Item 2 – MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
Various statements in this Form 10-Q, in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), in our press releases and in oral statements made from time to time by us or on our behalf constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are indicated by words or phrases such as "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project," "we believe," "is or remains optimistic," "currently envisions" and similar words or phrases and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and judgments and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are unforeseeable and beyond our control. A detailed discussion of risk factors that have the potential to cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2016 (the "Fiscal 2016 10-K"). There are no material changes to such risk factors, nor are there any identifiable previously undisclosed risks as set forth in Part II, Item 1A — "Risk Factors" of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
OVERVIEW
Our Business
ascena retail group, inc., a Delaware corporation (“ascena” or the “Company”), is a leading national specialty retailer of apparel for women and tween girls. On August 21, 2015, the Company acquired ANN INC. ("
ANN
"), a retailer of women’s apparel, shoes and accessories sold primarily under the
Ann Taylor
and
LOFT
brands (the "
ANN
Acquisition"). The results of
ANN
are represented by our
Premium Fashion
segment. The Company had annual revenue for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2016 of approximately
$7.0 billion
. The Company and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as the “Company,” “ascena,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “ourselves,” unless the context indicates otherwise.
General Business Conditions
Our performance is subject to macroeconomic conditions and their impact on levels and patterns of consumer spending. Some of the factors that could negatively impact discretionary consumer spending include general economic conditions, high unemployment, lower wage levels, reductions in net worth, higher energy and other prices, increasing interest rates and low consumer confidence.
In addition, consumer spending habits continue to shift on an accelerated pace towards an increasing preference to purchase merchandise digitally as opposed to in traditional brick-and-mortar retail stores. These factors could have a material negative effect on our business, operational results, financial condition and cash flows.
During our third quarter of Fiscal 2017, the U.S. economy continued to show signs of recovery. However, improved employment and wage growth have not translated into higher spending in nondurable goods, as consumer spending continues to shift towards experiences, services, health care and durable goods such as home improvements. Brick-and-mortar retailers, particularly those in the specialty retail sector, continued to face intense competition and channel disruption which accelerated during the third quarter. As a result, store traffic remained relatively weak and inconsistent during the quarter. Since store sales still comprise a majority of our sales mix, store traffic declines pressured comparable sales which, in turn, resulted in a more promotional operating environment. We expect negative store traffic trends to continue during the remainder of Fiscal 2017, and into Fiscal 2018. Accordingly, (i) we recorded an impairment charge as described under the section
Goodwill and Other Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets Impairment Charges
and (ii) we have responded to the continued trends by scaling back overall spending levels and we continue to refine our operating model to ensure we remain competitive in our rapidly evolving sector as described under the section
Change for Growth Program
.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Goodwill and Other Indefinite-lived Intangible Asset Impairment Charges
As a result of the aforementioned negative business conditions which accelerated during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company performed an interim assessment of its goodwill and other intangible assets and recorded non-cash impairment charges to write down the carrying values of its trade name intangible assets to their fair values as follows:
$210.0 million
of our
Ann Taylor
trade name,
$356.3 million
of our
LOFT
trade name and
$161.8 million
of our
Lane Bryant
trade name. In addition, the Company recognized the following goodwill impairment charges: a loss of
$428.9 million
at the
ANN
reporting unit,
$107.2 million
at the
maurices
reporting unit and
$60.2 million
at the
Lane Bryant
reporting unit to write down the carrying values of the reporting units to their fair values. These impairment charges are more fully described in Note 7 to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Change for Growth Program
As more fully described in Notes 8 and 15 to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, in October 2016, the Company initiated a transformation plan with the objective of supporting sustainable long-term growth and increasing shareholder value (the "Change for Growth" program). During Fiscal 2017, the Company (i) refined their operating model by the eliminating a number of executive positions and making organizational changes resulting in the creation of the
Premium Fashion
,
Value Fashion
,
Plus Fashion
and
Kids Fashion
operating segments, (ii) further consolidated certain support functions into its shared service group, including Human Resources, Real Estate, Non-Merchandise Procurement, and Asset Protection, and (iii) completed a review of its store fleet with the goal of reducing the number of marginally profitable stores, through rent reductions or closures to be identified, in an effort to increase the overall profitability of the remaining store footprint and convert sales from these stores into more profitable ecommerce sales or shift sales to nearby store locations ("Fleet Optimization"). Charges incurred as a result of these actions are described within the section
Results of Operations.
The Company realized approximately $30 million in cost savings, including $25 million in Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") and $5 million in Buying, distribution and occupancy ("BD&O") during the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
related to Change for Growth program actions identified and in process as of the end of the third quarter of Fiscal 2017. The Company also expects to realize additional cost savings related to these actions of approximately $20 to $30 million for the remainder of Fiscal 2017. Subsequent to Fiscal 2017, the Company expects to realize an additional $200 to $240 million in cost savings though Fiscal 2020, bringing the total expected annual cost savings from these actions to a range of $250 to $300 million. These savings are expected to be achieved through (i) operating expense reductions in the areas of professional services, travel and facilities management, among others, (ii) refinement of our operating model to eliminate duplicative overhead, and to increase utilization of our shared services functions, (iii) platform enabling reduced product costs and information technology efficiencies and (iv) Fleet Optimization. These savings are expected to be realized in our operating segment results generally in proportion to their sales.
The Company may incur significant additional charges and capital expenditures in future periods as it more fully defines incremental Change for Growth program initiatives, and moves into the execution phases of associated projects; however the benefits of such initiatives and related charges and required capital expenditures are not quantifiable at this time. Actions associated with the Change for Growth program are currently expected to continue through Fiscal 2020.
Integration of ANN
During Fiscal 2017, the Company (i) completed the integration of its
Premium Fashion
segment’s ecommerce operations into its Greencastle fulfillment center, (ii) negotiated favorable contracts with vendors and (iii) realized cost reductions from sourcing merchandise through third-party buying agents. As a result of these initiatives, the Company has realized cost savings of approximately $75 million for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
, with approximately $45 million in freight and product cost savings related to the Company's ongoing supply chain integration, and cost of goods sold initiative at its
Premium Fashion
segment, approximately $10 million in BD&O synergies related to the consolidation its
Premium Fashion
segment brands into the Company's ecommerce fulfillment center and approximately $20 million in SG&A synergies primarily related to the elimination of redundant leadership and non-merchandise procurement savings. We expect to realize additional synergies of approximately $20 million during the remainder of Fiscal 2017, approximately $65 million in Fiscal 2018 and approximately $10 million in Fiscal 2019. Annual synergies and cost savings related to
ANN
integration, including amounts achieved from Fiscal 2016 through Fiscal 2019, are expected to approximate $235 million.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Private Label and Co-branded Credit Card Programs
Our brands also offer various credit card programs to eligible customers in the U.S. The Company continues to focus on growing these credit card programs through effective marketing and point-of-sale discounts and believes it represents an area of operational growth for future periods. In January 2017, the Company's
Value Fashion
segment replaced its previous private label credit card arrangement with a new arrangement offered under an agreement with Capital One, National Association ("Capital One"). Accordingly, Capital One will offer private label credit cards to new and existing customers (the “Program”) at our
Value Fashion
segment. Under the Program, Capital One is responsible for the servicing of the accounts and the Company and Capital One will share in the net risk-adjusted revenue of the portfolio. The Company is not responsible for write-offs of uncollectible accounts in excess of finance revenues in any month. Revenues from this program are accounted for on a net basis less program expenses, and included within Net sales in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company recognized approximately $15 million of revenue under the Program during the three and nine months ended April 29, 2017 and expects to continue to recognize incremental revenue from this new arrangement through the second quarter of Fiscal 2018.
