Combined Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Interim Financial Statements
(All Registrants)
Capitalized terms and abbreviations appearing in the unaudited combined notes to condensed financial statements are defined in the glossary. Dollars are in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise noted. The specific Registrant to which disclosures are applicable is identified in parenthetical headings in italics above the applicable disclosure or within the applicable disclosure for each Registrants' related activities and disclosures. Within combined disclosures, amounts are disclosed for any Registrant when significant.
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with GAAP are reflected in the condensed financial statements. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, except as otherwise disclosed. Each Registrant's Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2016
is derived from that Registrant's
2016
audited Balance Sheet. The financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes contained in each Registrant's
2016
Form 10-K. The results of operations for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2017
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending
December 31, 2017
or other future periods, because results for interim periods can be disproportionately influenced by various factors, developments and seasonal variations.
The classification of certain prior period amounts has been changed to conform to the presentation in the
March 31, 2017
financial statements.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(All Registrants)
The following accounting policy disclosures represent updates to
Note 1
in each indicated Registrant's
2016
Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with those disclosures.
Accounts Receivable
(PPL and PPL Electric)
In accordance with a PUC-approved purchase of accounts receivable program, PPL Electric purchases certain accounts receivable from alternative electricity suppliers at a discount, which reflects a provision for uncollectible accounts. The alternative electricity suppliers have no continuing involvement or interest in the purchased accounts receivable. Accounts receivable that are acquired are initially recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, PPL Electric purchased
$356 million
and
$382 million
of accounts receivable from alternative electricity suppliers.
3. Segment and Related Information
(PPL)
See
Note 2
in PPL's
2016
Form 10-K for a discussion of reportable segments and related information.
Income Statement data for the segments and reconciliation to PPL's consolidated results for the periods ended
March 31
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
|
|
U.K. Regulated
|
$
|
568
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
Kentucky Regulated
|
809
|
|
|
826
|
|
Pennsylvania Regulated
|
573
|
|
|
585
|
|
Corporate and Other
|
1
|
|
|
5
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,951
|
|
|
$
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K. Regulated (a)
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
Kentucky Regulated
|
95
|
|
|
112
|
|
Pennsylvania Regulated
|
79
|
|
|
94
|
|
Corporate and Other
|
(57
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes unrealized gains and losses from hedging foreign-currency related economic activity. See
Note 13
for additional information.
|
Balance Sheet data for the segments and reconciliation to PPL's consolidated results as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K. Regulated (a)
|
$
|
15,039
|
|
|
$
|
14,537
|
|
Kentucky Regulated
|
14,010
|
|
|
14,037
|
|
Pennsylvania Regulated
|
9,699
|
|
|
9,426
|
|
Corporate and Other (b)
|
286
|
|
|
315
|
|
Total
|
$
|
39,034
|
|
|
$
|
38,315
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes
$10.9 billion
and
$10.8 billion
of net PP&E as of
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
. WPD is not subject to accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation as prescribed by GAAP.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Primarily consists of unallocated items, including cash, PP&E and the elimination of inter-segment transactions.
|
(PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
PPL Electric has two operating segments that are aggregated into a single reportable segment. LKE, LG&E and KU are individually single operating and reportable segments.
4. Earnings Per Share
(PPL)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to PPL common shareowners by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to PPL common shareowners by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, increased by incremental shares that would be outstanding if potentially dilutive non-participating securities were converted to common shares as calculated using the Treasury Stock Method. Incremental non-participating securities that have a dilutive impact are detailed in the table below.
Reconciliations of the amounts of income and shares of PPL common stock (in thousands) for the periods ended
March 31
used in the EPS calculation are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Income (Numerator)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
Less amounts allocated to participating securities
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Basic and Diluted
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
$
|
479
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock (Denominator)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares - Basic EPS
|
680,882
|
|
|
675,441
|
|
Add incremental non-participating securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment awards
|
2,202
|
|
|
3,376
|
|
Weighted-average shares - Diluted EPS
|
683,084
|
|
|
678,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income available to PPL common shareowners
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income available to PPL common shareowners
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
For the periods ended
March 31
, PPL issued common stock related to stock-based compensation plans and the DRIP as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Stock-based compensation plans (a)
|
887
|
|
|
2,125
|
|
DRIP
|
445
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes stock options exercised, vesting of performance units, vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units and conversion of stock units granted to directors.
|
See
Note 7
for additional information on common stock issued under the ATM Program.
For the periods ended
March 31
, the following shares (in thousands) were excluded from the computations of diluted EPS because the effect would have been antidilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Stock options
|
696
|
|
|
696
|
|
5. Income Taxes
Reconciliations of income taxes for the periods ended
March 31
are as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(PPL)
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
Valuation allowance adjustments
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
Impact of lower U.K. income tax rates
|
(48
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
U.S. income tax on foreign earnings - net of foreign tax credit
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Impact of the U.K. Finance Acts
|
(3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Depreciation not normalized
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Interest benefit on U.K. financing entities
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Other
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Total increase (decrease)
|
(57
|
)
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Total income taxes
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(PPL Electric)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
Depreciation not normalized
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Total increase (decrease)
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
Total income taxes
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LKE)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Total increase (decrease)
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
Total income taxes
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LG&E)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
Total increase (decrease)
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
Total income taxes
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(KU)
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Total increase (decrease)
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total income taxes
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
6. Utility Rate Regulation
(All Registrants)
The following table provides information about the regulatory assets and liabilities of cost-based rate-regulated utility operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPL
|
|
PPL Electric
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Current Regulatory Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental cost recovery
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Generation formula rate
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Transmission service charge
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
Smart meter rider
|
8
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
6
|
|
Storm costs
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
|
7
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total current regulatory assets (a)
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
$
|
936
|
|
|
$
|
947
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
Taxes recoverable through future rates
|
343
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
340
|
|
Storm costs
|
44
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
Unamortized loss on debt
|
58
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
36
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
126
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant
|
160
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
159
|
|
AROs
|
228
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total noncurrent regulatory assets
|
$
|
1,908
|
|
|
$
|
1,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Regulatory Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation supply charge
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Transmission service charge
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
Demand side management
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Universal service rider
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
Transmission formula rate
|
6
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
15
|
|
Fuel adjustment clause
|
13
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Act 129 compliance rider
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
Storm damage expense
|
5
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
13
|
|
Other
|
2
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total current regulatory liabilities
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPL
|
|
PPL Electric
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant
|
$
|
701
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Power purchase agreement - OVEC (b)
|
74
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
23
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
76
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities
|
$
|
897
|
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LKE
|
|
LG&E
|
|
KU
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Current Regulatory Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental cost recovery
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Generation formula rate
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other
|
6
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total current regulatory assets
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
Storm costs
|
44
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
22
|
|
Unamortized loss on debt
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
126
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
AROs
|
228
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
141
|
|
Plant retirement costs
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other
|
10
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
|
Total noncurrent regulatory assets
|
$
|
828
|
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Regulatory Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand side management
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Fuel adjustment clause
|
13
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
Other
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
3
|
|
Total current regulatory liabilities
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated cost of removal
of utility plant
|
$
|
701
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
Power purchase agreement - OVEC (b)
|
74
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
23
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
23
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
23
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
76
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
Other
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities
|
$
|
897
|
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
For PPL, these amounts are included in "Other current assets" on the Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
(b)
|
This liability was recorded as an offset to an intangible asset that was recorded at fair value upon the acquisition of LKE by PPL.
|
Regulatory Matters
Kentucky Activities
Rate Case Proceedings
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
On November 23, 2016, LG&E and KU filed requests with the KPSC for increases in annual base electricity rates of approximately $103 million at KU and an increase in annual base electricity and gas rates of approximately $94 million and $14 million at LG&E. The proposed base rate increases would result in an electricity rate increase of 6.4% at KU and electricity and gas rate increases of 8.5% and 4.2% at LG&E. LG&E's and KU's applications include requests for CPCNs for implementing an Advanced Metering System program and a Distribution Automation program. The applications are based on a forecasted test year of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 and a requested return on equity of 10.23%.
On April 19, 2017 and May 1, 2017, LG&E and KU, along with all intervening parties to the proceeding, filed with the KPSC, stipulation and recommendation agreements (stipulations) resolving all issues with the parties. Among other things, the proposed stipulations provide for increases in annual revenue requirements associated with KU base electricity rates of $55 million, LG&E base electricity rates of $59 million and LG&E base gas rates of $8 million, reflecting a return on equity of 9.75%, and the withdrawal of LG&E's and KU's request for a CPCN for the Advanced Metering System. The proposed stipulations would result in a base electricity rate increase of 3.4% at KU and base electricity and gas rate increases of 5.4% and 2.3% at LG&E. The proposed stipulations remain subject to KPSC approval. If approved, new rates and all elements of the stipulations would be effective July 1, 2017. A public hearing on the applications is scheduled to commence on May 9, 2017. LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.
Gas Franchise
(LKE and LG&E)
LG&E’s gas franchise agreement for the Louisville/Jefferson County service area expired in March 2016. In August 2016, LG&E and Louisville/Jefferson County entered into a revised franchise agreement with a
5
-year term (with renewal options). The franchise fee may be modified at Louisville/Jefferson County's election upon
60
days' notice. However, any franchise fee is capped at
3%
of gross receipts for natural gas service within the franchise area. The agreement further provides that if the KPSC determines that the franchise fee should be recovered from LG&E's customers, the franchise fee shall revert to
zero
. In August 2016, LG&E filed an application in a KPSC proceeding to review and rule upon the recoverability of the franchise fee.
