Kite Realty Group Trust
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rent
|
$
|
68,395
|
|
|
$
|
68,455
|
|
|
$
|
137,341
|
|
|
$
|
135,918
|
|
Tenant reimbursements
|
18,521
|
|
|
17,006
|
|
|
37,091
|
|
|
35,161
|
|
Other property related revenue
|
5,733
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
8,330
|
|
|
5,046
|
|
Total revenue
|
92,649
|
|
|
87,575
|
|
|
182,762
|
|
|
176,125
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating
|
12,139
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
25,091
|
|
|
23,538
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
11,228
|
|
|
10,503
|
|
|
21,559
|
|
|
21,637
|
|
General, administrative, and other
|
5,488
|
|
|
4,856
|
|
|
10,958
|
|
|
10,147
|
|
Transaction costs
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
Impairment charge
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,411
|
|
|
—
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
42,710
|
|
|
43,841
|
|
|
88,540
|
|
|
86,082
|
|
Total expenses
|
71,565
|
|
|
73,317
|
|
|
153,559
|
|
|
144,175
|
|
Operating income
|
21,084
|
|
|
14,258
|
|
|
29,203
|
|
|
31,950
|
|
Interest expense
|
(16,433
|
)
|
|
(15,500
|
)
|
|
(32,878
|
)
|
|
(30,825
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit of taxable REIT subsidiary
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
30
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
(80
|
)
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
4,568
|
|
|
(1,690
|
)
|
|
(3,864
|
)
|
|
283
|
|
Gains on sales of operating properties
|
6,290
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
15,160
|
|
|
194
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss)
|
10,858
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
11,296
|
|
|
477
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(678
|
)
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
(971
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Kite Realty Group Trust common shareholders
|
$
|
10,180
|
|
|
$
|
(1,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,186
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share - basic & diluted
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
|
83,585,736
|
|
|
83,375,765
|
|
|
83,575,587
|
|
|
83,362,136
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
|
83,652,627
|
|
|
83,375,765
|
|
|
83,640,327
|
|
|
83,362,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common dividends declared per common share
|
$
|
0.3025
|
|
|
$
|
0.2875
|
|
|
$
|
0.6050
|
|
|
$
|
0.5750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss)
|
$
|
10,858
|
|
|
$
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,296
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
(420
|
)
|
|
(2,619
|
)
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
(9,932
|
)
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
10,438
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
12,372
|
|
|
(9,455
|
)
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(668
|
)
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
(744
|
)
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Kite Realty Group Trust
|
$
|
9,770
|
|
|
$
|
(4,455
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,238
|
|
|
$
|
(10,199
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Kite Realty Group Trust
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Total
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2016
|
83,545,398
|
|
|
$
|
835
|
|
|
$
|
2,062,360
|
|
|
$
|
(316
|
)
|
|
$
|
(419,305
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,643,574
|
|
Stock compensation activity
|
50,092
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
Other comprehensive income attributable
to Kite Realty Group Trust
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
Distributions declared to common
shareholders
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(50,570
|
)
|
|
(50,570
|
)
|
Net income attributable to Kite
Realty Group Trust
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,186
|
|
|
10,186
|
|
Acquisition of partner's noncontrolling interest
in Fishers Station operating property
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,750
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,750
|
)
|
Adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling
interests
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
Balances, June 30, 2017
|
83,595,490
|
|
|
$
|
836
|
|
|
$
|
2,067,795
|
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
|
$
|
(459,689
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,609,678
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Kite Realty Group Trust
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income
|
$
|
11,296
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straight-line rent
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
(2,842
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
89,749
|
|
|
87,713
|
|
Gains on sales of operating properties
|
(15,160
|
)
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Impairment charge
|
7,411
|
|
|
—
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
1,790
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
Compensation expense for equity awards
|
3,122
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
Amortization of debt fair value adjustment
|
(1,486
|
)
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
Amortization of in-place lease liabilities, net
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
(3,252
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant receivables and other
|
(1,606
|
)
|
|
3,456
|
|
Deferred costs and other assets
|
(7,109
|
)
|
|
(5,917
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue and other liabilities
|
(2,688
|
)
|
|
(232
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
81,099
|
|
|
80,945
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, net
|
(34,947
|
)
|
|
(44,223
|
)
|
Net proceeds from sales of operating properties
|
76,076
|
|
|
139
|
|
Collection of note receivable
|
—
|
|
|
500
|
|
Change in construction payables
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
(1,260
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
39,531
|
|
|
(44,844
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common shares upon the vesting of restricted shares
|
(780
|
)
|
|
(755
|
)
|
Acquisition of partner's interest in Fishers Station operating property
|
(3,750
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Loan proceeds
|
54,200
|
|
|
178,970
|
|
Loan transaction costs
|
—
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
Loan payments
|
(109,933
|
)
|
|
(160,597
|
)
|
Distributions paid – common shareholders
|
(50,553
|
)
|
|
(46,676
|
)
|
Distributions paid – redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
(2,053
|
)
|
|
(1,941
|
)
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(112,869
|
)
|
|
(32,079
|
)
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
7,761
|
|
|
4,022
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
19,874
|
|
|
33,880
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
27,635
|
|
|
$
|
37,902
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Kite Realty Group, L.P. and subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
Investment properties, at cost
|
$
|
3,939,999
|
|
|
$
|
3,996,065
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(608,233
|
)
|
|
(560,683
|
)
|
|
3,331,766
|
|
|
3,435,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
27,635
|
|
|
19,874
|
|
Tenant and other receivables, including accrued straight-line rent of $29,818 and $28,703 respectively, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts
|
52,270
|
|
|
53,087
|
|
Restricted cash and escrow deposits
|
8,717
|
|
|
9,037
|
|
Deferred costs and intangibles, net
|
119,699
|
|
|
129,264
|
|
Prepaid and other assets
|
10,188
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
3,550,275
|
|
|
$
|
3,656,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other indebtedness, net
|
$
|
1,675,064
|
|
|
$
|
1,731,074
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
88,482
|
|
|
80,664
|
|
Deferred revenue and intangibles, net and other liabilities
|
103,302
|
|
|
112,202
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
1,866,848
|
|
|
1,923,940
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Redeemable Limited Partners’ and other redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
73,051
|
|
|
88,165
|
|
Partners Equity:
|
|
|
|
Parent Company:
|
|
|
|
Common equity, 83,595,490 and 83,545,398 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, respectively
|
1,608,942
|
|
|
1,643,890
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
736
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
Total Partners Equity
|
1,609,678
|
|
|
1,643,574
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests
|
698
|
|
|
692
|
|
Total Equity
|
1,610,376
|
|
|
1,644,266
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity
|
$
|
3,550,275
|
|
|
$
|
3,656,371
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Kite Realty Group, L.P. and subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rent
|
$
|
68,395
|
|
|
$
|
68,455
|
|
|
$
|
137,341
|
|
|
$
|
135,918
|
|
Tenant reimbursements
|
18,521
|
|
|
17,006
|
|
|
37,091
|
|
|
35,161
|
|
Other property related revenue
|
5,733
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
8,330
|
|
|
5,046
|
|
Total revenue
|
92,649
|
|
|
87,575
|
|
|
182,762
|
|
|
176,125
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating
|
12,139
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
25,091
|
|
|
23,538
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
11,228
|
|
|
10,503
|
|
|
21,559
|
|
|
21,637
|
|
General, administrative, and other
|
5,488
|
|
|
4,856
|
|
|
10,958
|
|
|
10,147
|
|
Transaction costs
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
Impairment charge
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,411
|
|
|
—
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
42,710
|
|
|
43,841
|
|
|
88,540
|
|
|
86,082
|
|
Total expenses
|
71,565
|
|
|
73,317
|
|
|
153,559
|
|
|
144,175
|
|
Operating income
|
21,084
|
|
|
14,258
|
|
|
29,203
|
|
|
31,950
|
|
Interest expense
|
(16,433
|
)
|
|
(15,500
|
)
|
|
(32,878
|
)
|
|
(30,825
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit of taxable REIT subsidiary
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
30
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
(80
|
)
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
4,568
|
|
|
(1,690
|
)
|
|
(3,864
|
)
|
|
283
|
|
Gains on sales of operating properties
|
6,290
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
15,160
|
|
|
194
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss)
|
10,858
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
11,296
|
|
|
477
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(438
|
)
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
(983
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders
|
$
|
10,420
|
|
|
$
|
(1,957
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,426
|
|
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Partners
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
Parent Company
|
10,180
|
|
|
(1,895
|
)
|
|
10,186
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,420
|
|
|
$
|
(1,957
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,426
|
|
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per unit - basic & diluted
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common units outstanding - basic
|
85,572,566
|
|
|
85,320,923
|
|
|
85,551,356
|
|
|
85,295,968
|
|
Weighted average common units outstanding - diluted
|
85,639,457
|
|
|
85,420,633
|
|
|
85,616,096
|
|
|
85,394,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common unit
|
$
|
0.3025
|
|
|
$
|
0.2875
|
|
|
$
|
0.6050
|
|
|
$
|
0.5750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss)
|
$
|
10,858
|
|
|
$
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,296
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
(420
|
)
|
|
(2,619
|
)
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
(9,932
|
)
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
10,438
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
12,372
|
|
|
(9,455
|
)
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(438
|
)
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
(983
|
)
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common unitholders
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
(4,576
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,502
|
|
|
$
|
(10,438
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Kite Realty Group, L.P. and subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Equity
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner
|
|
Total
|
|
Common Equity
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2016
|
$
|
1,643,890
|
|
|
$
|
(316
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,643,574
|
|
Stock compensation activity
|
2,598
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
Other comprehensive income attributable to Parent Company
|
—
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
Distributions declared to Parent Company
|
(50,570
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(50,570
|
)
|
Net income
|
10,186
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,186
|
|
Acquisition of partner's interest in Fishers Station operating property
|
(3,750
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,750
|
)
|
Adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
6,588
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
Balances, June 30, 2017
|
$
|
1,608,942
|
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
|
$
|
1,609,678
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Kite Realty Group, L.P. and subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income
|
$
|
11,296
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Straight-line rent
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
(2,842
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
89,749
|
|
|
87,713
|
|
Gains on sales of operating properties
|
(15,160
|
)
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Impairment charge
|
7,411
|
|
|
—
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
1,790
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
Compensation expense for equity awards
|
3,122
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
Amortization of debt fair value adjustment
|
(1,486
|
)
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
Amortization of in-place lease liabilities, net
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
(3,252
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Tenant receivables and other
|
(1,606
|
)
|
|
3,456
|
|
Deferred costs and other assets
|
(7,109
|
)
|
|
(5,917
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue and other liabilities
|
(2,688
|
)
|
|
(232
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
81,099
|
|
|
80,945
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, net
|
(34,947
|
)
|
|
(44,223
|
)
|
Net proceeds from sales of operating properties
|
76,076
|
|
|
139
|
|
Collection of note receivable
|
—
|
|
|
500
|
|
Change in construction payables
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
(1,260
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
39,531
|
|
|
(44,844
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common shares upon the vesting of restricted shares
|
(780
|
)
|
|
(755
|
)
|
Acquisition of partner's interest in Fishers Station operating property
|
(3,750
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Loan proceeds
|
54,200
|
|
|
178,970
|
|
Loan transaction costs
|
—
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
Loan payments
|
(109,933
|
)
|
|
(160,597
|
)
|
Distributions paid – common unitholders
|
(50,553
|
)
|
|
(46,676
|
)
|
Distributions paid – redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
(2,053
|
)
|
|
(1,941
|
)
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(112,869
|
)
|
|
(32,079
|
)
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
7,761
|
|
|
4,022
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
19,874
|
|
|
33,880
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
27,635
|
|
|
$
|
37,902
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Kite Realty Group Trust and Kite Realty Group, L.P. and subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 1. Organization
Kite Realty Group Trust (the "Parent Company"), through its majority-owned subsidiary, Kite Realty Group, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), owns interests in various operating subsidiaries and joint ventures engaged in the ownership and operation, acquisition, development and redevelopment of high-quality neighborhood and community shopping centers in select markets in the United States. The terms "Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, collectively, and those entities owned or controlled by the Parent Company and/or the Operating Partnership.