Distribution and Fulfillment
During the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company’s distribution center in Riverside, California became operational. The distribution center is expected to serve as the West Coast receiving and distribution hub for the Company's merchandise coming from Asia. This distribution center is expected to further reduce our per-unit processing costs, and contributed to the freight cost savings discussed above.
Seasonality of Business
Our individual segments are typically affected by seasonal sales trends primarily resulting from the timing of holiday and back-to-school shopping periods. In particular, sales at our
Kids Fashion
segment tend to be significantly higher during the fall season, which occurs during the first and second quarters of our fiscal year, as this includes the back-to-school period and the December holiday season. Our
Plus
Fashion
segment tends to experience higher sales during the spring season, which include the Easter and Mother's Day holidays. Our
Premium Fashion
and
Value Fashion
segments have relatively balanced sales across the Fall and Spring seasons. As a result, our operational results and cash flows may fluctuate materially in any quarterly period depending on, among other things, increases or decreases in comparable store sales, adverse weather conditions, shifts in the timing of certain holidays and changes in merchandise mix.
Summary of Financial Performance
Third Quarter Summary and Key Developments
Operating highlights for the third quarter are as follows:
|
|
•
|
Comparable sales decreased by
8%
and were down at all four segments primarily due to declines in store traffic and pricing challenges, caused by increased levels of promotions;
|
|
|
•
|
Gross margin, in terms of dollars, decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in comparable sales. Gross margin rate decreased by
30
basis points to
60.6%
from
60.9%
in the year-ago period, as improved performance at our
Premium Fashion
and
Plus Fashion
segments was more than offset by higher markdown levels at our
Value Fashion
and
Kids Fashion
segments;
|
|
|
•
|
Operating loss was
$1.312 billion
compared to income of
$57.4 million
in the year-ago period mainly due to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, lower comparable sales and higher Restructuring and other related charges, offset in part by operating expense reductions associated with the Change for Growth transformation program and integration activities; and
|
|
|
•
|
Net loss per diluted share was
$5.29
, compared to net income per diluted share of
$0.08
in the year-ago period.
|
Liquidity highlights for the
nine
-month period ended
April 29, 2017
are as follows:
|
|
•
|
Cash provided by operations was
$194.9 million
compared to
$163.4 million
in the year-ago period;
|
|
|
•
|
Capital expenditures were
$207.3 million
compared to
$268.8 million
in the year-ago period, which also had cash usage of
$1.495 billion
, net of cash acquired, for the
ANN
Acquisition; and
|
|
|
•
|
Term loan repayments totaled
$122.5 million
, and net borrowings under our revolving credit agreement totaled $72.5 million.
|
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
The comparability of the Company's operational results for the periods presented herein has been affected by certain transactions. A summary of the effect of these items on pretax income for each applicable period presented is noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
April 29,
2017
|
|
April 23,
2016
|
|
April 29,
2017
|
|
April 23,
2016
|
|
(millions)
|
Acquisition and integration expenses
(a)
|
$
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66.9
|
)
|
Restructuring and other related charges
(b)
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(48.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets
(c)
|
(1,324.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,324.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Non-cash inventory expense associated with the purchase accounting write-up of
ANN
's inventory to fair market value
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(126.9
|
)
|
(a)
Fiscal 2017 primarily represented settlement charges and professional fees related to a pension plan acquired in the
ANN
Acquisition and severance and retention costs associated with the post-acquisition integration of
ANN
's operations. Fiscal 2016 primarily represented costs related to the acquisition and integration of
ANN
.
(b)
Fiscal 2017 primarily represented severance, charges related to the Fleet Optimization and professional fees incurred in connection with the identification and implementation of the transformation initiatives associated with the Change for Growth program.
(c)
Represents the impact of non-cash impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets by segment as follows:
$428.9 million
of goodwill and $566.3 million of other intangible assets at the
Premium Fashion
segment, $107.2 million of goodwill at the
Value Fashion
segment and $60.2 million of goodwill and $161.8 million of other intangible assets at the
Plus Fashion
segment.
The preceding discussion highlights, as necessary, the significant changes in operating results arising from these items and transactions. However, unusual items or transactions may occur in any period. Accordingly, investors and other financial statement users should individually consider the types of events and transactions that have affected operating trends.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended
April 29, 2017
compared to Three Months Ended
April 23, 2016
The following table summarizes operating results for certain financial statement line items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
April 29,
2017
|
|
April 23,
2016
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
(millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
$
|
1,565.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,669.3
|
|
|
$
|
(104.2
|
)
|
|
(6.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
(616.7
|
)
|
|
(652.6
|
)
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold as % of net sales
|
39.4
|
%
|
|
39.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
948.4
|
|
|
1,016.7
|
|
|
(68.3
|
)
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
Gross margin as % of net sales
|
60.6
|
%
|
|
60.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buying, distribution and occupancy expenses
|
(313.4
|
)
|
|
(325.3
|
)
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
BD&O expenses as % of net sales
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(506.3
|
)
|
|
(535.7
|
)
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
SG&A expenses as % of net sales
|
32.3
|
%
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and integration expenses
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
54.8
|
%
|
Restructuring and other related charges
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
(596.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(596.3
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Impairment of other intangible assets
|
(728.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(728.1
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
(96.4
|
)
|
|
(89.9
|
)
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
(7.2
|
)%
|
Total other operating expenses
|
(2,260.2
|
)
|
|
(959.3
|
)
|
|
(1,300.9
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(1,311.8
|
)
|
|
57.4
|
|
|
(1,369.2
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Operating (loss) income as % of net sales
|
(83.8
|
)%
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
(25.8
|
)
|
|
(27.4
|
)
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Interest income and other (expense) income, net
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
(Loss) income before benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
(1,337.8
|
)
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
(1,368.7
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
307.1
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
323.0
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Effective tax rate
(a)
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
51.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
$
|
(1,030.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.0
|
|
|
$
|
(1,045.7
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
(5.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
(5.37
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(5.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
(5.37
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
_______
(a)
Effective tax rate is calculated by dividing the Benefit (provision) for income taxes by (Loss) income before provision for income taxes.
(NM)
Not meaningful.
Net Sales.
