NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
: The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, these financial statements include all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations, cash flows and the change in equity for the periods presented. The condensed consolidated financial statements for the
three
and
six months ended
June 30, 2017
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries (which may be referred to as “West”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016
(the “
2016
Annual Report”). The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
Beginning with the three months ended June 30, 2017, our consolidated financial statements exclude the results of our Venezuelan subsidiary. Please refer to Note 12,
Other Expense
, for further discussion.
Note 2: New Accounting Standards
Recently Adopted Standards
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance which removes the second step of the goodwill impairment test. A goodwill impairment charge will now be the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2017, on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2017, on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued guidance which requires companies to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2017, on a modified retrospective basis. As a result of the adoption, a cumulative-effect adjustment of
$4.1 million
was recorded within retained earnings in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2017, for unamortized tax expense previously deferred and previously unrecognized deferred tax assets.
In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance that simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2017, on a prospective basis as it relates to the timing or recognition and classification of share-based compensation award-related income tax effects. For the
three
and
six months ended
June 30, 2017
, we recorded a tax benefit of
$9.6 million
and
$25.5 million
, respectively, within income tax expense in our condensed consolidated statement of income. These tax benefits were recorded within capital in excess of par value in our condensed consolidated balance sheet in the prior-
year period. Also per the amended guidance, we classified the
$25.5 million
of excess tax benefits within net cash provided by operating activities in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows, rather than net cash used in financing activities, which included the excess tax benefits for the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
. The amended guidance allows entities to account for award forfeitures as they occur, however, we have elected to continue to estimate forfeitures expected to occur to determine the amount of compensation cost to be recognized in each period. We expect to record additional tax benefits throughout
2017
.
In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance that simplifies the transition to the equity method of accounting. This guidance eliminates the requirement to retroactively adopt the equity method of accounting when there is an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2017, on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued guidance regarding the subsequent measurement of inventory. This guidance requires inventory measured using any method other than last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value represents estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2017, on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Standards Issued Not Yet Adopted
In May 2017, the FASB issued guidance which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. The guidance focuses on changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards that would require the application of modification accounting and specifies that an entity would not apply modification accounting if its fair value, vesting conditions and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on our financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost (net benefit cost). The guidance requires the bifurcation of net benefit cost. The service cost component will be presented with other employee compensation costs in operating income (or capitalized in assets) and the other components will be reported separately outside of operations, and will not be eligible for capitalization. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on our financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued guidance on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. As of
June 30, 2017
, we had no restricted cash.
In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance to reduce the diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on our financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for leases. This guidance requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and to expand disclosures about leasing arrangements, both qualitative and quantitative. In terms of transition, the guidance requires adoption based upon a modified retrospective approach. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on our financial statements. As of
June 30, 2017
, future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases were
$71.8 million
.
In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance that addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. We believe that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for revenue from contracts with customers that will supersede most existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the guidance requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity's contracts with customers. The FASB subsequently issued additional clarifying standards to address issues arising from implementation of the new revenue recognition standard. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of one year prior to the current effective date. Entities can choose to apply the guidance using either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. We continue to make progress towards completion of our evaluation of the potential impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on our financial statements. Based on the results of the procedures performed through
June 30, 2017
, we believe that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on our financial statements and we expect to apply the guidance using the modified retrospective approach. We also continue to review the impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on our financial statement disclosures.
Note 3: Net Income Per Share
The following table reconciles the shares used in the calculation of basic net income per share to those used for diluted net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
(In millions)
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Net income
|
$
|
38.8
|
|
|
$
|
44.7
|
|
|
$
|
99.7
|
|
|
$
|
66.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
73.9
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
73.6
|
|
|
72.9
|
|
Dilutive effect of equity awards, based on the treasury stock method
|
1.9
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Weighted average shares assuming dilution
|
75.8
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
74.5
|
|
During the three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, there were
0.5 million
and
0.1 million
shares, respectively, from stock-based compensation plans not included in the computation of diluted net income per share because their impact was antidilutive. There were
0.3 million
and
0.4 million
antidilutive shares outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
In December 2016, we announced a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to
800,000
shares of our common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately-negotiated transactions as permitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 10b-18. The number of shares to be repurchased and the timing of such transactions will depend on a variety of factors, including market conditions. The program commenced on January 1, 2017 and is expected to be completed by December 31, 2017. There were no shares purchased during the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we purchased
325,000
shares of our common stock under the program at a cost of
$26.9 million
, or an average price of
$82.84
per share.