In August 2016, Louisville/Jefferson County submitted a motion to dismiss the proceeding filed by LG&E, and, in November 2016 filed an amended complaint against LG&E relating to these issues. LG&E submitted KPSC filings to respond to, request dismissal of and consolidate certain claims or aspects of the proceedings. In January 2017, the KPSC issued an order denying Louisville/Jefferson County's motion to dismiss, consolidating the matter with LG&E's filed application and establishing a procedural schedule for the case. Until the KPSC issues a final order in this proceeding, LG&E cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter but does not anticipate that it will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operation. LG&E continues to provide gas service to customers in this franchise area at existing rates, but without collecting or remitting a franchise fee.
Pennsylvania Activities
(
PPL and PPL Electric
)
Act 129
Act 129 requires Pennsylvania Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs) to meet, by specified dates, specified goals for reduction in customer electricity usage and peak demand. EDCs not meeting the requirements of Act 129 are subject to significant penalties. In November 2015, PPL Electric filed with the PUC its Act 129 Phase III Energy Efficiency and Conservation Plan for the period June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2021. In January 2016, PPL Electric and the other parties to the case reached a settlement of all major issues and filed that settlement with the Administrative Law Judge. In June 2016, the PUC issued a final order approving PPL Electric's Phase III Plan as modified by the settlement, allowing PPL Electric to recover, through the Act 129 compliance rider, a maximum
$313 million
in program cost over the
five
-year period June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2021.
Act 129 also requires Default Service Providers (DSP) to provide electricity generation supply service to customers pursuant to a PUC-approved default service procurement plan through auctions, requests for proposal and bilateral contracts at the sole discretion of the DSP. Act 129 requires a mix of spot market purchases, short-term contracts and long-term contracts (
4
to
20
years
), with long-term contracts limited to
25%
of load unless otherwise approved by the PUC. A DSP is able to recover the costs associated with its default service procurement plan.
PPL Electric has received PUC approval of its biannual DSP procurement plans for all prior periods required under Act 129. In January 2016, PPL Electric filed a Petition for Approval of a new DSP procurement plan with the PUC for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2021. The parties to the proceeding reached a settlement on all but one issue and a partial settlement agreement and briefs on the open issue were submitted to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in July 2016. In August 2016, the ALJ issued an initial decision, and certain parties filed exceptions and reply exceptions. In October 2016, the PUC issued an order approving the partial settlement agreement and adopting the initial decision with minor modifications. In November 2016, Retail Electric Supply Association (RESA) filed a Petition for Reconsideration of the portion of the October 2016 order that approved the Customer Assistance Program Standard Offer Referral Program (CAP-SOP). In January 2017, the PUC issued an order denying RESA's Petition for Reconsideration and closing the record. In February 2017, RESA filed a Petition for Review with the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania regarding the CAP-SOP. This matter remains pending before the court.
7. Financing Activities
Credit Arrangements and Short-term Debt
(All Registrants)
The Registrants maintain credit facilities to enhance liquidity, provide credit support and provide a backstop to commercial paper programs. For reporting purposes, on a consolidated basis, the credit facilities and commercial paper programs of PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU also apply to PPL and the credit facilities and commercial paper programs of LG&E and KU also apply to LKE. The amounts borrowed below are recorded as "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets. The following credit facilities were in place at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Borrowed
|
|
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
|
|
Unused
Capacity
|
|
Borrowed
|
|
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
|
PPL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WPD plc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility (a)
|
Jan. 2022
|
|
£
|
210
|
|
|
£
|
161
|
|
|
£
|
—
|
|
|
£
|
49
|
|
|
£
|
160
|
|
|
£
|
—
|
|
Term Loan Facility (b)
|
Dec. 2017
|
|
230
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
WPD (South West)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility (c)
|
July 2021
|
|
245
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
—
|
|
WPD (East Midlands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility (d)
|
July 2021
|
|
300
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
WPD (West Midlands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility
|
July 2021
|
|
300
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Uncommitted Credit Facilities (e)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total U.K. Credit Facilities (f)
|
|
|
£
|
1,375
|
|
|
£
|
591
|
|
|
£
|
4
|
|
|
£
|
780
|
|
|
£
|
339
|
|
|
£
|
4
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPL Capital Funding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility
|
Jan. 2022
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
761
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility
|
Nov. 2018
|
|
300
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Bilateral Credit Facility
|
Mar. 2018
|
|
150
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17
|
|
Total PPL Capital Funding Credit Facilities
|
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Borrowed
|
|
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
|
|
Unused
Capacity
|
|
Borrowed
|
|
Letters of
Credit
and
Commercial
Paper
Issued
|
PPL Electric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility
|
Jan. 2022
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LKE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility
|
Oct. 2018
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LG&E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility
|
Jan. 2022
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated Credit Facility
|
Jan. 2022
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Letter of Credit Facility
|
Oct. 2017
|
|
198
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
198
|
|
Total KU Credit Facilities
|
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The amounts borrowed at
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
were USD-denominated borrowings of
$200 million
for both periods, which bore interest at
1.61%
and
1.43%
. The unused capacity reflects the amount borrowed in GBP of
£161 million
as of the date borrowed.
|
|
|
(b)
|
The amount borrowed at
March 31, 2017
was a GBP-denominated borrowing which equated to
$286 million
and bore interest at
1.51%
.
|
|
|
(c)
|
The amounts borrowed at
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
were GBP-denominated borrowings which equated to
$90 million
and
$137 million
and bore interest at
0.66%
for both periods.
|
|
|
(d)
|
The amounts borrowed at
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
were GBP-denominated borrowings which equated to
$159 million
and
$11 million
and bore interest at
0.66%
for both periods.
|
|
|
(e)
|
The amount borrowed at
December 31, 2016
was a GBP-denominated borrowing which equated to
$75 million
and bore interest at
1.26%
.
|
|
|
(f)
|
At
March 31, 2017
, the unused capacity under the U.K. credit facilities was
$972 million
.
|
PPL, PPL Electric, LG&E and KU maintain commercial paper programs to provide an additional financing source to fund short-term liquidity needs, as necessary. Commercial paper issuances, included in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets, are supported by the respective Registrant's Syndicated Credit Facility. The following commercial paper programs were in place at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Weighted -
Average
Interest Rate
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Commercial
Paper
Issuances
|
|
Unused
Capacity
|
|
Weighted -
Average
Interest Rate
|
|
Commercial
Paper
Issuances
|
PPL Capital Funding
|
1.25%
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
811
|
|
|
1.10%
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
PPL Electric
|
1.26%
|
|
650
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
1.05%
|
|
295
|
|
LG&E
|
1.19%
|
|
350
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
0.94%
|
|
169
|
|
KU
|
1.18%
|
|
350
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
0.87%
|
|
16
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
|
$
|
931
|
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
(LKE)
See
Note 10
for discussion of intercompany borrowings.
Long-term Debt
(PPL)
In March 2017, WPD (South Wales) issued
£50 million
of
0.01%
Index-linked Senior Notes due
2029
. WPD (South Wales) received proceeds of
£53 million
, which equated to
$64 million
at the time of issuance, net of fees and including a premium. The principal amount of the notes is adjusted based on changes in a specified index, as detailed in the terms of the related indenture. The proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes.
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
In April 2017, the Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government of Kentucky remarketed
$128 million
of Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, 2003 Series A (Louisville Gas and Electric Company Project) due
2033
on behalf of LG&E. The bonds were remarketed at a long term rate and will bear interest at
1.50%
through their mandatory purchase date of
April 1, 2019
.
(PPL)
ATM Program
In February 2015, PPL entered into
two
separate equity distribution agreements, pursuant to which PPL may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate of
$500 million
of its common stock. For the periods ended
March 31
, PPL issued the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Number of shares (in thousands)
|
1,364
|
|
|
—
|
|
Average share price
|
$
|
36.66
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Net Proceeds
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Distributions
In
February 2017
, PPL declared a quarterly common stock dividend, payable
April 3, 2017
, of
39.5 cents
per share (equivalent to
$1.58
per annum). Future dividends, declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors, will depend upon future earnings, cash flows, financial and legal requirements and other factors.
8. Defined Benefits
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
Certain net periodic defined benefit costs are applied to accounts that are further distributed among capital, expense and regulatory assets, including certain costs allocated to applicable subsidiaries for plans sponsored by PPL Services and LKE. Following are the net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) of the plans sponsored by PPL and its subsidiaries, LKE and its subsidiaries and LG&E for the periods ended
March 31
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Three Months
|
|
U.S.
|
|
U.K.