Total Company net sales decreased by
$104.2 million
, or
6.2%
, to
$1.565 billion
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$1.669 billion
in the year-ago period. Net sales were down across all of our operating segments caused primarily by an
8%
comparable sales decline that resulted from reduced store traffic and a highly promotional selling environment; non-comparable sales increased by
$18.4 million
, or
63%
, to
$47.4 million
from
$29.0 million
as discussed on a segment basis below; and wholesale, licensing and other revenues increased by
$12.0 million
, or
41%
, to
$41.0 million
from
$29.0 million
.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Net sales data for our four operating segments is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
April 29,
2017
|
|
April 23,
2016
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Fashion
|
$
|
535.8
|
|
|
$
|
575.1
|
|
|
$
|
(39.3
|
)
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
Value Fashion
|
485.1
|
|
|
510.9
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
Plus Fashion
|
328.6
|
|
|
354.4
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)
|
|
(7.3
|
)%
|
Kids Fashion
|
215.6
|
|
|
228.9
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
Total net sales
|
$
|
1,565.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,669.3
|
|
|
$
|
(104.2
|
)
|
|
(6.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable sales
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
_______
(a)
Comparable sales represent combined store comparable sales and ecommerce sales. Store comparable sales generally refers to the growth of sales in only stores open in the current period and comparative calendar period in the prior year (including stores relocated within the same shopping center and stores with minor square footage additions). Stores that close during the fiscal year are excluded from store comparable sales beginning with the fiscal month the store actually closes. Ecommerce sales refer to growth of sales from the Company's ecommerce channel in the current period and comparative calendar period in the prior year. Due to customer cross-channel behavior, the Company reports a single, consolidated comparable sales metric, inclusive of store and ecommerce channels.
Premium Fashion
net sales
performance primarily reflected:
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
7%
in comparable sales at
Ann Taylor
and a decrease of
6%
in comparable sales at
LOFT
during the three months ended
April 29, 2017
; and
|
|
|
•
|
15
net store closures at
Ann Taylor
and
6
net store closures at
LOFT
in the last twelve months.
|
Value Fashion
net sales
performance primarily reflected:
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$32.0 million
, or
12%
, in comparable sales at
maurices
and a decrease of
$19.2 million
, or
8%
, in comparable sales at
dressbarn
during the three months ended
April 29, 2017
;
|
|
|
•
|
an increase of
$12.9 million
in non-comparable sales
due to
33
net store openings at
maurices
in the last twelve months, offset in part by
31
net store closures at
dressbarn
in the last twelve months; and
|
|
|
•
|
an increase of
$12.5 million
in other revenues primarily due to the segment's new credit card Program.
|
Plus Fashion
net sales
performance primarily reflected:
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$30.2 million
, or
11%
, in comparable sales at
Lane Bryant
and a decrease of
$4.3 million
, or
6%
in comparable sales at
Catherines
during the three months ended
April 29, 2017
; and
|
|
|
•
|
an increase of
$8.8 million
in non-comparable sales primarily due to
4
net store openings at
Lane Bryant
in the last twelve months, offset in part by the
10
net store closures at
Catherines
in the last twelve months.
|
Kids Fashion
net sales
performance primarily reflected:
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$12.0 million
, or
6%
, in comparable sales at
Justice
during the three months ended
April 29, 2017
;
|
|
|
•
|
an increase of
$2.0 million
in non-comparable sales; and
|
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$3.3 million
in wholesale, licensing operations and other revenues.
|
Gross Margin.
Gross margin, in terms of dollars decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in comparable sales. Gross margin rate, which represents the difference between net sales and cost of goods sold, expressed as a percentage of net sales, decreased by
30
basis points from the year-ago period to
60.6%
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
. The decrease was primarily due to the highly promotional selling environment, and higher markdown levels required to maintain appropriate inventory levels. Improved performance at our
Premium Fashion
and
Plus Fashion
segments partially offset the aforementioned declines. On a
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
consolidated basis, gross margin benefited in part from the realization of approximately $15 million in combined integration synergies and cost savings related to the Company's ongoing supply chain integration and the cost of goods sold initiative at its
Premium Fashion
segment.
Gross margin as a percentage of net sales is dependent upon a variety of factors, including changes in the relative sales mix among brands, changes in the mix of products sold, the timing and level of promotional activities and fluctuations in material costs. These factors, among others, may cause cost of goods sold as a percentage of net revenues to fluctuate from period to period.
Gross margin rate highlights on a segment basis are as follows:
|
|
•
|
Premium Fashion
gross margin rate
performance improved by approximately 160 basis points reflecting improvement at both
Ann Taylor
and
LOFT
. Both brands benefited from realization of freight cost synergies related to the Company's ongoing supply chain integration, and the segment's cost of goods sold initiative.
|
|
|
•
|
Value Fashion
gross margin rate
performance declined approximately 160 basis points as a result of a higher level of promotional selling across the segment and increased markdown requirements, partially offset by improved economics related to the segment’s new credit card program.
|
|
|
•
|
Plus Fashion
gross margin rate
performance improved by approximately 70 basis points reflecting improvement at
Lane Bryant
mainly due to more effective inventory management.
|
|
|
•
|
Kids Fashion
gross margin
rate performance declined approximately 400 basis points as a result of a higher level of promotional selling, along with increased markdowns needed to clear two non-performing fashion deliveries.
|
Buying, Distribution and Occupancy ("BD&O") Expenses
consist of store occupancy and utility costs (excluding depreciation) and all costs associated with the buying and distribution functions.
BD&O expenses decreased by
$11.9 million
, or
3.7%
, to
$313.4 million
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$325.3 million
in the year-ago period. The decrease in BD&O expenses was primarily due to lower occupancy expenses associated with Fleet Optimization on a reduced store count, lower performance-based compensation, approximately $5 million in transformation initiatives, and approximately $5 million in synergies related to the
ANN
Acquisition associated with the consolidation of the
Premium Fashion
segment brands into the Company's ecommerce fulfillment center. BD&O expenses as a percentage of net sales increased by
50
basis points to
20.0%
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
from
19.5%
in the year-ago period, primarily due to the de-leveraging effect of lower comparable sales.
Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses
consist of compensation and benefit-related costs for sales and store operations personnel, administrative personnel and other employees not associated with the functions described above under BD&O expenses. SG&A expenses also include advertising and marketing costs, information technology and communication costs, supplies for our stores and administrative facilities, insurance costs, legal costs and costs related to other administrative services.
SG&A expenses decreased by
$29.4 million
, or
5.5%
, to
$506.3 million
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$535.7 million
in the year-ago period. The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to lower store variable expenses associated with store closures and lower sales volume, operating expense reductions, lower performance-based compensation and approximately $20 million in synergies and transformation initiatives, primarily due to the elimination of redundant leadership and non-merchandise procurement savings. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased by
20
basis points to
32.3%
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
from
32.1%
in the year-ago period, primarily due to the de-leveraging effect of lower comparable sales.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
increased by
$6.5 million
, or
7.2%
, to
$96.4 million
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$89.9 million
in the year-ago period. The increase was primarily due to the Company's ecommerce platform investment which was placed in service in the third quarter of Fiscal 2016 and investments in our distribution network primarily to integrate the operations of
ANN
.
Operating (Loss) Income.
