UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant
x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
x
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
o
|
|
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
|
|
PRIME GLOBAL CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED
|
(Name of the Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
|
|
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
x
|
|
No fee required
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
PRIME GLOBAL CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED
E-5-2, Megan Avenue 1, Block E, Jalan Tun
Razak
50400 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that the annual meeting of stockholders of Prime Global Capital Group Incorporated will be held at The Campus, Grand Hyatt Erawan
Bangkok, 494 Rajdamri Road Bangkok 10330 Thailand on August 29, 2017, at 8:30 a.m., Bangkok Time (UTC+8 ), for the following purposes,
as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:
|
1.
|
To elect a Board of Directors to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of the Shareholders or until their successors are elected;
|
|
2.
|
To ratify the appointment of ShineWing Australia as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2017; and
|
|
3.
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
|
The record date for the
determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting is June 30, 2017. Accordingly, only stockholders
of record as of that date will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Your vote is very important
to us. Regardless of whether you expect to attend the meeting, please act promptly to vote your shares. You may vote your shares
by telephone, over the Internet or by attending the annual meeting and voting your shares in person. You may also grant your proxy
to vote by telephone, over the Internet or by returning a signed, dated and marked proxy card that you received. If you are present
at the meeting and hold shares in your name, you may vote in person even if you have previously submitted your proxy by telephone,
over the Internet or by mail. If your shares are held in street name with your broker or by a nominee and you wish to vote in person
at the meeting, you will need to obtain a legal proxy from the institution that holds your shares and provide that legal proxy
at the meeting.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors
Dato’ Weng Kung Wong
Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary
July 13, 2017
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING
THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR
THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO
BE HELD ON AUGUST 29, 2017
The Company’s
Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2016 are available at www.sec.gov.
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF
PRIME GLOBAL CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED
Approximate date of mailing — July
20, 2017
Date, Time and Place of Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of stockholders
of Prime Global Capital Group Incorporated, or “we”, “us” or the “Company,” is scheduled to
be held as follows:
|
Date:
|
|
Thursday, August 29, 2017
|
|
Time:
|
|
8.30 a.m., Bangkok Time (UTC +8)
|
|
Place:
|
|
The Campus, Grand Hyatt Erawan Bangkok
|
|
|
|
494 Rajdamri Road Bangkok 10330 Thailand
|
|
|
|
|
Proposals to be Considered at the Annual Meeting
At the annual meeting,
you will be asked to consider and vote on the following proposals:
|
·
|
To elect a Board of Directors to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of the Shareholders or until their successors are elected;
|
|
·
|
To ratify the appointment of ShineWing Australia as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2017; and
|
|
·
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
|
In the event that a quorum is not present at
the annual meeting, you may also be asked to vote upon a proposal to adjourn or postpone the annual meeting to solicit additional
proxies.
Record Date
Our Board of Directors
has fixed the close of business on June 30, 2017 as the record date for the annual meeting and only holders of record of our common
stock on the record date are entitled to vote at the annual meeting. On the record date, there were outstanding 512,682,393 shares
of our common stock.
Voting Rights and Quorum
Each share of our common
stock is entitled to one vote. The presence in person or representation by proxy of holders of a majority of the shares of our
common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on June 30, 2017, will constitute a quorum at the annual meeting.
If a share is represented for any purpose at the meeting, it is deemed to be present for the transaction of all business. Abstentions
and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction
of business. In the event that a quorum is not present at the annual meeting, it is expected that the annual meeting will be adjourned
or postponed to solicit additional proxies.
Vote Required
Each item to be acted upon
at the meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock represented at the
meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the item, assuming that a quorum is present or represented at the meeting.
A properly executed proxy marked “WITHHOLD” with respect to the election of one or more directors will not be voted
with respect to the director or directors indicated, and will have no effect. With respect to the other proposals, a properly executed
proxy marked “ABSTAIN,” although counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, will not be voted.
Accordingly, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote cast against a proposal. Under Nevada law, a broker non-vote will
have no effect on the outcome of the matters presented for a stockholder vote.
If you are the beneficial
owner of shares held in “street name” by a broker, your broker, as the record holder of the shares, must vote those
shares in accordance with your instructions. In accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the
“NYSE”
),
a brokerage firm may give a proxy to vote its customer’s stock without customer instructions if the brokerage firm (i) transmitted
proxy materials to the beneficial owner of the stock, (ii) did not receive voting instructions by the date specified in the
statement accompanying the proxy materials and (iii) has no knowledge of any contest with respect to the actions to be taken
at the stockholders’ meeting and such actions are adequately disclosed to stockholders. In addition, under NYSE rules, brokerage
firms may not vote their customers’ stock without instructions from the customer if the vote concerns the election of directors,
a matter relating to executive compensation, an authorization for a merger, consolidation or any matter that could substantially
affect the rights or privileges of the stock.
Voting and Revocation of Proxies
After carefully reading
and considering the information contained in this proxy statement, you may attend the annual meeting and vote your shares in person,
by telephone or over the Internet. You may also grant your proxy to vote by returning a signed, dated and marked proxy card, by
telephone or over the Internet.
Unless you specify to the
contrary, all of your shares represented by valid proxies will be voted
|
·
|
“
FOR
” all director nominees; and
|
|
·
|
“
FOR
” the appointment of ShineWing Australia as our independent registered public accounting firm.
|
The persons you name as
proxies may propose and vote for one or more adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting, including adjournments or postponements
to permit further solicitations of proxies. Such proxy holders may also vote in its discretion on any other matters that properly
come before the annual meeting.
Until exercised at the
annual meeting, you can revoke your proxy and change your vote in any of the following ways:
|
·
|
by delivering written notification to us at our principal executive offices at E-5-2, Megan Avenue 1, Block E, Jalan Tun Razak, 50400 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Attention: Corporate Secretary;
|
|
·
|
by changing your vote or revoking your proxy by telephone or over the Internet;
|
|
·
|
if you hold shares in your name, by attending the annual meeting and voting in person (your attendance at the meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy; you must vote in person at the meeting);
|
|
·
|
if you have instructed a broker or bank to vote your shares, by following the directions received from your broker or bank to change those instructions; or
|
|
·
|
if you hold shares in street name with your broker or by a nominee, by obtaining a legal proxy from the institution that holds your shares, attending the annual meeting and voting in person (your attendance at the meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy; you must vote in person at the meeting).
|
If you decide to vote by
completing, signing, dating and returning a proxy card, you should retain a copy of the voter control number found on the proxy
card in the event that you decide later to change or revoke your proxy.
Solicitation of Proxies
The accompanying proxy
is being solicited by our Board of Directors, and we will pay for the entire cost of the solicitation. Arrangements will also be
made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding the solicitation material to the beneficial
owners of our common stock held of record by those persons, and we may reimburse them for reasonable transaction and clerical expenses.
In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone, facsimile or other means of communication
by our officers and regular employees. These people will receive no additional compensation for these services, but will be reimbursed
for any expenses incurred by them in connection with these services. We have engaged Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. to assist
in the solicitation of proxies. We will pay that firm approximately $13,252 for its services and reimburse its out-of-pocket expenses
for such items as mailing, copying, phone calls, faxes and other related matters.
