AVCRF Avricore Health Inc (QB)

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

3.A.1. Selected Financial Data

The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere in the Annual Report.

The Company has not declared any dividends since incorporation and does not anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. The present policy of the Company is to retain all available funds for use in its operations and the expansion of its business.

The Company year end is December 31, 2016.

Table No. 3 is derived from the audited financial statements of the Company, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and Interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). IFRS represents standards and interpretations approved by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), and are comprised of IFRS, International Accounting Standards (“IASs”), and interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRICs”) or the former Standing Interpretations Committee (“SICs”) and effective for the Company’s reporting period ended December 31, 2016.

5

3.A.3. Exchange Rates

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian Dollars (CDN$). The Government of Canada permits a floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian Dollar against the U.S. Dollar (US$).

Table No. 4 sets forth the exchange rates for the Canadian Dollar at the end of year ended December 31, 2016 and three most recent fiscal years, stub year ending December 31, 2015 and year ended June 30, 2015, and 2014, the average rates for the period and the range of high and low rates for the period. The data for each month during the most recent six months is also provided.

For purposes of this table, the rate of exchange means the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

The table sets forth the number of US Dollars required under that formula to buy one Canadian Dollar. For example, where the number “0.7225” is quoted in the upper left hand number in the table, it means that it took on average in December 2015, 72.25 cents US to purchase one Canadian dollar. For most periods presented, the Canadian dollar has been worth less than one US dollar.

6

(Source: www.bankofcanada.ca/rates/exchange/10-year-lookup/)

3.B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Table No. 5 sets forth the capitalization and indebtedness of the Company as of December 31, 2016.

Table No. 5

Capitalization and Indebtedness

As of December 31, 2016

 ⁽¹⁾ See Table 12 for exercise prices and terms of these warrants.

7

Year ended June 30, 2013

During the year ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 3,664,348 shares for debt and assets. At June 30, 2013 there were 5,404,268 shares issued and outstanding.

Private placements

On June 12, 2013 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 2,000,000 units of the Company’s common shares at a price of $0.40 per unit for proceeds of $800,000. Each unit was exchangeable for one common share of the Company and one share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitled the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company for a period of 36 months at a price of $1.20 per common share in the first year, $1.60 in the second year and $2.00 in the third year. The units cannot be exchanged for shares and warrants during the first year unless the holder either simultaneously exercises or forgoes the warrants. The warrants are subject to an accelerated exercise provision in the event that the shares trade more than $0.40 above the exercise price for ten consecutive trading days.

The private placement was subject to an Exchange hold period expiring October 12, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, the private placement was classified as share subscriptions. Legal fees of $850 and finders’ fees of $57,600 were charged against share capital in connection with the private placement. The fair value of the warrants issued as part of the private placement is $663,834.

Shares issued for debt

On September 7, 2012, the Company announced that the Exchange had accepted a share for debt arrangement. Debts totaling $935,300 would be settled by issuing 2,814,348 common shares to creditors at $0.20 per share. Of these shares, 2,671,875 were subjected to resale restrictions equivalent to an Exchange Tier 2 Value Security Escrow Agreement, which allowed scheduled release of shares from escrow over a three year period.

Shares issued for assets

On September 17, 2012, the Company announced that the Exchange had provided acceptance of the License Agreement (“LA”) between the Company and Canagen Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Richmond, B.C. The LA provided the Company with the global sales, manufacturing and marketing rights, except for China and India, to Pedia-Safe Polyvitamin Drops. The Agreement provided for the payment of $170,000 by the issuance of 850,000 common shares at a deemed price of $0.20 per share. This transaction did not result in a change of control or in the creation of new insiders.

Year ended June 30, 2014

During the year ended June 30, 2014, the Company issued 850,000 shares for the acquisition of an asset, 2,000,000 shares for share subscriptions received in the year ended June 30, 2014, and 937,500 shares were issued through a private placement. At June 30, 2014, there were 36,767,075 shares issued and outstanding.

Private placements

On April 08, 2014 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 437,500 units of the Company at a price of $0.40 per unit for gross proceeds of $175,000. Each unit consists of one (1) common share and one transferrable share purchase warrant. Each warrant is entitle the holder thereof to purchase one additional common share for a period of twelve months from the Closing Date of the Offering at a price of $1.20 per

8

common share. The warrants are subject to an accelerated exercise provision in the event the shares trade more than $0.40 above the exercise price for ten consecutive days.