Operating loss was
$1.312 billion
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
compared to operating income of
$57.4 million
in the year-ago period primarily due to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, as well as a decrease in the operating results discussed on a segment basis below. The operating results also reflected a
$15.9 million
increase in Restructuring and other related charges, which was offset in part by lower Acquisition and integration expenses.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Operating results for our four operating segments are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
April 29,
2017
|
|
April 23,
2016
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Fashion
|
$
|
22.2
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Value Fashion
|
23.1
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
(35.7
|
)%
|
Plus Fashion
|
10.3
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
(40.1
|
)%
|
Kids Fashion
|
(23.3
|
)
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Unallocated acquisition and integration expenses
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
54.8
|
%
|
Unallocated restructuring and other related charges
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Unallocated impairment of goodwill
|
(596.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(596.3
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Unallocated impairment of other intangible assets
|
(728.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(728.1
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Total operating (loss) income
|
$
|
(1,311.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
57.4
|
|
|
$
|
(1,369.2
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
_______
(NM)
Not meaningful.
Premium Fashion
operating results increased by
$0.7 million
as an improvement in gross margin rate and decreases in operating expenses were mostly offset by the impact of lower comparable sales. Operating expense reductions were primarily driven by lower performance-based compensation, synergies savings associated with the transition into the Company's ecommerce fulfillment center, and a decrease in administrative payroll costs mainly associated with the Change for Growth program and integration-related activities.
Value Fashion
operating results decreased by
$12.8 million
as a result of the decreases in comparable sales and gross margin rate, both discussed above, offset in part by decreases in operating expenses. Operating expense reductions were primarily driven by lower performance-based compensation, reduced marketing expenses and a decrease in administrative payroll costs mainly associated with the Change for Growth program.
Plus Fashion
operating results decreased by
$6.9 million
as a result of a decrease in comparable sales offset in part by an improvement in gross margin rate and decreases in operating expenses. Operating expense reductions were primarily driven by a decrease in administrative payroll costs mainly associated with the Change for Growth program and reduced marketing expenses.
Kids Fashion
operating results decreased by
$14.5 million
as a result of a decrease in comparable sales and gross margin rate, discussed above, offset in part by a decrease in operating expenses. Operating expense reductions were primarily driven by lower performance-based compensation.
Unallocated Acquisition and Integration Expenses
of
$3.8 million
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
included $0.2 million of severance and retention-related expenses and $3.6 million of costs associated with the post-acquisition integration of
ANN
's operations. The
$8.4 million
in the year-ago period represents costs related to the
ANN
Acquisition consisting of $0.8 million of legal, consulting and investment-banking related transaction costs, $3.0 million of severance and retention-related expenses and $4.6 million of integration costs primarily to combine the operations and infrastructure of the
ANN
business into the Company's.
Unallocated Restructuring and Other Related Charges
of
$15.9 million
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
primarily included $5.3 million for charges related to the previously disclosed Fleet Optimization and $10.9 million for professional fees incurred in connection with the identification and implementation of the transformation initiatives associated with the Change for Growth program.
Unallocated impairment of goodwill
reflects the write down of the carrying values of the reporting units to their fair values and are included in our operating segments as follows:
$428.9 million
at our
Premium Fashion
segment, $107.2 at our
Value Fashion
segment
and
$60.2 million
at our
Plus Fashion
segment.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Unallocated impairment of other intangible assets
reflects the write down of the Company's trade name intangible assets to their fair values as follows:
$210.0 million
of our
Ann Taylor
trade name,
$356.3 million
of our
LOFT
trade name and
$161.8 million
of our
Lane Bryant
trade name.
Interest Expense
decreased by
$1.6 million
, or
5.8%
, to
$25.8 million
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
from $
27.4 million
in the year-ago period. The decrease was mainly the result of the principal redemptions and repayments of the term loan.
Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes
represents federal, foreign, state and local income taxes. The Company records income taxes based on the estimated effective tax rate for the year. For the three months ended
April 29, 2017
, the Company recorded a benefit of
$307.1 million
on a pre-tax loss of
$1.338 billion
primarily due to the impairment of other intangible assets, for an effective tax rate of
23.0%
. The expected annual tax rate computing the benefit is lower than the statutory federal and state tax rate primarily as
$526.5 million
of the impairment of goodwill is non-deductible for income tax purposes. In the year ago period, the Company recorded a provision of
$15.9 million
on a pre-tax income of
$30.9 million
for a
51.5%
effective tax rate. The expected annual tax rate for the year-ago period is higher than the statutory federal and state tax rate primarily due to the impact of permanent items on a relatively low level of pretax income and the impact of the earnings mix on the overall state effective rate.
Net (Loss) Income.
Net loss was
$1.031 billion
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
compared to net income of
$15.0 million
in the year-ago period. The decrease in net results was primarily due to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, as well as lower operating results, offset in part by the benefit for income taxes, as discussed above.
Net (Loss) Income per Diluted Common Share.
Net loss per diluted common share was
$5.29
for the three months ended
April 29, 2017
, compared to net income per diluted common share of
$0.08
in the year-ago period, primarily as a result of the net loss in the current period, as discussed above.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Nine Months Ended
April 29, 2017
compared to Nine Months Ended
April 23, 2016
The following table summarizes operating results for certain financial statement line items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
April 29,
2017
|
|
April 23,
2016
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
(millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
$
|
4,991.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,183.1
|
|
|
$
|
(191.4
|
)
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
(2,083.5
|
)
|
|
(2,295.7
|
)
|
|
212.2
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold as % of net sales
|
41.7
|
%
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
2,908.2
|
|
|
2,887.4
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Gross margin as % of net sales
|
58.3
|
%
|
|
55.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buying, distribution and occupancy expenses
|
(954.1
|
)
|
|
(958.2
|
)
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
BD&O expenses as % of net sales
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(1,568.8
|
)
|
|
(1,571.9
|
)
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
SG&A expenses as % of net sales
|
31.4
|
%
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and integration expenses
|
(31.6
|
)
|
|
(66.9
|
)
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
Restructuring and other related charges
|
(48.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(48.0
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
(596.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(596.3
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Impairment of other intangible assets
|
(728.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(728.1
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
(286.6
|
)
|
|
(261.8
|
)
|
|
(24.8
|
)
|
|
(9.5
|
)%
|
Total other operating expenses
|
(4,213.5
|
)
|
|
(2,858.8
|
)
|
|
(1,354.7
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(1,305.3
|
)
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
(1,333.9
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Operating (loss) income as % of net sales
|
(26.1
|
)%
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
(76.1
|
)
|
|
(75.7
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
Interest income and other income, net
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
(85.7
|
)%
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Loss before benefit for income taxes
|
(1,381.3
|
)
|
|
(45.6
|
)
|
|
(1,335.7
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
329.8
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
309.9
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Effective tax rate
(b)
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
43.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(1,051.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,025.8
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
(5.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.27
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(5.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.27
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
_______
(a)
For our
Premium Fashion
segment, the Fiscal 2017 period reflected a 39-week period and the Fiscal 2016 period reflected the 36-week post-acquisition period.
(b)
Effective tax rate is calculated by dividing the Benefit for income taxes by the Loss before benefit for income taxes.
(NM)
Not meaningful.
Net Sales.