The Operating Partnership was formed on August 16, 2004, when the Parent Company contributed properties and the net proceeds from an initial public offering of shares of its common stock to the Operating Partnership. The Parent Company was organized in Maryland in 2004 to succeed in the development, acquisition, construction and real estate businesses of its predecessor. We believe the Company qualifies as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The Parent Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, and as of
June 30, 2017
owned approximately
97.7%
of the common partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“General Partner Units”). The remaining
2.3%
of the common partnership interests (“Limited Partner Units” and, together with the General Partner Units, the “Common Units”) were owned by the limited partners. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company has full, exclusive and complete responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and control of the Operating Partnership. The Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are operated as one enterprise. The management of the Parent Company consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. As the sole general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes, and the Parent Company does not have any significant assets other than its investment in the Operating Partnership.
At
June 30, 2017
, we owned interests in
117
operating and redevelopment properties totaling approximately
23.1 million
square feet. We also owned
one
development project under construction as of this date.
Note 2. Basis of Presentation, Consolidation, Investments in Joint Ventures, and Noncontrolling Interests
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) may have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the presentation not misleading. The unaudited financial statements as of
June 30, 2017
and for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary in the opinion of management to present fairly the financial information set forth therein. The consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership for the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected on an annual basis.
Components of Investment Properties
The composition of the Company’s investment properties as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Investment properties, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
Land, buildings and improvements
|
|
$
|
3,830,947
|
|
|
$
|
3,885,223
|
|
Furniture, equipment and other
|
|
7,550
|
|
|
7,246
|
|
Land held for development
|
|
31,981
|
|
|
34,171
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
69,521
|
|
|
69,425
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,939,999
|
|
|
$
|
3,996,065
|
|
Consolidation and Investments in Joint Ventures
The accompanying financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis and include all accounts of the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, the taxable REIT subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership that are controlled and any variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which the Operating Partnership is the primary beneficiary. In general, a VIE is a corporation, partnership, trust or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (a) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities, (b) does not have equity investors with voting rights or (c) has equity investors whose votes are disproportionate from their economics and substantially all of the activities are conducted on behalf of the investor with disproportionately fewer voting rights.
The Operating Partnership accounts for properties that are owned by joint ventures in accordance with the consolidation guidance. The Operating Partnership evaluates each joint venture and determines first whether to follow the VIE or the voting interest entity ("VOE") model. Once the appropriate consolidation model is identified, the Operating Partnership then evaluates whether it should consolidate the joint venture. Under the VIE model, the Operating Partnership consolidates an entity when it has (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Under the VOE model, the Operating Partnership consolidates an entity when (i) it controls the entity through ownership of a majority voting interest if the entity is not a limited partnership or (ii) it controls the entity through its ability to remove the other partners or owners in the entity, at its discretion, when the entity is a limited partnership.
In determining whether to consolidate a VIE with the Operating Partnership, we consider all relationships between the Operating Partnership and the applicable VIE, including development agreements, management agreements and other contractual arrangements, in determining whether we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly affect the VIE's performance. As of
June 30, 2017
, we owned investments in
three
joint ventures that were VIEs in which the partners did not have substantive participating rights and we were the primary beneficiary. As of this date, these VIEs had total debt of
$238.8 million
, which were secured by assets of the VIEs totaling
$497.9 million
. The Operating Partnership guarantees the debts of these VIEs.
The Operating Partnership is considered a VIE as the limited partners do not hold kick-out rights or substantive participating rights. The Parent Company consolidates the Operating Partnership as it is the primary beneficiary in accordance with the VIE model.
Income Taxes and REIT Compliance
Parent Company
The Parent Company, which is considered a corporation for federal income tax purposes, has been organized and intends to continue to operate in a manner that will enable it to maintain its qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As a result, it generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the earnings that it distributes to the extent it distributes its “REIT taxable income” (determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains) to shareholders of the Parent Company and meets certain other requirements on a recurring basis. To the extent that it satisfies this distribution requirement, but distributes less than 100% of its taxable income, it will be subject to federal corporate income tax on its undistributed REIT taxable income. REITs are subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements. If the Parent Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates for a period of four years following the year in which qualification is lost. We may also be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income even if the Parent
Company does qualify as a REIT. The Operating Partnership intends to continue to make distributions to the Parent Company in amounts sufficient to assist the Parent Company in adhering to REIT requirements and maintaining its REIT status.
We have elected to treat Kite Realty Holdings, LLC as a taxable REIT subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, and we may elect to treat other subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries in the future. This election enables us to receive income and provide services that would otherwise be impermissible for a REIT. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting bases and the tax bases of assets and liabilities at the tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Operating Partnership
The allocated share of income and loss, other than the operations of our taxable REIT subsidiary, is included in the income tax returns of the Operating Partnership's partners. Accordingly, the only federal income taxes included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are in connection with the Operating Partnership's taxable REIT subsidiary.
Noncontrolling Interests
We report the non-redeemable noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries as equity, and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to these noncontrolling interests is set forth separately in the consolidated financial statements. The non-redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated properties for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Noncontrolling interests balance January 1
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
Net income allocable to noncontrolling interests,
excluding redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
6
|
|
|
118
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
—
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests balance at June 30
|
$
|
698
|
|
|
$
|
698
|
|
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests - Limited Partners
Limited Partner Units are redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership. We classify redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets outside of permanent equity because we may be required to pay cash to holders of Limited Partner Units upon redemption of their interests in the Operating Partnership or deliver registered shares upon their conversion. The carrying amount of the redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership is reflected at the greater of historical book value or redemption value with a corresponding adjustment to additional paid-in capital. At
June 30, 2017
, the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests did not exceed the historical book value. At
December 31, 2016
, the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests exceeded the historical book value, and the balance was accordingly adjusted to redemption value.
We allocate net operating results of the Operating Partnership after noncontrolling interests in the consolidated properties based on the partners’ respective weighted average ownership interest. We adjust the redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership at the end of each reporting period to reflect their interests in the Operating Partnership or redemption value. This adjustment is reflected in our shareholders’ and Parent Company's equity. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
, the weighted average interests of the Parent Company and the limited partners in the Operating Partnership were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Parent Company’s weighted average basic interest in
Operating Partnership
|
97.7
|
%
|
|
97.7
|
%
|
|
97.7
|
%
|
|
97.7
|
%
|
Limited partners' weighted average basic interests in
Operating Partnership
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
At
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Parent Company's interest and the limited partners' redeemable noncontrolling ownership interests in the Operating Partnership were
97.7%
and
2.3%
as of the end of each period presented.
Concurrent with the Parent Company’s initial public offering and related formation transactions, certain individuals received Limited Partner Units of the Operating Partnership in exchange for their interests in certain properties. The limited partners have the right to redeem Limited Partner Units for cash or, at the Parent Company's election, common shares of the Parent Company in an amount equal to the market value of an equivalent number of common shares of the Parent Company at the time of redemption. Such common shares must be registered, which is not fully in the Parent Company’s control. Therefore, the limited partners’ interest is not reflected in permanent equity. The Parent Company also has the right to redeem the Limited Partner Units directly from the limited partner in exchange for either cash in the amount specified above or a number of its common shares equal to the number of Limited Partner Units being redeemed.
There were
1,986,830
and
1,942,340
Limited Partner Units outstanding as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively. The increase in Limited Partner Units outstanding from December 31, 2016 is due to non-cash compensation awards made to our executive officers in the form of Limited Partner Units.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests - Subsidiaries
Prior to the merger with Inland Diversified Real Estate Trust, Inc. ("Inland Diversified") in 2014, Inland Diversified formed joint ventures with the previous owners of certain properties and issued Class B units in
three
joint ventures that indirectly own those properties. The Class B units related to
two
of these three joint ventures remain outstanding subsequent to the merger with Inland Diversified and are accounted for as noncontrolling interests in these properties. A portion of the Class B units became redeemable at our partner’s election in March 2017, and the remaining Class B units will become redeemable at our partner's election in October 2022 based on the applicable joint venture and the fulfillment of certain redemption criteria. Beginning in December 2020 and November 2022, with respect to the applicable joint venture, the Class B units can be redeemed at the election of either our partner or us for cash or Limited Partner Units in the Operating Partnership. None of the issued Class B units have a maturity date and none are mandatorily redeemable unless either party has elected for the units to be redeemed. We consolidate these joint ventures because we control the decision making of each of the joint ventures and our joint venture partners have limited protective rights.
We received notice from one of our partners exercising their right to redeem
$8.3 million
of their Class B units for cash. The amount that will be redeemed was reclassified from temporary equity to accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets. We expect to fund the redemption using cash prior to December 27, 2017.
We classify the remainder of the redeemable noncontrolling interests in certain subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets outside of permanent equity because, under certain circumstances, we may be required to pay cash to Class B unitholders in specific subsidiaries upon redemption of their interests. The carrying amount of these redeemable noncontrolling interests is required to be reflected at the greater of initial book value or redemption value with a corresponding adjustment to additional paid-in capital. As of
June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, the redemption amounts of these interests did not exceed the fair value of each interest, nor did they exceed the initial book value.
The redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership and subsidiaries for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests balance January 1
|
$
|
88,165
|
|
|
$
|
92,315
|
|
Net income allocable to redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
1,105
|
|
|
853
|
|
Distributions declared to redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
(2,066
|
)
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
Liability reclassification due to exercise of partial redemption option by joint venture partner
|
(8,261
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Other, net, including adjustments to redemption value
|
(5,892
|
)
|
|
8,994
|
|
Total limited partners' interests in Operating Partnership and other redeemable noncontrolling interests balance at June 30
|
$
|
73,051
|
|
|
$
|
100,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners' interests in Operating Partnership
|
$
|
40,520
|
|
|
$
|
55,743
|
|
Other redeemable noncontrolling interests in certain subsidiaries
|
32,531
|
|
|
44,436
|
|
Total limited partners' interests in Operating Partnership and other redeemable noncontrolling interests balance at June 30
|
$
|
73,051
|
|
|
$
|
100,179
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
We follow the framework established under accounting standard FASB ASC 820 for measuring fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities that are not required or permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis but only in certain circumstances, such as a business combination or upon determination of an impairment.
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
|
|
•
|
Level 1 fair value inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments to which we have access.
|
|
|
•
|
Level 2 fair value inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for similar instruments, either directly or indirectly, and appropriately consider counterparty creditworthiness in the valuations.
|
|
|
•
|
Level 3 fair value inputs reflect our best estimate of inputs and assumptions market participants would use in pricing an instrument at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation estimate.
|
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing GAAP revenue recognition guidance. It will also affect the existing GAAP guidance governing the sale of nonfinancial assets. The new standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it satisfies performance obligations by transferring promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for fulfilling those performance obligations. In doing so, companies will need to exercise more judgment and make more estimates than under existing GAAP guidance.
Under this standard, entities will now generally recognize the sale, and any associated gain or loss, of a real estate property when control of the property transfers, as long as collectability of the consideration is probable.
We have preliminarily evaluated our revenue streams and less than
1%
of our recurring revenue will be impacted by this new standard upon its initial adoption. Additionally, we have primarily disposed of property and land in all cash transactions with no continuing future involvement in the operations, and therefore, do not expect the new standard to significantly impact the recognition of property and land sales. During the first six months of 2017, we disposed of several operating properties and land parcels in all cash transactions with no continuing future involvement. The gains recognized were approximately
11%
of our total
revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2017. As we do not have any continuing involvement in the operations of the operating properties and land sold, the accounting for the transactions would have remained the same under ASC 2014-09.
ASU 2014-09 is effective for public entities for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. ASU 2014-09 allows for either recognizing the cumulative effect of application (i) at the start of the earliest comparative period presented (with the option to use any or all of three practical expedients) or (ii) as a cumulative effect adjustment as of the date of initial application, with no restatement of comparative periods presented. We expect to adopt ASU 2014-09 using the modified retrospective approach.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases
. ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making certain changes to lessor accounting, including the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The new standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-02, we expect common area maintenance reimbursements that are of a fixed nature to be recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the lease as these tenant reimbursements will be considered a non-lease component and will be subject to ASU 2014-09. We also expect to recognize right of use assets on our balance sheet related to certain ground leases where we are the lessee. In addition to evaluating the impact adopting the new accounting standard will have on our consolidated financial statements, we are performing an inventory of existing lease contracts, evaluating our current and potential system capabilities, and evaluating our current compensation structure.
The new leasing standard also amends ASC 340-40,
Other Assets and Deferred Costs - Contracts with Customers.
Under ASC 340-40, incremental costs of obtaining a contract are recognized as an asset if the entity expects to recover them, which will reduce the leasing costs currently capitalized. Upon adoption of the new standard, we expect an increase in general, administrative, and other expense and a decrease in amortization expense on our consolidated statement of operations, but the magnitude of that change is dependent upon the leasing compensation structure in place at the time of adoption.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business
. ASU 2017-01 amends the existing accounting standards for business combinations, by providing a screen to determine when a set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the assets and activities are not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that will likely qualify as business combinations. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We adopted ASU 2017-01 in the first quarter of 2017. As a result of the adoption, we expect future acquisitions of single investment properties will not result in the recognition of transaction cost expenses, as the single investment properties will likely not meet the definition of a business and all direct transaction costs will be capitalized.
Note 3. Earnings Per Share or Unit
Basic earnings per share or unit is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares or units outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share or unit is determined based on the weighted average common number of shares or units outstanding during the period combined with the incremental average common shares or units that would have been outstanding assuming the conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares or units into common shares or units as of the earliest date possible.
Potentially dilutive securities include outstanding options to acquire common shares; Limited Partner Units, which may be exchanged for either cash or common shares, at the Parent Company’s option and under certain circumstances; units under our Outperformance Incentive Compensation Plan ("Outperformance Plan"); and deferred common share units, which may be credited to the personal accounts of non-employee trustees in lieu of the payment of cash compensation or the issuance of common shares to such trustees. Limited Partner Units have been omitted from the Parent Company’s denominator for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share since the effect of including these amounts in the denominator would have no dilutive impact. Weighted average Limited Partner Units outstanding for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
were
2.0 million
and
1.9 million
, respectively.
Approximately
0.1 million
outstanding options to acquire common shares were excluded from the computations of diluted earnings per share or unit for both the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017
, because their impact was not dilutive. Due to the net loss allocable to common shareholders and Common Unit holders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,
no
securities had a dilutive impact for these periods.
Note 4. Mortgage and Other Indebtedness
Mortgage and other indebtedness consisted of the following as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2017
|
|
Principal
|
|
Unamortized Net Premiums
|
|
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs
|
|
Total
|
Senior unsecured notes - fixed rate
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(5,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
544,084
|
|
Unsecured revolving credit facility
|
33,100
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
30,780
|
|
Unsecured term loans
|
400,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,986
|
)
|
|
398,014
|
|
Mortgage notes payable - fixed rate
|
579,105
|
|
|
10,623
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
588,855
|
|
Mortgage notes payable - variable rate
|
114,005
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
|
113,331
|
|
Total mortgage and other indebtedness
|
$
|
1,676,210
|
|
|
$
|
10,623
|
|
|
$
|
(11,769
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,675,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|
Principal
|
|
Unamortized Net Premiums
|
|
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs
|
|
Total
|
Senior unsecured notes - fixed rate
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
$
|
543,860
|
|
Unsecured revolving credit facility
|
79,600
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,723
|
)
|
|
76,877
|
|
Unsecured term loans
|
400,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,179
|
)
|
|
397,821
|
|
Mortgage notes payable - fixed rate
|
587,762
|
|
|
12,109
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
|
598,877
|
|
Mortgage notes payable - variable rate
|
114,388
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
113,639
|
|
Total mortgage and other indebtedness
|
$
|
1,731,750
|
|
|
$
|
12,109
|
|
|
$
|
(12,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,731,074
|
|
Consolidated indebtedness, including weighted average maturities and weighted average interest rates as of
June 30, 2017
, considering the impact of interest rate swaps, is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
|
|
Weighted Average
Maturity (Years)
|
Fixed rate debt
1
|
$
|
1,589,907
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
|
6.1
|
Variable rate debt
|
86,303
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
4.6
|
Net debt premiums and issuance costs, net
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Total
|
$1,675,064
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
____________________
|
1
|
Fixed rate debt includes, and variable rate date excludes, the portion of such debt that has been hedged by interest rate derivatives. As of June 30, 2017, $460.8 million in variable rate debt is hedged for a weighted average 2.3 years.
|
Mortgage indebtedness is collateralized by certain real estate properties and leases, and is generally due in monthly installments of interest and principal and matures over various terms through 2030.
Variable interest rates on mortgage indebtedness are based on LIBOR plus spreads ranging from
160
to
225
basis points. At
June 30, 2017
, the one-month LIBOR interest rate was
1.22%
. Fixed interest rates on mortgage indebtedness range from
3.78%
to
6.78%
.
Debt Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective loan agreements.
The accompanying consolidated statements of operations include amortization of debt issuance costs as a component of interest expense as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
$
|
1,350
|
|
|
$
|
1,631
|
|
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Unsecured Term Loans
We have an unsecured revolving credit facility with a total commitment of
$500 million
that matures in July 2020 (inclusive of
two
six
-month extension options), a
$200 million
unsecured term loan maturing in July 2021("Term Loan") and a
$200 million
seven
-year unsecured term loan maturing in October 2022.
The Operating Partnership has the option to increase the borrowing availability of the unsecured revolving credit facility to
$1 billion
and the option to increase the Term Loan to provide for an additional
$200 million
, in each case subject to certain conditions, including obtaining commitments from one or more lenders.
As of
June 30, 2017
,
$33.1 million
was outstanding under the unsecured revolving credit facility. Additionally, we had letters of credit outstanding which totaled
$5.4 million
, against which
no
amounts were advanced as of
June 30, 2017
.
The amount that we may borrow under our unsecured revolving credit facility is limited by the value of the assets in our unencumbered asset pool. As of
June 30, 2017
, the value of the assets in our unencumbered asset pool was
$426.7 million
. Taking into account outstanding borrowings and letters of credit, we had
$388.2 million
available under our unsecured revolving credit facility for future borrowings as of
June 30, 2017
.
Our ability to borrow under the unsecured revolving credit facility is subject to our compliance with various restrictive and financial covenants, including with respect to liens, indebtedness, investments, dividends, mergers and asset sales. As of
June 30, 2017
, we were in compliance with all such covenants.
Senior Unsecured Notes
The Operating Partnership has
$550 million
of senior unsecured notes maturing at various dates through September 2027 (the "Notes"). The Notes contain a number of customary financial and restrictive covenants. As of
June 30, 2017
, we were in compliance with all such covenants.
Other Debt Activity
For the
six months ended June 30, 2017
, we had total new borrowings of
$54.2 million
and total repayments of
$109.9 million
. In addition to the items mentioned above, the remaining components of this activity were as follows:
|
|
•
|
We retired the
$6.7 million
loan secured by our Pleasant Hill Commons operating property through a draw on our unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility");
|
|
|
•
|
We borrowed
$47.5 million
on the Credit Facility to fund development activities, redevelopment activities, and tenant improvement costs;
|
|
|
•
|
We used the
$76.1 million
net proceeds from the sale of
four
operating properties to pay down the Credit Facility; and
|
|
|
•
|
We made scheduled principal payments on indebtedness totaling
$2.4 million
.
|
Fair Value of Fixed and Variable Rate Debt
As of
June 30, 2017
, the estimated fair value of our fixed rate debt was
$1.2 billion
compared to the book value of
$1.1 billion
. The fair value was estimated using Level 2 and 3 inputs with cash flows discounted at current borrowing rates for similar instruments, which ranged from
3.78%
to
6.78%
. As of
June 30, 2017
, the fair value of variable rate debt was
$583.0 million
compared to the book value of
$547.1 million
. The fair value was estimated using Level 2 and 3 inputs with cash flows discounted at current borrowing rates for similar instruments, which ranged from
2.52%
to
3.47%
.