In addition, on April 08, 2014 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 500,000 units of the Company at a price of $0.40 per unit for gross proceeds of $200,000. Each unit consists of one common share and one transferrable share purchase warrant. Each warrant will entitle the holder thereof to purchase one additional common share for a period of twenty four months from the Closing Date of the Offering at a price of $0.52 per common share.

In accordance with the private placements, finder’s fees of $12,000 cash were paid in addition to the issuance of 75,000 warrants. 30,000 warrants have a life of two years and are exercisable at $0.52. The remaining 45,000 warrants have a life of one year and are exercisable at $1.20. The fair value of these warrants was measured at $47,567. Total share issue cost was $59,567.

Proceeds from the Offering were used by the Company for general ongoing corporate and working capital purposes.

The fair value of the warrants of $375,000 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following parameters:

Year ended June 30, 2015

Private placements

On December 10, 2014, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 1,901,833 units at a price of $0.60 per unit for gross proceeds of $1,141,100. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one transferrable share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one additional common share on or before December 10, 2015 at a price of $1.00. Finder’s fees of $91,287 cash were paid in addition to the issuance of 152,146 warrants. The fair value of the warrants issued to agents was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and amounted to $67,533.

Securities are subject to a four-month hold period that expires April 11, 2015. Proceeds from the offering will be used by the Company for commercialization of the generic and OTC products and for general ongoing corporate and working capital purposes.

Additional share issue costs totaling $203,490 were incurred relating to options and warrants exercised for the year.

Stub year ended December 31, 2015

During the six months ended December 31, 2015, 37,500 shares were issued for the exercise of options, and 434,027 shares were issued for the exercise of warrants.

Year ended December 31, 2016

During the year ended December 31, 2016, 400,000 shares were issued for the exercise of options, and 325,000 shares were issued for the exercise of warrants.

9

On November 1, 2016, the Company consolidated all of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares on the basis of every 4 old common shares being consolidated into 1 new common share. All figures in the consolidated financial statements and this 20-F are adjusted to reflect the 4:1 share consolidation.

The following table summarizes information about share options outstanding and exercisable as at December 31, 2016:

10

The share warrants outstanding and exercisable as at December 31, 2016 is nil.

3.C.   Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

General working capital, pay down liabilities and applications for registrations with Health Canada.

3.D.  Risk Factors

Risks pertaining to the Company:

The Company's limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate the Company’s current business and forecast future results.

The Company was started as a Capital Pool Company, has been operating its current business since November, 2003 and has had limited revenues during this time. Since its inception, the Company has experienced significant operating losses each year. These losses are due to substantial expenditures on intellectual property protection, product development and product testing of commercial and consumer infection control products. The Company has also been engaged in a program of pre-clinical testing for registration of a number of therapeutic products with Health Canada and the FDA. This testing is costly and time consuming and the Company does not have sufficient funds to undertake all of the testing that is required to satisfy the requirements of these regulatory agencies. Accordingly, the Company requires outside funding to complete these tests. As funds are raised, they will be invested in the testing and the Company will continue to accumulate losses that are proportional to the funds raised and spent on testing. In addition, the Company launched a number of consumer and commercial products, described above, and established new sales and distribution agreements. Although sales of T ³ 6 ^® Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer products were substantial during the last quarter of 2009, sales subsequently dropped down nearly zero and were ceased. The Company has changed its direction and Company’s operations consist of the marketing and distribution of generic and over-the-counter (“OTC”) pharmaceuticals. As a result, future sales of the Company’s products are difficult to predict.

The Company has no significant source of operating cash flow and failure to generate revenues in the future could cause the Company to go out of business.

Based upon current plans to introduce its products into new markets in Canada and internationally, develop new products, maintain the Company’s public listing on the TSX-Venture Exchange (“the Exchange”) and support the continued registration of its securities in the US, the Company expects to incur operating losses in future periods. These losses will occur because there are continuing expenses associated with the marketing and production of the Company’s products, research and development, intellectual property protection, testing and registration of pharmaceutical products, legal and accounting fees, the maintenance of its public listing and other expenses associated with running an operating business. Even if the Company becomes operationally profitable from the introduction and sale of new products, the Company will need to raise significant amounts of new funding to expand these activities. Also, the Company may not be successful in generating significant

11

revenues from pharmaceutical products in the future. Failure to generate more revenues could cause the Company to contract or go out of business. In the future, it is likely that the inventory value will be reduced to reflect selling cost which will further decrease the value of the assets compared to liabilities. Also at the time of this report, the Company has sufficient funds to continue the sales of its products but it will be unable to do so without securing further financing.