Total Company net sales decreased by
$191.4 million
, or
3.7%
, to
$4.992 billion
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$5.183 billion
in the year-ago period. Net sales for the
Premium Fashion
segment increased by
$9.4 million
primarily as the nine-month period in Fiscal 2017 reflected a 39-week period whereas the year-ago period reflected the 36-week post-acquisition period, which was offset in part by a comparable sales decrease of
6%
. Net sales were down across all of our other operating segments caused primarily by a
6%
comparable sales decline that resulted from reduced store traffic and a highly promotional selling environment; non-comparable sales decreased by
$9.6 million
, or
8.3%
, to
$105.8 million
from
$115.4 million
as discussed on a segment basis below; and wholesale, licensing and other revenues decreased by
$1.1 million
, or
1.0%
, to
$108.5 million
from
$109.6 million
.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Net sales data for our four operating segments is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
April 29,
2017
|
|
April 23,
2016
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Fashion
|
$
|
1,723.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,713.8
|
|
|
$
|
9.4
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Value Fashion
|
1,470.8
|
|
|
1,554.2
|
|
|
(83.4
|
)
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
Plus Fashion
|
993.6
|
|
|
1,053.3
|
|
|
(59.7
|
)
|
|
(5.7
|
)%
|
Kids Fashion
|
804.1
|
|
|
861.8
|
|
|
(57.7
|
)
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
Total net sales
|
$
|
4,991.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,183.1
|
|
|
$
|
(191.4
|
)
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable sales
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
_______
(a)
Comparable sales represent combined store comparable sales and ecommerce sales. Store comparable sales generally refers to the growth of sales in only stores open in the current period and comparative calendar period in the prior year (including stores relocated within the same shopping center and stores with minor square footage additions). Stores that close during the fiscal year are excluded from store comparable sales beginning with the fiscal month the store actually closes. Ecommerce sales refer to growth of sales from the Company's ecommerce channel in the current period and comparative calendar period in the prior year. Due to customer cross-channel behavior, the Company reports a single, consolidated comparable sales metric, inclusive of store and ecommerce channels.
Premium Fashion
net sales
performance primarily reflected:
|
|
•
|
a 39-week period in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017 compared to the 36-week post-acquisition period in the first quarter of Fiscal 2016;
|
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
9%
in comparable sales at
Ann Taylor
and a decrease of
4%
in comparable sales at
LOFT
; and
|
|
|
•
|
15
net store closures at
Ann Taylor
and
6
net store closures at
LOFT
in the last twelve months.
|
Value Fashion
net sales
performance primarily reflected:
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$70.1 million
, or
9%
, in comparable sales at
maurices
and a decrease of
$38.1 million
, or
6%
, in comparable sales at
dressbarn
during the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
;
|
|
|
•
|
an increase of
$13.4 million
in non-comparable sales due to
33
net store openings at
maurices
in the last twelve months, offset in part by
31
net store closures at
dressbarn
in the last twelve months; and
|
|
|
•
|
an increase of
$11.4 million
in other revenues primarily due to the segment's new credit card Program.
|
Plus Fashion
net sales
performance primarily reflected:
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$51.9 million
, or
7%
, in comparable sales at
Lane Bryant
and a decrease of
$11.7 million
, or
5%
, in comparable sales at
Catherines
during the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
;
|
|
|
•
|
an increase of
$6.2 million
in non-comparable sales primarily due to
4
net store openings at
Lane Bryant
in the last twelve months, offset in part by
10
net store closures at
Catherines
in the last twelve months; and
|
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$2.3 million
in other revenues.
|
Kids Fashion
net sales
performance primarily reflected:
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$18.3 million
, or
2%
, in comparable sales at
Justice
during the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
;
|
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$29.2 million
in non-comparable sales caused by
20
net store closures in the last twelve months as well as the shift of a peak back to school week from the first week of the fiscal year to the last week of the fiscal year due to the 53
rd
week recognized at the end of Fiscal 2016; and
|
|
|
•
|
a decrease of
$10.2 million
in wholesale, licensing operations and other revenues.
|
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Gross Margin.
Gross margin rate, which represents the difference between net sales and cost of goods sold, expressed as a percentage of net sales, increased by
260
basis points from the year-ago period to
58.3%
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
. The increase was mainly due to an approximate $127 million non-cash purchase accounting expense related to the amortization of the write-up of inventory to fair market value recorded during the
nine
months ended
April 23, 2016
in our
Premium Fashion
segment. Excluding the prior year impact of the inventory amortization, gross margin rate increased by 10 basis points to
58.3%
from 58.2%, primarily due to improved performance at our
Premium Fashion
and
Plus Fashion
segments, offset in part by the impact of the highly promotional selling environment and higher markdown levels required to maintain appropriate inventory levels. On a consolidated basis, gross margin benefited from the realization of approximately $45 million in combined integration synergies and cost savings related to the Company's ongoing supply chain integration and the cost of goods sold initiative at its
Premium Fashion
segment.
Gross margin as a percentage of net sales is dependent upon a variety of factors, including changes in the relative sales mix among brands, changes in the mix of products sold, the timing and level of promotional activities and fluctuations in material costs. These factors, among others, may cause cost of goods sold as a percentage of net revenues to fluctuate from period to period.
Gross margin rate highlights on a segment basis are as follows:
|
|
•
|
Premium Fashion
gross margin rate
performance improved due to an approximate $127 million non-cash purchase accounting expense related to the amortization of the write-up of inventory recorded during the
nine
months ended
April 23, 2016
discussed above. Excluding the prior year impact of the inventory amortization, gross margin rate performance improved by approximately 220 basis points reflecting significant improvement at both
Ann Taylor
and
LOFT
. Both brands benefited from realization of freight cost synergies related to the Company's ongoing supply chain integration, and the segment's cost of goods sold initiative.
|
|
|
•
|
Value Fashion
gross margin rate
performance declined approximately 120 basis points as a result of a higher level of promotional selling across the segment and increased markdown requirements to maintain appropriate inventory levels on lower than expected customer demand.
|
|
|
•
|
Plus Fashion
gross margin rate
performance improved by approximately 130 basis points reflecting improvement at both
Lane Bryant
and
Catherines
mainly due to more effective inventory management.
|
|
|
•
|
Kids Fashion
gross margin
rate
performance declined approximately 330 basis points as a result of a higher level of promotional selling, along with increased markdowns needed to clear two non-performing fashion deliveries.
|
Buying, Distribution and Occupancy ("BD&O") Expenses
consist of store occupancy and utility costs (excluding depreciation) and all costs associated with the buying and distribution functions.
BD&O expenses decreased by
$4.1 million
, or
0.4%
, to
$954.1 million
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$958.2 million
in the year-ago period. BD&O expenses for the
Premium Fashion
segment increased by $11.0 million primarily as the results reflected a 39-week period in Fiscal 2017 compared to the 36-week post-acquisition period in Fiscal 2016. For our other segments, BD&O expenses decreased by $15.1 million primarily due to lower occupancy expenses on a reduced store count and lower performance-based compensation. On a consolidated basis, BD&O expenses also included approximately $5 million in transformation initiatives and approximately $10 million of synergies related to the
ANN
Acquisition associated with the consolidation of the
Premium Fashion
segment brands into the Company's ecommerce fulfillment center. BD&O expenses as a percentage of net sales increased by
60
basis points to
19.1%
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
18.5%
in the year-ago period, primarily due to the de-leveraging effect of lower comparable sales.
Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses
consist of compensation and benefit-related costs for sales and store operations personnel, administrative personnel and other employees not associated with the functions described above under BD&O expenses. SG&A expenses also include advertising and marketing costs, information technology and communication costs, supplies for our stores and administrative facilities, insurance costs, legal costs and costs related to other administrative services.
SG&A expenses decreased by
$3.1 million
, or
0.2%
, to
$1.569 billion
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$1.572 billion
in the year-ago period. SG&A expenses for the
Premium Fashion
segment increased by $31.6 million primarily as the results reflected a 39-week period in Fiscal 2017 compared to the 36-week post-acquisition period in Fiscal 2016. For our other segments, SG&A expenses decreased by $34.7 million primarily due to store closures and lower sales volume, operating expense reductions and a decrease in administrative payroll costs mainly associated with the Change for Growth program and lower
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
performance-based compensation. On a consolidated basis, SG&A expenses also included approximately $45 million in synergies and transformation initiatives, primarily due to the elimination of redundant leadership and non-merchandise procurement savings. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased by
110
basis points to
31.4%
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
30.3%
in the year-ago period, primarily due to the de-leveraging effect of lower comparable sales.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
increased by
$24.8 million
, or
9.5%
, to
$286.6 million
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$261.8 million
in the year-ago period. Depreciation and amortization expense for the
Premium Fashion
segment increased by
$7.4 million
primarily as the results reflected a 39-week period in Fiscal 2017 compared to the 36-week post-acquisition period in Fiscal 2016. For our other segments, depreciation and amortization expense increased by
$17.4 million
primarily due to the Company's ecommerce platform investment which was placed in service in the third quarter of Fiscal 2016 and investments in our distribution network primarily to integrate the operations of
ANN
.
Operating (Loss) Income.
Operating loss was
$1.305 billion
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
compared to operating income of
$28.6 million
in the year-ago period primarily due to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, as well as the decrease in operating results discussed on a segment basis below. The operating results also reflected lower non-cash purchase accounting expenses of approximately
$120 million
recorded by our
Premium Fashion
segment in Fiscal 2016.
Operating results for our four operating segments are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
April 29,
2017
|
|
April 23,
2016
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Fashion
|
$
|
88.5
|
|
|
$
|
(32.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
120.9
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Value Fashion
|
15.4
|
|
|
69.6
|
|
|
(54.2
|
)
|
|
(77.9
|
)%
|
Plus Fashion
|
6.5
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
(52.6
|
)%
|
Kids Fashion
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
(56.3
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Unallocated acquisition and integration expenses
|
(31.6
|
)
|
|
(66.9
|
)
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
Unallocated restructuring and other related charges
|
(48.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(48.0
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Unallocated impairment of goodwill
|
(596.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(596.3
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Unallocated impairment of other intangible assets
|
(728.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(728.1
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Total operating (loss) income
|
$
|
(1,305.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
28.6
|
|
|
$
|
(1,333.9
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
_______
(NM)
Not meaningful.
Premium Fashion
operating results increased by
$120.9 million
as a result of lower non-cash purchase accounting expenses of approximately
$120 million
due primarily to the write-up of
inventory to fair market value recorded in the year-ago period. The operating results for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
reflected a 39-week period and the
nine
months ended
April 23, 2016
reflected the 36-week post-acquisition period. The operating results for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
reflected a decrease in comparable sales, partially offset by an improvement in gross margin rate, both discussed above. Operating expenses for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
reflected lower performance-based compensation, synergies savings associated with the transition into the Company's ecommerce fulfillment center, lower occupancy expenses and a decrease in administrative payroll costs mainly associated with the Change for Growth program as well as integration-related activities.
Value Fashion
operating results decreased by
$54.2 million
as a result of the decreases in comparable sales and gross margin rate, both discussed above, as well as an increase in depreciation expense, offset in part by decreases in operating expenses. Operating expense reductions were driven by lower performance-based compensation, lower store variable expenses resulting from the decrease in sales volume, and a decrease in administrative payroll costs mainly associated with the Change for Growth program, partially offset by incremental marketing investments.
Plus Fashion
operating results decreased by
$7.2 million
as a result of the decrease in comparable sales, as discussed above, and an increase in depreciation expense. These items were offset in part by an improvement in gross margin rate and decreased operating expenses. Operating expense reductions were driven by lower occupancy expenses, reduced marketing expenses, and a decrease in administrative payroll costs mainly associated with the Change for Growth program.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Kids Fashion
operating results decreased by
$56.3 million
as a result of the decline in gross margin rate, the decrease in comparable sales, and the shift of the peak back-to-school week, discussed above, offset in part by a decrease in operating expenses. The shift of the peak back-to-school week negatively impacted results by approximately $10 million. Operating expense reductions were driven by lower occupancy expenses and lower performance-based compensation.
Unallocated Acquisition and Integration Expenses
of
$31.6 million
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
included $8.0 million of settlement charges and professional fees related to the termination of the pension plan acquired in the
ANN
Acquisition, $10.7 million of severance and retention costs and $12.9 million of other costs associated with the post-acquisition integration of
ANN
's operations. The
$66.9 million
in the year-ago period represents costs related to the
ANN
Acquisition consisting of $21.3 million of legal, consulting and investment-banking related transaction costs, $33.7 million of severance and retention-related expenses and $11.9 million of integration costs primarily to combine the operations and infrastructure of the
ANN
business into the Company's.
Unallocated Restructuring and Other Related Charges
of
$48.0 million
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
included $20.0 million of severance and other related expenses, $5.3 million for charges related to the previously disclosed Fleet Optimization and $22.7 million for professional fees incurred in connection with the identification and implementation of the transformation initiatives associated with the Change for Growth program.
Unallocated impairment of goodwill
reflects the write down of the carrying values of the reporting units to their fair values and are included in our operating segments as follows:
$428.9 million
at our
Premium Fashion
segment, $107.2 at our
Value Fashion
segment
and
$60.2 million
at our
Plus Fashion
segment.
Unallocated impairment of other intangible assets
reflects the write down of the Company's trade name intangible assets to their fair values as follows:
$210.0 million
of our
Ann Taylor
trade name,
$356.3 million
of our
LOFT
trade name
and
$161.8 million
of our
Lane Bryant
trade name.
Interest Expense
increased by
$0.4 million
, or
0.5%
, to
$76.1 million
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$75.7 million
in the year-ago period. The increase was mainly the result of an additional three weeks of interest expense on the term loan for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
due to the timing of the
ANN
Acquisition, offset in part by the impact of the principal redemptions and repayments of the term loan.
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt.
During the year-ago period, the Company repurchased $65.0 million of the outstanding principal balance of the term loan at an aggregate cost of $61.6 million through open market transactions, resulting in a $0.8 million pre-tax gain, net of the proportional write-off of unamortized original discount and debt issuance costs of $2.6 million.
Benefit for Income Taxes
represents federal, foreign, state and local income taxes. The Company records income taxes based on the estimated effective tax rate for the year. Income tax benefit increased by
$309.9 million
, to
$329.8 million
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$19.9 million
, primarily due to the impairment of other intangible assets. The effective tax rate was
23.9%
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
and the effective tax rate was
43.6%
in the year-ago period. The expected annual tax rate computing the benefit is lower than the statutory federal and state tax rate primarily as
$526.5 million
of the impairment of goodwill is non-deductible for income tax purposes. The expected annual tax rate for the year-ago period is higher than the statutory federal and state tax rate primarily due to the impact of permanent items on a relatively low level of pretax income and the impact of the earnings mix on the overall state effective rate.