Note 4: Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) and net realizable value. Inventory balances were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Raw materials
|
$
|
85.5
|
|
|
$
|
78.0
|
|
Work in process
|
33.3
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
Finished goods
|
92.5
|
|
|
92.4
|
|
|
$
|
211.3
|
|
|
$
|
199.3
|
|
Note 5: Affiliated Companies
At
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the aggregate carrying amount of investments in equity-method affiliates was
$70.2 million
and
$69.3 million
, respectively, and the aggregate carrying amount of cost-method investments, for which fair value was not readily determinable, was
$13.4 million
at both period-ends. We test our cost-method investments for impairment whenever circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the investments may not be recoverable. Please refer to Note 5,
Affiliated Companies
, to the consolidated financial statements in our
2016
Annual Report for additional details.
Note 6: Debt
The following table summarizes our long-term debt obligations, net of unamortized debt issuance costs and current maturities. The interest rates shown in parentheses are as of June 30, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Term loan, due January 1, 2018 (2.55%)
|
$
|
33.7
|
|
|
$
|
34.9
|
|
Note payable, due December 31, 2019
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Credit Facility, due October 15, 2020 (1.00%)
|
28.4
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
Series A notes, due July 5, 2022 (3.67%)
|
42.0
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
Series B notes, due July 5, 2024 (3.82%)
|
53.0
|
|
|
53.0
|
|
Series C notes, due July 5, 2027 (4.02%)
|
73.0
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
|
230.3
|
|
|
229.5
|
|
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Total debt
|
229.5
|
|
|
228.6
|
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt
|
33.8
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Long-term debt, net
|
$
|
195.7
|
|
|
$
|
226.2
|
|
Please refer to Note 8,
Debt
, to the consolidated financial statements in our
2016
Annual Report for additional details regarding our debt agreements.
At
June 30, 2017
, we had
$28.4 million
in outstanding long-term borrowings under our
$300.0 million
multi-currency revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), of which
$4.5 million
was denominated in Japanese Yen (“Yen”) and
$23.9 million
was denominated in Euro. These borrowings, together with outstanding letters of credit of
$3.0 million
, resulted in an available borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility of
$268.6 million
at
June 30, 2017
. Please refer to Note 7,
Derivative Financial Instruments
, for a discussion of the foreign currency hedges associated with this facility.
In addition, at
June 30, 2017
, we had
$33.7 million
outstanding under our
five
-year term loan due January 2018, all of which was classified as current. Please refer to Note 7,
Derivative Financial Instruments
, for a discussion of the interest-rate swap agreement associated with this loan.
Note 7: Derivative Financial Instruments
Our ongoing business operations expose us to various risks such as fluctuating interest rates, foreign exchange rates and increasing commodity prices. To manage these market risks, we periodically enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, options and foreign exchange contracts for periods consistent with and for notional amounts equal to or less than the related underlying exposures. We do not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for investment or trading purposes. All derivatives are recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheet at fair value.
Interest Rate Risk
At
June 30, 2017
, we had a
$33.7 million
forward-start interest rate swap outstanding that hedges the variability in cash flows due to changes in the applicable interest rate of our variable-rate
five
-year term loan. Under this swap, we receive variable interest rate payments based on
one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)
plus a margin in return for making monthly fixed interest payments at
5.41%
. We designated this swap as a cash flow hedge.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
We have entered into forward exchange contracts, designated as fair value hedges, to manage our exposure to fluctuating foreign exchange rates on cross-currency intercompany loans. As of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the total amount of these forward exchange contracts was
€73.0 million
and
€57.5 million
, respectively.
