversely impact our business and financial performance.

 

The good reputation of our restaurant concept is a key factor in the success of our business. Actual or alleged incidents at any of our restaurants could result in harmful publicity. Even incidents occurring at restaurants operated by our competitors or in the supply chain generally could result in negative publicity that could harm the restaurant industry and thus, indirectly, our brand. Negative publicity may result from: allegations of illegal, unfair or inconsistent employment practices; employee dissatisfaction; guest discrimination; illness; injury; or any other matter that could give rise to litigation. Regardless of whether the allegations or complaints are valid, unfavorable publicity  relating to a few of our restaurants, or even to a single restaurant, could adversely affect public perception of the entire brand.

 

 

Negative publicity also may result from the following: health concerns related to food safety and flu outbreaks; publication of government or industry findings concerning food products; environmental disasters; crime incidents; data privacy breaches; scandals involving our employees; or operational problems at our restaurants. All of these concerns could make our brand and menu offerings less appealing to our guests and negatively affect our business.

 

In recent years there has been a marked increase in the use of social media platforms and similar devices which give individuals access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. Many social media platforms immediately publish the content their participants ’ posts, often without filters or checks on accuracy of the content posted. A variety of risks are associated with the dissemination of this information online, including the improper disclosure of proprietary information, negative comments about our Company, exposure of personally identifiable information, fraud, or outdated information. The inappropriate use of social media platforms by our customers, employees, or other individuals could increase our costs, lead to litigation, or result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation. If we are unable to quickly and effectively respond, we may suffer declines in customer traffic which could affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

We could be adversely affected if we fail to protect our customers ’ credit card information or our employees’ personal data.

 

The majority of our restaurant sales are by credit or debit cards. Other restaurants and retailers have experienced security breaches in which credit and debit card information or other personal information of their customers has been stolen. We also maintain certain personal information regarding our employees. Despite our implementation of security measures, all of our technology systems are vulnerable to internal and external security breaches, employee error or malfeasance, denial of service attacks, viruses, worms, and other disruptive problems caused by hackers and cyber criminals. A breach in our systems that compromises the information of our consumers or employees could result in widespread negative publicity, damage to the reputation of our brand, a loss of consumers, and legal liabilities.

 

Shortages or interruptions in the availability and delivery of food and other products may increase costs or reduce revenues.  

 

Possible shortages or interruptions in the supply of food items and other products to our restaurants caused by inclement weather and natural disasters such as floods, drought, earthquakes and hurricanes; the inability of our suppliers to obtain credit in a tight credit market or remain solvent given disruptions in the financial markets; food safety warnings or advisories or the prospect of such pronouncements; or other conditions beyond our control, could adversely affect the availability, quality, and cost of items we buy and the operations of our restaurants. Our inability to effectively manage supply chain risk could increase our costs and limit the availability of products critical to our restaurant operations.

In addition, we have a limited number of suppliers for our major products and rely on one distribution company for our national distribution program in the U.S. If our suppliers or distributor are unable to fulfill their obligations under their contracts or we are unable to develop or maintain relationships with these or new suppliers or distributors, if needed, we could encounter supply shortages and incur higher costs.

 

The costs of compliance or noncompliance with government regulation related to our restaurant operations could adversely affect our business.  

 

The restaurant industry is subject to extensive federal, state, local, and international laws and regulations. These laws change regularly and are increasingly complex. For example, we are subject to:

 

 

Federal and state laws governing minimum wages, overtime, health care, unionization, and other labor issues. These include the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which governs matters such as minimum wages, overtime, and working conditions, as well as family leave mandates and a variety of similar state laws that govern these and other employment law matters. They include the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which requires among other things the preparation of Form I-9 to verify that employees are authorized to accept employment in the United States.  They also include the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 which mandates minimum employee health coverage;

 

 

 

Building, zoning, land use, environmental, and other laws and regulations and requirements that impact the development and operation of restaurants;

 

Licensing and regulation by state and local authorities relating to health, sanitation, safety, and fire standards and the sale of alcoholic beverages. If we fail to comply with federal, state, or local regulations, our licenses may be revoked and we may be forced to close one or more of our restaurants;

 

"Dram Shop" statutes in certain states. These statutes generally provide a person injured by an intoxicated person the right to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated person;

 

Laws and regulations relating to the preparation and sale of food, including regulations regarding product safety, nutritional content, and menu labeling;

 

Laws relating to information security, privacy, cashless payments, and consumer protection;

 

Federal and state laws which prohibit discrimination, including employment discrimination, and other laws regulating the design and operation of facilities, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be costly and increase our exposure to litigation and governmental proceedings, and a failure or perceived failure to comply with these laws could result in negative publicity that could harm our reputation;

 

Federal, state and local laws governing the use, storage, discharge, emission, and disposal of hazardous materials. There also has been increasing focus by federal, state, local, and international governmental authorities on other environmental matters, such as climate change, the reduction of greenhouse gases, and water consumption. This increased focus may lead to new initiatives directed at regulating a yet-to-be-specified array of environmental matters, such as the emission of greenhouse gases, which could effectively impose new or increased costs on the Company or its suppliers, who may pass the increased costs to the Company. Legislative, regulatory, or other efforts to combat climate change or other environmental concerns could result in future increases in the cost of raw materials, taxes, transportation, and utilities, which could decrease our operating profits and necessitate future investments in facilities and equipment; and

 

Regulations throughout the world could affect  the way we do business with our international franchisees. These include antitrust and tax requirements, anti-boycott regulations, import/export/customs and other international trade regulations, the USA Patriot Act, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Failure to comply with any such legal requirements could subject us to monetary liabilities and other sanctions.

 

A failure to comply with these or other government regulations could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Ineffective or increased costs of advertising and marketing may negatively affect our financial and operational success.

 

If our advertising and promotions become less effective than those of our competitors, or more costly, or if we do not adequately develop or utilize technology and data analytic capabilities needed to generate concise competitive insight, we could experience an adverse effect on our results of operations. A failure to sufficiently innovate, develop customer relationship initiatives, or maintain adequate and cost-effective advertising could inhibit our ability to maintain brand relevance and drive increased sales.

 

A decline in the quality of the locations of our current restaurants or a lack of availability of suitable locations for new restaurants may adversely affect our sales and results of operations.

 

The success of our restaurants depends in large part on their locations. As demographic and economic patterns change, current locations may not continue to be attractive or profitable. Possible declines in neighborhoods where our restaurants are located or adverse economic conditions in areas surrounding those neighborhoods could result in reduced sales in those locations. In addition, desirable locations for new restaurant openings or for the relocation of existing restaurants may not be available at an acceptable cost when we identify a particular opportunity for a new restaurant or relocation. The occurrence of one or more of these events could have a significant adverse effect on our sales and results of operations.

 

 

Our ability to raise capital in the future may be limited or become more costly, which could make us unable to fund our capital requirements.

 

As of June 6, 2017, we had $213.7 million of outstanding indebtedness, including $212.5 million of senior unsecured notes. Our indebtedness could have any or all of the following consequences:

 

 

there would be a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition if we were unable to service our indebtedness or obtain additional financing, as needed;

 

it may limit our ability to borrow money or sell stock to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, and debt service requirements;

 

a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations could be dedicated to the repayment and debt service of our indebtedness and would not be available for other purposes;

 

it may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business;

 

we may be more highly leveraged than some of our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage; and

 

it may make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business or the economy.

 

In the future, we may need to raise additional funds through the issuance of new equity securities, debt or a combination of both. Additional financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to fund our capital requirements.

 

Our debt agreements contain restrictions that limit our flexibility in operating our business.

 

The indenture governing our senior unsecured notes, the agreement governing our May 2017 364-day senior secured revolving credit agreement (the “Senior Credit Facility”), and our mortgage loan obligations contain various covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions, including transactions that may be in our long-term best interest. These covenants limit our ability to, among other things:

 

 

make certain investments;

 

incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;

 

declare or pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions to stockholders;

 

create liens or use assets as security in other transactions;

 

merge or consolidate, or sell, transfer, lease or dispose of certain or substantially all of our assets; and

 

enter into transactions with affiliates.

     

Additionally, the agreement governing the Senior Credit Facility and our mortgage loan obligations require us to maintain minimum appraised value of eligible restaurants and a maximum leverage  financial ratio. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the indenture, the Senior Credit Facility, and our mortgage loan obligations which could have a material adverse effect on us.  

 

Loss of key management personnel could hurt our business and limit our ability to operate and grow successfully.

 

Our success depends, to a significant extent, on our leadership team and other key management personnel. These personnel serve to maintain a corporate vision for our Company, execute our business strategy, and maintain consistency in the operating standards of our restaurants. If we are unable to attract and retain sufficiently experienced and capable management personnel, our business and financial results may suffer.

 

 

Future deterioration or prolonged difficulty in economic conditions could adversely affect our business, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources.

 

Job losses, foreclosures, bankruptcies, and falling home prices could cause customers to make fewer discretionary purchases, which could cause a decrease in our customer traffic and our average profit per transaction, which would in turn negatively affect our results of operations. In addition, if gasoline, natural gas, electricity and other energy costs increase, and credit card, home mortgage, and other borrowing costs increase with rising interest rates, our customers may have lower disposable income and reduce the frequency with which they dine out, spend less on each dining out occasion, or choose more inexpensive restaurants. Unfavorable changes in the above factors or in other business and economic conditions affecting our customers could increase our costs, reduce traffic in some or all of our restaurants, or impose practical limits on pricing, any of which could lower our profit margins and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

   

Adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, and terrorism could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Adverse weather conditions and natural disasters and other unforeseen events, such as winter storms, severe temperatures, thunderstorms, floods, hurricanes and earthquakes, terror attacks, war and widespread/pandemic illness, and the effects of such events on economic conditions and consumer spending patterns, could negatively impact our results of operations. Temporary and prolonged restaurant closures may occur and customer traffic may decline due to the actual or perceived effects from these events.

 

A material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could significantly affect our financial results.

 

Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of external financial reports in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that we would prevent or detect a misstatement of our financial statements or fraud. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud. A significant financial reporting failure or material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could cause a loss of investor confidence and declines in the market price of our common stock.

 

Our insurance policies may not provide adequate levels of coverage against all claims, and fluctuating insurance requirements and costs could negatively impact our profitability.

 

We self-insure a significant portion of expected losses under our health, workers ’ compensation, certain types of general liability claims, employment practices liability, and property insurance programs. However, there are types of losses we may incur that cannot be insured against or that we believe are not commercially reasonable to insure, including wage and hour claims. These losses, if they occur, could have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Unanticipated changes in the actuarial assumptions and management estimates underlying our reserves for these losses could result in materially different amounts of expense under these programs, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Additionally, if our insurance costs increase, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully offset the effect of such increases and our results of operations may be adversely affected.

 

Changing health or dietary preferences may cause consumers to avoid our products in favor of alternative foods.

 

Consumer tastes, demographic trends, and health needs could reduce sales. For instance, if prevailing health or dietary preferences cause consumers to avoid certain menu items we offer in favor of foods that are perceived as more healthy, our business and operating results could be harmed. The increasing prevalence of food allergies and other dietary restrictions or preferences, for example, may cause consumers to choose to dine out less frequently or choose other restaurants with different menu options.

 

 

Changes in financial accounting standards or management assumptions related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results.

 

A change in accounting standards can have a significant effect on our reported results and may affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. Additionally, our assumptions, estimates, and judgments related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results. Significant accounting judgments relevant to our business include but are not limited to, impairment of long-lived assets, income tax matters, lease obligations, and self-insured losses. Changes in accounting standards or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates, and judgments by our management could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance.

 

Changes in tax laws and unanticipated tax liabilities could adversely affect the taxes we pay and our profitability.

 

We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions. Our effective income tax rate in the future could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws, and the outcome of income tax audits. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of a tax audit could have a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made. In addition, our effective income tax rate and our results may be impacted by our ability to realize deferred tax benefits and by any increases or decreases of our valuation allowances applied to our existing deferred tax assets.

 

Our stock price is subject to volatility.

 

The stock market in general is highly volatile. The market price of our common stock is also highly volatile. The price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, some of which may be beyond our control. These factors include actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results, changes in, or our ability to achieve, estimates of our operating results by analysts, investors or management, analysts ’ recommendations regarding our stock or our competitors’ stock, sales of substantial amounts of our common stock by our stockholders, actions or announcements by us or our competitors, the maintenance and growth of the value of our brand, litigation, legislation or other regulatory developments affecting us or our industry, natural disasters, terrorist acts, war or other calamities and changes in general market and economic conditions.

 

Ability to Issue Preferred Stock

 

The Board of Directors, pursuant to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, has the authority to issue 250,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series. The Board of Directors has the power to establish the dividend rates, rights of conversion and redemption, liquidation prices, and other terms or conditions of such preferred stock. This preferred stock may be issued at the discretion of the Board of Directors with preferences over shares of our common stock in a manner that is materially dilutive to shareholders. In addition, blank check preferred stock can be used to create a shareholder rights plan, or "poison pill", which is designed to deter a hostile bidder from buying a controlling interest in our stock. While we have not adopted such a "poison pill" or issued any preferred stock as of the date of this filing, the Board of Directors has the ability to do so in the future, very rapidly and without stockholder approval.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

Item 2. Properties

 

Information regarding the locations of our restaurants is shown in the list below. Of the 543 Company-owned and operated Ruby Tuesday concept restaurants as of June 6, 2017, we owned the land and buildings for 269 restaurants, owned the buildings and held non-cancelable long-term land leases for 205 restaurants, and held non-cancelable leases covering land and buildings for 69 restaurants. Our Restaurant Support Services Center in Maryville, Tennessee, which was opened in fiscal year 1998, consists of one office building owned by the Company. During fiscal year 2015, we opened a leased satellite office in Orlando, Florida.

 

Additional information concerning our properties and leasing arrangements is included in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Under our franchise agreements, we have certain rights to gain control of a restaurant site in the event of default under the franchise agreements.

 

 

The following table lists the locations of the Company-owned and franchised Ruby Tuesday restaurants as of June 6, 2017.

 

 

Number of Ruby Tuesday Restaurants

State

Company

 

Franchise

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic:

 

 

 

 

 

Alabama

32

 

 

32

Arizona

4

 

 

4

Arkansas

3

 

 

3

Colorado

5

 

 

5

Connecticut

10

 

 

10

Delaware

5

 

 

5

Florida

63

 

1

 

64

Georgia

42

 

 

42

Illinois

3

 

 

3

Indiana

11

 

 

11

Iowa

1

 

2

 

3

Kentucky

7

 

 

7

Louisiana

2

 

 

2

Maine

7

 

 

7

Maryland

23

 

 

23

Massachusetts

6

 

 

6

Michigan

19

 

1

 

20

Minnesota

4

 

 

4

Mississippi

7

 

 

7

Missouri

20

 

 

20

Nebraska

5

 

 

5

Nevada

1

 

 

1

New Hampshire

3

 

 

3

New Jersey

20

 

1

 

21

New Mexico

 

1

 

1

New York

20

 

 

20

North Carolina

49

 

 

49

North Dakota

 

4

 

4

Ohio

26

 

 

26

Oklahoma

 

1

 

1

Pennsylvania

35

 

 

35

Rhode Island

2

 

 

2

South Carolina

29

 

 

29

South Dakota

 

4

 

4

Tennessee

26

 

 

26

Texas

1

 

 

1

Virginia

43

 

 

43

West Virginia

8

 

 

8

Wisconsin

1

 

1

 

2

Wyoming

 

1

 

1

Total Domestic

543

 

17

 

560

 

 

 

Number of Ruby Tuesday Restaurants

Country

Company

 

Franchise

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

International:

 

 

 

 

 

Canada

 

1

 

1

Chile

 

8

 

8

Egypt

 

3

 

3

El Salvador

 

1

 

1

Guam*

 

1

 

1

Hawaii*

 

5

 

5

Honduras

 

1

 

1

Hong Kong

 

6

 

6

Iceland

 

2

 

2

Kuwait

 

6

 

6

Oman

 

1

 

1

Panama

 

1

 

1

Romania

 

2

 

2

Saudi Arabia

 

2

 

2

Trinidad

 

4

 

4

United Arab Emirates

 

1

 

1

Total International

 

45

 

45

 

543

 

62

 

605

 

*  Guam and Hawaii are treated as international locations for internal purposes.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

We are presently, and from time to time, subject to pending claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business, including claims relating to injury or wrongful death under “dram shop” laws, workers ’ compensation and employment matters, claims relating to lease and contractual obligations, and claims from customers alleging illness or injury. We provide accruals for such claims when payment is probable and estimable in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. At this time, in the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of pending legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

 

 

PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity,

Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Market for Registrant ’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Our common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol RT. The following table sets forth the reported high and low intraday prices of our common stock and cash dividends paid thereon for each quarter during fiscal years 2017 and 2016.

 

Fiscal Year Ended June 6, 2017

 

Fiscal Year Ended May  31, 2016

 

 

 

Per Share

 

 

 

 

Per Share

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

Cash

Quarter

High

Low

Dividends

 

Quarter

High

Low

Dividends

First

$4.22

$2.94

--

 

First

$7.54

$6.10

--

Second

$3.25

$2.08

--

 

Second

$6.92

$5.10

--

Third

$3.68

$1.80

--

 

Third

$5.74

$4.52

--

Fourth

$2.88

$1.73

--

 

Fourth

$5.63

$3.80

--

As of August 16, 2017, there were approximately 2,243 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

 

Our Board of Directors has approved a dividend policy as an additional means of returning capital to our shareholders. The payment of a dividend in any particular future period and the actual amount thereof remains at the discretion of the Board of Directors and is restricted by the covenants of certain of our debt agreements. Our last dividend was paid on August 7, 2007 and no assurance can be given that dividends will be paid in the future.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table includes information regarding purchases of our common stock made by us during the fourth fiscal quarter ended June 6, 2017:

 

 

 

Total number

 

Average

 

Total number of shares

 

Maximum number of shares

 

 

 

of shares

 

price paid

 

purchased as part of publicly

 

that may yet be purchased

 

Period

 

purchased  

 

per share

 

announced plans or programs (1)

 

under the plans or programs (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 1 to April 4

 

 

 

 

9,884,829

 

April 5 to May 2

 

 

 

 

9,884,829

 

May 3 to June 6

 

 

 

 

9,884,829

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) As of June  6, 2017, 9.9 million shares remained available for purchase under an existing January 8, 2013 authorization by the Board of Directors to repurchase 10.0 million shares. The timing, price, quantity, and manner of the purchases to be made are at the discretion of management upon instruction from the Board of Directors, depending upon market conditions.  The repurchase of shares in any particular future period and the actual amount thereof remain at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and no assurance can be given that shares will be repurchased in the future.

 

 

Stock Performance Graph

 

The following chart and table compare the cumulative total return of the Company ’s common stock with the cumulative total return of the NYSE Composite Index and a peer group consisting of companies included in the same standard industrial classification (“SIC”) industry group as the Company’s business (SIC industry group 5812, Eating Places). The graph assumes the values of the investment in our common stock and each index was $100 at June 5, 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested.

 

 

 

 

   

06/05/2012

   

06/04/2013

   

06/03/2014

   

06/02/2015

   

05/31/2016

   

06/06/2017

 

Ruby Tuesday, Inc.

  $ 100.00     $ 139.71     $ 113.09     $ 90.59     $ 57.06     $ 33.82  

NYSE Composite Index

  $ 100.00     $ 130.55     $ 154.77     $ 163.18     $ 158.03     $ 181.43  

Peer Group Index (SIC 5812 – Eating Places)

  $ 100.00     $ 115.75     $ 128.89     $ 138.57     $ 151.11     $ 187.72  

 

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

 

Summary of Operations

(In thousands except per-share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restaurant sales and operating revenue

 

$

948,403

 

 

$

1,085,034

 

 

$

1,120,142

 

 

$

1,162,423

 

 

$

1,245,226

 

 

Franchise revenue

 

 

3,568

 

 

 

6,194

 

 

 

6,424

 

 

 

6,323

 

 

 

6,261

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

951,971

 

 

$

1,091,228

 

 

$

1,126,566

 

 

$

1,168,746

 

 

$

1,251,487

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

  ( 107,856

)

 

$

(52,862

)

 

$

(5,105

)

 

$

(69,575

)

 

$

(21,934

)

 

(Benefit)/provision for income taxes from continuing operations

 

 

(1,716

)

 

 

(2,180

)

 

 

(1,911

)

 

 

(4,665

)

 

 

1,500

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

 

( 106,140

)

 

 

(50,682

)

 

 

(3,194

)

 

 

(64,910

)

 

 

(23,434

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income/(l oss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

564

 

 

 

(15,979

)

 

Net loss

 

$

( 106,140

)

 

$

(50,682

)

 

$

(3,194

)

 

$

(64,346

)

 

$

(39,413

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic loss per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

( 1.76

)

 

$

(0.83

)

 

$

(0.05

)

 

$

(1.08

)

 

$

(0.38

)

 

Income/(loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

(0.27

)

 

Net loss per share

 

$

( 1.76

)

 

$

(0.83

)

 

$

(0.05

)

 

$

(1.07

)

 

$

(0.65

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted loss per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

( 1.76

)

 

$

(0.83

)

 

$

(0.05

)

 

$

(1.08

)

 

$

(0.38

)

 

Income/(loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

(0.27

)

 

Net loss per share

 

$

( 1.76

)

 

$

(0.83

)

 

$

(0.05

)

 

$

(1.07

)

 

$

(0.65

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common and common equivalent shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

60,139

 

 

 

60,871

 

 

 

60,580

 

 

 

60,231

 

 

 

61,040

 

 

Diluted

 

 

60,139

 

 

 

60,871

 

 

 

60,580

 

 

 

60,231

 

 

 

61,040

 

 

 

Fiscal year  2017 includes 53 weeks.  Fiscal years 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013 each include 52 weeks.  The extra week in fiscal year 2017 added $15.7 million to revenue and $0.02 to diluted earnings per share.

 

 

           

Fiscal Year

 
   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

   

2014

   

2013

 

Other Data

                                       

Cash dividends per share of common stock

  $     $     $     $     $  

Number of Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants

    543       646       658       668       706  

Company-owned Ruby Tuesday same- restaurant sales decrease

    (3.1

)%

    (1.4

)%

    (0.5

)%

    (5.3

)%

    (1.0

)%

Number of Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants

          2       19       20       18  
                                         

Balance Sheet Data (at year end):

                                       

Total assets

  $ 723,642     $ 837,917     $ 925,452     $ 951,697     $ 1,037,283  

Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities

  $ 213,341     $ 213,803     $ 231,017     $ 249,831     $ 285,332  

Shareholders ’ equity

  $ 307,366     $ 407,780     $ 465,583     $ 461,209     $ 516,835  
                                         

Statement of Operations Data:

                                       

Closures and impairments, net (a)

  $ 69,808     $ 64,680     $ 10,542     $ 33,686     $ 14,656  

Goodwill impairments

  $     $     $     $     $ 14,058  

Interest expense, net

  $ 20,855     $ 21,764     $ 22,735     $ 24,945     $ 26,576  
                                         

Cash Flow Data:

                                       

Net cash (used in)/provided by:

                                       

Operating activities

  $ (18,934

)

  $ 39,780     $ 55,054     $ 45,375     $ 35,954  

Investing activities

  $ 6,687     $ (19,755

)

  $ (17,497

)

  $ (6,203

)

  $ 22,113  

Financing activities

  $ (13,003

)

  $ (28,352

)

  $ (13,409

)

  $ (40,753

)

  $ (53,344

)

Purchases of property and equipment

  $ 33,509     $ 34,427     $ 31,010     $ 28,339     $ 37,117  

 

(a) See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of closures and impairments expenses, including impairment of the Lime Fresh trademark,  in fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015.