If the Company raises further funds through equity issuances, the price of its securities could decrease due to the dilution caused by the sale of additional shares.

Additional funds raised by the Company through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities will cause the Company’s current shareholders to experience dilution and possibly lower the trading price of its shares. Such securities may grant rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the Company’s common shareholders. The Company is not profitable and will not be profitable for the foreseeable future under its current development plan. The Company plans to issue further equity to raise funds as necessary to continue operations and fund its program of research and development, patent protection and regulatory approvals. As a result, an indeterminate amount of dilution of the Company’s capital stock will occur.

The Company has issued a limited number of shares out of its authorized capital of an unlimited number of common shares, which could be dilutive and negatively affect the share price.

Having an unlimited number of authorized but unissued common shares could allow the Company’s Directors and Officers to issue a large number of shares without shareholder approval, leading to significant dilution of current shareholders and possible lowering of the share price.

The Company could enter into debt obligations and not have the funds to repay these obligations.

The Company does not have any contractual restrictions on its ability to incur debt and, accordingly, the Company could incur significant amounts of indebtedness to finance its operations. Any such indebtedness could contain covenants, which would restrict the Company’s operations. The Company might not be able to repay indebtedness.

The Company could enter into contractual obligations and not have the funds to pay for these obligations.

The Company does not have any contractual restrictions on its ability to enter into binding agreements and, accordingly, the Company could incur significant obligations to third parties including financial obligations. Any such obligations could restrict the Company’s operations and the Company might not be able to pay for its commitments. If the Company cannot meet its commitments, legal action could be taken against the Company. Any such actions could further restrict the Company’s ability to conduct its business or could cause the Company to go out of business.

The Company has a history of generating limited revenues and the continuing failure to generate further revenues could cause the Company to cease operations.

The Company has no history of pre-tax profit and in the previous four years has had only limited annual revenues for each of the years it has been operating. The Company sustained operating losses for each of its fiscal years and has sustained significant accumulated operating losses. The continued operation of the Company will be dependent upon its ability to generate operating revenues and to procure additional financing. The Company may not be successful in generating revenues or raising capital in the future. Failure to generate revenues or raise capital could cause the Company to cease operations.

As the Company is a Canadian company, it may be difficult for U.S. shareholders of the Company to effect service on the Company or to realize on judgments obtained in the United States.

The Company is a Canadian corporation. All of its directors and officers are residents of Canada and a significant part of its assets are, or will be, located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for shareholders resident in the United States to effect service within the United States upon the Company, directors, officers or experts who are not residents of the United States, or to realize in the United States judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon civil liability of any of the Company, directors or officers under the United States federal securities laws. If a judgment is obtained in the U.S. courts based on civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against the Company or its directors or officers, it will be difficult to enforce the judgment in the Canadian courts against the Company and any of the Company’s non-U.S. resident executive officers or directors. Accordingly, United States shareholders may be forced to bring actions against the Company and its respective directors and officers under Canadian law and in

12

Canadian courts in order to enforce any claims that they may have against the Company or its directors and officers. Nevertheless, it may be difficult for United States shareholders to bring an original action in the Canadian courts to enforce liabilities based on the U.S. federal securities laws against the Company and any of the Company’s non-U.S. resident executive officers or directors.

The Company’s future performance is dependent on key personnel. The loss of the services of any of the Company’s executives or Board of Directors could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company’s performance is substantially dependent on the performance and continued efforts of the Company’s executives and its Board of Directors. The loss of the services of any of the Company’s executives or Board of Directors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. There is no assurance that key personnel can be replaced with people with similar qualifications within a reasonable period of time. The Company currently carries key person insurance on any of the executives or members of the board of directors. If any or all Directors resign, there is no assurance that new Directors can be found to replace any directors who resign.

The Company has not declared any dividends since its inception in 2000 and has no present intention of paying any cash dividends on its common shares in the foreseeable future.

The Company has not declared any dividends since its inception in 2000, and has no present intention of paying any cash dividends on its common shares in the foreseeable future. The payment by the Company of dividends, if any, in the future, rests in the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors and will depend, among other things, upon the Company's earnings, its capital requirements and financial condition, as well as other relevant factors.

The Company’s future performance is dependent on key suppliers and manufacturers and a loss of any suppliers or manufacturers could have a material adverse effect on the Company by reducing or eliminating the ability of the Company to manufacture or sell its products.