In addition, we have entered into several foreign currency contracts, designated as cash flow hedges, for periods of up to eighteen months, intended to hedge the currency risk associated with a portion of our forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies. As of
June 30, 2017
, we had outstanding foreign currency contracts to purchase and sell certain pairs of currencies, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Sell
|
Currency
|
Purchase
|
|
U. S. Dollar (
“
USD
”
)
|
Euro
|
USD
|
38.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
35.6
|
|
Yen
|
4,082.1
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
11.5
|
|
Singapore Dollar
|
25.6
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
5.3
|
|
At
June 30, 2017
, a portion of our debt consisted of borrowings denominated in currencies other than USD. We have designated our
€21.0 million
(
$23.9 million
) Euro-denominated borrowings under our Credit Facility as a hedge of our net investment in certain European subsidiaries. A cumulative foreign currency translation loss of
$0.1 million
pre-tax (
$0.1 million
after tax) on this debt was recorded within accumulated other comprehensive loss as of
June 30, 2017
. We have also designated our
¥500.0 million
(
$4.5 million
) Yen-denominated borrowings under our Credit Facility as a hedge of our net investment in Daikyo Seiko, Ltd. (“Daikyo”). At
June 30, 2017
, there was a cumulative foreign currency translation loss on this Yen-denominated debt of
$0.3 million
pre-tax (
$0.2 million
after tax), which was also included within accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Commodity Price Risk
Many of our proprietary products are made from synthetic elastomers, which are derived from the petroleum refining process. We purchase the majority of our elastomers via long-term supply contracts, some of which contain clauses that provide for surcharges related to fluctuations in crude oil prices. The following economic hedges did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment since they did not meet the highly effective requirement at inception.
In November 2016, we purchased a series of call options for a total of
96,525
barrels of crude oil to mitigate our exposure to such oil-based surcharges and protect operating cash flows with regards to a portion of our forecasted elastomer purchases through November 2017. With these contracts, we may benefit from an increase in crude oil prices, as there is no downward exposure other than the
$0.2 million
premium that we paid to purchase the contracts.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the loss recorded in cost of goods and services sold related to these call options was less than
$0.1 million
. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
, the loss recorded in cost of goods and services sold related to these call options was
$0.2 million
.
As of
June 30, 2017
, we had outstanding contracts to purchase
43,875
barrels of crude oil, at a strike price of $60 per barrel.
Effects of Derivative Instruments on Financial Position and Results of Operations
Please refer to Note 8,
Fair Value Measurements
, for the balance sheet location and fair values of our derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
The following table summarizes the effects of derivative instruments designated as hedges on other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and earnings, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of (Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI for the
|
|
Amount of Loss (Gain) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income for the
|
|
Location of Loss (Gain) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
($ in millions)
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedge contracts
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
Net sales
|
Foreign currency hedge contracts
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Cost of goods and services sold
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
—
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Total
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency-denominated debt
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Other expense
|
Total
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of (Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI for the
|
|
Amount of Loss (Gain) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income for the
|
|
Location of Loss (Gain) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
($ in millions)
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedge contracts
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
Net sales
|
Foreign currency hedge contracts
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Cost of goods and services sold
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
—
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Forward treasury locks
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Total
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency-denominated debt
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Other expense
|
Total
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
For the three and
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, there was no material ineffectiveness related to our hedges.
Note 8: Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy classifies the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into one of three levels:
|
|
•
|
Level 1
: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
•
|
Level 2
: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
|
|
|
•
|
Level 3
: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.
|
The following tables present the assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Basis of Fair Value Measurements
|
($ in millions)
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation assets
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
Deferred compensation liabilities
|
9.6
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swap contract
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
4.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Basis of Fair Value Measurements
|
($ in millions)
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation assets
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
0.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
Deferred compensation liabilities
|
8.4
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swap contract
|
1.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
1.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
19.0
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
Deferred compensation assets are included within other noncurrent assets and are valued using a market approach based on quoted market prices in an active market. The fair value of our foreign currency contracts, included within other current assets and other current liabilities, is valued using an income approach based on quoted forward foreign exchange rates and spot rates at the reporting date. The fair value of our contingent consideration, included within other current and other long-term liabilities, is discussed further in the section related to Level 3 fair value measurements. The fair value of deferred compensation liabilities is based on quoted prices of the underlying employees’ investment selections and is included within other long-term liabilities. Our interest rate swap, included within other current and other long-term liabilities, is valued based on the terms of the contract and observable market inputs (i.e., LIBOR, Eurodollar synthetic forwards and swap spreads). Please refer to Note 7,
Derivative Financial Instruments
, for further discussion of our derivatives.