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
PPL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Interest cost
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
62
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(57
|
)
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
(133
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
20
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
37
|
|
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) before special termination benefits
|
24
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Special termination benefits (a)
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits)
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(a)
|
Enhanced pension benefits offered to certain PPL Electric bargaining unit employees under a one-time voluntary retirement window offered as part of the new five year IBEW contract ratified in March 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
LKE
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Interest cost
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(22
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
11
|
|
|
5
|
|
Net periodic defined benefit costs
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
LG&E
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
Net periodic defined benefit costs
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
PPL
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest cost
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Net periodic defined benefit costs
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
LKE
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest cost
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net periodic defined benefit costs
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
(PPL Electric, LG&E and KU)
In addition to the specific plans it sponsors, LG&E is allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE. PPL Electric and KU do not directly sponsor any defined benefit plans. PPL Electric is allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by PPL Services and KU is allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE. These allocations are based on participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable. For the periods ended
March 31
, PPL Services allocated the following net periodic defined benefit costs to PPL Electric, and LKE allocated the following net periodic defined benefit costs to LG&E and KU:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
PPL Electric
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
LG&E
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
KU
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
Expected Cash Flows - U.K. Pension Plans
(PPL)
For the three months ended March 31, 2017, WPD contributed
$462 million
to its U.K. pension plans. WPD made additional contributions in the second quarter of 2017 of
$23 million
. These accelerated contributions fund all 2017 required contributions and a portion of 2018 required contributions. WPD does not expect to make additional contributions in 2017.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
(All Registrants)
PPL and its subsidiaries are involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business. PPL and its subsidiaries cannot predict the outcome of such matters, or whether such matters may result in material liabilities, unless otherwise noted.
WKE Indemnification
(PPL and LKE)
See footnote (e) to the table in "Guarantees and Other Assurances" below for information on an LKE indemnity relating to its former WKE lease, including related legal proceedings.
Cane Run Environmental Claims
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
In December 2013,
six
residents, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against LG&E and PPL in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky alleging violations of the Clean Air Act and RCRA. In addition, these plaintiffs assert common law claims of nuisance, trespass and negligence. These plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and civil penalties, plus costs and attorney fees, for the alleged statutory violations. Under the common law claims, these plaintiffs seek monetary compensation and punitive damages for property damage and diminished property values for a class consisting of residents within
four
miles of the Cane Run plant. In their individual capacities, these plaintiffs sought compensation for alleged adverse health effects. In response to a motion to dismiss filed by PPL and LG&E, in July 2014, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' RCRA claims and all but
one
Clean Air Act claim, but declined to dismiss the common law tort claims. In November 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint removing the personal injury claims and removing certain previously named plaintiffs. In February 2017, the District Court issued an order dismissing PPL as a defendant and dismissing the final federal claim against LG&E under the Clean Air Act, and directed the parties to submit briefs regarding whether the court should continue to exercise supplemental jurisdiction regarding the remaining state law-only claims. On April 13, 2017, the District Court issued an order declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and dismissing the case in its entirety, subject to certain federal appeals or state court re-filing rights of the parties. PPL, LKE and LG&E cannot predict the outcome of this matter. LG&E retired
one
coal-fired unit at the Cane Run plant in March 2015 and the remaining
two
coal-fired units at the plant in June 2015.
E.W. Brown Environmental Claims
(
PPL, LKE and KU)
In October 2015, KU received a notice of intent from Earthjustice and the Sierra Club informing certain federal and state agencies of the Sierra Club's intent to file a citizen suit, following expiration of the mandatory
60
-day notification period, for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The claimants allege discharges at the E.W. Brown plant in violation of applicable rules and the plant's water discharge permit. The claimants assert that, unless the alleged discharges are promptly brought into compliance, it intends to seek civil penalties, injunctive relief and attorney's fees. In November 2015, the claimants submitted an amended notice of intent to add the Kentucky Waterways Alliance as a claimant. In October 2016, the claimants submitted an additional notice of intent alleging management of waste in a manner that may present an imminent and substantial endangerment under the RCRA. PPL, LKE and KU cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on the operations of the E.W. Brown plant, including increased capital or operating costs, if any.
Trimble County Water Discharge Permit
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
In May 2010, the Kentucky Waterways Alliance and other environmental groups filed a petition with the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (KEEC) challenging the Kentucky Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit issued in April 2010,
which covers water discharges from the Trimble County plant. In November 2010, the KEEC issued a final order upholding the permit, which was subsequently appealed by the environmental groups. In September 2013, the Franklin Circuit Court reversed the KEEC order upholding the permit and remanded the permit to the agency for further proceedings. LG&E and the KEEC appealed the order to the Kentucky Court of Appeals. In July 2015, the Court of Appeals upheld the lower court ruling. LG&E and the KEEC moved for discretionary review by the Kentucky Supreme Court. In February 2016, the Kentucky Supreme Court issued an order granting discretionary review and oral arguments were held in September 2016. On April 27, 2017, the Kentucky Supreme Court issued an order reversing the decision of the appellate court and upholding the permit issued to LG&E by the KEEC. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on the operations of the Trimble County plant, including increased capital or operating costs, if any, but do not expect such costs to be material.
Regulatory Issues
(
All Registrants)
See
Note 6
for information on regulatory matters related to utility rate regulation.
Electricity - Reliability Standards
The NERC is responsible for establishing and enforcing mandatory reliability standards (Reliability Standards) regarding the bulk electric system in North America. The FERC oversees this process and independently enforces the Reliability Standards.
The Reliability Standards have the force and effect of law and apply to certain users of the bulk electric system, including electric utility companies, generators and marketers. Under the Federal Power Act, the FERC may assess civil penalties for certain violations.
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU monitor their compliance with the Reliability Standards and self-report or self-log potential violations of applicable reliability requirements whenever identified, and submit accompanying mitigation plans, as required. The resolution of a small number of potential violations is pending. Penalties incurred to date have not been significant. Any Regional Reliability Entity (including RFC or SERC) determination concerning the resolution of violations of the Reliability Standards remains subject to the approval of the NERC and the FERC.
In the course of implementing their programs to ensure compliance with the Reliability Standards by those PPL affiliates subject to the standards, certain other instances of potential non-compliance may be identified from time to time. The Registrants cannot predict the outcome of these matters, and cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any.
Environmental Matters
(All Registrants)
Due to the environmental issues discussed below or other environmental matters, it may be necessary for the Registrants to modify, curtail, replace or cease operation of certain facilities or performance of certain operations to comply with statutes, regulations and other requirements of regulatory bodies or courts. In addition, legal challenges to new environmental permits or rules add to the uncertainty of estimating the future cost of these permits and rules. Finally, the regulatory reviews specified in the President's March 2017 Executive Order (the March 2017 Executive Order) promoting energy independence and economic growth could result in future regulatory changes and additional uncertainty.
WPD's distribution businesses are subject to certain statutory and regulatory environmental requirements. It may be necessary for WPD to incur significant compliance costs, which costs may be recoverable through rates subject to the approval of Ofgem. PPL believes that WPD has taken and continues to take measures to comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.
LG&E and KU are entitled to recover, through the ECR mechanism, certain costs of complying with the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those federal, state or local environmental requirements applicable to coal combustion wastes and by-products from facilities that generate electricity from coal in accordance with approved compliance plans. Costs not covered by the ECR mechanism for LG&E and KU and all such costs for PPL Electric are subject to rate recovery before the companies' respective state regulatory authorities, or the FERC, if applicable. Because neither WPD nor PPL Electric owns any generating plants, their exposure to related environmental compliance costs is reduced. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU can provide no assurances as to the ultimate outcome of future environmental or rate proceedings before regulatory authorities.
Air
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
The Clean Air Act, which regulates air pollutants from mobile and stationary sources in the United States, has a significant impact on the operation of fossil fuel plants. The Clean Air Act requires the EPA periodically to review and establish concentration levels in the ambient air for
six
criteria pollutants to protect public health and welfare. These concentration levels are known as NAAQS. The six criteria pollutants are carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter and sulfur dioxide.
Federal environmental regulations of these criteria pollutants require states to adopt implementation plans, known as state implementation plans, for certain pollutants, which detail how the state will attain the standards that are mandated by the relevant law or regulation. Each state identifies the areas within its boundaries that meet the NAAQS (attainment areas) and those that do not (non-attainment areas), and must develop a state implementation plan both to bring non-attainment areas into compliance with the NAAQS and to maintain good air quality in attainment areas. In addition, for attainment of ozone and fine particulates standards, states in the eastern portion of the country, including Kentucky, are subject to a regional program developed by the EPA known as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule. The NAAQS, future revisions to the NAAQS and state implementation plans, or future revisions to regional programs, may require installation of additional pollution controls, the costs of which PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU believe are subject to cost recovery.
Although PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU do not anticipate significant costs to comply with these programs, changes in market or operating conditions could result in different costs than anticipated.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to reassess the NAAQS for certain air pollutants on a five-year schedule. In 2008, the EPA revised the NAAQS for ozone and proposed to further strengthen the standard in November 2014. The EPA released a new ozone standard on October 1, 2015. The states and the EPA will determine attainment with the new ozone standard through review of relevant ambient air monitoring data, with attainment or nonattainment designations scheduled no later than October 2017. States are also obligated to address interstate transport issues associated with new ozone standards through the establishment of "good neighbor" state implementation plans for those states that are found to contribute significantly to another state's non-attainment. States that are not in the ozone transport region, including Kentucky, worked together to evaluate the need for further nitrogen oxide reductions from fossil-fueled plants with SCRs. Based on regulatory developments to date, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU do not anticipate requirements for nitrogen oxide reductions beyond those currently required under the Cross State Air Pollution Rule.
In 2010, the EPA finalized revised NAAQS for sulfur dioxide and required states to identify areas that meet those standards and areas that are in "non-attainment". In July 2013, the EPA finalized non-attainment designations for parts of the country, including part of Jefferson County in Kentucky. Attainment must be achieved by 2018. Based on regulatory developments to date, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU expect that certain previously required compliance measures, such as upgraded or new sulfur dioxide Scrubbers and additional sulfur dioxide limits at certain plants and the retirement of coal-fired generating units at LG&E's Cane Run plant and KU's Green River plant, are sufficient to achieve compliance with the new sulfur dioxide and ozone standards.
Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS)
In February 2012, the EPA finalized the MATS rule requiring reductions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from fossil-fuel fired power plants, with an effective date of April 16, 2012. In a subsequent judicial challenge, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the EPA failed to properly consider costs when deciding to regulate hazardous air emissions from power plants under MATS. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the matter to the D.C. Circuit Court which, in December 2015, remanded the rule to the EPA without vacating it. The EPA has proposed a supplemental finding regarding costs of the rule. The EPA's MATS rule remains in effect during the pendency of the ongoing proceedings.
LG&E and KU have installed significant controls in response to the MATS rule and in conjunction with compliance with other environmental requirements, including fabric-filter baghouses, upgraded Scrubbers or chemical additive systems for which appropriate KPSC authorization and/or ECR treatment has been received. LG&E and KU have received KPSC approval for a compliance plan providing for installation of additional MATS-related controls; however, the estimated cost of these controls is not expected to be significant for either LG&E or KU.
New Source Review (NSR)
The NSR litigation brought by the EPA, states and environmental groups against coal-fired generating plants in past years continues to proceed through the courts. Although none of this litigation directly involves PPL, LKE, LG&E or KU, it can influence the permitting of large capital projects at LG&E's and KU's power plants, the costs of which cannot presently be determined but could be significant.
Climate Change
There is continuing world-wide attention focused on issues related to climate change. In June 2016, the President announced that the United States, Canada and Mexico have established the North American Climate, Clean Energy, and Environment Partnership Plan, which specifies actions to promote clean energy, address climate change and protect the environment. The plan includes a goal to provide 50% of the energy used in North America from clean energy sources by 2025. The plan does not impose any nation-specific requirements.
In December 2015,
195
nations, including the U.S., signed the Paris Agreement on Climate, which establishes a comprehensive framework for the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from both developed and developing nations. Although the agreement does not establish binding reduction requirements, it requires each nation to prepare, communicate, and maintain GHG reduction commitments. Reductions can be achieved in a variety of ways, including energy conservation, power plant efficiency improvements, reduced utilization of coal-fired generation or replacing coal-fired generation with natural gas or renewable generation. Based on the EPA's Clean Power Plan described below, the U.S. has committed to an initial reduction target of
26%
to
28%
below 2005 levels by 2025. The March 2017 Executive Order directed the EPA to review proposed and final rules relating to greenhouse gas reductions for consistency with certain policy directives and suspend, revise, or rescind those rules as appropriate. Additionally, the March 2017 Executive Order directs rescission of specified guidance, directives, and prior Presidential actions regarding climate change. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of such regulatory actions or the impact, if any, on plant operations, rate treatment or future capital or operating needs.
The U.K. has enacted binding carbon reduction requirements that are applicable to WPD. Under the U.K. law, WPD must purchase carbon allowances to offset emissions associated with WPD's operations. The cost of these allowances is included in WPD's current operating expenses.
The EPA's Rules under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act
As further described below, the EPA finalized rules imposing GHG emission standards for both new and existing power plants. The EPA has also issued a proposed federal implementation plan that would apply to any states that fail to submit an acceptable state implementation plan under these rules. The EPA's authority to promulgate these regulations under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act has been challenged in the D.C. Circuit Court by several states and industry groups. On February 9, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the rule for existing plants (the Clean Power Plan) pending the D.C. Circuit Court's review and subsequent review by the U.S. Supreme Court if a writ of certiorari is filed and granted.
The EPA's rule for new power plants imposes separate emission standards for coal and natural gas units based on the application of different technologies. The coal standard is based on the application of partial carbon capture and sequestration technology, but because this technology is not presently commercially viable, the rule effectively precludes the construction of new coal-fired plants. The standard for NGCC power plants is the same as what the EPA proposed in 2012 and is not continuously achievable. The preclusion of new coal-fired plants and the compliance difficulties posed for new natural gas-fired plants could have a significant industry-wide impact.
The President's March 2017 Executive Order requires the EPA to review the rules for new and existing power plants and suspend, revise or rescind them as appropriate.
The EPA's Clean Power Plan
The EPA's rule for existing power plants, referred to as the Clean Power Plan, was published in the Federal Register in October 2015. The Clean Power Plan contains state-specific rate-based and mass-based reduction goals and guidelines for the development, submission and implementation of state implementation plans to achieve the state goals. State-specific goals were calculated from 2012 data by applying the EPA's broad interpretation and definition of the BSER, resulting in the most stringent targets to be met in 2030, with interim targets to be met beginning in 2022. The EPA believes it has offered some flexibility to
the states as to how their compliance plans can be crafted, including the option to use a rate-based approach (limit emissions per megawatt hour) or a mass-based approach (limit total tons of emissions per year), and the option to demonstrate compliance through emissions trading and multi-state collaborations. Under the rate-based approach, Kentucky would need to make a
41%
reduction from its 2012 emissions rate and under a mass-based approach it would need to make a
36%
reduction. These reductions are significantly greater than initially proposed and present significant challenges to the state. If the Clean Power Plan is ultimately upheld and Kentucky fails to develop an approvable implementation plan by the applicable deadline, the EPA may impose a federal implementation plan that could be more stringent than what the state plan might provide. Depending on the provisions of the Kentucky implementation plan, LG&E and KU may need to modify their current portfolio of generating assets during the next decade and/or participate in an allowance trading program.
LG&E and KU are monitoring developments at the state and federal level. Various states, industry groups and individual companies including LKE have filed petitions for reconsideration with EPA and petitions for review with the D.C. Circuit Court challenging the Clean Power Plan. In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the rule pending the D.C. Circuit Court's review. In light of the President's March 2017 Executive Order the next steps in this litigation are unclear. Additionally, the EPA has commenced review of the Clean Power Plan and related actions, as directed by the President's March 2017 Executive Order, to determine whether various rules should be suspended, revised or rescinded. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of the pending litigation, any changes in regulations, interpretations, or litigation positions that may be implemented by the U.S. presidential administration or the potential impact, if any, on plant operations, or future capital or operating costs. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU believe that the costs, which could be significant, would be subject to cost recovery.
In April 2014, the Kentucky General Assembly passed legislation limiting the measures that the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet may consider in setting performance standards to comply with the EPA's regulations governing GHG emissions from existing sources, if enacted. The legislation provides that such state GHG performance standards shall be based on emission reductions, efficiency measures and other improvements available at each power plant, rather than renewable energy, end-use energy efficiency, fuel switching and re-dispatch. These statutory restrictions may make it more difficult for Kentucky to achieve the GHG reduction levels that the EPA has established for Kentucky, if enacted.
Sulfuric Acid Mist Emissions
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
In June 2016, the EPA issued a notice of violation under the Clean Air Act alleging that LG&E violated applicable rules relating to sulfuric acid mist emissions at its Mill Creek plant. The notice alleges failure to install proper controls, failure to operate the facility consistent with good air pollution control practice, and causing emissions exceeding applicable requirements or constituting a nuisance or endangerment. LG&E believes it has complied with applicable regulations during the relevant time period. Discussions between the EPA and LG&E are ongoing. PPL, LKE and LG&E are unable to predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on operations of the Mill Creek plant, including increased capital or operating costs, and potential civil penalties or remedial measures, if any.
Water/Waste
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Coal Combustion Residuals (CCRs)
In April 2015, the EPA published its final rule regulating CCRs. CCRs include fly ash, bottom ash and sulfur dioxide scrubber wastes. The rule became effective in October 2015. It imposes extensive new requirements, including location restrictions, design and operating standards, groundwater monitoring and corrective action requirements, and closure and post-closure care requirements on CCR impoundments and landfills that are located on active power plants in the United States and not closed. Under the rule, CCRs are regulated as non-hazardous under Subtitle D of RCRA and beneficial use of CCRs is allowed, with some restrictions. The rule's requirements for covered CCR impoundments and landfills include implementation of groundwater monitoring and commencement or completion of closure activities generally between three and ten years from certain triggering events. The rule requires posting of compliance documentation on a publicly accessible website. Industry groups, environmental groups, individual companies and others have filed legal challenges to the final rule, which are pending before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Recently enacted federal legislation has authorized the EPA to approve equally protective state programs that would operate in lieu of the CCR Rule. Kentucky is close to finalizing a state rule aimed at reflecting the requirements of the federal rule.
LG&E and KU have received KPSC approval for a compliance plan providing for construction of additional landfill capacity at the E.W. Brown station, closure of impoundments at the Mill Creek, Trimble County, E.W. Brown, and Ghent stations, and construction of process water management facilities at those plants. In addition to the foregoing measures required for compliance with federal CCR rule requirements, LG&E and KU also received KPSC approval for their plans to close impoundments at the retired Green River, Pineville and Tyrone plants to comply with applicable state law requirements. See
Note 6
for additional information.
In connection with the final CCR rule, LG&E and KU recorded adjustments to existing AROs during 2015 and 2016. See Note 19 in the Registrants' 2016 Form 10-K for additional information. Further changes to AROs, current capital plans or operating costs may be required as estimates are refined based on closure developments, groundwater monitoring results, and regulatory or legal proceedings. Costs relating to this rule are subject to rate recovery.
Clean Water Act
Regulations under the federal Clean Water Act dictate permitting and mitigation requirements for facilities and construction projects in the United States. Many of those requirements relate to power plant operations, including requirements related to the treatment of pollutants in effluents prior to discharge, the temperature of effluent discharges and the location, design and construction of cooling water intake structures at generating facilities, standards intended to protect aquatic organisms that become trapped at or pulled through cooling water intake structures at generating facilities. The requirements could impose significant costs for LG&E and KU, which are subject to rate recovery.
Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs)
In September 2015, the EPA released its final ELGs for wastewater discharge permits for new and existing steam electric generating facilities. The rule provides strict technology-based discharge limitations for control of pollutants in scrubber wastewater, fly ash and bottom ash transport water, mercury control wastewater, gasification wastewater and combustion residual leachate. The new guidelines require deployment of additional control technologies providing physical, chemical and biological treatment of wastewaters. The guidelines also mandate operational changes including "no discharge" requirements for fly ash and bottom ash transport waters and mercury control wastewaters. The implementation date for individual generating stations will be determined by the states on a case-by-case basis according to criteria provided by the EPA, but the requirements of the rule must be fully implemented no later than 2023. Industry groups, environmental groups, individual companies and others have filed legal challenges to the final rule, which have been consolidated before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. LG&E and KU are developing compliance strategies and schedules. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to fully estimate compliance costs or timing at this time, although certain preliminary estimates are included in current capital forecasts for applicable periods. Costs to comply with ELGs or other discharge limits, which are expected to be significant, are subject to rate recovery.
Seepages and Groundwater Infiltration
Seepages or groundwater infiltration have been detected at active and retired wastewater basins and landfills at various LG&E and KU plants. LG&E and KU have completed, or are completing, assessments of seepages or groundwater infiltration at various facilities and have completed, or are working with agencies to implement, further testing, monitoring or abatement measures, where applicable. A range of reasonable possible losses cannot currently be estimated. Depending on the circumstances in each case, certain costs, which may be subject to rate recovery, could be significant.
(All Registrants)
Waters of the United States (WOTUS)
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has issued a stay of the EPA's rule on the definition of WOTUS pending the court's review of the rule. The effect of the stay is that the WOTUS rule is not in effect anywhere. On February 28, 2017, the President issued an Executive Order directing the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to review the rule for consistency with certain policy directives and rescind or revise it as appropriate. Additionally, the Executive Order directs the agencies to interpret certain jurisdictional provisions in a manner consistent with specified U.S. Supreme Court precedent. The ultimate outcome of the pending judicial and regulatory reviews of the rule remains uncertain. Because of the strict permitting programs already in place in Kentucky and Pennsylvania, the Registrants do not expect the rule to have a significant impact on their operations.
Other Issues
On June 22, 2016, the "Frank Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act" took effect as an amendment to the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA). The Act made no changes to the pre-existing TSCA rules as it pertains to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB). The EPA continues to reassess its PCB regulations as part of the 2010 Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM). The EPA's ANPRM rulemaking is to occur in two phases. Only the second part of the rule, currently scheduled for November 2017, is applicable to PPL operations. This part of the rule relates to the use of PCBs in electrical equipment and natural gas pipelines, as well as continued use of PCB-contaminated porous surfaces. Although the first rulemaking will not directly affect the Registrants' operations, it may indicate certain approaches or principles to occur in the later rulemaking which may affect Registrants' facilities in the United States, including phase-out of some or all equipment containing PCBs. Should such a phase-out be required, the costs, which are subject to rate recovery, could be significant.
Superfund and Other Remediation
(All Registrants)
PPL Electric is potentially responsible for a share of the costs at several sites listed by the EPA under the federal Superfund program, including the Columbia Gas Plant site and the Brodhead site. Clean-up actions have been or are being undertaken at all of these sites, the costs of which have not been, and are not expected to be, significant to PPL Electric.
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU are investigating, responding to agency inquiries, remediating, or have completed the remediation of, several sites that were not addressed under a regulatory program such as Superfund, but for which PPL Electric, LG&E and KU may be liable for remediation. These include a number of former coal gas manufacturing plants in Pennsylvania and Kentucky previously owned or operated or currently owned by predecessors or affiliates of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU. To date, the costs of these sites have not been significant.
There are additional sites, formerly owned or operated by PPL Electric, LG&E and KU predecessors or affiliates. PPL Electric, LG&E and KU lack information on the condition of such additional sites and are therefore unable to estimate any potential liability they may have or a range of reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these matters.
At
March 31, 2017
and December 31, 2016, PPL Electric had a recorded liability of
$10 million
representing its best estimate of the probable loss incurred to remediate the sites noted above. Depending on the outcome of investigations at sites where investigations have not begun or been completed, or developments at sites for which information is incomplete, additional costs of remediation could be incurred; however, such costs are not expected to be significant.
The EPA is evaluating the risks associated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and naphthalene, chemical by-products of coal gas manufacturing. As a result of the EPA's evaluation, individual states may establish stricter standards for water quality and soil cleanup. This could require several PPL subsidiaries to take more extensive assessment and remedial actions at former coal gas manufacturing plants. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these matters.
From time to time, PPL's subsidiaries in the United States undertake testing, monitoring or remedial action in response to notices of violations, spills or other releases at various on-site and off-site locations, negotiate with the EPA and state and local agencies regarding actions necessary for compliance with applicable requirements, negotiate with property owners and other third parties alleging impacts from PPL's operations and undertake similar actions necessary to resolve environmental matters that arise in the course of normal operations. Based on analyses to date, resolution of these environmental matters is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on the operations of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU.
Future cleanup or remediation work at sites under review, or at sites not yet identified, may result in significant additional costs for PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU. Insurance policies maintained by LKE, LG&E and KU may be applicable to certain of the costs or other obligations related to these matters but the amount of insurance coverage or reimbursement cannot be estimated or assured.
Other
Labor Union Agreements
(PPL and PPL Electric)
In March 2017, members of the IBEW ratified a new
five
-year labor agreement with PPL. The contract covers nearly
1,400
employees and is effective May 22, 2017. The terms of the new labor agreement are not expected to have a significant impact on the financial results of PPL or PPL Electric.
Guarantees and Other Assurances
(All Registrants)
In the normal course of business, the Registrants enter into agreements that provide financial performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries. Such agreements include, for example, guarantees, stand-by letters of credit issued by financial institutions and surety bonds issued by insurance companies. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness attributed to a subsidiary on a stand-alone basis or to facilitate the commercial activities in which these subsidiaries engage.
(PPL)
PPL fully and unconditionally guarantees all of the debt securities of PPL Capital Funding.
(All Registrants)
The table below details guarantees provided as of
March 31, 2017
. "Exposure" represents the estimated maximum potential amount of future payments that could be required to be made under the guarantee. The probability of expected payment/performance under each of these guarantees is remote except for "WPD guarantee of pension and other obligations of unconsolidated entities" and "Indemnification of lease termination and other divestitures." The total recorded liability at
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
was
$22 million
for PPL and
$17 million
for LKE. For reporting purposes, on a consolidated basis, all guarantees of PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU also apply to PPL, and all guarantees of LG&E and KU also apply to LKE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure at
March 31, 2017
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
PPL
|
|
|
|
|
Indemnifications related to the WPD Midlands acquisition
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
WPD indemnifications for entities in liquidation and sales of assets
|
$
|
10
|
|
(b)
|
|
2019
|
WPD guarantee of pension and other obligations of unconsolidated entities
|
105
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPL Electric
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantee of inventory value
|
17
|
|
(d)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
LKE
|
|
|
|
|
Indemnification of lease termination and other divestitures
|
301
|
|
(e)
|
|
2021 - 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
LG&E and KU
|
|
|
|
|
LG&E and KU guarantee of shortfall related to OVEC
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Indemnifications related to certain liabilities, including a specific unresolved tax issue and those relating to properties and assets owned by the seller that were transferred to WPD Midlands in connection with the acquisition. A cross indemnity has been received from the seller on the tax issue. The maximum exposure and expiration of these indemnifications cannot be estimated because the maximum potential liability is not capped and the expiration date is not specified in the transaction documents.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Indemnification to the liquidators and certain others for existing liabilities or expenses or liabilities arising during the liquidation process. The indemnifications are limited to distributions made from the subsidiary to its parent either prior or subsequent to liquidation or are not explicitly stated in the agreements. The indemnifications generally expire
two
to
seven
years subsequent to the date of dissolution of the entities. The exposure noted only includes those cases where the agreements provide for specific limits.
|
In connection with their sales of various businesses, WPD and its affiliates have provided the purchasers with indemnifications that are standard for such transactions, including indemnifications for certain pre-existing liabilities and environmental and tax matters or have agreed to continue their obligations under existing third-party guarantees, either for a set period of time following the transactions or upon the condition that the purchasers make reasonable efforts to terminate the guarantees. Additionally, WPD and its affiliates remain secondarily responsible for lease payments under certain leases that they have assigned to third parties.
|
|
(c)
|
Relates to certain obligations of discontinued or modified electric associations that were guaranteed at the time of privatization by the participating members. Costs are allocated to the members and can be reallocated if an existing member becomes insolvent. At
March 31, 2017
, WPD has recorded an estimated discounted liability for which the expected payment/performance is probable. Neither the expiration date nor the maximum amount of potential payments for certain obligations is explicitly stated in the related agreements, and as a result, the exposure has been estimated.
|
|
|
(d)
|
A third party logistics firm provides inventory procurement and fulfillment services. The logistics firm has title to the inventory, however, upon termination of the contracts, PPL Electric has guaranteed to purchase any remaining inventory that has not been used or sold.
