Annual and Transition Report (foreign Private Issuer) (20-f)
April 28 2017 - 4:38PM
Edgar (US Regulatory)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
|
☐
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
OR
|
☒
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
|
OR
|
☐
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
.
|
OR
|
☐
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of event requiring this shell company report
|
Commission file number: 001-33356
GAFISA
S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
GAFISA S.A.
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
The Federative
Republic of Brazil
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Av. Nações Unidas No. 8,501,
19th Floor
05425-070 – São Paulo, SP – Brazil
phone: + 55 (11) 3025-9000
fax: + 55 (11) 3025-9348
e mail: ri@gafisa.com
Attn: Andre Bergstein – Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Shares, without par value*
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
* Traded only in the form of American
Depositary Shares (as evidenced by American Depositary Receipts), each representing two common shares which are registered under
the Securities Act of 1933.
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section
12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s
classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
The number of outstanding shares as
of December 31, 2016 was:
Title
of Class
|
Number
of Shares Outstanding
|
Common Stock
|
378,066,162
*
|
*Includes
14,160,533 common shares that are held in treasury.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
☐
No
☒
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Yes
☐
No
☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.
Yes
☒
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes
☐
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer
☐
|
Accelerated Filer
☒
|
Non-accelerated Filer
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company
☐
|
If an emerging
growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has
elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards†
provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
† The
term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.
Indicate by check mark which
basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
|
☐
|
International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
|
If “Other” has been
checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected
to follow.
☐
Item 17
☒
Item 18
If this is an annual report,
indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
☐
No
☒
table
of contents
_______________
INTRODUCTION
In this annual report,
references to “Gafisa,” “we,” “our,” “us,” “our company” and “the
Company” are to Gafisa S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries (unless the context otherwise requires). In addition, the term
“Brazil” refers to the Federative Republic of Brazil, and the phrase “Brazilian government” refers to the
federal government of Brazil. All references to “
real
,” “
reais
” or “R$” are to
the Brazilian
real
, the official currency of Brazil, and all references to “U.S. dollar,” “U.S. dollars”
or “US$” are to U.S. dollars, the official currency of the United States. References to “Brazilian GAAP”
or “BR GAAP” are to accounting practices adopted in Brazil and references to “U.S. GAAP” are to generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States. Any reference to “financial statement” is related to our consolidated
financial statements.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER
INFORMATION
Financial Information
We maintain our books
and records in
reais
. Our financial statements were prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, which are based on:
|
·
|
Brazilian Law No. 6,404/76, as amended by Brazilian Law No. 9,457/97, Brazilian Law No. 10,303/01,
Brazilian Law No. 11,638/07, Brazilian Law No. 12,431/11 and Brazilian Law No. 12,973/14, which we refer to hereinafter as “Brazilian
corporate law;”
|
|
·
|
the rules and regulations of the Brazilian Securities Commission (
Comissão de Valores
Mobiliários
), or the “CVM;” and
|
|
·
|
the accounting standards issued by the Brazilian Federal Accounting Council (
Conselho Federal
de Contabilidade
), or the “CFC”, and the Accounting Standards Committee (
Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis
),
or the “CPC.”
|
Brazilian corporate
law was amended by Law No. 11,638, dated December 28, 2007, in order to facilitate the convergence of Brazilian GAAP with International
Financial Reporting Standards, or “IFRS,” and thereafter, the CPC issued new accounting standards that generally converged
Brazilian GAAP with IFRS.
In preparing our financial
statements, we have applied: (1) Guideline OCPC 04 – Application of the Technical Interpretation of ICPC 02 to the Brazilian
Real Estate Development Entities – regarding revenue recognition, and the respective costs and expenses arising from real
estate development operations over the course of the construction period (percentage of completion method), and (2) CPC 37 (R1),
which requires that an entity develops accounting policies based on the standards and interpretations of the CPC. We have adopted
all pronouncements, guidelines and interpretations of the CPC issued through December 31, 2016. As a result, our financial statements
are prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, which allows revenue recognition on a percentage of completion basis for construction
companies (i.e., revenue is recorded in accordance with the percentage of financial evolution of the construction project), and
are therefore not compliant with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), which require
revenue recognition on a delivery basis (i.e., revenue is recorded upon transferring the ownership risks and benefits to the purchaser
of real estate, usually after the construction is completed and the unit is delivered).
Brazilian GAAP differs
in significant respects from U.S. GAAP. The notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report contain
a reconciliation of equity and net income (loss) from Brazilian GAAP to U.S. GAAP. Unless otherwise indicated, all financial information
of our company included in this annual report is derived from our Brazilian GAAP financial statements.
Our consolidated financial
statements reflect statement of operations and balance sheet information for all of our subsidiaries, and also separately disclose
the interest of non-controlling shareholders.
As set forth in “Item
4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company”, on December 9, 2013, we completed the sale
of a controlling stake in Alphaville Urbanismo S.A., or “Alphaville”, the leading residential community development
company in Brazil. The transaction involved the sale of 50% interest by Gafisa and 20% interest by our subsidiary Construtora Tenda
S.A., or “Tenda”, with Gafisa retaining the remaining 30% of Alphaville capital stock. As a result, since November
30, 2013, Alphaville is no longer consolidated in the
financial statements of the Company. In
this annual report, while financial information related to Alphaville is treated as discontinued operations, all operating information
related to our business includes full operating information for Alphaville through December 9, 2013.
Effective January
1, 2013, with the adoption of CPCs 19 (R2) (or IFRS 11) and 36 (R3) (or IFRS 10), the proportional consolidation method for investments
in jointly-controlled investees, which was previously applied by the Company, is no longer allowed under Brazilian GAAP. Consequently,
our jointly controlled investments are now accounted for by the equity method.
As explained in Notes
2.3 and 8.2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, the results of operations of Tenda have
been presented as discontinued operations under Brazilian GAAP in the Company’s 2016, 2015 and 2014 consolidated statements
of operations. Under Brazilian GAAP, previous period balance sheet information is not retrospectively adjusted. Brazilian GAAP
selected consolidated statements of operations financial data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 has also been retrospectively
adjusted to also reflect the results of operations of Tenda as discontinued operations for comparability purposes. Additionally,
earnings per share amounts have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the reverse split of our common shares at the ratio of 13.483023074
to 1, which was consummated on March 23, 2017.
The table below sets
forth the line items in our statements of profit or loss for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 that have been adjusted
to reflect Tenda as discontinued operations, as previously mentioned:
For
Year ended December 31,
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
Balances originally reported as of 12/31/2013
|
|
Impact of discontinued operations
|
|
Balances restated
|
|
Balances originally reported as of 12/31/2012
|
|
Impact of discontinued operations
|
|
Balances restated
|
Statement of profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
2,481,211
|
|
|
|
(817,461
|
)
|
|
|
1,663,750
|
|
|
|
2,805,086
|
|
|
|
(1,069,110
|
)
|
|
|
1,735,976
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,863,766
|
)
|
|
|
752,216
|
|
|
|
(1,111,550
|
)
|
|
|
(2,276,804
|
)
|
|
|
938,666
|
|
|
|
(1,338,138
|
)
|
Operating (expenses) income
|
|
|
(215,574
|
)
|
|
|
179,951
|
|
|
|
(35,623
|
)
|
|
|
(609,604
|
)
|
|
|
233,010
|
|
|
|
(376,594
|
)
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
(162,503
|
)
|
|
|
3,812
|
|
|
|
(158,691
|
)
|
|
|
(180,263
|
)
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
(180,992
|
)
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(2,812
|
)
|
|
|
8,651
|
|
|
|
5,839
|
|
|
|
(20,222
|
)
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
(16,089
|
)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
49,364
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
49,364
|
|
Profit or loss of discontinued operations
|
|
|
631,122
|
|
|
|
(127,169
|
)
|
|
|
503,953
|
|
|
|
204,128
|
|
|
|
(105,970
|
)
|
|
|
98,158
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
867,443
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
867,443
|
|
|
|
(127,043
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(127,043
|
)
|
Market Information
Certain industry,
demographic, market and competitive data, including market forecasts, used in this annual report were obtained from internal surveys,
market research, publicly available information and industry publications. We have made these statements on the basis of information
from third-party sources that we believe are reliable, such as the Brazilian Property Studies Company (
Empresa Brasileira de
Estudos de Patrimônio
), or “EMBRAESP,” the Association of Managers of Real Estate Companies (
Associação
de Dirigentes de Empresas do Mercado Imobiliário
), or “ADEMI,” the Getulio Vargas Foundation (
Fundaçao
Getulio Vargas
), or “FGV,” the National Bank of Economic and Social Development (
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Econômico e Social
), or “BNDES,” the Real Estate Companies’ Union (
Sindicato das Empresas de Compra,
Venda, Locação e Administração de Imóveis Residenciais e Comerciais
), or “SECOVI,”
the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística
), or “IBGE,”
and the Brazilian Central Bank (
Banco Central do Brasil
), or the “Central Bank,” among others. Industry and
government publications, including those referenced here, generall y state that the information presented therein has been obtained
from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed. Although we
have no reason to believe that any of this information or these reports are inaccurate in any material respect, such information
has not been independently verified by us. Accordingly, we do not make any representation as to the accuracy of such information.
Rounding and Other Information
Some percentages and
certain figures included in this annual report have been subject to rounding adjustments. Accordingly, figures shown as totals
in certain tables in this annual report may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that precede them.
In this annual report,
all references to “contracted sales” are to the aggregate amount of sales resulting from all agreements for the sale
of units (including residential communities and land subdivisions) entered into during a certain period, including new units and
units in inventory. Further, in this annual report we use the term “value of launches” as a measure of our performance.
Value of launches is not a GAAP measurement. Value of launches, as used in this annual report, is calculated by multiplying the
total numbers of units in a real estate development by the average unit sales price.
All references to
“potential sales value” are to our estimates of the total amount obtained or that can be obtained from the sale of
all launched units of a certain real estate development, calculated by multiplying the number of units in a development by the
sale price of the unit. Investors should be aware that our potential sales value may not be realized or may significantly differ
from the amount of contracted sales, since the total number of units actually sold may be lower than the number of units launched
and/or the contracted sales price of each unit may be lower than the launching price.
In addition, we present
information in square meters in this annual report. One square meter is equal to approximately 10.76 square feet.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
The statements contained
in this annual report in relation to our plans, forecasts, expectations regarding future events, strategies, and projections, are
forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties and which are therefore not guarantees of future results. Our
estimates and forward-looking statements are mainly based on our current expectations and estimates on projections of future events
and trends, which affect or may affect our businesses and results of operations. Although we believe that these estimates and forward-looking
statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, they are subject to several uncertainties and are made in light of information
currently available to us. Our estimates and forward-looking statements may be influenced by the following factors, among others:
|
·
|
changes in overall economic conditions, including employment levels, population growth and consumer
confidence;
|
|
·
|
changes in real estate market prices and demand, estimated budgeted costs and the preferences and
financial condition of our customers;
|
|
·
|
demographic factors and available income;
|
|
·
|
our ability to repay our indebtedness and comply with our financial obligations;
|
|
·
|
our ability to arrange financing and implement our expansion plan;
|
|
·
|
our ability to compete and conduct our businesses in the future;
|
|
·
|
changes in our business;
|
|
·
|
inflation and interest rate fluctuations;
|
|
·
|
changes in the laws and regulations applicable to the real estate market;
|
|
·
|
government interventions, resulting in changes in the economy, taxes, rates or regulatory environment;
|
|
·
|
other factors that may affect our business, market share, financial condition, liquidity and results
of our operations; and
|
|
·
|
other risk factors discussed under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors.”
|
The words
“believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,”
“anticipate,” “intend,” “expect” and similar words are intended to identify estimates and
forward-looking statements. Estimates and forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made, and we
undertake no obligation to update or to review any estimate and/or forward-looking statement because of new information,
future events or other factors. Estimates and forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not
guarantees of future performance. Our future results may differ materially from those expressed in these estimates and
forward-looking statements. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the estimates and forward-looking
statements discussed in this annual report might not occur and our future results and our performance may differ materially
from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to, inclusive of, but not limited to, the factors mentioned
above.
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR
MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED
TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
A. Selected Financial Data
The following selected
financial data for 2016, 2015, 2014 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements presented herein. As explained
in footnote 7 below, our selected Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP financial data for 2013 and 2012 has been retrospectively adjusted
to reflect the results of operations of Tenda as discontinued operations for comparability purposes.
Our financial statements
are prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, which differs in significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For a discussion of the significant
differences relating to these consolidated financial statements and a reconciliation of net income (loss) and equity from Brazilian
GAAP to U.S. GAAP, see notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. See also “Presentation
of Financial and Other Information.”
This financial information
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual
report.
As explained in Notes
2.3 and 8.2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, the results of operations of Tenda have
been presented as discontinued operations under Brazilian GAAP in the Company’s 2016, 2015 and 2014 consolidated statements
of operations. Under Brazilian GAAP, previous period balance sheet information is not retrospectively adjusted. Brazilian GAAP
selected consolidated statements of operations financial data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 has also been retrospectively
adjusted to also reflect the results of operations of Tenda as discontinued operations for comparability purposes. Additionally,
earnings per share amounts have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the reverse split of our common shares at the ratio of 13.483023074
to 1, which was consummated on March 23, 2017.
The following table
sets forth financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, which has been prepared
in accordance with Brazilian GAAP in effect as of December 31, 2016. Certain information below is presented in accordance with
U.S. GAAP.
|
|
As
of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
(7)
|
|
2014
(7)
|
|
2013
(7)
|
|
2012
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
,
except per share, per ADS and operating data)
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
915,698
|
|
|
|
1,443,357
|
|
|
|
1,580,861
|
|
|
|
1,663,750
|
|
|
|
1,735,976
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,029,213
|
)
|
|
|
(1,061,921
|
)
|
|
|
(1,164,997
|
)
|
|
|
(1,111,550
|
)
|
|
|
(1,338,138
|
)
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(113,515
|
)
|
|
|
381,436
|
|
|
|
415,864
|
|
|
|
552,200
|
|
|
|
397,838
|
|
Operating expenses, net
|
|
|
(362,747
|
)
|
|
|
(295,595
|
)
|
|
|
(324,211
|
)
|
|
|
(35,623
|
)
|
|
|
(376,593
|
)
|
Financial expenses, net
|
|
|
(25,679
|
)
|
|
|
(50,422
|
)
|
|
|
(16,250
|
)
|
|
|
(158,691
|
)
|
|
|
(180,992
|
)
|
Income (loss) before income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(501,941
|
)
|
|
|
35,419
|
|
|
|
75,403
|
|
|
|
357,886
|
|
|
|
(159,747
|
)
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(100,080
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(8,949
|
)
|
|
|
5,839
|
|
|
|
(16,089
|
)
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(602,021
|
)
|
|
|
34,761
|
|
|
|
66,454
|
|
|
|
363,725
|
|
|
|
(175,836
|
)
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations .
|
|
|
(559,704
|
)
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
|
|
503,953
|
|
|
|
98,158
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year attributable
to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
49,365
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year attributable
to owners of Gafisa
|
|
|
R$
(1,163,596
|
)
|
|
|
R$
74,449
|
|
|
|
R$
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
R$
867,443
|
|
|
|
R$
(127,043
|
)
|
Share and ADS data (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data—R$ per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per weighted average number of shares—Basic
|
|
|
(43.2218
|
)
|
|
|
2.7309
|
|
|
|
(1.4274
|
)
|
|
|
27.4355
|
|
|
|
(3.9628
|
)
|
From continuing operations
|
|
|
(22.6637
|
)
|
|
|
1.6187
|
|
|
|
2.2439
|
|
|
|
11.4965
|
|
|
|
(7.0247
|
)
|
From discontinued operations .
|
|
|
(20.5581
|
)
|
|
|
1.1122
|
|
|
|
(3.6714
|
)
|
|
|
15.9390
|
|
|
|
3.0618
|
|
Earnings (loss) per weighted average number of shares —Diluted
|
|
|
(43.2218
|
)
|
|
|
2.7123
|
|
|
|
(1.4274
|
)
|
|
|
27.2708
|
|
|
|
(3.9627
|
)
|
|
|
As
of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
(7)
|
|
2014
(7)
|
|
2013
(7)
|
|
2012
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
,
except per share, per ADS and operating data)
|
From continuing operations
|
|
|
(22.6637
|
)
|
|
|
1.6077
|
|
|
|
2.2439
|
|
|
|
9.8628
|
|
|
|
(9.0565
|
)
|
From discontinued operations
|
|
|
(20.5581
|
)
|
|
|
1.1046
|
|
|
|
(3.6714
|
)
|
|
|
17.4079
|
|
|
|
5.0939
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding—in thousands
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
|
|
31,618
|
|
|
|
32,059
|
|
Dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity declared—
in
thousands of reais
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
163,112
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share—R$ per share
|
|
|
(43.4518
|
)
|
|
|
2.7316
|
|
|
|
(1.5170
|
)
|
|
|
28.0837
|
|
|
|
(3.9593
|
)
|
Number of common shares outstanding as at end of period—in
thousands*
|
|
|
26,779
|
|
|
|
27,255
|
|
|
|
28,049
|
|
|
|
30,888
|
|
|
|
32,087
|
|
Earnings (loss) per ADS—R$ per ADS(1)
|
|
|
(86.9036
|
)
|
|
|
5.4631
|
|
|
|
(3.0339
|
)
|
|
|
56.1675
|
|
|
|
(7.9187
|
)
|
U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
854,572
|
|
|
|
1,464,591
|
|
|
|
1,805,140
|
|
|
|
1,714,599
|
|
|
|
2,357,094
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(985,789
|
)
|
|
|
(1,072,817
|
)
|
|
|
(1,316,588
|
)
|
|
|
(1,184,210
|
)
|
|
|
(1,708,715
|
)
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(131,217
|
)
|
|
|
391,774
|
|
|
|
488,552
|
|
|
|
530,389
|
|
|
|
648,379
|
|
Operating expenses, net
|
|
|
(316,182
|
)
|
|
|
(335,369
|
)
|
|
|
(322,473
|
)
|
|
|
21,067
|
|
|
|
(581,901
|
)
|
Financial expenses, net
|
|
|
(14,609
|
)
|
|
|
(52,923
|
)
|
|
|
(37,350
|
)
|
|
|
(183,487
|
)
|
|
|
(192,143
|
)
|
Income from disposal on controlling interests
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,228,429
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and social contribution and income
from equity method investments
|
|
|
(462,008
|
)
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
128,729
|
|
|
|
1,596,398
|
|
|
|
(125,665
|
)
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
45,492
|
|
|
|
(27,242
|
)
|
|
|
(14,512
|
)
|
|
|
(52,215
|
)
|
|
|
(52,462
|
)
|
Equity pick-up
|
|
|
(63,616
|
)
|
|
|
(14,430
|
)
|
|
|
30,887
|
|
|
|
(91,028
|
)
|
|
|
70,201
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(480,132
|
)
|
|
|
(38,190
|
)
|
|
|
145,104
|
|
|
|
1,453,155
|
|
|
|
(107,926
|
)
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(506,185
|
)
|
|
|
25,014
|
|
|
|
(104,870
|
)
|
|
|
(117,225
|
)
|
|
|
18,771
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
(986,317
|
)
|
|
|
(13,176
|
)
|
|
|
40,234
|
|
|
|
1,335,930
|
|
|
|
(89,155
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
|
(3,092
|
)
|
|
|
(2,071
|
)
|
|
|
13,462
|
|
|
|
32,048
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to owners
of Gafisa
|
|
|
(985,156
|
)
|
|
|
(10,084
|
)
|
|
|
42,305
|
|
|
|
1,322,468
|
|
|
|
(121,203
|
)
|
Per share and ADS data (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data—R$ per weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per weighted average number of shares—Basic
|
|
|
(36.5943
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3699
|
)
|
|
|
1.4192
|
|
|
|
41.8270
|
|
|
|
(3.7806
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per weighted average number of shares—Diluted
|
|
|
(36.5943
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3699
|
)
|
|
|
1.4133
|
|
|
|
41.5749
|
|
|
|
(3.7806
|
)
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding — in thousands
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
|
|
31,618
|
|
|
|
32,059
|
|
Dividends declared and interest on equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
163,112
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Per ADS data—R$ per ADS(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) per ADS —Basic(1)
|
|
|
(73.1886
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7398
|
)
|
|
|
2.8384
|
|
|
|
83.6540
|
|
|
|
(7.5612
|
)
|
Profit (loss) per ADS —Diluted(1)
|
|
|
(73.1886
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7398
|
)
|
|
|
2.8266
|
|
|
|
83.1498
|
|
|
|
(7.5612
|
)
|
Weighted average number of ADSs outstanding—in thousands
|
|
|
13,461
|
|
|
|
13,631
|
|
|
|
14,874
|
|
|
|
15,809
|
|
|
|
16,029
|
|
Dividends and interest on equity declared
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
163,112
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
|
253,180
|
|
|
|
712,311
|
|
|
|
1,157,254
|
|
|
|
2,024,163
|
|
|
|
1,567,755
|
|
Current and non-current properties for sale
|
|
|
1,715,699
|
|
|
|
2,630,617
|
|
|
|
2,512,342
|
|
|
|
2,094,414
|
|
|
|
2,166,424
|
|
Working capital(2)
|
|
|
1,124,650
|
|
|
|
2,267,795
|
|
|
|
2,420,342
|
|
|
|
2,996,884
|
|
|
|
3,764,756
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,210,089
|
|
|
|
6,760,332
|
|
|
|
7,205,852
|
|
|
|
8,183,030
|
|
|
|
8,712,569
|
|
Total debt(3)
|
|
|
1,637,568
|
|
|
|
2,150,793
|
|
|
|
2,586,524
|
|
|
|
3,059,528
|
|
|
|
3,640,437
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,930,453
|
|
|
|
3,097,236
|
|
|
|
3,058,403
|
|
|
|
3,214,483
|
|
|
|
2,685,829
|
|
U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted
short-term investments
|
|
|
253,180
|
|
|
|
478,037
|
|
|
|
662,682
|
|
|
|
1,381,509
|
|
|
|
791,352
|
|
Current and non-current properties for sale
|
|
|
2,082,207
|
|
|
|
2,219,226
|
|
|
|
2,044,627
|
|
|
|
1,844,254
|
|
|
|
1,937,158
|
|
Working capital(2)
|
|
|
1,034,762
|
|
|
|
2,389,212
|
|
|
|
2,430,100
|
|
|
|
2,862,274
|
|
|
|
3,072,049
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,206,314
|
|
|
|
6,688,848
|
|
|
|
7,225,112
|
|
|
|
8,477,587
|
|
|
|
8,694,612
|
|
Total debt(3)
|
|
|
1,637,568
|
|
|
|
1,902,463
|
|
|
|
2,147,974
|
|
|
|
2,428,982
|
|
|
|
2,727,804
|
|
Total Gafisa equity
|
|
|
1,711,614
|
|
|
|
2,702,234
|
|
|
|
2,747,532
|
|
|
|
2,799,171
|
|
|
|
1,619,276
|
|
Equity of non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|
|
2,648
|
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
|
23,074
|
|
|
|
53,222
|
|
|
|
As
of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
(7)
|
|
2014
(7)
|
|
2013
(7)
|
|
2012
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
(As restated)
|
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
,
except per share, per ADS and operating data)
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,710,653
|
|
|
|
2,704,882
|
|
|
|
2,750,871
|
|
|
|
2,822,245
|
|
|
|
1,672,498
|
|
Consolidated cash flow provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
269,666
|
|
|
|
104,563
|
|
|
|
41,893
|
|
|
|
297,652
|
|
|
|
644,288
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
162,455
|
|
|
|
384,664
|
|
|
|
751,953
|
|
|
|
53,464
|
|
|
|
(287,960
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(456,813
|
)
|
|
|
(516,482
|
)
|
|
|
(899,145
|
)
|
|
|
(568,124
|
)
|
|
|
162,080
|
|
Operating data (8):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of new developments
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Potential sales value(4)
|
|
|
920,846
|
|
|
|
2,085,257
|
|
|
|
1,636,311
|
|
|
|
2,886,204
|
|
|
|
2,951,961
|
|
Number of units launched(5)
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
10,089
|
|
|
|
6,104
|
|
|
|
11,072
|
|
|
|
8,947
|
|
Launched usable area (m2)(6)
|
|
|
109,117
|
|
|
|
428,257
|
|
|
|
326,421
|
|
|
|
2,893,541
|
|
|
|
3,153,251
|
|
Units sold
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
8,892
|
|
|
|
4,294
|
|
|
|
10,187
|
|
|
|
7,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
______________
* Common
shares held in Treasury are not included.
|
(1)
|
Earnings (loss) per ADS is calculated based on each ADS representing two common shares. On March
23, 2017, we consummated a reverse split of our common shares at the ratio of 13.483023074 to 1, decreasing the number of our total
common shares from 378,066,162 common shares to 28,040,162 common shares. All Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP information relating
to the number of shares and ADSs has been adjusted retroactively for the periods ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and
2012 to reflect the reverse split of our common shares.
|
|
(2)
|
Working capital equals current assets less current liabilities.
|
|
(3)
|
Total debt comprises current and non-current portion of loans and financings and debentures.
|
|
(4)
|
Potential sales value is calculated by multiplying the number of units in a development by the
sales price of the unit.
|
|
(5)
|
The units delivered in exchange for land pursuant to swap agreements are not included.
|
|
(6)
|
One square meter is equal to approximately 10.76 square feet.
|
|
(7)
|
As explained in Notes 2.3 and 8.2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2016, the results of operations of Tenda have been presented as discontinued operations under Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP
in the Company’s 2016, 2015 and 2014 consolidated statements of operations. Under Brazilian GAAP, previous period balance
sheet information is not retrospectively adjusted. Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP selected consolidated statements of operations
financial data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 has also been retrospectively adjusted to also reflect the results
of operations of Tenda as discontinued operations for comparability purposes.
|
|
(8)
|
The operating information presented in this annual report reflects our percentage interest in such
jointly-controlled investees as management believes it provides a better view of our operating performance. The information as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 does not include developments launched under the Tenda brand, the results of which
have been presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations as of December 31, 2016.
|
Exchange Rates
All transactions involving
foreign currency in the Brazilian market, whether carried out by investors resident or domiciled in Brazil or investors resident
or domiciled abroad, must now be conducted on the consolidated exchange market through institutions authorized by the Central Bank
and subject to the rules of the Central Bank.
The Central Bank has
allowed the
real
to float freely against the U.S. dollar since January 15, 1999. Since the beginning of 2001, the Brazilian
exchange market has been increasingly volatile, and, until early 2003, the value of the
real
declined relative to the U.S.
dollar, primarily due to financial and political instability in Brazil and Argentina. According to the Central Bank, in 2005, 2006
and 2007, however, the period-end value of the
real
appreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar 13.4%, 9.5% and 20.7%, respectively.
In 2008, the period-end value of the
real
depreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar by 24.2%. In 2009 and 2010, the period-end
value of the
real
appreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar by 34.2% and 4.3%. In 2011, the
real
depreciated against
the U.S. dollar by 11.2%. In 2013 and 2012, the
real
depreciated by 13.2% and 8.9% against the U.S. dollar, respectively.
On December 31, 2012, the period-end
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.0435 per U.S. $1.00, and on December 31, 2013
it was R$2.3420 per U.S.$1.00. In 2014, the period-end value of the
real
depreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar by 13.4%.
On December 31, 2014, the period-end
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.6562 per U.S. $1.00. In 2015, the period-end
value of the
real
depreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar by 47.0%. On December 31, 2015, the period-end
real
/U.S.
dollar exchange rate was R$3.9048 per U.S. $1.00. On December 31, 2016, the period-end
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was
R$3.2591 per U.S. $1.00. Although the Central Bank has intervened occasionally to control unstable movements in the foreign exchange
rates, the exchange market may continue to be volatile as a result of this instability or other factors, and, therefore, the
real
may substantially decline or appreciate in value in relation to the U.S. dollar in the future.
The following table
shows the selling rate, expressed in
reais
per U.S. dollar (R$/US$), for the periods and dates indicated.
|
|
Period-end
|
|
Average for period(1)
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
|
(per U.S. dollar)
|
Year Ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2.043
|
|
|
|
1.955
|
|
|
|
1.702
|
|
|
|
2.112
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2.343
|
|
|
|
2.160
|
|
|
|
1.953
|
|
|
|
2.446
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2.656
|
|
|
|
2.355
|
|
|
|
2.197
|
|
|
|
2.740
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3.905
|
|
|
|
3.339
|
|
|
|
2.575
|
|
|
|
4.195
|
|
2016
|
|
|
3.259
|
|
|
|
3.483
|
|
|
|
3.119
|
|
|
|
4.156
|
|
Month Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2016
|
|
|
3.181
|
|
|
|
3.186
|
|
|
|
3.119
|
|
|
|
3.236
|
|
November 2016
|
|
|
3.397
|
|
|
|
3.342
|
|
|
|
3.202
|
|
|
|
3.445
|
|
December 2016
|
|
|
3.259
|
|
|
|
3.352
|
|
|
|
3.259
|
|
|
|
3.465
|
|
January 2017
|
|
|
3.127
|
|
|
|
3.197
|
|
|
|
3.127
|
|
|
|
3.273
|
|
February 2017
|
|
|
3.099
|
|
|
|
3.104
|
|
|
|
3.051
|
|
|
|
3.148
|
|
March 2017
|
|
|
3.168
|
|
|
|
3.128
|
|
|
|
3.077
|
|
|
|
3.174
|
|
April 2017 (through April 24, 2017)
|
|
|
3.125
|
|
|
|
3.124
|
|
|
|
3.092
|
|
|
|
3.146
|
|
|
(1)
|
Annually, represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the
periods presented; monthly, represents the average of the end-of-day exchange rates during the periods presented.
|
Source:
Central Bank.
On April 24, 2017,
the selling rate was R$3.125 to US$1.00. The
real
/dollar exchange rate fluctuates and, therefore, the selling rate at April
24, 2017, may not be indicative of future exchange rates.
Brazilian law provides
that, whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or serious reasons to foresee such imbalance,
temporary restrictions may be imposed on remittances of foreign capital abroad. For approximately six months in 1989, and early
1990, for example, the Federal Government froze all dividend and capital repatriations that were owed to foreign equity investors.
These amounts were subsequently released in accordance with Federal Government directives. There can be no assurance that similar
measures will not be taken by the Federal Government in the future.
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of
Proceeds
Not applicable.
D. Risk Factors
This section is
intended to be a summary of the more detailed discussion included elsewhere in this annual report. Our business, results of operations,
financial condition or prospects could be adversely affected if any of these risks occurs, and as a result, the trading price of
our common shares and ADSs could decline. The risks described below are those known to us and those that we currently believe may
materially affect us.
Risks Relating to Our Business and
to the Brazilian Real Estate Industry
Our business, results
of operations, financial condition and the market price of our common shares or the ADSs may be adversely affected by weaknesses
in general economic, real estate and other conditions.
The residential homebuilding
and land development industry is cyclical and is significantly affected by changes in general and local economic conditions, such
as:
|
·
|
consumer demand, confidence, stability of income levels and interest rates;
|
|
·
|
availability of financing for land home site acquisitions and the availability of construction
and permanent mortgages;
|
|
·
|
inventory levels of both new and existing homes;
|
|
·
|
supply of rental properties; and
|
|
·
|
conditions in the housing resale market.
|
Furthermore, the market
value of undeveloped land, buildable lots and housing inventories held by us can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing
economic and real estate market conditions. If there are significant adverse changes in economic or real estate market conditions,
we will have to sell homes at a loss or hold land in inventory longer than planned.
For example, in 2008,
the global financial crisis adversely impacted Brazil’s gross domestic product, or “GDP,” resulting in a decrease
in both the number of developments launched and the rate of sales of our units. Since 2014, weakening economic conditions and political
instability in Brazil, leading to an increase in interest rates, higher inflation and an increase in levels of unemployment, among
other factors, had an adverse impact on the real estate market, including a decrease in the level of launches in the Gafisa segment
and a sharp decrease in the overall volume of real estate launches in Brazil. Worldwide financial market volatility may also adversely
impact government plans for the Brazilian real estate industry, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial
condition and results of operations.
We operate in a
highly competitive industry and our failure to compete effectively could adversely affect our business.
The Brazilian real
estate industry is highly competitive and fragmented. We compete with several developers on the basis of land availability and
location, price, funding, design, quality, and reputation as well as for partnerships with other developers. Because our industry
does not have high barriers to entry, new competitors, including international companies working in partnership with Brazilian
developers, may enter into the industry, further intensifying this competition. Some of our current potential competitors may have
greater financial and other resources than we do. Furthermore, a significant portion of our real estate development and construction
activity is conducted in the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro for Gafisa, and São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas
Gerais, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Sul and Bahia for Tenda, areas where the real estate market is highly competitive due to a scarcity
of properties in desirable locations and the relatively large number of local competitors. If we are not able to compete effectively,
our business, our financial condition and the results of our operations could be adversely affected.
Problems with the
construction and timely completion of our real estate projects, as well as third party projects for which we have been hired as
a contractor, may damage our reputation, expose us to civil liability and decrease our profitability.
The quality of work
in the construction of our real estate projects and the timely completion of these projects are major factors that affect our reputation,
and therefore our sales and growth. We may experience delays in the construction of our projects or there may be defects in materials
and/or workmanship. Any defects could delay the completion of our real estate projects, or, if such defects are discovered after
completion, expose us to civil lawsuits by purchasers or tenants. These factors may also adversely affect our reputation as a contractor
for third party projects, since we are responsible for our construction services and the building itself for five years. Construction
projects often involve delays in obtaining, or the inability to obtain, permits or approvals from the relevant authorities. In
addition, construction projects may also encounter delays due to adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, fires, delays in
the provision of materials or labor, accidents, labor disputes, unforeseen engineering, environmental or geological problems, disputes
with contractors and subcontractors, unforeseen conditions at construction sites, disputes with surrounding landowners, or other
events. In addition, we may encounter previously unknown conditions at or near our construction sites that may delay or prevent
construction of a particular project. If we encounter a previously unknown condition at or near a site, we may be required to correct
the condition prior to continuing construction and there may be a delay in the construction of a particular project. The occurrence
of any one or more of these problems in our real estate projects could adversely affect our reputation and our future sales.
We may incur construction
and other development costs for a project that exceeds our original estimates due to increases over time in interest rates, real
estate taxes or costs associated with materials and labor, among others. We may not be able to pass these increased costs on to
purchasers. Construction delays, scarcity of skilled workers, default and or bankruptcy of third party contractors, cost overruns
and adverse conditions may also increase project development costs. In addition, delays in the completion of a project may result
in a delay in the commencement of cash flow, which would increase our capital needs.
Our inability to
acquire adequate capital to finance our projects could delay the launch of new projects and adversely affect our business.
We expect that the
continued expansion and development of our business will require significant capital, including working capital, which we may be
unable to obtain on acceptable terms, or at all, to fund our capital expenditures and operating expenses, including working capital
needs. We may fail to generate sufficient cash flow from our operations to meet our cash requirements. Furthermore, our capital
requirements may vary materially from those currently planned if, for example, our revenues do not reach expected levels or we
have to incur unforeseen capital expenditures and make investments to maintain our competitive position. If this is the case, we
may require additional financing sooner than anticipated, or we may have to delay some of our new development and expansion plans
or otherwise forgo market opportunities. Future borrowing instruments such as credit facilities are likely to contain restrictive
covenants, particularly in light of the recent economic downturn and unavailability of credit, and/or may require us to pledge
assets as security for borrowings under those facilities. Our inability to obtain additional capital on satisfactory terms may
delay or prevent the expansion of our business, which would have an adverse effect on our business. As of December 31, 2016, our
net debt plus payable to venture partners (indebtedness from debentures, loans and financing, project financing and payables to
venture partners balance, net of our cash and short term investments position) was R$1,385.6 million, our cash and cash equivalents
and short-term investments were R$253.2 million and our total debt was R$1,638.8 million including obligations to venture partners
of R$1.2 million.
Changing market
conditions may adversely affect our ability to sell our property inventories at expected prices, which could reduce our margins
and adversely affect the market price of our common shares or the ADSs.
We must constantly
locate and acquire new tracts of land for development and development home sites to support our homebuilding operations. There
is a lag between the time we acquire land for development or development home sites and the time that we can bring the properties
to market and sell homes. As a result, we face the risk that demand for housing may decline, costs of labor or materials may increase,
interest rates may increase, currencies may fluctuate and political uncertainties may occur during this period and that we will
not be able to dispose of developed properties at expected prices or profit margins or within anticipated time frames or at all.
Significant expenditures associated with investments in real estate, such as maintenance costs, construction costs and debt payments,
cannot generally be reduced if changes in the economy cause a decrease in revenues from our properties. The market value of property
inventories, undeveloped tracts of land and desirable locations can fluctuate significantly because of changing market conditions.
In addition, inventory carrying costs (including interest on
funds unused to acquire
land or build homes) can be significant and can adversely affect our performance. Because of these factors, we may be forced to
sell homes and other real properties at a loss or for prices that generate lower profit margins than we anticipate. We may also
be required to make material write-downs of the book value of our real estate assets in accordance with Brazilian and U.S. GAAP
if values decline. The occurrence of any of these factors may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are subject to
risks normally associated with permitting our purchasers to make payments in installments; if there are higher than anticipated
defaults or if our costs of providing such financing increase, then our profitability could be adversely affected.
As is common in our
industry, we and the special purpose entities, or “SPEs,” in which we participate permit some purchasers of the units
in our projects to make payments in installments. As a result, we are subject to the risks associated with this financing, including
the risk of default in the payment of principal or interest on the loans we make as well as the risk of increased costs for the
funds raised by us. In addition, our term sales agreements usually bear interest and provide for an inflation adjustment. If the
rate of inflation increases, the loan payments under these term sales agreements may increase, which may lead to a higher rate
of payment default. If the default rate among our purchasers increases, our cash generation and, therefore, our profitability could
be adversely affected.
In the case of a payment
default after the delivery of financed units, Brazilian law provides for the filing of a collection claim to recover the amount
owed or to repossess the unit following specified procedures. The collection of overdue amounts or the repossession of the property
is a lengthy process and involves additional costs. It is uncertain that we can recover the full amount owed to us or that if we
repossess a unit, we can re-sell the unit at favorable terms or at all.
The affordable entry-level
segment is strongly dependent on the availability of financing, including from the
Minha Casa, Minha Vida
program and from
Caixa Econômica Federal
, or the “CEF.” The scarcity of financing, the increase in interest rates, the
reduction in financing terms, share of financing per unit and subsidies or any other modification in other financing terms and
conditions may adversely affect the performance of the affordable entry-level segment.
If we or the SPEs
in which we participate fail to comply with or become subject to more onerous government regulations, our business could be adversely
affected.
We and the SPEs in
which we participate are subject to various federal, state and municipal laws and regulations, including those relating to construction,
zoning, soil use, urban regulations, environmental protection, historical sites, consumer protection and antitrust. We are required
to obtain, maintain and renew on a regular basis permits, licenses and authorizations from various governmental authorities in
order to carry out our projects. We strive to maintain compliance with these laws and regulations, as well as with conditions of
permits, licenses and authorizations. If we are unable to achieve or maintain compliance with these laws, regulations and conditions,
we could be subject to fines, project shutdowns, cancellation of licenses and revocation of authorizations or other restrictions
on our ability to develop our projects, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. In addition, our contractors and subcontractors are required to comply with various labor and environmental regulations
and tax and other regulatory obligations. Because we are secondary obligors to these contractors and subcontractors, if they fail
to comply with these regulations or obligations, we may be subject to penalties by the relevant regulatory bodies, and to indemnification
claims from affected third parties.
Regulations governing
the Brazilian real estate industry as well as environmental laws have tended to become more restrictive over time. We cannot assure
that new and stricter standards will not be passed or become applicable to us, or that stricter interpretations of existing laws
and regulations will not be adopted. Furthermore, we cannot assure that any such more onerous regulations would not cause delays
in our projects or that we would be able to secure the relevant permits and licenses. Any such event may require us to spend additional
funds to achieve compliance with such new rules and therefore make the development of our projects more costly, which could adversely
affect our business and the market price of our common shares or the ADSs.
Scarcity of financing
and/or increased interest rates could cause a decrease in the demand for real estate properties, which could negatively affect
our results of operations, financial condition and the market price of our common shares or the ADSs.
The scarcity of financing
and/or an increase in interest rates or in other indirect financing costs may adversely affect the ability or willingness of prospective
buyers to purchase our products and services, especially prospective low income buyers. A majority of the bank financing obtained
by prospective buyers comes from the Housing
Financial System (
Sistema
Financeiro de Habitação
), or the “SFH,” which is financed by funds raised from savings account deposits.
The Brazilian Monetary Council (
Conselho Monetário Nacional
), or the “CMN,” often changes the amount
of such funds that banks are required to make available for real estate financing. If the CMN restricts the amount of available
funds that can be used to finance the purchase of real estate properties, or if there is an increase in interest rates, there may
be a decrease in the demand for our residential and commercial properties and for the development of lots of land, which may adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We and other companies
in the real estate industry frequently extend credit to our clients. As a result, we are subject to risks associated with providing
financing, including the risk of default on amounts owed to us, as well as the risk of increased costs of funding our operations.
An increase in inflation would raise the nominal amounts due from our clients, pursuant to their sales agreements, which may increase
their rates of default. If this were to occur, our cash generation and, therefore, our operating results may be adversely affected.
In addition, we obtain financings from financial institutions at different rates and subject to different indexes and may be unable
to match our debt service requirements with the terms of the financings we grant to our clients. The mismatch of rates and terms
between the funds we obtain and the financings we grant may adversely affect us.
Some of our subsidiaries
use significant funding from the “Minha Casa, Minha Vida” financing programs of the CEF and Banco do Brasil, or “BB”,
and, as a result, are subject to institutional and operating changes in the CEF and BB and enhanced customer risk profiles associated
with clients eligible for these programs.
The CEF and BB have
financing programs in connection with the Brazilian government’s public housing program called “
Minha Casa, Minha
Vida
.” for the low-income segment, which are used by Tenda to fund its activities. The CEF and BB are state-owned and
mixed capital financial institutions and are subject to political influence, which may change the availability or the terms of
the home financing programs. The cancelation, suspension, interruption or a significant change in such programs may affect our
growth estimates and our business. Furthermore, the suspension, interruption or slowdown in the activities of the CEF or BB to
approve projects, grant financing to our clients and evaluate construction process, among other activities, may adversely impact
our business, financial position, results of operations and the market price of our common shares and ADSs.
The “
Minha
Casa, Minha Vida
” program was created in March 2009 by the Brazilian government. The second phase of the program, which
was implemented from 2011 to 2014, financed and built approximately 2.3 million houses, with approximately 1.4 million additional
houses under construction. In 2015, the Brazilian government announced the third phase of the program. The program aims to reduce
the housing deficit in Brazil, which as of 2014 was estimated to be 5.2 million houses. The program’s “MCMV I”
and “MCMV II” phases call for total government investment of up to R$230 billion, to be made available through financing
from the CEF and BB, and aim to build approximately 4.1 million houses for families with monthly incomes of up to ten times the
minimum wage. This program offers, among other things, long-term financing, lower interest rates, greater share of the property
financed to the client, subsidies based on income level, lower insurance costs and the creation of a guarantor fund to refinance
debt in case of unemployment. Financing to the affordable entry-level segment is primarily made available through the CEF and BB.
On March 30, 2016, the Brazilian government launched “MCMVIII”, the third phase of the program, which aims to build
approximately 2 million houses in the next three years, with a total investment of approximately R$210.6 billion. In the first
quarter of 2017, the Brazilian government launched “MCMVIV”, the fourth phase of the program, which aims to build approximately
610 thousand houses in 2017, with a total investment of approximately R$8.5 billion.
Any changes in such
financing would force us to seek new sources of financing and the availability of funds under similar conditions is limited, which
would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We may sell portions
of our landbank located in nonstrategic regions, which is in line with our future strategies. As a result, we will prepare an annual
analysis for impairment of our landbank.
As part of our strategy
to focus our future operations on regions where our developments have historically been successful, and where we believe there
is homebuilding potential based on market opportunities, we may sell portions of our landbank located outside of these regions.
As a result, we will prepare an annual impairment analysis of our landbank based on the acquisition cost of the land in our portfolio.
In 2011, we made a decision to sell a portion of our landbank given our narrowed geographic focus and our evaluation of impairment
resulted in recording a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale in the amount of R$92.1 million. In December
2012, we had R$53.8 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale. As of December 31, 2013,
we had R$68.5 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale. As of December 31, 2014, we had
R$63.5 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale. As of December 31, 2015, we had R$50.3
million recorded as a provision for
impairment on landbank
and properties for sale. As of December 31, 2016, we had R$174.4 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and
properties for sale.
The real estate
industry is dependent on the availability of credit, especially in the affordable entry-level segment.
One of our main strategies
is to expand our operations to the affordable entry-level segment in which clients are strongly dependent on bank financing to
purchase homes. This financing may not be available on favorable terms to our clients, or at all. Changes in the Real Estate Financing
System (
Sistema de Financiamento Imobiliário
), or the “SFI,” and in the SFH rules, the scarcity of available
resources or an increase in interest rates may affect the ability or desire of such clients to purchase homes, consequently affecting
the demand for homes. These factors would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because we recognize
sales revenue from our real estate properties under the percentage of completion method of accounting under Brazilian GAAP as generally
adopted by construction companies and under U.S. GAAP, when we meet the conditions specified by the respective accounting standards,
an adjustment in the cost of a development project may reduce or eliminate previously reported revenue and income.
We recognize revenue
from the sale of units in our properties based on the percentage of completion method of accounting, which requires us to recognize
revenue as we incur the cost of construction. Total cost estimates are revised on a regular basis as the work progresses, and adjustments
based upon such revisions are reflected in our results of operations in accordance with the method of accounting used. To the extent
that these adjustments result in an increase, a reduction or an elimination of previously reported income, we will recognize a
credit to or a charge against income, which could have an adverse effect on our previously reported revenue and income.
Our participation
in SPEs creates additional risks, including potential problems in our financial and business relationships with our partners.
We invest in special
purpose entities (
Sociedade de Propósito Específico
or “SPEs”) with other real estate developers
and construction companies in Brazil. The risks involved with SPEs include the potential bankruptcy of our SPE partners and the
possibility of diverging or inconsistent economic or business interests between us and our partners. If an SPE partner fails to
perform or is financially unable to bear its portion of the required capital contributions, we could be required to make additional
investments and provide additional services in order to make up for our partner’s shortfall. In addition, under Brazilian
law, the partners of an SPE may be liable for certain obligations of an SPE, including with respect to tax, labor, environmental
and consumer protection laws and regulations. These risks could adversely affect us.
We may experience
difficulties in finding desirable land tracts, and increases in the price of land may increase our cost of sales and decrease our
earnings.
Our continued growth
depends in large part on our ability to continue to acquire land and to do so at a reasonable cost. As more developers enter or
expand their operations in the Brazilian home building industry, land prices could rise significantly and suitable land could become
scarce due to increased demand, decreased supply or both. A resulting rise in land prices may increase our cost of sales and decrease
our earnings. We may not be able to continue to acquire suitable land at reasonable prices in the future, which could adversely
affect our business.
The market value
of our inventory of undeveloped land may decrease, thus adversely affecting our results of operations.
We own tracts of undeveloped
land that are part of our inventory for future developments. We also intend to increase our inventory and acquire larger tracts
of land. The market value of these properties may significantly decrease from the acquisition date to the development of the project
as a result of economic downturns or market conditions, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Increases in the
price of raw materials and fixtures may increase our cost of sales and reduce our earnings.
The basic raw materials
and fixtures used in the construction of our homes include concrete, concrete block, steel, aluminum, bricks, windows, doors, roof
tiles and plumbing fixtures. Increases in the price of these and other raw materials, including increases that may occur as a result
of shortages, duties, restrictions, or fluctuations in exchange rates, could increase our cost of sales. Any such cost increases
could reduce our earnings and adversely affect our business.
If we are not able
to implement our growth strategy as planned, or at all, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
We plan to grow our
business by selectively expanding to meet the growth potential of the Brazilian residential market. We believe that there is increasing
competition for suitable real estate development sites. We may not find suitable additional sites for development of new projects
or other suitable expansion opportunities.
We anticipate that
we will need additional financing to implement our expansion strategy and we may not have access to the funding required for the
expansion of our business or such funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms. We may finance the expansion of our business
with additional indebtedness or by issuing additional debt or equity securities. For example, on October 7, 2013, we entered into
a Real Estate Finance System (SFI) loan in the amount of R$300 million. The loan is scheduled to mature in July 2017. The loan
is secured by (i) first-priority mortgages over select real estate ventures of the Company and (ii) fiduciary assignments of real
estate receivables generated by such select real estate ventures. The purpose of the loan is to provide funding for housing projects
only. The loan agreement contains restrictive covenants which trigger early redemption upon the occurrence of certain events of
default.
In July 2014, we issued
R$130 million in non-convertible debentures on a private placement basis. The debentures are secured by (i) first-priority mortgages
over select real estate ventures of the Company and (ii) fiduciary assignments of real estate receivables generated by such select
real estate ventures. The proceeds of the debentures will be used to fund the development of such real estate ventures only. The
debentures holders assigned their fiduciary rights in the real estate receivables in favor of a real estate securitization SPE,
which issued Certificates of Real Estate Receivables (
Certificados de Recebíveis Imobiliários
) or “CRIs”,
backed by such real estate receivables.
In September 2014,
the Company entered into a Real Estate Finance System (SFI) loan in the amount of R$194 million. The loan is scheduled to mature
in October 2018. The loan is secured by (i) first-priority mortgages over select real estate ventures of the Company and (ii) fiduciary
assignments of real estate receivables generated by such select real estate ventures. The purpose of the loan is to provide funding
for housing projects only.
In January 2015, we
issued R$55 million in non-convertible debentures on a private placement basis. The debentures are secured by (i) first-priority
mortgages over select real estate ventures of the Company and (ii) fiduciary assignments of real estate receivables generated by
such select real estate ventures. The debentures are scheduled to mature on January 20, 2020. The proceeds of the debentures will
be used to fund the development of such real estate ventures only.
In December 2015,
we entered into a real estate sales receivables (
Cédula de Crédito Imobiliário
, or “CCI”)
transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The
assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$32.2 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value,
for R$24.5 million.
In March 2016, we
entered into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its
subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$36.4 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted
to present value, for R$27.3 million.
In May 2016 , we entered
into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries.
The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$23.0 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present
value, for R$17.5 million.
In August 2016, we
entered into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its
subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$21.4 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted
to present value, for R$14.9million.
In September 2016,
we issued a certificate of bank credit (
Cédula de Crédito Bancário
, or “CCB”) in the amount
of R$65 million to finance our operation and to provide working capital for the Company. The CCB is guaranteed by a specific portion
of our landbank and real estate receivables.
In December 2016,
we entered into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and
its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$27.0 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted
to present value, for R$19.5 million.
We could face financial
risks, covenant restrictions and restrictions on our ability to employ assets associated with incurring additional indebtedness,
such as reducing our liquidity and access to financial markets and increasing the amount of cash flow required to service such
indebtedness, or associated with issuing additional stock, such as dilution of ownership and earnings.
There are risks
for which we do not have insurance coverage or the insurance coverage we have in place may not be sufficient to cover damages that
we may suffer.
We maintain insurance
policies with coverage for certain risks, including damages arising from engineering defects, fire, landslides, storms, gas explosions
and civil liabilities stemming from construction errors. We believe that the level of insurance we have contracted for accidents
is consistent with market practice. However, there can be no assurance that such policies will always be available or provide sufficient
coverage for certain damages. In addition, there are certain risks that may not be covered by such policies, such as damages resulting
from war, force majeure or the interruption of certain activities and, therefore any requirement to pay amounts not covered by
our insurance may have a negative impact on our business and our results of operations. Furthermore, we are required to pay penalties
and other fines whenever there is delay in the delivery of our units, and such penalties and fines are not covered by our insurance
policies.
Moreover, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to renew our current insurance policies under favorable terms, or at all. As a result, insufficient
insurance coverage or our inability to renew existing insurance policies could have an adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations.
Our level of indebtedness
could have an adverse effect on our financial health, diminish our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and
limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or the real estate industry.
As of December 31,
2016, our total debt (loans, financing and debentures) and payables to venture partners was R$1,638.8 million and our short-term
debt and payables to venture partners was R$985.9 million. In addition, as of December 31, 2016 our cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments available was R$253.2 million and our net debt represented 71.8% of our shareholders’ equity including
the non-controlling interest. Our indebtedness has variable interest rates. Our level of indebtedness could have important negative
consequences for us. For example, it could:
|
·
|
require us to dedicate a large portion of our cash flow from operations to fund payments on our
debt, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate
purposes;
|
|
·
|
increase our vulnerability to adverse general economic or industry conditions;
|
|
·
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or the industry
in which we operate;
|
|
·
|
limit our ability to raise additional debt or equity capital in the future or increase the cost
of such funding;
|
|
·
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploring business opportunities; and
|
|
·
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt.
|
Certain of our debt
agreements contain financial and other covenants and any default under such debt agreements may have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and cash flows.
Certain of our existing
debt agreements contain restrictions and covenants and require the maintenance or satisfaction of specified financial ratios, ratings
and tests. Our ability to meet these financial ratios, ratings and tests can be affected by events beyond our control and we cannot
assure that we will meet those tests, especially given the lower yield environment in which the industry currently operates. Failure
to meet or satisfy any of these covenants, financial ratios or financial tests could result in an event of default under these
and other agreements, as a result of cross-default provisions. If we are unable to comply with our debt covenants, we could be
forced to seek waivers.
If we are unable to
obtain waivers, a large portion of our debt could be subject to acceleration. We do not believe such occurrence to be likely; however,
if it were to happen, we could be required to renegotiate, restructure or refinance our indebtedness, seek additional equity capital
or sell assets, which could materially and adversely affect us.
We cannot guarantee
that we will be successful in obtaining any waivers. As of December 31, 2016, the Company and its subsidiaries were in compliance
with the contractual covenants provided for in our debentures and our credit instruments, except for a breach of a certain restrictive
covenant in one of the Company’s CCB’s. This breach was mainly due to an impairment of R$610.1 million we recorded
in line with CPC 31 – Non-Current Asset Held for Sale and Income from Discontinued Operations as a result of the discontinuation
of Tenda’s operations under Brazilian GAAP in the Company’s 2016, 2015 and 2014 consolidated statements of operations
(as described above), for which the Company obtained a waiver from the relevant creditor for the year ended December 31, 2016 and
period ended March 31, 2017. See Notes 12, 13 and 31(iii) to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual
report.
Failures or delays
by our third party contractors may adversely affect our reputation and business and expose us to civil liability.
We engage third party
contractors to provide services for our projects. Therefore, the quality of work in the construction of our real estate projects
and the timely completion of these projects may depend on factors that are beyond our control, including the quality and timely
delivery of building materials and the technical skills of the outsourced professionals. Such outsourcing may delay the identification
of construction problems and, as a result, the correction of such problems. Any failures, delays or defects in the services provided
by our third party contractors may adversely affect our reputation and relationship with our clients, which would adversely affect
our business and results of operations.
We may be unable
to successfully implement our strategy of reorganizing our operational organization and performance.
We are currently implementing
our strategy to reorganize our operational infrastructure to promote and enhance our performance. This strategy includes the implementation
of a new management structure that, among other things, assigns each brand manager direct responsibility for the operating performance
of each brand, and implementing a corporate culture shift within our Tenda brand focused on aligning incentives to improve project
execution. As a result, we established an operating structure organized by brand (Gafisa and Tenda) and appointed divisional executive
officers responsible for the profit and loss of each business unit. This strategy is intended to pursue the goal of helping to
produce more stable cash flow and contributing toward a return to sustainable growth.
On February 7, 2014,
we and Tenda issued a notice of material fact to the market reporting that our management was authorized by its board of directors
to initiate studies for a potential spin-off of our business unit and Tenda’s business unit into two publicly held and independent
companies, in view of the fact that we and Tenda have distinct profiles in respect of strategy, operations and capital structure,
and that the synergies between our operations and Tenda’s operations are limited.
After analyzing certain
alternatives, our management decided to sell 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock and transfer the remaining 50% of Tenda’s
total capital stock to our shareholders in connection with a reduction in our total capital stock. Accordingly, on December 14,
2016, we entered into a sale and purchase agreement, or the “SPA”, with Jaguar Real Estate Partners, LP, or “Jaguar”,
pursuant to which we will sell Tenda shares representing up to 30% of the total capital stock of Tenda.
The consummation of
the transactions described above is subject to certain conditions, among others, established in the SPA, as well as to the entering
into between us and Tenda of certain separation agreements, the obtaining of approvals from the competent corporate bodies and
obtaining the consent of certain creditors and third parties. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—A.
History and Development of the Company.”
There can be no assurance
that we will be able to successfully implement our strategy or satisfy the conditions necessary to enable the transactions described
above, and therefore we may also be unsuccessful in achieving such goals behind such strategy, which could result in a material
adverse effect with respect to our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Unfavorable judicial,
administrative or arbitration decisions may adversely affect us.
We currently are,
and may be in the future, defendants in several judicial, administrative proceedings related to civil, labor and tax matters. We
cannot assure you that we will obtain favorable decisions in such proceedings, that such proceedings will be dismissed, or that
our provisions for such proceedings are sufficient in the event of an unfavorable decision. Unfavorable decisions that impede our
operations, as initially planned, or that result in a claim
amount that is not adequately
covered by provisions in our balance sheet, may adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We may be held responsible
for labor liabilities of our third party contractors.
We may be held responsible
for the labor liabilities of our third party contractors and obligated to pay for fines imposed by the relevant authorities in
the event that our third party contractors do not comply with applicable legislation. As of December 31, 2016, R$35.3 million of
our R$61.7 million of total labor liabilities and provisions were for such liabilities. Approximately 57.8% of the labor claims
were commenced by employees of our third party contractors. An adverse result in such claims would cause an adverse effect on our
business.
Failure to keep
members of our senior management and/or our ability to recruit and retain qualified professionals may have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success
depends on the continued service and performance of our senior management and our ability to recruit and retain qualified professionals.
None of the members of our senior management are bound to long-term labor contracts or non-compete agreements and there can be
no assurance that we will successfully recruit and retain qualified professionals to our management as our business grows. The
loss of any key professionals or our inability to recruit or retain qualified professionals may have an adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in Brazilian
GAAP issued by CPC may differ from IFRS and may adversely affect our results.
Brazilian corporate
law was amended by Law No. 11,638 dated December 28, 2007 in order to facilitate the convergence of Brazilian GAAP with IFRS, and
thereafter, the CPC issued new accounting standards that generally converged Brazilian GAAP to IFRS.
On May 28, 2014, the
IASB published IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“IFRS 15”) (CPC 47), which establishes principles
that will apply to the recognition of revenue under IFRS. IFRS 15 will require entities to recognize revenue to depict the transfer
of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled
in exchange for those goods or services. When adopted, IFRS 15 will supersede most of the detailed guidance on the recognition
of revenue that currently applies under IFRS. In connection with the real estate development sector, the maintenance of the Percentage
of Completion revenue recognition method or the adoption of the method of revenue recognition at the time the each relevant unit
is delivered will be the result of the contractual analysis performed by our management. IFRS 15 will be effective for annual periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2018.
We are in the process
of evaluating the impact of CPC 47 on our financial statements. As of the date of this annual report, we have not completed our
analysis of CPC 47 and we have not determined the extent to which it will impact our financial statements once they are adopted.
Risks Relating to Brazil
Brazilian economic,
political and other conditions, and Brazilian government policies or actions in response to these conditions, may negatively affect
our business and results of operations and the market price of our common shares or the ADSs.
The Brazilian economy
has been characterized by unstable economic cycles and frequent and occasionally extensive intervention by the Brazilian government.
The Brazilian government has often changed monetary, fiscal, credit, tariff and other policies to influence the course of the Brazilian
economy. For example, the government’s actions to control inflation have at times involved setting wage and price controls,
blocking access to bank accounts, imposing exchange controls and limiting imports into Brazil. We have no control over, and cannot
predict, what policies or actions the Brazilian government may take in the future.
Our business, results
of operations, financial condition and prospects, as well as the market prices of our common shares or the ADSs, may be adversely
affected by, among others, the following factors:
|
·
|
exchange rate movements;
|
|
·
|
exchange control policies;
|
|
·
|
expansion or contraction of the Brazilian economy, as measured by rates of GDP;
|
|
·
|
other economic, political, diplomatic and social developments in or affecting Brazil;
|
|
·
|
liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets; and
|
|
·
|
social and political instability.
|
Uncertainty over whether
the Brazilian government may implement changes in policy or regulations may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to
heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets as well as securities issued abroad by Brazilian issuers. As a result,
these uncertainties and other future developments in the Brazilian economy may adversely affect us and our business and results
of operations and the market price of our common shares and the ADSs.
In addition, the Brazilian
Congress commenced impeachment proceedings against then President Dilma Rousseff on December 2, 2015, for violating budgetary laws
to prop up the Brazilian economy during her reelection campaign in 2014. On April 17, 2016, more than two-thirds of Brazil’s
Congress voted to proceed with the impeachment proceedings. The proceedings then moved to the Senate, which on May 12, 2016 voted
to commence a trial of President Rousseff, resulting in her suspension from the post for up to 180 days, during which time Vice
President Michel Temer assumed the Presidency. On August 31, 2016, President Rousseff was convicted by the Senate and definitively
removed from office. On the same date, Michel Temer assumed the Presidency of Brazil until the next general elections, scheduled
for October of 2018. Ms. Rousseff appealed the Senate’s final decision to the Supreme Court, whose decision is pending. In
this context, it is currently uncertain whether Mr. Temer will enjoy the support of the Brazilian Congress, or what policies he
will be able to implement. In addition, Mr. Temer and his government have been the target of protests throughout Brazil since he
assumed power on a provisional and now definitive basis. We have no control over the political situation in Brazil and cannot foresee
what policies or actions the Brazilian government may pursue. Any of these factors may adversely affect the Brazilian economy,
our business, financial condition, results of operations and the trading price of our common shares. The Brazilian government may
be subject to internal pressure to change its current macroeconomic policies in order the achieve higher rates of economic growth,
and has historically maintained a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thus restricting the availability of credit and
reducing economic growth. We cannot foresee what policies the government will adopt. In addition, in the past, the Brazilian economy
has been affected by political events in the country, which have also affected the confidence of investors and the general public,
which harms the performance of the Brazilian economy. Furthermore, any indecision by the Brazilian government in implementing changes
in certain policies or regulations may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil, and increase stock market volatility.
Inflation, and government
measures to curb inflation, may adversely affect the Brazilian economy, the Brazilian securities market, our business and operations
and the market prices of our common shares or the ADSs.
At times in the past,
Brazil has experienced high rates of inflation. According to the General Market Price Index (
Índice Geral de Preços—Mercado
),
or “IGP-M”, inflation rates in Brazil were 3.8% in 2006, 7.8% in 2007, 9.8% in 2008, (1.7)% in 2009, 11.3% in 2010,
5.1% in 2011, 7.8% in 2012, 5.5% in 2013, 3.7% in 2014, 10.5% in 2015 and 7.2% in 2016. In addition, according to the Expanded
Consumer Price Index (
Índice de Preços ao Consumidor Ampliado
), or “IPCA,” Brazilian consumer
price inflation rates were 3.1% in 2006, 4.5% in 2007, 5.9% in 2008, 4.3% in 2009, 5.9% in 2010, 6.5% in 2011, 5.8% in 2012, 5.9%
in 2013, 6.4% in 2014, 10.7% in 2015 and 6.3% in 2016. Our term sales agreements usually provide for an inflation adjustment linked
to the National Construction Cost Index (
Índice Nacional de Custo de Construção
), or “INCC”.
The INCC increased by 6.2% in 2007, 11.9% in 2008, 3.25% in 2009, 7.77% in 2010, 7.49% in 2011, 7.12% in 2012, 8.1% in 2013, 6.9%
in 2014, 7.5% in 2015 and 6.1% in 2016. The Brazilian government’s measures to control inflation have often included maintaining
a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby restricting availability of credit and reducing economic growth. Inflation,
actions to combat inflation and public speculation about possible additional actions have also contributed materially to economic
uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets.
Brazil may experience
high levels of inflation in future periods. Periods of higher inflation may slow the rate of growth of the Brazilian economy, which
could lead to reduced demand for our products in Brazil and decreased net sales. Inflation is also likely to increase some of our
costs and expenses, which we may not be able to pass on to our customers and, as a result, may reduce our profit margins and net
income. In addition, high inflation generally leads to higher domestic interest rates, and, as a result, the costs of servicing
our
reais
-denominated debt may increase, resulting in lower net income. Inflation and its effect on domestic interest rates
can, in addition, lead to reduced liquidity in the domestic capital and lending markets, which could affect our ability to refinance
our indebtedness in those markets. In addition, increases in inflation rates would increase the outstanding debt of our customers,
which could increase default levels and affect our cash flows. Any decline in our net operating revenue or net income and any deterioration
in our financial condition would also likely lead to a decline in the market price of our common shares and the ADSs.
Social, political
and economic events and the perception of risks, especially in other emerging economies, may adversely affect the Brazilian economy,
and consequently, our business, financial condition, results of operations and the market price of our securities.
The Brazilian capital
markets are influenced by the Brazilian market and economic conditions and, to a certain extent, by the conditions in other Latin
American countries and other emerging market countries. Investors’ reactions to developments in certain countries may have
an adverse effect on the market value of the securities of Brazilian issuers. Crises in other Latin American and emerging market
countries normally trigger a significant outflow of funds and the reduction of foreign investment in Brazil. For example, in 2001
Argentina announced a moratorium on its public debt after a recession and a period of political instability, which affected investor
perceptions towards the Brazilian capital markets for many years. Crises in other Latin American and emerging market countries
may diminish investor interest in the securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours, which could negatively affect the market
price of our common shares.
The market for securities
issued by Brazilian companies is influenced, to a varying degree, by international economic and market conditions generally, especially
in the United States. The prices of shares traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange (
BM&FBovespa S.A. — Bolsa
de Valores Mercadorias e Futuros
), or the “BM&FBOVESPA,” have been historically affected by the fluctuation
of interest rates and stock exchange indexes in the United States. Events in other countries or capital markets could have an adverse
effect on the price of our shares, which could make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and obtain financing
on acceptable terms in the future, or at all.
The ongoing “Lava
Jato” investigation regarding corruption at and with Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., or Petrobras, may hinder the growth
of the Brazilian economy, and could have an adverse effect on our business.
Petrobras and certain
other Brazilian companies active in the energy and infrastructure sectors are facing investigations by the CVM, the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, the Brazilian Federal Police and the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor’s Office, in connection with corruption
allegations, or the “Lava Jato” investigations. Depending on the duration and outcome of such investigations, the companies
involved may face downgrades from rating agencies, funding restrictions and a reduction in their revenues. Currently, elected officials
and other public officials in Brazil are also being investigated for allegations of unethical and illegal conduct identified during
the new major phase of the Lava Jato investigations, which began in July 2015. The potential outcome of these investigations is
unknown, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the companies involved, and on Brazil’s
economy and growth prospects in the near to medium term.
The allegations under
the “Lava Jato” investigations along with the economic downturn resulted in Brazil being downgraded to non-investment
grade status by S&P in September 2015, by Fitch Ratings in December 2015, and by Moody’s in February 2016, as well as
in the downgrade of various major Brazilian companies. Such downgrades have further worsened the conditions of the Brazilian economy
and the condition of Brazilian companies, especially those relying on foreign investments.
Such investigations
have recently extended to persons in high positions in the executive and legislative branches of the Brazilian government, which
has caused considerable political instability. It is difficult to predict the effects of such political instability. Persistent
economic hardship in Brazil resulting from, among other factors, such investigations, the developments arising therefrom and a
scenario of high political instability may have a material adverse effect on us.
Persistently poor
macroeconomic conditions resulting from, among other things, the Lava Jato investigations and their consequences, could have an
adverse effect on our business.
Fluctuations in
interest rates may have an adverse effect on our business and the market prices of our common shares and the ADSs.
The Central Bank,
through the Monetary Policy Committee (
Comitê de Política Monetária
), or the “COPOM,” establishes
the Special Clearance and Escrow System rate (
Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custodia
), or the “SELIC
rate,” which is the basic interest rate for the Brazilian financial system by reference to the level of economic growth of
the Brazilian economy, the level of inflation and other economic indicators. The SELIC rate is also an important policy instrument
used by the Brazilian government to achieve inflation targets it established on June 21, 1999 (Decree No. 3,088).
As of December 31,
2011, the SELIC rate was 11%. As of December 31, 2012, the Central Bank had significantly reduced the SELIC rate to 7.25%. As of
December 31, 2013, the Central Bank had increased the SELIC rate to 10%. As of December 31, 2014, the Central Bank had further
increased the SELIC rate to 11.75%. As of December 31, 2015, the SELIC rate was 14.25%, and as of December 31, 2016, the SELIC
was 13.75%. As of the date of this annual report, the SELIC rate is 11.25%. Debts of companies in the real estate industry, including
ours, are subject to the fluctuation of the SELIC rate. Should the SELIC rate continue to increase, the costs relating to the service
of our debt obligations may also increase.
As of December 31,
2016, our indebtedness was denominated in
reais
and subject to Brazilian floating interest rates, such as the Reference
Interest Rate (
Taxa Referencial
), or “TR,” and the Interbank Deposit Certificate Rate (
Certificado de Depósito
Interbancário
), or “CDI rate.” Any increase in the TR rate or the CDI rate may have an adverse impact on
our financial expenses, our results of operations and on the market price of our common shares or the ADSs. We are not a party
to any hedging instruments with respect to our indebtedness.
Restrictions on
the movement of capital out of Brazil may adversely affect your ability to receive dividends and distributions on the ADSs and
on our common shares, or the proceeds of any sale of our common shares.
Brazilian law permits
the Brazilian government to impose temporary restrictions on conversions of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies and on remittances
to foreign investors of proceeds from their investments in Brazil whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance
of payments or there are reasons to expect a pending serious imbalance. The Brazilian government last imposed remittance restrictions
for approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990. The Brazilian government may take similar measures in the future. Any imposition
of restrictions on conversions and remittances could hinder or prevent holders of our common shares or the ADSs from converting
into U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies and remitting abroad dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale in Brazil
of our common shares. Exchange controls could also prevent us from making payments on our U.S. dollar-denominated debt obligations
and hinder our ability to access the international capital markets. As a result, exchange controls restrictions could reduce the
market prices of our common shares and the ADSs.
Changes in tax laws
may increase our tax burden and, as a result, adversely affect our profitability.
The Brazilian government
regularly implements changes to tax regimes that may increase our and our customers’ tax burdens. These changes include modifications
in the rate of assessments and, on occasion, enactment of temporary taxes, the proceeds of which are earmarked for designated governmental
purposes. Since April 2003, the Brazilian government has presented several tax reform proposals, which were mainly designed to
simplify tax assessments, to avoid internal disputes within and between the Brazilian states and municipalities, and to redistribute
tax revenues. The tax reform proposals provided for changes in the rules governing the federal Social Integration Program (
Programa
de Integração Social
), or “PIS,” the federal Contribution for Social Security Financing (
Contribuição
para Financiamento da Seguridade Social
), or “COFINS,” the state Tax on the Circulation of Merchandise and Services
(
Imposto Sobre a Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços)
, or “ICMS,” and other taxes. The
effects of these proposed tax reform measures and any other changes that result from enactment of additional tax reforms have not
been, and cannot be, quantified. However, some of these measures, if enacted, may result in increases in our overall tax burden,
which could negatively affect our overall financial performance.
Risks Relating to Our Common Shares
and the ADSs
International economic
and market conditions, especially in the United States, may adversely affect the market price of the ADSs.
The market for securities
issued by Brazilian companies is influenced, to a varying degree, by international economic and market conditions generally. Because
our ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or the “NYSE,” adverse market conditions and economic and/or political
crises, especially in the United States, such as the
subprime mortgage lending
crisis in 2007 and 2008 and the financial and credit crises in 2008, have at times resulted in significant negative impacts on
the market price of our ADSs. Despite the fact that our clients, whether financed by us or by Brazilian banks through resources
obtained in the local market, are not directly exposed to the mortgage lending crisis in the United States, there are still uncertainties
as to whether such crisis may indirectly affect homebuilders worldwide. The uncertainties generated by the subprime crisis may
affect the market prices of our ADSs and could also make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and finance our
operations in the future on acceptable terms or at all.
Developments and
the perception of risks in other countries, especially emerging market countries, may adversely affect the market prices of our
common shares and the ADSs.
The market for securities
issued by Brazilian companies is influenced, to varying degrees, by economic and market conditions in other emerging market countries,
especially other Latin American countries. Although economic conditions are different in each country, the reaction of investors
to developments in one country may cause the capital markets in other countries to fluctuate. Developments or adverse economic
conditions in other emerging market countries have at times resulted in significant outflows of funds from, and declines in the
amount of foreign currency invested in, Brazil. For example, in 2001, after a prolonged recession, followed by political instability,
Argentina announced that it would no longer continue to service its public debt. The economic crisis in Argentina negatively affected
investors’ perceptions of Brazilian securities for several years. Economic or political crises in Latin America or other
emerging markets may significantly affect perceptions of the risk inherent in investing in the region, including Brazil.
The Brazilian economy
is also affected by international economic and general market conditions, especially economic and market conditions in the United
States. Share prices on the BM&FBOVESPA, for example, have historically been sensitive to fluctuations in U.S. interest rates
as well as movements of the major U.S. stock indexes, particularly in the current worldwide economic downturn. Developments in
other countries and securities markets could adversely affect the market prices of our common shares and the ADSs and could also
make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and finance our operations in the future on acceptable terms or at
all.
The relative volatility
and the lack of liquidity of the Brazilian securities market may adversely affect you.
The Brazilian securities
market is substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and more volatile than major securities markets in the United States.
This may limit your ability to sell our common shares and the common shares underlying your ADSs at the price and time at which
you wish to do so. The BM&FBOVESPA, the only Brazilian stock exchange, had a market capitalization of US$757.0 billion as of
December 31, 2016 and an average daily trading volume of US$2.4 billion for 2016. In comparison, the NYSE had a domestic market
capitalization of US$20.2 trillion (excluding funds and non-U.S. companies) as of December 31, 2016 and an average daily trading
volume of approximately US$43.9 billion for 2016.
There is also a large
concentration in the Brazilian securities market. The ten largest companies in terms of market capitalization represented 58.9%
of the aggregate market capitalization of the BM&FBOVESPA as of December 31, 2016. Gafisa’s average daily trading volume
on the BM&FBOVESPA and in the NYSE in 2016 was US$3.8 million and US$0.5 million, respectively.
Shares eligible
for future sale may adversely affect the market value of our common shares and the ADSs.
Certain of our shareholders
have the ability, subject to applicable Brazilian laws and regulations and applicable securities laws in the relevant jurisdictions,
to sell our shares and the ADSs. We cannot predict what effect future sales of our shares or ADSs may have on the market price
of our shares or the ADSs. Future sales of substantial amounts of such shares or the ADSs, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could adversely affect the market prices of our shares or the ADSs.
The economic value
of your investment in our company may be diluted.
We may need additional
funds in the future, in order to expand more rapidly, develop new markets, respond to competitive pressures or make acquisitions.
Any necessary additional financing may not be available on terms favorable to us. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable
terms, we may be unable to meet our business or strategic objectives or compete effectively. If additional funds are raised by
our issuing new equity securities existing shareholders may be diluted. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A.
History and Development of the Company.”
Holders of our common
shares or the ADSs may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity.
According to our
bylaws, we must generally pay our shareholders at least 25% of our annual net profit as dividends or interest on shareholders’
equity, as calculated and adjusted under Brazilian corporate law method. This adjusted net profit may be used to absorb losses
or for the payment of statutory participation on profits to debenture holders, employees or members of our management, which would
ultimately reduce the amount available to be paid as dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity. Additionally, Brazilian
corporate law allows a publicly traded company like us to suspend the mandatory distribution of dividends in any particular year
if our board of directors informs our shareholders that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition
or cash availability. For 2003, 2004 and 2005, we did not distribute dividends. We distributed dividends in each of 2007, 2008,
2009 and 2010 with respect to the prior respective fiscal year. Based on the negative results of the fiscal year 2012, on April
19, 2013, our shareholders did not approve any distribution of dividends. On December 20, 2013, with the completion of the sale
of the Alphaville interest, as fully detailed in item “4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of
the Company”, our board of directors approved the payment of interest on equity in the amount of R$130.2 million, representing
R$0.3111 per share. Such payment was effective February 12, 2014. On April 25, 2014, our shareholders approved a distribution
of dividends in the amount of R$32.9 million, representing R$0.0825 per share. Based on the negative results of the fiscal year
2014, on April 16, 2015, our shareholders did not approve any distribution of dividends. On April 25, 2016, our shareholders approved
a distribution of dividends in the amount of R$17.7 million, representing R$0.0481 per share. Based on the negative results of
the fiscal year 2016, we expect that our shareholders will not approve any distribution of dividends at our annual shareholders'
meeting expected to be held on or about April 28, 2017.
For further information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—A.
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy.”
Holders of ADSs
may find it difficult to exercise voting rights at our shareholders’ meetings.
Holders of ADSs may
exercise voting rights with respect to our common shares represented by ADSs only in accordance with the terms of the deposit agreement
governing the ADSs. Holders of ADSs will face practical limitations in exercising their voting rights because of the additional
steps involved in our communications with ADS holders. For example, we are required to publish a notice of our shareholders’
meetings in specified newspapers in Brazil. Holders of our common shares will be able to exercise their voting rights by attending
a shareholders’ meeting in person or voting by proxy. By contrast, holders of ADSs will receive notice of a shareholders’
meeting from the ADR depositary following our notice to the depositary requesting the depositary to do so. To exercise their voting
rights, holders of ADSs must instruct the ADR depositary on a timely basis. This voting process necessarily will take longer for
holders of ADSs than for holders of our common shares. Common shares represented by ADSs for which no timely voting instructions
are received by the ADR depositary from the holders of ADSs shall not be voted.
Holders of ADSs also
may not receive the voting materials in time to instruct the depositary to vote the common shares underlying their ADSs. In addition,
the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions of the holders of ADSs or for the
manner of carrying out those voting instructions. Accordingly, holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise voting rights, and they
will have little, if any, recourse if the common shares underlying their ADSs are not voted as requested.
No single shareholder
or group of shareholders holds more than 50% of our capital stock, which may increase the opportunity for alliances between shareholders
as well as conflicts between them.
No single shareholder
or group of shareholders holds more than 50% of our capital stock. There is no guidance in Brazilian corporate law for publicly-held
companies without an identified controlling shareholder. Due to the absence of a controlling shareholder, we may be subject to
future alliances or agreements between our shareholders, which may result in the exercise of a controlling power over our company
by them. In the event a controlling group is formed and decides to exercise its controlling power over our company, we may be subject
to unexpected changes in our corporate governance and strategies, including the replacement of key executive officers. Additionally,
we may be more vulnerable to a hostile takeover bid. The absence of a controlling group may also jeopardize our decision-making
process as the minimum quorum required by law for certain decisions by shareholders may not be reached and, as a result, we cannot
guarantee that our business plan will be affected. Any unexpected change in our management team, business policy or strategy, any
dispute between our shareholders, or any attempt to acquire control of our company may have an adverse impact on our business and
result of operations.
Holders of ADSs
will not be able to enforce the rights of shareholders under our bylaws and Brazilian corporate law and may face difficulties in
protecting their interests because we are subject to different corporate rules and regulations as a Brazilian company.
Holders of ADSs are
not direct shareholders of our company and are unable to enforce the rights of shareholders under our bylaws and Brazilian corporate
law.
Our corporate affairs
are governed by our bylaws and Brazilian corporate law, which differ from the legal principles that would apply if we were incorporated
in a jurisdiction in the United States, such as the State of Delaware or New York, or elsewhere outside Brazil. Although insider
trading and price manipulation are crimes under Brazilian law, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated and
supervised as the U.S. securities markets or the markets in some other jurisdictions. In addition, rules and policies against self-dealing
or for preserving shareholder interests may be less well-defined and enforced in Brazil than in the United States and certain other
countries, which may put holders of the ADSs at a potential disadvantage. Corporate disclosures also may be less complete or informative
than for a public company in the United States or in certain other countries.
Holders of ADSs
may face difficulties in serving process on or enforcing judgments against us and other persons.
We are a corporation
organized under the laws of Brazil, and all of our directors and executive officers and our independent public accountants reside
or are based in Brazil. Most of the assets of our company and of these other persons are located in Brazil. As a result, it may
not be possible for holders of ADSs to effect service of process upon us or these other persons within the United States or other
jurisdictions outside Brazil or to enforce against us or these other persons judgments obtained in the United States or other jurisdictions
outside Brazil. Because judgments of U.S. courts for civil liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws may be enforced
in Brazil only if certain conditions are met, holders may face greater difficulties in protecting their interests in the case of
actions by us or our directors or executive officers than would shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
Changes in Brazilian
tax laws may have an adverse impact on the taxes applicable to a disposition of the ADSs.
According to Law No.
10,833 of December 29, 2003, the disposition of assets located in Brazil by a non-resident to either a Brazilian resident or a
non-resident is subject to taxation in Brazil, regardless of whether the disposition occurs outside or within Brazil. Thus, gains
arising from a disposition of our common shares by a non-resident of Brazil to another non-resident of Brazil are subject to income
tax.
Although the matter
is not entirely clear, we believe it is reasonable to take the position that ADSs do not constitute assets located in Brazil for
the purposes of Law No. 10,833/03. Accordingly, the disposition of our ADSs by a non-resident to either a Brazilian resident or
a non-resident should not be subject to taxation in Brazil. We cannot assure you, however, that the Brazilian tax authorities or
the Brazilian courts will agree with this interpretation. In the event that a disposition of our ADSs is considered a disposition
of assets located in Brazil, gains on a disposition of ADSs by a non-resident of Brazil may be subject to income tax in Brazil.
See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Gains.”
Any gain or loss recognized
by a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations”)
would be treated as U.S. source gain or loss for all foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, U.S. Holders will not be able to
credit any Brazilian income tax imposed on such gains against their U.S. federal income tax liability unless they have other taxable
income from foreign sources in the appropriate foreign tax credit basket. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers as to
whether the Brazilian tax on gain would be creditable against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax on foreign-source income
from other sources.
There can be no
assurance that we will not be a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” for any taxable year, which could result
in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders of our common shares or ADSs.
In general, a non-U.S.
corporation is a PFIC for any taxable year if: (1) 75% or more of its gross income consists of passive income (the “income
test”) or (2) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of its assets consists of assets that produce, or are held for the
production of, passive income (including cash and cash equivalents). Generally, “passive income” includes interest,
dividends, rents, royalties and certain gains. For purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that directly
or indirectly owns at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as if it held its proportionate share
of the assets of the other corporation
and received directly
its proportionate share of the income of the other corporation. The Company believes that it was not a “passive foreign
investment company,” or “PFIC,” for U.S. federal income tax purposes for its 2016 taxable year. However, because
the Company’s PFIC status is an annual determination that can be made only after the end of each taxable year and will depend
on the composition of its income and assets for each such year, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be a PFIC for
the current or any other taxable year. Moreover, after the expected spin-off and sale of the Company’s shares of Tenda in
2017, as described in “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—General,”
the Company will own less than 25% of Tenda shares and, therefore, the Company’s income and assets will no longer include
Tenda’s income and assets for purposes of determining the Company’s PFIC status. On a non-consolidated basis (i.e.,
without taking into account Tenda’s income), the Company had financial income for the 2016 taxable year in an amount that
was substantial relative to its gross margin. The Company may become a PFIC if its financial income for any taxable year
constitutes 75% or more of its gross income (generally, the sum of the Company’s financial income and gross margin) for such
year.
If the Company were
a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder owned its common shares or ADSs, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax
consequences could apply to such U.S. holder. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation——Certain
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”
Judgments of Brazilian
courts with respect to our common shares will be payable only in reais.
If proceedings are
brought in the courts of Brazil seeking to enforce our obligations in respect of the common shares, we will not be required to
discharge our obligations in a currency other than
reais
. Under Brazilian exchange control limitations, an obligation in
Brazil to pay amounts denominated in a currency other than
reais
may be satisfied in Brazilian currency only at the exchange
rate, as determined by the Central Bank, in effect on the date of payment. The exchange rate may not afford non-Brazilian investors
with full compensation for any claim arising out of or related to our obligations under our common shares or the ADSs.
Holders of ADSs
may be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to our common shares underlying the ADSs.
Holders of ADSs will
be unable to exercise the preemptive rights relating to our common shares underlying ADSs unless a registration statement under
the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “Securities Act,” is effective with respect to those rights or
an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. We are not obligated to file a registration
statement with respect to the shares relating to these preemptive rights or to take any other action to make preemptive rights
available to holders of ADSs. We may decide, in our discretion, not to file any such registration statement. If we do not file
a registration statement or if we, after consultation with the ADR depositary, decide not to make preemptive rights available to
holders of ADSs, those holders may receive only the net proceeds from the sale of their preemptive rights by the depositary, or
if they are not sold, their preemptive rights will be allowed to lapse.
An exchange of ADSs
for common shares risks loss of certain foreign currency remittance and Brazilian tax advantages.
The ADSs benefit from
the certificate of foreign capital registration, which permits Citibank N.A., as depositary, to convert dividends and other distributions
with respect to our common shares into foreign currency, and to remit the proceeds abroad. Holders of ADSs who exchange their ADSs
for common shares will then be entitled to rely on the depositary’s certificate of foreign capital registration for five
business days from the date of exchange. Thereafter, they will not be able to remit the proceeds abroad unless they obtain their
own certificate of foreign capital registration under the terms of Law No. 4,131/62, or unless they qualify under Resolution CMN
4,373, which superseded Resolution CMN No. 2,689, which entitles certain investors to buy and sell shares on Brazilian stock exchanges
or organized over-the-counter market and benefit from the certificate of foreign capital registration managed by their authorized
representatives in Brazil. See “Item 9. The Offering and Listing—C. Markets—Investment in Our Common Shares by
Non-Residents of Brazil.”
If holders of ADSs
do not qualify under Resolution CMN 4,373, they will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment on distributions with
respect to our common shares. There can be no assurance that the depositary’s certificate of registration or any certificate
of foreign capital registration obtained by holders of ADSs will not be affected by future legislative or regulatory changes, or
that additional Brazilian law restrictions applicable to their investment in the ADSs may not be imposed in the future.