 

 

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis

of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Introduction

 

Ruby Tuesday, Inc., including its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“RTI,” the “Company,” “we” and/or “our”), owns and operates Ruby Tuesday® casual dining restaurants. We also franchise the Ruby Tuesday concept in select domestic and international markets. As of June 6, 2017, we owned and operated  543 Ruby Tuesday restaurants located in 35 states. Our franchisees operated 17 domestic and 45 international Ruby Tuesday restaurants in 11 states, Guam, and 14 foreign countries. The Company-owned and operated restaurants are concentrated primarily in the Southeast, Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, and Midwest regions of the United States. We consider these regions to be our core markets.

 

On August 11, 2016, following a comprehensive review of the Company ’s property portfolio, we announced a plan to close approximately 95 Company-owned restaurants with perceived limited upside due to market concentration, challenged trade areas, and other factors by September 2016. The plan was designed to streamline the organization through asset rationalization, improve financial profitability, and ultimately create long-term value for shareholders. The approved closures, which included mall, in line, and freestanding sites, encompassed restaurants spread throughout all of the geographic regions in which we operate. Of the restaurants closed, approximately two-thirds were operated on leased properties and approximately one-third were owned. As discussed further in the Known Events, Uncertainties, and Trends section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), our fiscal year 2017 results of operations included additional charges for impairment, estimated lease settlement costs, severance benefits, inventory write-offs, and other costs related to the 95 restaurant closures.

 

Our same-restaurant sales for Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants decreased 3.1% in fiscal year 2017 compared to fiscal year 2016, and our diluted loss per share was ($1.7 6) in fiscal year 2017 compared to diluted loss per share of ($0.83) in fiscal year 2016. Throughout this MD&A, we discuss our fiscal year 2017, 2016 and 2015 financial results , as well as discuss known events, uncertainties, and trends. We believe our commentary provides insight as to the factors which impacted our performance. We remind you, that, in order to best obtain an understanding of our financial performance during the last three fiscal years, this MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes appearing in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

References to franchise system revenue contained in this section are presented solely for the purposes of enhancing the investor's understanding of the franchise system, which includes our traditional domestic and international franchisees. Franchise system revenue is not included in, and is not, revenue of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. However, we believe that such information does provide the investor with a basis for a better understanding of our revenue from franchising activities, which includes royalties. Franchise system revenue contained in this section is based upon or derived from information that we obtain from our franchisees in our capacity as franchisor.

 

 

Overview and Strategies

 

The bar and grill segment of the casual dining industry in which we primarily operate is intensely competitive with respect to prices, services, convenience, locations, employees, advertising and promotion, and the types and quality of food. We compete with other food service operations, including locally-owned restaurants, and other national and regional restaurant chains that offer similar types of services and products as we do. We continue to believe there are opportunities to grow same-restaurant sales, strengthen our competitive position, enhance our profitability, and create value through the execution of the following strategies:

 

Review of Strategic Alternatives

On March 13, 2017, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized an exploration of   strategic alternatives in order to maximize shareholder value.  We are considering all strategic alternatives including, but not limited to, a potential sale or merger of the Company, and have retained a financial advisor to assist in the process.  The strategic alternatives process is ongoing and entering its final phase. 

 

Fresh Start Initiatives

In August 2016, we announced the launch of our Fresh Start initiatives which are intended to streamline our organization, improve financial profitability and ultimately create long-term value for our shareholders. The Fresh Start initiatives were developed to drive more significant top line growth and profitability over time.  The key components of the Fresh Start initiatives include:

 

 

A new menu which is intended to provide culinary innovation and value to our guests while simplifying recipes and procedures for our kitchen. As consumer preference continues to migrate toward healthier food options, we will continue to make meaningful improvements in our core menu that will incorporate hand-crafted American favorites but will contain more lean proteins and fresh vegetables.

 

A new Garden Bar which we restaged and improved to offer over 50 items in order to provide more  desirable offering in a cost effective way. The Garden Bar is a key brand differentiator that we believe sets us apart from our competition and is the most important item on our menu. Approximately half our guests utilize the Garden Bar when they dine with us, either as an add-on or as a main course.

 

A Fresh New Experience which is focused on revitalizing our brand through improving our service and overall guest experience. As part of our work in this area, we completed 13 store remodels in two test markets. Additionally, we are working with our teams at the restaurant level with service initiatives to improve the pace of meals and attentiveness, particularly through menu simplification.  We have placed a hold on further remodels while measuring the combined results from our new menu, new Garden Bar, and Fresh New Experience.

 

The Asset Rationalization Plan  involved a comprehensive restaurant-level review and analysis of the sales, cash flows and other key performance metrics of our corporate-owned restaurant properties, as well as site location, market positioning and lease status. Based upon our findings, we concluded that it was in the Company's and our shareholders' best interest to close 95 underperforming restaurants during the first quarter of fiscal year 2017.

 

Strengthen our Balance Sheet to Facilitate Growth and Value Creation

Our priority for the use of cash is to drive shareholder value. Our objective is to continue to maintain adequate cash levels to support business needs, while investing in key components of our Fresh Start initiatives. In fiscal year 2017, as a result of our Asset Rationalization Plan, we experienced  fluctuations in cash balances.  We generated cash through the sale of surplus properties while using cash to settle leases for closed restaurants. Additionally, from time to time, we consider other options for cash such as reducing outstanding debt levels and share repurchases within the limitations of our debt covenants. Our success in the key strategic initiatives outlined above should enable us to improve both our returns on assets and equity and create additional shareholder value.

 

This “MD&A” is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make subjective or complex judgments that may affect the reported financial condition and results of operations. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable in the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continually evaluate the information used to make these estimates as our business and the economic environment changes.

 

 

Our fiscal year ends on the first Tuesday following May 30.  Once every five or six years, we have 53 week year.  Fiscal 2017 was a 53 week year.  All other years discussed throughout this MD&A section contained 52 weeks.  In fiscal year 2017, the 53rd week added $15.7 million to restaurant sales and operating revenue and $0.02 to diluted earnings per share in our Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  We remind you that, in order to best obtain an understanding of the significant factors that influenced our performance during the last three fiscal years, this MD&A section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes. 

 

Results of Operations

 

Ruby Tuesday Restaurants
The table below presents the number of Ruby Tuesday concept restaurants at each fiscal year end from fiscal year 2015 through fiscal year 2017:

 

 

 

 

International

 

Fiscal Year

Company-Owned

Domestic  Franchise

  Franchise

Total

2017

543

17

45

605

2016

646

27

51

724

2015

658

29

49

736

 

Lime Fresh Restaurants
The table below presents the number of other concept restaurants at each fiscal year end from fiscal year 2015 through fiscal year 2017:

 

Fiscal Year

Company-Owned

Franchise

Total  

2017

2016

2

2

2015

19

7

26

 

During fiscal year 2017:

 

 

Same-restaurant sales* at Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants decreased 3.1%, while same-restaurant sales at domestic franchise Ruby Tuesday restaurants decreased 0.6%;

 

Eight Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants were closed as expected at, or near, lease expiration;

 

Two franchised Ruby Tuesday restaurants were opened and 18 were closed;

 

Two Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants were closed;

 

95 Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants were closed in connection with our Fresh Start initiative s, which resulted in additional closed restaurant lease reserves, inventory write-offs, severance benefits, and other closing expenses of $31.5 million;

 

Paid $11.1 million of principal payments on long-term debt, including $9.6 million related to two mortgage loan obligations that had balloon payments due during the third quarter of fiscal 2017;

 

On April 4, 2017, James F. Hyatt, II was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, replacing F. Lane Cardwell, Jr.  Mr. Hyatt also serves on the Board of Directors; and 

 

On September 13, 2016, James J. Buettgen resigned as Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.   On that same date, F. Lane Cardwell, Jr., a member of the Company's Board of Directors since October 2012 and an executive with approximately 38 years of leadership experience in the restaurant industry, was appointed Interim President and Chief Executive Officer.  Sue Briley, who had been serving as Interim Chief Financial Officer since June 2016, was appointed Chief Financial Officer on September 13, 2016. 

 

 

During fiscal year 2016:

 

 

Same-restaurant sales* at Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants decreased 1.4%, while same-restaurant sales at domestic franchise Ruby Tuesday restaurants increased 3.7%;

 

One Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurant was opened and 13 were closed

 

Five franchised Ruby Tuesday restaurants were opened and five were closed;

 

We formulated a plan beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 to restructure our property portfolio, which ultimately included the closing of 95 Company-owned restaurants during first quarter of fiscal year  2017, resulting in additional impairment charges of $39.2 million in fiscal year 2016;

 

We entered into an agreement to sell the assets related to eight Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants in Florida for $6.0 million and closed the remaining 11 Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants. Six of the restaurants were closed and  transferred to the buyer during fiscal year 2016, while the remaining two were closed and transferred to the buyer during fiscal year 2017. We also sold the Lime Fresh brand's intellectual property and the franchise agreements associated with eight franchised Lime Fresh concept restaurants for $4.6 million;

 

We prepaid and retired 16 mortgage loan obligations with an aggregate balance of $13.3 million plus prepayment penalties of $1.6 million and $0.1 million of accrued interest;

 

We repurchased and retired 1.9 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $10.1 million; and

 

We repurchased $2.5 million of the Senior Notes.  The repurchases settled for $2.4 million plus accrued interest.  We realized a negligible gain on these transactions.

   

* We define same-restaurant sales as a year-over-year comparison of sales volumes for restaurants that, in the current year have been open at least 18 months, in order to remove the impact of new openings in comparing the operations of existing restaurants.

 

Restaurant Sales
Restaurant sales in fiscal year 2017 decreased 12.6% from fiscal year 2016 for Company-owned restaurants and decreased 42.4% for domestic and international franchised restaurants as explained below. The tables presented below reflect restaurant sales and other revenue information for the last three fiscal years.

 

Restaurant Sales (in millions):

   

Ruby Tuesday Concept

   

Lime Fresh Concept

 

Fiscal Year

 

Company-Owned

   

Franchise (a)

   

Company-

Owned

   

Franchise (a)

 

2017

  $ 947.4     $ 135.6     $ 1.0     $  

2016

    1,070.7       162.4       14.4       15.3  

2015

    1,100.7       171.7       19.4       15.3  

 

 

(a)

Includes sales of all domestic and international franchised Ruby Tuesday and Lime Fresh restaurants.

 

Other Revenue Information:

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Company restaurant sales (in thousands)

                       

Ruby Tuesday concept

  $ 947,403     $ 1,070,679     $ 1,100,702  

Lime Fresh concept

    1,000       14,355       19,440  

Total restaurant sales

  $ 948,403     $ 1,085,034     $ 1,120,142  

Company restaurant sales growth-percentage

    (12.6

)%

    (3.1

)%

    (3.6

)%

 

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Franchise revenue (in thousands)

                       

Ruby Tuesday concept

  $ 3,568     $ 5,286     $ 5,602  

Lime Fresh concept

          908       822  

Total franchise revenue (a)

  $ 3,568     $ 6,194     $ 6,424  

Franchise revenue growth-percentage

    (42.4

)%

    (3.6

)%

    1.6

%

                         

Total revenue (in thousands)

                       

Ruby Tuesday concept

  $ 950,971     $ 1,075,965     $ 1,106,304  

Lime Fresh concept

    1,000       15,263       20,262  

Total revenue

  $ 951,971     $ 1,091,228     $ 1,126,566  

Total revenue growth-percentage

    (12.8

)%

    (3.1

)%

    (3.6

)%

   

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Ruby Tuesday concept same-restaurant sales growth percentage

    (3.1

)%

    (1.4

)%

    (0.5

)%

                         

Company average unit volumes (in millions)

  $ 1.66     $ 1.64     $ 1.66  

Company average unit volumes growth percentage

    1.2

%

    (1.3

)%

    (0.1

)%

 

 

(a)

Franchise revenue includes royalty, license, and development fees, but is exclusive of support service fees of   $0.9 million and $1.3 million, in fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are recorded as an offset to general and administrative expenses.  We discontinued franchise support service programs during fiscal year 2016.  Therefore, there were no support service fees during fiscal year 2017.

 

Restaurant sales and operating revenue for the fiscal year ended June 6,  2017 decreased 12.6% to $948.4 million compared to the prior fiscal year. This decrease is primarily a result of restaurant closings since the prior fiscal year, 95 of which were closed during first quarter of fiscal year 2017 in connection with our Asset Rationalization Plan as discussed previously in this MD&A, coupled with a 3.1% decrease in same-restaurant sales at Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants. The decrease in Ruby Tuesday concept same-restaurant sales is primarily attributable to a decline in customer traffic offset by a slight increase in net check.  The 95 restaurants that closed during the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 generated $22.8 million in revenue for the current fiscal year and $116.5 million in revenues during fiscal year 2016. In fiscal year 2017 the 53 rd week added $15.7 million in sales and operating revenue in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

 

Two Lime Fresh restaurants with $1.0 million of sales were closed and transferred to the buyer during fiscal year 2017.  As previously discussed within this MD&A, during the last fiscal year we entered into an agreement to sell the assets related to eight Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants and closed the remaining 11 Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants.

 

The Ruby Tuesday concept restaurant sales and operating revenue for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 decreased 2.7% to $1,070.7 million compared to fiscal year 2015. This decrease is primarily a result of restaurant closings since fiscal year 2015 coupled with a 1.4% decrease in same-restaurant sales at Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants. The decrease in Ruby Tuesday concept same-restaurant sales is attributable to a 3.9% decrease in customer traffic offset by a 2.5% increase in net check since fiscal year 2015.

 

The Lime Fresh concept restaurant sales and operating revenue for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 decreased 26.2% to $14.4 million compared to the prior fiscal year. This decrease is primarily due to restaurant closures since fiscal year 2015. As previously discussed within this MD&A, during the fiscal year 2016 we entered into an agreement to sell the assets related to eight Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants and closed the remaining 11 Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants.

 

Franchise development and license fees received are recognized when we have substantially performed all material services and the restaurant has opened for business. Franchise royalties are generally 4.0% of monthly sales.   Franchise revenue decreased 42.4% to $3.6 million in fiscal year 2017 and decreased 3.6% to $6.2 million in fiscal year 2016. Franchise revenue is predominantly comprised of domestic and international royalties.  The decrease in franchise revenue for fiscal year 2017 was primarily due to franchise restaurant closures.

 

 

Total franchise restaurant sales are shown in the table below.

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Franchise restaurant sales (in thousands)

                       

Ruby Tuesday concept

  $ 135,579     $ 162,401     $ 171,668  

Lime Fresh concept

          15,310       15,338  

Total franchise restaurant sales (a)

  $ 135,579     $ 177,711     $ 187,006  

Franchise restaurant sales growth-percentage

    (23.7

)%

    (5.0

)%

    5.8

%

 

(a)

Includes sales of all domestic and international franchised Ruby Tuesday and Lime Fresh restaurants.

 

Operating Profit

The following table sets forth selected restaurant operating data as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue or total revenue, as appropriate, for the periods indicated. All information is derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements located in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Restaurant sales and operating revenue

    99.6

%

    99.4

%

    99.4

%

Franchise revenue

    0.4       0.6       0.6  

Total revenue

    100.0       100.0       100.0  

Operating costs and expenses:

                       

Cost of goods sold (1)

    28.3       27.5       27.3  

Payroll and related costs (1)

    35.7       34.5       34.2  

Other restaurant operating costs (1)

    21.0       21.2       21.6  

Depreciation and amortization (1)

    4.4       4.7       4.7  

General and administrative expenses

    7.0       5.3       5.9  

Marketing expenses, net

    5.7       4.7       4.4  

Closures and impairments, net

    7.3       5.9       0.9  

Gain on sales of Lime Fresh Mexican Grill assets

          (0.5

)

     

Interest expense, net

    2.2       2.0       2.0  

Total operating costs and expenses

    111.3       104.8       100.5  

Loss before income taxes

    (11.3

)

    (4.8

)

    (0.5

)

Benefit for income taxes

    (0.2

)

    (0.2

)

    (0.2

)

Net loss

    (11.1

)%

    (4.6

)%

    (0.3

)%

 

(1)      As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue.

 

Pre-tax Loss  

Pre-tax loss increased $ 55.0 million from fiscal year 2016 to $107.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017.  The increase in pre-tax loss is due primarily to higher closures and impairments expense ($5.1 million), a decrease in same-restaurant sales of 3.1% at Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants, and an increase, as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue or total revenue, as appropriate, of costs of goods sold, payroll and related costs, general and administrative expenses, and marketing expenses, net. These were partially offset by a decrease in interest expense, net ($0.9 million) and decreases, as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue or total revenue, as appropriate, of other restaurant operating costs and depreciation and amortization. 

 

 

Pre-tax loss increased $47.8 million from fiscal year 2015 to $ 52.9 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016.  The increase in pre-tax loss is due primarily to higher closures and impairments expense ($52.1 million), a decrease in same-restaurant sales of 1.4% at Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants, a partial impairment of the Lime Fresh trademark ($2.0 million), and an increase, as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, of costs of goods sold and payroll and related costs. These were partially offset by gain on sales of Lime Fresh Mexican Grill assets ($5.9 million), a decrease in interest expense, net ($1.0 million) and decreases, as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue or total revenue, as appropriate, of other restaurant operating costs and selling, general and administrative, net.

 

In the paragraphs that follow, we discuss in more detail the components of the changes in pre-tax loss for fiscal years ended June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016  as compared to the comparable prior fiscal year. Because a significant portion of the costs recorded in the cost of goods sold, payroll and related costs, other restaurant operating costs, and depreciation categories are either variable or highly correlate with the number of restaurants we operate, we evaluate our trends by comparing the costs as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, as well as the absolute dollar change, to the comparable prior fiscal year.

 

Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold decreased $29.9 million (10.0%) from the prior fiscal year to $268.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017. As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, cost of goods sold increased from 27.5% to 28.3%.  Excluding the $26.9 million decrease from the elimination of the 95 restaurants closed during the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, cost of goods sold decreased $3.0 million.

 

The absolute dollar decrease in cost of goods sold for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 not attributable to the closing of 95 restaurants was primarily the result of other restaurant closures, a decline in same-restaurant sales, and commodities deflation since the prior fiscal year.  

 

As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, the increase  in cost of goods sold for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 is primarily the result of a shift in menu mix driven by changes to our core menu and promotional activity. 

 

Cost of goods sold decreased $6.8 million (2.2%) from fiscal year 2015 to $298.5 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016. As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, cost of goods sold increased from 27.3% to 27.5%.

 

The absolute dollar decrease in cost of goods sold for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 was primarily the result of restaurant closures, a decline in same-restaurant sales, and $1.4 million in settlement proceeds from a class-action lawsuit against a former vendor, which were offset by price increases on certain commodity items since fiscal year 2015 coupled with a shift in menu mix associated with menu changes introduced in November 2015.

 

As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, the increase in cost of goods sold for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 is primarily the result of price increases on certain commodity items and a shift in menu mix since fiscal year 2015 as discussed above.

 

Payroll and Related Costs
Payroll and related costs decreased $35.6 million (9.5%) from the prior fiscal year to $338.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017. As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, payroll and related costs increased from 34.5% to 35.7%.  Excluding the $38.4 million decrease from the elimination of the 95 restaurants closed during the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, payroll and related costs increased $2.8 million.

 

The absolute dollar increase in payroll and related costs for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 not attributable to the closing of 95 restaurants was primarily due to wage inflation, which was partially offset by lower health insurance due to favorable claims experience.  

 

As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, the increase in payroll and related costs for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 is primarily the result wage inflation and  loss of leveraging associated with lower sales volumes.

 

Payroll and related costs decreased $8.7 million (2.3%) from fiscal year 2015 to $374.6 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016. As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, payroll and related costs increased from 34.2% to 34.5%.

 

 

The absolute dollar decrease in payroll and related costs for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 was primarily due to restaurant closures, reductions in overtime as a result of scheduling improvements, decreased management labor costs, and lower workers' compensation costs due to favorable claims experience since fiscal year 2015. These reductions were partially offset by higher health insurance due to unfavorable claims experience.

 

As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, the increase in payroll and related costs for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 is primarily the result of wage inflation and  loss of leveraging associated with lower sales volumes.

 

Other Restaurant Operating Costs
Other restaurant operating costs decreased $30.8 million (13.4%) from the prior fiscal year to $198.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017. As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, other restaurant operating costs decreased from 21.2% to 21.0%. Excluding the $26.0 million decrease from the elimination of the 95 restaurants closed during the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, other restaurant operating costs decreased $4.8 million.

 

For the  fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, the decrease in other restaurant operating costs not attributable to the 95 restaurant closings related to the following (in thousands):

 

Rent and leasing

  $ 4,748  

Repairs

    866  

Utilities

    391  

Other decreases, net

    331  

Supplies

    (1,543

)

Net decrease

  $ 4,793  

 

In both absolute dollars and as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, the decrease was a result of lower rent and leasing, building repairs, and utilities  due primarily to restaurant closures other than the 95 that closed as part of our Asset Rationalization Plan since the prior fiscal year.  These were partially offset by higher supplies expense related to our new Garden Bar rollout.  In addition, the decrease as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue was partially offset by loss of leveraging associated with lower sales volumes.

 

Other restaurant operating costs decreased $12.6 million (5.2%) from the prior fiscal year to $229.5 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016. As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, other restaurant operating costs decreased from 21.6% to 21.2%.

 

For the fiscal  year ended May 31, 2016, the decrease in other restaurant operating costs related to the following (in thousands):

 

Repairs

  $ 3,607  

Utilities

    2,401  

Legal

    2,209  

Rent and leasing

    1,694  

Insurance

    1,693  

Supplies

    1,473  

Other decreases, net

    366  

Loss on sale of p roperty and equipment

    (852

)

Net decrease

  $ 12,591  

 

In both absolute dollars and as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, the decrease was a result of lower building repairs, utilities, and rent and leasing due in part to restaurant closures since the prior fiscal year, lower legal costs related to pending litigation, and insurance as a result of favorable general liability claims. These were partially offset by higher property and equipment losses due primarily to a Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurant that was destroyed by fire during fiscal year 2016. In addition, the decrease as a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue was partially offset by loss of leveraging associated with lower sales volumes.

