CALUMET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In millions)
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67.7
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
41.1
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
Amortization of turnaround costs
|
7.4
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
2.3
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
0.1
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments
|
(10.6
|
)
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
Asset impairment
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
1.3
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Non-cash equity based compensation
|
1.5
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Lower of cost or market inventory adjustment
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Loss from unconsolidated affiliates
|
0.1
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Other non-cash activities
|
1.5
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
(20.7
|
)
|
Inventories
|
(46.2
|
)
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Derivative activity
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
Turnaround costs
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
Other assets
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
21.7
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Accrued interest payable
|
2.6
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits
|
5.6
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
Other taxes payable
|
0.1
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
(46.8
|
)
|
|
24.0
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(40.7
|
)
|
|
(56.1
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
(17.2
|
)
|
|
(66.8
|
)
|
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
|
—
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(17.2
|
)
|
|
(67.7
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings — revolving credit facility
|
219.7
|
|
|
393.9
|
|
Repayments of borrowings — revolving credit facility
|
(190.7
|
)
|
|
(210.0
|
)
|
Repayments of borrowings
—
related party note
|
—
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Proceeds from inventory financing agreements
|
32.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other financing activities
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
2.4
|
|
Contributions from Calumet GP, LLC
|
0.1
|
|
|
—
|
|
Taxes paid for phantom unit grants
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Distributions to partners
|
—
|
|
|
(57.4
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
58.3
|
|
|
125.4
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
0.4
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
4.2
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.2
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities
|
|
|
|
Non-cash property, plant and equipment additions
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
29.3
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
CALUMET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Description of the Business
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the ticker symbol “CLMT.” The general partner of the Company is Calumet GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. As of
March 31, 2017
, the Company had
76,691,864
limited partner common units and
1,565,140
general partner equivalent units outstanding. The general partner owns
2%
of the Company and all of the incentive distribution rights (as defined in the Company’s partnership agreement), while the remaining
98%
is owned by limited partners. The general partner employs all of the Company’s employees and the Company reimburses the general partner for certain of its expenses.
The Company is engaged in the production and marketing of crude oil-based specialty products including lubricating oils, white mineral oils, solvents, petrolatums and waxes and fuel and fuel related products including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, asphalt and heavy fuel oils, in addition to oilfield services and products. The Company owns and leases additional facilities, primarily related to production and distribution of specialty, fuel and oilfield services products, throughout the United States (“U.S.”).
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of
March 31, 2017
, and for the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, included herein have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the U.S. have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the following disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the results of operations for the interim periods presented. All adjustments are of a normal nature, unless otherwise disclosed. The results of operations for the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2017
. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s
2016
Annual Report.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities consisted of the following as of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
RINs Obligation
|
$
|
33.4
|
|
|
$
|
79.3
|
|
Other
|
18.8
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
Total
|
$
|
52.2
|
|
|
$
|
99.6
|
|
The Company’s RINs obligation (“RINs Obligation”) represents a liability for the purchase of RINs to satisfy the EPA requirement to blend biofuels into the fuel products it produces pursuant to the EPA’s RFS. RINs are assigned to biofuels produced in the U.S. as required by the EPA. The EPA sets annual quotas for the percentage of biofuels that must be blended into transportation fuels consumed in the U.S. and, as a producer of motor fuels from petroleum, the Company is required to blend biofuels into the fuel products it produces at a rate that will meet the EPA’s annual quota. To the extent the Company is unable to blend biofuels at that rate, it must purchase RINs in the open market to satisfy the annual requirement. The Company’s RINs Obligation is based on the amount of RINs it must purchase and the price of those RINs as of the balance sheet date. The Company uses the inventory model to account for RINs, measuring acquired RINs at weighted-average cost. The cost of RINs used each period is charged to cost of sales with cash inflows and outflows recorded in the operating cash flow section of the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Excess RINs are classified as inventory in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognizes a liability at the end of each reporting period in which the Company does not have sufficient RINs to cover the RINs Obligation. The liability is calculated by multiplying the RINs shortage (based on actual results) by the period end RIN spot price.
From time to time, the Company holds varying amounts of RINs for resale. RINs obtained from third parties are initially recorded at their cost at the time the Company acquires them and are subsequently revalued at the lower of cost or market as of the last day of each accounting period and the resulting adjustments are reflected in cost of sales for the period in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The value of RINs obtained from third parties would be reflected in prepaid expenses and other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. See
Note 5
for further information on the Company’s RINs Obligation.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-07,
Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost
(“ASU 2017-07”). The changes to the standard require employers to report the service cost component in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees during the reporting period. The other components of net benefit costs will be presented in the statement of operations separately from the service cost and outside of a subtotal of operating income (loss). In addition, only the service cost component may be eligible for capitalization where applicable. ASU 2017-07 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-07 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,
Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 requires that (i) equity investments in unconsolidated entities that are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting generally be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income (loss) and (ii) when the fair value option has been elected for financial liabilities, changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk be recognized separately in other comprehensive income (loss). Additionally, ASU 2016-01 changes the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The amendments in this standard are generally effective for fiscal years (including interim periods) beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption not permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
(“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standard Codification Topic 605,
Revenue Recognition
. ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires enhanced disclosures. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,
which defers the original effective date by one year to annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date. ASU 2014-09 allows for either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective transition method. In March, April, May and December 2016, the FASB clarified the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations, identifying performance obligations, licensing, collectibility, presentation of sales taxes, non-cash consideration, transition, the scope of Topic 606, impairment testing, policy elections over determining the provision for losses on certain types of contracts, the accrual of advertising costs and disclosure requirements. All amendments are effective with the same date as ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these standards on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2018, expects to use the modified retrospective approach and is in the process of evaluating the full impact of adoption on the Company’s financial reporting.
Based on the evaluation performed to date, the Company has identified some contracts within the oilfield services segment that include implicit arrangements that could be considered material rights under the new standard. Additionally, these contracts contain elements of variable consideration that may impact the total transaction price for these contracts. The Company does not believe that these elements would result in a material change to how revenue would be recognized for these contracts upon the adoption of ASU 2014-09.
Based on the evaluation performed to date, the Company has identified some agreements with distributors within the specialty products segment that are subject to rebate and incentive programs that could contain elements of material rights and/or variable consideration. The Company does not believe that these elements would result in a material change to how revenue would be recognized for these agreements upon the adoption of ASU 2014-09.
The Company continues to analyze the full impact on its operating segments of the adoption of ASU 2014-09, which may result in differences between current revenue recognition practices and those required by ASU 2014-09 that may be material. As part of the Company’s evaluation, it has segregated its revenue streams into categories which will serve as the basis for the continuing accounting analysis on, and documentation of revenues, as it relates to the impact of ASU 2014-09. In addition, the Company continues to actively monitor outstanding issues currently being addressed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Revenue Recognition Working Group and the FASB’s Transition Resource Group, since conclusions reached by these groups may impact its application of ASU 2014-09.
3.
Inventories
The cost of inventory is recorded using the
last-in, first-out (“LIFO”)
method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs and are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. Costs include crude oil and other feedstocks, labor, processing costs and refining overhead costs. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market value. The replacement cost of these inventories, based on current market values, would have been
$23.7 million
and
$14.4 million
lower as of
March 31, 2017
, and
December 31, 2016
, respectively.
On March 31, 2017, the Company sold inventory comprised of crude oil and refined products to Macquarie Energy North America Trading Inc. (“Macquarie”) under Supply and Offtake Agreements as described in
Note 6
— “Inventory Financing Agreements.” Beginning on April 1, 2017, the Great Falls refinery will acquire substantially all of its crude oil from Macquarie. The crude oil remains in the legal title of Macquarie and is stored in the Company’s refinery storage tanks governed by a storage agreement. Legal title to the crude oil passes to the Company at the storage tank outlet. After processing, Macquarie takes title to the refined products stored in the Company’s storage tanks until sold to third parties. The Company records the inventory owned by Macquarie on the Company’s behalf as inventory with a corresponding obligation on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets because the Company maintains the risk of loss until the refined products are sold to third parties and the Company is obligated to repurchase the inventory in certain scenarios. The agreements are accounted for similar to a product financing arrangement.
Inventories consist of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Titled
Inventory
|
|
Supply & Offtake
Agreements
(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
Titled
Inventory
|
|
Supply & Offtake
Agreements
(1)
|
|
Total
|
Raw materials
|
$
|
66.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
68.8
|
|
|
$
|
57.4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
57.4
|
|
Work in process
|
70.5
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
76.5
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
Finished goods
|
259.6
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
291.1
|
|
|
254.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
254.6
|
|
|
$
|
396.1
|
|
|
$
|
40.3
|
|
|
$
|
436.4
|
|
|
$
|
386.2
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
386.2
|
|
(1)
Amounts represent LIFO value and do not necessarily represent the value at which the inventory was sold. Refer to
Note 6
for further information.
