Item 1. Financial
Statements
Trilogy Metals Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
in thousands of US dollars
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
|
November 30, 2016
$
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
14,529
|
|
|
|
7,340
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Deposits and prepaid amounts
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
Current investments (note 3)
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
|
21,347
|
|
|
|
15,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments (note 3)
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Plant and equipment
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Mineral properties and development costs (note 4)
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
|
|
|
52,376
|
|
|
|
46,747
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 5)
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral properties purchase option (note 4)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
11,200
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital (note 6)
– unlimited common shares authorized, no par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued -105,554,489 (2016 – 105,286,469)
|
|
|
136,463
|
|
|
|
136,357
|
|
Warrants (note 6(d))
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Contributed surplus – options (note 6(a, b))
|
|
|
18,380
|
|
|
|
18,134
|
|
Contributed surplus – units (note 6(c))
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(117,151
|
)
|
|
|
(111,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
41,176
|
|
|
|
46,154
|
|
|
|
|
52,376
|
|
|
|
46,747
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(notes 5 and 8)
(See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated
financial statements)
/s/ Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse, Director
|
|
/s/ Kalidas Madhavpeddi, Director
|
Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors
Trilogy Metals Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive
Loss
(unaudited)
in thousands of US dollars, except share and
per share amounts
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
For the six months ended
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
|
May 31, 2016
$
|
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
|
May 31, 2016
$
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Foreign exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Investor relations
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Mineral properties expense (note 4(d))
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Salaries
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Salaries – stock-based compensation
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
4,249
|
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on held for trading investments
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on sale of investments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Loss from continuing operations for the period
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Loss and comprehensive loss for the period
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
3,342
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
105,543,283
|
|
|
|
104,985,207
|
|
|
|
105,495,882
|
|
|
|
104,963,167
|
|
(See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated
financial statements)
Trilogy Metals Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’
Equity
(unaudited)
in thousands of US dollars, except share amounts
|
|
Number of
shares
outstanding
|
|
|
Share
capital
$
|
|
|
Warrants
$
|
|
|
Contributed
surplus
$
|
|
|
Contributed
surplus –
options
$
|
|
|
Contributed
surplus –
units
$
|
|
|
Deficit
$
|
|
|
Total
shareholders’
equity
$
|
|
Balance
– November 30, 2015
|
|
|
104,796,421
|
|
|
|
136,040
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
17,841
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
(106,902
|
)
|
|
|
50,430
|
|
Restricted Share Units
|
|
|
108,399
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Deferred Share Units
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
45,054
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
Loss
for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,343
|
)
|
|
|
(3,343
|
)
|
Balance
– May 31, 2016
|
|
|
105,024,874
|
|
|
|
136,117
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18,081
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
(110,245
|
)
|
|
|
47,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
– November 30, 2016
|
|
|
105,286,469
|
|
|
|
136,357
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18,134
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
(111,764
|
)
|
|
|
46,154
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
58,822
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Restricted Share Units
|
|
|
209,198
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Loss
for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,387
|
)
|
|
|
(5,387
|
)
|
Balance
– May 31, 2017
|
|
|
105,554,489
|
|
|
|
136,463
|
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18,380
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
(117,151
|
)
|
|
|
41,176
|
|
(See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated
financial statements)
Trilogy Metals Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
in thousands of US dollars
|
|
For six months ended
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
|
May 31, 2016
$
|
|
Cash flows used in operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
(5,387
|
)
|
|
|
(3,342
|
)
|
Items not affecting cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Unrealized loss on held for trading investments
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
Net change in non-cash working capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Decrease in deposits and prepaid amounts
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
(Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,586
|
)
|
|
|
(3,134
|
)
|
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of Restricted Share Units
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of plant & equipment
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Mineral properties funding (note 4)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of investments, net of fees
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
10,865
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
7,189
|
|
|
|
(3,139
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period
|
|
|
7,340
|
|
|
|
16,139
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents – end of period
|
|
|
14,529
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations – end of period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations – end of period
|
|
|
14,529
|
|
|
|
12,907
|
|
(See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated
financial statements)
Trilogy Metals Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Trilogy Metals Inc., formerly NovaCopper Inc.,
(“Trilogy” or the “Company”) was incorporated in British Columbia under the
Business Corporations Act
(BC)
on April 27, 2011. The Company changed its name from NovaCopper Inc. to Trilogy Metals Inc. on September 1,
2016 to better reflect its diversified metals resource base. The Company is engaged in the exploration and development of mineral
properties with a focus on the Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects (“UKMP”), including the Arctic and Bornite Projects located
in Northwest Alaska in the United States of America (“US”).
|
2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
|
Basis of presentation
These consolidated financial statements have
been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the
accounts of Trilogy and its wholly-owned subsidiary, NovaCopper US Inc. (“NovaCopper US”). These consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Sunward Resources Ltd. (“Sunward”), Sunward Investments Ltd. (“Sunward
Investments”) and Sunward Resources Limited (“Sunward BVI”) for the period June 19, 2015 to September 1, 2016,
inclusive. Sunward BVI has registered a branch, Sunward Resources Sucursal Colombia, to do business in Colombia. All significant
intercompany transactions are eliminated on consolidation.
On June 19, 2015, we completed the acquisition
of Sunward, which held 100% ownership in the Titiribi gold-copper exploration project in Colombia through Sunward Investments.
Sunward was converted to Sunward Resources Unlimited Liability Company on June 19, 2015 and wound-up on February 29, 2016. On September
1, 2016, we completed the sale of Sunward Investments and the Titiribi project.
The Company classified the operations of Sunward Investments as discontinued operations, retrospectively.
All figures are in United States dollars unless
otherwise noted. References to CDN$ refer to amounts in Canadian dollars.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position as
of May 31, 2017, our results of operations for the three months and six months ended May 31, 2017 and 2016 and our cash flows for
the six months ended May 31, 2017 and 2016. The results of operations for the three and six months ended May 31, 2017 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending November 30, 2017.
As these interim consolidated financial statements
do not contain all of the disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements, these unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and related notes included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2016 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
on February 3, 2017.
These financial statements were approved by
the Company’s Audit Committee on behalf of the Board of Directors for issue on June 27, 2017.
Recent accounting pronouncements
|
i.
|
Statement of cash flows
|
In November 2016, the FASB issued
guidance regarding the presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows (“ASU 2016-18”). This update
is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company has analyzed
the impact of the update and determined that the clarification will not affect the Company’s presentation on its statement
of cash flows. The Company has decided to early adopt the standard in the second quarter of 2017. As there was no impact on the
Company’s statement of cash flows, there were no changes as a result of adopting the standard.
In February 2016, the FASB issued
new accounting requirements for accounting for, presentation of, and classification of leases (“ASU 2016-02”). This
will result in most leases being capitalized as a right of use asset with a related liability on our balance sheets. The requirements
of the new standard are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within
those annual periods, which for us is the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. We expect the adoption will have an impact as we expect
to capitalize leases, specifically our office leases that are not currently recognized on the balance sheet and are in the process
of analyzing the quantitative impact of this guidance on our results of operations and financial position.
|
iii.
|
Stock-based compensation
|
In March 2016, the FASB issued
new guidance simplifying the accounting for stock-based compensation transactions, including income tax consequences, classification
of awards as equity or liabilities, forfeitures, and classification on the statement of cash flows (“ASU 2016-09”).