If any of the Company’s suppliers or manufacturers were to go out of business or were unable to procure the raw materials or other supplies required by the Company to manufacture its products, the Company would have to find other suppliers or manufacturers. There is no guarantee that the Company would be able to find other suppliers or manufacturers. If the Company could not find other suppliers or manufacturers, production of the Company’s products would be delayed for an indefinite period of time and such delays would lead to delayed revenues or reduced revenues or both.

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to secure the funds needed for future development, and failure to secure such funds could lead to a lack of opportunities for growth .

The testing is required in order to obtain required regulatory approvals from Health Canada, the EPA and FDA in the US and the EMA in the EU. A lack of funds would impair the ability of the Company to complete such tests. A lack of funds would also impair the Company’s ability to establish marketing and sales plans once the products have been approved for sale. If adequate financing is not available when required, the Company may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate various activities and may be unable to continue in operation. The Company may seek such additional financing through debt or equity offerings, but there can be no assurance that such financing will be available on terms acceptable to the Company or at all. Any equity offering will result in dilution to the ownership interests of the Company’s shareholders and may result in dilution to the value of such interests.

The Company and the Company’s products have limited brand awareness which limits the ability of the Company to gain credibility from prospective customers and to sell its products into new markets.

Market knowledge of the Company’s name is limited. The Company will need to devote considerable resources to educate new markets about the products the Company offers. In establishing new markets, the Company will be competing with companies that are potentially already entrenched in such markets or may be better funded than the Company. The ability of the Company to raise brand awareness will depend on its ability to raise the money required to undertake such an intensive marketing effort. As noted elsewhere, there is no assurance that the Company can raise funds required for such an investment in marketing.

The Company has limited sales and marketing experience and can provide no assurance that the Company can keep its current customers or gain new ones.

13

The Company has limited experience in marketing and selling its products and the Company has no sales or marketing staff. The Company will have to expend substantial funds to promote and develop its products. The Company’s success in this regard will depend on the quality of its products and its ability to develop and implement an effective sales and marketing strategy. Failure to achieve the marketing objectives will have a material adverse effect on the Company and on its results of operations and financial condition.

Conflicts of interest may exist for Directors and Officers which may inhibit their ability to act in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders leading to possible impairment of the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives.

The directors and officers of the Company will not be devoting all of their time to the affairs of the Company. Some of the directors and officers of the Company are directors and officers of other companies. The directors and officers of the Company will be required by law to act in the best interests of the Company. They will have the same obligations to the other companies in respect of which they act as directors and officers. Discharge by the directors and officers of their obligations to the Company may result in a breach of their obligations to the other companies and, in certain circumstances, this could expose the Company to liability to those companies. Similarly, discharge by the directors and officers of their obligations to the other companies could result in a breach of their obligation to act in the best interests of the Company. Such conflicting legal obligations may expose the Company to liability to others and impair its ability to achieve its business objectives.

Management of the Company can, through their stock ownership in the Company, influence all matters requiring approval by the Company’s shareholders.

Management of the Company at the time of this report, collectively own approximately 5% of the Company's issued and outstanding common shares at that date. These shareholders, if acting together, could significantly influence all matters requiring approval by the Company's shareholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other business combination transactions. Management may not make decisions that will maximize shareholder value and may make decisions that will contribute to or cause the entrenchment of management.

The value and transferability of the Company shares may be adversely impacted by the limited trading market for the Company’s common shares.

No assurance can be given that a market for the Company’s common shares will be quoted on an exchange in the U.S. or on the NASD's Over the Counter Bulletin Board. The Company’s common shares may be subject to illiquidity and investors may not be able to sell their shares in a timely manner.

The value and transferability of the Company shares may be adversely impacted by the penny stock rules.

The sale or transfer of the Company common shares by shareholders in the United States may be subject to the so-called "penny stock rules." Under Rule 15g-9 of the Exchange Act, a broker or dealer may not sell a "penny stock" (as defined in Rule 3a51-1) or effect the purchase of a penny stock by any person unless:

(a)

Such sale or purchase is exempt from Rule 15g-9;

(b)

Prior to the transaction the broker or dealer has (1) approved the person's account for transaction in penny stocks in accordance with Rule 15g-9, and (2) received from the person a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased; and

(c)

The purchaser has been provided an appropriate disclosure statement as to penny stock investment.