 

 

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $9.6 million (18.7%) to $41.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, compared to the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, depreciation expense decreased from 4.7% to 4.4%.  Excluding the $4.7 million dollar decrease attributable to the 95 restaurants closed during the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, depreciation and amortization decreased $4.9 million.

 

The absolute dollar decrease in depreciation and amortization for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 is due primarily to assets that became fully depreciated or were impaired since the prior fiscal year coupled with restaurant closures.

 

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $1.0 million (2.0%) to $51.4 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, compared to fiscal year 2015. As a percentage of restaurant sales and operating revenue, depreciation expense was consistent with the prior fiscal year at 4.7%.

 

The absolute dollar decrease in depreciation and amortization for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 is due primarily to assets that became fully depreciated or were impaired since the prior fiscal year coupled with restaurant closures.

 

General  and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased $8.8 million (15.2%) from the prior fiscal year to $67.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017.

 

The increase for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 is primarily due to higher executive severance and share-based compensation expense as a result of the accelerated vesting of share-based awards in connection with departure of our former Chief Executive officer and Ruby Tuesday Concept President, coupled with a forfeiture credit in the prior fiscal year, and a higher accrual for executive bonus.  Additionally, costs associated with strategic alternatives ($3.3 million) and higher legal fees contributed to the increase in general and administrative expense as compared to the prior fiscal year.  These were partially offset by lower management labor and employee pension-related costs.

 

General  and administrative expenses decreased $7.7 million (11.7%) from fiscal year 2015 to $58.2 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016.

 

The decrease for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 is primarily due to lower share-based compensation expense as a result of a forfeiture credit as further discussed in Note 10 to the  Consolidated Financial Statements and the substantial completion during fiscal year 2015 of expense recognition related to our former Chief Executive Officer's December 2012 inducement awards, a lower accrual for executive bonus, and decreased management labor from reductions in staffing. These were partially offset by higher employee pension-related costs, fees associated with certain service contracts, travel costs associated with restaurant manager training at our Restaurant Support Services Center, and consulting fees. 

 

Marketing Expenses, Net
Marketing expenses, net increased $2.7 million (5.3%) from the prior fiscal year to $54.1 million for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017.

 

The increase in marketing expenses, net for  the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 is primarily a result of higher television advertising due to advertising associated with our new Garden Bar, higher direct mail and other promotional advertising costs, which were partially offset by decreases in newspaper, magazine, and internet advertising costs since the prior fiscal year.

 

Marketing expenses, net increased $2.0 million (4.1%) from fiscal year 2015 to $51.4 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016.  

 

The increase for fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 is primarily a result of higher internet, magazine, direct mail, and other promotional advertising costs  offset by decreases in television advertising. 

 

Closures and Impairments, Net

Closures and impairments, net increased $5.1 million to $69.8 million for the fiscal year ended June  6, 2017, as compared to the prior fiscal year. The $5.1 million increase is primarily due to higher closed restaurant lease reserve expense ($13.9 million), and other closing costs ($9.0 million), which were partially offset by lower property impairment changes ($12.2 million) and higher gains on the sale of surplus properties ($3.6 million).

 

 

As discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, during fiscal year 2017, we closed  103 Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurants, 95 of which were closed in connection with an Asset Rationalization Plan announced on August 11, 2016. The plan was formulated in response to a comprehensive review of our property portfolio which included the planned closure of restaurants with perceived limited upside due to market concentration, challenged trade areas, or other factors. Included within Closures and impairments, net for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 are closed restaurant lease reserves, inventory write-off, severance benefits, and other closing expense of $31.5 million related to these closures in connection with the Asset Rationalization Plan.

 

Closures and impairments, net increased $52.1 million to $6 4.7 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, as compared to fiscal year 2015. The $52.1 million increase is primarily due to higher property impairment charges ($48.3 million), closed restaurant lease reserve expense ($2.6 million), and other closing costs ($0.3 million), coupled with lower gains on the sale of surplus properties ($0.9 million).

 

The increase in closures and impairments for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 is primarily due to higher Ruby Tuesday concept property impairment charges coupled with $6.4 million of impairments, lease reserves, severance, and other charges associated with the closure of 11 Lime Fresh restaurants during the current fiscal year. As further discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, on August 11, 2016, following a comprehensive review of the Company's property portfolio, we announced a plan  to close approximately 95 Company-owned restaurants by September 2016. Given the status of the plan as of May 31, 2016, we concluded that there was an impairment trigger as certain restaurants would be disposed of significantly before the end of their previously estimated useful lives. Accordingly, we recorded impairment charges of $39.2 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 related to these restaurants. Also included within Closures and impairments, net for fiscal year 2016 are impairments of $14.7 million related to open Ruby Tuesday concept restaurants with deteriorating operational performance during the first three quarters of fiscal year 2016 or not included within management's developing closure plan during the fourth fiscal quarter, $3.4 million related to Lime Fresh Mexican Grill concept restaurants, and $0.8 million related to surplus properties.

 

During fiscal year 2016, we entered into an agreement to sell eight Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants in Florida and closed the remaining 11 Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants. In connection with these events, we concluded that the Lime Fresh trademark was partially impaired. Accordingly, we recorded a non-cash charge of $2.0 million representing a partial impairment of the Lime Fresh trademark.

 

See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our closures and impairment charges recorded during fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015.  

 

Gain on Sales of Lime Fresh Mexican Grill Assets

As previously discussed within this MD&A and further discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, during fiscal year 2016, we entered into an agreement to sell the assets related to eight Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants in Florida for $6.0 million and closed the remaining 11 Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants.  Six of the restaurants were closed and transferred to the buyer during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016, after which we were paid $5.0 million. One of the remaining two restaurants closed and transferred to the buyer shortly after our fiscal year-end, and the other restaurant closed and transferred to the buyer later in fiscal year 2017. The remaining $1.0 million of consideration was received when the remaining restaurant was transferred to the buyer. We recognized during fiscal year 2016 a gain of $3.1 million on this transaction. All of the eight restaurants involved in this transaction were rebranded by the buyer as a different restaurant concept.

 

Also during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016, we sold the Lime Fresh brand's intellectual property  and the franchise agreements associated with eight franchised Lime Fresh concept restaurants for $4.6 million. We recognized a gain of $2.8 million on this transaction.

 

 

Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net decreased $0.9 million to $20.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, as compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily due to lower interest resulting from the maturities of certain mortgage loans since the prior fiscal year.

 

Interest expense, net decreased $1.0 million to $21.8 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, primarily due to lower interest expense resulting from early payoff of certain mortgage loans and repurchases of our Senior Notes since  fiscal year 2015. Partially offsetting these decreases were $0.6 million in increased prepayment premiums paid in connection with mortgage obligations that we prepaid and retired in fiscal year 2016 above those paid in fiscal year 2015.

 

Benefit for Income Taxes
We recorded a tax benefit of $1.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, compared to a tax benefit of $2.2 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016. Included in our $2.2 million tax benefit for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 was a current benefit of $0.4 million for a net operating loss carryback and $1.5 million deferred benefit to reduce our net deferred tax liability to zero.  Our $1.7 million tax benefit for fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 is primarily a result of the remaining net operating loss carryback to fiscal 2015.

 

We recorded a tax benefit of $2.2 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, compared to a tax benefit of $1.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015. Included in our $1.9 million tax benefit for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015 was a benefit of $3.2 million recorded during the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, representing an immaterial prior period correction to our deferred tax asset valuation allowance.

 

We regularly evaluate the need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets by assessing whether it is more likely than not that we will realize the deferred tax assets in the future.   A valuation allowance assessment is performed each reporting period, with any additions or adjustments reflected in earnings in the period of assessment.  In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets for each jurisdiction.

 

Our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets totaled $ 135.9 million and $89.9 million as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively. Included within our income tax benefit is the expense from the additional valuation allowance of $49.2 million, $28.2 million, and $9.1 million for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, representing the amount reserved for the increase in net deferred tax assets during the periods (primarily related to general business credit carryforwards and federal and state net operating loss carryforwards).

 

Under ASC 740, we are required to assess whether a valuation allowance should be established against our deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. As a result of, among other charges, closures and impairments and trademark impairment charges, we currently reflect a three-year cumulative pre-tax loss. A cumulative pre-tax loss is given more weight than projections of future income, and a recent historical cumulative loss is considered a significant factor that is difficult to overcome. Before consideration of the valuation  allowance expense, we had an income tax benefit of $50.9 million, $30.4 million, and $11.0 million, including the tax credits, in fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Sources and Uses of Cash  

The following table presents a summary of our cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities for the last three fiscal years (in thousands).

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities

  $ (18,934

)

  $ 39,780     $ 55,054  

Net cash provided by/(used in) by investing activities

    6,687       (19,755

)

    (17,497

)

Net cash used in financing activities

    (13,003

)

    (28,352

)

    (13,409

)

                         

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

  $ (25,250

)

  $ (8,327

)

  $ 24,148  

 

Operating Activities

Our cash (used in) or provided by operations is generally derived from cash receipts generated by our restaurant customers and franchisees.  Substantially all of the $948.4 million, $1,085.0 million, and $1,120.1 million of restaurant sales and operating revenue disclosed in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, were received in cash either at the point of sale or within two to four days (when our customers paid with debit or credit cards).  Our primary uses of cash for operating activities are food and beverage purchases, payroll and benefit costs, restaurant operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and marketing, a significant portion of which are incurred and paid in the same period.

 

Cash used in  operating activities for fiscal year 2017 was $ 18.9 million as compared to cash provided of $39.8 million for fiscal 2016. The decrease is primarily the result of lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (“EBITDA”) for reasons discussed in MD&A and decreases in accounts payable, accrued, and other liabilities due to the timing of payments, partially offset by lower cash paid for taxes ($4.2 million), decreases in amounts spent to acquire inventory (approximately $3.1 million),  and lower cash paid for interest ($2.5 million) due to the prepayment of certain of our mortgage obligations and other principal payments on our debt since the prior fiscal year.

 

Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2016 decreased $15.3  million (27.7%) from fiscal year 2015 to $39.8 million. The decrease is primarily the result of lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization ("EBITDA"), increases in amounts spent to acquire inventory, decreases in accounts payable, accrued, and other liabilities due to the timing of payments, and an increase in cash paid for taxes ($2.8 million). These were partially offset by lower cash paid for interest ($1.0 million) due to the prepayment of certain of our mortgage obligations and other principal payments on our debt since the prior fiscal year and a decrease in amounts spent on media advertising (approximately $1.7 million).

 

Our working capital and current ratio as of June 6, 2017 was negligible and 1.0:1, respectively.  

   

 

Investing Activities

We require capital principally for the maintenance, upkeep, and remodeling of our existing restaurants, limited new restaurant construction, investments in technology, equipment, and on occasion for the acquisition of franchisees or other restaurant concepts. Property and equipment expenditures purchased primarily with cash on hand, and/or  internally-generated cash flows for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $33.5 million, $34.4 million, and $31.0 million, respectively. In addition, proceeds from the disposal of assets produced $34.8 million, $11.7 million, and $11.3 million of cash in fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, following actions taken to more aggressively market surplus properties in order to pay down debt and, for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 to substantially exit the Lime Fresh Mexican Grill brand.

 

We intend to fund our investing activities with cash currently on hand, cash provided by operations, proceeds from the sale of surplus properties, or borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility.

 

Financing Activities

Historically our primary sources of cash have been operating activities, coupled with sales of surplus properties and  sale-leaseback transactions.  When these alone have not provided sufficient funds for both our capital and other needs, we have obtained funds through the issuance of indebtedness or through the issuance of additional shares of common stock.

 

Our current borrowings and credit facilities include $212.5 million outstanding principal of 7.625% senior notes due 2020 (the “Senior Notes”), a 364-day senior secured revolving credit agreement (the “Senior Credit Facility”) under which we may borrow up to $20.0 million, and $4.6 million of mortgage loan obligations acquired upon franchise acquisitions. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for key terms and further information on our Senior Notes, Senior Credit Facility, and mortgage loan obligations.

 

Under the terms of the Senior Credit Facility we are allowed, under certain circumstances, to repurchase up to $20.0 million of the Senior Notes in any fiscal year. We did not repurchase any Senior Notes during the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017.   During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, we repurchased $2.5 million of the Senior Notes for $2.4 million plus accrued interest. We realized a negligible gain on these transactions. We did not repurchase any Senior Notes during the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015.

 

During fiscal year 2016, we prepaid and retired 16 mortgage loan obligations with an aggregate balance of $13.3 million using cash on hand. We paid $1.6 million in prepayment premiums and $0.1 million of accrued interest in connection with the retirement of these obligations. The prepayment of this debt eliminated one mortgage lender and allowed for the release of 44 properties which had served as collateral. Additionally, during fiscal year 2015, we prepaid and retired ten mortgage loan obligations with an aggregate balance of $9.0 million using cash on hand. In connection with the retirement of these obligations, we paid $1.0 million in prepayment premiums and an insignificant amount of accrued interest.

 

During fiscal years 2017 and 2015, we repurchased a minimal number of shares of RTI common stock at an aggregate cost of a negligible amount and $0.1 million, respectively.  During fiscal year  2016, we repurchased 1.9 million shares of RTI common stock at an aggregate cost of $10.1 million. As of June 6, 2017, the total number of shares authorized to be repurchased was 9.9 million. Additionally, there were no dividends paid during fiscal years 2017, 2016, or 2015.

 

 

Significant Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
Long-term financial obligations were as follows as of June 6, 2017 (in thousands):

 

   

Payments Due By Period

 
           

Less than

      1-3       3-5    

More than 5

 
   

Total

   

1 year

   

years

   

years

   

years

 

Notes payable and other long-term debt, including current maturities (a)

  $ 4,868     $ 1,535     $ 2,528     $ 587     $ 218  

Senior unsecured notes (a)

    212,546             212,546              

Interest (b)

    50,912       16,600       32,825       133       1,354  

Operating leases (c)

    506,415       41,397       73,606       64,104       327,308  

Purchase obligations (d)

    42,762       27,431       11,586       3,745        

Pension obligations (e)

    34,026       3,839       4,698       13,548       11,941  

Total (f)

  $ 851,529     $ 90,802     $ 337,789     $ 82,117     $ 340,821  

 

 

(a)

See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on our debt.

 

(b)

Amounts represent contractual interest payments on our fixed-rate debt instruments. Additionally, the amounts shown above include interest payments on the Senior Notes at the current interest rate of 7.625%.

 

(c)

This amount includes lease payments for certain optional renewal periods for which exercise is considered reasonably assured as well as operating leases totaling $2.6 million for which sublease income from franchisees or others is expected. Certain of these leases obligate us to pay maintenance costs, utilities, real estate taxes, and insurance, which are excluded from the amounts shown above. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

 

(d)

The amounts for purchase obligations include cash commitments under contract for food items and supplies, advertising, utility contracts, and other miscellaneous commitments.

 

(e)

See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

 

(f)

This amount excludes $3.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with such obligations.

 

Commercial commitments were as follows as of June 6, 2017 (in thousands):

 

   

Payments Due By Period

 
           

Less than

   

1-3

   

3-5

   

More than 5

 
   

Total

   

1 year

   

years

   

years

   

years

 

Letters of credit

  $ 14,795     $ 14,795     $     $     $  

Divestiture guarantees

    6,279       528       1,070       1,072       3,609  

Lease guarantee

    16,386       1,274       2,485       1,911       10,716  

Total

  $ 37,460     $ 16,597     $ 3,555     $ 2,983     $ 14,325  

 

At June 6, 2017, we had divestiture guarantees, which arose in fiscal 1996, when our shareholders approved the distribution of our family dining restaurant business (Morrison Fresh Cooking, Inc., “MFC”) and our health care food and nutrition services business (Morrison Health Care, Inc., “MHC”). Subsequent to that date Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. (“Piccadilly”) acquired MFC and Compass Group (“Compass”) acquired MHC. As agreed upon at the time of the distribution, we have been contingently liable for payments to MFC and MHC employees retiring under MFC ’s and MHC’s versions of the Management Retirement Plan and the Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (the two non-qualified defined benefit plans) for the accrued benefits earned by those participants as of March 1996.

 

We estimated our divestiture guarantees at June 6, 2017 to be $6.3 million for employee benefit plans (all of which resides with MHC following Piccadilly ’s bankruptcy in fiscal 2004). We believe the likelihood of being required to make payments for MHC’s portion to be remote due to the size and financial strength of MHC and Compass.

 

As of June 6, 2017, we are the guarantor of nine third-party leases associated with closed concept restaurants. Lease guarantee amounts in the table above represent lease payments for which we are contingently liable. While we believe that the likelihood of being required to make these lease payments is remote, we recorded a guarantee liability of $0.4 million and $0.5 million in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively.

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our operating leases.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Information regarding accounting pronouncements not yet adopted is incorporated by reference from Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our MD&A is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make subjective or complex judgments that may affect the reported financial condition and results of operations. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable in the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We periodically evaluate the information used to make these estimates as our business and the economic environment changes.

 

We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate the carrying value of any individual restaurant when the cash flows of such restaurant have deteriorated and we believe the probability of continued operating and cash flow losses indicate that the net book value of the restaurant may not be recoverable. In performing the review for recoverability, we consider the forecasted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the restaurant and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the restaurant, an impairment loss is measured based on the difference between the estimated fair value of the restaurant and its carrying value. We estimate the fair value of our restaurants based on the highest and best use from the perspective of a market participant. Estimating the fair value of a restaurant requires judgment and includes consideration of discounted future cash flows, third party appraised value, broker opinions of value, and estimates of salvage value. 

 

Based on our experience, restaurants with marginal, sharply declining or negative trailing twelve month cash flows are key indicators of potential impairment.  If a restaurant that has been open for at least six full quarters, that has not previously been impaired to salvage value, demonstrates any of the previously mentioned scenarios under which a potential impairment may exist, we evaluate the plan to reverse declining performance.  Both qualitative and quantitative information are considered when evaluating for potential impairments.  Reacquired franchise rights and favorable leases (amortizable intangible assets), are included in the net book values of our restaurants that are evaluated for potential triggering events, and evaluated for impairment as facts and circumstances dictate.  

 

We recorded impairments to property and equipment of $46.0 million, $58.2 million, and $9.8 million for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate future cash flows and the fair value of our properties.  Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from quarter to quarter and from our estimates and further impairment charges may occur.   As of June 6, 2017, the Company has 3 restaurants with net book value of $3.0 million, excluding land, that have generated negative trailing twelve month cash flows where no impairment has been recorded due to the fact that the Company expects recovery of the net book value based on estimates of future cash flow from restaurant operations.

 

 

Income Tax Valuation Allowances and Tax Accruals

We record deferred tax assets for various items and a valuation allowance against those deferred tax assets when current available information raises doubt as to their ultimate realization.    Despite the existence of long carryforward periods for some of our largest deferred tax assets, such as unused employment tax credits and federal and/or state net operating losses, and a history of realizing our deferred tax assets by utilizing those credits and losses in subsequent or carryback years, a three-year cumulative pre-tax loss is an example of negative evidence that raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets.  To determine the appropriate amount of the valuation allowance, we schedule a year-by-year estimation of the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences in order to determine the availability of future taxable income which would allow for the realization of our existing deferred tax assets.   While we are able to incorporate tax planning strategies into our analysis, we do not factor projected future income until such time that the positive evidence supporting realization outweighs the negative evidence (most significantly, the three-year cumulative pre-tax loss). 

 

We recorded a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $ 135.9 million and $89.9 million as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively.  Included within our income tax benefit is the expense from the additional valuation allowance of $49.2 million, $28.2 million, and $9.1 million for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.  Given that we last recorded pre-tax income in fiscal 2011, we will likely not be able to reverse the significant valuation allowance recorded in the near future. Our recorded valuation allowance may be subject to material changes in the future, as our ability to utilize deferred tax assets can significantly change based on future events, including our determinations as to the feasibility of certain tax planning strategies. Upon such time that we are able to reverse the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, income tax expense will be reduced, and net income will correspondingly be increased, by the amount we are able to reverse.

 

Lease Obligations

We lease a significant number of our restaurant properties. At the inception of the lease, each property is evaluated to determine whether the lease will be accounted for as an operating or capital lease. The term used for this evaluation includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal option can be reasonably assured and failure to exercise such option would result in an economic penalty. The primary penalty to which we are subject is the economic detriment associated with our investment into leasehold improvements which might become impaired should we choose not to continue the use of the leased property.

 

Our operating lease term used for straight-line rent expense is calculated from the date we take possession of the leased premises through the end of the lease term. There is potential for variability in our “rent holiday” period which begins on the possession date and ends on the earlier of the restaurant open date or the commencement of rent payments. Factors that may affect the length of the rent holiday period generally relate to construction-related delays. Extension of the rent holiday period due to delays in restaurant opening will result in greater preopening rent expense recognized during the rent holiday period.

 

For operating leases that contain predetermined fixed rent escalations, we record the total rent payable during the lease term, as determined above, on the straight-line basis over the term of the lease (including the “rent holiday” period beginning upon possession of the premises), and we record the difference between the minimum rents paid and the straight-line rent as deferred escalating minimum rent.

 

Certain leases contain provisions that require additional rental payments, called "contingent rents," when the associated restaurants' sales volumes exceed agreed-upon levels. We recognize contingent rental expense (in annual as well as interim periods) prior to the achievement of the specified target that triggers the contingent rental expense, provided that achievement of that target is considered probable.  

 

 

The judgment regarding the probable term for each restaurant property lease impacts the classification and accounting for a lease as capital or operating, the rent holiday and/or escalation in payments that are taken into consideration when calculating straight-line rent and the term over which leasehold improvements for each restaurant amortized. The material factor we consider when making this judgment is the total amount invested in the restaurant at the inception of the lease and whether management believes that renewal appears reasonably assured. While a different term may produce materially different amounts of depreciation, amortization, and rent expense than reported, our historical lease renewal rates support the judgments made. We have not made any changes to the nature of the assumptions used to account for leases in any of the fiscal years presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

We record the estimated future lease obligations on leased restaurants upon closure for which we have not sublet or settled the lease with the respective landlord. Inherent in these estimates is an assumption on the time period we anticipate it will take to reach a settlement with our landlord or to execute on a sublease agreement. We calculate the lease obligation as the present value of future minimum net lease or settlement payments using a discount rate that takes into account the remaining time period prior to the estimated date of resolution. As further discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, our estimated lease obligations for closed restaurants as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016 were $16.2  million and $6.3 million, respectively.

 

Estimated Liability for Self-Insurance

We self-insure a portion of our expected losses under our employee health care benefits, workers ’ compensation, general liability, and property insurance programs. Specifically with our workers’ compensation and general liability coverages, we have stop loss insurance for individual claims in excess of stated loss amounts. Insurance liabilities are recorded based on third-party actuarial estimates of the ultimate incurred losses, net of payments made. The estimates themselves are based on standard actuarial techniques that incorporate both the historical loss experience of the Company and supplemental information as appropriate.