This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company
has analyzed the impact of the update and determined that the simplification applied to accounting for forfeitures will affect
the results of operations and financial position as it will alter the timing of recognition of forfeitures. The Company is currently
considering its policy choice. The remaining changes in the update do not have an effect on the Company’s accounting for
stock-based compensation.
|
iv.
|
Business combinations
|
In January 2017, the FASB issued
new guidance to assist in determining if a set of assets and activities being acquired or sold is a business (“ASU 2017-01”).
It also provided a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present, which
at a minimum, must be present to be considered a business. This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted in most circumstances. It expects there could be an impact to how the Company
accounts for assets acquired in the future.
On September 1, 2016, Trilogy completed the
sale of Sunward Investments to GoldMining Inc. (“GMI”), formerly Brazil Resources Inc., a public company listed on
the TSX-Venture exchange, of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Sunward Investments for consideration of 5,000,000 common
shares of GMI valued at $7.8 million and 1,000,000 warrants, with each warrant exercisable into one common share of GMI for a
period of two years at an exercise price of Cdn$3.50, valued at $0.3 million for total consideration of $8.1 million. Of the common
shares received, 2,500,000 common shares were saleable immediately with the remaining 2,500,000 common shares saleable six months
following the close. Sunward Investments, through a subsidiary, owns 100% of the Titiribi gold-copper exploration project.
The common shares and warrants received have
been designated as held-for-trading financial assets, with the classification as current investments and long-term investments,
respectively.
in thousands of dollars
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
|
November 30, 2016
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current investments
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
5,765
|
|
|
|
7,835
|
|
The fair value of the common shares is determined
based on the closing price at each period end. The fair value of the BRI warrants is determined using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model at each period end.
During the six months ended May 31, 2017, the
Company sold 570,000 common shares of GMI during the period for proceeds of $0.9 million and realized a gain on sale of $nil. For
the six months ended May 31, 2017, the Company recognized an unrealized loss on the common shares and warrants of GMI of $1.2 million.
|
4.
|
Mineral properties and development costs
|
in thousands of dollars
|
|
November 30, 2016
$
|
|
|
Acquisition costs
$
|
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
Alaska, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ambler (a)
|
|
|
26,586
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26,586
|
|
Bornite (b)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
in thousands of dollars
|
|
November 30, 2015
$
|
|
|
Acquisition costs
$
|
|
|
November 30, 2016
$
|
|
Alaska, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ambler (a)
|
|
|
26,586
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26,586
|
|
Bornite (b)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
On January 11, 2010, NovaGold
Resources Inc. (“NovaGold”), through Alaska Gold Company (“AGC”), at the time a wholly-owned subsidiary,
purchased 100% of the Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska, which contains the copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Arctic Project and other
mineralized targets within the volcanogenic massive sulfide belt, through a series of cash and share payments. Total fair value
of the consideration was $26.6 million. The vendor retained a 1% net smelter return royalty that the owner of the property
can purchase at any time for a one-time payment of $10.0 million.
The Ambler lands were acquired on
October 17, 2011 by NovaCopper US through a purchase and sale agreement with AGC. On October 24, 2011, NovaGold
transferred its ownership of NovaCopper US to the Company, then a wholly owned subsidiary of NovaGold, which was subsequently
spun-out to NovaGold shareholders and publicly listed on April 30, 2012 (“NovaGold Arrangement”).
On October 19, 2011, NovaCopper
US acquired the exclusive right to explore and the non-exclusive right to access and enter on the Bornite lands, and lands deeded
to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. (“NANA”) through the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, located adjacent to the
Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska. As consideration, NovaCopper US paid $4 million to acquire the right to explore and
develop the combined Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects through an Exploration Agreement and Option to Lease with NANA. Upon a decision
to proceed with construction of a mine on the lands, NANA maintains the right to purchase between a 16%-25% ownership interest
in the mine or retain a 15% net proceeds royalty which is payable after NovaCopper US has recovered certain historical costs, including
capital and cost of capital. Should NANA elect to purchase an ownership interest, consideration will be payable equal to all historical
costs incurred on the properties at the elected percentage purchased less $40 million, not to be less than zero. The parties
would form a joint venture and be responsible for all future costs, including capital costs of the mine based on their pro-rata
share.
NANA would also be granted a net
smelter return royalty of between 1% and 2.5% upon the execution of a mining lease or a surface use agreement, the amount of which
is determined by the classification of land from which production originates.
On April 10, 2017, Trilogy and NovaCopper
US entered into an Option Agreement to Form a Joint Venture with South32 Group Operations Pty Ltd. (“South32”) on the
UKMP (“Option Agreement”). NovaCopper US has granted South32 the right to form a 50/50 joint venture to hold all of
NovaCopper US’ Alaskan assets. Upon exercise of the option, NovaCopper US will transfer its Alaskan assets, including the
UKMP, and South32 will contribute a minimum of $150 million to a newly formed limited liability company (“JV LLC”),
plus any amounts NovaCopper US spends at the Arctic Project over the next three years to a maximum of $5 million per year (the
“Subscription Price”), less an amount of the initial funding contributed by South32.
To maintain the option in good standing,
South32 is required to fund a minimum of $10 million per year for up to a three year period, which funds will be used to execute
a mutually agreed upon program at the UKMP. The funds provided by South32 may only be expended based on the approved program. Provided
that all the exploration data and information has been made available to South32 by no later than December 31 of each year, South32
must decide by the end of January of the following year whether; (i) to fund a further tranche of a minimum of $10 million, or
(ii) to withdraw and not provide any further annual funding. If the election to fund a further tranche is not made in January,
South32 has until the end of March to exercise the option to form the JV LLC and make the subscription payment.
The Company received $10.0
million for the first payment following the approval of the year 1 program and budget. As at May 31, 2017, the Company held
$9.3 million in a segregated bank account for spending on the approved year 1 program at Bornite. The Company is responsible
for the disbursement of these funds in accordance with the approved program and budget and accordingly has not classified the
funds as restricted cash.
As the initial option payments are
credited against the future subscription price upon exercise, the Company has accounted for the payment received as deferred consideration.
At such time as the option is exercised, the initial payments received to that date will be recognized as part of the consideration
received for the Company’s contribution of the UKMP into the JV LLC. If South 32 withdraws from the Option Agreement, the
consideration will be recognized in the statement of loss at that time.
The option to form the JV LLC is
recognized as a financial instrument at inception of the arrangement with an initial fair value of $nil. This option is required
to be re-measured at fair value at each reporting date with any changes in fair value recorded in loss for the period.
|
(d)
|
Mineral properties expense
|
The following table summarizes mineral
properties expense for the noted periods and includes expenditures funded by South32.