A portion of the
compensation of our officers and members of the senior management is paid in form of stock options, which could tie their interest
to the market price of our shares and ADSs.
We have established
stock option plans for our officers and members of our senior management. Potential benefits under the stock option plans are tied
to the appreciation of the market price of our shares and ADSs.
As a result, our compensation
policy may influence our officers and members of the senior management and their interest to the market price of our shares and
ADSs, which may conflict with the interests of our shareholders. Our officers and members of the senior management may be influenced
to focus on short-term rather than long-term results because a significant portion of their compensation is tied to our results
and the market price of our shares and ADSs. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership—Stock
Option Plans” in this annual report.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A. History and Development of the
Company
General
Gafisa S.A. is a corporation
organized under the laws of Brazil. We were incorporated on November 12, 1996 for an indefinite term. Our registered and principal
executive offices are located at Av. Nações Unidas No. 8.501, 19th floor, 05425-070, São Paulo, SP, Brazil,
and our general telephone and fax numbers are + 55 (11) 3025-9000 and + 55 (11) 3025-9242, respectively.
We are a leading diversified
national homebuilder serving all demographic segments of the Brazilian market. Established over 60 years ago, we have completed
and sold more than 1,100 developments and constructed over 12 million square meters of housing under the Gafisa brand, which we
believe is more than any other homebuilder in Brazil. Recognized as one of the foremost professionally-managed homebuilders, we
are also one of the best-known brands in the real estate development market, enjoying a reputation among potential homebuyers,
brokers, lenders, landowners, and competitors for quality, consistency and professionalism. Our brands include Gafisa, which offers
a variety of residential options to the mid to higher income segments, Tenda (currently disclosed as a discontinued operations),
which serves the affordable entry-level housing segments and Alphaville (equity method investment), which focuses on the identification,
development and sale of high quality residential communities. In addition, we provide construction services to third parties on
certain developments in the Gafisa segment where we retain an equity interest.
Our core business
is the development of high-quality residential units in attractive locations. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 40.7% of the
value of our launches was derived from high and mid high-level residential developments under the Gafisa brand. For the year ended
December 31, 2016, approximately 59.3% of the value of our launches was derived from Tenda, our affordable entry-level housing
brand.
Gafisa and Tenda currently
operate in several cities, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Recife, Belo Horizonte, and Porto Alegre. Many
of these developments are located in markets where few large competitors currently operate. For the year ended December 31, 2016,
approximately 36.7% of the value of our launches was derived from our operations outside the states of São Paulo and Rio
de Janeiro and from developments related to the “
Minha Casa Minha Vida
” program under the Tenda brand.
In the fourth quarter
of 2011, we conducted an extensive review of our operations and the operations of our subsidiaries, and our combined business strategy.
As a result of this review, the following changes were made: temporary reductions of the activities of the Tenda segment, increase
in investments in the Alphaville segment and focus the Gafisa segment on the markets of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
The closing of 2013
marked the completion of Gafisa’s strategic repositioning, which commenced in early 2012. Our goal at the time was clear:
we needed to reduce the level of debt and restrict the Company's exposure to unprofitable businesses and markets. This process
evolved positively throughout the last two years in several fronts - including improvement in margins and cash generation, and
culminated with the sale of a 70% interest in Alphaville, which unlocked significant value and contributed to a reduction in the
Company's leverage, adjusting its capital structure. At the end of 2013 we finalized the development of our five-year business
plan for the period from 2014 to 2018. During the planning process, we set guidelines for the development of our business for the
upcoming years, including the expected size of Gafisa and Tenda operations, appropriate leverage, profitability guidelines, and
more importantly, our commitment to capital discipline and shareholder value generation, which are reflected in the
guidance released to
the market at the end of 2013. Gafisa S.A. completed the sale of a majority interest in Alphaville Urbanismo S.A. (“Alphaville”),
the leading residential community development company in Brazil, to Private Equity AE Investimentos e Participações
(“Fundo AE”), which has as shareholders Pátria Investimentos and Blackstone Real Estate Advisor, which was announced
on June 7, 2013. The transaction values Alphaville at an equity value of R$2.0 billion. The cash sale to Pátria and Blackstone
resulted in Fundo AE owning 70% of Alphaville, with Gafisa retaining the remaining 30%. All precedent conditions were met including
governmental approval, to the completion of the transaction. The transaction was concluded on December 9, 2013, with a sale of
a 50% interest by Gafisa and a 20% interest by Construtora Tenda S.A. (“Tenda”), with Gafisa retaining the remaining
30% of Alphaville capital stock. Following this transaction and since December 2013, Alphaville is no longer consolidated in the
financial statements of the Company.
The Company’s
results of operations reflect the results of operations of Alphaville for the period January 1 to November, 30 2013 which are presented
in the line item “Results from discontinued operations”.
For the year ended
December 31, 2013, the Company held two business combination transactions, as follows:
On February 27, 2013,
the Company implemented a business combination through an asset swap in which the Company swapped its 50% interest in the jointly-controlled
entity SPE Reserva Ecoville in exchange for a 50% controlling interest in SPE Parque Ecoville at a R$59.9 million fair value. As
a result, we recorded an adjustment to inventory of R$22.6 million.
On September 12, 2013,
the Company implemented a business combination through which it obtained control of Manhattan Square Empreendimentos Imobiliarios
Comercial 02 (“MC 02”) and Manhattan Square Empreendimentos Imobiliarios Residencial 02 (“MR 02”). These
two entities were previously jointly controlled and the Company held a 50% interest in both entities. As a result of this acquisition,
the Company now holds a 100% interest. The combined purchase price was R$64.7 million and was paid on September 12, 2013. As a
result of this transaction, the Company allocated the amount of R$62.3 million recorded as fair value adjustment to inventory.
On February 2, 2014,
Gafisa’s board of directors authorized management to initiate studies for a potential spin-off of Gafisa and Tenda business
units into two independent publicly traded companies. Our management initiated the studies in the first quarter of 2014.
During 2014, we revised
our 2014 launch guidance for the Gafisa segment as a result of weakening economic conditions in Brazil. This revision in the projected
volume of launches affected guidance for the Administrative Expenses to Launch Volumes ratio for the Gafisa segment, as well as
projected consolidated launches.
During 2015, we did
not issue a launch guidance for the Tenda segment or the Gafisa segment as a result of the continuing weakening economic conditions
and political instability in Brazil. High interest rates, high rates of inflation and an increase in levels of unemployment, among
other factors, had an adverse impact on the real estate market, including the Gafisa segment, resulting in a sharp decrease in
the overall volume of real estate launches in Brazil. Consequently, we adopted a conservative approach to launches, seeking to
balance the level of launches of new products in the market by prioritizing ventures with more liquidity, with the aim to reach
stable sales and profitability levels. In contrast, and despite the continuing weakening economic conditions in Brazil, we were
able to expand the Tenda segment of our business, which focuses on the low-income market.
During 2015, as part
of the spin-off studies, we (i) separated several joint departments of Gafisa and Tenda, including, among others, the services,
personnel and management department and the legal department, (ii) converted Tenda’s issuer registration with the CVM from
category B to category A, (iii) entered into negotiations with several banks and insurance companies to open lines of credit for
Tenda that are independent of Gafisa, and (iv) reviewed our contracts with our third party counterparties and evaluated the potential
impact of a spin-off on those contracts. On April 29, 2015, we announced to the market that the spin-off studies were ongoing and
would take longer to be concluded than had been initially expected.
During 2016, we did
not issue a launch guidance for the Tenda segment or the Gafisa segment as a result of the continuing weakening economic conditions
and political instability in Brazil.
On August 16, 2016,
we announced to the market that that the spin-off studies were ongoing and that we were evaluating other potential capital structure
options and separation alternatives for the Gafisa and Tenda business units, including a potential offer of securities and/or a
sale of equity interests, in addition to the spin-off itself.
In December 2016,
following the conclusion of our analysis of certain strategic options, our management decided to sell 50% of Tenda’s total
capital stock, and transfer the remaining 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock to our shareholders in connection with a reduction
in our total capital stock. Accordingly, on December 14, 2016, we entered into the SPA with Jaguar pursuant to which we will sell
Tenda shares representing up to 30% of the total capital stock of Tenda, at a price equal to R$8.13 per share. Pursuant to the
SPA, we will receive cash proceeds totaling R$231.7 million, valuing Tenda’s capital stock at R$539.0 million.
As of the date of
this annual report, we estimate the potential spin-off of the Gafisa and Tenda business units will be concluded in May or June
2017.
Our common shares
are listed on the BM&FBOVESPA under the symbol “GFSA3” and the ADSs are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “GFA.”
Our agent for service
of process in the United States is National Corporate Research, Ltd. located at 10 East 40th Street, 10th floor, New York, NY 10016.
Historical Background and Recent Developments
Gomes de Almeida Fernandes
Ltda., or “GAF,” was established in 1954 in the city of Rio de Janeiro with operations in the real estate markets in
the cities of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. In December 1997, GP Investimentos S.A. and its affiliates, or “GP,”
entered into a partnership with the shareholders of GAF to create Gafisa S.A. In 2004, as a result of a corporate restructuring,
GP assumed a controlling position in our company. In 2005, an affiliate of Equity International Management, LLC, or “Equity
International,” acquired approximately 32% of our company through a capital contribution. In February 2006, we concluded
our initial public offering in Brazil, resulting in a public float of approximately 47% of our total share capital at the conclusion
of the offering.
In September 2006,
we created Gafisa Vendas Intermediação Imobiliária Ltda., or “Gafisa Vendas,” to function as our
internal sales division in the state of São Paulo and in February 2007, we created a branch of Gafisa Vendas in Rio de Janeiro,
or “Gafisa Vendas Rio,” to function as our internal sales division in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro.
In October 2006, we
entered into an agreement with Alphaville Participações S.A. to acquire 100% of Alphaville, one of the largest residential
community development companies in Brazil in terms of units and square meters, focused on the identification, development and sale
of high quality residential communities in the metropolitan regions throughout Brazil targeted at upper and upper-middle income
families. On January 8, 2007, we successfully completed the acquisition of 60% of Alphaville’s shares for R$198.4 million,
of which R$20 million was paid in cash and the remaining R$178.4 million was paid in exchange for 6.4 million common shares of
Gafisa. On May 27, 2010, the shareholders of Gafisa approved the acquisition of 20% of Alphaville’s shares for the total
amount of R$126.5 million, through the merger of Shertis Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. or “Shertis”,
which main asset were 20% of Alphaville’s shares. As a consequence of such merger, Gafisa issued 9,797,792 common shares,
paid to the former shareholders of Shertis.
On March 17, 2007,
we concluded our initial public offering of common shares in the United States, resulting in a public float of 78.6% of our total
share capital at the conclusion of the offering. Upon completion of the offering, entities related to Equity International and
GP controlled 14.2% and 7.3% of our total capital stock, respectively. In June 2007, Brazil Development Equity Investments, LLC,
a company affiliated with GP, sold its remaining interest in our company (7.1% of our capital stock at the time).
On March 15, 2007,
we created a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Fit Residencial Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda., or “FIT,” for
the development, construction and management of lower and lower-middle income residential projects. On October 21, 2008, Gafisa
and Tenda concluded a business combination in which FIT was merged into Tenda. The purpose of the merger was to consolidate the
activities of FIT and Tenda in the lower-income segment in Brazil focused on developing real estate units with an average price
of less than R$200.0 thousand. As a result of the business combination, Gafisa became the owner of 60.0% of the total and voting
capital stock of Tenda. On December 30, 2009, the shareholders of Gafisa and Tenda approved a corporate restructuring to consolidate
Gafisa’s non-controlling share ownership in Tenda. The restructuring was accomplished by exchanging all of the remaining
Tenda shares not held by Gafisa into Gafisa shares. As a result of the restructuring, Tenda became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Gafisa. On October 26, 2007, Gafisa acquired 70% of Cipesa Empreendimentos Imobiliários S.A., a leading homebuilder in the
State of Alagoas at the time.
On October 1, 2010,
Equity International sold its remaining interest in our company.
On June 8, 2012, according
to the material fact then disclosed, the third phase of the Investment Agreement and Other Covenants entered into on October 2,
2006 (“Investment Agreement”), established the rules and conditions for Gafisa related to the acquisition of the remaining
20% interest in the capital stock of Alphaville not held by the Company. While the valuation of the capital stock has been agreed
by both parties, the number of shares that shall be issued by the Company to settle this transaction is being decided in arbitration
proceedings initiated by the minority shareholders of Alphaville, according to the material fact we released on July 3, 2012. There
is an embedded derivative component to the Investment Agreement, relating to the Company’s obligation to purchase the Alphaville
shares held by the non-controlling interest. As the fair value of this embedded derivative for all reporting periods has no significant
value, since the future settlement of the derivative will be based on the fair value of Alphaville’s capital stock, no derivative
asset or liability has been recorded. The future settlement to be made in cash or shares represented an amount of R$359.0 million
as at December 31, 2012 and 2011. If 70,251,551 common shares of Gafisa are issued to the other shareholders of Alphaville, these
shareholders will receive 13.96% of Gafisa’s total capital stock. On June 7, 2013, according to the material fact then disclosed,
Gafisa entered into an agreement to sell a 70% interest in Alphaville to Blackstone and Patria and also agreed to complete the
purchase of the outstanding 20% interest in Alphaville, finalizing the arbitration process.
On July 3, 2013, Gafisa
completed the purchase of the outstanding 20% interest in Alphaville, belonging to Alphapar, resulting in the Company holding 100%
of Alphaville’s capital stock. This transaction resulted in a temporary increase in the Company’s leverage to 126%
(Net Debt/Equity) and it was financed partially through Company’ cash in addition to funding of R$250 million in June. The
total disbursement was made in July in the amount of R$366.6 million.
On December 9, 2013,
Gafisa announced the completion of the agreement to sell a 70% interest in Alphaville to private equity firms Blackstone and Pátria.
Gafisa retained a 30% interest. The sale valued Alphaville at R$2.0 billion. The proceeds from the transaction totaled R$1.54 billion,
of which R$1.25 billion was received through the sale of shares, and R$290 million was received as a dividend distributed by Alphaville.
On February 2, 2014,
Gafisa’s board of directors authorized management to initiate studies for a potential spin-off of Gafisa and Tenda business
units into two independent publicly traded companies. Our management initiated the studies in the first quarter of 2014.
During 2014, we also
revised our 2014 launch guidance for the Gafisa segment as a result of weakening economic conditions in Brazil. We did not issue
a launch guidance for the Gafisa segment or the Tenda segment during 2015 and 2016 due to the continuing weakening economic conditions
and political instability in Brazil.
During 2015 and 2016,
we implemented several initiatives in connection with the potential spin-off. During 2016, our management decided to sell 50% of
Tenda’s total capital stock, and transfer the remaining 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock to our shareholders in connection
with a reduction in our total capital stock, and implement the spin-off, pursuant to the SPA. See “Item 4. Information on
the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—General” for further information.
On March 23, 2017,
the Company conducted a reverse split of common shares issued by the Company, at the ratio of 13.483023074 to 1, and proportional
adjustment to the limit of authorized capital. As of the date of this annual report, the share capital is comprised of 28,040,162
common, registered and non-par value shares.
Capital Expenditures
In 2016, under
the Gafisa brand, we invested R$35.8 million in machinery and equipment, information technology equipment, software, project
planning and information technology projects. Our main investments during the period were related to sales stands and
software acquisitions, which amounted to R$10.8 million and R$7.8 million, respectively.
In 2015, under
the Gafisa and Tenda brands, we invested R$54.6 million in machinery and equipment, information technology equipment,
software, project planning and information technology projects. Our main investments during the period were related to sales
stands and software acquisitions, which amounted to R$9.4 million and R$22.7 million, respectively.
In 2014, under
the Gafisa and Tenda brands, we invested R$88.5 million in machinery and equipment, information technology equipment,
software, project planning and information technology projects. Our main investments during the period were related to sales
stands and software acquisitions, which amounted to R$19.3 million and R$10.9 million, respectively.
Our capital expenditures
are all made in Brazil and are usually funded by financings through local debt capital markets. We currently do not have any significant
capital expenditures in progress.
B. Business Overview
General Overview
We believe we are
one of Brazil’s leading homebuilders. For over more than 60 years, Gafisa has been recognized as one of the foremost professionally-managed
homebuilders, having completed and sold more than 1,100 developments and constructed over 12 million square meters of housing,
which we believe is more than any other residential development company in Brazil. We believe our brands “Gafisa,”
“and “Tenda” are well-known brands in the Brazilian real estate development market, enjoying a reputation among
potential homebuyers, brokers, lenders, landowners and competitors for quality, consistency and professionalism.
Our core business
is the development of high-quality residential units in attractive locations. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 40.7% of the
value of our launches was derived from high and mid high-level residential developments under the Gafisa brand. In addition, we
also provide construction services to third parties on certain developments in the Gafisa segment where we retain an equity interest.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately 59.3% of the value of our consolidated launches was derived from the Tenda
brand, our affordable entry-level housing brand. We are currently operating in several cities, including São Paulo, Rio
de Janeiro, Salvador, Recife Belo Horizonte and, Porto Alegre which represents approximately 14% of the national population and
approximately 21% of the gross domestic product as of December 31, 2014. Many of these developments are located in markets where few large competitors currently operate. For the year ended December
31, 2016, approximately 34.9% of our launches were derived from our operations outside the states of São Paulo and Rio de
Janeiro and from developments related to the “
Minha Casa Minha Vida
” program under the Tenda brand.
Our Markets
We are present in
48 municipalities throughout Brazil, including Barueri, Belém, Belo Horizonte, Betim, Brasília, Camaçari,
Camaragibe, Campinas, Campos dos Goytacazes, Canoas, Cotia, Cuiabá, Curitiba, Goiânia, Governador Valadares, Gramado,
Guarujá, Guarulhos, Itaquaquecetuba, Itu, Jaboatão dos Guararapes, Jundiaí, Lauro de Freitas, Macaé,
Maceió, Manaus, Niterói, Nova Iguaçu, Osasco, Paulista, Porto Alegre, Porto Velho, Recife, Rio de Janeiro,
Salvador, Santa Luzia, Santo André, Santos, São Bernardo do Campo, São Caetano do Sul, São Gonçalo,
São José dos Campos, São Leopoldo, São Luís, São Paulo, Sete Lagoas, Vespasiano and Volta
Redonda.
Our Gafisa brand is
present in 30 municipalities throughout Brazil, including Barueri, Belém, Campinas, Cuiabá, Curitiba, Goiânia,
Gramado, Guarujá, Guarulhos, Itu, Jundiaí, Macaé, Maceió, Manaus, Niterói, Nova Iguaçu,
Osasco, Porto Alegre, Porto Velho, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Santo André, Santos, São Bernardo do Campo, São
Caetano do Sul, São Gonçalo, São Jose dos Campos, São Luís, São Paulo and Volta Redonda.
Our Real Estate Activities
Our real estate business
includes the following activities:
|
·
|
developments for sale of:
|
|
·
|
land subdivisions (also known as residential communities);
|
|
·
|
construction services to third parties on certain developments in the Gafisa segment where we retain
an equity interest; and
|
|
·
|
sale of units through our brokerage subsidiaries, Gafisa Vendas and Gafisa Vendas Rio, jointly
referred to as “Gafisa Vendas.”
|
The table below sets
forth our potential sales value, generated from new developments for each of our real estate activities and as a percentage of
total real estate amount generated during the periods presented:
|
|
For year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
)
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
)
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
)
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential buildings
|
|
|
2,263,336
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
2,060,984
|
|
|
|
98.8
|
|
|
|
1,636,311
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Land subdivisions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
24,272
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Potential sales (1)
|
|
|
2,263,336
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
2,085,257
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
1,636,311
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
(1)
|
Of this amount, R$1,342,490,
R$1,088,941 and R$613,299 are related to Tenda, which is disclosed as a discontinued
operations as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
|
The table below sets forth our sales value
from new developments generated for each of our real estate activities and as a percentage of total real estate amount generated
during the periods presented:
|
|
For year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
)
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
)
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
)
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential buildings
|
|
|
999,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
770,960
|
|
|
|
97.6
|
|
|
|
519,210
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Land subdivisions
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
18,679
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Sales (1)
|
|
|
999,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
789,639
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
519,210
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
(1)
|
Of this amount, R$557,970, R$507,570
and R$176,823are related to Tenda, which is disclosed as a discontinued operations as
of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 respectively.
|
Developments
for Sale
The table below provides
information on our developments for sale activities during the periods presented:
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
, unless otherwise stated)
|
São Paulo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential sales value of units launched(1)
|
|
|
920,846
|
|
|
|
884,269
|
|
|
|
770,269
|
|
Developments launched(2)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Usable area (m2)(3)
|
|
|
109,117
|
|
|
|
104,678
|
|
|
|
107,156
|
|
Units launched(4)
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
Average sales price (R$/m2)(3) (5)
|
|
|
8,439
|
|
|
|
8,448
|
|
|
|
7,188
|
|
Rio de Janeiro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential sales value of units launched(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
112,047
|
|
|
|
252,742
|
|
Developments launched(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Usable area (m2)(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,427
|
|
|
|
27,827
|
|
Units launched(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Average sales price (R$/m2)(3)(5)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,886
|
|
|
|
9,083
|
|
Total Gafisa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential sales value of units launched(1)
|
|
|
920,846
|
|
|
|
996,315
|
|
|
|
1,023,012
|
|
Developments launched(2)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Usable area (m2)(3)
|
|
|
109,117
|
|
|
|
114,105
|
|
|
|
134,983
|
|
Units launched(4)
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
1,789
|
|
Average sales price (R$/m2)(3)(5)
|
|
|
8,439
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
7,579
|
|
Tenda (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential sales value of units launched(1)
|
|
|
1,342,490
|
|
|
|
1,088,941
|
|
|
|
613,299
|
|
Developments launched(2)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Usable area (m2)(3)
|
|
|
454,921
|
|
|
|
314,152
|
|
|
|
191,438
|
|
Units launched(4)
|
|
|
9,819
|
|
|
|
7,711
|
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
Average sales price (R$/m2)(3)(5)
|
|
|
2,951
|
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
(1)
|
Potential sales value is calculated by multiplying the number of units in a development by the
expected sales price of the unit.
|
|
(2)
|
Does not consider acquisitions of additional ownership interests in projects or cancelled projects.
|
|
(3)
|
One square meter is equal to approximately 10.76 square feet.
|
|
(4)
|
The units delivered in exchange for land pursuant to barter transactions are not included.
|
|
(5)
|
Average sales price per square meter was R$8,439, R$8,732 and R$7,579 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively,
for Gafisa’s ventures only.
|
(6) This
information is presented for comparison purposes, as we have disclosed Tenda as a discontinued operations as of December 31, 2016.
Our developments for
sale are divided into three broad categories: (1) residential buildings, (2) land subdivisions, and (3) commercial buildings.
Overview of Residential
Buildings
In the residential
buildings category, we develop three main types of products: (1) luxury buildings targeted at upper-income customers; (2) buildings
targeted at middle-income customers; and (3) affordable entry-level housing targeted at lower-income customers. Quality residential
buildings for middle- and upper-income customers are our core products and we have developed them since our inception. A significant
portion of our residential developments is located in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro where we have held a leading position
over the past five years based upon area of total construction. In 2006, we began our national expansion to pursue opportunities
in residential buildings outside these cities. However in 2012, as a result of the difficulties to manage these projects and to
achieve reasonable profits, we focused our efforts back to São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
Luxury Buildings
Luxury buildings are
a high margin niche. Units usually have over 150 square meters of private area, at least four bedrooms and three parking spaces.
Typically, this product is fitted with modern, top-quality materials designed by brand-name manufacturers. The development usually
includes swimming pools, gyms, visitor parking, and other amenities. Average price per square meter generally is higher than approximately
R$12,000. Luxury building developments are targeted to families with monthly household incomes in excess of approximately R$40,000.
The table below sets
forth our luxury building developments launched between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016:
Project Description
|
|
Year Launched
|
|
Gafisa Participation (%)
|
|
Usable Area (m2) (1) (2)
|
|
Completion Year
|
|
Number of Units (2)
|
|
Units Sold (%) (As of December 31, 2016)
|
MN15 Ibirapuera
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
067 Hermann Junior
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
6,609
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
%
|
Scena Alto da Lapa
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,226
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
One square meter is equal to approximately 10.76 square feet.
|
|
(2)
|
Values for 100% of the building development, except on projects with partial interest.
|
Middle Income Buildings
Buildings targeted
at middle-income customers have accounted for the majority of our sales since our inception. Units usually have between 50 and
150 square meters of private area, between one and three bedrooms and up to three underground parking spaces. Buildings are usually
developed in large tracts of land as part of multi-building developments and, to a lesser extent, in smaller lots in attractive
neighborhoods. Average price per square meter ranges from approximately R$6,000 to R$12,000. Developments in Rio de Janeiro tend
to be larger due to the large tracts of land available in Barra da Tijuca. Middle-income building developments are tailored to
customers with monthly household incomes between approximately R$10,000 and R$40,000.
The table below sets
forth our middle-income building developments launched between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016:
Project Description
|
|
Year Launched
|
|
Gafisa Participation (%)
|
|
Usable Area (m2) (1) (2)
|
|
Completion Year
|
|
Number of Units (2)
|
|
Units Sold (%) (As of December 31, 2016)
|
Gafisa Like Aclimação
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,367
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
Barra Vista F2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
5,864
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Square Choice Santo Amaro
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
13,683
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Moov Estação Vl. Prudente
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,444
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
Gafisa Like Alto da Boa Vista
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
15,141
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Moov Freguesia
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
15,688
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
Gafisa Square Ipiranga
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
31,380
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
044 Vila Rica
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,568
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Marquês 2900
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
6,188
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Go Maraville
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
16,956
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Vision Paulista
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,168
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
Bosque Marajoara
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
23,833
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Mood Lapa
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Project Description
|
|
Year Launched
|
|
Gafisa Participation (%)
|
|
Usable Area (m2) (1) (2)
|
|
Completion Year
|
|
Number of Units (2)
|
|
Units Sold (%) (As of December 31, 2016)
|
Alphamall
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
Smart Santa Cecilia
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,947
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Smart Vila Madalena
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,097
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Vision Capote Valente
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,412
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Barra Vista Fase 1
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
5,864
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Gafisa Hi Centro
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
15,343
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
Alphagreen
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
17,985
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
D.O.C. Quatá
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
Ristretto Lorian Boulevard
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
32,393
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
Gafisa Wide Vila Mariana
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Today Modern Residences
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,228
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Gafisa Hi Guacá
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,689
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
Gafisa Home Espaço Cerâmica
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
20,442
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
Easy Cidade Universitaria
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
26,503
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
One square meter is equal to approximately 10.76 square feet.
|
|
(2)
|
Values for 100% of the building development, except on projects with partial interest.
|
Affordable Entry-Level
Developments
Affordable entry-level
housing consists of building and house units. Units usually have between 42 to 60 square meters of indoor private area and two
to three bedrooms. Average price per square meter ranges from approximately R$1,500 to R$4,800. Affordable entry-level housing
developments are tailored to families with monthly household incomes between approximately R$1,600 and R$5,000.
As part of our strategy
of expanding our foothold in the affordable entry-level residential market, on March 15, 2007 we incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary,
FIT, to focus exclusively on this market. The principal emphasis of FIT was on five standardized residential developments in the
peripheries of large metropolitan regions. Financing for FIT’s developments primarily came from the CEF, and such financing
was structured so that customers paid low monthly installments without increasing our credit risk.
On October 21, 2008,
Gafisa and Tenda concluded a business combination in which Gafisa’s wholly-owned subsidiary FIT was merged into Tenda. The
purpose of the merger was to consolidate the activities of FIT and Tenda in the lower-income sector in Brazil and to develop real
estate units with an average value of less than R$200,000. As a result of the business combination, Gafisa received 60.0% of the
total and voting capital stock of Tenda and FIT was merged into Tenda. Because Tenda launched very few units in 2008, we believe
the full impact of the merger was not reflected in Gafisa’s results of operations until 2009.
On December 30, 2009,
the shareholders of Gafisa and Tenda approved a corporate restructuring to consolidate Gafisa’s non-controlling share ownership
in Tenda. The restructuring was accomplished by exchanging all of the remaining Tenda shares not held by Gafisa into Gafisa shares.
As a result of the restructuring, Tenda became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gafisa.
As a result of Tenda’s
and Gafisa’s underperformance in 2011 due to high cost overruns and customer dissolutions, our management and the board of
directors have undertaken widespread structural and operational changes to avert future losses and strains on the business. Tenda
is now operating under a new strategy whereby pre-sales recognition and the remuneration of the sales force is based on the ability
to immediately pass mortgages on to financial institutions and the number of third party construction partners has been reduced
to a group that has been thoroughly vetted for quality and sustainability. The strategy also consists of a reduction in the number
of launches, and in 2012, we suspended the launch of additional Tenda units. Moreover, our management has decided to focus its
low- to middle-income businesses in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais and Bahia, where it has historically, had a
better supply chain structure and stronger customer demand. As part of our new organizational strategy to manage further risks,
our management has assigned a chief executive for each segment pursuant to which, our former CFO, Rodrigo Osmo assumed the position
as Tenda CEO during the second half of 2011. In 2013, Tenda implemented a new business model and resumed its launches.
The table below sets
forth our affordable entry-level housing developments launched by us between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016:
Project Description
|
|
Year Launched
|
|
Gafisa Participation (%)
|
|
Usable Area (m2) (1) (2)
|
|
Completion Year
|
|
Number of Units (2)
|
|
Units Sold (%) (As of December 31, 2016)
|
Monte Azul
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
6,970
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
Campo de Aviação - Fase 3
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,668
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
Vila Imperial - Fase 2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,612
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Querencia Amanda e Gaúcha
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,281
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
Vila Florida - Fase 3
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,344
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Terra Brasilis Praia Arembepe – F1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,800
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
Solar da Baronesa
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
3,560
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Alto da Colina
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Campos do Sul - Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,087
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
Reserva das Arvores II
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,739
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
Bela Vida I - Fase 2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
6,991
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
Mar Azul Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,015
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Reserva Das Arvores III
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,243
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Gênova
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,490
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Vista Azul - Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,176
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Parque Rio Maravilha III
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,198
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Avenida Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,323
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
Estação Primavera
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
Nova Zelandia I - Fase 2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,390
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
Vila São Luís
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4,646
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
Villa Germânica Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,357
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Veredas de Itaquá
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,177
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Bela Vida II
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
17,478
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Vila Verde - Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
13,856
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Alto da Baviera
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,886
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Eng. Camarás Cond I -Fase 2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,334
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Alto do Picuaia Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,159
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Viena - Fase 2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
6,245
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Vida Alegre Sarandi F3 - Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,271
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Província do Porto - Fase 2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,670
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Praia de Jangada Fase 2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
13,301
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Butantã Turmalina Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
Butantã Turmalina Fase 2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Estância das Flores Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,883
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Cidade Imperial - Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,680
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Campo de Aviação - Cond. Santos Dumont
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,668
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Vista do Vale Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,970
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Berlim Fase 1
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,367
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Arembepe II
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,806
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Campos Do Sul - Fase 2
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,475
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Colibris
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,886
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Residencial Orquídeas
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Residencial Vera Cruz
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,618
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Campo de Aviação F1
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,668
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Residencial Viena F1
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
17,173
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
Jardins Itaquera
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Residencial das Laranjeiras
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,518
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Vida Alegre Sarandi F1
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,865
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
Residencial Flor de Liz
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
6,970
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Mar de Abrantes
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Residencial Vila Atlântica F2
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,876
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Praia de Jangada F1
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
14,631
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
Parque Rio Maravilha F2
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,242
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Bela Vida F1
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,443
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Engenho Camaras - F1
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,001
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
Vila Florida F2
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,275
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
Vila Imperial F1
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,214
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Vida Alegre Sarandi F2
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,270
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Palácio Imperial - F2
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,214
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
Recanto do Sol
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,235
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
Nova Zelândia
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
15,488
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
Viver Bem São Gabriel
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,736
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
Res Parque Real Garden
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
6,814
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
Residencial Vida Leve
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
14,682
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
Project Description
|
|
Year Launched
|
|
Gafisa Participation (%)
|
|
Usable Area (m2) (1) (2)
|
|
Completion Year
|
|
Number of Units (2)
|
|
Units Sold (%) (As of December 31, 2016)
|
Res Provincia Do Porto I
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,281
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Res Morada Das Gaivotas
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,518
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Res Bellas Aguas
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,175
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
Barra Viva (3)
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
15,415
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Res Mirante Guaianazes
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,293
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Residencial Tulipas
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,293
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Res. Nova Itaquera
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Parque Das Flores Guaianazes
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
3,872
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Parque Rio Maravilha
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
19,591
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Verde Vida - F2
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
15,084
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
Renascença Candeias
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
19,228
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
Vila Florida - F1
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
19,225
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Palácio Imperial -
F1
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,323
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
Rio Da Prata
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
13,629
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Recanto De Abrantes - F1
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
13,270
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
Monte Alegre
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Parque Santo André
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
6,195
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Residencial Das Palmeiras
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,067
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Terra Brasilis - F1
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11,709
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
Vila Atlântica - F1
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,648
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Reserva Das Árvores
- F1
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
21,860
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
____________
|
(1)
|
One square meter is equal to approximately 10.76 square feet.
|
|
(2)
|
Values for 100% of the building development, except on projects with partial interest acquisition.
|
(3) Development
launched under Gafisa brand.
Land Subdivisions under
our Gafisa Brand
In 2001, we started
developing residential land subdivisions for sale upon which residential buildings can be developed. Land subdivisions under our
Gafisa brand are usually smaller than Alphaville residential communities and do not include some of the facilities available in
Alphaville residential communities, such as various amenities, shopping centers and schools. We usually provide the infrastructure
for a given land subdivision planning such as the electric, water and sewage systems, paved streets, and common recreational areas.
Our land subdivisions are typically located in affluent suburban areas close to major highways leading to the states of São
Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. A typical lot has between 250 and 1,500 square meters. Average price per square meter ranges from approximately
R$150 to R$800. We target clients with monthly household incomes in excess of approximately R$5,000 for these land subdivisions.
Since 2011, our only land subdivisions project was the development project of Barra da Tijuca, in partnership with Alphaville,
for which our share is 65%.
Completed developments
with percentage of units sold less than 90%
The table below sets
forth our completed luxury and middle income housing and commercial developments under Gafisa’s Brand as of December 31,
2016, with percentage of units sold less than 90%:
|
As
of December 31, 2016
|
Project Description
|
Units Sold (%)
|
Alpha Green (1)
|
86
|
Alphagreen RJ (2)
|
49
|
Américas Avenue Business Square (3)
|
58
|
Avant Garde (4)
|
88
|
Axis Business Tower (5)
|
47
|
D.O.C – Quatá (6)
|
88
|
Gafisa Square Santo Amaro (7)
|
88
|
Gafisa Wide Cambuí (8)
|
80
|
Gran Park Árvores F2 (9)
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016
|
Project Description
|
Units Sold (%)
|
Gran Park Árvores F4 (10)
|
88
|
Gran Park Árvores F6 (11)
|
74
|
Gran Park Varandas F2 (12)
|
87
|
Gran Park Varandas F3 (13)
|
75
|
Gran Park Varandas F4 (14)
|
72
|
Gran Park Varandas F5 (15)
|
66
|
Gran Park Varandas F6 (16)
|
69
|
Gafisa Hi Centro (17)
|
66
|
Laguna Mall (18)
|
73
|
Manhattan Square - Wall Street (19)
|
84
|
O Bosque (20)
|
72
|
Riviera de Ponta Negra – Nice (21)
|
88
|
SAO WAY (22)
|
66
|
SAO GATE (23)
|
33
|
Target Offices & Mall (24)
|
72
|
|
|
____________
|
1)
|
Alpha Green. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 86% of the
units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining
units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(2)
|
AlphaGreen
RJ. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 49% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s
business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining units will besold within the next 24 - 36 months.
The relatively low speed at which the units of this development have been sold is mainly due to the challenging macroeconomic
conditions in Brazil, particularly in the city of Rio de Janeiro, and their impact on the real estate market in the city of Rio
de Janeiro. We are currently working on increasing the sales speed of these units by investing in marketing and sales campaigns
for these units and, in some cases, by offering discounts on the sales prices for specific units.
|
|
(3)
|
Américas Avenue Business Square. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016
at which time 58% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling
forecast indicates the remaining units will be sold within the next two years. The relatively low speed at which the units of this development
have been sold is mainly due to the challenging macroeconomic conditions in Brazil, particularly in the city of Rio de Janeiro,
and their impact on the real estate market in the city of Rio de Janeiro. We are currently working on increasing the sales speed
of these units by investing in marketing and sales campaigns for these units and, in some cases, by offering discounts on the sales
prices for specific units.
|
|
(4)
|
Avant Garde. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 88% of the
units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining
units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(5)
|
Axis Business Tower. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 47%
of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within the next 24 - 36 months.
|
|
(6)
|
D.O.C - Quatá. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 88%
of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(7)
|
Gafisa Square Santo Amaro. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time
88% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(8)
|
Gafisa Wide Cambuí. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time
88% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(9)
|
Grand Park Árvores F2. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which
time 89% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast
indicates the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(10)
|
Grand Park Árvores F4. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which
time 88% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast
indicates the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(11)
|
Grand Park Árvores F6. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which
time 74% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast
indicates the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(12)
|
Grand Park Varandas F2. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time
87% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(13)
|
Grand Park Varandas F3. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time
75% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(14)
|
Grand Park Varandas F4. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time
72% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(15)
|
Grand Park Varandas F5. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time
66% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(16)
|
Grand Park Varandas F6. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time
69% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(17)
|
Gafisa Hi Centro. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 66% of
the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the
remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(18)
|
Laguna Mall. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 73% of the
units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining
units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(19)
|
Manhattan Square - Wall Street. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which
time 84% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast
indicates the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(20)
|
O Bosque. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 72% of the units
had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining
units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(21)
|
Riviera de Ponta Negra - Nice. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which
time 88% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast
indicates the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(22)
|
SAO WAY. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 66% of the units
had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining
units will be sold within the next 24 - 36 months.
|
|
(23)
|
SAO GATE. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time 33% of the units
had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining
units will be sold within the next 24 - 36 months.
|
|
(24)
|
Target Offices & Mall. This development was 100% completed at December 31, 2016 at which time
72% of the units had been sold. According to the Company’s business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates
the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
We have evaluated all of our Gafisa brand
developments and we have recorded reduction to net realizable value and write-offs to net realizable value for the following projects:
Espaço Alpha, AltaVista, Canto dos Passaros, Reserva do Bosque, Jatiuca Trade Residence, Americas Avenue, Icon Business
e Mall, Target Offices e Mall, Vision Capote Valente, Smart Vila Madalena and Barra Viva.
The table below sets
forth our finished affordable entry-level housing developments under Tenda’s Brand as of December 31, 2016, with less than
90% of units sold:
Project Description
|
As
of December 31, 2016
Units Sold (%)
|
Residencial Cordoba (1)
|
59%
|
Res Napoli (2)
|
80%
|
Residencial Michelangelo (3)
|
88%
|
Res Vila Coimbra (4)
|
50%
|
Positano Garden (5)
|
62%
|
____________
|
(1)
|
Residencial Cordoba. This development has 59% of its units sold. Due to certain issues related
to the legal documentation for the unsold units, there is no selling forecast as of the date of this annual report relating to
the time period within which the remaining units will be sold. However, it is expected that, once these issues are resolved, the
remaining units will be sold within a short time period, based on the Company’s internal assessments.
|
|
(2)
|
Res Napoli I. This development has 80% of its units sold. According to the Company’s existing
business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
|
(3)
|
Residencial Michelangelo. This development has 88% of its units sold. According to the Company’s
existing business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining units will be sold within a short time
period.
|
|
(4)
|
Res Vila Coimbra. This development has 50% of its units sold. According to the Company’s
existing business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining units will be sold within a short time
period.
|
|
(5)
|
Positano Garden. This development has 62% of its units sold. According to the Company’s existing
business plan, this development’s selling forecast indicates the remaining units will be sold within a short time period.
|
We have
evaluated all of our Tenda brand developments and we have recorded reduction to net realizable value and write-offs to net realizable
value for the following projects:
·
Res. Pedra Bella
·
Res. Quintas De Portugal
·
Res. Villa Esplendore
·
Bairro Novo Cotia II
·
Res. Portal Das Rosas
·
Fit Giardino
·
Res. Villa Verde
|
·
Res. Jardim Girassol II F1
·
Res. Jardim Girassol II F2
·
Parque Arvoredo Fase 2B
·
Vila Allegro
·
Residencial Flor De Liz
·
Res. Vila Coimbra
|
Land Subdivisions under
Alphaville Brand
As set forth in item
“4. Information on the Company—A History and Development of the Company”, we completed the sale of a controlling
interest in Alphaville, on December 9, 2013. As a result, Alphaville was no longer consolidated in the financial statements of
the Company since then. In this annual report, while financial information related to Alphaville is treated as discontinued operations,
all operating information related to our business includes full operating information for Alphaville through December 9, 2013.
As a result of the
sale of the 70% interest in Alphaville on December 9, 2013, we were not involved in the launch of any residential communities under
the Alphaville brand in 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Commercial Buildings
In 2014, we did not
launch any commercial buildings.
In 2015, we launched
one commercial building: Alphamall.
In 2016, we did not
launch any commercial buildings.
Construction Services
We provide construction
services to third parties on certain developments where we retain an equity interest. This practice allows us to benchmark our
construction costs, facilitates our access to new constructions materials, techniques and service providers such as architects
and sub-contractors, and provides larger economies of scale.
The table below sets
forth the real estate developments for third parties currently under construction, in which we also have an equity interest, between
January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016:
Project
|
First
Year of Construction
|
Gafisa
Participation
(%)
|
Partner
|
Type
of Project
|
Adamas
|
2013
|
50%
|
GTIS Partners
|
Residential
|
Sale of Units Through
Our Brokerage Subsidiaries
In September 2006,
we created a new subsidiary, Gafisa Vendas, to function as our internal sales division in the state of São Paulo. In February
2007, we created another new subsidiary, Gafisa Vendas Rio, to function as our internal sales division in the metropolitan region
of Rio de Janeiro. These wholly-owned subsidiaries promote sales of our projects in the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro
and focus their efforts on: (1) launches — our internal sales force focuses on promoting launches of our developments; however,
we also use outside brokers, thus creating what we believe to be a healthy competition between our sales force and outside brokers;
(2) inventory — Gafisa Vendas and Gafisa Vendas Rio each have a team focused on selling units launched in prior years; and
(3) web sales — Gafisa Vendas and Gafisa Vendas Rio each have a sales team dedicated to internet sales as an alternative
source of revenues with lower costs.
Our Clients
Our clients mainly
consist of development clients. Development clients are clients who purchase units in our developments. As of December 31, 2016,
our development-client database was comprised of more than 44,500 and 110,000 individuals for Gafisa and Tenda, respectively. We
currently have approximately 22,400 and 20,100 active clients for Gafisa and Tenda, respectively.
We also provide construction
services to certain construction-services clients in connection with developments in which we retain an equity interest. As of
December 31, 2016, our main construction services client was GTIS Partners, with whom we retain an equity interest in the Adamas
development.
No individual client
represents more than 5% of our revenues from residential developments or construction services.
Our Operations
The stages of our
development process are summarized in the diagrams below:
Land Acquisition
We use results from
our extensive market research to guide our land reserves strategy and process. Our marketing and development teams monitor market
fundamentals and trends. We have developed a sophisticated database to support our search for and analysis of new investment opportunities.
Key decision factors used by our management for land acquisition and new developments include location, type of product to be developed,
expected demand for the new developments, current inventory of units in the region and acquisition cost of the land.
Whenever we identify
an attractive tract of land, we first conduct a study of the project to define the most appropriate use of the space. Afterwards,
the basic design of the project enters the economic feasibility study stage, where we consider preliminary revenues and expenses
associated with the project. This study will determine project profitability. We collect and analyze information on demand, competition,
construction budget, sales policy and funding structure to ensure economic viability of the new development. We then initiate a
legal due diligence of the property to identify liens, encumbrances and restrictions, potential solutions to such issues and the
relevant costs. Before acquiring the land, we conduct a thorough due diligence process including an environmental review. Each
decision to acquire land is analyzed and approved by our investment committee. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management
and Employees—C. Board Practices” elsewhere in this annual report for further information on the activities of our
committees and boards.
We seek to finance
land acquisition through barter transactions, in which we grant the seller a certain number of units to be built on the land or
a percentage of the proceeds from the sale of units in such development. As a result, we reduce our cash requirements and increase
our returns. In the event we cannot do so or in order to obtain better terms or prices, we acquire land for cash, alone or in partnership
with other developers. We purchase land both for immediate development and for inventory.
As a new strategy
defined by the end of 2011, the Company is selling landbank located in cities and places where there is no intention to run operations
with new developments.
As of December 31,
2016, we had an inventory of 38 land parcels under Gafisa, in which we estimate we could develop a total of 10,917 residential
units with a sales value of R$4.8 billion, of which 60.3% represents land acquired through barter transactions. The table below
sets forth the breakdown of our land reserves by location and by segment:
|
|
Gafisa
|
|
Tenda
– Discontinued operations (2)
|
|
|
Future
Sales (% Gafisa) (1)
|
|
%
Bartered
|
|
Future
Sales (% Gafisa)
|
|
%
Bartered
|
|
|
(in millions
of
reais
)
|
|
|
|
(in millions
of
reais
)
|
|
|
São Paulo
|
|
|
3,019.8
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,239.0
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
Rio de Janeiro
|
|
|
1,819.5
|
|
|
|
72.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,047.1
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
Other states
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
2,175.6
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
4,839.3
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
%
|
|
|
4,461.8
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Information reflects our interest.
|
|
(2)
|
As of December 31, 2016, Tenda had an inventory of 138 land parcels, in which we estimate it could
develop a total of 32,707 residential units with a sales value of R$4.5 billion, of which 17.2% represents land acquired through
barter transactions.
|
Project Design
In order to meet evolving
preferences of our customers, we invest considerable resources in creating an appropriate design and marketing strategy for each
new development, which includes determining the size, style and price range of units. Our staff, including engineers and marketing
and sales professionals, works with recognized independent architects on the planning and design of our developments. Their activities
include designing the interior and exterior, drafting plans for the execution of the project, and choosing the finishing construction
materials. A team responsible for preparing the business plan and budget and assessing the financial viability for each of our
projects is also involved. Simultaneously with the planning and design of our developments, we seek to obtain all the necessary
licenses and regulatory approvals from local authorities, which usually take three to twelve months in the case of our residential
buildings and three years in the case of our residential communities.
Marketing and Sales
Our marketing efforts are coordinated by
our internal staff of approximately 16 professionals. Our specialized team generally coordinates with several outsourced brokerage
companies with a combined sales force of more than 80 representatives, monitoring such sales representatives in order to promote
loyalty and ensure performance. Our marketing intelligence team is also responsible for gathering information on the needs and
preferences of potential customers to provide guidance on our land acquisition and project design activities.
Gafisa Vendas was created as our internal
sales division and it currently consists of approximately 467 independent Gafisa Vendas brokers, 37 sales consultants and 11 sales
managers.
The creation of
Gafisa Vendas was intended to establish a strategic channel for us to access our clients and to reduce our dependence on
outside brokers for marketing. Because the sales force at Gafisa Vendas is trained to sell our products exclusively, we
believe that it is able to focus on the sale of our developments, articulate the unique features of our development, manage
our current customers and capture new customers more effectively. Gafisa Vendas was initially established in São Paulo
in 2006 and opened a branch in Rio de Janeiro in 2007. In 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, Gafisa Vendas was responsible for
approximately (i) 47%, 51%, 61%, 60.9% and 61.1%, respectively, of our sales in the state of São Paulo, and (ii) 52%, 45%, 23.4%,
60.6% and 48.8%, respectively, of our sales in the state of Rio de Janeiro.
We will continue to
utilize independent real estate brokerage firms as we believe this provides a healthy competition between our internal sales force
and outside brokers. Independent brokers provide us with a broad reach, access to a specialized and rich database of prospective
customers, and flexibility to accommodate the needs of our diverse offering and clientele. In line with our results-oriented culture,
we compensate brokers based on their profit contribution rather than on sales. Brokers are required to attend periodic specialized
training sessions where they are updated on customer service and marketing techniques, competing developments, construction schedules,
and marketing and advertising plans. We emphasize a highly transparent sales approach, as opposed to the traditional high-pressure
techniques, in order to build customer loyalty and to develop a sense of trust between customers and us. At our showrooms, brokers
explain the project and financing plans, answer questions and encourage customers to purchase or sign on to receive a visit or
additional information.
Under our Gafisa brand,
we typically initiate our marketing efforts 60 days before the launch of a development. We typically have a showroom on or near
the construction site, which includes a model unit furnished with appliances and furniture. We leverage our reputation for quality,
consistency, on-time delivery and professionalism to increase sales velocity. We have been successful with this strategy, usually
selling approximately 30% of the units before construction starts.
We market our developments
through newspapers, radio, television, direct mail advertising and by distributing leaflets in neighboring areas, as well as through
telemarketing and websites. In addition, on a quarterly basis, we publish the magazine “Gafisa Way” which is distributed
to our customers and offers news on our most recent developments and progress updates on buildings under construction. The Alphaville
developments also publish special magazines geared to their specific communities.
Tenda’s sales
and marketing efforts are coordinated through 35 store fronts located across the principal metropolitan areas of the country.
A direct sales force is trained to offer advice to first-time home buyers and to assist these buyers in finding the best financing
solution. In addition, this sales force provides information on the benefits under the public housing program “Minha Casa,
Minha Vida”, including the process of obtaining a mortgage through the CEF and BB. Because the Tenda sales force is specially
trained to provide information on the affordable entry-level segment, we believe that they are uniquely positioned to provide
us with an advantage in this segment.
In addition to direct
sales, Tenda markets its developments through telemarketing, which generates more than 50,000 calls and 40,000 chats per month
and results in over 12,000 visits per month to its store fronts. Tenda also gathers information on
its customers’ preferences to better tailor its marketing efforts and has implemented a customer relationship management
department in order to improve its client satisfaction. Finally, Tenda focuses on improving its sales during the launch of a development
using a specific strategy for each type of development. For example, with large developments, Tenda has successfully combined its
direct sales force with independent real estate brokerage firms, and the increase in cost associated with such combined efforts
was offset by the significant increase in sales during the initial months after launch.
Under Brazilian law,
we may establish a term within and the conditions under which we are entitled to cancel the development. According to our regular
purchase contracts, if we are not able to sell at least 60% of the units within 180 days of launching, we can cancel the development.
In the low income segment we need to have the project with at least 60% of the units sold (sales includes customers who are eligible
for mortgages and that can be immediately transferred to financial institutions) and the project needs to be contracted with financial
institutions prior to the launching phase, or we can cancel the development. Under those circumstances, we usually consider changing
the project or selling the land, but, in any of those cases, we have to return the cash payment made by our customers adjusted
for inflation but with no interest. Customers, however, are not entitled to other remedies.
Construction
Gafisa has been engaged
in the construction business for over 50 years. Our experience spans across the entire construction chain. Before engaging in each
new project, we develop sketches and research and develop projects and plans to create the most appropriate product possible. Our
standardized construction techniques and unique control system are designed to optimize productivity and minimize raw material
losses. Our monitoring tools are available on our intranet where all employees regularly review costs and key performance indicators
of each development such as actual versus budget comparisons, volume consumption for each raw material, and construction schedule.
We use strict quality
control methods. We have developed proprietary procedure manuals that describe in significant detail each task of each stage of
the construction project. These manuals are also used for the training sessions that we require all of our workers to attend. In
addition, we keep quarterly records of projects delivered.
The reviews focus
on identifying problems in order to take corrective and preventive actions in projects underway and thus avoid costly repetition.
We have adopted a quality management system that was certified for ISO 9002 by
Fundação Bureau Veritas
, from
Universidade de São Paulo. In 2007, we received a certification from
Programa Brasileiro de Qualidade e Produtividade
do Habitat
(PBQP-H), which is part of the Ministry of Cities. In addition, the Eldorado Business Tower building was certified
as a Green Building, category Platinum, by the U.S. Green Building Council, which attests that it is environmentally sustainable,
through the rational use of energy, natural lighting and pollution control and recycling. Eldorado Business Tower was the first
building in Latin America to achieve this category.
We invest in technology.
Our research and development costs amounted to R$1.0 million in 2016, R$1.0 million in 2015, and R$1.2 million in 2014. We believe
that we have pioneered the adoption of advanced construction techniques in Brazil such as dry wall and plane pre-stressed slabs,
which present numerous advantages over traditional techniques. We also optimize costs by synchronizing our projects’ progress
so as to coordinate the purchase of raw material and benefit from economies of scale. We have long-term arrangements with a number
of suppliers which allow us to build our developments with quality, using brand name construction materials and equipment, and
advanced technology. Moreover, our centralized procurement center enables us to achieve significant economies of scale in the purchase
of materials and retention of services.
We do not own heavy
construction equipment and we employ directly only a small fraction of the labor working on our sites. We generally act as a contractor,
supervising construction while subcontracting more labor-intensive activities. Substantially all on-site construction is performed
for a fixed price by independent subcontractors. We have policies in place in order to hire reputable, cost-oriented and reliable
service providers that are in compliance with labor laws and have performed their work diligently and on time in the past. Hiring
subcontractors instead of employing workers directly has some financial and logistical advantages. For instance, we do not need
to incur fixed costs to maintain a specialized labor force even when they are not actively working at a construction site and we
do not need to pay for frequent transfers of labor to different construction locations.
Our construction engineering
group coordinates the activities of service providers and suppliers, monitors compliance with safety and zoning codes, and monitors
completion of the project on a timely basis. We provide a five-year limited warranty covering structural defects in all our developments.
Risk Control
Our risk control procedures
require that all of our projects be approved by our investment committee, which meets on a monthly basis, or more frequently on
an as-needed basis, and consists of our chief executive officer and two members of our board of directors. Our investment committee
carefully reviews the various studies conducted by us and described above. In addition, we have a board of officers, which meets
monthly, and is in charge of overseeing and approving major decisions. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E.
Share Ownership” in this annual report.
Customer Financing
The table below sets forth the percentage
of each type of customer financing we provide for each type of development as of December 31, 2016:
Sales Term
|
|
Luxury
|
|
Middle Income
|
|
Affordable Entry—Level(1)
|
Mortgage lending (delivery)
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
Caixa Econômica Federal and Banco do Brasil
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Gafisa 36 months
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gafisa 60 months
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gafisa 120 months
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Includes Tenda developments. We do not provide any customer financing for these developments.
|
Mortgages
.
In 2016, 70% of our sales value was financed by bank mortgages, where the customer paid us approximately 25% to 60% of the sales
price of the property during the period of construction, and upon delivery of the property paid the balance of the sales price
through a bank mortgage. We analyze the credit history of each customer at the time of sale to see if the customer would qualify
for a bank mortgage based on banks’ standard credit rating policies. Although there is no assurance that the customer will
qualify for a mortgage at the time of delivery, our analyses have been fairly successful in predicting whether the customer would
qualify for a mortgage. The following table sets forth the credit limits established by mortgage sources available in Brazil in
2016:
Credit
Lines
|
Typical
Interest rate
|
Maximum
Home Value
|
Maximum
Loan Value
|
Mortgage portfolio (
Carteira Hipotecária
) or CH
|
% annually + TR(1)
|
No limit
|
No limit
|
Housing Finance System (
Sistema Financeiro da Habitação
) or SFH (2)
|
% annually + TR
|
R$1,500,000
|
R$1,200,000
|
Government Severance Indemnity Fund for Employees (
Fundo de Garantia do Tempo de Serviços
) or FGTS
|
6% annually + TR
|
R$225,000
|
R$225,000
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
TR refers to the daily reference rate.
|
|
(2)
|
The maximum home value and maximum loan value amounts are valid until December 31, 2017. As of
January 1, 2018, these amounts will be R$950,000 and R$760,000 for maximum home value and maximum loan value, respectively.
|
Mortgage financing
for Tenda’s developments primarily comes from CEF and BB. The financing is structured so that customers with monthly income
of up to ten times the Brazilian minimum wage pay low monthly installments without increasing our credit risk because CEF and BB
assume the credit risk of each customer.
Financing by Gafisa
during construction
. We finance some of our own sales during the construction period, with a down payment of 20-30% and financing
of the balance through monthly installments up to the delivery of the unit.
Financing by Gafisa
after delivery
. In addition, we offer financing plans to prospective customers using our own capital, where we finance purchases
for up to 120 months after the completion of the construction. For completed units we require a down payment of 30% and financing
of the remaining balance with up to 120 monthly installments. For units under construction we require a down payment of 10% and
provide financing for the remaining balance of 25-35% with up to 30 monthly installments until the delivery of the unit and financing
of the remaining 75-65%, respectively, with up to 120 additional monthly installments. All of our financing plans are guaranteed
by a conditional sale of the unit, with the transfer of the full property rights of the unit to the customer upon the full payment
of the outstanding installments.
We have developed
a strict credit policy in order to minimize risks. We take the following steps whenever we conduct a credit review process:
|
·
|
trained independent brokers interview each potential customer to collect personal and financial
information and fill out a registration form;
|
|
·
|
registration forms are delivered, along with a copy of the property deed, to us and, if the bank
providing the financing requests, to an independent company specialized in real estate credit scoring;
|
|
·
|
credit is automatically extended by us to the customer if his or her credit analysis is favorable.
However, if the credit analysis report raises concerns, we will carefully review the issues and accept or reject the customer’s
application depending on the degree of risk. To the extent financing is provided by a bank, such financial institution will follow
their own credit review procedures; and
|
|
·
|
after approving the application, our staff accepts the down payment which is given as a deposit
on the purchase of the unit.
|
Sales contracts.
Our sales contracts generally provide for adjustment of the sales price according to the INCC during construction and at an annual
interest rate of 12% plus IGP-M over the receivables balance after a stated date in our sales contracts. We have historically experienced
a low rate of customer delinquency on our sales. On March 31, 2017, our clients’ delinquency level was 13.5% of our accounts
receivable for Gafisa and 13.1% for Tenda.
In order to maintain
low rates of customer delinquency, we have adopted a conservative and robust credit and receivables management policy, pursuant
to which: (1) we conduct database research on the socio-economic background of our prospective customers; (2) our agreements discourage
delinquency and cancellation of the purchase by imposing immediate penalty fees, interest and liquidated damages which are adjusted
for inflation, and we retain approximately 40-45% (Gafisa) and 20% (Tenda) of the total amount paid to us plus expenses incurred
by us, which in general represents all or a substantial portion of the amount that the defaulted clients have already paid us;
and (3) we offer several options to our customers if they experience financial difficulties, such as offering them a greater number
of installment payments or exchanging the unit bought for a less expensive one. When a delinquency occurs, we endeavor to renegotiate
the outstanding loan with our customers before taking any legal action.
We will only transfer
title of the unit to a buyer after the release of the certificate of acceptance of occupancy by local authority and the full payment
of all outstanding installments. We have increased the percentage of mortgages that our customers obtain from commercial banks
from approximately 33% in 2006 to 49% in February 2017. This increase reflects the growing interest of commercial banks in financing
the Brazilian housing industry. See “Item 5”.
Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects—A. “Operating Results—Launches and Contracted Sales—Contracted Sales” for a
discussion of the sales value of contracts cancelled by our customers and penalties paid in connection with such cancellations.
The table below sets
forth the client’s delinquency level breakdown by segment:
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31,
|
Delinquency level by segment
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Gafisa
|
|
|
12.40
|
%
|
|
|
11.40
|
%
|
|
|
6.19
|
%
|
Tenda
|
|
|
11.30
|
%
|
|
|
12.85
|
%
|
|
|
7.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in our delinquency levels is mainly due to the weakening economic conditions and political instability in Brazil
since 2014.
Cancelation of
sales contracts
. Gafisa and Tenda sales contracts are irrevocable under Brazilian law. That means that a customer does not
have the unilateral ability to terminate a contract once it is executed, nor does the customer have an ability to require a refund
of amounts previously paid unless we agree. To the extent that a customer is not in compliance with its obligations under a contract,
we may at our option either force compliance through the Brazilian courts, or agree to a “default” by the customer.
Should we agree at our sole discretion to refund part of the amounts paid to the defaulting party, we will normally apply the penalty
set forth in the contract.
In the event either
we or the customer do not agree to enter into a commercial negotiation following a customer default there are two courses of action
available:
(1) the first option
is that we may seek to enforce the agreement in Court to collect the amount outstanding and effectively transfer ownership of the
unit to the buyer; or
(2) as provided in
the contract and contemplated in Brazilian law we have the right to force the unit to be auctioned. When the unit is purchased
in auction by a third party the proceeds from the auction are used in part to settle in full (including interest and penalties
for late payments) the amount owed by the customer to Gafisa and the remaining balance is paid to the customer. When no third party
is willing to acquire the unit in the auction, the title to the unit returns to Gafisa or Tenda without any disbursement, except
for the auctioneers fees. Provisions in the Gafisa contract indicate that when such auction occurs it is without prejudice of the
penalties set forth in this contract (meaning that the penalty provisions survive). Upon consultation, our legal counsel advised
us that the customer has a right to request that amounts paid by him be returned after the contractual “penalty” has
been deducted.
The table below provides
the number and sales value of contracts canceled by customers for the periods presented:
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016
|
|
As
of December 31, 2015
|
|
As
of December 31, 2014
|
Year Segment
|
|
Number
of contracts
|
|
Sales
value (in thousands of
reais
)
|
|
Number
of contracts
|
|
Sales
value (in thousands of
reais
)
|
|
Number
of contracts
|
|
Sales
value (in thousands of
reais
)
|
Gafisa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracted sales
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
1,319,292
|
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
|
|
1,427,733
|
|
|
|
2,836
|
|
|
|
1,246,996
|
|
Volume/Sales value of cancelations
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
|
(508,827
|
)
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
(512,937
|
)
|
|
|
(1,014
|
)
|
|
|
(435,964
|
)
|
Percentage
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Volume/Sales value, net of cancelations
|
|
|
2,178
|
|
|
|
810,464
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
914,796
|
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
|
|
811,032
|
|
Tenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracted sales
|
|
|
10,059
|
|
|
|
1,417,855
|
|
|
|
8,108
|
|
|
|
1,208,135
|
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
|
|
919,381
|
|
Volume/Sales value of cancelations
|
|
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
|
(275,988
|
)
|
|
|
(1,293
|
)
|
|
|
(192,004
|
)
|
|
|
(3,561
|
)
|
|
|
(523,400
|
)
|
Percentage
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
57.0
|
%
|
|
|
56.9
|
%
|
Volume/Sales value net of cancelations
|
|
|
8,138
|
|
|
|
1,141,866
|
|
|
|
6,815
|
|
|
|
1,016,131
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
395,981
|
|
Total sales value net of cancelation
|
|
|
10,316
|
|
|
|
1,952,330
|
|
|
|
9,148
|
|
|
|
1,930,927
|
|
|
|
4,509
|
|
|
|
1,207,013
|
|
Receivables securitization
We release capital
for new projects by seeking not to maintain receivables after our projects are completed. The securitization (mortgage-backed securities)
market in Brazil is expanding. This expansion is helped significantly by recent development in Brazilian foreclosure laws.
With the growing availability
of mortgages from commercial banks and the increasing liquidity of CRIs, we expect to further reduce our role as a financing provider
to our customers. Our goal is to optimize our working capital by transferring the financing activities to securitization companies
and banks.
Main Raw Materials and Suppliers
We purchase a wide
variety of raw materials for our operations. Even though these raw materials have represented on average, over the last three years,
approximately 41% of our total costs of development, aside from land, the only raw materials that represent more than approximately
5% of our total costs are steel and concrete. Prices of some raw materials have increased over the last three years at a rate higher
than inflation. The index that measures the fluctuation of construction costs, the INCC, increased 21.6% during the three year
period ended December 31, 2016, resulting in an increase in the construction costs of Gafisa and Tenda over that period. During
the three year period ended December 31, 2016, the IGP-M increased 20.70%. We have been working on the development of new construction
techniques and the utilization of alternative materials in order to reduce costs and improve our construction process with advanced
technology.
We contract with major
suppliers for the materials used in the construction of the buildings. We receive general pricing proposals from various suppliers
of raw materials and select the proposal with the best terms and conditions for each development. In addition to pricing, we select
our suppliers by the quality of their materials. We set forth specific minimum quality requirements for each construction project,
and the chosen supplier must meet this quality requirement. The materials for our developments are readily available from multiple
sources and, accordingly, we do not rely on any one supplier for our raw materials.
Our five largest suppliers
in terms of volume are Gerdau Aços Longos S.A., Votorantim Cimentos Brasil Ltda., Elevadores Atlas Shindler S.A., Portobello
S.A. and IBRAP Industria Brasileira de Aluminio e Plastico S.A. In general terms, we purchase products for our construction based
on the scheduled requirements, and we are given approximately 28 days to pay. The products we purchase generally come with a five-year
warranty. We do not have any exclusive arrangements with our suppliers. We work closely with suppliers, enabling them to schedule
their production in order to meet our demand or notify us in advance in the event they anticipate delays. We have good relationships
with our suppliers and have experienced no significant construction delays due to shortages of materials in recent years. We do
not maintain inventories of construction materials.
We achieve significant
economies of scale in our purchases because we:
|
·
|
use standard construction techniques,
|
|
·
|
engage in a large number of projects simultaneously, and
|
|
·
|
have long-term relationships with our suppliers. We periodically evaluate our suppliers. In the
event of problems, we generally replace the supplier or work closely with them to solve the problems.
|
Customer Service
In our industry, customer
satisfaction is based in large part on our ability to respond promptly and courteously to buyers before, during and after the sale
of our properties, including providing an owner’s guide. We use innovative and personalized customer service techniques beginning
with the initial encounter with a potential customer. We believe we were one of the first homebuilders in Brazil to introduce services
such as breakfast for customers at construction sites and providing monthly photos to customers on the progress of the construction.
These services are provided with the objective of educating customers on the progress of the construction and improving customers’
experience with the purchase of our units. Other customer service efforts include:
|
·
|
a dedicated outsourced call center with consultants and specialists trained to answer our customers’
inquiries;
|
|
·
|
the development of the “Gafisa Viver Bem” web portal, through which our customers can,
for example, follow the project’s progress, alter their registration information, simulate unit designs and check their outstanding
balances;
|
|
·
|
relationship events to engage the customer with the “Gafisa Viver Bem” program, like
the “Open House” (inauguration party in the unit) and the “House UP” (refurbish one room of the unit);
and
|
|
·
|
the development of the “Gafisa Personal Line,” through which buyers of certain units
are able to customize their units in accordance with plans and finishing touches offered by Gafisa. Such options vary by development.
|
As part of our customer
service program in our residential developments, we conduct pre-delivery inspections to promptly address any outstanding construction
issues. Prior to the delivery of each unit, we maintain regular contact with the customer by sending the customer our magazine
“Gafisa Way.” We also conduct monitored inspections of our developments to allow buyers to gather more information
from our technical personnel. In addition, we send a monthly status report on the construction of the unit. We conduct another
evaluation of the customer’s satisfaction with his or her unit, as well as the customer’s experience with our sales
personnel and our various departments (customer services, construction and title services) 18 months after the release of the certificate
of acceptance of occupancy by the relevant local authority. We also provide a five-year limited warranty covering structural defects,
which is required by Brazilian law.
Competition
The real estate market
in Brazil is highly fragmented and competitive with low barriers to entry. The main competitive factors include price, financing,
design, quality, reputation, reliability, meeting delivery expectations, partnerships with developers and the availability and
location of land. Certain of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do, which could provide them an advantage
over us in the acquisition of land using cash. In addition, some of our competitors have better brand recognition in certain regions,
which could give them a competitive advantage in increasing the velocity of their sales. Because of our geographic diversification,
we believe that we have access to different markets within Brazil that have different demand drivers.
Because of the high
fragmentation of the markets in which we operate, no single developer or construction company is likely to obtain a significant
market share. With the exception of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, where we face competition from major publicly-traded competitors,
in other regions we generally face competition from small and medium-sized local competitors that are not as well-capitalized.
We expect additional entrants, including foreign companies in partnership with Brazilian entities, into the real estate industry
in Brazil, particularly the São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro markets.
The table below sets
forth the most recent data available on our market share in the São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro markets:
São Paulo (1) — Gafisa’s Market Share
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
Year
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(Launches in R$ million)
|
Local market
|
|
|
12,208
|
|
|
|
14,410
|
|
|
|
26,359
|
|
Gafisa(2)
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
Gafisa’s market share
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_____________
Source:
EMBRAESP and SECOVI.
Rio de Janeiro (1) — Gafisa’s Market Share
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
Year
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(Launches in R$ million)
|
Local market
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
11,796
|
|
Gafisa(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Gafisa’s market share
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_____________
Source:
ADEMI.
|
(2)
|
Gafisa interest. In 2016, we did not launch any development in Rio de Janeiro.
|
Seasonality
Although the Brazilian
real estate market is not generally seasonal, there are a few months of the year when the market slows down (January, February
and July) each year. These months coincide with school vacations and result in the postponement of investment decisions. We are
impacted similarly as the rest of the market during such periods.
Subsidiaries
We carry out our real
estate developments directly or through our subsidiaries or our jointly-controlled entities in partnership with third parties.
As of December 31, 2016, Gafisa had 105 direct and indirect subsidiaries, 20 jointly-controlled entities under operations and 4
entities in which it had minority stakes. The majority of such subsidiaries, jointly-controlled entities and entities in which
Gafisa has a minority stake are incorporated as special purpose entities, are headquartered in Brazil and operate exclusively in
the real estate sector. Gafisa also holds a 30% interest in the capital stock of Alphaville.
Many of Gafisa’s
subsidiaries and joint-ventures are SPEs, many of which have been incorporated by us as joint ventures together with other real
estate and construction companies in Brazil. Of our 129 SPEs, 72.9% are wholly-owned by us and 8.5% are majority-owned by us, and
we hold an interest of 50% or less in the remaining 18.6%.
Tenda is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Gafisa. As of December 31, 2016, Tenda had 88 subsidiaries, 15 jointly-controlled entities under operations and 5
entities in which it had minority stakes. The majority of such subsidiaries, jointly-controlled entities and entities in which
Tenda has a minority stake are incorporated as special purpose entities, are headquartered in Brazil and operate exclusively in
the real estate sector.
Many of Tenda’s
subsidiaries and joint-ventures are SPEs, many of which have been incorporated by us as joint ventures together with other real
estate and construction companies in Brazil. Of Tenda’s 88 SPEs, 77% are wholly-owned by us and 13% are majority-owned by
us, and we hold an interest of 50% or less in the remaining 10%.
Intellectual Property
Trademarks
Our trademarks are
filed or registered in Brazil with the Brazilian Institute of Industrial Property (
Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial
),
or the “INPI,” which is the competent body for, among others, trademarks’ and patents’ registries in Brazil.
Besides, the trademark “Gafisa” is also registered before the competent agency for registering trademarks in the United
States.
Currently, the registration
process of a trademark takes approximately 30 to 36 months from the date of filing of the application until the definitive registration.
From the date of filing of the application to the date of the definitive registration, the applicant has an expectation of right
for the use of the trademark in connection with the products and services for which the trademark was applied for.
Each trademark registration
is effective for a 10-year period and is renewable for equal and successive periods. The renewal of a trademark registration is
granted upon request accompanied by payment of renewal fees during the final year of the trademark’s registration period
or within the 6-month waiting period after its expiration. In case of non-payment, the registration is cancelled by INPI.
A trademark registration
may be terminated in case (1) of expiration of its validity term; (2) the trademark owner or holder waives in whole or in part
the rights granted by registration; (3) of forfeiture, or the applicant’s or the holder’s failure to use a registered
trademark in connection with related goods or services for a period longer than five years; or (4) failure to appoint a Brazilian
resident with powers to represent the applicant or holder in administrative or judicial proceedings, in cases where the applicant
or the holder resides abroad.
As of the date of
this annual report, we had approximately 129 pending trademark applications and 130 trademarks registered in Brazil with the INPI
of which approximately (a) 123 pending applications and 118 registered trademarks refer to Gafisa, and (b) 6 pending applications
and 12 registered trademarks refer to Tenda.
Our most significant
trademark is “Gafisa,” which is duly registered with the INPI in the relevant market segment. Other relevant trademark
we own, such as “Tenda,” are also registered with the INPI in several classes in connection with our daily activities.
Domain Name
As of the date of
this annual report, we, together with our subsidiaries, were the owners of approximately 85 domain names including our and our
subsidiaries’ principal websites. The term of each domain name registration is one year and is renewable for equal and successive
periods. An annual fee payment is necessary for the maintenance of the domain name registrations. Other than non-payment of the
annual fee, domain name registration may be cancelled by: (1) express waiver of the owner; (2) irregularities in the data form
as requested by the respective agency; (3) non-compliance with applicable regulations; (4) judicial order; or (5) in the case of
foreign companies, non-compliance with the obligation to initiate the company’s activities in Brazil. Our domain names will,
unless renewed, expire between May 2017 and February 2023. We will seek to renew our domain names expiring in 2017, after evaluating
their continuing applicability.
Patents
We have no patents
registered in our name.
Software Licenses
Most of the software
we use in our daily business refers to common computer programs, such as Windows, SAP and AutoCAD. Additionally, we own all required
licenses of use in connection with such software. The use of computer software without the acquisition of proper licenses is considered
a felony subject to both criminal and civil liabilities, including the payment of fines and restrictions of future use of the applicable
software.
Licenses
Under Brazilian laws,
we are required to obtain a variety of licenses for each of our new developments. As of the date of this annual report, we have
obtained all necessary licenses and permits to operate our business.
Insurance
We maintain insurance
policies with leading Brazilian insurance companies, such as Allianz Seguros S.A., ACE Seguradora S.A., AXA Seguros S.A., Travelers
Seguros Brasil S.A, Tokio Marine Seguradora S.A., Porto Seguro Cia de Seguros Gerais, J. Malluceli Seguros S.A., Swiss RE, Fator Seguradora, Zurich Seguros and Pottencial Seguradora with coverage for, among
others, (1) potential risks arising from the commencement of construction, including property damages, business interruption, engineering
risks, fire, falls, collapse, lightning, and gas explosion; (2) construction errors; (3) performance bonds; and (4) losses arising
from damages or defense costs associated with litigation resulting from misconduct of directors and officer. Such insurance policies
contain customary specifications, limits and deductibles. Additionally, we do not maintain any insurance policy for our properties
after construction is completed.
According to Brazilian
Federal Law, it is mandatory that homebuilders have insurance policies in force with coverage for, among others, damages and losses
related to civil liabilities and performance bonds. Failure or default in contracting any compulsory insurance required by applicable
legislation is subject to a penalty amounting to the higher amount between (1) twice the premium price of the insurance that should
have been contracted; and (2) ten percent of the insured property value. Additionally, no operating authorization or license (or
the renewal of any existing license) shall be granted to companies subject to compulsory insurance in default of the aforementioned
obligations.
Our management believes
that the insurance coverage for our properties is adequate and that our insurance policies are customary for our industry in Brazil
and adequate for applicable regulations.
Regulatory Framework
Brazilian Government
and Real Estate Sector Regulations.
The real estate sector
is directly regulated by the Brazilian government and is indirectly impacted by the government’s regulations on the availability
of credit. Regulations include development policies, zoning restrictions and environmental laws which can determine the availability
of different products offered in the market. For example, city master plans and zoning laws restrict the types of real estate developments
that can be constructed in a given area.
As a general rule,
the NBCC requires that the transfer of title of real estate properties, as well as the assignment, transfer, change or waiver of
rights on real estate properties, be carried out by means of a public deed, except in certain cases, such as when the Real Estate
Finance System (
Sistema Financeiro Imobiliario
), or SFI, or the SFH, are involved. The intent of this rule is to increase
the security of real estate property transfers.
According to applicable
law, transfer of real estate title is only deemed effective upon the registration of the transfer with the relevant Real Estate
Registry Office. The procedure for the execution of public deeds and also the respective registration with the Real Estate Registry
Office (
Registro Imobiliário
) is regulated by the Brazilian Law of Public Registers (
Lei de Registros Públicos
),
in particular Law No. 6,015 of December 13, 1973.
Real estate development
Real estate development
activities are regulated by Law No. 4,591 of December 16, 1964, as amended, or Law No. 4,591. The main duties of a developer are
to: (1) obtain all required construction approvals and authorizations from the proper authorities; (2) register the development
with the Real Estate Registry Office (without registration, the developed units cannot be sold); (3) indicate in the preliminary
documents the deadline for the developer to withdraw from the development; (4) indicate in all advertisements and sales contracts
the registration number of the development with the Real Estate Registry Office; (5) oversee the construction of the project established
by the contract which must be in accordance with the approval granted by the authorities; (6) deliver to the final owner the completed
units, in accordance with the contractual specifications, and transfer to the final owner the title of the unit by signing the
final sale deed; (7) assume sole responsibility for the delivery of the developed units to the respective purchasers; (8) assume
sole responsibility in the event the construction of the unit is not in accordance with the advertisements and sale contracts;
and (9) provide construction blueprints and specifications along with the joint ownership agreement to the proper Real Estate Registry
Office. The final owner is obligated, in turn, to pay the price related to the cost of the land and the construction.
The construction of
the real estate units may be contracted and paid for by the developer or by the final owners of the units. Brazilian law provides
for two pricing methods in real estate development: (1) construction under contract and (2) construction under a system of management.
In construction under contract, the contracting parties will either set a fixed price, stipulated before the construction begins,
or agree on an adjustable price pegged to an index determined by the contracting parties. In construction under a system of management,
an estimated price is agreed upon by the contracting parties, but no fixed final price is provided at the beginning of the construction
process. The actual amount that purchasers of the units pay depends on the monthly costs of the developer or contractor.
Urban land subdivisions
Urban land subdivisions
consist of subdivisions of urban land parcels into building lots and the construction of new roads and other infrastructure, and
are regulated by Law No. 6,766 of December 19, 1979 - the Brazilian Law of Urban Land Subdivision (
Lei de Parcelamento do Solo
),
as amended, or Law No. 6,766. Law No. 6,766 governs urban land subdivisions and establishes, among other things, the planning and
technical requirements for this form of land parceling and the obligations of the developers, and also provides for fines and sanctions
in the event of violation of its provisions.
Under Law No. 6,766,
land subdivisions are intended for the creation of lots in urban areas or urban expansion zones, as defined by the planning director
or approved by municipal law, and must comply with Law No. 6,766.
For the construction
of land subdivisions, the developer must proceed through the following steps: (1) prior to developing the land subdivision plan,
it must request the municipality in which the development will be located to issue directives on use policies specifically to the
land, such as the delineation of lots, road and street systems and areas reserved for municipal or community properties; (2) pursuant
to the directives issued by the municipality, it must develop a plan for the proposed land subdivision and present it to the municipality
for approval, including the plans, designs, descriptions, and schedule for performance of the work, among other documents; and
(3) after approval for the land subdivision project is obtained, it must be submitted for recording in the property registry of
the appropriate Real Estate Registry Office within 180 days. The approval may be revoked and treated as expired if it is not submitted
for recording within the 180-day period.
In addition to the
approval of the project by the municipality in which the development will be located, the approval of other governmental bodies
may be necessary in cases where the land subdivision: (1) is located in an area of special interest, such as a protected cultural,
historical, landscape and archeological heritages site as defined by state or federal legislation; (2) is located in the boundary
area of a city, belongs to more than one municipality, or is in a metropolitan region or urban agglomeration as defined in state
or federal law; or (3) has an area greater than 1 million square meters. In the case of land subdivisions located in a municipality
area that is within a metropolitan area, the examination and prior consent to the approval of such project will be subject to the
metropolitan authority.
The legal requirements
for the approval of the land subdivision by a municipality include: (1) the developer must preserve a percentage of the land used
for residential communities as open spaces for public use and for municipal or community properties with the percentage determined
by each municipal zoning code; (2) each lot must have a minimum area of 125 square meters and the distance between the building
and the street must be at least five meters; (3) the developer must reserve 15 meters of land on either side of running or still
water and of strips of
public domain land for
roads and highways; and (4) the allotment procedures must be coordinated with the official adjacent tracks, existing or projected,
and harmonized with the local topography.
Law No. 6,766 also
sets forth locations where subdivisions are not permitted, such as: (1) on wetlands and lands subject to flooding, until measures
have been taken to assure water drainage; (2) on land that has been filled with material that is a public health hazard, unless
previously cleaned up; (3) on land that has a slope equal to or greater than 30 degrees, unless the requirements of the appropriate
authorities have been met; (4) on lands where geological conditions make buildings inadvisable; and (5) in ecological preserves
or areas where pollution creates unacceptable sanitary conditions, until corrected.
In order to offer
greater security to the property market, Law No. 6,766 prohibits the sale or promise of sale of any lot that is the result of a
subdivision where the developer has not previously obtained approval by the appropriate municipality and the development has not
been recorded with the respective Real Estate Registry Office. If any such lot is sold or contracted to be sold, the developer
and any person or legal entity benefiting from such sale or promise of sale shall be jointly liable for the resulting damages to
the purchaser and the public authorities.
Assets for Appropriation
Law No. 10,931 of
August 2, 2004, as amended, provides for certain protection of real estate assets. Accordingly, such protected assets are segregated
from other properties, rights and obligations of the developer, including other assets previously appropriated, and such appropriated
assets can only be used to guarantee debts and obligations related to the respective development. The appropriated assets are considered
bankruptcy free and will not be affected in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the developer. In the event of a bankruptcy
or insolvency of the developer, joint ownership of the construction may be instituted by a resolution of the purchasers of the
units or by judicial decision. The joint owners of the construction will decide whether the project will proceed or the assets
appropriated will be liquidated. Developers may also opt to submit a project to appropriation in order to benefit from a special
tax system. Under this system, land and objects built on the land, financial investments in the land, and any other assets and
rights with respect to the land are considered to be protected for the benefit of the construction of that development and the
delivery of the units to the final owners, and are thus separate from the remaining assets of the developer.
In addition, in order
to encourage the use of the appropriation system, Laws No. 11,977 of July 7, 2009 (amended by Law No. 12,249 enacted on June 11,
2010, Law No. 12,424 enacted on June 16, 2011, Law No. 12,693 enacted on July 24, 2012, Law No. 12,722 enacted on October 3, 2012,
Law No. 13,043 enacted on November 13, 2014 and Law No. 13,097 enacted on January 19, 2015) and No. 12,844 of July 13, 2013, which
granted tax benefits for the adoption of the system by reducing tax rates on appropriated assets from 7% to 4% and, in the case
of the appropriated assets under the public housing program “
Minha Casa, Minha Vida
,” the rates were reduced
from 7% to 1%, until December 31, 2018, by Law No. 13,097, enacted January 19, 2015.
We have not yet utilized the appropriation
system for any of our real estate developments. We prefer to use our subsidiaries and our jointly-controlled entities for each
specific real estate development. Our subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities allow us to borrow funds by segregating the
credit risk taken on by the financial institutions.
Credit Policy Regulations
The real estate sector
is highly dependent on the availability of credit in the market, and the Brazilian government’s credit policy significantly
affects the availability of funds for real estate financing, thus influencing the supply of and demand for properties.
Housing Finance System,
or “SFH”
Law No. 4,380 of August
21, 1964, as amended, created the SFH to promote the construction and ownership of private homes, especially for low income earners.
Financing resources under the SFH’s control are provided by the Government Severance Indemnity Fund for Employees (
Fundo
de Garantia do Tempo de Serviço
), or “FGTS,” and from savings account deposits. The FGTS, created by Law
No. 5,107 of September 13, 1966 and regulated by Law No. 8,036 of May 11, 1990, imposes a mandatory 8% employee payroll deduction
on all employees in Brazil. Employees maintain FGTS accounts, which are similar to pension funds, and are allowed, among other
things, to use the funds deposited in the accounts for the acquisition of real estate property under certain circumstances, as
set forth by applicable law. The CEF is the agency responsible for managing the funds deposited in the FGTS. In order to be eligible
for the financing, the beneficiary must purchase a completed unit or unit under construction priced at
up to R$950,000 (price
applicable to the States of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Distrito Federal) or R$800,000 (price applicable
to other Brazilian States). In addition, the beneficiary shall (1) not own or be the committed purchaser of any residential real
estate financed by the SFH within Brazil; (2) not own or be the committed purchaser of, any real estate property built or under
construction in both his or her current city of residence and the city where the beneficiary conducts his or her main activities;
(3) reside for at least one year in the city where the property is located; (4) pay the FGTS; and (5) be registered for at least
three years with the FGTS regime. The unemployed also have access to the FGTS to purchase real estate property provided that he
still has funds on the FGTS account (where the 8% payroll deduction was deposited while employed).
Financings that originate
from savings account deposits in the entities comprising the Brazilian Saving and Loan System (
Sistema Brasileiro de Poupança
e Empréstimo
), or “SBPE,” are regulated by the Central Bank. Such financings can be obtained through the
SFH, which is strictly regulated by the Brazilian government, or through the mortgage portfolio system, where banks are free to
set the financing conditions. SFH financing offers fixed interest rates lower than the market rates, capped at around 12% per year,
and SFH financing contract terms vary, in general, between 15 and 30 years. The mortgage portfolio system financing offers market
interest rates as determined by the financial institutions, generally varying between 18.5% and 12% per year.
CMN Resolution No.
3,932/2010 provides for the allocation of the funds deposited in savings accounts in the entities comprising SBPE and states that
the following conditions must be met for SFH financing: (1) the maximum amount of the financing is 80% of the appraisal price of
the property, as a general rule; (2) the maximum appraisal price for the financed unit is R$950,000 (applicable to the States of
Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Distrito Federal) or R$800,000 (applicable to other Brazilian States); (3) the
maximum actual cost to the borrower, which includes charges such as interest, fees and other financial costs, except insurance
and other costs, may not exceed 12% per year; and (4) the borrower is responsible for the potential outstanding balance verified
at the end of the financing term, (such term might be extended by half of the initial term).
SFH financings need
to be secured by at least one of the following: (1) a first mortgage over the unit that is being financed; or (2) a conditional
sale over the unit that is being financed, as prescribed by Law No. 9,514 of November 20, 1997, as amended by Law No. 10,931 of
August 2, 2004, Law No. 11,076 of December 30, 2004, Law No. 11,481 of May 31, 2007, Law No. 12,703 of August 07, 2012, Law No.
12,810 of May 15, 2013, Law No. 13,043 enacted on November 13, 2014 and Law No. 13,097 enacted on January 19,2015 (“Law No.