 

The analysis performed in calculating the estimated liability is subject to various assumptions including, but not limited to, (a) the quality of historical loss and exposure information, (b) the reliability of historical loss experience to serve as a predictor of future experience, (c) the reasonableness of insurance trend factors and governmental indices as applied to the Company, and (d) projected payrolls and revenue. As claims develop, the actual ultimate losses may differ from actuarial estimates. Therefore, an analysis is performed quarterly to determine if modifications to the accrual are required.

 

Known Events, Uncertainties, and Trends

 

Review of Strategic Alternatives

On March 13, 2017, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized an exploration of   strategic alternatives in order to maximize shareholder value.  We are considering all strategic alternatives including, but not limited to, a potential sale or merger of the Company, and have retained a financial advisor to assist in the process.  The strategic alternatives process is ongoing and entering its final phase. 

 

There can be no assurances that the strategic alternatives process will result in the announcement or consummation of any strategic transaction, or that any resulting plans or transactions will yield additional value for shareholders.   Any potential transaction would be dependent on a number of factors that may be beyond our control, including, among other things, market conditions, industry trends, the interest of third parties in a potential transaction with the Company and the availability of financing to potential buyers on reasonable terms. 

 

The process of exploring strategic alternatives could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.   We have incurred costs related to the strategic alternatives process of $3.3 million during fiscal year 2017 and have spent an additional $0.4 million during the first two months of fiscal year 2018.  We could continue to incur substantial expenses associated with identifying and evaluating potential strategic alternatives, including those related to employee retention payments, equity compensation, severance pay and legal, accounting and financial advisory fees.  In addition, the process may be time consuming and disruptive to our business operations, could divert the attention of management and the Board of Directors from our  business, could negatively impact the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees, and could expose us to potential litigation in connection with this process or any resulting transaction.  The public announcement of a strategic alternative may also yield a negative impact on operating results if prospective or existing service providers are reluctant to commit to new or renewal contracts or if existing customers decide to shift their business to a competitor. 

 

Further, we do not intend to disclose detailed developments or provide regular updates on the progress or status of the strategic alternatives process until our Board of Directors deems further disclosure is appropriate or required.   Accordingly, speculation regarding any developments related to the review of strategic alternatives and perceived uncertainties related to the future of our Company could cause our stock price to fluctuate significantly.

 

Impact on Cash from Sale of Surplus Properties and Lease Settlements

As further discussed in note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, as of June 6, 2017, we had surplus properties classified as assets held for sale of $12.8  million and surplus properties of $17.1 million not classified as held for sale as we had yet to conclude for accounting purposes that we can sell these assets within 12 months of the balance sheet date.  Additionally, as discussed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, as of June 6, 2017, we had a liability for future lease obligations of $16.2 million.  While we settled three of these leases for $0.2 million since June 6, 2017, the amounts of future settlements could be higher or lower than the amounts recorded, and the actual amount of any cash payments made by the Company for lease contract termination costs will be dependent upon ongoing negotiations with the landlords of the leased properties.  During fiscal year 2018, we expect to generate cash through the sale of surplus properties while using cash to settle closed restaurant lease obligations. 

 

 

Financial Strategy and Stock Repurchase Plan

Cash and cash equivalents as of June 6, 2017 were $41.7 million. Our overall goal is to invest in our brand and to strengthen our balance sheet to improve credit metrics. As such, our first priority is to ensure that we have adequate cash levels to run the business and internally fund our capital expenditures. Our second priority is to reduce our outstanding debt to help improve our credit metrics with the goal of improved flexibility and access to capital at reasonable rates. Lastly, we would consider share repurchases within the limitations of our debt covenants to return capital to shareholders. During the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, our share repurchases were minimal.   As of June 6, 2017, the total number of remaining shares authorized to be repurchased was 9.9 million. Any of these actions, in any particular period and the actual amount thereof, remain at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and no assurance can be given that any such actions will be taken in the future.

 

Repurchases of Senior Notes

We are allowed under the terms of the Senior Credit Facility to repurchase, in any fiscal year, up to $20.0 million of indebtedness to various holders of the Senior Notes. During the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, we had no  repurchases.  As of the date of this filing, we may repurchase $20.0 million of the Senior Notes during the remainder of fiscal year 2018. Future repurchases of the Senior Notes, if any, will be funded with available cash on hand.

 

Dividends

During fiscal 1997, our Board of Directors approved a dividend policy as an additional means of returning capital to our shareholders. No dividends were declared or paid during the three year period ended June 6, 2017. The payment of a dividend in any particular period and the actual amount thereof remain at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and no assurance can be given that dividends will be paid in the future.

 

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year 2018 will contain 52 weeks and end on June 5, 2018.

 

Impact of Inflation
The impact of inflation on the cost of food, labor, supplies, utilities, real estate, and construction costs could adversely impact our operating results. Historically, we have been able to recover certain inflationary cost increases through increased menu prices coupled with more efficient purchasing practices and productivity improvements. Competitive pressures may limit our ability to completely recover such cost increases. Historically, the effect of inflation has not significantly impacted our results of operations.

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative

Disclosure About Market Risk

 

We are exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest rates and changes in commodity prices. The interest rate charged on our Senior Credit Facility can vary based on the interest rate option we choose to utilize. Our options for the rate are LIBOR or a Base Rate plus , in each case, an applicable margin provided that the rate shall not be less than zero. The Base Rate is defined as the highest of the issuing bank’s prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or the Adjusted LIBO rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility) plus 1.0%. The applicable margin for the LIBO rate-based option is 4.0% and for the Base Rate option is 3.0%.  As of June 6, 2017, we had no outstanding debt subject to interest rate fluctuations as our Senior Notes and remaining mortgage loan obligations are fixed-rate debt instruments and our Senior Credit Facility was undrawn. As a result, a hypothetical 100 basis point change in short-term interest rates would have no impact on our interest expense.

 

Many of the ingredients used in the products we sell in our restaurants are commodities that are subject to unpredictable price volatility. This volatility may be due to factors outside our control such as weather and seasonality. We attempt to minimize the effect of price volatility by negotiating fixed price contracts for the supply of key ingredients. Historically, and subject to competitive market conditions, we have been able to mitigate the negative impact of price volatility through adjustments to average check or menu mix.

 

 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Da ta

 

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations  and Comprehensive Loss for the Fiscal Years Ended June 6, 2017, May 31, 2016, and June 2, 2015

43

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016

44

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended  June 6, 2017, May 31, 2016, and June 2, 2015

45

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended  June 6, 2017, May 31, 2016, and June 2, 2015

46

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

47-8 6

 

 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

8 7-88

 

 

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Operations and

Comprehensive Loss

(In thousands, except per-share data)

 

   

For the Fiscal Year Ended

 
   

June 6,

2017

   

May 31,

2016

   

June 2,

2015

 
                         

Revenue:

                       

Restaurant sales and operating revenue

  $ 948,403     $ 1,085,034     $ 1,120,142  

Franchise revenue

    3,568       6,194       6,424  

Total revenue

    951,971       1,091,228       1,126,566  
                         

Operating costs and expenses:

                       

Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation and amortization shown below)

    268,622       298,529       305,306  

Payroll and related costs

    338,918       374,561       383,261  

Other restaurant operating costs

    198,696       229,518       242,109  

Depreciation and amortization

    41,779       51,358       52,391  

General and administrative

    67,009       58,191       65,907  

Marketing expenses, net

    54,140       51,436       49,420  

Closures and impairments, net

    69,808       64,680       10,542  

Gain on sales of Lime Fresh Mexican Grill assets

          (5,937

)

     

Interest expense, net

    20,855       21,754       22,735  

Total operating costs and expenses

    1,059,827       1,144,090       1,131,671  
                         

Loss before income taxes

    (107,856

)

    (52,862

)

    (5,105

)

Benefit for income taxes

    (1,716

)

    (2,180

)

    (1,911

)

Net Loss

    (106,140

)

    (50,682

)

    (3,194

)

                         

Other comprehensive income/(loss):

                       

Pension liability reclassification

    2,127       831       (40

)

Total comprehensive loss

  $ (104,013

)

  $ (49,851

)

  $ (3,234

)

                         

Loss per share:

                       

Basic

  $ (1.76

)

  $ (0.83

)

  $ (0.05

)

Diluted

  $ (1.76

)

  $ (0.83

)

  $ (0.05

)

                         

Weighted average shares:

                       

Basic

    60,139       60,871       60,580  

Diluted

    60,139       60,871       60,580  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per-share data)

 

   

June 6,

2017

   

May 31,

2016

 
                 

Assets:

               

Current assets:

               

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 41,714     $ 66,964  

Restricted cash

    6,445       377  

Accounts and other receivables

    7,315       12,827  

Inventories:

               

Merchandise

    10,701       13,799  

China, silver and supplies

    6,477       7,796  

Income tax receivable

    3,061       3,003  

Prepaid rent and other expenses

    10,499       11,508  

Assets held for sale

    12,825       4,642  

Total current assets

    99,037       120,916  
                 

Property and equipment, net

    583,097       671,250  

Other assets

    41,508       45,751  

Total assets

  $ 723,642     $ 837,917  
                 

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:

               

Current liabilities:

               

Accounts payable

  $ 17,570     $ 22,141  

Accrued liabilities:

               

Taxes, other than income and payroll

    11,028       10,769  

Payroll and related costs

    15,505       14,561  

Insurance

    5,740       5,109  

Deferred revenue – gift cards

    15,051       16,354  

Rent and other

    33,812       18,838  

Current maturities of long-term debt, including capital leases

    368       9,934  

Total current liabilities

    99,074       97,706  
                 

Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities

    213,341       213,803  

Deferred escalating minimum rent

    43,464       51,535  

Other deferred liabilities

    60,397       67,093  

Total liabilities

    416,276       430,137  
                 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

               
                 

Shareholders ’ equity:

               

Common stock, $0.01 par value; (authorized: 100,000 shares; issued: 2017 – 60,755 shares, 2016 – 60,137 shares)

    607       601  

Capital in excess of par value

    79,531       75,938  

Retained earnings

    235,210       341,350  

Deferred compensation liability payable in Company stock

    303       521  

Company stock held by Deferred Compensation Plan

    (303

)

    (521

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

    (7,982

)

    (10,109

)

Total shareholders' equity

    307,366       407,780  

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

  $ 723,642     $ 837,917  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders ’ Equity

(In thousands)

 

                                           

Company Stock

                 
                                           

Held by the

   

Accumulated

         
   

Common Stock

   

Capital In

           

Deferred

   

Deferred

   

Other

   

Total

 
   

Issued

   

Excess of

   

Retained

   

Compensation

   

Compensation

   

Comprehensive

   

Shareholders

 
   

Shares

   

Amount

   

Par Value

   

Earnings

   

Liability

   

Plan

   

Loss

   

Equity

 
                                                                 

Balance, June 3, 2014

    61,442     $ 614     $ 76,269     $ 395,226     $ 622     $ (622

)

  $ (10,900

)

  $ 461,209  

Net loss

                            (3,194

)

                            (3,194

)

Pension and post-retirement benefit plans, net of taxes of $0

                                                    (40

)

    (40

)

Shares issued pursuant to compensation plans, net of cancellations

    665       7       549                                       556  

Share-based compensation, including taxes of $(13)

                    7,125                                       7,125  

Stock repurchases

    (9

)

            (73

)

                                    (73

)

Changes in Deferred Compensation Plan

                                    59       (59

)

             

Balance, June 2, 2015

    62,098       621       83,870       392,032       681       (681

)

    (10,940

)

    465,583  

Net loss

                            (50,682

)

                            (50,682

)

Pension and post-retirement benefit plans, net of taxes of $0

                                                    831       831  

Shares issued pursuant to compensation plans, net of cancellations

    (88

)

    (1

)

    1                                        

Share-based compensation, including taxes of $(31)

                    2,125                                       2,125  

Stock repurchases

    (1,873

)

    (19

)

    (10,058

)

                                    (10,077

)

Changes in Deferred Compensation Plan

                                    (160

)

    160                

Balance, May 31, 2016

    60,137       601       75,938       341,350       521       (521

)

    (10,109

)

    407,780  

Net loss

                            (106,140

)

                            (106,140

)

Pension and post-retirement benefit plans, net of taxes of $0

                                                    2,127       2,127  

Shares issued pursuant to compensation plans, net of cancellations

    625       6       (6

)

                                     
Share-based compensation, including taxes of $0                     3,625                                       3,625  

Stock repurchases

    (7

)

            (26

)

                                    (26

)

Changes in Deferred Compensation Plan

                                    (218

)

    218                

Balance, June 6, 2017

    60,755     $ 607     $ 79,531     $ 235,210     $ 303     $ (303

)

  $ (7,982

)

  $ 307,366  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended

 
   

June 6, 2017

   

May 31, 2016

   

June 2, 2015

 

Operating activities:

                       

Net loss

  $ (106,140

)

  $ (50,682

)

  $ (3,194

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

                       

Depreciation and amortization

    41,779       51,358       52,391  

Deferred income taxes

          (1,449

)

    (3,695

)

Loss on impairments, including disposition of assets

    41,657       60,646       10,896  

Inventory write-off

    2,754              

Gain on sales of Lime Fresh Mexican Grill assets

     

 

    (5,937

)

     

Share-based compensation expense

    3,625       2,094       7,112  

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

                (39

)

Lease reserve adjustments

    18,035       4,090       1,460  

Deferred escalating minimum rent

    868       2,075       2,342  

Other, net

    2,549       3,610       2,728  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                       

Restricted cash

    (6,068

)

    (337

)

    143  

Receivables

    386       (2,334

)

    (440

)

Inventories

    1,883       (1,184

)

    763  

Income taxes

    (58

)

    (4,072

)

    3,202  

Prepaid and other assets

    1,404       (610

)

    (1,875

)

Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities

    (21,608

)

    (17,488

)

    (16,740

)

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

    (18,934

)

    39,780       55,054  
                         

Investing activities:

                       

Purchases of property and equipment

    (33,509

)

    (34,427

)

    (31,010

)

Proceeds from disposal of assets

    34,800       11,701       11,260  

Insurance proceeds from property claims

    664       350       145  

Reductions in Deferred Compensation Plan assets

    1,890       1,049       1,318  

Other, net

    2,842       1,572       790  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

    6,687       (19,755

)

    (17,497

)

                         

Financing activities:

                       

Principal payments on long-term debt

    (11,086

)

    (18,243

)

    (13,638

)

Stock repurchases

    (26

)

    (10,077

)

    (73

)

Payments for debt issuance costs

    (1,891

)

    (32

)

    (293

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

                556  

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

                39  

Net cash used in financing activities

    (13,003

)

    (28,352

)

    (13,409

)

                         

(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

    (25,250

)

    (8,327

)

    24,148  

Cash and cash equivalents:

                       

Beginning of fiscal year

    66,964       75,291       51,143  

End of fiscal year

  $ 41,714     $ 66,964     $ 75,291  
                         

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

                       

Cash paid (received) for:

                       

Interest, net of amount capitalized

  $ 17,257     $ 19,790     $ 20,804  

Income taxes, net

  $ (831

)

  $ 3,368     $ 543  

Significant non-cash investing and financing activities:

                       

Retirement of fully depreciated assets

  $ 27,989     $ 30,576     $ 23,842  

Reclassification of properties to assets held for sale

  $ 26,499     $ 6,817     $ 7,218  

Monetization of, and subsequent reinvestment into, life insurance policies

  $     $ 5,642     $ 6,851  

Sale of Lime Fresh Mexican Grill assets

  $     $ 5,289     $  

Changes in property and equipment included in accounts payable

  $     $ 539     $  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Description of Business and Principles of Consolidation
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. including its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“RTI,” the “Company,” “we” and/or “our”) develops, operates and franchises casual dining restaurants in the United States, Guam, and 14 foreign countries under the Ruby Tuesday® brand. At June 6, 2017, we owned and operated 543 Ruby Tuesday restaurants concentrated primarily in the Southeast, Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, and Midwest of the United States, which we consider to be our core markets. As of our fiscal year end, there were 62 domestic and international franchise Ruby Tuesday restaurants located in 11 states primarily outside of our existing core markets (primarily the Western United States and portions of the Midwest) and in the Asia Pacific Region, Middle East, Canada, Iceland, Eastern Europe, and Central and South America.

 

As discussed further in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, during fiscal year 2017 we closed  103 Company-owned restaurants, 95 of which were closed following a comprehensive review of the Company’s property portfolio resulting from perceived limited upside due to market concentration, challenged trade areas, and other factors.

 

We also owned and operated two Lime Fresh Mexican Grill® (“Lime Fresh”) fast casual restaurants as of May 31, 2016. As further discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we entered into an agreement during fiscal year 2016 to sell the assets related to eight Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants. Of the two remaining Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants not closed and transferred to the buyer as of May 31, 2016, both closed and were transferred to the third party buyer during fiscal year 2017.

 

RTI consolidates its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

Fiscal Year
Our fiscal year ends on the first Tuesday following May 30 and, as a result, a 53 rd week is added every five or six years.  Fiscal year 2017 contained 53 weeks.  The first three quarters of fiscal 2017 each contained 13 weeks and the fourth quarter contained 14 weeks.  In fiscal 2017, the 53 rd  week added $15.7 million to restaurant sales and operating revenue and $0.02 to diluted earnings per share in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.  The fiscal years ended May 31, 2016 and June 2, 2015 each contained 52 weeks.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Our cash management program provides for the investment of excess cash balances in short-term money market instruments. These money market instruments are stated at cost, which approximates market value. We consider amounts receivable from credit card companies and marketable securities with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Book overdrafts are recorded in accounts payable and are included within operating cash flows.

 

Inventories
Our inventories principally consist of food and beverages and are stated using the weighted average cost method. 

 

 

Property and Equipment and Depreciation
Property and equipment, net, is reported at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments are capitalized while expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives of depreciable assets generally range from three to 35 years for buildings and improvements and from three to 15 years for restaurant and other equipment. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding our property and equipment.

 

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
We review our long-lived assets related to each restaurant to be held and used in the business, including any allocated intangible assets subject to amortization, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a restaurant may not be recoverable. We evaluate restaurants based upon cash flows as our primary indicator of impairment. Assets are reviewed at the lowest level for which cash flows can be identified, which, for property and equipment, net, is the individual restaurant level. If the carrying amount of the restaurant is not recoverable, we record an impairment loss for the excess of the carrying amount over the estimated fair value.

 

When we decide to close a restaurant it is reviewed for impairment and depreciable lives are considered for adjustment. The impairment evaluation is based on the estimated cash flows from continuing use through the expected disposal date and the expected terminal value. Any gain or loss recognized upon disposal of the assets associated with a closed restaurant is recorded as a component of Closures and impairments, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

See Note  7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion regarding our closures and impairments, including the impairment of our Lime Fresh trademark.

 

Other Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets which are included in Other assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

 
   

Gross

Carrying

Amount

   

Accumulated

Amortization

   

Gross

Carrying

Amount

   

Accumulated

Amortization

 
                                 

Reacquired franchise rights

  $ 12,744     $ 10,582     $ 14,096     $ 10,903  

Favorable leases *

    1,029       246       1,408       336  

Trademarks

    231       162       237       158  
    $ 14,004     $ 10,990     $ 15,741     $ 11,397  

 

* As of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, we also had $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of unfavorable lease liabilities which resulted from the terms of acquired franchise operating lease contracts being unfavorable relative to market terms of comparable leases on the acquisition date. The majority of these liabilities are included within Other deferred liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

The reacquired franchise rights reflected in the table above were acquired as part of certain franchise acquisitions.  The favorable leases resulted from the terms of acquired franchise operating lease contracts being favorable relative to market terms of comparable leases on the acquisition dates.

 

Amortization expense of other intangible assets for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015 totaled $0.9 million, $1.8 million, and $2.2 million, respectively. We amortize reacquired franchise rights on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the franchise operating agreements. The weighted average amortization period of reacquired franchise rights is 8.5 years. We amortize favorable leases as a component of rent expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining lives of the leases. The weighted average amortization period of the favorable leases is 28.6 years. We amortize trademarks on a straight-line basis over the life of the trademarks, typically 10 years. Amortization expense for intangible assets for each of the next five years is expected to be $0.6 million in fiscal year 2018, $0.6 million in  fiscal year 2019, $0.5 million in fiscal year 2020, $0.3 million in fiscal year 2021, and $0.1 million in fiscal year 2022. Rent expense resulting from amortization of favorable leases, net of the amortization of unfavorable leases, is expected to be insignificant for each of the next five years.

 

 

We evaluate reacquired franchise rights and favorable leases for impairment as part of our evaluation of restaurant-level impairments.

 

Debt Acquisition Costs

We defer debt acquisition costs and amortize them over the terms of the related agreements using a method that approximates the effective interest method. As of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, unamortized debt issuance costs associated with our Senior Credit Facility of $2.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, were included within Prepaid rent and other expenses, and as of May 31, 2016, $0.4 million was included within Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

Unamortized debt acquisition costs associated with our Senior Notes and mortgage loan obligations of $0.7 million as of both June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, were included within Current maturities of long-term debt, including capital leases and $1.6 million and $2.4 million were included within Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively .

 

Lease Obligations

274 of our 543 Company-owned Ruby Tuesday concept restaurants are located on leased properties. Of these, approximately 205 are land leases only; 69 are for both land and building. The initial terms of these leases expire at various dates over the next 20 years. At the inception of the lease, each property is evaluated to determine whether the lease will be accounted for as an operating or capital lease. The term used for this evaluation includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal option can be reasonably assured and failure to exercise such option would result in an economic penalty. The primary penalty to which we are subject is the economic detriment associated with our investment into leasehold improvements which might become impaired should we choose not to continue the use of the leased property.

 

These leases may also contain required increases in minimum rent at varying times during the lease term and have options to extend the terms of the leases at a rate that is included in the original lease agreement. Some of our leases require the payment of additional (contingent) rent that is based upon a percentage of restaurant sales above agreed upon sales levels for the year. These sales levels vary for each restaurant and are established in the lease agreements. We recognize contingent rental expense (in annual as well as interim periods) prior to the achievement of the specified target that triggers the contingent rental expense, provided that achievement of that target is considered probable.

 

Certain of our operating leases contain predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals during the term of the lease, which includes option periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty. For these leases, we recognize the related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, beginning with the point at which we obtain control and possession of the leased properties, and record the difference between the amounts charged to operations and amounts paid as deferred escalating minimum rent. Any lease incentives received are deferred and subsequently amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease as a reduction to rent expense.

 

 

Estimated Liability for Self-Insurance

We self-insure a portion of our expected losses under our employee health care benefits, workers ’ compensation, general liability, and property insurance programs. Specifically with our workers’ compensation and general liability coverages, we have stop loss insurance for individual claims in excess of stated loss amounts. Insurance liabilities are recorded based on third-party actuarial estimates of the ultimate incurred losses, net of payments made. The estimates themselves are based on standard actuarial techniques that incorporate both the historical loss experience of the Company and supplemental information as appropriate.

