Supplemental
Information Regarding Proposal 4 –
Approval
of Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan
We
are advised that Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), an influential proxy advisory firm, has issued a negative
recommendation on the proposal to approve our Amended Plan (Proposal 4). We are providing stockholders with the supplemental information
contained herein to rebut a number of ISS’ assertions, underscore the importance and appropriateness of the Amended Plan
as part of our overall compensation program, highlight the benefits to stockholders of the Amended Plan, and demonstrate why stockholder
support of this proposal is warranted.
We
believe stockholders should vote to approve the Amended Plan for several reasons:
ISS
does not account for our share repurchases in its 3-year average burn rate calculation.
ISS
relies on its Equity Plan Scorecard (EPSC) model to quantitatively analyze equity plan proposals. In its analysis of the Amended
Plan, ISS noted that ZAGG’s three-year average burn rate is “excessive,” which resulted in low/negative scoring
under the “Grant Practices” pillar of its EPSC model. ISS’ burn rate analysis disregards our stock buyback program
and the performance-based nature of most equity grants since the adoption of the 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the “Original
Plan”).
ZAGG
established a stock buyback program in December 2012. Since that time, ZAGG has consistently repurchased shares in the open market
in order to mitigate the potential dilutive impact of employee share-based compensation and to return wealth to stockholders.
We believe that ZAGG was unfairly penalized by ISS by not considering the ongoing share repurchase program in its calculation.
While share repurchases benefit stockholders, a lower number of common shares outstanding generates a higher burn rate for ZAGG
under ISS’ EPSC model. Adjusting for the repurchase activity, ZAGG’s annual burn rate is significantly lower than
what ISS is showing it its proxy report.
The
proposal seeks positive amendments to the plan and does not ask for additional shares.
The
Original Plan was approved by stockholders in 2013 and has remained in-place and unchanged since that time.
The
amendments included in the Amended Plan prompted a re-review of the entire Amended Plan by ISS, who has relied primarily on a
quantitative model to review the Amended Plan. Reliance on the results of a quantitative model has several procedural shortcomings,
particularly if a company is not seeking to add additional incremental shares to its equity plan (as is the case here). Instead,
the merits of the amendments being made to the Original Plan must be analyzed – and this requires a qualitative assessment
that was not properly applied to the Amended Plan.
Our
Amended Plan does not request additional shares; instead, we are seeking approval of the following amendments:
|
●
|
Prohibit
shares of common stock subject to expired, terminated or lapsed options or SARs from
returning to the pool of shares available for grant;
|
|
●
|
Increase
the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be granted to any one participant
during a one-year period from 300,000 shares to 600,000 shares;
|
|
●
|
Expressly
provide for “net exercise” as an acceptable form of payment of the exercise
price of a stock option;
|
|
●
|
Provide
that no award may vest or become exercisable until at least 12 months after the grant
date, provided that up to 5 percent of the shares of common stock authorized for issuance
may be subject to awards that do not meet such vesting or exercisability requirements;
and
|
|
●
|
Prohibit
ZAGG from buying back outstanding stock options or SARs.
|
These
are positive, stockholder-friendly amendments that bring our executive compensation and Amended Plan further in line with market
best practices. ISS has raised only one issue, which is our proposed increase in the maximum number of shares that may be granted
to any one participant, fearing that it may “accelerate the distribution of awards under the plan”. This is based
on flawed logic, is contrary to the Compensation Committee’s historical and expected future grant practices, and is contrary
to ZAGG’s historical compensation practices as they relate to executive officers.
Based
on its recent review of peer group compensation practices, our Compensation Committee has determined it is necessary and appropriate
to increase the individual participant limit on annual awards from 300,000 shares to 600,000 shares for ZAGG’s grant practices
to be more competitive with its peer group in recruiting and retaining key executive talent. The Compensation Committee also recognizes
the importance of balancing the need for attractive and competitive compensation programs with the interest of ZAGG’s stockholders
in preserving the value of their equity investments by aligning both short and long-term actions of employees, non-employee directors
and consultants of ZAGG with the interests of its stockholders and by protecting against premature and/or unnecessary dilution.
Plan
is Reasonably Structured
Our
compensation program features many equity grant practices that are stockholder-friendly and which reflect best practices. These
include:
|
–
|
Stock
ownership guidelines
|
|
–
|
Equity
holding requirements
|
|
–
|
Double-trigger
change-in-control provisions
|
|
–
|
Robust
anti-hedging policy
|
Furthermore,
the estimated duration of currently available shares is very reasonable, at an estimated 3 years. In fact, this is below the median
share pool duration for GICS 2520 of 4.3 years. Further, despite the ongoing share repurchase program, dilution is also quite
reasonable – 11%, compared to a GICs median of 13%.
Finally,
our proposed Amended Plan does not contain any ISS ‘dealbreakers’ such as language permitting repricing without shareholder
approval, tax gross-ups on equity awards, ongoing problematic pay practices or pay-for-performance misalignment.
Our
equity plan is an integral part of our pay program
Our
Compensation Committee has always strived to maintain a pay program that is well-balanced between short- and long-term incentives,
relies heavily on variable pay, and truly links and aligns executive pay with corporate and individual performance. An essential
part of this program is the equity plan, which accounts for 79% and 72% of total direct compensation for our CEO and average NEO,
respectively, versus our peer group at 70%.
Interestingly,
ISS has fully supported our pay program, as indicated by support for our say-on-pay proposal (Proposal 3). In fact, ISS raises
no
concerns with our say-on-pay, including an indication that our pay-for-performance is aligned (as indicated by our “low
concern” rating). Investors, too, have expressed strong support for compensation program, with say-on-pay support in excess
of 97% in 2016 and 93% in 2015.
We
believe our Amended Plan provides ZAGG with appropriate flexibility to attract, motivate and retain the services of directors,
employees and consultants upon whose judgment, interest and special effort the successful conduct of ZAGG’s business operations
is largely dependent. We also believe that the proposed amendments included in the Amended Plan further the interests of our stockholders.
In short, we believe ISS is incorrect in its assessment and that support for the Amended Plan is warranted.
We
request that you vote FOR approval of the Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan (Proposal 4).
Even
if you have already voted, you can change your vote at any time before the Annual Meeting. You may vote or change your vote using
any of the following methods:
|
●
|
By
Internet
: We encourage you to vote and submit your proxy over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com.
|
|
●
|
By
Telephone: You may vote by telephone by calling 1-800-579-1639.
|
|
●
|
In
person at the Annual Meeting: All stockholders may vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker,
bank or other holder of record and present it to the inspector of election with your
ballot to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting.
|
If
you are a stockholder of record, you can revoke your proxy before the time of voting at the Annual Meeting in any of the following
ways:
|
●
|
by
mailing a revised proxy to the Secretary of the Company;
|
|
●
|
by
changing your vote on the Internet website;
|
|
●
|
by
faxing a revised proxy card; or
|
|
●
|
by
voting in person at the Annual Meeting.
|
If
you hold your shares in street name, you may change or revoke the voting instructions you provide to your broker, bank or nominee
by following the specific directions provided to you by your broker, bank or nominee, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from
your broker, bank or nominee, by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
Voting
instructions, including instructions to revoke a proxy, are also included in your proxy materials.
Your
vote is important to us. We appreciate and thank you for your vote.
Sincerely,
ZAGG
Inc
Midvale,
Utah
June
20, 2017
This
information is first being released to stockholders on or about June 20, 2017, and should be read together with the proxy statement.
The information provided above may be deemed “additional soliciting materials” within the meaning of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
4