Note 5. Derivative Instruments, Hedging Activities and Other Comprehensive Income
In order to manage potential future variable interest rate risk, we enter into interest rate derivative agreements from time to time. All such agreements are designated as cash flow hedges. We do not use interest rate derivative agreements for trading or speculative purposes. The agreements with each of our derivative counterparties provide that, in the event of default on any of our indebtedness, we could also be declared in default on our derivative obligations.
As of
June 30, 2017
, we were party to various cash flow derivative agreements with notional amounts totaling
$460.8 million
. These derivative agreements effectively fix the interest rate underlying certain variable rate debt instruments over expiration dates
through 2021
. Utilizing a weighted average interest rate spread over LIBOR on all variable rate debt resulted in fixing the weighted average interest rate at
3.12%
.
These interest rate derivative agreements are the only assets or liabilities that we record at fair value on a recurring basis. The valuation of these assets and liabilities is determined using widely accepted techniques including discounted cash flow analysis. These techniques consider the contractual terms of the derivatives (including the period to maturity) and use observable market-based inputs such as interest rate curves and implied volatilities. We also incorporate credit valuation adjustments into the fair value measurements to reflect nonperformance risk on both our part and that of the respective counterparties.
We determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, although the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. As of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, we assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and determined the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we determined our derivative valuations were classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
As of
June 30, 2017
, the estimated fair value of our interest rate derivatives represented a net liability of
$0.5 million
, including accrued interest of
$0.2 million
. As of
June 30, 2017
,
$1.1 million
was reflected in prepaid and other assets and
$1.6 million
was reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At
December 31, 2016
, the estimated fair value of our interest rate hedges was a net liability of
$2.2 million
, including accrued interest of
$0.4 million
. As of
December 31, 2016
,
$0.9 million
was reflected in prepaid and other assets and
$3.1 million
was reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to earnings over time as the hedged items are recognized in earnings. Approximately
$1.7 million
and
$2.1 million
was reclassified as a reduction to earnings during the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. As the interest payments on our hedges are made over the next 12 months, we estimate the increase to interest expense to be
$0.6 million
, assuming the current LIBOR curve.
Unrealized gains and losses on our interest rate derivative agreements are the only components of the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Note 6. Shareholders’ Equity
Distribution Payments
Our Board of Trustees declared a cash distribution of
$0.3025
for the second quarter of 2017 to common shareholders and Common Unit holders of record as of July 6, 2017. The distribution was paid on July 13, 2017.
Note 7. Deferred Costs and Intangibles, net
Deferred costs consist primarily of acquired lease intangible assets, broker fees and capitalized salaries and related benefits incurred in connection with lease originations. Deferred leasing costs, lease intangibles and similar costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. At
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, deferred costs consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Acquired lease intangible assets
|
$
|
114,432
|
|
|
$
|
125,144
|
|
Deferred leasing costs and other
|
66,662
|
|
|
63,810
|
|
|
181,094
|
|
|
188,954
|
|
Less—accumulated amortization
|
(61,395
|
)
|
|
(59,690
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
119,699
|
|
|
$
|
129,264
|
|
Amortization of deferred leasing costs, leasing intangibles and other is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The amortization of above market lease intangibles is included as a reduction to revenue. The amounts of such amortization included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Amortization of deferred leasing costs, lease intangibles and other
|
$
|
12,113
|
|
|
$
|
13,242
|
|
Amortization of above market lease intangibles
|
2,199
|
|
|
3,796
|
|
Note 8. Deferred Revenue, Intangibles, Net and Other Liabilities
Deferred revenue and other liabilities consist of the unamortized fair value of in-place lease liabilities recorded in connection with purchase accounting, retainage payables for development and redevelopment projects, and tenant rent payments received in advance of the month in which they are due. The amortization of in-place lease liabilities is recognized as revenue over the remaining life of the leases (including option periods for leases with below market renewal options) through 2046. Tenant rent payments received in advance are recognized as revenue in the period to which they apply, which is typically the month following their receipt.
At
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, deferred revenue, intangibles, net and other liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Unamortized in-place lease liabilities
|
$
|
86,815
|
|
|
$
|
95,360
|
|
Retainage payables and other
|
5,030
|
|
|
5,437
|
|
Tenant rent payments received in advance
|
11,457
|
|
|
11,405
|
|
Total
|
$
|
103,302
|
|
|
$
|
112,202
|
|
The amortization of below market lease intangibles is included as a component of minimum rent in the accompanying consolidated statements and was
$4.0 million
and
$7.0 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
Other Commitments and Contingencies
We are not subject to any material litigation nor, to management’s knowledge, is any material litigation currently threatened against us. We are parties to routine litigation, claims, and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that such matters will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows taken as a whole.
We are obligated under various completion guarantees with certain lenders and lease agreements with tenants to complete all or portions of the development and redevelopment projects. We believe we currently have sufficient financing in place to fund these projects and expect to do so primarily through borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facility.
As of
June 30, 2017
, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling
$5.4 million
. At that date, there were
no
amounts advanced against these instruments.
Note 10. Disposals of Operating Properties and Related Recording of Impairment Charge
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, we sold our Clay Marketplace operating property in Birmingham, Alabama, our Shops at Village Walk operating property in Fort Myers, Florida, and our Wheatland Towne Crossing operating property in Dallas, Texas, for aggregate gross proceeds of
$54.6 million
and a net gain of
$6.3 million
.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we sold our Cove Center operating property in Stuart, Florida for gross proceeds of
$23.1 million
and a net gain of
$8.9 million
.
In connection with the preparation and review of the March 31, 2017 financial statements, we evaluated an operating property for impairment due to the shortening of the intended holding period. We concluded the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the expected holding period did not exceed the carrying value of the asset. The Company estimated the fair value of the property to be
$26.0 million
using Level 3 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, primarily using the market approach. We compared the fair value measurement to the carrying value, which resulted in the recording of a non-cash impairment charge of
$7.4 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2017.
Item 2.
Cautionary Note About Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by us, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements are based on assumptions and expectations that may not be realized and are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of which might not even be anticipated. Future events and actual results, performance, transactions or achievements, financial or otherwise, may differ materially from the results, performance, transactions or achievements, financial or otherwise, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties and other factors that might cause such differences, some of which could be material, include but are not limited to:
|
|
•
|
national and local economic, business, real estate and other market conditions, particularly in light of low growth in the U.S. economy as well as economic uncertainty caused by fluctuations in the prices of oil and other energy sources;
|
|
|
•
|
financing risks, including the availability of, and costs associated with, sources of liquidity;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to refinance, or extend the maturity dates of, our indebtedness;
|
|
|
•
|
the level and volatility of interest rates;
|
|
|
•
|
the financial stability of tenants, including their ability to pay rent and the risk of tenant bankruptcies;
|
|
|
•
|
the competitive environment in which we operate;
|
|
|
•
|
acquisition, disposition, development and joint venture risks;
|
|
|
•
|
property ownership and management risks;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
•
|
potential environmental and other liabilities;
|
|
|
•
|
impairment in the value of real estate property we own;
|
|
|
•
|
the impact of online retail and the perception that such retail has on the value of shopping center assets;
|
|
|
•
|
risks related to the geographical concentration of our properties in Florida, Indiana and Texas;
|
|
|
•
|
insurance costs and coverage;
|
|
|
•
|
risks associated with cybersecurity attacks and the loss of confidential information and other business disruptions;
|
|
|
•
|
other factors affecting the real estate industry generally; and
|
|
|
•
|
other risks identified in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and, from time to time, in other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or in other documents that we publicly disseminate, including, in particular, the section titled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2016
.
|
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in connection with the accompanying historical financial statements and related notes thereto. In this discussion, unless the context suggests otherwise, references to “our Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” mean Kite Realty Group Trust and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Kite Realty Group, L.P.
Our Business and Properties
Kite Realty Group Trust is a publicly-held real estate investment trust which, through its majority-owned subsidiary, Kite Realty Group, L.P., owns interests in various operating subsidiaries and joint ventures engaged in the ownership, operation, acquisition, development, and redevelopment of high-quality neighborhood and community shopping centers in select markets in the United States. We derive revenues primarily from activities associated with the collection of contractual rents and reimbursement payments from tenants at our properties. Our operating results therefore depend materially on, among other things, the ability of our tenants to make required lease payments, the health and resilience of the United States retail sector, interest rate volatility, job growth and overall economic and real estate market conditions.
At
June 30, 2017
, we owned interests in
117
operating and redevelopment properties totaling approximately 23.1 million square feet. We also owned
one
development project under construction as of this date.
At
June 30, 2016
, we owned interests in 120 operating and redevelopment properties totaling approximately 23.5 million square feet. We also owned one development project under construction as of this date.
Current Quarter Activities
Development and Redevelopment
We believe that continually evaluating our operating properties for development and redevelopment opportunities enhances shareholder value as it will make the properties more attractive to new tenants and it improves long-term values and economic returns. We initiated, advanced, and completed a number of development and redevelopment activities during the second quarter of 2017, including the following:
|
|
•
|
Parkside Town Commons – Phase II
near Raleigh, North Carolina
–
Phase II of this development is anchored by Frank CineBowl and Grille, Golf Galaxy, Stein Mart, and Hobby Lobby. We transitioned Parkside Town Commons –
Phase II to the operating portfolio at the end of the second quarter of 2017 at which date the property was 95.4% leased.
|
|
|
•
|
Holly Springs Towne Center – Phase II
near Raleigh, North Carolina – Phase II of this development is anchored by Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW, and Carmike Theatres. We transitioned Phase II to the operating portfolio in the second quarter of 2016. Subsequently, we began construction on an expansion of Phase II in the fourth quarter of 2016. We have a signed lease for 23,000 square feet with O2 Fitness for this expansion, and we expect to deliver the space in the fourth quarter of 2017.
|
|
|
•
|
Under Construction Redevelopment, Reposition, and Repurpose (
“
3-R
”
) Projects.