In thousands of dollars
|
|
Three months
ended May
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
Three months
ended May
31, 2016
$
|
|
|
Six months
ended May
31, 2017
$
|
|
|
Six months
ended May
31, 2016
$
|
|
Alaska, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Engineering
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Geochemistry and geophysics
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Land and permitting
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Project support
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Wages and benefits
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
Mineral property expense
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
Mineral property expenses consist
of direct drilling, personnel, community, resource reporting and other exploration expenses as outlined above, as well as indirect
project support expenses such as fixed wing charters, helicopter support, fuel, and other camp operation costs. Cumulative mineral
properties expense in Alaska from the initial earn-in agreement on the property in 2004 to May 31, 2017 is $64.9 million and
cumulative acquisition costs are $30.6 million totaling $95.5 million spent to date.
|
5.
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
in thousands of dollars
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
|
November 30, 2016
$
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Accrued salaries and vacation
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Authorized:
unlimited common shares, no par value
in thousands of dollars, except share amounts
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
Ascribed value
$
|
|
November 30, 2015
|
|
|
104,796,421
|
|
|
|
136,040
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
162,854
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Restricted Share Units
|
|
|
108,399
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Deferred Share Units
|
|
|
218,795
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
November 30, 2016
|
|
|
105,286,469
|
|
|
|
136,357
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
58,822
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Restricted Share Units
|
|
|
209,198
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
May 31, 2017, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
105,554,489
|
|
|
|
136,463
|
|
On April 30, 2012, under the NovaGold
Arrangement, Trilogy committed to issue common shares, once vested, to satisfy holders of deferred share units (“NovaGold
DSUs”) on record as of the close of business April 27, 2012. When vested, Trilogy committed to deliver one Common Share to
the holder for every six shares of NovaGold the holder is entitled to receive, rounded down to the nearest whole number. As of
May 31, 2017, 20,685 NovaGold DSUs remain outstanding representing a right to receive 3,447 Common Shares in Trilogy, which will
settle upon certain directors retiring from NovaGold’s board.
During the period ended May 31, 2017, 1,695,000
options (May 31, 2016 – 1,785,000 options) at a weighted-average exercise price of CAD$0.72 (May 31, 2016 – CAD$0.44)
were granted to employees, consultants and directors exercisable for a period of five years with various vesting terms between
nil and two years. The weighted-average fair value attributable to options granted in the period was $0.22.
For the six month period ended May 31, 2017,
Trilogy recognized a stock-based compensation charge of $0.27 million (May 31, 2016– $0.25 million) for options
granted to directors, employees and service providers, net of forfeitures.
The fair value of the stock options recognized
in the period has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Assumptions used in the pricing model for the
period are as provided below.
|
|
May 31, 2017
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
CDN$0.72
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
3.0 years
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
74.3
|
%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
As of May 31, 2017, there were 1,405,843 non-vested
options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $0.45; the non-vested stock option expense not yet recognized was
$0.1 million. This expense is expected to be recognized over the next two years.
A summary of the Company’s stock option
plan and changes during the period ended is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Number of options
|
|
|
Weighted average
exercise price
$
|
|
Balance – beginning of period
|
|
|
6,049,433
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,695,000
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(175,938
|
)
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(149,169
|
)
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
Balance – end of period
|
|
|
7,419,326
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
The following table summarizes information about the stock options
outstanding at May 31, 2017.
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
Range of
price
|
|
Number of
outstanding
options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
years to
expiry
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
$
|
|
|
Number of
exercisable
options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
$
|
|
|
Number of
unvested
options
|
|
$0.33 to $0.50
|
|
|
4,427,660
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
3,748,490
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
679,170
|
|
$0.51 to $1.00
|
|
|
2,936,666
|
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
2,209,993
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
726,673
|
|
$1.01 to $1.47
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
7,419,326
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
6,013,483
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
1,405,843
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of vested share
options (the market value less the exercise price) at May 31, 2017 was $1.2 million (May 31, 2016 - $0.78 million) and the aggregate
intrinsic value of exercised options for the six months ended May 31, 2017 was $0.03 million (May 31, 2016 - $0.03 million).
|
(b)
|
NovaGold Arrangement Options
|
Under the NovaGold Arrangement, holders of
NovaGold stock options received one option in Trilogy for every six options held in NovaGold (“NovaGold Arrangement Options”).
All NovaGold Arrangement Options remaining expired during the six months ended May 31, 2017.
A summary of the NovaGold Arrangement Options
and changes during the period ended is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Number of options
|
|
|
Weighted average
exercise price
$
|
|
Balance – beginning of period
|
|
|
312,195
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(312,195
|
)
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Balance – end of period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(c)
|
Restricted Share Units and Deferred
Share Units
|
The Company has a Restricted Share Unit Plan
(“RSU Plan”) and a Non-Executive Director Deferred Share Unit Plan (“DSU Plan”) to provide long-term incentives
to employees, officers and directors. The RSU Plan and DSU Plan may be settled in cash and/or Common Shares at the Company’s
election with each RSU and DSU entitling the holder to receive one common share of the Company or equivalent value. All units
are accounted for as equity-settled awards.
A summary of the Company’s unit plans
and changes during the period ended is as follows:
|
|
Number of RSUs
|
|
|
Number of DSUs
|
|
Balance – beginning of period
|
|
|
400,001
|
|
|
|
925,390
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
72,241
|
|
Vested/paid
|
|
|
(399,999
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance – end of period
|
|
|
600,002
|
|
|
|
997,631
|
|
For the six months ended May 31, 2017, Trilogy
recognized a stock-based compensation charge of $0.30 million (May 31, 2016- $0.15 million), net of forfeitures.
On December 15, 2016, 600,000 RSUs were granted
to officers vesting one third immediately, one third on the first anniversary of the grant date, and one third on the second anniversary.
On December 23, 2016, 399,999 RSUs vested and were settled through the issuance of 209,198 shares and a cash payment of $90,000
to cover tax withholdings.
|
(d)
|
Share Purchase Warrants
|
A summary of the Company’s warrants
and changes during the three months ended May 31, 2017 is as follows:
|
|
Number of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted
average years to
expiry
|
|
|
Weighted
average exercise
price
$
|
|
Balance – beginning of period
|
|
|
6,521,740
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
Balance – end of period
|
|
|
6,521,740
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
The Company is exposed to a variety of risks
arising from financial instruments. These risks and management’s objectives, policies and procedures for managing these
risks are disclosed as follows.
The Company’s financial instruments
consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposits, investments, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments approximates their carrying value due to the short-term nature of
their maturity. The Company’s financial instruments initially measured at fair value and then held at amortized cost include
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposits, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The Company’s investments
are held for trading and are marked-to-market at each period end with changes in fair value recorded to the statement of loss.
The South32 purchase option is a derivative financial liability measured at fair value with changes in value recorded to the statement
of loss.
Financial risk management
The Company’s activities expose them
to certain financial risks, including currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, interest risk and price risk.