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of the contingent consideration liability related to the SmartDose technology platform (the “SmartDose contingent consideration”) was initially determined using a probability-weighted income approach, and is revalued at each reporting date or more frequently if circumstances dictate. Changes in the fair value of this obligation are recorded as income or expense within other expense in our condensed consolidated statements of income. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the SmartDose contingent consideration are the sales projections, the probability of success factors, and the discount rate. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. As development and commercialization of the SmartDose technology platform progresses, we may need to update the sales projections, the probability of success factors, and the discount rate used. This could result in a material increase or decrease to the SmartDose contingent consideration.
The following table provides a summary of changes in our Level 3 fair value measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
Balance, December 31, 2015
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
Increase in fair value recorded in earnings
|
2.3
|
|
Payments
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Balance, December 31, 2016
|
8.0
|
|
Increase in fair value recorded in earnings
|
0.7
|
|
Payments
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Balance, June 30, 2017
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
Other Financial Instruments
We believe that the carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable approximate their fair values due to their near-term maturities.
The estimated fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted market prices for debt issuances with similar terms and maturities and is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. At
June 30, 2017
, the estimated fair value of long-term debt was
$199.3 million
compared to a carrying amount of
$195.7 million
. At
December 31, 2016
, the estimated fair value of long-term debt was
$228.3 million
and the carrying amount was
$226.2 million
.
Note 9: Stock-Based Compensation
The West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2016 Plan”) provides for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and performance awards to employees and non-employee directors. A committee of the Board of Directors determines the terms and conditions of awards to be granted. Vesting requirements vary by award. At
June 30, 2017
, there were
4,617,729
shares remaining in the 2016 Plan for future grants.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
, we granted
437,452
stock options at a weighted average exercise price of
$83.92
per share based on the grant-date fair value of our stock to key employees under the 2016 Plan. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted was
$18.05
per share as determined by the Black-Scholes option valuation model using the following weighted average assumptions: a risk-free interest rate of
2.05%
; expected life of
5.9
years based on prior experience; stock volatility of
19.9%
based on historical data; and a dividend yield of
0.7%
. Stock option expense is recognized over the vesting period, net of forfeitures.
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
, we granted
90,429
performance share unit (“PSU”) awards at a weighted average grant-date fair value of
$83.89
per share to key employees under the 2016 Plan. Each PSU award entitles the holder to
one
share of our common stock if the annual growth rate of revenue and return on invested
capital targets are achieved over a
three
-year performance period. Shares earned under PSU awards may vary from
0%
to
200%
of an employee’s targeted award. The fair value of PSU awards is based on the market price of our stock at the grant date and is recognized as expense over the performance period, adjusted for estimated target outcomes and net of forfeitures.
Total stock-based compensation expense was
$5.5 million
and
$9.0 million
for the
three
and
six months ended
June 30, 2017
, respectively. For the
three
and
six months ended
June 30, 2016
, stock-based compensation expense was
$4.9 million
and
$9.5 million
, respectively.
Note 10: Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the
three months ended
June 30
were as follows ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
Other retirement benefits
|
|
Total
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Service cost
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
Interest cost
|
2.4
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Recognized actuarial losses (gains)
|
1.2
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
Other retirement benefits
|
|
Total
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
U.S. plans
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
International plans
|
0.7
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the
six months ended
June 30
were as follows ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
Other retirement benefits
|
|
Total
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Service cost
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
Interest cost
|
4.9
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Recognized actuarial losses (gains)
|
2.4
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
Other retirement benefits
|
|
Total
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
U.S. plans
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
International plans
|
1.4
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
During the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
, we contributed
$20.0 million
to our U.S. qualified pension plan.