Delivery of One Proxy Statement to A Single
Household
We will deliver only one
proxy statement to multiple security holders sharing an address unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more
of the security holders. Upon written or oral request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of this proxy statement and any
future annual reports and information statements to any security holder at a shared address to which a single copy of this proxy
statement was delivered, or deliver a single copy of this proxy statement and any future proxy statements and annual reports to
any security holder or holders sharing an address to which multiple copies are now delivered. You should direct any
such requests to the following address: Prime Global Capital Group Incorporated, E-5-2, Megan Avenue 1, Block E, Jalan
Tun Razak, 50400 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Attn: Secretary. The Secretary may also be reached by telephone at +603 2162 0773; facsimile
at +603 2161 0770.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets
forth information as of July 10, 2017, as to the beneficial ownership of our common stock, in each case, by (i) each person known
to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; (ii) each executive officer; (iii) each individual named
in the Summary Compensation Table; (iv) each of our directors and nominees; and (v) all of our current executive officers and directors
as a group.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount
(number
of shares)
|
|
|
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares of
Common Stock
|
|
Dato’ Weng Kung Wong (1)
|
|
|
54,811,085
|
|
|
|
10.69%
|
|
Maylee Gan Suat Lee (1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Datao’ Jeremy Chia (1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (five persons)
|
|
|
54,811,085
|
|
|
|
10.69%
|
|
* Less than 1%.
(1)
|
Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Prime Global Capital Group Incorporated, E-5-2, Megan Avenue 1, Block E, Jalan Tun Razak, 50400 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
|
(2)
|
Applicable percentage ownership is based on 512,682,393 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 10, 2017, together with securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock within 60 days of July 10, 2017. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock that a person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of upon the exercise or conversion of options, convertible stock, warrants or other securities that are currently exercisable or convertible or that will become exercisable or convertible within 60 days of July 10, 2017, are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the number of shares beneficially owned and percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
|
DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, NOMINEES AND CONTROL
PERSONS
Set forth below are the
present directors and executive officers and director nominees of the Company. There are no arrangements or understandings between
any of the directors, director nominees, officers and other persons pursuant to which such person was selected as a director or
an officer. Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors
have been elected and have qualified. Officers are appointed to serve until the meeting of the Board of Directors following
the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Dato’ Weng Kung Wong
|
44
|
Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
|
Maylee Gan Suat Lee
|
39
|
Director
|
Dato’ Jeremy Chia Pei Chai
|
30
|
Director
|
Dato’ Weng
Kung Wong
, age 43, has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Director since November 15, 2010. He currently also serves
as the Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. He founded Mobile Wallet Sdn. Bhd., MWSB, one of the first Malaysian m-commerce
companies, in 2004 and currently serves as its Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to founding MWSB, Mr. Wong
served as an Agency Unit Manager of MAA Insurance from April, 2001 to November, 2003. From January, 2000 to April, 2001, he was
the Marketing Director of Spider Holding Sdn. Bhd., an herb products distribution company. Mr. Wong began his professional career
in 1995 with Forever Living Products, a health products multilevel marketing company, where he spent four years in positions of
accelerating responsibility in the areas of business development and marketing. Mr. Wong obtained a bachelor’s degree in
Management Information Systems from the National Central University of Taiwan in 1995. As our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Wong
brings to our Board of Directors knowledge of our operations and history, business leadership, corporate strategy and entrepreneurial
expertise.
Maylee Gan Suat Lee
,
age 39, joined our Board of Directors on April 1, 2016. She is currently the founder and senior partner of Messrs. Maylee Gan &
Tai. Prior to founding her firm in 2008, Ms. Gan practiced at one of the top 5 legal firms in Malaysia, Lee Hishammuddin Allen
& Gledhill from 2004 to 2008. Ms. Gan graduated with a Bachelor of Laws (Hons) degree from the University of London, England
in 1999. She obtained her Certificate of Legal Practice in 2000 and has a Masters of Science in Information Technology (MSc IT)
from the University of Staffordshire in 2004.
Ms. Gan was admitted and
enrolled as an advocate and solicitor of the High Court of Malaya in 2005. She has vast experience in various complex corporate
matters, and she was the lead associate in charge of the largest worldwide business disposal to-date known as the “Pfizer
Pontiac Project”, which involves the worldwide sale of Pfizer Consumer Healthcare business division in 2006, and the largest
Asset-Backed Securities transaction carried out by RCE Capital Berhad in Malaysia in the year 2008. Ms. Gan is also a Non-executive
Director of G&L Trading Sdn Bhd, as a successor of her late father. G&L Trading Sdn Bhd supplies cleaning detergent to
hotels and food & beverages related businesses. Through her vast experience in legal corporate matters with numerous large
corporations, with which her legal firm is a panel of solicitor, Ms. Gan brings to the Board of Directors her legal insight, knowledge
and experience in legal corporate matters.
Dato’ Jeremy
Chia Pei Chai,
age 30, joined our Board of Directors on February 13, 2017, and is the Director of Marathon Capital Management
Limited, HK, an international investment fund focusing on early and development stage private companies spanning the entertainment,
security, real estate and investment industries. His fund has made investments in Hong Kong, Macau, China, Philippines and Singapore.
Dato’ Jeremy has also started to build his business as a founder of flea market in 2012 at The Mines, Seri Kembangan, Selangor.
Prior to founding the fund, from 2009 to 2011 Dato’ Jeremy was a branch manager at Melilea, a prioneering global green corporation
that has won numerous industry and global awards for its innovative management as a health and wellness multinational corporation.
From 2008 to 2009, Dato’ Jeremy served as a client advisor for United Overseas Bank.
Dato’ Jeremy was
a major shareholder in XYEC HOLDINGS CO., LTD, a Japan limited company, that was listed on the Catalist market on the
Singapore Exchange on September 18, 2013. XYEC was taken private by its controlling shareholder Mamezou Holdings Co. Ltd (TYO:3756)
in the second quarter of 2016.
In appreciation of his
contributions to the state of Pahang, Dato’ Jeremy was conferred the honourable title of
Darjah Indera Mahkota Pahang
on 29th April 2014. In addition to his business, Dato’ Jeremy has devoted himself to philanthropy. On September of 2016,
Dato’ Jeremy received a Corporate and Social Responsibilty award from Asia Pacific CSR in recognition of his contributions
to society.
Dato’ Jeremy received
his bachelors degree in finance and investment from TAR College in Malaysia in 2007. We believe that Dato’ Jeremy will bring
to the Board of Directors his experience in international business operations as well as banking and finance expertise.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships
between any of our directors or executive officers.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
No executive officer or
director is a party in a legal proceeding adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to us or
any of our subsidiaries.
No executive officer or
director has been involved in the last ten years in any of the following:
|
·
|
Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business or property of such person, or of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
|
|
·
|
Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
|
|
·
|
Being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or any federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities;
|
|
·
|
Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;
|
|
·
|
Being the subject of or a party to any judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, or any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, including but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail, fraud, wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or
|
|
·
|
Being the subject of or a party to any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act, any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.
|
Certain Relationships And Related Transactions
Escrow Arrangement with
Peijin Wu Hoppe
We are party to an escrow
agreement dated July 7, 2014, with Peijin Wu Hoppe, our former director, pursuant to which we agreed to deposit One Hundred Thousand
Dollars on an annual basis in an escrow account up to an aggregate of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars. The funds will be used to
finance our indemnification obligations, if any, to Ms. Hoppe under our director retainer agreement with Ms. Hoppe. Unless earlier
terminated in accordance with its terms, the escrow agreement expires upon the seventh anniversary of the termination of Ms. Hoppe’s
director retainer agreement, or July 29, 2022. Our legal counsel, Chen-Drake Law Group, PC serves as the escrow agent at an annual
fee of $3,000.