9,514”); or (3) a first mortgage or conditional sale, as determined by Law No. 9,514, of other property owned by the borrower
or by a third party; or (4) other guarantees, as established by the financing agent. SFH funds are only released upon the formalization
of one of these methods of guaranteeing the loan.
The federal government
has announced, in 2014, changes in the regulations on financing and construction in order to promote growth in the real estate
market. Among the measures announced are: (1) all the acts involving immovable property will be entered on the property’s
record in the land registry office, i.e., unregistered acts and actions enforceable against third parties in good faith, even if
the unregistered act or action challenges ownership to the property; (2) the buyer of a real estate property will be able to give
property as guarantee to finance another, or to purchase other assets with funds raised in savings accounts; (3) banks will be
able to issue a new type of security, the Real Estate Covered Bond (
Letras Imobiliárias Garantidas
, or “LIGs”),
which is exempt from income tax to raise more funds and borrow to finance the purchase of real estate; (4) banks may grant payroll
loans, in which the parcels will be charged to the worker's salary in the private sector with more facilities, resulting in lower
interests; and (5) the Brazilian government will create a type of credit that will be easier for the bank to recapture the property
in case of default.
As of the date of
this annual report, the Central Bank is carrying out a public hearing in connection with a resolution to regulate the law which
created LIGs, Law No. 13,097 enacted on January 19, 2015.
Mortgage portfolio
While a large portion
of the funds in the deposits in saving accounts are allocated to the SFH, some of the funds are allocated to loans granted at market
rates. CMN Resolution No. 3,932/10 established that at least 65% of these deposits should be used for real estate financing, with
a minimum of 80% of the financing going to housing loans under the SFH and the remaining balance for loans granted at market rates
which are usually higher than in SFH loans, including mortgage portfolio used by banks for the concession of housing loans.
In early 2005 the
Brazilian government took a number of measures to better regulate the use of the funds raised in savings account deposits in order
to promote growth of the real estate sector, these measures included: (1) the cancellation of payments to the Central Bank of funds
not invested in real estate financing in January, February and
March; (2) the creation
of a real estate interbank deposit market to allow financial institutions with excessive investments in real estate to trade with
financial institutions that have capacity for more real estate credits; (3) a review of the factors used in the calculation guidelines
of the SFH in order to stimulate financing for the acquisition of new real estate properties at a low cost, applicable as of January
1, 2005; (4) authorization for the SFH to provide financing to legal entities for the construction of development projects for
their employees, provided that such entities follow all SFH guidelines; (5) in 2014, measures to facilitate the purchase of financed
properties, as discussed in “
Housing Finance System
, or “
SFH
”” above, and (6) in 2016, the
increase in the operating limits of the SFH to units with a maximum sales prices of R$800,000 and R$950,000 (applicable only to
the States of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Minas Gerais and the
Distrito Federal
). These changes have significantly
increased the funds available for investments in the Brazilian real estate sector.
Real Estate Finance System,
or “SFI”
The SFI was created
by Law No. 9,514 to establish assignment, acquisition and securitization criteria for real estate credits. The system seeks to
develop primary (loans) and secondary (trading of securities backed by receivables) markets for the financing of real estate properties
by creating advantageous payment conditions and special protection of creditors’ rights. The SFI supervises real estate financing
transactions carried out by savings banks, commercial banks, investment banks, real estate credit portfolio banks, housing loan
associations, savings and loan associations, mortgage companies and other entities authorized by the CMN to provide such financing.
SFI real estate credits may be freely negotiated by the parties, under the following conditions: (1) the amount loaned and the
related adjustments must be fully reimbursed; (2) interest must be paid at the rates established by the contract; (3) interest
must be capitalized; and (4) borrowers must purchase life and permanent disability insurance.
Real estate sales,
rental, or other real estate property financing in general, can be negotiated with non-financial institutions under the same conditions
permitted by authorized entities under the SFI. In these cases, non-financial entities are authorized to charge capitalized interest
rates greater than 12% per year.
The following types
of guarantees are applicable to loans approved by the SFI: (1) mortgages; (2) fiduciary assignment of credit rights resulting from
sales contracts; (3) guarantee of credit rights resulting from contracts of sale or promise of sale of property; and (4) conditional
sale of real estate property.
Law No. 9,514 also
reformed securitizations of real estate assets provisions, making them less expensive and more attractive. The securitization of
credits in the context of the SFI is made through real estate securitization companies, non-financial institutions formed as joint
stock companies whose objective is to acquire and securitize real estate credits. Funds raised by the securitizing companies can
be made through the issuance of debentures or notes, or the creation of a new type of CRI. According to applicable law, CRIs are
nominative credit securities issued exclusively by securitizing companies, backed by real estate credits, freely negotiated, and
payable in cash. CRIs tend to have, among others, the following characteristics: they are issued in book-entry form, they may have
fixed or floating interest rates and can be paid in installments, they may contain adjustment provisions, they are registered and
traded through centralized systems of custody and financial settlement of private securities and they can be secured by the assets
of the issuing company.
Minha Casa, Minha Vida
program
Provisional Measure
No. 459 enacted on March 25, 2009, converted into Law No. 11,977 enacted on July 7, 2009, amended by Law No. 12,249 enacted on
June 11, 2010, Law No. 12,424 enacted on June 16, 2011, Law No. 12,693 enacted on July 24, 2012, Law No. 13,043 enacted on November
13, 2014 and Law No. 13,097 enacted on January 19, 2015, created a public housing program called “
Minha Casa, Minha Vida
.”
Provisional Measure No. 514 enacted on December 1, 2010, converted into Law No. 12,424 enacted on June 16, 2011, modified the aforementioned
legislation, which calls for government investment of more than R$30 billion and is focused on building one million houses for
families with monthly incomes of up to ten times the minimum wage. Under this program, the government is authorized to finance
families purchasing houses with assessed values between R$90,000 and R$190,000. Law No. 12,868 enacted on October 15, 2013, released
resources for “
Minha Casa Melhor
”, in which CEF provides to each beneficiary of the program “
Minha
Casa Minha Vida
” subsidized credit up to R$5,000 for the purchase of furniture and appliances, with interest rate of
5% per year and repayable in 48 months.
Municipal Legislation
Municipal planning
is regulated by articles 182 and 183 of the Federal Constitution and by Law No. 10,257 of July 10, 2001 (
Estatuto da Cidade
),
as amended, or Law No. 10,257. Law No. 10,257 provides, among other things,
for the establishment
of (1) rules for the parceling, use and occupation of urban tracts of land in each municipality for the collective welfare and
environmental balance of the community; and (2) a master plan, which shall be reviewed every 10 years. The master plan is the guiding
tool used to plan developments in the urban areas of each municipality and is used as a reference by all public and private agents
acting within the municipality. It establishes the strategic goals and general guidelines for urban construction, the objectives
and guidelines for differentiated areas of planning and the instruments for their deployment.
We set out below certain
details of the laws governing the municipal planning of the two major cities in which we operate, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro:
São Paulo municipality
City laws govern the
zoning, construction, parceling, use and occupation of land in the municipality of São Paulo. They set forth technical and
urban planning requirements for parceling, and provide that the division, subdivision or segregation of urban tracts of land are
subject to the prior approval of the São Paulo municipal government. Moreover, the zoning laws describe the types of permissible
uses for the land and their respective characteristics, by dividing São Paulo into areas of use with fixed locations, limits
and boundaries. They also provide for fines and sanctions for noncompliance.
Municipal Law No.
11,228 of June 25, 1992, approved the Code of Works and Construction, regulated by Decree 32,329 of September 23, 1992, which governs
administrative and executive procedures and sets forth the rules to be followed in the planning, licensing, execution, maintenance
and use of public works and construction within properties in the municipality of São Paulo, and provides for sanctions
and fines applicable in cases of non-compliance with these rules.
On July 31, 2014,
Municipal Law No. 16,050 was published, replacing Municipal Law No. 13,430 of September 13, 2002, approving the master plan and
creating the Planning System of the municipality of São Paulo and regulating the new master plan of the municipality. The
new master plan provides a series of guidelines for the development and growth of the city of São Paulo for the next 16
years, in order to (i) incentivize the use of public and non-motorized forms of transport; (ii) reduce the housing deficit; (iii)
improve the access of residential areas to commercial areas of the city; and (iv) incentivize the development of urban areas already
equipped with public transportation infrastructure, among other guidelines.
On March 22, 2016,
Municipal Law No. 16,402 was published, replacing Municipal Law No. 13,885 of August 25, 2004, regulating the new rules regarding
the parceling, use and occupation of land in the municipality of São Paulo.
Rio de Janeiro municipality
Decree 322 of March
3, 1976, as amended, of the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, and Decree “E” 3,800 of April 20, 1970, as amended, of
the then State of Guanabara, jointly created the municipality’s Zoning Regulation, Land Parceling Regulation and Construction
Regulation. These regulations control the use of the municipality land, including urban zoning, use of properties, development
of construction sites and conditions for the use of each zone in the municipality. The Ten-year master plan of the municipality,
approved pursuant to Supplementary Law No. 111 of January 1, 2011, establishes rules and procedures related to urban policy of
the municipality, determines guidelines, provides instruments for its execution and defines area policies and their related programs,
aiming at meeting the social needs of the city.
Environmental Issues
We are subject to
a variety of Brazilian federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the protection of the environment, as well as urban
regulations and zoning restrictions, as described below. Applicable environmental laws may vary according to the development’s
location, the site’s environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site. Compliance with these environmental
laws may result in delays, cause us to incur in substantial costs, and prohibit or severely restrict project development. Before
we purchase any real estate, we conduct investigations of all necessary and applicable environmental issues, including the possible
existence of hazardous or toxic materials, as well as any inadequately disposed waste substances. During the investigations we
also identify the existence of water wells and protected vegetation, observing the proximity of the real estate property to permanent
preservation areas. We generally condition the real estate property acquisitions on obtaining the required regulatory approvals
prior to closing.
We have adopted certain
practices to further our commitment to environmental protection and landscape development. Through our Selective Collection Project,
we have partnered in environmental education initiatives with private and governmental entities, including non-governmental organizations.
We provide training to all of our outsourced workers (before we begin work on any particular project), that focuses on the importance
of preserving the environment and how to effectively collect, store and control materials for recycling. Alphaville was given the
“ECO Award” in 2006 and 2007 (by the American Chamber of Commerce), the “Top Ambiental Award” (Top Environmental
Award) in 2007 and 2008 (by the Brazilian Association of Marketing and Sales Agents, in recognition for its environmentally responsible
practices) and the “Top Social Award” in 2008 and 2009 (by the Brazilian Association of Marketing and Sales Agents,
in recognition for its socially responsible practices). Our Eldorado Business Tower building is the first building in Latin American,
to be pre-certified by the U.S. Green Building Council as a Leed CS 2.0 Platinum building for leadership in energy and environmental
design.
Environmental licenses
and authorizations
Brazilian environmental
policy requires environmental licenses and permits for the construction and operation of real estate projects. Environmental licensing
is required for both initial construction and alteration in existing developments, and the licenses must be periodically renewed.
The Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos
Naturais Renováveis
), or the IBAMA, is responsible for granting such licenses for projects developed in two states or
in federal conservation units. In other cases, state or municipal environmental agencies are responsible for granting such environmental
licenses, depending on the extent of environmental impacts caused by certain projects.
The environmental
licensing process is comprised of three stages: preliminary license, installation license and operational license. The preliminary
license, issued during the preliminary planning phase of the project, authorizes the location and basic development, and establishes
the conditions and technical requirements to be observed in further stages of development. The installation license authorizes
the facility’s construction. The operating license authorizes the commencement and continuation of operational activities.
Operating licenses are subject to compulsory renewal depending on their validity. The licensing of activities that may significantly
impact the environment, as determined by the competent environmental agency and according to the Environmental Impact Assessment
and its related Report (“EIA/RIMA”), requires environmental offset payments, to be invested in conservation units (e.g.
national parks, biological reserves etc.), pursuant to Article 36 of Law No. 9,985/00. The value of the environmental offset is
established by the environmental agency conducting the licensing proceeding, according to the “ecosystem impact level”
of the proposed activity, pursuant to Article 31-A of Federal Decree No. 6,848/09.
The installation,
operation or alteration of projects without proper and valid environmental licensing or the non-compliance with the conditions
or technical requirements of the respective environmental licenses, may subject the violator to administrative sanctions that may
range from fines (R$500 to R$10 million), as well as the suspension of activities and, depending on the specific circumstances,
criminal liability (of individuals and/or companies), pursuant to Federal Law No. 9,605/98 and civil liability (in case environmental
damage occurs).
The construction,
maintenance and sale of our projects may be hampered or halted by delays in the issuance of applicable licenses or even by failure
to obtaining such licenses.
The construction of
real estate developments often requires land moving activities, and in many cases, the cutting down of trees. In addition to environmental
licenses and permits, Brazilian legislation requires specific environmental authorizations for the development of projects, based
on the characteristics of the project, its location and the natural features inherent to the area. The development of projects
that require the cutting of trees or removing vegetation must receive specific authorizations from environmental agencies. Companies
that apply for an authorization for vegetation removal are required to perform the reforestation of other areas as a compensatory
measure, such as reforestation or to repair the affected areas, which may imply additional expenses. Brazilian legislation also
requires special protections for certain specific types of flora and areas with special ecological purpose, imposing additional
legal requirements to removal of such vegetation.
The removal of vegetation
without proper and valid authorization, or non-compliance with the authorization requirements, may subject the transgressor to
civil liability (in case environmental damage occurs), administrative sanctions (such as fines) and, according to specific circumstances,
criminal liability (of individuals and/or companies), pursuant to Federal Law No. 9,605/98.
The licensing of projects
with relevant environmental impacts located in a conservation unit or within its buffer zone will depend on prior authorization
from the conservation unit’s managing office.
In addition, the development
of projects that require water abstraction from bodies of water or groundwater, as well as the discharge of effluents into water
bodies, are subject to specific water use grants, to be issued by the relevant authorities. Water use grants are subject to certain
conditions and technical requirements, including maximum capacity requirements and effluent treatment standards, and are subject
to automatic renewal.
Moreover, some of
our projects require the transfer of wildlife to other areas, which is subject to specific authorizations issued by the state environmental
agencies. To catch, handle and transfer wildlife without the proper authorization may result in administrative sanctions of up
to R$5,000.00 per animal, pursuant to Federal Decree 6,514/08.
Waste disposal
Brazilian legislation
relies on several standards and procedures for waste management. All waste must be properly stored, treated, transported and disposed
of, in order to avoid the occurrence of environmental damages – and as a result, environmental liability.
The Brazilian “National
Waste Management Policy” (Federal Law No. 12,305/10) and CONAMA Resolution 307/2002 specifically regulate the handling of
solid waste generated by the construction sector. As part of their licensing procedure, companies are required to present and have
a solid waste management plan approved by competent environmental agency and must comply with the conditions and obligations set
forth in such plan. Failure to comply with such obligations may lead to civil (obligation to repair/indemnify in case of pollution),
administrative (e.g. fines, suspension of activities etc.) and, according to specific circumstances, criminal liability.
Regarding civil liability,
because Brazilian legislation imposes strict, joint and several liability for environmental damages, companies may be held liable
for any environmental damages that may arise as a result of its activities, including waste generated thereof, which must be properly
stored, treated, transported and disposed of. Likewise, the hiring of third parties for management of waste generated from our
activities does not exempt us from civil environmental liability.
Contaminated areas
We develop and construct
projects in several states within Brazil. Each state has its Environmental Secretary and/or Environmental Agency. The São
Paulo State Secretary of Environment (
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente de São Paulo
), or the “SMA,”
and the State Environmental Agency of São Paulo (
Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo
), or “CETESB,”
are the principal environmental regulatory entities of the State of São Paulo, and they have adopted procedures with regard
to the management of contaminated areas, including the creation of environmental standards to preserve the quality of land and
underground water, as well as procedures to be complied with if contamination is confirmed. The standards established by CETESB
are used as reference by most Brazilian states that have no specific regulation on contaminated land management.
In addition, the Rio
de Janeiro State Secretary of Environment (
Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Urbano do Rio de Janeiro
)
and the Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Agency, or “INEA,” also maintain their own quality standards, in combination
with those established by the National Environmental Council (
Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente
), or “CONAMA.”
Other states have similar requirements.
If contaminated areas
are identified in the development of our projects, we must provide proper disclosure to environmental authorities and registration
before real estate property records. Given the strict liability regime, we may be required to proceed with the remedial actions
deemed necessary by environmental agencies in order to comply with technical standards set forth for each kind of project, even
if we have not caused the contamination, and may result in delays for the project development’s completion. Prior approval
from environmental agencies before engaging in remedial actions may be necessary. All emergency actions to prevent and mitigate
risks to the environment and public health, if required, must be adopted promptly and at our expense.
Non-compliance with
the guidelines established by the environmental and health entities may result in criminal, as well as administrative penalties.
Moreover, the owners and holders of properties may be required to pay for costs relating to the clean-up of any contaminated soil
or groundwater located in their properties, even if they did not cause the contamination.
If there are contaminated
areas in the properties where our projects will be developed, this must be disclosed to our clients.
Environmental liability
Article 225 of the
Brazilian Federal Constitution, provides that “activities that are harmful to the environment shall subject violators, whether
individuals or companies, to criminal and administrative sanctions, regardless of the obligation to repair the damage caused.”
Therefore, the Brazilian Federal Constitution provided for environmental liability in three distinct fields: civil, administrative
and criminal. As an example, payment of an administrative fine does not offer exemption from the duty to make reparations or indemnify
for damages that might be caused by harmful conduct, nor does it offer exemption from possible criminal charges prompted by the
event.
Civil environmental
liability in Brazil is considered by case law as
propter rem
, that is, liability attaches to the real estate property. Therefore,
whoever buys or holds environmentally damaged land will succeed in the liability for the clean-up or recovery and for reparation
of potential damage to third parties. Although this liability can be contractually allocated between the parties, it cannot be
opposed either administratively or before third parties, meaning the concept of a
bona fide
prospective purchaser does not
exist in civil environmental liability in Brazil.
In addition, Federal
Law No. 6,938/81 establishes strict liability for the recovery of environmental damages or, if not possible, compensation or indemnity
for such damages, with joint and several liability established among all those directly or indirectly contributing to environmental
degradation, regardless of the degree of participation in the damage. Each of those involved may be held liable for the full amount
of the damages. Moreover, pursuant to Article 4 of Federal Law 9,605/1998, Brazilian environmental legislation determines that
the corporate veil may be pierced whenever the veil is considered to be an obstacle to recovery for environmental damages. As a
result, the controlling legal entity can be found liable despite a limited liability legal status.
At the administrative
level, environmental liability may be assigned through administrative sanctions imposed by the competent environmental entities,
pursuant to Law No. 9,605/98 which “
rules on the criminal and administrative sanctions deriving from conduct and activities
that are harmful to the environment
” and pursuant to Federal Decree No. 6,514/08. These sanctions may include, among
others: (1) fines of up to R$50 million, tailored to the economic capacity and track record of the offender, in addition to the
severity of the facts and past performance, with the possibility of these fines being imposed at double or triple rates for repeated
offenses; (2) suspension or interdiction of the activities of the respective enterprise; and (3) withdrawal of tax incentives and
benefits. Administrative liability falls on the person engaged in the conduct described as an administrative offense.
Criminal liability
is personal, arising directly from the unlawful conduct of the agent, with the crimes necessarily being specifically addressed
in the law. Brazilian law allows criminal liability to be assigned to individual persons as well as corporate entities. When liability
is assigned to the latter, the individual persons taking the decision that resulted in the criminal conduct (such as directors,
officers, administrators, board members, members of technical entities, auditors, managers, agents or representatives) may also
be penalized to the extent of their culpability.
C. Organizational
Structure
The following chart
shows our organizational structure for our principal subsidiaries, all of them incorporated in Brazil, as of December 31, 2016:
(*) We held 30% of this
entity at December, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
(**) At December 31,
2013 we held 70% of this entity and acquired the 30% remaining in November 21, 2014. At December 31, 2015 and 2016 we held 100%
of this entity.
For more information
on our remaining subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business
Overview—Subsidiaries.” A list of our significant subsidiaries as determined in accordance with Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation
S-X is being filed as Exhibit 8.1 to this annual report.
D. Property
and Equipment
We lease our headquarters
located at Av. Nações Unidas No. 8,501, 19th floor, São Paulo, SP — Brazil. Currently, we lease approximately
3,500 square meters under the Gafisa brand and approximately 8,600 square meters under Tenda brand. We believe our current facilities
are adequate for the full development of our operations.
As of December 31,
2016, our property and equipment recorded on our balance sheet mainly consisted of sales stands, facilities, model apartments,
computer equipment, vehicles and leasehold improvements, among others, the balance of which was R$24.0 million.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
AND PROSPECTS
A. Operating
Results
The financial statements
for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were prepared in accordance with the accounting practices adopted
in Brazil, which comprise the rules of the Brazilian Securities Commission (CVM), and the standards, interpretations and guidelines
of the Accounting Standards Pronouncements Committee (CPC), and are in compliance with the International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) adopted in Brazil, including the Guideline OCPC 04—Application of the Technical Interpretation ICPC 02 to the Brazilian
Real Estate Development Entities—regarding the revenue recognition, and the respective costs and expenses arising
from real estate development
operations over the construction progress (percentage of completion method). The Brazilian GAAP applied by us is not in compliance
with IFRS as issued by IASB.
Following the acquisition,
formation and incorporation of the entities Alphaville, FIT and Bairro Novo in 2007 and following the merger of FIT into Tenda
in 2008, our financial results for 2007 and 2008 included the results of the following segments: Gafisa S.A., Alphaville, Tenda,
FIT (merged with Tenda in October 2008) and Bairro Novo. Further, following Gafisa’s withdrawal from Bairro Novo and the
exchange of all the remaining Tenda shares not held by Gafisa into Gafisa shares, our financial results for 2013, 2012 and 2011
included the results of the following segments” Gafisa S.A., Alphaville and Tenda. On December 9, 2013, we completed the
sale of a majority interest in Alphaville to Private Equity AE Investimentos e Participações (“Fundo AE”),
a company controlled by Pátria Investimentos Ltda. and Blackstone Real Estate Advisor L.P., which was previously announced
on June 7, 2013. All conditions precedent to the completion of the transaction were met, including governmental approval. The transaction
was concluded with a sale of 50% interest by Gafisa and 20% interest by Tenda, with Gafisa retaining the remaining 30% of Alphaville
capital stock. As a result, since November 30, 2013, Alphaville results are no longer consolidated in our financial statements.
In October 2014, Shertis
Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. or “Shertis”, which held a 20% interest in the capital stock of
Alphaville, was merged into Gafisa. As a result and as of the date of this annual report, we hold a direct 30% interest in the
capital stock of Alphaville.
On November 21, 2014,
we acquired the remaining shares of Cipesa Empreendimentos Imobiliários S.A. in the amount of R$6,354. As a result of this
transaction, the Company recorded a net effect of the write-off of goodwill, in the amount of R$17,604.
In December 2016,
following the conclusion of our analysis of certain strategic options, our management decided to sell 50% of Tenda’s total
capital stock, and transfer the remaining 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock to our shareholders in connection with a reduction
in our total capital stock. Accordingly, on December 14, 2016, we entered into an SPA with Jaguar pursuant to which we will sell
Tenda shares representing up to 30% of the total capital stock of Tenda, at a price equal to R$8.13 per share. Pursuant to the
SPA, we will receive cash proceeds totaling R$231.7 million, valuing Tenda’s capital stock at R$539.0 million. The consummation
of the transaction is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent established in the SPA, among others. As of the
date of this annual report, we estimate the transaction will be concluded in May or June 2017.
As a result of this
transaction, the results of operations of Tenda have been presented as discontinued operations under Brazilian GAAP in the Company’s
2016, 2015 and 2014 consolidated statements of operations, and the Company recorded an impairment loss in the amount of R$610.1
million related to the measurement of disposal group held for sale at the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost
to sell, taking into account the price of R$8.13 per share described above.
See “Item 4.
Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Historical Background and Recent Developments.”
Our chief executive officer, who is responsible for allocating resources among these businesses and monitoring their progress,
uses economic present value data, which is derived from a combination of historical operating results and forecasted operating
results, to assess segment information primarily on the basis of different business segments.
Overview
We generate our revenues
mainly from the development and sale of real estate developments. We recognize revenues from the sale of real estate developments
over the course of their construction periods, based on a financial measure of completion and not at the time that the sales agreements
are executed. To a lesser extent, we also generate revenues from real estate services such as construction, technical and real
estate management we render to third parties. We structure some of our projects through either our subsidiaries or jointly-controlled
entities organized as special purpose vehicles.
Brazilian Economic Environment
Our business and results
of operations are significantly affected by changes in the Brazilian economic environment, including changes in employment levels,
population growth, consumer confidence, stability of income levels and availability of financing for land home site acquisitions.
At the end of 2010
and in the beginning of 2011, the Central Bank began implementing more restrictive monetary policies as a precaution against unsustainable
economic growth. In the second half of 2011, with growing uncertainty in economic conditions, due in part to ongoing volatility
in global financial markets, particularly in Europe, the Central Bank began to implement an easing process. As of December 31,
2011, the Central Bank had set the basic interest rate at 11% and the
real
depreciated by 12.6% relative to the U.S. dollar
in 2011. As of December 31, 2011, the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$1.87 per US$1.00. During this period, inflation
according to the INPC was 6.50%.
By the second half
of 2011, the Brazilian economy faced growing uncertainty and economic conditions began to deteriorate, due in part to ongoing volatility
in global financial markets, particularly in Europe. In order to avoid a contraction in economic growth, the Central Bank began
to implement easing measures combining macroeconomic policies and interest rate decreases in order to stimulate demand.
As of December 31,
2012, the Central Bank had set the SELIC rate at 7.25% and the
real
depreciated 8.8% relative to the U.S. dollar in 2012.
As of December 31, 2012, the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.048 per US$1.00. During this period, inflation according
to the IPCA was 5.8%.
As of December 31,
2013, the Central Bank set the SELIC rate at 10% and the
real
depreciated 13.2% relative to the U.S. dollar in 2013. As
of December 31, 2013, the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.3575 per US$1.00. During this period, inflation according
to the IPCA was 5.9%.
As of December 31,
2014, the Central Bank set the SELIC rate at 11.75% and the
real
depreciated 12.7% relative to the U.S. dollar in 2014.
As of December 31, 2014, the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.6550 per US$1.00. During this period, inflation according
to the IPCA was 6.4%.
As of December 31,
2015, the Central Bank set the SELIC rate at 14.25% and the
real
depreciated 47.0% relative to the U.S. dollar in 2015.
As of December 31, 2015, the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.9048 per US$1.00. During this period, inflation according
to the IPCA was 10.7%.
As of December 31,
2016, the Central Bank set the SELIC rate at 13.75% and the
real
appreciated 16.5% relative to the U.S. dollar in 2016.
As of December 31, 2016, the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.2591 per US$1.00. During this period, inflation according
to the IPCA was 6.3%.
The table below shows
the actual growth of the Brazilian GDP, inflation, interest rates and dollar exchange rates for the periods indicated:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(%, unless otherwise stated)
|
Real growth in GDP
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Inflation rate (INPC)(1)
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Inflation rate (IGP—M)(2)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
National Construction Cost Index (INCC)(3)
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
TJLP rate(4)
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
CDI rate(5)
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Appreciation (devaluation) of the
real
vs. US$
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
(47.0
|
)
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
Exchange rate (closing) — US$1.00
|
|
|
R$3.26
|
|
|
|
R$3.90
|
|
|
|
R$2.65
|
|
Exchange rate (average)(6) — US$1.00
|
|
|
R$3.45
|
|
|
|
R$3.39
|
|
|
|
R$2.35
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
INPC: consumer price index measured by the IBGE.
|
|
(2)
|
General Market Price Index (
Índice Geral de Preços-Mercado
) measured by the
FGV.
|
|
(3)
|
National Index of Construction Cost (
Índice Nacional de Custo da Construção
)
measured by the FGV.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents the interest rate used by BNDES for long-term financing (end of period).
|
|
(5)
|
Represents an average of interbank overnight rates in Brazil (accumulated for period-end month,
annualized).
|
|
(6)
|
Average exchange rate for the last day of each month in the period indicated.
|
Brazilian Real Estate Sector
The Brazilian real
estate sector is characterized by cyclical performance influenced by various macroeconomic factors. Demand for housing, the availability
of financing and growth in population and incomes are, among others, factors that influence the performance of the real estate
market.
Since 1994, Brazil’s
ability to control inflation has contributed to the country’s economic recovery (particularly at the lower income level)
and allowed Brazil to assert itself more effectively into the global economic context. For example, during the second half of the
1990s, policies that promoted economic liberalization and privatization of public services facilitated a significant influx of
foreign investment. This environment generated pressure among the Brazilian financial and business communities to encourage responsible
and transparent public management, promoting economic stability. In general, the current and previous presidential administrations
have adopted comparatively austere economic policies, characterized by increased independence of the Central Bank, transparency
and control over public accounts. Another significant effect of Brazil’s heightened international profile and economic stability
was an increase in the competitiveness of various economic sectors, with a notable improvement in standards of corporate administration
and governance. This pattern, along with favorable conditions in the global economy, has contributed to improved economic indicators
in Brazil.
In addition, since
2006, the Brazilian government has enacted incentives in the real estate sector, including the following:
|
·
|
Provisional Measure No. 321 enacted on September 12, 2006, later converted into Law No. 11,434
enacted on December 28, 2006 and amended by Law No. 12,599 enacted on March 23, 2012, gave banks the option to charge fixed interest
rates on mortgages;
|
|
·
|
Law No. 10,820 enacted on December 17, 2003, amended by Law No. 10,953 enacted on September 27,
2004, regulated by Decree No. 5,892 enacted on September 12, 2006, as amended by Decree No. 4,840 enacted on September 17, 2003,
as amended by Law No. 13,097 enacted on January 19, 2015, allowed payroll deductible mortgage loans to employees of both public
and private entities;
|
|
·
|
Decree No. 6,006 enacted on December 28, 2006, replaced by Decree No. 7,660 enacted on December
23, 2011, implemented a 50% tax cut on Tax on Manufactured Products (
Imposto sobre Produtos Industrializados
), or IPI, levied
on the acquisition of important construction products, including certain types of tubes, ceilings, walls, doors, toilets and other
materials. In 2009, other decrees eliminated the IPI levied on the acquisition of similar products, but were implemented for a
limited term only and were set to expire in March 2010, but were extended until December 31, 2012;
|
|
·
|
Provisional Measure No. 459 enacted on March 25, 2009, converted into Law No. 11,977 enacted on
July 7, 2009, amended by Law No. 12,249 enacted on June 11, 2010, Law No. 12,424 enacted on June 16, 2011 and Law No. 12,693 enacted
on July 24, 2012, Law No. 12,722 enacted on October 3, 2012, Law No. 13,043 enacted on November 13, 2014 and Law No. 13,097 enacted
on January 19, 2015 created a public housing program called “
Minha Casa, Minha Vida
,” which calls for government
investment of more than R$30 billion and is focused on building one million houses for families with monthly incomes of up to ten
times the minimum wage. Under this program, the government is authorized to finance families purchasing houses with assessed values
between R$90,000 and R$190,000;
|
|
·
|
Provisional Measure No. 514 enacted on December 1, 2010, converted into Law No. 12,424 enacted
on June 16, 2011 confirmed the extension of “
Minha Casa, Minha Vida
” through 2014, and a total investment of
R$72 billion, more than doubled the R$34 billion allocated to the initial program. The goal of the second phase of the “
Minha
Casa, Minha Vida
” program is to deliver two million homes in four years encompassing an even lower income segment than
previously targeted, but also expanded the current resources available to 40% of the total new amount to be destined to the lower-income
segments;
|
|
·
|
Provisional Measure No. 620 enacted on June 12, 2013, converted into Law No. 12,686 enacted on
October 15, 2013, which released resources for "
Minha Casa Melhor
", in which CEF provides to each beneficiary
of the program "
Minha Casa Minha Vida
" subsidized credit up to R$5,000 for the purchase of furniture and appliances,
with interest rate of 5% per year and repayable in 48 months; and
|
|
·
|
Provisional Measure No. 656 enacted on October 7, 2014, converted into Law No. 13,097 enacted on
January 19, 2015 (“Law No. 13,097”), which establishes mechanisms for protecting purchasers and
|
recipients
of
in rem
rights which enter into legal transactions based on the information contained in the real estate records. In addition,
deals with payroll loans, establishing the concentration of acts in the real estate property registration and creates the LIG.
|
·
|
Normative Instructions No. 30 and No. 31 enacted on December 30, 2015, which establish new interests
rates and loan limit subsidies for the 2nd and 3rd brackets of the “National Individual Loan Program” segment of the
FGTS.
|
As of the date of
this annual report, the Central Bank is carrying out a public hearing in connection with a resolution to regulate the law which
created LIGs, Law No. 13,097 enacted on January 19, 2015.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of
financial statements in accordance with Brazilian GAAP requires management to make judgments, estimates and adopts assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities, as well as the disclosure of contingent liabilities,
at the balance sheet date. Assets and liabilities subject to estimates and assumptions include the useful life of property plant
and equipment, impairment of assets, deferred tax assets, provision for uncertainty tax positions, labor and civil risks, and the
measurement of the estimated cost of ventures and financial instruments. Estimates are used for, among other things, impairment
of non-financial assets, transactions with share-based payment, provisions for tax, labor and civil risks, fair value of financial
instruments, estimated costs of ventures, realization of deferred income tax and other similar provisions. Although we believe
that our judgments and estimates are based on reasonable assumptions that are subject to several risks and uncertainties and are
made in light of information available to us, our actual results may differ from these judgments and estimates.
In this sense, we
set forth below summarized information related to our critical accounting policies. See the note 2.2 to our consolidated financial
statements, included elsewhere in this annual report for further information on these and other accounting policies we adopt.
Impairment of non-financial
assets
We annually review
the carrying amount of assets, with the objective of evaluating events or changes in the economic, operational or technological
circumstances that may indicate a decrease or loss in the recoverable amount of such assets. Should such evidence exist, and the
carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, a provision for impairment loss is recognized in the statement of operations by
adjusting the carrying amount to the recoverable amount. A test for impairment of intangible assets with indefinite useful lives
and goodwill is performed at least annually or when circumstances indicate a decrease in the carrying amount. As of December 31,
2014, the Company has recorded a provision for impairment for land and goodwill related to the acquisition of Cipesa Empreendimentos
Imobiliários S.A. As of December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment loss related to Tenda’s discontinued
operations in the amount of R$610.1 million.
The recoverable amount
of an asset or of a certain cash-generating unit is defined as the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to
sell. When estimating the value in use of an asset, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to present value using a pre-tax
discount rate that reflects the weighted average cost of capital for the industry in which the cash-generating unit operates. Cash
flows are derived from the budget for the following five years, and do not include restructuring activities for which the Company
has not yet committed or future significant investments that will improve the asset basis of the cash-generating unit being tested.
The recoverable amount is sensitive to the discount rate used under the discounted cash flow method, as well as the estimated future
cash inflows and the growth rate used. The fair value less costs to sell is determined, whenever possible, based on a binding sale
agreement in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties, adjusted for expenses attributable to
the sale of the asset, or, in the absence of a binding sale agreement, based on the market price in an active market, or on a recent
transaction with similar assets.
The main assumptions
used in the estimate of value in use are the following: Revenue – revenues were projected between 2017 and 2021 considering
the growth in sales and client base of the different cash-generating units. Operating costs and expenses – costs and expenses
were projected in line with the Company’s historical performance, as well as the historical growth of revenues. The key assumptions
were based on the Company’s historical performance and on reasonable macroeconomic assumptions, and supported by the financial
market projections, documented and approved by the Company’s management.
Properties for sale
Our properties for
sale are stated at construction cost, which cannot exceed its net realizable value. In the case of real estate developments in
progress, the portion in inventory corresponds to the cost incurred for units that have not yet been sold.
The cost of properties
for sale includes expenditures incurred in the acquisition of the land and in construction (including foundation, structure, finishing
and the respective costs of construction materials), costs of own and outsourced labor, and financial costs directly related to
the ventures.
Land is recorded at
acquisition cost. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Operations—Land Acquisition”.
Land can be acquired for cash, in installments, through barter for units that are completed or in construction of other ventures,
or through barter for receivables from future sales of ventures. The cost of land related to bartered units comprises the estimated
sale price in cash, this fair value being recorded as contra-entry to the advances from customers-barter.
The interest on loans
and financing directly related to ventures financed by the National Housing System (SFH) and other credit facilities which funds
are used to finance the construction and acquisition of land are capitalized over the development and construction stage, and recognized
in the statement of operations in the proportion to the units sold.
We have the policy
of annually conducting tests on our landbank, comparing its carrying amount and its recoverable amount, and on the units in construction
and completed units, comparing the unit construction cost with the sale value of units in inventory. The assumptions that usually
underlie the calculation of the recoverable value of assets are based on expected cash flows, and economic viability studies of
real estate ventures that show the recoverability of assets or its market value, all discounted to present value.
The classification
of land into current or non-current assets is carried out by the Management based on the schedule of the real estate venture launches.
Management periodically reviews the estimates of real estate venture launches.
In accordance with
our internal policy, each individual project launched has been internally evaluated taking into consideration the following: (1)
assumptions for market, sales forecast, economics and operating conditions; (2) cash flow analysis using the discounted cash flow
method; (3) approval by an investment committee; and (4) inclusion in the business plan regarding the timetable and backlog for
development releases. This process is part of our corporate governance practices. We update the assumptions on an annual basis
and consider the continuing viability for each project for impairment test purposes.
Transactions with share-based
payment
We measure the cost
of transactions with employees to be settled with shares based on the fair value of equity instruments on the grant date. The estimate
of the fair value of share-based payments requires the determination of the most adequate pricing model to grant equity instruments,
which depends on the grant terms and conditions. It also requires the determination of the most adequate data for the pricing model,
including the expected option life, volatility and dividend income, and the corresponding assumptions.
Provisions for legal
claims
We recognize a provision
for tax, labor and civil claims. The assessment of the probability of a loss includes the evaluation of the available evidence,
the hierarchy of Laws, existing case law, the latest court decisions and their significance in the judicial system, as well as
the opinion of external legal counsel. The provisions are reviewed and adjusted to take into account the changes in circumstances,
such as the applicable expiration term, findings of tax inspections, or additional exposures found based on new court issues or
decisions. The settlement of transactions involving these estimates may result in amounts different from those estimated in view
of the inaccuracies inherent in the process of estimating them. The Company reviews its estimates and assumptions on a monthly
basis.
Taxes on income
Current income tax
and social contribution
Current income tax
is the expected tax payable or receivable to be offset in relation to taxable profit or loss for the year. To calculate the current
income tax and social contribution on net profits, we adopt the regime set forth by Law No. 12,973 enacted on May 13, 2014 and
in force as of January 1, 2015. The new regime is based on the Brazilian accounting standards introduced by Laws No. 16,638/2007
and No. 11,941/2009, from the tax basis of such taxes, thus revoking the Brazilian Transitory Tax Regime, or “RTT.”
Taxes on income in
Brazil comprise income tax (25%) and social contribution on net profits (9%), for entities on the standard profit regime, for which
the composite statutory rate is 34%. Deferred taxes for these entities are recognized as at the balance sheet date for all temporary
tax differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities, and their carrying amounts.
As permitted by tax
legislation, certain subsidiaries opted for the presumed profit regime, a method under which taxable profit is calculated as a
percentage of gross sales. For these companies, income tax is calculated on presumed profits of 8% of gross revenues and social
contribution on presumed profits of 12% on gross revenues, to which income tax and social contribution rates of 25% and 9%, respectively,
are applied.
As permitted by tax
legislation, the development of certain ventures are subject to the “
afetação
” regime, whereby
the land and its features where a real estate will be developed, as well as other binding assets and rights, are separated from
the assets of the developer and comprise the “
patrimônio de afetação
” (detached assets)
of the corresponding development and which real estate units will be delivered to the buyers. In addition, certain subsidiaries
elected the irrevocable option for the Special Taxation Regime (RET), adopting the “patrimônio de afetação”,
according to which the income tax, social contribution on net profits, PIS and COFINS are calculated at 4% on monthly gross revenues
On May 13, 2014, Provisional
Measure No. 627 was converted into Law No. 12,973/14, revoking the RTT and bringing significant changes to Brazilian tax legislation.
The new rules came into effect on January 1, 2015, with an option to adhere to the new rules from January 1, 2014. During 2014,
we analyzed the potential impact of the new rules on our consolidated financial statements and internal control structure. Based
on our analysis, we concluded that the new rules would not have a material impact on how we account for taxes in 2014 and we therefore
opted not to adopt them from January 1, 2014. We have adhered to the new rules since January 1, 2015.
Deferred income
tax and social contribution
Deferred tax is recognized
in relation to tax losses and temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes
and the corresponding amounts used for tax purposes. It is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income
will be available to be used to offset deferred tax assets, based on profit projections made using internal assumptions and considering
future economic scenarios that estimate their full or partial use. The recognized amounts are periodically reviewed and the impacts
of realization or settlement are reflected in compliance with tax legislation provisions. Tax credits on accumulated tax losses
do not have an expiration date, however, they can only be offset against up to 30% of the taxable profit for each year. Companies
that opt for the presumed profit tax regime do not record tax losses and do not have temporary differences, and for this reason,
deferred taxes are not recognized.
To the extent that
the realization of deferred tax assets is not considered to be probable, this amount is not recorded. We record deferred tax on
a net basis, determined by legal entity and same jurisdiction. For entities with cumulative tax losses for the last three years,
the Company and its subsidiaries recognized deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the following assumptions:
|
·
|
100% of deferred tax liabilities on temporary differences;
|
|
·
|
Deferred tax assets on temporary differences that have realization terms similar to deferred tax
liabilities, and relate to the same legal entity, are recorded up to the limit of the deferred tax liabilities; and
|
|
·
|
In situations where recent losses indicate that future taxable income is uncertain, deferred tax
assets are not recognized on deductible temporary differences in excess of deferred tax liabilities recorded on taxable temporary
difference liabilities nor is an asset recognized for the carry forward of unused tax losses.
|
Measurement of deferred
tax asset
Our projections assume
that a significant portion of our business will be conducted in our principal holding companies, and this enables the recovery
of a substantial portion of our accumulated tax losses.
However, several external
factors, beyond our control, may affect such tax calculations, in addition to possible requirements to segregate ventures in their
own development entities (SPEs, for example) to a greater extent than we intend. There is also the possibility that taxation rulings
relating to new ventures or even ventures that have already been developed within the principal holding companies, may require
the exclusion of such businesses and for such businesses to file their own tax returns separate from that of the Company.
A reduction in the
concentration of projects in holding companies with tax losses carried forward may, therefore, compromise the expected recovery
of losses carried forward, which is the reason we partially recognized a deferred income tax asset.
Fair value of financial
instruments
When the fair value
of the financial assets and liabilities presented in the balance sheet cannot be obtained in the active market, it is determined
using valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flow method. The data for such methods is based on those available in
the market, when possible; however, when such data is not available in the market, a certain level of judgment is required to establish
the fair value. This judgment includes considerations on the data used, such as liquidity risk, credit risk, and volatility. Changes
in the assumptions about these factors may affect the presented fair value of financial instruments.
Estimated cost of construction
Total estimated costs,
mainly comprising the incurred and future costs for completing the construction works, were reviewed in the preparation of these
financial statements, and changes to estimates are possible. The percentage of completion, which is the method for revenue recognition,
is measured in view of the incurred cost in relation to the total estimated cost of the respective project.
Development and sale
of real estate
Real estate development
and sales
Revenues, as well
as costs and expenses directly relating to real estate development units sold and not yet finished, are allocated to the statement
of operations over the construction period and the following procedures are adopted:
(a) For
the sales of completed units, revenues are recorded when the sale is completed and the transfer of significant risks and benefits
has occurred, regardless of the receipt from the customer of the contracted amount;
(b) For
the sales of units under construction, the following applies:
|
·
|
The incurred cost, including the cost of land, and other directly related expenditure, that correspond
to the units sold is fully recognized in the consolidated statement of operations;
|
|
·
|
Sales revenues are recognized in profit or loss, using the percentage-of-completion method for
each venture, this percentage being measured in view of the incurred cost in relation to the total estimated cost of the respective
ventures
|
|
·
|
Revenue recognized in excess of actual payments received from customers is recorded as either a
current or non-current asset in “Trade accounts receivable”. Any payment received in connection with the sales of units
that exceeds the amount of revenue recognized is recorded as “Payables for purchase of land and advances from customers”;
|
|
·
|
Interest and inflation-indexation charges on accounts receivable as from the time the units are
delivered, as well as the adjustment to present value of accounts receivable, are recognized in profit or loss on a pro rata basis
using the accruals basis of accounting;
|
|
·
|
The financial charges on accounts payable for acquisition of land and those directly associated
with the financing of construction are recorded in properties for sale and recorded in the incurred cost of finished units until
their completion, and follow the same recognition criteria as for the recognition of the cost of real estate units sold while under
construction;
|
|
·
|
Taxes levied and deferred on the difference between real estate development revenues and the cumulative
revenue subject to tax are calculated and recognized when this difference in revenue is recognized; and
|
|
·
|
Advertising and publicity expenses are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations on
an accrual basis.
|
Construction services
Revenues from real
estate services are recognized as services are rendered and consist primarily of amounts received in connection with construction
management activities for third parties, and technical advisory services, related to developments in the Gafisa segment where we
retain an equity interest.
Barter transactions
Barter transactions
have the objective of receiving land from third parties and are settled with the delivery of real estate units or transfer of portions
of the revenue from the sale of real estate units of ventures. The value of the land acquired is determined based on the fair value,
as a component of inventory of properties for sale, with a corresponding entry to advances from customers’ liabilities. Revenues
and costs incurred from barter transactions are included in profit or loss over the course of construction period of ventures,
as described in item (b).
Allowance for
doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts
We annually review
the assumptions used in establishing an allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts, in view of the revision of historical
data of its current operation and improvement of measurement estimates.
We record an allowance
for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts for customers whose installments are past due and when there is evidence that the
cancelation will occur, based on the annually reviewed assumptions for each segment. For the Gafisa segment, we record an allowance
for doubtful accounts for contracts for customers whose installments are over 360 days past due for completed units, even though
all of our financing plans are guaranteed by a conditional sale of the unit, with the transfer of the full property rights of the
unit to the customer upon the full payment of the outstanding installments. For the Tenda segment, we record an allowance for cancelled
contracts for customers whose financing balance has not yet been received from financial agents and for customers whose installments
are over 90 days past due. This allowance is calculated based on the percentage of the construction work completion, a methodology
adopted for recognizing income for the year and the amounts are considered sufficient by management to cover possible future losses
on accounts receivable.
Disposal group held
for sale and profit or loss from discontinued operations
The Company classifies
a disposal group as held for sale if its carrying value is recovered by the sale transaction. The asset or group of assets held
for sale are available for immediate sale at current market conditions, subject only to applicable customary terms for the sale
of such assets held for sale, resulting in a high sale probability.
For a sale to be highly
probable, management must be committed to the sale of the asset, and must initiate an active search to identify a buyer and complete
the sale. In addition, the asset held for sale shall also be effectively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation
to its current fair value. In addition, the sale must be completed within one year of the classification date, unless events beyond
the control of the Company result in an extension of such period.
The asset held for
sale is measured at the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell. In case the carrying value is higher
than the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in statement of profit or loss for the year. Any reversal or gain will only
be recorded within the limit of the recognized loss. As of December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment loss related to
Tenda’s discontinued operations in the amount of R$610.1 million.
The assets and liabilities
of the group of discontinued assets are shown in single line items in our assets and liabilities. The profit or loss of discontinued
operations is presented as a single amount in the statement of profit or loss, contemplating the total post-tax profit or loss
of such operations less any impairment-related loss.
Launches and Contracted Sales
Launches
The table below presents
detailed information on our launches for the periods presented, including developments launched by our jointly-controlled entities
in partnership with third parties:
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016 (3)
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Launches (in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
2,085
|
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
Number of projects launched
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Number of units launched(1)
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
10,089
|
|
|
|
6,073
|
|
Launched usable area (m2)(2)
|
|
|
148,065
|
|
|
|
428,257
|
|
|
|
326,421
|
|
Percentage of Gafisa investment
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
The units delivered in exchange for land pursuant to barter arrangements are not included.
|
|
(2)
|
One square meter is equal to approximately 10.76 square feet.
|
|
(3)
|
The information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 does not include developments launched
under the Tenda brand, the results of operations of which have been presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements
of operations as of December 31, 2016.
|
In 2016, we launched
under the Gafisa brand 10 residential developments with a total potential sales value of R$920.8 million and 100% of these developments
were located in the state of São Paulo
In 2015, we launched
11 residential developments with a total potential sales value of R$2.1 billion, with Gafisa accounting for 48% of launches and
Tenda for 52% in terms of potential sales value. 20 of the developments we launched were located in the state of São Paulo,
9 developments were located in the state of Rio de Janeiro and the remaining 13 developments were located in Camaçari, Salvador
and Lauro de Freitas, in the state of Bahia, Vespasiano and Belo Horizonte, in the state of Minas Gerais Porto Alegre, in the state
of Rio Grande do Sul and Paulista, Camaragibe and Jaboatão dos Guararapes, in the state of Pernambuco.
In 2014, we launched
23 residential developments with a total potential sales value of R$1.6 billion, with Gafisa accounting for 62.5% of launches and
Tenda for 37.5% in terms of potential sales value. 11 of the developments we launched were located in the state of São Paulo,
6 developments were located in the state of Rio de Janeiro and the remaining 6 developments were located in Camaçari, Salvador
and Lauro de Freitas, in the state of Bahia, Vespasiano, in the state of Minas Gerais and Jaboatão dos Guararapes, in the
state of Pernambuco.
During 2016,
under the Gafisa and Tenda brands, approximately 36.7% of our launches in terms of potential sales value was generated from
launches outside the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. The affordable entry-level business accounted for
approximately 59.3% of our total potential sales value for the year ended December 31, 2016, of which 61.8% was generated
from launches outside the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
During 2015, approximately
24% of our launches in terms of potential sales value was generated from launches outside the states of São Paulo and Rio
de Janeiro. The affordable entry-level business accounted for approximately 52% of our total potential sales value for the year
ended December 31, 2015, of which 45.7% was generated from launches outside the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
During 2014, approximately
16.6% of our launches in terms of potential sales value was generated from launches outside the states of São Paulo and
Rio de Janeiro. The affordable entry-level business accounted for approximately 37.5% of our total sales value for the year ended
December 31, 2014, of which 44.2% was generated from launches outside the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
Gafisa segment
In 2016, Gafisa launches
totaled R$920.8 million, a 8% decrease compared with 2015.
Contracted sales for
the year totaled R$810.5 million, down 11.4% from 2015. Sales of units launched over the year accounted for 54.5%, while sales
of inventories accounted for the remaining 45.5%.
In 2015, Gafisa launches
totaled R$996.3 million, a 2.6% decrease compared with 2014.
Contracted sales for
the year totaled R$914.8 million, up 12.8% from 2014. Sales of units launched over the year accounted for 30.8%, while sales of
inventories accounted for the remaining 69.2%.
In 2014, Gafisa launches
totaled R$1.0 billion, a 6% decrease compared with 2013.
Contracted sales for
the year totaled R$811 million, down 16% from 2013. Sales of units launched over the year accounted for 42.2%, while sales of inventories
accounted for the remaining 57.8%.
In 2016, Gafisa delivered
16 ventures/stages and 3,747 units, accounting for R$1.7 billion in Potential Sales Volume.
The market value of
Gafisa segment inventories reached R$1.76 billion at the end of 2016, compared to R$2.0 billion at the end of 2015 and R$2.3 billion
at the end of 2014.
Tenda segment
In 2016, Tenda launches
totaled R$1.3 billion, representing a 23% increase when compared to R$1.1 billion in 2015. Contracted sales for the year 2016 totaled
R$1.1 billion, a 12.4% increase compared with 2015. Sales of units launched over the year 2016 accounted for 48.9%, while sales
of inventories accounted for the remaining 51.1%.
Cancellation levels
increased in 2016 mainly due to a revision of its unilateral dissolution process for sales not transferred after a period of three
months. Out of R$1.3 billion in property launches in 2016, we recorded sales of R$1.1 billion in which financing has already been
obtained by the end purchaser.
Out of R$1.0 billion
in property launches during 2015, we recorded sales of R$889 million in which financing has already been obtained by the end purchaser.
Out of R$613.3 million in property launches during 2014, we recorded sales of R$176.8 million in which financing had already been
obtained and reached a total amount of R$396.0 million in net sales.
In 2016, the Tenda
segment delivered 34 ventures/stages, and 6,838 units accounting for R$973.3 million in Potential Sales Value.
The market value of
Tenda inventories was R$1.1 billion at the end of 2016, compared to R$899.8 million at the end of 2015 and R$828.7 million at the
end of 2014.
Contracted sales
The following table
shows the composition of our contracted sales by the type of development, according to units sold during the same year that they
were launched and the units sold in the years after they were launched, as well as their respective percentages in relation to
total sales for the periods presented:
|
|
As
of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
(2)
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Type of development
|
|
(in millions of
reais
,
unless otherwise stated)
|
Luxury buildings
|
|
|
107.8
|
|
|
|
212.7
|
|
|
|
108.8
|
|
Middle-income buildings
|
|
|
704.3
|
|
|
|
676.5
|
|
|
|
650.0
|
|
Affordable entry-level housing
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
1,034.1
|
|
|
|
396.0
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
(28.7
|
)
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
Total contracted sales (1)
|
|
|
810.5
|
|
|
|
1,930.9
|
|
|
|
1,207.0
|
|
Sale of units launched in the year
|
|
|
441.9
|
|
|
|
789.6
|
|
|
|
519.2
|
|
Percentage of total contracted sales
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Sale of units launched during prior years
|
|
|
368.5
|
|
|
|
1,141.3
|
|
|
|
687.8
|
|
Percentage of total contracted sales
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Amount net of sales cancellation.
|
|
(2)
|
The information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 does not include developments launched
under the Tenda brand, the results of operations of which have been presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements
of operations as of December 31, 2016.
|
The following table
shows our and our main subsidiaries’ contracted sales for the periods presented:
|
|
As
of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Contracted sales (1)
|
|
(
in millions of reais
, unless otherwise stated)
|
Gafisa
|
|
|
810.5
|
|
|
|
914.8
|
|
|
|
811.0
|
|
Tenda
|
|
|
1,141.9
|
|
|
|
1,016.1
|
|
|
|
396.0
|
|
Total contracted sales
|
|
|
1,952.4
|
|
|
|
1,930.9
|
|
|
|
1,207.0
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Amount net of sales cancellation.
|
In 2016, we sold 44%
of the launched units, which combined with the sales of units launched during prior periods, resulted in total contracted sales
of R$810.5 million under the Gafisa brand, a decrease of approximately 11% compared to 2015.
In 2015, we sold 40.9%
of the launched units, which combined with the sales of units launched during prior periods, resulted in total contracted sales
of R$1,930.9 million, an increase of approximately 60% compared to 2014.
In 2014, we sold 42.2%
of the launched units, which combined with the sales of units launched during prior periods, resulted in total contracted sales
of R$1,207.0 million, a decrease of approximately 16.9% compared to 2013, net of discontinued operations.
In 2016, we sold 41.6%
of the units launched during that year through our Tenda brand, which together with the sales of units launched during prior periods,
resulted in total contracted sales of R$1,141.9 million. In 2015, we sold 50.0% of the units launched during that year through
our Tenda brand, which together with the sales of units launched during prior periods, resulted in total contracted sales of R$1,016.1
million. In 2014, we sold 29.6% of units launched during that year through our Tenda brand, which together with the sales of units
launched during prior periods, resulted in total contracted sales of R$396.0 million.
Our sales contracts
are irrevocable under Brazilian law, which means a customer does not have a unilateral ability to terminate a contract once it
is executed, or require a refund of amounts previously unpaid unless we agree. To the extent that a customer is not in compliance
with its obligations under a contract, we have the option to either force compliance through the Brazilian courts, or agree to
“default” by the customer. Should we agree to such default, the customer is then charged penalties as defined in the
contracts with any remaining amounts remitted to the customer. Penalties charged by Tenda have historically been 20% of amounts
paid, while penalties charged by Gafisa have historically been significantly higher (average about 40% of amounts paid).
We provide a limited
amount of post-construction client financing, although this financing is not available to Tenda clients. Our default rate was 12.4%,
11.8% and 7.4% as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The table below shows
the penalties charged to customers that have defaulted and had their contracts cancelled for the periods presented:
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
Gafisa
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
Tenda
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
The following table
sets forth our contracted sales expected to be recognized, as well as the amount corresponding to the expected cost of units sold,
and the expected margin, all of them to be recognized in future periods, for the periods presented:
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016 (4)
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(
in millions of reais
, unless otherwise stated)
|
Sales to be recognized
|
|
|
525.2
|
|
|
|
793.0
|
|
|
|
1,064.0
|
|
Net sales to be recognized(1)
|
|
|
506.0
|
|
|
|
764.0
|
|
|
|
1,025.2
|
|
Cost of units sold to be recognized(2)
|
|
|
(315.1
|
)
|
|
|
(453.9
|
)
|
|
|
(628.8
|
)
|
Expected gross margin—yet to be recognized(3)
|
|
|
190.9
|
|
|
|
310.1
|
|
|
|
396.4
|
|
Expected margin percentage
|
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
|
|
40.6
|
%
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Excludes indirect PIS and COFINS taxes of 3.65%. This information includes ventures that are subject
to restriction due to a contractual clause, which defines the legal period of 180 days in which the Company can cancel a development.
|
|
(2)
|
The estimated gross profit shown does not consider the tax effects or the present value adjustment,
and the costs of lands, financial charges and guarantees, which will be carried out to the extent they are realized.
|
|
(3)
|
Based on management’s estimates.
|
(4) This
amount relates to the Gafisa segment only, since Tenda’s results of operations have been presented as discontinued operations
in our consolidated statements of operations as of December 31, 2016.
Gross Operating Revenues
Our revenues are derived
mainly from the development and sale of real estate and, to a much lesser extent, the rendering of construction services to third
parties on certain developments in the Gafisa segment where we retain an equity interest.
Real estate development
and sales
Real estate development
revenues, including inflation adjustments and interest from credit sales, comprise revenues from the sales of units in the residential
buildings we develop, and to a lesser extent, the sales of lots and commercial buildings.
Construction services
rendered
Our revenues generated
by real estate services consist substantially of amounts received in connection with construction management activities for third
parties, technical management and real estate management, related to developments in the Gafisa segment where we retain an equity
interest. As of December 31, 2016, 0.9% of our net operating revenues were derived from constructions services rendered.
Operating Costs
Our operating costs
consist of real estate development costs and, to a lesser extent, costs of services rendered.
Real estate development
costs
Real estate development
costs consist of costs of land, construction (which includes costs for a broad variety of raw materials and labor), capitalized
interest (financial costs) from project specific financing, projects, foundations, structuring and furnishing, as well as costs
for outsourced labor. The items making up our costs, as a percentage of our total cost in the Gafisa segment, were as set forth
for the periods presented
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016 (1)
|
|
2015 (1)
|
|
2014 (1)
|
Land
|
|
|
39.06
|
%
|
|
|
21.22
|
%
|
|
|
20.31
|
%
|
Construction costs
|
|
|
41.59
|
%
|
|
|
59.70
|
%
|
|
|
62.33
|
%
|
Financial costs
|
|
|
15.24
|
%
|
|
|
14.24
|
%
|
|
|
12.39
|
%
|
Development costs
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
|
|
4.84
|
%
|
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Percentages retroactively adjusted to reflect the Gafisa segment only, given the results of operations
of Tenda have been presented as discontinued operations under Brazilian GAAP in the Company’s 2016, 2015 and 2014 consolidated
statements of operations.
|
One of our principal
real estate development costs is the cost of land. Over the last five years, land represented, on average, 25.6% of our total cost
of development. However, this is an extremely volatile component, varying according to characteristics of the land, the region
where the land is located, the type of development to be launched and market conditions. Land can be acquired for cash, through
the exchange of units once the building is constructed, through financial swaps (whereby a portion of sales is given to the owner
of land as a form of financing for the land), or through a combination of the three options.
No single raw material
alone represents a significant portion of our total costs of development, but over the last five fiscal years, raw materials represented,
on average, 35% of our total cost of development. The index that measures construction cost variation, the INCC, increased by 6.1%,
7.5% and 7.0% in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Although some of the principal raw materials, such as steel, have experienced
significant price increases well above the level of inflation over the last four years, we have reduced our raw materials costs
by developing and using new construction techniques and materials.
Over the last five
years, we have incurred most of our construction costs from the 1st to the 18th month of construction of a development, as shown
in the table below:
Period
of construction
|
Percentage
of costs incurred(1)
|
1st to 6th month
|
18%
|
7th to 12th month
|
26%
|
13th to 18th month
|
31%
|
19th to 24th month
|
18%
|
25th to 30th month
|
7%
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Including cost of land.
|
Real estate services
Our costs of real
estate services consist of direct and indirect labor fees and outsourced services.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses
include selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization expenses and revenues and revaluation of investment
in affiliates.
Selling expenses
Selling expenses include
advertising, promotion, brokerage fees and similar expenses.
General and administrative
expenses
General and administrative
expenses principally include the following:
|
·
|
employee compensation and related expenses;
|
|
·
|
fees for outsourced services, such as legal, auditing, consulting and others;
|
|
·
|
management fees and expenses;
|
|
·
|
stock option plan expenses;
|
|
·
|
overhead corporate expenses;
|
|
·
|
expenses related to legal claims and commitments; and
|
|
·
|
legal expenses related to public notaries and commercial registers, among others.
|
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation expenses
consist of depreciation of our property and equipment.
Financial Income and Expenses
Financial income includes
income from financial investments. Interest revenues are recognized on an accrual basis. Financial expenses generally consist of
interest payable on loans, financings and debentures and are also recognized on an accruals basis.
Taxes on Income
In general, taxes
on income in Brazil consist of federal income tax (25%) and social contribution on net profits (9%), for a composite statutory
tax rate of 34%. We calculate income tax and social contribution in accordance with the “taxable profit” regime. Our
subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities, however, with annual billings lower than a specified threshold, may calculate their
respective income and social contribution taxes through either this “taxable profit” regime or through the “presumed
profit” regime, depending on our strategic tax planning. For the companies that opt for the “presumed profit”
regime, the income tax basis is calculated as 8% of gross revenues and the social contribution basis is calculated as 12% of gross
revenues, to which income tax and social contribution rates of 25% and 9%, respectively, are applied.
As permitted by tax
legislation, the development of certain ventures are subject to the “afetação” regime, whereby the land
and its features where real estate will be developed, as well as other binding assets and rights, are separated from the assets
of the developer and comprise the “patrimônio de afetação” (detached assets) of the corresponding
development and whose real estate units will be delivered to the buyers. In addition, certain subsidiaries made the irrevocable
option for the Special Taxation Regime (RET), adopting the “patrimônio de afetação”, according
to which the income tax, social contribution on net profits, PIS and COFINS are calculated at 4% monthly on gross revenues.
Net loss from discontinued operations
The net loss from
discontinued operations represents the results of operations of Tenda for the year ended December 31, 2016, as well as the results
of operations for this entity for the comparative periods. This line item also contains the impairment loss related to the the
measurement of disposal group held for sale at the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell.
The income (loss)
of discontinued operations is presented as a single amount in statement of operations, which includes the total after-tax-income
of these operations, less any impairment-related loss.
Results of Operations
The following discussion
of our results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP. References
to increases or decreases in any given period relate to the corresponding preceding period, unless otherwise indicated.
As explained in Notes
2.3 and 8.2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, the results of operations of Tenda have
been presented as discontinued operations under Brazilian GAAP in the Company’s 2016, 2015 and 2014 consolidated statements
of operations.
As required by CPC
31 – Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations and for comparability purposes, the table below sets forth
the line items in our statements of profit or loss for the specified periods that have been adjusted to reflect Tenda as discontinued
operations:
For
Year ended December 31,
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
Balances originally reported as of 12/31/2015
|
|
Impact of discontinued operations
|
|
Balances restated
|
|
Balances originally reported as of 12/31/2014
|
|
Impact of discontinued operations
|
|
Balances restated
|
Statement of profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
2,294,319
|
|
|
|
(850,962
|
)
|
|
|
1,443,357
|
|
|
|
2,150,998
|
|
|
|
(570,138
|
)
|
|
|
1,580,861
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,667,505
|
)
|
|
|
605,584
|
|
|
|
(1,061,921
|
)
|
|
|
(1,609,246
|
)
|
|
|
444,249
|
|
|
|
(1,164,997
|
)
|
Operating (expenses) income
|
|
|
(552,294
|
)
|
|
|
216,684
|
|
|
|
(335,610
|
)
|
|
|
(580,547
|
)
|
|
|
217,932
|
|
|
|
(362,616
|
)
|
Income from equity method investments
|
|
|
41,766
|
|
|
|
(1,751
|
)
|
|
|
40,015
|
|
|
|
19,263
|
|
|
|
19,142
|
|
|
|
38,405
|
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
(38,127
|
)
|
|
|
(12,295
|
)
|
|
|
(50,422
|
)
|
|
|
(8,918
|
)
|
|
|
(7,332
|
)
|
|
|
(16,250
|
)
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(7,180
|
)
|
|
|
6,522
|
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(15,275
|
)
|
|
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
(8,949
|
)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
Profit or loss of discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Net operating revenue
Net operating revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2016, recognized by the Percentage of Completion (“PoC”) method, was R$915.7 million,
a decrease of 36.6% from R$1,443.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, due to (i) the lower volume of Gafisa launches,
(ii) a decrease in the sales speed for our inventory, (iii) an increase in dissolutions (cancellations of sales), and (iv) the
challenging macroeconomic conditions in Brazil and their adverse impact on the price of our units.
The gross revenue
generated from the sale of property and barter transactions, net of the cancellation provision (reversal) totaled R$983.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of R$578.1 million or 37.0% compared with the same period in 2015 of R$1,561.8
million. The tax deductions from gross revenue reached R$68.0 million in 2016 from R$118.5 million in 2015, representing a decrease
of 42.6%, which was mainly impacted by the lower launch volumes in Gafisa.
In addition, due to
the continuing deterioration of economic conditions in Brazil during 2016, the Company continued to take a more conservative and
selective approach with respect to the development and launch of products, focusing mainly on the middle to high income segment,
in order to prioritize stable levels of profitability.
During 2016, inflation
as measured by the INCC, the main Brazilian indicator for civil construction costs, was 6.1%. This resulted in an increase in our
construction costs and consequently, the prices of our units for some projects, notably those launched in 2015 and 2016 and expected
to be delivered in 2018. This increase was offset by (i) monthly increases in the sale prices of our inventory units, and (ii)
monthly upward adjustments of outstanding balances on our units sold, in order to reflect inflationary increases.
Operating costs
Operating costs in
2016 totaled R$1,029.2 million, a 3.1% decrease compared to R$1,061.9 million in 2015, as a result of a decrease in sales in the
Gafisa segment, due to a lower level of launches in 2016. Cost related to construction is the main component of operating cost,
totaling R$428.1 million, equivalent to 41.6% of the original total cost base of projects. Operating costs, as a percentage of
net operating revenue, increased from 73.6% in 2015 to 112.4% in 2016, mainly due to (i) an increase in customer defaults, and
(ii) a reduction to net realizable value we recorded in our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016,
in the amount of R$159.9 million related to downward pricing adjustments to inventory and landbank at market value.
Gross profit
Gross result in 2016
totaled negative R$113.5 million, representing a decrease from positive R$381.4 million in 2015. This decrease was mainly due to
the effects of the deterioration of macroeconomic conditions in Brazil during 2016, resulting in a lower volume of launches in
the Gafisa segment, and also non-recurring effects related to impairment adjustments in our inventory and landbank in the amount
of R$159.9 million.
In 2016, the gross
margin generated from our activities decreased to negative 12.4% as compared to positive 26.4% in 2015. This decrease was due to
(i) an increase in dissolutions (cancellations of sales), and (ii) the challenging macroeconomic conditions in Brazil and their
adverse impact on the price of our units.
Selling expenses
Selling expenses in
2016 totaled R$94.9 million, representing a decrease of 3.1% as compared to R$97.9 million in 2015, mainly due to the lower volume
of sales in 2016. Selling expenses in 2016 represented 10.4% of our net operating revenue compared to 6.8% in 2015.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative
expenses were R$106.6 million in 2016, a 9.4% increase from the R$97.4 million recorded in 2015. This increase was mainly due to:
(i) an increase in our payroll expense totaling R$2.7 million, attributable to severance payments and indemnity expenses related
to our corporate restructuring at the end of 2016; (ii) a non-recurring expense totaling R$2.9 million, related to the separation
of the information technology infrastructures of Gafisa and Tenda, and (iii) the net effect of the reversal of a profit sharing
provision recorded in 2015 totaling R$9.3 million.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization
in 2016, which is mainly related to sales stands, was R$33.9 million, an increase of R$1.3 million when compared to the R$32.6
million recorded in 2015. This variation was mainly due to the mix of projects for our sales stands related to our luxury and middle
income residential buildings. In 2016 we launched 10 developments compared to 12 developments launched in 2015.
Financial income and expenses, net
Net financial expenses
totaled R$25.7 million in 2016, compared to net financial expenses of R$50.4 million in 2015. The difference is mainly due to a
reduction of our total indebtedness during the period and a reduction in cash and cash equivalents during the period.
Taxes on income
Income, social contribution
and deferred taxes for 2016 amounted to R$100.1 million, compared to R$0.7 million in 2015. This increase in the expense was mainly
due to a reversal of a portion of previously recognized deferred tax assets in the amount of R$90.3 million, as a result of the
loss for year, mainly related to (i) the impact of the discontinued operations of Tenda on our net income for the period, and (ii)
the impairment loss we recorded in the amount of R$610.1 million related to the measurement of disposal group held for sale at
the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell, in connection with the sale of Tenda shares representing
up to 30% of Tenda’s total capital stock pursuant to the SPA we entered into with Jaguar on December 14, 2016.
Net income (loss) from discontinued
operations
Our net income (loss)
from discontinued operations was a net loss of R$559.7 million in 2016, compared to a net income of R$36.2 million in 2015. This
variation was due to the impairment loss we recorded in the amount of R$610.1 million related to the measurement of disposal group
held for sale at the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell.
Net income attributable to non-controlling
interest
Net income attributable
to non-controlling interests increased from a loss of R$3.5 million in 2015 to a net income of R$1.9 million in 2016, due to the
overall positive financial results of our subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Net income (loss) attributable to
owners of Gafisa
Net income (loss)
attributable to owners of Gafisa was a loss of R$1,163.6 million in 2016, compared to a net income of R$74.4 million in 2015. This
variation was mainly due to the effects generated by the SPA entered into with Jaguar, which totaled R$680.2 million, and were
comprised of: (i) the impairment loss we recorded in the amount of R$610.1 million related to the measurement of disposal group
held for sale at the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell, in connection with the sale of Tenda shares
representing up to 30% of Tenda’s total capital stock pursuant to the SPA we entered into with Jaguar on December 14, 2016,
(ii) the reversal of a portion previously recognized deferred tax assets in the amount of R$90.3 million, as a result of the impact
of the discontinued operations of Tenda on our net income for the period, and (iii) downward pricing adjustments to inventory and
landbank at market value totaling R$159.9 million.
Results of Operations
for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Net operating revenue
Net operating revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2015, recognized by the PoC method, was R$1.44 billion, a decrease of 8.7% from R$1.58 billion
for the year ended December 31, 2014. This decrease was mainly due to a decrease in Gafisa segment sales as a result of the lower
volume of Gafisa launches during 2015. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in revenues from certain new projects.
The gross revenue
generated from the sale of property and barter transactions, net of the cancellation provision (reversal) totaled R$1.56 billion
for the year ended December 31, 2015, an decrease of R$144.0 million or 8.4% compared with the same period in 2014 of R$1.71 billion.
The tax deductions from gross revenue reached R$118.5 million in 2015 from R$125.0 million in 2014, representing a decrease of
5.2%, which was mainly impacted by lower launch volumes in Gafisa.
In addition, due to
the continuing deterioration of economic conditions in Brazil during 2015, the Company continued to take a more conservative and
selective approach with respect to the development and launch of products, focusing mainly on the middle to high income segment,
in order to prioritize stable levels of profitability.
During 2015, inflation
as measured by the INCC, the main Brazilian indicator for civil construction costs, was 7.49%. This resulted in an increase in
our construction costs and consequently, the prices of our units. This increase was offset by (i) monthly increases in the sale
prices of our inventory units, and (ii) monthly upward adjustments of outstanding balances on our units sold, in order to reflect
inflationary increases.
Operating costs
Operating costs in
2015 totaled R$1.06 billion, a 8.8% decrease compared to R$1.16 billion in 2014, mainly due to a decrease in construction costs
and the lower volume of Gafisa launches over the past three years. Cost related to construction is the main component of operating
cost, totaling R$634.0 million, equivalent to 59.7% of the original total cost base of projects. Operating costs, as a percentage
of net operating revenue, remained stable at 73.6%.
Gross profit
Gross profit in 2015
totaled R$381.4 million, representing a decrease of 8.3%, from R$415.9 million in 2014. The decrease was mainly due to (i) the
lower volume of Gafisa launches, (ii) an increase in dissolutions (cancellations of sales), and (iii) the challenging macroeconomic
conditions in Brazil and their adverse impact on the price of our units.
In 2015, gross margin
generated from our activities was 26.4%, as compared to 26.3% in 2014.
Selling expenses
Selling expenses in
2015 totaled R$97.9 million, representing an increase of 2.9% as compared to R$95.1 million in 2014, mainly due to an increase
in marketing expenses. Selling expenses in 2015 represented 6.8% of our net operating revenue compared to 6.0% in 2014.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative
expenses were R$97.4 million in 2015, a 21.9% decrease from the R$124.8 million recorded in 2014, reflecting our strategy of realigning
costs to the challenging macroeconomic scenario in Brazil and mainly due to a decrease in expenses attributable to our legacy projects.
Our payroll expenses decreased R$5.3 million, or 6.6%, in 2015 as compared to 2014. Expenses related to provisions and profit sharing
decreased R$9.5 million, or 27.1%, in 2015 as compared to 2014, totaling R$25.5 million in 2015. Services expenses decreased R$6.2
million, or 20.3%, in 2015 as compared to 2014.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization
in 2015 was R$32.6 million, a decrease of R$31.0 million when compared to the R$63.6 million recorded in 2014, mainly due to the
lower level of Gafisa launches in 2015 and to a non-recurring goodwill impairment of R$14.5 million recorded in 2014 as a result
of the incorporation of a subsidiary.
Financial income and expenses, net
Net financial expenses
totaled R$50.4 million in 2015, compared to net financial expenses of R$16.3 million in 2014. The difference is mainly due to a
decrease in financial revenues of 21.2% and higher average interest rates for loans and financings during the period.
Taxes on income
Income, social contribution
and deferred taxes for 2015 amounted to R$0.7 million, compared to R$8.9 million in 2014. The variation is mainly due to the recognition
of income tax and social contribution credits totaling approximately R$7.2 million, as a result of an update of the study of Gafisa’s
business plan, which shows the total recovery capacity of the tax loss inventory and temporary differences over the upcoming years.
Net income (loss) from discontinued
operations
Net income (loss)
from discontinued operations was a net income of R$36.2 million in 2015, compared to a loss of R$110.2 million in 2014. This variation
was due the higher level of launches under Tenda’s new business model implemented in 2013, which contain higher margins than
legacy projects.
Net income attributable to non-controlling
interest
Net income attributable
to non-controlling interests increased to a loss of R$3.5 million in 2015 from a loss of R$1.2 million in 2014, due to the overall
negative financial results of our subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Net income attributable to owners
of Gafisa
Net
income attributable to owners of Gafisa increased to R$74.4 million in 2015, compared to a net loss of R$42.5 million in 2014.
This increase is mainly due to (i) the further consolidation of the Gafisa segment’s production cycle and (ii) the higher
level of launches under Tenda’s new business model implemented in 2013, which contain higher margins than legacy projects.
Business Segments
See “Item 4.
Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Historical Background and Recent Developments.”
Our chief executive officer, who is responsible for allocating resources among these businesses and monitoring their progress,
uses data derived from a combination of historical operating results and forecasted operating results, to assess segment information
primarily on the basis of different business segments.
We provide below a
measure of historical results, selected segment assets and other related information for each reporting segment. The information
below is derived from our statutory accounting records which are maintained in accordance with Brazilian GAAP. No individual customer
represented more than 10% of our net operating revenue.
|
|
For Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Gafisa
|
|
Tenda
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(millions of
reais
except for percentages)
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
915.7
|
|
|
|
1,052.7
|
|
|
|
1,968.4
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,029.2
|
)
|
|
|
(729.7
|
)
|
|
|
1,758.9
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
(113.5
|
)
|
|
|
323.0
|
|
|
|
209.5
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)%
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
Net (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(602.0
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(602.0
|
)
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(610.1
|
)
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
(559.7
|
)
|
|
|
For Year Ended December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Gafisa
|
|
Tenda
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(millions of
reais
except for percentages)
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
1,443.3
|
|
|
|
851.0
|
|
|
|
2,294.3
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,061.9
|
)
|
|
|
(605.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.667,5
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
381.4
|
|
|
|
245.4
|
|
|
|
626.8
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
For Year Ended December 31, 2014
|
|
|
Gafisa
|
|
Tenda
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(millions of
reais
except for percentages)
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
1,580.9
|
|
|
|
570.1
|
|
|
|
2,151.0
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,165.0
|
)
|
|
|
(444.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,609.2
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
415.9
|
|
|
|
125.9
|
|
|
|
541.8
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
Net (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(110.2
|
)
|
|
|
(110.2
|
)
|
Gafisa Segment
Years Ended December 31, 2016
and 2015
Net operating revenue
On a consolidated
basis, net operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016, recognized by the Percentage of Completion (“PoC”)
method, was R$915.7 million, a decrease of 36.6% from R$1,443.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, as a result of (i)
the lower volume of Gafisa launches, (ii) a decrease in the sales speed for our inventory, (iii) an increase in dissolutions (cancellations
of sales), and (iv) the challenging macroeconomic conditions in Brazil and their adverse impact on the price of our units.
Operating costs
Operating costs in
2016 totaled R$1,029.2 million, a 3.1% decrease compared to R$1,061.9 million in 2015, as a result of a decrease in sales in the
Gafisa segment, due to a lower level of launches in 2016.
Gross profit
Gross result in 2016
totaled negative R$113.5 million, representing a decrease from positive R$381.4 million in 2015. This decrease was mainly due to
the effects of the deterioration of macroeconomic conditions in Brazil during 2016, resulting in a lower volume of launches in
the Gafisa segment and non-recurring effects related to impairment adjustments in our inventory and landbank in the amount
of R$159.9 million.
In 2016, the gross
margin generated from our activities decreased to negative 12.4% as compared to positive 26.4% in 2015. This decrease was due to
(i) an increase in dissolutions (sales cancellations), and (ii) the challenging macroeconomic conditions in Brazil and their adverse
impact on the price of our units.
Net income (loss) from discontinued
operations
Our net income (loss)
from discontinued operations was a net loss of R$559.7 million in 2016, compared to a net income of R$36.2 million in 2015. This
variation was due to the impairment loss we recorded in the amount of R$610.1 million related to the measurement of disposal group
held for sale at the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell, in connection with the sale of Tenda shares
representing up to 30% of Tenda’s total capital stock pursuant to the SPA we entered into with Jaguar on December 14, 2016.
Net income (loss) attributable to
owners of Gafisa
Net income (loss)
attributable to owners of Gafisa was a loss of R$1,163.6 million in 2016, compared to a net income of R$74.4 million in 2015. This
variation was mainly due to the effects generated by the SPA entered into with Jaguar, which totaled R$680.2 million, and were
comprised of: (i) the impairment loss we recorded in the amount of R$610.1 million related to the measurement of disposal group
held for sale at the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell, in connection with the sale of Tenda shares
representing up to 30% of
Tenda’s total
capital stock pursuant to the SPA we entered into with Jaguar on December 14, 2016, (ii) a reversal of tax credits in the amount
of R$90.3 million, which was originally recorded in 2013, resulting from the impact of the discontinued operations of Tenda on
our net income for the period, and (iii) downward pricing adjustments to inventory and landbank at market value totaling R$159.9
million.
Tenda Segment
Years Ended December 31, 2016
and 2015
Net operating revenue
Net operating revenue
of sales and/or services during 2016 totaled R$1,052.7 million, compared to R$851.0 million in 2015, an increase of 23.7%. This
increase was mainly due to (i) an increase in sales under the Tenda segment, as a result of the higher level of launches under
Tenda’s new business model implemented in 2013, (ii) an increase in the recognition of revenues from Tenda projects starting
in 2013, and (iii) better performance on construction projects.
Operating costs
The costs of development
and sale of property and barter transactions in 2016 totaled R$729.7 million, compared to R$605.6 million in 2015. This increase
was mainly due to the higher volume of projects launched under Tenda’s new business model since 2013.
Gross profit
Gross profit in 2016
was R$323.0 million, compared to R$245.4 million in 2015. Gross margins increased from to 30.7% in 2016 from 28.8% in 2015, impacted
by the replacement of Tenda’s legacy projects by projects launched pursuant to Tenda’s new business model, the profit
margins of which are higher.
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations
Net income for the
Tenda segment was R$50.4 million in 2016, compared to a net income of R$36.2 million in 2015. This increase in net income is a
result of (i) the higher volume of projects launched under Tenda’s new business model during 2016, the profit margins of
which are higher than those of our legacy projects, and (ii) the decrease in our cost structure.
Gafisa Segment
Years Ended December 31, 2015
and 2014
Net operating revenue
Net operating revenue
for the Gafisa segment was R$1,443.3 million in 2015 compared to the net operating revenue of R$1,580.9 million in 2014, which
represents a decrease of 8.7%. This decrease was mainly due to the mix of sales in the period, which was more concentrated in projects
launched in 2014 and the reduction in the level of launches in Gafisa in 2015.
Operating costs
The costs of development
and sale and barter transactions in 2015 totaled R$1.1billion, a decrease of 8.8% compared with the R$1.2 billion reported in 2014.
This decrease was mainly due to the lower volume of projects under construction.
Gross profit
The gross profit in
2015 was R$381.4 million, representing a decrease of 8.3% compared with the R$415.9 million reported in 2014, in line with the
decrease in net operating revenues. The gross margin in 2015 generated by our projects sales increased to 26.4% compared to 26.3%
in the same period of 2014. This increase was primarily due to the lower volume of projects under construction and the mix of sales
in 2015, which was more concentrated in projects recently launched and with higher profit margins.
Net income from continuing operations
Net income for the
Gafisa segment was R$34.8 million in 2015, compared to a net income of R$66.5 million in 2014. The decrease in net income is primarily
a result of the following: (i) lower level of revenues; (ii) higher expenses related to contingencies; and (iii) negative impact
of net financial income in 2015 when compared to 2014. Net income from continuing operations as a percentage of net operating revenues
was positive 3.0% in 2015 as compared to positive 4.2% in 2014.
Tenda Segment
Years Ended December 31, 2015
and 2014
Net operating revenue
Net operating revenue
of sales and/or services during 2015 totaled R$851.0 million, compared to R$570.1 million in 2014, an increase of 49.3%. In 2015,
Construtora Tenda S.A accounted for 37% of the consolidated net operating revenue. This increase was mainly due to an increase
in sales under the Tenda segment, as a result of the higher level of launches under Tenda’s new business model implemented
in 2013.
Operating costs
The costs of development
and sale of property and barter transactions in 2015 totaled R$605.6 million, compared to R$444.2 million in 2014. This increase
was mainly due to the higher volume of projects launched under Tenda’s new business model since 2013.
Gross profit
Gross profit in 2015
was R$245.4 million, compared to R$125.9 million in 2014. Gross margins increased to 28.8% in 2015 from 22.1% in 2014, impacted
by the replacement of Tenda’s legacy projects by projects launched pursuant to Tenda’s new business model, the profit
margins of which are higher.
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations
Net income for the
Tenda segment was R$36.2 million in 2015, compared to a net loss of R$110.2 million in 2014. This increase in net income is a result
of the higher volume of projects launched under Tenda’s new business model during 2015.
B. Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our transactions are
financed mainly through the contracting of real estate financing and securitization of receivables. When necessary and in accordance
with market demands, we carry out long-term financing for the sale of our developments. In order to turn over our capital and accelerate
its return, we try to transfer to banks and sell to the market the receivables portfolio of our units.
In 2016, we carried
out the following receivables sales with recourse:
On March 4, 2016,
Gafisa and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$36.4 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, for R$27.3 million.
On May 20, 2016, Gafisa
and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$23.0 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, for R$17.5 million.
On August 31, 2016,
Gafisa and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$21.4 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, for R$14.9 million.
On December 22, 2016,
Gafisa and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$27.0 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, for R$19.5 million.
In 2015, we carried
out the following receivables sales with recourse:
On December 3, 2015,
Gafisa and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising select residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$32.2 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, for R$24.5 million.
In 2014, we carried
out the following receivables sales with recourse:
On November 25, 2014,
Gafisa and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising select residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$15.2 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, for R$12.4 million.
Construction financing
lines of credit are available and we have fulfilled substantially all of our construction financing needs for 2017, 2016 and 2015
at consolidated rates similar to the CDI rate. In order to mitigate the effects of the 2008 global credit crisis, the Brazilian
government has announced additional lines of credit to assist the construction industry and its customers, including R$6 billion
from the FGTS (a Government Severance Indemnity Fund for Employees). In 2009, we approved the issue of two series of debentures
for Gafisa and Tenda in the total amount of R$1.2 billion. In addition, local financial institutions are financing up to 80% of
construction costs, through the Brazilian Saving and Loan System (
Sistema Brasileiro de Poupança e Empréstimo
—
SBPE) indexed to TR (
Taxa Referencial
) and a fixed rate spread.
During 2016, our customers’
ability to obtain bank mortgage loans continued to improve, with interest rates in the range of 6%+TR (affordable entry level)
to 12%+TR, depending on family income and credit score.