|
|
|
(e)
|
LKE provides certain indemnifications covering the due and punctual payment, performance and discharge by each party of its respective obligations. The most comprehensive of these guarantees is the LKE guarantee covering operational, regulatory and environmental commitments and indemnifications made by WKE under a 2009 Transaction Termination Agreement. This guarantee has a term of
12
years ending July 2021, and a maximum exposure of
$200 million
, exclusive of certain items such as government fines and penalties that may exceed the maximum. Another WKE-related LKE guarantee covers other indemnifications related to the purchase price of excess power, has a term expiring in 2023, and a maximum exposure of
$100 million
. In May 2012, LKE's indemnitee received an unfavorable arbitration panel's decision interpreting this matter. In October 2014, LKE's indemnitee filed a motion for discretionary review with the Kentucky Supreme Court seeking to overturn the arbitration decision, and such motion was denied by the court in September 2015. In September 2015, the counterparty issued a demand letter to LKE's indemnitee. In February 2016, the counterparty filed a complaint in Henderson, Kentucky Circuit Court, seeking an award of damages in the matter. The proceeding is currently in the discovery phase. LKE does not believe appropriate contractual, legal or commercial grounds exist for the claim made. LKE believes its indemnification obligations in the WKE matter remain subject to various uncertainties, including additional legal and contractual developments, as well as future prices, availability and demand for the subject excess power. Although the parties have also conducted certain settlement discussions, the ultimate outcomes of the WKE termination-related indemnifications cannot be predicted at this time. Additionally, LKE has indemnified various third parties related to historical obligations for other divested subsidiaries and affiliates. The indemnifications vary by entity and the maximum exposures range from being capped at the sale price to no specified maximum. LKE could be required to perform on these indemnifications in the event of covered losses or liabilities being claimed by an indemnified party. LKE cannot predict the ultimate outcomes of the various indemnification scenarios, but does not expect such outcomes to result in significant losses above the amounts recorded.
|
|
|
(f)
|
Pursuant to the OVEC power purchase contract, LG&E and KU are obligated to pay for their share of OVEC's excess debt service, post-retirement and decommissioning costs, as well as any shortfall from amounts included within a demand charge designed and expected to cover these costs over the term of the contract. LKE's proportionate share of OVEC's outstanding debt was
$120 million
at
March 31, 2017
, consisting of LG&E's share of
$83 million
and KU's share of
$37 million
. The maximum exposure and the expiration date of these potential obligations are not presently determinable. See "Energy Purchase Commitments" in Note 13 in PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's 2016 Form 10-K for additional information on the OVEC power purchase contract. In connection with recent credit market related developments at OVEC or certain of its sponsors, such parties, including LG&E and KU, are analyzing certain potential additional credit support actions to preserve OVEC's access to credit markets or mitigate risks or adverse impacts relating thereto, including increased interest costs and accelerated maturities of OVEC's existing short and long-term debt. The ultimate outcome of these matters, including any potential impact on LG&E's and KU's obligations relating to OVEC debt under the power purchase contract cannot be predicted.
|
The Registrants provide other miscellaneous guarantees through contracts entered into in the normal course of business. These guarantees are primarily in the form of indemnification or warranties related to services or equipment and vary in duration. The amounts of these guarantees often are not explicitly stated, and the overall maximum amount of the obligation under such guarantees cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, no significant payments have been made with respect to these types of guarantees and the probability of payment/performance under these guarantees is remote.
PPL, on behalf of itself and certain of its subsidiaries, maintains insurance that covers liability assumed under contract for bodily injury and property damage. The coverage provides maximum aggregate coverage of
$225 million
. This insurance may be applicable to obligations under certain of these contractual arrangements.
10. Related Party Transactions
Support Costs
(PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS provide PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, their respective subsidiaries, including LG&E and KU, and each other, as applicable, with administrative, management and support services. For all service companies, the costs of these services are charged to the respective recipients as direct support costs. General costs that cannot be directly attributed to a specific entity are allocated and charged to the respective recipients as indirect support costs. PPL Services and PPL EU Services use a three-factor methodology that includes the applicable recipients' invested capital, operation and maintenance expenses and number of employees to allocate indirect costs. LKS bases its indirect allocations on the subsidiaries' number of employees, total assets, revenues, number of customers and/or other statistical information. PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS charged the following amounts for the periods ended
March 31
, including amounts applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense on the books of the recipients, based on methods that are believed to be reasonable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
PPL Electric from PPL Services
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
LKE from PPL Services
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
|
PPL Electric from PPL EU Services
|
18
|
|
|
17
|
|
LG&E from LKS
|
44
|
|
|
47
|
|
KU from LKS
|
44
|
|
|
56
|
|
In addition to the charges for services noted above, LKS makes payments on behalf of LG&E and KU for fuel purchases and other costs for products or services provided by third parties. LG&E and KU also provide services to each other and to LKS. Billings between LG&E and KU relate to labor and overheads associated with union and hourly employees performing work for the other company, charges related to jointly owned generating units and other miscellaneous charges. Tax settlements between LKE and LG&E and KU are reimbursed through LKS.
Intercompany Borrowings
(LKE)
LKE maintains a
$225 million
revolving line of credit with a PPL Energy Funding subsidiary whereby LKE can borrow funds on a short-term basis at market-based rates. The interest rates on borrowings are equal to one-month LIBOR plus a spread. At
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
,
$82 million
and
$163 million
were outstanding and reflected in "Notes payable with affiliate" on the Balance Sheets. The interest rates on the outstanding borrowing at
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
were
2.29%
and
2.12%
.
In November 2015, LKE entered into a
$400 million
ten
-year note with a PPL affiliate with an interest rate of
3.5%
. At
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the note was reflected in "Long-term debt to affiliate" on the Balance Sheets. Interest expense on this note was not significant at March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Other
(PPL Electric, LG&E and KU)
See
Note 8
for discussions regarding intercompany allocations associated with defined benefits.
11. Other Income (Expense) - net
(PPL)
"Other Income (Expense) - net" for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
consisted primarily of gains (losses) on foreign currency contracts to economically hedge PPL's translation risk related to its GBP denominated earnings in the U.K. See
Note 13
for additional information on these derivatives.
12. Fair Value Measurements
(All Registrants)
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). A market approach (generally, data from market transactions), an income approach (generally, present value techniques and option-pricing models) and/or a cost approach (generally, replacement cost) are used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability, as appropriate. These valuation approaches incorporate inputs such as observable, independent market data and/or unobservable data that management believes are predicated on the assumptions market participants would use to price an asset or liability. These inputs may incorporate, as applicable, certain risks such as nonperformance risk, which includes credit risk. The fair value of a group of financial assets and liabilities is measured on a net basis. Transfers between levels are recognized at end-of-reporting-period values. During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, there were
no
transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. See
Note 1
in each Registrant's
2016
Form 10-K for information on the levels in the fair value hierarchy.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The assets and liabilities measured at fair value were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
PPL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
409
|
|
|
$
|
409
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (a)
|
25
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Price risk management assets (b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
200
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
179
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total price risk management assets
|
379
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
813
|
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
766
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price risk management liabilities (b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
50
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total price risk management liabilities
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPL Electric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (a)
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LKE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Cash collateral posted to counterparties (c)
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price risk management liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total price risk management liabilities
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LG&E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Cash collateral posted to counterparties (c)
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price risk management liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total price risk management liabilities
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
KU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Current portion is included in "Other current assets" and long-term portion is included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Current portion is included in "Price risk management assets" and "Other current liabilities" and noncurrent portion is included in "Price risk management assets" and "Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets. Represents cash collateral posted to offset the exposure with counterparties related to certain interest rate swaps under master netting arrangements that are not offset.
|
Price Risk Management Assets/Liabilities - Interest Rate Swaps/Foreign Currency Contracts/Cross-Currency Swaps
(
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
To manage interest rate risk, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU use interest rate contracts such as forward-starting swaps, floating-to-fixed swaps and fixed-to-floating swaps. To manage foreign currency risk, PPL uses foreign currency contracts such as forwards, options and cross-currency swaps that contain characteristics of both interest rate and foreign currency contracts. An income approach is used to measure the fair value of these contracts, utilizing readily observable inputs, such as forward interest rates (e.g., LIBOR and government security rates) and forward foreign currency exchange rates (e.g., GBP), as well as inputs that may not be observable, such as credit valuation adjustments. In certain cases, market information cannot practicably be obtained to value credit risk and therefore internal models are relied upon. These models use projected probabilities of default and estimated recovery rates based on historical observances. When the credit valuation adjustment is significant to the overall valuation, the contracts are classified as Level 3.
Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value
(All Registrants)
The carrying amounts of long-term debt on the Balance Sheets and their estimated fair values are set forth below. The fair values were estimated using an income approach by discounting future cash flows at estimated current cost of funding rates, which incorporate the credit risk of the Registrants. Long-term debt is classified as Level 2. The effect of third-party credit enhancements is not included in the fair value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Carrying
Amount (a)
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying
Amount (a)
|
|
Fair Value
|
PPL
|
$
|
18,375
|
|
|
$
|
21,646
|
|
|
$
|
18,326
|
|
|
$
|
21,355
|
|
PPL Electric
|
2,832
|
|
|
3,141
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
LKE
|
5,066
|
|
|
5,472
|
|
|
5,065
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
LG&E
|
1,618
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
KU
|
2,327
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts are net of debt issuance costs.
|
The carrying amounts of other current financial instruments (except for long-term debt due within one year) approximate their fair values because of their short-term nature.
13. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objectives
(All Registrants)
PPL has a risk management policy approved by the Board of Directors to manage market risk associated with commodities, interest rates on debt issuances and foreign exchange (including price, liquidity and volumetric risk) and credit risk (including non-performance risk and payment default risk). The Risk Management Committee, comprised of senior management and chaired by the Senior Director-Risk Management, oversees the risk management function. Key risk control activities designed
to ensure compliance with the risk policy and detailed programs include, but are not limited to, credit review and approval, validation of transactions, verification of risk and transaction limits, value-at-risk analyses (VaR, a statistical model that attempts to estimate the value of potential loss over a given holding period under normal market conditions at a given confidence level) and the coordination and reporting of the Enterprise Risk Management program.
Market Risk
Market risk includes the potential loss that may be incurred as a result of price changes associated with a particular financial or commodity instrument as well as market liquidity and volumetric risks. Forward contracts, futures contracts, options, swaps and structured transactions are utilized as part of risk management strategies to minimize unanticipated fluctuations in earnings caused by changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Many of the contracts meet the definition of a derivative. All derivatives are recognized on the Balance Sheets at their fair value, unless NPNS is elected.
The following summarizes the market risks that affect PPL and its subsidiaries.
Interest rate risk
|
|
•
|
PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to interest rate risk associated with forecasted fixed-rate and existing floating-rate debt issuances. PPL and WPD hold over-the-counter cross currency swaps to limit exposure to market fluctuations on interest and principal payments from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. PPL, LKE and LG&E utilize over-the-counter interest rate swaps to limit exposure to market fluctuations on floating-rate debt. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU utilize forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge changes in benchmark interest rates, when appropriate, in connection with future debt issuances.
|
|
|
•
|
PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to interest rate risk associated with debt securities and derivatives held by defined benefit plans. This risk is significantly mitigated to the extent that the plans are sponsored at, or sponsored on behalf of, the regulated domestic utilities and for certain plans at WPD due to the recovery mechanisms in place.
|
Foreign currency risk
|
|
•
|
PPL is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk primarily associated with its investments in and earnings of U.K. affiliates.
|
Commodity price risk
PPL is exposed to commodity price risk through its domestic subsidiaries as described below.
|
|
•
|
PPL Electric is exposed to commodity price risk from its obligation as PLR; however, its PUC-approved cost recovery mechanism substantially eliminates its exposure to this risk. PPL Electric also mitigates its exposure to commodity price risk by entering into full-requirement supply agreements to serve its PLR customers. These supply agreements transfer the commodity price risk associated with the PLR obligation to the energy suppliers.
|
|
|
•
|
LG&E's and KU's rates include certain mechanisms for fuel and fuel-related expenses. In addition, LG&E's rates include a mechanism for natural gas supply expenses. These mechanisms generally provide for timely recovery of market price fluctuations associated with these expenses.
|
Volumetric risk
PPL is exposed to volumetric risk through its subsidiaries as described below.
|
|
•
|
WPD is exposed to volumetric risk which is significantly mitigated as a result of the method of regulation in the U.K. Under the RIIO-ED1 price control period, recovery of such exposure occurs on a two year lag. See Note 1 in PPL's 2016 Form 10-K for additional information on revenue recognition under RIIO-ED1.
|
|
|
•
|
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU are exposed to volumetric risk on retail sales, mainly due to weather and other economic conditions for which there is limited mitigation between rate cases.
|
Equity securities price risk
|
|
•
|
PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to equity securities price risk associated with defined benefit plans. This risk is significantly mitigated at the regulated domestic utilities and for certain plans at WPD due to the recovery mechanisms in place.
|
|
|
•
|
PPL is exposed to equity securities price risk from future stock sales and/or purchases.
|
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the potential loss that may be incurred due to a counterparty's non-performance.
PPL is exposed to credit risk from "in-the-money" interest rate and foreign currency derivatives with financial institutions, as well as additional credit risk through certain of its subsidiaries, as discussed below.
In the event a supplier of LG&E, KU or PPL Electric defaults on its obligation, those entities would be required to seek replacement power or replacement fuel in the market. In general, subject to regulatory review or other processes, appropriate incremental costs incurred by these entities would be recoverable from customers through applicable rate mechanisms, thus mitigating the financial risk for these entities.
PPL and its subsidiaries have credit policies in place to manage credit risk, including the use of an established credit approval process, daily monitoring of counterparty positions and the use of master netting agreements or provisions. These agreements generally include credit mitigation provisions, such as margin, prepayment or collateral requirements. PPL and its subsidiaries may request additional credit assurance, in certain circumstances, in the event that the counterparties' credit ratings fall below investment grade, their tangible net worth falls below specified percentages or their exposures exceed an established credit limit.
Master Netting Arrangements
Net derivative positions on the balance sheets are not offset against the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) under master netting arrangements.
PPL had a
$13 million
obligation to return cash collateral under master netting arrangements at
March 31, 2017
and a
$19 million
obligation to return cash collateral under master netting arrangements at
December 31, 2016
.
LKE and LG&E had
no
obligation to return cash collateral under master netting arrangements at
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
PPL, LKE and LG&E posted
$2 million
of cash collateral under master netting arrangements at
March 31, 2017
and
$3 million
of cash collateral under master netting arrangements at
December 31, 2016
.
See "Offsetting Derivative Instruments" below for a summary of derivative positions presented in the balance sheets where a right of setoff exists under these arrangements.
Interest Rate Risk
(All Registrants)
PPL and its subsidiaries issue debt to finance their operations, which exposes them to interest rate risk. Various financial derivative instruments are utilized to adjust the mix of fixed and floating interest rates in their debt portfolio, adjust the duration of the debt portfolio and lock in benchmark interest rates in anticipation of future financing, when appropriate. Risk limits under PPL's risk management program are designed to balance risk exposure to volatility in interest expense and changes in the fair value of the debt portfolio due to changes in benchmark interest rates. In addition, the interest rate risk of certain subsidiaries is potentially mitigated as a result of the existing regulatory framework or the timing of rate cases.
Cash Flow Hedges
(PPL)
Interest rate risks include exposure to adverse interest rate movements for outstanding variable rate debt and for future anticipated financings. Financial interest rate swap contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges may be entered into to hedge floating interest rate risk associated with both existing and anticipated debt issuances. PPL held no such contracts at
March 31, 2017
.
For the three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, PPL had
no
hedge ineffectiveness associated with interest rate derivatives.
At
March 31, 2017
, PPL held an aggregate notional value in cross-currency interest rate swap contracts of
$802 million
that range in maturity from
2017
through
2028
to hedge the interest payments and principal of WPD's U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes.
For the three months ended
March 31, 2017
and
2016
, PPL had
no
hedge ineffectiveness associated with cross-currency interest rate swap derivatives.
Cash flow hedges are discontinued if it is no longer probable that the original forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally specified time period and any amounts previously recorded in AOCI are reclassified into earnings once it is determined that the hedged transaction is not probable of occurring.
For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, PPL had an insignificant amount of cash flow hedges reclassified into earnings associated with discontinued cash flow hedges.
At
March 31, 2017
, the amount of accumulated net unrecognized after-tax gains (losses) on qualifying derivatives expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months is
insignificant
. Amounts are reclassified as the hedged interest expense is recorded.
Economic Activity
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
LG&E enters into interest rate swap contracts that economically hedge interest payments on variable rate debt. Because realized gains and losses from the swaps, including a terminated swap contract, are recoverable through regulated rates, any subsequent changes in fair value of these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities until they are realized as interest expense. Realized gains and losses are recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income at the time the underlying hedged interest expense is recorded. At
March 31, 2017
, LG&E held contracts with a notional amount of
$147 million
that range in maturity through
2033
.
Foreign Currency Risk
(PPL)
PPL is exposed to foreign currency risk, primarily through investments in and earnings of U.K. affiliates. PPL has adopted a foreign currency risk management program designed to hedge certain foreign currency exposures, including firm commitments, recognized assets or liabilities, anticipated transactions and net investments. In addition, PPL enters into financial instruments to protect against foreign currency translation risk of expected GBP earnings.
Net Investment Hedges
PPL enters into foreign currency contracts on behalf of a subsidiary to protect the value of a portion of its net investment in WPD. There were no such contracts outstanding at
March 31, 2017
.
At
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, PPL had
$21 million
of accumulated net investment hedge after tax gains (losses) that were included in the foreign currency translation adjustment component of AOCI.
Economic Activity
PPL enters into foreign currency contracts on behalf of a subsidiary to economically hedge GBP-denominated anticipated earnings. At
March 31, 2017
, the total exposure hedged by PPL was approximately
£2.8 billion
(approximately
$3.8 billion
based on contracted rates). These contracts had termination dates ranging from
April 2017
through
December 2019
.
Accounting and Reporting
(All Registrants)
All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value on the Balance Sheet as an asset or liability unless NPNS is elected. NPNS contracts for PPL and PPL Electric include certain full-requirement purchase contracts and other physical purchase contracts.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated as NPNS are recognized in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met and designated as such, except for the changes in fair values of LG&E's and KU's interest rate swaps that are recognized as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. See
Note 6
for amounts recorded in regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities at
March 31, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
See Notes 1 and 17 in each Registrant's
2016
Form 10-K for additional information on accounting policies related to derivative instruments.