As of the date of this
proxy statement, we have deposited Two Hundred Thousand Dollars into the escrow account and expect to reach the full Five Hundred
Thousand Dollar balance by May 2018. After the escrow balance reaches Five Hundred Thousand Dollars, we will be obligated to make
additional deposits to ensure that the escrow balance is maintained at or above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars during the term of
the escrow agreement.
The foregoing description
of the escrow agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to such agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 1 to this proxy
statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Transactions With Dato’
Weng Kung Wong, Wooi Khang Pua and Kok Wai Chai
As of April 30, 2017,
October 31, 2016, and October 31, 2015, we obtained from Wooi Khang Pua, UHT’s director, several unsecured, interest-free
temporary advances made to the Company with the aggregate principal amount of $107,654, $180,149 and $180,316, respectively. The
advances are repayable on demand.
During the period ended
April 30, 2017, the related party loan to Mr. Pua Wooi Khang was re-assigned to Mr. Chai Kok Wai, a director of UHT because Mr.
Pua Wooi Khang was no longer a director of UHT.
As of April 30, 2017, October
31, 2016, and October 31, 2015, we obtained from Dato’ Weng Kung Wong, our Chief Executive Officer and director, several
unsecured, interest-free advances which, together with prior advances, have an aggregate principal amount of approximately $1,671,539,
$1,279,196 and $2,071,183. The advances are not expected to be repayable within the next twelve months. We repaid approximately
$264,281 during the six months ended April 30, 2017, $924,780 during fiscal year ended October 31, 2016, and $1,171,026 during
fiscal year ended October 31, 2015.
We are parties to a loan
from the Bank of China (Malaysia) Berhad consisting of a revolving line of credit, or the RC, in the amount of RM15,000,000 and
a term loan, or the TL, in the amount of RM40,000,000, for an aggregate of RM55,000,000 in December 2014. This loan is personally
guaranteed by Dato’ Weng Kung Wong, our Chief Executive Officer and Director, and also guaranteed by UHT, our wholly owned
subsidiary. The foregoing description of the loan with the Bank of China (Malaysia) Berhad is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 2 to this proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Dato’ Weng Kung Wong
and Kok Wai Chai also have jointly and severally guaranteed the repayment of the loans made by RHB Bank Berhad to PGCG Assets in
the principal amount of RM9,840,000 in connection with the acquisition of its twelve story commercial building in Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia. The foregoing description of the loans with RHB Bank Berhad is qualified in its entirety by reference to such agreements,
which are filed as Exhibits 3 through and including 5 to this proxy statement and are incorporated herein by reference
We have not adopted policies
or procedures for approval of related person transactions but review them on a case-by-case basis. We believe that all related
party transactions were on terms at least as favorable as we would have secured in arm’s-length transactions with third parties.
Except as set forth above, we have not entered into any material transactions with any director, executive officer, and promoter,
beneficial owner of five percent or more of our common stock, or family members of such persons.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports
regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with
copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from
certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended October 31, 2016, and the six months ended April 30, 2017,
our officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners timely filed all reports required by Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act except as set forth below. Jeremy Chia Pei Chai did not timely file his Form 3, which form was ultimately
filed on June 9, 2017.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Director Independence
We have adopted standards
for director independence that correspond to NYSE listing standards and SEC rules. An “independent director” means
a person who is not an officer or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries, or any other individual having a relationship that,
in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of
a director. To be considered independent, the Board must affirmatively determine that neither the director, nor any member of his
or her immediate family, has had any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company within the previous three years.
In addition, to be considered “independent” under SEC rules, each member of the Audit Committee may not accept, directly
or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from us, other than compensation for his or her services as
a director.
The Board considered relationships,
transactions and/or arrangements with each of the directors and concluded that none of the non-employee directors, or any of his
or her immediate family members, has any relationship with us that would impair his or her independence. The Board has determined
that each member of the Board, other than Mr. Wong, is an independent director under applicable NYSE listing standards and SEC
rules. Mr. Wong does not meet the independence standards because he is an employee and executive officer of the Company.
Board and Committee Meetings
During fiscal year 2017,
our Board held 3 meetings and acted by written consent 3 times and our committees held 3 meetings. Our independent directors did
not meet in executive sessions without the presence of any of our executive officers. Each director attended all meetings held
during fiscal year 2016 and during the six months ended April 30, 2017. No director attended less than 75 percent of our Board
or committee meetings of which they were members. The work of the Company’s directors is performed not only at meetings of
the Board, but also by consideration of the Company’s significant business decisions through the review of documents and
in numerous communications among Board members and others.
Director Attendance at Annual Meeting
We have not yet developed
a policy regarding director attendance at annual meetings of the stockholders. Three of our directors attended our 2016 Annual
Stockholders Meeting. We expect a majority of our current directors to attend our 2017 Annual Stockholders Meeting.
Committees of Our Board
The members of each of
our Compensation, Audit, and Nominations and Corporate Governance committees are comprised of our two independent directors: Maylee
Gan Suat Lee and Dato’ Jeremy Chia Pei Chai. Maylee Gan Suat Lee was appointed to serve as the Chairperson of the Compensation
Committee and the Audit Committee while Dato’ Jeremy Chia Pei Chai serves as the Chairman of the Nominations and Corporate
Governance Committee. We do not currently have an Audit Committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K
promulgated under the Securities Act but hope to be able to retain one in the near future. Copies of the charters for each of the
Compensation, Audit and Nominations and Corporate Governance Committees are filed as Exhibits 6, 7 and 8, respectively, to this
proxy statement.
Compensation Committee
Our Compensation Committee
is responsible for developing and overseeing the implementation of our philosophy with respect to the compensation of executives
and for monitoring the implementation and results of the compensation philosophy to ensure compensation remains competitive, creates
proper incentives to enhance stockholder value and rewards superior performance. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and
approves for each named executive officer, and particularly with regard to the Chief Executive Officer, all components of the executive’s
compensation. The Compensation Committee may award discretionary bonuses to each of the named executives, and reviews and approves
the process and factors (including individual and corporate performance measures and actual performance versus such measures) used
by the Chief Executive Officer to recommend such awards. Additionally, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves the base
salary, equity-incentive awards (if any) and any other special or supplemental benefits of the named executive officers. For additional
information regarding the operation of the Compensation Committee, see our discussion under the section entitled “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis” of this proxy statement. The Compensation Committee held 3 meetings during fiscal 2016 and 3 meeting
during the six months ended April 30, 2017. The charter of the Compensation Committee is included as Exhibit 6 to this proxy statement.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee reviews
with our management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm, the adequacy and effectiveness
of our system of internal control over financial reporting; reviews significant accounting matters; reviews quarterly unaudited
financial information prior to public release; approves the audited financial statements prior to public distribution; approves
our assertions related to internal controls prior to public distribution; reviews any significant changes in our accounting principles
or financial reporting practices; reviews, approves and retains the services performed by our independent registered public accounting
firm; has the authority and responsibility to evaluate our independent registered public accounting firm; discusses with the independent
registered public accounting firm their independence and considers the compatibility of non-audit services with such independence;
annually selects and retains our independent registered accounting firm to examine our financial statements; and conducts a legal
compliance review. No member of the Audit Committee serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies. The Audit
Committee held 3 meetings during fiscal 2016 and 3 meeting during the six months ended April 30, 2017. The charter of the Audit
Committee is included as Exhibit 7 to this proxy statement.
