Quarterly Report (10-q)

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



[X]	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	for the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2017
	or



[ ]	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	for the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 001-34624

Umpqua Holdings Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



OREGON	93-1261319
(State or Other Jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
of Incorporation or Organization)

One SW Columbia Street, Suite 1200

Portland, Oregon 97258

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)

(503) 727-4100

(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

[X] Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer

[ ] Smaller reporting company [ ] Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding for each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date:

Common stock, no par value: 220,403,834 shares outstanding as of April 30, 2017

Table of Contents

UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

Table of Contents



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	46
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	70
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	70
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION		71
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	71
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	71
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	72
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	72
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	72
Item 5.	Other Information	72
Item 6.	Exhibits	72
SIGNATURES		73
EXHIBIT INDEX		74

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)

UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)



(in thousands, except shares)
	March 31,			December 31,
	2017			2016
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks (restricted cash of $27,557 and $51,017)	$	262,655		$	331,994
Interest bearing cash and temporary investments (restricted cash of $645 and $0)	421,991			1,117,438
Total cash and cash equivalents	684,646			1,449,432
Investment securities
Trading, at fair value	11,241			10,964
Available for sale, at fair value	3,243,408			2,701,220
Held to maturity, at amortized cost	4,121			4,216
Loans held for sale, at fair value	372,073			387,318
Loans and leases	17,829,638			17,508,663
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(136,292		)	(133,984		)
Net loans and leases	17,693,346			17,374,679
Restricted equity securities	45,522			45,528
Premises and equipment, net	293,133			303,882
Goodwill	1,787,651			1,787,651
Other intangible assets, net	35,197			36,886
Residential mortgage servicing rights, at fair value	142,344			142,973
Other real estate owned	6,518			6,738
Bank owned life insurance	301,777			299,673
Deferred tax asset, net	8,464			34,322
Other assets	232,017			227,637
Total assets	$	24,861,458		$	24,813,119
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits
Noninterest bearing	$	6,021,585		$	5,861,469
Interest bearing	13,145,708			13,159,516
Total deposits	19,167,293			19,020,985
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	304,280			352,948
Term debt	852,308			852,397
Junior subordinated debentures, at fair value	263,605			262,209
Junior subordinated debentures, at amortized cost	100,851			100,931
Other liabilities	241,971			306,854
Total liabilities	20,930,308			20,896,324
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 8)
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, no par value, shares authorized: 400,000,000 in 2017 and 2016; issued and outstanding: 220,349,111 in 2017 and 220,177,030 in 2016	3,516,537			3,515,299
Retained earnings	433,417			422,839
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(18,804		)	(21,343		)
Total shareholders' equity	3,931,150			3,916,795
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	24,861,458		$	24,813,119

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)



(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
INTEREST INCOME
Interest and fees on loans and leases	$	205,996		$	217,928
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
Taxable	13,931			13,055
Exempt from federal income tax	2,242			2,235
Dividends	388			366
Interest on temporary investments and interest bearing deposits	1,557			480
Total interest income	224,114			234,064
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on deposits	9,648			8,413
Interest on securities sold under agreement to repurchase	30			36
Interest on term debt	3,510			4,186
Interest on junior subordinated debentures	4,201			3,727
Total interest expense	17,389			16,362
Net interest income	206,725			217,702
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES	11,672			4,823
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses	195,053			212,879
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposits	14,729			14,516
Brokerage revenue	4,122			4,094
Residential mortgage banking revenue, net	26,834			15,426
(Loss) gain on investment securities, net	(2		)	696
Gain on loan sales, net	1,754			2,371
Loss on junior subordinated debentures carried at fair value	(1,555		)	(1,572		)
BOLI income	2,069			2,139
Other income	12,274			8,281
Total non-interest income	60,225			45,951
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and employee benefits	106,473			106,538
Occupancy and equipment, net	38,673			38,295
Communications	5,104			5,564
Marketing	1,733			2,850
Services	11,305			10,671
FDIC assessments	4,087			3,721
Loss on other real estate owned, net	82			1,389
Intangible amortization	1,689			2,560
Merger related expenses	1,020			3,450
Goodwill impairment	—			142
Other expenses	12,548			8,809
Total non-interest expense	182,714			183,989
Income before provision for income taxes	72,564			74,841
Provision for income taxes	26,561			27,272
Net income	$	46,003		$	47,569

Table of Contents

UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)



(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017		2016
Net income	$	46,003	$	47,569
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities	12		29
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	45,991	$	47,540
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$0.21		$0.22
Diluted	$0.21		$0.22
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	220,287		220,227
Diluted	220,779		221,052

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Net income	$	46,003		$	47,569
Available for sale securities:
Unrealized gains arising during the period	4,142			31,651
Income tax expense related to unrealized gains	(1,604		)	(12,249		)

Reclassification adjustment for net realized losses (gains) in earnings	2			(696		)
Income tax (benefit) expense related to realized gains	(1		)	269
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	2,539			18,975
Comprehensive income	$	48,542		$	66,544

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)



(in thousands, except shares)									Accumulated
									Other
	Common Stock					Retained			Comprehensive
	Shares		Amount			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Total
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2016	220,171,091		$	3,520,591		$	331,301		$	(2,558	)	$	3,849,334
Net income						232,940						232,940
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax									(18,785		)	(18,785		)
Stock-based compensation			9,790									9,790
Stock repurchased and retired	(1,117,061	)	(17,708		)							(17,708		)
Issuances of common stock under stock plans	1,123,000		2,626									2,626
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.64 per share)						(141,402		)				(141,402		)
Balance at December 31, 2016	220,177,030		$	3,515,299		$	422,839		$	(21,343	)	$	3,916,795

BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2017	220,177,030		$	3,515,299		$	422,839		$	(21,343	)	$	3,916,795
Net income						46,003						46,003
Other comprehensive income, net of tax									2,539			2,539
Stock-based compensation			2,804									2,804
Stock repurchased and retired	(99,033	)	(1,796		)							(1,796		)
Issuances of common stock under stock plans	271,114		230									230
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.16 per share)						(35,425		)				(35,425		)
Balance at March 31, 2017	220,349,111		$	3,516,537		$	433,417		$	(18,804	)	$	3,931,150

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	46,003		$	47,569
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of investment premiums, net	6,878			4,602
Loss (gain) on sale of investment securities, net	2			(696		)
Loss (gain) on sale of other real estate owned, net	15			(34		)
Valuation adjustment on other real estate owned	67			1,423
Provision for loan and lease losses	11,672			4,823
Change in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance	(2,104		)	(2,208		)
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	14,862			14,828
Loss on sale of premises and equipment	—			299
Additions to residential mortgage servicing rights carried at fair value	(7,041		)	(5,980		)
Change in fair value of residential mortgage servicing rights carried at fair value	7,670			20,625
Change in junior subordinated debentures carried at fair value	1,396			1,460
Stock-based compensation	2,804			3,227
Net increase in trading account assets	(277		)	(205		)
Gain on sale of loans	(22,746		)	(33,340		)
Change in loans held for sale carried at fair value	(4,885		)	(4,861		)
Origination of loans held for sale	(754,715		)	(764,076		)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale	795,837			759,893
Goodwill impairment	—			142
Change in other assets and liabilities:
Net decrease (increase) in other assets	19,235			(19,844		)
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities	(54,791		)	15,193
Net cash provided by operating activities	59,882			42,840
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of investment securities available for sale	(672,148		)	(96,603		)
Proceeds from investment securities available for sale	127,195			103,629
Proceeds from investment securities held to maturity	124			111
Purchases of restricted equity securities	(1		)	(600		)
Redemption of restricted equity securities	7			4
Net change in loans and leases	(360,236		)	(505,995		)
Proceeds from sales of loans	25,259			151,466
Net change in premises and equipment	(6,937		)	(10,099		)
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance death benefits	—			25
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned	927			2,461
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(885,810	)	$	(355,601	)

Table of Contents

UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued) (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposit liabilities	$	146,619		$	456,620
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase	(48,668		)	20,643
Proceeds from term debt borrowings	100,000			115,000
Repayment of term debt borrowings	(100,000		)	(100,000		)
Dividends paid on common stock	(35,243		)	(35,281		)
Proceeds from stock options exercised	230			513
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(1,796		)	(5,539		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	61,142			451,956
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(764,786		)	139,195
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	1,449,432			773,725
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	684,646		$	912,920

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	18,161		$	18,313
Income taxes	$	8,281		$	8,165
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Change in unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale, net of taxes	$	2,539		$	18,975
Cash dividend declared on common stock and payable after period-end	$	35,264		$	35,247
Transfer of loans to loans held for sale	$	—		$	255,976
Change in GNMA mortgage loans recognized due to repurchase option	$	(5,603	)	$	(5,021	)
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	$	789		$	2,210
Transfers from other real estate owned to loans due to internal financing	$	—		$	256
Receivable from BOLI death benefits	$	—		$	372

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accounting and financial reporting policies of Umpqua Holdings Corporation conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. The condensed consolidated financial statements have not been audited. A more detailed description of our accounting policies is included in the 2016 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the 2016 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. All references in this report to "Umpqua," "we," "our," "us," the "Company" or similar references mean Umpqua Holdings Corporation, and include our consolidated subsidiaries where the context so requires. References to "Bank" refer to our subsidiary Umpqua Bank, an Oregon state-chartered commercial bank, and references to "Umpqua Investments" refer to our subsidiary Umpqua Investments, Inc., a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser. The Bank also has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Financial Pacific Leasing Inc., a commercial equipment leasing company. Pivotus Ventures, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Umpqua Holdings Corporation, which focuses on advancing bank innovation by developing new bank platforms that could have a significant impact on the experience and economics of banking.

In preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to March 31, 2017 for potential recognition or disclosure. In management's opinion, all accounting adjustments necessary to accurately reflect the financial position and results of operations on the accompanying financial statements have been made. These adjustments include normal and recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair and accurate presentation. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or any other interim period. Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts have been made to conform to current classifications.

Note 2 – Investment Securities

The following table presents the amortized costs, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and approximate fair values of investment securities at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	303,534	$	6,276	$	(2,591	)	$	307,219
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	2,968,607		3,693		(38,081		)	2,934,219
Investments in mutual funds and other equity securities	1,959		11		—			1,970
	$	3,274,100	$	9,980	$	(40,672	)	$	3,243,408
HELD TO MATURITY:
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	$	4,121	$	1,025	$	—		$	5,146
	$	4,121	$	1,025	$	—		$	5,146

Table of Contents



(in thousands)	December 31, 2016
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	305,708	$	5,526	$	(3,537	)	$	307,697
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	2,428,387		3,664		(40,498		)	2,391,553
Investments in mutual funds and other equity securities	1,959		11		—			1,970
	$	2,736,054	$	9,201	$	(44,035	)	$	2,701,220
HELD TO MATURITY:
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	$	4,216	$	1,001	$	—		$	5,217
	$	4,216	$	1,001	$	—		$	5,217

Investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are presented in the following tables, based on the length of time individual securities have been in an unrealized loss position.



March 31, 2017
(in thousands)	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	57,669	$	2,119	$	1,828	$	472	$	59,497	$	2,591
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	2,336,941		34,077		174,784		4,004		2,511,725		38,081
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	2,394,610	$	36,196	$	176,612	$	4,476	$	2,571,222	$	40,672



December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	71,571	$	3,065	$	1,828	$	472	$	73,399	$	3,537
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	1,855,304		35,981		182,804		4,517		2,038,108		40,498
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	1,926,875	$	39,046	$	184,632	$	4,989	$	2,111,507	$	44,035

The unrealized losses on obligations of states and political subdivisions were caused by changes in market interest rates or the widening of market spreads subsequent to the initial purchase of these securities. Management monitors the published credit ratings of these securities for material rating or outlook changes. As of March 31, 2017 , 92% of these securities were rated A3/A- or higher by rating agencies. Substantially all of the Company's obligations of states and political subdivisions are general obligation issuances. All of the available for sale residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations portfolio in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2017 are issued or guaranteed by government sponsored enterprises. The unrealized losses on residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations were caused by changes in market interest rates or the widening of market spreads subsequent to the initial purchase of these securities, and not concerns regarding the underlying credit of the issuers or the underlying collateral. It is expected that these securities will be settled at a price at least equal to the amortized cost of each investment.

Table of Contents

Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates or widening market spreads and not credit quality, and because the Bank does not intend to sell the securities and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may include holding each security until maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

The following table presents the maturities of investment securities at March 31, 2017 :



(in thousands)	Available For Sale				Held To Maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
AMOUNTS MATURING IN:
Three months or less	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	1
Over three months through twelve months	1,904		1,922		—		—
After one year through five years	80,558		81,463		—		—
After five years through ten years	402,632		406,211		9		10
After ten years	2,787,047		2,751,842		4,111		5,135
Other investment securities	1,959		1,970		—		—
	$	3,274,100	$	3,243,408	$	4,121	$	5,146

The following table presents the gross realized gains and losses on the sale of securities available for sale for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017				March 31, 2016
	Gains		Losses		Gains		Losses
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	—	$	2	$	696	$	—
	$	—	$	2	$	696	$	—

The following table presents, as of March 31, 2017 , investment securities which were pledged to secure borrowings, public deposits, and repurchase agreements as permitted or required by law:



(in thousands)	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
To Federal Home Loan Bank to secure borrowings	$	507	$	514
To state and local governments to secure public deposits	897,105		895,844
Other securities pledged principally to secure repurchase agreements	434,549		429,702
Total pledged securities	$	1,332,161	$	1,326,060

Table of Contents

Note 3 – Loans and Leases

The following table presents the major types of loans and leases, net of deferred fees and costs, as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	3,410,914	$	3,330,442
Owner occupied term, net	2,584,183		2,599,055
Multifamily, net	2,885,164		2,858,956
Construction & development, net	471,007		463,625
Residential development, net	145,479		142,984
Commercial
Term, net	1,620,311		1,508,780
LOC & other, net	1,114,160		1,116,259
Leases and equipment finance, net	1,000,376		950,588
Residential
Mortgage, net	2,916,924		2,887,971
Home equity loans & lines, net	1,015,138		1,011,844
Consumer & other, net	665,982		638,159
Total loans and leases, net of deferred fees and costs	$	17,829,638	$	17,508,663

The loan balances are net of deferred fees and costs of $70.2 million and $67.7 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively. Net loans also include discounts on acquired loans of $31.8 million and $41.3 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively. As of March 31, 2017 , loans totaling $10.4 billion were pledged to secure borrowings and available lines of credit.

The outstanding contractual unpaid principal balance of purchased impaired loans, excluding acquisition accounting adjustments, was $340.6 million and $368.2 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively. The carrying balance of purchased impaired loans was $260.3 million and $280.4 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.

The following table presents the changes in the accretable yield for purchased impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	95,579		$	132,829
Accretion to interest income	(8,912		)	(14,198		)
Disposals	(3,287		)	(8,513		)
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference	3,391			4,217
Balance, end of period	$	86,771		$	114,335

Table of Contents

Loans and leases sold

In the course of managing the loan and lease portfolio, at certain times, management may decide to sell loans and leases. The following table summarizes the carrying value of loans and leases sold by major loan type during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017		2016
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	1,707	$	8,509
Owner occupied term, net	6,675		9,661
Multifamily, net	—		129,430
Commercial
Term, net	2,630		1,494
Leases and equipment finance, net	12,493		—
Total	$	23,505	$	149,094

Note 4 – Allowance for Loan and Lease Loss and Credit Quality

The Bank's methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Loss ("ALLL") consists of three key elements: 1) the formula allowance; 2) the specific allowance; and 3) the unallocated allowance. By incorporating these factors into a single allowance requirement analysis, we believe all risk-based activities within the loan and lease portfolios are simultaneously considered.

Formula Allowance

When loans and leases are originated or acquired, they are assigned a risk rating that is reassessed periodically during the term of the loan or lease through the credit review process. The Bank's risk rating methodology assigns risk ratings ranging from 1 to 10 , where a higher rating represents higher risk. The 10 risk rating categories are a primary factor in determining an appropriate amount for the formula allowance.

The formula allowance is calculated by applying risk factors to various segments of pools of outstanding loans and leases. Risk factors are assigned to each portfolio segment based on management's evaluation of the losses inherent within each segment. Segments with greater risk of loss will therefore be assigned a higher risk factor.

Base risk – The portfolio is segmented into loan categories, and these categories are assigned a Base risk factor based on an evaluation of the loss inherent within each segment.

Extra risk – Additional risk factors provide for an additional allocation of ALLL based on the loan and lease risk rating system and loan delinquency, and reflect the increased level of inherent losses associated with more adversely classified loans and leases.

Risk factors may be changed periodically based on management's evaluation of the following factors: loss experience; changes in the level of non-performing loans and leases; regulatory exam results; changes in the level of adversely classified loans and leases; improvement or deterioration in economic conditions; and any other factors deemed relevant. Additionally, Financial Pacific Leasing Inc. considers the additional quantitative and qualitative factors: migration analysis; a static pool analysis of historic recoveries; and forecasting uncertainties. A migration analysis is a technique used to estimate the likelihood that an account will progress through the various delinquency states and ultimately be charged off.