 

Pensions and Post-Retirement Medical Benefits

We measure and recognize the funded status of our defined benefit and postretirement plans in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of our fiscal year end. The funded status represents the difference between the projected benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets.   The projected benefit obligation is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants, including the effect of future salary increases and years of service, as applicable.  The difference between the projected benefit obligation and the fair value of assets that has not previously been recognized as expense is recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss. We record a curtailment when an event occurs that significantly reduces the accrual of defined benefits.

 

Revenue Recognition
Revenue from restaurant sales is recognized when food and beverage products are sold. We present sales net of coupons, discounts, sales tax, and other sales-related taxes. Deferred revenue-gift cards primarily represents our liability for gift cards that have been sold, but not yet redeemed, and is recorded at the expected redemption value. When the gift cards are redeemed, we recognize restaurant sales and reduce the deferred revenue. Gift cards sold at a discount are recorded as revenue upon redemption of the associated gift cards at an amount net of the related discount.

 

Breakage income represents the value associated with the portion of gift cards sold that will most likely never be redeemed. Using gift card redemption history, we have determined that substantially all of our customers utilize their gift cards within two years from the date of purchase. Accordingly, we recognize gift card breakage income for non-escheatable amounts beginning 24 months after the date of activation.

 

We recognized gift card breakage income of $2.4  million, $2.1 million, and $2.0 million during fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. This income is included as an offset to Other Restaurant Operating Costs in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

Franchise development and license fees received are recognized when substantially all of our material obligations under the franchise agreements have been performed and the restaurant has opened for business. Franchise royalties are generally 4.0% of monthly sales.   Advertising amounts received from domestic franchisees are considered by us to be reimbursements, recorded when earned, and have been netted against marketing expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

We charge our franchisees various monthly fees that are calculated as a percentage of the respective franchise ’s monthly sales. Our Ruby Tuesday concept franchise agreements allow us to charge up to a 4.0% royalty fee, a 1.5% marketing and purchasing fee, and an advertising fee of up to 3.0%. We defer recognition of franchise fee revenue for any amounts greater than 60 days past due.

 

A further description of our franchise programs is provided in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Pre-Opening Expenses
Salaries, personnel training costs, pre-opening rent, and other expenses of opening new facilities are charged to expense as incurred.

 

 

Share-Based Employee Compensation Plans
We measure and recognize share-based payment transactions, including grants of employee stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units as compensation expense based on the fair value of the equity award on the grant date. We estimate the fair value of service-based stock option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair values of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards are based on the closing prices of our common stock on the dates prior to the grant date.  This compensation expense is recognized over the service period on a straight-line basis for all awards except those awarded to retirement-eligible individuals, which are recognized on the grant date at estimated fair value. We classify share-based compensation expense consistent with all other compensation expenses in General and administrative in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding our share-based employee compensation plans.

 

Marketing Costs
Except for television, radio, internet, and social media advertising production costs which we expense when the advertisement is first shown, we expense marketing costs as incurred. Marketing expenses, net of franchise reimbursements, totaled $54.1 million, $51.4 million, and $49.4 million for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

 

Income Taxes
Our deferred income taxes are determined utilizing the asset and liability approach. This method gives consideration to the future tax consequences associated with differences between financial accounting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Temporary differences represent the cumulative taxable or deductible amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements in different years than recognized in the tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. If, after consideration of all available positive and negative evidence, current available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, the need for a valuation allowance is addressed. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets may be required if the amount of taxes recoverable through loss carry-back declines, if we project lower levels of future taxable income, or if we have recently experienced pretax losses. Such a valuation allowance is established through a charge to income tax expense which adversely affects our reported operating results. The judgments and estimates utilized when establishing, and subsequently adjusting, a deferred tax asset valuation allowance are reviewed on a periodic basis as regulatory and business factors change.

 

The effect on the deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits as components of our income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

We recognize in our consolidated financial statements the benefit of a position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return when it is more likely than not (i.e. a likelihood of more than 50%) that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Changes in judgment that result in subsequent recognition, derecognition or change in a measurement of a tax position taken in a prior annual period (including any related interest and penalties) are recognized as a discrete item in the interim period in which the change occurs.

 

See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of our income taxes.

 

 

Loss Per Share
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period presented. Diluted earnings per share gives effect to stock options and restricted stock outstanding during the applicable periods, except during loss periods as the effect would be anti-dilutive. The following table reflects the calculation of weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding as presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (in thousands, except per-share data):

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Net loss

  $ (106,140

)

  $ (50,682

)

  $ (3,194

)

                         

Weighted average common shares outstanding

    60,139       60,871       60,580  

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock

                 

Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding

    60,139       60,871       60,580  
                         

Basic loss per share

  $ (1.76

)

  $ (0.83

)

  $ (0.05

)

Diluted loss per share

  $ (1.76

)

  $ (0.83

)

  $ (0.05

)

 

Stock options with an exercise price greater than the average market price of our common stock and certain options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units with unrecognized compensation expense do not impact the computation of diluted loss per share because the effect would be anti-dilutive. The following table summarizes on a weighted-average basis stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units that were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Stock options

    2,242       2,407       3,057  

Restricted stock / Restricted stock units

    640       826       1,352  

Total

    2,882       3,233       4,409  

 

Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss includes net loss adjusted for certain income, expenses, gains and losses that are excluded from net loss in accordance with U.S. GAAP, such as pension and other postretirement medical plan adjustments. Comprehensive loss is shown as a separate component in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is the price that we would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. For assets and liabilities we record or disclose at fair value, we determine the fair value based upon the quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, we determine the fair value based upon the quoted market price of similar assets or the present value of expected future cash flows using discount rates appropriate for the duration.

 

 

The fair values are assigned a level within the following fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used to measure the fair value of assets or liabilities:

 

 

Level 1 – Observable inputs based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and

 

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

 

See Notes 8 and 12  to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of our fair value measurements.

 

Reclassifications

As shown in the table below, we split our previously reported expenses within Selling, general and administrative, net into separately reported General and administrative expenses and Marketing expenses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the prior fiscal year to be comparable with the classification for the fiscal year-ended June 6, 2017.   Additionally, we reclassified an impairment of the Lime Fresh trademark to Closures and impairments, net.   Amounts presented are in thousands.

 

   

As presented

Fiscal year ended

May 31, 2016

   

 

 

Reclassifications

   

As adjusted

Fiscal year ended

May 31, 2016

 

Selling, general, and administrative, net

  $ 109,627     $ (109,627

)

  $  

General and administrative expenses

          58,191       58,191  

Marketing expenses, net

          51,436       51,436  

Closures and impairments, net

    62,681       1,999       64,680  

Trademark impairment

    1,999       (1,999

)

     

 

   

As presented

Fiscal year ended

June 2, 2015

   

Reclassifications

   

As adjusted

Fiscal year ended

June 2, 2015

 

Selling, general, and administrative, net

  $ 115,327     $ (115,327

)

  $  

General and administrative expenses

          65,907       65,907  

Marketing expenses, net

          49,420       49,420  

 

As shown in the table below, we split our previously reported Cash and cash equivalents into separately reported Cash and cash equivalents and Restricted cash  in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the prior fiscal year to be comparable with the classification for the fiscal year-ended June 6, 2017.   Amounts presented are in thousands.

 

   

As presented

Fiscal year ended

May 31, 2016

   

Reclassifications

   

As adjusted

Fiscal year ended

May 31, 2016

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 67,341     $ (377

)

  $ 66,964  

Restricted cash

            377       377  

 

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides clarification regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payments should be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The guidance addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective to reduce diversity in practice of how certain transactions are classified within the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein (our fiscal year 2019). Early application is permitted. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

In March  2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting  (“ASU 2016-09”), which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows.  ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein (our fiscal year 2018).  Early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a right-of-use asset, representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term, and a lease liability for all leases with terms greater than 12 months. The guidance also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures designed to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The standard requires the use of a modified retrospective transition approach, which includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein (our fiscal year 2020). Early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In May 2014, the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board jointly issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09") . ASU 2014-09 will replace almost all existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry specific guidance, upon its effective date. The standard's core principle is for a company to recognize revenue when it transfers goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled.

 

A company may also need to use more judgment and make more estimates when recognizing revenue, which could result in additional disclosures. ASU 2014-09 also provides guidance for transactions that were not addressed comprehensively in previous guidance, such as the recognition of breakage income from the sale of gift cards. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017 (our fiscal year 2019), with early application permitted in the first quarter of 2017. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to impact our recognition of Company-owned restaurants sales and operating revenue or our recognition of continuing fees from franchisees, which are based on a percentage of franchise sales. We have not yet selected a transition method and are continuing to evaluate the impact of this guidance on our less significant revenue transactions, such as initial franchise license fees.

 

Additionally, in March and April 2016, the FASB issued the following amendments to ASU 2014-09 to clarify the implementation guidance: ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) and ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing . Under the new guidance, expected gift card breakage income will be required to be recognized proportionately as redemption occurs. Our current accounting policy of recognizing gift card breakage income applying the remote method will no longer be allowed. The timing of transition of this guidance is consistent with the new revenue recognition standard as discussed above. We expect to implement the provisions of ASU 2014-09 and the related amendments in the same period.

 

2.   Franchise Programs

 

As of June 6, 2017, our franchise programs included arrangements with 22 domestic and international Ruby Tuesday concept franchisees. At the end of fiscal year  2017, our franchisees collectively operated 62 Ruby Tuesday restaurants. We do not own any equity interest in our existing franchisees.

 

We enter into development agreements with our franchisees that require them to open varying numbers of Ruby Tuesday restaurants. As of June 6, 2017, seven of our 22 Ruby Tuesday concept franchisees had agreements to develop new franchised Ruby Tuesday restaurants. During fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, our Ruby Tuesday franchisees opened one, five, and six restaurants, respectively, pursuant to development agreements, as follows:

 

   

Ruby Tuesday

 

Fiscal Year

 

Domestic

   

International

   

Total

 

2017

    1       1       2  

2016

          5       5  

2015

            6       6  

 

 

During fiscal years  2016 and 2015, our then Lime Fresh franchisees opened one and two restaurants, respectively, pursuant to development agreements. However, as discussed further in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016, we sold the Lime Fresh brand's intellectual property and the franchise agreements associated with eight Lime Fresh concept restaurants for $4.6 million.  As a result of this transaction, we had no remaining Lime Fresh concept franchisees as of May 31, 2016.    

 

In conjunction with these openings, we recognized development and licensing fee income totaling an insignificant amount in fiscal year 2017 and $0.2 million in each of fiscal years 2016 and 2015.

 

Deferred development and licensing fees associated with all franchisees, which are reported as a component of Other deferred liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, totaled $0.3 million and $0.4 million as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively. We will recognize these fees as income when we have substantially performed all material services and the restaurant has opened for business.

 

3.   Lime Fresh Mexican Grill 

 

On May 31, 2016, we entered into agreements with two separate buyers to sell various Lime Fresh Mexican Grill assets.   Pursuant to the terms of an asset purchase agreement with another restaurant company, we agreed to sell our eight remaining Lime Fresh Mexican Grill Company-owned restaurants for $6.0 million.  Given that closing requirements were satisfied for only six of the eight restaurants, an amendment was agreed upon which allowed for the payment of $5.0 million upon the transfer of the six restaurants and the holdback of $1.0 million until such time that both of the remaining two restaurants had closed and transferred to the buyer.  The six restaurants closed and were transferred on May 31, 2016.  Both of the remaining two Lime Fresh restaurants remained open and operated by Ruby Tuesday as of our May 31 fiscal year-end and were subsequently closed during fiscal year 2017.  

 

Because we did not collect the $5.0 million on the sale of the six Lime Fresh restaurants until the first day of our fiscal year 2017, the gain of $3.1 million included in our fiscal year 2016 Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss is non-cash.   Further, given that the closing requirements were not satisfied on the two remaining restaurants as of the close of our fiscal year 2016, we did not reflect those restaurants as having been sold in fiscal year 2016, nor we did accrue as a receivable the $1.0 million holdback.

 

Also on May 31, 2016, we sold the Lime Fresh Mexican Grill brand, including the intellectual property and franchising rights for all eight Lime Fresh franchised restaurants to a third party buyer for $4.6 million, substantially all of which was received in cash on that date.   We recognized a gain of $2.8 million on the transaction.    

 

4.   Accounts and Other Receivables

 

Accounts and other receivables consist of the following (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

 
                 

Rebates receivable

  $ 1,031     $ 1,001  

Amounts due from franchisees

    4,014       3,013  

Third-party gift card sales

    1,147       1,272  

Receivables from sales of Lime Fresh Mexican Grill assets

          5,289  

Other receivables

    1,123       2,252  
    $ 7,315     $ 12,827  

 

We negotiate purchase arrangements, including price terms, with designated and approved suppliers on behalf of us and our franchise system. We receive various volume discounts and rebates based on purchases for our Company-owned restaurants from numerous suppliers.

 

 

Amounts due from franchisees consist of royalties, license and other miscellaneous fees, a portion of which represents current and recently-invoiced billings.

 

On May 31, 2016, we entered into agreements with two separate buyers to sell various Lime Fresh assets. The $5.3 million of receivables from sales of Lime Fresh assets in the table above consists of $5.0 million due from the buyer of our Lime Fresh restaurants, which was collected on the first day of fiscal year 2017, and $0.3 million due from the buyer of the Lime Fresh brand. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on these transactions.

 

As of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, other receivables consisted primarily of amounts due from our distributor, receivables from online ordering, sales and other miscellaneous tax refunds, and other receivables.

 

5. Property, Equipment, Assets Held for Sale, Operating Leases, and Sale-Leaseback Transactions

 

Property and equipment, net, is comprised of the following (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

 

Land

  $ 180,520     $ 209,930  

Buildings

    366,566       398,984  

Improvements

    227,056       303,032  

Restaurant equipment

    192,217       222,646  

Other equipment

    71,851       82,204  

Surplus properties*

    17,139       4,354  

Construction in progress and other

    1,172       3,325  
      1,056,521       1,224,475  

Less accumulated depreciation

    473,424       553,225  

Property and equipment, net

  $ 583,097     $ 671,250  

 

* Surplus properties represent assets held for sale that are not classified as such in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as we do not expect to sell these assets within the next 12 months. These assets primarily consist of parcels of land upon which we have no intention to build restaurants, closed properties which include a building, and liquor licenses not needed for operations.

 

Included within the current assets section of our Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016 are amounts classified as assets held for sale totaling $12.8 million and $4.6 million, respectively. Assets held for sale primarily consist of land and buildings of closed restaurants, parcels of land upon which we have no intention to build restaurants, and liquor licenses. In addition to Lime Fresh restaurants sold as discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, during fiscal years

 

 

2017, 2016, and 2015 we sold surplus properties with carrying values of $24.3 million, $6.7 million, and $9.5 million, respectively, at net gains of $4.4 million, $0.9 million, and $1.7 million, respectively. Cash proceeds, net of broker fees, from these sales totaled $28.7 million, $7.6 million, and $11.2 million, respectively.

 

We realized gains during fiscal year 2014 on the sale-leaseback transactions of $0.8 million, which have been deferred and are being recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial terms of the leases. The current portion of the deferred gains on all sale-leaseback transactions to date was $1.1 million as of both June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, and is included in Accrued liabilities – Rent and other in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The long-term portion of the deferred gains on all sale-leaseback transactions to date was $9.7 million and $10.9 million as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively, and is included in Other deferred liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amortization of the deferred gains of $1.1 million in each of fiscal year June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, and June 2, 2015 is included within Other restaurant operating costs in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

The following is a schedule by year of future minimum lease payments under operating leases that have initial lease terms in excess of one year as of June 6, 2017 (in thousands):

 

2018

  $ 41,397  

2019

    38,117  

2020

    35,489  

2021

    33,153  

2022

    30,951  

Subsequent years

    327,308  

Total minimum lease payments

  $ 506,415  

 

The amounts included in the table above include lease payments for certain optional renewal periods for which exercise is considered reasonably assured as well as operating leases totaling $2.6 million as discussed below for which sublease income from franchisees or others is contractually required.

 

The following schedule shows the future minimum sub-lease payments contractually due for the next five years and thereafter under noncancellable sub-lease agreements as of June 6, 2017 (in thousands):

 

2018

  $ 382  

2019

    285  

2020

    285  

2021

    291  

2022

    300  

Subsequent years

    1,019  

Total minimum sub-lease payments

  $ 2,562  

 

 

The following table summarizes our minimum and contingent rent expense and our sublease rental income under our operating leases (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Minimum rent

  $ 38,922     $ 49,699     $ 50,489  

Contingent rent

    558       662       745  
      39,480       50,361       51,234  

Sublease rental income

    (572

)

    (940

)

    (504

)

    $ 38,908     $ 49,421     $ 50,730  

 

The amounts shown for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015 above exclude rent expense of $14. 2 million, $3.6 million, and $1.2 million, respectively, relating to lease reserves established for closed restaurants or dead sites, which is included within Closures and impairments expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

6. Long-Term Debt and Capital Leases

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

 
                 

Senior unsecured notes

  $ 212,546     $ 212,546  

Unamortized discount

    (1,366

)

    (1,771

)

Unamortized debt issuance costs

    (2,311

)

    (2,995

)

Senior unsecured notes less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs

    208,869       207,780  

Revolving credit facility

           

Mortgage loan obligations

    4,650       15,745  

Unamortized ( discount) premium - mortgage loan obligations

    (1

)

    75  

Unamortized debt issuance costs - mortgage loan obligations

    (27

)

    (74

)

Capital lease obligations

    218       211  

Total long-term debt and capital leases

    213,709       223,737  

Less current maturities

    368       9,934  

Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities

  $ 213,341     $ 213,803  

 

Estimated annual maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations at June 6, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

 

2018

  $ 1,535  

2019

    1,483  

2020

    213,591  

2021

    488  

2022

    99  

Subsequent years

    218  
Total estimated annual maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations   $ 217,414  

 

On May 14, 2012, we entered into an indenture (the “Indenture”) among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., certain subsidiaries of the Company as guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as trustee, governing the Company ’s $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.625% senior notes due 2020 (the “Senior Notes”). The Senior Notes were issued at a discount of $3.7 million, which is being amortized using the effective interest method over the eight-year term of the notes.

 

The Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. They rank equal in right of payment with our existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any of our future subordinated indebtedness. The Senior Notes are  effectively subordinated to all of our secured debt, including borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt and structurally subordinated to all of the liabilities of our existing and future subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Senior Notes.

 

 

Interest on the Senior Notes is calculated at 7.625% per annum, payable semiannually on each May 15 and November 15 to holders of record on the May 1 or November 1 immediately preceding the interest payment date. Accrued interest on the Senior Notes and our other long-term debt and capital lease obligations was $1.2 million and $1.0 million as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively, and is included in Accrued liabilities – Rent and other in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

We may redeem the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices specified in the Indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest. There is no sinking fund for the Senior Notes, which mature on May 15, 2020.

 

The Indenture contains covenants that limit, among other things, our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to (i) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; (ii) declare or pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions to stockholders; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) create liens or use assets as security in other transactions; (v) merge or consolidate, or sell, transfer, lease or dispose of substantially all of their assets; (vi) enter into transactions with affiliates; (vii) sell or transfer certain assets; and (viii) repurchase outstanding common stock. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications, as described in the Indenture, and certain covenants will not apply at any time when the Senior Notes are rated investment grade by the Rating Agencies, as defined in the Indenture. The Indenture also provides for events of default, which, if any of them occurs, would permit or require the principal, premium, if any, interest and any other monetary obligations on all the then outstanding Senior Notes to be due and payable immediately.

 

On May 26, 2017, we entered into a 364-day senior secured revolving credit agreement (the “Senior Credit Facility”) with UBS AG, Stamford Branch, under which we may borrow up to $20.0 million. We entered into the Senior Credit Facility to replace our previous $30 million revolving credit facility (the "Prior Credit Facility") which was paid in full on May 26, 2017.  The terms of the Senior Credit Facility provide for a $15.0 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit.

 

Under the terms of the Senior Credit Facility, interest rates charged on borrowings can vary depending on the interest rate option we choose to utilize. Our options for the rate are a Base Rate or LIBOR plus , in each case, an applicable margin, provided that the rate shall not be less than zero. The Base Rate is defined as the highest of the issuing bank’s prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, or the Adjusted LIBO rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility) plus 1.0%. The applicable margin for the LIBO rate-based option is 4.00% and for the Base Rate option is 3.00%. We pay commitment fees of 0.50% on the unused portion of the Senior Credit Facility.

 

As security for the Senior Credit Facility, we have granted the lenders security interests in and liens on substantially all of the Company’s personal property, including equity interest in certain of its subsidiaries, and the real property, improvements, and fixtures of 22 Ruby Tuesday restaurants. The real property, improvements, and fixtures of the 22 restaurants pledged as collateral appraised at an approximate value of $31.3 million as of February 2017 and have a June 6, 2017 net book value of $34.8 million.

 

We had no borrowings outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility at June 6, 2017. After consideration of letters of credit outstanding, we had $5.2  million available under the Senior Credit Facility as of June 6, 2017.

 

The Senior Credit Facility contains a number of customary affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict our ability to incur liens, engage in mergers or other fundamental changes, make acquisitions, investments, loans and advances, pay dividends or other distributions, sell or otherwise dispose of certain assets, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, enter into burdensome agreements or certain hedging agreements, amend organizational documents, change accounting practices, incur additional indebtedness and prepay other indebtedness.

 

Under the terms of the Senior Credit Facility we are allowed, under certain circumstances, to repurchase up to $20.0 million of the Senior Notes in any fiscal year. During the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, we did not repurchase any Senior Notes.   During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016, we repurchased $2.5 million of the Senior Notes for $2.4 million plus accrued interest. We realized a negligible gain on these transactions.

 

 

Under the Senior Credit Facility, we are required to comply with financial covenants relating to the maintenance of a minimum appraised value of eligible restaurants and a maximum leverage ratio. The terms of the Senior Credit Facility require us to maintain a minimum appraised value of eligible restaurants of no less than $30 .0 million and maximum leverage ratio of no more than 5.00 to 1.0 starting with the fiscal quarter ending on or around September 5, 2017.

 

The Senior Credit Facility terminates no later than May 25,  2018.  Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders may terminate the loan commitments, accelerate all loans and exercise any of their rights under the Senior Credit Facility and any ancillary loan documents.

 

On May 25, 2017, in connection with our entry into the Senior Credit Facility, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into loan modification agreements (the “Loan Modification Agreements”) with certain mortgage lenders to, among other things, provide waivers and consents under certain of our mortgage loan obligations to enter into the Senior Credit Facility. The Loan Modification Agreements also amended certain financial reporting requirements under the specified loans and modified and/or provided for certain financial covenants for the specified loans, including the maximum leverage ratio.

 

Our $4.6 million in mortgage loan obligations as of June 6, 2017 consist of various loans a ssumed upon franchise acquisitions. These loans, which mature between February 2019 and October 2021, have balances that range from $0.5 million to $0.9 million and interest rates of 7.78% to 10.17%. Many of the properties acquired from franchisees collateralize the loans outstanding.