Net Loss
increased by
$1.026 billion
to
$1.052 billion
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$25.7 million
in the year-ago period, primarily due to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, as well as lower operating results, as discussed above.
Net Loss per Diluted Common Share
increased by
$5.27
to
$5.40
per share for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
from
$0.13
per share in the year-ago period, primarily as a result of an increase in net loss, as discussed above.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Cash Flows
The table below summarizes our cash flows and is presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
April 29,
2017
|
|
April 23,
2016
|
|
(millions)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
194.9
|
|
|
$
|
163.4
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(217.8
|
)
|
|
(1,737.8
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(48.8
|
)
|
|
1,579.8
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
(71.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
.
Net cash provided by operations was
$194.9 million
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
, compared to net cash provided by operations of
$163.4 million
in the year-ago period. Cash provided by operations was higher during Fiscal 2017 as there were certain non-recurring payments made during the year-ago period, including an escrow payment of approximately $51 million for the proposed
Justice
pricing litigation settlement, payment of approximately $44 million to a former
Justice
executive and payment of approximately $95 million in employee-related obligations assumed in the
ANN
Acquisition. These items were mostly offset by lower net income before non-cash expenses (such as depreciation and amortization expense, the amortization of the acquisition-related inventory write-up and goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charges) as well as timing differences of other working capital payments in the current period.
Net cash used in investing activities
.
Net cash used in investing activities for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
was
$217.8 million
, consisting primarily of capital expenditures of
$207.3 million
and the purchase of an intangible asset of
$11.3 million
. Net cash used in investing activities in the year-ago period was
$1.738 billion
, consisting primarily of
$1.495 billion
of cash paid in the
ANN
Acquisition and
$268.8 million
of capital expenditures, offset in part by
$25.6 million
of net proceeds from the sale of investments.
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
.
Net cash used in financing activities was
$48.8 million
for the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
, consisting primarily of
$122.5 million
of principal repayments of our term loan debt, offset in part by net borrowings of debt under our amended revolving credit agreement of $72.5 million. Net cash provided by financing activities in the year-ago period was
$1.580 billion
, consisting primarily of $1.8 billion of borrowing under our term loan and
$9.4 million
of proceeds relating to our stock-based compensation plans, offset in part by net repayments of debt under our amended revolving credit agreement of
$66.5 million
,
$66.1 million
of redemptions of our term loan debt and
$42.4 million
of payments made for deferred financing costs related to the borrowing arrangements entered into as a result of the
ANN
Acquisition.
Capital Spending
Capital expenditures during the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
were
$207.3 million
, which included both routine spending in connection with our retail store network, construction and renovation of our existing portfolio of retail stores as well as spending for non-routine capital investments including our omni-channel platform, fit-out of our Riverside, California distribution center, integration activity related to the
ANN
Acquisition and initiatives identified with Change for Growth program. For a detailed discussion of our significant non-routine capital investments, see Part II, Item 7 as specified in the
Capital Spending
section of the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of the Fiscal 2016 10-K.
The Company continually assesses its capital forecast and priority of projects. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company lowered its full year outlook of planned store openings and, as a result, lowered its full year capital spending outlook for Fiscal 2017 to its current expected range of $235 million to $260 million. Our capital requirements are expected to be funded primarily with available cash and cash equivalents, operating cash flows and, to the extent necessary, borrowings under the Company’s Amended Revolving Credit Agreement which is discussed below.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Liquidity
Our primary sources of liquidity are the cash flow generated from our operations, remaining availability under our Amended Revolving Credit Agreement (as defined below) after taking into account outstanding borrowings, letters of credit and the collateral limitation and available cash and cash equivalents. These sources of liquidity are used to fund our ongoing cash requirements, including working capital requirements, retail store expansion, construction and renovation of stores, any future dividend requirements, investment in technological and supply chain infrastructure, acquisitions, debt servicing requirements, stock repurchases, contingent liabilities (including uncertain tax positions), and other corporate activities. Management believes that our existing sources of liquidity will be sufficient to support our operating needs, capital requirements and any debt service requirements for the foreseeable future.
As of
April 29, 2017
, the Company had Cash and cash equivalents of
$300.1 million
. Approximately $251 million, or 84%, of our available cash and cash equivalents was held overseas by our foreign subsidiaries. As such, for the Company to have access to those cash and cash equivalents in the U.S, we would incur a current U.S. tax liability of between 15% and 20% of any such cash repatriated. A U.S. tax liability has been previously provided for in the provision for income taxes for the portion that is not permanently reinvested and is currently classified within Deferred income taxes on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. We continue to assess options for use of our overseas cash and cash equivalents.
As of
April 29, 2017
, after taking into account the
$72.5 million
of revolving debt outstanding and the
$31.3 million
in outstanding letters of credit, the Company had
$448.8 million
of availability under the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement.
Debt
For a detailed description of the terms and restrictions under the amended revolving credit agreement ("Amended Revolving Credit Agreement") and the $1.8 billion seven-year term loan (the "Term Loan"), see Note 9 to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Amended Revolving Credit Agreement
We believe that our Amended Revolving Credit Agreement is adequately diversified with no undue concentrations in any one financial institution. Upon the closing of the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement, there were seven financial institutions participating in the Amended Revolving Credit Facility, with no one participant maintaining a maximum commitment percentage in excess of 25%. Management has no reason at this time to believe that the participating institutions will be unable to fulfill their obligations to provide financing in accordance with the terms of the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement in the event of our election to draw funds in the foreseeable future. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants contained in the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement as of
April 29, 2017
. The Company believes the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement will provide sufficient liquidity to continue to support the Company’s operating needs and capital requirements for the foreseeable future.
Term Loan
For the nine months ended
April 29, 2017
, the Company repaid a total of $122.5 million, which was applied to future quarterly scheduled payments such that the Company is not required to make its next quarterly payment until May 2018. We may from time to time seek to repay or purchase our outstanding debt through open market transactions, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise depending on prevailing market conditions and our liquidity requirements, subject to any restrictions under our debt arrangements, among other factors.
The Company expects to incur cash interest expense of approximately $22 million on the Term Loan during the remainder of Fiscal 2017 based on the outstanding balance and interest rates in effect as of
April 29, 2017
. Such interest and principal payments are expected to be funded with our cash flows from operations.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Common Stock Repurchase Program
There were no purchases of common stock by the Company during the
nine
months ended
April 29, 2017
under its repurchase program. For a complete description of the Company's 2016 Stock Repurchase Program, see Note 11 to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
We may from time to time continue to repurchase additional shares depending on prevailing market conditions and our liquidity requirements, subject to any restrictions under our debt agreements, among other factors.