Table of Contents

Specific Allowance

Regular credit reviews of the portfolio identify loans that are considered potentially impaired. Potentially impaired loans are referred to the ALLL Committee which reviews and approves designated loans as impaired. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, we determine that we will probably not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan contract, including scheduled interest payments. When we identify a loan as impaired, we measure the impairment using discounted cash flows or estimated note sale price, except when the sole remaining source of the repayment for the loan is the liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, we use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs, instead of discounted cash flows. If we determine that the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we either recognize an impairment reserve as a specific allowance to be provided for in the allowance for loan and lease losses or charge-off the impaired balance on collateral-dependent loans if it is determined that such amount represents a confirmed loss. Loans determined to be impaired are excluded from the formula allowance so as not to double-count the loss exposure.

The combination of the formula allowance component and the specific allowance component represents the allocated allowance for loan and lease losses. There is currently no unallocated allowance.

Management believes that the ALLL was adequate as of March 31, 2017 . There is, however, no assurance that future loan and lease losses will not exceed the levels provided for in the ALLL and could possibly result in additional charges to the provision for loan and lease losses.

The reserve for unfunded commitments ("RUC") is established to absorb inherent losses associated with our commitment to lend funds, such as with a letter or line of credit. The adequacy of the ALLL and RUC are monitored on a regular basis and are based on management's evaluation of numerous factors. These factors include the quality of the current loan portfolio; the trend in the loan portfolio's risk ratings; current economic conditions; loan concentrations; loan growth rates; past-due and non-performing trends; evaluation of specific loss estimates for all significant problem loans; historical charge-off and recovery experience; and other pertinent information.

There have been no significant changes to the Bank's ALLL methodology or policies in the periods presented.

Activity in the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The following table summarizes activity related to the allowance for loan and lease losses by loan and lease portfolio segment for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Commercial									Consumer
	Real Estate			Commercial			Residential			& Other			Total
Balance, beginning of period	$	47,795		$	58,840		$	17,946		$	9,403		$	133,984
Charge-offs	(339		)	(10,104		)	(210		)	(2,349		)	(13,002		)
Recoveries	400			2,030			197			1,011			3,638
Provision	1,150			8,351			33			2,138			11,672
Balance, end of period	$	49,006		$	59,117		$	17,966		$	10,203		$	136,292

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Commercial									Consumer
	Real Estate			Commercial			Residential			& Other			Total
Balance, beginning of period	$	54,293		$	47,487		$	22,017		$	6,525		$	130,322
Charge-offs	(502		)	(4,655		)	(337		)	(2,356		)	(7,850		)
Recoveries	500			1,173			231			1,044			2,948
(Recapture) Provision	(2,841		)	6,776			(1,014		)	1,902			4,823
Balance, end of period	$	51,450		$	50,781		$	20,897		$	7,115		$	130,243

Table of Contents

The valuation allowance on purchased impaired loans was increased by provision expense, which includes amounts related to subsequent deterioration of purchased impaired loans of $8,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . There was no provision expense that related to subsequent deterioration of purchased impaired loans recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2017 . The valuation allowance on purchased impaired loans was decreased by recaptured provision of $81,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and $777,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 .

The following table presents the allowance and recorded investment in loans and leases by portfolio segment as of March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017
	Commercial						Consumer
	Real Estate		Commercial		Residential		& Other		Total
Allowance for loans and leases:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	45,722	$	58,763	$	17,374	$	10,146	$	132,005
Individually evaluated for impairment	735		7		—		—		742
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	2,549		347		592		57		3,545
Total	$	49,006	$	59,117	$	17,966	$	10,203	$	136,292
Loans and leases:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	9,243,447	$	3,714,197	$	3,890,613	$	665,412	$	17,513,669
Individually evaluated for impairment	40,353		15,357		—		—		55,710
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	212,947		5,293		41,449		570		260,259
Total	$	9,496,747	$	3,734,847	$	3,932,062	$	665,982	$	17,829,638



(in thousands)	March 31, 2016
	Commercial						Consumer
	Real Estate		Commercial		Residential		& Other		Total
Allowance for loans and leases:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	49,069	$	50,250	$	20,223	$	7,058	$	126,600
Individually evaluated for impairment	317		482		—		—		799
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	2,064		49		674		57		2,844
Total	$	51,450	$	50,781	$	20,897	$	7,115	$	130,243
Loans and leases:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	9,013,669	$	3,207,045	$	3,767,604	$	553,723	$	16,542,041
Individually evaluated for impairment	30,819		20,429		—		—		51,248
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	292,567		13,529		55,250		948		362,294
Total	$	9,337,055	$	3,241,003	$	3,822,854	$	554,671	$	16,955,583

Table of Contents

Summary of Reserve for Unfunded Commitments Activity

The following table presents a summary of activity in the RUC and unfunded commitments for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,611		$	3,574
Net charge to other expense	(116		)	(92		)
Balance, end of period	$	3,495		$	3,482



(in thousands)
	Total
Unfunded loan and lease commitments:
March 31, 2017	$	4,215,048
March 31, 2016	$	3,703,352

Asset Quality and Non-Performing Loans and Leases

We manage asset quality and control credit risk through diversification of the loan and lease portfolio and the application of policies designed to promote sound underwriting and loan and lease monitoring practices. The Bank's Credit Quality Administration is charged with monitoring asset quality, establishing credit policies and procedures and enforcing the consistent application of these policies and procedures across the Bank. Reviews of non-performing, past due loans and leases and larger credits, designed to identify potential charges to the allowance for loan and lease losses, and to determine the adequacy of the allowance, are conducted on an ongoing basis. These reviews consider such factors as the financial strength of borrowers, the value of the applicable collateral, loan and lease loss experience, estimated loan and lease losses, growth in the loan and lease portfolio, prevailing economic conditions and other factors.

Table of Contents

Non-Accrual Loans and Leases and Loans and Leases Past Due

The following table summarizes our non-accrual loans and leases and loans and leases past due, by loan and lease class, as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017
	Greater than 30 to 59 Days Past Due		60 to 89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days and Accruing		Total Past Due		Non-Accrual		Current & Other (1)		Total Loans and Leases
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	5,679	$	1,863	$	41	$	7,583	$	1,553	$	3,401,778	$	3,410,914
Owner occupied term, net	965		1,597		—		2,562		8,000		2,573,621		2,584,183
Multifamily, net	2,170		—		—		2,170		387		2,882,607		2,885,164
Construction & development, net	—		—		—		—		—		471,007		471,007
Residential development, net	—		—		—		—		—		145,479		145,479
Commercial
Term, net	1		—		214		215		6,782		1,613,314		1,620,311
LOC & other, net	4,095		6,885		172		11,152		3,162		1,099,846		1,114,160
Leases and equipment finance, net	10,001		4,885		—		14,886		9,031		976,459		1,000,376
Residential
Mortgage, net (2)	4,716		1,284		25,180		31,180		—		2,885,744		2,916,924
Home equity loans & lines, net	1,552		522		2,148		4,222		—		1,010,916		1,015,138
Consumer & other, net	2,537		778		920		4,235		—		661,747		665,982
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	31,716	$	17,814	$	28,675	$	78,205	$	28,915	$	17,722,518	$	17,829,638

(1) Other includes purchased credit impaired loans of $260.3 million .

(2) Includes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that Umpqua has the right but not the obligation to repurchase that are past due 90 days or more, totaling $ 5.3 million at March 31, 2017 .

Table of Contents



(in thousands)	December 31, 2016
	Greater than 30 to 59 Days Past Due		60 to 89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days and Accruing		Total Past Due		Non-Accrual		Current & Other (1)		Total Loans and Leases



Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	718	$	1,027	$	1,047	$	2,792	$	2,100	$	3,325,550	$	3,330,442
Owner occupied term, net	974		4,539		1		5,514		4,391		2,589,150		2,599,055
Multifamily, net	—		—		—		—		476		2,858,480		2,858,956
Construction & development, net	—		—		—		—		—		463,625		463,625
Residential development, net	—		—		—		—		—		142,984		142,984
Commercial
Term, net	319		233		—		552		6,880		1,501,348		1,508,780
LOC & other, net	1,673		27		—		1,700		4,998		1,109,561		1,116,259
Leases and equipment finance, net	5,343		6,865		1,808		14,016		8,920		927,652		950,588
Residential
Mortgage, net (2)	10		3,114		33,703		36,827		—		2,851,144		2,887,971
Home equity loans & lines, net	289		848		2,080		3,217		—		1,008,627		1,011,844
Consumer & other, net	3,261		1,185		587		5,033		—		633,126		638,159
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	12,587	$	17,838	$	39,226	$	69,651	$	27,765	$	17,411,247	$	17,508,663

(1) Other includes purchased credit impaired loans of $ 280.4 million .

(2) Includes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that Umpqua has the right but not the obligation to repurchase that are past due 90 days or more, totaling $ 10.9 million at December 31, 2016 .

Impaired Loans

Loans with no related allowance reported generally represent non-accrual loans, which are also considered impaired loans. The Bank recognizes the charge-off on impaired loans in the period it arises for collateral-dependent loans. Therefore, the non-accrual loans as of March 31, 2017 have already been written down to their estimated net realizable value and are expected to be resolved with no additional material loss, absent further decline in market prices. The valuation allowance on impaired loans primarily represents the impairment reserves on performing restructured loans, and is measured by comparing the present value of expected future cash flows on the restructured loans discounted at the interest rate of the original loan agreement to the loan's carrying value.

Table of Contents

The following tables summarize our impaired loans by loan class as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017
	Unpaid		Recorded Investment
	Principal		Without		With		Related
	Balance		Allowance		Allowance		Allowance
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	16,762	$	—	$	16,704	$	393
Owner occupied term, net	12,243		5,528		5,900		127
Multifamily, net	4,006		387		3,519		105
Construction & development, net	1,091		—		1,091		14
Residential development, net	—		—		7,224		96
Commercial
Term, net	16,282		5,735		3,076		6
LOC & other, net	6,697		3,162		2,919		1
Leases and equipment finance, net	465		465		—		—
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	57,546	$	15,277	$	40,433	$	742



(in thousands)	December 31, 2016
	Unpaid		Recorded Investment
	Principal		Without		With		Related
	Balance		Allowance		Allowance		Allowance
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	19,797	$	278	$	19,116	$	524
Owner occupied term, net	8,467		1,768		6,445		131
Multifamily, net	4,015		476		3,520		123
Construction & development, net	1,091		—		1,091		9
Residential development, net	7,304		—		7,304		72
Commercial
Term, net	16,875		5,982		3,239		8
LOC & other, net	8,279		4,755		—		—
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	65,828	$	13,259	$	40,715	$	867

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans by loan class for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017				March 31, 2016
	Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	15,735	$	149	$	10,403	$	108
Owner occupied term, net	8,952		61		7,939		61
Multifamily, net	3,939		30		3,775		30
Construction & development, net	1,312		11		1,091		11
Residential development, net	7,445		75		7,912		81
Commercial
Term, net	12,827		35		19,612		28
LOC & other, net	4,966		12		3,028		20
Leases, net	232		—		—		—
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	55,408	$	373	$	53,760	$	339

The impaired loans for which these interest income amounts were recognized primarily relate to accruing restructured loans.

Credit Quality Indicators

As previously noted, the Bank's risk rating methodology assigns risk ratings ranging from 1 to 10 , where a higher rating represents higher risk. The Bank differentiates its lending portfolios into homogeneous loans and leases and non-homogeneous loans and leases. Homogeneous loans and leases are not risk rated until they are greater than 30 days past due, and risk rating is based on the past due status of the loan or lease. The 10 risk rating categories can be generally described by the following groupings for loans and leases:

Minimal Risk —A minimal risk loan or lease, risk rated 1 , is to a borrower of the highest quality. The borrower has an unquestioned ability to produce consistent profits and service all obligations and can absorb severe market disturbances with little or no difficulty.

Low Risk —A low risk loan or lease, risk rated 2 , is similar in characteristics to a minimal risk loan. Margins may be smaller or protective elements may be subject to greater fluctuation. The borrower will have a strong demonstrated ability to produce profits, provide ample debt service coverage and to absorb market disturbances.

Modest Risk —A modest risk loan or lease, risk rated 3 , is a desirable loan or lease with excellent sources of repayment and no currently identifiable risk associated with collection. The borrower exhibits a very strong capacity to repay the credit in accordance with the repayment agreement. The borrower may be susceptible to economic cycles, but will have reserves to weather these cycles.

Average Risk —An average risk loan or lease, risk rated 4 , is an attractive loan or lease with sound sources of repayment and no material collection or repayment weakness evident. The borrower has an acceptable capacity to pay in accordance with the agreement. The borrower is susceptible to economic cycles and more efficient competition, but should have modest reserves sufficient to survive all but the most severe downturns or major setbacks.

Acceptable Risk —An acceptable risk loan or lease, risk rated 5 , is a loan or lease with lower than average, but still acceptable credit risk. These borrowers may have higher leverage, less certain but viable repayment sources, have limited financial reserves and may possess weaknesses that can be adequately mitigated through collateral, structural or credit enhancement. The borrower is susceptible to economic cycles and is less resilient to negative market forces or financial events. Reserves may be insufficient to survive a modest downturn.

Table of Contents

Watch— A watch loan or lease, risk rated 6 , is still pass-rated, but represents the lowest level of acceptable risk due to an emerging risk element or declining performance trend. Watch ratings are expected to be temporary, with issues resolved or manifested to the extent that a higher or lower rating would be appropriate. The borrower should have a plausible plan, with reasonable certainty of success, to correct the problems in a short period of time.

Special Mention— A special mention loan or lease, risk rated 7 , has potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or the institution's credit position at some future date. They contain unfavorable characteristics and are generally undesirable. Loans and leases in this category are currently protected but are potentially weak and constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of a substandard classification. A special mention loan or lease has potential weaknesses, which if not checked or corrected, weaken the asset or inadequately protect the Bank's position at some future date. For commercial and commercial real estate homogeneous loans and leases to be classified as special mention, risk rated 7 , the loan or lease is greater than 30 to 59 days past due from the required payment date at month-end. Residential and consumer and other homogeneous loans are risk rated 7 , when the loan is greater than 30 to 89 days past due from the required payment date at month-end.

Substandard— A substandard asset, risk rated 8 , is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard assets, does not have to exist in individual assets classified substandard. Loans and leases are classified as substandard when they have unsatisfactory characteristics causing unacceptable levels of risk. A substandard loan or lease normally has one or more well-defined weaknesses that could jeopardize repayment of the debt. The likely need to liquidate assets to correct the problem, rather than repayment from successful operations is the key distinction between special mention and substandard. Commercial and commercial real estate homogeneous loans and leases that are classified as a substandard loan or lease, risk rated 8 , when the loan or lease 60 to 89 days past due from the required payment date at month-end. Residential and consumer and other homogeneous loans are classified as a substandard loan, risk rated 8 , when an open-end loan is 90 to 180 days past due from the required payment date at month-end or when a closed-end loan 90 to 120 days is past due from the required payment date at month-end.

Doubtful —Loans or leases classified as doubtful, risk rated 9 , have all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors, which may work towards strengthening of the asset, classification as a loss (and immediate charge-off) is deferred until more exact status may be determined. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, liquidation procedures, capital injection, and perfection of liens on additional collateral and refinancing plans. In certain circumstances, a doubtful rating will be temporary, while the Bank is awaiting an updated collateral valuation. In these cases, once the collateral is valued and appropriate margin applied, the remaining un-collateralized portion will be charged-off. The remaining balance, properly margined, may then be upgraded to substandard, however must remain on non-accrual. Commercial and commercial real estate homogeneous doubtful loans or leases, risk rated 9 , are 90 to 179 days past due from the required payment date at month-end.

Loss —Loans or leases classified as loss, risk rated 10 , are considered un-collectible and of such little value that the continuance as an active Bank asset is not warranted. This rating does not mean that the loan or lease has no recovery or salvage value, but rather that the loan or lease should be charged-off now, even though partial or full recovery may be possible in the future. For a commercial or commercial real estate homogeneous loss loan or lease to be risk rated 10 , the loan or lease is 180 days and more past due from the required payment date. These loans are generally charged-off in the month in which the 180 day time period elapses. Residential, consumer and other homogeneous loans are risk rated 10 , when a closed-end loan becomes past due 120 cumulative days or when an open-end retail loan that becomes past due 180 cumulative days from the contractual due date. These loans are generally charged-off in the month in which the 120 or 180 day period elapses.

