Trump Willing to Hold Off on Border-Wall Funding
April 24 2017 - 9:47PM
Dow Jones News
By Kristina Peterson and Rebecca Ballhaus
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump is open to waiting until
later this year to secure funding for a wall along the border with
Mexico, White House officials said Monday night, in a shift that
could clear the way for lawmakers to strike a deal to avoid a
government shutdown on Saturday.
Mr. Trump and top administration officials had previously
indicated the president wanted to include money to begin building a
wall along the Southern border in the bill needed this week to keep
the government running after its current funding expires at 12:01
a.m. Saturday, which is also the president's 100th day in
office.
Mr. Trump addressed the issue at a reception with conservative
media at the White House Monday night. The president's new
flexibility over whether the wall is funded in this spending bill
or one that will be needed in late September could remove one of
the last remaining hurdles facing congressional Democrats and
Republicans hammering out the five-month bill they must pass this
week to avoid a partial government shutdown.
Without the debate over the border wall, lawmakers may be able
to come to an agreement on the spending bill relatively quickly.
Both Democrats and Republicans had signaled they were willing
increase money for the military and for broader border security
before administration officials last week indicated that Mr. Trump
would press for money to begin building the wall.
There had been little appetite among Republicans on Capitol Hill
to demand funding now for the border wall specifically, rather than
offer a general boost for tighter border security. Democrats, whose
votes will be needed to pass the spending legislation in the
Senate, had said they would oppose a spending bill that included
money to start building the border wall.
It's good for the country that President Trump is taking the
wall off the table in these negotiations," Senate Minority Leader
Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) said in a statement Monday night. Earlier
Monday, Mr. Schumer had said the wall was a "nonstarter" for
Democrats. "Now the bipartisan and bicameral negotiators can
continue working on the outstanding issues, " he said.
Democratic votes will be needed, because Republicans hold just
52 seats in the Senate, where spending bills need 60 votes to clear
procedural hurdles. House GOP leaders will also likely have to rely
on some Democratic help, since some conservative Republicans are
expected to oppose it.
Many Republicans had indicated they would be satisfied with a
spending bill that included money for means of strengthening
security along the border other than a wall.
"Border security's the main issue -- whether that includes a
wall or technology, drones, or repairing what we have," Sen.
Shelley Moore Capito (R., W.Va.) said Monday evening. Ms. Capito
said she wasn't interested in risking a shutdown over the border
wall. "I'm not going to risk a shutdown over anything," she
said.
Other Republicans echoed that their top priority was making sure
they crafted a spending bill that could clear both chambers before
the government runs out of money.
"I wouldn't mind funding the wall, but it's a question of what
we can do up here, what's doable," said Sen. Richard Shelby (R.,
Ala.), a senior member of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
In March, the administration asked Congress for $1.4 billion in
spending for the current fiscal year for the wall, with an
additional $2.6 billion for the next fiscal year, beginning Oct. 1.
Administration officials said the fiscal 2017 money would pay for
48 miles of new border and levee wall systems, and 14 miles of
replacement fencing, as well as some technology improvements and
road construction.
One issue that remains unresolved is whether the five-month
spending bill under negotiation would include payments to health
insurers known as "cost-sharing reductions," as requested by
Democrats.
The payments support Affordable Care Act insurance plans by
helping insurers lower costs for low-income consumers. An abrupt
withdrawal of the payments would pose an immediate threat to
health-insurance markets, potentially triggering the collapse of
health plans midyear.
Write to Kristina Peterson at kristina.peterson@wsj.com and
Rebecca Ballhaus at Rebecca.Ballhaus@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
April 24, 2017 21:32 ET (01:32 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.