The following table
shows the balance of our receivables from clients for the development and sale of properties for the periods presented:
|
|
As
of December 31,
|
|
|
2016
(1)
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
Real estate development receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
722.6
|
|
|
|
1,395.3
|
|
|
|
1,440.5
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
271.3
|
|
|
|
407.1
|
|
|
|
384.8
|
|
Total
|
|
|
993.9
|
|
|
|
1,802.4
|
|
|
|
1,825.3
|
|
Receivables to be recognized on our balance sheet according
to percentage of completion method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
525.2
|
|
|
|
793.0
|
|
|
|
1,064.0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
525.2
|
|
|
|
793.0
|
|
|
|
1,064.0
|
|
Total receivables from clients
|
|
|
1,519.1
|
|
|
|
2,595.4
|
|
|
|
2,889.3
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
This amount relates to the Gafisa segment only, since Tenda’s results of operations have
been presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016.
|
The total balance
of receivables on the balance sheet has the following maturity profile:
|
As
of December 31, 2016
|
Maturity
|
(in millions
reais
)
|
Overdue
|
184.2
|
2017
|
538.4
|
2018
|
608.6
|
2019
|
142.5
|
2020
|
24.3
|
2021 onwards
|
21.1
|
Total
|
1,519.1
|
Loans made to our
clients are generally adjusted on a monthly basis as follows: (1) during construction, by the INCC in São Paulo, Rio de
Janeiro and other Brazilian cities; and (2) after delivery set forth in the contract, by the IGP-M plus 12% per annum in all markets.
We limit our exposure
to credit risk by selling to a broad customer base and by continuously analyzing the credit of our clients. As of March 31, 2017,
our clients’ default level was 13.5% of our accounts receivable for Gafisa and 13.1% for Tenda. We annually review the assumptions
used in establishing an allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts, in view of the revision of historical data of
its current operation and improvement of measurement estimates. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled
contracts for customers whose installments are past due, based on the assumptions made about each segment of the Company. This
allowance is calculated based on the percentage of the construction work completion, a methodology adopted for recognizing income
for the year. The allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts totaled R$19.3 million as of December 31, 2016 and is
considered sufficient by our management to cover incurred losses on the realization of accounts receivable.
Cash Flows
Operating activities
In 2016, net cash
generated from operating activities totaled R$269.7 million, compared to R$104.5 million in 2015. This increase is mainly related
to cash generated from Tenda as a disposal group held for sale in the amount of R$137.1 million in 2016 compared to cash used in
the amount of R$85.5 million in 2015. Under Gafisa segment there was a lower volume of Gafisa launches as a result of the challenging
macroeconomic conditions in Brazil. In addition to the cash generated from Tenda in the amount of R$137.5 million, the R$269.7
million was primarily composed of: (1) a decrease of R$73.6 million in obligations for purchase of land and advances from customers;
(2) an increase of R$288.9 million in receivables from clients; (3) an increase of R$100.2 million in related party transactions;
(4) an increase of R$75.2 million in expenses which did not affect our cash and cash equivalents; and (5) other less significant
increases and decreases in other operating categories.
In 2015, net
cash generated from operating activities totaled R$104.5 million, compared to net cash generated in operating activities
totaling R$41.9 million in 2014. This increase reflects the improved operational and financial management in the Gafisa
segment. The R$104.5 million was primarily composed of: (1) a decrease of R$267.6 million in expenses in 2015 which did not
affect our working capital; (2) a decrease of R$159.6 million in properties for sale, attributable to landbank and
construction; and (3) other less significant increases and decreases in other operating categories.
Investing activities
Net cash generated
in investing activities, including the acquisition of assets, equipment and new investments was R$162.5 million in 2016, compared
to R$384.7 million in 2015. Our cash generated in 2016 was mainly related to the redemption of investments in marketable securities,
restricted securities and loans in the amount of R$193.4 million, which was in line with the amount of R$197.4 million in 2015.
Under Tenda segment, disclosed as a disposal group held for sale, cash generated in investing activities decreased to R$5.0 million,
compared to R$222.9 million in 2014 mainly related to the decrease in redemption of investments in marketable securities, restricted
securities and loans in the amount R$17.6 million, compared to R$250.3 million in 2015.
Net cash generated
in investing activities, including the acquisition of property, equipment and new investments, was R$384.6 million in 2015 compared
to a net cash used in investing activities of R$751.9 million in 2014. Our cash generated in 2015 was mainly related to the redemption
of investments in marketable securities, restricted securities and loans in the amount of R$197.4 million, which was lower than
the amount of R$709.4 million in 2014 mainly due to the challenging macroeconomic conditions in Brazil in 2015.
Financing activities
Net cash used from
financing activities in 2016 totaled R$456.8 million, compared to the net cash used from financing activities in 2015 of R$516.5
million. The cash used in 2016 was mainly attributable to: (1) repayment of loans and financing, net of the increase of new contracts,
totaling R$365.4 million, in line with our conservative approach to allocation of capital and: (2) a dividends payment of R$17.7
million. Net cash used from financing activities related to the disposal group held for sale in 2016 totaled R$135.6 million compared
to R$176.8 million in 2015.
Net cash used from
financing activities in 2015 totaled R$516.5 million, compared to the net cash used from financing activities in 2014 of R$899.1
million. The cash used in 2015 was mainly attributable to: repayment of loans and financing, net of the increase of new contracts,
totaling R$334.3 million, in line with our conservative approach to allocation of capital, and the purchase of treasury shares
totaling R$24.2 million. The decrease in the net cash used from financing activities in 2015 compared to R$899.1 million in the
previous year is mainly due to the occurrence of non-recurring events in 2014, primarily the payment of dividends and interest
on equity in the amount of R$150.0 million, payment to venture partners totaling R$112.7 million and a higher amount of treasury
shares purchased totaling R$115.3 million in 2014 when compared to R$24.2 million in 2015. Net cash used from financing activities
related to the disposal group held for sale in 2015 totaled R$176.8 million compared to R$213.1 million in 2014.
Pledged mortgage receivables
and short-term investments
As of December 31,
2016, substantially all of our mortgage receivables totaling R$723.0 million are pledged. In addition, R$2.2 million of our short-term
investments and collaterals are restricted as they have been pledged.
Capital Expenditures
In 2016, under
the Gafisa brand, we invested R$35.8 million in property and equipment, primarily information technology equipment, software,
the construction of sales stands, facilities, model apartments and related furnishings and office facilities in São
Paulo. Our main investments during the period were investments in information technology equipment and software, which
totaled R$8.3 million, and the construction of sales stands, which totaled R$10.8 million.
In 2015, under
the Gafisa and Tenda brands, we invested R$54.6 million in property and equipment, primarily information technology
equipment, software, the construction of sales stands, facilities, model apartments and related furnishings and office
facilities in São Paulo. Our main investments during the period were investments in information technology equipment
and software, which totaled R$31.7 million, the construction of sales stands, which totaled R$9.4 million, and third party
leasehold improvements and facilities, which totaled R$2.8 million.
In 2014, under
the Gafisa and Tenda brands, we invested R$88.5 million in property and equipment, primarily information technology
equipment, software, the construction of sales stands, facilities, model apartments and related furnishings and office
facilities in São Paulo. Our main investments during the period were the construction of sales stands, which totaled
R$19.3 million, investments in information technology equipment and software, which totaled R$17.6 million, and third party
leasehold improvements and facilities, which totaled R$6.7 million.
Our capital expenditures
are all made in Brazil and are usually funded by local debt capital markets. We currently do not have any significant capital expenditures
in progress.
Indebtedness
When we consider appropriate,
we have incurred indebtedness within SFH, which offers lower interest rates than the private market. When our customers obtain
a mortgage, we use the proceeds to redeem our SFH indebtedness. We intend to continue our strategy of maintaining low levels of
debt comprised mainly of transactions within SFH or long-term transactions.
As of December 31,
2016, we had outstanding debt in the total amount of R$1,639 million, a decrease of 24% as compared to December 31, 2015. As of
December 31, 2016, our indebtedness principally consisted of: (1) debentures totaling R$451 million, (2) working capital loans
in the total amount of R$164 million and (3) other loans (mainly SFH) in the total amount of R$1,022 million. In addition, we had
outstanding payables to venture partners in the amount of R$1 million.
As of December 31,
2015, we had outstanding debt in the total amount of R$2,156 million, a decrease of 17.0% as compared to December 31, 2014. As
of December 31, 2015, our indebtedness principally consisted of: (1) debentures totaling R$858.0 million, (2) working capital loans
in the total amount of R$131.1 million and (3) other loans (mainly SFH) in the total amount of R$1,162 million. In addition, we
had outstanding payables to venture partners in the amount of R$4.9 million.
|
|
Maturity
as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Total
(1)
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
and thereafter
|
|
|
(in millions
of
reais
)
|
Debentures (Project Finance)
|
|
|
302.4
|
|
|
|
302.4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Debentures (Working Capital)
|
|
|
148.9
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
Other Working Capital
|
|
|
164.2
|
|
|
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Housing Finance System (SFH)
|
|
|
1,022.1
|
|
|
|
534.6
|
|
|
|
393.5
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
Payables to venture partners
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,638.8
|
|
|
|
986.0
|
|
|
|
516.0
|
|
|
|
81.2
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
This amount relates to the Gafisa segment only, since Tenda’s results of operations have
been presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016.
|
Payables to venture
partners refer to contributions received from venture partners of R$45.0 million in 2011, which will be fully redeemed by us until
2017.On June 27, 2011, eight CCBs were issued by the Company, totaling R$65.0 million. CCBs are guaranteed by 30,485,608 shares
issued by Gafisa SPE-89 Empreendimentos Imobiliários S.A. Funds from the aforementioned CCBs were allocated to develop residential
projects.
As part of the funding
through the issuance of CCBs, the Company entered into a paid usufruct agreement in connection with 100% of the preferred shares
in SPE-89 Empreendimentos Imobiliários S.A for a period of six years, having raised R$45.0 million recorded based on the
effective interest method of amortization in the consolidated statement of operations.
On May 9, 2013, we
issued a CCB in a total amount of R$217 million due in 2017. The CCB is guaranteed by pledge of to be performed units of selected
ventures and real estate receivables. This issuance was fully redeemed by October 7, 2013.
On October 7, 2013,
the Company entered into a loan agreement in a total amount of R$300 million due in July 2017. This agreement was guaranteed by
a pledge of to be performed units of selected ventures and real estate receivables.
On September 29, 2014
the Company entered into a loan agreement of R$194 million due in October 2018. This agreement was guaranteed by a pledge of to
be performed units of selected ventures and real estate receivables.
On September 28, 2016,
we issued a CCB in a total amount of R$65.0 million due in 2019. The CCB is guaranteed by a specific portion of our landbank and
real estate receivables.
Debenture program
In April 2009, Tenda’s
first debenture program was approved, under which we issued R$600.0 million in non-convertible debentures. The debentures provide
for payment of annual interest at a rate of 9.25% + TR per annum, calculated from the subscription date. Proceeds from the issuance
of the debentures were used solely to finance real estate ventures focused exclusively on the affordable entry-level segment that
meet certain eligibility criteria. Guarantees were comprised of assignments of receivables and bank accounts. The debentures were
redeemed by the Company in their entirety in December 2016.
Additionally, certain
covenants contained in the agreement governing Tenda’s debenture program restrict its ability to take certain actions, including
incurring additional debt, and may require Tenda to repay or refinance the debenture if it is unable to meet certain financial
ratios. The ratios, its parameters and our performance against them are summarized below.
In August 2009, the
CVM approved our sixth issuance, which consisted of non-convertible simple debentures in two series, secured by a general guarantee,
maturing in four years and unit face value at the issuance date of R$10,000, totaling R$250 million. The debentures provide for
the payment of annual interest corresponding to the CDI rate
plus
2.00% to 3.25% per annum, calculated from the subscription
date. Under the sixth issuance, we are obligated to acquire all outstanding debentures upon the request of debenture holders whenever
we raise money through the issuance of non-debt securities in excess of R$500.0 million. We also have the right to repurchase the
debentures in the occurrence of a liquidity event. In October 2010, the Company carried out the early redemption of the first series
of this placement in the amount of R$150.0 million. On June 2, 2014, the Company redeemed all outstanding debentures under the
sixth issuance in the amount of R$100.0 million.
In November 2009,
the CVM approved our seventh issuance under which we received R$600 million in non-convertible debentures. The debentures provide
for payment of annual interest at a rate of 8.25% to 10.25% plus TR per annum, calculated from the subscription date. Proceeds
from the issuance of the debentures will be used solely to finance real estate ventures. The debentures are scheduled to mature
in December 2017.
In September 2010,
the CVM approved our eighth issuance which consisted of non-convertible debentures in two series maturing in five and six years,
respectively the first and the second series, with a unit face value at the issuance date of R$1,000, for an aggregate of R$300
million. The debentures provide for the payment of annual interest corresponding to the CDI rate plus 1.95% in the first series
and IPCA plus 7.96% in the second series, calculated from the subscription date. The first series of the debentures was redeemed
by the Company in its entirety on October 15, 2015, and the second series of the debentures was redeemed by the Company in its
entirety on October 17, 2016.
In July 2014, the
CVM approved the private placement of our ninth issuance which consisted of non-convertible debentures in a single series maturing
in July 2018, for an aggregate of R$130 million. The debentures provide for the payment of semiannual interest corresponding to
the CDI rate plus 1.90%. The issuance is guaranteed by real estate receivables and a pledge of units of selected real estate ventures.
Proceeds from the issuance will be used solely to finance such selected real estate ventures. The debentures holders assigned their
fiduciary rights in the real estate receivables in favor of a real estate securitization SPE, which issued CRIs backed by such
real estate receivables.
In December 2014,
the CVM approved the private placement of our tenth issuance which consisted of non-convertible debentures in a single series maturing
in January 2020, for an aggregate of R$55 million. The private placement was concluded in January 2015. The debentures provide
for the payment of semiannual interest corresponding to the IPCA plus 8.22%. The issuance is guaranteed by a pledge of units of
selected real estate ventures. Proceeds from the issuance will be used solely to finance such selected real estate ventures.
We have various covenants
relating to our debentures issuances described above. These mainly consist of (i) cross default provisions, whereby outstanding
indebtedness will become immediately due and payable in the event that the Company or its subsidiaries do not comply with their
obligations under any other credit facility for a value in excess of the amounts set forth therein; (ii) restrictions on transfer
of control and merger and acquisition transactions; (iii) limitations on our ability to incur debt; (iv) limitations or creating
liens on assets; (v) limitations on the distribution of dividends if we are under default and (vi) the following ratios and limits
to be calculated on a quarterly basis. The table below sets forth these ratios and limits as amended.
The actual ratios
and minimum and maximum amounts stipulated by these restrictive covenants at December 31, 2016 are as follows:
|
At December 31, 2016
|
Seventh placement
|
|
Total account receivable plus inventory required to be below zero or 2.0 times over net debt less venture debt (3)
|
53.98 times
|
Total debt less venture debt (3), less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (1), cannot exceed 75% of equity plus non-controlling interests
|
3.11%
|
Total account receivable plus unappropriated income plus total inventory of finished units required to be 1.5 time over the net debt plus payable for purchase of properties plus unappropriated cost
|
2.15 times
|
Ninth
placement
|
|
Total accounts receivable plus total inventory required to be below zero or greater than 2.0 times over net debt
|
2.34 times
|
Net debt cannot exceed 100% of equity plus non-controlling interests
|
71.71%
|
Tenth
placement
|
|
Total accounts receivable plus inventory required to be below zero or 2.0 times over net debt less venture debt (3)
|
53.98 times
|
Total debt less venture debt (3), less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (1), cannot exceed 75% of equity plus non-controlling interests
|
3.11%
|
|
(1)
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments refer to cash and cash equivalents and marketable
securities.
|
|
(2)
|
Total receivables, whenever mentioned, refers to the amount reflected in the Balance Sheet plus
the amount to be recognized according to the PoC and not yet shown in the Balance Sheet
|
|
(3)
|
Venture debt and general guarantee debt refer to SFH debts, defined as the sum of all disbursed
borrowing contracts which funds were provided by SFH, as well as the debt related to the seventh placement.
|
We expect to comply
with the covenants in the agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness which may limit our long-term growth prospects by hindering
our ability to incur future indebtedness or grow through acquisitions. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Our
level of indebtedness could have an adverse effect on our financial health, diminish our ability to raise additional capital to
fund our operations and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or the real estate industry.”
As of December 31,
2016, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants, except for a breach of a certain restrictive covenant in one of
the Company’s CCB’s in the amount of R$65.0 million, mainly due to an impairment of R$610.1 million which we recorded
in line with CPC 31 – Non-Current Asset Held for Sale and Income from Discontinued Operations as a result of the discontinuation
of Tenda’s operations under Brazilian GAAP in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations (as described above),
for which the Company obtained a waiver from the relevant creditor for the year ended December 31, 2016 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2017.
Financing through the
Housing Finance System (SFH)
Most of our financing
is incurred directly or through our subsidiaries or jointly-controlled entities from the principal banks that operate within SFH.
As of December 31, 2016, the interest rates on these loans generally varied between 8.30% and 14.00% per annum, plus TR, and the
loans generally mature through February 2017 and April 2021. This financing is secured by mortgages on property and by security
interests on the receivables from clients. As of December 31, 2016, we had 25 loan agreements in effect, with a balance of R$1,022
million. At the same date we also had R$120 million in aggregate principal amount of financing agreements with SFH, the funds of
which will be released through the date of completion as construction of the corresponding development’s progress.
Securitization deals
and Fund — FIDC
On March 31, 2009,
we entered into a securitized receivables transaction, whereby we assigned a portfolio of select residential and commercial real
estate receivables to “Gafisa FIDC” which issued senior and subordinated quotas. This first issuance of senior quotas
was made through an offering restricted to qualified investors. Subordinated quotas were subscribed exclusively by Gafisa S.A.
Gafisa FIDC acquired the present value of the portfolio based on an agreed discount rate. We provide Gafisa FIDC with administrative
and accounting services including the reconciliation and analysis of receivables and collections and can be replaced by another
collection agent in the event of non-fulfillment with contractual parameters. The senior and subordinated quotas are remunerated
based on the IGP-M index plus interest of 12% per year. Because the subordinated quotas have a disproportional percentage of the
expected losses, Gafisa FIDC was considered a variable interest entity and was fully consolidated in our financial statements as
of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. On May 28, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the subordinated quotas to
seniors investors in exchange for R$5 million in cash and R$3 million of real estate receivables. The Company remained obligated
to fully register the real estate pledge to investors.
On June 27, 2011,
the Company and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising select residential real estate
receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$203.9 million (R$185.2 million
– Gafisa’s interest) in exchange for cash, at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$171.7 million (R$155.9
million – Gafisa’s interest), recorded under “Obligations assumed on assignment of receivables”.
On September 29, 2011,
the Company and its subsidiaries entered into a Private Instrument for Assignment of Real Estate Receivables and Other Covenants
which consist of an assignment of a portfolio comprising select residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries.
The amount of real estate receivables assignment paid by the Assignee amounts to R$238.4 million (R$221.4 million - Gafisa’s
interest). The assignment amount will be settled by the Assignee by offsetting the Housing Financial System (SFH) debt balance
of the own bank. On July 6, 2012, the
remaining balance was settled by issuance of Bank Deposit Certificate (CDB) guaranteed in favor of the Company.
On December 22, 2011,
Gafisa and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising select residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$72.4 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, by R$60.1 million, classified as “Obligations with assignment of receivables”.
On May 9, 2012, Gafisa
and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising select residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$64.9 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, by R$45.2 million.
On July 6, 2012, Gafisa
and its subsidiaries entered into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising select residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$18.2 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, for R$11.5 million.
On December 27, 2012,
Gafisa and its subsidiaries enter into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising select residential real estate receivables
from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$72.0 million in exchange for cash at the transfer
date, discounted to present value, by R$61.6 million.
On November 29, 2013,
a selected portfolio of sales receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries was transferred to investors. The assigned portfolio
amounts to R$24.2 million in exchange of cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, by R$19.6 million.
On November 25, 2014,
a selected portfolio of sales receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries was transferred to investors. The assigned portfolio
amounts to R$15.2 million in exchange of cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, by R$12.4 million.
On December 3, 2015,
a selected portfolio of sales receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries was transferred to investors. The assigned portfolio
amounts to R$32.2 million in exchange of cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, by R$24.5 million.
On March 4, 2016,
a selected portfolio of sales receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries was transferred to investors. The assigned portfolio
amounts to R$36.4 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$27.3 million.
On May 09, 2016, a
selected portfolio of sales receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries was transferred to investors. The assigned portfolio amounts
to R$23.0 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$17.5 million.
On August 16, 2016,
a selected portfolio of sales receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries was transferred to investors. The assigned portfolio
amounts to R$21.4 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$14.9 million.
On December 21, 2016,
a selected portfolio of sales receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries was transferred to investors. The assigned portfolio
amounts to R$27.0 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$19.5 million.
Pursuant to Article
125 of the Brazilian Civil Code, the CCI-Investor carries general guarantees represented by statutory liens on real estate units,
effective as soon as the conditional restrictions included in the registration are lifted, as reflected in the real estate deed
on (i) the assignment of receivables from the assignors to SPEs, as provided for in Article 167, item II, (21) of Law No. 6,015,
of December 31, 1973; and (ii) the issue of CCI-Investor by SPEs, as provided for in Article 18, paragraph 5 of Law No. 10,931/04.
We will be compensated
for, among other things, the reconciliation of the receipt of receivables, guarantee the CCIs, and the collection of past due receivables.
The transaction structure provides for the substitution of us as collection agent in the event of non-fulfillment of the responsibilities
described in the collection service contract.
Working Capital
We believe that our
current working capital is sufficient for our present requirements and that our sources of funds from financing activities are
sufficient to meet the financing of our activities and cover our need for funds for
at least the next twelve
months. Additionally, during the Preemptive Right exercise period from March 17, 2017 to April 15, 2017, related to the Preemptive
Right to the Company’s shareholders to acquire, in proportion to their respective interests in the Company’s capital,
up to 50% of Tenda’s capital stock, 25,233,408 common shares issued by Tenda were acquired, at the purchase price of R$8.13
per share, totaling R$205.1 milllion.
U.S. GAAP Reconciliation
We prepare our consolidated
financial statements in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, which differs in significant respects from U.S. GAAP. Our net income attributable
to owners of Gafisa, in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, was a net loss of R$1,163.6, a net income of R$74.4 million and a net loss
of R$42.5 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Under U.S. GAAP, our net loss was R$985.2, our net loss was R$10.1 million
and our net income was R$42.3 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Our equity, in accordance
with Brazilian GAAP, was R$1,930.5 million, R$3,097.2 million and R$3,058.4 million, as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Under U.S. GAAP, we recorded total equity of R$1,710.6 million, R$2,704.9 million and R$2,750.9 million as of December 31, 2016,
2015 and 2014, respectively.
The following items
generated the most significant differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP in determining net income and shareholders’
equity:
|
·
|
effects of deferred taxes on the differences above; and
|
|
·
|
non-controlling interest.
|
For a discussion of
the principal differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP as they relate to our financial statements and a reconciliation
of net income and equity see Note 32 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report and “Item
3.A. Key Information—Selected Financial Data.”
New Accounting Pronouncements, Interpretations
and Guidance
Pronouncements (new
or revised) and interpretation applicable to years beginning January 1, 2016
The Company adopted
all of the pronouncements (new or revised) and interpretations issued by the CPC applicable to its operations which were effective
as of December 31, 2016.
There are no other
standards or interpretations that were issued and not yet adopted that could, in the opinion of our management, have a significant
impact on the profit, loss or equity disclosed by the Company.
On May 28, 2014, the
IASB published IFRS 15, which establishes principles that will apply to the recognition of revenue under IFRS. IFRS 15 will require
entities to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. When adopted, IFRS 15 will supersede
most of the detailed guidance on the recognition of revenue that currently applies under IFRS. IFRS 15 will be effective for annual
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and earlier application of IFRS 15 will be permitted for IFRS purposes. In December
2016, CPC has issued this pronouncement as CPC 47, effective on January 1, 2018. The standard can be applied either on the retrospective
method or the cumulative effect method, and is currently being evaluated by the Company.
In July 2014, the
IASB published IFRS 9, which establishes, among other principles, principles that will apply to the classification, measurement
and recognition of financial assets and liabilities. IFRS 9 will replace (i) earlier versions of IFRS 9 and (ii) IAS 39. IFRS 9
is comprised of three phases:
Phase 1 - Classification
and measurement of financial assets and liabilities
: Phase 1 introduces an approach for the classification of financial assets
driven by cash flow characteristics and the business model in which an asset is held. This single, principle-based approach will
replace existing rule-based requirements. The new model will also result in a single impairment model being applied to all financial
instruments.
Phase 2 - Impairment
:
Phase 2 introduces a new, expected loss impairment model that will require more timely recognition of expected credit losses. It
will require entities to account for expected credit losses (as opposed to incurred credit losses) from when financial instruments
are first recognized. It will also lower the threshold for recognition of full lifetime expected losses.
Phase 3 - Hedge
Accounting
: Phase 3 replaces the rule-based hedge accounting requirements in IAS 39. It will introduce a reformed model for
hedge accounting with enhanced disclosures about risk management activity. The new model will align the accounting treatment with
risk management activities, enabling entities to better reflect these activities in their financial statements. In addition, as
a result of these changes, users of the financial statements will be provided with better information about risk management and
the effect of hedge accounting on the financial statements.
IFRS 9 will be effective
for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. Earlier application of IFRS 9 will be permitted for IFRS purposes. In
December 2016, CPC has issued this pronouncement as CPC 48, effective on January 1, 2018. IFRS 9 contains a general requirement
that it should be applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.
On January 13,
2016, the IASB published IFRS 16 – Leases (“IFRS 16”), which establishes principles that will apply to the
recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases in the financial statements of lessors and lessees. IFRS 16
will require lessors to recognize a lease liability reflecting future lease payments and a “right-of-use assets”
for all lease contracts, except certain short-term leases and leases for low-value assets. The principles that apply to the
recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases in the financial statements of lessees will remain
substantially the same. IFRS 16 will be effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019, and earlier
application of IFRS 16 will be permitted for IFRS purposes. In Brazil, earlier application of IFRS 16 will be subject to the
implementation of IFRS 16 in Brazil and the prior approval of the CPC and the CVM. The standard can be applied either on the
cumulative catch-up approach or the full retrospective method, and is currently being evaluated by the Company.
We are in the process
of evaluating the impact of CPC 47, CPC 48 and IFRS 16 on our financial statements. As of the date of this annual report, we have
not completed our analysis of CPC 47, CPC 48 and IFRS 16 and we have not determined the extent to which CPC 47, CPC 48 and IFRS
16 will impact our financial statements once they are adopted.
Recently Adopted and
Issued U.S. GAAP Accounting Standards
Please refer to Note
32(c) to our consolidated financial information for a description of recently adopted U.S. GAAP accounting standards and recently
issued U.S. GAAP accounting standards.
C. Research
and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
We have a research
and development department for new products, processes and methodologies focused on reducing the construction cycle. As of December
31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we had 5, 6 and 10 employees engaged in research and development activities, respectively. Our research
and development expenditures in 2016, 2015 and 2014 were immaterial. See also “Item 4. Information on the Company—B.
Business Overview—Construction.”
D. Trend
Information
Elsewhere in this
annual report, including under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Brazilian Real Estate Sector,” we discuss trends, uncertainties, demands,
commitments or events which could have a material effect upon our net sales or revenues, income from continuing operations, profitability,
liquidity or capital resources, or that could cause reported financial information to not necessarily be indicative of future operating
results or financial condition.
In addition, while
we believe the long term prospects for the Brazilian housing market have not changed, during 2014, 2015 and 2016, we recognized
that we needed to adjust how we have approached the demand for high growth and diversification in the market in order to achieve
sustainable, profitable growth. In the Brazilian housing market, demand has outstripped supply on all fronts, from units and availability
of skilled labor, to reliable and experienced suppliers and building partners, to financing, and to the ability to rapidly issue
permits and obtain the necessary approvals to deliver units under the
Minha Casa Minha Vida
program.
In the second half
of 2011, our management team conducted a detailed analysis of our operations and profitability by project, region and brand and
has developed certain strategies to address the market trends that we have identified. As part of our revised strategies, we plan
to continue to simplify and streamline our organizational and operational structure to reinforce the fundamental strengths of each
of our brands. In particular, we determined the specific geographic markets where each of our brands has the strongest prospects
for performance and where we enjoy supply chain efficiencies, and will focus our efforts for each brand in its respective geographic
markets. We
also implemented a new
management structure that, among other things, assigns each brand manager direct responsibility for the operating performance of
each brand. In addition, we are implementing a corporate culture shift within our Tenda brand focused on the transfer of receivables
and on aligning incentives across the organization (including from senior management to individual project engineers) to encourage
project execution based on high-quality, on-time, under-budget performance.
In 2013 Gafisa completed
its strategic repositioning, which commenced in early 2012. Our goal was to reduce the level of debt, restrict the Company's exposure
to unprofitable businesses and markets and improve in margins and cash generation. One of the several initiatives we adopted to
achieve this goal was the sale of a 70% interest in Alphaville, which contributed to a decrease in our leverage.
By the end of 2013
we finalized our five-year business plan for the period from 2014 to 2018. We set guidelines for our business including the expected
size of Gafisa and Tenda operations, appropriate leverage, profitability guidelines, and our commitment to capital discipline and
shareholder value generation, which are reflected in the guidance released to the market at the end of 2013.
With the implementation
of the SAP enterprise application software platform, we believe we will have the appropriate tools and data to make more effective
management and supply decisions. We believe the successful implementation of these initiatives will help produce more stable cash
flow and contribute toward a return to sustainable growth.
On February 2, 2014,
Gafisa’s board of directors authorized management to initiate studies for a potential spin-off of Gafisa and Tenda business
units into two independent publicly traded companies. Our management initiated the studies in the first quarter of 2014. The main
objectives of the proposed spin-off are to:
|
·
|
enable shareholders to allocate resources between Gafisa and Tenda in line with their interests
and investment strategies;
|
|
·
|
enable Gafisa and Tenda to respond faster to the opportunities in their target markets;
|
|
·
|
establish sustainable capital structures for each of Gafisa and Tenda, based on each company’s
risk profile and strategic priorities;
|
|
·
|
give greater visibility to the market on the individual performance of each of Gafisa and Tenda,
enabling better assessment of intrinsic value; and
|
|
·
|
increase the ability of Gafisa and Tenda to attract and retain talent, through the development
of appropriate cultures and compensation structures consistent with the specific results of each business.
|
The implementation
of these strategic initiatives could have a material effect upon our net sales or revenues, income from continuing operations,
profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or could cause reported financial information to not necessarily be indicative of
future operating results or financial condition.
In 2015, the government
announced the third phase of the program “
Minha Casa, Minha Vida
”. The program aims to reduce the housing deficit
in Brazil, which as of 2014 was estimated to be 5.2 million houses. The program’s “MCMV I” and “MCMV II”
phases call for total government investment of up to R$230 billion, to be made available through financing from the CEF and BB,
and aim to build approximately 4.1 million houses for families with monthly incomes of up to ten times the minimum wage. This program
offers, among other things, long-term financing, lower interest rates, greater share of the property financed to the client, subsidies
based on income level, lower insurance costs and the creation of a guarantor fund to refinance debt in case of unemployment. On
March 30, 2016, the Brazilian government launched “MCMVIII”, the third phase of the program, which aims to build approximately
2 million houses in the next three years, with a total investment of approximately R$210.6 billion. As of the date of this annual
report, the Brazilian government has not released any further details regarding the implementation of the third phase of the program.
During 2015, the Company
continued to evaluate the potential spin-off of the Gafisa and Tenda business units into two separate entities. During 2015, as
part of the spin-off studies, we (i) separated several joint departments of Gafisa and Tenda, including, among others, the services,
personnel and management department and the legal department, (ii) converted Tenda’s issuer registration with the CVM from
category B to category A, (iii) entered into
negotiations with several
banks and insurance companies to open lines of credit for Tenda that are independent of Gafisa, and (iv) reviewed our contracts
with our third party counterparties and evaluated the potential impact of a spin-off on those contracts. On April 29, 2015, we
announced to the market that the spin-off studies were ongoing and would take longer to be concluded than had been initially expected.
On August 16, 2016, we announced to the market that that the spin-off studies were ongoing and that we were evaluating other potential
capital structure options and separation alternatives for the Gafisa and Tenda business units, including a potential offer of securities
and/or a sale of equity interests, in addition to the spin-off itself.
In December 2016,
following the conclusion of our analysis of certain strategic options, our management decided to sell 50% of Tenda’s total
capital stock, and transfer the remaining 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock to our shareholders in connection with a reduction
in our total capital stock. Accordingly, on December 14, 2016, we entered into an SPA with Jaguar pursuant to which we will sell
Tenda shares representing up to 30% of the total capital stock of Tenda, at a price equal to R$8.13 per share. Pursuant to the
SPA, we will receive cash proceeds totaling R$231.7 million, valuing Tenda’s capital stock at R$539.0 million.
As of the date of
this annual report, we estimate the potential spin-off of the Gafisa and Tenda business units will be concluded in May or June
2017.
E. Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently do not
have any off-balance sheet arrangements or significant transactions with unconsolidated entities not reflected in our consolidated
financial statements. All of our interests in and/or relationships with our subsidiaries or jointly-controlled entities are recorded
in our consolidated financial statements.
F. Tabular
Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The table below presents
the maturity of our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2016. The table does not include deferred income tax
liability.
|
|
Maturity Schedule
|
|
|
Total (4)
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
(
in millions of reais
)
|
Loans and financing
|
|
|
1,167.7
|
|
|
|
650.6
|
|
|
|
510.0
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
444.6
|
|
|
|
307.1
|
|
|
|
137.5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest (1)
|
|
|
325.2
|
|
|
|
217.9
|
|
|
|
106.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Real estate development obligations (2)
|
|
|
773.8
|
|
|
|
292.5
|
|
|
|
472.1
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Obligations for land purchase
|
|
|
260.7
|
|
|
|
170.4
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Payables to venture partners (3)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Credit assignments
|
|
|
99.0
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Obligations from operating leases
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
Other accounts payable
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
68.7
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,185.0
|
|
|
|
1,746.3
|
|
|
|
1,363.4
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Estimated interest payments are determined using the interest rate as of December 31, 2016. However,
our long-term debt is subject to variable interest rates and inflation indices, and these estimated payments may differ significantly
from payments actually made.
|
|
(2)
|
Including commitments not reflected in the balance—CFC Resolution No. 963. Pursuant to Brazilian
GAAP, and since the adoption of CFC Resolution No. 963, the total costs to be incurred on the units launched but not sold are not
recorded on our balance sheet. As of December 31, 2016, the amount of “real estate development obligations” related
to units launched but not sold was R$400.8 million.
|
|
(3)
|
Payables to venture partners accrue a minimum annual dividend equivalent to the variation in CDI,
which is not included in the table above.
|
|
(4)
|
This amount relates to the Gafisa segment only, since Tenda’s results of operations have
been presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016.
|
We also recorded provisions
for contingencies in relation to labor, tax and civil lawsuits in the amounts of R$79.1 million and R$83.9 million in current and
non-current liabilities, respectively, as of December 31, 2016.
G. Safe
Harbor
See “Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT
AND EMPLOYEES
A. Directors
and Senior Management Board of Directors
The table below shows
the names, positions, and terms of office of the members of our board of directors:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Election
Date
|
Term
of Office(1)
|
Odair Garcia Senra(2)(3)
|
70
|
Chairman
|
April 25, 2016
|
Annual Shareholders’ General Meeting in 2018
|
Guilherme Affonso Ferreira(2)(3)
|
65
|
Director
|
April 25, 2016
|
Annual Shareholders’ General Meeting in 2018
|
Maurício Marcellini Pereira(2)(3)
|
43
|
Director
|
April 25, 2016
|
Annual Shareholders’ General Meeting in 2018
|
Cláudio José Carvalho de Andrade(2)(3)
|
45
|
Director
|
April 25, 2016
|
Annual Shareholders’ General Meeting in 2018
|
José Écio Pereira da Costa Junior(2)(3)
|
65
|
Director
|
April 25, 2016
|
Annual Shareholders’ General Meeting in 2018
|
Rodolpho Amboss(2)(3)
|
53
|
Director
|
April 25, 2016
|
Annual Shareholders’ General Meeting in 2018
|
Francisco Vidal Luna (2)(3)
|
70
|
Director
|
April 25, 2016
|
Annual Shareholders’ General Meeting in 2018
|
|
(1)
|
Under Brazilian corporate law, an annual general shareholders’ meeting must take place within
the first four months of the calendar year.
|
|
(2)
|
Independent member pursuant to NYSE rules.
|
|
(3)
|
Independent member pursuant to Brazilian Law. According to Brazilian Law, a director is considered
independent when: (1) he/she has no relationship with the company, except for holding shares; (2) he/she is not a controlling shareholder,
spouse or relative of the controlling shareholder, has not been in the past three years linked to any company or entity related
to the controlling shareholder; (3) he/she has not been in the past three years an employee nor an executive of the company, of
the controlling shareholder or of any subsidiary of the company; (4) he/she is not a supplier or buyer, direct or indirect, of
the company where the arrangement exceeds a certain amount; (5) he/she is not an employee or manager of any company which renders
services to the company or which uses services or products from the company; (6) he/she is not a spouse or relative of any member
of the company’s management; and (7) he/she does not receive any compensation from the company, except for the compensation
related to its position as a board member.
|
Our directors are
not subject to mandatory retirement due to age.
The following is a
summary of the business experience and principal outside business interests of the current members of our board of directors.
Odair Garcia Senra
.
Mr. Garcia Senra is currently the chairman of our board of directors. He started as an intern at former Gomes de Almeida Fernandes
and occupied positions in the Company as construction engineer, general manager of construction, construction officer, and institutional
relations officer. Currently he also holds the following positions: member of the board of directors of Tenda; member of the board
of directors of Alphaville Urbanismo S.A.; Officer of SECOVI SP – Sindicato das Empresas de Compra, Venda, Locação
e Administração de Imóveis Residenciais e Comerciais de São Paulo, union for the companies involved
in buying, selling and administrating Real Estate in São Paulo; Vice President of SINDUSCON SP – Sindicato da Indústria
da Construção Civil do Estado de São Paulo, union for the construction companies in São Paulo; member
of the board of directors of Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia, appointed as a representative of SINDUSCON SP; member of the
Consulting Counsel of FIABCI/Brasil – Federação Internacional das Profissões Imobiliárias; and
Officer of BRIO Investimentos Imobiliários S.A., a Real Estate asset management.
In the past 5 years,
he has held, among others, the following positions: Operational Officer of Construtora Tenda S.A., and member of the board of directors
of São Carlos Empreendimentos e Participações S.A., a company
specialized in asset
management of commercial Real Estate He holds a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from the Civil Engineering School
of Mauá and was also a professor at the Civil Engineering School of Mauá in 1972.
Guilherme Affonso
Ferreira
. Mr. Ferreira is currently a member of our board of directors and the CEO of Bahema Participações S.A.,
a financial investment company. Currently he also holds the following positions: member of the board of directors, Finance and
Strategic Committees of Petrobras S.A., an oil and gas company; member of the board of directors and compensation committee of
SulAmérica S.A., an insurance company; member of the board of directors of Valid Soluções e Serviços
de Segurança em Meios de Pagamento e Identificação S.A.; a company that specializes in payment facilitation
program, system identification and telecommunication; member of the board of directors and Audit Committee of Arezzo Indústria
e Comércio S.A., a shoes retailer; member of the board of directors of T4F Entretenimento S.A.; a member of the board of
directors of Tavex Algodonera S.A., a textile company; and member of the board of directors of Entidades Benemerentes, Instituto
de Cidadania Empresarial, Esporte Solidário e AACD, all third sector entities.
In the past 5 years
he was also, among others, member of the following board of directors: Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição (Pão
de Açucar), a retail company; Ideiasnet S.A., a technology, media and telecommunications company, Banco Indusval, a financial
institution, B2W S.A., an electronic commerce company and Entidades Benemerentes, a third sector entity. He holds a production
engineering degree from the University of São Paulo and a master’s degree in economics and political science from
Macalester College.
Maurício
Marcellini Pereira
. Mr. Pereira is currently a member of our board of directors.
In the past 5 years
he has held, among others, the following positions: member of the board of directors of Tenda; Investment Officer of
Fundação
dos Economiários Federais – FUNCEF
, a pension fund for the employees of Caixa Econômica Federal; Executive
Officer of New Business of Caixa Participações S.A. – CAIXAPAR, a company specialized in strategic corporate
stakes a member of the board of directors of Elo Serviços S.A., a debit and credit card administrator member of the board
of directors of Telemar Participações S.A., a telecommunication company, member of the board of directors of Brasil
Ferrovias S.A. and Ferronorte S.A., railway companies; and a member of the fiscal council of Tim Participações S.A.,
a telecom company. He holds a degree in business administration from Minas Gerais Federal University, an MBA in Finance from Ibmec
Business School and is getting his master’s degree in pension economics from Brasília University (UnB).
Cláudio
José Carvalho de Andrade
. Mr. Andrade is currently a member of our board of directors, and partner of Polo Capital Gestão
de Recursos and several other real estate asset and management companies that form part of the Polo group of companies. He is also
member of the board of directors of Tenda and a member of the board of directors of Casa e Video Rio de Janeiro S.A., an electronic
retail company.
In the past 5 years,
he has held, among others, the following positions: member of the board of directors of Telefônica Data Holding, a telecommunication
company alternate member of the fiscal councils of Banco Panamericano S.A., and Banco Sofisa S.A., both financial institutions,
and alternate member of the fiscal council of Copel – Companhia Paranaense de Energia, an energy development company. He
holds a degree in Business Administration from EAESP Getulio Vargas Foundation University.
José Écio
Pereira da Costa Júnior
. Mr. Pereira da Costa is a member of our board of directors and a partner at JEPereira Consultoria
em Gestão de Negócios S/S Ltda., a consulting company. He also holds the following positions: member of the board
of directors of Princecampos Participações S.A., a public transportation company; alternate member of the board of
directors and member of audit committee of Fibria S.A. and Votorantim Cimentos S.A.; member of the audit committee of Votorantim
Metais S.A. and Citrosuco S.A; and member of the consulting committee of CVI Refrigerantes S.A., a beverage company.
He has also been an
auditing partner of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes S/C Ltda., and in the past 5 years he has also been a member
of the board of directors of Tenda and BRMALLS S.A., a shopping mall management company. He holds a bachelor’s degree in
business administration from
Fundação Getúlio Vargas
and a bachelor’s degree in accounting from
Faculdade São Judas Tadeu.
Rodolpho Amboss
.
Mr. Amboss is a member of our board of directors. He also holds the following positions: member of the board of directors of Tenda;
founding partner and managing director of Silverpeak Real Estate Partners LP, Real Estate asset management and fund; member of
board of directors of BR Properties, a construction company specializing in industrial sheds and large commercial buildings He
holds a degree in civil engineering from Rio de Janeiro Federal University and an MBA from the Booth School of Business of the
University of Chicago.
Francisco Vidal
Luna
. Mr. Luna is a member of our board of directors. He currently is on the board of directors of several Municipal owned
or related companies and foundations, such as Sabesp, Desenvolve São Paulo, Museu da Língua Portuguesa, Museu do
Futebol, FIESP – Federação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo, Associação Comercial
de São Paulo, Fundação Faculdade de Medicina – FFM, FIPE – Fundação Instituto de
Pesquisas Econômicas and Fundação Padre Anchieta – TV Cultura and he has been member of Board of Directors
of several others such as SP Urbanismo, SP Obras, SP Tur, SP Trans, CET and Prodam. In the past 5 years, he has also held, among
others, the following positions: member of board of directors of Tenda, member of board of officers of Banco Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ
do Brasil and a member of management of other banks, such as Banco InterAmerican Express (former Banco SRL), Banco Nossa Caixa
Desenvolvimento and Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico – BNDES. Mr. Luna has an economics degree and post-graduate
degree from the University of São Paulo.
The table below shows
the names, positions, and terms of office of our executive officers:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Election
Date
|
Term
of Office
|
Sandro Rogério da Silva Gamba
|
41
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
May 05, 2014
|
May 04, 2017
|
Andre Bergstein
|
46
|
Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer
|
May 05, 2014
|
May 04, 2017
|
Katia Varalla Levy
|
43
|
Operational Executive Officer
|
May 05, 2014
|
May 04, 2017
|
The business address
of each of our executive officers is Av. Nações Unidas No. 8,501, 19th floor , 05425-070 – São Paulo,
SP – Brazil.
The following is a
summary of the business experience and principal outside business interests of the current members of our board of executive officers.
Sandro Rogério
da Silva Gamba
. Mr. Gamba is currently our chief executive officer and his current term commenced in May 2014, with a term
of office through May 4, 2017. With over 15 years at Gafisa, having worked as head of business development for Gafisa and Tenda
in the São Paulo region, he has significant institutional knowledge and oversaw the growth of our business in São
Paulo, our largest region. Previously, he served us in a number of senior roles in the São Paulo region, including head
of business development for Gafisa and director and manager of land prospecting. Mr. Gamba holds a degree in civil engineering
from Mackenzie University, advanced degrees in engineering and real estate management from the University of São Paulo and
Fundação Armando Alvares Penteado
, and an executive master’s in business administration from IBMEC.
Andre Bergstein
.
Mr. Bergstein is currently our chief financial officer and investor relations officer, and his current term commenced in May 2014,
with a term of office through May 4, 2017. He is also a member of the board of directors of Alphaville Urbanismo S.A. In the past
five years he has also occupied the following positions: (i) Real Estate Executive of Plural Capital Gestora de Recursos Ltda.,
an asset management company; (ii) CFO of Brazilian Securities Cia de Securitização S.A., a securitization of financial
credits company; (iii) CFO and Investor Relations Officer of Brazilian Finance & Real Estate S.A., holding company of Brazilian
Securities Cia de Securitização S.A.
Katia Varalla Levy
.
Mrs. Levy is currently one of our operational executive officers, responsible internally for responsible internally for several
development and construction departments. Mrs. Levy joined us in 1992 as intern, and in the last five years she served as
product development manager and product development officer.
Our Relationship with our Executive
Officers and Directors
As of December 31,
2016, our board of officers in the aggregate held 0.6% of our share capital and our board of directors in the aggregate held a
0.2% direct or indirect interest in our share capital. As of December 31, 2016, there were no contracts of any type or any other
material agreements entered into by us with the members of our board of directors and our board of officers. As of December 31,
2016, some of our executive officers held interests in our subsidiaries as directors and/or executive officers. In none of these
cases, as of the referenced date, were the interests held material.
As of December 31,
2015, our board of officers in the aggregate held 0.5% of our share capital and our board of directors in the aggregate held a
0.2% direct or indirect interest in our share capital. As of December 31, 2015, there
were no contracts of
any type or any other material agreements entered into by us with the members of our board of directors and our board of officers.
As of December 31, 2015, some of our executive officers held interests in our subsidiaries as directors and/or executive officers.
In none of these cases, as of the referenced date, were the interests held material.
As of December 31,
2014, our board of officers in the aggregate held 0.4% of our share capital and our board of directors in the aggregate held a
0.2% direct or indirect interest in our share capital.
B. Compensation
For each of 2016, 2015 and 2014
Under Brazilian corporate
law, the company’s shareholders are responsible for establishing the aggregate amount paid to members of the board of directors,
the executive officers and the members of the fiscal council. Once the shareholders establish an aggregate amount of compensation,
the members of the board of directors are then responsible for setting individual compensation levels.
For each of 2016,
2015 and 2014, the aggregate compensation we paid to the members of the board of directors was R$2.3 million, R$2.0 million and
R$1.8 million, respectively, considering Gafisa and Tenda for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
For each of 2016,
2015 and 2014, the aggregate compensation we paid to the members of the fiscal council was R$296 thousand, R$255 thousand and
R$244 thousand, respectively, considering Gafisa and Tenda for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
For each of 2016,
2015 and 2014, the aggregate compensation we paid to the executive officers was R$14.2 million (net of bonuses for Gafisa and Tenda
executive officers) R$9.6 million (net of bonuses for Gafisa and Tenda executive officers) and R$8.7 million (net of bonuses for
Gafisa executive officers), respectively, which includes, unless otherwise indicated, fixed compensation, annual bonus amounts
and the costs related to Stock Options Programs, considering Gafisa and Tenda for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Approximately 60%
of the total compensation paid to Gafisa officers and 53.7% of the total compensation paid to Tenda officers is variable. The amounts
related to short-term bonuses paid for our officers were, for each of 2016, 2015 and 2014, R$7.6 million, and R$3.2 million and
R$3.4 million, respectively, considering Gafisa and Tenda for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
For each of 2016,
2015 and 2014, the individual compensation we paid to members of our board of directors (fixed compensation in 2014, fixed compensation
in 2015 and fixed compensation in 2016), fiscal council (fixed compensation) and officers (fixed compensation, short-term bonus
and costs related to Stock Options Programs) is set forth in the tables below.
Gafisa
2016
|
Board
of Directors
|
Fiscal
Council
|
Executive
Officers
|
Number of members (1)
|
7.00
|
3.00
|
5.00
|
Annual highest individual compensation (in R$)
|
365,141
|
79,200
|
3,200,555
|
Annual lowest individual compensation (in R$)(2)
|
195,048
|
79,200
|
1,081,222
|
Annual average individual compensation (in R$)
|
282,713
|
78,687
|
2,109,275
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on the average number of members during the period.
|
|
(2)
|
Annual lowest individual compensation includes only the members of board of directors, fiscal council
and executive officers who served an entire year and does not include members who are also executive officers (if a member is an
executive officer, he or she is paid as an executive officer).
|
2015
|
Board
of Directors
|
Fiscal
Council
|
Executive
Officers
|
Number of members (1)
|
7.00
|
3.00
|
5.00
|
Annual highest individual compensation (in R$)
|
304,284
|
66,000
|
3,393,078
|
Annual lowest individual compensation (in R$)(2)
|
195,048
|
66,000
|
980,516
|
Annual average individual compensation (in R$)
|
241,863
|
66,000
|
2,128,272
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on the average number of members during the period.
|
|
(2)
|
Annual lowest individual compensation includes only the members of board of directors, fiscal council
and executive officers who served an entire year and does not include members who are also executive officers (if a member is an
executive officer, he or she is paid as an executive officer).
|
2014
|
Board
of Directors
|
Fiscal
Council
|
Executive
Officers
|
Number of members (1)
|
7.67
|
3.00
|
5.17
|
Annual highest individual compensation (in R$)
|
308,868
|
63,500
|
3,732,593
|
Annual lowest individual compensation (in R$)(2)
|
185,778
|
63,500
|
2,691,098
|
Annual average individual compensation (in R$)
|
226,852
|
63,007
|
3,321,336
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on the average number of members during the period.
|
|
(2)
|
Annual lowest individual compensation includes only the members of board of directors, fiscal council
and executive officers who served an entire year and does not include members who are also executive officers (if a member is an
executive officer, he or she is paid as an executive officer).
|
Tenda (discontinued
operations)
2016
|
Board
of Directors
|
Fiscal
Council
|
Executive
Officers
|
Number of members (1)
|
9.08
|
3.00
|
10.25
|
Annual highest individual compensation (in R$)
|
126,670
|
38,400
|
2,497,824
|
Annual lowest individual compensation (in R$)(2)
|
126,670
|
10,560
|
568,253
|
Annual average individual compensation (in R$)
|
128,845
|
19,840
|
1,227,182
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on the average number of members during the period.
|
|
(2)
|
Annual lowest individual compensation includes only the members of board of directors, fiscal council
and executive officers who served an entire year and does not include members who are also executive officers (if a member is an
executive officer, he or she is paid as an executive officer).
|
2015
|
Board
of Directors
|
Fiscal
Council
|
Executive
Officers
|
Number of members (1)
|
10.00
|
3.00
|
10.33
|
Annual highest individual compensation (in R$)
|
126,254
|
38,400
|
1,969,515
|
Annual lowest individual compensation (in R$)(2)
|
100,000
|
9,456
|
47,892
|
Annual average individual compensation (in R$)
|
112,084
|
19,104
|
753,090
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on the average number of members during the period.
|
|
(2)
|
Annual lowest individual compensation includes only the members of board of directors, fiscal council
and executive officers who served an entire year and does not include members who are also executive officers (if a member is an
executive officer, he or she is paid as an executive officer).
|
2014
|
Board
of Directors
|
Fiscal
Council
|
Executive
Officers
|
Number of members (1)
|
5.75
|
3.00
|
8.83
|
Annual highest individual compensation (in R$)
|
126,324
|
38,400
|
2,821,951
|
Annual lowest individual compensation (in R$)(2)
|
—
|
8,688
|
886,515
|
Annual average individual compensation (in R$)
|
126,324
|
13,829
|
924,046
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on the average number of members during the period.
|
|
(2)
|
Annual lowest individual compensation includes only the members of board of directors, fiscal council
and executive officers who served an entire year and does not include members who are also executive officers (if a member is an
executive officer, he or she is paid as an executive officer).
|
C. Board
Practices
General Information
We are managed by
a board of directors consisting of at least five and up to nine directors and at least two and up to eight executive officers.
Our directors are elected for a two-year term and our executive officers are elected for a three-year term. Reelection of officers
and directors is permitted. We also have (1) a fiscal council, which under Brazilian Law is not a permanent body, although currently
installed; (2) permanent advisory committees created in accordance with our bylaws, namely: an audit committee and a corporate
governance and compensation committee; and (iii) executive committees established by the Board of Directors, namely: an investment
executive committee, a finance executive committee, and an ethics executive committee. See “—A. Directors and Senior
Management.”
Board of Directors
Our board of directors
is our decision-making body responsible for formulating general guidelines and policies for our business, including our long term
strategies. Among other things, our board of directors is responsible for appointing and supervising our executive officers.
Our board of directors
meets at least once every two months and at any other time when a meeting is called by its chairman or by at least two other effective
members. The decisions of our board of directors are taken by the majority vote of those members present at the respective meeting
and constituting a quorum of at least four members. In the event of a tie vote, the chairman of our board of directors has, in
addition to his personal vote, the right to cast a tie-breaking vote. In addition, pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, a member
of our board of directors is prevented from voting in any shareholders’ or board of directors’ meeting, or from acting
in any business or transaction, in which he may have a conflict of interest with our company.
Under Brazilian corporate
law, a company’s board of directors must have at least three members. Our bylaws provide for a board of directors of up to
nine members, from which at least 20% shall be independent members, as determined by the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
.
Our directors are elected at our annual general shareholders’ meeting for a two-year term of office, with reelection permitted,
and are subject to removal at any time by our shareholders at a shareholders’ general meeting. Although the Listing Rules
of the
Novo Mercado
require at least 20% independent members, our board of directors currently has six independent members,
out of a total of seven members.
Article 141 of Brazilian
corporate law provides that shareholders with at least 10% of a company’s total capital stock may request the adoption of
the multiple voting procedure for the election of the board of directors, even where there is no provision for this in the company’s
bylaws. The multiple voting procedure grants each share as many votes as the number of board members, and allows shareholders to
allocate either all of their votes to a single candidate or to distribute their votes among several candidates.
All the voting proceedings
discussed in the previous paragraphs currently apply to our company.
As prescribed by CVM
Instruction No. 282, of June 26, 1998, the minimum voting capital percentage required for the adoption of the multiple voting procedure
in publicly-held companies may be reduced as a result of the amount of its capital stock. Based on the current amount of our capital
stock, shareholders representing 5% of our total capital stock may request the adoption of the multiple voting procedure in order
to elect the members to our board of directors. The referred minimum percentage may vary from 5% to 10% depending on the amount
of our capital stock, as prescribed in the aforementioned CVM Instruction No. 282, of June 26, 1998. If the adoption of the multiple
voting procedure is not requested, directors are elected by a majority vote of our shareholders, and such shareholders who, individually
or collectively, represent at least 10% of our shares, are entitled to appoint, in a separate vote, a director and its alternate.
The Listing Rules
of the
Novo Mercado
also provide that all members of our board of directors and our board of officers must comply, by means
of the execution of a management compliance statement, with obligations set forth
under the
Novo Mercado
Listing Agreement, the Market Arbitration Chamber Rules and the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
, including, but not limited,
to: (1) any shareholder that becomes our controlling shareholder, or becomes part of our controlling group, must comply, by means
of executing of the controlling shareholder compliance statement, with the obligations set forth under the
Novo Mercado
Listing Agreement, the Market Arbitration Chamber Rules and the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
; (2) any indirect controlling
shareholder of our company must fully comply with the obligations established in the
Novo Mercado
Listing Agreement, the
Market Arbitration Chamber Rules, the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
, Brazilian corporate law, Brazilian Securities Regulations
and our bylaws; (3) use best efforts to ensure that our shares are widely held through public share offerings; (4) re-establish
the minimum percentage of outstanding floating stock, in case additional shares are issued or the controlling power over our company
is transferred; (5) inform BM&FBOVESPA with respect to the trading of the securities held by our controlling shareholders;
(4) comply with the rules imposed on our directors in the event our public company registration with the CVM is cancelled; and
(7) comply with rules and regulations applicable in the event of the delisting of our company from the
Novo Mercado
.
Executive Officers
Under Brazilian corporate
law, a company’s board of executive officers must have at least two members, and each of such members must be a resident
in Brazil. Furthermore, no more than one-third of our directors may serve as members of our board of officers at any given time.
In addition, under the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
, the chief executive officer of our company shall not serve as
the chairman of the board of directors.
Our executive officers
are our legal representatives and are primarily responsible for managing our day-to-day operations and implementing the general
policies and guidelines set forth in our shareholders’ general meetings and by our board of directors. Our bylaws require
that our board of officers be composed of at least two members and a maximum of eight members. The members of our board of officers
are appointed by our board of directors for a term of three-years, and may be reelected or removed by our board of directors at
any time. Our bylaws and our board of directors determine the role of our executive officers. Currently, we have a board of officers
comprised of three members: (1) Mr. Sandro Rogerio da Silva Gamba, who is the chief executive officer, (2) Mr. Andre Bergstein,
who is the chief financial officer and investor relations officer, and (3) Mrs. Katia Varalla Levy, who is an operational executive
officer.
The chief executive
officer submits the business plan, annual budget, investment plans and new expansion plans for Gafisa and our subsidiaries to the
approval of the board of directors. The chief executive officer enacts these plans and develops our strategy and operational plan,
including the manner in which we will execute the resolutions approved at the shareholders’ meeting and by the board of directors.
Together with the other officers, he also supervises and coordinates our activities. The officer in charge of investor relations
supplies our financial information to investors, the CVM and the BM&FBOVESPA, and is also responsible for keeping an updated
register based on the applicable regulations.
Fiscal Council
Under Brazilian corporate
law, the fiscal council is a corporate body independent from the management of the company and its external auditors. The fiscal
council is not a permanent body, and whenever installed, must consist of no less than three and no more than five members. The
primary responsibility of the fiscal council is to review management’s activities and the company’s financial statements
and to report its findings to the shareholders of the company. The fiscal council is not equivalent to an audit committee as contemplated
by the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. Under Brazilian corporate law, a fiscal council must be established at a shareholders’
general meeting upon request of shareholders representing at least 10% of the shares with voting rights, or 5% of the shares with
no voting rights, and its members shall remain in office until the annual general shareholders’ meeting of the year following
their election. Each member of the fiscal council is entitled to receive compensation in an amount equal to at least 10% of the
average amount paid to each executive officer (excluding benefits and profit sharing).
As prescribed by CVM
Instruction No. 324, of January 19, 2000, the minimum voting capital percentage required to request the fiscal council to be installed
may be reduced as a result of the amount of the company’s capital stock. Based on the current amount of our capital stock,
shareholders representing 2% of our voting capital stock may request the fiscal council to be installed. The referred minimum percentage
may vary from 2% to 8% depending on the amount of our capital stock, as prescribed in the aforementioned CVM instruction.
Individuals who are
also employees or members of the administrative bodies of our company, of companies controlled by us, or of companies forming a
group of companies with us (pursuant to Chapter XXI of Brazilian corporate law), as well as spouses or parents of our management,
cannot serve on the fiscal council.
Our by-laws provide
for a non-permanent fiscal council composed of at least three and up to five members, which can be formed and have its members
elected at the shareholders’ general meeting, as requested by the shareholders, in the events set forth by Brazilian corporate
law. When in operation, the compensation of our fiscal council is set at the shareholders’ general meeting that elects it.
Our fiscal council
has three members (Olavo Fortes Campos Rodrigues Junior, Peter Edward Cortes Marsden Wilson and Laiza Fabiola Martins de Santa
Rosa) and three alternates (Marcello Mascotto Iannalfo, Marcelo Martins Louro and Alessandro de Oliveira Nascimento).
We also have established
a permanent audit committee. See “Item 6.C. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board Practices—Audit
Committee.”
Audit Committee
Our bylaws provide
for an Audit Committee that convenes regularly, as often as it determines is appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The
Audit Committee must be comprised of at least three members, all of which must be independent members of our Board of Directors.
The Audit Committee is currently comprised by Francisco Vidal Luna, who is also the chairman, Jose Ecio Pereira da Costa Junior
and Odair Garcia Senra. Our board of directors has determined that Jose Ecio Pereira da Costa Junior, Francisco Vidal Luna and
Odair Garcia Senra are each independent as set forth in the NYSE Listed Companies Manual as well as being independent for the purpose
of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Our board of directors has determined that Francisco Vidal Luna is an audit committee financial
expert within the meaning of the regulations promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
This committee has
responsibility for, among others, planning and reviewing our annual and quarterly reports and accounts with the involvement of
our auditors, focusing particularly on compliance with legal requirements and accounting standards, and ensuring that an effective
system of internal financial controls is maintained, as set forth in the Company’s by-laws. The ultimate responsibility for
reviewing and approving our annual and quarterly reports and accounts remains with our directors.
Corporate Governance and Compensation
Committee
Our bylaws provide
for a Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee that convenes regularly, as often as it determines is appropriate to carry
out its responsibilities. The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee must be comprised of at least three members, all
of which must be independent members of our Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is currently
comprised by Cláudio José Carvalho de Andrade, who is also the chairman, Guilherme Affonso Ferreira and Rodolpho
Amboss. This committee, among other things, considers and periodically reports on matters relating to the size, identification,
selection and qualification of the board of directors, executive officers and candidates nominated for the board of directors and
its committees, is responsible for overseeing compliance with the corporate governance principles applicable to us under our bylaws
and other policies, as well as for proposing improvements and changes to such applicable principles; reviews and makes recommendations
to our directors regarding its compensation policies and all forms of compensation to be provided to our executive officers and
other employees.
Investment Executive Committee
On January 13, 2006,
our board of directors modified the structure of our incorporation and new businesses committee, renaming it the Investment Committee
and on September 9, 2010 it was renamed to Investment Executive Committee, in order to clarify that this is a collegiate body to
provide advice and guidance to the Board of Directors, composed solely by members of the Board of Officers (statutory or otherwise).
Our Investment Executive Committee is a non-permanent body and its duties are, among others, to: (1) analyze, discuss and recommend
land acquisitions and new real estate developments; (2) advise our executive officers during the negotiation of new deals and the
structuring of new developments; (3) supervise the beginning of new projects and their related cash flows; and (4) in special cases,
assist in the negotiation and structuring of new types of business. Each decision by our investment committee to acquire land is
made by ensuring that the investment meets the minimum return threshold set by us and comparing it with other potential investments.
Such decision is made independent of the geographical location of the investment in order to maximize return on our capital allocation
as a whole.
Currently, our Investment
Executive Committee is in operation and is comprised by Sandro Rogério da Silva Gamba (also the Coordinator of the Committee),
Andre Bergstein and Katia Varalla Levy.
Finance Executive Committee
Our directors have
established a Finance Executive Committee composed by André Bergstein (also the Coordinator of the Committee) and Sandro
Rogério da Silva Gamba. This committee, among others, evaluates and makes periodic recommendations to our board of directors
regarding risk and financial investments policies.
Ethics Executive Committee
On September 9, 2010,
our board of directors renamed the Ethics Committee, created on February 17, 2006, the Ethics Executive Committee. The Ethics Executive
Committee is a collegiate body tasked with providing advice and guidance to the board of directors, elected by the board of directors,
and is composed primarily of members of the board of officers (statutory or otherwise). Currently, it is composed of the following
members: Sandro Rogério da Silva Gamba (Coordinator of the Committee), André Bergstein, Emmanoel Soares and Adriana
Farhat. This committee is responsible, among others, for the actions related to violation of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics,
solving ethics conflicts and evaluating the adequacy of amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and proposing them
to the board of directors.
Summary of Significant Differences
of Corporate Governance Practices
NYSE Corporate Governance
Rules provide that we are required to disclose any significant differences on our corporate governance practices from those required
to be followed by U.S. companies under NYSE listing standard. We have summarized these significant differences below.
We are permitted to
follow practice in Brazil in lieu of the provisions of the NYSE Corporate Governance Rules, except that we will be required to
have a qualifying audit committee under Section 303A.06 of the Rules, or avail ourselves of an appropriate exemption. In addition,
Section 303A.12(b) provides that our chief executive officer is obligated to promptly notify the NYSE in writing after any of our
executive officers becomes aware of any material non-compliance with any applicable provisions of the NYSE Corporate Governance
Rules.
Majority of Independent
Directors
NYSE Rule 303A.01
provides that each NYSE-listed company must have a majority of independent directors. Neither Brazilian corporate law nor our by-laws
require that we have a majority of independent members. Notwithstanding this, the majority of our board members qualify as independent
directors under NYSE rules.
Separate Meetings
of Non-Management Directors
NYSE Rule 303A.03
provides that the non-management directors of each NYSE-listed company must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without
management. According to the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
, the chief executive officer may not serve as the chairman
of the Board of Directors. In addition, under Brazilian corporate law, up to one-third of the members of the board of directors
can also hold management positions. Under Brazilian corporate law, there is no specific requirement that non-management directors
meet regularly without management. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our board of directors consists entirely of non-management directors
and holds regular meetings without the management and as such we believe we are in compliance with the NYSE Rule 303A.03.
Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
NYSE Rule 303A.04
provides that each U.S. listed company must have a nominating and corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent
directors. We are required to have such a committee under our bylaws, which is nevertheless not required under Brazilian law. Therefore,
we have a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee responsible for considering and periodically reporting on matters relating
to the size, identification, selection and qualification of the board of directors and candidates nominated for the board of directors
and its committees; and for overseeing compliance with the corporate governance principles applicable to us under our bylaws and
other policies, as well as for proposing improvements and changes to such applicable principles.
Compensation Committee
NYSE Rule 303A.05
provides that each U.S. listed company must have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. We are required
to have such a committee under our bylaws, which is nevertheless not required under Brazilian law. Therefore, we have a Compensation
Committee responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations
to our directors regarding our compensation policies and all forms of compensation to be provided to our executive officers and
other employees. With respect to compensation, under Brazilian corporate law, the shareholders determine the total or individual
compensation of our board members and executive officers, including benefits and allowances, at a general shareholders’ meeting.
If the shareholders only determine the total compensation, it is incumbent upon the board of directors to establish the individual
amounts. The Compensation Committee, is responsible for advising the board of directors in such task. See “Item 6.B. Directors,
Senior Management and Employees—Compensation.”
Audit Committee
NYSE Rule 303A.06
and the requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the SEC provide that each U.S. listed company is required to have an audit committee consisting
entirely of independent members that comply with the requirements of Rule 10A-3. In addition, the audit committee must have a written
charter compliant with the requirements of NYSE Rule 303.A.07(c), have an internal audit position and otherwise fulfill all other
requirements of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3. The SEC recognized that due to the local legislation for foreign private issuers, some
of the responsibilities of the audit committee could be subordinated by local laws to our other bodies.
We are required to
have such a committee under our bylaws, which is nevertheless not required under Brazilian law. Therefore, we have an Audit Committee
with the following responsibilities:
|
·
|
Pre-approving services to be provided by our independent auditor;
|
|
·
|
Choosing and overseeing the work of any accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or
issuing an audit report or performing any other service;
|
|
·
|
Reviewing auditor independence issues and rotation policy;
|
|
·
|
Supervising the appointment of our independent auditors;
|
|
·
|
Discussing with management and auditors major audit issues;
|
|
·
|
Reviewing financial statements prior to their publication, including the related notes, management’s
report and auditor’s opinion;
|
|
·
|
Reviewing our annual report and financial statements;
|
|
·
|
Providing recommendations to the board of directors on the audit committee’s policies and
practices;
|
|
·
|
Reviewing recommendations given by our independent auditor and internal audits and management’s
responses;
|
|
·
|
Evaluating the performance, responsibilities, budget and staffing of our internal audit function
and review the internal audit plan;
|
|
·
|
Providing recommendations on the audit committee’s bylaws; and
|
|
·
|
Reviewing our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the procedures for monitoring compliance
with it.
|
Equity Compensation
Plans
NYSE Rule 303A.08
provides that shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto,
with certain limited exemptions as described in the rule. Under Brazilian corporate law, shareholder pre-approval is required for
the adoption of equity compensation plans and any material revision thereto.
Corporate Governance
Guidelines
NYSE Rule 303A.09
provides that each U.S. listed company must adopt and disclose their corporate governance guidelines. Although we do not have a
similar requirement under Brazilian law, our bylaws contain a comprehensive list of principles that must be complied with at all
times by all of our directors and officers. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also propose new principles and
amendments to existing
principles. In addition,
we have listed our common shares in the
Novo Mercado
(New Market) of the São Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&FBOVESPA),
which requires adherence to the corporate governance standards established under the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
,
as described under “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Bylaws.” Finally, we have adopted a written
policy of trading of securities and disclosure matters.
Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics
NYSE Rule 303A.10 provides
that each U.S. listed company must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees
and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. We are required to have a Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics under our bylaws and under the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
. We have adopted such a Code on July 10, 2007
and the last review of the Code was approved on July 17, 2014. See “Item 16B. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.”
D. Employees
As of December 31,
2016, we had 776 employees at Gafisa and 1,684 empoyees at Tenda across the following states:
States
|
|
Gafisa
Number of Employees
|
|
Tenda
Number of Employees
|
Amazonas
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Bahia
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Goiás
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Maranhão
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Minas Gerais
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Pará
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Paraná
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Pernambuco
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Rio de Janeiro
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Rio Grande do Sul
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Rondônia
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
São Paulo
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
Total
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
The table below shows
the number of employees for the periods presented, within the macro areas of the company:
Period
|
Operations
|
Administration
& Finance
|
Business
Development
|
Sales
|
Total
|
2016 (2)
|
1,244
|
500
|
151
|
565
|
2,460
|
2015
|
1,297
|
499
|
167
|
387
|
2,350
|
2014
|
1,134
|
527
|
191
|
310
|
2,162
|
2013(1)
|
2,008
|
722
|
404
|
212
|
3,346
|
2012
|
2,551
|
811
|
395
|
267
|
4,024
|
_____________
|
Note:
|
The numbers presented in the tables above for the year 2013 refer to the employees of Gafisa Group
(Gafisa’s Business Unit, Tenda’s Business Unit, Alphaville’s Business Unit as well as the corporate areas, including
the shared services center). For the year ended December 31, 2016, the numbers presented refer to the employees of Gafisa, and
do not refer to the employees of Tenda.
|
|
(1)
|
Total number includes 529 Alphaville employees, of which
290 are allocated in Operations, 95 in Administration and Finance, 135 in Business Development and 9 in Sales.
|
|
(2)
|
Total number includes 1,684 Tenda employees, of which
917 are allocated in Operations, 236 in Administration and Finance, 61 in Business Development and 470 in Sales.
|
Our administrative
employees carry out management, finance, information technology, legal and human resources activities among others. Our construction
site employees focus on management and oversight of our
construction workers,
the majority being outsourced. The outsourced professionals are hired by the contractors to carry out various tasks on the construction
sites. As of the date of this annual report, we estimate that around 4,750 outsourced professionals are providing services to Gafisa
group across the following regions:
Region
|
|
Gafisa’s
Outsourced Professionals
|
|
Tenda’s
Outsourced Professionals
|
North/Central West
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Northeast
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
South
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Southeast
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
We offer training
programs to our employees, subcontractors and outsourced employees. All of our professionals involved in the construction of our
developments are trained prior to the beginning of their work and are supervised directly by our engineers.
The majority of our
employees and outsourced professionals of the State of São Paulo are enrolled with the Civil Construction Industries Workers’
Union (SINTRACON). As a rule, the Civil Construction of Large Building Industry in the State of São Paulo (SINDUSCON-SP)
annually negotiates with SINTRACON collective bargaining agreements applicable to our employees. The most recent collective bargaining
agreement for our employees and outsourced professionals in the State of São Paulo was executed in May 2016, establishing
a salary adjustment of 9.82% as of May 2016. This collective bargaining agreement became effective in May 2016 and will expire
in April 2017. The majority of our employees and outsourced professionals of the State of Rio de Janeiro are members of the Civil
Construction, Tiles, Cement, Marble and Granite Products, Road Construction, Paving, and Land Moving and Industrial Maintenance
and Assembly Industries’ Workers Union of the Rio de Janeiro Municipality (SINTRACONST-RIO). As a rule, the Civil Construction
of Large Building Industry in the State of Rio de Janeiro (SINDUSCON-RIO) annually negotiates with SINTRACONST-RIO the collective
bargaining agreements applicable to our employees. The most recent collective bargaining agreement for our employees and outsourced
professionals in the State of Rio de Janeiro was executed in March 2016, establishing a salary adjustment of 8% as of March 2016.
This collective bargaining agreement became effective in March 2016 and will expire in February 2017.
We believe that our
relationship with our employees and workers’ unions is good. In all the regions where we operate, we maintain a stable relationship
with the workers unions, which generally decreases the risk of strikes.
The benefits we offer
to our permanent employees include life insurance, dental plan, health insurance, meal tickets and profit sharing.
Health and Safety
We are committed to
preventing work-related accidents and diseases. Accordingly, we maintain a risk prevention program which seeks to maintain and
enhance the health and physical conditions of our employees, by anticipating, recognizing, evaluating and controlling any existing
or potential environmental risks in the workplace.
In addition, we have
an internal committee for the avoidance of accidents, which seeks to prevent diseases and accidents from occurring in the workplace.
We make significant investments in this area, providing frequent training programs for our construction employees as well as for
our subcontractors’ employees, and we require our subcontractors to follow strict guidelines.
E. Share
Ownership
As of the date of
this annual report, our directors and executive officers do not hold, on an aggregate basis, any direct or indirect interest of
greater than 0.751% of our total share capital or of the share capital of any of our subsidiaries or jointly-controlled entities.
As of December 31, 2016, some of our executive officers held interests in our subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities as directors
and executive officers. In none of these cases, as of the date of this annual report, were the interests held material.
The table below sets
forth the number of our total shares beneficially owned by each of our directors and executive officers as of the date of this
annual report:
Name
|
Position
|
Number
of Shares Owned (1)
|
Sandro Rogério
da Silva Gamba
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
68,220
|
Andre Bergstein
|
Chief Financial Officer
and Investor Relations Officer
|
46,526
|
Cláudio José
Carvalho de Andrade
|
Director
|
25,884
|
Odair Garcia Senra
|
Director
|
18,060
|
Katia Varalla Ley
|
Officer
|
12,091
|
Guilherme Affonso Ferreira
|
Director
|
8
|
José Écio Pereira da Costa
Junior
|
Director
|
—
|
Francisco Vidal Luna
|
Director
|
—
|
Maurício Marcellini Pereira
|
Director
|
—
|
Rodolpho Amboss
|
Director
|
—
|
Total
|
|
170,789
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Considering the reverse stock split of all Gafisa’s shares at a ratio of 13.483023074 to
1 consummated on March 23, 2017.
|
Stock Option Plans
Gafisa’s stock
option plans seek to: (1) encourage our expansion and success by allowing our executives and key employees to acquire shares of
our capital stock in order to encourage their integration with the company; (2) allow us to obtain and retain the services of executives
and key employees by offering them the benefit of becoming one of our shareholders; and (3) align the interests of our executives
and key employees with the interests of our shareholders.
Tenda’s stock
option plans seek to: (1) allow Tenda to hire and retain the services of executives and key employees by offering them the benefit
of becoming one of our shareholders; and (2) align the interests of Tenda executives and key employees with the interests of our
shareholders.
We have individual
agreements with our key employees and executives for both Gafisa and Tenda, under which they are entitled to purchase shares of
our capital stock pursuant to the terms and conditions of the stock option plans and the specific conditions set forth in their
agreements.
In 2002, our shareholders
ratified the terms and conditions of our stock option plan. A standard stock option program to grant subscription rights related
to our preferred shares was approved by our board of directors at a meeting held on April 3, 2000. As a result of our entry in
the
Novo Mercado
segment of BM&FBOVESPA, our preferred shares were converted into common shares, and therefore all options
relating to this plan grant subscription rights related to our common shares. Currently, we do not have any stock option grants
related to this plan.
On February 3, 2006,
our shareholders approved a new stock option plan. Under the 2006 stock option plan, our board of directors may release further
programs on a regular basis of options to purchase up to 5% of the total outstanding shares of our company, as set forth in the
2006 stock option plan. Such new programs would grant our executives and key employees the right to subscribe and/or acquire our
shares for a set price, under terms and conditions according to the agreements set for each participant. Currently, we do not have
any stock option grants related to this plan.
Our most recent stock
option plan was approved on May 18, 2008 during a special shareholders’ general meeting. Under this new stock option plan,
our board of directors may create additional programs on a regular basis for options to purchase up to 5% of the total outstanding
shares of our company, as set forth in the 2008 stock option plan.
Under this stock option
plan, the board of directors may also grant different types of options to certain beneficiaries, namely “A options”,
which are regular options, and “B options,” for the exercise price of R$0.13. The exercise of B options, if granted,
is subject to the proportional purchase of common shares or exercise of a regular option under this 2008 plan, according to the
terms and conditions set forth in each program, and to lapse two years from the common share purchase date.
On August 11, 2014,
our shareholders approved Tenda’s first stock option plan. Under this stock option plan, our board of directors may release
further programs on a regular basis of options to purchase up to 10% of the total outstanding shares of our company. Such new programs
would grant our executives and key employees the right to subscribe and/or acquire our shares for a set price, under terms and
conditions according to the agreements set for each participant.
As of the date of
this annual report, all active stock option Programs follow the Plan approved in 2008.
2012 Programs
Two stock option programs
were approved in 2012 for executive officers and key employees.
The first is a standard
stock option program granting subscription rights related to our common shares. Under this program, the board of directors may
grant to certain beneficiaries the right to subscribe and/or acquire our shares for a set price, under the terms and conditions
set forth in the stock option plan agreement entered into with each participant.
As of the date of
this annual report, 264,036 options to purchase shares of our common shares have been granted to executive officers and other key
employees pursuant to this program. Out of the amount granted, 168,906 have been acquired or expired pursuant to such program.
Under the second program,
the board of directors may grant different types of B options for the exercise price of R$0.13 per share. The exercise of B options,
if granted, is subject to the proportional exercise of regular options at market price, granted under this second program, according
to the terms and conditions set forth in such second program, and to lapse one year from the grant date.
As of the date of
this annual report, options to purchase 302,532 shares of our common shares have been granted to key employees and executive officers
pursuant to this second program. The options granted included 222,912 “B” options, and all of them have been acquired
or expired pursuant to such program.
2013 Programs
Two stock option programs
were approved in 2013 for executive officers and key employees.
The first is a standard
stock option program granting subscription rights related to our common shares. Under this program, the board of directors may
grant to certain beneficiaries the right to subscribe and/or acquire our shares for a set price, under the terms and conditions
set forth in the stock option plan agreement entered into with each participant.
As of the date of
this annual report, 101,612 options to purchase shares of our common shares have been granted to executive officers pursuant to
this agreement and none has been acquired. Out of the amount granted, 51,331 have been expired pursuant to such agreements.
Under the second program,
the board of directors may grant different types of B options for the exercise price of R$0.13 per share. The exercise of B options,
if granted, is subject to the proportional exercise of regular options at market price, granted under this program, according to
the terms and conditions set forth in this second program, and to lapse one year from the grant date.
As of the date of
this annual report, options to purchase 297,677 shares of our common shares have been granted to employees and executives pursuant
to this second program. The options granted included 217,222 “B” options. Out of the total options granted, 219,910
have been acquired or expired pursuant to such second program.
2014 Programs
One stock option program
was approved in 2014 for executives and key employees.
Under this program,
the board of directors may grant different types of B options for the exercise price of R$0.13 per share. The exercise of B options,
if granted, is subject to the proportional exercise of regular options at market price, granted under this program, according to
the terms and conditions set forth in each program, and to lapse one year from the grant date.
As of the date of
this annual report, options to purchase 323,501 shares of our common shares have been granted to employees and executives pursuant
to this agreement. The options granted included 124,651 “B” options. Out of the total options granted, 49,310 have
been acquired, expired or cancelled pursuant to such program.
2015 Programs
One stock option program
was approved in 2015 for executives and key employees.
This program is a
standard stock option program granting subscription rights related to our common shares. Under this program, the board of directors
may grant to certain beneficiaries the right to subscribe and/or acquire our shares for a set price, under the terms and conditions
set forth in the stock option plan agreement entered into with each participant.
As of the date of
this annual report, options to purchase 264,570 shares of our common shares have been granted to key employees and executive officers
pursuant to this agreement. Out of the total options granted, none have been acquired or expired pursuant to such agreement.
In addition to the
above stock option program, the board of directors approved a “Phantom Shares” program, payable in cash in accordance
with the amount of options exercisable by the executives and key employees during the exercise period under the 2015 stock option
program.
2016 Programs
One stock option program
was approved in 2016 for executives and key employees.
This program is a
standard stock option program granting subscription rights related to our common shares. Under this program, the board of directors
may grant to certain beneficiaries the right to subscribe and/or acquire our shares for a set price, under the terms and conditions
set forth in the stock option plan agreement entered into with each participant.
As of the date of
this annual report, options to purchase 163,900 shares of our common shares have been granted to key employees and executive officers
pursuant to this agreement. Out of the total options granted, none have been acquired or expired pursuant to such agreement.
In addition to the
above stock option program, the board of directors approved a “Phantom Shares” program, payable in cash in accordance
with the amount of options exercisable by the executives and key employees during the exercise period under the 2016 stock option
program.
Tenda
programs
2014 Programs
One stock option program
was approved in 2014 by the board of directors of Tenda for executives and key employees of Tenda.
The program is a standard
stock option program granting subscription rights related to Tenda’s common shares. Under this program, the board of directors
may grant to certain beneficiaries the right to subscribe and/or acquire Tenda’s shares for a set price, under the terms
and conditions set forth in the stock option plan agreement entered into with each participant.
On November 14, 2016,
we conducted a reverse split of Tenda shares at the ratio of 11.72292224 Tenda shares to one Tenda share, with no reduction in
the capital stock of Tenda. Considering the new shareholding structure resulting from this reverse split, the Company adjusted
the number of Tenda shares and exercise price pursuant to this stock option plan at the ratio of 7.79555 Tenda shares to one Tenda
share, resulting in a decrease from 46,773,302 to 6,000,000 shares that could be granted as options. In addition, the exercise
price of the stock option plan for 2014 was adjusted from R$0.85 per share to R$6.62622 per share, and the exercise price of the
stock option plan for 2016 was adjusted from R$0.88 per share to R$6.86008 per share.
2016 Programs
One stock option program
was approved in 2016 by the board of directors of Tenda for executives and key employees of Tenda.
The program is a standard
stock option program granting subscription rights related to Tenda’s common shares. Under this program, the board of directors
may grant to certain beneficiaries the right to subscribe and/or acquire Tenda’s shares for a set price, under the terms
and conditions set forth in the stock option plan agreement entered into with each participant.
As of the date of this annual report, options
to purchase 210,000 shares of Tenda’s common shares have been granted to employees and executives pursuant to this agreement.
Out of the total options granted, none have been acquired or expired pursuant to such agreement.
Gafisa Active Programs
|
|
Number of Stock Options granted (2)
|
|
Number of Stock Options Outstanding (Not Expired or exercised) as of the date of this annual report (2)
|
|
Exercise Price per Stock Option (2)
|
|
Expiration
|
August 2012 (Standard SOP) (1)
|
|
|
264,036
|
|
|
|
95,130
|
|
|
|
36.81
|
|
|
|
August 2025
|
|
May 2013 (Standard SOP) (1)
|
|
|
101,612
|
|
|
|
50,281
|
|
|
|
49.35
|
|
|
|
May 2017
|
|
May 2013 (Restricted Type B) (1)
|
|
|
217,222
|
|
|
|
77,767
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
May 2017
|
|
March 2014 (Restricted Type A) (1)
|
|
|
198,850
|
|
|
|
182,162
|
|
|
|
42.20
|
|
|
|
March 2020
|
|
March 2014 (Restricted Type B) (1)
|
|
|
124,651
|
|
|
|
113,463
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
March 2020
|
|
April 2015 (Standard SOP) (Gafisa)
|
|
|
264,570
|
|
|
|
264,570
|
|
|
|
30.20
|
|
|
|
April 2021
|
|
April 2016 (Standard SOP) (Gafisa)
|
|
|
163,900
|
|
|
|
163,900
|
|
|
|
35.33
|
|
|
|
April 2022
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
947,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Options unvested or vested and not yet exercised.
|
|
(2)
|
Considering the reverse stock split of all Gafisa’s shares at a ratio of 13.483023074 to
1 consummated on March 23, 2017.
|
Tenda Active Programs
|
|
Number of Stock Options granted
|
|
Number of Stock Options Outstanding (Not Expired or exercised) as of the date of this annual report
|
|
Exercise Price per Stock Option
|
|
Expiration
|
August 2014 (Standard SOP) (Tenda)
|
|
|
5,421,001
|
|
|
|
5,279,848
|
|
|
|
R$6.63
|
|
|
|
March 2024
|
|
May 2016 (Standard SOP) (Tenda)
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
R$6.86
|
|
|
|
March 2026
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,489,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A. Major
Shareholders
As of the date of
this annual report, the following shareholders held more than 5.0% of our common shares. The following table sets forth information
of our directors and officers as a group, as well as common shares held in treasury and other shares in the public float. Each
holder of common shares has the same rights.
Shareholders
|
|
Shares (1)
|
|
(%)
|
Polo Capital Gestão de Recursos Ltda. and Polo Capital Internacional Gestão de Recursos Ltda.
|
|
|
2,269,397
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
Wishbone Management, LP
|
|
|
1,915,000
|
|
|
|
6.83
|
|
Pátria Investimentos Ltda.
|
|
|
1,570,204
|
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
River and Mercantile Asset Management, LLP
|
|
|
1,458,461
|
|
|
|
5.20
|
|
Public Float
|
|
|
19,780,874
|
|
|
|
70.54
|
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
1,046,226
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
|
Total
|
|
|
28,040,162
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Considering the reverse stock split of all Gafisa’s shares at a ratio of 13.483023074 to
1 consummated on March 23, 2017.
|
We had a total of
88 record shareholders located in the United States, 74.5% of which hold shares traded at BM&FBOVESPA and 25.5% of which hold
ADSs traded on the NYSE. We are not aware of any shareholders’ agreement currently in force with our main shareholder.