Under the LIFO method, the most recently incurred costs are charged to cost of sales and inventories are valued at the earliest acquisition costs. In addition, the use of the LIFO inventory method may result in increases or decreases to cost of sales in years that inventory volumes decline as the result of charging cost of sales with LIFO inventory costs generated in prior periods. In periods of rapidly declining prices, LIFO inventories may have to be written down to market value due to the higher costs assigned to LIFO layers in prior periods. Such write downs are subject to reversal in subsequent periods, not to exceed LIFO cost, if prices recover. During the
three months ended March 31, 2017
and
2016
, the Company recorded decreases of
$4.0 million
and
$8.1 million
, respectively, in cost of sales in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations due to the lower of cost or market (“LCM”) valuation.
4.
Investment In Unconsolidated Affiliates
The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in unconsolidated affiliates as of March 31, 2017, and
December 31, 2016
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Investment
|
|
Percent Ownership
|
|
Investment
|
|
Percent Ownership
|
Pacific New Investment Limited
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
Other
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
Pacific New Investment Limited and Shandong Hi-Speed Hainan Development Co., Ltd.
On August 5, 2015, the Company and The Heritage Group, a related party, formed Pacific New Investment Limited (“PACNIL”) for the purpose of investing in a joint venture with Shandong Hi-Speed Materials Group Corporation and China Construction Installation Engineering Co., Ltd. to construct, develop and operate a solvents refinery in mainland China. The joint venture is named Shandong Hi-Speed Hainan Development Co., Ltd. (“Hi-Speed”). The Company invested
$4.8 million
in June 2016 and
$4.8 million
in October 2016. As of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company owned an equity interest of approximately
23.8%
in PACNIL, and through that ownership the Company owned an equity interest of approximately
6.0%
in Hi-Speed. PACNIL wishes to exit its investment in Hi-Speed. The Company and PACNIL believe they will fully recover their investment in the Hi-Speed joint venture.
The Company accounts for its ownership in PACNIL under the equity method of accounting. As of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had an investment of
$9.6 million
in PACNIL, primarily related to the purchase of equity in the Hi-Speed joint venture.
5.
Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, the Company is a party to certain claims and litigation incidental to its business, including claims made by various regulatory and taxation authorities, such as the EPA, various state environmental regulatory bodies, the Internal Revenue Service, various state and local departments of revenue and the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), as the result of audits or reviews of the Company’s business. In addition, the Company has property, business interruption, general liability and various other insurance policies that may result in certain losses or expenditures being reimbursed to the Company.
Environmental
The Company conducts crude oil and specialty hydrocarbon refining, blending and terminal operations in addition to providing oilfield services and products, and such activities are subject to stringent federal, state, regional and local laws and regulations governing worker health and safety, the discharge of materials into the environment and environmental protection. These laws and regulations impose obligations that are applicable to the Company’s operations, such as requiring the acquisition of permits to conduct regulated activities, restricting the manner in which the Company may release materials into the environment, requiring remedial activities or capital expenditures to mitigate pollution from former or current operations, requiring the application of specific health and safety criteria addressing worker protection and imposing substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from its operations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of sanctions, including administrative, civil and criminal penalties; the imposition of investigatory, remedial or corrective action obligations or the incurrence of capital expenditures; the occurrence of delays in the permitting, development or expansion of projects and the issuance of injunctive relief limiting or prohibiting Company activities. Moreover, certain of these laws impose joint and several, strict liability for costs required to remediate and restore sites where petroleum hydrocarbons, wastes or other materials have been released or disposed. In addition, new laws and regulations, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, increased governmental enforcement or other developments, some of which legal requirements are discussed below, could significantly increase the Company’s operational or compliance expenditures.
Remediation of subsurface contamination is in process at certain of the Company’s refinery sites and is being overseen by the appropriate state agencies. Based on current investigative and remedial activities, the Company believes that the soil and groundwater contamination at these refineries can be controlled or remediated without having a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. However, such costs are often unpredictable and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the future costs will not become material.
San Antonio Refinery
In connection with the acquisition of the San Antonio refinery, the Company agreed to indemnify NuStar for an unlimited term and without consideration of a monetary deductible or cap from any environmental liabilities associated with the San Antonio refinery, except for any governmental penalties or fines that may result from NuStar’s actions or inactions during NuStar’s 20-month period of ownership of the San Antonio refinery. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (“Anadarko”) and Age Refining, Inc. (“Age Refining”), a third party that has since entered bankruptcy, are subject to a 1995 Agreed Order from the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, now known as the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, pursuant to which Anadarko and Age Refining are obligated to assess and remediate certain contamination at the San Antonio refinery that predates the Company’s acquisition of the facility. The Company does not expect this pre-existing contamination at the San Antonio refinery to have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
Great Falls Refinery
In connection with the acquisition of the Great Falls refinery from Connacher Oil and Gas Limited (“Connacher”), the Company became a party to an existing 2002 Refinery Initiative Consent Decree (the “Great Falls Consent Decree”) with the EPA and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (the “MDEQ”). The material obligations imposed by the Great Falls
Consent Decree have been completed. On September 27, 2012, Montana Refining Company, Inc. received a final Corrective Action Order on Consent, replacing the refinery’s previously held hazardous waste permit. This Corrective Action Order on Consent governs the investigation and remediation of contamination at the Great Falls refinery. The Company believes the majority of damages related to such contamination at the Great Falls refinery are covered by a contractual indemnity provided by HollyFrontier Corporation (“Holly”), the owner and operator of the Great Falls refinery prior to its acquisition by Connacher, under an asset purchase agreement between Holly and Connacher, pursuant to which Connacher acquired the Great Falls refinery. Under this asset purchase agreement, Holly agreed to indemnify Connacher and Montana Refining Company, Inc., subject to timely notification, certain conditions and certain monetary baskets and caps, for environmental conditions arising under Holly’s ownership and operation of the Great Falls refinery and existing as of the date of sale to Connacher. During 2014, Holly provided the Company a notice challenging the Company’s position that Holly is obligated to indemnify the Company’s remediation expenses for environmental conditions to the extent arising under Holly’s ownership and operation of the refinery and existing as of the date of sale to Connacher, which expenditures totaled approximately
$18.7 million
as of
March 31, 2017
, of which
$14.6 million
was capitalized into the cost of the Company’s recently completed refinery expansion project and
$4.1 million
was expensed. The Company continues to believe that Holly is responsible to indemnify the Company for these remediation expenses disputed by Holly and on September 22, 2015, the Company initiated a lawsuit against Holly and the sellers of the Great Falls refinery under the asset purchase agreement. On November 24, 2015, Holly and the sellers of the Great Falls refinery under the asset purchase agreement filed a motion to dismiss the case pending arbitration. On February 10, 2016, the court ordered that all of the claims be addressed in arbitration. Arbitration is scheduled for early 2018. In the event the Company is unsuccessful in the legal dispute with Holly, the Company will be responsible for the remediation expenses. The Company expects that it may incur costs to remediate other environmental conditions at the Great Falls refinery; however, the costs cannot be estimated at this time. The Company believes at this time that these other costs it may incur will not be material to its financial position or results of operations.
Superior Refinery
In connection with the acquisition of the Superior refinery, the Company became a party to an existing Refinery Initiative Consent Decree (“Superior Consent Decree”) with the EPA and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (“WDNR”) that applies, in part, to its Superior refinery. Under the Superior Consent Decree, the Company must complete certain reductions in air emissions at the Superior refinery as well as report upon certain emissions from the refinery to the EPA and the WDNR. As of
March 31, 2017
, the Company estimates costs of up to
$5.0 million
to make known equipment upgrades and conduct other discrete tasks in compliance with the Superior Consent Decree. Failure to perform these required tasks under the Superior Consent Decree could result in the imposition of stipulated penalties, which could be material. The Company is currently assessing certain past actions at the refinery for compliance with the terms of the Superior Consent Decree, which actions may be subject to stipulated penalties under the Superior Consent Decree but, in any event, the Company does not currently believe that the imposition of such penalties for those actions, should they be imposed, would be material. In addition, the Company is pursuing certain additional environmental and safety-related projects at the Superior refinery. Completion of these additional projects will result in the Company incurring additional costs, which could be substantial. For the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, the Company incurred
no
costs related to installing process equipment at the Superior refinery pursuant to EPA fuel content regulations.