Impaired— Loans are classified as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due, in accordance with the terms of the original loan agreement, without unreasonable delay. This generally includes all loans classified as non-accrual and troubled debt restructurings. Impaired loans are risk rated for internal and regulatory rating purposes, but presented separately for clarification.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our internal risk rating by loan and lease class for the loan and lease portfolio, including purchased credit impaired loans, as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017
	Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Impaired (1)		Total
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	3,289,051	$	55,328	$	48,403	$	248	$	1,180	$	16,704	$	3,410,914
Owner occupied term, net	2,457,239		66,413		46,341		183		2,579		11,428		2,584,183
Multifamily, net	2,844,856		21,805		14,597		—		—		3,906		2,885,164
Construction & development, net	465,728		1,689		2,499		—		—		1,091		471,007
Residential development, net	137,066		—		1,189		—		—		7,224		145,479
Commercial
Term, net	1,569,166		11,841		29,328		890		275		8,811		1,620,311
LOC & other, net	1,059,396		16,742		31,939		2		—		6,081		1,114,160
Leases and equipment finance, net	975,994		10,001		4,885		7,845		1,186		465		1,000,376
Residential
Mortgage, net (2)	2,855,718		3,428		55,751		—		2,027		—		2,916,924
Home equity loans & lines, net	1,008,705		2,781		3,350		—		302		—		1,015,138
Consumer & other, net	661,718		3,316		832		—		116		—		665,982
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	17,324,637	$	193,344	$	239,114	$	9,168	$	7,665	$	55,710	$	17,829,638

(1) The percentage of impaired loans classified as pass/watch, special mention, substandard, and doubtful was 7.8% , 1.9% , 84.9% , and 5.4% respectively, as of March 31, 2017 .

(2) Includes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that Umpqua has the right but not the obligation to repurchase that are past due 90 days or more, totaling $ 5.3 million at March 31, 2017 , which is included in the substandard category.



(in thousands)	December 31, 2016
	Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Impaired (1)		Total
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	3,205,241	$	55,194	$	48,699	$	1,368	$	546	$	19,394	$	3,330,442
Owner occupied term, net	2,466,247		75,189		46,781		972		1,653		8,213		2,599,055
Multifamily, net	2,828,370		11,903		14,687		—		—		3,996		2,858,956
Construction & development, net	458,328		1,712		2,494		—		—		1,091		463,625
Residential development, net	134,491		—		1,189		—		—		7,304		142,984
Commercial
Term, net	1,458,699		15,716		24,678		119		347		9,221		1,508,780
LOC & other, net	1,063,305		10,565		37,387		3		244		4,755		1,116,259
Leases and equipment finance, net	927,378		5,614		6,866		9,752		978		—		950,588
Residential
Mortgage, net (2)	2,830,547		1,803		53,607		—		2,014		—		2,887,971
Home equity loans & lines, net	1,006,647		1,490		2,727		—		980		—		1,011,844
Consumer & other, net	633,098		4,446		527		—		88		—		638,159
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	17,012,351	$	183,632	$	239,642	$	12,214	$	6,850	$	53,974	$	17,508,663

(1) The percentage of impaired loans classified as pass/watch, special mention, substandard and doubtful was 8.1% , 6.5% , 82.5% , and 2.9% , respectively, as of December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

(2) Includes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that Umpqua has the right but not the obligation to repurchase that are past due 90 days or more, totaling $ 10.9 million at December 31, 2016, which is included in the substandard category.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , impaired loans of $43.0 million and $40.7 million , respectively, were classified as accruing restructured loans, respectively. The restructurings were granted in response to borrower financial difficulty, and generally provide for a temporary modification of loan repayment terms. In order for a newly restructured loan to be considered for accrual status, the loan's collateral coverage generally will be greater than or equal to 100% of the loan balance, the loan is current on payments, and the borrower must either prefund an interest reserve or demonstrate the ability to make payments from a verified source of cash flow. Impaired restructured loans carry a specific allowance and the allowance on impaired restructured loans is calculated consistently across the portfolios.

There were no available commitments for troubled debt restructurings outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

The following tables present troubled debt restructurings by accrual versus non-accrual status and by loan class as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017
	Accrual		Non-Accrual		Total
	Status		Status		Modifications
Commercial real estate, net	$	29,934	$	—	$	29,934
Commercial, net	5,834		3,293		9,127
Residential, net	7,261		—		7,261
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	43,029	$	3,293	$	46,322



(in thousands)	December 31, 2016
	Accrual		Non-Accrual		Total
	Status		Status		Modifications
Commercial real estate, net	$	30,563	$	—	$	30,563
Commercial, net	3,054		3,345		6,399
Residential, net	7,050		—		7,050
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	40,667	$	3,345	$	44,012

The Bank's policy is that loans placed on non-accrual will typically remain on non-accrual status until all principal and interest payments are brought current and the prospect for future payment in accordance with the loan agreement appears relatively certain. The Bank's policy generally refers to six months of payment performance as sufficient to warrant a return to accrual status.

Table of Contents

The following tables present newly restructured loans that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Rate		Term		Interest Only		Payment		Combination		Total
	Modifications		Modifications		Modifications		Modifications		Modifications		Modifications
Commercial, net	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,919	$	2,919
Residential, net	—		—		—		—		253		253
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,172	$	3,172

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Rate		Term		Interest Only		Payment		Combination		Total
	Modifications		Modifications		Modifications		Modifications		Modifications		Modifications
Commercial real estate, net	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	209	$	209
Residential, net	—		—		—		—		132		132
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	341	$	341

For the periods presented in the tables above, the outstanding recorded investment was the same pre and post modification. There were $118,000 in financing receivables modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous 12 months for which there was a payment default during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and none for the three months ended March 31, 2016 .

Note 5–Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill totaled $1.8 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and represents the excess of the total acquisition price paid over the fair value of the assets acquired, net of the fair values of liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis at December 31 of each year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. No events or circumstances since the December 31, 2016 annual impairment test were noted that would indicate it was more likely than not a goodwill impairment exists.

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company's other intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the three months ended March 31, 2017 .



(in thousands)	Other Intangible Assets
	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	113,471	$	(67,963	)	$	45,508
Amortization	—		(8,622		)	(8,622		)
Balance, December 31, 2016	113,471		(76,585		)	36,886
Amortization	—		(1,689		)	(1,689		)
Balance, March 31, 2017	$	113,471	$	(78,274	)	$	35,197

Core deposit intangible asset's values were determined by an analysis of the cost differential between the core deposits inclusive of estimated servicing costs and alternative funding sources for core deposits acquired through acquisitions. The core deposit intangible assets are amortized on an accelerated basis over a period of approximately 10 years .

Table of Contents

The table below presents the forecasted amortization expense for other intangible assets acquired in all mergers:



(in thousands)
Year	Expected Amortization
Remainder of 2017	$	5,067
2018	6,166
2019	5,618
2020	4,986
2021	4,520
Thereafter	8,840
	$	35,197

Note 6 – Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights

The following table presents the changes in the Company's residential mortgage servicing rights ("MSR"), which are carried at fair value, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	142,973		$	131,817
Additions for new MSR capitalized	7,041			5,980
Changes in fair value:
Due to changes in model inputs or assumptions (1)	(3,606		)	(10,251		)
Other (2)	(4,064		)	(10,374		)
Balance, end of period	$	142,344		$	117,172


(1)	Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates.


(2)	Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.

Information related to our serviced loan portfolio as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is as follows:



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Balance of loans serviced for others	$	14,541,171		$	14,327,368
MSR as a percentage of serviced loans	0.98		%	1.00		%

The amount of contractually specified servicing fees, late fees and ancillary fees earned, recorded in residential mortgage banking revenue, was $9.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $7.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 .

Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the MSR as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:



	March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Constant prepayment rate	12.35	%	11.43	%
Discount rate	9.69	%	9.69	%
Weighted average life (years)	6.3		6.6

Table of Contents

A sensitivity analysis of the current fair value to changes in discount and prepayment speed assumptions as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is as follows:



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Constant prepayment rate
Effect on fair value of a 10% adverse change	$	(6,180	)	$	(6,075	)
Effect on fair value of a 20% adverse change	$	(11,880	)	$	(11,720	)

Discount rate
Effect on fair value of a 100 basis point adverse change	$	(5,642	)	$	(5,817	)
Effect on fair value of a 200 basis point adverse change	$	(10,790	)	$	(11,118	)

The sensitivity analysis presents the hypothetical effect on fair value of the MSR. The effect of such hypothetical change in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in an assumption to the change in fair value is not linear. Additionally, in the analysis, the impact of an adverse change in one assumption is calculated independent of any impact on other assumptions. In reality, changes in one assumption may change another assumption.

Table of Contents

Note 7 – Junior Subordinated Debentures

Following is information about the Company's wholly-owned trusts ("Trusts") as of March 31, 2017 :



(dollars in thousands)		Issued		Carrying			Effective
Trust Name	Issue Date	Amount		Value (1)		Rate (2)	Rate (3)	Maturity Date
AT FAIR VALUE:
Umpqua Statutory Trust II	October 2002	$	20,619	$	15,842	Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.35%, adjusted quarterly	5.71%	October 2032
Umpqua Statutory Trust III	October 2002	30,928		23,920		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.45%, adjusted quarterly	5.80%	November 2032
Umpqua Statutory Trust IV	December 2003	10,310		7,545		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 2.85%, adjusted quarterly	5.29%	January 2034
Umpqua Statutory Trust V	December 2003	10,310		7,503		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 2.85%, adjusted quarterly	5.49%	March 2034
Umpqua Master Trust I	August 2007	41,238		25,257		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 1.35%, adjusted quarterly	4.05%	September 2037
Umpqua Master Trust IB	September 2007	20,619		14,444		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 2.75%, adjusted quarterly	5.54%	December 2037
Sterling Capital Trust III	April 2003	14,433		11,559		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.25%, adjusted quarterly	5.35%	April 2033
Sterling Capital Trust IV	May 2003	10,310		8,171		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.15%, adjusted quarterly	5.29%	May 2033
Sterling Capital Statutory Trust V	May 2003	20,619		16,371		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.25%, adjusted quarterly	5.55%	June 2033
Sterling Capital Trust VI	June 2003	10,310		8,141		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.20%, adjusted quarterly	5.49%	September 2033
Sterling Capital Trust VII	June 2006	56,702		35,912		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 1.53%, adjusted quarterly	4.19%	June 2036
Sterling Capital Trust VIII	September 2006	51,547		32,908		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 1.63%, adjusted quarterly	4.33%	December 2036
Sterling Capital Trust IX	July 2007	46,392		28,612		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 1.40%, adjusted quarterly	3.89%	October 2037
Lynnwood Financial Statutory Trust I	March 2003	9,279		7,300		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.15%, adjusted quarterly	5.47%	March 2033
Lynnwood Financial Statutory Trust II	June 2005	10,310		6,841		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 1.80%, adjusted quarterly	4.42%	June 2035
Klamath First Capital Trust I	July 2001	15,464		13,279		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.75%, adjusted semiannually	5.95%	July 2031
		$	379,390	$	263,605
AT AMORTIZED COST:
HB Capital Trust I	March 2000	$	5,310	$	6,036	10.875%	8.64%	March 2030
Humboldt Bancorp Statutory Trust I	February 2001	5,155		5,693		10.200%	8.55%	February 2031
Humboldt Bancorp Statutory Trust II	December 2001	10,310		11,096		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.60%, adjusted quarterly	3.93%	December 2031
Humboldt Bancorp Statutory Trust III	September 2003	27,836		29,921		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 2.95%, adjusted quarterly	3.38%	September 2033
CIB Capital Trust	November 2002	10,310		10,989		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.45%, adjusted quarterly	3.81%	November 2032
Western Sierra Statutory Trust I	July 2001	6,186		6,186		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.58%, adjusted quarterly	4.62%	July 2031
Western Sierra Statutory Trust II	December 2001	10,310		10,310		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 3.60%, adjusted quarterly	4.75%	December 2031
Western Sierra Statutory Trust III	September 2003	10,310		10,310		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 2.90%, adjusted quarterly	3.92%	September 2033
Western Sierra Statutory Trust IV	September 2003	10,310		10,310		Floating rate, LIBOR plus 2.90%, adjusted quarterly	3.92%	September 2033
		96,037		100,851
	Total	$	475,427	$	364,456

Table of Contents


(1)	Includes acquisition accounting adjustments, net of accumulated amortization, for junior subordinated debentures assumed in connection with previous mergers as well as fair value adjustments related to trusts recorded at fair value.


(2)	Contractual interest rate of junior subordinated debentures.


(3)	Effective interest rate based upon the carrying value as of March 31, 2017 .

The Trusts are reflected as junior subordinated debentures in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets . The common stock issued by the Trusts is recorded in other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets , and totaled $14.3 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . As of March 31, 2017 , all of the junior subordinated debentures were redeemable at par, at their applicable quarterly or semiannual interest payment dates.

The Company selected the fair value measurement option for junior subordinated debentures originally issued by the Company (the Umpqua Statutory Trusts) and for junior subordinated debentures acquired from Sterling Financial Corporation ("Sterling"). Refer to Note 14 for discussion of the rationale for election of fair value and the approach used to fair value the selected junior subordinated debentures.

Absent changes to the significant inputs utilized in the discounted cash flow model used to measure the fair value of these instruments, the discounts will reverse over time in a manner similar to the effective interest rate method as if these instruments were accounted for under the amortized cost method. Losses recorded resulting from the change in the fair value of these instruments were $1.6 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 .

Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments — As of March 31, 2017 , the Bank leased 251 sites under non-cancelable operating leases. The leases contain various provisions for increases in rental rates, based either on changes in the published Consumer Price Index or a predetermined escalation schedule. Substantially all of the leases provide the Company with the option to extend the lease term one or more times following expiration of the initial term.

Rent expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $9.8 million and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $9.7 million . Rent expense was partially offset by rent income of $513,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and $503,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 .

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk — The Company's financial statements do not reflect various commitments and contingent liabilities that arise in the normal course of the Bank's business and involve elements of credit, liquidity, and interest rate risk.

The following table presents a summary of the Bank's commitments and contingent liabilities:



(in thousands)	As of March 31, 2017
Commitments to extend credit	$	4,145,219
Forward sales commitments	$	626,430
Commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale	$	447,676
Standby letters of credit	$	69,829

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet credit risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. Those instruments involve elements of credit and interest-rate risk similar to the risk involved in on-balance sheet items recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets . The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of the Bank's involvement in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees written, is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

Table of Contents

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any covenant or condition established in the applicable contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. While most standby letters of credit are not utilized, a significant portion of such utilization is on an immediate payment basis. The Bank evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral varies but may include cash, accounts receivable, inventory, premises and equipment and income-producing commercial properties.

Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including international trade finance, commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank holds cash, marketable securities, or real estate as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary. The Bank was not required to perform on any financial guarantees during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 . At March 31, 2017 , approximately $50.4 million of standby letters of credit expire within one year, and $19.5 million expire thereafter. Upon issuance, the Bank recognizes a liability equivalent to the amount of fees received from the customer for these standby letter of credit commitments. Fees are recognized ratably over the term of the standby letter of credit. The Bank recorded approximately $154,000 and $110,000 in fees associated with standby letters of credit during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively.

Residential mortgage loans sold into the secondary market are sold with limited recourse against the Company, meaning that the Company may be obligated to repurchase or otherwise reimburse the investor for incurred losses on any loans that suffer an early payment default, are not underwritten in accordance with investor guidelines or are determined to have pre-closing borrower misrepresentations. As of March 31, 2017 , the Company had a residential mortgage loan repurchase reserve liability of $1.1 million . For loans sold to GNMA, the Bank has a unilateral right, but not the obligation, to repurchase loans that are past due 90 days or more. As of March 31, 2017, the Bank has recorded a liability for the loans subject to this repurchase right of $5.3 million , and has recorded these loans as part of the loan portfolio as if we had repurchased these loans.

Legal Proceedings —In the ordinary course of business, various claims and lawsuits are brought by and against the Company and its affiliates and subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, there is no pending or threatened proceeding in which an adverse decision that could result in a material adverse change in the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of operations is reasonably probable.

Concentrations of Credit Risk — The Bank grants real estate mortgage, real estate construction, commercial, agricultural and installment loans and leases to customers throughout Oregon, Washington, California, Idaho, and Nevada. In management's judgment, a concentration exists in real estate-related loans, which represented approximately 75% of the Bank's loan and lease portfolio at March 31, 2017 and 76% at December 31, 2016 . Commercial real estate concentrations are managed to assure wide geographic and business diversity. Although management believes such concentrations have no more than the normal risk of collectability, a substantial decline in the economy in general, material increases in interest rates, changes in tax policies, tightening credit or refinancing markets, or a decline in real estate values in the Bank's primary market areas in particular, could have an adverse impact on the repayment of these loans. Personal and business incomes, proceeds from the sale of real property, or proceeds from refinancing, represent the primary sources of repayment for a majority of these loans.

The Bank recognizes the credit risks inherent in dealing with other depository institutions. Accordingly, to prevent excessive exposure to any single correspondent, the Bank has established general standards for selecting correspondent banks as well as internal limits for allowable exposure to any single correspondent. In addition, the Bank has an investment policy that sets forth limitations that apply to all investments with respect to credit rating and concentrations with an issuer.

Note 9 – Derivatives

The Bank may use derivatives to hedge the risk of changes in the fair values of interest rate lock commitments and residential mortgage loans held for sale. None of the Company's derivatives are designated as hedging instruments. Rather, they are accounted for as free-standing derivatives, or economic hedges, with changes in the fair value of the derivatives reported in income. The Company primarily utilizes forward interest rate contracts in its derivative risk management strategy.