On December 9, 2013,
we completed the sale of a majority interest in Alphaville to Private Equity AE Investimentos e Participações (“Fundo
AE”), a company controlled by Pátria Investimentos Ltda. and Blackstone Real Estate Advisor L.P., which was previously
announced on June 7, 2013. All conditions precedent to the completion of the transaction were met, including governmental approval.
The transaction was concluded with a sale of 50% interest by Gafisa and 20% interest by Tenda, with Gafisa retaining the remaining
30% of Alphaville capital stock. The proceeds from the transaction, post adjustments agreed to in the Share and Purchase Agreement,
were R$1.54 billion, consisting of R$1.25 billion from Fundo AE for the acquisition of Alphaville shares, and an R$290 million
dividend distribution by Alphaville.
B. Related
Party Transactions
Other than arrangements
which are described in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—
Our Relationship with our Executive Officers and Directors” and the transaction described below, since January 1, 2007, there
has not been, and there is not currently proposed, any material transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were
or will be a party in which any director, executive officer, holder of 5% of our capital stock or any member of their immediate
family had or will have a direct or indirect interest.
Under Brazilian corporate
law, our directors and executive officers cannot vote on any matter in which they have a conflict of interest and such transactions
can only be approved on reasonable and fair terms and under conditions that are no more favorable than the terms and conditions
prevailing in the market or offered by third parties.
We participate in
the development of real estate ventures with other partners, directly or through related parties, based on the constitutive documents
of condominiums and/or consortia. The management structure of these enterprises and the cash management are centralized in the
lead partner of the enterprise, which manages the construction schedule and budgets. Thus, the lead partner ensures that the investments
of the necessary funds are made and allocated as planned. The sources and uses of resources of the venture are reflected in the
balance sheet of the ventures, reflecting the respective participation percentages of the partners, which are not subject to inflation
adjustments or financial charges and do not have a predetermined maturity date. The average term for the development and completion
of the projects in which the resources are invested is between 24 and 30 months. Please refer to Note 21 to our consolidated financial
statements for further information on balances with related parties.
As of and for the
years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we have not entered into any loan or other type of financing agreement with our directors
or executive officers. In the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no units sold to management members (R$1.5 million
in 2014), and the amount receivable was R$1.0 million, R$1.6 million and R$4.7 million as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014,
respectively.
C. Interests
of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A. Consolidated
Statements and Other Financial Information
For our consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto see “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
Legal Proceedings
We are currently party
to several legal and administrative proceedings arising from the normal course of our business, principally relating to civil,
environmental, tax and labor claims. We establish provisions in our balance sheets relating to potential losses from litigation
based on estimates of probable losses. Brazilian GAAP requires us to establish provisions in connection with probable losses and
we record a provision when, in the opinion of our management, we feel that an adverse outcome in a litigation is probable and a
loss can be estimated. The determination of the amounts provisioned is based on the amounts involved in the claims and the opinion
of external legal counsel.
Civil Claims
As of December 31,
2016, we were a party to 5,435 civil actions, totaling R$639 million. Of these actions, we were the plaintiff in 319 actions and
the defendant in 5,116 actions, with aggregate amounts of R$154 million and R$485 million, respectively.
Most of these civil
claims involve ordinary course matters relating to the development of our properties, including annulment of contractual clauses
and termination of agreements with the reimbursement of the amounts paid. We also have a few civil claims where we discuss the
resolution of the construction partnership.
As of December 31,
2016, the provisions related to civil claims include R$18.3 million related to lawsuits in which the Company is included as successor
in enforcement actions for judicial and extrajudicial debts, in which the original debtor is a former shareholder of Gafisa, Cimob
Companhia Imobiliária (“Cimob”) or companies that are part of the economic group of Cimob. The plaintiff alleges
that the Company should be liable for the debts of Cimob. We have made judicial deposits amounting to R$16.4 million in connection
with these claims. The Company is filing appeals against all decisions, as it considers that the inclusion of Gafisa in the claims
to be legally unreasonable; these appeals aim at releasing amounts and obtaining the recognition that it cannot be held liable
for the debt of a company that does not have any relationship with Gafisa. The Company has obtained both favorable and unfavorable
decisions on appeal, and the final decision of each pending appeal cannot be predicted at present.
The Company is a plaintiff
in proceedings against Cimob and its former and current controlling shareholders. The Company is seeking (i) restitution of amounts
already paid by the Company in connection with the lawsuits in which the Company is included as successor in enforcement actions
for judicial and extrajudicial debts proceedings in which the original debtor is Cimob and (ii) the recognition of the court that
it does not have any relationship with Cimob and cannot therefore be held liable for the debt of Cimob. The final decision is on
appeal, and cannot be predicted at present.
As of December 31,
2016, the provision for our civil claims amounted to R$98.2 million.
Environmental Claims
As of December 31,
2016, we were the defendants in certain environmental claims alleging damage to a permanent conservation area and we are currently
not able to estimate the aggregate amount of such claims.
In addition, we are
occasionally party to other administrative environmental inquiries or claims by the Public Prosecution Offices or by other governmental
agencies or third parties. These inquiries may result in public environmental claims against us and the findings in these inquires
may give rise to other administrative and criminal claims. However, based on currently available information, we do not believe
these matters are, or are likely to be in the future, material to our business or financial condition.
In Case No. 20654-60.2011.4.01.3200,
federal prosecutors (Ministério Público Federal) argue that the company has built one of the towers of “Riviera
da Ponta Building” on Federal Government property, next to a riverbank. The federal prosecutors claimed R$88.3 million in
damages, comprising both environmental liability for construction in an allegedly “protected area” and payoff for the
property. We estimate the probability of the Company to be sentenced to pay R$88.3 million as remote because we believe that the
federal prosecutors’ computations to get this number are unreasonable, since they neither the value nor the extension of
the area supposedly invaded are accurate.
As of December 31,
2016, we have made no provisions for environmental claims.
Tax Claims
As of December 31,
2016, we were party to several tax proceedings involving tax liabilities in the aggregate amount of R$76 million. As of December
31, 2016, the provision for tax liabilities amounted to R$1.4 million. In addition, we have deposited R$24 million with the court
in connection with some of these proceedings. These amounts take into consideration the tax liabilities of our subsidiaries, in
proportion to our interest in their share capital. The main tax proceedings to which we are a party are described below.
Alphaville is a party
to legal and administrative claims related to Federal VAT (IPI) and State VAT (ICMS) on two imports of aircraft in 2001 and 2005,
respectively, under leasing agreements without purchase options. The likelihood of loss in the ICMS case is rated by legal counsel
as remote. According to the negotiation of the sale of
controlling interest
of 70% in Alphaville, it was agreed in the purchase and sale contract that Gafisa is responsible in the event of an unfavorable
decision.
Several municipalities
charge a municipal tax on construction services on an arbitrated basis, which varies depending on the characteristic of the construction.
We have filed lawsuits against the municipalities of São Paulo and São Caetano do Sul to challenge the calculation
of the arbitrated basis on several of our developments under construction. In these proceedings, we deposited R$2.7 million with
the courts and we are awaiting the final decision. In addition, the municipalities of Rio de Janeiro, Niterói, São
Paulo and Santo Andre have issued tax assessments against us. We have filed administrative defenses and are awaiting the final
administrative decisions. The total amount involved in these proceedings is R$2.7 million.
We filed a lawsuit
against the Brazilian Ministry of Finance to challenge the increase in the PIS and Cofins rates from 0% to 0.65% and 4%, respectively,
on financial income earned by legal entities subject to the non-cumulative regime, on the basis that in our view, this increase
is illegal and unconstitutional. Accordingly, we requested from the Brazilian courts a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Brazilian
Ministry of Finance from collecting the PIS and Cofins contributions on financial revenues. The Brazilian courts denied our request.
We appealed the decision and as of December 31, 2016, we had deposited R$9.4 million with the court in connection with the lawsuit,
which is pending a final decision.
Labor Claims
As of December 31,
2016, we were a defendant in 2,336 labor claims resulting from our ordinary course of business, of which approximately 83% were
filed by outsourced workers and approximately 12% were filed by our former employees. The alleged legal bases for these claims
mainly relate to termination benefits, overtime hours, employee relationship and dismissal rights. As of December 31, 2016, the
total value involved in the labor claims filed against us was approximately R$114.0 million. As of December 31, 2016, the provision
for labor claims amounted to R$61.6 million.
In addition, we are
periodically party to other administrative labor inquiries or claims by the Public Prosecution Offices or by other governmental
agencies or third parties. These inquiries may result in public labor claims against us and the findings in these inquires may
give rise to other claims. However, based on currently available information, we do not believe these matters are, or are likely
to be in the future, material to our business or financial condition.
We have adopted certain
measures to audit third party contractors. The objective of these measures is to evaluate compliance by third party contractors
with labor obligations to their employees. We believe this will help us minimize the risks of potential labor liabilities.
Arbitration
We are also involved
in 5 arbitrations proceedings: 4 of them by partners seeking to discuss and terminate the partnership to develop a few real estate
projects and 1 of them commenced by us against a partner seeking to discuss damages suffered in connection with the development
of certain real estate projects.
As of December 31,
2016, we had made provisions for our arbitration claims totaling R$0.8 million.
Other Developments
On June 14, 2012,
we received a subpoena from the SEC Division of Enforcement related to the Matter of Certain 20-F Filer Home Builders (HO-11760).
The subpoena requests that we produce all documents from January 1, 2010 to the present related to the preparation of our financial
statements, including, among other things, copies of our financial policies and procedures, board and audit committee and operations
committee minutes, monthly closing reports and financial packages, any documents relating to possible financial or accounting irregularities
or improprieties and internal audit reports. The SEC’s investigation is a non-public, fact-finding inquiry and it is not
clear what action, if any, the SEC intends to take with respect to the information it gathers. The SEC subpoena does not specify
any charges. The Company has already submitted all the information requested by SEC, which as of the publication of these financial
statements has not issued any opinion. We have not received any further notice from the SEC after delivering the requested information
in the first half of 2012.
On July 31, 2012,
we received a letter from the CVM: CVM/SEP/GEA-5/ Letter No. 208/2012, requesting information related to criteria for measurement
and recognition of revenue and enhancement in the disclosure of
some notes to our financial
information. We have already provided all the information requested by the CVM. In addition, on February 19, 2013, we received
a letter from the CVM: CVM/SEP/GEA-5/ Letter No. 040/2013 recommending enhancements to the notes to our financial statements regarding
the percentage of assets by venture that is included in the structures of equity segregation of the purchase.
On July 11, 2013,
the Company received CVM/SEP/GEA-5 Letter No. 240/2013, which requested information on the criteria for measuring and recognizing
revenues. The Company has already provided all the information requested by CVM. On November 2013, we received a letter from the
CVM: SEP/GEA-5/no 362/2013, requesting information related to some control deficiencies. We have already provided all the information
requested by the CVM.
The CVM letters listed
above led to administrative proceeding “
Processo Administrativo Sancionador Nº RJ2014-9034
” involving Wilson
Amaral de Oliveira and Alceu Duilio Calciolari, former executive officers of the Company, and André Bergstein, current chief
financial officer of the Company. The former executive officers presented their defense to the alleged facts on December 8, 2014,
regarding the lack of disclosure of some control deficiencies. This administrative proceeding is pending judgment by the CVM.
Dividend Policy
The amount of any
of our distributions of dividends and/or interest on shareholders’ equity will depend on a series of factors, such as our
financial conditions, prospects, macroeconomic conditions, tariff adjustments, regulatory changes, growth strategies and other
issues our board of directors and our shareholders may consider relevant, as discussed below.
Amounts Available for
Distribution
At each annual general
shareholders’ meeting, our board of directors is required to propose to our shareholders how our earnings of the preceding
fiscal year are to be allocated. For purposes of Brazilian corporate law, a company’s income after federal income tax for
such fiscal year, net of any accumulated losses from prior fiscal years and amounts allocated to debentures, employees’ and
management’s participation in earnings and founders’ shares, represents its “net income” for such fiscal
year. In accordance with Brazilian corporate law, an amount equal to the company’s “net income” may be affected
by the following:
|
·
|
reduced by amounts allocated to the legal reserve;
|
|
·
|
reduced by amounts allocated to any statutory reserve;
|
|
·
|
reduced by amounts allocated to the contingency reserve, if any;
|
|
·
|
reduced by amounts allocated to the tax incentives reserve;
|
|
·
|
reduced by amounts allocated to the investment reserve;
|
|
·
|
increased by reversals of contingency reserves recorded in prior years; and
|
|
·
|
increased by amounts allocated to the investment reserve, when realized and if not absorbed by
losses.
|
Our calculation of
net income and allocation of funds to our reserves for any fiscal year are determined on the basis of our audited unconsolidated
financial statements for the immediately preceding fiscal year.
Allocation of Net Income
According to Brazilian
corporate law, we have two types of reserve accounts: (1) profit reserves and (2) capital reserve.
Profit Reserves
Our profit reserves
consist of the following:
|
·
|
Legal Reserve
. Under Brazilian corporate law and our by-laws, we are required to maintain
a legal reserve to which we must allocate 5% of our net income for each fiscal year until the aggregate amount of such reserve
equals 20% of our share capital. However, we are not required to make any allocations to our legal
|
reserve in
a fiscal year in which the legal reserve, when added to our other established capital reserves, exceeds 30% of our total share
capital. The portion of our net income allocated to our legal reserve must be approved by our annual general shareholders’
meeting and the balance of such reserve may only be used to increase our share capital or to absorb losses, but is unavailable
for the payment of dividends. As of December 31, 2016, there was no amount allocated to our legal reserve.
|
·
|
Statutory Reserve
. Under Brazilian corporate law, we are permitted to provide for the allocation
of part of our net income to discretionary reserve accounts that may be established in accordance with our bylaws. The allocation
of our net income to discretionary reserve accounts may not be made if it serves to prevent distribution of the mandatory distributable
amount. According to our bylaws, up to 71.25% of our net income may be allocated to an investment reserve to finance the expansion
of our activities and the activities of our controlled companies by subscribing for capital increases, creating new projects or
participating in consortia or any other type of association to achieve our corporate purpose. This statutory reserve is established
in accordance with our bylaws as an “investment reserve, and such reserve may not exceed 80% of our share capital. As of
December 31, 2016, there was no amount allocated to our statutory reserve.
|
|
·
|
Contingency Reserve
. Under Brazilian corporate law, a percentage of our net income may be
allocated to a contingency reserve for anticipated losses that are deemed probable in future years. Management must indicate the
cause of the anticipated loss and justify the establishment of the reserve for allocation of a percentage of our net income. Any
amount so allocated in a prior year either must be reversed in the year in which the justification for the loss ceases to exist
or charged off in the event that the anticipated loss occurs. The allocations to the contingency reserve are subject to the approval
of our shareholders in a general shareholders’ meeting. As of December 31, 2016, there was no amount allocated to our contingency
reserve.
|
|
·
|
Unrealized Profit Reserve
. Under Brazilian corporate law, the amount by which the mandatory
distributable amount exceeds the “realized” net income in a given fiscal year, as proposed by the board of directors,
may be allocated to the investment reserve. Brazilian corporate law defines “realized” net profits as the amount by
which net profits exceed the sum of (1) the net positive results, if any, from the equity method of accounting and (2) the net
profits, net gains or net returns resulting from transactions or the accounting of assets and liabilities based on their market
value, to be received after the end of the following fiscal year. All amounts allocated to the unrealized profit reserve must be
paid as mandatory dividends when those “unrealized” profits are realized if they have not been designated to absorb
losses in subsequent periods. As of December 31, 2016, there was no amount allocated to our unrealized profit reserve.
|
|
·
|
Retained Earnings Reserve
. Under Brazilian corporate law, a portion of our net income may
be reserved for investment projects in an amount based on a capital expenditure budget approved by our shareholders. If such budget
covers more than one fiscal year, it might be reviewed annually at the general shareholders’ meeting. The allocation of this
reserve cannot jeopardize the payment of the mandatory dividends. As of December 31, 2016, there was no amount allocated to our
retained earnings reserve.
|
Capital Reserves
The capital reserve
is formed by (a) amounts received by shareholders in excess of the par value of shares issued (premium on capital stock), as well
as the part of the issue price of the shares with no par value that exceeds the amount intended to form the capital stock; and
(b) proceeds from the sale of founders’ shares and warrants. Under Brazilian corporate law, capital reserve may only be applied
to: (1) absorb losses that exceed accumulated earnings and revenue reserves; (2) redeem, reimburse or buy our own shares; and (3)
increase our share capital.
Mandatory Distribution
of Dividends
Brazilian corporate
law generally requires that the bylaws of each Brazilian company specify a minimum percentage of the amounts available for distribution
by such company for each fiscal year that must be distributed to shareholders as dividends or as interest on shareholders’
equity, also known as the mandatory dividend.
The mandatory dividend
is based on a percentage of adjusted net income, rather than a fixed monetary amount per share. Under our bylaws, at least 25%
of our net income, as calculated under Brazilian GAAP and adjusted under Brazilian corporate law (which differs significantly from
net income as calculated under U.S. GAAP), for the
preceding fiscal year
must be distributed as a mandatory dividend. Adjusted net income means the distributable amount before any deductions for profit
retention and statutory reserves.
Under Brazilian corporate
law, however, we are allowed to suspend the distribution of the mandatory dividends in any year in which our board of directors
report to our general shareholders’ meeting that the distribution would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition.
Such suspension is subject to the approval at the shareholders’ meeting and review by members of the fiscal council. In the
case of publicly held companies, the board of directors must file a justification for such suspension with the CVM within five
days of the relevant general shareholders’ meeting. If the mandatory dividend is not paid, the unpaid amount shall be attributed
to a special reserve account. If not absorbed by subsequent losses, those funds shall be paid out as dividends as soon as the financial
condition of the company permits.
The mandatory dividend
may also be paid in the form of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity, which is considered to be a deductible financial
expense for purpose of calculating our income and social contribution tax obligations, provided that certain requirements are met.
See “ Item 10. Additional Information – E. Taxation” for further information.
Payment of Dividends
We are required by
Brazilian corporate law and our bylaws to hold an annual general shareholders’ meeting within the first four months following
the end of each fiscal year, at which time, among other things, the shareholders have to decide on the allocation of the results
from the preceding year and on the payment of dividends based on our financial results from the previous fiscal year.
Under Brazilian corporate
law, dividends are generally required to be paid to the holder of record on the date of the dividend declaration date within 60
days following the date the dividend was declared, unless a shareholders’ resolution sets forth another date of payment,
which, in either case, must occur within the fiscal year in which such dividend was declared. A shareholder has a three-year period
from the date of the dividend payment to claim dividends, which do not bear interest and are not monetarily restated, after which
the aggregate amount of any unclaimed dividends shall legally revert to us.
Our board of directors
may declare interim dividends to be deducted from the retained earnings or profit reserves in our semi-annual or annual financial
statements. In addition, our board of directors may pay dividends from our net income based on our net income registered on semi-annual
or quarterly balance sheet. The dividends paid in each semester may not exceed the amounts accounted for in our capital reserve
accounts. Any payment of interim dividends may be set off against the amount of mandatory dividend relating to the net profit earned
in the year in which the interim dividends were paid.
In general, shareholders
who are not residents of Brazil must register their equity investment with the Central Bank to have dividends, sales proceeds or
other amounts with respect to their shares eligible to be remitted outside of Brazil. The common shares underlying the ADSs are
held in Brazil by Banco Itaú S.A., also known as the custodian, as agent for the depositary, who is the registered owner
on the records of the registrar for our shares. The depositary registers the common shares underlying the ADSs with the Central
Bank and, therefore, it is possible to have dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to the common shares remitted
outside Brazil.
Payments of cash dividends
and distributions, if any, are made in
reais
to the custodian on behalf of the depositary, which then converts such proceeds
into U.S. dollars and causes such U.S. dollars to be delivered to the depositary for distribution to holders of ADSs. In the event
that the custodian is unable to convert immediately the
reais
received as dividends into U.S. dollars, the amount of U.S.
dollars payable to holders of ADSs may be adversely affected by any depreciation of the real that occurs before the dividends are
converted. Under current Brazilian tax law, dividends paid to persons who are not Brazilian residents, including holders of ADSs,
will not be subject to Brazilian withholding tax, except for dividends declared based on profits generated prior to December 31,
1995, which will be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying tax rates. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E.
Taxation.”
Holders of ADSs have
the benefit of the electronic registration obtained from the Central Bank, which permits the depositary and the custodian to convert
dividends and other distributions or sales proceeds with respect to the common shares represented by ADSs into foreign currency
and remit the proceeds outside of Brazil. In the event the holder exchanges the ADSs for common shares, the holder will be entitled
to continue to rely on the depositary’s certificate of registration for five business days after the exchange. Thereafter,
in order to convert foreign currency and remit outside of Brazil the sales proceeds or distributions with respect to the common
shares, the holder must
obtain a new certificate
of registration in its own name that will permit the conversion and remittance of such payments through the commercial exchange
rate market.
Under current Brazilian
legislation, the Brazilian government may impose temporary restrictions of foreign capital abroad in the event of a serious imbalance
or an anticipated serious imbalance of Brazil’s balance of payments. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
Relating to Our Common Shares and the ADSs.”
Interest on Equity
Under the Brazilian
tax legislation effective January 1, 1996, Brazilian companies are permitted to pay “interest” to holders of equity
securities and treat such payments as a deductible financial expense for Brazilian income tax purposes and, from 1997, for social
contribution on net profit purposes. The purpose of the tax law change is to encourage the use of equity investment, as opposed
to debt, to finance corporate activities. Payment of such interest may be made at the discretion of our board of directors. The
amount of any such notional “interest” payment to holders of equity securities is generally limited in respect of any
particular year to the greater of:
|
·
|
50% of net income (after the deduction of the provisions for social contribution on net profits
but before taking into account the provision for corporate income tax and the interest attributable to shareholders’ equity)
for the period in respect of which the payment is made; or
|
|
·
|
50% of the sum of retained earnings and profit reserves as of the beginning of the year in respect
to which such payment is made.
|
For tax deduction
purposes, the rate applied in calculating interest attributable to shareholders’ equity cannot exceed the
pro rata die
variation of the Long Term Interest Rate (
Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo
), or TJLP, as determined by the Central Bank from
time to time.
For accounting purposes,
although the interest should be reflected in the statement of operations for tax deduction, the charge is reversed before the calculation
of the net income in the statutory financial statements and deducted from the shareholders’ equity in the same way as the
dividend. Please refer to “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Income—Interest
on Shareholders’ Equity” below for a discussion of tax consequences related to the receipt of payments of interest
attributable to shareholders’ equity by a non-resident holder of our common shares or ADSs.
The amount distributed
to shareholders as interest attributable to equity, net of any withholding tax, may be included as part of the minimum mandatory
dividend. In accordance with applicable law, we are required to pay to shareholders an amount sufficient to ensure that the net
amount they receive in respect of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity, after payment of the applicable withholding
tax, plus the amount of declared dividends, is at least equivalent to the amount of the minimum mandatory dividend. A shareholder
has a three-year period from the date of the interest payment to claim interest attributable to equity, after which the aggregate
amount of any unclaimed interest shall legally revert to us.
If a payment of interest
on equity is recorded at net value as part of a mandatory dividend, we will pay the income tax on behalf of our shareholders at
the time the payment is distributed. Otherwise, the income tax will be paid by the shareholders, subject to our obligation to retain
and collect taxes on the payment.
History of Payment of Dividends and
Interest on Equity
In 2010, we distributed
dividends in the total amount of R$50.7 million, or R$0.12 per share (after giving effect to the stock split of one existing share
into two newly issued shares approved at our shareholders’ meeting on February 22, 2010), for fiscal year 2009. In 2011,
we distributed dividends in the total amount of R$98.8 million, or R$0.2991 per share, for fiscal year 2010.
In 2012, we did not
distribute any dividends, related to fiscal year 2011. In 2013, we did not distribute any dividends, related to fiscal year 2012.
On December 20, 2013,
we approved the distribution of interest on equity, charging the account of net income for the current fiscal year, according to
the extraordinary balance sheet of December 3, 2013 and deducted from the mandatory minimum dividends of 2013 fiscal year, as set
forth on §7, Article 9, Law 9,249/95 and CVM Deliberation No. 207/96, in the gross amount of R$130.2 million, corresponding
to R$0.3111 per outstanding share.
On April 25, 2014,
we approved the payment of dividends in the total amount of R$32.9 million, or R$0.082 per share (excluding treasury shares) for
fiscal year 2013. The dividends were distributed on December 11, 2014, as approved by a meeting of the board of directors held
on December 1, 2014.
On April 25, 2014,
we approved the distribution of interest on equity, charging the account of net income for the current fiscal year, according to
the extraordinary balance sheet of December 3, 2013 and deducted from the mandatory minimum dividends of 2013 fiscal year, as set
forth on §7, Article 9, Law 9,249/95 and CVM Deliberation No. 207/96, in the gross amount of R$130.2 million, corresponding
to R$0.3111 per outstanding share. The interest on equity was distributed on December 11, 2014, as approved by a meeting of the
board of directors held on December 1, 2014.
In 2015, we did not
distribute any dividends related to fiscal year 2014.
On April 25, 2016,
we approved the payment of dividends in the total amount of R$17.7 million, or R$0.048 per share (excluding treasury shares) for
fiscal year 2015. The dividends were distributed on December 22, 2016, as approved by a meeting of the board of directors held
on December 16, 2016.
In 2016, we did not
distribute any dividends related to fiscal year 2015.
B. Significant
Changes
None.
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
A. Offer
and Listing Details
Our common shares
started trading on the BM&FBOVESPA on February 17, 2006 and the ADSs started trading on the NYSE on March 16, 2007. The table
below sets forth, for the indicated periods, the high and low closing prices of the ADSs on the NYSE, in U.S. dollars, and the
common shares on the BM&FBOVESPA, in
reais
:
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
São Paulo Stock Exchange
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Volume(1)
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Volume(1)
|
|
|
(in US$ per ADS)
|
|
(in
reais
per common shares)
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
2,911,582
|
|
|
|
6.78
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
14,660,144
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
1,853,011
|
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
10,648,389
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
1,184,125
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
|
|
|
5,990,816
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
483,148
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
3,784,043
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
330,931
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
5,547,208
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter 2015
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
753,723
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
4,547,867
|
|
Second quarter 2015
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
507,015
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
3,607,857
|
|
Third quarter 2015
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
441,346
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
3,995,428
|
|
Fourth quarter 2015
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
243,567
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
2,961,135
|
|
First quarter 2016
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
197,372
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
2,640,703
|
|
Second quarter 2016
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
256,970
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
3,872,952
|
|
Third quarter 2016
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
329,930
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
7,452,148
|
|
Fourth quarter 2016
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
536,402
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
8,105,362
|
|
Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2016
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
603,620
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
10,102,560
|
|
November 2016
|
|
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
499,148
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
8,810,279
|
|
December 2016
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
506,439
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
5,531,919
|
|
January 2017
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
630,567
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
10,530,223
|
|
February 2017
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
357,747
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
7,983,872
|
|
March 2017
(2)
|
|
|
21.71
|
|
|
|
18.74
|
|
|
|
35,229
|
|
|
|
34.65
|
|
|
|
26.48
|
|
|
|
566,758
|
|
April 2017
(2)
(through April 24, 2017)
|
|
|
19.89
|
|
|
|
16.07
|
|
|
|
74,115
|
|
|
|
27.19
|
|
|
|
25.20
|
|
|
|
321,327
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Average number of shares traded per day.
|
(2) Considering
the reverse stock split of all Gafisa’s shares at a ratio of 13.483023074 to 1 consummated on March 23, 2017.
In September 2007,
we joined the BM&FBOVESPA Index, or “IBM&FBOVESPA,” the main indicator of the Brazilian stock market’s
average performance. We are part of the IbrX-100, an index measuring the total return on a theoretical portfolio composed of 100
stocks selected among BM&FBOVESPA’s most actively traded securities. Additionally, we are part of the MSCI Emerging Markets
Index, which is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure equity market performance in the
global emerging markets. Through the inclusion on these indices, our stock has expanded opportunity for increased liquidity. Prior
to joining the indices, we traded at a daily average of R$38.1 million (or 1.3 million shares), and after joining the indices,
trading in our shares increased to a daily average of R$57.1 million (or 11.3 million shares).
We are part of the
following indices of the Brazilian stock market:
|
·
|
IBRA: This index comprises all stocks actively traded on the cash market operated by BM&FBOVESPA
that have a certain minimum liquidity and active trading criteria;
|
|
·
|
IBRX 100:
This index measures the average stock performance of the
100 most actively traded stocks of the Brazilian stock market.
|
|
·
|
ICON: This index measures the
average stock performance of the more
actively traded cyclical and non-cyclical consumer stocks.
|
|
·
|
IMOB: This index is a real estate sector index covering BM&FBOVESPA’s most actively traded
securities;
|
|
·
|
IGCX: This index comprises all stocks trading on the
Novo Mercado
and Levels 1 and 2 of
the BM&FBOVESPA;
|
|
·
|
IGCT: The stocks that comprise this index are selected as constituents of the Special Corporate
Governance Equity Index (IGC) to the extent they meet certain additional membership criteria;
|
|
·
|
IGC-NM: This index comprises stocks listed for trading on the Novo Mercado segment of the BM&FBOVESPA;
|
|
·
|
ITAG: This index comprises stocks which give minority shareholders enhanced tag-along rights protection
in addition to the protection required by law in the event of a change of control;
|
|
·
|
SMLL: This index comprises small capitalization stocks; and
|
|
·
|
INDX: This index was developed to measure the performance of the most representative companies
of the industrial sector, an important segment of the Brazilian economy. Its theoretical portfolio is composed by the industry’s
most representative stocks, which are selected among BM&FBOVESPA’s most actively traded securities.
|
B. Plan
of Distribution
Not applicable.
C. Markets
Our common shares
are listed on the BM&FBOVESPA under the symbol “GFSA3” and the ADSs are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “GFA.”
Trading on the BM&FBOVESPA
Trading on the São
Paulo Stock Exchange is conducted every business day, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., on an electronic trading system called the
PUMA Trading System (“PUMA”). Trading is also conducted between 5:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., on an online system connected
to PUMA and Internet brokers called the “after market” The “after-market” trading is scheduled after the
close of principal trading sessions, when investors may send purchase and sell orders and trade through the home broker system.
This after-market trading is subject to regulatory limits on price volatility of securities traded by investors operating on the
Internet.
The CVM and the BM&FBOVESPA
have discretionary authority to suspend trading in shares of a particular issuer under certain circumstances. Trading in securities
listed on the BM&FBOVESPA, including the
Novo Mercado, Bovespa Mais, Bovespa Mais Nível 2
and Levels 1 and 2
segments, may be effected off the exchanges in the unorganized over-the-counter market in certain circumstances.
The shares of all
companies listed on the BM&FBOVESPA, including the
Novo Mercado, Bovespa Mais, Bovespa Mais Nível 2
and Level
1 and Level 2 companies, are traded together.
Settlement of transactions
occurs three business days after the trade date, without adjustments to the purchase price. Delivery of and payment for shares
are made through the facilities of separate clearing houses for each exchange, which maintain accounts for brokerage firms, the
BM&FBOVESPA Brazilian Securities Depositary (
Central Depositária da BM&FBOVESPA
), formerly the BM&FBOVESPA
Securities Clearinghouse (
Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia
). The seller is ordinarily
required to deliver the shares to the BM&FBOVESPA clearing house on the second business day following the trade date.
In order to maintain
control over the fluctuation of the BM&FBOVESPA index, the BM&FBOVESPA has adopted a “circuit breaker” system
pursuant to which trading sessions may be suspended for a period of 30 minutes or one hour whenever specified indices of the BM&FBOVESPA
fall below the limits of approximately 10% and 15%, respectively, in relation to the closing index levels for the previous trading
session.
Although the Brazilian
equity market is the largest in Latin America in terms of capitalization, it is smaller and less liquid than the major U.S. and
European securities markets. The BM&FBOVESPA is significantly less liquid than the NYSE, or other major exchanges in the world.
The BM&FBOVESPA, had a market capitalization of US$757.0 billion as of December 31, 2016 and an average daily trading volume
of US$2.4 billion for 2016. In comparison, the NYSE had a market capitalization of US$20.2 trillion as of December 31, 2016 and
an average daily trading volume of approximately US$43.9 billion for 2016. Although any of the outstanding shares of a listed company
may trade on the BM&FBOVESPA, in most cases fewer than half of the listed shares are actually available for trading by the
public, the remainder being held by small groups of controlling persons, by government entities or by one main shareholder. The
relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may substantially limit your ability to sell the common
shares at the time and price you desire and, as a result, could negatively impact the market price of these securities.
Trading on Brazilian
stock exchanges by non-residents of Brazil is subject to registration procedures. See “—Investment in Our Common Shares
by Non-Residents of Brazil.”
Regulation of Brazilian Securities
Markets
The Brazilian securities
markets are mainly governed by Law No. 6,385, of December 7, 1976, Law No. 4,728, of July 14, 1965 and Brazilian corporate law,
each as amended and supplemented, and by regulations issued by the CVM, which has authority over stock exchanges and the securities
markets generally; the CMN; and the Central Bank, which has, among other powers, licensing authority over brokerage firms and regulates
foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions.
These laws and regulations,
among others, provide for licensing and oversight of brokerage firms, governance of the Brazilian stock exchanges, disclosure requirements
applicable to issuers of traded securities, restrictions on price manipulation and protection of minority shareholders. They also
provide for restrictions on insider trading. However, the Brazilian securities markets may not be considered to be as highly regulated
and supervised as the U.S. securities markets or securities markets in some other jurisdictions. Accordingly, any trades or transfers
of our equity securities by our officers and directors, our controlling shareholders or any of the officers and directors of our
controlling shareholders must comply with the regulations issued by the CVM. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B.
Memorandum and Bylaws—Disclosure Requirements.”
We have the option
to ask that trading in our securities on the BM&FBOVESPA be suspended in anticipation of a material announcement. Trading may
also be suspended on the initiative of the BM&FBOVESPA or the CVM, based on or due to, among other reasons, a belief that a
company has provided inadequate information regarding a material event or has provided inadequate responses to inquiries by the
CVM or the BM&FBOVESPA.
Under Brazilian corporate
law, a corporation is either public, as we are, or closely held. All public companies are registered with the CVM and are subject
to reporting requirements. A company registered with the CVM may trade its securities either on the BM&FBOVESPA, if it has
registered to have its securities traded at the BM&FBOVESPA, or on the Brazilian over-the-counter market. The shares of a listed
company may also be traded
privately, subject to
several limitations. Our common shares are listed on
Novo Mercado
segment of the BM&FBOVESPA.
The Brazilian over-the-counter
market consists of direct trades between individuals in which a financial institution registered with the CVM (and in the relevant
over the counter market) serves as intermediary. The Brazilian over-the-counter market is divided into two categories: (i) an organized
over the counter market, in which the transactions are supervised by self-regulating entities authorized by the CVM; and (ii) a
non-organized over the counter market, in which the transactions are not supervised by self-regulating entities authorized by the
CVM. In either case, transactions are directly traded outside of the stock exchange market, through a financial institution authorized
by the CVM. No special application, other than registration with the CVM, is necessary for securities of a public company to be
traded in this market. The CVM requires that it be given notice of all trades carried out in the Brazilian over-the-counter market
by the respective intermediaries.
Investment in Our Common Shares by
Non-Residents of Brazil
Portfolio Investment
Investors residing
outside Brazil are authorized to purchase equity instruments, including our common shares, in the form of foreign portfolio investments
on the BM&FBOVESPA, provided that they comply with the registration requirements set forth in (i) CVM Instruction No. 560,
published on March 25, 2015, which revoked CVM Instruction No. 325 and (ii) Resolution No. 4,373 of September 29, 2014 (“Resolution
No. 4,373”).
With certain exceptions,
Resolution No. 4,373/14 investors are permitted to carry out any type of transaction in the Brazilian financial capital market
involving a security traded on a stock, futures or organized over-the-counter market authorized by the CVM. Investments and remittances
outside Brazil of gains, dividends, profits or other payments under our common shares are made through the foreign exchange market.
See “Item 10. Additional Information—D. Exchange Controls.”
In order to become
a Resolution No. 4,373/14 investor, an investor residing outside Brazil must:
|
·
|
appoint a representative in Brazil with powers to take actions relating to the investment;
|
|
·
|
appoint an authorized custodian in Brazil for the investments, which must be a financial institution
duly authorized by the Central Bank and CVM;
|
|
·
|
appoint a tax representative in Brazil;
|
|
·
|
through its representative in Brazil, register itself as a foreign investor with the CVM and the
Central Bank; and
|
|
·
|
through its representative in Brazil, register itself with the Brazilian Internal Revenue (Receita
Federal) pursuant to Regulatory Instruction No. 1,470 of May 30, 2014, and Regulatory Instruction No. 1,548 of February 13, 2015,
as the case may be.
|
Securities and other
financial assets held by foreign investors pursuant to Resolution No. 4,373/14 must be registered or maintained in deposit accounts
or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the Central Bank or the CVM. In addition, securities trading by foreign investors
is generally restricted to transactions carried out in the Brazilian stock exchanges or in organized over-the-counter markets licensed
by the CVM. Therefore, as a general rule, no private sale of securities and other financial assets held by foreign investors pursuant
to Resolution No. 4,373/14 are permitted.
Foreign Direct Investment
Foreign direct investors
under Law No. 4,131/62 may sell their shares in both private or open market transactions, but these investors will generally be
subject to less favorable tax treatment on gains as compared to foreign portfolio investors.
A foreign direct investor
under Law No. 4,131/62 must:
|
·
|
register itself as a foreign direct investor and the investment with the Central Bank;
|
|
·
|
obtain a taxpayer identification number from the Brazilian tax authorities;
|
|
·
|
appoint a tax representative in Brazil; and
|
|
·
|
appoint a representative in Brazil for service of process in respect of suits based on Brazilian
corporate law.
|
Depositary Receipts
Resolution No. 4,373/14,
which revoked Resolutions No. 1,927/92 and 3,845/10 of the CMN, regulates the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets
in connection with shares of Brazilian issuers. Our ADSs program was approved by the CVM on March 8, 2007.
If a holder of ADSs
decides to exchange ADSs for the underlying common shares, the holder may (1) sell the common shares on the BM&FBOVESPA and
rely on the depositary’s electronic registration for five business days from the date of the exchange to obtain and remit
U.S. dollars abroad upon the holder’s sale of our common shares; (2) convert its investment into a foreign portfolio investment
under Resolution No.4,373/14, subject to simultaneous foreign exchange transactions (without actual inflow or outflow of funds);
or (3) convert its investment into a foreign direct investment under Law No. 4,131/62, subject to simultaneous foreign exchange
transactions.
If a holder of ADSs
wishes to convert its investment into either a foreign portfolio investment under Resolution No. 4,373/14 or a foreign direct investment
under Law No. 4,131/62, it should first comply with such regulations, obtaining his own foreign investor registration with the
Central Bank or with the CVM as the case may be, in advance of exchanging the ADSs for common shares and of executing the simultaneous
foreign exchange agreements.
The custodian is permitted
to update the depositary’s electronic registration to reflect conversions of foreign portfolio investments under Resolution
No. 4,373/14 into ADSs. If a foreign direct investor under Law No. 4,131/62 wishes to deposit its shares into the ADR program in
exchange for ADSs, such holder will be required to execute simultaneous foreign exchange transactions and to present to the custodian
evidence of payment of the applicable taxes. Please refer to “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Brazilian
Tax Considerations” for a description of the tax consequences to an investor residing outside Brazil of investing in our
common shares in Brazil.
D. Selling
Shareholders
Not applicable.
E. Dilution
Not applicable.
F. Expenses
of the Issue
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. Share
Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum
and Bylaws
Registration
We are currently a
publicly-held company incorporated under the laws of Brazil, registered with the Board of Trade of the State of São Paulo
(JUCESP) under NIRE 35300147952 and with the CVM under No. 01610-1, and enrolled with the Brazilian Taxpayer’s Authorities
under CNPJ/MF No. 01,545,826/0001-07.
Corporate Purposes
Article 3 of our bylaws
provides that our corporate purpose is to: (1) promote and develop any type of real estate project, whether our own or that of
a third party, in the latter case as a contractor and agent; (2) purchase and sell any type of real estate; (3) perform civil construction
and provide civil engineering services; and (4) develop and implement marketing strategies for any type of real estate project,
whether our own or that of a third party. In addition, we may participate in companies that are not affiliated to us in Brazil
and outside of Brazil.
Issued Share Capital
As of December 31,
2016, our share capital was R$2,740,661,187.74, all of which was fully subscribed and paid-in. Our share capital was comprised
of 378,066,162 registered, book-entry common shares, without par value. Under our bylaws, our board of directors may increase our
share capital to the limit of our authorized capital by issuing up to 600,000,000 common shares without the need of specific shareholder
approval. Our shareholders must approve any capital increase above that amount at a shareholders’ general meeting. Pursuant
to the agreement entered into with the BM&FBOVESPA for the listing of our shares on the
Novo Mercado
, we are not permitted
to issue preferred shares.
Novo Mercado
Our shares were accepted
for trading on the
Novo Mercado
on February 17, 2006. In order to delist our shares from the
Novo Mercado
and since
we currently do not have a controlling shareholder, the general shareholders’ meeting that decides upon the delisting shall
appoint among those presents the person that, upon its express acceptance, must conduct a tender offer for the purchase of the
shares of our capital stock outstanding in the market. See “—Delisting from the
Novo Mercado
.” In the
Novo Mercado
, listed companies are required to, among others, (1) only issue common shares, (2) maintain a minimum free
float equal to at least 25% of the company’s capital, (3) detail and include additional information in the quarterly information
and (4) make available the annual financial statements in English and based on international accounting standards.
The rules imposed
by the
Novo Mercado
aim at providing transparency in relation to the activities and economic situation of the companies
to the market, as well as more power to the minority shareholders in the management of the companies, among other rights. The main
rules relating to the
Novo Mercado
, to which the company is subject, are summarized below.
According to CMN Resolution
No. 3,792 of September 24, 2009, which governs the closed complementary social security entities’ investment policy (
Entidades
Fechadas de Previdência Complementar —
EFPC), such pension funds may invest up to 70% of its variable income investment
portfolio (in which are included corporate stakes) in publicly held companies listed in the
Novo Mercado
, which may, therefore,
improve the development of this corporate governance segment, benefiting the companies listed therein, taking into account the
immense financial equity held by such pension funds in Brazil.
Authorization for Trading
in the Novo Mercado
Firstly, the company
that is authorized to list its securities on the
Novo Mercado
of BM&FBOVESPA shall keep its listed company register
with the CVM updated, which allows the trading of the company’s common shares at the stock market. The Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
were revised in 2011 and the rules are in full force and effect since May 10, 2011. By June 9, 2011, we had
already adapted our bylaws to the rules of the
Novo Mercado
. As of the date of this annual report, the 2011 version of the
Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
are being revised.
According to the Listing
Rules of the
Novo Mercado
, the company willing to negotiate its securities on the
Novo Mercado
shall, among other
conditions: (1) along with its controlling shareholder (if any), execute a Listing Agreement in the
Novo Mercado
, (2) adapt
its bylaws to comply with the minimum requirements determined in the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
and (3) file the
Management Compliance Statements and the Fiscal Council Compliance Statements (if applicable) with BM&FBOVESPA, duly executed
by all managers and members of the fiscal council, respectively. The capital of the company shall be exclusively divided into common
shares and a minimum free float equal to 25% of the capital stock shall be maintained by the company. The existence of founders’
shares by the companies listed on the
Novo Mercado
is prohibited.
In addition to the
previous requirements, the company’s bylaws may not (1) establish any provision which restricts the number of votes of any
shareholder or group of shareholders (as defined in the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
) to a percentage inferior to 5%
of the company’s corporate capital, (2) determine qualified quorums
for matters submitted
for the approval of the shareholders’ general meetings, except as provided by law, nor (3) restrict or establish any encumbrance
to shareholders who vote favorably to the suppression or amendment of any provision of the company’s bylaws.
Board of Directors
The board of directors
of companies authorized to have their shares traded on the
Novo Mercado
shall be comprised of at least five members, of
which at least 20% shall be independent, as defined in the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
. The members of the board of
directors shall be elected by a shareholders’ general meeting for a maximum two-year term of office, and are eligible for
reelection. All new members of the board of directors and of the board of officers shall sign a Management Compliance Statement
which shall be filed with BM&FBOVESPA within 15 days of the date such members take office. Through such Compliance Statement,
the company’s directors and officers are personally responsible for complying with the Listing Agreement in the
Novo Mercado
,
the Rules of the Market Arbitration Chamber, the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
and any other rule issued by BM&FBOVESPA
regarding the
Novo Mercado
.
The positions of chairman
of the board of directors and of chief executive officer may not be cumulated by the same person, except in the event of (1) a
transition period (limited to 3 years as of the date the company was authorized to negotiate on the
Novo Mercado
, except
if BM&FBOVESPA authorizes otherwise); or (2) vacancy, for a maximum period of 180 days.
Directors shall inform
the company of any other board of directors, executive committee, fiscal council or any other office occupied by them in other
companies or entities, which information will be sent by the company to BM&FBOVESPA pursuant to the terms established in the
Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
.
The board of directors
shall always disclose to the market an opinion regarding any tender offer of the company’s shares, informing, among others,
their position on the convenience and consequences of such offer in respect to the interests (a) of the shareholders and regarding
the liquidity of such securities held by the shareholders and (b) of the company, stating their reasons for being favorable or
against the offer. Additionally, the board of directors shall always emphasize that each shareholder is responsible for the final
decision regarding the acceptance or not of such tender offer.
Other Novo Mercado Characteristics
Novo Mercado
rules cover other areas designed to foster high levels of corporate governance and market transparency. Companies are required
to keep the minimum stock percentage floating in the market in order to foster dispersion of share ownership. In addition, companies
are obliged to assign tag-along rights to their shareholders in order to ensure equal treatment if a controlling shareholder sells
its controlling stake.
The
Novo Mercado
rules require companies to provide information on the number of shares held by the controlling shareholder, if any, in addition
to other information required by the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
. Companies are also required to give more disclosure
regarding related party transactions in which a company may be involved. The Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
also require
companies to prepare and disclose to BM&FBOVESPA and to the market a Securities Negotiation Policy applicable at least to the
company, its controlling shareholders, directors, officers, members of the fiscal council and members of other committees, as well
as a Code of Conduct establishing the company’s principles and values regarding its relationship with its management, employees,
service providers and any person or entity with which the company maintains any relation.
Finally, controlling
shareholders, other shareholders, directors, officers and members of a company’s fiscal council are required to submit to
arbitration any disputes or conflicts related to or arising from the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
, the Listing Agreement
in the
Novo Mercado
, the Penalties Regulation and the Arbitration Clause, specifically with regard to their application,
validity, effectiveness and interpretation. The arbitrations shall take place before the Market Arbitration Chamber established
by the BM&FBOVESPA and shall be conducted in accordance with the Rules of the Market Arbitration Chamber.
Novo Mercado Public Hearings
As of the date of
this annual report, the existing Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
are in force but are being revised and the BM&FBOVESPA
is conducting public and private hearings in that regard. It is expected that any new listing rules will come into effect in: (i)
2018, for new companies; and (ii) 2020, for listed companies.
Company Management
We are managed by
a board of directors (
Conselho de Administração
) and a board of officers (
Diretoria
). See “Item
6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.”
The members of the
board of directors and of the board of officers must be individuals, provided that the latter must also be Brazilian residents.
Conflict of Interests
According to Brazilian
corporate law a director or an officer shall not take part in any corporate transaction in which he/she has an interest which conflicts
with the interest of the company. In this case, he/she shall disclose his/her disqualification to the other directors or officers
and shall cause the nature and extent of his/her interest to be recorded in the minutes of the board of directors or board of officers’
meeting, as the case may be.
With due compliance
with the rules above relating to conflict of interests, a director or an officer may only contract with the company under reasonable
and fair conditions, identical to those which prevail in the market or under which the corporation would contract with third parties.
Any business contracted otherwise is voidable and the director or the officer concerned shall be obliged to transfer to the corporation
all benefits which he/she may have obtained in such business.
According to Brazilian
corporate law, a director or officer may not:
|
·
|
perform any act of generosity to the detriment of the company;
|
|
·
|
without prior approval of the shareholders’ general meeting or the board of directors, borrow
money or property from the company or use its property, services or take advantage of its standing for his/her own benefit, for
the benefit of a company in which he/she has an interest or for the benefit of a third party; and
|
|
·
|
by virtue of his or her position, receive any type of direct or indirect personal advantage from
third parties, without authorization in the bylaws or from a shareholders’ general meeting.
|
According to our bylaws,
any business or agreement between the company and any shareholder, director or officer must be previously approved by the board
of directors, except if specified in our annual budget or business plan.
Rules for Retirement
There is no retirement
age limit relating to directors or officers pursuant to the Brazilian law and our bylaws.
Policy for the Trading of Our Securities
On, August 10, 2015,
our board of directors approved the second amendment of our Conduct Manual on Information Disclosure and Use and Securities Trading
Policy passed on July 15, 2009, which establishes the following procedures regarding the policy for the trading of our securities:
|
·
|
the company and all of our directors, executive officers, employees, members of the other bodies
with technical or consultant duties, our possible controlling shareholders, and whoever by virtue of his/her position, job, or
post at our company or our subsidiaries and affiliates, and who have signed the compliance statement and became aware of information
of a material transaction or event involving our company, are restricted from trading in our securities until such material transaction
or event is disclosed to the market as a material fact, except as regards treasury stock transactions, through private trading,
the exercise of options to purchase shares of our capital stock, with stock option plan approved by the shareholders, or a possible
buyback, also through private trading, carried out by us, provided that such buyback program is carried due to the exercise of
stock options in connection with the plan or program. This restriction is extended to periods prior to the announcement of such
information or annual or interim financial statements or prior to disclosure of a material fact in accordance with applicable law;
|
|
·
|
trading of our securities or transactions related to our securities carried out by the aforementioned
persons pursuant to an Individual Investment Program, consisting of long-term investments, as defined in the Trading Policy, is
not subject to the aforementioned restrictions;
|
|
·
|
the restrictions of the Trading Policy also apply to our former directors and executive officers
who resigned prior to the public disclosure of a transaction or fact that began during their administration (a) for the six month
period following the end of their duties with the company, or (b) until the disclosure of the material event or the related financial
statements, whichever occurs first; and
|
|
·
|
the abovementioned restrictions also apply to indirect trading carried out by such persons, except
those conducted by investment funds, provided that the investment funds are not exclusive and the transaction decisions taken by
the investment fund officers cannot be influenced by its unit holders.
|
Rights of Common Shares
Each of our common
shares entitles its holder to one vote at an annual or special shareholders’ general meeting. A holder of ADSs has the right
under the deposit agreement to instruct the depositary to exercise the voting rights for the common shares represented by his/hers
ADSs. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Common Shares and the ADSs.” Pursuant
to our bylaws, Brazilian corporate law and the
Novo Mercado
rules, owners of common shares are entitled to dividends, or
other distributions made in respect of common shares, in proportion to their ownership of outstanding shares. See “Item 8.
Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy” and “Item
9. The Offer and Listing—C. Markets— Investment in Our Common Shares by Non-Residents of Brazil” for a more complete
description of payment of dividends and other distributions on our common shares. In addition, upon our liquidation, holders of
our shares are entitled to share all our remaining assets, after payment of all our liabilities, ratably in accordance with their
respective participation in the total amount of our issued and outstanding shares. Holders of our common shares are entitled to
participate on a
pro rata
basis in future capital calls by our company except in some specific circumstances under Brazilian
law, as described in “—Preemptive Rights.” Our common shares have tag along rights, which enable their holders
to, upon the sale of a controlling interest in us, receive 100% of the price paid per common share of the controlling block by
a single or series of transaction.
Options
According to our bylaws,
we may, within our authorized share capital and upon resolution of the shareholders’ general meeting, grant stock options
to (1) our directors, executive officers and employees, or (2) individuals who provide services to us or to companies we control.
Appraisal Rights
Shareholders who are
absent, dissent or abstain from voting on certain actions taken during a shareholders’ general meeting have the right under
Brazilian corporate law to withdraw from our company and to receive the value of their shares.
According to Brazilian
corporate law, shareholder appraisal rights may be exercised in the following circumstances, among others:
|
·
|
a reduction in the percentage of our mandatory dividends;
|
|
·
|
a change in our corporate purpose;
|
|
·
|
an acquisition, by our company, of a controlling stake in another company if the acquisition price
is outside of the limits established by Brazilian corporate law;
|
|
·
|
a merger of shares involving our company, a merger of our company into another company, if we are
not the surviving entity, or our consolidation with another company; or
|
|
·
|
an approval of our participation in a group of companies (as defined in Brazilian corporate law).
|
Brazilian corporate
law further provides that any resolution regarding a spin-off will also entitle shareholders to withdraw if the spin-off:
|
·
|
causes a change in our corporate purpose, except if the equity is spun-off to a company whose primary
activities are consistent with our corporate purposes;
|
|
·
|
reduces our mandatory dividends; or
|
|
·
|
causes us to join a group of companies (as defined in Brazilian corporate law).
|
In cases where (1)
our company merges with another company where we are not the surviving company, or (2) we are consolidated with another company,
or (3) we participate in a group of companies (as defined in Brazilian corporate law), our shareholders will not be entitled to
withdraw from our company if their respective shares are (a) liquid, i.e. part of the BM&FBOVESPA index or other stock exchange
index in Brazil or abroad, (as defined by the CVM), and (b) widely held, such that less than 50% of our shares are held by a controlling
shareholder or by companies a controlling shareholder controls. We are currently part of the IBOVESPA (the BM&FBOVESPA index)
and have no controlling shareholder. Therefore, our shares are, at present, considered liquid and widely held for the purposes
of this paragraph.
The right to withdraw
expires 30 days after publication of the minutes of the relevant shareholders’ general meeting. We are entitled to reconsider
any action giving rise to withdrawal rights for within 10 days after the expiration of the 30-day period if the redemption of shares
of absent, dissenting or non-voting shareholders would jeopardize our financial stability. If shareholders exercise withdrawal
rights, they are entitled to receive the economic value of the company’s shares, as determined by a valuation report issued
by a specialized firm.
Redemption of Shares
According to Brazilian
corporate law, we may redeem our shares by a decision taken in a special shareholders’ general meeting by shareholders representing
at least 50% of our share capital. The share redemption may be paid with our profit, profit reserves or capital reserves. If the
share redemption is not applicable to all shares, the redemption will be made by lottery. If custody shares are picked in the lottery
and there are no rules established in the custody agreement, the financial institution will specify on a
pro rata
basis,
the shares to be redeemed.
Registration of Shares
Our shares are held
in book-entry form with Itaú Unibanco Corretora S.A., which will act as the custodian agent for our shares. Transfer of
our shares will be carried out by means of book entry by Itaú Unibanco S.A., debiting the share account of the seller and
crediting the share account of the buyer, with the presentation of a written order of the transferor or a judicial authorization
or order to effect such transfers.
Preemptive Rights
Except as provided
below, our shareholders have a general preemptive right to participate in any issuance of new shares, convertible debentures and
warrants, in proportion to their respective shareholding at such time, but the conversion of debentures and subscription warrants
into shares, the granting of options to purchase shares and the issuance of shares as a result of its exercise, are not subject
to preemptive rights. In addition, Brazilian corporate law allows for companies’ bylaws to give the board of directors the
power to exclude preemptive rights or reduce the exercise period of such rights with respect to the issuance of new shares, debentures
convertible into shares and subscription warrants up to the limit of the authorized share capital if the distribution of those
shares, debentures or subscription warrants is effected through a sale on a stock exchange, through a public offering or through
an exchange of shares in a tender offer the purpose of which is to acquire control of another company. Shareholders are allowed
to exercise the preemptive rights for a period of at least 30 days following the publication of notice of the issuance of shares,
convertible debentures and warrants, and the right may be transferred or disposed of for consideration.
Holders of ADSs may
be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to our common shares underlying the ADSs. See “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Common Shares and the ADSs—Holders of ADSs may be unable to exercise preemptive
rights with respect to our common shares underlying the ADSs.”
Shareholders’ General Meetings
Under Brazilian corporate
law, at our shareholders’ meetings, shareholders are empowered to take any action relating to our corporate purpose and to
pass any such resolutions as they deem necessary. The approval of our financial statements and the determination of the allocation
of our net profits with respect to each fiscal year take place at our annual general shareholders’ meeting immediately following
such fiscal year. The election of our directors and, if requested by shareholders, of members of our fiscal council typically takes
place at the annual general shareholders’ meeting, although under Brazilian corporate law it may also occur at a special
shareholders’ general meeting.
A special shareholders’
general meeting may be held concurrently with the annual general shareholders’ meeting. Pursuant to our bylaws and Brazilian
corporate law, the following actions, among others, may only be taken at a general shareholders’ meeting:
|
·
|
amendment of our bylaws, including amendment of our corporate purpose;
|
|
·
|
election and dismissal, at any time, of our directors and members of our fiscal council;
|
|
·
|
determination of the aggregate compensation of our board of directors and board of officers, as
well as the fiscal council’s compensation;
|
|
·
|
approval of stock splits and reverse stock splits;
|
|
·
|
approval of a stock option plan;
|
|
·
|
approval of the company’s financial statements;
|
|
·
|
resolution upon the destination of our net profits and distribution of dividends;
|
|
·
|
election of the fiscal council to function in the event of our dissolution;
|
|
·
|
cancellation of our registration with the CVM as a publicly-held company;
|
|
·
|
suspension of the rights of a shareholder who has violated Brazilian corporate law or our bylaws;
|
|
·
|
acceptance or rejection of the valuation of in-kind contributions offered by a shareholder in consideration
for shares of our capital stock;
|
|
·
|
approval of our transformation into a limited liability company or any other corporate form;
|
|
·
|
delisting of our common shares from the
Novo Mercado
;
|
|
·
|
appointment of a financial institution responsible for our valuation, in the event of a mandatory
tender offer, specifically in the event that a tender offer for our common shares is carried out in connection with the delisting
of our common shares from the
Novo Mercado
or cancellation of our registration as a publicly-held company;
|
|
·
|
reduction in the percentage of mandatory dividends;
|
|
·
|
participation in a group of companies (as defined in Brazilian corporate law);
|
|
·
|
approval of any merger, consolidation with another company or spin-off;
|
|
·
|
approval of our dissolution or liquidation, the appointment and dismissal of the respective liquidator
and the official review of the reports prepared by him or her; and
|
|
·
|
authorization to petition for bankruptcy or request for judicial or extrajudicial restructuring.
|
According to Brazilian
corporate law, neither a company’s bylaws nor actions taken at a shareholders’ meeting may deprive a shareholder of
specific rights, such as:
|
·
|
the right to participate in the distribution of profits;
|
|
·
|
the right to participate equally and ratably in any remaining residual assets in the event of liquidation
of the company;
|
|
·
|
preemptive rights in the event of subscription of shares, convertible debentures or subscription
warrants, except in some specific circumstances under Brazilian law described in “—Preemptive Rights;”
|
|
·
|
the right to inspect and monitor the management of the company’s business in accordance with
Brazilian corporate law; and
|
|
·
|
the right to withdraw from the company in the cases specified in Brazilian corporate law, described
in “—Appraisal Rights.”
|
Quorum for our Shareholders’
General Meetings
As a general rule,
Brazilian corporate law provides that a quorum at a shareholders’ general meeting consists of shareholders representing at
least 25% of a company’s voting capital on the first call and, if that quorum is not reached, any percentage on the second
call. A quorum for the purposes of amending our bylaws consists of shareholders representing at least two-thirds of voting capital
on the first call and any percentage on the second call.
As a general rule,
the affirmative vote of shareholders representing at least the majority of our issued and outstanding common shares present in
person, remotely (as described in “—Remote Voting”) or represented by proxy at a shareholders’ general
meeting is required to ratify any proposed action, with abstentions not taken into account. However, the affirmative vote of shareholders
representing one-half of our issued and outstanding voting capital is required to:
|
·
|
reduce the percentage of mandatory dividends;
|
|
·
|
change our corporate purpose;
|
|
·
|
merge or consolidate our company with another company;
|
|
·
|
spin-off a portion of our assets or liabilities;
|
|
·
|
approve our participation in a group of companies (as defined in Brazilian corporate law);
|
|
·
|
apply for cancellation of any voluntary liquidation;
|
|
·
|
approve our dissolution; and
|
|
·
|
approve the merger of all our shares into another company.
|
A quorum smaller than
one-half of our issued and outstanding voting capital may be authorized by the CVM for a publicly-held company with widely-traded
and widespread shares that has had less than half of the holders of its voting shares in attendance at its last three shareholders’
meetings. In such case, resolutions may only be taken on a third call.
According to our bylaws
and for so long as we are listed on the
Novo Mercado
, we may not issue preferred shares or founders’ shares and we
will have to conduct a tender offer in order to delist ourselves from the
Novo Mercado
.
Notice of our Shareholders’
General Meetings
According to Brazilian
corporate law, notice of our shareholders’ general meetings must be published at least three times in the
Diário
Oficial do Estado de São Paulo
, the official newspaper of the State of São Paulo, and in another widely circulated
newspaper in the same State, previously chosen at an annual shareholders meeting, which, in our case is
O Estado de São
Paulo
.
According to CVM Instruction
No. 559 of March 27, 2015 (which deals with the approval of ADR programs), the first notice must be published no later than 15
days before the date of the meeting on the first call, and no later than eight days before the date of the meeting on the second
call.
In addition, the CVM
may suspend for up to 15 days the required prior notice of the special shareholders’ general meeting so that it may further
analyze the proposal to be voted upon at such meeting. Such call notice in all circumstances shall contain the date, time, place
and agenda for the meeting and a list of the documents that will be required from our shareholders to be admitted at the meetings,
and in case of amendments to the bylaws, the indication of the relevant matters. CVM Instruction No. 481 of December 17, 2009 also
requires that additional information be disclosed in the call notice for certain matters. For example, in the event of an election
of directors, the call notice shall also disclose the minimum percentage of equity participation required from a shareholder to
request the adoption of cumulative voting procedures. All documents pertaining to the matters to be discussed at the
shareholders’ general
meeting shall be made available to the shareholders upon publication of the first call notice, except if the law or CVM regulations
provide otherwise.
Location of our Shareholders’
General Meetings
Our shareholders’
meetings shall take place at our head offices at Av. Nações Unidas No. 8,501, 19
th
floor, 05425-070 –
São Paulo, SP – Brazil. Brazilian corporate law allows our shareholders to hold meetings outside our head offices
in the event of force majeure, provided that the relevant notice contains a clear indication of the place where the meeting will
occur, which, in any case, shall never be held outside the city where the company’s headquarters are located.
Who May Call our Shareholders’
General Meetings
According to Brazilian
corporate law, our board of directors may call a shareholders’ general meeting. Shareholders’ general meetings may
also be called by:
|
·
|
any shareholder, if our directors fail to call a shareholders’ general meeting within 60
days after the date they were required to do so under applicable laws and our bylaws;
|
|
·
|
shareholders holding at least 5% of our share capital if our directors fail to call a meeting within
eight days after receipt of a request to call the meeting by those shareholders, and such request must indicate the proposed agenda;
|
|
·
|
shareholders holding at least 5% of voting share capital or 5% of non-voting share capital if our
directors fail to call a meeting within eight days after receipt of a request to call the meeting to convene a fiscal council;
and
|
|
·
|
our fiscal council (if installed), in the event our board of directors delays calling an annual
shareholders’ meeting for more than one month. The fiscal council may also call a special general shareholders’ meeting
at any time if it believes that there are significant or urgent matters to be addressed.
|
There is an obligation
of the chairman of our board of directors to call a shareholders’ general meeting if: (1) we are not under control of a shareholder
holding more than 50% of our voting capital, and (2) BM&FBOVESPA determines that the price of our shares shall be quoted separately
or that the trading of our shares on the
Novo Mercado
shall be suspended by reason of non-compliance with the listing rules
of
Novo Mercado
. At such a meeting all members of our board of directors must be replaced. In the event the shareholders’
general meeting is not called by the chairman of the board of directors within the time period established in our bylaws, the meeting
may be called by any shareholder of the company.
Conditions for Admission at our Shareholders’
General Meetings
A shareholder may
be represented at a shareholders’ general meeting by a proxy, as long as the proxy is appointed less than a year before such
shareholders’ general meeting. The proxy must be either a shareholder, an executive officer or a director of our company,
a lawyer or a financial institution. An investment fund must be represented by its investment fund officer. A legal entity may
be represented by its legal representative.
Shareholders attending
a shareholders’ general meeting must deliver proof of their status as shareholders and proof that they hold the shares they
intend to vote by delivery of proper identification and a receipt issued by the custodian agent of our shares.
Remote Voting
Participation and
remote voting at the general shareholders’ meetings of publicly-held companies is regulated by CVM Rule No. 561 of April
2015, which aims to facilitate the participation of shareholders in general meetings either through voting or through the submission
of proposals. This rule provides the following:
|
·
|
the creation of a remote voting bulletin through which shareholders may exercise their right to
vote prior to the date the general meeting is held;
|
|
·
|
the possibility to include in the voting bulletin a list of candidates and submit minority shareholders
proposals for deliberation at the general meeting, with due observance of certain deadlines and percentages of equity interest,
in order to facilitate shareholders’ participation in general meetings; and
|
|
·
|
the deadlines, procedures and means of transmitting the bulletin, which may be transmitted by the
shareholder: (a) to the custodian (if the shares held by the shareholder are kept at a centralized deposit); (b) to the book-entry
agent of the shares issued by the company (if such shares are not kept at a centralized deposit); or (c) directly to the company.
|
In addition, publicly-held
companies are required to adopt certain measures in connection with the voting process. Publicly-held companies are required to:
(1) inform the market of the adoption of the cumulative voting process in annual meetings immediately upon receipt of the first
valid requirement; (2) disclose the final voting summary statements, as well as any voting statement presented by a shareholder
at the general meetings; and (3) register in the minutes of the general meeting the number of approving, rejecting or abstaining
votes for each item on the agenda, including the votes received by each member of the Board of Directors and/or Fiscal Council
elected in such annual shareholders’ meeting.
The
application of CVM Rule No. 561 became mandatory on January 1, 2017 for companies that on April 9, 2015 had at least one share
class listed either on the Index Brasil 100 or the IBOVESPA index of the BM&FBOVESPA, such as Gafisa.
Arbitration
Any disputes or controversies
involving our company, our shareholders, members of our management or our fiscal council relating to or arising from the Listing
Agreement on the
Novo Mercado
, Listing Rules, our bylaws, Brazilian corporate law, the rules published by the CMN, the Central
Bank, the CVM, any shareholders’ agreement filed at our headquarters, and other rules applicable to the Brazilian capital
markets in general, must be submitted to arbitration conducted in accordance with the Rules of the Market Arbitration Chamber established
by the BM&FBOVESPA.
Going Private Process
We may become a private
company by the decision of our shareholders only if we conduct a public tender offer to acquire all of our outstanding shares in
accordance with the rules and regulations of Brazilian corporate law, the CVM and the
Novo Mercado
regulations which requires:
|
·
|
a fair bid price at least equal to the value estimated of the company; and
|
|
·
|
shareholders holding more than two thirds of the outstanding shares have specifically approved
the process or accepted the offer.
|
The minimum price
offered for the shares in the public tender offer will correspond to the economic value of such shares, as determined by a valuation
report issued by a specialized firm, and we may only purchase shares from shareholders that have voted in favor of us becoming
a private company after purchasing all shares from the other shareholders that did not vote in favor of such deliberation and that
have accepted the public tender offer.
The valuation report
must be prepared by a specialized and independent firm of recognized experience chosen by the shareholders representing the majority
of the outstanding shares present at the relevant shareholders’ meeting (excluding, for such purposes, treasury shares, shares
held by our affiliates and by other companies that are a part of our economic group, as well as blank votes) from a list of three
institutions presented by our board of directors. All the expenses and costs incurred in connection with the preparation of the
valuation report must be paid for by the person making the tender offer.
Shareholders holding
at least 10% of our outstanding shares may require our management to call a special shareholders’ general meeting to determine
whether to perform another valuation using the same or a different valuation method. This request must be made within 15 days following
the disclosure of the price to be paid for the shares in the public offering. The shareholders who make such request as well as
those who vote in its favor must reimburse us for any costs involved in preparing the new valuation, if the new valuation price
is not higher than the original valuation price. If the new valuation price is higher than the original valuation price, the public
offering must be made at the higher price.
Delisting from the
Novo Mercado
We may, at any time,
delist our common shares from the
Novo Mercado
, provided that shareholders approve the decision and that the BM&FBOVESPA
is notified in writing at least 30 days in advance. Delisting of shares from the
Novo Mercado
does not require delisting
from the BM&FBOVESPA.
If our common shares
are delisted from the
Novo Mercado
, our controlling shareholders, if any, will be required to conduct a tender offer for
the acquisition of our outstanding common shares. In case there are no controlling shareholders, the shareholders’ general
meeting deciding on the delisting must also appoint who will be responsible for the mandatory tender offer. The minimum price offered
for the shares in the public tender offer will correspond to the economic value of the shares, as determined by a valuation report
issued by a specialized firm chosen by the shareholders representing a majority of the outstanding shares (excluding, for such
purposes, shares held by the controlling shareholders, if any, and their affiliates, treasury shares, shares held by our affiliates,
and blank votes) from a list of three institutions presented by our board of directors. All the expenses and costs incurred in
connection with the preparation of the valuation report must be paid for by the controlling shareholder, if any, or by us.
If our delisting from
the
Novo Mercado
occurs due to the cancellation of our registration as a publicly held company, all the other requirements
established by such delisting shall be followed. See “—Going Private Process.”
In the event that
we delist due to a corporate reorganization where the surviving company is not admitted for listing on the
Novo Mercado
within one hundred and twenty days as of the date of the shareholders’ general meeting that resolved on the corporate reorganization,
the then-controlling shareholders will need to carry out a public tender offer for the acquisition of the shares held by the other
shareholders, and the minimum price offered per share shall be the economic value of the shares. In case the company does not have
controlling shareholders, the shareholders’ general meeting that decided on the delisting must also determine who will be
responsible for the mandatory tender offer, and in case the shareholders’ general meeting fails to do so, the shareholders
who approved the corporate reorganization will be responsible for the tender offer. The notice of public tender offer shall be
given to the BM&FBOVESPA and released to the market immediately after the shareholders’ general meeting that has approved
the corporate reorganization.
If our share control
is sold within twelve months of our delisting from the
Novo Mercado
, the selling controlling shareholder and the acquirer
shall offer to acquire the shares of all other shareholders under the same conditions offered to the selling controlling shareholder.
Sale of a Controlling Stake in our
Company
Under the Listing
Rules of the
Novo Mercado
, the sale of a controlling interest in our company, either through a single transaction or through
successive transactions, takes place under a suspension or resolution condition, where the acquirer agrees to, within the time
and pursuant to the conditions specified under Brazilian corporate law and the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
, make a
tender offer of the remaining shares of the other shareholders under the same terms and conditions granted to the selling controlling
shareholder.
A tender offer is
also required under the following conditions:
|
·
|
when rights are assigned for a subscription of shares and other securities or rights related to
securities convertible into shares that results in the sale of the company’s controlling stake;
|
|
·
|
when, if the controlling shareholder is an entity, the control of such controlling entity is transferred;
and
|
|
·
|
when a controlling stake is acquired through an agreement for the purchase of shares. In this case,
the acquirer is obligated to make a tender offer under the same terms and conditions granted to the selling shareholders and reimburse
the shareholders from whom he/she had purchased the shares traded on stock exchanges within the six months before the sale date
of the company’s share control. The reimbursement value is the difference between the price paid to the selling controlling
shareholder and the amount traded on stock exchanges per share, during this period, adjusted by the inflation in the period. Such
amount shall be distributed among all persons who sold shares issued by the company in the stock market trading session in which
the acquirer made its acquisitions, proportionally to the daily net selling balance of each acquisition, being BM&FBOVESPA
responsible for processing such distribution according to its regulations.
|
The buyer, when necessary,
must take the necessary measures to recompose the minimum 25% of outstanding shares in the market within the subsequent six months.
Mandatory Tender Offer in Case of
Acquisition of a 30% Stake
Under the rules of
our bylaws, if any person acquires our shares directly or indirectly, or any securities or rights related to such shares, in an
amount representing 30% or more of our corporate capital, such acquirer has to carry out a mandatory tender offer for the acquisition
of all shares issued by the Company. The minimum price offered for the shares in the public tender offer will correspond to the
economic value of such shares, as determined by a valuation report issued by a specialized firm.
The valuation report
must be prepared by a specialized and independent firm of recognized experience chosen by the shareholders representing the majority
of the outstanding shares present at the relevant shareholders’ meeting (excluding, for such purposes, shares held by the
controlling shareholder, if any, by the members of the board of directors and officers appointed, directly or indirectly, by the
controlling shareholder, if any, treasury shares, as well as abstentions) from a list of three institutions presented by our board
of directors. All the expenses and costs incurred in connection with the preparation of the valuation report must be paid for by
the person making the tender offer.
Shareholders holding
at least 10% of our outstanding shares may require our management to call a special shareholders’ general meeting to determine
whether to perform another valuation using the same or a different valuation method. This request must be made within 15 days following
the disclosure of the price to be paid for the shares in the public offering. The shareholders who make such request as well as
those who vote in its favor must reimburse us for any costs involved in preparing the new valuation, if the new valuation price
is not higher than the original valuation price. If the new valuation price is higher than the original valuation price, the acquirer
may either increase the offer price or withdraw the tender offer, in the latter case provided that it shall dispose of the shares
in excess of 30% of our corporate capital within 3 months counted from the special general meeting mentioned in this paragraph.
A tender offer as
a result of an acquisition of a 30% equity stake is not mandatory in any of the following cases: (1) if after the acquisition of
such 30% equity stake, the same shareholder who held more than 50% of our shares remains as controlling shareholder; (2) if a 30%
equity stake is obtained as a result of purchases made under another public tender offer for the acquisition of our shares by their
economic value, made in accordance with the
Novo Mercado
Listing Rules or with the applicable law; provided that the offer
was made for all shares of the company and at least the minimum price has been paid; (3) if a 30% equity stake is obtained involuntarily
as a result of a corporate reorganizations, cancellation of shares in treasury, share redemption, capital reduction, or of a subscription
of shares made under a primary public offer for distribution of our shares where the preemptive rights were not exercised by all
shareholders who had it or which did not have as subscribers as expected; or (4) in the case of a sale of a controlling stake,
which is subject to the rules described above for such case.
Purchases by us of our own Shares
Purchases by us of
our own shares are regulated by CVM Rule No. 567 of September, 2015. The rule requires us to obtain the prior approval of our shareholders
in connection with a purchase by us of our own shares if such purchase:
|
·
|
is conducted outside an organized securities markets and results, whether in a single transaction
or by a series of transactions, in us acquiring more than 5% of the type or class of shares in circulation over a period of 18
months;
|
|
·
|
is conducted outside an organized securities markets and is for a price that is, (i) in the case
of an acquisition of shares, more than 10% greater than the market quotation for such shares, or(ii) in the case of a disposal
of shares, more than 10% lower than the market quotation for such shares;
|
|
·
|
aims to change or preserve the composition of the controlling stock or the administrative structure
of the company; or
|
|
·
|
is conducted toutside an organized securities markets with a related party.
|
Our board of directors
may approve the acquisition of our own shares in other circumstances. The decision to acquire our shares for purposes of maintaining
the acquired shares in treasury or of cancelling them may not, among other things:
|
·
|
result in the reduction of our share capital;
|
|
·
|
require the use of resources greater than our profit reserves and other available reserves, as
provided in our financial statements;
|
|
·
|
create, as a result of any action or inaction, directly or indirectly, any artificial demand, supply
or condition relating to share price;
|
|
·
|
involve any unfair practice;
|
|
·
|
be used for the acquisition of unpaid shares or shares held by our controlling shareholders; or
|
|
·
|
when a public offer for acquisition of the shares of the company is being made.
|
We may not keep in
treasury more than 10% of our outstanding common shares, including the shares held by our subsidiaries and affiliates.
On February 26, 2014,
the Board of Directors of Tenda approved the closing of Tenda’s repurchase of shares program as approved on December 9, 2013.
During the course of this program, Tenda purchased 15,500,000 common shares issued by Gafisa to be kept in treasury and future
disposal.
On the same date,
the Board of Directors of Gafisa approved the repurchase of its common shares to be kept in treasury and future cancellation or
disposal up to 17,456,434, which corresponded to 10% of the then outstanding common shares. The purchase of shares by Gafisa under
this program was conditioned on the maintenance of Gafisa’s consolidated net debt to equity ratio at or below 60%. This program
ended on February 25, 2015.
On February 2, 2015,
our Board of Directors approved the closing of a repurchase of shares program as approved on December 3, 2014. During the course
of this program, we purchased 30,207,130 of Gafisa’s common shares to be kept in treasury and future disposal.
On the same date,
the Board of Directors of Gafisa approved the repurchase of its common shares to be kept in treasury and future cancellation or
disposal up to 27,000,000, which corresponded to 10% of the then outstanding common shares.
On March 3, 2016,
the Board of Directors of Gafisa approved the closing of the repurchase of shares program as approved on February 2, 2015. During
the course of this program, we purchased 1,000,000 of Gafisa’s common shares to be kept in treasury and future disposal.
On the same date,
the Board of Directors of Gafisa approved the creation of a repurchase program of its common shares to be kept in treasury and
future cancellation or disposal up to 8,198,565 common shares, which corresponded to 5% of the then outstanding common shares.
The objective of this program is to acquire shares in order to effectively use the Company’s available funds, aiming at medium-term
and long-term profitability. Additionally, a portion of the shares to be acquired might be reserved for the exercise of options
and/or shares to be granted in the Stock Option Plan previously approved by the Company’s shareholders at the Company’s
general meeting. The purchase of shares by Gafisa under this program was conditioned on the maintenance of Gafisa’s consolidated
net debt to equity ratio at or below 60%. This program ends on September 2, 2017.
Under our current
shares repurchase program, any acquisition by us of our own shares must be made on a stock exchange and cannot be made in a private
transaction.
Disclosure Requirements
We are subject to
the reporting requirements established by Brazilian corporate law and the CVM. Furthermore, because we are listed with the
Novo
Mercado
, we must also follow the disclosure requirements provided for in the Listing Rules of the
Novo Mercado
.
Disclosure of Information
The Brazilian securities
regulations require that a publicly-held corporation provide the CVM and the relevant stock exchanges with periodic information
that includes annual information statements, quarterly financial statements, quarterly management reports, independent auditor
reports, notices and minutes of shareholders’ meetings, among others. In addition, we also must disclose any material development
related to our business to the CVM and the BM&FBOVESPA.
We observe the
Novo
Mercado
disclosure standards and are required to, among other things:
|
·
|
present the company’s financial statements, standard financial statements form (DFP), quarterly
information form (ITR) and Reference Form (
Formulário de Referência
);
|
|
·
|
include a note in the quarterly information form (ITR) regarding all operations with related parties;
|
|
·
|
disclose and maintain updated the information presented in the Reference Form regarding any shareholder
holding, directly or indirectly, at least 5% of the company’s capital stock, considering the information received by company
from the relevant shareholders;
|
|
·
|
disclose, monthly, the individual and consolidated amount and characteristics of our securities
held directly or indirectly by controlling shareholders (if this is the case); and
|
|
·
|
disclose, monthly, the individual and consolidated changes in the amount of securities held by
controlling shareholders (if this is the case), as well as their respective spouses or dependents, as per their income tax statements,
as the case may be.
|
Disclosure of Trading
by Insiders
Pursuant to the rules
of the
Novo Mercado
, each of our possible controlling shareholders must disclose to the BM&FBOVESPA information in connection
with the total amount and characteristics of securities owned, directly or indirectly, by them and issued by us, or any derivatives
referenced in such securities, as well as any subsequent trading of such securities and derivatives. In the case of individuals,
such information shall also include securities held by the spouse, companion or dependents of such persons, included in the annual
income tax statement of such controlling shareholder. This information must be communicated to the BM&FBOVESPA within 10 days
following the end of each month.
CVM regulations require
our directors, executive officers, members of the fiscal council, and members of any other technical or advisory body to disclose
to us, to the CVM and to the BM&FBOVESPA, the total amount, the characteristics and form of acquisition of securities issued
by us, listed companies under our control or the control of our listed controlling shareholders, including derivatives referenced
in such securities that are held by each of them, as well as any change in such investments within 10 days after the end of the
month when the securities were traded. In the case of individuals, such information shall also include securities held by the spouse,
companion or dependents of such persons, included in the annual income tax statement and companies controlled directly or indirectly
by such person.
As of September 2015,
pursuant to changes introduced by CVM Rule No. 568/15 to CVM Rule No. 358/02, we are required to disclose to the CVM and to the
BM&FBOVESPA the total amount and the characteristics of securities issued by us, which are held by us or any of our affiliates,
as well as any change in such investments, within 10 days after the end of the month in which the relevant securities were traded.
In addition, CVM Rule
No. 568/15 also amended CVM Rule No. 358/02 regarding, among other things, (1) the change in the form of calculation of trades
of relevant equity interests to determine when a disclosure obligation of those trades is triggered, and (2) the regulation of
individual investment plans, as described below.
In addition, our controlling
shareholders, our shareholders who have caused the election of members of our board of directors or fiscal council, as well as
any individual, legal entity or group of persons acting jointly whose direct or indirect participation reaches 5% of our shares,
must provide to us, and we shall transmit to the CVM and the BM&FBOVESPA, the following information:
|
·
|
the name and qualification of the person providing the information;
|
|
·
|
reason and purpose for the acquisition and amount of securities to be acquired, including, as the
case may be, a representation of the acquirer stating that the acquisition does not aim at modifying the management or the controlling
structure of the company;
|
|
·
|
amount of shares, as well as other securities and related derivatives, by type and/or class, already
owned, directly or indirectly, by the acquirer or any person related with the acquirer; and
|
|
·
|
information on any agreement regarding the exercise of voting rights or the purchase and sale of
our securities.
|
The disclosure requirement
referred to above will also apply to any person or group acting jointly, holding participation equal to or in excess of 5%, each
time such person increases or decreases its participation in our shares by an amount equal to 5% of our shares.
Finally, pursuant
to the individual investment plans introduced by CVM Rule No. 568/15, direct or indirect controlling shareholders, members of any
statutory governing bodies of a publicly-held corporation, as well as any persons who, due to their responsibility, function or
position in a listed company, its controlling company, subsidiaries or affiliates have potential access to insider information,
are now allowed, subject to certain requirements, to trade in the company’s shares in certain periods during which such trading
would otherwise be prohibited.
Disclosure of Material
Developments
According to Law No.
6,385 of December 7, 1976, and subsequent amendments, and CVM Instruction No. 358 of January 3, 2002, and subsequent amendments,
we must disclose any material development related to our business to the CVM and to the BM&FBOVESPA and must publish a notice
of the material development. A development is deemed to be material if it has a material impact on the price of our securities,
on the decision of investors to trade in our securities or on the decision of investors to exercise any rights as holders of any
of our securities.
Under special circumstances,
we may request confidential treatment of certain material developments from the CVM, when our management believes that public disclosure
could result in adverse consequences to us.
C. Material
Contracts
On December 30, 2009,
the shareholders of Gafisa and Tenda approved a corporate restructuring to consolidate Gafisa’s non-controlling share ownership
in Tenda. The restructuring was accomplished by exchanging all of the remaining Tenda shares not held by Gafisa into Gafisa shares.
As a result of the restructuring, Tenda became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gafisa.
On May 27, 2010, the
shareholders of Gafisa approved the acquisition of 20% of Alphaville’s shares, by means of a merger of the totality of shares
issued by Shertis Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. or “Shertis”, which main asset are shares representing
20% of Alphaville’s shares, in the total amount of R$126.5 million. As a consequence of such merger, Gafisa issued 9,797,792
common shares, paid to the former shareholders of Shertis. On July 3, 2013, we acquired the remaining shares of Alphaville, corresponding
to 20% of its capital stock, by means of the acquisition by Tenda of all the shares of EVP Participações SA, a holding
company that had Renato de Albuquerque and Nuno Luís de Carvalho Lopes Alves as shareholders and the holder of the remaining
shares of Alphaville. Gafisa paid R$366,661,985.11 in Brazilian national currency to the former owners of the shares.
On December 9, 2013,
we completed the sale of a majority stake in Alphaville to Private Equity AE Investimentos e Participações (“Fundo
AE”), a company controlled by Pátria Investimentos Ltda. and Blackstone Real Estate Advisor L.P., which was previously
announced on June 7, 2013. All precedent conditions were met including governmental approval, to the completion of the transaction.
The transaction was concluded with a sale of 50% stake by Gafisa and 20% stake by Tenda, with Gafisa retaining the remaining 30%
of Alphaville capital stock. The proceeds from the transaction, post adjustments agreed to in the Share and Purchase Agreement,
were R$1.54 billion, consisting of R$1.25 billion from Fundo AE for the acquisition of Alphaville shares, and an R$290 million
dividend distribution by Alphaville.
On December 14, 2016,
we entered into an SPA with Jaguar pursuant to which we will sell Tenda shares representing up to 30% of the total capital stock
of Tenda, at a price equal to R$8.13 per share, after offering 50% of the total capital stock of Tenda for the exercise of preemptive
rights of Gafisa’s shareholders. Pursuant to the SPA, we will receive cash proceeds totaling R$231.7 million, valuing Tenda’s
capital stock at R$539.0 million. Gafisa
will transfer the remaining
50% of Tenda’s total capital stock to our shareholders in connection with a reduction in our total capital stock. During
the preemptive rights exercise period, which commenced on March 17, 2017 and expired on April 15, 2017, a total of 25,233,408 common
shares (registered, non-par value) of Tenda were acquired by participating shareholders at the purchase price of R$8.13 per share,
totaling R$205,147,607.04. A total of 1,766,592 Tenda common shares were not acquired. Pursuant to the notice to shareholders dated
April 19, 2017, the 1,766,592 Tenda common shares that were not acquired during the preemptive rights exercise period may be acquired
by shareholders who expressed an interest in acquiring such unsold shares during the period starting on April 24, 2017 and expiring
on April 27, 2017. On April 22, 2017, following the expiration of the 60-day period set forth in Article 174 of Brazilian corporate law pursuant to which our creditors had the right to object to the reduction in our total capital stock and to which they did not object, we reduced our total capital stock in an amount equal to R$219.5 million. The consummation of the reduction in our capital stock was a condition to delivery of the Tenda shares acquired by shareholders pursuant to the exercise of their preemptive rights during the preemptive rights exercise period. Accordingly, we expect to deliver such Tenda shares to such shareholders on or about May 4, 2017, which is also expected to be the date on which such Tenda shares will be listed and will commence trading on the traditional segment of BM&FBOVESPA.