In June 2012, the EPA issued a Finding of Violation/Notice of Violation to the Superior refinery, which included a proposed penalty amount of
$0.1 million
. This finding is in response to information provided to the EPA by the Company in response to an information request. The EPA alleges that the efficiency of the flares at the Superior refinery is lower than regulatory requirements. The Company is contesting the allegations and is in settlement discussions with the EPA to resolve this issue. The Company has not yet received formal action from the EPA. The Company does not believe that the resolution of these allegations will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
The Company is contractually indemnified by Murphy Oil Corporation (“Murphy Oil”) under an asset purchase agreement between the Company and Murphy Oil for specified environmental liabilities arising from the operation of the Superior refinery including: (i) certain obligations arising out of the Superior Consent Decree (including payment of a civil penalty required under the Superior Consent Decree), (ii) certain liabilities arising in connection with Murphy Oil’s transport of certain wastes and other materials to specified offsite real properties for disposal or recycling prior to the acquisition of Superior and (iii) certain liabilities for certain third-party actions, suits or proceedings alleging exposure, prior to the acquisition of Superior, of an individual to wastes or other materials at the specified on-site real property, which wastes or other materials were spilled, released, emitted or otherwise discharged by Murphy Oil. The Company believes contractual indemnity by Murphy Oil for such specified environmental liabilities is unlimited in duration and not subject to any monetary deductibles or maximums. The amount of any damages payable by Murphy Oil pursuant to the contractual indemnities under the asset purchase agreement are net of any amount recoverable under an environmental insurance policy that the Company obtained in connection with the acquisition of the Superior refinery, which named the Company and Murphy Oil as insureds and covers environmental conditions existing at the Superior refinery prior to the acquisition of the Superior refinery.
Shreveport, Cotton Valley and Princeton Refineries
On
December 23, 2010
, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (“LDEQ”) under LDEQ’s “Small Refinery and Single Site Refinery Initiative,” covering the Shreveport, Princeton and Cotton Valley refineries. This settlement agreement became effective on
January 31, 2012
. The settlement agreement, termed the “Global Settlement,” resolved alleged violations of the federal Clean Air Act, as amended (“CAA”), and federal Clean Water Act regulations that arose prior to
December 23, 2010
. Among other things, the Company agreed to complete beneficial environmental programs and implement emissions reduction projects at the Company’s Shreveport, Princeton and Cotton Valley refineries on an agreed-upon schedule. During the
three months ended March 31, 2017
and
2016
, the Company incurred approximately
$0.3 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively, of such capital expenditures. The Global Settlement is substantially complete and any remaining capital investment requirements will be incorporated into the Company’s annual capital expenditures budget. The Company does not expect any additional capital expenditures included in the Global Settlement to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
The Company is contractually indemnified by Shell Oil Company (“Shell”), as successor to Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, and Atlas Processing Company, under an asset purchase agreement between the Company and Shell, for specified environmental liabilities arising from the operations of the Shreveport refinery prior to the Company’s acquisition of the facility. The Company believes the contractual indemnity is unlimited in amount and duration, but requires the Company to contribute
$1.0 million
of the first
$5.0 million
of indemnified costs for certain of the specified environmental liabilities. The Company has recorded the
$1.0 million
liability in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Bel-Ray Facility
Bel-Ray executed an Administrative Consent Order (“ACO”) with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, effective January 4, 1994, which required investigation and remediation of contamination at or emanating from the Bel-Ray facility. In 2000, Bel-Ray entered into a fixed price remediation contract with Weston Solutions (“Weston”), a large remediation contractor, whereby Weston agreed to be fully liable for the remediation of the soil and groundwater issues at the facility, including an offsite groundwater plume pursuant to the ACO (“Weston Agreement”). The Weston Agreement set up a trust fund to reimburse Weston, administered by Bel-Ray’s environmental counsel. As of
March 31, 2017
, the trust fund contained approximately
$0.6 million
. In addition, Weston has remediation cost containment insurance, should Weston be unable to complete the work required under the Weston Agreement. In connection with the acquisition of Bel-Ray, the Company became a party to the Weston Agreement.
Weston has been addressing the environmental issues at the Bel-Ray facility over time and the next phase will address the groundwater issues, which extend offsite.
Renewable Identification Numbers Obligation
On
February 10, 2017
, the EPA granted certain of the Company’s refineries a “small refinery exemption” under the RFS for the full year 2016, as provided for under the CAA. In granting those exemptions, the EPA determined that for the full year 2016 compliance with the RFS would represent a “disproportionate economic hardship” for these refineries.
As of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had a RINs Obligation of
$33.4 million
and
$79.3 million
, respectively. RINs gain for the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
was
$47.6 million
as compared to a RINs expense for the same period in
2016
of
$16.8 million
.
Occupational Health and Safety
The Company is subject to various laws and regulations relating to occupational health and safety, including OSHA and comparable state laws. These laws and regulations strictly govern the protection of the health and safety of employees. In addition, OSHA’s hazard communication standard requires that information be maintained about hazardous materials used or produced in the Company’s operations and that this information be provided to employees, contractors, state and local government authorities and customers. The Company maintains safety and training programs as part of its ongoing efforts to promote compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The Company conducts periodic audits of Process Safety Management (“PSM”) systems at each of its locations subject to the PSM standard. The Company’s compliance with applicable health and safety laws and regulations has required, and continues to require, substantial expenditures. Changes in occupational safety and health laws and regulations or a finding of non-compliance with current laws and regulations could result in additional capital expenditures or operating expenses, as well as civil penalties and, in the event of a serious injury or fatality, criminal charges.
In the first quarter of 2011, OSHA conducted an inspection of the Cotton Valley refinery’s PSM program. On
March 14, 2011
, OSHA issued a Citation and Notification of Penalty (the “Cotton Valley Citation”) to the Company as a result of the Cotton Valley inspection, which included a proposed penalty amount of
$0.2 million
. The Company has contested the Cotton Valley Citation and the parties have reached a tentative settlement with OSHA on the matter, which the Company does not believe will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to claims and litigation arising in the normal course of its business. The Company has recorded accruals with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, that are reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements but are not individually considered material. For other matters, the Company has not recorded accruals because it has not yet determined that a loss is probable or because the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated. While the ultimate outcome of claims and litigation currently pending cannot be determined, the Company currently does not expect that these proceedings and claims, individually or in the aggregate (including matters for which the Company has recorded accruals), will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, however, and if decided adversely to the Company, or if the Company determines that settlement of particular litigation is appropriate, the Company may be subject to liability that could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Standby Letters of Credit
The Company has agreements with various financial institutions for standby letters of credit, which have been issued primarily to vendors. As of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit of
$73.8 million
and
$82.1 million
, respectively, under its senior secured revolving credit facility (the “revolving credit facility”). Refer to
Note 7
for additional information regarding the Company’s revolving credit facility. At
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the maximum amount of letters of credit the Company could issue under its revolving credit facility was subject to borrowing base limitations, with a maximum letter of credit sublimit equal to
$600.0 million
, which amount may be increased to
90%
of revolver commitments in effect (
$900.0 million
at
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
) with the consent of the Agent (as defined in the revolving credit facility agreement).
As of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had availability to issue letters of credit of
$358.0 million
and
$360.8 million
, respectively, under its revolving credit facility.
6.
Inventory Financing Agreements
On
March 31, 2017
, the Company entered into several agreements with Macquarie Energy North America Trading Inc. (“Macquarie”) to support the operations of the Great Falls refinery (the “Supply and Offtake Agreements”). The Supply and Offtake Agreements expire on
October 31, 2019
; however, Macquarie has the option to terminate the agreements on
October 31, 2017
or
October 31, 2018
.
At the commencement of the Supply and Offtake Agreements, the Company sold to Macquarie inventory comprised of
652,000
barrels of crude oil and refined products valued at
$32.2 million
. In addition, the Company incurred approximately
$0.9 million
of costs related to the Supply and Offtake Agreements. These capitalized costs are recorded in obligations under inventory financing agreements in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.
During the term of the Supply and Offtake Agreements, the Company and Macquarie will identify mutually acceptable contracts for the purchase of crude oil from third parties. Per the Supply and Offtake Agreements, Macquarie will provide up to
30,000
barrels per day of crude oil to the Great Falls refinery. The Company agreed to purchase the crude oil on a just-in-time basis to support the production operations at the Great Falls refinery. Additionally, the Company agreed to sell, and Macquarie agreed to buy, at market prices, refined products produced at the Great Falls refinery. The Company will then repurchase the refined products from Macquarie prior to selling the refined products to third parties.
The Supply and Offtake Agreements are subject to minimum and maximum inventory levels. The agreements also provide for the lease to Macquarie of crude oil and certain refined product storage tanks located at the Great Falls refinery. Following expiration or termination of the agreements, Macquarie has the option to require the Company to purchase the crude oil and refined product inventories then owned by Macquarie and located at the leased storage tanks at then current market prices. The Company’s obligations under the agreements are secured by the inventory included in these agreements.