 

During fiscal year 2016, we prepaid and retired 16 mortgage loan obligations with an aggregate balance of $13.3 million using cash on hand. Included within Interest expense, net in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 were $1.6 million in prepayment premiums and $0.1 million of accrued interest paid in connection with the retirement of these obligations. The prepayment of this debt eliminated one mortgage lender and allowed for the release of 44 properties which had served as collateral.

 

 

7. Closures and Impairments Expense, Including Trademark Impairments

 

Closures and impairments, net include the following (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Closures and impairments:

                       

Property impairments

  $ 45,974     $ 58,153     $ 9,822  

Closed restaurant lease reserves

    18,035       4,090       1,461  

Other closing expense

    10,213       1,260       966  

Gain on sale of surplus properties

    (4,414

)

    (822

)

    (1,707

)

Lime Fresh trademark impairment

          1,999

 

     

Closures and impairments, net

  $ 69,808     $ 64,680     $ 10,542  

 

Included within Closures and impairments, net for fiscal year 2017 are impairments of $43.1 million related to open restaurants with deteriorating operational performance, $0.6 million related to surplus properties, and $2.3 million associated with lease expirations and restaurant closures.   Also included within Closures and impairments, net for fiscal 2017 are $31.5 million in closing expenses related to the 95 Asset Rationalization Plan closures.

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016, the Company ’s management began to formulate a plan in response to a comprehensive review of its property portfolio through the planned closure of restaurants with perceived limited upside due to market concentration, challenged trade areas, or other factors. Given the status of management’s proposed plan as of May 31, 2016, the Company determined that there was an impairment trigger as certain restaurants would be disposed of significantly before the end of their previously estimated useful lives. Accordingly, we recorded impairment charges of $39.2 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 related to these restaurants. On August 11, 2016, we announced a plan to close approximately 95 Company-owned restaurants by September 2016. Also included within Closures and impairments, net for fiscal year 2016 are impairments of $14.7 million related to open Ruby Tuesday concept restaurants with deteriorating operational performance during the first three quarters of fiscal year 2016 or not included within management’s developing closure plan during the fourth fiscal quarter and $0.8 million related to surplus properties.

 

As previously discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, during fiscal year 2016, we entered into an agreement to sell eight Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants in Florida for $6.0 million and closed the remaining 11 Company-owned Lime Fresh restaurants. Included within closures and impairments, net for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 are $6.4 million of impairments, lease reserves, and other charges relating to the closed Lime Fresh restaurants.  

 

Included within Closures and impairments, net for fiscal year 2015 are impairments of $7.7 million related to restaurants with deteriorating operational performance, $1.8 million related to surplus properties, and $0.3 million associated with lease expirations and restaurant closures.

 

In addition to impairment charges recorded in connection with the closed Lime Fresh restaurants as discussed above, during the second quarter of fiscal year 2016, we recorded a $2.0 million trademark impairment charge representing a partial impairment of the Lime Fresh trademark.   As previously discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we sold the Lime Fresh brand's intellectual property, including the Lime Fresh trademark, during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016.  

 

 

A rollforward of our future lease obligations associated with closed restaurants is as follows (in thousands):

 

   

Reserve for

Lease Obligations

 

Balance at June 2, 2015

  $ 7,051  

Closing expense including rent and other lease charges

    4,090  

Payments

    (5,737

)

Adjustments to deferred escalating minimum rent and other

    866  

Balance at May 31, 2016

    6,270  

Closing expense including rent and other lease charges

    18,035  

Payments

    (17,205

)

Adjustments to deferred escalating minimum rent and other

    9,130  

Balance at June 6, 2017

  $ 16,230  

 

 

The amounts comprising future lease obligations in the table above are estimated using certain assumptions, including the period of time it will take to settle the lease with the landlord or find a suitable sublease tenant, and the amount of actual future cash payments could differ from our recorded lease obligations. Of the total future lease obligations included in the table above, $15.3  million and $6.2 million are included within the Accrued liabilities – Rent and other caption in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively. For fiscal year 2018 and beyond, our focus will be on obtaining settlements, or subleases as necessary, on as many of these leases as possible and these settlements could be higher or lower than the amounts recorded. The actual amount of any cash payments made by the Company for lease contract termination costs will be dependent upon ongoing negotiations with the landlords of the leased restaurant properties.

 

8. Employee Post-Employment Benefits

 

Pension and Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits

We sponsor three defined benefit pension plans for active employees and offer certain postretirement benefits for retirees. A summary of each of these is presented below.

 

Retirement Plan
RTI sponsors the Morrison Restaurants Inc. Retirement Plan (the "Retirement Plan"). Effective December 31, 1987, the Retirement Plan was amended so that no additional benefits would accrue and no new participants could enter the Retirement Plan after that date. Participants receive benefits based upon salary and length of service.

 

Minimum funding for the Retirement Plan is determined in accordance with the guidelines set forth in employee benefit and tax laws. From time to time we may contribute additional amounts as we deem appropriate. We estimate that we will not be required to make contributions to the Retirement Plan in fiscal year 2018.

 

 

The Retirement Plan ’s assets are held in a trust and were allocated as follows on the measurement dates:

 

   

2017

   

2016

 
   

Target

Allocation

   

Actual

Allocation

   

Target

Allocation

   

Actual

Allocation

 

Equity securities

    41 - 71%

 

    63

%

    41 - 71%

 

    61

%

Fixed income securities

    13 - 43%

 

    25

%

    13 - 43%

 

    20

%

Public real estate investment trusts

    0 - 10%

 

    0

%

    0 - 10%

 

    5

%

Cash and cash equivalents

    0 - 20%

 

    1

%

    0 - 20%

 

    4

%

Other

    0 - 21%

 

    11

%

    0 - 21%

 

    10

%

                                         

Total

                100

%

                100

%

 

The Retirement Plan fiduciaries set investment policies and strategies for the Retirement Plan ’s trust. The overall investment objective is to invest the Retirement Plan’s assets in a structure designed to produce returns, over a long-term horizon (greater than 10 years), that meets the actuarially assumed rate of return. The Retirement Plan’s fiduciaries oversee the investment allocation process, which includes selecting investment managers, commissioning periodic asset-liability studies, setting long-term strategic targets, and monitoring asset allocations. Target allocation ranges are guidelines, not limitations, and occasionally the Retirement Plan’s fiduciaries will approve allocations above or below a target range. The target allocation percentages presented above reflect an objective focused on capital appreciation with a secondary focus on current income through a higher allocation to equities than fixed income, and where appropriate, other asset classes.

 

Under the terms of the investment policy statement, plan assets are comprised of two major classes: equity and fixed income securities. The goal of the equity portfolio is to produce a total return that will provide a hedge against inflation. Equity securities can include both domestic and international securities with a long-term strategic target to maintain an equity allocation of approximately 56% of the total market value of plan assets.

 

The goal of the fixed income portfolio is to reduce the overall volatility of the Retirement Plan, provide a stable stream of income, and provide a hedge against deflation without exposure to excessive interest rate or credit rate risk. Fixed income securities should be primarily U.S. Treasury or Government Agency securities and investment-grade corporate bonds at the time of purchase with a long-term strategic target to maintain a fixed income allocation of approximately 28% of the total market value of plan assets.

 

Aside from equity and fixed income securities, the trust may also invest in alternative investments, such as public real estate investment trusts and mutual funds investing in hedge funds and commodities, with a long-term strategic target to maintain an allocation of approximately 16% of the total market value of plan assets.

 

The fair values of assets held by the Retirement Plan by asset category are as follows (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

 

Level 2:

               

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 80     $ 249  

Level 1:

               

Equity securities

               

U.S.-based companies

    2,677       2,561  

International-based companies

    1,175       1,222  

Fixed income securities

    1,504       1,259  

Public real estate investment trusts

          315  

Other

    690       603  

Total assets reported as of fiscal year end

  $ 6,126     $ 6,209  

 

 

Executive Supplemental Pension Plan and Management Retirement Plan
Under these unfunded defined benefit pension plans, eligible employees earn supplemental retirement income based upon salary and length of service, reduced by social security benefits and amounts otherwise receivable under other specified Company retirement plans. The Executive Supplemental Pension Plan and the Management Retirement Plan have been amended so that no additional benefits will accrue and no new participants may enter the plan. 

 

Although considered to be unfunded, we own whole-life insurance contracts in order to provide a source of funding for benefits due under the terms of the Executive Supplemental Pension Plan and the Management Retirement Plan. Benefits payable under these two plans are paid from a rabbi trust which holds the insurance contracts. We will on occasion contribute additional amounts into the rabbi trust in the event of a liquidity shortfall. We currently project that benefit payments from the rabbi trust for these two plans will approximate $3.0 million in fiscal year 2018.

 

Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits
Our Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits plans provide medical benefits to substantially all retired employees and life insurance benefits to certain retirees. The medical plan requires retiree cost sharing provisions that are more substantial for employees who retire after January 1, 1990.

 

The following tables detail the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Retirement Plan, Management Retirement Plan, and the Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (collectively, the "Pension Plans") and the Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits plans, which is recorded as a component of Selling, general, and administrative expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (in thousands):

 

   

Pension Plans

 
   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 
                         

Service cost

  $ 26     $ 312     $ 301  

Interest cost

    1,711       1,999       1,773  

Expected return on plan assets

    (370

)

    (411

)

    (498

)

Amortization of prior service cost (a)

          1       1  

Recognized actuarial loss

    1,542       2,218       1,718  

Curtailment expense

          1        

Net periodic benefit cost

  $ 2,909     $ 4,120     $ 3,295  

 

   

Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits

 
   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 
                         

Service cost

  $ 1     $ 4     $ 4  

Interest cost

    36       47       46  

Recognized actuarial loss

    71       130       134  

Net periodic benefit cost

  $ 108     $ 181     $ 184  

 

(a) Prior service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive benefits.  

 

 

The following table details changes in the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our 2017 and 2016 Consolidated Financial Statements for the Pension Plans and the Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits plans (in thousands):

 

   

Pension Plans

   

Postretirement Medical

and Life Benefits

 
   

2017

   

2016

   

2017

   

2016

 
                                 

Beginning of year

  $ (16,821

)

  $ (17,149

)

  $ (491

)

  $ (994

)

Net actuarial (loss)/gain

    367

 

    (1,891

)

    147       373  

Amortization of prior service credit

          1              

Amortization of actuarial loss

    1,542       2,218       71       130  

End of year

  $ (14,912

)

  $ (16,821

)

  $ (273

)

  $ (491

)

 

The change in benefit obligation and plan assets and reconciliation of funded status is as follows (in thousands):

 

   

Pension Plans

   

Postretirement Medical

and Life Benefits

 
   

2017

   

2016

   

2017

   

2016

 

Change in benefit obligation:

                               

Beginning projected benefit obligation

  $ 44,429     $ 43,843     $ 1,100     $ 1,404  

Service cost

    26       312       1       4  

Interest cost

    1,711       1,999       36       47  

Plan participant contributions

                84       73  

Actuarial loss/(gain)

    (183

)

    1,411       (147

)

    (373

)

Benefits paid

    (3,403

)

    (2,888

)

    (85

)

    (55

)

Curtailment gain

          (248

)

           

Benefit obligation at end of year

  $ 42,580     $ 44,429     $ 989     $ 1,100  

Change in plan assets:

                               

Beginning fair value of plan assets

  $ 6,209     $ 6,786     $     $  

Actual return on plan assets

    554       (318

)

           

Employer contributions

    2,766       2,629       1       (18

)

Plan participant contributions

                84       73  

Benefits paid

    (3,403

)

    (2,888

)

    (85

)

    (55

)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $ 6,126     $ 6,209     $     $  
                                 

Funded status at end of year

  $ (36,454

) *

  $ (38,220

)*

  $ (989

)

  $ (1,100

)

                                 

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

                               

Accrued liabilities – payroll and related costs

  $ (2,953

)

  $ (2,527

)

  $ (123

)

  $ (113

)

Other deferred liabilities

    (33,501

)

    (35,693

)

    (866

)

    (987

)

Net amount recognized at year-end

  $ (36,454

)

  $ (38,220

)

  $ (989

)

  $ (1,100

)

                                 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

                               

Net actuarial loss

    (14,912

)

    (16,821

)

    (273

)

    (491

)

Total amount recognized

  $ (14,912

)

  $ (16,821

)

  $ (273

)

  $ (491

)

 

 

*

The funded status reflected above includes the liabilities attributable to all of the Pension Plans but only the assets of the Retirement Plan as the other plans are not considered funded for Employee Retirement Income Security Act purposes. To provide a source for the payment of benefits under the Executive Supplemental Pension Plan and the Management Retirement Plan, we own life insurance contracts on some of the participants. The cash value of these policies (Level 2), which are included within the Other Assets caption in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, was $25.4 million and $27.9 million at June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016,   respectively. In addition, we reclassified as Restricted cash in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016 $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of cash held in trust that is restricted for benefit payments under these plans.  We maintain a rabbi trust to hold the policies and death benefits as they are received.

 

During fiscal years 2017, 2016, and  2015, we reclassified the following items out of accumulated other comprehensive loss and into Pension and Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits expense, which is included in Selling, general and administrative, net within our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, as follows (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Recognized actuarial loss

  $ 1,613     $ 2,348     $ 1,852  

Amortization of prior service cost/(credit)

          1       1  

Curtailment expense

          1        

Pension reclassification

  $ 1,613     $ 2,350     $ 1,853  

 

The estimated net loss for the Pension and the Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic pension cost in fiscal year 2018 is $0.7 million.

 

Additional measurement date information for the Pension and Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits plans which have benefit obligations in excess of plan assets (in thousands):

 

   

 

Pension Plans

   

Postretirement Medical

and Life Benefits

 
   

June 6, 2017

   

May 31,

2016

   

June 6, 2017

   

May 31,

2016

 

Projected benefit obligation

  $ 42,580     $ 44,429     $ 989     $ 1,100  

Accumulated benefit obligation

    42,580       44,428       989       1,100  

Fair value of plan assets

    6,126       6,209              

 

The weighted average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for fiscal years are set forth below:

 

   

Pension Plans

 
   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Discount rate

    4.0

%

    4.2

%

    4.4

%

Expected return on plan assets

    6.3

%

    6.3

%

    7.0

%

Rate of compensation increase

    2.0

%

    2.0

%

    2.0

%

 

   

Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits

 
   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Discount rate

    3.5

%

    3.6

%

    3.5

%

Rate of compensation increase

    2.0

%

    2.0

%

    2.0

%

 

Our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets represents the weighted average of expected future returns on the asset categories included in our target investment allocation based primarily on the historical returns for each asset category, adjusted for an assessment of current market conditions.

 

 

 

The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the measurement dates are set forth below:

 

   

Pension Plans

 
   

2017

   

2016

 

Discount rate

    3.9

%

    4.0

%

Rate of compensation increase

    2.0

%

    2.0

%

 

   

Postretirement Medical and Life Benefits

 
   

2017

   

2016

 

Discount rate

    3.5

%

    3.5

%

Rate of compensation increase

    2.0

%

    2.0

%

 

We currently are assuming a gross medical trend rate of 7.1% for fiscal 2018. We expect this rate to decrease at varying amounts per year with an ultimate trend rate of 5.0% in fiscal 2026. A change in this rate of 1.0% would have no significant impact on our net periodic postretirement benefit expense or our accrued postretirement benefits liability.

 

The benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five years and in the aggregate for the five years thereafter are set forth below (in thousands):

 

   

 

Pension Plans

   

Postretirement

Medical

and Life Benefits

 

2018

  $ 3,716     $ 123  

2019

    2,274       109  

2020

    2,214       101  

2021

    5,212       103  

2022

    8,138       95  

2023-2027

    11,585       356  

 

Expected benefit payments are estimated based on the same assumptions used to measure our benefit obligation on our measurement date of June 6, 2017 and, where applicable, include benefits attributable to estimated further employee service.

 

Defined Contribution Plans

We sponsor two defined contribution plans for active employees, as summarized below.

 

Salary Deferral Plan
RTI offers certain employees a 401(k) plan called the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan (“401(k) Plan”). We make matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan based on each eligible employee's pre-tax contribution. We match in cash each fiscal quarter 25% of the participating employee's first 4% of contributions. Company matches vest immediately. Fiscal years 2017 and 2016 had 401(k) Plan expenses for the Company match of $0.3 million for both periods. During fiscal year 2015, we matched participating employee’s contributions based on a same-restaurant sales performance factor. Given that the Company did not achieve the fiscal year 2015 same-restaurant sales performance factor in order for there to be an employer match, we had no expense related to the 401(k) Plan for fiscal year 2015.

 

Deferred Compensation Plan
On January 5, 2005, our Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), effective as of January 1, 2005, and froze the existing deferred compensation plan, the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Predecessor Plan”), effective as of December 31, 2004, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, enacted as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

 

Like the Predecessor Plan, the Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan for eligible employees. The Company matching provisions of the Deferred Compensation Plan are similar to those of the 401(k) Plan. Fiscal years 2017 and 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan expenses were negligible for both periods. For similar reasons as discussed above for the 401(k) Plan, we had no expenses for Company match under the Deferred Compensation Plan for fiscal year 2015. Assets earmarked to pay benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan are held by a  rabbi trust.

 

 

Assets and liabilities of a rabbi trust must be accounted for as if they are Company assets or liabilities and are therefore reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Furthermore, all Deferred Compensation Plan earnings and expenses are recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Deferred Compensation Plan ’s assets and liabilities approximated $5.6 million and $6.7 million as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively. Of these amounts as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively, was included in Prepaid and other expenses and Accrued liabilities – Payroll and related costs for both periods, and $5.0 million and $6.0 million, respectively, was included in Other assets, net and Other deferred liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The investment in RTI common stock and the related liability payable in RTI common stock, which totaled $0.3 million and $0.5 million as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively, is reflected in Shareholders’ Equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

Executive Separations and Corporate Support Services Restructuring

Fiscal 2017

On September 13, 2016, James J. Buettgen resigned as Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.   In connection with Mr. Buettgen's resignation, $3.0 million in severance accruals and other benefits were paid during fiscal 2017.  We also recorded a charge of approximately $0.9 million in connection with the accelerated vesting of Mr. Buettgen's share-based compensation awards.  The Ruby Tuesday Concept President and a Divisional Vice President departed the Company April 24, 2017 and June 2, 2017, respectively.  During the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, we recorded severance expense of $0.8 million and made severance payments of $0.1 million in connection with these two departures coupled with recording a charge of $0.2 million related to their accelerated vesting of share-based compensation awards. 

 

Fiscal 2016

Our former President-Ruby Tuesday Concept and Chief Operations Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer resigned from the Company on July 25, 2015 and April 11, 2016, respectively. As further discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we recorded $1.6 million of forfeiture credits during fiscal year 2016 in connection with these resignations.

 

Fiscal 2015

On June 26, 2014, our then Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer stepped down as Chief Financial Officer and subsequently retired from the Company on August 4, 2014. Additionally, three Senior Vice Presidents, our Chief Development Officer, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, and Chief Marketing Officer left the Company on July 24, 2014, December 12, 2014, and April 27, 2015, respectively. During the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015, we recorded severance expense and made severance payments of $0.3 million in connection with the separation agreements for certain of these former executives.

 

As of both June 6, 2017  and May 31, 2016, liabilities of $0.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively, representing unpaid obligations in connection with the separations and restructurings, were included within Accrued liabilities: Payroll and related costs in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Costs of $4.2 million and $1.6 million are reflected in the table below related to employee severance and unused vacation accruals are included within General and administrative expenses, and Closures and impairments, net, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. A roll forward of our obligations in connection with employee separations is as follows (in thousands):

 

Balance at June 2, 2015

  $ 313  

Employee severance and unused vacation accruals

    1,006  

Cash payments

    (1,002

)

Balance at May 31, 2016

  $ 317  

Employee severance and unused vacation accruals

    5,807  

Cash payments

    (5,270

)

Balance at June 6, 2017

  $ 854  

 

 

9. Income Taxes

 

Income tax benefit for fiscal years  2017, 2016, and 2015 was allocated as follows (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Current:

                       

Federal

  $ (1,912

)

  $ (1,138

)

  $ 1,714  

State

    154       289       (48

)

Foreign

    42       118       118  
      (1,716

)

    (731

)

    1,784  

Deferred:

                       

Federal

          (1,449

)

    (3,254

)

State

                (441

)

            (1,449

)

    (3,695 )

Total benefit for income taxes

  $ (1,716

)

  $ (2,180

)

  $ (1,911

)

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

 

Deferred tax assets:

               

General business credits carryforward

  $ 88,087     $ 70,424  

Employee benefits

    21,227       22,420  

Deferred escalating minimum rents

    17,500       20,803  

Federal net operating loss

    19,664        

State net operating losses

    13,318       9,807  

Insurance reserves

    5,253       5,896  

Goodwill

    4,448       5,033  

Deferred gain on sale-leaseback transactions

    4,284       4,728  

Closed restaurant lease reserves

    6,265       2,520  

Other

    7,423       7,761  

Gross deferred tax assets

    187,469       149,392  

Deferred tax asset valuation allowances

    (135,894

)

    (89,933

)

Net deferred tax assets

    51,575       59,459  
                 

Deferred tax liabilities:

               

Depreciable property and equipment

    (43,665

)

    (48,367

)

Other

    (7,910

)

    (11,092

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

    (51,575

)

    (59,459

)

                 

Net deferred tax liability

  $     $  

 

 

The above deferred tax assets and liabilities include the income tax effect of temporary differences between financial reporting and tax reporting.   Temporary differences represent the cumulative taxable or deductible amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements in different years than recognized in the tax returns.  General business credits carryforward and federal and state net operating losses may be used to offset future taxable income, and their benefit is reflected in the deferred tax assets.  Other deferred tax assets, such as employee benefits, escalating minimum rents, and certain others listed, become deductible in the tax return upon payment or funding in qualified trusts.  The depreciable property and equipment temporary difference represents generally tax depreciation in excess of financial statement depreciation.

 

We regularly evaluate the need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets by assessing whether it is more likely than not that we will realize the deferred tax assets in the future.   A valuation allowance assessment is performed each reporting period, with any additions or adjustments reflected in earnings in the period of assessment.  In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets for each jurisdiction. As of June 6, 2017, we have rolling three-year historical operating losses and have concluded that the negative evidence outweighs the positive evidence.

 

In accordance with the applicable accounting standards, we are unable to use future income projections to support the realization of our deferred tax assets as a consequence of the above conclusion.    Instead, in determining the appropriate amount of the valuation allowance, we considered the timing of future reversal of our taxable temporary differences and available tax strategies that, if implemented, would result in the realization of deferred tax assets.

 

A rollforward of our valuation allowance is as follows (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 
                         

Beginning of fiscal year

  $ (89,933

)

  $ (62,799

)

  $ (54,582

)

Changes in estimated realization of deferred tax assets:

                       

Continuing operations

    (49,219

)

    (28,192

)

    (9,138

)

Other reductions

    3,258       1,058       921  

End of fiscal year

  $ (135,894

)

  $ (89,933

)

  $ (62,799

)

 

As of June 6, 2017, we had state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 343.3 million which expire at varying times between fiscal years 2018 and 2037.  Our federal net operating loss will expire, if unused, by fiscal year 2037.  The above accounting has no effect on our ability to use our federal or state operating loss carryforwards or general business carryforward credits, which begin to expire in fiscal year 2031, in the future to reduce cash tax payments.