D. Exchange
Controls
There are no restrictions
on ownership of our common shares by individual or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However, the right to convert dividend
payments and proceeds from the sale of our shares into foreign currency and to remit such amounts abroad is subject to requirements
under foreign investment legislation which generally establish that the relevant investment be registered with the Central Bank
and/or the CVM. Subject to certain procedures and specific regulatory provisions, the purchase and sale of foreign currency and
the international transfer of
reais
by a person or legal entity resident, domiciled or headquartered in Brazil, as the case
may be, is allowed, without limitation as to amount, provided that the underlying transaction is legal, legitimate and has economic
substance, as evidenced by the applicable supporting documentation submitted to the financial institution in charge of the foreign
exchange transaction. In addition, foreign currencies may only be purchased through duly authorized financial institutions headquartered
in Brazil. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Brazil—Restrictions on the movement
of capital out of Brazil may adversely affect your ability to receive dividends and distributions on the ADSs and on our common
shares, or the proceeds of any sale of our common shares” and “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—C. Markets—Investment
in Our Common Shares by Non-Residents of Brazil.”
In the past, the Brazilian
Central Bank has intervened occasionally to control unstable movements in foreign exchange rates. We cannot predict whether the
Brazilian Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to let the
real
float freely or will intervene in the exchange
rate market through the return of a currency band system or otherwise. The
real
may depreciate or appreciate against the
U.S. dollar substantially.
Brazilian law provides
that, whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or there are serious reasons to foresee a serious
imbalance, temporary restrictions may be imposed on remittances of funds abroad. We cannot assure you that such measures will not
be taken by the Brazilian government in the future. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating
to Brazil—Restrictions on the movement of capital out of Brazil may adversely affect your ability to receive dividends and
distributions on the ADSs and on our common shares, or the proceeds of any sale of our common shares” and “Item 9.
The Offer and Listing—C. Markets—Investment in Our Common Shares by Non-Residents of Brazil.”
E. Taxation
The following discussion
contains a description of material Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition
of common shares or ADSs. The discussion is based upon the tax laws of Brazil and regulations thereunder and on the tax laws of
the United States and regulations thereunder as of the date hereof, which are subject to change.
Although there is
at present no income tax treaty between Brazil and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries have entered into
a Tax Information Exchange Agreement and have had discussions that may culminate in an income tax treaty. No assurance can be given,
however, as to whether or when an income tax treaty will enter into force or how it will affect the U.S. Holders (as defined below)
of common shares or ADSs. Prospective holders of common shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisers as to the tax consequences
of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs in their particular circumstances.
Brazilian Tax Considerations
The following discussion
summarizes the principal Brazilian tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares or ADSs
by a holder that is not domiciled in Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation (a “Non-Resident Holder”). This discussion
is based on Brazilian law as currently in effect, which is subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, and subject to
different interpretations. Any change in that law may change the consequences described below.
The tax consequences
described below do not take into account the effects of any tax treaties or reciprocity agreements for tax treatment entered into
by Brazil and other countries. The discussion also does not address any tax consequences under the tax laws of any state or municipality
of Brazil. The description below is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to the acquisition,
exchange, ownership and disposition of our common shares or ADSs. Each Non-Resident Holder should consult his or her own tax adviser
concerning the Brazilian tax consequences of an investment in our common shares or ADSs.
Income tax
Dividends
.
Dividends paid by a Brazilian corporation, such as ourselves, including stock dividends and other dividends paid to a Non-Resident
Holder of common shares or ADSs, are currently not subject to income withholding tax in Brazil to the extent that such amounts
are related to profits generated after January 1, 1996. Dividends paid from profits generated before January 1, 1996 may be subject
to Brazilian income withholding tax at varying rates depending on the year the profits were generated, according to the tax legislation
applicable to each corresponding year. There is uncertainty regarding the taxation of dividends supported by profits earned in
the 2014 calendar year, due to the new rules introduced in Brazil in order to align the Brazilian tax system with the International
Financial Reporting Standards, or “IFRS”, as of January 1, 2015. As we did not earn profits in that year, this
issue should not apply to us.
Interest on Shareholders’
Equity
. Law No. 9,249, dated December 26, 1995, as amended, permits a Brazilian corporation, such as ourselves, to make distributions
to shareholders of interest on shareholders’ equity as an alternative to making dividend distributions and to treat such
payments as a deductible expense for purposes of calculating Brazilian corporate income tax and social contribution on net profits,
to the extent the limits described below are observed. These distributions may be paid in cash. For tax purposes, this interest
is limited to the daily pro rata variation of the Brazilian long-term interest rate, or TJLP, as determined by the Central Bank
from time to time, and the amount of the deduction may not exceed the greater of:
|
·
|
50% of net income (after the deduction of social contribution on net profits but before taking
into account the provision for corporate income tax and the interest on shareholders’ equity) for the period in respect of
which the payment is made; and
|
|
·
|
50% of the sum of retained profits and profit reserves as of the date of the beginning of the period
in respect of which the payment is made.
|
Payment of interest
on shareholders’ equity to a Non-Resident Holder is subject to income withholding tax at the rate of 15%, or 25% if the Non-Resident
Holder is domiciled in a Tax Favorable Jurisdiction, as defined below.
These payments of
interest on shareholders’ equity may be included, at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend. To the extent payment
of interest on shareholders’ equity is so included, the Company is required to distribute to shareholders an additional amount
to ensure that the net amount received by them, after payment of the applicable withholding income tax, plus the amount of declared
dividends is at least equal to the mandatory dividend.
Gains
According to Law No.
10,833/03, enacted on December 29, 2003, the disposition or sale of assets located in Brazil by a Non-Resident Holder, whether
to another non-Brazilian resident or to a Brazilian resident, may be subject to capital gain taxes in Brazil.
Therefore, with respect
to the disposition of our common shares, which are treated as assets located in Brazil, a non-Brazilian resident will be subject
to income tax on the gains assessed according to the rules described below, regardless of whether the transactions are conducted
in Brazil or with a Brazilian resident.
With respect to the
ADSs, although the matter is not entirely clear, it is reasonable to take the position that ADSs do not constitute assets located
in Brazil for the purposes of Law No. 10,833/03 and, therefore, that the gains realized by a Non-Resident Holder on the disposition
of our ADSs to another Non-Resident Holder should not be taxed in Brazil. We cannot assure you, however, that the Brazilian tax
authorities or the Brazilian courts will agree with this interpretation. Accordingly, gains on a disposition of ADSs by a Non-Resident
Holder may be subject to income tax in Brazil in the event that courts determine that ADSs constitute assets located in Brazil.
For more information, please refer to “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risks Factors—Risks Relating to Our Common
Shares and the ADSs—Changes in Brazilian tax laws may have an adverse impact on the taxes applicable to a disposition of
the ADSs.”
As a general rule,
gain realized as a result of a disposition or sale of common shares (or ADSs should they be deemed to be “assets located
in Brazil”) is the positive difference between the amount realized on the sale or other disposition of the securities and
their acquisition cost.
Under Brazilian law,
however, income tax rules on such gains can vary, depending on the domicile of the Non-Resident Holder, the type of registration
of the investment by the Non-Resident Holder with the Central Bank and how the disposition is carried out, as described below.
Gains assessed on
a disposition of common shares carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the transactions carried out on the organized
over-the-counter market) are:
|
·
|
exempt from income tax when the gain is earned by a Non-Resident Holder that (1) has registered
its investment in Brazil with the Central Bank under the rules of Resolution No. 4,373, dated September 14, 2014, which replaced
Resolution 2,689, dated January 26, 2000 (a “4,373 Holder”) and (2) is not a resident or domiciled in a country or
location that does not tax income, or that taxes it at a maximum rate lower than 20%; or
|
|
·
|
in all other cases, subject to income tax at a rate of up to 25%. In these cases, a withholding
income tax of 0.005% of the sale value will be applicable and can be later offset against any income tax due on the capital gain.
|
Any other gains recognized
on a sale or disposition of the common shares that is not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange are subject to (1) income tax
at a progressive rate from 15% up to 22.5%, when realized by a Non-Resident Holder that is not resident or domiciled in a Tax Favorable
Jurisdiction; and (2) income tax up to a rate of 25% when realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder that is resident or domiciled in a
Tax Favorable Jurisdiction. In the event that these gains are related to transactions conducted on the Brazilian non-organized
over-the-counter market with intermediation, the withholding income tax of 0.005% shall also be applicable and can be offset against
the eventual income tax due on the capital gain.
In the case of a redemption
of common shares (or ADSs, should they be deemed to be “assets located in Brazil”) or a capital reduction by a Brazilian
corporation, such as ourselves, the positive difference between the amount received by the Non-Resident Holder and the acquisition
cost of the common shares or ADSs redeemed is treated as capital gain derived from the sale or exchange of shares not carried out
on a Brazilian stock exchange and is therefore subject to income tax at a rate from 15% to 22.5%, or up to 25%, as described above.
Any exercise of preemptive
rights relating to the common shares or ADSs will not be subject to Brazilian income tax. Gains realized by a Non-Resident Holder
on the disposition of preemptive rights relating to the common shares (or ADSs, should they be deemed to be “assets located
in Brazil”) will be subject to Brazilian income tax according to the same rules applicable to the sale or disposition of
common shares.
As a Non-Resident
Holder of ADSs, you may cancel your ADSs and exchange them for the underlying common shares and no income tax may be levied on
such exchange, as long as the appropriate rules are complied with in connection with the registration of the investment with the
Central Bank and as long as ADSs are not deemed to be “assets located in Brazil.” See “Item 9 The Offering and
Listing—C. Markets—Investment in Our Common Shares by Non-Residents of Brazil—Depositary Receipts” for
a discussion of the rules related to exchanging ADS for common shares.
The deposit of common
shares by Non-Resident Holders in exchange for ADSs may be subject to Brazilian income tax if the acquisition cost of the common
shares is lower than (a) the average price per common share on a Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of such
common shares were sold on the day of deposit; or (b) if no common shares were sold on that day, the average price on a Brazilian
stock exchange on which the
greatest number of common
shares were sold in the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit. The difference between the acquisition cost and
the average price of the common shares will be considered to be a capital gain subject to income tax at a rate from 15% up to 22.5%
or 25%, as described above. In some circumstances, it could be reasonable to take the position that this tax is not applicable
in the case of a Non-Resident Holder that is a 4,373 Holder and is not a resident in a Tax Favorable Jurisdiction.
There can be no assurance
that the current favorable treatment of 4,373 Holders will continue in the future.
On March 16, 2016,
Provisional Measure No. 692 was converted into Law 13,259/16, increasing tax rates on capital gains earned by Brazilian individuals
and certain legal entities. Although the law is not very clear, the new rates should apply as from 2017 as follows: (i) 15% on
the capital gain not exceeding R$5,000,000; (ii) 17.5% on the capital gain amount which varies from R$5,000,000 and R$10,000,000;
(iii) 20% on the capital gain amount which varies from R$10,000,000 and R$30,000,000; and (iv) 22.5% on the capital gain which
exceeds R$ 30,000,000. The new rates should also apply to Non-Resident Holders depending on their type of investment, jurisdiction
and the sale transaction, to be determined on a case by case basis.
Discussion on Tax
Favorable Jurisdictions and Privileged Tax Regimes
A “Tax Favorable
Jurisdiction” is a country or location that (1) does not impose taxation on income or imposes the income tax at a rate lower
than 20% or (2) imposes restrictions on the disclosure of shareholding composition or the ownership of the investment. A regulation
issued by the Ministry of Treasury on November 28, 2014 decreased from 20% to 17% this minimum threshold for certain specific cases.
The 17% threshold applies only to countries and regimes aligned with international standards of fiscal transparency in accordance
with rules to be established by the Brazilian tax authorities.
Law No. 11,727/08
created the concept of “Privileged Tax Regimes”, which encompasses the countries and jurisdictions that: (1) do not
tax income or tax it at a maximum rate lower than 20%, or 17%, as applicable; (2) grant tax advantages to a non-resident entity
or individual (i) without the need to carry out a substantial economic activity in the country or territory or (ii) conditioned
to the non-exercise of a substantial economic activity in the country or territory; (3) do not tax or taxes proceeds generated
abroad at a maximum rate lower than 20%, or 17%, as applicable; or (4) restricts the ownership disclosure of assets and ownership
rights or restricts disclosure about economic transactions carried out.
Normative Ruling 1,037
provides a list of Tax Favorable Jurisdictions and Privileged Tax Regimes. Normative Ruling No. 1,037 is periodically updated to
include and exclude countries, locations and tax regimes from the lists of Tax Favorable Jurisdictions and Privileged Tax Regimes.
In principle, the
best interpretation of Law No. 11,727/08 leads us to conclude that the concept of Privileged Tax Regimes should be applied solely
for purposes of transfer pricing rules in export and import transactions, for the definition of the applicable rate of withholding
income tax on the remittance of specific items of income and for certain other Brazilian tax purposes that are not relevant to
an investment by a Non-Resident Holder in our common shares or ADSs. Although we are of the opinion that the concept of Privileged
Tax Regimes should not affect the tax treatment of a Non-Resident Holder described above, we cannot assure you that subsequent
legislation or interpretations by the Brazilian tax authorities regarding the definition of “privileged tax regimes”
will not apply such regime to Non-Resident Holders. Investors should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the consequences
of the implementation of Law No. 11,727, Normative Ruling No. 1,037 and of any related Brazilian tax laws or regulations concerning
Tax Favorable Jurisdictions and Privileged Tax Regimes.
Tax on Foreign Exchange
and Financial Transactions
Foreign Exchange
Transactions
. Brazilian law imposes a Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions, or IOF/Exchange Tax, on the conversion of
reais
into foreign currency and on the conversion of foreign currency into
reais
. Any inflow of funds related to investments carried
out on the Brazilian financial and capital markets by 4,373 Holders is currently subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax at a rate of zero
percent. Foreign exchange transactions related to outflows of funds in connection with investments carried out on the Brazilian
financial and capital markets are subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax at a rate of zero percent, which also applies to payments of
dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity to 4,373 Holders with respect to investments on the Brazilian financial and
capital markets.
Nevertheless, the
rate applicable to most foreign exchange transactions is 0.38%. In any case, the Brazilian government may increase the rate at
any time by up to 25% on the foreign exchange transaction amount. However, any increase in rates will only apply to future transactions.
The purchase of ADSs
by a Non-Resident Holder outside Brazil generally does not require the execution of a foreign exchange agreement with the Brazilian
Central Bank. If this is the case, the IOF/Exchange Tax is not due. The IOF/Exchange Tax is levied at a zero percent rate in connection
with foreign exchange agreements, without any actual flows of funds, that are required for a cancellation of ADSs and exchange
for shares traded on a Brazilian stock exchange.
Tax on Transactions
Involving Bonds and Securities
. Brazilian law imposes a Tax on Transactions Involving Bonds and Securities, or IOF/Bonds Tax,
due on transactions involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange. The rate of IOF/Bonds
Tax applicable to transactions involving common shares is currently zero percent. The rate of the IOF/Bonds Tax applicable to the
transfer of shares with the sole purpose of enabling the issuance of ADSs is currently also zero percent. However, the Brazilian
government may increase the rate of the IOF/Bonds Tax at any time by up to 1.5% per day on the transaction amount, but only in
respect of future transactions.
Other Brazilian
Taxes
There are no Brazilian
inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of common shares or ADSs, except for
gift and inheritance taxes that may be imposed by some Brazilian states. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or
similar taxes or duties payable by holders of common shares or ADSs.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following discussion
is a summary of material U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders described herein of owning and disposing of common
shares or ADSs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant
to a particular person’s decision to hold such securities. The discussion applies only to the U.S. Holders described below
that hold common shares or ADSs as capital assets for U.S. federal tax purposes and does not address all of the tax consequences
applicable to all categories of investors, some of which may be subject to special rules, such as:
|
·
|
certain financial institutions;
|
|
·
|
dealers or traders in securities who use a mark-to-market method of tax accounting;
|
|
·
|
persons holding common shares or ADSs as part of a hedging transaction, straddle, wash sale, conversion
transaction or integrated transaction or persons entering into a constructive sale with respect to the common shares or ADSs;
|
|
·
|
persons whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;
|
|
·
|
entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
·
|
persons liable for the alternative minimum tax;
|
|
·
|
tax-exempt entities, including “individual retirement accounts” or “Roth IRAs;”
|
|
·
|
persons that own or are deemed to own ten percent or more of our voting stock;
|
|
·
|
persons who acquired our ADSs or common shares pursuant to the exercise of any employee stock option
or otherwise as compensation; or
|
|
·
|
persons holding our ADSs or common shares in connection with a trade or business conducted outside
of the United States.
|
If an entity that
is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds common shares or ADSs, the U.S. federal income tax treatment
of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding
common shares or ADSs and partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisers as to the particular U.S. federal income
tax consequences of holding and disposing of common shares or ADSs.
This discussion is
based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and final,
temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, all as of the date hereof, any of which is subject to change, possibly with retroactive
effect. It is also based in part on representations by the depositary and assumes that each obligation under the deposit agreement
and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms.
You are a “U.S.
Holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our common shares or ADSs and if you are, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
·
|
a citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
·
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws
of the United States, any state therein or the District of Columbia; or
|
|
·
|
an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of
its source.
|
The summary of
U.S. federal income tax consequences set out below is intended for general informational purposes only. You should consult your
advisers with respect to the particular tax consequences to you of owning or disposing of common shares or ADSs, including the
applicability and effect of state, local, non-U.S. and other tax laws and the possibility of changes in tax laws.
In general, if you
own ADSs, you will be treated as the owner of the underlying shares represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized if you exchange ADSs for the underlying shares represented by those ADSs.
The U.S. Treasury
has expressed concerns that parties to whom American depositary shares are released before shares are delivered to the depositary
(“pre-release”) or intermediaries in the chain of ownership between U.S. Holders and the issuer of the security underlying
the American depositary shares may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by U.S. Holders
of American depositary shares. Such actions would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the reduced rate of tax, described
below, applicable to dividends received by certain non-corporate holders. Accordingly, the creditability of Brazilian taxes, and
the availability of the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certain non-corporate holders, each described below, could be
affected by actions taken by such parties or intermediaries.
Please consult your
tax adviser concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of common
shares or ADSs in your particular circumstances.
Except as discussed
below under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” this discussion assumes that the Company will not be
a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year.
Taxation of Distributions
Distributions paid
on ADSs or common shares (including any amounts that are treated as interest on shareholders’ equity for Brazilian tax purposes
and any Brazilian withholding taxes deducted from distributions), other than certain
pro rata
distributions of ordinary
shares, will generally be treated as dividends to the extent paid out of the Company’s current or accumulated earnings and
profits as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Because the Company does not maintain calculations of its earnings
and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, it is expected that distributions will generally be reported to you as dividends.
Subject to applicable
limitations and the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, dividends paid by “qualified foreign
corporations” to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders may be taxable at rates applicable to long-term capital gains. A foreign
corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid on stock that is readily tradable on a
securities market in the United States, such as the NYSE, where our ADSs are traded. You should consult your tax adviser to determine
whether the favorable rate will apply to dividends you receive and whether you are subject to any special rules that limit your
ability to be taxed at this favorable rate.
The amount of a dividend
will include any amounts withheld by the Company in respect of Brazilian taxes on the distribution. The amount of the dividend
will be treated as foreign-source dividend income to you and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally
available to U.S. corporations under the Code. Dividends
will be included in your
income on the date of your, or in the case of ADSs, the depositary’s, receipt of the dividend. The amount of any dividend
income paid in
reais
will be the U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of
such receipt, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S.
dollars on the date of receipt, you should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend
income. You may have foreign currency gain or loss if the amount of such dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date
of such receipt. See also “—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Tax on Foreign Exchange and Financial Transactions.”
Subject to applicable
limitations that may vary depending upon your circumstances and subject to the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by
the U.S. Treasury, Brazilian income taxes withheld from dividends on common shares or ADSs will be creditable against your U.S.
federal income tax liability. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex, and you should consult your tax adviser regarding
the availability of foreign tax credits in your particular circumstances. Instead of claiming a credit, you may, at your election,
deduct foreign taxes, including Brazilian taxes in computing your taxable income, subject to generally applicable limitations under
U.S. law. An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits applies to all taxes paid or accrued in the
relevant taxable year to foreign countries and possessions of the United States.
Sale or Other Disposition
of Common Shares or ADSs
For U.S. federal income
tax purposes, gain or loss you realize on the sale or other disposition of common shares or ADSs will be capital gain or loss,
and will be long-term capital gain or loss if you have held the common shares or ADSs for more than one year. Long-term capital
gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders (including individuals) are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital
losses is subject to limitations.
The amount of your
gain or loss will equal the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and your tax basis in the common shares or
ADSs disposed of, in each case as determined in U.S. dollars. If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale or disposition of common
shares or ADSs, your amount realized will include the gross amount of the proceeds of such sale or disposition before deduction
of the Brazilian tax. See “—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Gains” for a description of when a disposition
may be subject to taxation by Brazil. Such gain or loss will generally be U.S.-source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes.
Consequently, you will not be able to credit any Brazilian income tax imposed on such gains against your U.S. federal income tax
liability unless you have other taxable income from foreign sources in the appropriate foreign tax credit basket. You should consult
your tax adviser as to whether the Brazilian tax on gains would be creditable against your U.S. federal income tax on foreign-source
income from other sources.
Other Brazilian Taxes
Any Brazilian IOF/Bond
Tax and the IOF/Exchange Tax imposed on the deposit of common shares in exchange for ADSs and the cancellation of ADSs in exchange
for common shares (as discussed above under “—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Tax on Foreign Exchange and Financial
Transactions”) will not be treated as creditable foreign taxes for U.S. federal income tax purposes. U.S. Holders should
consult their tax advisers regarding the treatment of these taxes for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Passive Foreign Investment
Company Rules
In general, a non-U.S.
corporation is a PFIC for any taxable year if: (1) 75% or more of its gross income consists of passive income (the “income
test”) or (2) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of its assets consists of assets that produce, or are held for the
production of, passive income (including cash and cash equivalents). Generally, “passive income” includes interest,
dividends, rents, royalties and certain gains. For purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that directly
or indirectly owns at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as if it held its proportionate share
of the assets of the other corporation and received directly its proportionate share of the income of the other corporation. The
Company believes that it was not a “passive foreign investment company,” or “PFIC,” for U.S. federal income
tax purposes for its 2016 taxable year. However, because the Company’s PFIC status is an annual determination that can be
made only after the end of each taxable year and will depend on the composition of its income and assets for each such year, there
can be no assurance that the Company will not be a PFIC for the current or any other taxable year. Moreover, after the expected
spin-off and sale of the Company’s shares of Tenda in 2017, as described in “Item 4. Information on the Company—A.
History and Development of the Company—General,” the Company will own less than 25% of Tenda shares and, therefore,
the Company’s income and assets will no longer include Tenda’s income and assets for purposes of determining the Company’s
PFIC status. On a non-consolidated basis (i.e., without taking into account
Tenda’s income),
the Company had financial income for the 2016 taxable year in an amount that is substantial relative to its gross margin.
The Company may become a PFIC if its financial income for any taxable year constitutes 75% or more of its gross income (generally,
the sum of the Company’s financial income and gross margin) for such year.
If the Company were
a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held common shares or ADSs, gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on a sale or
other disposition (including, under certain circumstances, a pledge) of the common shares or ADSs would be allocated ratably over
the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares or ADSs. The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or
other disposition and to any year before the Company became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each
other taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as appropriate, for that
taxable year, and an interest charge would be imposed on the tax on the amount allocated to that taxable year. Further, to the
extent that any distribution received by a U.S. Holder on its common shares or ADSs exceeds 125% of the average of the annual distributions
on common shares or ADSs received during the preceding three years or the U.S. Holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter,
that distribution would be subject to taxation in the same manner as gain, described immediately above. Certain elections may be
available that would result in alternative treatments (such as mark-to-market treatment) of the common shares or ADSs. If we are
a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder owned our shares, the U.S. Holder will generally be required to file Internal
Revenue Service Form 8621 with their annual U.S. federal income tax returns, subject to certain exceptions. You should consult
your tax adviser to determine whether any of these elections would be available and, if so, what the consequences of the alternative
treatments would be in your particular circumstances.
Information Reporting
and Backup Withholding
Payments of dividends
and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries generally are
subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding unless (1) you are a corporation or other exempt recipient
or (2) in the case of backup withholding, you provide a correct taxpayer identification number and certify that you are not subject
to backup withholding.
The amount of any
backup withholding from a payment to you will be allowed as a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle
you to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
Certain U.S. Holders
who are individuals (and certain entities that are formed or availed of for purposes of holding certain foreign financials assets)
may be required to report information relating to their ownership of securities of a non-U.S. person, subject to certain exceptions
including an exception for securities held in certain accounts maintained by U.S. financial institutions, such as our ADSs. You
should consult your tax adviser regarding the effect, if any, of these rules on your ownership and disposition of common shares
or ADSs.
U.S. HOLDERS OF OUR
COMMON SHARES OR ADSs SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISERS AS TO THE BRAZILIAN, U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES
OF THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR COMMON SHARES OR ADSs BASED UPON THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.
F. Dividends
and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement
by Experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents
on Display
Statements contained
in this annual report as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete, and each of
these statements is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit
hereto. A copy of the complete annual report including the exhibits and schedules filed herewith may be inspected without charge
at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such
materials may be obtained by mail from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, at
prescribed rates. Such reports and other information may also be inspected at the offices of the NYSE, 11 Wall Street, New York,
New York 10005, on which
our ADSs are listed. In addition the SEC maintains a website that contains information filed electronically with the SEC, which
can be accessed over the Internet at
http://www.sec.gov
.
We are subject to
the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act and, in accordance therewith, file periodic
reports and other information with the SEC. However, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Securities
Exchange Act relating to the furnishing and content of proxy statements and relating to short-swing profits reporting and liability.
We furnish to Citibank,
N.A., as depositary, copies of all reports we are required to file with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act, including our
annual reports in English, containing a brief description of our operations and our audited annual consolidated financial statements
which are prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP and include a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP. In addition, we are required under
the deposit agreement to furnish the depositary with copies of English translations to the extent required under the rules of the
SEC of all notices of meetings of shareholders and other reports and communications that are generally made available to shareholders.
Under certain circumstances, the depositary will arrange for the mailing, at our expense, of these notices, other reports and communications
to all ADS holders.
We also file financial
statements and other periodic reports with the CVM, which are available to the public from CVM’s website at
http://www.cvm.gov.br
.
I. Subsidiary
Information
Not applicable.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to
market risks arising from the normal course of our business. These market risks mainly involve the possibility that changes in
interest rates may impact the value of our financial liabilities. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
Relating to Brazil.”
Interest rates
Our results of operations
and profitability are affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact that these changes have on our interest expenses
relating to our variable interest rate debt instruments and on our purchase and sale contracts and on our interest income generated
from our financial investments.
The table below provides
information about our significant interest rate-sensitive instruments (fixed and variable) as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date
|
|
|
Total (3)
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020 and later
|
|
Principal Index(1)
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(
in millions of reais, unless otherwise indicated
)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, financing and debentures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
451.3
|
|
|
|
314.1
|
|
|
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
CDI/TR
|
|
|
|
470.2
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans and financing (working capital)
|
|
|
164.2
|
|
|
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
CDI
|
|
|
|
172.6
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans and financing — SFH
|
|
|
1,022.0
|
|
|
|
534.6
|
|
|
|
393.5
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
TR
|
|
|
|
1,016.0
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total loans, financing and debentures
|
|
|
1,637.5
|
|
|
|
984.7
|
|
|
|
516.0
|
|
|
|
81.2
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
|
|
CDI/TR
|
|
|
|
1,658.8
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
CDI
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Obligation to venture partner
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
CDI
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Real estate development obligations(2)
|
|
|
773.8
|
|
|
|
292.5
|
|
|
|
313.0
|
|
|
|
159.1
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
INCC
|
|
|
|
773.8
|
|
Obligations for purchase of land
|
|
|
260.7
|
|
|
|
170.4
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
INCC
|
|
|
|
260.7
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,675.7
|
|
|
|
1,442.2
|
|
|
|
896.6
|
|
|
|
254.7
|
|
|
|
82.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,697.0
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalent
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
CDI
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
Marketable securities (current and non-current)
|
|
|
223.6
|
|
|
|
223.6
|
|
|
|
—-
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
CDI
|
|
|
|
223.6
|
|
Receivables from clients
|
|
|
993.9
|
|
|
|
722.6
|
|
|
|
207.3
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
INCC
|
|
|
|
993.9
|
|
Receivables from clients (2)
|
|
|
525.2
|
|
|
|
120.39
|
|
|
|
280.91
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
INCC
|
|
|
|
525.2
|
|
Total client receivables
|
|
|
1,772.2
|
|
|
|
1,096.09
|
|
|
|
488.21
|
|
|
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,772.2
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,025.3
|
|
|
|
1,349.19
|
|
|
|
488.21
|
|
|
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,025.3
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
See notes 12 and 13 to our consolidated financial statements for information about the interest
rates on our loans, financing and debentures. As of December 31, 2016, the annualized index was 13.63% for CDI, 2.75% for TR, 6.11%
for INCC, 6.29% for IPCA and 7.19% for IGPM.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes commitments and receivables arising from units sold after January 1, 2004 for which balances
have not been recorded in our balance sheet—CFC Resolution No. 963.
|
|
(3)
|
This amount relates to the Gafisa segment only, since Tenda’s results of operations have
been presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016.
|
We borrow funds at
different rates and linked to different indices in order to try to match the financing that we provide to some of our clients.
The mismatch between rates and terms on our funds borrowed and the financing we provide may adversely affect our cash flow. We
constantly monitor and evaluate the impact of indexation on our assets and liabilities. If we anticipate the possibility of an
interest rate mismatch between our assets and obligations, we may use derivative financial instruments in order to hedge against
the risk that arises from interest rate variations.
Foreign Exchange
Rate
During 2016, we had
no derivative financial instruments with the objective of hedging against fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. As of December
31, 2016, we had no debt in foreign currency.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
D. American
Depositary Shares
Depositary Fees
We and the holders
and beneficial owners of our ADSs and the person depositing our common shares or surrendering ADSs for cancellation are responsible
for the following fees of the depositary:
Service
|
Rate
|
Paid
By
|
Issuance of ADSs upon deposit of Shares (excluding issuances as a result of distributions described in paragraph (4) below).
|
Up to US$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) issued.
|
Person depositing our common shares or person receiving ADSs.
|
Delivery of common shares deposited under our deposit agreement against surrender of ADSs.
|
Up to US$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) issued.
|
Person surrendering ADSs for purpose of withdrawal of common shares deposited under our deposit agreement or person to whom common shares deposited under our deposit agreement are delivered.
|
Distribution of cash dividends or other cash distributions (i.e., sale of rights and other entitlements).
|
Up to US$2.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) held.
|
Person to whom distribution is made.
|
Distribution of ADSs pursuant to (i) stock dividends or other free stock distributions, or (ii) exercise of rights to purchase additional ADSs.
|
Up to US$2.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) held.
|
Person to whom distribution is made.
|
Distribution of securities other than ADSs or rights to purchase additional ADSs (i.e., spin-off shares).
|
Up to US$2.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) held.
|
Person to whom distribution is made.
|
Depositary services
|
Up to US$4.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) held.
|
Person holding ADSs on applicable record date(s) established by the depositary.
|
Transfer of ADRs
|
US$1.50 per certificate presented for transfer.
|
Person presenting certificate for transfer.
|
The depositary may
deduct applicable depositary fees from the funds being distributed in the case of cash distributions. For distributions other than
cash, the depositary will invoice the amount of the applicable depositary fees to the applicable holders.
Additional Charges
Holders and beneficial
owners of our ADSs and person depositing our common shares for deposit and person surrendering ADSs for cancellation and withdrawal
of our common shares will be required to pay the following charges:
|
·
|
taxes (including applicable interest and penalties) and other governmental charges;
|
|
·
|
such registration fees as may from time to time be in effect for the registration of our common
shares or other common shares deposited under our deposit agreement on the share register and applicable to transfers of our common
shares or other common shares deposited under our deposit agreement to or from the name of the custodian, the depositary or any
nominees upon the making of deposits and withdrawals, respectively;
|
|
·
|
such cable, telex and facsimile transmission and delivery expenses as are expressly provided in
the deposit agreement to be at the expense of the person depositing or withdrawing our common shares or holders and beneficial
owners of ADSs;
|
|
·
|
the expenses and charges incurred by the depositary in the conversion of foreign currency;
|
|
·
|
such fees and expenses as are incurred by the depositary in connection with compliance with exchange
control regulations and other regulatory requirements applicable to our common shares, common shares deposited under our deposit
agreement, ADSs and ADRs; and
|
|
·
|
the fees and expenses incurred by the depositary, the custodian or any nominee in connection with
the servicing or delivery of common shares deposited under our deposit agreement.
|
Direct and Indirect
Payments
Citibank N.A., located
at 388 Greenwich Ave.- New York - NY 10013, as depositary, has agreed to reimburse certain of our reasonable expenses related to
our ADR program and incurred by us in connection with the program. As of December 31, 2016, we received from the depositary of
our ADSs US$1.9 million, which was used for general corporate purposes such as the payment of costs and expenses associated with
(1) the preparation and distribution of proxy materials, (2) the preparation and distribution of marketing materials and (3) consulting
and other services related to investor relations.
PART II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES
AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO
THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Registrant maintains
controls and procedures designed to ensure that it is able to collect the information it is required to disclose in the reports
it files with the SEC, and to process, summarize and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules of
the SEC. Based on an evaluation of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by this report conducted by the Registrant’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officers, after evaluating together with other members of management the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under Rule 13a-15(e)) have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective, to ensure that the Registrant is able to collect, process and disclose the information it is required to disclose
in the reports it files with the SEC within the required time periods.
(b) Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of
the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as a process designed by, or under the supervision
of, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting, and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in conformity with Brazilian GAAP, including the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP in accordance
with Item 18 of Form 20-F .
Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluations
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this
assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Internal Control-Integrated Framework 2013 issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management
believes that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are effective based on those
criteria.
(c) Attestation
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, has been audited by KPMG Auditores Independentes an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included under Item 18 in this annual report on Form 20-F on
pages F-2 and F-3.
(d) Changes in Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change
in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16. RESERVED
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL
EXPERT
For the purposes of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our directors established an Audit Committee that convenes as often as it determines is appropriate
to carry out its responsibilities, but at least quarterly. This committee has responsibility for planning and reviewing our annual
and quarterly reports and accounts with the involvement of our auditors in that process, focusing particularly on compliance with
legal requirements and accounting standards, and ensuring that an effective system of internal financial controls is maintained.
The ultimate responsibility for reviewing and approving our annual and quarterly reports and accounts remains with our directors.
The Audit Committee
convened 12 times in 2016. The Audit Committee currently comprises Francisco Vidal Luna, Jose Ecio Pereira da Costa Junior and
Odair Garcia Senra, each of whom is a director of our company. Our board of directors has determined that Francisco Vidal Luna,
Jose Ecio Pereira da Costa Junior and Odair Garcia Senra are each independent as set forth in the NYSE Listed Companies Manual
as well as being independent for the purpose of Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act. Our board of directors has determined
that Francisco Vidal Luna is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the regulations promulgated by the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 16B. CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT
AND ETHICS
On July 10, 2007,
we adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (The Code) that applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer,
principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions, as well as to our directors, other officers and employees.
The objective of this code is (1) to reduce the subjectivity of personal interpretations of ethical principles; (2) to be a formal
and institutional benchmark for the professional conduct of the employees, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent
conflicts of interests, becoming a standard for the internal and external relationship of the Company with its shareholders, clients,
employees, partners, suppliers, service providers, labor unions, competitors, society, government and the communities in which
we operate; and (3) to ensure that the daily concerns with efficiency, competitiveness and profitability do not override ethical
behavior.
The Code is regularly
reviewed and updated, in order to address international and local requirements regarding ethics on business, conflict of interests,
disclosure of information and anti-corruption procedures.
The Code was reviewed
in July 2014. The objective of the review was to (1) update the message of our CEO to our employees regarding our vision, mission
and organizational culture, encouraging ethical conduct and a
commitment to compliance
with the law, (2) reinforce the Company’s message of ethical principles and practices to our employees and to those conducting
business on our behalf in order to protect our integrity.
The Code can be obtained
from our website (www.gafisa.com.br) or free of charge by requesting a copy from our Investor Relations Department at the following
address: Av. Nações Unidas No. 8,501, 19
th
floor, 05425-070 – São Paulo, SP – Brazil,
telephone 55-11-3025-9242, fax 55-11-3025-9348 and e-mail ri@gafisa.com.br.
In July 2007, we established
a “whistleblower channel” in order to receive “complaints,” by any person (provided such complaint is first
reported to the Ethics Committee or Audit Committee), regarding any “unethical conduct” and “accounting, internal
accounting controls, or auditing matters” and equally confidential and anonymous submissions of “concerns” of
the same type by our employees and affiliates. The “whistleblower channel” can be accessed through our intranet or
website or a letter may be forwarded to our headquarters under the attention of our Ethics Committee and/or Audit Committee. Since
its establishment, 444 issues were reported to our “whistleblower channel,” all of them related to personal conduct
and, therefore, without any financial impact on our results of operations.
In January 2014, we
established a compliance and ethics program in order to help prevent, detect, rectify and report potential misconduct, including
violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Brazilian anti-corruption legislation (pursuant to Brazilian Law No. 12,846).
This program comprises extensive risk assessment of our operations, ongoing training and advice to employees, incentives and disciplinary
measures, and third party due diligence.
In December 2015,
Tenda adopted its own Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which conserves the core values of the Gafisa code, adapting them to
the lower income market, as well as aligning the new text to Tenda’s vision, mission and organizational culture.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES
AND SERVICES
The relationship with
our independent auditors in respect to the contracting of services unrelated to the external audit is based on principles that
preserve the independence of the auditor. Our board of directors approves our financial statements, the performance by our auditors
of audit and permissible non-audit services, and associated fees, supported by our Audit Committee.
The following table
describes the total amount billed to us by KPMG Auditores Independentes (“KPMG”) for services performed in 2016 and
2015, respectively, and the remuneration for these services in each year.
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
(in thousands of
reais
)
|
Audit fees (1)
|
|
|
4,560
|
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
Audit related fees (2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Tax fees (3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,560
|
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
“Audit fees” are the aggregate fees billed by KPMG for the audit of our consolidated
and annual financial statements including the audit of internal control over financial reporting, reviews of interim financial
statements and attestation services that are provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
|
(2)
|
There were no “audit related fees” billed by KPMG during 2016 or 2015.
|
|
(3)
|
There were no “Tax fees” billed by KPMG during 2016 or 2015.
|
Audit Committee
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our board of directors
has established pre-approval policies and procedures for the engagement of registered public accounting firm for audit and non-audit
services. Under such pre-approval policies and procedures, our board of directors reviews the scope of the services to be provided
by each registered public accounting firm to be engaged in order to ensure that there are no independence issues and the services
are not prohibited services as defined by Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING
STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
None.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER
AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
None.
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S
CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
Not applicable.
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
See “Item 6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.”
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have responded
to Item 18, in lieu of reporting to this Item.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See our audited consolidated
financial statements beginning on page F-1.
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
We are filing the
following documents as part of this Annual Report Form 20-F:
1.1. Bylaws
of Gafisa S.A., as amended (English), which is incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5, 2012.
2.1. Deposit
Agreement dated March 21, 2007, among Gafisa S.A., Citibank, N.A., as depositary, and the Holders and Beneficial Owners from time
to time of American Depositary Shares issued thereunder, which is incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form
F-6 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2007.
4.1. Merger
of shares agreement dated November 6, 2009 between Gafisa S.A. and Construtora Tenda S.A., which is incorporated by reference to
our registration statement on Form F-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2009.
8.1. List
of Subsidiaries*
11.1. Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics (English), which is incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2008.
12.1. Certification
pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Executive Officer*
12.2. Certification
pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Financial Officer*
13.1. Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive
Officer*
13.2. Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial
Officer*
_____________
* Filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant certifies that it meets all requirements for filing on Form
20-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
GAFISA S.A.
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Sandro Rogério da Silva Gamba
|
|
Name:
|
Sandro Rogério da Silva Gamba
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
By:
|
/s/ Andre Bergstein
|
|
Name:
|
Andre Bergstein
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: April 28, 2017
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
and Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
Gafisa S.A.
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Table of contents
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls over
Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal controls over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a – 15(f) and 15d – 15(f) under the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in Brazil (“Brazilian GAAP”), along with a reconciliation of net income
and equity from Brazilian GAAP to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records
that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance
with Brazilian GAAP, along with a reconciliation of net income and equity from Brazilian GAAP to US GAAP, and that our receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the our assets that could
have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, and that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in “Internal Control –
Integrated Framework (2013 Framework)”.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the Company's
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, has been audited by KPMG Auditores Independentes, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
São Paulo, Brazil
April 28, 2017
By:
|
/s/ Sandro Rogério da Silva Gamba
|
|
Name:
|
Sandro Rogério da Silva Gamba
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Andre Bergstein
|
|
Name:
|
Andre Bergstein
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Gafisa S.A.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Gafisa S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related
consolidated statements of profit or loss, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, cash flows and value added for each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2016. We also have audited Gafisa S.A.’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework
(2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Gafisa S.A.’s management
is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements and an opinion on the Gafisa S.A.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s
internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records
that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gafisa S.A. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations, cash flows and value added for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting practices adopted in Brazil applicable to real estate
development entities. Also in our opinion, Gafisa S.A. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Accounting practices adopted in Brazil applicable to real estate
development entities vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 32 to the consolidated financial
statements.
São Paulo - Brazil
April 28, 2017
/s/ KPMG Auditores Independentes
Gafisa S.A.
Consolidated balance sheets
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015
(In thousands of Brazilian Reais)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
29,534
|
|
|
|
82,640
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
223,646
|
|
|
|
629,671
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
722,640
|
|
|
|
1,395,273
|
|
Properties for sale
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,122,724
|
|
|
|
1,880,377
|
|
Receivables from related parties
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
57,455
|
|
|
|
95,118
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
7,171
|
|
Land for sale
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
3,306
|
|
|
|
105,857
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
1,189,011
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
49,336
|
|
|
|
120,657
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,400,200
|
|
|
|
4,316,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
271,322
|
|
|
|
407,091
|
|
Properties for sale
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
592,975
|
|
|
|
750,240
|
|
Receivables from related parties
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
25,529
|
|
|
|
109,193
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
20.i.b
|
|
|
|
9,030
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
58,917
|
|
|
|
82,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957,773
|
|
|
|
1,349,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
799,911
|
|
|
|
993,122
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
23,977
|
|
|
|
49,176
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
28,228
|
|
|
|
51,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852,116
|
|
|
|
1,094,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,809,889
|
|
|
|
2,443,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,210,089
|
|
|
|
6,760,332
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Consolidated balance sheets
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015
(In thousands of Brazilian Reais)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing
|
|
12
|
|
|
669,795
|
|
|
|
672,365
|
|
Debentures
|
|
13
|
|
|
314,139
|
|
|
|
389,621
|
|
Payable for purchase of properties and advances from customers
|
|
17
|
|
|
205,388
|
|
|
|
361,420
|
|
Payables for goods and service suppliers
|
|
-
|
|
|
79,120
|
|
|
|
57,335
|
|
Taxes and contributions
|
|
-
|
|
|
51,842
|
|
|
|
102,057
|
|
Salaries, payroll charges and profit sharing
|
|
-
|
|
|
28,880
|
|
|
|
60,102
|
|
Minimum mandatory dividends
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
Provision for legal claims and commitments
|
|
16
|
|
|
79,054
|
|
|
|
100,312
|
|
Obligations assumed on the assignment of receivables
|
|
14
|
|
|
34,698
|
|
|
|
23,482
|
|
Payables to related parties
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
85,611
|
|
|
|
87,100
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
20.i.b
|
|
|
5,290
|
|
|
|
14,056
|
|
Other payables
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
69,921
|
|
|
|
163,437
|
|
Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale
|
|
15
|
|
|
651,812
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
2,275,550
|
|
|
|
2,048,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing
|
|
12
|
|
|
516,505
|
|
|
|
620,470
|
|
Debentures
|
|
13
|
|
|
137,129
|
|
|
|
468,337
|
|
Payable for purchase of properties and advances from customers
|
|
17
|
|
|
90,309
|
|
|
|
248,514
|
|
Deferred income tax and social contributions
|
|
19
|
|
|
100,405
|
|
|
|
16,489
|
|
Provision for legal claims and commitments
|
|
16
|
|
|
83,904
|
|
|
|
142,670
|
|
Obligations assumed on the assignment of receivables
|
|
14
|
|
|
64,332
|
|
|
|
35,811
|
|
Payables to related parties
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41,002
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
20.i.b
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,618
|
|
Other payables
|
|
15
|
|
|
11,502
|
|
|
|
33,216
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
1,004,086
|
|
|
|
1,614,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
2,740,662
|
|
|
|
2,740,662
|
|
Treasury shares
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
(32,524
|
)
|
|
|
(25,980
|
)
|
Capital reserves and reserve for granting stock options
|
|
-
|
|
|
81,948
|
|
|
|
76,834
|
|
Income reserve
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
303,975
|
|
Accumulated losses
|
|
|
|
|
(861,761
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928,325
|
|
|
|
3,095,491
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
1,930,453
|
|
|
|
3,097,236
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
|
5,210,089
|
|
|
|
6,760,332
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Consolidated statement of profit or loss
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
(In thousands of Brazilian Reais, except if stated otherwise)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
(Restated)
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
22
|
|
|
915,698
|
|
|
|
1,443,357
|
|
|
|
1,580,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate development and sales of properties
|
|
23
|
|
|
(1,029,213
|
)
|
|
|
(1,061,921
|
)
|
|
|
(1,164,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross (loss) profit
|
|
|
|
|
(113,515
|
)
|
|
|
381,436
|
|
|
|
415,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (expenses) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
23
|
|
|
(94,946
|
)
|
|
|
(97,949
|
)
|
|
|
(95,063
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
23
|
|
|
(106,585
|
)
|
|
|
(97,442
|
)
|
|
|
(124,833
|
)
|
Income from equity method investments
|
|
9
|
|
|
(48,332
|
)
|
|
|
40,015
|
|
|
|
38,405
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
10 and 11
|
|
|
(33,892
|
)
|
|
|
(32,585
|
)
|
|
|
(63,607
|
)
|
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
23
|
|
|
(78,992
|
)
|
|
|
(107,634
|
)
|
|
|
(79,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) profit before financial income and expenses and income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
|
|
(476,262
|
)
|
|
|
85,841
|
|
|
|
91,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
24
|
|
|
(84,118
|
)
|
|
|
(127,728
|
)
|
|
|
(114,371
|
)
|
Financial income
|
|
24
|
|
|
58,439
|
|
|
|
77,306
|
|
|
|
98,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) profit before income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
|
|
(501,941
|
)
|
|
|
35,419
|
|
|
|
75,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
|
|
(10,722
|
)
|
|
|
(14,763
|
)
|
|
|
(25,304
|
)
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
|
|
(89,358
|
)
|
|
|
14,105
|
|
|
|
16,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income tax and social contribution
|
|
19.i
|
|
|
(100,080
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(8,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
(602,021
|
)
|
|
|
34,761
|
|
|
|
66,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
(559,704
|
)
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
(1,161,725
|
)
|
|
|
70,979
|
|
|
|
(43,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-) Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
Owners of the parent
|
|
|
|
|
(1,163,596
|
)
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares (in thousands)
|
|
27
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per thousand shares - In Reais
|
|
27
|
|
|
(43.222
|
)
|
|
|
2.731
|
|
|
|
(1.427
|
)
|
From continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
(22.664
|
)
|
|
|
1.619
|
|
|
|
2.244
|
|
From discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
(20.558
|
)
|
|
|
1.112
|
|
|
|
(3.671
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per thousand shares - In Reais
|
|
27
|
|
|
(43.222
|
)
|
|
|
2.712
|
|
|
|
(1.427
|
)
|
From continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
(22.664
|
)
|
|
|
1.608
|
|
|
|
2.244
|
|
From discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
(20.558
|
)
|
|
|
1.105
|
|
|
|
(3.671
|
)
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
(loss)
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
(In thousands of Brazilian Reais, except if
stated otherwise)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income for the year
|
|
|
(1,161,725
|
)
|
|
|
70,979
|
|
|
|
(43,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the year, net of taxes
|
|
|
(1,161,725
|
)
|
|
|
70,979
|
|
|
|
(43,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of the parent
|
|
|
(1,163,596
|
)
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of Brazilian Reais)
|
|
|
|
Attributed
to Owners of the Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
Capital
|
|
Treasury
shares
|
|
Reserve
for granting shares
|
|
Legal
reserve
|
|
Reserve
for investments
|
|
Retained
earnings (accumulated losses)
|
|
Total
Company
|
|
Noncontrolling
interests
|
|
Total
consolidated
|
Balances at December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
2,740,662
|
|
(73,070)
|
|
54,383
|
|
31,593
|
|
437,156
|
|
-
|
|
3,190,724
|
|
23,759
|
|
3,214,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option plan
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,514
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,514
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,514
|
|
Treasury shares acquired
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(115,265
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(115,265
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(115,265
|
)
|
Treasury shares sold
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,583
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10,662
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,921
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,921
|
|
Treasury shares cancelled
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
91,693
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(91,693
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Acquisition of non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(19,525
|
)
|
|
|
(19,525
|
)
|
Loss for the year
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
(43,725
|
)
|
Absorption of loss for the year with income
reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
42,549
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
2,740,662
|
|
|
|
(79,059
|
)
|
|
|
69,897
|
|
|
|
31,593
|
|
|
|
292,252
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,055,345
|
|
|
|
3,058
|
|
|
|
3,058,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
Stock option plan
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,937
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,937
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,937
|
|
Treasury shares acquired
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(24,157
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(24,157
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(24,157
|
)
|
Treasury shares sold
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,022
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,423
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
Treasury shares cancelled
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
74,214
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(74,214
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
70,979
|
|
Allocation:
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal reserve
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,722
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Declared dividends
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,682
|
)
|
|
|
(17,682
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,682
|
)
|
Reserve for investments
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53,045
|
|
|
|
(53,045
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
2,740,662
|
|
|
|
(25,980
|
)
|
|
|
76,834
|
|
|
|
35,315
|
|
|
|
268,660
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,095,491
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
|
|
3,097,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
Stock option plan
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
Treasury shares acquired
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,693
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,693
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,693
|
)
|
Treasury shares sold
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,140
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
(Loss) profit for the year
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,163,596
|
)
|
|
|
(1,163,596
|
)
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
(1,161,725
|
)
|
Absorption:
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal reserve
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(35,315
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
35,315
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Reserve for investments
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(266,520
|
)
|
|
|
266,520
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,919
|
)
|
|
|
(2,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
2,740,662
|
|
|
|
(32,524
|
)
|
|
|
81,948
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(861,761
|
)
|
|
|
1,928,325
|
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
|
|
1,930,453
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
Gafisa S.A.
Consolidated statements of cash flow statement
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of Brazilian Reais)
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
(Loss) profit before income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(1,043,812
|
)
|
|
|
71,637
|
|
|
|
(60,655
|
)
|
Expenses/(income) not affecting cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (Notes 10 and 11)
|
|
|
33,892
|
|
|
|
32,585
|
|
|
|
46,003
|
|
Stock option expense (Note 18.3)
|
|
|
6,821
|
|
|
|
7,826
|
|
|
|
33,168
|
|
Unrealized interests and charges, net
|
|
|
100,508
|
|
|
|
88,801
|
|
|
|
56,464
|
|
Warranty provision (Note 15)
|
|
|
(12,390
|
)
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
7,771
|
|
Provision for legal claims and commitments (Note 16)
|
|
|
70,796
|
|
|
|
91,193
|
|
|
|
61,885
|
|
Provision for profit sharing (Note 26 (iii))
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts (Note 5)
|
|
|
6,950
|
|
|
|
6,749
|
|
|
|
(1,424
|
)
|
Provision for realization of non-financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties and land for sale (Note 6 and 8)
|
|
|
160,216
|
|
|
|
(618
|
)
|
|
|
5,449
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,604
|
|
Income from equity method investments (Note 9)
|
|
|
48,332
|
|
|
|
(40,015
|
)
|
|
|
(38,405
|
)
|
Financial instruments (Note 20)
|
|
|
(13,404
|
)
|
|
|
17,151
|
|
|
|
7,492
|
|
Provision for penalties due to delay in construction works (Note 15)
|
|
|
(1,404
|
)
|
|
|
(2,137
|
)
|
|
|
(3,332
|
)
|
Write-off of property and equipment and intangible assets, net (Notes 10 and 11)
|
|
|
7,666
|
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
6,298
|
|
Write-off of goodwill supported by inventory surplus (Notes 6 and 9)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,748
|
|
Impairment loss on disposal group held for sale (Note 8.2)
|
|
|
610,105
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in operating assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
288,999
|
|
|
|
133,674
|
|
|
|
103,027
|
|
Properties for sale and land available for sale
|
|
|
21,759
|
|
|
|
(159,654
|
)
|
|
|
(318,732
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
29,471
|
|
|
|
18,883
|
|
|
|
(46,911
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
|
|
7,622
|
|
|
|
17,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in operating liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties and advances from customers
|
|
|
(73,603
|
)
|
|
|
9,243
|
|
|
|
(49,573
|
)
|
Taxes and contributions
|
|
|
(9,874
|
)
|
|
|
(7,195
|
)
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
Payables for goods and service suppliers
|
|
|
31,991
|
|
|
|
(28,036
|
)
|
|
|
(3,997
|
)
|
Salaries, payroll charges and profit sharing
|
|
|
(17,740
|
)
|
|
|
(25,464
|
)
|
|
|
(39,189
|
)
|
Other payables
|
|
|
(152,209
|
)
|
|
|
(84,266
|
)
|
|
|
29,177
|
|
Transactions with related parties
|
|
|
100,207
|
|
|
|
72,444
|
|
|
|
81,059
|
|
Paid taxes
|
|
|
(10,722
|
)
|
|
|
(14,763
|
)
|
|
|
(101,415
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated (used) from operating activities related to disposal group held for sale
|
|
|
68,821
|
|
|
|
(121,713
|
)
|
|
|
209,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated (used) from operating activities
|
|
|
269,666
|
|
|
|
104,563
|
|
|
|
41,893
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment, and intangible assets (Notes 10 and 11)
|
|
|
(35,838
|
)
|
|
|
(33,340
|
)
|
|
|
(70,626
|
)
|
Acquisition of short-term investments
|
|
|
(1,417,794
|
)
|
|
|
(3,502,264
|
)
|
|
|
(3,593,955
|
)
|
Redemption of short-term investments
|
|
|
1,611,200
|
|
|
|
3,699,616
|
|
|
|
4,303,400
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(1,636
|
)
|
|
|
32,193
|
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37,563
|
|
Cash from investing activities related to disposal group held for sale
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
222,288
|
|
|
|
43,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from investing activities
|
|
|
162,455
|
|
|
|
384,664
|
|
|
|
751,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from loans, financing and debentures
|
|
|
579,391
|
|
|
|
734,552
|
|
|
|
763,339
|
|
Payment of loans, financing and debentures - principal
|
|
|
(719,390
|
)
|
|
|
(806,398
|
)
|
|
|
(840,840
|
)
|
Payment of loans, financing and debentures - interest
|
|
|
(225,405
|
)
|
|
|
(262,466
|
)
|
|
|
(251,796
|
)
|
Assignment of receivables
|
|
|
72,776
|
|
|
|
24,558
|
|
|
|
12,433
|
|
Payables to venture partners
|
|
|
(3,658
|
)
|
|
|
(6,135
|
)
|
|
|
(112,650
|
)
|
Paid dividends
|
|
|
(17,682
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(150,042
|
)
|
Loan transactions with related parties
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of treasury shares (Note 18.1)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
6,919
|
|
Repurchase of treasury shares (Note 18.1)
|
|
|
(8,693
|
)
|
|
|
(24,157
|
)
|
|
|
(115,265
|
)
|
Cash used in financing activities related to disposal group held for sale
|
|
|
(135,291
|
)
|
|
|
(176,755
|
)
|
|
|
(213,146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(456,813
|
)
|
|
|
(516,482
|
)
|
|
|
(899,145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(24,692
|
)
|
|
|
(27,255
|
)
|
|
|
(105,299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the beginning of the year
|
|
|
82,640
|
|
|
|
109,895
|
|
|
|
215,194
|
|
(-) Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year from disposal group held for sale
|
|
|
(28,414
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
At the end of the year
|
|
|
29,534
|
|
|
|
82,640
|
|
|
|
109,985
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Consolidated statement of value added
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
(In thousands of Brazilian Reais)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
(Restated)
|
Revenues
|
|
|
983,664
|
|
|
|
1,561,815
|
|
|
|
1,705,824
|
|
Real estate development and sales
|
|
|
990,614
|
|
|
|
1,568,564
|
|
|
|
1,704,400
|
|
Reversal (recognition) of allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts
|
|
|
(6,950
|
)
|
|
|
(6,749
|
)
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
Inputs acquired from third parties (including taxes on purchases)
|
|
|
(1,569,281
|
)
|
|
|
(1,010,112
|
)
|
|
|
(1,227,918
|
)
|
Operating costs - Real estate development and sales
|
|
|
(872,401
|
)
|
|
|
(910,736
|
)
|
|
|
(1,020,605
|
)
|
Materials, energy, outsourced labor and other
|
|
|
(137,176
|
)
|
|
|
(135,594
|
)
|
|
|
(97,134
|
)
|
Profit or loss of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(559,704
|
)
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross value added
|
|
|
(585,617
|
)
|
|
|
551,703
|
|
|
|
477,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(33,892
|
)
|
|
|
(32,585
|
)
|
|
|
(63,607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net value added produced by the entity
|
|
|
(619,509
|
)
|
|
|
519,118
|
|
|
|
414,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value added received on transfer
|
|
|
10,107
|
|
|
|
117,321
|
|
|
|
136,526
|
|
Income from equity method investments
|
|
|
(48,332
|
)
|
|
|
40,015
|
|
|
|
38,405
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
58,439
|
|
|
|
77,306
|
|
|
|
98,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total value added to be distributed
|
|
|
(609,402
|
)
|
|
|
636,439
|
|
|
|
550,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value added distribution
|
|
|
(609,402
|
)
|
|
|
636,439
|
|
|
|
550,825
|
|
Personnel and payroll charges
|
|
|
115,054
|
|
|
|
124,920
|
|
|
|
157,840
|
|
Taxes and contributions
|
|
|
190,173
|
|
|
|
144,770
|
|
|
|
162,582
|
|
Interest and rents
|
|
|
248,967
|
|
|
|
292,300
|
|
|
|
272,952
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Retained earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(1,871
|
)
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
Retained earnings (incurred losses)
|
|
|
(1,161,725
|
)
|
|
|
53,297
|
|
|
|
(43,725
|
)
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
Gafisa S.A. ("Gafisa"
or "Company") is a publicly traded company with registered office at Avenida das Nações Unidas, 8,501,
19
th
floor, in the city and state of São Paulo, Brazil and commenced its operations in 1997 with the objectives
of: (i) promoting and managing all forms of real estate ventures on its own behalf or for third parties (in the latter case, as
construction company or proxy); (ii) selling and purchasing real estate properties; (iii) providing civil construction and civil
engineering services; (iv) developing and implementing marketing strategies related to its own and third party real estate ventures;
and (v) investing in other companies who share similar objectives.
The Company has stocks traded at
BM&FBovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), reporting its information
to the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The Company enters real estate
development projects with third parties through specific purpose partnerships (“Sociedades de Propósito Específico”
or “SPEs”) or through the formation of consortia and condominiums. Controlled entities substantially share managerial
and operating structures, and corporate, managerial and operating costs with the Company. The SPEs, condominiums and consortia
operate solely in the real estate industry and are linked to specific ventures.
On December 14, 2016, the Company
entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with
Jaguar
Real Estate Partners LP
pursuant to which the Company will sell Tenda shares representing up to 30% of the total capital
stock of Tenda, at a price equal to R$8.13 per share which values Tenda at R$539,020. The consummation of the transaction
is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent established in the SPA, among others (Note 8.2). The Company estimates
the transaction will be concluded in May or June 2017.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
|
|
2.1.
|
Basis of presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements
|
The consolidated financial statements were authorized
for issue by the Company’s Board of Directors on April 28, 2017.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company
have been prepared and are being presented according to the accounting practices adopted in Brazil, including the pronouncements
issued by the CPC, approved by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) (“Brazilian GAAP” or “BR
GAAP”).
Brazilian GAAP, differs from International
Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
(“IASB”) in certain respects, including the fact that Brazilian GAAP permits the application of percentage of
completion accounting by real estate companies in more circumstances than are permitted by IFRS and has interpretations on
the accounting treatment for cancelations. This application of Brazilian GAAP is commonly referred to in Brazil as
“IFRS applicable to real estate development entities in Brazil, as approved by the Accounting Pronouncements Committee,
or CPC, the CVM and the Federal Accounting Council, or CFC, including CPC Guideline 04 - Application of the Technical
Interpretation ICPC 02 to the Brazilian Real Estate Development Entities - regarding revenue recognition, and the respective
costs and expenses arising from real estate development operations by reference to the stage of completion (percentage of
completion method)”, including the accounting treatment for cancelations. Accordingly, for the purpose of its annual
filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the accompanying consolidated financial statements prepared
in accordance with BR GAAP have been reconciled to US GAAP as presented in Note 32. US GAAP condensed consolidated balance
sheets have been included in Note 32 (d)(i) for 2016 and 2015 and US GAAP consolidated statement of profit or loss and
comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 have been included in Note 32 (d)(ii) and
Note 32 (d)(iii), respectively.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.1.
|
Basis of presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements
--Continued
|
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared
on a going concern basis. Management makes an assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as going concern when preparing
the consolidated financial statements.
All amounts reported in the accompanying financial
statements are in thousands of Reais, except as otherwise stated.
|
2.1.1.
|
Consolidated financial statements
|
The consolidated financial statements
of the Company include the financial statements of Gafisa and its direct and indirect subsidiaries. The Company controls an entity
when it is exposed to, or has right to variable returns arising from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect
those returns through the power that it exerts over the entity. The existence and the potential effects of voting rights, which
are currently exercisable or convertible, are taken into account when evaluating whether the Company controls another entity. The
financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which the control commences
until the date on which control ceases.
The accounting practices have been
applied consistently by all subsidiaries in the consolidated financial statements. The subsidiaries have the same fiscal year as
the Company.
|
2.1.2.
|
Functional and presentation currency
|
The functional and presentation
currency of the Company is Real.
|
2.1.3.
|
Presentation of segment information
|
The
presentation of operating segment information is consistent with the internal reports provided to the main decision makers of operational
matters, the Statutory Board, who are responsible for allocating resources, assessing the performance of operating segments, and
making strategic decisions.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
|
|
2.2.1.
|
Accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions
|
Accounting estimates and judgments
are evaluated on an ongoing basis based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations on future events, considered
reasonable under the circumstances.
The preparation of the consolidated
financial statements of the Company requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities, as well as the disclosure of contingent liabilities, at the reporting date.
Assets and liabilities subject
to estimates and assumptions include the provision for impairment of asset, transactions with share-based payment, provision for
legal claims, fair value of financial instruments, measurement of the estimated cost of construction, deferred tax assets, among
others.
The main assumptions related to
sources of uncertainty over future estimates and other important sources of uncertainty over estimates at the reporting date, which
may result in different amounts upon settlement are discussed below:
|
a)
|
Impairment loss of non-financial assets
|
An impairment loss exists when the
asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to
sell and its value in use.
The calculation of the fair value
less costs to sell is based on available information on sale transactions of similar assets or market prices less additional costs
of disposal. The calculation of the value in use is based on the discounted cash flow model.
Cash flows are derived based on the
budget for the following five years, and do not include uncommitted restructuring activities or future significant investments
that will improve the asset basis of the cash-generating unit being tested. The recoverable amount is sensitive to the discount
rate used under the discounted cash flow method, the estimated future cash inflows, and the growth rate used for purposes of extrapolation.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.1.
|
Accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions
--Continued
|
|
a)
|
Impairment loss of non-financial assets
--Continued
|
Indefinite life intangible assets
and goodwill attributable to future economic benefit are tested at least annually, and/or when circumstances indicate a decrease
in the carrying value. The main assumptions used for determining the recoverable amount of cash-generating units are detailed in
Note 9.
|
b)
|
Share-based payment transactions
|
The Company measures the cost of
transactions with employees to be settled with shares based on the fair value of equity instruments on the grant date. For cash-settled
share-based transactions, the liability is required to be remeasured at the end of each reporting period through the settlement
date, recognizing in profit or loss possible changes in fair value, which requires revaluation of the estimates used at the end
of each reporting period. The estimate of the fair value of share-based payments requires the determination of the most adequate
pricing model to grant equity instruments, which depends on the grant terms and conditions.
It also requires the determination
of the most adequate data for the pricing model, including the expected option life, volatility and dividend income, and the corresponding
assumptions. The assumptions and models used to estimate the fair value of share-based payments are disclosed in Note 18.3.
|
c)
|
Provision for legal claims
|
The Company recognizes a provision
for tax, labor and civil claims (Note 16). The assessment of the probability of a loss includes the evaluation of the available
evidences, the hierarchy of Laws, existing case law, the latest court decisions and their significance in the judicial system,
and the opinion of external legal counsel. Provisions are reviewed and adjusted to take into account the changes in circumstances,
such as applicable statutes of limitations, findings of tax inspections, or additional exposures found based on new court issues
or decisions.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--
Continued
|
|
2.2.1.
|
Accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions
--Continued
|
|
c)
|
Provision for legal claims
--Continued
|
There are uncertainties inherent
in the interpretation of complex tax rules and in the value and timing of future taxable income. In the ordinary course of business,
the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to assessments, audits, legal claims and administrative proceedings in civil, tax
and labor matters.
|
d)
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts
|
The Company measures the allowance
for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts based on assumptions which consider the history of its current operations and its
estimates. Such estimates are annually reviewed to consider any changes in circumstances and histories.
The measurement of the warranty provision,
to cover expenditures for repairing construction defects covered during the warranty period, is based on the estimate that considers
the history of incurred expenditures adjusted by the future expectation, which is regularly reviewed.
|
f)
|
Estimated cost of construction
|
Estimated costs, mainly comprising
the incurred and future costs for completing construction projects, are regularly reviewed, based on the progress of construction,
and any resulting adjustments are recognized in profit or loss of the Company.
|
g)
|
Realization of deferred income tax
|
A deferred tax asset is recognized
when it is probable that a taxable profit will be available in subsequent years to offset the deferred tax asset, based on projections
of results and based on internal assumptions and future economic scenarios.
The other
provisions recognized in the Company are described in Note 2.2.22.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.2.
|
Recognition of revenue and expenses
|
|
(i)
|
Real estate development and sales
|
|
(a)
|
For the sales of completed units, revenues are recognized upon completion of the sale, and the transfer
of significant risks and benefits, regardless of the timing of receipt from the customer.
|
|
(b)
|
For the construction phase of units sold, but not yet completed:
|
|
·
|
The incurred cost (including cost of land,
and other directly related expenditures) that corresponds to the units sold is included in profit or loss. For the units not yet
sold, the incurred cost is included in inventory (Note 2.2.7);
|
|
·
|
Sales revenues are appropriated to profit
or loss, using the percentage-of-completion method for each project, this percentage being measured in view of the incurred cost
in relation to the total estimated cost of the respective project;
|
|
·
|
Revenue recognized in excess of actual payments
received from customers is recorded as either a current or non-current asset in “Trade accounts receivable”. Any payment
received in connection with the sales of units that exceeds the amount of revenues recognized is recorded as “Payables for
purchase of land and advances from customers";
|
|
·
|
Interest and inflation-indexation charges
on accounts receivable from the time the units are sold and delivered, as well as the adjustment to present value of account receivable,
are included in “Real estate development, sale, barter transactions and construction services” when incurred, on a
pro rata basis using the accrual basis of accounting;
|
|
·
|
Financial charges on accounts payable for
acquisition of land and those directly associated with the financing of construction are capitalized and recorded in properties
for sale and included in the incurred cost of units under construction until their completion, and follow the same recognition
criteria as the cost of real estate development for units sold while under construction;
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.2.
|
Recognition of revenue and expenses
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Real estate development and sales
--Continued
|
|
·
|
The taxes levied and deferred on the difference
between real estate development revenues and the cumulative revenue subject to tax are calculated and recognized when this difference
in revenue is recognized; and
|
|
·
|
Other expenses, including advertising and
publicity, are recognized in profit or loss when incurred.
|
|
(ii)
|
Construction services
|
Revenues from
real estate services are recognized as services are rendered and tied to the construction management activities for third parties
and technical advisory services.
|
(iii)
|
Barter transactions
|
Barter transactions
have the objective of receiving land from third parties that are settled with the delivery of real estate units or transfer of
portions of the revenue from the sale of real estate units of ventures. The value of the land acquired is determined on fair value
of the units to be delivered, as a component of “properties for sale”, with a corresponding entry to “payable
for purchase of properties and advances from customers”. Revenues and costs incurred from barter transactions are included
in profit or loss over the course of construction period of ventures, as previously described in item (b).
|
2.2.3.
|
Financial instruments
|
Financial instruments are recognized
from the date the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of financial instruments, which mainly comprise cash and
cash equivalents, short-term investments, account receivable, loans and financing, debentures, suppliers, payable for purchase
of properties and advances from customers and other debts.
After initial recognition, financial
instruments are measured as described below:
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.3.
|
Financial instruments
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Financial instruments through profit or loss
|
A financial instrument is classified
at fair value through profit or loss when it is designated as such upon initial recognition, or when it meets the definition of
a derivative and hedge accounting is not applicable.
Financial instruments are designated
at fair value through profit or loss if the Company manages these investments and makes purchase and sale decisions based on their
fair value in accordance with the Company’s documented investment strategy or risk management. Financial instruments at fair
value through profit or loss are measured at fair value, and their changes therein are recognized in profit or loss.
For the year ended December 31,
2016, the Company held derivative financial instruments with the objective of mitigating the risk of its exposure to the volatility
of indices and interest rates, recognized at the fair value directly in profit or loss. In accordance with its treasury policies,
the Company does not have or issue derivative financial instruments for purposes other than to mitigate risk.
The Company does not adopt the
hedge accounting practice.
Financial
assets are classified into financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, receivables, held-to-maturity investments, and
available-for-sale financial assets. The Company determines the classification of its financial assets upon initial recognition,
when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Financial
assets are initially recognized at fair value, plus, in the case of investments not measured at fair value through profit or loss,
directly attributable transaction costs.
The
financial assets of the Company include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade accounts receivable and derivative
financial instruments.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.3.
|
Financial instruments
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Financial assets
--Continued
|
Derecognition
(write-off)
A
financial asset (or, as the case may be, a portion of a financial asset or portion of a group of similar financial assets) is derecognized
when:
|
·
|
The contractual rights to the cash flows from
the asset expire; or
|
|
·
|
The Company transfers the rights to receive cash
inflows of an asset or assume an obligation of fully pay the cash inflows received, without significant delay, to a third party
because of a “transfer” agreement; and (a) the Company substantially transfers the risks and benefits of the asset,
or (b) the Company does not substantially transfer or retain all risks and benefits related to the asset, but transfers the control
over the asset.
|
When
the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash inflows of an asset, and signed an agreement to pass it on, and has not
substantially transferred or has retained all risks and benefits related to the asset, an asset is recognized to the extent of
the continuous involvement of the Company with the asset. In this case, the Company also recognizes a related liability. The transferred
asset and related liability are measured based on the rights and obligations that the Company has maintained.
The
continuous involvement by means of a guarantee on the transferred asset is measured at the lower of the original carrying value
of the asset, or the highest consideration that may be required from the Company.
|
(iii)
|
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
|
Financial
liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated
as such upon initial recognition.
Loans
and financing
Subsequent
to initial recognition, loans and financing accruing interest are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest rate
method. Gains and losses are recognized in statement of profit or loss, at the time liabilities are derecognized, as well as during
the amortization process using the effective interest rate method.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.3.
|
Financial instruments
--Continued
|
|
(iii)
|
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss --Continued
|
Derecognition
(write-off)
A
financial liability is derecognized when its contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled or expired.
When
an existing financial liability is substituted by another from the same creditor, under substantially different terms, or when
the terms of an existing liability are significantly modified, this substitution or change is treated as a derecognition of the
original liability and recognition of a new liability. The difference in the corresponding carrying values is recognized in profit
or loss.
|
2.2.4.
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
Cash and cash equivalents substantially
comprise demand deposits and bank certificates of deposit held under resale agreements, denominated in Reais, with high market
liquidity and original contractual maturities of 90 days or less, and for which there are no penalties or other restrictions for
the immediate redemption thereof.
Cash equivalents are classified
as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and are recorded at the original amounts plus income earned, calculated
on a “pro rata basis", which are equivalent to their market values, not having any impact to be accounted for in the
Company’s equity.
Short-term investments include
bank deposit certificates, federal government bonds, exclusive investment funds that are fully consolidated and also restricted
cash in guarantee to loans, which are classified at fair value through profit or loss (Note 4.2).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.5.
|
Trade account receivable
|
These are presented at present
and realizable values. The classification between current and noncurrent is made based on the expected maturity of contract installments.
The installments due are indexed
based on the National Civil Construction Index (INCC) during the period of construction, and based on the General Market Prices
Index (IGP-M) and interest at 12% p.a., after the delivery of the units.
The adjustment to present value
is calculated between the contract signature date and the estimated date to transfer the completed property keys to the buyer,
using a discount rate represented by the average rate of the financing obtained by the Company, net of inflation, as mentioned
in Note 2.2.19.
Considering that financing its
customers is an important part of the Company operations, the reversal of the present value adjustment was carried out as contra-entry
to the group of “Real estate development, sale, barter transactions and construction services” revenue, consistently
with interest incurred on the portion of receivables balance related to the period subsequent to the handover of keys.
|
2.2.6.
|
Mortgage-backed Securities (CRIs) and Housing Loan Certificate (CCI)
|
The Company and its subsidiaries
carry out the assignment and/or securitization of receivables related to completed projects and those still under construction.
This securitization is carried out through the issuance of the Housing Loan Certificate (“Cédula de Crédito
Imobiliário” or “CCI”), which is assigned to financial institutions. When there is no right of recourse,
this assignment is recorded as reduction of accounts receivable. When there is right of recourse against the Company, the assigned
receivable is maintained in the balance sheet and the funds from assignment are classified into the account “Obligations
assumed on assignment of receivable”, until receivables are settled by customers.
In this situation, the transaction
cost is recorded in “financial expenses” in the statement of profit or loss for the year in which the transfer is made.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.7.
|
Properties for sale
|
The Company and its subsidiaries
acquire land for future real estate developments, on payment conditions in currency or through barter transactions. Land acquired
through barter transaction is stated at fair value of the units to be delivered, and the revenue and cost are recognized according
to the criteria described in Note 2.2.2 (iii).
Properties are measured at the
lower of construction cost, and net realizable value. In the case of real estate under construction, the portion in inventories
corresponds to the cost incurred for units that have not yet been sold. The incurred cost comprises construction costs (materials,
own or outsourced labor, and other related items), and legal expenses relating to the acquisition of land and projects, land costs,
and financial charges which relate to a project over the construction period.
The classification of land between
current and noncurrent assets is made by Management based on the expected period for launching real estate ventures. Management
periodically revises the estimates of real estate ventures launches.
These are recognized in profit
or loss as incurred using the accrual basis of accounting.
Land available for sale is measured
at the lower of the carrying value and the fair value less costs to sell and is classified as held for sale if its carrying value
is to be recovered through a sale transaction of the land. This condition is considered fulfilled only when the sale is highly
probable, and the asset is available for immediate sale in its current condition. Management shall commit to sell it within one
year of the classification date.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.10.
|
Investments in associates
|
Investments in associates are recorded
in the Company using the equity method.
When the Company's share of the
losses of associates is equal to or higher than the amount invested, the Company recognizes the residual portion in net capital
deficiency since it assumes obligations and makes payments on behalf of these companies. For this purpose, the Company recognizes
a provision at an amount considered appropriate to meet the obligations of the associates (Note 9).
|
2.2.11.
|
Property and equipment
|
Items of property and equipment
are measured at cost, less accumulated depreciation and/or any accumulated impairment losses, if applicable.
An item of property and equipment
is derecognized when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. The gain or loss arising from derecognition
of an asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying value of the asset) is recognized
in profit or loss upon derecognition.
Depreciation is calculated based
on the straight-line method considering the estimated useful lives of the assets (Note 10).
Expenditures incurred in the construction
of sales stands, display apartments and related furnishings are capitalized as property and equipment of the Company and its subsidiaries.
Depreciation of these assets commences upon launch of the development and is recorded over the average term the stand is in use
and is written-off when it is retired.
Property and equipment are subject
to periodic assessments of impairment.
|
2.2.12.
|
Intangible assets
|
|
(i)
|
Expenditures related to the acquisition and implementation of computer systems and software licenses
are recorded at acquisition cost, and amortized on straight-line basis over a period of up to five years, and are subject to periodic
assessments of impairment of assets.
|
|
(ii)
|
The Company’s investments in subsidiaries include goodwill when the acquisition cost exceeds
the market value of net assets of the acquiree.
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.12.
|
Intangible assets
--Continued
|
Impairment testing of goodwill
is performed at least annually or whenever circumstances indicate an impairment loss.
|
2.2.13.
|
Payables for purchase of properties and advances from customer due to barter
|
Payables for purchase of land are
recognized at the amounts corresponding to the contractual obligations assumed. Subsequently they are measured at amortized cost,
plus interest and charges proportional to the incurred period (“pro rata” basis), net of present value adjustment.
The obligations related to barter
transactions of land in exchange for real estate units are stated at fair value of the units to be delivered.
|
2.2.14.
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
(i)
|
Current income tax and social contribution
|
Current income tax is the expected
tax payable or receivable/to be offset in relation to taxable profit for the year.
Income taxes in Brazil comprise
income tax (25%) and social contribution (9%), for entities on the standard profit regime, for which the composite statutory rate
is 34%. Deferred taxes for these entities are recognized on all temporary tax differences at the reporting date between the tax
bases of assets and liabilities, and their carrying values.
As permitted by tax legislation,
certain subsidiaries opted for the presumed profit regime, a method under which the taxable profit is calculated as a percentage
of gross sales. For these companies, the income tax is calculated on estimated profits at rate of 8% and 12% of gross revenues,
respectively, on which the rates of the respective tax and contribution are levied.
As permitted by tax legislation,
the development of certain ventures are subject to the “afetação” regime, based on which the land and
any other related right where a real estate will be developed, as well as other binding assets, rights and obligations, are separated
from the developer’s assets and comprise the “patrimônio de afetação” (detached assets) of
the corresponding development and which real estate units will be delivered to the buyers. Its main objective is to provide guarantees
to the buyers rights in the acquisition of units in construction. In addition, certain subsidiaries made the irrevocable option
for the Special Taxation Regime (RET), adopting the “patrimônio de afetação”, according to which
the income tax and social contribution are calculated at 1.92% on gross revenues (4% also levying PIS and COFINS on revenues (Note
2.2.23)).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.14.
|
Income tax and social contribution
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
|
Deferred taxes are recognized
in relation to tax losses and temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes
and the corresponding amounts used for tax purposes. For subsidiaries under the Special Taxation Regime (RET), deferred taxes are
related to temporary differences between income taxed on cash basis and recorded on an accrual basis.
Deferred tax assets are recognized
to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income will be available to be used to offset deferred tax assets, based
on profit projections made using internal assumptions, and considering future economic scenarios that make it possible their full
or partial use, upon the recognition of a provision for the non-realization of the balance. The recognized amounts are periodically
reviewed and the impacts of realization or settlement are reflected in compliance with tax legislation provisions.
Deferred tax on accumulated tax
losses does not have an expiration date, however, they can only be offset against up to 30% of the taxable profit for each year.
Companies that opt for the presumed profit tax regime cannot offset tax losses for a period in subsequent years.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are stated at net amount in the balance sheet when there is the legal right and intention to offset them when determining the current
taxes, related to the same legal entity and the same tax authority.
|
2.2.15.
|
Other current and noncurrent liabilities
|
These liabilities are stated at
their known or estimated amounts, plus, when applicable, adjustment for charges and inflation-indexed variations through the balance
sheet date, which contra-entry is recorded in profit or loss. When applicable, current and non-current liabilities are recorded
at present value based on interest rates that reflect the term, currency and risk of each transaction.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.16.
|
Stock option plans
|
As approved by its Board of Directors,
the Company offers executives and employees share-based compensation plans (“Stock Options”), as payments for services
received.
The fair value of options is determined
on the grant date, considering that it is recognized as expense in profit or loss (as contra-entry to equity), to the extent services
are provided by employees and executives.
In an equity-settled transaction,
in which the plan is modified, a minimum expense is recognized corresponding to the expense that would have been recorded if the
terms have not been changed. An additional expense is recognized for any modification that increases the total fair value of granted
options, or that otherwise benefits the employee, measured on the modification date.
In case of cancellation of a stock
option plan, this is treated as if it had been vested on the cancellation date, and any unrecognized plan expense is immediately
recognized. However, if a new plan replaces the cancelled plan, and a substitute plan is designated on the grant date, the cancelled
plan and the new plan are treated as if they were a modification of the original plan, as previously mentioned.
The Company annually revises its
estimates of the amount of options that shall be vested, considering the vesting conditions not related to the market and the conditions
based on length of service. The Company recognizes the impact of the revision of the initial estimates, if any, in the statement
of profit or loss, as contra-entry to equity.
|
2.2.17.
|
Share-based payment – Phantom Shares
|
The
Company has a cash-settled share-based payment plan (phantom shares) under fixed terms and conditions.
These
amounts are recorded as a liability, with contra-entry in profit or loss for the year, based on the fair value of the phantom shares
granted, and during the vesting period. The fair value of this liability is remeasured and adjusted every reporting period, according
to the change in the fair value of the benefit granted and vesting.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.18.
|
Other employee benefits
|
The salaries and benefits granted
to the Company’s employees and executives include fixed compensation (salaries, social security contributions (INSS), Government
Severance Indemnity Fund for Employees (FGTS), vacation and 13th monthly salary, among others) and variable compensation such as
profit sharing, bonus, and stock option-based payments. These benefits are recorded in profit or loss for the year, under the account
“General and administrative expenses”, as they are incurred.
The bonus system operates with
individual and corporate targets, structured based on the efficiency of corporate goals, followed by the business goals and, finally,
individual goals.
The Company and its subsidiaries do not offer private
pension or retirement plans.
|
2.2.19.
|
Present value adjustment – assets and liabilities
|
Assets and liabilities arising
from long or short-term transactions are adjusted to present value if significant.
In installment sales of not completed
units, real estate development entities adjust receivables by an inflation index, including the installment related to the delivery
of units, without accrual of interest, and shall be discounted to present value, as the agreed inflation rates do not include interest.
Borrowing costs and other financing
costs directly attributable to the construction of real estate ventures are capitalized. Therefore, the reversal of the present
value adjustment of an obligation related to these items is included in the cost of real estate unit sold or in the inventories
of properties for sale, as the case may be, until the period of construction of the project is completed.
Accordingly, certain assets and
liabilities are adjusted to present value based on discount rates that reflect the best estimate of the value of the money over
time.
The applied discount rate’s
underlying economic basis and assumption is the average rate of the financing and loans obtained by the Company, net of the inflation-index
effect (Notes 5 and 12).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.20.
|
Debenture and public offering costs
|
Transaction costs and premiums
on issuance of securities are accounted for as a direct reduction in the amount raised by the Company. In addition, transaction
costs and premiums on issuance of debt securities are amortized over the terms of the instrument and the net balance is classified
as reduction in the respective transaction (Note 13).
|
2.2.21.
|
Loans and financing costs
|
Loans and financing costs which
are directly attributable to the development of assets for sale and land, are capitalized as part of the cost of that asset during
the construction period, which are recognized in profit or loss to the extent units are sold. All other loans and financing costs
are expensed as incurred. These costs comprise interest and other related costs incurred, including those for debt issuances.
|
(i)
|
Provision for legal claims
|
The Company is party to various
lawsuits and administrative proceedings. Provisions are recognized for all contingencies related to lawsuits which risk of loss
is considered probable.
Contingent liabilities for which
losses are considered possible are only disclosed in a note to the consolidated financial statements, and those for which losses
are considered remote are neither recognized nor disclosed.
Contingent assets are recognized
only when there are secured guarantees or favorable final and unappealable court decisions. Contingent assets with probable favorable
decisions are only disclosed in the notes. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 there are no claims involving contingent assets recorded
in the consolidated balance sheet of the Company.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.22.
|
Provisions
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Allowance for doubtful account and cancelled contracts
|
The Company annually reviews its
assumptions related to the establishment of its allowance for doubtful account and cancelled contracts, taking into account the
review of the histories of its current operations and improvement of estimates.
The
Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts for customers whose installments are past due
and
when there is evidence that the cancelation will occur
, based on the assumptions
made about each segment of the Company. This allowance is calculated based on the percentage of completion of the construction
work, a methodology adopted for recognizing profit or loss for the year (Note 2.2.2).
|
(iii)
|
Provision for penalties due to delay in construction work
|
As contractually provided, the
Company has the practice of provisioning the charges payable to eligible customers for projects whose delivery is delayed over
180 days, pursuant to the respective contractual clause and history of payments.