While title to certain inventories will reside with Macquarie, the Supply and Offtake Agreements are accounted for by the Company similar to a product financing arrangement; therefore, the inventories sold to Macquarie will continue to be included in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets until processed and sold to a third party. Each reporting period, the Company will record a liability in an amount equal to the amount the Company expects to pay to repurchase the inventory held by Macquarie based on current market prices included in obligations under inventory financing agreements in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company has determined that the redemption feature on the initially recognized liability and the contingent interest feature are embedded derivatives indexed to commodity prices. As such, the Company has accounted for these embedded derivatives at fair value with changes in the fair value, if any, recorded in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of March 31, 2017, the embedded derivatives had
zero
fair value. The embedded derivatives will be recorded in obligations under inventory financing agreements on the condensed consolidated balance
sheets. The cash flow impact of the embedded derivatives will be classified as a change in derivative activity in the financing activities section in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2017
, the Company incurred
no
financing costs related to the Supply and Offtake Agreements, which would have been included in interest expense in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Upon execution of the Supply and Offtake Agreements, the Company owed
$2.5 million
related to the initial purchase of inventory to cover credit risk for future crude oil deliveries and potential liquidation risk if it sells the inventory to third parties. The receivable from Macquarie was recorded as a reduction to the Company’s obligation under inventory financing agreements pursuant to its Master Netting Agreement. The Supply and Offtake Agreements also include a deferred payment arrangement (“Deferred Payment Arrangement”) whereby the Company can defer payments on just-in-time crude oil purchases from Macquarie owed under the agreements up to the value of the collateral provided (
90%
of the collateral inventory) with the amount due always paid prior to the 20
th
of the month. Amounts outstanding under the Deferred Payment Arrangement are included in obligations under inventory financing agreements in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the amount outstanding under the Deferred Payment Arrangement are included within cash flows from financing activities on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. As of
three months ended March 31, 2017
, the capacity of the Deferred Payment Arrangement was
$4.0 million
and the Company had
no
deferred payments outstanding.
7.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
Borrowings under amended and restated senior secured revolving credit agreement with third-party lenders, interest payments quarterly, borrowings due July 2019, weighted average interest rate of 5.5% and 4.8% at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
|
$
|
39.2
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
Borrowings under 2021 Secured Notes, interest at a fixed rate of 11.50%, interest payments semiannually, borrowings due January 2021, effective interest rate of 12.3% and 12.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively
|
400.0
|
|
|
400.0
|
|
Borrowings under 2021 Notes, interest at a fixed rate of 6.50%, interest payments semiannually, borrowings due April 2021, effective interest rate of 6.8% for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively
|
900.0
|
|
|
900.0
|
|
Borrowings under 2022 Notes, interest at a fixed rate of 7.625%, interest payments semiannually, borrowings due January 2022, effective interest rate of 8.0% for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively
(1)
|
352.4
|
|
|
352.5
|
|
Borrowings under 2023 Notes, interest at a fixed rate of 7.75%, interest payments semiannually, borrowings due April 2023, effective interest rate of 8.0% for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively
|
325.0
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
Other
|
7.6
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Capital lease obligations, at various interest rates, interest and principal payments monthly through November 2034
|
45.9
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
Less unamortized debt issuance costs
(2)
|
(31.3
|
)
|
|
(33.2
|
)
|
Less unamortized discounts
|
(11.4
|
)
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
Total long-term debt
|
$
|
2,027.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,997.2
|
|
Less current portion of long-term debt
|
3.5
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,023.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,993.7
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The balance includes a fair value interest rate hedge adjustment, which increased the debt balance by
$2.4 million
and
$2.5 million
as of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively (refer to
Note 8
for additional information on the interest rate swap designated as a fair value hedge).
|
|
|
(2)
|
Deferred debt issuance costs are being amortized by the effective interest rate method over the lives of the related debt instruments. These amounts are net of accumulated amortization of
$16.2 million
and
$14.5 million
at
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively.
|
Senior Notes
11.50% Senior Secured Notes (the “2021 Secured Notes”)
On
April 20, 2016
, the Company issued and sold
$400.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of 11.50% Senior Secured Notes due
January 15, 2021
, in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to eligible purchasers at a discounted price of
98.273
percent of par. Subject to certain exceptions, the 2021 Secured Notes are secured by a lien on all of the fixed assets that secure the Company’s obligations under its secured hedge agreements, including certain present and future real property, fixtures and equipment; all U.S. registered patents and patent license rights, trademarks and trademark license rights, copyrights and copyright license rights and trade secrets; chattel paper, documents and instruments; certain cash deposits in the property, plant and equipment proceeds account; certain books and records; and all accessions and proceeds of any of the foregoing. The Company received net proceeds of approximately
$382.5 million
net of discount, initial purchasers’ fees and estimated expenses, which it used to repay borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facility and for general partnership purposes, including planned capital expenditures at its facilities and working capital. Interest on the 2021 Secured Notes is paid
semiannually
in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2016.
7.75% Senior Notes (the “2023 Notes”)
On
March 27, 2015
, the Company issued and sold
$325.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Notes due
April 15, 2023
, in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, to eligible purchasers at a discounted price of
99.257
percent of par. The Company received net proceeds of approximately
$317.0 million
net of discount, initial purchasers’ fees and expenses, which the Company used to fund the redemption of
$178.8 million
in aggregate principal amount of outstanding 9.625% senior notes due 2020 on April 28, 2015, to repay borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facility and for general partnership purposes, including planned capital expenditures at the Company’s facilities and working capital. Interest on the 2023 Notes is paid
semiannually
in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on October 15, 2015.
6.50% Senior Notes (the “2021 Notes”)
On
March 31, 2014
, the Company issued and sold
$900.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% Senior Notes due
April 15, 2021
, in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, to eligible purchasers at par. The Company received net proceeds of approximately
$884.0 million
net of initial purchasers’ fees and expenses, which the Company used to fund the purchase price of ADF Holdings, Inc., the parent company of Anchor Drilling Fluids USA, Inc. (subsequently converted to ADF Holdings, LLC and Anchor Drilling Fluids USA, LLC), the redemption of
$500.0 million
in aggregate principal amount outstanding of 9.375% Senior Notes due 2019 and for general partnership purposes, including planned capital expenditures at the Company’s facilities. Interest on the 2021 Notes is paid
semiannually
in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on October 15, 2014.
7.625% Senior Notes (the “2022 Notes”)
On
November 26, 2013
, the Company issued and sold
$350.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of 7.625% Senior Notes due
January 15, 2022
, in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, to eligible purchasers at a discounted price of
98.494
percent of par. The Company received net proceeds of approximately
$337.4 million
, net of discount, initial purchasers’ fees and expenses, which the Company used for general partnership purposes, to fund previously announced organic growth projects, the purchase price of the Bel-Ray acquisition and the redemption of
$100.0 million
in aggregate principal amount outstanding of 9.375% Senior Notes due 2019. Interest on the 2022 Notes is paid
semiannually
in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2014.
2021 Secured Notes, 2021 Notes, 2022 Notes and 2023 Notes
In accordance with SEC Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X, unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of non-guarantors are not required. The Company has no assets or operations independent of its subsidiaries. Obligations under its 2021, 2022 and 2023 Notes are fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Company’s current 100%-owned operating subsidiaries and certain of the Company’s future operating subsidiaries, with the exception of the Company’s “minor” subsidiaries (as defined by Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X), including Calumet Finance Corp. (100%-owned Delaware corporation that was organized for the sole purpose of being a co-issuer of certain of the Company’s indebtedness, including the 2021 Secured, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Notes). There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Company or subsidiary guarantors for the Company to obtain funds from its subsidiary guarantors by dividend or loan. None of the subsidiary guarantors’ assets represent restricted assets pursuant to SEC Rule 4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X.
The 2021 Secured, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Notes are subject to certain automatic customary releases, including the sale, disposition or transfer of capital stock or substantially all of the assets of a subsidiary guarantor, designation of a subsidiary
guarantor as unrestricted in accordance with the applicable indenture, exercise of legal defeasance option or covenant defeasance option, liquidation or dissolution of the subsidiary guarantor and a subsidiary guarantor ceases to both guarantee other Company debt and to be an obligor under the revolving credit facility. The Company’s operating subsidiaries may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of their properties or assets to, or consolidate with or merge into, another company if such a sale would cause a default under the indentures governing the 2021 Secured, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Notes.
The indentures governing the 2021 Secured, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Notes contain covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability and the ability of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries to: (i) sell assets; (ii) pay distributions on, redeem or repurchase the Company’s common units or redeem or repurchase its subordinated debt or, in the case of the 2021 Secured Notes, its unsecured notes; (iii) make investments; (iv) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred units; (v) create or incur certain liens; (vi) enter into agreements that restrict distributions or other payments from the Company’s restricted subsidiaries to the Company; (vii) consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; (viii) engage in transactions with affiliates and (ix) create unrestricted subsidiaries. These covenants are subject to important exceptions and qualifications. At any time when the 2021 Secured, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Notes are rated investment grade by either Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) and no Default or Event of Default, each as defined in the indentures governing the 2021 Secured, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Notes, has occurred and is continuing, many of these covenants will be suspended. As of
March 31, 2017
, the Company’s Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the indentures governing the 2021 Secured, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Notes) was
1.3
to 1.0. As of
March 31, 2017
, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the indentures governing the 2021 Secured, 2021, 2022 and 2023 Notes.