Currency risk is the risk of a fluctuation
in financial asset and liability settlement amounts due to a change in foreign exchange rates. The Company operates in the United
States and Canada. The Company’s exposure to currency risk at May 31, 2017 is limited to the Canadian dollar consisting
of cash of CDN$1,471,000, accounts receivable of CDN$125,000, deposit amounts of CDN$116,000, investments of CDN$8,106,000 and
accounts payable of CDN$442,000. Based on a 10% change in the US-Canadian exchange rate, assuming all other variables remain constant,
the Company’s net loss would change by approximately $631,000.
Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss
if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company holds cash and cash
equivalents with Canadian Chartered financial institutions. The Company’s accounts receivable consist of GST receivable
from the Federal Government of Canada and other receivables for recoverable expenses. The Company’s exposure to credit risk
is equal to the balance of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable as recorded in the financial statements.
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company
will encounter difficulties raising funds to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company is in the exploration
stage and does not have cash inflows from operations; therefore, the Company manages liquidity risk through the management of
its capital structure and financial leverage. Management does expect to monetize its investments held over the next year to assist
in meeting its operational requirements. Future financings are anticipated through the sale of investments, equity financing,
the exercise of mineral properties option, debt financing, convertible debt, or other means.
Contractually obligated cash flow requirements
as at May 31, 2017 are as follows.
in thousands of dollars
|
|
Total
$
|
|
|
< 1 Year
$
|
|
|
1–2 Years
$
|
|
|
2–5 Years
$
|
|
|
Thereafter
$
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Office lease (note 8)
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
On February 21, 2017, the Company entered
into a lease for office space effective July 1, 2017 for a period of seven years with a total commitment of $1.3 million.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair
value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company is
exposed to interest rate risk with respect to interest earned on cash and cash equivalents. Based on balances as at May 31, 2017,
a 1% change in interest rates would result in a change in net loss of $0.1 million, assuming all other variables remain constant.
As we are currently in the exploration phase
none of our financial instruments are exposed to commodity price risk; however, our ability to obtain long-term financing and its
economic viability could be affected by commodity price volatility.
Fair value accounting
Financial instruments measured at fair value
are classified into one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the significance of the inputs used in making
the measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1
— Unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2
— Quoted prices
in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of
the asset or liability; and
Level 3
— Prices or
valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by
little or no market activity)
The levels in the fair value hierarchy into
which the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis
were categorized as follows:
in thousands of dollars
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
|
November 30, 2016
$
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Current investments – shares
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Investments – warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
South32 purchase option
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company’s investments consist of
shares and warrants in a publicly-held mining company. The share investments are recorded as current investments and are valued
using quoted market prices in active markets and as such are classified as a Level 1 financial instrument. The warrants are valued
using a Black-Scholes pricing model and are considered a Level 3 financial instrument because the valuation models have significant
unobservable inputs.
The South32 purchase option received is recorded
at fair value. As the inputs to valuing the purchase option are significant to the measurement of the option and are unobservable,
it is considered a Level 3 financial instrument.
The Company has commitments in respect of
office leases requiring future minimum lease payments as follows:
in thousands of dollars
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
2017
|
|
|
77
|
|
2018
|
|
|
164
|
|
2019
|
|
|
170
|
|
2020
|
|
|
178
|
|
2021
|
|
|
187
|
|
2022-2024
|
|
|
507
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary notes
Forward-looking statements
This Management’s Discussion
and Analysis contains “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning
of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”), and Canadian securities laws. These forward-looking statements may include statements regarding
outlook, perceived merit of properties, exploration results and budgets, mineral reserves and resource estimates, work programs,
capital expenditures, operating costs, cash flow estimates, production estimates and similar statements relating to the economic
viability of a project, timelines, strategic plans, statements relating to anticipated activity with respect to the Ambler Mining
District Industrial Access Project, including the Company’s plans and expectations relating to its Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects,
the adequacy of the Subscription Price to fund the UKMP through to feasibility and permitting of the first mine, the exercise
of the option by South32, market prices for precious and base metals, or other statements that are not statements of fact. These
statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet
determinable and assumptions of management. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute
“forward-looking statements” to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered
if the property is developed.
Any statements that express or involve
discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or
performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”,
“believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”,
“strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations
thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”,
“should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these
terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on
a number of material assumptions, including those listed below, which could prove to be significantly incorrect:
|
·
|
assumptions made in the interpretation of drill results, and of the geology, grade, and continuity
of the Company’s mineral deposits;
|
|
·
|
our ability to achieve production at any of the Company’s mineral exploration and development
properties;
|
|
·
|
our expected ability to develop adequate infrastructure and that the cost of doing so will be reasonable;
|
|
·
|
assumptions that all necessary permits and governmental approvals will be obtained;
|
|
·
|
estimated capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;
|
|
·
|
estimated metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs,
together with other assumptions underlying the Company’s resource and reserve estimates;
|
|
·
|
continued good relationships with local communities and other stakeholders;
|
|
·
|
our expectations regarding demand for equipment, skilled labour and services needed for exploration
and development of mineral properties;
|
|
·
|
assumptions regarding the merit of litigation; and
|
|
·
|
that our activities will not be adversely disrupted or impeded by development, operating or
regulatory risks.
|
Forward-looking statements are subject to
a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from
those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:
|
·
|
risks related to the inability to define proven and probable reserves;
|
|
·
|
risks related to our ability to finance the development of our mineral properties through external
financing, strategic alliances, the sale of property interests or otherwise;
|
|
·
|
none of the Company’s mineral properties are in production or are under development;
|
|
·
|
uncertainties relating to the assumptions underlying our resource estimates, such as metal pricing,
metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs;
|
|
·
|
risks related to lack of infrastructure including but not limited to the risk whether or not
the AMDIAP will receive the requisite permits and, if it does, whether AIDEA will build the AMDIAP;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty as to whether there will ever be production at the Company’s mineral exploration
and development properties;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty as to estimates of capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;
|
|
·
|
risks related to our ability to commence production and generate material revenues or obtain
adequate financing for our planned exploration and development activities;
|
|
·
|
risks related to future sales or issuances of equity securities decreasing the value of existing
Trilogy common shares, diluting voting power and reducing future earnings per share;
|
|
·
|
risks related to market events and general economic conditions;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty related to inferred mineral resources;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty related to the economic projections contained herein derived from the Preliminary
Economic Assessment titled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Report on the Arctic Project, Ambler Mining District, Northwest
Alaska” dated effective September 12, 2013;
|
|
·
|
risks related to inclement weather which may delay or hinder exploration activities at its mineral
properties;
|
|
·
|
risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade,
and continuity of our mineral deposits;
|
|
·
|
mining and development risks, including risks related to infrastructure, accidents, equipment
breakdowns, labor disputes or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in development, construction or production;
|
|
·
|
the risk that permits and governmental approvals necessary to develop and operate mines at our
mineral properties will not be available on a timely basis or at all;
|
|
·
|
commodity price fluctuations;
|
|
·
|
risks related to governmental regulation and permits, including environmental regulation, including
the risk that more stringent requirements or standards may be adopted or applied due to circumstances unrelated to the Company
and outside of its control;
|
|
·
|
risks related to the need for reclamation activities on our properties and uncertainty of cost
estimates related thereto;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty related to title to our mineral properties;
|
|
·
|
our history of losses and expectation of future losses;
|
|
·
|
risks related to increases in demand for equipment, skilled labor and services needed for exploration
and development of mineral properties, and related cost increases;
|
|
·
|
our need to attract and retain qualified management and technical personnel;
|
|
·
|
risks related to conflicts of interests of some of our directors;
|
|
·
|
risks related to potential future litigation;
|
|
·
|
risks related to the voting power of our major shareholders and the impact that a sale by such
shareholders may have on our share price;
|
|
·
|
risks related to global climate change;
|
|
·
|
risks related to adverse publicity from non-governmental organizations;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty as to the volatility in the price of the Company’s shares;
|
|
·
|
the Company’s expectation of not paying cash dividends;
|
|
·
|
adverse federal income tax consequences for U.S. shareholders should the Company be a passive
foreign investment company;
|
|
·
|
uncertainty as to our ability to maintain the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting
as per the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and
|
|
·
|
increased regulatory compliance costs, associated with rules and regulations promulgated by
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), Canadian Securities Administrators, the NYSE-MKT,
the TSX, and the Financial Accounting Standards Boards, and more specifically, our efforts to comply with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
|
This list is not exhaustive of the factors
that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements about the future
and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of the Company or other future events or conditions may differ materially
from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without
limitation, those referred to in Trilogy’s Form 10-K dated February 2, 2017, filed with the Canadian securities regulatory
authorities and the SEC, and other information released by Trilogy and filed with the appropriate regulatory agencies.
