Tab Swells to $25 Billion for Nuclear-Power Plant in Georgia
August 02 2017 - 12:56PM
Dow Jones News
By Russell Gold
It will cost more than $25 billion to complete a Georgia nuclear
power plant, according to a new estimate released Wednesday,
raising new questions about whether the sole remaining nuclear
facility under construction in the U.S. will get built.
The disclosure from utility Southern Co. comes two days after
Scana Corp. pulled the plug on a similar nuclear plant in South
Carolina following years of delays and rising costs that also put
final completion of that facility above $25 billion.
The escalating expenses, which have nearly doubled over the past
nine years, have heightened concern that what was supposed to be a
rebirth of the nuclear power industry in the U.S., driven by
Westinghouse Electric Co. reactors, is becoming a costly
failure.
On Wednesday morning, Southern released a preliminary estimate
that indicated overall costs for its Vogtle Electric Generating
Plant have risen to at least $25.2 billion. In 2008, when it first
proposed building the plant's two reactors, it said it expected to
spend $6.4 billion for its 45.7% stake, meaning the entire project
would cost roughly $14 billion.
The company also said the earliest the reactors could be
operational would be February 2021 and February 2022. Previously,
the company said it expected them to be in service by 2019 and
2020.
Southern said it would make a recommendation to Georgia
regulators later this month about whether it would proceed with the
project. Thomas A. Fanning, Southern's chairman and CEO, is
expected to talk to investors Wednesday afternoon on a conference
call to discuss quarterly earnings.
A company spokesman confirmed the latest figures on the Georgia
plant, but declined to comment on its future.
Earlier this week, Santee Cooper, a state-owned electric utility
that was a part owner of South Carolina's V.C. Summer Nuclear
Station along with Scana Corp., said total costs of that facility
had swelled to $25.7 billion, more than twice the original cost of
$11.5 billion proposed in 2008. The utilities decided to cancel the
project on Monday, citing the higher costs and anticipated
additional delays.
Both Southern and Scana tried to shield investors from the risk
of escalating costs by negotiating fixed-cost contracts with
Westinghouse, the plants' designer and contractor. But cost
overruns forced Westinghouse to seek bankruptcy protection earlier
this year, a situation that threatened the financial health of its
Japanese parent, Toshiba Corp.
Construction at the Georgia facility is 44% complete, compared
to 35% for the South Carolina plant. What's more, Southern
negotiated a $3.7 billion financial settlement with Toshiba Corp.,
which sought to cap its exposure to higher costs from the
Westinghouse projects by cutting deals with the utilities.
Vogtle is the only nuclear power plant under construction in the
U.S., and the first to be started since the 1980s.
The soaring costs of building new plants are reminiscent of the
1970s and early 1980s, when rising costs contributed to a total
halt in new nuclear construction. In 2008, Westinghouse proposed a
new design that was intended to be easier to build on time and on
budget. This has not turned out to be the case.
The troubles with building new plants come at a time when the
idea of generating electricity from nuclear power has received a
boost. Some environmentalists have supported nuclear plants as a
way of providing power that doesn't emit carbon dioxide. And
President Donald Trump said earlier this summer he wanted to
"revive and expand our nuclear-energy sector."
Southern said on Wednesday morning that it posted a $1.38
billion loss in the second quarter of the year, compared to a $623
million profit in the same period a year earlier.
The change was almost entirely due to a $2.8 billion pre-tax
charge the company took related to an expensive, and ultimately
unsuccessful, attempt to build a power plant In Mississippi that
could cleanly burn coal and capture much of its carbon-dioxide
output.
In June, Mississippi regulators said they were unwilling to pass
any additional costs onto to electricity customers. The plant cost
$7.5 billion and seven years to build, but Southern couldn't get
the carbon dioxide technology to operate properly for extended
periods.
Write to Russell Gold at russell.gold@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
August 02, 2017 12:41 ET (16:41 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Southern (NYSE:SO)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Southern (NYSE:SO)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024