The Company and its subsidiaries
recognize a provision to cover expenditures for repairing construction defects covered during the warranty period, based on the
estimate that considers the history of incurred expenditures adjusted by the future expectation, except for the subsidiaries that
operate with outsourced companies, which are the direct guarantors of the construction services provided. The warranty period is
five years from the delivery of the venture.
|
(v)
|
Provision for impairment of non-financial assets
|
When there is evidence of impairment
of asset, and the net carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount, a provision for impairment is recorded, adjusting the net
carrying value to the recoverable value. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives have the recovery of their
net carrying amounts tested annually, regardless whether there is any indication of impairment, by comparing to the net carrying
value to the recoverable amount measured by cash flows discounted to present value, using a discount rate before taxes, which reflects
the weighted average cost of capital of the Company.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
For companies under the non-cumulative taxation regime,
the PIS and COFINS contribution rates are 1.65% and 7.6%, respectively, for companies under the taxable profit taxation regime,
levied on gross revenue and discounting certain credits determined based on incurred costs and expenses. For companies that opt
for the presumed profit taxation regime, under the cumulative taxation regime, the PIS and COFINS contribution rates are 0.65%
and 3%, respectively, on gross revenue, without discounts of credits in relation to incurred costs and expenses. In addition, certain
subsidiaries made de irrevocable option for the Special Taxation Regime (RET), adopting the “patrimônio de afetação”,
according to which the PIS and COFINS are calculated at 0.37% and 1.71%, respectively, on gross revenue.
Own equity instruments that are
repurchased (treasury shares) are recognized at cost and charged to equity. No gain or loss is recognized in the statement of profit
or loss upon purchase, sale, issue, or cancellation of the Company’s own equity instruments.
|
2.2.25.
|
Interest on equity and dividends
|
The portion of declared dividends
and interest on equity are recorded as current liabilities in the heading “Dividends payable”. Mandatory dividends
are also recorded as current liabilities since it is a legal obligation provided for in the By-laws of the Company.
|
2.2.26.
|
Earnings (loss) per share – basic and diluted
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
are calculated by dividing the net income (loss) attributable (allocated) to common shareholders by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding over the period.
Diluted earnings per share are
calculated in a similar manner, except that the weighted average number of shares outstanding is increased, to include the additional
shares that would be outstanding, in case the shares with dilutive potential attributable to stock option had been issued over
the respective periods, using the weighted average price of shares.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.
|
Summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.2.27.
|
Disposal group held for sale and profit or loss from discontinued operations
|
The Company classifies a disposal
group as held for sale if its carrying value is expected to be recovered by means of a sale transaction. In such case, the asset
or the group of assets held for sale must be available for immediate sale on current conditions, subject to the usual and customary
terms for selling such assets held for sale and its sale must be highly probable.
For a sale to be considered highly
probable, Management must be committed to a plan to sell the asset, and have initiated a program for finding a buyer and complete
the plan at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value. In addition, the sale must be expected to be completed
within one year of the classification date, unless events beyond the control of the Company change such period.
The asset held for sale is measured
at the lower of its carrying value and fair value less cost to sell. In case the carrying value exceeds its fair value, an impairment
loss is recognized in profit or loss for the year. Any reversal or gain shall only be recognized to the extent of such recognized
loss.
The assets and liabilities of the
group of assets held for sale are presented separately in the consolidated financial statements. The profit or loss of discontinued
operations is presented at a single amount in the statement of profit or loss, which includes the total after-tax income of these
operations, less any impairment-related loss. The net cash flow amounts attributable to operating, investing and financing activities
of discontinued operations are presented in Note 8.2.
According to Note 1, on December
14, 2016, the Company disclosed a material fact informing about the signature of the disposal of up to 30% of the shares issued
by Tenda. The completion of the transaction is subject to the verification of certain conditions precedent, among which the decrease
in the Company’s capital with effect of distribution to its shareholders of the shares corresponding to 50% of Tenda’s
investment, as detailed in Note 8.2.
As required by the CPC 31 –
Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, for comparability purposes, the information of the statement of profit
or loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is being presented on the same basis of the current year, and its retrospective
effects are shown in Note 2.3.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
2.
|
Presentation of financial statements and summary of significant accounting policies
--Continued
|
|
2.3.
|
Restatement of Financial Statements
|
As
required by CPC 31 – Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, for comparability purposes, the information
of the statements of profit or loss, cash flows and value added as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 are being presented on the same
basis of the current year, and its retrospective effects are as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
Balances originally reported as of 12/31/2015
|
|
Impact of the application of CPC 31 (Note 2.2.27) (a)
|
|
Balances restated
|
|
Balances originally reported as of 12/31/2014
|
|
Impact of the application of CPC 31 (Note 2.2.27) (a)
|
|
Balances restated
|
Statement of profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
2,294,319
|
|
|
|
(850,962
|
)
|
|
|
1,443,357
|
|
|
|
2,150,998
|
|
|
|
(570,138
|
)
|
|
|
1,580,860
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,667,505
|
)
|
|
|
605,584
|
|
|
|
(1,061,921
|
)
|
|
|
(1,609,246
|
)
|
|
|
444,249
|
|
|
|
(1,164,997
|
)
|
Operating (expenses) income
|
|
|
(552,294
|
)
|
|
|
216,684
|
|
|
|
(335,610
|
)
|
|
|
(580,547
|
)
|
|
|
217,932
|
|
|
|
(362,615
|
)
|
Income from equity method investments
|
|
|
41,766
|
|
|
|
(1,751
|
)
|
|
|
40,015
|
|
|
|
19,263
|
|
|
|
19,142
|
|
|
|
38,405
|
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
(38,127
|
)
|
|
|
(12,295
|
)
|
|
|
(50,422
|
)
|
|
|
(8,918
|
)
|
|
|
(7,332
|
)
|
|
|
(16,250
|
)
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(7,180
|
)
|
|
|
6,522
|
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(15,275
|
)
|
|
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
(8,949
|
)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
Profit or loss of discontinued operations (Note 8.2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
91,748
|
|
|
|
12,815
|
|
|
|
104,563
|
|
|
|
41,893
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41,893
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
361,466
|
|
|
|
23,198
|
|
|
|
384,664
|
|
|
|
751,953
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
751,953
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(480,469
|
)
|
|
|
(36,013
|
)
|
|
|
(516,482
|
)
|
|
|
(899,145
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(899,145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of value added
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net value added produced by the entity
|
|
|
709,284
|
|
|
|
(190,166
|
)
|
|
|
519,118
|
|
|
|
579,216
|
|
|
|
(164,917
|
)
|
|
|
414,299
|
|
Value added received on transfer
|
|
|
165,897
|
|
|
|
(48,576
|
)
|
|
|
117,321
|
|
|
|
176,057
|
|
|
|
(39,531
|
)
|
|
|
136,526
|
|
Total value added to be distributed
|
|
|
875,181
|
|
|
|
(238,742
|
)
|
|
|
636,439
|
|
|
|
755,273
|
|
|
|
(204,448
|
)
|
|
|
550,825
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts after elimination of consolidation items.
|
Additionally,
for purposes of improving the presentation of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company
reclassified the goodwill supporting future profitability from Intangible assets (Note 11) into Investments (Note 9) in the amount
of R$25,476, as it refers to an investment in associate.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
3.
|
New standards, changes and interpretation of standards issued and not yet adopted
|
|
·
|
IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments (CPC 48)
|
IFRS 9 replaces the guidance of
IAS 39 (CPC 38) Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and includes the new models for classification and measurement
of financial instruments, and measurement of expected credit losses for financial and contractual assets, as well as new requirements
for hedge accounting. The standard maintains the existing guidance on the recognition and derecognition of financial instruments
of IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. IFRS 9 contains a general requirement that it should
be applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.
The effective impact of the adoption
of IFRS 9 on the Company’s financial statements in 2018 cannot be reliably estimated, because it will depend on the financial
instruments that the Company holds and the economic conditions in 2018, as well as the accounting decisions and judgments that
the Company will make in the future. The new standard will require Management to review its accounting processes and internal controls
related to the classification and measurement of financial instruments, and these changes have not been completed yet.
|
·
|
IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (CPC 47)
|
This standard introduces new requirements
for measurement and recognition of revenue under both IFRS. The IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requires
an entity to recognize the amount of revenue reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for the control over
such goods or services. The new standard is going to replace most of the detailed guidance on the recognition of revenue that currently
exists under the IFRS, including the CPC 30 (IAS 18) Revenue and CPC 17 (IAS 11) Construction Contracts, when adopted. For the
specific case of the real estate development sector, maintaining the POC revenue recognition method or the adoption of the method
of keys, for example, will result of the contractual analyses made by Management. The Company is still evaluating the effects of
such standard and not yet concluded its analyses on the impact of its adoption.
The new standard
is applicable beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The standard can be applied either on the retrospective method or the cumulative
effect method, still under evaluation by the Company.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
3.
|
New standards, changes and interpretation of standards issued and not yet adopted
--Continued
|
This standard
replaces the previous lease standard, IAS 17/CPC 06 (R1) – Leases, and related interpretation, and establishes the principles
for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract, that is, the customers
(lessees) and providers (lessors). Lessees are required to recognize a lease liability reflecting the future lease payments and
a “right-of-use assets” for practically all lease contracts, except certain short-term leases and contracts of low-value
assets. For lessors, the criteria for recognition and measurement of leases in the financial statements are substantially maintained.
This standard is effective beginning on January 1, 2019.
The Company
is evaluating the effects of the IFRS 16 on its financial statements and has not yet concluded its analysis on the impact of their
adoption. The standard can be applied either on the cumulative catch-up approach or the full retrospective method, still under
evaluation by the Company.
The Accounting Pronouncements Committee
(CPC) has not yet issued an accounting pronouncement or change to effective this pronouncement corresponding to IFRS 16.
The entities that disclose their
financial statements according to the accounting practices adopted in Brazil are not permitted to early adopt such IFRS.
There is no
other standard, changes to standards or interpretation issued and not yet adopted that could, in the Management’s opinion,
have significant impact arising from their adoption on its financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
4.
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
4.1.
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and banks
|
|
|
29,534
|
|
|
|
69,560
|
|
Securities purchased under resale agreements (a)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents (Note 20.ii.a and 20.iii)
|
|
|
29,534
|
|
|
|
82,640
|
|
|
(a)
|
Securities purchased under resale agreement comprise securities issued by Banks with a repurchase
commitment by the bank, and resale commitment by the customer, at rates and maturities agreed upon, backed by private or government
securities, depending on the bank. The securities are registered with Central de Custódia e de Liquidação
Financeira de Títulos (“CETIP”)
.
|
As
of December 31,
2016,
the securities purchased under resale agreement include interest earned
from 75% to 101.5%
of Interbank Deposit Certificates (CDI) (from
75%
to 100.5% of CDI in 2015).
All transaction are with what management considers to be top tier financial institutions
.
|
4.2.
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-income funds (a)
|
|
|
123,868
|
|
|
|
279,486
|
|
Government bonds (LFT) (a)
|
|
|
6,018
|
|
|
|
18,631
|
|
Corporate securities (LF/DPGE) (a)
|
|
|
31,742
|
|
|
|
95,801
|
|
Securities purchased under resale agreements (Note 4.1 (a))
|
|
|
11,935
|
|
|
|
25,548
|
|
Bank certificates of deposit (a) / (b)
|
|
|
27,834
|
|
|
|
101,733
|
|
Restricted cash in guarantee of loans (c)
|
|
|
10,669
|
|
|
|
31,633
|
|
Restricted credits (d)
|
|
|
11,580
|
|
|
|
76,839
|
|
Total short-term investments (Note 20.i.d, 20.ii.a and 20.iii)
|
|
|
223,646
|
|
|
|
629,671
|
|
|
(a)
|
Structure of exclusive Investment funds aimed at earning
interest on funds in excess of the variation in the Interbank Deposit Certificate (CDI). These funds have mandates of risks that
are periodically monitored and observe the internal investment policies in effect.
|
|
(b)
|
As of December 31, 2016, Bank Certificates of Deposit
(CDBs) include interest earned varying from 90% to 100.8% (from 90% to 107% in 2015) of Interbank Deposit Certificates (CDI) rate.
|
|
(c)
|
Restricted cash in guarantee of loans are investments
in fixed-income funds, which invest only in federal government bonds, indexed to fixed rates or to price indexes, and pledged
to guarantee a portion of the Company’s issuances. These amounts are periodically released, when there is a surplus of guarantee
in the issuance and/or as provided for in the indenture. See further information in Notes 13 and 16(b).
|
|
(d)
|
Restricted credits are represented by onlending of
the funds from associate credit (“
crédito associativo
”), a type of government real estate financing,
which are in process of approval at the Caixa Econômica Federal (a Federally owned Brazilian bank used for real estate financing
purpose). These approvals are made to the extent the contracts signed with customers at the financial institutions are regularized,
which the Company expect to be in up to 90 days.
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
5.
|
Trade accounts receivable from real estate development and services
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate development and sales
|
|
|
1,019,359
|
|
|
|
1,895,795
|
|
( - ) Allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts
|
|
|
(19,315
|
)
|
|
|
(100,530
|
)
|
( - ) Present value adjustments
|
|
|
(26,816
|
)
|
|
|
(31,052
|
)
|
Services and construction and other receivables
|
|
|
20,734
|
|
|
|
38,151
|
|
Total trade accounts receivable from real estate development and services (Note 20.ii.a)
|
|
|
993,962
|
|
|
|
1,802,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
722,640
|
|
|
|
1,395,273
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
271,322
|
|
|
|
407,091
|
|
The
current and non-current portions have the following maturities
:
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overdue:
|
|
|
|
|
Up to 90 days
|
|
|
64,830
|
|
|
|
207,838
|
|
From 91 to 180 days
|
|
|
45,442
|
|
|
|
50,985
|
|
Over 180 days
|
|
|
93,265
|
|
|
|
290,247
|
|
|
|
|
203,537
|
|
|
|
549,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
925,543
|
|
2017
|
|
|
544,292
|
|
|
|
286,138
|
|
2018
|
|
|
111,007
|
|
|
|
83,266
|
|
2019
|
|
|
120,367
|
|
|
|
34,518
|
|
2020
|
|
|
45,552
|
|
|
|
41,454
|
|
2021 onwards
|
|
|
15,338
|
|
|
|
13,957
|
|
|
|
|
836,556
|
|
|
|
1,384,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( - ) Present value adjustment
|
|
|
(26,816
|
)
|
|
|
(31,052
|
)
|
( - ) Allowance for doubtful account and cancelled contracts
|
|
|
(19,315
|
)
|
|
|
(100,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993,962
|
|
|
|
1,802,364
|
|
The
total amount receivable from units sold and not yet delivered is not fully reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
The balance recognized is limited to the portion of the recorded revenues net of the amounts already received, according to the
accounting practice mentioned in
Note 2.2.2(i)(b).
As
of December 31, 2016, the amount received from customers in excess of the recognized revenues totaled R$35,024 (R$39,743 in 2015),
and are classified in the heading “Payables for purchase of properties and advances from customers" (Note 17).
Accounts
receivable from completed real estate units financed by the Company are in general subject to IGP-M variation plus annual interest
of 12%, with revenue being recorded in profit or loss in the account “Revenue from real estate development and sale, barter
transactions and construction services". The interest amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31,
2016
totaled
R$28,230 (R$40,089
in 2015 and R$28,736 in 2014).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
5.
|
Trade accounts receivable from real estate development and services
--Continued
|
The
balances of allowance for doubtful accounts and cancelled contracts are considered sufficient by the Company’s management
to cover the incurred losses on realization of the accounts receivable
.
The change in the allowance for doubtful accounts
and cancelled contracts for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, is as follows:
|
|
Receivables
|
|
Properties
for sale
(Note 6)
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
(109,893
|
)
|
|
|
52,309
|
|
|
|
(57,584
|
)
|
Additions
|
|
|
(6,749
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,749
|
)
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
16,112
|
|
|
|
(30,545
|
)
|
|
|
(14,433
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
(100,530
|
)
|
|
|
21,764
|
|
|
|
(78,766
|
)
|
Reclassification to discontinued operations
|
|
|
88,165
|
|
|
|
(21,764
|
)
|
|
|
66,401
|
|
Additions (Note 22)
|
|
|
(8,438
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,438
|
)
|
Write-offs / Reversals (Note 22)
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
(19,315
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(19,315
|
)
|
The
reversal of the present value adjustment recognized in revenue from real estate development for the year ended December 31,
2016
totaled
R$(3,762) (R$6,106 in 2015 and R$11,111 in 2014)
in the consolidated financial
statements
.
Receivables
from units not yet completed were measured at present value using a discount rate determined according to the criteria described
in Note 2.2.2. The discount rate applied by the Company and its subsidiaries was
9.00% in 2016
(6.78% in 2015),
net of Civil Construction National Index (INCC)
.
The
Company entered into the following Real Estate Receivables Agreement (CCI) transactions, which are aimed to transfer a portfolio
comprising select residential and business real estate receivables delivered and yet to be delivered arising out of Gafisa and
its subsidiaries to the assignee. The assigned portfolios, discounted to present value, are recorded under the heading “obligations
assumed on the assignment of receivables”.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
5.
|
Trade accounts receivable from real estate development and services
–Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction date
|
Assigned portfolio
|
|
Portfolio discounted to present value
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2011
|
|
|
|
203,915
|
|
|
|
171,694
|
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
(ii)
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
72,384
|
|
|
|
60,097
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
|
(iii)
|
|
|
|
Jul 06, 2012
|
|
|
|
18,207
|
|
|
|
13,917
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
(iv)
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2012
|
|
|
|
181,981
|
|
|
|
149,025
|
|
|
|
4,651
|
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
(v)
|
|
|
|
Dec 27, 2012
|
|
|
|
72,021
|
|
|
|
61,647
|
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
7,541
|
|
|
(vi)
|
|
|
|
Nov 29, 2013
|
|
|
|
24,149
|
|
|
|
19,564
|
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
|
6,362
|
|
|
(vii)
|
|
|
|
Nov 25, 2014
|
|
|
|
15,200
|
|
|
|
12,434
|
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
6,696
|
|
|
(viii)
|
|
|
|
Dec 03, 2015
|
|
|
|
32,192
|
|
|
|
24,469
|
|
|
|
15,988
|
|
|
|
24,558
|
|
|
(ix)
|
|
|
|
Mar 04, 2016
|
|
|
|
27,954
|
|
|
|
27,334
|
|
|
|
17,178
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(x)
|
|
|
|
May 09, 2016
|
|
|
|
17,827
|
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
|
|
14,407
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(xi)
|
|
|
|
Aug 16, 2016 (a)
|
|
|
|
15,418
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
9,164
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(xii)
|
|
|
|
Dec 21, 2016
|
|
|
|
21,102
|
|
|
|
19,532
|
|
|
|
18,948
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(a)
|
The consolidated balance of the transaction as of December 31, 2016 (Note 14) does not include
the jointly-controlled entities, which are accounted for using the equity method, according to CPCs 18(R2) and 19(R2).
|
In
the transactions above, the Company and its subsidiaries are jointly responsible until the time of the transfer of the collateral
to the securitization company.
For
the items
(i) to (iii) and (viii) to (xii)
above, the Company was engaged to perform, among
other duties, the management of the receipt of receivables, the assignment’s underlying assets, and collection from defaulting
customers, among other, according to the criteria of each investor, being paid for these services.
The
difference between the face value of the portfolio of receivables and the amount discounted to present value was recorded in profit
or loss in the account “Discount in Securitization Transaction” under financial expenses
.
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
823,516
|
|
|
|
1,443,460
|
|
( - ) Write-down to net realizable value of land
|
|
|
(43,505
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
( - ) Write-down to net realizable value of inventory surplus
|
|
|
(62,343
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
( - ) Adjustment to present value
|
|
|
(8,781
|
)
|
|
|
(16,771
|
)
|
Property under construction
|
|
|
509,049
|
|
|
|
857,619
|
|
Real estate cost in the recognition of the provision for cancelled contracts (Note 5)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,764
|
|
Completed units
|
|
|
557,426
|
|
|
|
333,036
|
|
( - ) Write-down to net realizable value of properties under construction and completed units
|
|
|
(59,663
|
)
|
|
|
(8,491
|
)
|
Total properties for sale
|
|
|
1,715,699
|
|
|
|
2,630,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
1,122,724
|
|
|
|
1,880,377
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
592,975
|
|
|
|
750,240
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
6.
|
Properties for sale
--Continued
|
For
the years ended December 31,
2016 and 2015,
the change in the write-down to net realizable
value of properties for sale is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,2014
|
|
|
(12,309
|
)
|
Additions
|
|
|
(1,236
|
)
|
Write-offs / Reversals
|
|
|
5,054
|
|
Balance at December 31,2015
|
|
|
(8,491
|
)
|
Reclassification to discontinued operations
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
Additions:
|
|
|
|
|
Land (Note 23)
|
|
|
(43,505
|
)
|
Property under construction and completed units (Note 23)
|
|
|
(54,226
|
)
|
Inventory surplus (Notes 9 and 23)
|
|
|
(62,343
|
)
|
Balance at December 31,2016
|
|
|
(165,511
|
)
|
As disclosed in Note 12, the balance
of capitalized financial charges as of December 31, 2016 amounts to R$343,231 (R$299,649 in 2015).
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to suppliers
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
|
7,102
|
|
Recoverable taxes (IRRF, PIS, COFINS, among other)
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
|
|
66,289
|
|
Judicial deposit (Note 16)
|
|
|
79,785
|
|
|
|
125,358
|
|
Others
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,788
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
108,253
|
|
|
|
203,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
49,336
|
|
|
|
120,657
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
58,917
|
|
|
|
82,880
|
|
8.1
Land for sale
The
Company, in line with its strategic direction, opted to sell land not included in the Business Plan approved for
2017.
Therefore, it devised a specific plan for the sale of such land. The carrying value of such land, adjusted to market value
when applicable, after the test for impairment, is as follows
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Provision for impairment
|
|
Net balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
161,737
|
|
|
|
(51,174
|
)
|
|
|
110,563
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
9,735
|
|
|
|
(19,152
|
)
|
|
|
(9,417
|
)
|
Transfer from (to) properties for sale, net
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
Reversal/Write-offs
|
|
|
(23,182
|
)
|
|
|
28,510
|
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
147,673
|
|
|
|
(41,816
|
)
|
|
|
105,857
|
|
Reclassification to disposal group held for sale
|
|
|
(128,216
|
)
|
|
|
26,726
|
|
|
|
(101,490
|
)
|
Additions
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
Reversal/Write-offs
|
|
|
(9,490
|
)
|
|
|
6,302
|
|
|
|
(3,188
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
12,236
|
|
|
|
(8,930
|
)
|
|
|
3,306
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
8.
|
Assets held for sale
--Continued
|
8.2
Disposal group held for sale and profit or loss of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment loss (i)
|
|
|
(610,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal group held for sale (ii)
|
|
|
1,799,116
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total disposal group held for sale
|
|
|
1,189,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale (ii)
|
|
|
651,812
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment loss (i)
|
|
|
(610,105
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tenda’s profit or loss (ii)
|
|
|
50,401
|
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
Profit or loss of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(559,704
|
)
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
(i)
The measurement of disposal group held for sale at the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell, considering
the price of R$8.13 per share, according to the contract.
(ii)
The amounts of the disposal group held for sale, liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale, and profit or loss
of discontinued operations, net of the eliminations related to intercompany transactions.
According to Note 1, on December 14, 2016, the Company
disclosed a material fact informing about the contract for purchase and sale of shares with Jaguar Real Estate Partners LP (third
party), aimed at the disposal of up to 30% of the shares issued by Tenda, with the latter being estimated at R$539,020, at the
price of R$8.13 per share.
The completion of the transaction is subject to the
fulfillment of certain conditions precedent, among which the following are the most significant: (i) decrease in Tenda’s
capital, with no cancellation of shares, and repayment to the Company, its only shareholder, of R$ 100,000, indexed to the country’s
base rate (Selic), of which (a) R$ 50,000 shall be paid until December 31, 2018, and (b) the remaining balance shall be paid until
December 31, 2019, with possibility of paying it in advance due to the fulfillment of certain targets set in the contract (Note
31(ii)); (ii) decrease in Company’s capital, with the effect of the distribution to its shareholders of the shares corresponding
to 50% of Tenda’s investment (Note 31(i)(c)); and (iii) the conclusion of the proceedings related to the exercise by Gafisa
shareholders of their preemptive rights for the acquisition of shares, at the price per share of R$8.13, under the terms of Article
253, I, of Law 6.404/76. In addition to the shares, the Company will offer its shareholders additional shares corresponding to
20% of Tenda's capital stock; and if, after the exercise of the Preemptive Rights, there are less than 20% of shares issued by
Tenda available for acquisition by Jaguar, Jaguar shall not be obliged to acquire them and the transaction will move forward with
the shareholders that exercised the Preemptive Rights.
In accordance with the provisions of paragraph 38 of
CPC 31 – Non-current Asset Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, the Company presents below the main classes of assets
and liabilities classified as held for sale of the subsidiary Tenda as of December 31, 2016, after eliminations of consolidation
items, as follows:
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
8.
|
Assets held for sale
--Continued
|
8.2
Disposal group held for sale and profit or loss of discontinued operations
Assets
|
|
2016
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
2016
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
28,414
|
|
|
Loans and financing
|
|
|
41,333
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
195,073
|
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties and advance from customers
|
|
|
131,280
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
250,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties for sale
|
|
|
563,576
|
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
150,663
|
|
Land for sale
|
|
|
75,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
104,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,217,370
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
323,276
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
176,673
|
|
|
Loans and financing
|
|
|
93,661
|
|
Properties for sale
|
|
|
211,711
|
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties and advance from customers
|
|
|
104,343
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
60,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
84,798
|
|
|
Provisions for legal claims
|
|
|
44,951
|
|
Property and equity and intangible assets
|
|
|
48,008
|
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
85,581
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
581,746
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
328,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,799,116
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
651,812
|
|
The main lines of the statement of profit or loss
and cash flow of the subsidiary Tenda are as follows:
Statement of profit or loss
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
Cash flow
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
1,052,710
|
|
|
|
850,962
|
|
|
|
570,138
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
137,055
|
|
|
|
(85,495
|
)
|
|
|
19,334
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(729,705
|
)
|
|
|
(605,584
|
)
|
|
|
(444,249
|
)
|
|
Elimination items
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54,517
|
|
Operating expenses, net
|
|
|
(216,973
|
)
|
|
|
(201,849
|
)
|
|
|
(205,633
|
)
|
|
Operating activities net of elimination items
|
|
|
137,055
|
|
|
|
(85,495
|
)
|
|
|
73,851
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(12,298
|
)
|
|
|
(14,835
|
)
|
|
|
(12,299
|
)
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
222,288
|
|
|
|
95,484
|
|
Income from equity method investments
|
|
|
(5,456
|
)
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
(19,142
|
)
|
|
Elimination items
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(52,106
|
)
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
(20,043
|
)
|
|
|
5,774
|
|
|
|
7,332
|
|
|
Investing activities net of elimination items
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
222,288
|
|
|
|
43,378
|
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(20,966
|
)
|
|
|
(6,522
|
)
|
|
|
(6,326
|
)
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(135,291
|
)
|
|
|
(176,755
|
)
|
|
|
(210,736
|
)
|
|
|
|
47,269
|
|
|
|
29,697
|
|
|
|
(110,179)
|
|
|
Elimination items
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,411
|
)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(9,381
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
Investing activities net of elimination items
|
|
|
(135,291
|
)
|
|
|
(176,755
|
)
|
|
|
(213,146
|
)
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
56,650
|
|
|
|
30,320
|
|
|
|
(109,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
9.
|
Investments in associates and jointly-controlled investees
|
|
(a)
|
Information on associates and jointly-controlled investees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
in capital - %
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
Equity
and advance for future capital increase
|
|
Profit
(loss) for the year
|
|
Investments
|
|
Income
from equity method investments
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2016
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alphaville Urbanismo S.A (AUSA)
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
2,607,994
|
|
|
|
2,011,373
|
|
|
|
596,620
|
|
|
|
728,519
|
|
|
|
(108,298
|
)
|
|
|
148,144
|
|
|
|
178,986
|
|
|
|
218,556
|
|
|
|
(32,490
|
)
|
|
|
50,478
|
|
|
|
32,283
|
|
Gafisa SPE-116 Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
193,080
|
|
|
|
72,286
|
|
|
|
120,794
|
|
|
|
103,372
|
|
|
|
17,421
|
|
|
|
22,864
|
|
|
|
60,397
|
|
|
|
51,686
|
|
|
|
8,711
|
|
|
|
11,432
|
|
|
|
(2,690
|
)
|
Gafisa e Ivo Rizzo SPE-47 Em. Im. Ltda.
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
32,657
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
32,151
|
|
|
|
31,749
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
25,721
|
|
|
|
25,399
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Sitio Jatiuca Emp. Imob. SPE Ltda
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
38,184
|
|
|
|
41,470
|
|
|
|
3,116
|
|
|
|
3,680
|
|
|
|
19,092
|
|
|
|
20,735
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
Parque Arvores Empr. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
(a)(c)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
32,038
|
|
|
|
5,423
|
|
|
|
26,615
|
|
|
|
33,378
|
|
|
|
(6,774
|
)
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
13,308
|
|
|
|
16,689
|
|
|
|
(3,381
|
)
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
5,519
|
|
Varandas Grand Park Em. Im. SPE Ltda
|
|
(a)(c)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
88,517
|
|
|
|
62,692
|
|
|
|
25,826
|
|
|
|
43,588
|
|
|
|
(20,707
|
)
|
|
|
(2,197
|
)
|
|
|
12,913
|
|
|
|
21,794
|
|
|
|
(9,877
|
)
|
|
|
(1,704
|
)
|
|
|
4,642
|
|
Atins Emp. Imob.s Ltda.
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
25,316
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
18,202
|
|
|
|
15,777
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
9,101
|
|
|
|
7,888
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
Gafisa SPE-113 Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
59,616
|
|
|
|
50,178
|
|
|
|
9,438
|
|
|
|
7,521
|
|
|
|
(11,679
|
)
|
|
|
(9,600
|
)
|
|
|
5,663
|
|
|
|
4,513
|
|
|
|
(7,007
|
)
|
|
|
(5,760
|
)
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
Parque Aguas Empr. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
(a)(c)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
14,685
|
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
11,317
|
|
|
|
15,263
|
|
|
|
(3,558
|
)
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
5,658
|
|
|
|
7,632
|
|
|
|
(1,973
|
)
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
2,925
|
|
Performance Gafisa General Severiano Ltda
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
27,074
|
|
|
|
16,272
|
|
|
|
10,802
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,401
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other (*)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,987
|
|
|
|
68,350
|
|
|
|
84,638
|
|
|
|
114,485
|
|
|
|
(31,748
|
)
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
|
46,227
|
|
|
|
51,354
|
|
|
|
(4,991
|
)
|
|
|
(4,255
|
)
|
|
|
339
|
|
Direct jointly-controlled investees - Gafisa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,275,964
|
|
|
|
2,301,378
|
|
|
|
974,587
|
|
|
|
1,135,122
|
|
|
|
(161,975
|
)
|
|
|
168,727
|
|
|
|
382,467
|
|
|
|
426,246
|
|
|
|
(49,502
|
)
|
|
|
54,030
|
|
|
|
46,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saí Amarela S.A.
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
2,061
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Gafisa SPE-51 Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
Other (*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
14,367
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Indirect jointly-controlled investees - Gafisa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
4,442
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
16,115
|
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acedio SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
(1,973
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Maria Inês SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
21,058
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
21,016
|
|
|
|
21,050
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,630
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fit 02 SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
12,301
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
9,882
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
(2,060
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,929
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fit Jardim Botânico SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
8,812
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
8,579
|
|
|
|
9,999
|
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
(5,639
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,554
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fit 11 SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
33,339
|
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
28,955
|
|
|
|
32,062
|
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22,443
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fit 31 SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
15,074
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
14,420
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
|
(2,529
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,518
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fit 34 SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
35,719
|
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
34,387
|
|
|
|
33,634
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23,544
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fit 03 SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
11,691
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
11,381
|
|
|
|
11,404
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,123
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Imbuí I SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
9,263
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
8,968
|
|
|
|
8,723
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Città Ipitanga SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
12,705
|
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
|
11,828
|
|
|
|
11,761
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Grand Park - Pq. dos Pássaros SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
39,608
|
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
37,389
|
|
|
|
22,466
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
(3,997
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,233
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Citta Itapua Emp. Imob. SPE Ltda.
|
|
-
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
18,639
|
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
17,052
|
|
|
|
18,015
|
|
|
|
(964
|
)
|
|
|
8,463
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,007
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
SPE Franere Gafisa 08 Emp. Imob. LTDA.
|
|
-
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
54,920
|
|
|
|
6,089
|
|
|
|
48,832
|
|
|
|
47,831
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
18,180
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23,916
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fit 13 SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
21,544
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
20,892
|
|
|
|
34,487
|
|
|
|
(13,596
|
)
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,840
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other (*)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,349
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
94,940
|
|
|
|
69,986
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
41,128
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Indirect jointly-controlled investees - Tenda
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,415
|
|
|
|
25,114
|
|
|
|
372,302
|
|
|
|
348,431
|
|
|
|
(11,354
|
)
|
|
|
57,609
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
163,351
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677,101
|
|
|
|
2,326,807
|
|
|
|
1,350,296
|
|
|
|
1,487,995
|
|
|
|
(172,951
|
)
|
|
|
226,399
|
|
|
|
398,582
|
|
|
|
591,793
|
|
|
|
(49,284
|
)
|
|
|
54,230
|
|
|
|
45,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill on associate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,476
|
|
|
|
25,476
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Goodwill on remeasurement of investment in
associate
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,853
|
|
|
|
375,853
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799,911
|
|
|
|
993,122
|
|
|
|
(49,284
|
)
|
|
|
54,230
|
|
|
|
45,858
|
|
(*)Includes
companies with investment balances below R$ 5,000.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
9.
|
Investments in associates and jointly-controlled investees
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Ownership interest
--Continued
|
|
(a)
|
Information on associates and jointly-controlled investees
—Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
in capital - %
|
Total
assets
|
Total
liabilities
|
Equity
and advance for future capital increase
|
Profit
(loss) for the year
|
Investments
|
Income
from equity method investments
|
Direct
investees
|
2016
|
2015
|
2016
|
2016
|
2016
|
2015
|
2016
|
2015
|
2016
|
2015
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
Provision for net capital deficiency
(f):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan
Comercial 01 SPE Ltda.
|
|
(g)
|
50
|
%
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(7,887
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
(9,408)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(4,350
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(4,704
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Manhattan
Residencial 01 SPE Ltda.
|
|
(g)
|
50
|
%
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(89,319
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
(21,261
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
(44,627
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(10,631
|
)
|
|
(10,509
|
)
|
Other (*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,546
|
|
|
7,618
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
(9,270
|
)
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
(7,236
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
(5,424
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
4,120
|
Total provision for net capital deficiency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,546
|
|
|
7,618
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
(106,476
|
)
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
(37,905
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
(54,401
|
)
|
|
952
|
|
|
(14,215
|
)
|
|
(6,389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Income from equity method investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,332)
|
|
|
40,015
|
|
|
38,446
|
|
|
(a)
|
Jointly-controlled
entities.
|
|
(b)
|
Entity
jointly controlled with subsidiary Tenda.
|
|
(c)
|
The
Company recorded expense of R$354 in Income from equity method investments for 2016 related
to the recognition, by jointly-controlled entities, of adjustments in prior years, in
accordance with the ICPC09 (R2) – Individual, Separate, and Consolidated Financial
Statements and the Equity Method of Accounting.
|
|
(d)
|
Charges
of the Company not appropriated to the profit or loss of subsidiaries, as required by
paragraph 6 of OCPC01.
|
|
(e)
|
Amount
related to the goodwill resulting of the remeasurement of the portion of the remaining
investment of 30% in the associate AUSA, in the amount of R$375,853, arising from the
sale of control over the entity. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the impairment test,
which is performed annually based on the estimate of future profitability, or when circumstances
indicate impairment of carrying value, did not identify the need for recognizing an impairment
provision for loss on realization. The main assumptions adopted for determining the recoverable
amount of the remaining investment of AUSA are detailed below.
|
|
(f)
|
The
provision for net capital deficiency is recorded in “Other payables” (Note
15).
|
|
(g)
|
In
the year ended December 31, 2016, there was increase in capital in the amount of R$50,500
related to a conversion of debt for equity (Note 21 (a)).
|
|
(h)
|
The
table below sets forth summarized financial information for AUSA, which is considered
as a material associate, and the aggregated information for the other associates and
joint-controlled investees:
|
|
|
AUSA
|
|
Other associates and jointly-controlled investees
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
1,286,614
|
|
|
|
1,418,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,135
|
|
|
|
917,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non current assets
|
|
|
1,321,380
|
|
|
|
1,146,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,518
|
|
|
|
265,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,607,994
|
|
|
|
2,564,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076,653
|
|
|
|
1,183,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
1,378,611
|
|
|
|
593,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,641
|
|
|
|
332,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non current liabilities
|
|
|
632,771
|
|
|
|
1,242,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,411
|
|
|
|
223,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,011,373
|
|
|
|
1,835,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,052
|
|
|
|
555,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
716,346
|
|
|
|
1,149,700
|
|
|
|
958,248
|
|
|
|
177,264
|
|
|
|
210,617
|
|
|
|
345,775
|
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(108,298
|
)
|
|
|
148,144
|
|
|
|
107,662
|
|
|
|
(64,747
|
)
|
|
|
40,350
|
|
|
|
(101,720
|
)
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
9
.
|
Investments in associates and jointly-controlled investees
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Ownership interest
--Continued
|
|
(b)
|
Change in investments
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
993,122
|
|
Income from equity method investment
|
|
|
(49,284
|
)
|
Payment of (decrease in) capital
|
|
|
5,445
|
|
Conversion of debt for equity (g)
|
|
|
50,500
|
|
Transfer from provision for net capital deficiency to Investment (g)
|
|
|
(45,726
|
)
|
Acquisition/Sale of Interest
|
|
|
(10,442
|
)
|
Dividends receivable
|
|
|
(16,009
|
)
|
Asset of discontinued operations (Note 8.2)
|
|
|
(120,527
|
)
|
Other investments
|
|
|
(7,168
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
799,911
|
|
The Company evaluated the recovery of the carrying
value of goodwill using the “value in use” concept, applying discounted cash flow models of the cash-generating units.
The process for determining the value in use involves the use of assumptions, judgments and estimates relating to cash flows, such
as growth rate of revenues, costs and expenses, estimates of investment and future working capital, and discount rates. The assumptions
relating to growth, cash flow and future cash flows are based on the Company’s business plan, approved by the Management,
as well as on comparable market data, and represent the Management’s best estimate of the economic conditions that will prevail
during the economic life of the different cash-generating units, group of assets that provides the generation of cash flows. The
future cash flows were discounted based on the rate representative of the cost of capital. Consistent with the economic valuation
techniques, the evaluation of the value in use is made for a five-year period, and after such period, considering the perpetuity
of assumptions in view of the capacity for indefinite business continuity. The main assumptions used in the estimate of value in
use are the following: (a) revenue – revenues were projected between 2017 and 2021 considering the growth in sales and client
base of the different cash-generating units; (b) Operating costs and expenses – costs and expenses were projected in line
with the Company’s historical performance, as well as the historical growth of revenues. The key assumptions were based on
the Company’s historical performance over the past five years, and on reasonable macroeconomic assumptions, and supported
by the financial market projections. The impairment test performed by the Company did not result in the need for recognizing a
provision for impairment loss in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
|
10
.
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
2014
|
|
Addition
|
|
Write-off and 100% depreciated items
|
|
2015
|
|
Addition
|
|
Write-off and 100% depreciated items
|
|
Reclassification to disposal group held for sale
|
|
2016
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardware
|
|
|
22,333
|
|
|
|
9,017
|
|
|
|
(3,207
|
)
|
|
|
28,143
|
|
|
|
3,408
|
|
|
|
(4,829
|
)
|
|
|
(13,582
|
)
|
|
|
13,140
|
|
Leasehold improvements and installations
|
|
|
24,516
|
|
|
|
2,819
|
|
|
|
(9,886
|
)
|
|
|
17,449
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
(3,557
|
)
|
|
|
(8,020
|
)
|
|
|
6,558
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5,453
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
5,503
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(4,315
|
)
|
|
|
978
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
4,020
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4,039
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,400
|
)
|
|
|
2,639
|
|
Molds
|
|
|
10,035
|
|
|
|
3,032
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,067
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13,067
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales stands
|
|
|
15,083
|
|
|
|
9,426
|
|
|
|
(8,785
|
)
|
|
|
15,724
|
|
|
|
10,799
|
|
|
|
(8,950
|
)
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
|
15,974
|
|
|
|
|
81,440
|
|
|
|
24,373
|
|
|
|
(21,888
|
)
|
|
|
83,925
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
(17,546
|
)
|
|
|
(41,983
|
)
|
|
|
39,289
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardware
|
|
|
(11,457
|
)
|
|
|
(5,224
|
)
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
(13,474
|
)
|
|
|
(2,722
|
)
|
|
|
4,829
|
|
|
|
5,886
|
|
|
|
(5,481
|
)
|
Leasehold improvements and installations
|
|
|
(12,225
|
)
|
|
|
(5,579
|
)
|
|
|
9,886
|
|
|
|
(7,918
|
)
|
|
|
(1,836
|
)
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
3,069
|
|
|
|
(3,128
|
)
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
(3,115
|
)
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(3,664
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
2,952
|
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
(1,608
|
)
|
Molds
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
|
|
(2,464
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,379
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,379
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales stands
|
|
|
(3,539
|
)
|
|
|
(9,636
|
)
|
|
|
8,759
|
|
|
|
(4,416
|
)
|
|
|
(10,103
|
)
|
|
|
8,950
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
(4,483
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32,749
|
)
|
|
|
(23,862
|
)
|
|
|
21,862
|
|
|
|
(34,749
|
)
|
|
|
(15,035
|
)
|
|
|
17,118
|
|
|
|
17,354
|
|
|
|
(15,312
|
)
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
48,691
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
49,176
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
(24,629
|
)
|
|
|
23,977
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
10
.
|
Property and equipment
--Continued
|
The following useful lives and rates are used for
calculating depreciation:
|
|
Useful life
|
|
Annual depreciation rate - %
|
Leasehold improvements and installations
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
25
|
|
Furniture and fixture
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
10
|
|
Hardware
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
20
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
10
|
|
Molds
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
20
|
|
Sales stands
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
100
|
|
The residual value, useful life, and depreciation
methods are reviewed at the end of each year; no change was made in relation to the information for the prior year.
Property and equipment are subject to periodic
analysis of impairment. At December 31, 2016 and 2015 there was no indication of impairment of property and equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Addition
|
|
Write-down / amortization
|
|
100% amortized items
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software – Cost
|
|
|
101,581
|
|
|
|
22,665
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13,687
|
)
|
|
|
110,559
|
|
Software – Amortization
|
|
|
(58,555
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(20,540
|
)
|
|
|
13,687
|
|
|
|
(65,408
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
8,401
|
|
|
|
3,796
|
|
|
|
(5,482
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,715
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
51,427
|
|
|
|
26,461
|
|
|
|
(26,022
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
51,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Addition
|
|
Write-down / amortization
|
|
100% amortized items
|
|
Reclassification to disposal group held for sale
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software – Cost
|
|
|
110,559
|
|
|
|
8,261
|
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
(17,408
|
)
|
|
|
(34,774
|
)
|
|
|
66,023
|
|
Software – Amortization
|
|
|
(65,408
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13,012
|
)
|
|
|
17,408
|
|
|
|
17,915
|
|
|
|
(43,102
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
6,715
|
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
|
|
(5,845
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
5,307
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
51,866
|
|
|
|
14,331
|
|
|
|
(19,482
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18,487
|
)
|
|
|
28,228
|
|
Other intangible assets comprise expenditures on the
acquisition and implementation of information systems and software licenses, amortized over the average term of five years (20%
per year).
The test of recovery of the intangible assets of the
Company resulted in the need for recognizing a provision for impairment for the year ended December 31, 2016 in the amount of R$614
(zero in 2015), related to the Company’s software and R$17,604 in 2014 related to the goodwill on acquisition of Cipesa.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Annual interest rate
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Housing System - SFH /SFI (i)
|
|
February 2017 to
April 2021
|
|
8.30% to 14.00% + TR 129% of CDI
|
|
|
1,022,038
|
|
|
|
1,161,707
|
|
Certificate of Bank Credit - CCB (ii)
|
|
June 2017 to
September 2019
|
|
125% of CDI 0.59%/ 3%/ 3.95%/ 4.25%+CDI INCC
|
|
|
164,262
|
|
|
|
131,128
|
|
Total loans and financing (Note 20.i.d, 20.ii.a and 20.iii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,186,300
|
|
|
|
1,292,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,795
|
|
|
|
672,365
|
|
Current – reclassification for non-fulfillment of covenant
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669,795
|
|
|
|
672,365
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516,505
|
|
|
|
620,470
|
|
|
(i)
|
The SFH financing is used for covering costs related to the development of real estate ventures of
the Company and its subsidiaries, and are guaranteed with the first lien mortgage of real estate ventures and the fiduciary assignment
or pledge of receivables.
|
|
(ii)
|
In the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made payments in the total amount of R$48,827, of
which R$15,122 related to principal and R$33,705 related to the interest payable. Additionally, on September 28, 2016, the Company
entered into a CCB transaction in the amount of R$65,000, with final maturity on September 27, 2019, amortization of principal
in five equal quarterly installments as from the 24th month (including), or observed the possibility of extraordinary amortization,
payment of quarterly interests from the issue date, with secured guarantee of the mortgage of the real estate pledged.
|
|
·
|
CDI -
Interbank
Deposit Certificate
;
|
|
·
|
TR -
Referential
Rate
.
|
The
maturities of the current and non-current installments are as follows
:
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
672,365
|
|
2017
|
|
|
669,795
|
|
|
|
440,418
|
|
2018
|
|
|
422,523
|
|
|
|
166,996
|
|
2019
|
|
|
59,763
|
|
|
|
12,049
|
|
2020
|
|
|
27,126
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
2021 onwards
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1,186,300
|
|
|
|
1,292,835
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries have restrictive
covenants under certain loans and financing that limit their ability to perform certain actions, such as the issuance of debt,
and that could require the early redemption or refinancing of loans if the Company does not fulfill such restrictive covenants.
The ratio and minimum and maximum amounts required under such restrictive covenants as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are disclosed
in Note 13. In view of the restrictive covenants and the non-fulfillment of the covenants of a CCB transaction, the non-current
portions of this transaction were reclassified into short term in the amount of R$65,000. The Company obtained, on March 22, 2017,
a waiver from the bank, agreeing with the non-fulfillment of the limit of net debt in relation to the financial statements as of
December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017, thus not requiring mandatory early payment and/or declaration of early maturity (Note 31
(iii)).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
12.
|
Loans and financing
—Continued
|
Financial expenses of loans, financing and debentures
(Note 13) are capitalized at the cost of each venture and land, according to the use of funds, and recognized in profit or loss
for the year, according to the criteria for revenue recognition. The capitalization rate used in the determination of costs of
loans eligible to capitalization ranges from 13.59% to 15.48% as of December 31, 2016 (10.54% to 14.42% in 2015).
The following table shows the summary of financial
expenses and charges and the capitalized rate in the account “properties for sale”.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial charges for the year
|
|
|
235,153
|
|
|
|
279,632
|
|
|
|
304,720
|
|
Capitalized financial charges
|
|
|
(200,394
|
)
|
|
|
(223,396
|
)
|
|
|
(221,770
|
)
|
Financial expenses (Note 24)
|
|
|
34,759
|
|
|
|
56,236
|
|
|
|
82,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial charges included in “Properties for sale”:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance
|
|
|
299,649
|
|
|
|
227,438
|
|
|
|
150,060
|
|
Capitalized financial charges
|
|
|
200,394
|
|
|
|
223,396
|
|
|
|
221,770
|
|
Charges recognized in profit or loss (Note 23)
|
|
|
(156,812
|
)
|
|
|
(151,185
|
)
|
|
|
(144,392
|
)
|
Closing balance (Note 6)
|
|
|
343,231
|
|
|
|
299,649
|
|
|
|
227,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program/placement
|
|
Principal - R$
|
|
Annual interest
|
|
Final maturity
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seventh placement (i)
|
|
300,000
|
|
TR + 10.38%
|
|
December 2017
|
|
|
302,363
|
|
|
|
452,568
|
|
Eighth placement / second series (ii)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,395
|
|
Ninth placement (iii)
|
|
80,393
|
|
CDI + 1.90%
|
|
July 2018
|
|
|
79,693
|
|
|
|
130,394
|
|
Tenth placement (iv)
|
|
55,000
|
|
IPCA + 8.22%
|
|
January 2020
|
|
|
69,212
|
|
|
|
64,724
|
|
First placement (Tenda) (v)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
201,877
|
|
Total debentures (Note 20.i.d, 20.ii.a and 20.iii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451,268
|
|
|
|
857,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314,139
|
|
|
|
389,621
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,129
|
|
|
|
468,337
|
|
In the years ended December 31,
2016 and 2015, the Company made the following payments:
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Face Value Placement
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
Total amortization
|
|
Face Value Placement
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
Total amortization
|
(i)
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
49,658
|
|
|
|
199,658
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
54,993
|
|
|
|
104,993
|
|
(ii)
|
|
|
5,787
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
9,473
|
|
|
|
8,089
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
9,371
|
|
(iii)
|
|
|
51,634
|
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
67,377
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
23,023
|
|
|
|
24,317
|
|
(iv)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(v)
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
15,335
|
|
|
|
215,335
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
40,415
|
|
|
|
220,415
|
|
|
|
|
407,421
|
|
|
|
89,197
|
|
|
|
496,618
|
|
|
|
239,383
|
|
|
|
119,713
|
|
|
|
359,096
|
|
Maturities of current and non-current
installments are as follows:
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
389,621
|
|
2017
|
|
|
314,139
|
|
|
|
344,690
|
|
2018
|
|
|
94,316
|
|
|
|
83,485
|
|
2019
|
|
|
21,404
|
|
|
|
20,078
|
|
2020
|
|
|
21,409
|
|
|
|
20,084
|
|
|
|
|
451,268
|
|
|
|
857,958
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
13.
|
Debentures
--Continued
|
As mentioned in Note 4.2, as of
December 31, 2016, the balance of restricted cash in guarantee of loans in investment funds in the amount R$10,702 (R$31,633 in
2015) is pledged as part of the calculation of the guarantee of the 7
th
debenture placement of the Company.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company
exceeded the amount established in the restrictive financial debt covenant, as presented below. The Company analyzed the other
debt contracts and did not identify any impact on the cross restrictive covenants in relation to the aforementioned non-compliance.
The ratio and minimum and maximum amounts required by the restrictive covenants as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
|
2016
|
2015
|
Seventh placement
|
|
|
Total account receivable plus inventory required to be below zero or 2.0 times over net debt less venture debt
(3)
|
53.98 times
|
-14.12 times
|
Total debt less venture debt
(3)
, less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
(1)
, cannot exceed 75% of equity plus noncontrolling interests
|
3.11%
|
-12.19%
|
Total receivables plus unappropriated income plus total inventory of finished units required to be 1.5 time over the net debt plus properties payable plus unappropriated cost
|
2.15 times
|
2.25 times
|
|
|
|
Eighth placement - Second series
|
|
|
Total account receivable plus inventory of finished units required to be below zero or 2.0 times over net debt less venture debt
|
Debt settled.
|
-7.73 times
|
Total debt less venture debt, less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
(1)
, cannot exceed 75% of equity plus noncontrolling interests
|
Debt settled
|
-12.19%
|
|
|
|
Ninth placement
|
|
|
Total account receivable plus total inventory required to be below zero or 2.0 times over net debt
|
2.34 times
|
3.71 times
|
Net debt cannot exceed 100% of equity plus noncontrolling interests
|
71.71%
|
46.44%
|
|
|
|
Tenth placement
|
|
|
Total account receivable plus inventory required to be below zero or 2.0 times over net debt less venture debt
(3)
|
53.98 times
|
-14.12 times
|
Total debt less venture debt
(3)
, less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
(1)
, cannot exceed 75% of equity plus noncontrolling interests
|
3.11%
|
-12.19%
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing
|
|
|
Net debt required to be not in excess of 70% of equity plus non-controlling interests (Non-compliant)
|
71.71%
|
n/a
|
Total accounts receivable plus inventory required to be below zero or 2.0 times over venture debt (3)
|
2.44 times
|
2.91 times
|
Total accounts receivable plus inventory of finished units required to be below zero or 2.0 times over net debt less venture debt
|
33.62 times
|
-7.73 times
|
Total debt, less venture debt, less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
(1)
, required to be not in excess of 75% of equity plus non-controlling interests
|
3.11%
|
-12.19%
|
|
|
|
First placement – Tenda
|
|
|
Total account receivable plus inventory required to be 2.0 times or more of net debt less debt with secured guarantee
(3)
or below zero, considering that TR
(2)
plus TE
(4)
always above zero.
|
Debt settled
|
-6.79 times
|
Net debt less debt with secured guarantee
(3)
required to not be in excess of 50% of equity.
|
Debt settled
|
-21.47%
|
Total receivables plus unappropriated income plus total inventory of finished units required to be more than 1.5 times the net debt plus property payable plus unappropriated cost, or below zero
|
Debt settled
|
2.47 times
|
|
(1)
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments refer to cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities.
|
|
(2)
|
Total receivables, whenever mentioned, refers to the amount reflected in the Balance Sheet plus
the amount not presented in the Balance Sheet.
|
|
(3)
|
Venture debt and secured guarantee debt refer to SFH debts, defined as the sum of all disbursed borrowing contracts which funds
were provided by SFH, as well as the debt related to the seventh placement.
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
14.
|
Obligations assumed on assignment of receivables
|
The
Company’s transactions of assignment of receivables portfolio are as follows
:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment of receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation CCI Jun/11 - Note 5(i)
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
Obligation CCI Dec/11 - Note 5(ii)
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
Obligation CCI Jul/12 - Note 5(iii)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
Obligation CCI Nov/12 - Note 5(iv)
|
|
|
4,651
|
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
Obligation CCI Dec/12 - Note 5(v)
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
7,541
|
|
Obligation CCI Nov/13 - Note 5(vi)
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
|
6,362
|
|
Obligation CCI Nov/14 - Note 5(vii)
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
6,696
|
|
Obligation CCI Dec/15 - Note 5(viii)
|
|
|
15,988
|
|
|
|
24,558
|
|
Obligation CCI Mar/16 - Note 5(ix)
|
|
|
17,178
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Obligation CCI May/16 - Note 5(x)
|
|
|
14,407
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Obligation CCI Aug/16 - Note 5(xi)
|
|
|
9,164
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Obligation CCI Dec/16 - Note 5(xii)
|
|
|
18,948
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Obligation FIDC
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
Total obligations assumed on assignment of receivables (Note 20.iii)
|
|
|
99,030
|
|
|
|
59,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
34,698
|
|
|
|
23,482
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
64,332
|
|
|
|
35,811
|
|
Regarding
the above transactions
,
the assignor is required to fully formalize the guarantee instruments
of receivables in favor of the assignee. Until it is fully fulfilled, these amounts will be classified into a separate account
in current and non-current liabilities
.
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for penalties for delay in construction works
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
Cancelled contract payable
|
|
|
26,255
|
|
|
|
24,053
|
|
Warranty provision
|
|
|
29,568
|
|
|
|
59,647
|
|
Noncurrent sales taxes (PIS and COFINS – deferred and current sales taxes)
|
|
|
8,739
|
|
|
|
13,129
|
|
Provision for net capital deficiency (Note 9 (g))
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54,401
|
|
Long-term suppliers (Note 20.i.d)
|
|
|
4,046
|
|
|
|
7,508
|
|
Payables to venture partners (a) (Note 20.i.d, 20.ii and 20.iii)
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
4,895
|
|
Share-based payment - Phantom Shares (Note 18.4)
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
8,982
|
|
|
|
28,918
|
|
Total other payables
|
|
|
81,423
|
|
|
|
196,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
69,921
|
|
|
|
163,437
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
11,502
|
|
|
|
33,216
|
|
|
(a)
|
The Company entered in June 2011 into a private instrument for establishing the usufruct
of 100% preferred shares of SPE-89 Empreendimentos Imobiliários S.A., over a period of six years, raising funds amounting
to R$45,000.
In the year ended December 31, 2016,
the total amount of dividends paid to
the holders of preferred shares by SPE-89 Empreendimentos Imobiliários S.A. amounted to
R$
4,700.
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
16.
|
Provisions for legal claims and commitments
|
The Company and its subsidiaries
are parties to lawsuits and administrative proceedings at various courts and government agencies that arise from the ordinary course
of business, involving tax, labor, civil, and other matters. Management, based on information provided by its legal counsel and
analysis of the pending claims and, with respect to the labor claims, based on past experience regarding the amounts claimed, recognized
a provision in an amount considered sufficient to cover the losses on future settlements. The Company does not expect any reimbursement
in connection with these claims.
In the years ended December 31,
2016 and 2015, the changes in the provision are summarized as follows:
|
|
Civil lawsuits(i)
|
|
Tax proceedings
|
|
Labor claims
|
|
Total
|
Balance at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
157,842
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
81,318
|
|
|
|
239,574
|
|
Additional provision
|
|
|
68,976
|
|
|
|
12,156
|
|
|
|
37,317
|
|
|
|
118,449
|
|
Payment and reversal of provision not used
|
|
|
(77,197
|
)
|
|
|
(12,170
|
)
|
|
|
(25,674
|
)
|
|
|
(115,041
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
149,621
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
92,961
|
|
|
|
242,982
|
|
(-) Reclassification to discontinued operations
|
|
|
(29,982
|
)
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(25,554
|
)
|
|
|
(55,716
|
)
|
Additional provision (Note 23)
|
|
|
49,872
|
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
17,959
|
|
|
|
70,796
|
|
Payment and reversal of provision not used
|
|
|
(71,332
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(23,711
|
)
|
|
|
(95,104
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
98,179
|
|
|
|
3,124
|
|
|
|
61,655
|
|
|
|
162,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
53,867
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
23,818
|
|
|
|
79,054
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
44,312
|
|
|
|
1,755
|
|
|
|
37,837
|
|
|
|
83,904
|
|
|
(a)
|
Civil lawsuits, tax proceedings and labor claims
|
As of December 31, 2016, the Company
and its subsidiaries have deposited in court the amount of R$79,785 (R$125,358 in 2015) (Note 7).
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Civil lawsuits
|
|
|
33,313
|
|
|
|
81,919
|
|
Tax proceedings
|
|
|
24,806
|
|
|
|
14,222
|
|
Labor claims
|
|
|
21,666
|
|
|
|
29,217
|
|
Total (Note 7
)
|
|
|
79,785
|
|
|
|
125,358
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
16.
|
Provisions for legal claims and commitments
--Continued
|
|
(a)
|
Civil lawsuits, tax proceedings and labor claims
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
As of December 31, 2016, the provisions related to civil lawsuits include R$18,337 (R$42,296 in 2015)
related to lawsuits in which the Company is included as a successor in enforcement actions and in which the original debtor is
a former shareholder of Gafisa, Cimob Companhia Imobiliária (“Cimob”), or involve other companies of the same
economic group of Cimob. In these lawsuits, the plaintiff believes that the Company should be liable for Cimob’s debts, as
the Company would have taken on the obligations of Cimob after acquisition (business succession, merger of assets and/or formation
of a same economic group involving the Company and the Cimob Group). In addition, there are judicial deposits in the amount of
R$16,359 (R$44,099 in 2015) related to these lawsuits. The change in the amount of civil lawsuits and judicial deposits in the
year ended December 31, 2016 is due to an unfavorable outcome in a lawsuit, settled by means of judicial deposit, the Company not
having disbursed any additional cash.
|
The Company does not agree with
the statement of facts based on which it has been included in these lawsuits and continues to dispute in court its liability for
the debts of a third company, as well as the amount charged by the plaintiffs. The Company has already obtained favorable and unfavorable
decisions in relation to this matter, which is the reason why it is not possible to estimate a uniform outcome in all lawsuits.
The Company also aims to file a lawsuit against Cimob, and its former and current parent companies to argue that it should not
be liable for the debts of that company, as well as indemnity of the amounts already paid by the Company in lawsuits relating to
the charge of debts owed only by Cimob.
Environmental
risk
Considering the diversity of environmental
legislation in the federal, state and municipal levels, which may restrict or impede the development of real estate ventures, the
Company analyzes all environmental risks, including the possible existence of hazardous or toxic materials, residues, vegetation
and proximity of the land to permanent preservation areas, in order to mitigate risks in the development of ventures, during the
process of land acquisition for future ventures.
In addition, environmental legislation establishes
criminal, civil and administrative sanctions to individuals and legal entities for activities considered as environmental infringements
or offense. The penalties include the stop of development activities, loss of tax benefits, confinement and fines. The lawsuits
in dispute by the Company in civil court are considered by the legal advisor to have possible losses in the amount of R$4,924 (R$8,639
in 2015).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(
Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
16.
|
Provisions for legal claims and commitments
--Continued
|
|
(a)
|
Civil lawsuits, tax proceedings and labor claims --Continued
|
Lawsuits in which likelihood of
loss is rated as possible
As of December 31, 2016, the Company
and its subsidiaries are aware of other claims and civil, labor and tax risks. Based on the history of probable processes and the
specific analysis of main claims, the measurement of the claims with likelihood of loss considered possible amounted to R$249,153
(R$810,163 in 2015), based on average past outcomes adjusted to current estimates, for which the Company’s Management believes
it is not necessary to recognize a provision for occasional losses. The change in the period was caused by change in the volume
of lawsuits with diluted amounts, and review of the involved amounts, and the disclosure of the discontinued operations related
to the subsidiary Tenda, which amounted to R$497,620 as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Civil lawsuits
|
|
|
156,523
|
|
|
|
469,841
|
|
Tax proceedings
|
|
|
52,812
|
|
|
|
263,540
|
|
Labor claims
|
|
|
39,818
|
|
|
|
76,782
|
|
|
|
|
249,153
|
|
|
|
810,163
|
|
|
(b)
|
Payables related to the completion of real estate development
|
The Company commits to complete
units sold and to comply with the laws regulating the civil construction sector, including the obtainment of licenses from the
proper authorities, and compliance with the terms for starting and delivering the real estate developments, being subject to legal
and contractual penalties.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company
and its subsidiaries have restricted cash which will be released to the extent the guarantee indexes described in Note 4.2 are
met, which include land and receivables pledged in guarantee of 120% of the debt outstanding.
In addition to the commitments
mentioned in Notes 6, 12 and 13, the Company has commitments related to the rental of four business office suites where its facilities
are located, at a monthly cost of R$644 adjusted by the IGP-M/FGV variation. The rental term is from one to eight years and there
is a fine in case of cancelled contracts corresponding to three-month rent, or in proportion to the contract expiration time. The
estimate of minimum future rent payment of the business office suites (cancellable leases) amounts to R$32,639 until the maturity
of contracts, as follows.
|
|
|
Estimate of payment
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
2018
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
2019
|
|
|
4,383
|
|
2020
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
2021 onwards
|
|
|
16,633
|
|
|
|
|
32,639
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
17.
|
Payables for purchase of properties and advances from customers
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties
|
|
|
January 2017 to March 2021
|
|
|
|
118,257
|
|
|
|
362,800
|
|
Present value adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,469
|
)
|
|
|
(17,039
|
)
|
Advances from customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and sales (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,024
|
|
|
|
39,743
|
|
Barter transaction - Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,885
|
|
|
|
224,430
|
|
Total payables for purchase of properties and advance from customers (Notes 20.i.d and 20.ii.a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,697
|
|
|
|
609,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,388
|
|
|
|
361,420
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,309
|
|
|
|
248,514
|
|
Maturities
of the current and non-current portions are as follows
:
Maturity
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
-
|
361,420
|
2017
|
|
205,388
|
181,395
|
2018
|
|
71,119
|
37,230
|
2019
|
|
9,243
|
21,010
|
2020
|
|
8,116
|
8,879
|
2021 onwards
|
|
1,831
|
-
|
|
|
295,697
|
609,934
|
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015,
the Company's authorized and paid-in capital amounts to R$2,740,662, represented in both periods by 378,066,162 registered common
shares, with no par value, of which 14,160,533 (10,584,756 in 2015) were held in treasury.
According to the Company’s
By-Laws, capital may be increased without further amendments, upon resolution of the Board of Directors, which shall set the conditions
for issuance up to the limit of 600,000,000 (six hundred million) common shares.
On March 3, 2016, the Company approved
the creation of a new program to repurchase its common shares aimed at holding them in treasury, and later selling or cancelling
them, over a period of 18 months, up to the limit of 8,198,565 shares. In the year ended December 31, 2016, 4,503,600 shares were
acquired totaling R$8,693. Additionally, the Company transferred 927,824 shares (1,221,860 in 2015) in the total amount of R$2,149
(R$3,022 in 2015) related to the exercise of options under the stock option plan of common shares by the beneficiaries, for which
it received the total amount of R$9 (R$599 in 2015).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
18.1.
|
Capital
--Continued
|
Treasury shares
|
|
Type
|
GFSA3
|
R$
|
%
|
Market value (*)
R$ thousand
|
Carrying value
R$ thousand
|
Acquisition date
|
Number
|
Weighted average price
|
% - on shares outstanding
|
2016
|
2015
|
2016
|
2015
|
11/20/2001
|
599,486
|
2.8875
|
0.17%
|
1,115
|
1,457
|
1,731
|
1,731
|
Changes in 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
18,500,000
|
3.8562
|
5.12%
|
34,410
|
44,955
|
71,339
|
71,339
|
Changes in 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
43,738,235
|
2.6353
|
12.11%
|
81,353
|
106,284
|
115,265
|
115,265
|
Transfers
|
(5,463,395)
|
3.2183
|
-1.51%
|
(10,162)
|
(13,276)
|
(17,583)
|
(17,583)
|
Cancellations
|
(27,493,039)
|
3.3351
|
-7.61%
|
(51,137)
|
(66,808)
|
(91,693)
|
(91,693)
|
Changes in 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
11,925,330
|
2.0257
|
3.30%
|
22,181
|
28,979
|
24,157
|
24,157
|
Transfers
|
(1,221,860)
|
2.4733
|
-0.34%
|
(2,272)
|
(2,970)
|
(3,022)
|
(3,022)
|
Cancellations
|
(30,000,000)
|
2.4738
|
-8.31%
|
(55,800)
|
(72,900)
|
(74,214)
|
(74,214)
|
Changes in 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
4,503,600
|
1.9302
|
1.25%
|
8,377
|
-
|
8,693
|
-
|
Transfers
|
(927,824)
|
2.3162
|
-0.26%
|
(1,726)
|
-
|
(2,149)
|
-
|
|
14,160,533
|
2.2968
|
3.92%
|
26,339
|
25,721
|
32,524
|
25,980
|
|
(*)
|
Market value calculated based on the closing share price at December 31, 2016 of R$1.86 (R$2.43 in
2015), not considering the effect of any volatilities.
|
The Company holds shares in treasury
acquired in 2001 in order to guarantee the performance of lawsuits (Note 16(a)(i)).
The change in the number of outstanding
shares is as follows:
|
|
Common shares - In thousands
|
Outstanding shares as of December 31, 2014
|
|
|
378,184
|
|
Repurchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
(11,925
|
)
|
Transfer related to the stock option plan
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Outstanding shares as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
367,481
|
|
Repurchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
(4,504
|
)
|
Transfer related to the stock option plan
|
|
|
928
|
|
Shares held by the Management members of the Company
|
|
|
(2,838
|
)
|
Outstanding shares as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
361,067
|
|
Reverse split of shares (Note 31(i)(a))
|
|
|
(334,288
|
)
|
Adjusted outstanding shares as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
26,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (Note 27)
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
18.2.
|
Allocation of net income (loss) for the year
|
According to the Company’s By-Laws, profit
for the year is allocated as follows, after deduction of occasional accumulated losses and provision for income taxes and social
contribution: (i) 5% to legal reserve, until it reaches 20% of capital, or when the legal reserve balance plus the balances of
capital reserves exceeds 30% of capital; (ii) 25% of the remaining balance to pay mandatory dividends; and (iii) amount not in
excess of 71.25% to set up the Reserve for Investments, with the purpose of financing the expansion of the operations of the Company
and its subsidiaries.
The Board of Directors, by referendum of the Annual
Shareholders’ Meeting, shall examine the accounts and financial statements related to the year 2016.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
18.2.
|
Allocation of net income (loss) for the year
--Continued
|
The allocation of net income for the year 2015 and
the absorption of losses incurred for the year 2016 by the income reserve and legal reserve, according to Article 189 of Act 6,404/76,
are as follows:
|
|
|
Net income for 2015
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
(-) Legal reserve (5%)
|
|
|
(3,722
|
)
|
(-) Calculation basis
|
|
|
70,727
|
|
Minimum mandatory dividend (25%)
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
Reserve for investments
|
|
|
53,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum mandatory dividend (25%) per share
|
|
|
0.048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for 2016
|
|
|
(1,163,596
|
)
|
(-) Income reserve
|
|
|
266,520
|
|
(-)Legal reserve
|
|
|
35,315
|
|
Balance of accumulated losses for 2016
|
|
|
(861,761
|
)
|
Expenses
for granting stocks recorded under the account “General and administrative expenses” (Note 23) in the years ended December
31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-settled stock option plans
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
6,937
|
|
|
|
15,489
|
|
Phantom Shares (Note 18.4)
|
|
|
1,707
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total stock option grant expenses (Note 23)
|
|
|
6,821
|
|
|
|
7,826
|
|
|
|
15,489
|
|
The Company has a total of five
stock option plans comprising common shares, launched in 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 which follows the rules established in
the Stock Option Plan of the Company.
The granted options entitle their
holders (employees) to purchase common shares of the Company’s capital, after periods that vary from one to four years of
employment (essential condition to exercise the option), and expire six to ten years after the grant date.
The fair value of options is set
on the grant date, and it is recognized as expense in profit or loss (as contra-entry to equity) during the vesting period of the
plan, to the extent the services are provided by employees and management members.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
18.3.
|
Stock option plan
-- Continued
|
Changes in the stock options outstanding
in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, including the respective weighted average exercise prices are as follows:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Number of options
|
|
Weighted average exercise price (Reais)
|
|
Number of options
|
|
Weighted average exercise price (Reais)
|
Options outstanding at the beginning of the year
|
|
|
11,743,379
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
9,542,643
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
2,209,869
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
3,567,201
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
Options exercised (i)
|
|
|
(930,449
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(1,221,860
|
)
|
|
|
(0.49
|
)
|
Options expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(32,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3.05
|
)
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(114,717
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(112,605
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at the end of the year
|
|
|
12,908,082
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
11,743,379
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
(i)
|
In the year ended December 31, 2016, the amount received through exercised options was R$9 (R$599
in 2015).
|
As of December 31, 2016, the stock
options outstanding and exercisable are as follows:
Outstanding options
|
Exercisable options
|
Number of options
|
Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)
|
Weighted average exercise price (R$)
|
Number of options
|
Weighted average exercise price (R$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,908,082
|
4.03
|
2.11
|
1,927,083
|
2.68
|
During the year ended December 31,
2016, the Company granted 2,209,869 options in connection with its stock option plans comprising common shares (3,567,201 options
granted in 2015).
The models used by the Company
for pricing granted options are the Binomial model for traditional options and the Monte Carlo model for options in the
Restricted Stock Options format.
The fair value of the new options
granted totaled R$1,265 (R$3,232 in 2015), which was determined based on the following assumptions:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Pricing model
|
|
|
Binomial
|
|
|
|
Binomial
|
|
Exercise price of options (R$)
|
|
|
R$2.62
|
|
|
|
R$2.24
|
|
Weighted average price of options ( (R$)
|
|
|
R$2.62
|
|
|
|
R$2.24
|
|
Expected volatility (%) – (*)
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
Expected option life (years)
|
|
|
5.78 years
|
|
|
|
5.58 years
|
|
Dividend income (%)
|
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate (%)
|
|
|
14.13
|
%
|
|
|
13.64
|
%
|
(*)The
volatility was determined based on regression analysis of the ratio of the share volatility of Gafisa S.A. to the Ibovespa index.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
18.4.
|
Share-based payment – Phantom Shares
|
The Company has a total of two
cash-settled share-based payment plans with fixed terms and conditions, according to the plans approved by the Company, launched
in 2015 and 2016.
In the plan approved in 2016,
the beneficiaries were granted the right to receive an amount equivalent to 1,143,145 phantom shares, together with the stock option
plan for the year 2016. The phantom shares have the same grace and expiration period of the options, and can be partially or fully
exercised during the established period.
As of December 31, 2016, the
amount of R$2,596 (R$889 in 2015), related to the fair value of the phantom shares granted, is recognized in the heading “Other
payables” (Note 15).
|
19.
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
The reconciliation of the effective
tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before income tax and social contribution, and statutory interest
|
|
|
(501,941
|
)
|
|
|
35,419
|
|
|
|
75,403
|
|
Income tax calculated at the applicable rate - 34 %
|
|
|
170,660
|
|
|
|
(12,043
|
)
|
|
|
(25,637
|
)
|
Net effect of subsidiaries taxed by presumed profit
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
19,711
|
|
|
|
9,282
|
|
Tax losses (tax loss carryforwards used)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,101
|
)
|
|
|
(7,523
|
)
|
Income from equity method investments
|
|
|
(19,546
|
)
|
|
|
13,605
|
|
|
|
11,757
|
|
Stock option plan
|
|
|
(2,895
|
)
|
|
|
(2,714
|
)
|
|
|
(11,277
|
)
|
Other permanent differences
|
|
|
(5,702
|
)
|
|
|
(14,203
|
)
|
|
|
(3,675
|
)
|
Charges on payables to venture partners
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
Tax benefits recognized (unrecognized)
|
|
|
(244,271
|
)
|
|
|
(1,674
|
)
|
|
|
15,523
|
|
|
|
|
(100,080
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(8,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expenses - current
|
|
|
(10,722
|
)
|
|
|
(14,763
|
)
|
|
|
(25,304
|
)
|
Tax (expense ) income – deferred
|
|
|
(89,358
|
)
|
|
|
14,105
|
|
|
|
16,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
|
The Company recognized deferred
tax assets on tax losses and income tax and social contribution carryforwards for prior years, which have no expiration, and for
which offset is limited to 30% of annual taxable profit, to the extent the taxable profit is likely to be available for offsetting
temporary differences, based on the assumptions and conditions established in the business model of the Company.
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015,
deferred income tax and social contribution are from the following sources:
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
19.
|
Income tax and social contribution
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
--Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for legal claims
|
|
|
55,406
|
|
|
|
82,614
|
|
Temporary differences – Deferred PIS and COFINS
|
|
|
11,333
|
|
|
|
16,404
|
|
Provisions for realization of non-financial assets
|
|
|
143,073
|
|
|
|
59,218
|
|
Temporary differences – CPC adjustment
|
|
|
24,044
|
|
|
|
44,748
|
|
Provision for impairment loss of discontinued operations
|
|
|
207,436
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
15,401
|
|
|
|
38,469
|
|
Income tax and social contribution loss carryforwards
|
|
|
129,163
|
|
|
|
317,282
|
|
Tax benefits from subsidiaries
|
|
|
49,174
|
|
|
|
28,166
|
|
|
|
|
635,030
|
|
|
|
586,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized deferred tax assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(207,436
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrecognized deferred tax assets of continued operations
|
|
|
(250,944
|
)
|
|
|
(272,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
(458,380
|
)
|
|
|
(272,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative goodwill
|
|
|
(92,385
|
)
|
|
|
(92,385
|
)
|
Temporary differences –CPC adjustment
|
|
|
(143,436
|
)
|
|
|
(130,929
|
)
|
Differences between income taxed on cash basis and recorded on an
accrual basis
|
|
|
(41,234
|
)
|
|
|
(107,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
(277,054
|
)
|
|
|
(330,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net
|
|
|
(100,405
|
)
|
|
|
(16,489
|
)
|
The Company has income tax and
social contribution loss carryforwards for offset in the following amounts:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Income tax
|
|
Social contribution
|
|
Total
|
|
Income tax
|
|
Social contribution
|
|
Total
|
Balance of income tax and social contribution loss carryforwards
|
|
|
379,892
|
|
|
|
379,892
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
933,182
|
|
|
|
933,182
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred tax asset (25%/9%)
|
|
|
94,973
|
|
|
|
34,190
|
|
|
|
129,163
|
|
|
|
233,296
|
|
|
|
83,986
|
|
|
|
317,282
|
|
Recognized deferred tax asset
|
|
|
55,712
|
|
|
|
20,056
|
|
|
|
75,768
|
|
|
|
55,712
|
|
|
|
20,056
|
|
|
|
75,768
|
|
Unrecognized deferred tax asset
|
|
|
39,261
|
|
|
|
14,134
|
|
|
|
53,395
|
|
|
|
177,584
|
|
|
|
63,930
|
|
|
|
241,514
|
|
As a result of the loss for the
year, the Company made the reversal of a portion of the previously recognized deferred tax assets. The portion of remaining tax
loss is limited to 30% of the deferred tax liabilities related to the goodwill arising from the remeasurement of the portion of
remaining investment of AUSA, and temporary differences to be taxed – CPC adjustments, which do not have established realization
term.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
20.
|
Financial instruments
|
The Company and its subsidiaries
engage in operations involving financial instruments. These instruments are managed through operational strategies and internal
controls aimed at providing liquidity, return and safety. The use of financial instruments with the objective of hedging is achieved
through a periodical analysis of exposure to the risk that the management intends to cover (exchange, interest rate, etc.) which
is submitted to the corresponding Management bodies for approval and performance of the proposed strategy. The control policy consists
of continuously monitoring the contracted conditions in relation to the prevailing market conditions. The Company and its subsidiaries
do not use derivatives or any other risky assets for speculative purposes. The result from these operations is consistent with
the policies and strategies devised by the Company’s management. The Company and its subsidiaries operations are subject
to following risk factors:
The Company and its subsidiaries
restrict their exposure to credit risks associated with cash and cash equivalents, investing only in short-term securities of top
tier financial institutions.
With regards to accounts receivable,
the Company restricts its exposure to credit risks through sales to a broad base of customers and ongoing credit analysis. Additionally,
there is no relevant history of losses due to the existence of secured guarantee, represented by real estate unit, for the recovery
of its products in the cases of default during the construction period. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, there was no significant
credit risk concentration associated with customers.
|
b)
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
The Company holds derivative instruments
to mitigate the risk arising from its exposure to index and interest volatility recognized at their fair value in profit or loss
for the year. Pursuant to its treasury policies, the Company does not own or issue derivative financial instruments other than
for hedging purposes.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company
had derivative contracts for hedging purposes in relation to interest rate fluctuations, with final maturity between June 2017
and January 2020. The derivative contracts are as follows:
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
20.
|
Financial instruments
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Risk considerations
--Continued
|
|
b)
|
Derivative financial instruments --Continued
|
|
|
|
Reais
|
|
|
Gain (loss) not realized by derivative instruments - net
|
|
|
Percentage
|
Validity
|
|
|
Companies
|
Swap
agreements (Fixed for CDI)
|
Face value
|
Original Index –
asset position
|
Swap –
liability position
|
Beginning
|
End
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gafisa S/A
|
Banco Votorantim S.A.
|
55,000
|
Fixed 14.2672%
|
CDI + 1.6344%
|
12/21/2015
|
06/20/2016
|
-
|
(637)
|
Gafisa S/A
|
Banco Votorantim S.A.
|
27,500
|
Fixed 11.1136%
|
CDI + 0.2801%
|
06/20/2016
|
12/20/2016
|
-
|
(641)
|
Gafisa S/A
|
Banco Votorantim S.A.
|
27,500
|
Fixed 15.1177%
|
CDI + 1.6344%
|
12/20/2016
|
06/20/2017
|
88
|
(399)
|
Gafisa S/A
|
Banco Votorantim S.A.
|
130,000
|
CDI + 1.90%
|
118% CDI
|
07/22/2014
|
07/26/2018
|
(313)
|
(2,216)
|
Gafisa S/A
|
Banco Bradesco
|
194,000
|
Fixed 12.8727%
|
120% CDI
|
09/29/2014
|
10/08/2018
|
(556)
|
(15,907)
|
Gafisa S/A
|
Banco Votorantim S.A. (a)
|
55,000
|
IPCA + 8.22%
|
120% CDI
|
03/17/2015
|
01/20/2020
|
4,521
|
(1,874)
|
Total derivative financial instruments (Note 20 (i) (d) and Note 20 (ii) (a))
|
3,740
|
(21,674)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
(5,290)
|
(14,056)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current
|
9,030
|
(7,618)
|
During the year ended December 31,
2016, the income of R$13,404 (R$(17,151) in 2015) in the consolidated financial statements, which refers to net result of the interest
swap transaction, arising from the payment in the amount of R$12,009, and the positive change to market of R$25,413, was recognized
in the “financial income (expenses)” line in the statement of profit or loss for the year, allowing correlation between
the impact of such transactions the and interest rate fluctuation in the Company’s consolidated financial statements (Note
24).
The
estimated fair value of derivative financial instruments contracted by the Company was determined based on information available
in the market and specific valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment was necessary for interpreting market data to
produce the estimated fair value of each transaction, which may vary upon the financial settlement of transactions.
Interest rate risk arises from the
possibility that the Company and its subsidiaries may experience gains or losses because of fluctuations in the interest rates
of its financial assets and liabilities. Aiming to mitigate this risk, the Company and its subsidiaries seek to diversify funding
in terms of fixed and floating rates. The interest rates on loans, financing and debentures are disclosed in Notes 12 and 13. The
interest rates contracted on financial investments are disclosed in Note 4. Accounts receivable from real estate units completed
(Note 5), are subject to annual interest rate of 12%, appropriated on a
pro rata
basis.
Liquidity risk refers to the possibility
that the Company and its subsidiaries do not have sufficient funds to meet their commitments as they become due.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
20.
|
Financial instruments
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Risk considerations
--Continued
|
|
d)
|
Liquidity risk
--Continued
|
To mitigate liquidity risks, and
to optimize the weighted average cost of capital, the Company and its subsidiaries monitor on an on-going basis the indebtedness
levels according to the market standards and the fulfillment of covenants provided for in loan, financing and debenture agreements,
in order to guarantee that the operating-cash generation and the advance funding, when necessary, are sufficient to meet the schedule
of commitments (Notes12 and 13).
The maturities of financial instruments,
loans and financing, suppliers, payables to venture partners, debentures, payables for purchase of properties and advance from
customers, cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and trade accounts receivable are as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
1 to 3 years
|
|
4 to 5 years
|
|
More than 5 years
|
|
Total
|
Loans and financing (Note 12)
|
|
|
669,795
|
|
|
|
509,412
|
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,186,300
|
|
Debentures (Note 13)
|
|
|
314,139
|
|
|
|
137,129
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
451,268
|
|
Payables to venture partners (Note 15)
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
Suppliers (Note 15 and Note 20(ii)(a))
|
|
|
79,120
|
|
|
|
4,046
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
83,166
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties and advance from customers (Note 17)
|
|
|
205,388
|
|
|
|
80,362
|
|
|
|
9,947
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
295,697
|
|
|
|
|
1,269,679
|
|
|
|
730,949
|
|
|
|
17,040
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,017,668
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (Notes 4.1 and 4.2)
|
|
|
253,180
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
253,180
|
|
Trade accounts receivable (Note 5)
|
|
|
722,640
|
|
|
|
255,861
|
|
|
|
15,461
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
993,962
|
|
|
|
|
975,820
|
|
|
|
255,861
|
|
|
|
15,461
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,247,142
|
|
|
(ii)
|
Fair value of financial instruments
|
|
(a)
|
Fair value classification
|
The Company uses the following classification
to determine and disclose the fair value of financial instruments by the valuation technique:
Level 1: quoted prices (without
adjustments) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: input different from the
quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are observable, directly (as prices) or indirectly (prices derivate);
and
Level 3: inputs to asset or liability
not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
20.
|
Financial instruments
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Fair value for financial instruments
--Continued
|
|
(a)
|
Fair value classification
--Continued
|
The classification level of fair
value for financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss of the Company as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 is
as follows:
|
|
|
Fair value classification
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments (Note 4.2)
|
-
|
223,646
|
-
|
Derivative financial instruments (Note 20.i.b)
|
-
|
3,740
|
-
|
|
Fair value classification
|
As of December 31, 2015
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments (Note 4.2)
|
-
|
629,671
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
addition, the fair value classification of financial instruments liabilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value classification
|
As of December 31, 2015
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments (Note 20.i.b)
|
-
|
21,674
|
-
|
In the years ended December 31,
2016 and 2015, there were no transfers between the Levels 1 and 2 fair value classifications, nor were transfers between Levels
3 and 2 fair value classifications.
|
(b)
|
Fair value measurement
|
The following estimate fair values
were determined using available market information and proper measurement methodologies. However, a considerable amount of judgment
is necessary to interpret market information and estimate fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented in this document are
not necessarily indicative of amounts that the Company could realize in the current market. The use of different market assumptions
and/or estimation methodology may have a significant effect on estimated fair values.
The following methods and assumptions
were used in order to estimate the fair value for each financial instrument type for which the estimate of values is practicable.
|
(i)
|
The amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, other receivables,
suppliers, and other current liabilities approximate to their fair values, recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
20.
|
Financial instruments
—Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Fair value of financial instruments
--Continued
|
|
b)
|
Fair value measurement --Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
The fair value of bank loans and other financial debts is estimated through future cash flows discounted
using rates that are annually available for similar and outstanding debts or terms.
|
The most significant carrying values and fair values
of financial assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
Fair value
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 4.1)
|
|
|
29,534
|
|
|
|
29,534
|
|
|
|
82,640
|
|
|
|
82,640
|
|
Short-term investments (Note 4.2)
|
|
|
223,646
|
|
|
|
223,646
|
|
|
|
629,671
|
|
|
|
629,671
|
|
Derivative financial instruments (Note 20(i)(b))
|
|
|
3,740
|
|
|
|
3,740
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Trade accounts receivable (Note 5)
|
|
|
993,962
|
|
|
|
993,962
|
|
|
|
1,802,364
|
|
|
|
1,802,364
|
|
Loans receivable (Note 21.1)
|
|
|
25,529
|
|
|
|
25,529
|
|
|
|
109,193
|
|
|
|
109,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing (Note 12)
|
|
|
1,186,300
|
|
|
|
1,188,603
|
|
|
|
1,292,835
|
|
|
|
1,237,222
|
|
Debentures (Note 13)
|
|
|
451,268
|
|
|
|
470,179
|
|
|
|
857,958
|
|
|
|
828,387
|
|
Payables to venture partners (Note 15)
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
4,895
|
|
|
|
5,472
|
|
Derivative financial instruments (Note 20(i)(b))
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,674
|
|
|
|
21,674
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
83,166
|
|
|
|
83,166
|
|
|
|
57,335
|
|
|
|
57,335
|
|
Obligations assumed on assignment of receivables (Note 14)
|
|
|
99,030
|
|
|
|
99,030
|
|
|
|
59,293
|
|
|
|
59,293
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties and advance from customers (Note 17)
|
|
|
295,697
|
|
|
|
295,697
|
|
|
|
609,934
|
|
|
|
609,934
|
|
Loans payables (Note 21.1)
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
51,482
|
|
|
|
51,482
|
|
|
(c)
|
Risk of debt acceleration
|
As of December 31, 2016, the Company
has loans and financing, with restrictive covenants related to cash generation, indebtedness ratios, and other. These restrictive
covenants have been complied with by the Company and do not limit its ability to conduct its business as usual. As mentioned in
Notes 12 and 13, in view of the non-compliance with the covenants of a CCB issue (Note 12), the non-current installments of this
operation were reclassified into short term. The Company obtained the agreement from the bank related to the non-fulfillment of
the net debt limit in relation to the financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017, thus not requiring the mandatory
early payment and/or declaration of early maturity (Note 31 (iii)).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
20.
|
Financial instruments
--Continued
|
The
objective of the Company’s capital management is to guarantee that a strong credit rating is maintained in institutions and
an optimum capital ratio, in order to support the Company’s business and maximize value to shareholders.