Our 3-R initiative, which includes a total of 14 projects under construction or active evaluation for modification, continued to progress in the second quarter of 2017. There are a total of seven projects currently under construction, which have an estimated combined annualized return of approximately 8% to 9%, with aggregate costs for these projects expected to range between $68.5 million to $74.0 million.
|
We completed the following three 3-R projects during the second quarter of 2017:
|
|
◦
|
Centennial Gateway
in Las Vegas, Nevada – We completed the recapture of an existing anchor space and executed a lease with Trader Joe's, which opened in June 2017. Total costs were $1.1 million and the projected annual return is 30.0%.
|
|
|
◦
|
Market Street Village
in Fort Worth, Texas – We completed the recapture of a 15,000 square foot anchor space and executed a lease with Party City, which opened in April 2017. Total costs were $0.8 million and the projected annual return is 30.9%.
|
|
|
◦
|
Northdale Promenade
in Tampa, Florida – We completed the rightsizing and demolition of small shop space to add Ulta Beauty, which opened in 2016, and Tuesday Morning, which opened in July 2017. Total costs were $4.2 million and the projected annual return is 14.4%.
|
We commenced construction on the following 3-R project during the second quarter of 2017:
|
|
◦
|
Rampart
Commons
in Las Vegas, Nevada – This project will be anchored by Williams Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Ann Taylor, North Italia, Flower Child, Honey Salt and P.F. Chang's. We expect total costs for this project to range between $16 million to $17 million, with an estimated annualized return of approximately 7.0% to 7.5%.
|
Operations
During the
second
quarter of
2017
, we executed
96
new and renewal leases totaling
624,317
square feet. New leases were signed on
51
individual spaces for
164,214
square feet of GLA, while renewal leases were signed on
45
individual spaces for
460,103
square feet of GLA.
For comparable new leases, which are defined as those for which the space was occupied by a tenant within the last 12 months, we achieved a blended rent spread of
9.8%
while incurring
$10.02
per square foot of incremental capital improvement costs. The average rent for the
23
new comparable leases signed in the
second
quarter of
2017
was
$25.27
per square foot compared to average expiring rent of
$21.52
per square foot. The average rent for the
45
renewal leases signed in the
second
quarter of
2017
was
$15.20
per square foot compared to average expiring rent of
$14.07
per square foot.
Results of Operations
The comparability of results of operations for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
is affected by our development, redevelopment and operating property disposition activities during these periods. Therefore, we believe it is useful to review the comparisons of our results of operations for these periods in conjunction with the discussion of our activities during those periods, which is set forth below.
Property Dispositions
Since January 1, 2016, we sold the following operating properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
MSA
|
|
Disposition Date
|
|
Owned GLA
|
Shops at Otty
|
|
Portland, OR
|
|
June 2016
|
|
9,845
|
|
Publix at St. Cloud
|
|
St. Cloud, FL
|
|
December 2016
|
|
78,820
|
|
Cove Center
|
|
Stuart, FL
|
|
March 2017
|
|
155,063
|
|
Clay Marketplace
|
|
Birmingham, AL
|
|
June 2017
|
|
63,107
|
|
The Shops at Village Walk
|
|
Fort Myers, FL
|
|
June 2017
|
|
78,533
|
|
Wheatland Towne Crossing
|
|
Dallas, TX
|
|
June 2017
|
|
194,727
|
|
Development Activities
The following development properties became operational from January 1,
2016
through
June 30, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
MSA
|
|
Transition to Operating Portfolio
|
|
Owned GLA
|
Tamiami Crossing
|
|
Naples, FL
|
|
June 2016
|
|
121,705
|
|
Holly Springs Towne Center – Phase II
|
|
Raleigh, NC
|
|
June 2016
|
|
122,009
|
|
Parkside Town Commons – Phase II
|
|
Raleigh, NC
|
|
June 2017
|
|
291,681
|
|
Redevelopment Activities
The following properties were under active redevelopment at various times during the period from January 1,
2016
through
June 30, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
MSA
|
|
Transition to
Redevelopment
1
|
|
Transition to Operations
|
|
Owned GLA
|
Courthouse Shadows
2
|
|
Naples, FL
|
|
June 2013
|
|
Pending
|
|
124,802
|
|
Hamilton Crossing Centre
2
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
June 2014
|
|
Pending
|
|
92,283
|
|
City Center
2
|
|
White Plains, NY
|
|
December 2015
|
|
Pending
|
|
384,651
|
|
Fishers Station
2
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
December 2015
|
|
Pending
|
|
175,229
|
|
Beechwood Promenade
2
|
|
Athens, GA
|
|
December 2015
|
|
Pending
|
|
348,815
|
|
The Corner
2
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
December 2015
|
|
Pending
|
|
26,500
|
|
Rampart Commons
2
|
|
Las Vegas, NV
|
|
March 2016
|
|
Pending
|
|
81,292
|
|
Northdale Promenade
3
|
|
Tampa, FL
|
|
March 2016
|
|
June 2017
|
|
179,680
|
|
Burnt Store
2
|
|
Punta Gorda, FL
|
|
June 2016
|
|
Pending
|
|
95,787
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
|
1
|
Transition date represents the date the property was transferred from our operating portfolio into redevelopment status.
|
2
|
This property has been identified as a redevelopment property and is not included in the operating portfolio or the same property pool.
|
3
|
This property was transitioned to the operating portfolio as of June 30, 2017; however, it remains excluded from the same property pool because it has not been in the operating portfolio for the full period presented (12 months).
|
Comparison of Operating Results for the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
to the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
The following table reflects income statement line items from our consolidated statements of operations for the
three months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income (including tenant reimbursements)
|
$
|
86,916
|
|
|
$
|
85,461
|
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
Other property related revenue
|
5,733
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
3,619
|
|
Total revenue
|
92,649
|
|
|
87,575
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating
|
12,139
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
793
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
11,228
|
|
|
10,503
|
|
|
725
|
|
General, administrative, and other
|
5,488
|
|
|
4,856
|
|
|
632
|
|
Transaction costs
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
(2,771
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
42,710
|
|
|
43,841
|
|
|
(1,131
|
)
|
Total expenses
|
71,565
|
|
|
73,317
|
|
|
(1,752
|
)
|
Operating income
|
21,084
|
|
|
14,258
|
|
|
6,826
|
|
Interest expense
|
(16,433
|
)
|
|
(15,500
|
)
|
|
(933
|
)
|
Income tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiary
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
335
|
|
Other expense, net
|
(80
|
)
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
30
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
4,568
|
|
|
(1,690
|
)
|
|
6,258
|
|
Gains on sales of operating properties
|
6,290
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
6,096
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss)
|
10,858
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
12,354
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(678
|
)
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
(279
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Kite Realty Group Trust common shareholders
|
$
|
10,180
|
|
|
$
|
(1,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expense to total revenue ratio
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
Rental income (including tenant reimbursements) increased
$1.5 million
, or
1.7%
, due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Properties sold during 2016 and 2017
|
$
|
(1,014
|
)
|
Properties under redevelopment during 2016 and/or 2017
|
(818
|
)
|
Properties fully operational during 2016 and 2017 and other
|
3,287
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
The net increase of
$3.3 million
in rental income for properties fully operational during
2016
and
2017
is primarily attributable to an increase in rental rates and an increase in economic occupancy percentage, which leads to more tenants paying rent. The increase in the economic occupancy percentage is primarily due to multiple anchor and small shop tenants opening as we completed various developments and redevelopments including Petco at Hitchcock Plaza, Petsmart at Tarpon Bay Plaza, Buy Buy Baby and DSW at Cool Springs Market, Five Below at Shops at Moore and new small shop buildings at Castleton Crossing and Portofino Shopping Center subsequent to June 30, 2016.
The increase in rental rates is evidenced by the average rent for new comparable leases signed in the
second
quarter of
2017
increasing to
$25.27
per square foot compared to average expiring rent of
$21.52
per square foot. The average rent for renewals signed in the
second
quarter of
2017
was
$15.20
per square foot compared to average expiring rent of
$14.07
per square foot in that quarter. Our same property economic occupancy improved to
93.8%
for the three months ended
June 30, 2017
from
92.7%
for the three months ended
June 30, 2016
. For our total retail operating portfolio, annualized base rent per square foot improved to
$15.95
per square foot as of
June 30, 2017
, up from $15.27 as of
June 30, 2016
.
Other property related revenue primarily consists of parking revenues, overage rent, lease termination income and gains on sales of undepreciated assets. This revenue increased by
$3.6 million
, primarily as a result of higher gains on sales of undepreciated assets of $3.8 million (including the effect of a $4.9 million gain on the sale of an outlot at Cove Center during the second quarter of 2017), partially offset by a decrease of $0.3 million in lease termination income.
Property operating expenses increased
$0.8 million
, or
7.0%
, due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Properties sold during 2016 and 2017
|
$
|
(158
|
)
|
Properties under redevelopment during 2016 and/or 2017
|
43
|
|
Properties fully operational during 2016 and 2017 and other
|
908
|
|
Total
|
$
|
793
|
|
The net increase of
$0.9 million
in property operating expenses for properties fully operational during
2016
and
2017
is primarily due to a combination of an increase of $0.5 million in bad debt expense primarily related to certain tenant bankruptcies, $0.2 million in general building repair and landscaping costs at certain properties, $0.1 million in utility expense and $0.1 million in security expense.
As a percentage of revenue, property operating expenses increased between periods from
13.0%
to
13.1%
.
Real estate taxes increased
$0.7 million
, or
6.9%
, due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Properties sold during 2016 and 2017
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
Properties under redevelopment during 2016 and/or 2017
|
20
|
|
Properties fully operational during 2016 and 2017 and other
|
904
|
|
Total
|
$
|
725
|
|
The net
$0.9 million
increase in real estate taxes for properties fully operational during
2016
and
2017
is primarily due to an increase in current year tax assessments at certain operating properties compared to the same period in 2016. The majority of real estate tax expense is recoverable from tenants and such recovery is reflected in tenant reimbursement revenue.
General, administrative and other expenses increased
$0.6 million
, or
13.0%
. The increase is due primarily to higher personnel costs and company overhead expenses.
Transaction costs decreased by $2.8 million, as we did not incur any transaction costs for the three months ended June 30, 2017.