Nominations and Corporate
Governance Committee
The Nominations and Governance
Committee is involved in determining compensation for our Directors. The Nominations and Governance Committee reviews and administers
our Directors’ compensation plans, including approval of grants of equity or equity-based awards, and makes recommendations
to the Board with respect to compensation plans and equity-based plans for Directors. The Nominations and Governance Committee
annually reviews Director compensation in relation to comparable companies and other relevant factors. Any change in Director compensation
must be approved by our Board. The Nominations and Governance Committee held 3 meetings during fiscal 2016 and 3 meeting during
the six months ended April 30, 2017. The charter of the Nominations and Governance Committee is included as Exhibit 8 to this proxy
statement.
Consideration of Director Nominees
The policy of the Nominations
and Corporate Governance Committee is to consider properly submitted shareholder nominations for candidates for membership on the
Board as described below under “Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors” and “Stockholder Proposals.”
In evaluating nominations, the Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability
on our Board and to address the membership criteria set forth below under “Board Diversity and Director Qualifications.”
Board Diversity and
Director Qualifications
Although there is no specific
board diversity policy in place presently, the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee does consider such factors as it
deems appropriate and consistent with our the charter of the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee and other criteria
which may be established by our Board. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee’s goal in selecting directors for
nomination to our Board is generally to seek to create a well-balanced team that combines diverse experience, skill and intellect
of seasoned directors in order to enable us to pursue our strategic objectives. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee
has not reduced the qualifications for service on our Board to a checklist of specific standards or specific, minimum qualifications,
skills or qualities. Rather, we seek, consistent with the vacancies existing on our Board at any particular time and the interplay
of a particular candidate’s experience with the experience of other Directors, to select individuals whose business experience,
knowledge, skills, diversity and integrity would be considered a desirable addition to our Board and any committees thereof. In
addition, the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee annually conducts an informal review of incumbent Directors in order
to determine whether a Director should be nominated for re-election to our Board.
The Nominations and Corporate
Governance Committee makes determinations as to Director selection based upon the facts and circumstances at the time of the receipt
of the Director candidate recommendation. Applicable considerations include: whether the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee
is currently looking to fill a new position created by an expansion of the number of Directors, or a vacancy that may exist on
our Board; whether the current composition of our Board is consistent with the criteria described in our charter; whether the candidate
submitted possesses the qualifications that are generally the basis for selection of candidates to our Board; and whether the candidate
would be considered independent under the rules of the NYSE and our standards with respect to Director independence.
Identifying and Evaluating
Nominees for Directors
The Nominations and Corporate
Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for Director. The Nominations and Corporate
Governance Committee considers the appropriate size of our Board and whether any vacancies on our Board are expected due to retirement
or otherwise. In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee
will consider various potential candidates for Director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominations and Corporate
Governance Committee through current Board members, professional search firms, shareholders or other persons. As described above,
the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee considers properly submitted nominations for candidates for our Board. Following
verification of the recommending shareholder’s status, recommendations are considered by the Nominations and Corporate Governance
Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
Communications with Our Board
Stockholders and interested
parties who wish to contact our Board, a committee thereof, the presiding non-management director of executive sessions or any
individual director are invited to do so by writing to:
Board of Directors of Prime Global Capital Group
Incorporated
c/o Corporate Secretary
E-5-2, Megan Avenue 1, Block E
Jalan Tun Razak
50400 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
All communications will
be forwarded to our Board of Directors, the specified committee or the specified individual director, as appropriate.
Board Leadership Structure
We intend to designate
Dato’ Weng Kung Wong to serve as executive member of the Board upon re-election to the Board. As the Chief Executive Officer,
Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, we believe that Mr. Wong will bring to the Board extensive experience
and familiarity with our business in particular and its industries generally. We believe this background enhances the role of executive
members of the Board in the development of long-term strategic plans and oversight of senior management in the implementation of
those plans. We provide independent directors with opportunities to meet in executive sessions without management present at the
time of each regular Board meeting and additionally as deemed appropriate or necessary. Because Mr. Wong is not independent under
NYSE standards, the chair at these executive sessions will rotate among the chairman of the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee
and the Nominating and Governance Committee. We believe that this structure will allow multiple directors to exercise important
leadership roles, and will also provide for focused engagement by the Board committees and their chairs in their respective areas
of responsibility. We believe that this structure will help facilitate clear and open communications between the Board of Directors
and senior management, while providing for active oversight by independent directors. For the above reasons, the Board of Directors
believes the current and the prospective leadership structure is appropriate for the Company.
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Our management team is
primarily responsible for the day-to-day assessment and management of the Company’s risk exposure. The Board of Directors
provides oversight in connection with these efforts, with a particular focus on the most significant risks facing us. The Board
of Directors believes that communication between the management team and the Board of Directors is essential for both effective
risk management and for meaningful oversight. To this end, the Board of Directors meets with our Chief Executive Officer and the
other members of our senior management team to discuss strategies, key challenges, and risks and opportunities for us. Management
team members make themselves available to the Board of Directors to answer questions regarding the Company’s most significant
issues, including risks affecting the Company.
In order to help facilitate
its risk oversight responsibilities, the Board of Directors intends to utilize each of its committees to oversee specific areas
of risk that are appropriately related to the committee’s areas of responsibility once such committees are established. The
Audit Committee will assist the Board of Directors in discharging its oversight responsibilities in the areas of internal control
over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures and legal and regulatory compliance. The Audit Committee will discuss
with management, the internal audit group and the independent auditor guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and
risk management. The Audit Committee will also discuss with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the
steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposure. The Compensation Committee will assist the Board of Directors
in discharging its oversight responsibilities regarding the risks related to the attraction and retention of personnel as well
as the risks associated with the design of compensation programs and arrangements applicable to both executive officers and to
all employees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will establish, monitor and evaluate the implementation of our
corporate governance policies. While the Board committees will be responsible for initially monitoring certain risks, the entire
Board of Directors will be kept informed of the significant risks facing the Company through management and committee reports about
such risks and the steps being taken to mitigate these risks.
Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices
Our Board of Directors
oversees management’s evaluation of whether our employee compensation policies and practices pose any risks that are reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In conducting this evaluation, management reviews our overall compensation
structure, taking into account the overall mix of compensation and the overall business risk. Management undertakes such a review
periodically and reports to the Board any finding that a risk related to our compensation structure may exist, as well as any factors
which may mitigate the risk posed by the particular compensation policy or practice. We have determined that there are currently
no risks arising from our compensation policies and practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Company.