Table of Contents

The Bank enters into forward delivery contracts to sell residential mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers at specific prices and dates in order to hedge the interest rate risk in its portfolio of mortgage loans held for sale and its residential mortgage loan commitments. Credit risk associated with forward contracts is limited to the replacement cost of those forward contracts in a gain position. There were no counterparty default losses on forward contracts in the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 . Market risk with respect to forward contracts arises principally from changes in the value of contractual positions due to changes in interest rates. The Bank limits its exposure to market risk by monitoring differences between commitments to customers and forward contracts with broker/dealers. In the event the Company has forward delivery contract commitments in excess of available mortgage loans, the Company completes the transaction by either paying or receiving a fee to or from the broker/dealer equal to the increase or decrease in the market value of the forward contract. At March 31, 2017 , the Bank had commitments to originate mortgage loans held for sale totaling $447.7 million and forward sales commitments of $626.4 million , which are used to hedge both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet exposures.

The Bank executes interest rate swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting the interest rate swaps that the Bank executes with a third party, such that the Bank minimizes its net risk exposure. As of March 31, 2017 , the Bank had 548 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $2.5 billion related to this program. As of December 31, 2016 , the Bank had 516 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $2.3 billion related to this program.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $6.3 million and $34.9 million , respectively. The Bank has collateral posting requirements for initial margin with its clearing members and clearing houses and has been required to post collateral against its obligations under these agreements of $27.1 million and $50.3 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.

Effective in the first quarter of 2017, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and London Clearing House amended their respective rulebooks to legally characterize variation margin payments, for derivative contracts that are referred to as settled-to-market (STM), as settlements of the derivative’s mark-to-market exposure and not collateral. Based on these changes, Umpqua has treated the variation margin as a settlement, which has resulted in a decrease in our cash collateral, and a corresponding decrease in our derivative asset and liability. As of March 31, 2017 , the variation margin was $21.9 million . The change was applied prospectively so prior period balances have not been adjusted.

The Bank incorporates credit valuation adjustments ("CVA") to appropriately reflect nonperformance risk in the fair value measurement of its derivatives. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the net CVA decreased the settlement values of the Bank's net derivative assets by $945,000 and $241,000 , respectively.

The Bank also executes foreign currency hedges as a service for customers. These foreign currency hedges are then offset with hedges with other third-party banks to limit the Bank's risk exposure.

The following tables summarize the types of derivatives, separately by assets and liabilities, and the fair values of such derivatives as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)	Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
Derivatives not designated	March 31,		December 31,		March 31,		December 31,
as hedging instrument	2017		2016		2017		2016
Interest rate lock commitments	$	6,294	$	4,076	$	—	$	—
Interest rate forward sales commitments	78		8,054		3,807		1,318
Interest rate swaps	27,368		34,701		6,333		34,871
Foreign currency derivative	289		670		298		874
Total	$	34,029	$	47,501	$	10,438	$	37,063

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the types of derivatives and the gains (losses) recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
Derivatives not designated	March 31,
as hedging instrument	2017			2016
Interest rate lock commitments	$	2,219		$	4,624
Interest rate forward sales commitments	(2,733		)	(11,097		)
Interest rate swaps	(727		)	(1,793		)
Foreign currency derivative	409			261
Total	$	(832	)	$	(8,005	)

The gains and losses on the Company's mortgage banking derivatives are included in mortgage banking revenue. The gains and losses on the Company's interest rate swaps and foreign currency derivative are included in other income.

The following table summarizes the derivatives that have a right of offset as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets/Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position		Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities presented in the Statement of Financial Position		Financial Instruments			Collateral Posted			Net Amount
March 31, 2017
Derivative Assets
Interest rate swaps	$	27,368	$	—	$	27,368	$	(6,333	)	$	—		$	21,035
Foreign currency derivative	289		—		289		—			—			289
Derivative Liabilities
Interest rate swaps	$	6,333	$	—	$	6,333	$	(6,333	)	$	—		$	—
Foreign currency derivative	298		—		298		—			—			298

December 31, 2016
Derivative Assets
Interest rate swaps	$	34,701	$	—	$	34,701	$	(11,225	)	$	—		$	23,476
Foreign currency derivative	670		—		670		—			—			670
Derivative Liabilities
Interest rate swaps	$	34,871	$	—	$	34,871	$	(11,225	)	$	(23,646	)	$	—
Foreign currency derivative	874		—		874		—			—			874

The above table represents the impact of the changes to the derivative clearing rules that treat the variation margin as a settlement.

Note 10 – Shareholders' Equity and Stock Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

The compensation cost related to stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units granted to employees and included in salaries and employee benefits was $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , as compared to $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . The total income tax benefit recognized related to stock-based compensation was $977,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , as compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 .

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information about stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2017 :



(in thousands, except per share data)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
					Weighted-Avg
	Options		Weighted-Avg		Remaining Contractual	Aggregate
	Outstanding		Exercise Price		Term (Years)	Intrinsic Value
Balance, beginning of period	219		$	15.74
Granted/assumed	—		$	—
Exercised	(19	)	$	12.10
Forfeited/expired	(50	)	$	26.12
Balance, end of period	150		$	12.73	2.97	$	750
Options exercisable, end of period	142		$	12.77	2.80	$	704

The total intrinsic value (which is the amount by which the stock price exceeded the exercise price on the date of exercise) of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $112,000 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 of $132,000 .

During the three months ended March 31, 2017 , the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was $49,000 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 of $33,000 . Total consideration was $230,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 of $635,000 .

The Company grants restricted stock periodically for the benefit of employees and directors. Restricted shares generally vest over a three year period, subject to time or time plus performance vesting conditions. The following table summarizes information about nonvested restricted share activity for the three months ended March 31, 2017 :



(in thousands, except per share data)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Restricted		Weighted
	Shares		Average Grant
	Outstanding		Date Fair Value
Balance, beginning of period	1,096		$	15.61
Granted	528		$	18.25
Vested/released	(250	)	$	16.16
Forfeited/expired	(68	)	$	16.71
Balance, end of period	1,306		$	16.51

The total fair value of restricted shares vested and released during the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $4.5 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 of $4.4 million .

The Company granted restricted stock units in connection with the acquisition of Sterling as replacement awards. Restricted stock unit grants may be subject to performance-based vesting as well as other approved vesting conditions. The total number of restricted stock units granted represents the maximum number of restricted stock units eligible to vest based upon the performance and service conditions set forth in the grant agreements.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information about nonvested restricted stock unit activity for the three months ended March 31, 2017 :



(in thousands, except per share data)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Restricted		Weighted
	Stock Units		Average Grant
	Outstanding		Date Fair Value
Balance, beginning of period	78		$	18.58
Assumed	—		$	—
Released	(2	)	$	18.58
Forfeited/expired	(3	)	$	18.58
Balance, end of period	73		$	18.58

The total fair value of restricted stock units vested and released during the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $41,000 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 of $260,000 .

As of March 31, 2017 , there was $15,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.40 years. As of March 31, 2017 , there was $13.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.99 years. As of March 31, 2017 , there was $1.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock units which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.72 years, assuming expected performance conditions are met.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 , the Company received income tax benefits of $1.8 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 of $1.9 million related to the exercise of non-qualified employee stock options, disqualifying dispositions on the exercise of incentive stock options, the vesting of restricted shares and the vesting of restricted stock units. The tax deficiency or benefit is recorded as income tax expense or benefit in the period the shares are vested.

Note 11 – Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well as in the majority of states and in Canada. The Company believes it is more likely than not that it will be able to fully realize the benefit of its federal net operating loss ("NOL") carry-forwards. The Company also believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain state NOL and tax credit carry-forwards will not be realized and therefore has provided a valuation allowance of $1.1 million against the deferred tax assets relating to these NOL and tax credit carry-forwards.

The Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $3.0 million as of March 31, 2017 . If recognized, the unrecognized tax benefit would reduce the 2017 annual effective tax rate by 0.5% . During the three months ended March 31, 2017 , the Company accrued $6,000 of interest relating to its liability for unrecognized tax benefits. Interest on unrecognized tax benefits is reported by the Company as a component of tax expense. As of March 31, 2017 , the accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits was $360,000 .

Note 12 – Earnings Per Common Share

Nonvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Certain of the Company's nonvested restricted stock awards qualify as participating securities.

Net earnings is allocated between the common stock and participating securities pursuant to the two-class method. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding participating nonvested restricted shares.

Table of Contents

Diluted earnings per common share is computed in a similar manner, except that first the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive common shares, excluding the participating securities, were issued using the treasury stock method. For all periods presented, stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units are the only potentially dilutive non-participating instruments issued by the Company. Next, we determine and include in diluted earnings per common share calculation the more dilutive effect of the participating securities using the treasury stock method or the two-class method. Undistributed losses are not allocated to the nonvested share-based payment awards (the participating securities) under the two-class method as the holders are not contractually obligated to share in the losses of the Company.

The following is a computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands, except per share data)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017		2016
NUMERATORS:
Net income	$	46,003	$	47,569
Less:
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities (1)	12		29
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	45,991	$	47,540
DENOMINATORS:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic	220,287		220,227
Effect of potentially dilutive common shares (2)	492		825
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted	220,779		221,052
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.22
Diluted	$	0.21	$	0.22


(1)	Represents dividends paid and undistributed earnings allocated to certain nonvested restricted stock awards.


(2)	Represents the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options, vesting of non-participating restricted shares, and vesting of restricted stock units, based on the treasury stock method.

The following table presents the weighted average outstanding securities that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because their effect would be anti-dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 .



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017	2016
Stock options	36	119
Restricted Stock	—	25

Table of Contents

Note 13 – Segment Information

In the first quarter of 2017, the Company realigned its operating segments based on changes in its internal reporting structure to align with the change in the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker. The Company now reports four primary segments: Commercial Bank, Wealth Management, Retail Bank, and Home Lending with the remainder as Corporate and other. The prior periods have been restated to reflect current presentation of segments.

The Commercial Bank segment includes lending, treasury and cash management services and customer risk management products to small businesses, middle market and larger commercial customers and includes the operations of Financial Pacific Leasing Inc., a commercial leasing company. The Wealth Management segment consists of the operations of Umpqua Investments, which offers a full range of retail brokerage and investment advisory services and products to its clients who consist primarily of individual investors, and Umpqua Private Bank, which serves high net worth individuals with liquid investable assets and provides customized financial solutions and offerings. The Retail Bank segment includes retail lending and deposit services for customers served through the Bank's store network. The Home Lending segment originates, sells and services residential mortgage loans. The Corporate and other segment includes activities that are not directly attributable to one of the four principal lines of business and includes the operations of Pivotus Ventures, Inc. and the parent company, eliminations and the economic impact of certain assets, capital and support functions not specifically identifiable within the other lines of business.

Management monitors the Company's results using an internal performance measurement accounting system, which provides line of business results and key performance measures. A primary objective of this profitability measurement system and related internal financial reporting practices are designed to produce consistent results that reflect the underlying economics of the businesses, and to support strategic objectives and analysis based on how management views the business. Various methodologies employed within this system to measure performance are based on management's judgment or other subjective factors. Consequently, the information presented is not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial institutions.

This system uses various techniques to assign balance sheet and income statement amounts to the business segments, including internal funds transfer pricing, allocations of income, expense, the provision for credit losses, and capital. The application and development of these management reporting methodologies is a dynamic process and is subject to periodic enhancements. As these enhancements are made, financial results presented by each reportable segment may be periodically revised retrospectively, if material.

Funds transfer pricing is used in the determination of net interest income reported by assigning a cost for funds used or credit for funds provided to all assets and liabilities within each business segment. In general, assets and liabilities are match-funded based on their maturity or repricing characteristics, adjusted for estimated prepayments if applicable. The value of funds provided or cost of funds used by the business segments is priced at rates that approximate wholesale market rates of the Company for funds with similar duration and re-pricing characteristics. Market rates are generally based on LIBOR or interest rate swap rates, plus consideration of the Company’s incremental credit spread/cost of borrowing. As a result, the business segments are generally insulated from changes in interest rates. This method of funds transfer pricing also serves to transfer interest rate risk to Treasury, which is contained within the Corporate & Other segment. However, the business segments have some latitude to retain certain interest rate exposures related to customer pricing decisions that are within overall Corporate guidelines.

Noninterest income and expenses directly attributable to a business segment are directly recorded within that business unit. To better analyze the total financial performance of each business unit and to consider the total cost to support a segment, management allocates centrally provided support services and other corporate overhead to the business segments based on various methodologies. Examples of these type of expense overhead pools include information technology, operations, human resources, finance, risk management, credit administration, legal, and marketing. Expense allocations are based on actual usage where practicably calculated or by management’s estimate of such usage. Example of typical expense allocation drivers include number of employees, loan or deposits average balances or counts, origination or transaction volumes, credit quality related indicators, noninterest expense, or other identified drivers.

The provision for loan and lease losses is based on the methodology consistent with our process to estimate our consolidated allowance. The provision for credit losses incorporates the actual net charge-offs recognized related to loans contained within each business segment. The residual provision for credit losses to arrive at the consolidated provision for credit losses is included in Corporate and Other.

Table of Contents

The provision for income taxes is allocated to business segments using a 37% effective tax rate. The residual income tax expense or benefit arising from tax planning strategies or other tax attributes to arrive at the consolidated effective tax rate is retained in Corporate and Other.

Summarized financial information concerning the Company's reportable segments and the reconciliation to the consolidated financial results is shown in the following tables:



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Commercial Bank		Wealth Management		Retail Bank		Home Lending			Corporate & Other		Consolidated
Net interest income	$	102,497	$	4,429	$	68,044	$	9,498		$	22,257	$	206,725
Provision for loan and lease losses	9,109		200		1,816		27			520		11,672
Non-interest income	12,474		4,748		14,831		26,880			1,292		60,225
Non-interest expense	49,857		8,369		73,670		40,986			9,832		182,714
Income (loss) before income taxes	56,005		608		7,389		(4,635		)	13,197		72,564
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	20,722		225		2,734		(1,715		)	4,595		26,561
Net income (loss)	$	35,283	$	383	$	4,655	$	(2,920	)	$	8,602	$	46,003



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Commercial Bank		Wealth Management		Retail Bank		Home Lending			Corporate & Other		Consolidated
Net interest income	$	102,857	$	5,013	$	65,885	$	8,192		$	35,755	$	217,702
Provision (recapture) for loan and lease losses	3,315		298		2,035		(1,428		)	603		4,823
Non-interest income	9,122		4,561		14,712		15,743			1,813		45,951
Non-interest expense	45,725		9,250		77,016		39,798			12,200		183,989
Income (loss) before income taxes	62,939		26		1,546		(14,435		)	24,765		74,841
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	23,287		10		572		(5,341		)	8,744		27,272
Net income (loss)	$	39,652	$	16	$	974	$	(9,094	)	$	16,021	$	47,569



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017
	Commercial Bank		Wealth Management		Retail Bank		Home Lending		Corporate & Other			Consolidated
Total assets	$	13,081,521	$	439,496	$	1,915,816	$	3,231,422	$	6,193,203		$	24,861,458
Total loans and leases	$	12,903,317	$	417,530	$	1,841,187	$	2,693,514	$	(25,910	)	$	17,829,638
Total deposits	$	3,367,310	$	1,018,767	$	12,331,062	$	248,149	$	2,202,005		$	19,167,293



(in thousands)	December 31, 2016
	Commercial Bank		Wealth Management		Retail Bank		Home Lending		Corporate & Other			Consolidated
Total assets	$	12,829,249	$	437,058	$	1,893,433	$	3,243,600	$	6,409,779		$	24,813,119
Total loans and leases	$	12,640,383	$	415,737	$	1,806,554	$	2,685,181	$	(39,192	)	$	17,508,663
Total deposits	$	3,288,837	$	1,011,454	$	12,032,906	$	229,358	$	2,458,430		$	19,020,985

Table of Contents

Note 14 – Fair Value Measurement

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , whether or not recognized or recorded at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets :



(in thousands)		March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
		Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Level	Value		Value		Value		Value
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	1	$	684,646	$	684,646	$	1,449,432	$	1,449,432
Trading securities	1,2	11,241		11,241		10,964		10,964
Investment securities available for sale	2	3,243,408		3,243,408		2,701,220		2,701,220
Investment securities held to maturity	3	4,121		5,146		4,216		5,217
Loans held for sale	2	372,073		372,073		387,318		387,318
Loans and leases, net	3	17,693,346		17,710,155		17,374,679		17,385,156
Restricted equity securities	1	45,522		45,522		45,528		45,528
Residential mortgage servicing rights	3	142,344		142,344		142,973		142,973
Bank owned life insurance assets	1	301,777		301,777		299,673		299,673
Derivatives	2,3	34,029		34,029		47,501		47,501
Visa Class B common stock	3	—		67,327		—		59,107
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits	1,2	$	19,167,293	$	19,162,214	$	19,020,985	$	19,016,330
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	2	304,280		304,280		352,948		352,948
Term debt	2	852,308		845,932		852,397		844,377
Junior subordinated debentures, at fair value	3	263,605		263,605		262,209		262,209
Junior subordinated debentures, at amortized cost	3	100,851		78,051		100,931		77,640
Derivatives	2	10,438		10,438		37,063		37,063