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased
$1.1 million
, or
2.6%
, due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Properties sold during 2016 and 2017
|
$
|
(865
|
)
|
Properties under redevelopment during 2016 and/or 2017
|
954
|
|
Properties fully operational during 2016 and 2017 and other
|
(1,220
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
(1,131
|
)
|
The
$1.0 million
net increase in depreciation and amortization for properties under redevelopment during 2016 and 2017 is primarily due to $1.0 million of accelerated depreciation due to the demolition of a building at our Fishers Station redevelopment property in preparation for the construction of the space for the replacement anchor tenant. The net decrease of
$1.2 million
in depreciation and amortization at properties fully operational during
2016
and
2017
is primarily due to accelerated depreciation and amortization on tenant-specific assets caused by tenants vacating prior to their lease expiration in 2016, compared to the same period in 2017.
Interest expense increased
$0.9 million
or
6.0%
. The increase is due to securing longer-term fixed rate debt through the issuance of senior unsecured notes in the third quarter of 2016 that carried higher interest rates than the variable rate on our
unsecured revolving credit facility, which was paid down with the proceeds. The increase is also due to certain development projects, including Tamiami Crossing, Parkside Town Commons - Phase II and Holly Springs Towne Center - Phase II becoming operational throughout 2016. As a portion of a development project becomes operational, we cease capitalization of the related interest expense.
Income tax expense of our taxable REIT subsidiary decreased
$0.3 million
primarily due to the decrease in gains on sales of residential units at Eddy Street Commons. The last of the units in Phase I were sold in 2016.
We recorded a net gain of
$6.3 million
from the sales of our Clay Marketplace, The Shops at Village Walk and Wheatland Towne Crossing operating properties during the three months ended June 30, 2017.
Comparison of Operating Results for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
to the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
The following table reflects income statement line items from our consolidated statements of operations for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income (including tenant reimbursements)
|
$
|
174,432
|
|
|
$
|
171,079
|
|
|
$
|
3,353
|
|
Other property related revenue
|
8,330
|
|
|
5,046
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
Total revenue
|
182,762
|
|
|
176,125
|
|
|
6,637
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating
|
25,091
|
|
|
23,538
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
21,559
|
|
|
21,637
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
General, administrative, and other
|
10,958
|
|
|
10,147
|
|
|
811
|
|
Transaction costs
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
(2,771
|
)
|
Impairment charge
|
7,411
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,411
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
88,540
|
|
|
86,082
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
Total expenses
|
153,559
|
|
|
144,175
|
|
|
9,384
|
|
Operating income
|
29,203
|
|
|
31,950
|
|
|
(2,747
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
(32,878
|
)
|
|
(30,825
|
)
|
|
(2,053
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense) of taxable REIT subsidiary
|
30
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
778
|
|
Other expense, net
|
(219
|
)
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
(125
|
)
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
(3,864
|
)
|
|
283
|
|
|
(4,147
|
)
|
Gains on sales of operating properties
|
15,160
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
14,966
|
|
Consolidated net income
|
11,296
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
10,819
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
(971
|
)
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Kite Realty Group Trust common shareholders
|
$
|
10,186
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expense to total revenue ratio
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
Rental income (including tenant reimbursements) increased
$3.4 million
, or
2.0%
, due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Properties sold during 2016 and 2017
|
$
|
(1,720
|
)
|
Properties under redevelopment during 2016 and/or 2017
|
(119
|
)
|
Properties fully operational during 2016 and 2017 and other
|
5,192
|
|
Total
|
$
|
3,353
|
|
The net increase of
$5.2 million
in rental income for properties fully operational during
2016
and
2017
is primarily attributable to an increase in rental rates and an increase in economic occupancy percentage. The increase in the economic occupancy percentage is primarily due to multiple anchor and small shop tenants opening as we completed various developments and redevelopments including Petco at Hitchcock Plaza, Petsmart at Tarpon Bay Plaza, Buy Buy Baby and DSW at Cool Springs Market, Five Below at Shops at Moore and new small shop buildings at Castleton Crossing and Portofino Shopping Center subsequent to June 30, 2016.
The average rent for new comparable leases signed in the first six months of
2017
was $19.98 per square foot compared to average expiring rent of $15.77 per square foot in that period. The average rent for renewals signed in the first six months of
2017
was $15.98 per square foot compared to average expiring rent of $15.03 per square foot in that quarter. Our same property economic occupancy improved to
93.9%
for the six months ended
June 30, 2017
from
93.0%
for the six months ended
June 30, 2016
. For our total retail operating portfolio, annualized base rent per square foot improved to
$15.95
per square foot as of
June 30, 2017
, up from $15.27 as of
June 30, 2016
.
Other property related revenue primarily consists of parking revenues, overage rent, lease termination income and gains on sales of undepreciated assets. This revenue increased by
$3.3 million
, primarily as a result of higher gains on sales of undepreciated assets of $2.1 million (including the effect of a $4.9 million gain on the sale of an outlot at Cove Center during the second quarter of 2017) and increases of $0.8 million in lease termination income and $0.1 million in overage rent.
Property operating expenses increased
$1.6 million
, or
6.6%
, due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Properties sold during 2016 and 2017
|
$
|
(353
|
)
|
Properties under redevelopment during 2016 and/or 2017
|
34
|
|
Properties fully operational during 2016 and 2017 and other
|
1,872
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,553
|
|
The net increase of
$1.9 million
in property operating expenses for properties fully operational during
2016
and
2017
is primarily due to a combination of increases of $0.7 million in general building repair and landscaping costs at certain properties, $0.6 million in bad debt expense, $0.2 million in marketing expense and $0.2 million in utility expense. The increases were partially offset by a decrease of $0.2 million in insurance expense.
As a percentage of revenue, property operating expenses increased between years from
13.4%
to
13.7%
. The increase was mostly due to an increase in bad debt expense, non-recoverable utility expense at several of our properties and marketing expenses, the majority of which are not recoverable from our tenants.
Real estate taxes decreased
$0.1 million
, or
0.4%
, due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Properties sold during 2016 and 2017
|
$
|
(248
|
)
|
Properties under redevelopment during 2016 and/or 2017
|
72
|
|
Properties fully operational during 2016 and 2017 and other
|
98
|
|
Total
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
The net
$0.1 million
increase in real estate taxes for properties fully operational during
2016
and
2017
is primarily due to an increase in current year tax assessments at certain operating properties. The majority of real estate tax expense is recoverable from tenants and such recovery is reflected in tenant reimbursement revenue.
General, administrative and other expenses increased
$0.8 million
, or
8.0%
. The increase is due primarily to higher personnel costs and company overhead expenses, which are partially offset by the severance charge of $0.5 million in 2016.
Transaction costs decreased by
$2.8 million
, as we did not incur any transaction costs for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we recorded an impairment charge of
$7.4 million
related to one of our operating properties. In connection with the preparation and review of the March 31, 2017 financial statements, we evaluated this property for impairment due to the shortening of the intended holding period. We concluded the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the expected holding period did not exceed the carrying value of the asset. Our assessment of this property resulted in the recording of a non-cash impairment charge for the three months ended March 31, 2017. See additional discussion in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$2.5 million
, or
2.9%
, due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Net change 2016 to 2017
|
Properties sold during 2016 and 2017
|
$
|
(1,122
|
)
|
Properties under redevelopment during 2016 and/or 2017
|
3,640
|
|
Properties fully operational during 2016 and 2017 and other
|
(60
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
2,458
|
|
The net increase of
$3.6 million
in properties under redevelopment during 2016 and 2017 is primarily due to $3.4 million of accelerated depreciation and amortization from the demolition of a building at our Fishers Station redevelopment property in preparation for the replacement anchor tenant.
Interest expense increased
$2.1 million
or
6.7%
. The increase is due to securing longer-term fixed rate debt through the issuance of senior unsecured notes in the third quarter of 2016 that carried higher interest rates than the variable rate on our unsecured revolving credit facility, which was paid down with the proceeds. The increase is also due to certain development projects, including Tamiami Crossing, Parkside Town Commons - Phase II and Holly Springs Towne Center - Phase II, becoming operational or partially operational throughout 2016. As a portion of a development project becomes operational, we cease capitalization of the related interest expense.
We recorded an income tax benefit of our taxable REIT subsidiary of less than $0.1 million compared to an income tax expense of our taxable REIT subsidiary of
$0.7 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The decrease is primarily due to lower gains on sales of residential units at Eddy Street Commons for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The last of the units in Phase I were sold in 2016.
We recorded a net gain of
$15.2 million
on the sale of our Cove Center, Clay Marketplace, The Shops at Village Walk and Wheatland Towne Center operating properties for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
.
Net Operating Income and Same Property Net Operating Income
We use property net operating income (“NOI”), a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate the performance of our properties. We define NOI as income from our real estate, including lease termination fees received from tenants, less our property operating expenses. NOI excludes amortization of capitalized tenant improvement costs and leasing commissions and certain corporate level expenses. We believe that NOI is helpful to investors as a measure of our operating performance because it excludes various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of our operating performance, such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense, and impairment, if any.
We also use same property NOI ("Same Property NOI"), a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate the performance of our properties. Same Property NOI excludes properties that have not been owned for the full period presented. It also excludes net gains from outlot sales, straight-line rent revenue, bad debt expense and recoveries, lease termination fees, amortization of lease intangibles and significant prior period expense recoveries and adjustments, if any. We believe that Same Property NOI is helpful to investors as a measure of our operating performance because it includes only the NOI of properties that have been owned for the full period presented, which eliminates disparities in net income due to the acquisition or disposition of properties during the particular period presented and thus provides a more consistent metric for the comparison of our properties. The year to date results represent the sum of the individual quarters, as reported.
NOI and Same Property NOI should not, however, be considered as alternatives to net income (calculated in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance. Our computation of NOI and Same Property NOI may differ from the methodology used by other REITs, and therefore may not be comparable to such other REITs.
When evaluating the properties that are included in the same property pool, we have established specific criteria for determining the inclusion of properties acquired or those recently under development. An acquired property is included in the same property pool when there is a full quarter of operations in both years subsequent to the acquisition date. Development and redevelopment properties are included in the same property pool four full quarters after the properties have been transferred to the operating portfolio. A redevelopment property is first excluded from the same property pool when the execution of a redevelopment plan is likely and we begin recapturing space from tenants. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
, we excluded eight redevelopment properties and the recently completed Northdale Promenade from the same property pool that met these criteria and were owned in both comparable periods.