Code of Conduct
On February 2, 2012, our
Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all employees of the Company including the principal
executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer. The Board also adopted a separate Code
of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, which contains provisions specifically applicable to our
Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers including the Chief Financial Officer. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics and Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officer are filed as Exhibit 9 to this Annual
Report and are incorporated herein by reference. The Company will provide a copy of its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and
Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers upon written request addressed to the Secretary of
the Company.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation
philosophy is to create a long-term direct relationship between pay and our performance. Our executive compensation program is
designed to provide a balanced total compensation package over the executive’s career with us. The compensation program objectives
are to attract, motivate and retain the qualified executives that help ensure our future success, to provide incentives for increasing
our profits by awarding executives when corporate goals are achieved and to align the interests of executives and long-term stockholders.
The compensation package of our named executive officers consists of two main elements:
|
1.
|
base salary for our executives that is competitive relative to the market, and that reflects individual performance, retention and other relevant considerations; and
|
|
2.
|
discretionary bonus awards payable in cash and tied to the satisfaction of corporate objectives.
|
Process for Setting Executive Compensation
Our Compensation Committee
is responsible for developing and overseeing the implementation of our philosophy with respect to the compensation of executives
and for monitoring the implementation and results of the compensation philosophy to ensure compensation remains competitive, creates
proper incentives to enhance stockholder value and rewards superior performance. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and
approves for each named executive officer, and particularly with regard to the Chief Executive Officer, all components of the executive’s
compensation. The Compensation Committee may award discretionary bonuses to each of the named executives, and reviews and approves
the process and factors (including individual and corporate performance measures and actual performance versus such measures) used
by the Chief Executive Officer to recommend such awards. Additionally, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves the base
salary, equity-incentive awards (if any) and any other special or supplemental benefits of the named executive officers.
The Chief Executive Officer
periodically provides the Compensation Committee with an evaluation of each named executive officer’s performance, based
on the individual performance goals and objectives developed by the Chief Executive Officer at the beginning of the year, as well
as other factors. The Compensation Committee provides an evaluation for the Chief Executive Officer. These evaluations serve as
the bases for bonus recommendations and changes in the compensation arrangements of our named executives.
Our Compensation Peer Group
We currently engage in
informal market analysis in evaluating our executive compensation arrangements. As the Company and its businesses mature, we may
retain compensation consultants that will assist us in developing a formal benchmark and selecting a compensation peer group of
companies similar to us in size or business for the purpose of comparing executive compensation levels.
Program Components
Our executive compensation
program consists of the following elements:
Base Salary
Our base salary structure
is designed to encourage internal growth, attract and retain new talent, and reward strong leadership that will sustain our growth
and profitability. The base salary for each named executive officer reflects our past and current operating profits, the named
executive officer’s individual contribution to our success throughout his career, internal pay equity and informal market
data regarding comparable positions within similarly situated companies. In determining and setting base salary, the Compensation
Committee considers all of these factors, though it does not assign specific weights to any factor. The Compensation Committee
generally reviews the base salary for each named executive officer on an annual basis. For each of our named executive officers,
we review base salary data internally obtained by the Company for comparable executive positions in similarly situated companies
to ensure that the base salary rate for each executive is competitive relative to the market.
Discretionary Bonus
The objectives of our bonus
awards are to encourage and reward our employees, including the named executive officers, who contribute to and participate in
our success by their ability, industry, leadership, loyalty or exceptional service and to recruit additional executives who will
contribute to that success.
Each of our named executive
officers is eligible for consideration for a discretionary cash bonus. The Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations regarding
bonus awards for the named executive officers and the Compensation Committee provides the bonus recommendation for the Chief Executive
Officer. However, the Compensation Committee has sole and final authority and discretion in designating to whom awards are made,
the size of the award, if any, and its terms and conditions. The bonus recommendation for each of the named executive officers
depends on a number of factors, including (i) the performance of the Company for the year, (ii) the satisfaction of certain
individual and corporate performance measures, and (iii) other factors which the Compensation Committee may deem relevant.
The Company did not award any cash bonuses during fiscal year 2016 and for the six months ended April 30, 2017.
Stock Holdings
The Compensation Committee
recognizes the importance of having a portion of the named executive officers’ compensation be paid in the form of equity,
to help align the executives’ interests with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. At this point, however, the
Compensation Committee has chosen to emphasize the cash-based portion of our compensation program over a stock program because
it believes the discretionary nature of the cash-based compensation gives it the needed flexibility to factor in and reward the
attainment of longer-term goals for the Company and the executives, as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.
Accordingly, we encourage,
but do not insist on, executive ownership of our common stock. Methods of supporting ownership include turning to executives to
support the financing needs of the Company. We have historically allowed our named executives to participate in private placements
of the Company’s securities on the same terms and conditions as other investors. During fiscal year 2012, our Chief Executive
Officer invested approximately US $20,890,272 into the Company resulting in a beneficial ownership of 54,811,085 shares of common
stock, or approximately 10.69% of our issued and outstanding common stock. Our executive officers did not purchase any of our securities
during fiscal year 2016 and the six months ended April 30, 2017. We believe that this practice achieves the dual goals of meeting
the Company’s financing needs and aligning our executives’ interests with the interests of our stockholders.
We have not timed nor do
we plan to time our release of material non-public information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
Summary Compensation Table
The following summary compensation
table sets forth the aggregate compensation we paid or accrued during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2016 and 2015, and the
six months ended April 30, 2017, to (i) our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), (ii) our Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer), (iii) our three most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer
and the principal financial officer who were serving as executive officers on October 31, 2016, whose total compensation was in
excess of $100,000, and (iii) up to two additional individuals who would have been within the two-other-most-highly compensated
but were not serving as executive officers on October 31, 2016, or during the six months ended April 30, 2017.
Name and
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary (1)
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
|
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation Earnings
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
|
|
|
Total(1)
|
|
Dato’ Weng Kung Wong
|
|
|
Six Months Ended 4/30/2017
|
|
|
$
|
34,427
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
34427
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
$
|
84,845
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
84,845
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
90,758
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
90,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liong Tat Teh
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
$
|
32,809
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
32,809
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (2)
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
36,883
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
36,883
|
|
____________________________
|
(1)
|
All cash compensation was paid in Malaysian Ringgit, our functional currency. The Malaysian Ringgit was converted into United States Dollars using the exchange rate prevailing at the dates of payment at an average annualized rate of 4.1217 and 3.7524 for fiscal years ended October 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
Liong Tat Teh resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary effective November 14, 2016. Concurrently therewith, Dato’ Weng Kung Wong, our Chief Executive Officer, was appointed to fill the vacancy created by Mr. Teh’s resignation.
|
Narrative disclosure to Summary Compensation
Each of our executive officers
are parties to an employment agreement with UHT, our subsidiary, dated July 19, 2011, or the Employment Agreements. Pursuant to
the terms of the Employment Agreements, the executive officers will receive the annual base salaries set forth below, retroactive
July 1, 2011:
|
Name
|
|
Annual Salary
|
|
Dato’ Weng Kung Wong
|
|
MYR 293,260 or US$71,151
|
|
Liong Tat Teh (1)
|
|
MYR 113,100 or US$27,440
|
|
Sek Wong Fong (1)
|
|
MYR 46,200 or US$12,312
|
Effective January 2016.
Dato’ Weng Kung Wong, our Chief Executive Officer accepted a salary reduction of MYR4,000 per month, while Liong Tat Teh,
our former Chief Financial Officer, accepted a salary reduction of MYR 1,000 per month.
________________________
(1) Sek Fek Wong resigned from her position
as the Secretary effective March 7, 2016. Liong Tat Teh resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary effective
November 14, 2016.