Second Amended and Restated Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
The Company has a
$900.0 million
senior secured revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing base limitations, which includes a
$500.0 million
incremental uncommitted expansion feature. The revolving credit facility is the Company’s primary source of liquidity for cash needs in excess of cash generated from operations. The revolving credit facility matures in
July 2019
and currently bears interest at a rate equal to either the prime rate plus a basis points margin or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a basis points margin, at the Company’s option. As of
March 31, 2017
, the margin was
50
basis points for prime rate loans and
150
basis points for LIBOR rate loans; however, the margin can fluctuate quarterly based on the Company’s average availability for additional borrowings under the revolving credit facility in the preceding fiscal quarter.
On March 31, 2017, the Company amended its revolving credit facility to allow for the entry into the Supply and Offtake Agreements at the Great Falls refinery. The amendment resulted in the release of certain Eligible Inventory (as defined in the revolving credit facility agreement) from the revolving credit facility as that inventory is now collateral under the Supply and Offtake Agreements. For additional discussion of the Supply and Offtake Agreements, refer to
Note 6
.
In addition to paying interest
quarterly
on outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, the Company is required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the revolving credit facility with respect to the unutilized commitments thereunder at a rate equal to
0.250%
or
0.375%
per annum, depending on the average daily available unused borrowing capacity for the preceding month. The Company also pays a customary letter of credit fee, including a fronting fee of
0.125%
per annum of the stated amount of each outstanding letter of credit and customary agency fees.
The borrowing capacity as of
March 31, 2017
under the revolving credit facility was
$471.0 million
. As of
March 31, 2017
, the Company had
$39.2 million
in outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and outstanding standby letters of credit of
$73.8 million
, leaving
$358.0 million
available for additional borrowings based on specified availability limitations. Lenders under the revolving credit facility have a first priority lien on the Company’s accounts receivable, certain inventory and substantially all of its cash (collectively, the “Credit Agreement Collateral”).
The revolving credit facility contains various covenants that limit, among other things, the Company’s ability to: incur indebtedness; grant liens; dispose of certain assets; make certain acquisitions and investments; redeem or prepay other debt or make other restricted payments such as distributions to unitholders; enter into transactions with affiliates and enter into a merger, consolidation or sale of assets. Further, the revolving credit facility contains one springing financial covenant which provides that only if the Company’s availability under the revolving credit facility falls below the
greater of (a) 12.5% of the Borrowing Base (as defined in the revolving credit agreement) then in effect and (b) $45.0 million (which amount is subject to increase in proportion to revolving commitment increases), then the Company will be required to maintain as of the end of each fiscal quarter a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the revolving credit agreement) of at least 1.0 to 1.0
.
As of
March 31, 2017
, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the revolving credit facility.
Maturities of Long-Term Debt
As of
March 31, 2017
, principal payments on debt obligations and future minimum rentals on capital lease obligations are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
Maturity
|
2017
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
2018
|
4.3
|
|
2019
|
42.0
|
|
2020
|
2.4
|
|
2021
|
1,303.3
|
|
Thereafter
|
713.1
|
|
Total
|
$
|
2,067.7
|
|
8.
Derivatives
The Company is exposed to price risks due to fluctuations in the price of crude oil, refined products (primarily in the Company’s fuel products segment), natural gas and precious metals. The Company uses various strategies to reduce its exposure to commodity price risk. The strategies to reduce the Company’s risk utilize both physical forward contracts and
financially settled derivative instruments, such as swaps, collars, options and futures,
to attempt to reduce the Company’s exposure with respect to:
|
|
•
|
crude oil purchases and sales;
|
|
|
•
|
fuel product sales and purchases;
|
|
|
•
|
precious metals purchases; and
|
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in the value of crude oil between geographic regions and between the different types of crude oil such as New York Mercantile Exchange West Texas Intermediate (“NYMEX WTI”), Light Louisiana Sweet (“LLS”), Western Canadian Select (“WCS”), Mixed Sweet Blend (“MSW”) and ICE Brent.
|
The Company manages its exposure to commodity markets, credit, volumetric and liquidity risks to manage its costs and volatility of cash flows as conditions warrant or opportunities become available. These risks may be managed in a variety of ways that may include the use of derivative instruments. Derivative instruments may be used for the purpose of mitigating risks associated with an asset, liability and anticipated future transactions and the changes in fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments will affect its earnings and cash flows; however, such changes should be offset by price or rate changes related to the underlying commodity or financial transaction that is part of the risk management strategy. The Company does not speculate with derivative instruments or other contractual arrangements that are not associated with its business objectives. Speculation is defined as increasing the Company’s natural position above the maximum position of its physical assets or trading in commodities, currencies or other risk bearing assets that are not associated with the Company’s business activities and objectives. The Company’s positions are monitored routinely by a risk management committee to maintain compliance with its stated risk management policy and documented risk management strategies. All strategies are reviewed on an ongoing basis by the Company’s risk management committee, which will add, remove or revise strategies in anticipation of changes in market conditions and/or its risk profiles. Such changes in strategies are to position the Company in relation to its risk exposures in an attempt to capture market opportunities as they arise.
The Company is obligated to repurchase crude oil and refined products from Macquarie at the termination of the Supply and Offtake Agreements in certain scenarios. The Company has determined that the redemption feature on the initially recognized liability and the contingent interest feature are embedded derivatives indexed to commodity prices. As such, the Company has accounted for these embedded derivatives at fair value with changes in the fair value, if any, recorded in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of March 31, 2017, the embedded derivatives had
zero
fair value.
The Company recognizes all derivative instruments at their fair values (see
Note 9
) as either current assets or current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Fair value includes any premiums paid or received and unrealized gains and losses. Fair value does not include any amounts receivable from or payable to counterparties, or collateral provided to counterparties. Derivative asset and liability amounts with the same counterparty are netted against each other for financial reporting purposes.
The following tables summarize the Company’s gross fair values of its derivative instruments, presenting the impact of offsetting derivative assets in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
March 31, 2017
, and
December 31, 2016
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets
|
|
Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Net Amounts of Assets Presented
in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets
|
|
Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Net Amounts of Assets Presented
in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
Derivative instruments not designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Fuel products segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil swaps
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
2.9
|
|
Crude oil basis swaps
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Crude oil percentage basis swaps
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Total derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
$
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
The following tables summarize the Company’s gross fair values of its derivative instruments, presenting the impact of offsetting derivative liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2017, and
December 31, 2016
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities
|
|
Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented
in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities
|
|
Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented
in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
Derivative instruments not designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty products segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Fuel products segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil swaps
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Crude oil basis swaps
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
Crude oil percentage basis swaps
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Gasoline crack spread swaps
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
Diesel crack spread swaps
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
2/1/1 crack spread swaps
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
Total derivative instruments
|
|
|
$
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
|
$
|
(14.8
|
)
|
The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by its counterparties on these derivative transactions. The Company does not expect nonperformance on any derivative instruments, however, no assurances can be provided. The Company’s credit exposure related to these derivative instruments is represented by the fair value of contracts reported as derivative assets. As of
March 31, 2017
, the Company had
three
counterparties in which the derivatives held were net assets, totaling
$1.5 million
. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company had
one
counterparty in which the derivatives held were net assets, totaling
$0.8 million
. To manage credit risk, the Company selects and periodically reviews counterparties based on credit ratings. The Company
primarily executes its derivative instruments with large financial institutions that have ratings of at least
Baa1 and BBB+
by Moody’s and S&P, respectively. In the event of default, the Company would potentially be subject to losses on derivative instruments with mark-to-market gains. The Company requires collateral from its counterparties when the fair value of the derivatives exceeds agreed-upon thresholds in its master derivative contracts with these counterparties.
No
such collateral was held by the Company as of
March 31, 2017
or
December 31, 2016
. Collateral received from counterparties is reported in other current liabilities, and collateral held by counterparties is reported in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets and is not netted against derivative assets or liabilities. For financial reporting purposes, the Company does not offset the collateral provided to a counterparty against the fair value of its obligation to that counterparty. Any outstanding collateral is released to the Company upon settlement of the related derivative instrument liability. As of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had provided
no
collateral to its counterparties.
Certain of the Company’s outstanding derivative instruments are subject to credit support agreements with the applicable counterparties which contain provisions setting certain credit thresholds above which the Company may be required to post agreed-upon collateral, such as cash or letters of credit, with the counterparty to the extent that the Company’s mark-to-market net liability, if any, on all outstanding derivatives exceeds the credit threshold amount per such credit support agreement. The majority of the credit support agreements covering the Company’s outstanding derivative instruments also contain a general provision stating that if the Company experiences a material adverse change in its business, in the reasonable discretion of the counterparty, the Company’s credit threshold could be lowered by such counterparty. The Company does not expect that it will experience a material adverse change in its business.