The following table reflects Same Property NOI and a reconciliation to net income attributable to common shareholders for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
($ in thousands)
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
% Change
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
% Change
|
Number of properties for the quarter
1
|
102
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased percentage at period end
|
94.3
|
%
|
|
95.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
94.3
|
%
|
|
95.1
|
%
|
|
|
Economic Occupancy percentage
2
|
93.8
|
%
|
|
92.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
93.9
|
%
|
|
93.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Property NOI
3
|
$
|
54,492
|
|
|
$
|
52,782
|
|
|
3.2%
|
|
$
|
110,587
|
|
|
$
|
107,197
|
|
|
3.2%
|
Same Property NOI - excluding the impact of the 3-R initiative
|
|
|
|
|
3.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Same Property NOI to Most Directly Comparable GAAP Measure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income - same properties
|
$
|
54,492
|
|
|
$
|
52,782
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,587
|
|
|
$
|
107,197
|
|
|
|
Net operating income - non-same activity
4
|
14,790
|
|
|
12,944
|
|
|
|
|
25,525
|
|
|
23,753
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net
|
(83
|
)
|
|
(448
|
)
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
(842
|
)
|
|
|
General, administrative and other
|
(5,488
|
)
|
|
(4,856
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,958
|
)
|
|
(10,147
|
)
|
|
|
Transaction costs
|
—
|
|
|
(2,771
|
)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,771
|
)
|
|
|
Impairment charge
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
(7,411
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
(42,710
|
)
|
|
(43,841
|
)
|
|
|
|
(88,540
|
)
|
|
(86,082
|
)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
(16,433
|
)
|
|
(15,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32,878
|
)
|
|
(30,825
|
)
|
|
|
Gains on sales of operating properties
|
6,290
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
15,160
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(678
|
)
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
(971
|
)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
10,180
|
|
|
$
|
(1,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,186
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
|
1
|
Same Property NOI excludes eight properties in redevelopment,
the recently completed Northdale Promenade as well as
office properties (Thirty South Meridian and Eddy Street Commons).
|
2
|
Excludes leases that are signed but for which tenants have not yet commenced the payment of cash rent. Calculated as a weighted average based on the timing of cash rent commencement and expiration during the period.
|
3
|
Same Property NOI excludes net gains from outlot sales, straight-line rent revenue, bad debt expense and recoveries, lease termination fees, amortization of lease intangibles and significant prior period expense recoveries and adjustments, if any.
|
4
|
Includes non-cash activity across the portfolio as well as net operating income from properties not included in the same property pool.
|
Our Same Property NOI increased
3.2%
for both the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017
compared to the same period of the prior year. This increase was primarily due to increases in rental rates and an improvement in economic occupancy caused by the completion of several 3-R projects since the second quarter of 2016. We also realized a
$0.1 million
improvement from expense control and operating expense recovery resulting in an improvement in net recoveries for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our primary finance and capital strategy is to maintain a strong balance sheet with sufficient flexibility to fund our operating and investment activities in a cost-effective manner. We consider a number of factors when evaluating our level of indebtedness
and when making decisions regarding additional borrowings or equity offerings, including the estimated value of properties to be developed or acquired, the estimated market value of our properties and the Company as a whole upon placement of the borrowing or offering, and the ability of particular properties to generate cash flow to cover debt service. We will continue to monitor the capital markets and may consider raising additional capital through the issuance of our common or preferred shares, unsecured debt securities, or other securities.
Our Principal Capital Resources
For a discussion of cash generated from operations, see “Cash Flows,” beginning on page 36. In addition to cash generated from operations, we discuss below our other principal capital resources.
The increased operating cash flows of the Company have substantially enhanced our liquidity position and reduced our borrowing costs. We continue to focus on a balanced approach to growth and staggering debt maturities in order to retain our financial flexibility.
As of
June 30, 2017
, we had approximately
$388.2 million
available under our unsecured revolving credit facility for future borrowings based on the unencumbered property pool allocated to the unsecured revolving credit facility. We also had
$27.6 million
in cash and cash equivalents as of
June 30, 2017
.
We were in compliance with all applicable financial covenants under our unsecured revolving credit facility, our unsecured term loans and our senior unsecured notes as of
June 30, 2017
.
We have on file with the SEC a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 relating to the offer and sale, from time to time, of an indeterminate amount of equity and debt securities. Equity securities may be offered and sold by the Parent Company, and the net proceeds of any such offerings would be contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for additional General Partner Units. Debt securities may be offered and sold by the Operating Partnership with the Operating Partnership receiving the proceeds. From time to time, we may issue securities under this shelf registration statement to fund the repayment of long-term debt upon maturity and for other general corporate purposes.
We currently have an at-the-market equity program that allows the Parent Company to issue new common shares from time to time, with an aggregate offering price of up to $250.0 million. We have $245.9 million remaining available for future common share issuances under our current at-the-market equity program.
In the future, we will continue to monitor the capital markets and may consider raising additional capital through the issuance of our common shares, preferred shares or other securities. We may also raise capital by disposing of properties, land parcels or other assets that are no longer core components of our growth strategy. The sale price may differ from our carrying value at the time of sale.
We derive the majority of our revenue from tenants who lease space from us at our properties. Therefore, our ability to generate cash from operations is dependent on the rents that we are able to charge and collect from our tenants. While we believe that the nature of the properties in which we typically invest-primarily neighborhood and community shopping centers-provides a relatively stable revenue flow in uncertain economic times, the recent economic downturn adversely affected the ability of some of our tenants to meet their lease obligations.
Our Principal Liquidity Needs
Short-Term Liquidity Needs
Near-Term Debt Maturities
. As of
June 30, 2017
, we do not have any secured debt scheduled to mature prior to June 30, 2018, excluding scheduled monthly principal payments.
Other Short-Term Liquidity Needs.
The requirements for qualifying as a REIT and for a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends paid to shareholders necessitate that we distribute at least 90% of our taxable income on an annual basis. Such requirements cause us to have substantial liquidity needs over both the short term and the long term. Our short-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay operating expenses associated with our operating properties, interest expense and scheduled principal payments on our debt, expected dividend payments to our common shareholders and to Common Unit holders, and recurring capital expenditures.
In May 2017, our Board of Trustees declared a cash distribution of
$0.3025
per common share and Common Unit for the
second
quarter of
2017
. This distribution was paid on July 13, 2017 to common shareholders and Common Unit holders of record as of July 6, 2017. Future distributions, if any, are at the discretion of the Board of Trustees.
Other short-term liquidity needs include expenditures for tenant improvements, external leasing commissions and recurring capital expenditures. During the
six months ended June 30, 2017
, we incurred
$1.2 million
of costs for recurring capital expenditures on operating properties and also incurred
$11.1 million
of costs for tenant improvements and external leasing commissions (excluding development and redevelopment properties). We currently anticipate incurring approximately $14 million to $16 million of additional major tenant improvements and renovation costs within the next 12 months at a number of our operating properties.
We received notice from one of our joint venture partners exercising its right to redeem $8.3 million of its noncontrolling interests that became redeemable in March 2017. We expect to fund the redemption using cash prior to December 27, 2017. See further discussion in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
As of
June 30, 2017
, we had one development project under construction. The total estimated cost of this project is approximately
$2.7 million
, of which
$0.2 million
had been incurred as of
June 30, 2017
. We currently anticipate incurring the majority of the remaining
$2.5 million
of costs over the next 12 months. We believe we currently have sufficient financing in place to fund the project and expect to do so through cash flow from operations or borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facility.
We have seven properties in our 3-R initiative that are currently under construction. Total estimated costs of this construction are expected to be in the range of $68.5 million to $74.0 million and are expected to be incurred through the middle of 2018. We expect to be able to fund the majority of these costs from operating cash flows.
Long-Term Liquidity Needs
Our long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for any new development projects, redevelopment of existing properties, non-recurring capital expenditures, acquisitions of properties, and payment of indebtedness at maturity.
Potential Redevelopment, Reposition, Repurpose Opportunities.
We are currently evaluating additional redevelopment, repositioning, and repurposing of several other operating properties as part of our 3-R initiative. Total estimated costs of these properties are currently expected to be in the range of $65 million to $85 million. We believe we will have sufficient funding for these projects through cash flow from operations and borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facility.
Selective Acquisitions, Developments and Joint Ventures
. We may selectively pursue the acquisition and development of other properties, which would require additional capital. It is unlikely that we would have sufficient funds on hand to meet these long-term capital requirements. We would have to satisfy these needs through additional borrowings, sales of common or preferred shares, issuance of Operating Partnership units, cash generated through property dispositions or future property acquisitions and/or participation in joint venture arrangements. We cannot be certain that we would have access to these sources of capital on satisfactory terms, if at all, to fund our long-term liquidity requirements. We evaluate all future opportunities against pre-established criteria including, but not limited to, location, demographics, expected return, tenant credit quality, tenant relationships, and amount of existing retail space. Our ability to access the capital markets will be dependent on a number of factors, including general capital market conditions.
Capitalized Expenditures on Consolidated Properties
The following table summarizes cash capital expenditures for our development and redevelopment properties and other capital expenditures for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
and on a cumulative basis since the project’s inception:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to Date –
|
|
Cumulative –
|
($ in thousands)
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
Development Project
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
Under Construction 3-R Projects
|
15,850
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
3-R Opportunities
|
1,866
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Recently completed developments/redevelopments and other
1
|
5,703
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Recurring operating capital expenditures (primarily tenant improvement payments)
|
11,288
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Total
|
$
|
34,947
|
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
|
1
|
This classification includes Parkside Town Commons - Phase II, Holly Springs Towne Center - Phase II, Centennial Gateway, Market Street Village and Northdale Promenade.
|
We capitalize certain indirect costs such as interest, payroll, and other general and administrative costs related to these development activities. If we were to experience a 10% reduction in development and redevelopment activities, without a corresponding decrease in indirect project costs, we would have recorded additional expense of $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017
.
Debt Maturities
The following table presents maturities of mortgage debt and corporate debt as of
June 30, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Scheduled Principal Payments
|
|
Term Maturity
1
|
|
Total
|
2017
|
$
|
2,560
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,560
|
|
2018
|
5,635
|
|
|
37,584
|
|
|
43,219
|
|
2019
|
5,975
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,975
|
|
2020
|
5,920
|
|
|
42,338
|
|
|
48,258
|
|
2021
|
4,627
|
|
|
392,974
|
|
|
397,601
|
|
Thereafter
|
8,349
|
|
|
1,170,248
|
|
|
1,178,597
|
|
|
$
|
33,066
|
|
|
$
|
1,643,144
|
|
|
$
|
1,676,210
|
|
Unamortized net debt premiums and issuance costs, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,675,064
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
|
1
|
This presentation reflects the Company's exercise of its option to extend the maturity date by one year to July 28, 2021 for the Company's unsecured credit facility.
|
Failure to comply with our obligations under our indebtedness agreements (including our payment obligations) could cause an event of default under such debt, which, among other things, could result in the loss of title to assets securing such debt, the acceleration of principal and interest payments or the termination of the debt facilities, or exposure to the risk of foreclosure. In addition, certain of our variable rate loans contain cross-default provisions which provide that a violation by us of any financial covenant set forth in our unsecured revolving credit facility agreement will constitute an event of default under the loans, which could allow the lenders to accelerate the amounts due under our indebtedness agreements if we fail to satisfy these financial covenants. See “Item 1.A Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Operations” in Kite Realty Group Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016
for more information related to the risks associated with our indebtedness.