Each executive officer
may terminate his or her respective employment agreement by giving two months prior written notice or, in lieu of such notice,
electing to immediately terminate and receive a sum equal to two months salary. UHT may terminate each Employment Agreement by
giving 24 hours prior written notice in the event of any gross misconduct, criminal activities committed by the employee, or serious
default or breach by the employee of any terms of his or her respective employment agreement or the rules and regulations of UHT.
Each executive officer
also executed a noncompetition and nondisclosure agreement containing non-solicitation obligations that survive the termination
of the agreement for a period of two years, confidentiality obligations and other obligations relating to employee inventions by
the executive.
The foregoing descriptions
of the Employment Agreements are qualified in their entirety by reference to such agreements which are filed as Exhibits 10 and
11 to this proxy statement, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference.
Our executive officers
are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their services
on our behalf.
Equity Awards
There are no options, warrants
or convertible securities outstanding. At no time during the last fiscal year with respect to any of any of our executive officers
was there:
|
·
|
any outstanding option or other equity-based award repriced or otherwise materially modified (such as by extension of exercise periods, the change of vesting or forfeiture conditions, the change or elimination of applicable performance criteria, or the change of the bases upon which returns are determined;
|
|
·
|
any waiver or modification of any specified performance target, goal or condition to payout with respect to any amount included in non-stock incentive plan compensation or payouts;
|
|
·
|
any option or equity grant;
|
|
·
|
any non-equity incentive plan award made to a named executive officer;
|
|
·
|
any nonqualified deferred compensation plans including nonqualified defined contribution plans; or
|
|
·
|
any payment for any item to be included under All Other Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
|
Compensation of Directors
The following director
compensation table sets forth the aggregate compensation we paid or accrued during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016:
Name
|
|
Fees earned or paid in cash*
($)
|
|
|
Stock awards
($)
|
|
|
Option awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-equity incentive plan compensation
($)
|
|
|
Change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings
|
|
|
All other compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
Maylee Gan Suat Lee **
|
|
$
|
5,095
|
*
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
5,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amiruddin Bin Che Embi **
|
|
$
|
3,636
|
*
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
3,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. Scheifley***
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
*
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ham Poh Chai
|
|
$
|
8,734
|
*
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
8,734
|
|
______________
*
|
All fees were paid in Malaysian Ringgit, our functional currency. The Malaysian Ringgit was converted into United States Dollars using the exchange rate prevailing at the dates of payment at an average annualized rate of 4.1217 for fiscal year ended October 31, 2016.
|
**
|
Amiruddin Bin Che Embi resigned from his position as a director effective March 30, 2016. Maylee Gan Suat Lee was appointed to serve as a director effective April 1, 2016.
|
***
|
James E. Scheifley resigned from his position as a director effective November 14, 2016.
|
The following director
compensation table sets forth the aggregate compensation we paid or accrued during the six months ended April 30, 2017:
Name
|
|
Fees earned or paid in cash*
($)
|
|
|
Stock awards
($)
|
|
|
Option awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-equity incentive plan compensation
($)
|
|
|
Change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings
|
|
|
All other compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
Maylee Gan Suat Lee
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
*
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dato’ Jeremy Chia Pei Chai**
|
|
$
|
2,177
|
*
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ham Poh Chai**
|
|
$
|
2,177
|
*
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,177
|
|
*
|
All fees were paid in Malaysian Ringgit, our functional currency. The Malaysian Ringgit was converted into United States Dollars using the exchange rate prevailing at the dates of payment at an average annualized rate of 4.1217 for fiscal year ended October 31, 2016.
|
**
|
Ham Poh Chai resigned from his position as our director on February 13, 2017. Dato’ Jeremy Chia Pei Chai joined out Board of Directors on February 13, 2017.
|
Narrative disclosure to Director Compensation Table
During our fiscal year
ended October 31, 2016, and the six months ended April 30, 2017, we did not provide compensation to any of our employee directors
for serving as our director. We currently have no formal plan for compensating our employee directors for their services in their
capacity as directors, although we may elect to issue stock options to such persons from time to time.
Non-Employee Director Fees
Our Compensation Committee
and Board determines the form and amount of compensation for our non-employee directors based on informal surveys of similar companies
and the amount necessary to attract and retain such directors. Directors who are residents of Malaysia receive a monthly retainer
in the amount of RM3,000. Mr. Scheifley, our former director who is a U.S. resident, received a monthly retainer in the amount
of $2,500. All directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection
with attendance at meetings of our Board of Directors. Our Compensation Committee may award special remuneration to any director
undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
Maylee Gan Suat Lee and
Poh Chai Ham served on our Compensation Committee during fiscal year ended October 31, 2016. During the six months ended April
30, 2017, Maylee Gan Suat Lee, Ham Poh Chai and Dato Jeremy Chia Pei Chai served on our Compensation Committee during their tenure
on our Board. During their tenure on our Board of Directors, Dato’ Amiruddin Bin Che Embi and James E. Scheifley served on
our Compensation Committee. Dato’ Amiruddin Bin Che Embi and Mr. Scheifley departed our Board effective March 30, 2016, and
November 14, 2016, respectively.
Compensation Committee Report
Our Compensation Committee
has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this report with management. Based on its review and discussion
with management, the Board of Directors recommended that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
The material in this report is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made on, before, or after the date
of this Proxy Statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Submitted by members of the Compensation
Committee:
Maylee Gan Suat Lee
Dato’ Jeremy Chia Pei Chai
CHANGES IN OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM; FEES
Appointment of ShineWing
Australia
Effective July 17, 2017,
the audit committee of the Board of Directors of Prime Global Capital Group Incorporated (the "Company") approved the
dismissal of Centurion ZD CPA Limited, formerly known as DCAW (CPA) Limited (“Centurion CPA”), as our independent accountant.
Centurion CPA audited our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016, and reviewed our consolidated
financial statements for the related interim periods and the interim periods ended January 31, 2017 and April 30, 2017. Effective
July 17, 2017, we retained the services of ShineWing Australia to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year
ending October 31, 2017.
Centurion CPA’s reports
on the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer
of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that its report
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016, contained an emphasis of matter paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. During the Company’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2016 and through July 17, 2017, there were
no disagreements with Centurion CPA on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing
scope or procedure which disagreements, if not resolved to Centurion CPA’s satisfaction, would have caused them to make reference
to the subject matter in connection with their report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for such periods.
Furthermore, no “reportable events” occurred within the periods covered by Centurion CPA’s reports on the Company's
consolidated financial statements, or subsequently up to the date of Centurion CPA’s dismissal. As used herein, the term
“reportable event” means any of the items listed in paragraphs (a)(1)(v)(A)-(D) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K.
During the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2016, and through July 17, 2017, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted ShineWing Australia
regarding (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of
audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and ShineWing Australia did not
provide either a written report or oral advice to the Company that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching
a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (2) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement
with Centurion CPA on accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which,
if not resolved to the satisfaction of Centurion CPA, would have caused Centurion CPA to make reference to the matter in their
report, or a “reportable event” as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K of the SEC’s rules and regulations.
Appointment of Centurion
CPA
Effective September 26,
2016, we were advised that the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Crowe Horwath (HK) CPA Limited (“CHHK”),
would no longer provide audit and assurance services to public companies subject to the statutes and regulations of the United
States effective as of October 1, 2016. Accordingly, the Company, with the approval of its audit committee and board of directors,
terminated the services of CHHK effective September 30, 2016.