The Company’s forward-looking statements
are based on the beliefs, expectations, and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and the Company does not
assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions
should change, except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements.
Cautionary note to United States investors
Reserve and resource estimates
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis
has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements
of U.S. securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all resource and reserve estimates included in this Management’s Discussion
and Analysis have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
(“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum Definition Standards on Mineral Resources
and Mineral Reserves. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators which establishes standards for all
public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. Canadian standards, including
NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of the SEC, and resource and reserve information contained herein may not
be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
the term “resource” does not equate to the term “reserves”. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not
be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and
legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. The SEC’s disclosure standards normally do not
permit the inclusion of information concerning “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources”
or “inferred mineral resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not
constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that
any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. U.S. investors should also understand
that “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and great uncertainty as
to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource”
will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimated “inferred mineral resources” may not form
the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any
part of an “inferred mineral resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces”
in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization
that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.
The requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of “reserves” are also not the same as those of the SEC, and reserves
reported by the Company in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC standards. Accordingly,
information concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable with information made public by companies that report
in accordance with U.S. standards.
General
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis
(“MD&A”) of Trilogy Metals Inc. (“Trilogy”, “Trilogy Metals”, “the Company”
or “we”) is dated June 27, 2017 and provides an analysis of our unaudited interim financial results for the quarter
ended May 31, 2017 compared to the quarter ended May 31, 2016.
The following information should be read in
conjunction with our May 31, 2017 unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes which were prepared in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The MD&A should also
be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended November 30, 2016.
A summary of the U.S. GAAP accounting policies are outlined in note 2 of the audited consolidated financial statements
and note 2 of the interim consolidated financial statements. All amounts are in United States dollars unless otherwise stated.
References to “Canadian dollars” and “C$” and “CDN$” are to the currency of Canada and references
to “U.S. dollars”, “$” or “US$” are to the currency of the United States.
Andrew W. West, P.Geo., an employee and Exploration
Manager for Trilogy, is a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 -
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
(“NI 43-101”), and has approved the scientific and technical information in this MD&A.
Trilogy’s shares are listed on the Toronto
Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and the NYSE-MKT under the symbol “TMQ”. Additional information related to Trilogy,
including our annual report on Form 10-K, is available on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com
and on EDGAR at
www.sec.gov
.
Description of business
We are a base metals exploration company focused
on exploring and developing our mineral holdings in the Ambler mining district located in Alaska, U.S.A. We conduct our operations
through a wholly-owned subsidiary, NovaCopper US Inc. which is doing business as Trilogy Metals US (“NovaCopper US”).
Our Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects, (“UKMP” or “UKMP Projects”), consist of: i) the 100% owned Ambler lands
which host the Arctic copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Project; and ii) the Bornite lands being explored under a collaborative long-term
agreement with NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. (“NANA”), a regional Alaska Native Corporation, which host the Bornite
carbonate-hosted copper Project.
Project activities
South32 Option Agreement
On April 10, 2017, Trilogy and NovaCopper
US entered into an Option Agreement to form a Joint Venture with South32 Group Operations Pty Ltd. (“South32”) on the
UKMP (“Option Agreement”). Under the terms of the Option Agreement, NovaCopper US granted South32 the right to form
a 50/50 joint venture to hold all of NovaCopper US’ Alaskan assets. Upon exercise of the option, NovaCopper US will transfer
its Alaskan assets, including the UKMP, and South32 will contribute a minimum of $150 million, to a newly formed and jointly held,
limited liability company.
To maintain the option in good standing,
South32 is required to fund a minimum of $10 million per year for up to a three year period, which funds will be used to execute
a mutually agreed upon program at the UKMP. The funds provided by South32 may only be expended in accordance with an approved program
by a newly formed technical committee with equal representation from Trilogy and South32. South32 may exercise its option at any
time over the next three years to enter into the 50/50 joint venture. To subscribe for 50% of the JV, South32 will contribute a
minimum of $150 million, plus any amounts NovaCopper US spends at the Arctic Project over the next three years, to a maximum of
$5 million per year (the “Subscription Price”), less an amount of the initial funding contributed by South32.
Option Funding Phase
Provided that all the exploration data
and information has been made available to South32 by no later than December 31 of each year, South32 must decide by the end of
January of the following year whether; (i) to fund a further tranche of a minimum of $10 million, or (ii) to withdraw and not provide
any further annual funding. If the election to fund a further tranche is not made in January, South32 has until the end of March
to exercise the option to form the LLC and make the subscription payment. If South32 elects to exercise the option, the Subscription
Price less certain deductions for initial funding shall be paid in one tranche within 45 business days. Should South32 not make
its annual minimum payment or elect to withdraw, the option will lapse and South32 will have no claim to ownership or the funds
it had already spent. The option payment for the first year has been paid by South32 to NovaCopper US and the funds will be used
for a $10 million exploration program at the Bornite Project to be executed in 2017.
Subscription Funding Phase
At any time during the option funding phase
of the agreement, South32 may elect to subscribe for a 50% interest in a newly formed LLC which will take transfer of, and hold,
NovaCopper US’ Alaskan Assets. As part of the Subscription Price, South32 will match any spending expended by us at the Arctic
Project over the next 3 years, to a cumulative maximum of $15 million. Depending on when the option is exercised, certain amounts
of the Initial Funding will be deducted from the Subscription Price.