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present information about the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Trading securities
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	211	$	—	$	211	$	—
Equity securities	11,030		11,030		—		—
Investment securities available for sale
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	307,219		—		307,219		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	2,934,219		—		2,934,219		—
Investments in mutual funds and other equity securities	1,970		—		1,970		—
Loans held for sale, at fair value	372,073		—		372,073		—
Residential mortgage servicing rights, at fair value	142,344		—		—		142,344
Derivatives
Interest rate lock commitments	6,294		—		—		6,294
Interest rate forward sales commitments	78		—		78		—
Interest rate swaps	27,368		—		27,368		—
Foreign currency derivative	289		—		289		—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	3,803,095	$	11,030	$	3,643,427	$	148,638
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Junior subordinated debentures, at fair value	$	263,605	$	—	$	—	$	263,605
Derivatives
Interest rate forward sales commitments	3,807		—		3,807		—
Interest rate swaps	6,333		—		6,333		—
Foreign currency derivative	298		—		298		—
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	274,043	$	—	$	10,438	$	263,605

Table of Contents



(in thousands)	December 31, 2016
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Trading securities
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	662	$	—	$	662	$	—
Equity securities	10,302		10,302		—		—
Investment securities available for sale
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	307,697		—		307,697		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	2,391,553		—		2,391,553		—
Investments in mutual funds and other equity securities	1,970		—		1,970		—
Loans held for sale, at fair value	387,318		—		387,318		—
Residential mortgage servicing rights, at fair value	142,973		—		—		142,973
Derivatives
Interest rate lock commitments	4,076		—		—		4,076
Interest rate forward sales commitments	8,054		—		8,054		—
Interest rate swaps	34,701		—		34,701		—
Foreign currency derivative	670		—		670		—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	3,289,976	$	10,302	$	3,132,625	$	147,049
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Junior subordinated debentures, at fair value	$	262,209	$	—	$	—	$	262,209
Derivatives
Interest rate forward sales commitments	1,318		—		1,318		—
Interest rate swaps	34,871		—		34,871		—
Foreign currency derivative	874		—		874		—
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	299,272	$	—	$	37,063	$	262,209

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument in the tables above:

Cash and Cash Equivalents — For short-term instruments, including noninterest bearing cash and interest bearing cash, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities — Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as matrix or model pricing, or broker indicative bids, when market quotes are not readily accessible or available. Management periodically reviews the pricing information received from the third-party pricing service and compares it to a secondary pricing service, evaluating significant price variances between services to determine an appropriate estimate of fair value to report.

Loans Held for Sale — Fair value for residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale is determined based on quoted secondary market prices for similar loans, including the implicit fair value of embedded servicing rights. For loans not originated as held for sale, these loans are accounted for at lower of cost or market, with the fair value estimated based on the expected sales price.

Loans and Leases — Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type, including commercial, real estate and consumer loans. Each loan category is further segregated by fixed and adjustable rate loans. The fair value of loans is calculated by discounting expected cash flows at rates which similar loans are currently being made. These amounts are discounted further by embedded probable losses expected to be realized in the portfolio.

Restricted Equity Securities — The carrying value of restricted equity securities approximates fair value as the shares can only be redeemed by the issuing institution at par.

Table of Contents

Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights — The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is estimated using a discounted cash flow model. Assumptions used include market discount rates, anticipated prepayment speeds, delinquency and foreclosure rates, and ancillary fee income net of servicing costs. This model is periodically validated by an independent external model validation group. The model assumptions and the MSR fair value estimates are also compared to observable trades of similar portfolios as well as to MSR broker valuations and industry surveys, as available. Management believes the significant inputs utilized are indicative of those that would be used by market participants.

Bank Owned Life Insurance Assets — Fair values of insurance policies owned are based on the insurance contract's cash surrender value.

Visa Inc. Class B Common Stock — The fair value of Visa Class B common stock is estimated by applying a 5% discount to the value of the unredeemed Class A equivalent shares. The discount primarily represents the risk related to the further potential reduction of the conversion ratio between Class B and Class A shares and a liquidity risk premium.

Deposits — The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing deposits, savings and interest checking accounts, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase — For short-term instruments, including securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Term Debt — The fair value of term notes is calculated based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows using current rates at which such borrowings can currently be obtained.

Junior Subordinated Debentures — The fair value of junior subordinated debentures is estimated using an income approach valuation technique. The significant inputs utilized in the estimation of fair value of these instruments are the credit risk adjusted spread and three month LIBOR. The credit risk adjusted spread represents the nonperformance risk of the liability, contemplating the inherent risk of the obligation. The Company periodically utilizes an external valuation firm to determine or validate the reasonableness of inputs and factors that are used to determine the fair value. The ending carrying (fair) value of the junior subordinated debentures measured at fair value represents the estimated amount that would be paid to transfer these liabilities in an orderly transaction amongst market participants. Due to credit concerns in the capital markets and inactivity in the trust preferred markets that have limited the observability of market spreads, we have classified this as a Level 3 fair value measure.

Derivative Instruments — The fair value of the interest rate lock commitments and forward sales commitments are estimated using quoted or published market prices for similar instruments, adjusted for factors such as pull-through rate assumptions based on historical information, where appropriate. The pull-through rate assumptions are considered Level 3 valuation inputs and are significant to the interest rate lock commitment valuation; as such, the interest rate lock commitment derivatives are classified as Level 3. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is determined using a discounted cash flow technique incorporating credit valuation adjustments to reflect nonperformance risk in the measurement of fair value. Although the Bank has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate swap derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the CVA associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of March 31, 2017 , the Bank has assessed the significance of the impact of the CVA on the overall valuation of its interest rate swap positions and has determined that the CVA are not significant to the overall valuation of its interest rate swap derivatives. As a result, the Bank has classified its interest rate swap derivative valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Table of Contents

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

The following table provides a description of the valuation technique, significant unobservable inputs, and qualitative information about the unobservable inputs for the Company's assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 and measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2017 :



Financial Instrument	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Weighted Average
Residential mortgage servicing rights	Discounted cash flow
		Constant Prepayment Rate	12.35%
		Discount Rate	9.69%
Interest rate lock commitment	Internal Pricing Model
		Pull-through rate	85.78%
Junior subordinated debentures	Discounted cash flow
		Credit Spread	5.26%

Generally, any significant increases in the constant prepayment rate and discount rate utilized in the fair value measurement of the residential mortgage servicing rights will result in negative fair value adjustments (and a decrease in the fair value measurement). Conversely, a decrease in the constant prepayment rate and discount rate will result in a positive fair value adjustment (and increase in the fair value measurement).

An increase in the pull-through rate utilized in the fair value measurement of the interest rate lock commitment derivative will result in positive fair value adjustments (and an increase in the fair value measurement.) Conversely, a decrease in the pull-through rate will result in a negative fair value adjustment (and a decrease in the fair value measurement.)

Management believes that the credit risk adjusted spread utilized in the fair value measurement of the junior subordinated debentures carried at fair value is indicative of the nonperformance risk premium a willing market participant would require under current market conditions, that is, the inactive market. Management attributes the change in fair value of the junior subordinated debentures during the period to market changes in the nonperformance expectations and pricing of this type of debt, and not as a result of changes to our entity-specific credit risk. The widening of the credit risk adjusted spread above the Company's contractual spreads has primarily contributed to the positive fair value adjustments. Future contractions in the credit risk adjusted spread relative to the spread currently utilized to measure the Company's junior subordinated debentures at fair value as of March 31, 2017 , or the passage of time, will result in negative fair value adjustments. Generally, an increase in the credit risk adjusted spread and/or the forward swap interest rate curve will result in positive fair value adjustments (and decrease the fair value measurement). Conversely, a decrease in the credit risk adjusted spread and/or the forward swap interest rate curve will result in negative fair value adjustments (and increase the fair value measurement).

Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on a recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 .



(in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31,	Beginning Balance		Change included in earnings			Purchases and issuances		Sales and settlements			Ending Balance		Net change in unrealized gains or (losses) relating to items held at end of period
2017
Residential mortgage servicing rights	$	142,973	$	(7,670	)	$	7,041	$	—		$	142,344	$	(3,955	)
Interest rate lock commitment, net	4,076		797			10,649		(9,228		)	6,294		6,294
Junior subordinated debentures, at fair value	262,209		4,680			—		(3,284		)	263,605		4,680

2016
Residential mortgage servicing rights	$	131,817	$	(20,625	)	$	5,980	$	—		$	117,172	$	(19,827	)
Interest rate lock commitment, net	3,631		2,044			14,963		(12,383		)	8,255		8,255
Junior subordinated debentures, at fair value	255,457		4,294			—		(2,834		)	256,917		4,294

Changes in residential mortgage servicing rights carried at fair value are recorded in residential mortgage banking revenue within non-interest income. Gains (losses) on interest rate lock commitments carried at fair value are recorded in residential mortgage banking revenue within non-interest income. Gains (losses) on junior subordinated debentures carried at fair value are recorded in non-interest income. The contractual interest expense on the junior subordinated debentures is recorded on an accrual basis as interest on junior subordinated debentures within interest expense. Settlements related to the junior subordinated debentures represent the payment of accrued interest that is embedded in the fair value of these liabilities.

Additionally, from time to time, certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments to fair value generally result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets due to impairment, typically on collateral dependent loans.

Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The following table presents information about the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded during the reporting period. The amounts disclosed below represent the fair values at the time the nonrecurring fair value measurements were made, and not necessarily the fair value as of the dates reported upon.



(in thousands)	March 31, 2017
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Loans and leases	$	20,249	$	—	$	—	$	20,249
Other real estate owned	2,151		—		—		2,151
	$	22,400	$	—	$	—	$	22,400



(in thousands)	December 31, 2016
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Loans and leases	$	25,753	$	—	$	—	$	25,753
Other real estate owned	2,612		—		—		2,612
	$	28,365	$	—	$	—	$	28,365

Table of Contents

The following table presents the losses resulting from nonrecurring fair value adjustments for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017		2016
Loans and leases	$	11,242	$	6,079
Other real estate owned	67		1,423
Total loss from nonrecurring measurements	$	11,309	$	7,502

The following provides a description of the valuation technique and inputs for the Company’s assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 and measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Unobservable inputs and qualitative information about the unobservable inputs are not presented as the fair value is determined by third-party information. The loans and leases amount above represents impaired, collateral dependent loans that have been adjusted to fair value. When we identify a collateral dependent loan as impaired, we measure the impairment using the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs. Depending on the characteristics of a loan, the fair value of collateral is generally estimated by obtaining external appraisals. If we determine that the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we recognize this impairment and adjust the carrying value of the loan to fair value through the allowance for loan and lease losses. The loss represents charge-offs or impairments on collateral dependent loans for fair value adjustments based on the fair value of collateral.

The other real estate owned amount above represents impaired real estate that has been adjusted to fair value. Other real estate owned represents real estate which the Bank has taken control of in partial or full satisfaction of loans. At the time of foreclosure, other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of the carrying amount of the loan or fair value less costs to sell, which becomes the property's new basis. Any write-downs based on the asset's fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. After foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations such that the real estate is carried at the lower of its new cost basis or fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. Fair value adjustments on other real estate owned are recognized within net loss on real estate owned. The loss represents impairments on other real estate owned for fair value adjustments based on the fair value of the real estate.

Fair Value Option

The following table presents the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans held for sale accounted for under the fair value option as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :

(in thousands)

March 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Fair Value

Aggregate

Less Aggregate

Aggregate

Less Aggregate

Unpaid

Fair

Principal

Fair

Principal

Value

Balance

Value

Balance

Loans held for sale

372,073

358,843

13,230

387,318

378,974

8,344

Residential mortgage loans held for sale accounted for under the fair value option are measured initially at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Gains and losses from such changes in fair value are reported as a component of residential mortgage banking revenue, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income . For both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 , the Company recorded a net increase in fair value of $4.9 million .

There were no nonaccrual residential mortgage loans held for sale or residential mortgage loans held for sale 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.

The Company selected the fair value measurement option for existing junior subordinated debentures (the Umpqua Statutory Trusts) and for junior subordinated debentures acquired from Sterling. The remaining junior subordinated debentures were acquired through previous business combinations and were measured at fair value at the time of acquisition and subsequently measured at amortized cost.

Table of Contents

Accounting for the selected junior subordinated debentures at fair value enables us to more closely align our financial performance with the economic value of those liabilities. Additionally, we believe it improves our ability to manage the market and interest rate risks associated with the junior subordinated debentures. The junior subordinated debentures measured at fair value and amortized cost are presented as separate line items on the balance sheet. The ending carrying (fair) value of the junior subordinated debentures measured at fair value represents the estimated amount that would be paid to transfer these liabilities in an orderly transaction amongst market participants under current market conditions as of the measurement date.

Due to inactivity in the junior subordinated debenture market and the lack of observable quotes of our, or similar, junior subordinated debenture liabilities or the related trust preferred securities when traded as assets, we utilize an income approach valuation technique to determine the fair value of these liabilities using our estimation of market discount rate assumptions. The Company monitors activity in the trust preferred and related markets, to the extent available, evaluates changes related to the current and anticipated future interest rate environment, and considers our entity-specific creditworthiness, to validate the reasonableness of the credit risk adjusted spread and effective yield utilized in our discounted cash flow model. We also consider changes in the interest rate environment in our valuation, specifically the absolute level and the shape of the slope of the forward swap curve.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Report contains certain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for "forward-looking statements" provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may include statements that expressly or implicitly predict future results, performance or events. Statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as "anticipates," "expects," "believes," "estimates," "intends" and "forecast," and words or phrases of similar meaning. We make forward-looking statements regarding projected sources of funds; our securities portfolio; loan sales; availability of acquisition and growth opportunities; adequacy of our allowance for loan and lease losses and reserve for unfunded commitments; provision for loan and lease losses; impaired loans and future losses; performance of troubled debt restructurings; our commercial real estate portfolio, its collectability and subsequent charge-offs; resolution of non-accrual loans; litigation; Pivotus Ventures, Inc.; junior subordinated debentures; and the effect of accounting pronouncements. Forward-looking statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond our control. There are many factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties include those set forth in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and the following factors that might cause actual results to differ materially from those presented:


•	our ability to attract new deposits and loans and leases;


•	demand for financial services in our market areas;


•	competitive market pricing factors;


•	our ability to effectively develop and implement new technology;


•	deterioration in economic conditions that could result in increased loan and lease losses;


•	risks associated with concentrations in real estate related loans;


•	market interest rate volatility;


•	compression of our net interest margin;


•	stability of funding sources and continued availability of borrowings;


•	changes in legal or regulatory requirements or the results of regulatory examinations that could increase expenses or restrict growth;


•	our ability to recruit and retain key management and staff;


•	availability of, and competition for, acquisition opportunities;


•	risks associated with merger and acquisition integration;


•	significant decline in the market value of the Company that could result in an impairment of goodwill;


•	our ability to raise capital or incur debt on reasonable terms;


•	regulatory limits on the Bank's ability to pay dividends to the Company;


•	the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and other new legislation on the Company's business operations, including our compliance costs, interest expense, and revenue;


•	the impact of Basel III capital rules issued by federal banking regulators; and


•	competition, including from financial technology companies.

There are many factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements. Readers should consider any forward-looking statements in light of this explanation, and we caution readers about relying on forward-looking statements.

Table of Contents

General

Umpqua Holdings Corporation, an Oregon corporation, is a financial holding company with two principal operating subsidiaries, Umpqua Bank and Umpqua Investments, Inc.

With headquarters located in Roseburg, Oregon, the Bank is considered one of the most innovative community banks in the United States, recognized nationally and internationally for its unique company culture and customer experience strategy, which differentiate the Company from its competition. The Bank provides a wide range of banking, wealth management, mortgage and other financial services to corporate, institutional and individual customers, and also has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc., a commercial equipment leasing company.

Umpqua Investments is a registered broker-dealer and registered investment advisor with offices in Oregon, Washington, and California, and also offers products and services through Umpqua Bank stores. The firm is one of the oldest investment companies in the Northwest and is actively engaged in the communities it serves. Umpqua Investments offers a full range of investment products and services including: stocks, fixed income securities (municipal, corporate, and government bonds, CDs, and money market instruments), mutual funds, options, retirement planning, advisory account services, goals based planning, insurance and annuities.

In 2015, we formed Pivotus Ventures, Inc. as a subsidiary of Umpqua Holdings Corporation. Pivotus will use a startup dynamic and collaboration with other institutions to validate, develop, and test new bank platforms that could have a significant impact on the experience and economics of banking. We believe the collaborative model will enhance Pivotus' ability to imagine and develop disruptive technologies, test them with a broad range of customers and deliver them at scale.

Along with its subsidiaries, the Company is subject to the regulations of state and federal agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by these regulatory agencies.