CHHK’s reports on
the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer
of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that its report
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 contained an emphasis of matter paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern. During the Company’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 and through September 30, 2016, there were no
disagreements with CHHK on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope
or procedure which disagreements, if not resolved to CHHK’s satisfaction, would have caused them to make reference to the
subject matter in connection with their report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for such periods. Furthermore,
no “reportable events” occurred within the periods covered by CHHK’s reports on the Company's consolidated financial
statements, or subsequently up to the date of CHHK’s dismissal. As used herein, the term “reportable event” means
any of the items listed in paragraphs (a)(1)(v)(A)-(D) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K.
Effective October 10, 2016,
we retained the services of Centurion CPA to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending October 31,
2016. It is our understanding that the director formerly responsible for the Company's account at Crowe Horwath (HK) CPA Limited,
the Company’s prior independent registered public accounting firm, has joined DCAW and will be the director responsible for
the Company's account at DCAW.
During the fiscal years
ended October 31, 2015, and 2014, and through October 10, 2016, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted Centurion
CPA regarding (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type
of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and Centurion CPA did not provide
either a written report or oral advice to the Company that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision
as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (2) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement or a
“reportable event” as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) )(A)-(D) of Regulation S-K of the SEC’s rules and regulations.
Appointment of Crower
Horwath (HK)
On June 9, 2015, we approved
the dismissal of B F Borgers CPA PC (“Borgers PC”) as our independent accountant. Borgers PC audited our consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, and reviewed our consolidated financial statements
for the related interim periods. Concurrently therewith, we retained the firm of Crowe Horwath (HK) CPA Limited (“Crowe Horwath”),
to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending October 31, 2015.
In connection with the
audits of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no disagreements
with Borgers PC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope of procedures,
which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Borgers PC, would have caused them to make reference in connection
with its reports to the subject matter of the disagreements. None of the “reportable events” described in Item 304(a)(1)(v)
of Regulation S-K of the SEC’s rules and regulations have occurred during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013,
or during any subsequent interim period.
The audit reports of Borgers
PC on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, did not contain an adverse
opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except
that each of the audit report for the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, contained an emphasis of matter paragraph regarding
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
During the fiscal years
ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, and through June 9, 2015, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted Crowe
Horwath regarding (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the
type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and Crowe Horwath did not
provide either a written report or oral advice to the Company that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching
a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (2) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement
with Borgers PC on accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which, if
not resolved to the satisfaction of Borgers PC, would have caused Borgers PC to make reference to the matter in their report, or
a “reportable event” as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K of the SEC’s rules and regulations.
Fees Billed by Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Our Audit Committee has
considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence,
and has approved such services in accordance with its pre-approval policies and procedures which are more fully described in Exhibit
12.
The following table sets
forth fees billed by our auditors during the last two fiscal years for services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated
financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements, services by our auditors that are reasonably related
to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and that are not reported as audit fees, services
rendered in connection with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, and all other fees for services rendered.
|
|
Years ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees (1)
|
|
$
|
79,000
|
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit related fees (2)
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
_________________________
(1)
|
Audit Fees represent fees for professional services billed and to be billed in connection with the audit of our consolidated annual financial statements, the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015 and review of the quarterly financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting, and audit services in connection with statutory or regulatory filings, consents or other SEC matters.
|
|
|
|
B F Borgers
CPA has billed us $6,000 in the aggregate, for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 for audit services rendered. Crowe Horwath
(HK) CPA Limited has billed us $21,000 and $67,000 in the aggregate for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively,
for audit services rendered. Centurion ZD CPA Limited has billed us $58,000 in the aggregate for the fiscal year ended October
31, 2016 for audit services rendered.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” In fiscal 2016 and 2015, this category consisted of fees billed by HKCMCPA Company Limited in connection with compiling the Company’s financial statements for fiscal 2016 and 2015.
|
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee has
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent
auditors the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended and adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. It has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant
required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s
communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent
accountant’s independence. Based upon the foregoing review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board
that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended
October 31, 2016.
Submitted by members of the Audit Committee:
Maylee Gan Suat Lee
Dato’ Jeremy Chia Pei Chai
PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors
has approved the persons named below as nominees for election to our Board of Directors. All persons named below presently serve
as directors. Proxies will be voted for the election as directors for the ensuing year of the persons named below (or if for any
reason unavailable, of such substitutes as our Board of Directors may designate). Our Board of Directors has no reason to believe
that any of the nominees will be unavailable to serve.
Dato’ Weng
Kung Wong
, age 43, has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Director since November 15, 2010. He currently also serves
as the Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. He founded Mobile Wallet Sdn. Bhd., MWSB, one of the first Malaysian m-commerce
companies, in 2004 and currently serves as its Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to founding MWSB, Dato’
Wong served as an Agency Unit Manager of MAA Insurance from April, 2001 to November, 2003. From January, 2000 to April, 2001, he
was the Marketing Director of Spider Holding Sdn. Bhd., an herb products distribution company. Dato’ Wong began his professional
career in 1995 with Forever Living Products, a health products multilevel marketing company, where he spent four years in positions
of accelerating responsibility in the areas of business development and marketing. Dato’ Wong obtained a bachelor’s
degree in Management Information Systems from the National Central University of Taiwan in 1995. As our Chief Executive Officer,
Dato’ Wong brings to our Board of Directors knowledge of our operations and history, business leadership, corporate strategy
and entrepreneurial expertise.
Maylee Gan Suat Lee
,
age 39, joined our Board of Directors on April 1, 2016. She is currently the founder and senior partner of Messrs. Maylee Gan &
Tai. Prior to founding her firm in 2008, Ms. Gan practiced at one of the top 5 legal firms in Malaysia, Lee Hishammuddin Allen
& Gledhill from 2004 to 2008. Ms. Gan graduated with a Bachelor of Laws (Hons) degree from the University of London, England
in 1999. She obtained her Certificate of Legal Practice in 2000 and has a Masters of Science in Information Technology (MSc IT)
from the University of Staffordshire in 2004.
Ms. Gan was admitted and
enrolled as an advocate and solicitor of the High Court of Malaya in 2005. She has vast experience in various complex corporate
matters, and she was the lead associate in charge of the largest worldwide business disposal to-date known as the “Pfizer
Pontiac Project”, which involves the worldwide sale of Pfizer Consumer Healthcare business division in 2006, and the largest
Asset-Backed Securities transaction carried out by RCE Capital Berhad in Malaysia in the year 2008. Ms. Gan is also a Non-executive
Director of G&L Trading Sdn Bhd, as a successor of her late father. G&L Trading Sdn Bhd supplies cleaning detergent to
hotels and food & beverages related businesses. Through her vast experience in legal corporate matters with numerous large
corporations, with which her legal firm is a panel of solicitor, Ms. Gan brings to the Board of Directors her legal insight, knowledge
and experience in legal corporate matters.
Dato’ Jeremy
Chia Pei Chai,
age 30, joined our Board of Directors on February 13, 2017, and is the Director of Marathon Capital Management
Limited, HK, an international investment fund focusing on early and development stage private companies spanning the entertainment,
security, real estate and investment industries. His fund has made investments in Hong Kong, Macau, China, Philippines and Singapore.