The cash flow impact of the Company’s commodity derivative activities is classified primarily as a change in derivative activity in the operating activities section in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The cash flow impact of the Company’s embedded derivatives included in the Supply and Offtake Agreements is classified as a change in derivative activity in the investing activities section in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
The Company accounts for certain derivatives hedging purchases of crude oil and sales of diesel swaps as cash flow hedges. The derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are hedging sales and purchases are recorded to sales and cost of sales, respectively, in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations upon recording the related hedged transaction in sales or cost of sales. The Company assesses, both at inception of the cash flow hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged items. Periodically, the Company may enter into crude oil and fuel product basis swaps to more effectively hedge its crude oil purchases, crude oil sales and fuel products sales. These derivatives can be combined with a swap contract in order to create a more effective cash flow hedge.
To the extent a derivative instrument designated as a cash flow hedge is determined to be effective as a cash flow hedge of an exposure to changes in the fair value of a future transaction, the change in fair value of the derivative is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of partners’ capital in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, until the underlying transaction hedged is recognized in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Ineffectiveness is inherent in the hedging of crude oil and fuel products. Due to the volatility in the markets for crude oil and fuel products, the Company is unable to predict the amount of ineffectiveness each period, determined on a derivative by derivative basis or in the aggregate for a specific commodity and has the potential for the future loss of cash flow hedge accounting. Ineffectiveness has resulted, and the loss of cash flow hedge accounting has resulted, in increased volatility in the Company’s financial results. However, even though certain derivative instruments may not qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, the Company intends to continue to utilize such instruments as management believes such derivative instruments continue to provide the Company with the opportunity to more effectively stabilize cash flows.
Cash flow hedge accounting is discontinued when it is determined that a derivative no longer qualifies as an effective hedge or when it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur. When cash flow hedge accounting is discontinued because the derivative instrument no longer qualifies as an effective cash flow hedge, the derivative instrument is subject to the mark-to-market method of accounting prospectively. Changes in the mark-to-market fair value of the derivative instrument are recorded to unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Unrealized gains and losses related to discontinued cash flow hedges that were previously deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will remain in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the underlying transaction is reflected in earnings, unless it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur, at which time, associated deferred amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are immediately recognized in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The Company recorded the following amounts in its condensed consolidated balance sheets, unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss and unaudited condensed consolidated statements of partners’ capital as of and for the
three months ended March 31, 2017
and
2016
, related to its derivative instruments that were designated as cash flow hedges (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Derivative
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss on Derivatives (Effective Portion)
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Net Loss (Effective Portion)
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Net Loss on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion)
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Specialty products segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil swaps
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Fuel products segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil swaps
|
—
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
—
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Diesel swaps
|
—
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
—
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
As of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, there was
no
effective portion of cash flow hedges to be classified in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Derivative Instruments Designated as Fair Value Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge (which are limited to interest rate swaps), the effective gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized as interest expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. No hedge ineffectiveness is recognized if the interest rate swap qualifies for the “shortcut” method and, as a result, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument offset the changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged debt. In addition, the differential to be paid or received on the interest rate swap arrangement is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company assesses at the inception of the fair value hedge whether the derivatives that are used in the hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values of hedged items.
Fair value hedge accounting is discontinued when it is determined that a derivative no longer qualifies as an effective hedge or when it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur. When fair value hedge accounting is discontinued because the derivative instrument no longer qualifies as an effective fair value hedge, the derivative instrument is still subject to mark-to-market method of accounting, however the Company will cease to adjust the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value.
In 2014, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement which converted a portion of the Company’s fixed rate debt to a floating rate. This agreement involved the receipt of fixed rate amounts in exchange for floating rate interest payments over the life of the agreement without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. Also, in connection with the interest rate swap agreement, the Company entered into an option that permits the counterparty to cancel the interest rate swap for a specified premium. The Company designated this interest rate swap and option as a fair value hedge. On January 13, 2015, the Company terminated its interest rate swap, which was designated as a fair value hedge, related to a notional amount of
$200.0 million
of 2022 Notes. In settlement of this swap, the Company recognized a net gain of approximately
$3.3 million
.
The Company recorded the following losses in its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, related to its derivative instrument designated as a fair value hedge (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Loss of Derivative
|
Amount of Loss Recognized
in Net Loss
|
|
Hedged Item
|
|
Location of Gain on Hedged Item
|
Amount of Gain Recognized
in Net Loss
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Swaps not allocated to a specific segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
Interest expense
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
2022 Notes
|
|
Interest income
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
For derivative instruments not designated as hedges, the change in fair value of the asset or liability for the period is recorded to gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Upon the settlement of a derivative not designated as a hedge, the gain or loss at settlement is realized in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, the Company has entered into natural gas swaps and certain other crude oil swaps that do not qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes as they are determined not to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows associated with crude oil purchases and natural gas purchases and gasoline and diesel sales at the Company’s refineries.
The Company recorded the following gains (losses) in its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2017
and
2016
, related to its derivative instruments not designated as hedges (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Derivative
|
Amount of Realized Loss Recognized in Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
|
|
Amount of Unrealized Gain (Loss) Recognized in Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Specialty products segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
Fuel products segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil swaps
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
1.5
|
|
Crude oil basis swaps
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Crude oil percentage basis swaps
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Crude oil options
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Crude oil futures
|
—
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gasoline crack spread swaps
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
2/1/1 crack spread swaps
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Diesel crack spread swaps
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
—
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
Derivative Positions — Specialty Products Segment
Natural Gas Swap Contracts
At
March 31, 2017
, the Company had the following derivatives related to natural gas purchases in its specialty products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
MMBtu
|
|
$/MMBtu
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
1,320,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.87
|
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
1,320,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.87
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
960,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.72
|
|
Total
|
3,600,000
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
At
December 31, 2016
, the Company had the following derivatives related to natural gas purchases in its specialty products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
MMBtu
|
|
$/MMBtu
|
First Quarter 2017
|
1,350,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.88
|
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
1,320,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.87
|
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
1,320,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.87
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
960,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.72
|
|
Total
|
4,950,000
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
$
|
3.85
|
|
Derivative Positions — Fuel Products Segment
Crude Oil Swap Contracts
At
March 31, 2017
, the Company had the following derivatives related to crude oil purchases in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Purchased
|
|
BPD
|
|
Average Swap
($/Bbl)
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
323,605
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
327,161
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
327,161
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
Total
|
977,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
At
March 31, 2017
, the Company had the following derivatives related to crude oil sales in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Sold
|
|
BPD
|
|
Average Swap
($/Bbl)
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
131,768
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
41.56
|
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
133,216
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
41.56
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
133,216
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
41.56
|
|
Total
|
398,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.56
|
|
At
December 31, 2016
, the Company had the following derivatives related to crude oil purchases in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Purchased
|
|
BPD
|
|
Average Swap
($/Bbl)
|
First Quarter 2017
|
320,049
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
323,605
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
327,161
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
327,161
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
Total
|
1,297,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
At
December 31, 2016
, the Company had the following derivatives related to crude oil sales in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Sold
|
|
BPD
|
|
Average Swap
($/Bbl)
|
First Quarter 2017
|
130,320
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
41.56
|
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
131,768
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
41.56
|
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
133,216
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
41.56
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
133,216
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
41.56
|
|
Total
|
528,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.56
|
|
Crude Oil Basis Swap Contracts
The Company has entered into crude oil basis swaps to mitigate the risk of future changes in pricing differentials between WCS and NYMEX WTI. At
March 31, 2017
, the Company had the following derivatives related to crude oil basis swaps in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Basis Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Purchased
|
|
BPD
|
|
Average Differential to NYMEX WTI
($/Bbl)
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
637,000
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
(13.22
|
)
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
644,000
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
(13.22
|
)
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
644,000
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
(13.22
|
)
|
Total
|
1,925,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average differential
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.22
|
)
|
At
December 31, 2016
, the Company had the following derivatives related to crude oil basis swaps in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Basis Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Purchased
|
|
BPD
|
|
Average Differential to NYMEX WTI
($/Bbl)
|
First Quarter 2017
|
630,000
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
(13.22
|
)
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