Executive Overview

Significant items for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were as follows:

Financial Performance


•	Net earnings available to common shareholders per diluted common share were $0.21 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , compared to $0.22 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 .

•

Net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was 3.85% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to 4.34% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . The decrease in net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , compared to the same period in the prior year, reflects lower interest income, primarily attributable to lower average yields on the loan and lease portfolio and taxable investments, as well as an increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

•

Residential mortgage banking revenue was $26.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $15.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . The increase as compared to the prior period is principally attributable to a lower negative fair value adjustment of $7.7 million on the MSR asset for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , relative to the negative fair value adjustment of $20.6 million in the same period of the prior year. The gain on sale margin decreased to 3.27% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , compared to 3.72% in the same period of the prior year, driving lower revenue from the origination and sale of residential mortgages over the same period.


•	Total gross loans and leases were $17.8 billion as of March 31, 2017 , an increase of $321.0 million , as compared to December 31, 2016 . The increase was due to balanced growth in the Company's commercial term, commercial real-estate non-owner occupied term, leases & equipment finance and consumer portfolios.


•	Total deposits were $19.2 billion as of March 31, 2017 , an increase of $146.3 million , compared to December 31, 2016 . This increase was primarily attributable to growth in non-interest bearing demand and savings accounts, partially offset by a decrease in public funds, which was attributable to a combination of seasonal fluctuations and targeted run-off.


•	Total consolidated assets were $24.9 billion as of March 31, 2017 , compared to $24.8 billion at December 31, 2016 .

Table of Contents

Credit Quality


•	Non-performing assets decreased to $58.9 million , or 0.24% of total assets, as of March 31, 2017 , as compared to $62.9 million , or 0.25% of total assets, as of December 31, 2016 . Non-performing loans were $52.3 million , or 0.29% of total loans, as of March 31, 2017 , as compared to $56.1 million , or 0.32% of total loans, as of December 31, 2016 .

•

The provision for loan and lease losses was $11.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the $4.8 million recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . The increase for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , compared to the same period of the prior year was primarily attributable to strong growth in the loan portfolio, as well as an increase in net charge-offs. Net charge-offs were $9.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , or 0.22% of average loans and leases (annualized), as compared to net charge-offs of $4.9 million , or 0.12% of average loans and leases (annualized), for the three months ended March 31, 2016 .

Capital and Growth Initiatives


•	The Company's total risk based capital was 14.5% and its Tier 1 common to risk weighted assets ratio was 11.3% as of March 31, 2017 . As of December 31, 2016 , the Company's total risk based capital ratio was 14.7% and its Tier 1 common to risk weighted assets ratio was 11.5% .


•	Cash dividends declared in the first quarter of 2017 were $0.16 per common share, consistent with the comparable period of the prior year.

Table of Contents

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2017. Not all of these significant accounting policies require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments or estimates. Management believes that the following policies would be considered critical under the SEC's definition.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

The Bank performs regular credit reviews of the loan and lease portfolio to determine the credit quality and adherence to underwriting standards. When loans and leases are originated, they are assigned a risk rating that is reassessed periodically during the term of the loan through the credit review process. The Bank's risk rating methodology assigns risk ratings ranging from 1 to 10, where a higher rating represents higher risk. The 10 risk rating categories are a primary factor in determining an appropriate amount for the allowance for loan and lease losses. The Bank has a management Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses ("ALLL") Committee, which is responsible for, among other things, regularly reviewing the ALLL methodology, including loss factors, and ensuring that it is designed and applied in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The ALLL Committee reviews and approves loans and leases recommended for impaired status. The ALLL Committee also approves removing loans and leases from impaired status. The Bank's Audit and Compliance Committee provides board oversight of the ALLL process and reviews and approves the ALLL methodology on a quarterly basis.

Each risk rating is assessed an inherent credit loss factor that determines the amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses provided for that group of loans and leases with similar risk rating. Credit loss factors may vary by region based on management's belief that there may ultimately be different credit loss rates experienced in each region.

Regular credit reviews of the portfolio also identify loans that are considered potentially impaired. Potentially impaired loans are referred to the ALLL Committee which reviews and approves designated loans as impaired. A loan is considered impaired when based on current information and events, we determine that we will probably not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan contract, including scheduled interest payments. When we identify a loan as impaired, we measure the impairment using discounted cash flows, except when the sole remaining source of the repayment for the loan is the liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, we use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs, instead of discounted cash flows. If we determine that the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we either recognize an impairment reserve as a specific component to be provided for in the allowance for loan and lease losses or charge-off the impaired balance on collateral dependent loans if it is determined that such amount represents a confirmed loss. The combination of the risk rating-based allowance component and the impairment reserve allowance component lead to an allocated allowance for loan and lease losses.

The Bank may also maintain an unallocated allowance amount to provide for other credit losses inherent in a loan and lease portfolio that may not have been contemplated in the credit loss factors. This unallocated amount generally comprises less than 5% of the allowance, but may be maintained at higher levels during times of economic conditions characterized by falling real estate values. The unallocated amount is reviewed periodically based on trends in credit losses, the results of credit reviews and overall economic trends. As of March 31, 2017 , there was no unallocated allowance amount.

The RUC is established to absorb inherent losses associated with our commitment to lend funds, such as with a letter or line of credit. The adequacy of the ALLL and RUC are monitored on a regular basis and are based on management's evaluation of numerous factors. These factors include the quality of the current loan portfolio; the trend in the loan portfolio's risk ratings; current economic conditions; loan concentrations; loan growth rates; past-due and non-performing trends; evaluation of specific loss estimates for all significant problem loans; historical charge-off and recovery experience; and other pertinent information.

Management believes that the ALLL was adequate as of March 31, 2017 . There is, however, no assurance that future loan losses will not exceed the levels provided for in the ALLL and could possibly result in additional charges to the provision for loan and lease losses. In addition, bank regulatory authorities, as part of their periodic examination of the Bank, may require additional charges to the provision for loan and lease losses in future periods if warranted as a result of their review. A substantial percentage of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, as a result a significant decline in real estate market values may require an increase in the allowance for loan and lease losses.

Table of Contents

Acquired Loans

Acquired loans and leases are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. For purchased non-impaired loans, the difference between the fair value and unpaid principal balance of the loan at the acquisition date is amortized or accreted to interest income using the effective interest method over the remaining contractual period to maturity.

The acquired loans that are purchased impaired loans are aggregated into pools based on individually evaluated common risk characteristics and aggregate expected cash flows were estimated for each pool. A pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single interest rate, cumulative loss rate and cash flow expectation. The cash flows expected to be received over the life of the pool were estimated by management. These cash flows were input into an accounting loan system which calculates the carrying values of the pools and underlying loans, book yields, effective interest income and impairment, if any, based on actual and projected events. Default rates, loss severity, and prepayment speeds assumptions are periodically reassessed and updated within the accounting model to update our expectation of future cash flows. The excess of the cash flows expected to be collected over a pool's carrying value is considered to be the accretable yield and is recognized as interest income over the estimated life of the loan or pool using the effective yield method. The accretable yield may change due to changes in the timing and amounts of expected cash flows. Changes in the accretable yield are disclosed quarterly.

Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights ("MSR")

The Company determines its classes of servicing assets based on the asset type being serviced along with the methods used to manage the risk inherent in the servicing assets, which includes the market inputs used to value the servicing assets. The Company measures its residential mortgage servicing assets at fair value and reports changes in fair value through earnings. Fair value adjustments encompass market-driven valuation changes and the runoff in value that occurs from the passage of time, which are separately reported. Under the fair value method, the MSR is carried in the balance sheet at fair value and the changes in fair value are reported in earnings under the caption residential mortgage banking revenue in the period in which the change occurs.

Retained mortgage servicing rights are measured at fair value as of the date of the related loan sale. We use quoted market prices when available. Subsequent fair value measurements are determined using a discounted cash flow model. In order to determine the fair value of the MSR, the present value of expected net future cash flows is estimated. Assumptions used include market discount rates, anticipated prepayment speeds, delinquency and foreclosure rates, and ancillary fee income net of servicing costs. This model is periodically validated by an independent external model validation group. The model assumptions and the MSR fair value estimates are also compared to observable trades of similar portfolios as well as to MSR broker valuations and industry surveys, as available.

Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but instead are periodically tested for impairment. Management performs an impairment analysis for the intangible assets with indefinite lives on an annual basis as of December 31. Additionally, goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are evaluated on an interim basis when events or circumstances indicate impairment potentially exists. The impairment analysis requires management to make subjective judgments. Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, competitive forces, customer behaviors and attrition, changes in revenue growth trends, cost structures, technology, changes in discount rates and specific industry and market conditions. There can be no assurance that changes in circumstances, estimates or assumptions may result in additional impairment of all, or some portion of, goodwill or other intangible assets.

The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis of the Community Banking reporting segment as of December 31, 2016. The Company assessed qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicated that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, and determined no factors indicated an impairment.

Table of Contents

Stock-based Compensation

We recognize expense in the income statement for the grant-date fair value of restricted shares and stock options as equity-based forms of compensation issued to employees over the employees' requisite service period (generally the vesting period). The requisite service period may be subject to performance conditions. The fair value of the restricted shares is based on the Company's share price on the grant date. Management assumptions utilized at the time of grant impact the fair value of the option calculated under the pricing model, and ultimately, the expense that will be recognized over the expected service period related to each option.

Fair Value

A hierarchical disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability is utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of financial instruments generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of pricing observability and a lesser degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial instruments rarely traded or not quoted will generally have little or no pricing observability and a higher degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Pricing observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the market and not yet established and the characteristics specific to the transaction.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which creates Topic 606 and supersedes Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) , which postponed the effective date of 2014-09. Multiple ASUs and interpretative guidance have been issued in connection with ASU 2014-09. The core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In general, the new guidance requires companies to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current guidance, including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. The standard is effective for public entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is not permitted. For financial reporting purposes, the standard allows for either full retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or modified retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application. The Company has begun their process to implement this new standard. The Company has started by reviewing all revenue sources to determine the sources that are in scope for this guidance. As a bank, key revenue sources, such as interest income have been identified as out of scope of this new guidance. The Company has not yet determined the financial statement impact this guidance will have.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . The new guidance is intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. This ASU requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. In addition, the amendment requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes and requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. This ASU also eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The amendment also requires a re porting organization to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument specific credit risk (also referred to as "own credit") when the organization has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for certain provisions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . The amendments in this update require lessees, among other things, to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under previous authoritative guidance. This update also introduces new disclosure requirements for leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company has established a project team, for the implementation of this new standard. The team is currently working with a vendor to put a new leasing software in place that will support the current leasing process, as well as aid in the transition to the new leasing guidance. Although an estimate of the impact of the new leasing standard has not yet been determined, the Company expects a significant new lease asset and related lease liability on the balance sheet due to the number of leased properties the Bank currently has that are accounted for under current operating lease guidance.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments —Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The ASU is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. The ASU requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for certain financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates, but will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization's portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for specified periods. The Company has formed a cross-functional team to begin its implementation efforts of this new guidance. The team has begun the next steps of the process by evaluating the data elements, and modeling options, that are expected to be critical to the new process. An estimate of the impact of this standard has not yet been determined, however, the impact is expected to be significant.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, Other Income —Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets. The amendment clarifies that a financial asset is within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 if it meets the definition of an in substance nonfinancial asset. The amendments also define the term in substance nonfinancial asset. The amendments clarify that nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty. A contract that includes the transfer of ownership interests in one or more consolidated subsidiaries is within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 if substantially all of the fair value of the assets that are promised to the counterparty in a contract is concentrated in nonfinancial assets. The amendments clarify that an entity should identify each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset promised to a counterparty and derecognize each asset when a counterparty obtains control of it. The amendment is effective at the same time as the Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. For public entities, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Overview

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 , net earnings available to common shareholders were $46.0 million , or $0.21 per diluted common share, as compared to net earnings available to common shareholders of $47.5 million , or $0.22 per diluted common share, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . The decrease in net earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the same period of the prior year was principally attributable to a decrease in net interest income, primarily attributable to lower average yields on interest-earning assets, specifically within the loan and lease portfolio, and an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses. The decline was partially offset by an increase in non-interest income, related to residential mortgage banking revenue and a decrease in non-interest expense, related to decreases in merger related expenses.

The following table presents the return on average assets, average common shareholders' equity and average tangible common shareholders' equity for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 . For each of the periods presented, the table includes the calculated ratios based on reported net earnings available to common shareholders. Our return on average common shareholders' equity is negatively impacted as the result of capital required to support goodwill. To the extent this performance metric is used to compare our performance with other financial institutions that do not have merger and acquisition-related intangible assets, we believe it is beneficial to also consider the return on average tangible common shareholders' equity. The return on average tangible common shareholders' equity is calculated by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by average shareholders' common equity less average goodwill and intangible assets, net (excluding MSRs). The return on average tangible common shareholders' equity is considered a non-GAAP financial measure and should be viewed in conjunction with the return on average common shareholders' equity.

Return on Average Assets, Common Shareholders' Equity and Tangible Common Shareholders' Equity



(dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Return on average assets	0.75		%	0.82		%
Return on average common shareholders' equity	4.74		%	4.93		%
Return on average tangible common shareholders' equity	8.83		%	9.34		%
Calculation of average common tangible shareholders' equity:
Average common shareholders' equity	$	3,936,340		$	3,878,540
Less: average goodwill and other intangible assets, net	(1,823,799		)	(1,832,046		)
Average tangible common shareholders' equity	$	2,112,541		$	2,046,494

Additionally, management believes tangible common equity and the tangible common equity ratio are meaningful measures of capital adequacy. Umpqua believes the exclusion of certain intangible assets in the computation of tangible common equity and tangible common equity ratio provides a meaningful base for period-to-period and company-to-company comparisons, which management believes will assist investors in analyzing the operating results and capital of the Company. Tangible common equity is calculated as total shareholders' equity less preferred stock and less goodwill and other intangible assets, net (excluding MSRs). In addition, tangible assets are total assets less goodwill and other intangible assets, net (excluding MSRs). The tangible common equity ratio is calculated as tangible common shareholders' equity divided by tangible assets. The tangible common equity and tangible common equity ratio is considered a non-GAAP financial measure and should be viewed in conjunction with the total shareholders' equity and the total shareholders' equity ratio.

Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of ending shareholders' equity (GAAP) to ending tangible common equity (non-GAAP), and ending assets (GAAP) to ending tangible assets (non-GAAP) as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :

Reconciliations of Total Shareholders' Equity to Tangible Common Shareholders' Equity and Total Assets to Tangible Assets



(dollars in thousands)	March 31,			December 31,
	2017			2016
Total shareholders' equity	$	3,931,150		$	3,916,795
Subtract:
Goodwill	1,787,651			1,787,651
Other intangible assets, net	35,197			36,886
Tangible common shareholders' equity	$	2,108,302		$	2,092,258
Total assets	$	24,861,458		$	24,813,119
Subtract:
Goodwill	1,787,651			1,787,651
Other intangible assets, net	35,197			36,886
Tangible assets	$	23,038,610		$	22,988,582
Tangible common equity ratio	9.15		%	9.10		%

Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not reviewed or audited. Although we believe these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company, they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the largest source of our income. Net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $206.7 million , a decrease of $11.0 million , compared to the same period in 2016 . The decrease in net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is primarily attributable to lower average yields on interest-earning assets, specifically within the loan and lease portfolio. The decrease was partially offset by growth in average interest-earning assets with increases in loans and leases, taxable securities, and interest-bearing cash. The decrease also reflects a higher average cost of funds, primarily driven by an increase in the cost of time deposits due to the utilization of longer-term maturities which typically carry a high rate paid, as well as an increase in the interest expense on junior subordinated debentures.

The net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets) on a fully tax equivalent basis was 3.85% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , a decrease of 49 basis points as compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease in net interest margin primarily resulted from the lower level of accretion of the credit discount recorded on loans acquired, as well as decreased yields on interest-earning assets. The yield on loans and leases decreased by 42 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Our net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in the yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on deposits and borrowed funds.