(PPL)
The following table presents the fair value and location of derivative instruments recorded on the Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
|
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Risk Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/Liabilities (a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (b)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Cross-currency swaps (b)
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
21
|
|
Total current
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
25
|
|
Noncurrent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Risk Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/Liabilities (a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (b)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
Cross-currency swaps (b)
|
147
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
6
|
|
Total noncurrent
|
147
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
33
|
|
Total derivatives
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Current portion is included in "Price risk management assets" and "Other current liabilities" and noncurrent portion is included in "Price risk management assets" and "Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Excludes accrued interest, if applicable.
|
The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments recognized in income, OCI or regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities for the periods ended
March 31, 2017
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
Derivative
Relationships
|
|
Derivative Gain
(Loss) Recognized in
OCI (Effective Portion)
|
|
Location of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Income
on Derivative
|
|
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
|
|
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Income
on Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) - net
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Net Investment Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Income on Derivative
|
|
Three Months
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Other income (expense) - net
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Regulatory Liabilities/Assets
|
|
Three Months
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Regulatory assets - noncurrent
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments recognized in income, OCI or regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities for the periods ended
March 31, 2016
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
Derivative
Relationships
|
|
Derivative Gain
(Loss) Recognized in
OCI (Effective Portion)
|
|
Location of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Income
on Derivative
|
|
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
|
|
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Income
on Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
113
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) - net
|
|
97
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Net Investment Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Income on Derivative
|
|
Three Months
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Other income (expense) - net
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Regulatory Liabilities/Assets
|
|
Three Months
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Regulatory assets - noncurrent
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
(LKE and LG&E)
The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Risk Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Total current
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
Noncurrent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Risk Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
Total noncurrent
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
Total derivatives
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in income or regulatory assets for the periods ended
March 31, 2017
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments
|
|
Income on Derivatives
|
|
Three Months
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments
|
|
Regulatory Assets
|
|
Three Months
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Regulatory assets - noncurrent
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in income or regulatory assets for the periods ended
March 31, 2016
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments
|
|
Income on Derivatives
|
|
Three Months
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments
|
|
Regulatory Assets
|
|
Three Months
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Regulatory assets - noncurrent
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Offsetting Derivative Instruments
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU or certain of their subsidiaries have master netting arrangements in place and also enter into agreements pursuant to which they purchase or sell certain energy and other products. Under the agreements, upon termination of the agreement as a result of a default or other termination event, the non-defaulting party typically would have a right to set off amounts owed under the agreement against any other obligations arising between the two parties (whether under the agreement or not), whether matured or contingent and irrespective of the currency, place of payment or place of booking of the obligation.
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU have elected not to offset derivative assets and liabilities and not to offset net derivative positions against the right to reclaim cash collateral pledged (an asset) or the obligation to return cash collateral received (a liability) under derivatives agreements. The table below summarizes the derivative positions presented in the balance sheets where a right of setoff exists under these arrangements and related cash collateral received or pledged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Eligible for Offset
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eligible for Offset
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
|
Cash
Collateral
Received
|
|
Net
|
|
Gross
|
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
|
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
|
|
Net
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPL
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
LKE
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
27
|
|
LG&E
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPL
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
LKE
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
28
|
|
LG&E
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
28
|
|
Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features
Certain derivative contracts contain credit risk-related contingent features which, when in a net liability position, would permit the counterparties to require the transfer of additional collateral upon a decrease in the credit ratings of PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU or certain of their subsidiaries. Most of these features would require the transfer of additional collateral or permit the counterparty to terminate the contract if the applicable credit rating were to fall below investment grade. Some of these features also would allow the counterparty to require additional collateral upon each downgrade in credit rating at levels that remain above investment grade. In either case, if the applicable credit rating were to fall below investment grade, and assuming no assignment to an investment grade affiliate were allowed, most of these credit contingent features require either immediate payment of the net liability as a termination payment or immediate and ongoing full collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions.
Additionally, certain derivative contracts contain credit risk-related contingent features that require adequate assurance of performance be provided if the other party has reasonable concerns regarding the performance of PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's obligations under the contracts. A counterparty demanding adequate assurance could require a transfer of additional collateral or other security, including letters of credit, cash and guarantees from a creditworthy entity. This would typically involve negotiations among the parties. However, amounts disclosed below represent assumed immediate payment or immediate and ongoing full collateralization for derivative instruments in net liability positions with "adequate assurance" features.
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
At
March 31, 2017
, derivative contracts in a net liability position that contain credit risk-related contingent features, collateral posted on those positions and the related effect of a decrease in credit ratings below investment grade are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPL
|
|
LKE
|
|
LG&E
|
Aggregate fair value of derivative instruments in a net liability position with credit risk-related contingent features
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Aggregate fair value of collateral posted on these derivative instruments
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
Aggregate fair value of additional collateral requirements in the event of a credit downgrade below investment grade (a)
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes the effect of net receivables and payables already recorded on the Balance Sheet.
|
14. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(PPL)
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2017
was due to the effect of foreign currency exchange rates on the U.K. Regulated segment.
The change in the carrying amount of other intangible assets for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2017
was primarily due to a change in WPD’s approach in acquiring rights-of-way relating to WPD equipment impacting landowners' property. A shorter term agreement at a lower cost is now being offered which has also reduced the estimated liability for claims not yet settled.
15. Asset Retirement Obligations
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
The changes in the carrying amounts of AROs were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPL
|
|
LKE
|
|
LG&E
|
|
KU
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Accretion
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
Obligations settled
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Balance at March 31, 2017
|
$
|
487
|
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's ARO liabilities are primarily related to CCR closure costs. See
Note 9
for information on the final CCR rule. For LKE, LG&E and KU, all ARO accretion and depreciation expenses are reclassified as a regulatory asset. ARO regulatory assets associated with approved ECR projects for CCRs are amortized to expense over a period of
10
to
25
years based on retirement expenditures made related to the obligation. For other AROs, at the time of retirement, the related ARO regulatory asset is offset against the associated cost of removal regulatory liability, PP&E and ARO liability.
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(PPL)
The after-tax changes in AOCI by component for the periods ended
March 31
were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
on qualifying
derivatives
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
investees'
AOCI
|
|
Prior
service
costs
|
|
Actuarial
gain
(loss)
|
|
Total
|
PPL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
$
|
(1,627
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,778
|
)
|
Amounts arising during the period
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Reclassifications from AOCI
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
31
|
|
Net OCI during the period
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
1
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
$
|
(1,651
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
$
|
(520
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,728
|
)
|
Amounts arising during the period
|
(464
|
)
|
|
80
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
Reclassifications from AOCI
|
—
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Net OCI during the period
|
(464
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
March 31, 2016
|
$
|
(984
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,164
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,159
|
)
|
(PPL)
The following table presents the gains (losses) and related income taxes for reclassifications from AOCI for the periods ended
March 31
. The defined benefit plan components of AOCI are not reflected in their entirety in the Statement of Income during
the periods; rather, they are included in the computation of net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) and subject to capitalization. See
Note 8
for additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Affected Line Item on the
|
Details about AOCI
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Statements of Income
|
Qualifying derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Interest Expense
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
3
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense) - net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
Total Pre-tax
|
|
1
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
—
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
Total After-tax
|
|
1
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
Total Pre-tax
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
Total After-tax
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reclassifications during the period
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
17. New Accounting Guidance Pending Adoption
(All Registrants)
Accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued accounting guidance that establishes a comprehensive new model for the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. This model is based on the core principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
For public business entities, this guidance can be applied using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method, beginning in annual reporting periods after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. The Registrants will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018.
The Registrants have performed an assessment of a significant portion of their revenue under this new guidance to determine its effect on their current revenue recognition policies, and at this time they do not believe it will have a material impact. However, the Registrants will continue to monitor the development of industry specific application guidance which could have an impact on their assessments. The Registrants are currently assessing the disclosure requirements included in the standard, which will result in increased information being provided to enable the users of the financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. The Registrants will determine the transition method they will apply after the industry specific application guidance is final and the implications of using either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition methods are known.
Accounting for Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance for leases. This new guidance requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all of their leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model for lessees, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Operating leases will result in straight-line expense (similar to current operating leases) while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current capital leases). Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting, but without explicit bright lines.
Lessor accounting under the new guidance is similar to the current model, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. Similar to current practice, lessors will classify leases as operating, direct financing, or sales-type.
The standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition, and provides for certain practical expedients. Transition will require application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented.
The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance and the period they will adopt it.
Accounting for Financial Instrument Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires the use of a current expected credit loss (CECL) model for the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments within the scope of this guidance, which includes accounts receivable. The CECL model requires an entity to measure credit losses using historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future events, rather than the incurred loss impairment model required under current GAAP.
For public business entities, this guidance will be applied using a modified retrospective approach and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those years. All entities may early adopt this guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years.
The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance and the period they will adopt it.
Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
In March 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the income statement presentation of net periodic benefit cost. This new guidance requires the service cost component to be disaggregated from other components of net benefit cost and presented in the same income statement line items as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. The other components of net periodic benefits will be presented separately from the line items that include the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income. Only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization.
For public business entities, the guidance on the presentation of the components of net periodic benefit costs will be applied retrospectively. The guidance that limits the capitalization to the service cost component of net periodic benefit costs will be applied prospectively. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years.
The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance and will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018.
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
In January 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance that simplifies the test for goodwill impairment by eliminating the second step of the quantitative test. The second step of the quantitative test requires a calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill, which is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill in a business combination. Under this new guidance, an entity will now compare the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value and recognize an impairment charge for the amount the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit.
For public business entities, this guidance will be applied prospectively and is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities may early adopt this guidance for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.
The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance and the period they will adopt it.