The SEC adopted regulations generally define a penny stock to be any equity security other than a security excluded from such definition by Rule 3a51-1. Such exemptions include, but are not limited to (1) an equity security issued by an issuer that has (i) net tangible assets of at least $2,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operations for at least three years, (ii) net tangible assets of at least $5,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for less than three years, or (iii) average revenue of at least $6,000,000 for the preceding three years; (2) except for purposes of Section 7(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 419, any security that has a price of $5.00 or more; and (3) a security that is authorized or approved for authorization upon notice of issuance for quotation on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.'s Automated Quotation System. It is likely that the Company’s common shares, assuming a market were to develop in the US, will be subject to the regulations on penny stocks. Consequently, the market liquidity for the common shares may be adversely affected by such regulations limiting the ability of broker/dealers to sell the Company’s common shares and the

14

ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the secondary market in the US Moreover, the Company shares may only be sold or transferred by the Company shareholders in those jurisdictions in the US in which an exemption for such "secondary trading" exists or in which the shares may have been registered.

There is no guarantee that there is a market for the Company’s common shares in the United States.

Although the Company’s common shares were added to the OTC Bulletin Board System on April 20, 2009 under the symbol “APCSF”, trading of the company’s shares is very limited. The Company cannot guarantee that there will be a market for the Company’s common shares in the United States or that there will any significant amount trading in the company’s shares for the foreseeable future The Company cannot guarantee that it will continue to maintain a listing in the United States or that it will not be found in default of existing regulations or new regulations and be suspended from trading or delisted.

Risks Pertaining to the Industry

Registration of products may not occur in a timely manner which could lead to delays in product introductions, reduced revenue expectations and extra costs to conduct further tests to satisfy regulatory agencies.

Government agencies, such as the EPA and the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) in the United States and Health Products and Food Branch in Canada, need to provide approvals of the Company’s products prior to any sales of these products. To obtain such approvals, the Company must submit extensive amounts of information on the efficacy, toxicology, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and other testing of the products that it is trying to register. After all of the information is provided, the agencies can request supplemental information and further testing. Once all of the requirements for documentation are satisfied, the agencies can take an indeterminate amount of time to provide approvals for the Company to market its products. Significant delays could lead to slower revenue growth than anticipated. In addition, regulatory delays can allow time for competitors to devise strategies to prevent or reduce market penetration. There is no assurance that government agencies will accept for registration any of the Company’s products.

The Company is very dependent on the registration and sale of its commercial, retail and pharmaceutical products.

If the Company is not successful in achieving regulatory approval of its products, its ability to generate revenues will be impaired. Even if registrations are successful, there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to maintain the registrations or be able to pass inspections by the regulatory authorities that permit the sale of the Company’s products. In the event of a failed inspection, it is possible that the Company may be ordered to stop the sale of its products or undertake a recall of products that the regulatory authorities deem to be non-compliant with existing regulations. If the Company is ordered to recall or stop the sale of any of its products, the ability of the Company to generate revenues will be impaired. If such a recall or suspension of sales occurs, there is no guarantee that the Company will, at any future date, be able to resume the sale of the suspended or recalled products.

There is a risk that the Company’s intellectual property infringes upon the rights of other companies, which could lead to reduced revenues, reduced margins due to sanctions against the Company, outright withdrawal or prohibition of products or trademarks from the market and significant costs for legal defense against infringement claims, re-branding of products and revised marketing materials.

The Company is unaware of any infringement claims being made against the Company or its products or processes at the time of writing. In the future, there can be no assurances that third parties will not assert infringement claims in the future or require the Company to obtain a license for the intellectual property rights of such third parties. There can be no assurance that such a license, if required, will be available on reasonable terms or at all. If the Company does not obtain such a license, it could encounter delays in the introduction of products or could find that the development, manufacture or sale of products requiring such a license could be prohibited.

There may be limited ability to defend the patents if and when they are issued, leading to loss of sales that might otherwise be realized if the Company was in a position to defend its patents.

Litigation among pharmaceutical companies can be intense and costly. The Company might not have the financial ability to defend its patents, if issued, against larger industry players. Litigation may be necessary to enforce patents issued or assigned to the Company, or to determine the scope and validity of a third party's

15

proprietary rights. Additionally, there can be no assurances that the Company would prevail in any such action. An adverse outcome in litigation or as part of an interference or other proceeding in a court or patent office could subject the Company to significant liabilities, require disputed rights to be licensed from other parties or require the Company to cease using certain technology or products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.