Impact of Changes in Credit Ratings on Our Liquidity
We have been assigned investment grade corporate credit ratings from two nationally recognized credit rating agencies. These ratings remain unchanged as of
June 30, 2017
.
In the future, the ratings could change based upon, among other things, the impact that prevailing economic conditions may have on our results of operations and financial condition. Credit rating reductions by one or more rating agencies could also adversely affect our access to funding sources, the cost and other terms of obtaining funding, as well as our overall financial condition, operating results and cash flow.
Cash Flows
As of
June 30, 2017
, we had cash and cash equivalents on hand of
$27.6 million
. We may be subject to concentrations of credit risk with regard to our cash and cash equivalents. We place our cash and short-term cash investments with highly rated financial institutions. While we attempt to limit our exposure at any point in time, occasionally, such cash and investments may temporarily be in excess of FDIC and SIPC insurance limits. We also maintain certain compensating balances in several financial institutions in support of borrowings from those institutions. Such compensating balances were not material to the consolidated balance sheets.
Comparison of the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
to the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Cash provided by operating activities was
$81.1 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
, an increase of
$0.2 million
from the same period of
2016
. The increase was primarily due to an improvement in the collection of outstanding account receivables, the completion of several 3-R projects, and higher revenue on sales of undepreciated assets in 2017, partially offset by a decrease in cash provided by operating activities due to our 2017 property sales.
Cash provided by investing activities was
$39.5 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
, as compared to cash used in investing activities of
$44.8 million
in the same period of
2016
. Highlights of significant cash sources and uses in investing activities are as follows:
|
|
•
|
Net proceeds of
$76.1 million
related to the sale of Cove Center in March 2017 and Clay Marketplace, The Shops at Village Walk and Wheatland Towne Crossing in June 2017, compared to net proceeds of
$0.1 million
over the same period in 2016;
|
|
|
•
|
Decrease in capital expenditures of
$9.3 million
, partially offset by a decrease in construction payables of
$1.6 million
. In 2017, we incurred additional construction costs at our Parkside Towne Commons - Phase II and Holly Springs Towne Center - Phase II development projects, and additional construction costs at several of our redevelopment properties.
|
Cash used in financing activities was
$112.9 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
, compared to cash used in financing activities of
$32.1 million
in the same period of
2016
. Highlights of significant cash sources and uses in financing activities during the first six months of 2017 are as follows:
|
|
•
|
We retired the
$6.7 million
loan secured by our Pleasant Hill Commons operating property using a draw on the unsecured revolving credit facility;
|
|
|
•
|
We borrowed
$47.5 million
on the unsecured revolving credit facility to fund development activities, redevelopment activities, and tenant improvement costs;
|
|
|
•
|
We used the
$76.1 million
proceeds from the sale of four operating properties to pay down the unsecured revolving credit facility; and
|
|
|
•
|
We made distributions to common shareholders and Common Unit holders of
$52.6 million
.
|
Funds From Operations
Funds from Operations ("FFO") is a widely used performance measure for real estate companies and is provided here as a supplemental measure of operating performance. We calculate FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, in accordance with the best practices described in the April 2002 National Policy Bulletin of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"). The NAREIT white paper defines FFO as net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or
losses) from sales and impairments of depreciated property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Considering the nature of our business as a real estate owner and operator, we believe that FFO is helpful to investors in measuring our operational performance because it excludes various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of our operating performance, such as gains or losses from sales of depreciated property and depreciation and amortization, which can make periodic and peer analyses of operating performance more difficult. For informational purposes, we have also provided FFO adjusted for transaction costs and a severance charge in 2016. We believe this supplemental information provides a meaningful measure of our operating performance. We believe our presentation of FFO, as adjusted, provides investors with another financial measure that may facilitate comparison of operating performance between periods and among our peer companies. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance, is not an alternative to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, and is not indicative of funds available to satisfy our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions. Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do.
Our calculations of FFO
1
and reconciliation to consolidated net income and FFO, as adjusted for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017
and
2016
(unaudited) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Consolidated net income (loss)
|
$
|
10,858
|
|
|
$
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,296
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in properties
|
(438
|
)
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
(922
|
)
|
Less: gains on sales of operating properties
|
(6,290
|
)
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
(15,160
|
)
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Add: impairment charge
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,411
|
|
|
—
|
|
Add: depreciation and amortization of consolidated entities, net of noncontrolling interests
|
42,050
|
|
|
43,545
|
|
|
87,416
|
|
|
85,599
|
|
FFO of the Operating Partnership
1
|
46,180
|
|
|
41,394
|
|
|
90,093
|
|
|
84,960
|
|
Less: Limited Partners' interests in FFO
|
(1,056
|
)
|
|
(809
|
)
|
|
(2,045
|
)
|
|
(1,790
|
)
|
Funds From Operations attributable to Kite Realty Group Trust common shareholders
1
|
$
|
45,124
|
|
|
$
|
40,585
|
|
|
$
|
88,048
|
|
|
$
|
83,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO of the Operating Partnership
1
|
$
|
46,180
|
|
|
$
|
41,394
|
|
|
$
|
90,093
|
|
|
$
|
84,960
|
|
Add: transaction costs
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
Add: severance charge
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
500
|
|
FFO, as adjusted, of the Operating Partnership
|
$
|
46,180
|
|
|
$
|
44,165
|
|
|
$
|
90,093
|
|
|
$
|
88,231
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
|
1
|
“FFO of the Operating Partnership" measures 100% of the operating performance of the Operating Partnership’s real estate properties. “FFO attributable to Kite Realty Group Trust common shareholders” reflects a reduction for the redeemable noncontrolling weighted average diluted interest in the Operating Partnership.
|
Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization
We define EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, as net income before depreciation and amortization, interest expense and income tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiary. For informational purposes, we have also provided Adjusted EBITDA, which we define as EBITDA less (i) EBITDA from unconsolidated entities, (ii) gains on sales of operating properties or impairment charges, (iii) other income and expense, (iv) noncontrolling interest EBITDA and (v) other non-recurring activity or items impacting comparability from period to period. Annualized Adjusted EBITDA is Adjusted EBITDA for the most recent quarter multiplied by four. Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA is our share of net debt divided by Annualized Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Annualized Adjusted EBITDA and Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA, as calculated by us, are not comparable to EBITDA and EBITDA-related measures reported by other REITs that do not define EBITDA and EBITDA-related measures exactly as we
do. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Annualized Adjusted EBITDA do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered alternatives to net income as an indicator of performance or as alternatives to cash flows from operating activities as an indicator of liquidity.
Considering the nature of our business as a real estate owner and operator, we believe that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and the ratio of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA are helpful to investors in measuring our operational performance because they exclude various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of our operating performance, such as gains or losses from sales of depreciated property and depreciation and amortization, which can make periodic and peer analyses of operating performance more difficult. For informational purposes, we have also provided Annualized Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted as described above. We believe this supplemental information provides a meaningful measure of our operating performance. We believe presenting EBITDA and the related measures in this manner allows investors and other interested parties to form a more meaningful assessment of our operating results.
The following table presents a reconciliation of our EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Annualized Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated net income (the most directly comparable GAAP measure) and a calculation of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2017
|
Consolidated net income
|
$
|
10,858
|
|
Adjustments to net income
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
42,710
|
|
Interest expense
|
16,433
|
|
Income tax benefit of taxable REIT subsidiary
|
3
|
|
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
|
70,004
|
|
Adjustments to EBITDA:
|
|
Unconsolidated EBITDA
|
34
|
|
Gain on sale of operating property
|
(6,290
|
)
|
Pro-forma adjustments
1
|
(3,369
|
)
|
Other income and expense, net
|
80
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
(432
|
)
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
60,027
|
|
|
|
Annualized Adjusted EBITDA
2
|
$
|
240,108
|
|
|
|
Company share of net debt:
|
|
|
Mortgage and other indebtedness
|
1,675,064
|
|
Less: Partner share of consolidated joint venture debt
3
|
(13,373
|
)
|
Less: Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
(36,352
|
)
|
Less: Net debt premiums and issuance costs, net
|
1,146
|
|
Company Share of Net Debt
|
1,626,485
|
|
Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA
|
6.77x
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
|
1
|
Relates to (a) a reduction reflecting the second quarter GAAP operating income of $0.8 million for properties sold during the second quarter of 2017, which adjustment to EBITDA (an income measure) corresponds with the use of proceeds from such sales to pay down the Credit Facility, as reflected in the change in net debt (a balance sheet measure) for the period ending June 30, 2017, and (b) a reduction of approximately $2.6 million in other property related revenue to normalize the impact on comparability of a $4.9 million net gain from the sale of an outlot at Cove Center during the second quarter of 2017 to the Company's quarterly average of other property related revenue.
|
2
|
Represents Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2017 (as shown in the table above) multiplied by four.
|
3
|
Partner share of consolidated joint venture debt is calculated based upon the partner's pro-rata ownership of the joint venture, multiplied by the related secured debt balance. In all cases, this debt is the responsibility of the consolidated joint venture.
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements that in our opinion have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. We do, however, have certain obligations related to some of the projects in our operating and development properties.
Contractual Obligations
Except with respect to our debt maturities as discussed on page 35, there have been no significant changes to our contractual obligations disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016
.
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Market Risk Related to Fixed and Variable Rate Debt
We had
$1.7 billion
of outstanding consolidated indebtedness as of
June 30, 2017
(exclusive of net premiums and issuance costs, net of
$1.1 million
on acquired indebtedness). As of this date, we were party to various consolidated interest rate hedge agreements totaling
$460.8 million
, with expiration dates
through 2021
. Reflecting these hedge agreements, our fixed and variable rate debt was
$1.6 billion
(95%) and
$0.1 billion
(5%), respectively, of our total consolidated indebtedness at
June 30, 2017
.
As of
June 30, 2017
, we do not have any fixed rate debt maturing within the next twelve months. A 100 basis point change in market interest rates would not materially impact the annual cash flows associated with this hedged debt. A 100 basis point change in interest rates on our unhedged variable rate debt as of
June 30, 2017
would change our annual cash flow by $0.9 million.
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
Kite Realty Group Trust
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Parent Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Parent Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Parent Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of
June 30, 2017
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Kite Realty Group, L.P.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Operating Partnership’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Operating Partnership's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of
June 30, 2017
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.