637,000
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
(13.22
|
)
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
644,000
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
(13.22
|
)
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
644,000
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
(13.22
|
)
|
Total
|
2,555,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average differential
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.22
|
)
|
Crude Oil Percentage Basis Swap Contracts
The Company has entered into derivative instruments to secure a percentage differential of WCS crude oil to NYMEX WTI. At
March 31, 2017
, the Company had the following derivatives related to crude oil percentage basis swaps in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Percentage Basis Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Purchased
|
|
BPD
|
|
Fixed Percentage of NYMEX WTI
(Average % of WTI/Bbl)
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
273,000
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
276,000
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
276,000
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
Total
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average percentage
|
|
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
At
December 31, 2016
, the Company had the following derivatives related to crude oil percentage basis swaps in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Percentage Basis Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Purchased
|
|
BPD
|
|
Fixed Percentage of NYMEX WTI
(Average % of WTI/Bbl)
|
First Quarter 2017
|
270,000
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
273,000
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
276,000
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
276,000
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
Total
|
1,095,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.3
|
%
|
Gasoline Crack Spread Swap Contracts
At
December 31, 2016
, the Company had the following derivatives related to gasoline crack spread sales in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline Crack Spread Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Sold
|
|
BPD
|
|
Average Swap
($/Bbl)
|
First Quarter 2017
|
590,000
|
|
|
6,556
|
|
|
$
|
10.21
|
|
Total
|
590,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.21
|
|
Diesel Crack Spread Swap Contracts
At
December 31, 2016
, the Company had the following derivatives related to diesel crack spread sales in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel Crack Spread Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Sold
|
|
BPD
|
|
Average Swap
($/Bbl)
|
First Quarter 2017
|
590,000
|
|
|
6,556
|
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
Total
|
590,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
2/1/1 Crack Spread Swap Contracts
At
December 31, 2016
, the Company had the following derivatives related to 2/1/1 crack spread sales in its fuel products segment, none of which are designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/1/1 Crack Spread Swap Contracts by Expiration Dates
|
Barrels Sold
|
|
BPD
|
|
Average Swap
($/Bbl)
|
First Quarter 2017
|
590,000
|
|
|
6,556
|
|
|
$
|
11.91
|
|
Total
|
590,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.91
|
|
9.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. Observable inputs are from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. These tiers include the following:
|
|
•
|
Level 1 — inputs include observable unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
|
|
|
•
|
Level 2 — inputs include other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable
|
|
|
•
|
Level 3 — inputs include unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions
|
In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation techniques and prioritizes the use of observable inputs. The availability of observable inputs varies from instrument to instrument and depends on a variety of factors including the type of instrument, whether the instrument is actively traded and other characteristics particular to the instrument. For many financial instruments, pricing inputs are readily observable in the market, the valuation methodology used is widely accepted by market participants and the valuation does not require significant management judgment. For other financial instruments, pricing inputs are less observable in the marketplace and may require management judgment.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Derivative Assets and Liabilities
Derivative instruments are reported in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements at fair value. The Company’s commodity derivative instruments consist of over-the-counter (“OTC”) contracts, which are not traded on a public exchange. Substantially all of the Company’s commodity derivative instruments are with counterparties that have long-term credit ratings of at least
Baa1 and BBB+
by Moody’s and S&P, respectively.
To estimate the fair values of the Company’s commodity derivative instruments, the Company uses the forward rate, the strike price, contractual notional amounts, the risk free rate of return and contract maturity. To estimate the fair value of the Company’s fixed-to-floating interest rate swap derivative instrument prior to settlement, the Company used discounted cash flows, which use observable inputs such as maturity and market interest rates. Various analytical tests are performed to validate the counterparty data. The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments are adjusted for nonperformance risk and creditworthiness of the hedging entities through the Company’s credit valuation adjustment (“CVA”). The CVA is calculated at the counterparty level utilizing the fair value exposure at each payment date and applying a weighted probability of the appropriate survival and marginal default percentages. The Company uses the counterparty’s marginal default rate and the Company’s survival rate when the Company is in a net asset position at the payment date and uses the Company’s marginal default rate and the counterparty’s survival rate when the Company is in a net liability position at the payment date. As a result of applying the applicable CVA at
March 31, 2017
, the Company’s net assets were increased by approximately
$0.2 million
and net liabilities were reduced by approximately
$0.3 million
. As a result of applying the CVA at
December 31, 2016
, the Company’s net assets were increased by less than
$0.1 million
and net liabilities were reduced by approximately
$0.5 million
.
Observable inputs utilized to estimate the fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments were based primarily on inputs that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. Based on the use of various unobservable inputs, principally nonperformance risk, creditworthiness of the hedging entities and unobservable inputs in the forward rate, the Company has categorized these derivative instruments as Level 3. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those unobservable inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The Company believes it has obtained the most accurate information available for the types of derivative instruments it holds. See
Note 8
for further information on derivative instruments.
Pension Assets
Pension assets are reported at fair value in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. At
March 31, 2017
, the Company’s investments associated with its pension plan (as such term is hereinafter defined) primarily consisted of mutual funds. The mutual funds are valued at the net asset value (“NAV”) of shares in each fund held by the pension plan at quarter end as provided by the respective investment sponsors or investment advisers. Plan investments can be redeemed within a short time frame (approximately 10 business days), if requested. See
Note 10
for further information on pension assets.
Renewable Identification Numbers Obligation
The RINs Obligation is categorized as Level 2 and is measured at fair value using the market approach based on quoted prices from an independent pricing service. See
Note 5
for further information on the Company’s RINs Obligation.
Hierarchy of Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The Company’s recurring assets and liabilities measured at fair value at
March 31, 2017
, and
December 31, 2016
, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Crude oil swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Crude oil percent basis swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Crude oil basis swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Total derivative assets
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Pension plan investments
|
0.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Total recurring assets at fair value
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil swaps
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Crude oil basis swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.0
|
)
|
Crude oil percentage basis swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Gasoline crack spread swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
Diesel crack spread swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
2/1/1 crack spread swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
Natural gas swaps
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Total derivative liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
RINs Obligation
|
—
|
|
|
(33.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(33.4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(79.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(79.3
|
)
|
Total recurring liabilities at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(33.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(79.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(94.1
|
)
|
The table below sets forth a summary of net changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities for the
three months ended March 31, 2017
and
2016
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Fair value at January 1,
|
$
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33.9
|
)
|
Realized loss on derivative instruments
|
4.9
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments
|
10.6
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Settlements
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
(12.3
|
)
|
Transfers in (out) of Level 3
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fair value at March 31,
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29.3
|
)
|
Total gain included in net loss attributable to changes in unrealized gain relating to financial assets and liabilities held as of March 31,
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
All settlements from derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and deemed “effective” are included in sales for gasoline, diesel and jet fuel derivatives, and cost of sales for crude oil derivatives in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations in the period that the hedged cash flow occurs. Any “ineffectiveness” associated with these settlements from derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in earnings in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. All settlements from derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges are accrued and recorded as an adjustment to interest expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. All settlements from derivative instruments not designated as hedges are recorded in gain (loss) on derivative
instruments in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 8
for further information on derivative instruments.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
Certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment. Assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations are recorded at their fair value as of the date of acquisition.
The Company reviews for goodwill impairment annually on
October 1
and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate its carrying value may not be recoverable. The fair value of the reporting units is determined using the income approach. The income approach focuses on the income-producing capability of an asset, measuring the current value of the asset by calculating the present value of its future economic benefits such as cash earnings, cost savings, corporate tax structure and product offerings. Value indications are developed by discounting expected cash flows to their present value at a rate of return that incorporates the risk-free rate for the use of funds, the expected rate of inflation and risks associated with the reporting unit. These assets would generally be classified within Level 3, in the event that the Company were required to measure and record such assets at fair value within its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used, including indefinite-lived intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, when events or circumstances warrant such a review. Fair value is determined primarily using anticipated cash flows assumed by a market participant discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved and these assets would generally be classified within Level 3, in the event that the Company was required to measure and record such assets at fair value within its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents is considered to be representative of its fair value.
Debt
The estimated fair value of long-term debt at
March 31, 2017
, and
December 31, 2016
, consists primarily of senior notes. The estimated aggregate fair value of the Company’s senior notes defined as Level 1 was based upon quoted market prices in an active market. The estimated aggregate fair value of the Company’s senior secured notes classified as Level 2 was based upon directly observable inputs. The carrying value of borrowings, if any, under the Company’s revolving credit facility, capital lease obligations and other obligations approximate their fair values as determined by discounted cash flows and are classified as Level 3. See
Note 7
for further information on long-term debt.
The Company’s carrying and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, carried at adjusted historical cost, at
March 31, 2017
, and
December 31, 2016
, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Level
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying Value
|
Financial Instrument:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes
|
1
|
|
$
|
1,341.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,553.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,334.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,552.2
|
|
Senior secured notes
|
2
|
|
$
|
462.5
|
|
|
$
|
385.2
|
|
|
$
|
458.8
|
|
|
$
|
384.5
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
3
|
|
$
|
35.4
|
|
|
$
|
35.4
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
Capital lease and other obligations
|
3
|
|
$
|
53.5
|
|
|
$
|
53.5
|
|
|
$
|
54.5
|
|
|
$
|
54.5
|
|
10.