 

A reconciliation from the statutory federal income tax benefit to the reported income tax (benefit)/expense is as follows (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 
                         

Statutory federal income taxes

  $ (37,750

)

  $ (18,502

)

  $ (1,787

)

State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

    (4,795

)

    (2,926

)

    (711

)

FICA tip credit

    (6,070

)

    (7,071

)

    (7,280

)

Work opportunity tax credit

    (1,833

)

    (1,389

)

    (1,899

)

Increase in valuation allowance

    49,219       28,192       9,138  

Permanent differences

    (1,123

)

    319       528  

Other, net

    636       (803

)

    100  

Total benefit for income taxes

  $ (1,716

)

  $ (2,180

)

  $ (1,911

)

 

 

We had a gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of accrued interest and penalties, of $3.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively, as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, of which $3.4 million and $3.7 million, respectively, was reclassified against our deferred tax assets.   As of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate was $2.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively.  If these benefits were recognized as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, this would result in adjustments to other tax accounts, primarily deferred taxes and valuation allowance from net operating loss tax benefits of $2.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively.  A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 follows (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

 

Beginning of fiscal year

  $ 4,548     $ 3,870  

Additions for tax positions related to the current year

    532       725  

Reductions for tax positions related to the current year

    (127

)

    (113

)

Additions for tax positions of prior years

    164       868  

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

    (228

)

    (150

)

Reductions for settlements with taxing authorities

    (779

)

     

Reductions due to statute settlements

    (220

)

    (652

)

End of fiscal year

  $ 3,890     $ 4,548  

 

The liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of June 6, 2017 includes an insignificant amount  related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could change within the next twelve months based on the outcome of examinations and negotiations with tax authorities.

 

As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, our policy is to accrue interest related to potential underpayment of income taxes within the provision for income taxes. Interest is computed on the difference between our uncertain tax benefit positions and the amount deducted or expected to be deducted in our tax returns. At both June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, we had $0.4 million of accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

 

During fiscal year 2017, accrued interest and penalties decreased by an insignificant amount. If we were to prevail on all uncertain tax positions, the reversal of this accrual would also be a benefit to our effective tax rate. At June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, total liabilities of $0.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively, including the above-mentioned amounts for the payment of accrued interest and penalties, are included in Accrued liabilities – Rent and other and Other deferred liabilities as reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

At June 6, 2017, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for fiscal years prior to 2012, and with few exceptions, we are no longer subject to state and local examinations by tax authorities prior to fiscal year 2014.

 

10. Share-Based Employee Compensation

 

Preferred Stock

RTI is authorized, under its Certificate of Incorporation, to issue up to 250,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01. These shares may be issued from time to time in one or more series. Each series will have dividend rates, rights of conversion and redemption, liquidation prices, and other terms or conditions as determined by the Board of Directors. No preferred shares have been issued as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016.

 

The Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan and the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan

A committee, appointed by the Board of Directors, administers the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (“SIP”) and the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (“1996 SIP”), and has full authority in its discretion to determine the key employees, officers, and non-employee directors to whom share-based incentives are granted and the terms and provisions of share-based incentives. Stock option grants under the SIP and 1996 SIP can have varying vesting provisions and exercise periods as determined by such committee. A majority of currently outstanding stock options granted under the SIP and 1996 SIP vest within three years following the date of grant and expire seven years after the date of grant. The SIP and 1996 SIP permit the committee to make awards of shares of common stock, awards of stock options or other derivative securities related to the value of the common stock, and certain cash awards to eligible persons. These discretionary awards may be made on an individual basis or for the benefit of a group of eligible persons. All stock options awarded under the SIP and 1996 SIP have been awarded with an exercise price equal to the fair market value at the time of grant.

 

At June 6, 2017, we had reserved a total of 6,420,000 shares of common stock for the SIP and 1996 SIP. Of the reserved shares at June 6, 2017, 1,694,000 were subject to stock options outstanding. Stock option exercises are settled with the issuance of new shares. Net shares of common stock available for issuance at June 6, 2017 were 4,726,000.

 

 

Stock Options

The following table summarizes our stock option activity under these stock option plans for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 (Stock Options and Aggregate Intrinsic Value are in thousands):

 

   

 

 

Stock Options

   

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

   

Weighted Average

Remaining Contractual

Term (years)

   

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic Value

 

Service-based vesting:

                               

Outstanding at beginning of year

    2,066     $ 7.89                  

Granted

    1,126       3.46                  

Cancellations and forfeitures

    (50

)

    4.49                  

Expired

    (1,448

)

    6.66                  

Outstanding at end of year

    1,694     $ 6.09       2.93     $  

Exercisable at end of year

    1,224     $ 7.00       1.72     $  

 

 

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the closing stock price as of June 6, 2017 less the strike price, multiplied by the number of stock options that have a strike price that is less than that closing stock price. There were no stock options exercised during fiscal years 2017 and 2016.   The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal year 2015 was $0.1 million.

 

At June 6, 2017, there was approximately $0.3 million of unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense related to non-vested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years. The total fair value at grant date of awards vested during fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015 totaled $1.8 million, $1.7 million, and $1.9 million, respectively.

 

During fiscal year 2017, we granted 879,000 service-based stock options to certain employees under the terms of the SIP.   The stock options awarded vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period following grant of the award, and have a maximum life of seven years.

 

Also during fiscal 2017, we granted 247,000 service-based stock options to our then Interim Chief Executive Officer under the terms of the SIP.   The stock options awarded cliff vested at the end of fiscal year 2017 and have a maximum life of seven years.

 

The weighted average Black-Scholes grant date fair value for stock options awarded during fiscal years 2017 and 2015 was $1.21 and $2.27 per share, respectively. No stock options were awarded during fiscal year 2016. The grant date fair values of unvested stock options are amortized over the respective vesting period of the awards unless a recipient becomes retirement eligible during the vesting period. For retirement eligible individuals, the grant date fair value of the award is amortized from the period of the date of grant through the date upon which the individual becomes retirement eligible. The weighted average assumptions used in our Black-Scholes option-pricing model are as follows:

 

   

2017

   

2015

 

Risk-free interest rate

    1.08

%

    1.48

%

Expected dividend yield

    0

%

    0

%

Expected stock price volatility

    41.19

%

    44.27

%

Expected life (in years)

    4.34       4.50  

 

 

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”)

The following table summarizes our restricted stock and RSU activity for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 (in thousands, except per-share data):

 

   

2017

 
   

 

 

Shares

   

Weighted

Average

Fair Value

 

Service-Based Vesting:

               

Unvested at beginning of year

    564     $ 6.29  

Granted

    680       3.10  

Vested

    (618

)

    5.70  

Cancellations and forfeitures

    (45

)

    5.61  

Unvested at end of year

    581     $ 3.24  
                 

Performance-Based Vesting:

               

Unvested at beginning of year

    225     $ 6.51  

Cancellations and forfeitures

    (108

)

    6.51  

Unvested at end of year

    117     $ 6.51  

 

The fair value of restricted stock and RSU awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date prior to the grant date. The total intrinsic value of restricted stock and RSU grants vesting during fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $1.8 million, $2.1 million, and $5.4 million, respectively. At June 6, 2017, unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock and RSU grants expected to vest totaled $1.0 million and will be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.3 years.

 

During fiscal year 2017, we granted 219,000 restricted shares to non-employee directors under the terms of the SIP. These shares cliff vest over a one year period following the grant date of the award.

 

During fiscal year 2017, we granted 319,000 RSUs and 142,000 restricted shares to certain employees under the terms of the SIP and 1996 SIP.   The awards will vest in three equal installments over a three-year period following the date of grant.

 

Phantom  Stock Units

We began granting phantom stock units during fiscal year 2017.   Each phantom stock unit entitles the recipient to receive a cash payment equal to the value of a single share of our common stock upon vesting.  The following table summarizes our phantom stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017 (in thousands): 

 

 

   

Phantom

Stock Units

 

Service-Based Vesting:

       

Unvested at beginning of year

     

Granted

    652  

Vested

    (76

)

Unvested at end of year

    576  
         

Performance-Based Vesting:

       

Unvested at beginning of year

     

Granted

    598  

Cancellations and forfeitures

    (300

)

Unvested at end of year

    298  

 

During fiscal year 2017, we granted 81,000 service-based phantom stock units to our then Interim Chief Executive Officer.   The phantom stock units cliff vested at the end of the fiscal year 2017.  Also during the fiscal year 2017, we granted 571,000 service-based phantom stock units to our senior executive team.  The phantom stock units will cliff vest two years following the grant date of the award.  During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017, 76,000 of these units vested in connection with the departure of our former Ruby Tuesday Concept President.  

 

During the fiscal year 2017, we granted 598,000 performance-based phantom stock units that will vest approximately three years after the grant date.   Vesting of the performance-based phantom stock units is contingent upon the Company's achievement of a same-restaurant sales performance condition related to the next three fiscal years.  Of these performance-based phantom stock units, 300,000 were forfeited during fiscal year 2017 primarily in connection with the departure of our former President and Chief Executive Officer and the Ruby Tuesday Concept President.

 

Included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are amounts within Accrued liabilities: Payroll and related costs of $0.4 million as of June 6, 2017 and amounts within Other deferred liabilities of $0.5 million and $0.2 million as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively, relating to all of our long-term incentive awards that will settle in cash.

 

Included within General  and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss is share-based compensation expense of $3.6 million, $2.1 million, and $7.1 million for the fiscal years ended June 6, 2017, May 31, 2016, and June 2, 2015, respectively.

 

 

As discussed further in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, various management personnel left the Company during fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015. Several of these individuals held share-based compensation awards at the times of their separations, and these awards were either vested or forfeited in accordance with the terms of the original awards.

 

11. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Litigation

We are presently, and from time to time, subject to pending claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. We provide reserves for such claims when payment is probable and estimable in accordance with GAAP. At this time, in the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of pending legal proceedings, including the matter referred to below, will not have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial position, or cash flows.

 

In May 2014, a securities class action case styled Dennis Krystek v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division.   The case alleged that the Company and some of its former executives made false and misleading statements about the Company's financial performance and the financial performance of the Lime Fresh concept.  On March 29, 2017, the Company agreed to settle the case for $5.0 million.  We maintain insurance to cover these types of claims with our primary insurance carrier, subject to a self-insured retention which has been met.  Our insurance policies cover amounts in excess of our self-insured retention.  The parties agreed to resolve the matter and the settlement was funded by the insurance carrier as of June 6, 2017. Final court approval of the settlement agreement was obtained on August 7, 2017.  In accordance with ASC Subtopic 405-20-40, Extinguishment of Liabilities , and ASC Subtopic 210-20, Balance Sheet Offsetting , we have recorded both an accrued liability (included within Accrued liabilities: Rent and other) and Restricted cash, in the amount of $5.0 million, in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 6, 2017.

 

Insurance Programs
We are currently self-insured for a portion of our expected workers’ compensation, employment practices liability, general liability, and automobile liability losses (collectively, “casualty losses”) as well as property losses and certain other insurable risks. To mitigate the cost of our exposures for certain property and casualty losses, we make annual decisions to either retain the risks of loss up to a certain maximum per occurrence, aggregate loss limits negotiated with our insurance carriers, or fully insure those risks. We are also self-insured for healthcare claims for eligible participating employees subject to certain deductibles and limitations. We have accounted for our retained liabilities for casualty losses and healthcare claims, including reported and incurred but not reported claims, based on information provided by third-party actuaries. At June 6, 2017, we were committed under letters of credit totaling $14.8 million issued primarily in connection with our workers’ compensation and casualty insurance programs.

 

Purchase Commitments

We have minimum purchase commitments with various vendors. Outstanding commitments as of June 6, 2017 were approximately $42.8 million. These obligations consist of supplies, advertising, utility contracts, and various types of meat, beverages, and other food products, which are an integral part of our business operations.

 

 

12. Fair Value Measurements

 

The following table presents the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the measurements fall (in thousands):

 

   

Level

   

June 6, 2017

   

May 31, 2016

 

Deferred compensation plan – Assets

    1     $ 5,631     $ 6,660  

Deferred compensation plan – Liabilities

    1       (5,631

)

    (6,660

)

 

There were no transfers among levels within the fair value hierarchy during fiscal years 2017 or 2016.

 

The Deferred Compensation Plan and the Predecessor Plan are unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plans for eligible employees. Assets earmarked to pay benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan and Predecessor Plan are held by a rabbi trust. We report the accounts of the rabbi trust in our Consolidated Financial Statements. The investments held by these plans are considered trading securities and are reported at fair value based on third-party broker statements. The realized and unrealized holding gains and losses related to these other investments, as well as the offsetting compensation expense, is recorded in Selling, general, and administrative expense, net in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

The investment in RTI common stock and related liability payable in RTI common stock, which are reflected in Shareholders ’ Equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are excluded from the fair value table above as these are considered treasury shares and reported at cost.

 

The following table presents the fair values on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016 for those assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis (in thousands):

 

   

Fair Value Measurements

 
   

Level

   

June 6, 2017

   

May 31, 2016

 

Long-lived assets held for sale

    2     $ 3,499     $ 2,123  

Long-lived assets held for use

    2       13,480       56,101  

Long-lived assets held for use

    3             553  

Total

          $ 16,979     $ 58,777  

 

The following table presents the losses recognized during the fiscal years ended June 6, 2017, May 31, 2016, and June 2, 2015 resulting from fair value measurements of assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis. The losses are included in Closures and impairments, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (in thousands):

 

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

 

Included within operations

                       

Long-lived assets held for sale

  $ 2,862     $ 447     $ 1,830  

Long-lived assets held for use

    43,112       57,706       7,992  

Lime Fresh trademark

          1,999        
    $ 45,974     $ 60,152     $ 9,822  

 

Long-lived assets held for sale are valued using Level 2 inputs, primarily from information obtained through broker listings or sales agreements. Costs to market and/or sell are factored into the estimates of fair value for those properties included in Assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

We review our long-lived assets (primarily property, equipment, and, as appropriate, reacquired franchise rights and favorable leases) related to each restaurant to be held and used in the business, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a restaurant may not be recoverable.

 

 

Long-lived assets held for use presented in the table above includes restaurants or groups of restaurants that we have impaired. From time to time, the table will also include closed restaurants or surplus sites not meeting held for sale criteria that have been offered for sale at a price less than their carrying value.

 

The fair values of our long-lived assets held for use are primarily based on broker estimates of the value of the land, building, leasehold improvements, and other residual assets (Level 2) or discounted cash flow estimates using unobservable inputs (Level 3).

 

Our financial instruments at June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016 consisted of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and payable, and long-term debt. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable and payable approximated their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amounts and fair values of our long-term debt, which are not measured on a recurring basis using fair value, are as follows (in thousands):

 

   

June 6, 2017

   

May 31, 2016

 
   

Carrying

Amount

   

Fair

Value

   

Carrying

Amount

   

Fair

Value

 

Long-term debt (Level 2)

  $ 213,491     $ 209,524     $ 223,526     $ 223,212  

 

We estimated the fair value of debt using market quotes and calculations based on market rates.

 

13. Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements

 

As discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Senior Notes are a liability of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (the “Parent”) and are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions (the “Guarantors”). Each of the Guarantors is wholly-owned by Ruby Tuesday, Inc. None of the few remaining subsidiaries of Ruby Tuesday, Inc., which were primarily created to hold liquor license assets, guarantee the Senior Notes (the “Non-Guarantors”). Our Non-Guarantor subsidiaries are immaterial and are aggregated within the Parent information disclosed below.

 

The following condensed consolidating financial information, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements for presentation of Rule 3-10(f) of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, presents the condensed consolidating financial information separately for the Parent, the Guarantors, and elimination entries necessary to consolidate the Parent and Guarantors. Investments in wholly-owned subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method for purposes of the consolidated presentation. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

As of June 6, 2017

(In thousands)

 

   

Parent

   

Guarantors

   

Eliminations

   

Consolidated

 

Assets

                               

Current assets:

                               

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 41,584     $ 130     $     $ 41,714  

Restricted cash

    6,445                   6,445  

Accounts and other receivables

    1,913       5,402             7,315  

Inventories

    12,447       4,731             17,178  

Income tax receivable

    175,535             (172,474

)

    3,061  

Other current assets

    15,969       7,355             23,324  

Total current assets

    253,893       17,618       (172,474

)

    99,037  
                                 

Property and equipment, net

    446,211       136,886             583,097  

Investment in subsidiaries

    51,214             (51,214

)

     

Due from/(to) subsidiaries

    94,281       213,066       (307,347

)

     

Other assets

    37,454       4,054             41,508  

Total assets

  $ 883,053     $ 371,624     $ (531,035

)

  $ 723,642  
                                 

Liabilities & Shareholders ’ Equity

                               

Current liabilities:

                               

Accounts payable

  $ 14,333     $ 3,237     $     $ 17,570  

Accrued and other current liabilities

    47,796       33,340             81,136  
                                 

Current maturities of long-term debt, including capital leases

    (1,157

)

    1,525             368  

Income tax payable

          172,474       (172,474

)

     

Total current liabilities

    60,972       210,576       (172,474

)

    99,074  
                                 

Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities

    210,243       3,098             213,341  

Due to/(from) subsidiaries

    213,066       94,281       (307,347

)

     

Other deferred liabilities

    91,406       12,455             103,861  

Total liabilities

    575,687       320,410       (479,821

)

    416,276  
                                 

Shareholders ’ equity:

                               

Common stock

    607                   607  

Capital in excess of par value

    79,531                   79,531  

Retained earnings

    235,210       51,214       (51,214

)

    235,210  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

    (7,982

)

                (7,982

)

Total shareholders ’ equity

    307,366       51,214       (51,214

)

    307,366  
                                 

Total liabilities & shareholders ’ equity

  $ 883,053     $ 371,624     $ (531,035

)

  $ 723,642  

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

As of May 31, 2016

(In thousands)

 

   

Parent

   

Guarantors

   

Eliminations

   

Consolidated

 

Assets

                               

Current assets:

                               

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 66,831     $ 133     $     $ 66,964  

Restricted cash

    377                   377  

Accounts and other receivables

    8,102       4,725             12,827  

Inventories

    15,401       6,194             21,595  

Income tax receivable

    167,065             (164,062

)

    3,003  

Other current assets

    11,282       4,868             16,150  

Total current assets

    269,058       15,920       (164,062

)

    120,916  
                                 

Property and equipment, net

    501,482       169,768             671,250  

Investment in subsidiaries

    98,929             (98,929

)

     

Due from/(to) subsidiaries

    76,208       213,816       (290,024

)

     

Other assets

    40,626       5,125             45,751  

Total assets

  $ 986,303     $ 404,629     $ (553,015

)

  $ 837,917  
                                 

Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity

                               

Current liabilities:

                               

Accounts payable

  $ 17,405     $ 4,736     $     $ 22,141  

Accrued and other current liabilities

    35,674       29,957             65,631  

Current maturities of long-term debt, including capital leases

    (1,067

)

    11,001             9,934  

Income tax payable

          164,062       (164,062

)

     

Total current liabilities

    52,012       209,756       (164,062

)

    97,706  
                                 

Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities

    209,058       4,745             213,803  

Due to/(from) subsidiaries

    213,816       76,208       (290,024

)

     

Other deferred liabilities

    103,637       14,991             118,628  

Total liabilities

    578,523       305,700       (454,086

)

    430,137  
                                 

Shareholders' equity:

                               

Common stock

    601                   601  

Capital in excess of par value

    75,938                   75,938  

Retained earnings

    341,350       98,929       (98,929

)

    341,350  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

    (10,109

)

                (10,109

)

Total shareholders' equity

    407,780       98,929       (98,929

)

    407,780  
                                 

Total liabilities & shareholders' equity

  $ 986,303     $ 404,629     $ (553,015

)

  $ 837,917  

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and

Comprehensive (Loss)/Income

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 6, 2017

(In thousands)

 

   

Parent

   

Guarantors

   

Eliminations

   

Consolidated

 

Revenue:

                               

Restaurant sales and operating revenue

  $ 694,398     $ 254,005     $     $ 948,403  

Franchise revenue

    10       3,558             3,568  

Total revenue

    694,408       257,563             951,971  
                                 

Operating costs and expenses:

                               

Cost of goods sold

    196,515       72,107             268,622  

Payroll and related costs

    242,041       96,877             338,918  

Other restaurant operating costs

    146,391       52,305             198,696  

Depreciation and amortization

    30,673       11,106             41,779  

General and administrative expenses

    37,929       29,080             67,009  

Marketing expenses, net

    40,264       13,876             54,140  

Intercompany general and administrative allocations

    38,558       (38,558

)

           

Closures and impairments, net

    47,191       22,617             69,808  

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

    (628

)

          628        

Interest expense, net

    19,973       882             20,855  

Intercompany interest expense/(income)

    12,050       (12,050

)

           

Total operating costs and expenses

    810,957       248,242       628       1,059,827  
                                 

(Loss)/income before income taxes

    (116,549

)

    9,321       (628

)

    (107,856

)

(Benefit)/provision for income taxes

    (10,409

)

    8,693             (1,716

)

                                 

Net (loss)/income

  $ (106,140

)

  $ 628     $ (628 )   $ (106,140

)

                                 

Other comprehensive income:

                               

Pension liability reclassification

    2,127                   2,127  

Total comprehensive (loss)/income

  $ (104,013

)

  $ 628     $ (628

)

  $ (104,013

)

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and

Comprehensive (Loss)/Income

For the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2016

(In thousands)

 

   

Parent

   

Guarantors

   

Eliminations

   

Consolidated

 

Revenue:

                               

Restaurant sales and operating revenue

  $ 785,147     $ 299,887     $     $ 1,085,034  

Franchise revenue

    245       5,949             6,194  

Total revenue

    785,392       305,836             1,091,228  
                                 

Operating costs and expenses:

                               

Cost of goods sold

    216,121       82,408             298,529  

Payroll and related costs

    263,499       111,062             374,561  

Other restaurant operating costs

    167,051       62,467             229,518  

Depreciation and amortization

    36,387       14,971             51,358  

General and administrative expenses

    32,264       25,927             58,191  

Marketing expenses, net

    37,748       13,688             51,436  

Intercompany general and administrative allocations

    42,870       (42,870

)

           

Closures and impairments, net

    40,683       23,997             64,680  

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

    (15,212

)

          15,212        

Gain on sales of Lime Fresh Mexican Grill assets

    (5,937

)

                (5,937

)

Interest expense, net

    18,329       3,425             21,754  

Intercompany interest expense/(income)

    12,143       (12,143

)

           

Total operating costs and expenses

    845,946       282,932       15,212       1,144,090  
                                 

(Loss)/income before income taxes

    (60,554

)

    22,904       (15,212

)