Trilogy estimates that the Subscription Price
will fund the UKMP through feasibility and the permitting of the first mine to be developed in the Ambler mining district. Once
the full amount of the subscription payment of approximately $150 million is expended, the parties will contribute funding pro
rata, as contemplated by the operating agreement which will govern the LLC (the “LLC Agreement”). The LLC Agreement
anticipates a General Manager, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating and Technical Officer to be appointed by the LLC’s
Board, which will have equal representation from Trilogy and South32.
As the initial option payments are credited
against the future subscription price upon exercise, we have accounted for the payment received as deferred consideration. At such
time as the option is exercised, the initial payments received to that date will be recognized as part of the consideration received
for our contribution of the Alaska assets, including the UKMP, into the joint venture. If South 32 withdraws from the Option Agreement,
the consideration will be recognized in the statement of loss at that time.
Arctic Project
In April 2017, we released an updated resource
estimate for the Arctic Project in preparation for the kick-off of a pre-feasibility study (the “Arctic PFS”) on the
Arctic Project. We also announced the results of a metallurgical test work program using sample material from the Arctic deposit
collected during the 2016 field season. This metallurgical test program was carried out as a follow-on program to confirm previous
metallurgical results completed in 2012 and in support of advancing the project to PFS. The results demonstrate that excellent
recoveries and clean concentrates of copper and zinc can be generated from the polymetallic copper-lead-zinc-gold-silver ores at
Arctic. Concentrates of copper recovered an average of 91.7% of the copper and formed a concentrate averaging 28.7% copper metal.
Concentrates of zinc recovered an average of 87.8% of the zinc and formed a concentrate averaging 60% zinc metal. Neither concentrate
contains significant deleterious penalty metals and are considered excellent quality by world standards. The lead concentrate contains
significant precious metals and is still undergoing further test work to determine optimal recoveries for lead, gold and silver.
In early June 2017, we announced the engagement
of Ausenco Engineering Canada Inc. to prepare the Arctic PFS technical report anticipated to be complete in Q1, 2018. The Company
has also engaged Amec Foster Wheeler to complete mine planning and SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. to complete tailings and waste
design, hydrology and environmental studies.
The field program for the Arctic PFS began
in June and will continue through early August at the UKMP. We will be completing geotechnical drilling, hydrology installations,
and test pits for site facility locations and mine design, and geophysical ground surveys to evaluate ground conditions. A significantly
expanded environmental baseline program will be underway in 2017 to further the ongoing baseline data collection at the Arctic
Project. Aquatics, avian and large mammal surveys will be continued and expanded, water balance programs will be expanded, and
collection of data from the existing meteorological station will continue. The timing of the field program will provide the information
required for completion of the PFS anticipated to be in Q1 2018.
Bornite Project
We are executing a $10 million program at the
Bornite Project, funded by South32 per the Option Agreement. This year’s exploration at Bornite was approved by a joint Trilogy-South32
Technical Committee and is focused on drilling the extensions of mineralization last drilled by us in 2013.
During the 2013 exploration program at the
Bornite Project, we completed 8,142 meters of drilling with 4,684 meters drilled at the Ruby Creek zone (a potential open pit resource)
and 3,458 meters drilled at the South Reef zone (a potential underground resource). A series of press releases highlighted results
of the drilling at Bornite starting with the Company’s press release dated October 7, 2013 where we highlighted drill hole
RC13-224 which intersected two mineralized intervals, starting at 513.3 meters and ending at 754.6 meters (241.3 meter interval),
for a combined 236.0 meter composite interval with a weighted average grade of 1.90% copper, and comprised of 229.4 meters at a
grade of 1.73% copper and 6.6 meters at a grade of 7.70% copper.
This year’s exploration program at Bornite
is one of the larger programs in the history of drilling at the Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects. With an approved budget of $10 million,
we will be drilling approximately 12,000 meters at Bornite this field season to test the extension of the mineralization from the
drill holes from our 2013 drill campaign along with a ground gravity survey, continuation of hydrology data collection and initiating
metallurgy and acid based accounting for Bornite.
Drilling at the Bornite Project began in early
June and is expected to be finished in late September with results released throughout the fall.
Ambler Mining District Industrial Access
Project
In March 2017, we announced that the permitting
process had advanced on the Ambler Mining District Industrial Access Project (“AMDIAP”) with the publishing of the
Notice of Intent (“NOI”) by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) on February 28, 2017 which is a significant
milestone in the permitting process. The NOI initiates the permitting process under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”)
for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) on the AMDIAP. The BLM is the lead Federal agency
for the EIS. This notice initiated the public scoping process for the EIS with comments due by May 30, 2017.
The Notice of Intent states that the various
federal and state agencies intend to prepare an EIS for Federal authorization to construct and operate an approximately 211-mile
long industrial access road in the southern Brooks Range foothills of Alaska, originating at the Dalton Highway and ending at the
Ambler River and providing access to the Ambler Mining District. The BLM has announced the beginning of the EIS scoping process
to solicit public comments and identify issues. The BLM intends to coordinate the development of the EIS with the National Park
Service (“NPS”), which is in accordance with the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (“ANILCA”).
The NPS is developing a separate environmental and economic analysis solely for the purpose of determining the most desirable route
for that portion of the proposed road right-of-way that would cross the Gates of the Arctic National Preserve. More information
on the AMDIAP and the ANILCA permitting process is available on AIDEA’s website at www.ambleraccess.org, which website is
not incorporated by reference.
The AMDIAP is anticipated to provide surface
access to the Ambler Mining District, long known to contain significant deposits of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver and specifically
including the Company’s UKMP.
We are also working closely with AIDEA
to amend the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”), originally signed in 2013, as the industrial road route has been
selected and permitting documents have been submitted to the relevant US federal agencies. We will work with AIDEA, as the proponent
for the AMDIAP, to have direct input into the permitting process for the road and the ability to attend meetings with the BLM,
as the lead federal agency for the EIS process.
Corporate developments
Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting was held on May
8, 2017. We are pleased to report all directors standing for nomination were resoundingly elected by the Shareholders of the Company.
Outlook
Our 2017 program has a total budget of $17.1
million with $7.1 million to be expended during the fiscal year to advance the Arctic Project to pre-feasibility and $10.0 million
for the exploration program at the Bornite Project. The Arctic PFS will be supported by information collected during the 2015
and 2016 field seasons as well as additional information to be collected during the 2017 summer field program. The completion
of the 2017 field program will complete a staged three-year site investigation program where the first two years focused almost
exclusively on collecting data in and around the proposed Arctic open-pit, and the third year focuses on infrastructure and mine
design. The Arctic PFS is anticipated to be completed in Q1 2018.
The exploration program at the Bornite
Project is an opportunity to potentially expand the resource at Bornite by drilling the extensions of mineralization last drilled
by the Company in 2013. Approximately 12,000 meters will be drilled at Bornite which drilling will be focused entirely on testing
the size and depth of the extension of the known deposit. Bornite currently has 5.5 billion pounds of copper inferred resource
and 913 million pounds of copper indicated resource. Drilling at the Bornite Project commenced in early June and will continue
through to late September with drill results anticipated to be released late in the summer and continue into the fall.