Table of Contents

The following table presents condensed average balance sheet information, together with interest income and yields on average interest-earning assets, and interest expense and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :

Average Rates and Balances



(dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended							Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017							March 31, 2016
				Interest		Average					Interest		Average
	Average			Income or		Yields or		Average			Income or		Yields or
	Balance			Expense		Rates		Balance			Expense		Rates
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS:
Loans held for sale	$	351,570		$	3,395	3.86	%	$	297,732		$	3,022	4.06	%
Loans and leases (1)	17,598,314			202,601		4.65	%	17,008,084			214,906		5.07	%
Taxable securities	2,723,576			14,319		2.10	%	2,311,589			13,421		2.32	%
Non-taxable securities (2)	286,444			3,409		4.76	%	287,085			3,398		4.73	%
Temporary investments and interest-bearing cash	804,354			1,557		0.79	%	356,674			480		0.54	%
Total interest-earning assets	21,764,258			225,281		4.18	%	20,261,164			235,227		4.66	%
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(136,216		)					(132,466		)
Other assets	3,102,243							3,286,741
Total assets	$	24,730,285						$	23,415,439
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	2,265,934		$	645	0.12	%	$	2,137,381		$	618	0.12	%
Money market deposits	6,871,515			2,669		0.16	%	6,612,209			2,834		0.17	%
Savings deposits	1,364,808			128		0.04	%	1,175,934			160		0.05	%
Time deposits	2,617,479			6,206		0.96	%	2,485,481			4,801		0.78	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	13,119,736			9,648		0.30	%	12,411,005			8,413		0.27	%
Repurchase agreements	326,666			30		0.04	%	312,399			36		0.05	%
Term debt	852,351			3,510		1.67	%	896,660			4,186		1.88	%
Junior subordinated debentures	362,805			4,201		4.70	%	356,614			3,727		4.20	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	14,661,558			17,389		0.48	%	13,976,678			16,362		0.47	%
Non-interest-bearing deposits	5,883,924							5,289,810
Other liabilities	248,463							270,411
Total liabilities	20,793,945							19,536,899
Common equity	3,936,340							3,878,540
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	24,730,285						$	23,415,439
NET INTEREST INCOME				$	207,892						$	218,865
NET INTEREST SPREAD						3.70	%						4.19	%
AVERAGE YIELD ON EARNING ASSETS (1), (2)						4.18	%						4.66	%
INTEREST EXPENSE TO EARNING ASSETS						0.33	%						0.32	%
NET INTEREST INCOME TO EARNING ASSETS OR NET INTEREST MARGIN (1), (2)						3.85	%						4.34	%


(1)	Non-accrual loans and leases are included in the average balance.


(2)	Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis at a 35% tax rate. The amount of such adjustment was an addition to recorded income of approximately $1.2 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in tax equivalent net interest income due to changes in average asset and liability balances (volume) and changes in average rates (rate) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 . Changes in tax equivalent interest income and expense, which are not attributable specifically to either volume or rate, are allocated proportionately between both variances.

Rate/Volume Analysis



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017 compared to 2016
	Increase (decrease) in interest income
	and expense due to changes in
	Volume			Rate			Total
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS:
Loans held for sale	$	522		$	(149	)	$	373
Loans and leases	6,808			(19,113		)	(12,305		)
Taxable securities	2,221			(1,323		)	898
Non-taxable securities (1)	(7		)	18			11
Temporary investments and interest bearing cash	817			260			1,077
Total (1)	10,361			(20,307		)	(9,946		)
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES:
Interest bearing demand deposits	37			(10		)	27
Money market deposits	108			(273		)	(165		)
Savings deposits	23			(55		)	(32		)
Time deposits	266			1,139			1,405
Repurchase agreements	2			(8		)	(6		)
Term debt	(200		)	(476		)	(676		)
Junior subordinated debentures	66			408			474
Total	302			725			1,027
Net increase in net interest income (1)	$	10,059		$	(21,032	)	$	(10,973	)


(1)	Tax exempt income has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis at a 35% tax rate.

Provision for Loan and Lease Losses

The provision for loan and lease losses was $11.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , as compared to $4.8 million for the same period in 2016 . As an annualized percentage of average outstanding loans and leases, the provision for loan and lease losses recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was 0.27% as compared to 0.11% in the same period in 2016 .

The increase for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same prior year period is primarily related to strong growth in the loan portfolio, in addition to an increase in net charge-offs. Net charge-offs on loans were $9.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 , or 0.22% of average loans and leases (annualized), as compared to net charge-offs of $4.9 million , or 0.12% of average loans and leases (annualized), for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . For the first quarter of 2017 , $380,000 of the provision for loan and lease losses related to previously acquired loans that were not purchased credit impaired. For the first quarter of 2016, $579,000 of the provision for loan and lease was recaptured related to previously acquired loans that were not purchased credit impaired.

The Company recognizes the charge-off of impairment reserves on impaired loans in the period they arise for collateral-dependent loans. Therefore, the non-accrual loans of $28.9 million as of March 31, 2017 have already been written-down to their estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell, and are expected to be resolved with no additional material loss, absent further decline in market prices.

Table of Contents

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $60.2 million , an increase of $14.3 million , or 31% , as compared to the same period in 2016 . The following table presents the key components of non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :

Non-Interest Income



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
							Change			Change
	2017			2016			Amount			Percent
Service charges on deposits	$	14,729		$	14,516		$	213		1	%
Brokerage revenue	4,122			4,094			28			1	%
Residential mortgage banking revenue, net	26,834			15,426			11,408			74	%
(Loss) gain on investment securities, net	(2		)	696			(698		)	(100	)%
Gain on loan sales, net	1,754			2,371			(617		)	(26	)%
Loss on junior subordinated debentures carried at fair value	(1,555		)	(1,572		)	17			(1	)%
BOLI income	2,069			2,139			(70		)	(3	)%
Other income	12,274			8,281			3,993			48	%
Total	$	60,225		$	45,951		$	14,274		31	%

Residential mortgage banking revenue increased for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same periods of 2016 due primarily to a decrease of $13.0 million in the loss on fair value of the MSR asset, driven by increasing long-term interest rates during the current period, and its impact on the prepayment speed assumption for the MSR asset. This increase in revenue was partially offset by a decline in revenue from the origination and sale of residential mortgages and servicing income, as the gain on sale margin declined to 3.27% for the three months ended March 31, 2017, from 3.72% for the prior year period. Closed for-sale mortgage volume for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $754.7 million , compared to $764.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 .

Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year increased by $4.0 million . The increase was primarily related to the change in debt capital market swap derivatives revenues which increased by $2.9 million as compared to the same period of 2016.

Table of Contents

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $182.7 million , a decrease of $1.3 million , or 1% as compared to the same period in 2016 . The following table presents the key elements of non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :

Non-Interest Expense



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
					Change			Change
	2017		2016		Amount			Percent
Salaries and employee benefits	$	106,473	$	106,538	$	(65	)	—	%
Occupancy and equipment, net	38,673		38,295		378			1	%
Communications	5,104		5,564		(460		)	(8	)%
Marketing	1,733		2,850		(1,117		)	(39	)%
Services	11,305		10,671		634			6	%
FDIC assessments	4,087		3,721		366			10	%
Loss on other real estate owned, net	82		1,389		(1,307		)	(94	)%
Intangible amortization	1,689		2,560		(871		)	(34	)%
Merger related expenses	1,020		3,450		(2,430		)	(70	)%
Goodwill impairment	—		142		(142		)	(100	)%
Other expenses	12,548		8,809		3,739			42	%
Total	$	182,714	$	183,989	$	(1,275	)	(1	)%

Marketing expense decreased by $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily related to costs associated with branding initiatives in early 2016.

In the three months ended March 31, 2017 , the Company recognized a net loss on OREO properties (which includes loss on sale and valuation adjustments) of $82,000 , as compared to a net loss on OREO properties of $1.4 million in the same period in 2016 . The change is primarily the result of improving real estate values, allowing for better realization of market values of existing OREO properties.

We incur significant expenses in connection with the completion and integration of bank acquisitions that are not capitalizable. These merger expenses are recorded in accordance with a Board approved accounting policy with respect to merger related charges, including internal and external charges. These expenses include acquisition related expenses, certain facility closure related costs, customer communications, restructuring expenses (including associate severance and retention charges) and expenses related to conversions of systems, including consulting costs. The merger related expenses incurred in 2017 and 2016 relate to the merger with Sterling.

The following table provides a breakout of Merger related expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
Premises and Equipment	$	793	$	794
Personnel	146		912
Legal and professional	81		1,140
Communication	—		245
Other	—		359
Total merger related expense	$	1,020	$	3,450

Table of Contents

Other non-interest expense increased by $3.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase is primarily due to $1.2 million in litigation settlement losses that were paid during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and a $703,000 incremental increase in brokered deposit fees due paid during the quarter.

Income Taxes

The Company's consolidated effective tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was 36.6% , as compared to 36.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 . The effective tax rates differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% and the apportioned state rate of 5% (net of the federal tax benefit) principally because of the relative amount of income earned in each state jurisdiction, non-taxable income arising from bank-owned life insurance, income on tax-exempt investment securities, stock-based compensation and tax credits arising from low income housing investments.

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Investment Securities

Trading securities were $11.2 million at March 31, 2017 , up from $11.0 million at December 31, 2016 .

Investment securities available for sale were $3.2 billion as of March 31, 2017 compared to $2.7 billion at December 31, 2016 . The increase was due to the Company deploying excess cash by purchasing $672.1 million in investments during the quarter, offset by sales and paydowns of $127.2 million . The shift in liquidity from lower interest bearing cash into investment securities assisted in improving the net interest margin by 2 basis points as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 .

Investment securities held to maturity were $4.1 million as of March 31, 2017 , as compared to $4.2 million at December 31, 2016 . The change primarily related to paydowns and maturities of investment securities held to maturity of $124,000 .

The following table presents the available for sale and held to maturity investment securities portfolio by major type as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :

Investment Securities Composition



(dollars in thousands)	Investment Securities Available for Sale
	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Fair Value		%		Fair Value		%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	307,219	10	%	$	307,697	11	%
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	2,934,219		90	%	2,391,553		89	%
Investments in mutual funds and other equity securities	1,970		—	%	1,970		—	%
Total	$	3,243,408	100	%	$	2,701,220	100	%



(dollars in thousands)	Investment Securities Held to Maturity
	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Amortized				Amortized
	Cost		%		Cost		%
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations	$	4,121	100	%	$	4,216	100	%
Total	$	4,121	100	%	$	4,216	100	%

We review investment securities on an ongoing basis for the presence of other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") or permanent impairment, taking into consideration current market conditions, fair value in relationship to cost, extent and nature of the change in fair value, issuer rating changes and trends, whether we intend to sell a security or if it is likely that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of our amortized cost basis of the investment, which may be maturity, and other factors.

Gross unrealized losses in the available for sale investment portfolio were $40.7 million at March 31, 2017 . This consisted primarily of unrealized losses on residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of $38.1 million . The unrealized losses were primarily caused by interest rate increases subsequent to the purchase of the securities, and not credit quality. In the opinion of management, these securities are considered only temporarily impaired due to changes in market interest rates or the widening of market spreads subsequent to the initial purchase of the securities, and not due to concerns regarding the underlying credit of the issuers or the underlying collateral.

Table of Contents

Restricted Equity Securities

Restricted equity securities were $45.5 million at March 31, 2017 and $45.5 million at December 31, 2016 . Of the $45.5 million at March 31, 2017 , $44.0 million represented the Bank's investment in the FHLBs of Des Moines and San Francisco. FHLB stock is carried at par and does not have a readily determinable fair value. Ownership of FHLB stock is restricted to the FHLB and member institutions, and can only be purchased and redeemed at par.

Loans and Leases

Loans and Leases, net

Total loans and leases outstanding at March 31, 2017 were $17.8 billion , an increase of $321.0 million as compared to year-end 2016 . The increase included net new loan and lease originations of $360.2 million , partially offset by loans sold of $23.5 million , charge-offs of $13.0 million , and transfers to other real estate owned of $789,000 during the period.

The following table presents the concentration distribution of the loan and lease portfolio, net of deferred fees and costs, as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Loan and Lease Concentrations



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Amount		Percentage		Amount		Percentage
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	3,410,914	19.2	%	$	3,330,442	19.0	%
Owner occupied term, net	2,584,183		14.5	%	2,599,055		14.9	%
Multifamily, net	2,885,164		16.2	%	2,858,956		16.3	%
Construction & development, net	471,007		2.6	%	463,625		2.7	%
Residential development, net	145,479		0.8	%	142,984		0.8	%
Commercial
Term, net	1,620,311		9.1	%	1,508,780		8.6	%
LOC & other, net	1,114,160		6.2	%	1,116,259		6.4	%
Leases and equipment finance, net	1,000,376		5.6	%	950,588		5.4	%
Residential
Mortgage, net	2,916,924		16.4	%	2,887,971		16.5	%
Home equity loans & lines, net	1,015,138		5.7	%	1,011,844		5.8	%
Consumer & other, net	665,982		3.7	%	638,159		3.6	%
Total, net of deferred fees and costs	$	17,829,638	100.0	%	$	17,508,663	100.0	%

Table of Contents

Asset Quality and Non-Performing Assets

Non-Performing Assets

The following table summarizes our non-performing assets and restructured loans as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(in thousands)	March 31,			December 31,
	2017			2016
Loans and leases on non-accrual status	$	28,915		$	27,765
Loans and leases past due 90 days or more and accruing ⁽¹⁾	23,421			28,369
Total non-performing loans and leases	52,336			56,134
Other real estate owned	6,518			6,738
Total non-performing assets	$	58,854		$	62,872
Restructured loans ⁽²⁾	$	43,029		$	40,667
Allowance for loan and lease losses	$	136,292		$	133,984
Reserve for unfunded commitments	3,495			3,611
Allowance for credit losses	$	139,787		$	137,595
Asset quality ratios:
Non-performing assets to total assets	0.24		%	0.25		%
Non-performing loans and leases to total loans and leases	0.29		%	0.32		%
Allowance for loan and leases losses to total loans and leases	0.76		%	0.77		%
Allowance for credit losses to total loans and leases	0.78		%	0.79		%
Allowance for credit losses to total non-performing loans and leases	267		%	245		%


(1)	Excludes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that Umpqua has the right but not the obligation to repurchase that are past due 90 days or more totaling $ 5.3 million and $ 10.9 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.


(2)	Represents accruing restructured loans performing according to their restructured terms.

The purchased non-credit impaired loans had remaining credit discount that is expected to accrete into interest income over the life of the loans of $38.5 million and $43.9 million, as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively. The purchased credit impaired loan pools had remaining discount of $42.8 million and $45.7 million, as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively.

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality are accounted for as purchased credit impaired pools. Typically this would include loans that were considered non-performing or restructured as of acquisition date. Accordingly, subsequent to acquisition, loans included in the purchased credit impaired pools are not reported as non-performing loans based upon their individual performance status, so the categories of nonaccrual, impaired and 90 day past due and accruing do not include any purchased credit impaired loans.

Table of Contents

The Bank has written down impaired, non-accrual loans as of March 31, 2017 to their estimated net realizable value and expects resolution with no additional material loss, absent further decline in market prices. The following table summarizes our non-performing loans and leases by loan type as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :

Non-Performing Loans by Type



(in thousands)	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied term, net	$	1,594	$	3,147
Owner occupied term, net	8,000		4,392
Multifamily, net	387		476
Commercial
Term, net	6,996		6,880
LOC & other, net	3,334		4,998
Leases and equipment finance, net	9,031		10,728
Residential
Mortgage, net (1)	19,926		22,846
Home equity loans & lines, net	2,148		2,080
Consumer & other, net	920		587
Total	$	52,336	$	56,134


(1)	Excludes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that Umpqua has the right but not the obligation to repurchase that are past due 90 days or more totaling $ 5.3 million and $ 10.9 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The Company has performed, and will continue to perform, extensive reviews of our permanent commercial real estate portfolio, including stress testing. We perform reviews on both our non-owner and owner occupied credits to verify status, to ensure the accuracy of risk ratings, and to develop proactive action plans with borrowers on projects where debt service coverage has dropped below the Bank's benchmark. There can be no assurance that any further declines in economic conditions, such as potential increases in retail or office vacancy rates, will exceed the projected assumptions utilized in the stress testing and may result in additional non-performing loans in the future.

Restructured Loans

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , impaired loans of $43.0 million and $40.7 million , respectively, were classified as performing restructured loans. The restructurings were granted in response to borrower financial difficulty, and generally provide for a temporary modification of loan repayment terms. The performing restructured loans on accrual status represent principally the only impaired loans accruing interest at March 31, 2017 . In order for a new restructured loan to be considered performing and on accrual status, the loan's collateral coverage generally will be greater than or equal to 100% of the loan balance, the loan must be current on payments, and the borrower must either prefund an interest reserve or demonstrate the ability to make payments from a verified source of cash flow.

A further decline in the economic conditions in our general market areas or other factors could adversely impact individual borrowers or the loan portfolio in general. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that loans will not become 90 days or more past due, become impaired or placed on non-accrual status, restructured or transferred to other real estate owned in the future.

Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

The ALLL totaled $136.3 million at March 31, 2017 , an increase of $2.3 million from $134.0 million at December 31, 2016 . The following table shows the activity in the ALLL for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses



(in thousands)	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	133,984		$	130,322
Charge-offs	(13,002		)	(7,850		)
Recoveries	3,638			2,948
Net charge-offs	(9,364		)	(4,902		)
Provision for loan and lease losses	11,672			4,823
Balance, end of period	$	136,292		$	130,243
As a percentage of average loans and leases (annualized):
Net charge-offs	0.22		%	0.12		%
Provision for loan and lease losses	0.27		%	0.11		%
Recoveries as a percentage of charge-offs	27.98		%	37.55		%

The increase in allowance for loan and lease losses as of March 31, 2017 compared to the same period of the prior year was primarily the result of growth in our loan and lease portfolios, and higher net charge-offs during the period. Additional discussion on the change in provision for loan and lease losses is provided under the heading Provision for Loan and Lease Losses above.