Employee Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic benefit income for the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Interest cost
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Net periodic benefit income
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
At
March 31, 2017
, and
December 31, 2016
, the Company’s investments associated with its pension plan primarily consisted of (i) cash and cash equivalents and (ii) mutual funds. Mutual funds are valued based on the NAV per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient to estimate fair value due to the absence of readily available market prices. NAV’s are provided by the respective investment sponsors or investment advisers and are subsequently reviewed and necessary to make an adjustment at the balance sheet date. In determining whether an adjustment to the external valuation is required, the Company will review material factors that could affect the valuation, such as changes to the composition of performance of the underlying investments or comparable investments, overall market conditions, expected sale prices for private investments which are probable of being sold in the short-term and other economic factors that may possibly have a favorable or unfavorable effect on the reported external valuation. See
Note 9
for the definition of Level 1.
The Company’s pension plan assets measured at fair value at
March 31, 2017
, and
December 31, 2016
, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Total
|
Plan assets subject to leveling:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Total plan assets subject to leveling
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Plan assets measured at net asset value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic equities
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Foreign equities
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Total plan assets measured at net asset value
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
Total plan assets
|
|
|
$
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.8
|
|
Investment Fund Strategies
Domestic equity funds include funds that invest in U.S. common and preferred stocks. Foreign equity funds invest in securities issued by companies listed on international stock exchanges. Certain funds have value and growth objectives and managers may attempt to profit from security mispricing in equity markets to meet these objectives. Short-term investments (including commercial paper, certificates of deposits and government repurchase agreements) and derivatives may be used for hedging purposes to limit exposure to various risk factors.
Fixed income funds invest in U.S. dollar-denominated, investment grade bonds, including U.S. Treasury and government agency securities, corporate bonds and mortgage and asset-backed securities. These funds may also invest in any combination of non-investment grade bonds, non-U.S. dollar-denominated bonds and bonds issued by issuers in emerging capital markets. Short-term investments (including commercial paper, certificates of deposits and government repurchase agreements) and derivatives may be used for hedging purposes to limit exposure to various risk factors.
11.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The table below sets forth a summary of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Amount Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Derivative gains (losses) reflected in gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
16.0
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
—
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of defined benefit pension plans:
|
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(1)
|
This accumulated other comprehensive loss component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit income. See
Note 10
for additional details.
|
12.
Earnings Per Unit
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
(in millions, except unit and per unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67.7
|
)
|
General partner’s interest in net loss
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Net loss available to limited partners
|
$
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66.3
|
)
|
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average limited partner units outstanding
|
77,412,634
|
|
|
76,449,841
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
Participating securities — phantom units
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Diluted weighted average limited partner units outstanding
(1)
|
77,412,634
|
|
|
76,449,841
|
|
Limited partners’ interest basic and diluted net loss per unit
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
(1)
Total diluted weighted average limited partner units outstanding excludes
0.8 million
of dilutive phantom units for the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
. Total diluted weighted average limited partner units outstanding excludes less than
0.1 million
of dilutive phantom units for the
three months ended
March 31, 2016
.
13.
Segments and Related Information
a. Segment Reporting
The Company manages its business in multiple operating segments, which are grouped on the basis of similar product, market and operating factors into the following reportable segments:
|
|
•
|
Specialty Products.
The specialty products segment produces a variety of lubricating oils, solvents, waxes, synthetic lubricants and other products which are sold to customers who purchase these products primarily as raw material components for basic automotive, industrial and consumer goods. Specialty products also include synthetic lubricants used primarily in manufacturing, mining and automotive applications.
|
|
|
•
|
Fuel Products
. The fuel products segment produces primarily gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and asphalt which are primarily sold to customers located in the PADD 2, PADD 3 and PADD 4 areas within the U.S.
|
|
|
•
|
Oilfield Services.
The oilfield services segment markets its products and oilfield services including drilling fluids, completion fluids and solids control services to the oil and gas industry.
|
The accounting policies of the reporting segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies as disclosed in Note 2 — “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Part II, Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of the Company’s
2016
Annual Report, except that the disaggregated financial results for the reporting segments have been prepared using a management approach, which is consistent with the basis and manner in which management internally disaggregates financial information for the purposes of assisting internal operating decisions. The Company accounts for intersegment sales and transfers at cost plus a specified mark-up. The Company evaluates performance based upon Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure). The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA for any period as: (1) net income (loss) plus (2)(a) interest expense; (b) income taxes; (c) depreciation and amortization; (d) impairment; (e) unrealized losses from mark to market accounting for hedging activities; (f) realized gains under derivative instruments excluded from the determination of net income (loss); (g) non-cash equity-based compensation expense and other non-cash items (excluding items such as accruals of cash expenses in a future period or amortization of a prepaid cash expense) that were deducted in computing net income (loss); (h) debt refinancing fees, premiums and penalties; (i) any net loss realized in connection with an asset sale that was deducted in computing net income (loss) and (j) all extraordinary, unusual or non-recurring items of gain or loss, or revenue or expense; minus (3)(a) unrealized gains from mark to market accounting for hedging activities; (b) realized losses under derivative instruments excluded from the determination of net income (loss) and (c) other non-recurring expenses and unrealized items that reduced net income (loss) for a prior period, but represent a cash item in the current period.
The Company manages its assets on a total company basis, not by segment. Therefore, management does not review any asset information by segment and, accordingly, the Company does not report asset information by segment.
Reportable segment information for the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
|
Specialty
Products
|
|
Fuel
Products
|
|
Oilfield
Services
|
|
Combined
Segments
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
$
|
337.2
|
|
|
$
|
549.3
|
|
|
$
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
937.4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
937.4
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
0.1
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Total sales
|
$
|
337.3
|
|
|
$
|
564.5
|
|
|
$
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
952.7
|
|
|
$
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
937.4
|
|
Loss from unconsolidated affiliates
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
45.6
|
|
|
$
|
36.8
|
|
|
$
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
78.7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
78.7
|
|
Reconciling items to net loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
17.0
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
Impairment charges
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.6
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
Non-cash equity based compensation and other non-cash items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
|
Specialty
Products
|
|
Fuel
Products
|
|
Oilfield
Services
|
|
Combined
Segments
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
$
|
300.7
|
|
|
$
|
379.9
|
|
|
$
|
32.4
|
|
|
$
|
713.0
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
713.0
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
0.4
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Total sales
|
$
|
301.1
|
|
|
$
|
383.6
|
|
|
$
|
32.4
|
|
|
$
|
717.1
|
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
713.0
|
|
Loss from unconsolidated affiliates
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(11.1
|
)
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
58.5
|
|
|
$
|
(46.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
Reconciling items to net loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
18.4
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on derivatives, not reflected in net loss or settled in a prior period
|
0.7
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
Non-cash equity based compensation and other non-cash items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(67.7
|
)
|
b. Geographic Information
International sales accounted for less than 10% of consolidated sales in each of the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
. Substantially all of the Company’s long-lived assets are domestically located.
c. Product Information
The Company offers specialty products primarily in categories consisting of lubricating oils, solvents, waxes, packaged and synthetic specialty products and other. Fuel products categories primarily consist of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, asphalt, heavy fuel oils and other. All oilfield services products are consolidated in a standalone category. The following table sets forth the major product category sales for the
three months ended March 31, 2017
and
2016
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Specialty products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubricating oils
|
$
|
151.3
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
129.2
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
Solvents
|
67.5
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
55.9
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
Waxes
|
31.0
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Packaged and synthetic specialty products
|
78.4
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
80.9
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Other
|
9.0
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Total
|
$
|
337.2
|
|
|
36.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
300.7
|
|
|
42.2
|
%
|
Fuel products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline
|
$
|
228.2
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
162.2
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
Diesel
|
206.8
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
138.9
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
Jet fuel
|
37.6
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Asphalt, heavy fuel oils and other
|
76.7
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
Total
|
$
|
549.3
|
|
|
58.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
379.9
|
|
|
53.3
|
%
|
Oilfield services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
50.9
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
32.4
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Consolidated sales
|
$
|
937.4
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
713.0
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
d. Major Customers
During the
three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, the Company had
no
customer that represented 10% or greater of consolidated sales.
e. Major Suppliers
During the
three months ended March 31, 2017
and
2016
, the Company had
two
suppliers that supplied approximately
66.2%
and
52.8%
, respectively, of its crude oil supply.
14.
Subsequent Events
On
May 4, 2017
, the EPA granted certain of the Company’s refineries a “small refinery exemption” under the RFS for the full year
2016
, as provided for under the CAA. In granting those exemptions, the EPA determined that for the full year
2016
, compliance with the RFS would represent a “disproportionate economic hardship” for these refineries.