Dato’ Jeremy has also started to build his business as a founder of flea market in 2012 at The Mines, Seri Kembangan, Selangor.
Prior to founding the fund, from 2009 to 2011 Dato’ Jeremy was a branch manager at Melilea, a prioneering global green corporation
that has won numerous industry and global awards for its innovative management as a health and wellness multinational corporation.
From 2008 to 2009, Dato’ Jeremy served as a client advisor for United Overseas Bank.
Dato’ Jeremy was
a major shareholder in XYEC HOLDINGS CO., LTD, a Japan limited company, that was listed on the Catalist market on the
Singapore Exchange on September 18, 2013. XYEC was taken private by its controlling shareholder Mamezou Holdings Co. Ltd (TYO:3756)
in the second quarter of 2016.
In appreciation of his
contributions to the state of Pahang, Dato’ Jeremy was conferred the honourable title of
Darjah Indera Mahkota Pahang
on 29th April 2014. In addition to his business, Dato’ Jeremy has devoted himself to philanthropy. On September of 2016,
Dato’ Jeremy received a Corporate and Social Responsibilty award from Asia Pacific CSR in recognition of his contributions
to society.
Dato’ Jeremy received
his bachelors degree in finance and investment from TAR College in Malaysia in 2007. We believe that Dato’ Jeremy will bring
to the Board of Directors his experience in international business operations as well as banking and finance expertise.
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends
that you vote “FOR” all of the nominees listed above.
PROPOSAL 2:
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Our Board of Directors
has appointed ShineWing Australia, an independent registered public accounting firm, as our independent registered public accounting
firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2017, subject to stockholder approval. A representative of ShineWing Australia is not
expected to be present at the annual meeting.
ShineWing Australia’s
principal function is to audit management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
and our consolidated financial statements and, in connection with that audit, to review certain related filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and to conduct limited reviews of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports.
Our Board of Directors
unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of ShineWing Australia as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2017.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Proposals by stockholders
intended to be presented at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for
that annual meeting, must be personally delivered or mailed and received, as required by our Amended and Restated By-Laws, at the
principal offices of the corporation not less than 45 days nor more than 75 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the date
on which the corporation first mailed its proxy materials for the previous year’s annual meeting of shareholders (or the
date on which the corporation mails its proxy materials for the current year if during the prior year the corporation did not hold
an annual meeting or if the date of the annual meeting was changed more than 30 days from the prior year), to the attention of
the Corporate Secretary as follows: Corporate Secretary, E-5-2, Megan Avenue 1, Block E, Jalan Tun Razak, 50400 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Proxies for the 2016 Annual Stockholders Meeting were mailed on August 11, 2016.
With respect to any proposal
by a stockholder not seeking to have its proposal included in the proxy statement but seeking to have its proposal considered at
the 2017 Annual Stockholders Meeting, if that stockholder fails to notify us of its proposal in the manner set forth above, then
the persons appointed as proxies may exercise their discretionary voting authority if the proposal is considered at the 2017 annual
meeting, notwithstanding that stockholders have not been advised of the proposal in the proxy statement for the 2016 annual meeting.
Any stockholder proposals must comply in all respects with Rule 14a-8 of Regulation 14A and other applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC.
In order for a stockholder
to bring other business before a stockholder meeting, timely notice must be received by us within the time limits described in
the immediately preceding paragraph. The stockholder’s notice must contain:
|
·
|
a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting;
|
|
·
|
the name and record address of the shareholder proposing such business;
|
|
·
|
the class and number of shares of the corporation which are beneficially owned by the shareholder;
|
|
·
|
a description of any material interest of such shareholder in such business;
|
|
·
|
a representation that such shareholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to bring such business before the meeting; and
|
|
·
|
any other information required by law.
|
Our amended bylaws provide
that a stockholder entitled to vote for the election of our directors may nominate persons for election to our Board of Directors
by delivering written notice to our corporate secretary. With respect to an election to be held at an annual meeting of stockholders,
such notice generally must be delivered not less than 45 days nor more than 75 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the date
on which the corporation first mailed its proxy materials for the previous year’s annual meeting of shareholders (or the
date on which the corporation mails its proxy materials for the current year if during the prior year the corporation did not hold
an annual meeting or if the date of the annual meeting was changed more than 30 days from the prior year).
The stockholder’s
notice must include:
(a) as to each person
whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director,
|
·
|
the name, age, business address and residence address of the person;
|
|
·
|
the principal occupation or employment of the person;
|
|
·
|
the class and number of shares of the corporation which are beneficially owned by the person;
|
|
·
|
any other information relating to the person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors pursuant to Rule 14a under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
(b) as to the stockholder
giving the notice,
|
·
|
the name and record address of the stockholder; and
|
|
·
|
the class and number of shares of the corporation which are beneficially owned by the stockholder.
|
We may require any proposed nominee to furnish
such other information as may reasonably be required by us to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as a
director of the corporation.
Because the 2017 annual
meeting is to be held on August 29, 2017, our corporate secretary must receive written notice of a stockholder proposal to be acted
upon at the 2017 annual meeting not later than the close of business on June 27, 2017, nor earlier than the close of business on
May 28, 2017.
The requirements found
in our amended and restated bylaws are separate from and in addition to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission
that a stockholder must meet to have a proposal included in our proxy statement. We will furnish any stockholder desiring a copy
of our amended bylaws without charge by writing to our corporate secretary as described in “Voting and Revocation of Proxies.”
EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
1
|
|
Escrow Agreement dated July 7, 2014, by and among Chen-Drake Law Group, P.C. Prime Global Capital Group Incorporated, and Peijin Wu Hoppe.
(1)
|
2
|
|
Letter of Offer issued by the Bank of China (Malaysia) Berhad to PGCG Assets Holdings Sdn. Bhd. effective October 31, 2014.
(2)
|
3
|
|
Offer Letter dated March 26, 2013, issued by RHB Bank Berhad with respect to four banking facilities in the aggregate principal amount of up to RM 3,452,000
(3)
|
4
|
|
Offer Letter dated March 26, 2013, issued by RHB Bank Berhad with respect to two banking facilities in the aggregate principal amount of up to RM 1,680,000
(3)
|
5
|
|
Offer Letter dated March 26, 2013, issued by RHB Bank Berhad with respect to six banking facilities in the aggregate principal amount of up to RM 4,708,000
(3)
|
6
|
|
Compensation Committee Charter
(4)
|
7
|
|
Audit Committee Charter
(5)
|
8
|
|
Nominations and Governance Committee Charter
(6)
|
9
|
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
(7)
|
10
|
|
Letter of Appointment dated July 19, 2011, by and between Union Hub Technology Sdn. Bhd. and Dato’ Weng Kung Wong
(8)
|
11
|
|
L
etter of Appointment dated July 19, 2011, by and between Union Hub Technology Sdn. Bhd. and Liong Tat Teh
(8)
|
12
|
|
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Procedures
(9)
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Commission on January 29, 2016.
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2014.
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2013.
|
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to our Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2015.
|
|
(5)
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to our Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2015.
|
|
(6)
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to our Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2015.
|
|
(7)
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 2, 2012.
|
|
(8)
|
Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2011.
|
|
(9)
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 29, 2016.
|