    (52,862

)

(Benefit)/provision for income taxes

    (9,872

)

    7,692             (2,180

)

                                 

Net (loss)/income

  $ (50,682

)

  $ 15,212     $ (15,212

)

  $ (50,682

)

                                 

Other comprehensive income:

                               

Pension liability reclassification

    831                   831  

Total comprehensive (loss)/income

  $ (49,851

)

  $ 15,212     $ (15,212

)

  $ (49,851

)

   

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and

Comprehensive (Loss)/Income

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2015

(In thousands)

 

   

Parent

   

Guarantors

   

Eliminations

   

Consolidated

 

Revenue:

                               

Restaurant sales and operating revenue

  $ 809,171     $ 310,971     $     $ 1,120,142  

Franchise revenue

    238       6,186             6,424  

Total revenue

    809,409       317,157             1,126,566  
                                 

Operating costs and expenses:

                               

Cost of goods sold

    220,537       84,769             305,306  

Payroll and related costs

    270,535       112,726             383,261  

Other restaurant operating costs

    175,819       66,290             242,109  

Depreciation and amortization

    37,466       14,925             52,391  

General and administrative expenses

    39,261       26,646             65,907  

Marketing expenses, net

    36,157       13,263             49,420  

Intercompany general and administrative allocations

    44,768       (44,768

)

           

Closures and impairments, net

    7,914       2,628             10,542  

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

    (28,148

)

          28,148        

Interest expense, net

    18,489       4,246             22,735  

Intercompany interest expense/(income)

    12,009       (12,009

)

           

Total operating costs and expenses

    834,807       268,716       28,148       1,131,671  
                                 

(Loss)/income before income taxes

    (25,398

)

    48,441       (28,148

)

    (5,105

)

(Benefit)/provision for income taxes

    (22,204

)

    20,293             (1,911

)

Net (loss)/income

  $ (3,194

)

  $ 28,148     $ (28,148

)

  $ (3,194

)

                                 

Other comprehensive loss:

                               

Pension liability reclassification, net of tax

    (40

)

                (40

)

Total comprehensive (loss)/income

  $ (3,234

)

  $ 28,148     $ (28,148

)

  $ (3,234

)

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 6, 2017

(In thousands)

 

   

Parent

   

Guarantors

   

Eliminations

   

Consolidated

 
                                 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

  $ (18,767

)

  $ 48,926     $ (49,093

)

  $ (18,934

)

                                 

Investing activities:

                               

Purchases of property and equipment

    (26,065

)

    (7,444

)

          (33,509

)

Proceeds from disposal of assets

    17,051       17,749             34,800  

Insurance proceeds from property claims

    462       202             664  

Reductions in deferred compensation plan assets

    1,890                   1,890  

Other, net

    2,842                   2,842  

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

    (3,820

)

    10,507             6,687  
                                 

Financing activities:

                               

Principal payments on long-term debt

    7       (11,093

)

          (11,086

)

Stock repurchases

    (26

)

                (26

)

Payments for debt issuance costs

    (1,891

)

                (1,891

)

Dividends paid

          (48,343

)

    48,343        

Net transactions with related entities

    (750

)

          750        

Net cash used in financing activities

    (2,660

)

    (59,436

)

    49,093       (13,003

)

                                 

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

    (25,247

)

    (3

)

          (25,250

)

Cash and cash equivalents:

                               

Beginning of fiscal year

    66,831       133             66,964  

End of fiscal year

  $ 41,584     $ 130     $     $ 41,714  

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2016

(In thousands)

 

   

Parent

   

Guarantors

   

Eliminations

   

Consolidated

 
                                 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

  $ 15,384     $ 71,061     $ (46,665

)

  $ 39,780  
                                 

Investing activities:

                               

Purchases of property and equipment

    (24,174

)

    (10,253

)

          (34,427

)

Proceeds from disposal of assets

    11,701                   11,701  

Insurance proceeds from property claims

    350                   350  

Reductions in deferred compensation plan assets

    1,049                   1,049  

Other, net

    1,572                   1,572  

Net cash used in investing activities

    (9,502

)

    (10,253

)

          (19,755

)

                                 

Financing activities:

                               

Principal payments on long-term debt

    (2,379

)

    (15,864

)

          (18,243

)

Stock repurchases

    (10,077

)

                (10,077

)

Payments for debt issuance costs

    (32

)

                (32

)

Dividends paid

          (45,108

)

    45,108        

Net transactions with related entities

    (1,557

)

          1,557        

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

    (14,045

)

    (60,972

)

    46,665       (28,352

)

                                 

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

    (8,163

)

    (164

)

          (8,327

)

Cash and cash equivalents:

                               

Beginning of fiscal year

    74,994       297             75,291  

End of fiscal year

  $ 66,831     $ 133     $     $ 66,964  

   

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2015

(In thousands)

 

   

Parent

   

Guarantors

   

Eliminations

   

Consolidated

 
                                 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  $ 63,219     $ 77,717     $ (85,882

)

  $ 55,054  
                                 

Investing activities:

                               

Purchases of property and equipment

    (23,326

)

    (7,684

)

          (31,010

)

Proceeds from disposal of assets

    10,213       1,047             11,260  

Insurance proceeds from property claims

    10       135             145  

Reductions in deferred compensation plan assets

    1,318                   1,318  

Other, net

    790                   790  

Net cash used in investing activities

    (10,995

)

    (6,502

)

          (17,497

)

                                 

Financing activities:

                               

Principal payments on long-term debt

    4       (13,642

)

          (13,638

)

Stock repurchases

    (73

)

                (73

)

Payments for debt issuance costs

    (293

)

                (293

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

    556                   556  

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

    39                   39  

Dividends paid

          (57,590

)

    57,590        

Net transactions with related entities

    (28,292

)

          28,292        

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

    (28,059

)

    (71,232

)

    85,882       (13,409

)

                                 

Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    24,165       (17

)

          24,148  

Cash and cash equivalents:

                               

Beginning of fiscal year

    50,829       314             51,143  

End of fiscal year

  $ 74,994     $ 297     $     $ 75,291  

 

 

14. Supplemental Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

Quarterly financial results for the fiscal years ended June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, are summarized below.


(In thousands, except per-share data)

 

   

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 6, 2017

 
   

First

Quarter

   

Second

Quarter

   

Third

Quarter

   

Fourth

Quarter

   

 

Total

 
                                         

Revenues

  $ 256,657     $ 214,719     $ 225,732     $ 254,863     $ 951,971  

Gross profit*

  $ 36,497     $ 25,539     $ 36,226     $ 47,473     $ 145,735  
                                         

Loss before income taxes

  $ (41,386

)

  $ (37,920

)

  $ (19,889

)

  $ (8,661

)

  $ (107,856

)

( Benefit) provision for income taxes

    (1,694

)

    36       (84

)

    26       (1,716

)

Net loss

  $ (39,692

)

  $ (37,956

)

  $ (19,805

)

  $ (8,687

)

  $ (106,140

)

                                         

Basic loss per share:

                                       

Net loss per share **

  $ (0.66

)

  $ (0.63

)

  $ (0.33

)

  $ (0.14

)

  $ (1.76

)

                                         

Diluted loss per share:

                                       

Net loss per share **

  $ (0.66

)

  $ (0.63

)

  $ (0.33

)

  $ (0.14

)

  $ (1.76

)

 

   

For the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2016

 
   

First

Quarter

   

Second

Quarter

   

Third

Quarter

   

Fourth

Quarter

   

 

Total

 
                                         

Revenues

  $ 279,480     $ 260,956     $ 271,470     $ 279,322     $ 1,091,228  

Gross profit*

  $ 45,697     $ 41,982     $ 47,659     $ 53,282     $ 188,620  
                                         

Loss before income taxes

  $ (5,217

)

  $ (15,979

)

  $ (3,569

)

  $ (28,097

)

  $ (52,862

)

Benefit for income taxes

    (1,023

)

    (180

)

    (483

)

    (494

)

    (2,180

)

Net loss

  $ (4,194

)

  $ (15,799

)

  $ (3,086

)

  $ (27,603

)

  $ (50,682

)

                                         

Basic loss per share:

                                       

Net loss per share **

  $ (0.07

)

  $ (0.26

)

  $ (0.05

)

  $ (0.46

)

  $ (0.83

)

                                         

Diluted loss per share:

                                       

Net loss per share **

  $ (0.07

)

  $ (0.26

)

  $ (0.05

)

  $ (0.46

)

  $ (0.83

)

 

* We define gross profit as revenue less cost of goods sold, payroll and related costs, and other restaurant operating costs.   As previously discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we reclassified amortization of intangible assets from other restaurant operating costs to depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the prior fiscal year to be comparable with the classification for the fiscal year ended June 6, 2017.

 

** The sum of the quarterly loss per share does not equal the reported annual amount as each is computed independently based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Ruby Tuesday, Inc.:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and  subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 6, 2017. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the accompanying financial statement schedule. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, and the resu lts of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 6, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Bo ard (United States), Ruby Tuesday, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 6, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated August 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Knoxville, Tennessee
August 21, 2017

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Ruby Tuesday, Inc.:

 

We have audited Ruby Tuesday, Inc. ’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of June 6, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company ’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subje ct to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal cont rol over financial reporting as of June 6, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 6, 2017 and May 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders ’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 6, 2017, and our report dated August 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Knoxville, Tennessee
August 21, 2017

 

 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on

Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

   

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

The Company ’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are operating effectively.

 

Management ’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Under Section 404 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management is required to assess the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether the Company's internal control over financial reporting is effective.

 

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, internal control over financial reporting determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect all misstatements.

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 6, 2017 using the criteria based on the “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon our assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 6, 2017.

 

KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form  10-K, has also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 6, 2017 as stated in their report filed within Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

Changes in Internal Controls

 

During the fiscal quarter ended June 6, 2017, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B. Other Information

 

None.

 

 

PART III

 

We expect to file a definitive proxy statement (the “2017 Proxy Statement”) relating to our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of our most recent fiscal year. Accordingly, certain information required by Part III has been omitted under General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. Only those sections of the 2017 Proxy Statement that specifically address disclosure requirements of Items 10-14 below are incorporated by reference.

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The information required by this Item 10 regarding the directors of the Company is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the table entitled “Director and Director Nominee Information” in the 201 7 Proxy Statement.

 

Information regarding executive officers of the Company has been included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Executive Officers.”

 

Information regarding corporate governance of the Company and other information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions, “Corporate Governance,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Committees of the Board of Directors” in the 2017 Proxy Statement.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “2017 Summary Compensation Table,” “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2017,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2017,” “Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2017,” “2017 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” “Pension Benefits for Fiscal Year 2017,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” “Directors ’ Fees and Attendance,” “2017 Director Compensation,” and “Committees of the Board of Directors” in the 2017 Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting.

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the tables captioned “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” in the 2017 Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting.

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Related Person Transactions” and “Directors ’ Independence” in the 2017 Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting.

 

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Accountants ’ Fees and Expenses” in the 2017 Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting.

 

 

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)   The following documents are filed as part of this report:

 

     1.        Financial Statements :

 

     The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries are listed in the accompanying “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page 42.

 

     2.        Financial Statement Schedule :

 

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended June 6, 2017, May 31, 2016, and June 2, 2015 (in thousands):

 

           

Charged/

   

Charged/

                 
   

Balance at

   

(Credited)

   

(Credited)

                 
   

Beginning

   

to Costs

   

to other

           

Balance at

 

Description

 

of Period

   

and Expenses

   

Accounts

   

Write-offs

   

End of Period

 

Allowance for Doubtful Notes

                                       
                                         

Fiscal Year Ended June 6, 2017

  $ 106     $     $     $ (106

)

  $  
                                         

Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2016

          106                   106  
                                         

Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2015

          (2

)

          2        

 

All other financial statement schedules have been omitted, as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or related notes.

 

 

     3.        Exhibits:

     

The exhibits filed with or incorporated by reference in this report are listed on the Exhibit Index beginning on page 9 3.

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

RUBY TUESDAY, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ James F. Hyatt, II

 

 

 

 

James F. Hyatt, II

 

 

 

 

President and Chief

 

 

 

 

Executive Officer

 

        

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

  Name

Position

Date

/s/ James F. Hyatt, II

James F. Hyatt, II

President and  Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ Sue Briley

Sue Briley

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ Wayne Kalish

Wayne Kalish

Vice President,

Corporate Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ Mark W. Addicks

Mark W. Addicks

Director

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ F. Lane Cardwell, Jr.

F. Lane Cardwell, Jr.

Director

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ Kevin T. Clayton

Kevin T. Clayton

Director

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ Donald E. Hess

Donald E. Hess

Director

Date: August 21,  2017

 

 

 

/s/ Bernard Lanigan Jr.

Bernard Lanigan Jr.

Director

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey J. O ’Neill

Jeffrey J. O ’Neill

Director

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ Stephen I. Sadove

Stephen I. Sadove

Director

Date: August 21, 2017

 

 

RUBY TUESDAY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
Number 


                                                  Description of Exhibit

 

 

*

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

+

Filed herewith.

 

 

3.1

Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-B filed on March 15, 1996 (File No. 1-12454)).  

 

   

3.2

Bylaws, as amended and restated, of Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2017  (File No. 1-12454)). 

 

   

4.1

Specimen Common Stock Certificate. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-B filed on March 15, 1996 (File No. 1-12454)).  

 

   

10.1

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Executive Supplemental Pension Plan, amended and restated as of January 1, 2007. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 5, 2007 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.2

First Amendment, dated as of April 2, 2008, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2007) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 4, 2008 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

   

10.3

Second Amendment, dated as of December 31, 2008, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2007) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 2, 2008 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.4

Third Amendment, dated as of January 6, 2010, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2007) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 1, 2009 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.5

Fourth Amendment, dated as of November 30, 2012, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2007) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 4, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.6

Fifth Amendment, dated as of December 14, 2015, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2007) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 1, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.7

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (Amended and Restated as of April 9, 2014) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 4, 2014 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.8

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated April 8, 2015) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 3, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

10.9

Amendment, dated as of August 27, 2015, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated April 8, 2015) (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on August 31, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.10

Amendment, dated as of October 5, 2016, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated April 8, 2015) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.11

Form of Service-Based Restricted Stock Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 4, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.12

Form of Restricted Stock Award for Directors (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 4, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.13

Form of Service-Based Restricted Stock Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 25, 2013 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.14

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99-1  to Form 8-K/A filed on October 11, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.15

Form of Service-Based Phantom Stock Option Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99-2 to Form 8-K/A filed on October 11, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.16

Form of High-Performance Non-Qualified Stock Option Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on August 28, 2013 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.17

Form of Performance-Based Cash Incentive Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed on August 28, 2013 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.18

Form of Service-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.19

Form of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.20

Form of Performance Stock Unit Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.21

Form of Service-Based Phantom Stock Unit Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.22

Form of Performance Cash Incentive Award (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

   

 

10.23

Morrison Restaurants Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as restated effective January 1, 1994, together with amended and restated Trust Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1992, to Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(i) to the Morrison Restaurants Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 5, 1993 (File No. 0-1750)).*

 

   

10.24

Morrison Restaurants Inc. Management Retirement Plan together with First Amendment, dated as of June 30, 1994 and Second Amendment, dated as of July 31, 1995 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(n) to the Morrison Restaurants Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 1995 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.25

Form of Third Amendment to Management Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.32 to Form 8-B filed on March 15, 1996 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.26

Form of Fourth Amendment to Management Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.14 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2003 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.27

Form of Fifth Amendment to Management Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.15 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2003 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.28

Sixth Amendment, dated as of April 9, 2001, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Management Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.41 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 5, 2001 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.29

Seventh Amendment (dated as of October 5, 2004) to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Management Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.5 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.30

Morrison Retirement Plan, amended and restated as of October 7, 2009 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 1, 2009 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.31

Indenture, dated January 7, 2015, to the Morrison Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 2, 2014 (File No. 12454)).*

 

 

10.32

Executive Group Life and Executive Accidental Death and Dismemberment Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(q) to the Morrison Restaurants Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 1989 (File No. 0-1750)).*

 

 

10.33

Morrison Restaurants Inc. Executive Life Insurance Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(a)(a) to the Morrison Restaurants Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 4, 1994 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.34

Form of First Amendment to the Morrison Restaurants Inc. Executive Life Insurance Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.25 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2003 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.35

Second Amendment (dated as of January 1, 2004) to the Ruby Tuesday Inc. Executive Life Insurance Plan (formerly the Morrison Restaurants Inc. Executive Life Insurance Plan) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.36

Ruby Tuesday Inc. Executive Life Insurance Premium Plan dated as of January 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.37

First Amendment, dated November 30, 2012, to the Ruby Tuesday Inc. Executive Life Insurance Premium Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 4, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.38

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, restated as of September 30, 1999 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 3, 2000 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.39

First Amendment, dated as of July 10, 2000, to the restated Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 3, 2000 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.40

Second Amendment, dated as of October 5, 2016, to the restated Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2016  (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.41

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan, amended and restated as of October 7, 2009 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 1, 2009 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.42

First Amendment, dated as of April 6, 2011, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 1, 2011 (File No. 1-12454)).*

   

10.43

Indenture, dated January 7, 2015, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 2, 2014 (File No. 12454)).*

 

 

10.44

First Amendment, dated as of July 29, 2015, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.45

Second Amendment, dated as of March 16, 2016, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 1, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.46

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan Trust Agreement restated as of June 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.44 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 5, 2001 (File No. 1-12454)).*

   

10.47

First Amendment, dated as of June 10, 2002, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.58 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 4, 2002 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.48

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of November 26, 2002 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 3, 2002 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.49

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2005 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.50

First Amendment, dated as of December 14, 2006, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 5, 2006 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.51

Second Amendment, dated as of July 11, 2007, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.40 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 5, 2007 (File No. 1-12454)).*

   

 

10.52

Third Amendment, dated as of December 30, 2008, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 2, 2008 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.53

Fourth Amendment, dated as of December 31, 2008, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 2, 2008 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.54

Fifth Amendment, dated as April 6, 2011, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 1, 2011 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.55

Sixth Amendment, dated as October 31, 2012, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 4, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.56

Seventh Amendment, dated as July 29, 2015, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.57

Distribution Agreement, dated as of March 2, 1996, by and among Morrison Restaurants Inc., Morrison Fresh Cooking, Inc. and Morrison Health Care, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.23 to Form 8-B filed on March 15, 1996 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.58

Amended and Restated Tax Allocation and Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 2, 1996, by and among Morrison Restaurants Inc., Custom Management Corporation of Pennsylvania, Custom Management Corporation, John C. Metz & Associates, Inc., Morrison International, Inc., Morrison Custom Management Corporation of Pennsylvania, Morrison Fresh Cooking, Inc., Ruby Tuesday, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Ruby Tuesday (Georgia), Inc., a Georgia corporation, Tias, Inc. and Morrison Health Care, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.24 to Form 8-B filed on March 15, 1996 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.59

Agreement Respecting Employee Benefit Matters, dated as of March 2, 1996, by and among Morrison Restaurants Inc., Morrison Fresh Cooking, Inc. and Morrison Health Care, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.25 to Form 8-B filed on March 15, 1996 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

1 0.60

Trust Agreement , dated as of July 23, 2004, between Ruby Tuesday Inc. and U.S. Trust Company, N.A. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.3 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.61

Master Distribution Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2006 and effective as of November 15, 2006, by and between Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and PFG Customized Distribution (portions of which have been redacted pursuant to a confidential treatment request filed with the SEC) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 5, 2006 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.62

Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 26, 2017, among Ruby Tuesday, Inc. as Borrower, of the Borrower as the Guarantors, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Administrative Agent and Issuing Bank, and UBS Securities, as Sole Arranger and Book Manager (File No. 1-12454)).+

   
10.63 Security Agreement dated as of May  26, 2017, among Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and the other grantors party thereto, and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Administrative Agent for the secured creditors (File No 1-112454).+

 

10.64

Pledge Agreement dated as of May 26, 2017, among Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and the other pledgors party thereto, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, and UBS AG, Stamford Branch., as Administrative Agent for the secured creditors (File No. 1-12454).+

 

 

10.65

Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2013, among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Issuing Bank, (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 9, 2013 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.66

Waiver and Consent in Connection with Revolving Credit Facility (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 3, 2013 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.67

First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of January 10, 2014, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 3, 2013 (File No. 1-12454)).

10. 68

Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of February 7, 2014, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 4, 2014 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10. 69

Third Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of August 5, 2014, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2014 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.70

Fourth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of June 29, 2015, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.71

Fifth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of October 23, 2015, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 1, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).

   

10.72

Sixth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of August 10, 2016, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).

   

10.73

Seventh Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of January 31, 2017, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2017 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.74

Waiver to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2016 by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on January 3, 2017 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.75

First Amendment to Waiver to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2016 by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., as the Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on January 3, 2017 (File No. 1-12454))

   

10.76

Loan Modification Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2013, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and the Borrowers and Lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 3, 2013 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.77

Loan Modification Agreement, dated as of August 3, 2015, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and the Borrowers and Lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.78

Loan Modification Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2017, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and the Borrowers and Lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter   ended February 28, 2017 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.79

Loan Modification Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2017, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and the Borrowers and Lenders party thereto (File No. 1-12454).+

 

 

10.80

Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10. 81

Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2012, by and among Ruby Tuesday, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto, and Wells Fargo, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 17, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.82

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 17, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.83

Pledge Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed on May 17, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).

 

 

10.84

Indenture, dated January 9, 2013, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Cafeteria Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 4, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.85

Form of Indemnification Agreement, dated April 7, 2010 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 2, 2010 (File No. 1-12454)).

   

10.86

Offer letter, dated as of April 4, 2017, by and between Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and James F. Hyatt, II, II (File No. 1-12454). *+

 

 

10.87

Employment Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2012, by and between Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and James J. Buettgen (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 4, 2012 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

10.88

 

Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 20, 2013, to Employment Agreement by and between Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and James J. Buettgen (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2013 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.89

Agreement and General Release, dated as of September 13, 2016, by and between Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and James J. Buettgen (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K/A filed on November 10, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.90

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Executive Compensation Clawback Policy, dated as of July 22, 2015 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10. 91

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2015 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 3, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10. 92

First Amendment, dated as of October 7, 2015, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. 2015 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 1, 2015 (File No. 1-12454)).*

   

10.93

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, effective as of May 1, 2016 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.94

First Amendment, dated as of April 4, 2017, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2017 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.95

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan, effective as of May 1, 2016 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2016 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

10.96

First Amendment, dated as of April 4, 2017, to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2017 (File No. 1-12454)).*

 

 

12.1

Statement regarding computation of Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.+

 

 

21.1

Subsidiaries of Ruby Tuesday, Inc.+

 

 

23.1

Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.+

 

 

31.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.+

 

 

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.+

 

 

32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.+

 

 

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.+

 

 

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.+

 

 

101.SCH

XBRL Schema Document.+

 

 

101.CAL

XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.+

 

 

101.DEF

XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.+

 

 

101.LAB

XBRL Labels Linkbase Document.+

 

 

101.PRE

XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.+  

 

 

99

Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (NYSE:RT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Charts.
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (NYSE:RT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Ruby Tuesday, Inc. Charts.