Note 11: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table presents the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
Losses on
cash flow
hedges
|
|
Unrealized gains
on investment
securities
|
|
Defined benefit
pension and other
postretirement plans
|
|
Foreign
currency
translation
|
|
Total
|
Balance, December 31, 2016
|
$
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
(45.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(143.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(186.8
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
Amounts reclassified out
|
0.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2017
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(46.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(151.8
|
)
|
A summary of the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss is presented in the following table ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Location on Statement of Income
|
Detail of components
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Losses on cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Net sales
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
Cost of goods and services sold
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
Forward treasury locks
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
Total before tax
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
Tax expense
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
$
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
Amortization of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
(a)
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
Total before tax
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
Tax expense
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(a) These components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. Please refer to Note 10,
Benefit Plans
, for additional details.
Note 12: Other Expense
Other expense consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
($ in millions)
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Restructuring and related charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and post-employment benefits
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
Asset-related charges
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Total restructuring and related charges
|
—
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
Venezuela currency devaluation
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Venezuela deconsolidation
|
11.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
Development income
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Contingent consideration costs
|
0.4
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Other items
|
0.6
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Total other expense
|
$
|
11.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
$
|
26.6
|
|
Restructuring and Related Charges
On February 15, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan designed to repurpose several of our production facilities in support of growing high-value proprietary products and to realign operational and commercial activities to meet the needs of our new market-focused commercial organization.
During the
three months ended
June 30, 2016
, we recorded
$1.5 million
in reversals of previously-recorded restructuring and related charges. During the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
, we incurred
$21.4 million
in restructuring and related charges, consisting of
$6.4 million
for severance charges,
$10.0 million
for a non-cash asset write-down associated with the discontinued use of a trademark, and
$5.0 million
for non-cash asset write-downs associated with the discontinued use of a patent and certain equipment.
The balance of the charges related to this plan will be recognized as incurred in 2017.
The following table presents activity related to our restructuring obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
Severance
and benefits
|
|
Asset-related charges
|
|
Other charges
|
|
Total
|
Balance, December 31, 2015
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Charges
|
8.9
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
Cash payments
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
Non-cash asset write-downs
|
—
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(17.5
|
)
|
Balance, December 31, 2016
|
5.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Cash payments
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
Balance, June 30, 2017
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
Other Items
On February 17, 2016, the Venezuelan government announced a devaluation of the Bolivar, from the previously-prevailing official exchange rate of
6.3
Bolivars to USD to
10.0
Bolivars to USD, and streamlined the previous three-tiered currency exchange mechanism into a dual currency exchange mechanism. As a result, during the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
, we recorded a
$2.7 million
charge. During the three and six months ended
June 30,
2017
, as a result of the continued deterioration of conditions in Venezuela as well as our continued reduced access to USD settlement controlled by the Venezuelan government, we recorded a charge of
$11.1 million
related to the deconsolidation of our Venezuelan subsidiary, following our determination that we no longer met the U.S. GAAP criteria for control of that subsidiary. This charge included the derecognition of the carrying amounts of our Venezuelan subsidiary's assets and liabilities, as well as the write-off of our investment in our Venezuelan subsidiary, related unrealized translation adjustments and the elimination of intercompany accounts. Beginning with the three months ended June 30, 2017, our consolidated financial statements exclude the results of our Venezuelan subsidiary except for income from sales of inventory or from dividends only to the extent that USD is received from our Venezuelan subsidiary. We will continue to actively monitor the political and economic developments in Venezuela.
In addition, during both the
three
and
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, we recognized development income of
$0.4 million
and
$0.8 million
, respectively, within Proprietary Products, related to a nonrefundable customer payment of
$20.0 million
received in June 2013 in return for the exclusive use of the SmartDose technology platform within a specific therapeutic area. As of
June 30, 2017
, there was
$13.6 million
of unearned income related to this payment, of which
$1.5 million
was included in other current liabilities and
$12.1 million
was included in other long-term liabilities. The unearned income is being recognized as development income on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the agreement. The agreement does not include a future minimum purchase commitment from the customer.
Contingent consideration costs represent changes in the fair value of the SmartDose contingent consideration. Please refer to Note 8,
Fair Value Measurements
, for additional details.
Other items consist of foreign exchange transaction gains and losses, gains and losses on the sale of fixed assets, and miscellaneous income and charges.