Contractual and Other Obligations
Firm Commitments
The following table summarizes certain of the Company's aggregate contractual obligations as of
April 29, 2017
and the estimated timing and effect that such obligations are expected to have on the Company's liquidity and cash flows in future periods. The Company expects to fund the firm commitments with operating cash flow generated in the normal course of business and, if necessary, availability under its Amended Revolving Credit Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Remainder of Fiscal
2017
|
|
Fiscal 2018-
2019
|
|
Fiscal 2020-
2021
|
|
Fiscal 2022
and
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(millions)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
111.5
|
|
|
$
|
252.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,305.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,669.0
|
|
Interest payments on long-term debt
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
174.9
|
|
|
156.4
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
|
429.7
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22.4
|
|
|
$
|
286.4
|
|
|
$
|
408.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,381.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,098.7
|
|
The following is a description of the Company's material, firmly committed contractual obligations as of
April 29, 2017
:
|
|
•
|
Long-term debt
represents contractual payments of outstanding borrowings under our borrowing agreements as of
April 29, 2017
.
|
|
|
•
|
Interest payments on long-term debt
represent interest payments related to our borrowing agreements. Interest payments on our Amended Revolving Credit Agreement, if any, were calculated based on the outstanding balance and the interest rates in effect as of
April 29, 2017
, as if the borrowings remain outstanding until mandatory repayment is required at expiration in August 2020. Interest payments on our Term Loan were calculated based on the interest rates in effect as of
April 29, 2017
and the estimated outstanding balance, giving effect to the contractual payments in future periods.
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no material changes during the period covered by this report to the off-balance sheet arrangements specified in the contractual and other obligations section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the Fiscal 2016 10-K.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Notes 3 and 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Fiscal 2016 10-K. For a detailed discussion of the Company's critical accounting policies, see the “Critical Accounting Policies” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the Fiscal 2016 10-K. Other than below, there have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies since July 30, 2016. Below is an update regarding the Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets.
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
Goodwill and Other Indefinite-lived Intangible Asset Impairment Assessment
As described in Note 3 to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company elected to early adopt "ASU" 2017-04, which removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test requiring a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Under the new guidance, the Company evaluates assets for potential impairment, and then determines goodwill impairment by comparing the reporting unit's fair value to its carrying value. Goodwill impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the reporting unit's carrying value over its fair value, up to the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.
To assist management in the process of determining goodwill impairment, the Company reviews and considers an appraisal from an independent valuation firm. Estimates of fair value are determined using discounted cash flows and market comparisons. These approaches use significant estimates and assumptions, including projected future cash flows (including timing of those cash flows), discount rates reflecting the risks inherent in future cash flows, perpetual growth rates and determination of appropriate market comparables. Estimating the fair value is judgmental in nature, which could have a significant impact on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized and the magnitude of any such charge.
Historically, the Company organized its businesses into six reportable segments following a brand-focused approach:
ANN
,
Justice
,
Lane Bryant
,
maurices
,
dressbarn
and
Catherines
. In October 2016, the Company reorganized its businesses into four operating segments:
Premium Fashion
(
ANN
),
Value Fashion
(
maurices
and
dressbarn
),
Plus Fashion
(
Lane Bryant
and
Catherines
) and
Kids Fashion
(
Justice
). The Company's segment managers currently review discrete information for the
Justice
,
Lane Bryant
,
maurices
,
dressbarn
and
Catherines
brands. Discrete information for operating income (loss) does not exist for the
Ann Taylor
and
LOFT
brands in the
Premium Fashion
segment. As a result, the reporting units identified for the purposes of assessing goodwill for Fiscal 2017 are
ANN
,
Justice
,
Lane Bryant
,
maurices
,
dressbarn
and
Catherines
which is consistent with the reporting units for Fiscal 2016 when each segment was a separate reporting unit. No reporting units were combined for impairment testing.
Fiscal 2017 Interim Impairment Assessment
The third quarter of Fiscal 2017 marked the continuation of the challenging market environment in which the Company competes. Lower than expected comparable sales for the third quarter, along with a reduced comparable sales outlook for the fourth quarter led the Company to significantly reduce its level of forecasted earnings. The Company concluded that these factors, as well as the decline in the Company's stock price, represented impairment indicators which required the Company to test its goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017 (the "Interim Test").
As a result of a significantly lower forecasted revenue assumptions over the projection period, partially offset by the impact of estimated cost reductions resulting from the Change for Growth Program (refer to the
Overview
section of this MD&A for a detailed discussion), the Company recognized an impairment loss of
$728.1 million
to write down the carrying values of its trade name intangible assets to their fair values as follows:
$210.0 million
of our
Ann Taylor
trade name,
$356.3 million
of our
LOFT
trade name,
and
$161.8 million
of our
Lane Bryant
trade name. The fair value of the trade names was determined using an approach that values the Company’s cash savings from having a royalty-free license compared to the market rate it would pay for access to use the trade name (Level 3 measurement). In addition, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of
$596.3 million
as follows: a goodwill impairment charge of
$428.9 million
at the
ANN
reporting unit,
$107.2 million
at the
maurices
reporting and
$60.2 million
at the
Lane Bryant
reporting unit to write down the carrying values of the reporting units (based on the revised carrying value after deducting the trade name impairments discussed above) to their fair values. The results of the Interim Test were also used to support our annual impairment test of the first day of the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017.
Significant assumptions underlying the discounted cash flows included: a weighted average cost of capital ("WACC") of 11.0% to 15.0% which was determined from relevant market comparisons and adjusted for specific risks; operating income margin of mid-to-high single digits and a terminal growth rate of 2%. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the valuation model. As an example, the impact of a hypothetical change in each of the significant assumptions is described below. In quantifying the impact, we changed only the specific assumption and held all other assumptions constant. A hypothetical 1% change in WACC rate would increase/decrease the fair value by approximately $60 million at
ANN
, $30 million at
maurices
and $15 million at
Lane Bryant
. A hypothetical 1% change in the operating income percentages in all periods would increase/decrease the fair value by approximately $120 million at
ANN
, $60 million at
maurices
and $45 million at
Lane Bryant
. Finally, a hypothetical 1% change in the terminal growth rate would increase/decrease the fair value by approximately $40 million at
ANN
,
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – (Continued)
$20 million at
maurices
and $10 million at
Lane Bryant
. Any changes in fair value resulting from changes in the assumptions discussed above would increase/decrease the impairment charges of the respective goodwill and trade name.
Additionally, if we continue to experience sustained periods of unexpected declines or shifts in consumer spending, or fail to realize the anticipated cost savings associated from the Change for Growth Program, it could adversely impact the long-term assumptions used in our Interim Test. Such trends may also have a negative impact on some of the other key assumptions used in the Interim Test, including anticipated gross margin and operating income margin as well as the weighted average cost of capital rate. These assumptions are highly judgmental and subject to change. Such changes, if material, may require us to incur additional impairment charges for goodwill and/or other indefinite-lived intangible assets in future periods, including our other reporting units that exceeded or substantially exceeded their respective carrying values. In that regard, our
Justice
reporting unit currently only exceeded its carrying value by 8%. The fair value of our
Catherines
reporting unit substantially exceeded its carrying value and was not at risk of impairment as of our Interim Test.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PROUNCEMENTS
See Note 3 to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of certain recently issued or proposed accounting standards which may impact our financial statements in future periods.