The
Company controls its capital structure by making adjustments and adapting to current economic conditions. In order to maintain
its structure adjusted, the Company may pay dividends, return on capital to shareholders, raise new loans and issue debentures,
among others.
There
were no changes in objectives, policies or procedures during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
The
Company included in its net debt structure: loans and financing, debentures, obligations assumed on assignment of receivables and
payables to venture partners less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing (Note 12)
|
|
|
1,186,300
|
|
|
|
1,292,835
|
|
Debentures (Note 13)
|
|
|
451,268
|
|
|
|
857,958
|
|
Payables to venture partners (Note 15)
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
4,895
|
|
( - ) Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (Note 4.1 and 4.2)
|
|
|
(253,180
|
)
|
|
|
(712,311
|
)
|
Net debt
|
|
|
1,385,625
|
|
|
|
1,443,377
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
1,930,453
|
|
|
|
3,097,236
|
|
|
(iv)
|
Sensitivity analysis
|
The
sensitivity analysis of financial instruments for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, except swap contracts, which are
analyzed through their due dates, describing the risks that may incur material losses on the Company’s profit or loss, as
provided for by CVM, through Rule No. 475/08, in order to present a 25% and 50% increase/decrease in the risk variable considered.
As
of December 31, 2016, the Company has the following financial instruments:
|
a)
|
Short-term investments, loans and financing, and debentures linked to Interbank Deposit Certificates (CDI);
|
|
b)
|
Loans and financing and debentures linked to the Referential Rate (TR) and CDI, and debentures indexed to the CDI, IPCA and
TR;
|
|
c)
|
Accounts receivable, linked to the National Civil Construction Index (INCC) and General Market Price Index (IGP-M).
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
20.
|
Financial instruments
--Continued
|
|
(iv)
|
Sensitivity analysis
--Continued
|
For
the sensitivity analysis in the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company considered the interest rates of investments, loans and
accounts receivables, the CDI rate at 13.63%, TR rate at 2.75%, INCC rate at 6.11%, IPCA rate at 6.29% and IGP-M rate at 7.19%.
The scenarios considered were as follows:
Scenario
I – Probable:
10% increase/decrease in the risk variables used for pricing
Scenario
II – Possible:
25% increase/decrease in the risk variables used for pricing
Scenario
III –
Remote: 50% increase/decrease in the risk variables used for pricing
The
Company presents in the following chart the sensitivity to risks to which the Company is exposed, based on the scenarios above,
as of December 31, 2016. The effects on equity are basically the same ones on profit or loss.
|
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
|
|
I
|
|
II
|
|
III
|
|
III
|
|
II
|
|
I
|
Instrument
|
|
Risk
|
|
Increase 10%
|
|
Increase 25%
|
|
Increase 50%
|
|
Decrease 50%
|
|
Decrease 25%
|
|
Decrease 10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of CDI
|
|
|
|
2,544
|
|
|
|
6,359
|
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
|
|
(12,719
|
)
|
|
|
(6,359
|
)
|
|
|
(2,544
|
)
|
Loans and financing
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of CDI
|
|
|
|
(5,572
|
)
|
|
|
(13,930
|
)
|
|
|
(27,860
|
)
|
|
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
13,930
|
|
|
|
5,572
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of CDI
|
|
|
|
(956
|
)
|
|
|
(2,390
|
)
|
|
|
(4,780
|
)
|
|
|
4,780
|
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of CDI
|
|
|
|
(1,952
|
)
|
|
|
(4,882
|
)
|
|
|
(9,570
|
)
|
|
|
10,751
|
|
|
|
5,257
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of CDI variation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,936
|
)
|
|
|
(14,843
|
)
|
|
|
(29,491
|
)
|
|
|
30,672
|
|
|
|
15,218
|
|
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of TR
|
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
|
|
(4,821
|
)
|
|
|
(9,641
|
)
|
|
|
9,641
|
|
|
|
4,821
|
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of TR
|
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(2,020
|
)
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of TR variation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,736
|
)
|
|
|
(6,841
|
)
|
|
|
(13,681
|
)
|
|
|
13,681
|
|
|
|
6,841
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of IPCA
|
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
|
|
(2,047
|
)
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of IPCA variation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
|
|
(2,047
|
)
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of INCC
|
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
|
|
8,435
|
|
|
|
16,870
|
|
|
|
(16,870
|
)
|
|
|
(8,435
|
)
|
|
|
(3,374
|
)
|
Payable for purchase of properties
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of INCC
|
|
|
|
(1,703
|
)
|
|
|
(4,258
|
)
|
|
|
(8,516
|
)
|
|
|
8,516
|
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of INCC variation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
4,177
|
|
|
|
8,354
|
|
|
|
(8,354
|
)
|
|
|
(4,177
|
)
|
|
|
(1,671
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
Increase/decrease of IGP-M
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
6,846
|
|
|
|
13,692
|
|
|
|
(13,692
|
)
|
|
|
(6,846
|
)
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of IGP-M variation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
6,846
|
|
|
|
13,692
|
|
|
|
(13,692
|
)
|
|
|
(6,846
|
)
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
21.1.
|
Balances with related parties
|
The
transactions between the Company and related companies are made under conditions and prices established between the parties.
|
|
|
|
|
Current accounts
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current account (a):
|
|
|
|
|
Total SPEs
|
|
|
50,232
|
|
|
|
86,010
|
|
Condominium and consortia (b) and thirty party’s works (c)
|
|
|
7,223
|
|
|
|
9,108
|
|
Loan receivable (d) (Note 20.ii.a)
|
|
|
25,529
|
|
|
|
109,193
|
|
Total Current account – assets
|
|
|
82,984
|
|
|
|
204,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
57,455
|
|
|
|
95,118
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
25,529
|
|
|
|
109,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account (a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SPEs
|
|
|
(76,791
|
)
|
|
|
(76,620
|
)
|
Loan payable (d) (Note 20.ii.a)
|
|
|
(8,820
|
)
|
|
|
(51,482
|
)
|
Total current account – liabilities
|
|
|
(85,611
|
)
|
|
|
(128,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(85,611
|
)
|
|
|
(87,100
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(41,102
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
The Company participates in the development of real estate ventures with other partners,
directly or through related parties, based on the formation of condominiums and/or consortia. The management structure of these
ventures and the cash management are centralized in the lead partner of the venture, which manages the construction schedule and
budgets. Thus, the lead partner ensures that the investments of the necessary funds are made and allocated as planned. The sources
and use of resources of the venture are reflected in these balances, observing the respective interest of each investor, which
are not subject to indexation or financial charges and do not have a fixed maturity date. Such transactions aim at simplifying
business relations that demand the joint management of amounts reciprocally owed by the involved parties and, consequently, the
control over the change of amounts reciprocally granted which offset against each other at the time the current account is closed.
The average term for the development and completion of the ventures in which the resources are invested is between 24 and 30 months.
The Company receives a compensation for the management of these ventures.
|
|
(b)
|
Refers to transactions between the consortia lead partner, partners, and condominiums.
|
|
(c)
|
Refers to operations in third-party’s works.
|
|
(d)
|
The loans of the Company with its associates, presented below, are made to provide associates
with cash to carry out their respective activities, subject to the respective agreed-upon financial charges. The businesses and
operations with related parties are carried out in extremely commutative conditions, in order to protect the interests of the
both parties involved in the business.
|
The
composition, nature and conditions of the balances of loans receivable and payable by the Company are presented below. Maturities
for these loans range from January 2017 to the duration of the related real estate developments and are tied to the cash flows
of the related developments.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
21.
|
Related parties
--Continued
|
|
21.1.
|
Balances with related parties
--Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Nature
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Ipiranga - Liga das Senhoras Católicas.
|
6,635
|
-
|
Construction
|
12% p.a. + IGPM
|
Lagunas - Tembok Planej. E Desenv. Imob. Ltda.
|
4,250
|
-
|
Construction
|
12% p.a. + IGPM
|
Tembok Planej. E Desenv. Imob. Ltda. (Vistta Laguna)
|
-
|
11,044
|
Construction
|
12% p.a. + IGPM
|
Acquarelle Civilcorp Incorporações Ltda.
|
-
|
287
|
Construction
|
12% p.a. + IGPM
|
Manhattan Residencial I (a)
|
2,486
|
53,862
|
Construction
|
10% p.a. + TR
|
Target Offices & Mall
|
12,158
|
3,105
|
Construction
|
12% p.a. + IGPM
|
Scena Laguna - Tembok Planej. e Desenv. Imob. Ltda.
|
-
|
10,520
|
Construction
|
12% p.a. + IGPM
|
Fit Campolim SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
-
|
14,097
|
Construction
|
113.5% of 126.5% of CDI
|
Acedio SPE Emp. Imob. Ltda.
|
-
|
3,260
|
Construction
|
113.5% of 126.5% of CDI
|
Atua Construtora e Incorporadora S.A.
|
-
|
12,168
|
Construction
|
113.50% to 112% of CDI
|
Other
|
-
|
850
|
Construction
|
Several
|
Total loan receivable
|
25,529
|
109,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fit 34 SPE Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda.
|
-
|
21,925
|
Construction
|
6% p.a.
|
Fit 03 SPE Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda.
|
-
|
7,912
|
Construction
|
6% p.a.
|
Fit 11 SPE Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda.
|
-
|
5,910
|
Construction
|
6% p.a.
|
Gafisa Spe-113 Empr Imob
|
-
|
3,788
|
Construction
|
100% do CDI
|
Parque dos Pássaros
|
-
|
2,725
|
Construction
|
6% p.a.
|
Dubai Residencial
|
3,403
|
2,650
|
Construction
|
6% p.a.
|
Parque Árvores
|
2,437
|
2,270
|
Construction
|
6% p.a.
|
Parque Águas
|
2,980
|
1,772
|
Construction
|
6% p.a.
|
Fit 31 SPE Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda.
|
-
|
1,298
|
Construction
|
6% p.a.
|
Araçagy
|
-
|
1,232
|
Construction
|
6% p.a.
|
Total loan payable
|
8,820
|
51,482
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
See change in Note 9 (h).
|
In
the year ended December 31, 2016 the recognized financial income from interest on loans amounted to R$687 (R$10,049 in 2015 and
R$7,622 in 2014) (Note 25).
Information
regarding management transactions and compensation is described in Note 25.
|
21.2.
|
Endorsements, guarantees and sureties
|
The financial transactions of the subsidiaries are
guaranteed by the endorsement or surety in proportion to the interest of the Company in the capital stock of such companies, in
the amount of R$722,990 as of December 31, 2016 (R$1,067,950 in 2015).
|
22.
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Gross operating revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate development, sale, barter transactions and construction services
|
|
|
990,613
|
|
|
|
1,568,566
|
|
|
|
1,704,400
|
|
(Recognition)
Reversal of allowance for doubtful accounts and provision for cancelled contracts (Note 5)
|
|
|
(6,950
|
)
|
|
|
(6,749
|
)
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
Taxes on sale of real estate and services
|
|
|
(67,965
|
)
|
|
|
(118,460
|
)
|
|
|
(124,963
|
)
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
915,698
|
|
|
|
1,443,357
|
|
|
|
1,580,861
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
23.
|
Costs and expenses by nature
|
These
are represented by the following
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Cost of real estate development and sale of properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction cost
|
|
|
(346,827
|
)
|
|
|
(587,636
|
)
|
|
|
(684,220
|
)
|
Land cost
|
|
|
(296,008
|
)
|
|
|
(225,984
|
)
|
|
|
(236,574
|
)
|
Development cost
|
|
|
(42,353
|
)
|
|
|
(51,359
|
)
|
|
|
(57,841
|
)
|
Provision for loss on realization of properties for sale (Note 6)
|
|
|
(160,216
|
)
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Capitalized financial charges (Note 12)
|
|
|
(156,812
|
)
|
|
|
(151,185
|
)
|
|
|
(144,392
|
)
|
Maintenance / warranty
|
|
|
(26,997
|
)
|
|
|
(46,375
|
)
|
|
|
(41,970
|
)
|
Total cost of real estate development and sale
|
|
|
(1,029,213
|
)
|
|
|
(1,061,921
|
)
|
|
|
(1,164,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product marketing expenses
|
|
|
(45,239
|
)
|
|
|
(50,486
|
)
|
|
|
(37,714
|
)
|
Brokerage and sale commission
|
|
|
(28,214
|
)
|
|
|
(18,194
|
)
|
|
|
(2,310
|
)
|
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) and corporate marketing expenses
|
|
|
(20,351
|
)
|
|
|
(28,094
|
)
|
|
|
(38,982
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
|
(1,175
|
)
|
|
|
(16,057
|
)
|
Total selling expenses
|
|
|
(94,946
|
)
|
|
|
(97,949
|
)
|
|
|
(95,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and payroll charges
|
|
|
(37,558
|
)
|
|
|
(37,579
|
)
|
|
|
(43,256
|
)
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
(4,331
|
)
|
|
|
(4,551
|
)
|
|
|
(4,409
|
)
|
Travel and utilities
|
|
|
(622
|
)
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
(1,517
|
)
|
Services
|
|
|
(10,608
|
)
|
|
|
(10,063
|
)
|
|
|
(16,928
|
)
|
Rents and condominium fees
|
|
|
(8,037
|
)
|
|
|
(8,984
|
)
|
|
|
(8,762
|
)
|
IT
|
|
|
(18,409
|
)
|
|
|
(13,011
|
)
|
|
|
(14,448
|
)
|
Stock option plan (Note 18.3)
|
|
|
(6,821
|
)
|
|
|
(7,826
|
)
|
|
|
(15,489
|
)
|
Reserve for profit sharing (Note 25.iii)
|
|
|
(18,750
|
)
|
|
|
(14,000
|
)
|
|
|
(19,000
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,449
|
)
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
Total general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(106,585
|
)
|
|
|
(97,442
|
)
|
|
|
(124,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses with lawsuits (Note 16)
|
|
|
(70,796
|
)
|
|
|
(91,193
|
)
|
|
|
(61,869
|
)
|
Expenses with the adjustment to the stock option plan balance of AUSA (Note 18.2)
|
|
|
(3,401
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,679
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(4,795
|
)
|
|
|
(16,441
|
)
|
|
|
435
|
|
Total other income/(expenses), net
|
|
|
(78,992
|
)
|
|
|
(107,634
|
)
|
|
|
(79,113
|
)
|
|
24.
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Financial income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from financial investments
|
|
|
40,940
|
|
|
|
66,153
|
|
|
|
85,405
|
|
Derivative transactions (Note 20 (i) (b))
|
|
|
13,404
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Financial income on loans (Note 21)
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
10,049
|
|
|
|
7,622
|
|
Other financial income
|
|
|
3,408
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
5,094
|
|
Total financial income
|
|
|
58,439
|
|
|
|
77,306
|
|
|
|
98,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on funding, net of capitalization (Note 12)
|
|
|
(34,759
|
)
|
|
|
(56,236
|
)
|
|
|
(82,950
|
)
|
Amortization of debenture cost
|
|
|
(3,053
|
)
|
|
|
(3,831
|
)
|
|
|
(4,144
|
)
|
Payables to venture partners
|
|
|
(1,506
|
)
|
|
|
(1,891
|
)
|
|
|
(2,830
|
)
|
Banking expenses
|
|
|
(9,687
|
)
|
|
|
(4,113
|
)
|
|
|
(2,516
|
)
|
Derivative transactions (Note 20 (i) (b))
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,151
|
)
|
|
|
(7,492
|
)
|
Offered discount and other financial expenses
|
|
|
(35,113
|
)
|
|
|
(44,506
|
)
|
|
|
(14,439
|
)
|
Total financial expenses
|
|
|
(84,118
|
)
|
|
|
(127,728
|
)
|
|
|
(114,371
|
)
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
25.
|
Transactions with management and employees
|
|
(i)
|
Management compensation
|
The amounts recorded in the account
“general and administrative expenses” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, related to the compensation
of the Company’s key management personnel and fiscal council are as follows:
|
Management compensation
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2016
|
Board of Directors
|
Statutory Board
|
Fiscal Council
|
|
|
|
|
Number of members
|
7
|
5
|
3
|
Annual fixed compensation (in R$)
|
|
|
|
Salary / Fees
|
1,682
|
3,575
|
197
|
Direct and indirect benefits
|
-
|
345
|
-
|
Others (INSS)
|
297
|
715
|
39
|
Monthly compensation (in R$)
|
165
|
386
|
20
|
Total compensation
|
1,979
|
4,635
|
236
|
Profit sharing (Note 25 (iii))
|
-
|
2,275
|
-
|
Total compensation and profit sharing
|
1,979
|
6,910
|
236
|
|
Management compensation
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2015
|
Board of Directors
|
Statutory Board
|
Fiscal Council
|
|
|
|
|
Number of members
|
7
|
5
|
3
|
Annual fixed compensation (in R$)
|
|
|
|
Salary / Fees
|
1,693
|
3,575
|
198
|
Direct and indirect benefits
|
-
|
393
|
-
|
Others (INSS)
|
339
|
715
|
40
|
Monthly compensation (in R$)
|
169
|
390
|
29
|
Total compensation
|
2,032
|
4,683
|
238
|
Profit sharing (Note 25 (iii))
|
-
|
2,247
|
-
|
Total compensation and profit sharing
|
2,032
|
6,930
|
238
|
|
Management compensation
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2014
|
Board of Directors
|
Statutory Board
|
Fiscal Council
|
|
|
|
|
Number of members
|
8
|
5
|
3
|
Annual fixed compensation (in R$)
|
|
|
|
Salary / Fees
|
1,720
|
3,630
|
189
|
Direct and indirect benefits
|
19
|
374
|
-
|
Others (INSS)
|
344
|
726
|
38
|
Monthly compensation (in R$)
|
145
|
334
|
16
|
Total compensation
|
2,083
|
4,730
|
227
|
Profit sharing (Note 25 (iii))
|
-
|
3,412
|
-
|
Total compensation and profit sharing
|
2,083
|
8,142
|
227
|
The amount related to the stock
compensation of the Company’s management was R$3,785 for the year ended December 31, 2016 (R$4,861 in 2015 and R$9,744 in
2014).
The maximum aggregate compensation
of the Company’s management members for the year 2016, was established at R$19,823, as approved at the Annual Shareholders’
Meeting held on April 25, 2016.
On the same occasion the compensation
limit of the Fiscal Council members for their next term of office that ends in the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting to be held
in 2017, was approved at R$245.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
25.
|
Transactions with management and employees
--Continued
|
In the year ended December 31,
2016 and December 31, 2015, there were no units sold to the Management and the total receivables is R$957 (R$1,610 in 2015).
The Company has a profit sharing
plan that entitles its employees and management members, and those of its subsidiaries to participate in the distribution of profits
the Company.
This plan is tied to the achievement
of specific targets, established, agreed-upon and approved by the Board of Directors at the beginning of each year.
In the year ended December 31,
2016, the Company recorded a provision for profit sharing amounting to R$18,750 in the consolidated financial statements (R$14,000
in 2015 and R$19,000 in 2014) in the account “General and Administrative Expenses" (Note 23).
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
Executive officers (Note 25(i))
|
2,275
|
2,247
|
3,412
|
Other employees
|
16,475
|
11,753
|
15,588
|
Total profit sharing
|
18,750
|
14,000
|
19,000
|
Profit sharing is calculated and
reserved based on the achievement of the Company’s targets for the period. An assessment is performed subsequent to year-end
of the achievement of the Company’s and its employees’ targets, and the payment shall be made in April 2017.
As presented in the previous tables
and paragraphs, the aggregate compensation of Management and Fiscal Council members of the Company is according to the limit approved
at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 27, 2016.
Gafisa S.A. and its subsidiaries
maintain insurance policies against engineering risk, barter guarantee, guarantee for the completion of the work, and civil liability
related to unintentional personal damages caused to third parties and material damages to tangible assets, as well as against fire
hazards, lightning strikes, electrical damages, natural disasters and gas explosion. The contracted coverage is considered sufficient
by management to cover possible risks involving its assets and/or responsibilities.
The liabilities covered by insurance
and the respective amounts as of December 31, 2016 are as follows:
Insurance type
|
|
Coverage – R$
|
Engineering risks and guarantee for completion of work
|
|
|
833,803
|
|
Civil liability (Directors and Officers – D&O)
|
|
|
162,067
|
|
|
|
|
995,870
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
27.
|
Earning (loss) per share
|
In accordance with CPC 41, the Company presents basic
and diluted loss per share. The comparison data of basic and diluted earnings/loss per share is based on the weighted average number
of shares outstanding for the year, and all dilutive potential shares outstanding for each year presented, respectively.
Diluted earnings per share is computed similarly
to basic earnings per share except that the outstanding shares are increased to include the number of additional shares that would
have been outstanding if the potential dilutive shares attributable to stock options and redeemable shares of noncontrolling interest
had been issued during the respective periods, utilizing the weighted average stock price.
As mentioned in Note 31(i)(a), on February 20, 2017,
the reverse split of the totality of common shares was approved, in the ratio of 13.483023074 to 1, changing from 378,066,162 common
shares to 28,040,162 common shares. All information related to the number of shares was retroactively adjusted to reflect such
reverse split of shares.
The following table presents the calculation of basic
and diluted earnings and loss per share. In view of the loss for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2014, shares with dilutive
potential are not considered, because the impact would be antidilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Basic numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed dividends and interest on equity
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Undistributed profit (loss) from continued operations
|
|
|
(610,141
|
)
|
|
|
44,129
|
|
|
|
66,888
|
|
Undistributed profit (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(553,455
|
)
|
|
|
30,320
|
|
|
|
(109,437
|
)
|
Undistributed profit (loss), available for the holders of common shares
|
|
|
(1,163,596
|
)
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic denominator (in thousands of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares (Note 18.1)
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earning (loss) per share in Reais
|
|
|
(43.222
|
)
|
|
|
2.731
|
|
|
|
(1.427
|
)
|
From continued operations
|
|
|
(22.664
|
)
|
|
|
1.619
|
|
|
|
2.244
|
|
From discontinued operations
|
|
|
(20.558
|
)
|
|
|
1.112
|
|
|
|
(3.671
|
)
|
Diluted numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed dividends and interest on equity
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Undistributed earning (loss) from continued operations
|
|
|
(610,141
|
)
|
|
|
44,129
|
|
|
|
66,888
|
|
Undistributed earning (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(553,455
|
)
|
|
|
30,320
|
|
|
|
(109,437
|
)
|
Undistributed earning (loss), available for the holders of common shares
|
|
|
(1,163,596
|
)
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted denominator (in thousands of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares (Note 18.1)
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Anti-dilution effect
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,448
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earning (loss) per share in Reais
|
|
|
(43.222
|
)
|
|
|
2.712
|
|
|
|
(1.427
|
)
|
From continued operations
|
|
|
(22.664
|
)
|
|
|
1.608
|
|
|
|
2.244
|
|
From discontinued operations
|
|
|
(20.558
|
)
|
|
|
1.105
|
|
|
|
(3.671
|
)
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
The Company's management assesses
segment information on the basis of different business segments rather than based on the geographical regions of operations.
The Company operates in the following segments: Gafisa
(for ventures targeted at high and medium income) and Tenda (for ventures targeted at low income). With the completion of the discontinuation
of Tenda’s operations, (Note 8.2), the Company will have only one segment.
The Company's chief executive officer,
who is responsible for allocating resources to businesses and monitoring their progresses, uses economic present value data, which
is derived from a combination of historical and projected operating results.
The table below provides certain
information related to each segment in the statement of profit or loss and balance sheet.
Segment information provided to
the chief operating decision maker does not segregate operating expenses. No revenues from an individual client represented more
than 10% of net sales and/or services.
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
|
|
Tenda
|
|
(-) Discontinued operations (Note 8.2)
|
|
2016
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
915,698
|
|
|
|
1,052,710
|
|
|
|
(1,052,710
|
)
|
|
|
915,698
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,029,213
|
)
|
|
|
(729,705
|
)
|
|
|
729,705
|
|
|
|
(1,029,213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
(113,515
|
)
|
|
|
323,005
|
|
|
|
(323,005
|
)
|
|
|
(113,515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
(94,946
|
)
|
|
|
(90,490
|
)
|
|
|
90,490
|
|
|
|
(94,946
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(106,585
|
)
|
|
|
(89,739
|
)
|
|
|
89,739
|
|
|
|
(106,585
|
)
|
Other income / (expenses), net
|
|
|
(78,992
|
)
|
|
|
(49,042
|
)
|
|
|
49,042
|
|
|
|
(78,992
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(33,892
|
)
|
|
|
(12,299
|
)
|
|
|
12,299
|
|
|
|
(33,892
|
)
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(84,118
|
)
|
|
|
(47,300
|
)
|
|
|
47,300
|
|
|
|
(84,118
|
)
|
Financial income
|
|
|
58,439
|
|
|
|
27,257
|
|
|
|
(27,257
|
)
|
|
|
58,439
|
|
Tax expenses
|
|
|
(100,080
|
)
|
|
|
(20,966
|
)
|
|
|
20,966
|
|
|
|
(100,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) for the year attributed to the owners of the Parent
|
|
|
(1,220,247
|
)
|
|
|
56,651
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,163,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers (short and long term)
|
|
|
993,962
|
|
|
|
427,147
|
|
|
|
(427,147
|
)
|
|
|
993,962
|
|
Inventories (short and long term)
|
|
|
1,715,699
|
|
|
|
775,287
|
|
|
|
(775,287
|
)
|
|
|
1,715,699
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
638,279
|
|
|
|
659,715
|
|
|
|
1,202,434
|
|
|
|
2,500,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,347,940
|
|
|
|
1,862,149
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,210,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,493,109
|
|
|
|
786,527
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,279,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
|
|
Tenda
|
|
(-) Discontinued operations (Note 8.2)
|
|
2015
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
1,443,357
|
|
|
|
850,962
|
|
|
|
(850,962
|
)
|
|
|
1,443,357
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,061,921
|
)
|
|
|
(605,584
|
)
|
|
|
605,584
|
|
|
|
(1,061,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
381,436
|
|
|
|
245,378
|
|
|
|
(245,378
|
)
|
|
|
381,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
(97,949
|
)
|
|
|
(65,311
|
)
|
|
|
65,311
|
|
|
|
(97,949
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(97,442
|
)
|
|
|
(83,971
|
)
|
|
|
83,971
|
|
|
|
(97,442
|
)
|
Other income / (expenses), net
|
|
|
(107,634
|
)
|
|
|
(52,567
|
)
|
|
|
52,567
|
|
|
|
(107,634
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(32,585
|
)
|
|
|
(14,835
|
)
|
|
|
14,835
|
|
|
|
(32,585
|
)
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(121,207
|
)
|
|
|
(41,051
|
)
|
|
|
41,051
|
|
|
|
(121,207
|
)
|
Financial income
|
|
|
77,306
|
|
|
|
46,825
|
|
|
|
(46,825
|
)
|
|
|
77,306
|
|
Tax expenses
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(6,522
|
)
|
|
|
6,522
|
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) for the year attributed to the owners of the Parent
|
|
|
44,129
|
|
|
|
30,320
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers (short and long term)
|
|
|
1,322,949
|
|
|
|
479,415
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,802,364
|
|
Inventories (short and long term)
|
|
|
1,896,613
|
|
|
|
734,004
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,630,617
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,635,110
|
|
|
|
692,241
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,327,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,854,672
|
|
|
|
1,905,660
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,760,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,884,249
|
|
|
|
778,846
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,663,096
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
28.
|
Segment information
--Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
|
|
Tenda
|
|
(-) Discontinued operations (Note 8.2)
|
|
2014
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
1,580,861
|
|
|
|
570,138
|
|
|
|
(570,138
|
)
|
|
|
1,580,861
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,164,997
|
)
|
|
|
(444,248
|
)
|
|
|
444,248
|
|
|
|
(1,164,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
415,864
|
|
|
|
125,890
|
|
|
|
(125,890
|
)
|
|
|
415,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
(95,063
|
)
|
|
|
(52,978
|
)
|
|
|
52,978
|
|
|
|
(95,063
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(124,833
|
)
|
|
|
(87,073
|
)
|
|
|
87,073
|
|
|
|
(124,833
|
)
|
Other income / (expenses), net
|
|
|
(79,113
|
)
|
|
|
(62,236
|
)
|
|
|
62,236
|
|
|
|
(79,113
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(63,607
|
)
|
|
|
(15,644
|
)
|
|
|
15,644
|
|
|
|
(63,607
|
)
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(114,371
|
)
|
|
|
(51,341
|
)
|
|
|
51,341
|
|
|
|
(114,371
|
)
|
Financial income
|
|
|
98,121
|
|
|
|
58,673
|
|
|
|
(58,673
|
)
|
|
|
98,121
|
|
Tax expenses
|
|
|
(8,949
|
)
|
|
|
(6,328
|
)
|
|
|
6,328
|
|
|
|
(8,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) for the year attributed to the owners of the Parent
|
|
|
66,888
|
|
|
|
(109,437
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers (short and long term)
|
|
|
1,484,766
|
|
|
|
340,553
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,825,319
|
|
Inventories (short and long term)
|
|
|
1,734,634
|
|
|
|
777,708
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,512,342
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,861,263
|
|
|
|
1,006,928
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,868,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,080,663
|
|
|
|
2,125,189
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,205,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,037,820
|
|
|
|
1,042,843
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,147,449
|
|
|
29.
|
Real estate ventures under construction – information and commitments
|
In order to meet the provisions of paragraphs 20
and 21 of ICPC 02, the recognized revenue amounts and incurred costs are presented in the statement of profit or loss, and the
advances received in the account “Payables for purchase of property and advances from customer”. The Company presents
below information on the real estate developments under construction as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Unappropriated sales revenue of units sold
|
|
507,713
|
Unappropriated estimated cost of units sold
|
|
(301,888)
|
Unappropriated estimated cost of units in inventory
|
|
(389,237)
|
|
|
|
(i) Unappropriated sales revenue of units sold
|
|
|
Ventures under construction:
|
|
|
Contracted sales revenue
|
|
1,447,860
|
Appropriated sales revenue
|
|
(940,147)
|
Unappropriated sales revenue (a)
|
|
507,713
|
(ii) Unappropriated estimated cost of units sold
|
|
|
Ventures under construction:
|
|
|
Estimated cost of units
|
|
(862,887)
|
Incurred cost of units
|
|
560,999
|
Unappropriated estimated cost (b)
|
|
(301,888)
|
(iii) Unappropriated estimated costs of units in inventory
|
|
|
Ventures under construction:
|
|
|
Estimated cost of units
|
|
(898,286)
|
Incurred cost of units
|
|
509,049
|
Unappropriated estimated cost
|
|
(389,237)
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
29.
|
Real estate ventures under construction – information and commitments
--Continued
|
|
(a)
|
The unappropriated sales revenue of units sold are measured by the face value of contracts,
plus the contract adjustments and deducted for cancellations, not considering the effects of the levied taxes and adjustment to
present value, and do not include ventures that are subject to restriction due to a suspensive clause (legal period of 180 days
in which the Company can cancel a development), and therefore is not appropriated to profit or loss.
|
|
(b)
|
The estimated cost of units sold and in inventory to be incurred do not include financial
charges, which are appropriated to properties for sale and profit or loss (cost of real estate sold) in proportion to the real
estate units sold as they are incurred.
|
As of December 31, 2016, the percentage
of assets consolidated in the financial statements related to real estate developments included in the asset segregation structure
was 35.7% (33.1% in 2015).
|
30.
|
Communication with regulatory bodies
|
On June 14, 2012, the Company received a subpoena
from the Securities Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement related to the Matter of Certain 20-F Filer Home Builders
listed at SEC, Foreign Private Issuers (FPI). The subpoena requests that the Company produces all documents from January 1, 2010
to July 10, 2012, date of the Company’s reply, related to the preparation of our financial statements, including, among other
things, copies of our financial policies and procedures, board and audit committee’s and operations committee’s meeting
minutes, monthly closing reports and financial packages, any documents relating to possible financial or accounting irregularities
or improprieties, and internal audit reports. The SEC’s investigation is a non-public, fact-finding inquiry and is not clear
what action, if any, the SEC intends to take with respect to the information it gathers. The SEC subpoena does not specify any
charges. As of the publication of these financial statements, no further inquiries or communications have been received from the
SEC related to this matter.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
(i)
|
Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting
|
On February 20, 2017, two Extraordinary Shareholders’
Meetings of the Company were held, and the following main resolutions were taken:
|
a)
|
Reverse split of the totality of common shares issued by the Company, in the ratio of 13.483023074 to 1, thus the 378,066,162
common shares issued by the Company started to represent 28,040,162 common shares, all registered and with no par value, and proportional
adjustment of the authorized capital limit, changing from 600,000,000 to 44,500,405 common shares.
|
|
b)
|
Registering of the offering to the Company’s shareholders of the Preemptive Right to acquire, in proportion to their
respective interests in the Company’s capital, up to 50% of Tenda’s capital stock, for the price of R$8.13 per share,
for cash payment upon the exercise of the Preemptive Right, subject to the conclusion of Gafisa’s capital reduction. The
exercise period of the preemptive right is within 30 days counted as from March 17, 2017, until April 15, 2017. During the Preemptive
Right exercise period, 25,233,408 common shares issued by Tenda were acquired, equivalent to 46.7% of Tenda’s issued shares,
all of them registered and non-par shares, at the purchase price of R$8.13 per share, totaling R$205,147,607.04. Considering the
total number of shares tendered within the scope of the Preemptive Right, during referred period, 1,766,592 common shares issued
by Tenda were not acquired. According to the Notice to Shareholders, referred 1,766,592 common shares issued by Tenda, then, may
be acquired by shareholders who in the Preemptive Right exercise form, expressed their interest in the reserve of unsold shares,
which shall be exercised between April 24, 2017 and April 27, 2017.
|
|
c)
|
Approval of the Company’s capital stock reduction in the total amount of R$219,510,000, changing from R$2,740,661,187.74
to R$2,521,151,187.74, without cancellation of shares, with the delivery to the Company’s shareholders of 1 common share
issued by Tenda for each 1 common share issued by Gafisa owned by the shareholder after the reverse split, excluding the treasury
shares, totaling 27,000,000 common shares issued by Tenda, representing the other 50% of its capital stock.
|
As a result of the resolutions taken above, the Company’s
capital will amount to R$2,521,151,187.74 represented by 28,040,162 common shares, all registered, book-entry, and with no par
value. In case the decrease in Gafisa’s capital is not completed, the Company may not proceed with the disposal of Tenda’s
shares, in which case it will return to the shareholders who exercised their preemptive rights the Price per Share effectively
paid, without any adjustment or indexation. On April 22, 2017 expired the 60-day term provided for by Article 174 of Act 6,404/76
for creditors’ objection to the Company’s capital stock reduction, without any objection. As the conclusion of Gafisa’s
capital reduction was a condition to deliver the shares issued by Tenda, Tenda’s shares acquired within the scope of Preemptive
Right will be delivered to acquirers on May 4, 2017, date when listing will initiate as well as Tenda trades at the traditional
segment of BM&FBovespa.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
31.
|
Subsequent events
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Decrease in the capital of subsidiary Tenda
|
In view of the expiration of the legal term of 60
days from the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of the subsidiary Tenda, held on December 14, 2016, with no opposition
from creditors, the following items are authorized:
|
a)
|
Decrease in the Company’s capital, in the total amount of R$100,000,000, with no cancellation of shares, so that the capital
of subsidiary Tenda changes from R$1,194,000,000 to R$1,094,000,000.
|
|
b)
|
The total amount of the decrease in capital, adjusted by SELIC, will be fully allocated to the parent Gafisa, for partial repayment
of the invested capital, payable as follows: R$50,000,000 plus indexation until December 31, 2018, and the remaining balance until
December 31, 2019, with the possibility of advance in view of certain covenants provided for in the contract.
|
|
(iii)
|
Waiver for non-fulfillment of the restrictive covenant of the CCB
|
As mentioned in Notes 12 and 13, as of December 31,
2016, the Company exceeded the amount established in a restrictive covenant of a CCB issue. Immediately thereafter, the Company
started negotiations with the creditor to obtain a waiver for the non-fulfillment of the ratio established in contractual clauses.
So, on March 22, 2017, the Company obtained the agreement from the bank related to the non-fulfillment of the net debt limit in
relation to the financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017. Therefore, no mandatory early payment and/or declaration
of early maturity of the CCB was required.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
|
|
(a)
|
Description of the GAAP differences
|
The Company’s accounting policies and its consolidated
financial statements comply with and are prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP.
A summary of the Company’s principal accounting
policies under Brazilian GAAP that differ significantly from US GAAP is set forth below.
Under Brazilian GAAP, real estate development and
retail land sales revenues, costs and related expenses are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting,
by project, measuring progress towards completion in terms of actual costs incurred versus total budgeted expenditures for each
stage of a development. Land is treated as a portion of budgeted construction costs and is appropriated proportionally to each
real estate development. Under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, revenues for work completed are recognized prior
to receipt of actual cash proceeds or vice-versa. Revenues start to be recognized under the percentage-of-completion when the Company
is no longer able to cancel the launched project, after the sales period established by law.
Under US GAAP for sale of individual units in a building
the Company follows the guidance of ASC 360-20-40-50 to recognize the sale by the percentage-of-completion method, only when the
individual units in condominium projects are sold separately and all the following criteria are met:
a. Construction is beyond a preliminary stage: Construction
is not beyond a preliminary stage if engineering and design work, execution of construction contracts, site clearance and preparation,
excavation, and completion of the building foundation are incomplete.
b. The buyer is committed to the extent of being unable
to require a refund except for non delivery of the unit.
c. Sufficient units have already been sold to assure
that the entire property will not revert to rental property.
d. Sales prices are collectible.
e. Aggregate sales proceeds and costs can be reasonably
estimated.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
--Continued
|
|
(a)
|
Description of the GAAP differences
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Revenue recognition
--Continued
|
Collectability of the sales price is demonstrated
by the buyer’s commitment to pay for the property, and there is a reasonable likelihood that the Company will collect the
receivable which in turn is supported by substantial initial and continuing investments. When determining if the buyer’s
initial and continuing investments are adequate, the potentially refundable amount, through judicial or other means, determined
based on contractual termination clauses is excluded, pursuant to U.S. GAAP ASC 360.20.40. This standard requires amounts potentially
refundable to a customer to be excluded from the initial and continuing investment test required by ASC 306.20.20, applicable prospectively
as from January 1, 2008.
Additionally, as part of the analysis of this adjustment,
the Company also determined the effect over the non-controlling interest from their consolidated subsidiaries. The amount of income
to the non-controlling interest for this adjustment was R$3,032, R$(378) and R$895 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015
and 2014, respectively (Note 32(b)(i)).
(ii) Business combinations
Until December 31, 2008, under Brazilian GAAP, goodwill
arose from the difference between the amount paid and the Brazilian GAAP book value (normally also the tax basis) of the net assets
acquired. This goodwill was normally attributed to the difference between the book value and the market value of assets acquired
or justified based on expectation of future profitability and was amortized over the remaining useful lives of the assets or up
to ten years. Effective January 1, 2009, goodwill is no longer amortized under Brazilian GAAP as is the case in US GAAP. Negative
goodwill arises under Brazilian GAAP when the book value of assets acquired exceeds the purchase consideration; negative goodwill
is not generally amortized but is realized upon disposal of the investment. For US GAAP purpose, when a business combination process
generates negative goodwill, this amount is allocated first to non-current assets acquired and any remaining amount is recognized
as an extraordinary gain. Additionally, investments in affiliates, including the corresponding goodwill on the acquisition of such
affiliates are tested, at least, annually for impairment.
Under US GAAP, fair values are assigned to acquired
assets and liabilities in business combinations, including identifiable assets. Any residual amount is allocated to goodwill. Goodwill
is not amortized but, instead, is assigned to an entity’s reporting unit and tested for impairment at least annually. The
differences in relation to Brazilian GAAP arise principally from the measurement of the consideration paid under US GAAP using
the fair value of shares and put options issued, and the effects of amortization which are not recorded for US GAAP purposes (goodwill
amortization is also no longer recorded for Brazilian GAAP purposes effective January 1, 2009).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
--Continued
|
|
(a)
|
Description of the GAAP differences
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Business Combination
--Continued
|
Under Brazilian GAAP, the acquisition was consummated
on October 21, 2008. As part of the acquisition of a controlling interest in Tenda, the Company contributed the net assets of FIT
Residencial amounting to R$411,241, acquiring 60% of the shareholders’ equity of Tenda.
Under US GAAP, the total cost of the acquisition
has been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values. Acquired
intangible assets include, R$73,038 assigned to existing development contracts, which were amortized in straight-line over
the estimated useful lives up to 6 years. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the amount of R$11,447 was amortized,
totaling the accumulated amount of R$73,038. Also, R$54,741 was assigned to registered trademarks, which were determined to
have indefinite useful lives, and are not amortized, but are tested for impairment at least annually. A provision for
impairment loss for its total amount was recorded due to Tenda’s presentation as a discontinued operation (Notes 8.2
and 32(d)(iv)).
On December 31, 2009, the shareholders of Gafisa and
Tenda approved the merger by Gafisa of total outstanding shares issued by Tenda. Because of the merger, Tenda became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Gafisa on this date.
On October 26, 2007, the Company acquired 70% of Cipesa.
The Company and Cipesa formed a new company, Cipesa Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda. (“Nova Cipesa”), in which
Gafisa had 70% of the capital and Cipesa had 30%. At the time, the acquisition total amounted to R$90,000 and goodwill amounted
to R$40,687 was recorded, based on expected future profitability under BR GAAP. On November 21, 2014, the Company acquired the
remaining portion of Cipesa Empreendimentos Imobiliários and as a result of this transaction, the Company recorded a net
effect of the write-off of goodwill, in the amount of R$17,604.
Under US GAAP, the total cost of the acquisition had
been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values. The amounts of R$41,634
and R$39,577, related to goodwill and obligation canceled due to the acquisition of the remaining portion in 2014, respectively,
were totally written-off in the year ended December 31, 2014. Therefore, as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there are
no longer differences between Brazilian GAAP and US GAAP.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(a)
|
Description of the GAAP differences
--Continued
|
|
(iii)
|
Classification of balance sheet line items
|
Under Brazilian GAAP, the classification of certain
balance sheet items is presented differently from US GAAP. The Company has recast its consolidated balance sheet under Brazilian
GAAP to present a condensed consolidated balance sheet in accordance with US GAAP (Note 32(d)(i)). The reclassifications are summarized
as follows:
·
Under
Brazilian GAAP, restricted cash is presented as short-term investment in the balance sheet (Note 4.2(d)). For US GAAP purposes,
restricted cash is presented separately outside of short-term investment.
·
Under
Brazilian GAAP accounts receivable present value adjustment and monetary variation are recorded in the operating revenue. For US
GAAP purpose the realization of accounts receivable present value adjustment and monetary variation are classified in the financial
income/expense.
·
Under
Brazilian GAAP, deferred income taxes are netted and classified as non-current liabilities. For US GAAP purposes, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are netted and classified as current or non-current based on the classification of the underlying temporary
difference.
·
Under
Brazilian GAAP, the assets and liabilities included within a disposal group classified as held for sale, must be presented separately
in a single line only for the current year. For US GAAP purposes, according to ASU 2014-08, an entity is required to present, for
each comparative period, the assets and liabilities of a disposal group that includes an asset classified as held for sale operation
separately in the asset and liabilities sections, respectively, of the statement of financial position.
·
Under
Brazilian GAAP, when the Company is in breach of a covenant, the waiver must be in place before the balance sheet date in order
for the debt to be classified as a non-current liability. Under US GAAP even if the waiver is obtained after the balance sheet
date, but before the issuance of the financial statements, the debt will still be classified as a non-current liability.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
- Continued
|
|
(a)
|
Description of the GAAP differences
--Continued
|
|
(iv)
|
Classification of statement of income (operations) line
items
|
Under Brazilian GAAP, in addition to the issues noted
above, the classification of certain income and expense items is presented differently from US GAAP. The Company has recast its
statement of income (loss) prepared under the Brazilian GAAP to present a condensed consolidated statement of income (loss) in
accordance with US GAAP (Note 32(d)(ii)). The reclassifications are summarized as follows:
·
The
net income differences between Brazilian GAAP and US GAAP (Note 32(b)(i)) were incorporated in the consolidated statement of profit
or loss in accordance with US GAAP.
(v) Deferred
income tax
Deferred income tax differences between Brazilian
GAAP and US GAAP are related to the recognition of deferred income tax on the adjustments mentioned above.
Under Brazilian GAAP deferred tax assets are recognized
for the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences and unused tax losses carried forward based on tax profitability
history and estimated future taxable income, which takes into account all factors concerning entity´s expected future profitability.
The deferred tax asset is derecognized to the extent that it is no longer probable that taxable profit will be available to
compensate deferred tax assets. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company has derecognized a portion of the previously
recognized deferred tax assets since it is no longer possible to estimate the expected future profitability to compensate deferred
tax assets. As of December 31, 2016, the recognition of deferred income tax under Brazilian GAAP is converged with US GAAP.
Under US GAAP deferred tax assets are recognized for
the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards. A valuation allowance to reduce the deferred
tax asset is recognized if upon available evidences, both positive and negative, and the weight of those evidences, the deferred
tax asset is the more-likely-than-not that will not be recoverable (the amounts recognized as valuation allowance in the respective
years are reversal of R$141,177 in 2016,expense of R$19,722 in 2015 and reversal of R$16,156 in 2014).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(b)
|
Reconciliation of significant differences between Brazilian
GAAP and US GAAP
|
|
|
Note
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) under Brazilian GAAP attributable to owners of Gafisa S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,163,596
|
)
|
|
|
74,449
|
|
|
|
(42,549
|
)
|
Revenue recognition - net operating revenue
|
|
|
32
|
(a)(i)
|
|
|
(61,125
|
)
|
|
|
21,232
|
|
|
|
224,280
|
|
Revenue recognition - operating costs
|
|
|
32
|
(a)(i)
|
|
|
43,424
|
|
|
|
(1,838
|
)
|
|
|
(151.591
|
)
|
Business Combination
|
|
|
32
|
(a)(ii)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39,577
|
|
Non-controlling interests on adjustments above
|
|
|
32
|
(a)(i)
|
|
|
3,032
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
895
|
|
Equity pick-up
|
|
|
32
|
(a)(i)
|
|
|
(15,284
|
)
|
|
|
(54,445
|
)
|
|
|
(7,518
|
)
|
Present value adjustment on revenue recognition adjustments above and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,302
|
|
|
|
(11,316
|
)
|
|
|
(20,534
|
)
|
Deferred income tax on adjustments above
|
|
|
32
|
(a)(v)
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
|
(6,863
|
)
|
|
|
(21,720
|
)
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
32
|
(a)(v)
|
|
|
(4,139
|
)
|
|
|
(19,722
|
)
|
|
|
16,156
|
|
Reversal of valuation allowance in US GAAP to offset 2016 recognition in BRGAAP
|
|
|
32
|
(a)(v)
|
|
|
145,316
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Discontinued operation adjustments
|
|
|
32
|
(b)(i)(b)
|
|
|
53,519
|
|
|
|
(11,204
|
)
|
|
|
5,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders of Gafisa under US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(985,156
|
)
|
|
|
(10,084
|
)
|
|
|
42,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the non-controlling interests under US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
|
(3,092
|
)
|
|
|
(2,071
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) under US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(986,317
|
)
|
|
|
(13,176
|
)
|
|
|
40,234
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding in the year (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to shareholders of Gafisa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
32
|
(d)(iv)
|
|
|
(36.5943
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3699
|
)
|
|
|
1.4192
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
32
|
(d)(iv)
|
|
|
(36.5943
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3699
|
)
|
|
|
1.4133
|
|
|
(a)
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
Note
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) under Brazilian GAAP from continuing operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(602,021
|
)
|
|
|
34,761
|
|
|
|
66,454
|
|
Revenue recognition - net operating revenue
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
(61,125
|
)
|
|
|
21,232
|
|
|
|
224,280
|
|
Revenue recognition - operating costs
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
43,424
|
|
|
|
(1,838
|
)
|
|
|
(151,591
|
)
|
Business Combination
|
|
|
32(a)(ii)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39,577
|
|
Equity pick-up
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
(15,284
|
)
|
|
|
(54,445
|
)
|
|
|
(7,518
|
)
|
Present value adjustment on revenue recognition adjustments above and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,302
|
|
|
|
(11,315
|
)
|
|
|
(20,534
|
)
|
Deferred income tax on adjustments above
|
|
|
32(a)(v)
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
|
(6,863
|
)
|
|
|
(21,720
|
)
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
32(a)(v)
|
|
|
(4,139
|
)
|
|
|
(19,722
|
)
|
|
|
16,156
|
|
Reversal of valuation allowance in US GAAP to offset 2016 recognition in BRGAAP
|
|
|
32(a)(v)
|
|
|
145,316
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) under US GAAP from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(480,132
|
)
|
|
|
(38,190
|
)
|
|
|
145,104
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding in the year (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
32(d)(iv)
|
|
|
(17.8349
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4009
|
)
|
|
|
4.8052
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
32(d)(iv)
|
|
|
(17.8349
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4009
|
)
|
|
|
4.7851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
--Continued
|
|
(b)
|
Reconciliation of significant differences between Brazilian GAAP and US GAAP
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Net income (loss)
--Continued
|
|
(b)
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
Note
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) under Brazilian GAAP from discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559,704
|
)
|
|
|
36,218
|
|
|
|
(110,179
|
)
|
Revenue recognition - net operating revenue
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
(5,874
|
)
|
|
|
35,902
|
|
|
|
69,365
|
|
Revenue recognition - operating costs
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
(9,713
|
)
|
|
|
(53,715
|
)
|
|
|
(58,774
|
)
|
Business Combination
|
|
|
32(a)(ii)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11,447
|
)
|
Equity pick-up
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
5,808
|
|
|
|
5,616
|
|
Present value adjustment on revenue recognition adjustments above and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
Deferred income tax on adjustments above
|
|
|
32(a)(v)
|
|
|
(2,737
|
)
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
9,991
|
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
32(a)(v)
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(9,493
|
)
|
Impairment loss remeasurement
|
|
|
32(d)(iv)
|
|
|
66,748
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Discontinued operation adjustments
|
|
|
32(b)(i)
|
|
|
53,519
|
|
|
|
(11,204
|
)
|
|
|
5,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) under US GAAP from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506,185
|
)
|
|
|
25,014
|
|
|
|
(104,870
|
)
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding in the year (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
32(d)(iv)
|
|
|
(18.8026
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9175
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4554
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
32(d)(iv)
|
|
|
(18.8026
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9113
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4554
|
)
|
|
|
Note
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity under Brazilian GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928,324
|
|
|
|
3,095,491
|
|
|
|
3,055,345
|
|
Revenue recognition - net operating revenue
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
(492,647
|
)
|
|
|
(690,812
|
)
|
|
|
(745,136
|
)
|
Revenue recognition - operating costs
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
350,409
|
|
|
|
445,749
|
|
|
|
502,365
|
|
Business Combination
|
|
|
32(a)(ii)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
56,266
|
|
|
|
56,266
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
9,054
|
|
Non-controlling interests on adjustments above
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
US GAAP adjustment equity accounted investees
|
|
|
32(a)(i)
|
|
|
(79,409
|
)
|
|
|
(63,382
|
)
|
|
|
(14,818
|
)
|
Deferred income tax on adjustments above
|
|
|
32(a)(v)
|
|
|
38,221
|
|
|
|
42,819
|
|
|
|
47,542
|
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
32(a)(v)
|
|
|
(35,956
|
)
|
|
|
(39,535
|
)
|
|
|
(47,542
|
)
|
Constitution of valuation allowance in US GAAP to offset recognition in BRGAAP
|
|
|
32(a)(v)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(145,316
|
)
|
|
|
(117,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to shareholders of Gafisa under US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,711,614
|
|
|
|
2,702,234
|
|
|
|
2,747,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to non-controlling interests under US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|
|
2,648
|
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity under US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,710,653
|
|
|
|
2,704,882
|
|
|
|
2,750,871
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
– Continued
|
|
(b)
|
Reconciliation of significant differences between Brazilian GAAP and US GAAP
--Continued
|
Condensed
changes in total equity under US GAAP
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At beginning of the year
|
|
|
2,704,882
|
|
|
|
2,750,871
|
|
|
|
2,822,245
|
|
Changes in equity, BRGAAP
|
|
|
(8,684
|
)
|
|
|
(23,558
|
)
|
|
|
(108,344
|
)
|
Stock options
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
6,937
|
|
|
|
15,514
|
|
Net profit (loss) attributable to Gafisa
|
|
|
(985,156
|
)
|
|
|
(10,084
|
)
|
|
|
42,305
|
|
Declared mandatory dividend
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,682
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(3,609
|
)
|
|
|
(691
|
)
|
|
|
(19,735
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
(911
|
)
|
|
|
(1,114
|
)
|
At end of the year
|
|
|
1,710,653
|
|
|
|
2,704,882
|
|
|
|
2,750,871
|
|
Condensed equity under US GAAP
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, comprising 361,067,658 shares outstanding
(2015 – 367,481,406; 2014 – 378,184,876)
|
|
|
2,740,662
|
|
|
|
2,740,662
|
|
|
|
2,740,662
|
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
(32,524
|
)
|
|
|
(25,980
|
)
|
|
|
(79,059
|
)
|
Accumulated reserve (losses)
|
|
|
(996,524
|
)
|
|
|
(12,448
|
)
|
|
|
85,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity attributable to shareholders of Gafisa
|
|
|
1,711,614
|
|
|
|
2,702,234
|
|
|
|
2,747,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|
|
2,648
|
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,710,653
|
|
|
|
2,704,882
|
|
|
|
2,750,871
|
|
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
|
|
(i)
|
Recently adopted US GAAP accounting standards
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12 - Compensation—stock
compensation (Topic 718). Some share-based payment awards that require a specific performance target to be achieved before the
employee can benefit from the award, also require an employee to render service until the performance target is achieved. In some
cases, the terms of an award may provide that the performance target could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite
service period. That is, the employee would be entitled to benefit from the award regardless of whether the employee is rendering
service on the date the performance target is achieved. Some entities account for those performance targets as performance conditions
that affect the vesting of the award and, therefore, do not reflect the performance target in the estimate of the grant-date fair
value. Others treat them as nonvesting conditions that affect the grant-date
fair value of the award. The amendments apply to reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the
terms of the award provide that a performance target can be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments in ASU
2014-12 are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier
adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Recently adopted US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-17 - Business
combinations (Topic 805) - Pushdown Accounting. The objective of ASU 2014-17 is to provide guidance for determining whether and
at what threshold an acquiree (acquired entity) that is a business or nonprofit activity can reflect the acquirer's accounting
and reporting basis (pushdown accounting) in its separate financial statements. Paragraphs 805-50-S99-1 through S99-4 of the Codification
provide limited guidance for SEC registrants for determining whether and when a new accounting and reporting basis should be established
in an acquiree's separate financial statements. However, because diversity in practice exists with respect to the application of
pushdown accounting among entities that are not SEC registrants, the amendments provide guidance for entities that are SEC registrants
and for those that are not. The amendments in ASU 2014-17 are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired
entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event.
The adoption of ASU 2014-17 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, Income
statement - Extraordinary and unusual items (Subtopic 225-20). The objective of ASU 2015-01 is to simplify the income statement
presentation requirements in Subtopic 225-20 by eliminating the concept of extraordinary items. Extraordinary items are events
and transactions that are distinguished by their unusual nature and by the infrequency of their occurrence. Eliminating the extraordinary
classification simplifies income statement presentation by altogether removing the concept of extraordinary items from consideration.
The amendments in ASU 2015-01 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December
15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively and also may apply the amendments retrospectively to all prior
periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning
of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2015-01 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Recently adopted US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation
(Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 affects the following areas: (i) Limited partnerships and similar
legal entities, (ii) Evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest, (iii) The effect of
fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination, (iv) The effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination
and (v) Certain investment funds. The amendments in ASU 2015-02 affect reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether
they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation
model. Overall, the amendments in ASU 2015-02 are an improvement to current GAAP because they simplify the Codification and reduce
the number of consolidation models through the elimination of the indefinite deferral of Statement 167 and because they place more
emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. The amendments in ASU 2015-02 are effective for public
business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption
of ASU 2015-02 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03 –
Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). To simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs, ASU 2015-03 requires
that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of debt liability, consistent
with debt discounts or premiums. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs would not be affected by ASU
2015-03. For public business entities, ASU 2015-03 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 was applied on a retrospective basis
and did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05 - Intangibles—Goodwill
and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40). The amendments in this Update provide guidance to customers about whether
a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement
includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with
the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer
should account for the arrangement as a service contract. For public business entities, the amendments will be effective for annual
periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-05
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Recently adopted US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07: Disclosures
for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). Under the amendments in this
Update, investments for which fair value is measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) using the practical expedient
should not be categorized in the fair value hierarchy. Removing those investments from the fair value hierarchy not only eliminates
the diversity in practice resulting from the way in which investments measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent)
with future redemption dates are classified, but also ensures that all investments categorized in the fair value hierarchy are
classified using a consistent approach. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2015-07 did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15 - Presentation
and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. This Accounting Standards Update
adds SEC paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Announcement at the June 18, 2015 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting about
the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements. For public business
entities, the amendments in this Update should be adopted concurrent with adoption of ASU 2015-03. The adoption of ASU 2015-15
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16 -
Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. The amendments in this Update require that an acquirer recognize
adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment
amounts are determined. The amendments in this Update require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements,
the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to
the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. An entity should present separately
on the face of the income statement or disclose in the
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period
earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts
had been recognized as of the acquisition date. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2015-16 did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Recently adopted US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-19: Technical
Corrections and Improvements. The amendments in this Update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification.
The reason for each amendment is provided before each of the amendments for clarity and ease of understanding. The amendments generally
fall into one of the following types of categories: Amendments related to differences between original guidance and the Accounting
Standards Codification; Guidance clarification and reference corrections; Simplification and Minor improvements. Most of the amendments
in this Update do not require transition guidance and are effective upon issuance of this Update. Early adoption is permitted for
the amendments that require transition guidance. The adoption of ASU 2016-19 did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 - Revenue
from contracts with customers (Topic 606). The amendments in ASU 2014-09 create revenue from contracts with customers (Topic 606),
and supersede the revenue recognition requirements in revenue recognition (topic 605), including most industry-specific revenue
recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, the amendments supersede the cost guidance
in revenue recognition—construction-type and production-type contracts (subtopic 605-35), and create new subtopic 340-40,
other assets and deferred costs—Contracts with Customers. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity
recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 are effective
for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application
is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impacts of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 - Presentation
of financial statements—going concern (Subtopic 205-40). The Update provides U.S. GAAP guidance on management’s responsibility
in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern
and about related footnote disclosures. For each reporting period, management will be required to evaluate whether there are conditions
or events that raise substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the
date the financial statements are issued. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December
15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is
not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 - Simplifying
the Measurement of Inventory. The amendments in this Update more closely align the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement
of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). An entity should measure inventory within the scope of this
Update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course
of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged
for inventory measured using LIFO or the retail inventory method. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application
is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2015-11 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 - Balance
Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this Update require
that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The amendments
in this Update apply to all entities that present a classified statement of financial position. The current requirement that deferred
tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by
the amendments in this Update. The amendments in this Update will align the presentation of deferred income tax assets and liabilities
with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective
for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods.
Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2015-17 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 - Recognition
and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendments in this Update address certain aspects of recognition,
measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. For public business entities, the amendments
in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 - Leases
(Topic 842). The FASB is issuing this Update to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease
assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. To meet that objective,
the FASB is amending the FASB Accounting Standards Codification® and creating Topic 842, Leases. This Update, along with IFRS
16, Leases, are the results of the FASB’s and the International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB’s) efforts
to meet that objective and improve financial reporting. The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the assets
and liabilities that arise from leases. All leases create an asset and a liability for the lessee in accordance with FASB Concepts
Statement No. 6, Elements of Financial Statements, and, therefore, recognition of those lease assets and lease liabilities represents
an improvement over previous GAAP, which did not require lease assets and lease liabilities to be recognized for most leases. The
accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under previous GAAP. For public business entities, the amendments
in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. Earlier application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impacts of the adoption of ASU 2014-16 on our consolidated
financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07 - Simplifying
the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. The amendments in this Update eliminate the requirement to retroactively adopt
the equity method of accounting. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is
permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-07 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08 - Principal
versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). The core principle of the guidance in Topic 606 is that an entity
should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those
goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: 1. Identify the contract(s) with
a customer; 2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3. Determine the transaction price; 4. Allocate the transaction
price to the performance obligations in the contract; and 5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance
obligation. The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance. The amendments clarify the implementation
guidance on principal versus agent considerations.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
For public business entities, the amendments in this
Update affect the guidance in Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is
not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective
date and transition requirements of Update 2014-09. Earlier application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impacts of
the adoption of ASU 2016-08 on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09: Improvements
to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The areas for simplification in this Update involve several aspects of the accounting
for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities,
and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 is
not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10: Revenue
from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The core principle of the guidance
in Topic 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an
amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The
amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this Update
clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance,
while retaining the related principles for those areas. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this
Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09).
We are currently evaluating the impacts of the adoption of ASU 2016-10 on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12: Revenue
from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The core principle of the guidance
in Topic 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an
amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The
amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this Update
affect only some of the narrow aspects of Topic 606.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
The effective date and transition requirements for
the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any other Topic
amended by Update 2014-09). We are currently evaluating the impacts of the adoption of ASU 2016-12 on our consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13: Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in this Update
require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected
to be collected. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial
asset(s) to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. In addition, available-for-sale
accounting recognizes that value may be realized either through collection of contractual cash flows or through sale of the security.
Therefore, the amendments limit the amount of the allowance for credit losses to the amount by which fair value is below amortized
cost because the classification as available for sale is premised on an investment strategy that recognizes that the investment
could be sold at fair value, if cash collection would result in the realization of an amount less than fair value. The amendments
in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. Early adoption is permitted as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those
fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impacts of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15: Statement
of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in this Update provide guidance
on the following eight specific cash flow issues: debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero-coupon debt
instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate
of the borrowing; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance
claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life
insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; distributions received from equity method investees; beneficial
interests in securitization transactions; and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle.
The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16: Income
Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The Board decided that an entity should recognize the
income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Consequently, the
amendments in this Update eliminate the exception for an intraentity transfer of an asset other than inventory. Two common examples
of assets included in the scope of this Update are intellectual property and property, plant, and equipment. The amendments in
this Update do not include new disclosure requirements; however, existing disclosure requirements might be applicable when accounting
for the current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The amendments in this
Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within
those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-16 is not expected to have a material impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17: Consolidation
(Topic 810): Interests held through Related Parties that are under Common Control. The amendments in this Update do not change
the characteristics of a primary beneficiary in current generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Therefore, a primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity (VIE) has both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities of a VIE
that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could
potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. The amendments in this Update improve GAAP because, in situations involving common control, a single decision maker focuses
on the economics to which it is exposed when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE before potentially evaluating
which party is most closely associated with the VIE. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating
the impacts of the adoption of ASU 2016-17 on our consolidated financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18: Statement
of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The amendments in this Update require that a statement of cash flows explain the change
during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash
equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with
cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash
flows. The amendments in this Update do not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The amendments
in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20: Technical
Corrections and Improvements (Topic 606): Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this Update include items brought
to the Board’s attention through a variety of sources, including: the Codification’s online feedback mechanism; submissions
to the Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition (TRG); and stakeholders’ technical inquiries. The amendments in
this Update affect narrow aspects of the guidance issued in Update 2014-09. The effective date and transition requirements for
the amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update
2014-09). We are currently evaluating the impacts of the adoption of ASU 2016-20 on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01: Business
Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. Under the current implementation guidance in Topic 805, there
are three elements of a business—inputs, processes, and outputs. While an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively
referred to as a “set”) that is a business usually has outputs, outputs are not required to be present. In addition,
all the inputs and processes that a seller uses in operating a set are not required if market participants can acquire the set and continue to
produce outputs, for example, by integrating the acquired set with their own inputs and processes.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
The amendments in this Update provide a screen to
determine when a set is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired
(or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business.
This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated. The amendments in this Update are effective to
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. Early adoption is permitted.
The adoption of ASU 2017-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03: Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323) - Amendments to SEC
Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the September 22, 2016 and November 17, 2016 EITF Meetings. This Accounting Standards
Update adds an SEC paragraph and amends other Topics pursuant to an SEC Staff Announcement made at the September 22, 2016 and November
17, 2016 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meetings: Amendments to Topic 250 - Accounting changes and error corrections; Amendments
to Topic 326 - Financially instruments - Credit losses; Amendments to Topic 606 - Revenue from contracts with customers; Amendments
to Topic 842 - Leases and Amendments to Topic 323 - Investments - Equity method and joint ventures- Income taxes. The effective
date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements
of the respective amended Topics. The adoption of ASU 2017-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04: Intangibles—Goodwill
and Other (Topic 350). Under the amendments in this Update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment
test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge
for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should
not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects
from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable.
The amendments in this Update are effective for the Company’s annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.
The adoption of ASU 2017-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05: Other
Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20). The amendments in this Update clarify
that a financial asset is within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 if it meets the definition of an in substance nonfinancial asset.
The amendments in this Update also clarify that nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 may include nonfinancial
assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty. The amendments in this Update clarify that an entity should identify
each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset promised to a counterparty and derecognize each asset when
a counterparty obtains control of it. The amendments also clarify that an entity should allocate consideration to each distinct
asset by applying the guidance in Topic 606 on allocating the transaction price to performance obligations. The amendments in this
Update require an entity to derecognize a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in substance nonfinancial asset in a partial
sale transaction when it (1) does not have (or ceases to have) a controlling financial interest in the legal entity that holds
the asset in accordance with Topic 810 and (2) transfers control of the asset in accordance with Topic 606. The amendments in this
Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within
that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2017-05 is not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-06: Defined
Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965).
The amendments in this Update require all plans to disclose (1) their master trust’s other asset and liability balances and
(2) the dollar amount of the plan’s interest in each of those balances. The amendments will require the health and welfare
benefit plan to disclose the name of the defined benefit pension plan in which those investment disclosures are provided, so that
participants can easily access those statements for information about the 401(h) account assets, if needed. The amendments in this
Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2017-06
is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07: Compensation—Retirement
Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The
amendments in this Update require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line
item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The amendments
in this Update also allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable (for example, as a
cost of internally manufactured inventory or a self-constructed asset).
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
32. Supplemental Information
- Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US
GAAP” for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
(c)
|
Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
--Continued
|
The amendments in this Update are effective for annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted.
The adoption of ASU 2017-07 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08: Receivables—Nonrefundable
Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. The amendments in this Update
shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the
premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a
discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU
2017-08 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
|
Based on the reconciling items and discussion above,
the Gafisa S.A. consolidated balance sheets, statements of income (loss), and statement of changes in shareholders’ equity
(see b(ii)) under US GAAP have been recast in condensed format as follows:
(i) Condensed consolidated balance sheets
under US GAAP
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
(Restated)
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
29,534
|
|
|
|
60,987
|
|
|
|
48,280
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
212,066
|
|
|
|
402,020
|
|
|
|
605,466
|
|
Restricted short-term investments
|
|
|
11,580
|
|
|
|
15,030
|
|
|
|
8,936
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
446,612
|
|
|
|
694,818
|
|
|
|
865,889
|
|
Properties for sale
|
|
|
1,489,232
|
|
|
|
1,712,507
|
|
|
|
1,454,597
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
9,712
|
|
Other
|
|
|
110,470
|
|
|
|
146,553
|
|
|
|
187,909
|
|
Assets held from sale (Note 32(d)(iv)
|
|
|
1,259,297
|
|
|
|
1,841,911
|
|
|
|
2,095,928
|
|
|
|
|
3,561,339
|
|
|
|
4,876,159
|
|
|
|
5,276,717
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in associates
|
|
|
720,502
|
|
|
|
802,252
|
|
|
|
838,880
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
23,977
|
|
|
|
22,819
|
|
|
|
13,585
|
|
Intangibles assets
|
|
|
27,553
|
|
|
|
34,432
|
|
|
|
55,600
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
185,817
|
|
|
|
284,109
|
|
|
|
291,981
|
|
Properties for sale
|
|
|
592,975
|
|
|
|
506,719
|
|
|
|
590,030
|
|
Other
|
|
|
93,476
|
|
|
|
161,683
|
|
|
|
157,644
|
|
|
|
|
1,644,975
|
|
|
|
1,812,689
|
|
|
|
1,941,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,206,314
|
|
|
|
6,688,848
|
|
|
|
7,225,112
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
--Continued
|
|
(i)
|
Condensed consolidated balance sheets under US GAAP
--Continued
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
(Restated)
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing
|
|
|
604,795
|
|
|
|
663,466
|
|
|
|
530,851
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
314,139
|
|
|
|
187,744
|
|
|
|
314,770
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties
|
|
|
170,364
|
|
|
|
194,828
|
|
|
|
265,421
|
|
Payables for goods and services suppliers
|
|
|
79,120
|
|
|
|
43,666
|
|
|
|
71,670
|
|
Taxes and labor contributions
|
|
|
34,111
|
|
|
|
46,952
|
|
|
|
60,555
|
|
Advances from customers
|
|
|
181,977
|
|
|
|
136,658
|
|
|
|
142,820
|
|
Obligations assumed on the assignment of receivables
|
|
|
34,698
|
|
|
|
23,482
|
|
|
|
24,135
|
|
Declared dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
284,857
|
|
|
|
366,873
|
|
|
|
338,523
|
|
Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale (Note 32(d)(iv)
|
|
|
722,516
|
|
|
|
805,596
|
|
|
|
1,097,872
|
|
|
|
|
2,426,577
|
|
|
|
2,486,947
|
|
|
|
2,846,617
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing
|
|
|
581,505
|
|
|
|
582,916
|
|
|
|
817,641
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
137,129
|
|
|
|
468,337
|
|
|
|
484,712
|
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
100,405
|
|
|
|
157,795
|
|
|
|
124,388
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties
|
|
|
90,309
|
|
|
|
146,102
|
|
|
|
80,069
|
|
Obligations assumed on the assignment of receivables
|
|
|
64,332
|
|
|
|
35,811
|
|
|
|
31,994
|
|
Payables to venture partners
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
4,713
|
|
Provisions for legal claims
|
|
|
83,904
|
|
|
|
82,563
|
|
|
|
66,806
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,360
|
|
|
|
22,173
|
|
|
|
17,301
|
|
|
|
|
1,069,084
|
|
|
|
1,497,019
|
|
|
|
1,627,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to shareholders of Gafisa
|
|
|
1,711,614
|
|
|
|
2,702,234
|
|
|
|
2,747,532
|
|
Equity attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|
|
2,648
|
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,710,653
|
|
|
|
2,704,882
|
|
|
|
2,750,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
5,206,314
|
|
|
|
6,688,848
|
|
|
|
7,225,112
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
--Continued
|
|
(ii)
|
Condensed consolidated statements of operations under
US GAAP
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Gross operating revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
Real estate development and sales of properties
|
|
|
920,181
|
|
|
|
1,580,651
|
|
|
|
1,927,672
|
|
Taxes on services and revenues
|
|
|
(65,609
|
)
|
|
|
(116,060
|
)
|
|
|
(122,532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
854,572
|
|
|
|
1,464,591
|
|
|
|
1,805,140
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(985,789
|
)
|
|
|
(1,072,817
|
)
|
|
|
(1,316,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross (loss) profit
|
|
|
(131,217
|
)
|
|
|
391,774
|
|
|
|
488,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(201,777
|
)
|
|
|
(195,147
|
)
|
|
|
(219,330
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(114,405
|
)
|
|
|
(140,222
|
)
|
|
|
(103,143
|
)
|
Income (loss) before financial income and expenses and income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(447,399
|
)
|
|
|
56,405
|
|
|
|
166,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
58,439
|
|
|
|
77,306
|
|
|
|
98,121
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(73,048
|
)
|
|
|
(130,229
|
)
|
|
|
(135,471
|
)
|
Income (loss) before income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(462,008
|
)
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
128,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(10,722
|
)
|
|
|
(14,763
|
)
|
|
|
(25,304
|
)
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
56,214
|
|
|
|
(12,479
|
)
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
Total income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
45,492
|
|
|
|
(27,242
|
)
|
|
|
(14,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in results and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(416,516
|
)
|
|
|
(23,760
|
)
|
|
|
114,217
|
|
Income from equity method investments
|
|
|
(63,616
|
)
|
|
|
(14,430
|
)
|
|
|
30,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income for the year for continuing operations
|
|
|
(480,132
|
)
|
|
|
(38,190
|
)
|
|
|
145,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income for the year for discontinued operations
|
|
|
(506,185
|
)
|
|
|
25,014
|
|
|
|
(104,870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income for the year
|
|
|
(986,317
|
)
|
|
|
(13,176
|
)
|
|
|
40,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
|
(3,092
|
)
|
|
|
(2,071
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to shareholders of Gafisa
|
|
|
(985,156
|
)
|
|
|
(10,084
|
)
|
|
|
42,305
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
--Continued
|
|
(iii)
|
Condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income for the year
|
(986,317)
|
(13,176)
|
40,234
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes
|
(986,317)
|
(13,176)
|
40,234
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
(1,161)
|
(3,092)
|
(2,071)
|
Shareholders of Gafisa
|
(985,156)
|
(10,084)
|
42,305
|
|
(iv)
|
Disposal group held for sale
|
As explained in Note 8.2, the results of operations
of Tenda have been presented as discontinued operations in the Company’s 2016, 2015 and 2014 consolidated statements of operations.
As required by ASC 205-20-50 – Presentation
of Financial Statements – Discontinued Operations, the information of the statements of operations, as of December 31, 2015
and 2014 are being presented on the same basis of the current year, and its retrospective effects are as follows:
|
|
Originally reported as of 12/31/2015
|
|
Discontinued operation reclassification
|
|
12/31/2015
|
|
Originally reported as of 12/31/2014
|
|
Discontinued operation reclassification
|
|
12/31/2014
|
Statement of profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
2,351,528
|
|
|
|
(886,937
|
)
|
|
|
1,464,591
|
|
|
|
2,446,548
|
|
|
|
(641,408
|
)
|
|
|
1,805,140
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(1,732,117
|
)
|
|
|
659,300
|
|
|
|
(1,072,817
|
)
|
|
|
(1,819,612
|
)
|
|
|
503,024
|
|
|
|
(1,316,588
|
)
|
Operating (expenses) income
|
|
|
(552,606
|
)
|
|
|
217,237
|
|
|
|
(335,369
|
)
|
|
|
(551,800
|
)
|
|
|
229,327
|
|
|
|
(322,473
|
)
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
(40,702
|
)
|
|
|
(12,221
|
)
|
|
|
(52,923
|
)
|
|
|
(31,924
|
)
|
|
|
(5,426
|
)
|
|
|
(37,350
|
)
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(32,408
|
)
|
|
|
5,166
|
|
|
|
(27,242
|
)
|
|
|
(20,339
|
)
|
|
|
5,827
|
|
|
|
(14,512
|
)
|
Income from equity method investments
|
|
|
(6,871
|
)
|
|
|
(7,559
|
)
|
|
|
(14,430
|
)
|
|
|
17,361
|
|
|
|
13,526
|
|
|
|
30,887
|
|
Net income (loss) of discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,014
|
|
|
|
25,014
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(104,870
|
)
|
|
|
(104,870
|
)
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
(13,176
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13,176
|
)
|
|
|
40,234
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40,234
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
--Continued
|
|
(iv)
|
Disposal group held for sale
--Continued
|
The assets and liabilities of the group of assets
held for sale are presented separately in the financial statements. The net income (loss) of discontinued operations is presented
as a single amount in the statement of operations, contemplating the total after-tax profit or loss of such operations less any
impairment-related loss, as demonstrated below:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment loss (i)
|
|
|
(543,357
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Disposal group held for sale (ii)
|
|
|
1,802,654
|
|
|
|
1,841,911
|
|
|
|
2,095,928
|
|
Total disposal group held for sale
|
|
|
1,259,297
|
|
|
|
1,841,911
|
|
|
|
2,095,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale (ii)
|
|
|
722,516
|
|
|
|
805,596
|
|
|
|
1,097,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment loss (i)
|
|
|
(543,357
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tenda’s net income (loss) (ii)
|
|
|
37,172
|
|
|
|
25,014
|
|
|
|
(104,870
|
)
|
Net income (loss) of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(506,185
|
)
|
|
|
25,014
|
|
|
|
(104,870
|
)
|
(i) The measurement of disposal
group held for sale at the lower of its carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell, considering the price of R$8.13 per
share, according to the contract.
(ii) The amounts of the disposal
group held for sale, liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale, and profit or loss of discontinued operations,
net of the eliminations related to intercompany transactions.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
--Continued
|
|
(iv)
|
Disposal group held for sale
--Continued
|
For purposes of compliance with paragraph 50-5B of
ASC 205-20 Presentation of financial information – Discontinued Operations, the Company shows below the main classes of assets
and liabilities classified as held for sale of the subsidiary Tenda under USGAAP as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 after eliminations
of consolidation items, demonstrated as follows:
Assets
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
28,414
|
|
|
|
21,653
|
|
|
|
61,615
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
195,073
|
|
|
|
212,621
|
|
|
|
432,957
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
20,032
|
|
|
|
238,533
|
|
|
|
124,134
|
|
Properties for sale
|
|
|
720,543
|
|
|
|
565,814
|
|
|
|
648,154
|
|
Land for sale
|
|
|
75,227
|
|
|
|
101,490
|
|
|
|
104,489
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
104,931
|
|
|
|
183,238
|
|
|
|
204,060
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,144,220
|
|
|
|
1,323,349
|
|
|
|
1,575,409
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
176,673
|
|
|
|
22,420
|
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
Properties for sale
|
|
|
211,711
|
|
|
|
243,521
|
|
|
|
226,495
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
85,175
|
|
|
|
30,390
|
|
|
|
61,664
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
82,126
|
|
|
|
124,374
|
|
|
|
129,885
|
|
Property and equity and intangible assets
|
|
|
102,749
|
|
|
|
97,857
|
|
|
|
92,172
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
658,434
|
|
|
|
518,562
|
|
|
|
520,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,802,654
|
|
|
|
1,841,911
|
|
|
|
2,095,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, financing and debentures
|
|
|
41,333
|
|
|
|
210,776
|
|
|
|
208,824
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties and advance from customers
|
|
|
166,907
|
|
|
|
180,184
|
|
|
|
264,317
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
162,000
|
|
|
|
157,221
|
|
|
|
265,144
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
370,240
|
|
|
|
548,181
|
|
|
|
738,285
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, financing and debentures
|
|
|
93,661
|
|
|
|
37,554
|
|
|
|
229,726
|
|
Payables for purchase of properties and advance from customers
|
|
|
104,343
|
|
|
|
102,412
|
|
|
|
21,068
|
|
Provisions for legal claims
|
|
|
44,951
|
|
|
|
60,107
|
|
|
|
69,734
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
109,321
|
|
|
|
57,342
|
|
|
|
39,059
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
352,276
|
|
|
|
257,415
|
|
|
|
359,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
722,516
|
|
|
|
805,596
|
|
|
|
1,097,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main lines of the statement of operations
of the subsidiary Tenda are as follows:
Statement of operations
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
1,049,083
|
886,937
|
641,408
|
Operating costs
|
|
(739,418)
|
(659,300)
|
(503,024)
|
Operating expenses, net
|
|
(216,973)
|
(202,402)
|
(206,128)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
(12,298)
|
(14,835)
|
(23,199)
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
(28,419)
|
12,221
|
5,426
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
(21,113)
|
(5,166)
|
(5,827)
|
Income from equity method investments
|
|
(3,414)
|
6,891
|
(12,784)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
(9,724)
|
(668)
|
742
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
|
37,172
|
25,014
|
(104,870)
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
--Continued
|
|
(v)
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
Under US GAAP, the presentation
of earnings (loss) per share is required for public companies, including earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations and
net income (loss) per share on the face of the statement of income (loss), and the per share effect of changes in accounting principles,
discontinued operations and extraordinary items either on the face of the income statement or in a note. A dual presentation is
required: basic and diluted. Computations of basic and diluted earnings per share data should be based on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the period and all dilutive potential shares outstanding during each period presented, respectively.
The Company has issued employee stock options (Note
18.3), the dilutive effects of which are reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the “treasury stock method”.
Under the treasury stock method, earnings per share are calculated as if options were exercised at the beginning of the period,
or at time of issuance, if later, and as if the funds received were used to purchase the Company’s own stock. When the stock
options’ exercise price is greater than the average market price of shares, diluted earnings per share are not affected by
the stock options. Under US GAAP and Brazilian GAAP, potentially dilutive securities are not considered in periods where there
is a loss as the impact would be anti-dilutive. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 potentially dilutive
stock options were not considered.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
--Continued
|
|
(v)
|
Earnings (loss) per share
--Continued
|
The table below presents the determination of net
income available (loss) allocated to common shareholders and weighted average common shares outstanding used to calculate basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per share.
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declared dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. GAAP undistributed profit (loss)
|
|
|
(985,156
|
)
|
|
|
(27,766
|
)
|
|
|
42,305
|
|
Allocated U.S. GAAP undistributed profit (loss) available for Common shareholders
|
|
|
(985,156
|
)
|
|
|
(10,084
|
)
|
|
|
42,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic denominator (in thousands of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share – U.S. GAAP - R$
|
|
|
(36.5943
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3699
|
)
|
|
|
1.4192
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends proposed
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. GAAP undistributed profit (loss)
|
|
|
(985,156
|
)
|
|
|
(27,766
|
)
|
|
|
42,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated U.S. GAAP undistributed profit (loss) available for Common shareholders
|
|
|
(985,156
|
)
|
|
|
(10,084
|
)
|
|
|
42,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted denominator (in thousands of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Non-controlling interest shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Antidilutive effect
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of shares
|
|
|
26,921
|
|
|
|
27,262
|
|
|
|
29,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share – U.S. GAAP - R$
|
|
|
(36.5943
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3699
|
)
|
|
|
1.4133
|
|
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
--Continued
|
|
(vi)
|
Additional information – income taxes
|
Change in the valuation allowance for net operating
losses and temporary differences was as follows:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance at January 1
|
|
|
(457,848
|
)
|
|
|
(441,424
|
)
|
|
|
(426,318
|
)
|
(-) Discontinued operation valuation allowance at January 1
|
|
|
280,715
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Benefit of the utilization of operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,731
|
|
|
|
7,349
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(317,203
|
)
|
|
|
(20,155
|
)
|
|
|
(22,455
|
)
|
Closing balance at December 31
|
|
|
(494,336
|
)
|
|
|
(457,848
|
)
|
|
|
(441,424
|
)
|
The Company recognizes its deferred tax asset net
of a valuation allowance such that the amount of the net deferred tax asset is more likely than not to be realized. During the
year 2016, movements in the valuation allowance amounted to a net decrease of R$36,488. Of this amount, R$280,715 is related to
the reclassification of Tenda’s valuation allowance opening balance due to its disclosure as a discontinued operation.
The Company recognizes its deferred tax asset net
of a valuation allowance such that the amount of the net deferred tax asset is more likely than not to be realized. During the
year 2016, movements in the valuation allowance amounted to a net increase of R$317,203 and there was no utilization of operating
loss carryforwards. Of this amount, R$207,436 is related to the valuation allowance on the provision for impairment loss of discontinued
operations.
During the year 2015, movements in the valuation allowance
amounted to a net increase of R$16,424. The amount of R$3,731, related to the benefit of the utilization of operating loss carryforwards,
is primarily due to the continuing restructuring process implemented by management. During the year 2014, movements in the
valuation allowance amounted to a net increase of R$15,106. This is primarily related to the continuing restructuring process
implemented by management.
The Company records the financial statement effects
of an income tax position when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that it will be sustained upon examination.
A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold value added is measured and recorded as the largest amount
of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority.
As of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company
has no amount recorded for any uncertainty in income taxes.
Gafisa S.A.
Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands of Brazilian
Reais, except as otherwise stated)
|
32.
|
Supplemental Information - Summary of Principal Differences
between Brazilian GAAP and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States “US GAAP” for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
- Continued
|
|
(d)
|
US GAAP condensed consolidated financial information
--Continued
|
|
(vi)
|
Additional information – income taxes
--Continued
|
Gafisa S.A. and its subsidiaries file income tax returns
in Brazil. Brazilian income tax returns are subject to inspections by tax authorities for the period beginning in 2011 and forward,
i.e., within 5 years after the filing.
|
(vii)
|
Statement of comprehensive income (loss)
|
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income
(loss) and other comprehensive income (loss) that include charges or credits directly to equity which are not the result of transactions
with owners.
|
(viii)
|
Statement of cash flows
|
For each period for which a statement of profit or
loss is presented and required to be reconciled to US GAAP, SEC rules require that the Company provide either a statement of cash
flows prepared in accordance with US GAAP or IFRS; or furnish in a note to the financial statements a qualified description of
the material differences between cash or funds flows reported in the primary financial statements and cash flows that would be
reported in a statement of cash flows, prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
The Company’s primary differences in net income
(loss) between Brazilian GAAP and net income (loss) for US GAAP are explained in items 32(a) (ii) to (vii) above. The statement
of cash flows for Brazilian GAAP was prepared based on CPC 3(R2) - Statement of Cash Flows, which conforms with IAS 7.
(ix) Statement of value added
The statement of value added for new Brazilian GAAP
was prepared based on CPC 09 - “Demonstração do Valor Adicionado.” For US GAAP, this statement is not
required.
***
Gafisa (PK) (USOTC:GFASY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Gafisa (PK) (USOTC:GFASY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024