The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses and percent of loans in each category to total loans and leases as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Amount		% Loans to total loans		Amount		% Loans to total loans
Commercial real estate	$	49,006	53.3	%	$	47,795	53.7	%
Commercial	59,117		20.9	%	58,840		20.4	%
Residential	17,966		22.1	%	17,946		22.3	%
Consumer & other	10,203		3.7	%	9,403		3.6	%
Allowance for loan and lease losses	$	136,292			$	133,984

At March 31, 2017 , the recorded investment in loans classified as impaired totaled $55.7 million , with a corresponding valuation allowance (included in the allowance for loan and lease losses) of $742,000 . The valuation allowance on impaired loans represents the impairment reserves on performing current and former restructured loans and nonaccrual loans. At December 31, 2016 , the total recorded investment in impaired loans was $54.0 million , with a corresponding valuation allowance (included in the allowance for loan and lease losses) of $867,000 .

Table of Contents

The following table presents a summary of activity in the RUC:

Summary of Reserve for Unfunded Commitments Activity



(in thousands)	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,611		$	3,574
Net charge to other expense	(116		)	(92		)
Balance, end of period	$	3,495		$	3,482

We believe that the ALLL and RUC at March 31, 2017 are sufficient to absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and credit commitments outstanding as of that date based on the best information available. This assessment, based in part on historical levels of net charge-offs, loan and lease growth, and a detailed review of the quality of the loan and lease portfolio, involves uncertainty and judgment. Therefore, the adequacy of the ALLL and RUC cannot be determined with precision and may be subject to change in future periods. In addition, bank regulatory authorities, as part of their periodic examination of the Bank, may require additional charges to the provision for loan and lease losses in future periods if warranted as a result of their review.

Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights

The following table presents the key elements of our residential mortgage servicing rights portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :

Summary of Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights



(in thousands)	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	142,973		$	131,817
Additions for new MSR capitalized	7,041			5,980
Changes in fair value:
Due to changes in model inputs or assumptions ⁽¹⁾	(3,606		)	(10,251		)
Other ⁽²⁾	(4,064		)	(10,374		)
Balance, end of period	$	142,344		$	117,172


(1)	Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates.


(2)	Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.

Information related to our residential serviced loan portfolio as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was as follows:



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Balance of loans serviced for others	$	14,541,171		$	14,327,368
MSR as a percentage of serviced loans	0.98		%	1.00		%

Mortgage servicing rights are adjusted to fair value quarterly with the change recorded in mortgage banking revenue.

Table of Contents

Goodwill and Other Intangibles Assets

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , we had goodwill of $1.8 billion . Goodwill is recorded in connection with business combinations and represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired. There were no changes to goodwill during the three months ended March 31, 2017 .

At March 31, 2017 , we had other intangible assets of $35.2 million , as compared to $36.9 million at December 31, 2016 . As part of a business acquisition, the fair value of identifiable intangible assets such as core deposits, which include all deposits except certificates of deposit, are recognized at the acquisition date. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized to their estimated residual values over their respective estimated useful lives, and are also reviewed for impairment. We amortize other intangible assets on an accelerated or straight-line basis over an estimated ten to fifteen year life. The decrease from December 31, 2016 relates to the amortization of the other intangible assets of $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 .

Deposits

Total deposits were $19.2 billion at March 31, 2017 , an increase of $146.3 million , as compared to December 31, 2016 . The increase is attributable to growth in non-interest bearing demand and savings accounts, partially offset by a decrease in public funds, related to a combination of seasonal fluctuations and targeted run-off.

The following table presents the deposit balances by major category as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Amount		Percentage		Amount		Percentage
Non-interest bearing demand	$	6,021,585	31	%	$	5,861,469	31	%
Interest bearing demand	2,327,226		12	%	2,296,532		12	%
Money market	6,784,442		36	%	6,932,717		36	%
Savings	1,400,330		7	%	1,325,757		7	%
Time, $100,000 or greater	1,739,461		9	%	1,702,982		9	%
Time, less than $100,000	894,249		5	%	901,528		5	%
Total	$	19,167,293	100	%	$	19,020,985	100	%

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company's brokered deposits, including Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service ("CDARS"), totaled $956.7 million and $1.0 billion , respectively.

Borrowings

At March 31, 2017 , the Bank had outstanding $304.3 million of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and no outstanding federal funds purchased balances. The Bank had outstanding term debt of $852.3 million at March 31, 2017 . Term debt outstanding as of March 31, 2017 decreased $89,000 since December 31, 2016 . Advances from the FHLB amounted to $851.8 million of the total term debt and are secured by investment securities and loans secured by real estate. The FHLB advances have fixed interest rates ranging from 0.94% to 7.10% and mature in 2017 through 2033 .

Junior Subordinated Debentures

We had junior subordinated debentures with carrying values of $364.5 million and $363.1 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively. The increase is due to the change in fair value for the junior subordinated debentures selected to be carried at fair value. As of March 31, 2017 , the majority of the junior subordinated debentures had interest rates that are adjustable on a quarterly basis based on a spread over three month LIBOR. Interest expense for junior subordinated debentures increased for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 , primarily resulting from increases in the LIBOR rate during the period.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Cash Flow

The principal objective of our liquidity management program is to maintain the Bank's ability to meet the day-to-day cash flow requirements of our customers who either wish to withdraw funds or to draw upon credit facilities to meet their cash needs.

We monitor the sources and uses of funds on a daily basis to maintain an acceptable liquidity position. One source of funds includes public deposits. Individual state laws require banks to collateralize public deposits, typically as a percentage of their public deposit balance in excess of FDIC insurance. Public deposits represented 7.5% of total deposits at March 31, 2017 and 8.6% of total deposits at December 31, 2016 . The amount of collateral required varies by state and may also vary by institution within each state, depending on the individual state's risk assessment of depository institutions. Changes in the pledging requirements for uninsured public deposits may require pledging additional collateral to secure these deposits, drawing on other sources of funds to finance the purchase of assets that would be available to be pledged to satisfy a pledging requirement, or could lead to the withdrawal of certain public deposits from the Bank. In addition to liquidity from core deposits and the repayments and maturities of loans and investment securities, the Bank can utilize established uncommitted federal funds lines of credit, sell securities under agreements to repurchase, borrow on a secured basis from the FHLB or issue brokered certificates of deposit.

The Bank had available lines of credit with the FHLB totaling $6.0 billion at March 31, 2017 , subject to certain collateral requirements, namely the amount of pledged loans and investment securities. The Bank had available lines of credit with the Federal Reserve totaling $420.1 million , subject to certain collateral requirements, namely the amount of certain pledged loans. The Bank had uncommitted federal funds line of credit agreements with additional financial institutions totaling $450.0 million at March 31, 2017 . Availability of these lines is subject to federal funds balances available for loan and continued borrower eligibility. These lines are intended to support short-term liquidity needs, and the agreements may restrict consecutive day usage.

The Company is a separate entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. Substantially all of the Company's revenues are obtained from dividends declared and paid by the Bank. There were $48.5 million of dividends paid by the Bank to the Company in the three months ended March 31, 2017 . There are statutory and regulatory provisions that could limit the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company. We believe that such restrictions will not have an adverse impact on the ability of the Company to fund its quarterly cash dividend distributions to common shareholders and meet its ongoing cash obligations, which consist principally of debt service on the outstanding junior subordinated debentures. As of March 31, 2017 , the Company did not have any borrowing arrangements of its own.

As disclosed in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows , net cash provided by operating activities was $59.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017 , with the difference between cash provided by operating activities and net income largely consisting of proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale of $795.8 million , offset by originations of loans held for sale of $754.7 million . This compares to net cash provided by operating activities of $42.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 , with the difference between cash provided by operating activities and net income largely consisting of proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale of $759.9 million , offset by originations of loans held for sale of $764.1 million .

Net cash of $885.8 million used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2017 consisted principally of purchases of investment securities available for sale of $672.1 million and net loan originations of $360.2 million , offset by proceeds from investment securities available for sale of $127.2 million and proceeds from sale of loans and leases of $25.3 million . This compares to net cash of $355.6 million used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2016 , which consisted principally of net loan originations of $506.0 million and purchases of investment securities available for sale of $96.6 million , partially offset by proceeds from the sale of loans and leases of $151.5 million and proceeds from investment securities available for sale of $103.6 million .

Net cash of $61.1 million provided by financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily consisted of $146.6 million increase in net deposits and proceeds from term debt borrowings of $100.0 million , offset by $100.0 million repayment of term debt, a net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $48.7 million and the dividends paid on common stock of $35.2 million . This compares to net cash of $452.0 million provided by financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2016 , which consisted primarily of $456.6 million increase in net deposits and proceeds from term debt borrowings of $115.0 million , offset by $100.0 million repayment of term debt and $35.3 million in dividends paid on common stock.

Although we expect the Bank's and the Company's liquidity positions to remain satisfactory during 2017 , it is possible that our deposit growth for 2017 may not be maintained at the levels experienced in the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Table of Contents

Off-balance-Sheet Arrangements

Information regarding Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements is included in Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Information regarding Concentrations of Credit Risk is included in Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Capital Resources

Shareholders' equity at March 31, 2017 was $3.9 billion , an increase of $14.4 million from December 31, 2016 . The increase in shareholders' equity during the three months ended March 31, 2017 was principally due to net income for the period and other comprehensive income, net of tax, offset by declared common dividends.

The following table shows the Company's consolidated and the Bank's capital adequacy ratios compared to the regulatory minimum capital ratio and the regulatory minimum capital ratio needed to qualify as a "well-capitalized" institution, as calculated under regulatory guidelines of Basel III at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 :



(dollars in thousands)					For Capital				To be Well
	Actual				Adequacy purposes				Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
As of March 31, 2017
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated	$	2,728,217	14.45	%	$	1,510,644	8.00	%	$	1,888,305	10.00	%
Umpqua Bank	$	2,548,617	13.51	%	$	1,509,435	8.00	%	$	1,886,794	10.00	%
Tier I Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated	$	2,127,280	11.27	%	$	1,132,983	6.00	%	$	1,510,644	8.00	%
Umpqua Bank	$	2,408,938	12.77	%	$	1,132,076	6.00	%	$	1,509,435	8.00	%
Tier I Common
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated	$	2,127,280	11.27	%	$	849,737	4.50	%	$	1,227,398	6.50	%
Umpqua Bank	$	2,408,938	12.77	%	$	849,057	4.50	%	$	1,226,416	6.50	%
Tier I Capital
(to Average Assets)
Consolidated	$	2,127,280	9.29	%	$	916,109	4.00	%	$	1,145,137	5.00	%
Umpqua Bank	$	2,408,938	10.52	%	$	916,173	4.00	%	$	1,145,216	5.00	%
As of December 31, 2016
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated	$	2,707,693	14.72	%	$	1,471,577	8.00	%	$	1,839,471	10.00	%
Umpqua Bank	$	2,534,927	13.79	%	$	1,470,731	8.00	%	$	1,838,414	10.00	%
Tier I Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated	$	2,108,948	11.47	%	$	1,103,682	6.00	%	$	1,471,577	8.00	%
Umpqua Bank	$	2,397,449	13.04	%	$	1,103,048	6.00	%	$	1,470,731	8.00	%
Tier I Common
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated	$	2,108,948	11.47	%	$	827,762	4.50	%	$	1,195,656	6.50	%
Umpqua Bank	$	2,397,449	13.04	%	$	827,286	4.50	%	$	1,194,969	6.50	%
Tier I Capital
(to Average Assets)
Consolidated	$	2,108,948	9.21	%	$	915,917	4.00	%	$	1,144,896	5.00	%
Umpqua Bank	$	2,397,449	10.47	%	$	916,260	4.00	%	$	1,145,325	5.00	%

Table of Contents

The phase-in period for the final rules that revise the regulatory capital rules to incorporate certain revisions by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to the Basel capital framework ("Basel III") began for the Company on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with the final rules in their entirety required to be phased in on January 1, 2019.

The final rules, among other things, include a common equity Tier 1 capital ("CET1") to risk-weighted assets ratio, including a capital conservation buffer, which will gradually increase from 4.5% on January 1, 2015 to 7.0% on January 1, 2019. The final rules also raise the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 6.0%, which is the current minimum, to 8.5% on January 1, 2019, as well as require a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%.

The Company's dividend policy considers, among other things, earnings, regulatory capital levels, the overall payout ratio and expected asset growth to determine the amount of dividends declared, if any, on a quarterly basis. There is no assurance that future cash dividends on common shares will be declared or increased. The following table presents cash dividends declared and dividend payout ratios (dividends declared per common share divided by basic earnings per common share) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 :

Cash Dividends and Payout Ratios per Common Share



	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2017			2016
Dividend declared per common share	$	0.16		$	0.16
Dividend payout ratio	76		%	73		%

As of March 31, 2017 , a total of 10.8 million shares are available for repurchase under the Company's current share repurchase plan. The Board of Directors approved an extension of the repurchase plan to July 31, 2017. The timing and amount of future repurchases will depend upon the market price for our common stock, securities laws restricting repurchases, asset growth, earnings, and our capital plan. In addition, our stock plans provide that option and award holders may pay for the exercise price and tax withholdings in part or whole by tendering previously held shares.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our assessment of market risk as of March 31, 2017 indicates there are no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures from those in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 .

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to information relating to us that is required to be included in our periodic filings with the SEC. The disclosure controls and procedures were last evaluated by management as of March 31, 2017 .

No change in our internal controls occurred during the first quarter of 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Due to the nature of our business, we are involved in legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company assumed, as successor-in-interest to Sterling, the defense of litigation matters pending against Sterling. Sterling previously reported that on December 11, 2009, a putative securities class action complaint captioned City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Sterling Financial Corp., et al., No. CV 09-00368-EFS, was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington against Sterling and certain of its current and former officers. On June 18, 2010, lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint alleging that the defendants violated sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 by making false and misleading statements concerning Sterling's business and financial results. Plaintiffs sought unspecified damages and attorneys' fees and costs. On August 30, 2010, Sterling moved to dismiss the Complaint, and the court granted the motion to dismiss without prejudice on August 5, 2013. On October 11, 2013, the lead plaintiff filed an amended consolidated complaint with the same defendants, class period, alleged violations, and relief sought. On January 24, 2014, Sterling moved to dismiss the amended consolidated complaint, and on September 17, 2014, the court entered an order dismissing the amended consolidated complaint in its entirety with no further leave to amend. On October 24, 2014, plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the district court's order granting the motion to dismiss the amended consolidated complaint. Appellant filed its opening brief on April 3, 2015 and the Company filed its reply brief on June 17, 2015; additional appellate briefing was filed in the third quarter 2015. The appellate court will hold a hearing on May 10, 2017.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under "Part I--Item 1A--Risk Factors" in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 . These factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in our Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Not applicable

(b) Not applicable

(c) The following table provides information about repurchases of common stock by the Company during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 :



Period	Total number of Common Shares Purchased (1)	Average Price Paid per Common Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan (2)	Maximum Number of Remaining Shares that May be Purchased at Period End under the Plan
1/1/17-1/31/17	39,041	$	18.23	—	10,807,429
2/1/17-2/28/17	46,804	$	18.03	—	10,807,429
3/1/17-3/31/17	989	$	19.28	—	10,807,429
Total for quarter	86,834	$	18.13	—

(1)

Common shares repurchased by the Company during the quarter consist of cancellation of 85,914 shares to be issued upon vesting of restricted stock awards and 920 shares to be issued upon vesting of restricted stock units to pay withholding taxes. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 , no shares were repurchased pursuant to the Company's publicly announced corporate stock repurchase plan described in (2) below.

(2)

The Company's share repurchase plan, which was first approved by its Board of Directors and announced in August 2003, was amended on September 29, 2011 to increase the number of common shares available for repurchase under the plan to 15 million shares. The repurchase program has been extended multiple times by the board with the current expiration date of July 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2017 , a total of 10.8 million shares remained available for repurchase. The timing and amount of future repurchases will depend upon the market price for our common stock, laws and regulations restricting repurchases, asset growth, earnings, and our capital plan.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable

Item 6. Exhibits

The exhibits filed as part of this Report and exhibits incorporated herein by reference to other documents are listed in the Exhibit Index to this Report, which follows the signature page.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION
		(Registrant)

Dated	May 5, 2017	/s/ Cort L. O'Haver
		Cort L. O'Haver President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated	May 5, 2017	/s/ Ronald L. Farnsworth
		Ronald L. Farnsworth Executive Vice President/ Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Dated	May 5, 2017	/s/ Neal T. McLaughlin
		Neal T. McLaughlin Executive Vice President/Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit #	Description
3.1	(a) Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended

3.2	(b) Bylaws, as amended

4.1	(c) Specimen Common Stock Certificate

4.2	The Company agrees to furnish upon request to the Commission a copy of each instrument defining the rights of holders of senior and subordinated debt of the Company.

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.3	Certification of Principal Accounting Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS XBRL Instance Document *

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document *

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document *

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document *

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document *

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document *

* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities and

Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

(a) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2014

(b) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed April 21, 2017

(c) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-77259) filed April 28, 1999