Banks Rack Up Advisory Fees as Fiduciary Rule's Future Hangs
April 18 2017 - 7:32PM
Dow Jones News
By Michael Wursthorn
An Obama-era retirement-savings rule is in limbo, but investors
already are pouring their retirement savings into brokerages'
promise of conflict-free financial advice in exchange for a
fee.
Bank of America Corp.'s global wealth unit, which includes the
"thundering herd" brokerage force of Merrill Lynch, gained a record
$29.2 billion in new fee-based assets in the first quarter, the
bank said Tuesday. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. said last week that
$8 billion of new assets flowed into long-term products, including
those that charge a recurring fee.
Also on Tuesday, private-equity firms Stone Point Capital LLC
and KKR & Co. agreed to spend $2 billion for a majority stake
in Focus Financial Partners, a New York-based investment firm that
backs independent financial advisers who charge fees and pledge to
minimize conflicts.
The developments are the latest sign that advice for a recurring
fee is Wall Street's go-to compensation model for the future, as
firms like Merrill and J.P. Morgan use the fiduciary rule as a way
to phase out commissions as a payment option in retirement
accounts. The industry shift is coming even as the Trump
administration seeks to eliminate or revise the rule.
"They were already in this mode" of shifting toward fees, said
Denise Valentine, a senior analyst on wealth management at Aite
Group. "The rule just allowed them to put this into the marketplace
and make a commitment."
Even before the fiduciary rule, brokerages had been trying to
abandon their sales-driven cultures to position their broker forces
more like independent financial advisers who create financial plans
and offer advice. Besides positioning themselves to better compete
with the rise of smaller, independent rivals and investors' growing
preference for passive investments, brokerage executives found that
fees for advice and services could be more lucrative over the
longer term compared with commissions.
Researcher Morningstar Inc. says fee-based accounts can yield as
much as 50% more revenue than commission accounts.
The shift to fees from commissions has picked up as firms sought
to comply with the Labor Department's fiduciary rule. Besides the
wider margin on such accounts, fees also minimize potential
conflicts tied to the sale of specific investment products and cut
down on some of the litigation risk brought on by the rule,
observers said. However, such accounts can also lead to higher fees
for investors who trade little.
Bank of America has been at the fore of the charge. It set a
course that sought to mostly do away with commissions in retirement
accounts in favor of recurring fees and has been heavily
advertising its shift. Merrill, for its part, decided that clients
who wanted retirement advice from one of its brokers would have to
pay a fee to avoid the rule's more onerous requirements and
heightened legal risk. It also says fee-based accounts are better
suited to minimize risks.
That shift to fees is already boosting its bottom line. Higher
revenue tied to fee-based assets helped push Merrill's revenue up
3% from last year to $3.8 billion in the first quarter and offset
declines in traditional commission revenue, the bank said. Of Bank
of America's $2.6 trillion in total wealth assets, about $946.8
billion are in longer-term investment strategies, including those
that charge a fee.
"These solid results were produced in a period of change for the
industry as firms and clients anticipate new fiduciary standards
and other market dynamics, such as the shift between active and
passive investing," Bank of America's finance chief, Paul Donofrio,
said on a conference call Tuesday.
Even after the Labor Department said earlier this month that it
would delay the rule's April 10 implementation by 60 days to
conduct a review of its economic impact, Merrill executives told
brokers to push forward. J.P. Morgan said it would continue with
its plan to steer its commission-paying clients to accounts that
charge a fee or a self-directed option but would push back its
deadlines for clients to convert to coincide with the rule's new
timeline.
Rivals such as Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo & Co. have
said they would continue to allow retirement savers to pay
commissions in retirement accounts, although they would likely face
some sales restrictions. Still, those banks have continued to
report gains in fee-based assets in recent years.
Bank of America's first-quarter fee-based inflows were a record
high for the wealth unit, which includes Merrill and private bank
U.S. Trust, beating the previous mark of $20.4 billion set in the
first quarter of 2013. The bank said the inflows were driven by
"strong" client activity and the movement of assets from individual
retirement accounts that pay commissions into fee-based
accounts.
The industry's transformation comes as the U.S.'s biggest
brokerages attempt to stop losing market share to independent
financial advisers much like the ones who work with Focus
Financial. Traditional brokerages' share of the advice market has
shrunk from 63% of assets in 2010 to 59% in 2015, while independent
advisers have grown from 37% to nearly 41%, according to researcher
Cerulli Associates.
By 2020, Cerulli estimates, traditional brokerages will advise
on less than 48% of the market's assets, while independent advisers
will oversee more than 52%. Much of that growth comes from brokers
who defect from firms like Merrill to launch their own
practices.
Even as brokerages like Merrill attempt to act more like the
independent firms they once looked down on, Focus Financial expects
to rely on the deep pockets of Stone Point and KKR to expand its
roster of independent wealth managers beyond the 46 that currently
work with it.
"This deal is a reflection of the tremendous success of our
industry, the [investment adviser] model and fiduciaries," said
Rudy Adolf, Focus's chief executive and founder. "There's a lot of
money in motion in this industry."
Write to Michael Wursthorn at Michael.Wursthorn@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
April 18, 2017 19:17 ET (23:17 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Bank of America (NYSE:BAC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Bank of America (NYSE:BAC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024