Property review
Our principal assets, the UKMP Projects, are
located in the Ambler mining district in Northwest Alaska. Our UKMP Projects comprise approximately 352,943 acres (142,831 hectares)
consisting of the Ambler and Bornite lands.
Arctic Project
The Ambler lands, which host a number of deposits,
including the high-grade copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Arctic Project, and other mineralized targets within a 100 kilometer long
volcanogenic massive sulfide (“VMS”) belt, are owned by NovaCopper US. The Ambler lands are located in Northwestern
Alaska and consist of 112,058 acres (45,348 hectares) of Federal patented mining claims and State of Alaska mining claims,
within which VMS mineralization has been found.
We have recorded the Ambler lands as a mineral
property with acquisition costs capitalized and exploration costs expensed in accordance with our accounting policies.
Bornite Project
On October 19, 2011, NovaCopper US
and NANA signed a collaborative agreement to explore and develop the Ambler mining district. Under the Exploration Agreement and
Option to Lease (the “NANA Agreement”), we acquired, in exchange for, among other things, a $4.0 million cash payment
to NANA, the exclusive right to explore the Bornite property and lands deeded to NANA through the Alaska Native Claims Settlement
Act (“ANCSA”), located adjacent to the Arctic Project, and the non-exclusive right to access and entry onto NANA’s
lands. The agreement establishes a framework for any future development of either the Bornite Project or the Arctic Project. Both
projects are included as part of a larger area of interest set forth in the NANA Agreement. The agreement with NANA created a total
land package incorporating our Ambler lands with the adjacent Bornite and ANCSA lands with a total area of approximately 352,900
acres (142,831 hectares).
Upon the decision to proceed with development
of a mine within the area of interest, NANA maintains the right to purchase an ownership interest in the mine equal to between
16%-25% or retain a 15% net proceeds royalty which is payable after we have recovered certain historical costs, including capital
and cost of capital. Should NANA elect to purchase an ownership interest in the mine, consideration will be payable based on the
elected percentage purchased and all the costs incurred on the properties less $40.0 million, not to be less than zero. The
parties would form a joint venture and be responsible for all future costs incurred in connection with the mine, including capital
costs of the mine, based on each party’s pro-rata share.
NANA would also be granted a net smelter return
royalty between 1% and 2.5% upon the execution of a mining lease or a surface use agreement, the amount of which is determined
by the particular area of land from which production originates.
We have accounted for the Bornite property
as a mineral property with acquisition costs capitalized and exploration costs expensed in accordance with our accounting policies.
Summary of results
in thousands of dollars,
except for per share amounts
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
Selected expenses
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
|
May 31, 2016
$
|
|
|
May 31, 2017
$
|
|
|
May 31, 2016
$
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Mineral properties expense
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Salaries
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Salaries – stock-based compensation
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on held for trading investments
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss from continuing operations for the period
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Loss and comprehensive loss for the period
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
3,342
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
For the three months ended May 31, 2017,
Trilogy reported a net loss of $2.4 million (or $0.02 basic and diluted loss per common share) compared to a net loss of $1.6 million
for the corresponding period in 2016 (or $0.01 basic and diluted loss per common share). This variance was primarily due to the
size of the field programs at the UKMP in 2017 as well as the timing of the program. An increase of $840,000 of mineral property
expenses occurred during the three months ended May 31, 2017 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2016. In 2017, the combined
Arctic and Bornite field program began with drilling by early June compared to 2016 where the field program kicked off in early
July. This earlier start resulted in an increased mineral property expense during the second quarter of 2017. Additionally, in
preparation for the Arctic PFS study, an increased level of ongoing technical studies was occurring during the three months ended
May 31, 2017 compared to the corresponding period in 2016.
Trilogy recognized a gain on held for trading
investments of $70,000 during the three months ended May 31, 2017 due to an appreciation in the share price of Gold Mining Inc.
(“GMI”). The investments consist of common shares and warrants in GMI acquired as consideration for the sale of Sunward
Investments Limited (“Sunward”) and its Titiribi gold-copper exploration project in Colombia. Other minor differences
noted for the comparable periods were i) a small increase in general and administrative expenses to support the increased field
program at the UKMP; ii) a small decrease in professional fees due to lower activity in the second quarter of 2017 compared to
2016; and iii) a small decrease in salaries due to the continued depreciation of the Canadian dollar..
The basic and diluted loss per common share
of $0.02 for the three months ended May 31, 2017 is increased from the basic and diluted loss per common share of $0.01 for the
three months ended May 31, 2016 due to the increased loss as described above.
For the six months ended May 31, 2017,
Trilogy reported a net loss of $5.4 million (or $0.05 basic and diluted loss per common share) compared to a net loss of $3.3 million
for the corresponding period in 2016 (or $0.03 basic and diluted loss per common share). This variance was primarily due to an
unrealized loss on investments on the GMI securities of $1.2 million classified as held for trading for which movements in the
fair value of the investments are recorded through the statement of loss. There are no comparable amounts for the six months ended
May 31, 2016 as the Company acquired the investments in September 2016.
Adjusting for the unrealized loss on held for
trading investments, there is a loss from continued operations of $4.2 million for the six months ended May 31, 2017 compared to
the loss from continuing operations of $3.0 million for the six months ended May 31, 2016. The remaining increase is due almost
entirely to an increase of $1.0 in mineral properties expenses. We incurred $1.9 million in mineral properties expense for the
six months ended May 31, 2017 compared to $1.0 million for the six months ended May 31, 2016. The increase in mineral property
expenses in 2017 is due to the significantly increased size of the 2017 field program compared to the 2016 program as discussed
above. The increase is also attributable to several ongoing engineering studies, specifically an updated 3D geology model and resource
estimate for the Arctic deposit, metallurgical test programs on the Arctic and Bornite Projects, completion of a pre-feasibility
level slope geotechnical and hydrology study on the Arctic deposit, and a review of the hydrogeological conditions at the Bornite
property. Waste characterization is also continuing on the Arctic Project which began in 2016. General and administrative expenses,
salaries, stock-based compensation, and professional fees continue to be at comparable levels in the periods presented.
The basic and diluted loss per common share
of $0.05 for the six months ended May 31, 2017 is increased from the basic and diluted loss per common share of $0.03 for the six
months ended May 31, 2016 due to the increased loss as described above.
Selected financial data
Quarterly information
in thousands of dollars,
except per share amounts
|
|
Q2
2017
|
|
|
Q1
2017
|
|
|
Q4
2016
|
|
|
Q3
2016
|
|
|
Q2
2016
|
|
|
Q1
2016
|
|
|
Q4
2015
|
|
|
Q3
2015
|
|
|
|
05/31/17
$
|
|
|
02/28/17
$
|
|
|
11/30/16
$
|
|
|
08/31/16
$
|
|
|
05/31/16
$
|
|
|
02/29/16
$
|
|
|
11/30/15
$
|
|
|
08/31/15
$
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Mineral property expenses
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,561
|
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) for the period
|
|
|
(2,390
|
)
|
|
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
(3,544
|
)
|
|
|
(1,648
|
)
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
|
|
(2,090
|
)
|
|
|
(4,162
|
)
|
Earnings
(loss) per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
($
|
0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Factors that can cause fluctuations in our
quarterly results include the length of the exploration field season at the properties, the type of program conducted, stock option
vesting, and issuance of shares. Other factors that have caused fluctuations in the quarterly results that would not be expected
to re-occur include the acquisition and disposition of Sunward and financing activities.