Note 13: Income Taxes
The tax provision for interim periods is determined using the estimated annual effective consolidated tax rate, based on the current estimate of full-year earnings before taxes, adjusted for the impact of discrete quarterly items. The provision for income taxes was
$2.9 million
and
$17.0 million
for the
three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively, and the effective tax rate was
7.1%
and
28.6%
, respectively. The provision for income taxes was
$5.1 million
and
$23.9 million
for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively, and the effective tax rate was
5.1%
and
27.4%
, respectively.
The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017
, as compared to the same periods in
2016
, reflects the impact of a tax benefit of
$9.6 million
and
$25.5 million
for the
three
and
six months ended
June 30, 2017
, respectively, associated with our adoption of the guidance issued by the FASB regarding share-based payment transactions. Please refer to Note 2,
New Accounting Standards
, for further discussion of the new accounting guidance. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same periods in 2016, also reflects the impact of a tax benefit of
$3.5 million
related to a planned repatriation of approximately
$65.0 million
of cash held by non-U.S. subsidiaries during 2017.
Note 14: Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, we are involved in product liability matters and other legal proceedings and claims generally incidental to our normal business activities. We accrue for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. While the outcome of current proceedings cannot be accurately predicted, we believe their ultimate resolution should not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
There have been no significant changes to the commitments and contingencies included in our
2016
Annual Report.
Note 15: Segment Information
Our business operations are organized into
two
reportable segments, Proprietary Products and Contract-Manufactured Products. Our Proprietary Products reportable segment develops commercial, operational, and innovation strategies across our global network, with specific emphasis on product offerings to biotechnology, generics, and pharmaceutical customers. Our Contract-Manufactured Products reportable segment serves as a fully integrated business focused on the design, manufacture, and automated assembly of complex devices, primarily for pharmaceutical, diagnostic, and medical device customers.
Segment operating profit excludes general corporate costs, which include executive and director compensation, stock-based compensation, adjustments to annual incentive plan expense for over- or under-attainment of targets, certain pension and other retirement benefit costs, and other corporate facilities and administrative expenses not allocated to the segments. Also excluded are items that we consider not representative of ongoing operations. Such items are referred to as other unallocated items and generally include restructuring and related charges, certain asset impairments and other specifically-identified income or expense items.
The following table presents information about our reportable segments, reconciled to consolidated totals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
($ in millions)
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products
|
$
|
312.8
|
|
|
$
|
311.0
|
|
|
$
|
621.6
|
|
|
$
|
601.8
|
|
Contract-Manufactured Products
|
84.9
|
|
|
77.2
|
|
|
164.0
|
|
|
148.8
|
|
Intersegment sales elimination
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Consolidated net sales
|
$
|
397.6
|
|
|
$
|
388.0
|
|
|
$
|
785.3
|
|
|
$
|
750.1
|
|
Operating profit (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products
|
$
|
56.3
|
|
|
$
|
66.2
|
|
|
$
|
121.2
|
|
|
$
|
128.1
|
|
Contract-Manufactured Products
|
10.5
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
Corporate
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
(16.2
|
)
|
|
(25.4
|
)
|
|
(29.5
|
)
|
Other unallocated items
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
(24.1
|
)
|
Total operating profit
|
$
|
42.7
|
|
|
$
|
61.2
|
|
|
$
|
104.0
|
|
|
$
|
91.2
|
|
Interest expense
|
2.3
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Interest income
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
40.7
|
|
|
$
|
59.5
|
|
|
$
|
100.2
|
|
|
$
|
87.3
|
|
The intersegment sales elimination, which is required for the presentation of consolidated net sales, represents the elimination of components sold between our segments.
Other unallocated items, during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017
, consisted of a charge of
$11.1 million
related to the deconsolidation of our Venezuelan subsidiary. Other unallocated items, during the
three
and
six months ended
June 30, 2016
, consisted of
$(1.5) million
and
$21.4 million
, respectively, in restructuring and related (reversals) charges. In addition, during the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
, other unallocated items included a charge of
$2.7 million
related to the devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar from the previously-prevailing official exchange rate of 6.3 Bolivars to USD to 10.0 Bolivars to USD. Please refer to Note 12,
Other Expense
, for further discussion of these items.