During the third quarter of 2015, we incurred
mineral property expenses of $2.8 million as we completed our drilling program. We also incurred $0.2 million of discontinued operation
costs operating Sunward. As a result, our loss for the third quarter ended August 31, 2015 is higher compared to previous quarter
losses. Our net loss for the fourth quarter of 2015 of $2.1 million consists of $0.8 million in mineral property expenses incurred
for assay costs and engineering studies conducted in the fall as well as $0.2 million in discontinued operation costs from Sunward.
Our loss for the first quarter ended February
29, 2016 is comparable to typical first quarter losses in that it consists mainly of mineral property expenses relating to engineering
studies completed in advance of the 2016 field program. The loss is increased slightly due to costs related to operating Sunward
of $0.2 million when compared to periods where Trilogy did not own Sunward. During the second quarter of 2016, we incurred $0.5
million in mineral property expenses due to field season starting up in the last month of the second quarter and $0.2 million in
discontinued operations relating to Sunward. During the third quarter of 2016, we incurred mineral property expenses of $2.6 million
as we completed our drilling program. As a result, our loss for the third quarter ended August 31, 2016 is higher compared to previous
quarter losses and consistent with the spending in the third quarter of 2015. We recognized earnings for the fourth quarter of
2016 of $2.0 million due to the gain on the sale of Sunward. Adjusted for the discontinued operations, the fourth quarter periods
are substantially comparable.
Our loss for the first quarter ended February
28, 2017 of $3.0 million is significantly increased compared to prior quarterly periods due to an unrealized loss on held for trading
investments of $1.2 million. The investments are classified as held for trading for which changes in the fair value of the investments
are recorded through the statement of loss. Our loss for the second quarter ended May 31, 2017 of $2.4 million is significantly
increased from the comparable period due to a significant increase is the size of our field program resulting in increased mineral
property expenses of $1.3 million.
Liquidity and capital resources
At May 31, 2017, we had $14.5 million
in cash and cash equivalents. We expended $3.6 million on operating activities during the six months ended May 31, 2017 compared
with $3.1 million for operating activities for the same period in 2016. A majority of cash spent on operating activities during
all periods was expended on mineral property expenses, general and administrative, salaries and professional fees. As at May 31,
2017, the Company continues to manage its cash expenditures and management believes that the working capital available is sufficient
to meet its operational requirements for the next year. Management does expect to monetize its investments by selling shares of
GMI in the next three to six months to assist in meeting its operational requirements. Future financings are anticipated through
the sale of investments, equity financing, the exercise of mineral properties option, debt financing, convertible debt, or other
means.
During the six months ended May 31, 2017,
we received $10.0 million in funding from South32 for the exploration program at the Bornite Project which is categorized as an
investing activity as the funds are being utilized on the UKMP. During the six months ended May 31, 2017, we generated $0.9 million
in proceeds from the sale of investments. The proceeds were used for general operating activities. There was no comparable amount
from investing activities in 2016 as we acquired the investments in September 2016.
We received $10.0 million from South32 for
the first year program under the Option Agreement. As at May 31, 2017, the Company held $9.3 million in a segregated bank account
for spending on the approved year 1 program at the Bornite Project. The Company is responsible for the disbursement of these funds
in accordance with the approved program and budget and accordingly has not classified the funds as restricted cash.
During the six months ended May 31, 2017, $0.1
million was used in financing activities to pay statutory employee withholding taxes on Restricted Share Units that vested. There
were no comparable amounts from financing activities in 2016.
Contractual obligations
Contractually obligated cash flow requirements
as at May 31, 2017 are as follows.
in thousands of dollars
|
|
Total
$
|
|
|
< 1 Year
$
|
|
|
1–2 Years
$
|
|
|
2–5 Years
$
|
|
|
Thereafter
$
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Office lease
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
On February 21, 2017, the Company entered into
a lease for office space effective July 1, 2017 for a period of seven years with a total commitment of $1.3 million.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements.
The Company has lease commitments for office spaces with a remaining total commitment of $1.3 million.
Outstanding share data
At June 27, 2017, we had 105,554,489
common shares issued and outstanding. At June 27, 2017, we had outstanding 6,521,740 warrants with an exercise price of $1.60
each, 7,399,326 stock options with a weighted-average exercise price of $0.52, 997,631 DSUs, 600,002 RSUs, and 20,685 NovaGold
DSUs for which the holder is entitled to receive one common share for every six NovaGold shares received. For additional information
on NovaGold Arrangement Options and NovaGold DSUs, please refer to note 6 in our May 31, 2017 interim consolidated financial statements.
Upon exercising all of the forgoing convertible securities, the Company would be required to issue aggregate of 15,522,146 common
shares.
New accounting pronouncements
Certain recent accounting pronouncements have
been included under note 2 in our May 31, 2017 unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
Critical accounting estimates
The most critical accounting estimates upon
which our financial status depends are those requiring estimates of the recoverability of our capitalized mineral properties, impairment
of long-lived assets, and valuation of stock-based compensation.
Mineral properties and development costs
All direct costs related to the acquisition
of mineral property interests are capitalized. The acquisition of title to mineral properties is a complicated and uncertain process.
The Company has taken steps, in accordance with industry standards, to verify the title to mineral properties in which it has an
interest. Although the Company has made efforts to ensure that legal title to its mining assets is properly recorded, there can
be no assurance that such title will be secured indefinitely.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Management assesses the possibility of impairment
in the carrying value of its long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the asset
or asset group may not be recoverable. Significant judgments are made in assessing the possibility of impairment. Management considers
several factors in considering if an indicator of impairment has occurred, including but not limited to, indications of value from
external sources, significant changes in the legal, business or regulatory environment, and adverse changes in the use of physical
condition of the asset. These factors are subjective and require consideration at each period end. If an indicator of impairment
is determined to exist, management calculates the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows relating to the asset or asset group
using estimated future prices, mineral resources, and operating, capital and reclamation costs. When the carrying value of an asset
exceeds the related undiscounted cash flows, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value, which is usually determined
using discounted future cash flows. Management’s estimates of mineral prices, mineral resources, foreign exchange rates,
production levels and operating capital and reclamation costs are subject to risk and uncertainties that may affect the determination
of the recoverability of the long-lived asset.
Stock-based compensation
Compensation expense for options granted to
employees, directors and certain service providers is determined based on estimated fair values of the options at the time of grant
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which takes into account, as of the grant date, the fair market value of the shares,
expected volatility, expected life, expected forfeiture rate, expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate over the
expected life of the option. The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires input estimation of the expected life of
the option, volatility, and forfeiture rate which can have a significant impact on the valuation model, and resulting expense recorded.
Additional information
Additional information regarding the Company,
including our annual report on Form 10-K, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov and on our website at
www.trilogymetals.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference.