UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ________ to ________

 

Commission File Number 333-192997

 

NuGene International, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada   46-3999052
(State of incorporation)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
17912 Cowan, Suite A, Irvine, California  92614   714-641-2640
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class registered: Name of each exchange on which registered:
None None

 

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of class)

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and, (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein and, will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

 

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates as of April 10, 2017 was $5,898,823 based on the closing price of the registrant's common stock reported by the OTCQB market on April 10, 2017. The determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The outstanding number of shares of common stock as of April 10, 2017 was: 42,260,211

 

Documents incorporated by reference: None

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I     3
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS   3
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS   12
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS   28
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES   28
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS   28
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES   29
PART II     29
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES   29
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.   32
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS   32
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.   39
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA   40
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE   67
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES   67
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION   68
PART III     68
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE   68
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION   70
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS   72
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE   73
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.   74
PART IV     74
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES   74
SIGNATURES     75

 

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties.

 

All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans, and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words.

 

Our forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those described or implied in the forward-looking statements, including:

 

· future financial and operating results;
· our ability to fund operations and business plans, and the timing of any funding or corporate development transactions we may pursue;
· the ability of our suppliers to provide products or services in the future of an acceptable quality on a timely and cost-effective basis;
· our ability to continue as a going concern in the face of limited current sales, material negative stockholders’ equity and working capital;
· the ability to manage our considerable short term debt;
· expectations concerning market acceptance of our products;
· current and future economic and political conditions;
· overall industry and market trends;
· the outcome of existing litigation described under “Legal Proceedings” below and other filings which we make with the Commission;
· management’s goals and plans for future operations; and
· other assumptions described in this report underlying or relating to any forward-looking statements.

 

  2  

 

 

The assumptions used for purposes of the forward-looking statements specified in the following information represent estimates of future events and are subject to uncertainty as to possible changes in economic, legislative, industry, and other circumstances. As a result, the identification and interpretation of data and other information and their use in developing and selecting assumptions from and among reasonable alternatives requires the exercise of judgment. To the extent that the assumed events do not occur, the outcome may vary substantially from anticipated or projected results, and, accordingly, no opinion is expressed on the achievability of those forward-looking statements. We can give no assurance that any of the assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are accurate, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

 

We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions, or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included or incorporated by reference important factors in the cautionary statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in the “Risk Factors” section, that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make.

 

You should read this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the documents that have been filed as exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K or any document incorporated by reference herein completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. It is routine for internal projections and expectations to change as the year, or each quarter in the year, progresses, and, therefore, it should be clearly understood that the internal projections and beliefs upon which we base our expectations are made as of the date of this prospectus and may change prior to the end of each quarter or the year.

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY

 

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 30, 2013 under the name “Bling Marketing, Inc.”  Until December 29, 2014, we were a wholesaler of jewelry, principally earrings, rings, and pendants (“BMI Business”).  We recognized a minimal amount of sales from operations prior to the three months ended September 30, 2014. 

 

On December 26, 2014, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with NuGene Inc., a California corporation (“NuGene”), and on December 29, 2014 (the “Closing Date”) we filed a certificate of merger in the State of California whereby our subsidiary, NG Acquisition Inc. (“Acquisition Sub”) merged with NuGene. As a result, NuGene (the surviving entity) became our wholly owned subsidiary.  The transaction contemplated under the Merger Agreement was deemed to be a reverse merger. Under reverse merger accounting, our Company (the legal acquirer) is considered to have been acquired by NuGene. The assets, liabilities, and operations of NuGene have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized. 

 

NUGENE HISTORY AND BUSINESS

 

NuGene was incorporated in California in December 2006 and formed and funded by our founders, Ali Kharazmi and Mohammed Kharazmi, M.D. The initial focus of NuGene was to develop and market customized skin care products. As part of that focus, NuGene sought to leverage the working relationships developed by our founders with the plastic surgery community. NuGene directed significant time and resources on developing anti-aging and scar treatment/reduction products.

 

In 2007, we continued to focus on age defying products utilizing  peptide complexes  (see further description, below) and  nano-encapsulation  for absorption into the skin (see further description, below). We introduced a limited product line under the NuGene name, and co-branded the products with an affiliated entity, Genetic Institute of Anti Aging, Inc. (“GIAA”), which is also owned by our founders. We utilized the services of a Korean based contract manufacturer to supply our products. This product line (the “GIAA Line”) was based on the use of peptides and did not utilize stem cells. We had very modest sales in 2007, with our sole customer being GIAA, a related party.

 

In 2008, we stopped production of the GIAA Line and sales were limited to selling remaining inventory through medical offices and through GIAA. With the GIAA Line discontinued, we spent the remainder of 2008 considering different formulations and methodologies for improved anti-aging products. In 2009 and 2010, we had limited activity and very limited sales. Our sales were mostly overseas and limited to the remaining inventory of the GIAA Line. We continued to explore how we might advance our formulations and methodologies. We expended funds on research and development, carried out mostly by scientists engaged by the Company.

 

In 2011, our founders decided to use adult adipose human stem cells (undifferentiated cells found throughout the body that multiply by cell division to replenish dying cells and regenerate tissues) as the foundation of the formulation for its products. During 2011, the Company developed a proprietary process to extract human adult stem cells from fat cells that the Company then used in its customized NuGene line made specifically for those client(s). Throughout 2011, we continued to provide autologous, or mature, fat-derived stem cells for use in clinical procedures, utilizing this technology. Through this process, the Company refined its ability to culture adult human stem cells to render human conditioned stem cell media at a proprietary concentration which is a primary ingredient in the NuGene line of cosmeceuticals.

  

  3  

 

 

In 2012, we completed our initial line of cosmeceutical products based on these adipose derived stem cells. We branded this advanced skin care line solely under the NuGene name (the “NuGene Line”). We were able to eliminate the unpleasant odor associated with stem cells by adding a fragrance with a very low incidence of allergic reaction. The packaging of this new product line bears no resemblance to the prior GIAA Line. We also manufactured the NuGene Line ourselves at a small laboratory facility that we leased from an affiliated entity owned by one of our founders. Throughout 2013, we continued to expand the product offerings of the NuGene Line. The Company focused its stem cell work in the surgical arena and orthopedic regeneration. These services were delivered to one client, which was an affiliated entity. Sales of the NuGene Line were limited as we were in an initial rollout and branding phase.

 

During 2014, we focused our efforts on transitioning to a cosmeceutical skincare business for mass distribution. With this transition and expanded attention to our consumer products, we sought to develop our marketing plan and distribution channels. By the end of 2014, we had wholesalers distributing products from the NuGene Line to medical offices and medical spas throughout the United States. In addition to the NuGene Line, we generated revenues from an affiliate, Advanced Surgical Partners (“ASP”) which is also owned by our former CEO and Chairman of the Board, Messrs. Ali and Mohammed Kharazmi, respectively. Revenues generated from ASP resulted from NuGene providing Plasma Rich Platelet and Stem Cell injections for orthopedic and plastic surgery procedures to ASP. We provided these products and services to ASP as we transitioned into the commercialization of our cosmeceutical product lines. We had no such product sales and provided no services to ASP subsequent to the Merger Agreement in December 2014.

 

The Company currently is principally engaged in marketing its NuGene Line of products. We will need to seek substantial additional funding to remain a going concern, maintain operations and to implement our business plan. Without adequate funding to support our operations for at least the next 12 months, our ability to expend funds on advertising, retain channels of distribution, retain supplier relationships, build inventory and recruit experienced sales personnel cannot be assured. Additionally, we were unsuccessful in several attempts to raise capital during 2015 and early 2016 and these failures have put our Company under significant financial strain. We continue to attempt to procure new sources of funding, whether from the issuance of debt or shares of our common stock or a combination of both. Even if we are able to obtain such additional funding, no assurance can be given that the amounts of funding we might secure will prove to be adequate or that we will be able to accomplish our goals within the timeframes projected. In addition, no assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain any additional financing on commercially reasonable terms or otherwise. If we are unable to obtain adequate funding, we may be unable to manage our existing outstanding debt, and may be required to significantly curtail or even discontinue our operations.

 

OVERVIEW

 

Cosmeceuticals ” refer to the combinations of cosmetics and pharmaceuticals that may offer medicinal or drug-like benefits. The term is more of a marketing term rather than a legal term, with the cosmetics industry having adopted the term in the late 1990’s. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) does not recognize the term. While drugs are subject to a review and approval process by the FDA, cosmetics and cosmeceuticals are not subject to the same stringent regulatory regime and scrutiny. As such, if a product has drug properties, it must be approved as a drug. However, cosmeceuticals are not subject to this review and approval process.

 

Cosmeceuticals offer consumers cosmetic-like treatments with active ingredients, which we believe give them pharmaceutical-like efficacy. Driven by aesthetic-consciousness, according to the May 2014 RNCOS research publication entitled, “Global Cosmeceuticals Market Outlook 2018” the global market for cosmeceutical products reached an estimated size of $35.1 billion in 2013. We believe that this market benefits from a younger generation of consumers as well as baby boomers who want to preserve their youthful looks. In our view the U.S. cosmeceutical market will continue to be favorably influenced by these groups who want beautiful and younger looking skin while aging.

 

Two of the fastest growing cosmeceuticals segments are the anti-aging and hair restoration markets which focus on mechanisms that influence the aging of skin and prevent/restore hair loss. Also according to the same RNCOS research, skin care garnered a material share of the cosmeceutical market in 2013 with a 60%, $21 billion worldwide market share, followed by hair care which represented a 14%, $4.75 billion market share. The global skincare cosmeceutical market is expected to reach $30.3 billion by 2018, accounting for a 62% share in the total cosmeceutical markets. In particular it is anticipated that with an aging baby boomer population and increased male grooming, skin whitening, facial care and sun-damaged products will drive the expected global demand.

 

The use of stem cell based media as a foundation for cosmeceutical products is designed to promote the anti-aging process. Every human being has stem cells in his or her body. These cells exist from the early stages of human development until the end of a person’s life. Throughout our lives, our body continues to produce stem cells that regenerate to produce differentiated cells that make up various aspects of the body such as skin, blood, muscles, and nerves. These are generally referred to as adult stem cells (non-embryonic). These cells are important for the purpose of medical therapies aiming to replace lost or damaged cells or tissues or to otherwise treat disorders. Our NuGene Line of products uses human adult stem cells culture media that we believe, when applied to human skin cells, may reduce the appearance of aging skin. We have not yet commenced widespread marketing efforts of the NuGene Line, however we are in the process of developing relationships with distributors to provide access to national and international channels of distribution.  

 

  4  

 

 

STRATEGY

 

In our view, anti-aging products represent (and will continue to represent) a significant portion of the facial skincare market. In key markets, we believe that the facial skincare market is positioned for significant growth with limited downside risks from the overall condition of the economy. In order to make claims that products can diminish the signs of aging, marketers are constantly looking for new combinations of specialty ingredients. The category of skincare products based on biotechnology such as human stem cell is in our view just beginning to be developed, and therefore we expect that it has significant growth potential. Our goal is to leverage our knowledge in human adult stem cell technology to develop and commercialize advanced anti-aging skincare and hair growth products for the retail and professional channels. We intend to develop, manufacture, and market cosmetic skin care and hair products to address this significant market opportunity.

 

We plan to continue to sell our NuGene Line of products domestically and internationally through professional channels, including dermatologists, plastic surgeons, medical offices, and day and resort spas. We also expect to directly market our product through television sales-dedicated channels. We plan to promote brand awareness through advertising, our own sales personnel, other marketing and public relations. We will also partially rely upon the name recognition of Kathy Ireland secured under the License Agreement discussed below. We propose to further expand our sales efforts through our branded website ( www.nugene.com ) and additional online commerce channels.

 

In addition to our product enhancement and marketing activities, our success will also depend on our ability to develop and protect our proprietary technology. We intend to rely on a combination of patent, trade secret and know-how, copyright and trademark laws, as well as confidentiality agreements, licensing agreements and other agreements, to establish and protect our proprietary rights. Our success will also depend upon our ability to avoid infringing upon the proprietary rights of others.

 

OUR PRODUCTS

 

All of our products listed below have been formulated, fully developed and are currently being marketed. We have formulated and are testing other products which we expect to introduce (financial resources permitting) once we complete product testing and preparation of marketing materials. None of our products are licensed from third parties.  All of products are either protected by patents for which we have applied, or derived from trade secrets and proprietary formulas.

 

NuGene Skincare Products

 

· Universal Cream : Our moisturizer works to smooth fine lines and wrinkles, improve aging skin tone and texture, increase collagen production, and reduce puffiness and dark circles-without any heaviness or oiliness.

 

· Universal Serum : Formulated with multiple human growth factors, polypeptides, vitamins, minerals and amino acids, our signature serum encourages skin’s natural production of collagen and elastin while boosting other vital matrix protein syntheses, enabling it to repair and prevent environmental damage, improve texture and thickness, and restore skin’s natural luminosity.

  

· Eye Serum :  Designed to prevent and correct wrinkles, fine lines, puffiness, dryness and dark circles, this innovative product relies on our cutting-edge stem cell technology, along with multiple growth factors and other nourishing ingredients, to help reverse skin damage, minimize the appearance of future signs of aging, and restore youthful luminosity around the eyes, fostering skin that looks younger, smoother and fresher.

 

· Light & Bright Gel : This potent product works to break down excess melanin in the skin without any of the harsh ingredients typically found in brightening products. And, in addition to quickly reducing the look of dark spots and excess pigmentation, it works to increase overall radiance, restoring a youthful glow.

 

· Face Wash : As an anti-aging cleanser, our Face Wash is formulated with a unique blend of multiple growth factors, cytokines and rich pentapeptide complexes. NuGene’s Face Wash minimizes the visibility of pores and softens imperfections while the natural cleansing agents gently wash away dirt, oil, and makeup leaving the skin refreshed, smooth, clean and hydrated.

 

Hair care Products 

 

· Anti-Hair Loss Serum: Our stem cell based technology replenishes the hair follicles with essential growth factors and cytokines to reduce and prevent further hair loss, as well as to stimulate follicular regeneration.

 

· Regenerative Shampoo : Rich in growth factors, polypeptide complexes and vitamins, this product has been formulated to rejuvenate the hair and scalp. In addition to increasing hydration, vibrancy, and shine, it works to protect hair from environmental assault, preventing and correcting breakage, thinning and split ends.

 

· Regenerative Conditioner : This hydrating, shine-enhancing conditioner utilizes additional key ingredients, vitamins, and polypeptide complexes, to name a few, to instantly smooth even the coarsest, most damaged strands. With regular use, it fosters stronger, shinier, younger-looking hair that’s easier to style.

 

  5  

 

 

Wound Care-Wound Healing; Biopharma Products

 

In 2014, we initiated research and formulation for a new topical burn cream for treatment of burns that we expect may reduce infection and could improve healing time. Burns are the fourth most common type of trauma worldwide according to RNCOS research. Despite recent advances in wound management, infection continues to be a significant problem in treating burns. This has resulted in the routine use of prophylactic topical antimicrobial agents. The most common topical antimicrobial agent used is silver sulfadiazine cream. However, the side effects of delayed wound healing have remained a challenge to overcome.

 

Tissue healing research has demonstrated adipose-derived stem cell culture conditioned media exhibit human dermal fibroblast proliferation and enhanced secretion of type I, III collagen and fibronectin. These properties are well suited for dermal wound healing. In order to develop and bring this product to market, we intend to work with a contract manufacturer to combine the product with our stem cell media technology. The preclinical FDA work we will need to have completed consists of in vitro and in vivo efficacy studies, experimental toxicology testing, formulation study, storage condition, stability testing, and ensuring Good Manufacturing Practices are all followed in the manufacturing process. This topical product will require FDA approval and we can give no assurance that we will obtain that approval.

 

STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS AND LICENSING ARRANGEMENTS

 

kiWW License Agreement

 

In November 2014, we entered into a License Agreement with kathy ireland Worldwide ®  ("kiWW ® ") whereby we licensed the right to utilize the trademarks and rights to the name, likeness and visual representations of Kathy Ireland in connection with our cosmeceutical line of products containing adult human adipose stem cell derived or containing biologically active or biologically derived ingredients. The initial term of the license is for eight years and it may be renewed for up to an additional four years.

 

In accordance with the License Agreement, we are required to submit a Business Plan to kiWW ®  within ninety days of the effective date of the License Agreement. We have submitted our Business Plan to the Licensor within the required time frame and received the necessary approvals. The License Agreement defines the Licensed Products as those NuGene products containing stem cell derived or containing biologically active or biologically derived ingredients including: NuGene Face Wash, NuGene Universal Cream, NuGene Universal Serum, NuGene Light and Bright, NuGene Eye Serum, NuGene Anti-Hair Loss Serum, NuGene Regenerative Shampoo & Conditioner, and Advanced Infusion Serums as well as the following products which have not yet been commercially launched and/or developed: NuGene FaceMask, NuGene Melasma Serum, NuGene Acne Serum, NuGene Revitalizing Night Cream, NuGene Toner, NuGene Body Lotion, NuGene Specialty Soap, NuGene Neck and Décolleté Lotion, and other age defying products that are stem cell derived or which contain biologically active or biologically derived ingredients. On March 5, 2015, we announced the launch of the NuGene kathy ireland ® brand. The campaign includes a re-branded internet presence and new videos featuring Ms. Ireland. We have initiated the launch of a larger multi-media campaign to promote the product line.

 

NuGene is obligated to utilize commercially reasonable efforts to meet the following minimum totals of net sales of Licensed Products for the specified periods:

 

Period   Forecasted Minimum
Net Sales
 
       
Contract Year 1   $ 1,500,000  
         
Contract Year 2   $ 2,500,000  
         
Contract Year 3   $ 3,750.000  
         
Contract Year 4   $ 5,000,000  

 

A "Contract Year" corresponds to a calendar year ending December 31 and commences with the year 2015.

 

The Forecasted Minimum Net Sales are not binding. Rather, they are estimates and establish a target and a benchmark for the Minimum Royalty discussed below. Should we fail to meet the Forecasted Minimum Net Sales in any given Contract Year, the License Agreement remains in full force and effect so long as we have made commercially reasonable efforts to meet the Forecasted Minimum Net Sales for the Contract Year. However, we are still obligated to pay the Minimum Royalty for that Contract Year.

 

  6  

 

 

For each of these Contract Years we are obligated to pay a minimum royalty as follows:

 

Period   Minimum Royalty  
       
Contract Year 1   $ 100,000  
         
Contract Year 2   $ 150,000  
         
Contract Year 3   $ 200,000  
         
Contract Year 4   $ 250,000  

 

Once the minimum royalties, as noted above, are paid, we pay royalties in the amount of 5% of net sales of products under the License Agreement, and an additional royalty payment in the amount of 1% of net sales of products under the License Agreement sold to purchasers introduced to NuGene by kiWW.

 

Additionally, we are obligated to pay an annual Brand Participation fee to kiWW ®  which provides for general advertising, goodwill and promotion of the overall kathy ireland brand. NuGene paid kiWW $350,000 effective upon execution of the License. This onetime fee includes a "Brand Participation" fee for Contract Year 1. Brand Participation fees for Contract Years 2 through 8 are $50,000 annually with an additional 1% of the total gross sales of Licensed Products of the prior year beginning in Contract Year 4.

  

This description of the License Agreement is a summary and does not purport to describe all material conditions, obligations and payments that are the responsibility of NuGene to the Licensor. The description provided of the License Agreement in this Annual Report is qualified in its entirety by reference to the License Agreement attached as an Exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on January 6, 2015, and that agreement is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein Report.

 

The Company and kiWW have recently been in discussions to address and resolve issues and problems under the License Agreement, which includes the Company’s failure to timely tender certain payments under the License Agreement. In order to settle all disputes under the License Agreement and to confirm their commitment to each other under the License Agreement, on 03 February 2017 the Company finalized and executed a Confirmation and Continuation Agreement (the “Confirmation Agreement”) with kiWW. Pursuant to the Confirmation Agreement, the Company is obligated to provide the following consideration: (i) Pay the sum of $50,000 to settle a lawsuit in which the Company, kiWW, and other parties are named as defendants (the Company previously paid the $50,000 and the litigation has been dismissed); (ii) Issue to kiWW warrants in the form of a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to acquire 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the warrant expires five years from the date of issuance and is exercisable for $0.01 per share, with a cash-less exercise option); (iii) Issue to kiWW 500,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, which will be subject to the same lock-up agreement placed on executives of the Company pursuant to the Company’s proposed public offering under this Registration Statement; and, (iv) Upon the earlier of 30 June 2017, or the closing of the Company’s proposed public offering under this Registration Statement, the Company shall pay to kiWW $50,000. Pursuant to the Confirmation Agreement, kiWW is obligated as follows: (x) kiWW agrees that the Company has performed, paid, and otherwise satisfied all of its obligations under the License Agreement for calendar year 2016; (ii) kiWW agrees that as of the end of calendar year 2016, the Company was not in breach of the License Agreement in any respect; and, (iii) kiWW ratifies and confirms the License Agreement, and that it shall continue in full force and effect.

 

Advisory Board

 

In an effort to improve our product line and retain the latest and most forward looking state of the art services, the Company has assembled an Advisory Board consisting of Board Certified Dermatologists and Plastic Surgeons consisting of medical professionals whom the Company believes are leaders in their respective fields. We anticipate that our Advisory Board members, among other things, will provide us with strategic and business development ideas, insight into major trends in the highly competitive cosmeceutical marketplace and input regarding their specific expertise.

   

COMPETITION 

 

NuGene experiences and will experience intense competition from companies developing cosmeceuticals with stem cell derived active ingredients as well other ingredients. Our pharmaceutical division competes or will compete with companies developing stem cell based pharmaceuticals. Our cosmeceutical line of products also competes with other companies that offer a plant derived stem cell skin care line or stem-cell derived extracts. Many of these companies have substantially greater financial, technological, research and development, marketing and personnel resources.

 

  7  

 

 

In order to successfully compete with larger and better funded brands, the Company employs a strategy of developing products that are either proprietary or have some unique characteristics. All of our products combine in-house advancements, proprietary, and patent pending technologies and formulations. We believe that our use of well accepted, adult human stem cell derived conditioned media obtained through adipose derived stem cells gives us a competitive advantage against competitors seeking to use controversial human stem cells derived from bone marrow and other sources. Our patent pending adipose derived stem cell culture process also provides us with a low cost, high yield output for production.

 

Adipose derived stem cells are also called mesenchymal, or in simpler terms, “adult stem cells”. Adult stem cells are limited to categorization by their tissue of origin. Stem cells which are present in fat are called adipose stem cells . This is entirely different from embryonic stem cells, which are found in embryos and subject to significant ethical issues. The foremost mechanism by which adult stem cells participate in repair of the human body is related to the secretion of trophic factors. They provide a microenvironment with the production of a wide range of growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines, all of which are broadly defined as the stem cell secretomes or biomolecules. The secretomes are well preserved in their biological conformation and effectiveness in the fat tissue or when cultured in a tissue culture plate.

NuGene uses adipose stem cells. These stem cells are cultivated in a plastic flask fed with a liquid solution mix composed of amino acids and other nutrients. This promotes the cells to attach to the flask, thrive, divide, and grow in an incubator which mimics the human body environment. This is process is called stem cell culture. In the process of dividing and growing, these stem cells secrete a vast array of secretomes or biomolecules which are functionally and structurally similar to the ones produced in their host tissue (fat). This solution, with secreted biomolecules, is called stem cell derived condition media. Since the source of the cells is fat, which is mesenchymal/adult in nature, this media is also called as adult stem cell derived conditioned media . This conditioned media is a pure solution of secretomes and does not contain any dead or live stem cells. This conditioned media is then processed and used in NuGene’s proprietary formulations, providing a competitive advantage to NuGene.

There are many large, integrated, and established pharmaceutical, specialty chemical, personal care, and health care companies that have greater capacity than us to develop and to commercialize types of products which would be competitive to ours. The Company believes that manufacturing, regulatory, distribution and marketing expertise will be increasingly important competitive factors in favor of the Company. In this regard, the Company believes that its management and contractors it has engaged provide it with a competitive advantage.

 

Our marketing strategy seeks to employ a dual approach of offering both a direct to consumer line of products and a professional line of product. Our consumer brand has the competitive advantage of using the Kathy Ireland name and brand. We will also employ the most efficient media buying and direct to consumer techniques to create awareness in the most cost efficient manner possible. Our professional line of products will benefit from Key Opinion Leader studies; clinical studies; and, the engagement of sales network professionals with a proven history of success in our market segment.

 

While we have experienced slow growth in the sales of our products, we believe that is a direct result of our lack of available cash. The proceeds we seek to obtain through the public offering under this Registration Statement should provide us with the cash resources to effectively market our products. We believe that we will be able to effectively compete on the basis of product quality and reliability, cost of production, technical capability, product innovation, and customer service. We believe that we will further improve our competitive position by utilizing contract manufacturers to further lower our overhead and cost of production.

 

GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION 

 

U.S. Government Regulation 

 

The health care industry is highly regulated in the United States. The federal government, through various departments and agencies, state and local governments, and private third-party accreditation organizations regulate and monitor the health care industry, associated products, and operations. The following is a general overview of the laws and regulations pertaining to our business. 

 

FDA Regulation of Stem Cell Treatment and Products 

 

The FDA regulates the manufacture of human stem cell treatments and associated products under the authority of the Public Health Safety Act (“PHSA”) and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). Stem cell derived products can be regulated under FDA’s Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products Regulations (“HCT/Ps”), or may also be subject to FDA’s drug, biological product, or medical device regulations.

 

Cosmetic and Skin Care Regulation 

 

Depending upon product claims and formulation, skin care products may be regulated as cosmetics, drugs, devices, or combination cosmetics and drugs. We currently only market cosmetic skin care products and are evaluating entry into the pharmaceutical market. The FDA has authority to regulate cosmetics marketed in the United States under the FDCA and the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (“FPLA”) and implementing regulations. The Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) regulates the advertising of cosmetics under the FTCA. 

 

The FDCA prohibits the marketing of adulterated and misbranded cosmetics. Cosmetic ingredients must also comply with the FDA’s ingredient, quality, and labeling requirements and the FTC’s requirements pertaining to truthful and non-misleading advertising. Cosmetic products and ingredients, with the exception of color additives, are not required to have FDA premarket approval. Manufacturers of cosmetics are also not required to register their establishments, file data on ingredients, or report cosmetic-related injuries to the FDA. 

 

  8  

 

 

We are required to substantiate the safety and product claims of our cosmetic products and ingredients before marketing. The FDA or FTC may disagree with our characterization of one or more of the skin care products as a cosmetic or the product claims. This could result in a variety of enforcement actions which could require the reformulation or relabeling of our products, the submission of information in support of the product claims or the safety and effectiveness of our products, or more punitive action, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. If the FDA determines we have failed to comply with applicable requirements under the FDCA or FPLA, it can impose a variety of enforcement actions from public warning letters, injunctions, consent decrees, and civil penalties to seizure of our products, total or partial shutdown of our production, and criminal prosecutions. If any of these events were to occur, it could materially adversely affect us. If the FTC determines we have failed to substantiate our claims, it can pursue a variety of actions including disgorgement of profits, injunction from further violative conduct, and consent decrees.  

 

Some types of skin-care products are regulated as both cosmetics and drugs under the FDCA. Examples of drug-cosmetic combination products are facial moisturizers that contain sunscreen and skin protectant hand lotions. Products that are both cosmetics and drugs because of ingredients or intended use must satisfy the regulatory requirements for both cosmetics and drugs. The drug requirements include either FDA premarket approval under an NDA or an abbreviated new drug application (“ANDA”), or, more typically, implicit approval through conformance with the applicable FDA final regulation (also known as an over-the-counter drug monograph) that specifies the conditions that must be met for the drug to be generally recognized as safe and effective.  

 

At present, we do not anticipate that any of the products we market will be regulated as a combination cosmetic and drug or solely as a drug or device. However, the FDA may disagree with such a determination which could result in a variety of enforcement actions and significant additional expenditure to comply with regulations which the FDA may deem applicable to such products. We are in the process of researching new products that may be classified as combination cosmetics and drugs which would require FDA approval. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 13 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Domestic State and Local Government Regulation 

 

Some states and local governments in the United States regulate the labeling, operation, sale, and distribution of our skin care products. To the extent additional state or local laws apply, we intend to comply with them.  

 

Foreign Government Regulation 

 

In general, we will need to comply with the government regulations of each individual country in which our products are to be distributed and sold. These regulations vary in complexity and can be as stringent, and on occasion even more stringent, than FDA regulations in the United States. The level of complexity and stringency is not always precisely understood today for each country, creating greater uncertainty for the international regulatory process. Furthermore, government regulations can change with little to no notice and may result in increased regulation of our product(s), resulting in a greater regulatory burden for us. We have not yet thoroughly explored the applicable laws and regulations that we will need to comply with in foreign jurisdictions. As a result, it is possible that we may not be permitted to sell our products in foreign markets or expand our business into one or more foreign jurisdictions.

   

THE SCIENCE BEHIND OUR PRODUCTS

 

Human Stem Cells

 

Cells are the basic living units that make up humans, animals, plants and other organisms. Stem cells have two important characteristics that distinguish them from other types of cells. First, they can renew themselves for long periods of time. Second, they are unspecialized and under certain conditions can be induced to become cells with special functions such as metabolically active cells of the liver or transparent and protective cells of the eye. Until recently, scientists have worked with two major kinds of stem cells, embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells each category of which has different properties and characteristics.

 

Adipose Stem Cell-Derived Media

 

We use human fat tissue (adipose tissue) to derive adult human stem cells. Adipose stem cell derived growth factors have been shown to contribute to exerting diverse regenerative effects on skin cells. These growth factors help in stimulating collagen synthesis and migration of dermal fibroblasts (a major contributor in skin repair, regeneration, and revitalization). Using a proprietary technique for the isolation of these cytokines from adipose derived stem cells, NuGene has been able to incorporate these proteins into its cosmeceutical line of products.

 

Peptides

 

Peptides are molecular links of amino acids that help your skin to produce the anti-wrinkle protein known as collagen. Peptides are closely related to proteins. Peptides and proteins are present in every living cell and are responsible for many biochemical activities including acting in enzymes, hormones, antibiotics, etc. Peptides are listed in many better skin care products, and they perform important functions in the skin. As people age, they lose collagen which results in sagging and wrinkled skin. Since collagen is a protein composed of long chains of amino acids linked together by peptide bonds, peptides play an important role in replacing lost collagen. As collagen breaks down, the protein chains break up into smaller chains of peptides. The resulting peptide chains send signals to the body to produce more collagen. Since peptides are small, they can penetrate the skin’s protective barriers. Applying peptides directly to the skin through good skin care products tricks the skin into thinking that it has lost collagen recently and needs to produce more. Research has identified a number of peptides which mimic the function of the naturally produced growth factors in the human body. The advantage of using peptides over growth factors in skin care formula is their stability, but they are not complete in structural integrity as expressed by proteins in vivo.

 

  9  

 

 

Production of Growth Factors

 

NuGene has been able to produce a sufficient quantity of biologically active growth factors derived from adipose stem cells to meet its current product requirements. With patent-pending technology, the process has achieved a high yield rate and superior quality of biomolecules. Our purification technique enables NuGene to have a high concentration of growth factors and cytokines in our skincare line.

 

Nano-encapsulation

 

One of the material challenges of the skincare science is the delivery of the active ingredients to the skin. At NuGene, we met this challenge by using proprietary nano-encapsulation technology. This technology allowed us to effectively deliver adipose stem cell derived cytokines and growth factors through embedding them within a nanosome or capsule. This added step enhances the penetration of these biomolecules into the skin cells. Additionally, it prevents these growth factors/cytokines from becoming degraded by proteases present in the mixture. We believe this enhances the effectiveness of our products.    

 

NuGene’s Anti-Aging Mechanism

 

Based upon research on adipose derived stem cell cultured media, we have discovered the following potential benefits:

 

· Increases the proliferation of epithelial cells;

· Increases the synthesis of hyaluronic acid;

· Increases the synthesis of collagen and elastin;

· Adipose stem cell-derived EGF, bFGF increases the proliferation of fibroblast which synthesizes collagen and elastin; and

· Adipose stem cell-derived EGF, IGF, bFGF, aFGF increases the skin elasticity by up-regulation of collagen, elastin, hyaluronic acid, and other extracellular matrixes (ECMs).

 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

 

We have invested, and continue to invest, significantly in intellectual properties, which consist of patents, trademarks, proprietary formulas and trade secrets, and URLs. We have a program to file applications for and obtain patents in the United States and in selected foreign countries where we believe filing for such protection is appropriate. There are certain processes and applications which we wish to keep confidential; we do not seek patent protection for such items. We currently have four U.S. provisional patent applications, and four pending international applications based on the same four U.S. provisional patents. The principal claims made in these applications cover wound scar and burn treatment creams, the methods of preparing stem cells and the formulations for stem cell media containing products. There are currently no patents issued in favor of the Company.

 

The following summarizes our pending applications:

 

AK01 skin treatment formulations  application describes and claims dermal treatment compositions include medium recovered from an adipose-derived stem cell culture where the medium is collected under defined conditions. The medium includes growth factors and other materials that, when transported to living portions of the skin, improve the condition of damaged or aged skin. The compositions include combinations of transport ingredients in controlled proportions for effective topical application.

 

A K03-WO burn, scar, and wound treatment creams  application describes and claims dermal treatment compositions include an emollient base, a conditioned medium, and a nanosilver particulate. The conditioned medium may be harvested from culture of human adipocyte-derived stem cells. The stem cells may be cultured in the presence of the nanosilver particulate. In other embodiments, the stem cells are cultured in medium that does not contain a nanosilver particulate. Instead the conditioned medium is compounded with the nanosilver particulate after the media is harvested from the stem cell culture.

  

AK04 burn, scar, and wound healing aids and bandages  application describes and claims bandages combining sterile dressings with a composition including a conditioned medium. The conditioned medium may be nanoencapsulated or may be dispersed in an emollient base and applied to the sterile dressing. The conditioned medium may be harvested from culture of human adipocyte-derived stem cells. The nanoencapsulated conditioned medium may be washed and resuspended before applying to the sterile dressing. The emollient base may include defined proportions of oils and emulsifying agents.

 

  10  

 

 

NG06 wound, wrinkle, and blemish treatment dressings  application claims priority (benefits from the earlier filing of) two of the Company’s earlier U.S. Provisional applications. The NG06 application describes and claims inventions relating to electroactive dressings and bandages. These inventions combine electroactive sterile dressings and the Company's proprietary human adipose-derived stem cell culture media. Human adipose-derived stem cells produce a variety of growth-promoting and healing materials such as growth factors and cytokines. Electroactive wound dressings produce local electric fields by providing electrical half cells in proximity to treated skin. The inventions combine the benefits of the growth factors and the localized electric fields to a localized region of the body.

 

The device of the invention includes dressings having a cathode and an anode, each forming an electrical half-cell, and a conductive treatment gel containing HADSCC media. The treatment gel may also contain human adipose-derived stem cells. The method includes providing a treatment gel and a dressing, applying the treatment gel to the skin or to the dressing, and applying the dressing to the skin. Other embodiments include bandages combining sterile dressings with a composition including a conditioned medium. The conditioned medium may be nanoencapsulated or may be dispersed in an emollient base and applied to the sterile dressing.

 

EMPLOYEES

 

As of December 31, 2016, we had 10 employees, all of which were full time employees. None of our employees is represented by a labor union, and we consider our relationship with our employees to be good. It is possible that the Company will outsource many functions so we cannot estimate whether there will be a significant increase in the number of employees. It is likely, however, that we will need to increase the number of employees in the general and administrative and business development areas over the next two years, as well as for our research and development activities.

  

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

 

Our corporate offices are currently located at 17912 Cowan, Suite A, Irvine, California, 92614. We sublease our sole corporate facilities from ASP, an affiliate of our Company, for approximately $17,109 per month (including common area maintenance), consistent with the amount that is charged to ASP by the property owner. On February 5, 2015, ASP entered into a new five-year lease for the property with the owner beginning July 1, 2015 and subsequently amended to begin June 1, 2015. The lease was subsequently amended to increase the square footage under lease beginning in January 2016. The lease includes annual increases in the monthly lease payments of approximately 3% each year.

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

On July 10, 2015, Stemage Skin Care, LLC (the “Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California entitled “Stemage Skin Care LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company vs. NuGene International, Inc. et al.” (Civil Action No.8:15-cv-01078-AG-JCG). The complaint also names as defendants NuGene, Inc., Ali Kharazmi, Saeed Kharazmi, Kathy Ireland Worldwide, Stephen Roseberry, Steve Rosenblum and Erik Sterling. The complaint contains allegations of damage asserted to be grounded on: (i) copyright infringement; (ii) interference with contract; (iii) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; (iv) negligent interference with prospective economic advantage; and (v) conspiracy. The complaint allegedly arises out of an August 20, 2012 agreement among the Plaintiff and kathy ireland inc. (“KI”) pursuant to which KI made Kathy Ireland available to perform “Ambassador Services” as defined within that agreement. That agreement effectively terminated in October 2014 and is the subject of a separate arbitration with KI and Kathy Ireland before the American Arbitration Association. On or around August 4, 2016 the Company settled the litigation. All parties to this litigation executed a settlement agreement resolving and waiving all claims, with a full dismissal, with prejudice, of the action. Pursuant to the settlement, in December 2016 the Company paid the total sum of $50,000 to the Plaintiff.

 

On July 31, 2015 Star Health & Beauty, LLC (“SH&B”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entitled “Star Health & Beauty, LLC vs. NuGene, Inc. and NuGene International, Inc. Defendants” (Case No. 1:15-cv-02634-CAP). The complaint alleges that our use of the NuGene name and trademark infringes on SH&B’s NUGEN name. SH&B seeks cancelation of our NuGene trademark, as well as unspecified monetary damages. In February, 2017 the parties agreed upon terms to settle the matter, subject to execution of a definitive written settlement agreement to include the following terms: (i) $60,000 to be paid by the Company to SH&B, in installments of $5,000 upon execution of a Settlement Agreement, $25,000 90-days thereafter, and $30,000 60-days thereafter; (ii) issuance of 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to SH&B upon execution of a Settlement Agreement; (iii) each side continues to use their names as the wish; (iv) full mutual releases of known and unknown claims; (v) each bears its respective cost of litigation; and, (vi) dismissal with prejudice of the action. The written Settlement Agreement is being finalized and should be executed within the next 30 days.

 

In May 2016, we were informed that the California Labor Commissioner scheduled a hearing in connection with two individuals that claimed our Company did not fulfill its obligations to pay a final paycheck. The two individuals are seeking back pay and penalties totaling approximately $31,000. A trial/hearing was scheduled for March 14, 2017 to decide each matter. In February 2017 we settled both matters. In exchange for a complete release from the first claimant, we will pay the first claimant a total of $9,000 in accordance with the following schedule: $4,500 on or before March 10, 2017; four additional payments of $1,000 each on the 15 th day of April, May, June, and July 2017; and, a final payment of $500 on or before the 15 th day of August. In exchange for a complete release from the second claimant, we will pay the second claimant a total of $4,000 on or before March 10, 2017.

 

  11  

 

 

On May 6, 2016, we were presented with a demand for payment of compensation for a former executive employee (the “Former Executive”) pursuant to his employment contract with our Company. The amount of the compensation claimed by the Former Executive totaled $49,998. The Company’s management is evaluating the merits of this matter. We believe that no amounts are due to the Former Executive and we have not accrued a liability as of December 31, 2016.

 

In December, 2016, we were informed by the four holders of our promissory notes totaling $480,000 (the “Holders”) that they would not honor their obligation to provide an additional $600,000 in similar financing. The Holders allege that certain breaches of the notes by the Company relieve them of their obligation. The Company firmly believes there is no merit whatsoever to the claims of the Holders. Rather than pursue litigation against the Holders, the Company has elected to pursue other sources of financing. However, should the Holders seek any acceleration or damages of any kind under the Notes, NuGene is committed to aggressively protect its rights, including though not limited to seeking damages from the Holders.

 

On February 24, 2017, we were informed that the Company will need to respond to a lawsuit filed by Habib American Bank (“Habib”) in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange. The action names Advanced Surgical Partners, LLC (“ASP”) as a defendant, as well as a number of additional named parties including though not limited to NuGene, Inc.; our Chairman of the Board, Mohammad Ali Kharazmi (“Ali”); and, our Chief Financial Officer and Board Member, Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi (“Saeed”). The action is based on a purported default under a commercial loan from Habib to ASP on or around January, 2008 (the “Loan”). According to the complaint, ASP currently owes Habib approximately $2.7 million under the Loan and that ASP has defaulted on the Loan. The Loan was arranged by Ali on behalf of ASP. Ali and Saeed are owners of, and control, ASP; they are also guarantors on the Loan. Additional family members of Ali and Saeed are alleged to be additional guarantors on the Loan, as are additional business entities owned by, or affiliated with, Ali and Saeed. The Loan is secured, in part, by the pledge of real estate owned by family members of Ali and Saeed (the “Pledged Real Estate”). A Deed of Trust was recorded by Habib against the Pledged Real Estate, and there appears to be more than sufficient equity in the Pledged Real Estate to pay off the Loan. NuGene is also alleged to be an additional guarantor on the Loan. A thorough search of NuGene records and files has failed to yield any documents or indication that NuGene was in fact a guarantor on the Loan. The Company has no documentation of the Loan or its purported guaranty, and there was no business relationship between ASP and NuGene which would suggest that a guaranty would have been provided. There was no prior knowledge by the Company of the existence of the Loan or the purported guaranty. Ali has steadfastly rejected the existence of the guaranty and has affirmatively assured the Company that he never authorized NuGene to guaranty the Loan, and that he never signed any documents on behalf of NuGene regarding the Loan. At this time, the Company intends to aggressively defend its rights and reject any status as a guarantor of the Loan. We believe that the Company’s risk and liability exposure under the Loan is minimal based upon (i) good faith and evidentiary defenses; and, (ii) the fact that there is more than adequate value/equity in the Pledged Real Estate to pay off the loan.

 

On April 4, 2017, Habib agreed to dismiss the Company from the litigation brought by Habib. A formal Settlement Agreement and Release has been executed by and between the Company and Habib.

 

Other than that described above, we are not currently a party to any other material legal proceedings. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us that in our view would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, or operating results. However, legal claims are inherently uncertain, and we cannot assure you that we will not be adversely affected in the future by legal proceedings.

 

WEBSITE

 

We currently maintain our corporate website at www.nugene.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and other related information will be available, free of charge, on our website after we electronically file those documents with, or otherwise furnish them to, the SEC. Our Internet website and the information contained therein, or connected thereto, are not and are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other SEC filing.

 

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our common stock involves a very high degree of risk.  You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, before making an investment decision.    Our future operating results may vary substantially from anticipated results due to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that affect us. The following discussion highlights some of these risks and uncertainties and the possible impact of these risks on future results of operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the market value of our stock could decline substantially and you could lose part or all of your investment.

 

  12  

 

 

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital

 

We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

 

Since the inception of NuGene, Inc. (our wholly owned subsidiary) in December 2006, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net losses were approximately $5.2 million and $11.8 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, we had a deficit accumulated since inception of $18.4 million. We have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of our NuGene line of products. More recently, we have begun to also invest our efforts and financial resources in the early development of our wound care/wound healing products.

 

We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses for at least the next several years. To become and remain profitable we must succeed in commercializing and marketing our NuGene line of products. We may never succeed in these activities and may never generate revenues that are significant or large enough to achieve profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, or continue our operations. A decline in the market price of our common stock could also cause you to lose all or a part of your investment.

 

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that our Company will continue as a going concern and we will need to obtain additional funding if we are to continue operations.

 

The factors described elsewhere herein raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from this uncertainty. To date we have incurred significant cash losses that have materially impaired our liquidity and working capital. We have been under severe liquidity restraints such that our prior CEO was required to personally guarantee borrowings made by our Company from our bank. This has resulted in the substantial increase in balances outstanding and owing to our suppliers that has put our relationships with them in jeopardy. We continue to attempt to procure the needed funding to maintain our operations. Should we be successful, we will need to quickly reverse the historical trend of our operations through generating significantly higher levels of revenue (at or about historical margins) and reducing our operating expenses. If we cannot generate the revenues and gross margin at levels required to achieve profitability or obtain sufficient additional capital on acceptable terms, we will need to substantially revise our business plan or cease operations. Should that happen, an investor could suffer the loss of a significant portion or all of his investment in our Company.

 

We have a limited operating history and investors will have no ability to gauge market acceptance for our products or the ability of management to execute on our business plan.

 

We are an early-stage company with a limited operating history and limited revenues derived from our operations. Our operations to date have been primarily focused on our formation, the hiring of our management team, acquiring, licensing, and developing our technology and products, building and expanding our sales force, marketing department and investor relations and commencing the commercial launch of our products.

  

It is difficult to predict future performance and our ability to maintain operations is dependent upon a number of factors over which we have limited control. As a result, it is difficult to predict our quarterly financial results and they are likely to fluctuate significantly. We are a relatively new company with a limited operating history and our sales prospects are uncertain. We also have relatively limited experience selling our products. Accordingly, we cannot predict with any certainty the timing or level of sales of our products in the future. If our quarterly sales or operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. In addition to the other factors discussed under these “Risk Factors,” specific factors that may cause fluctuations in our operating results include:

 

Demand and pricing for our products, including any change in wholesaler purchasing patterns for our products;
Physician and patient acceptance of our products;
Timing of new product offerings, acquisitions, licenses or other significant events by us, our partners or our competitors;
Regulatory approvals and legislative changes affecting our cosmeceutical products;
Any interruption in the manufacturing or distribution of our products, including events affecting our third-party suppliers and any failure to comply with manufacturing specifications;
Changes in treatment practices of physicians or other providers that currently recommend our products;
Significant product returns and rebates;
Implementation of new or revised accounting or tax rules or policies; and
The effect of competing technological and market developments.

 

  13  

 

 

Because we have a limited operating history, we are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties of a new business.

 

We initiated the rollout of the first generation of NuGene products in 2013. We are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties normally associated with an early stage business, including potential manufacturing issues, difficulties establishing our marketing and distribution operations, lack of name recognition, lack of adequate capital, difficulties hiring and retaining qualified employees and difficulties in complying with all applicable federal, state, and local regulatory and administrative requirements. As an early stage company, we expect to incur operating losses until (if ever) we successfully release and market a line of products that will generate enough revenues and gross margin to become profitable or thereafter maintain profitability. There is no assurance that we will be able to validate and market products that will generate enough revenues for us to become profitable or thereafter maintain profitability. As a result, we cannot predict when, if ever, it might achieve profitability and cannot be certain that it will be able to sustain profitability, if achieved. Our lack of an operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate our business prospects in connection with an investment in our securities. 

 

We need to raise additional capital to continue our operations, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and which materially may dilute your investment .

 

To attain profitability, we must increase our revenues and manage our product, operating and administrative expenses, as to which each of which we can give no assurance. Because we have been to date unable to generate sufficient revenues to pay our expenses and our existing sources of cash and cash flows are otherwise insufficient to fund our activities, we must raise additional funds to continue our operations and to manage our current short-term debt load. Further, our recent efforts to raise additional capital have been unsuccessful. We do not have any arrangements in place for additional funds and no assurance can be given that required funds will become available on favorable terms, or at all. Furthermore, if we issue equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, our existing stockholders may experience dilution, and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders. Our current cash and cash equivalents are insufficient to fund our operations through the end of our fiscal year in 2016. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining additional funds on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and thereafter in achieving profitability, we may be required to curtail significantly or cease our operations, which could result in the loss of all of your investment in our stock.   

 

Should we be able to obtain additional financing and thereafter be successful in growing our revenues according to our operating plans, we may not be able to manage our growth effectively, which could adversely affect our operations and financial performance

 

The ability to manage and operate our business as we execute our growth strategy will require further substantial capital and effective planning. Additionally, we have not been able to maintain adequate levels of capital to fund existing operations. Significant rapid growth on top of our current operations could greatly strain our internal resources, leading to a much lower quality of customer service, reporting problems and delays in meeting important deadlines resulting in substantial loss of market share and other problems that could adversely affect our financial performance. Our efforts to grow could place a significant strain on our personnel, management systems, infrastructure, liquidity, and other resources. If we do not manage our growth effectively, our operations could be adversely affected, resulting in slower, no or negative growth, critical shortages of cash and a failure to achieve or sustain profitability.

 

Significant differences between actual and estimated demand for our products could adversely affect us.

 

If we overestimate demand for our products, we may be required to write off inventories and increase our reserves for product returns or liabilities to customers in future periods. If we underestimate demand, we may not have sufficient inventory of products to ship to our customers. Our cosmeceutical products have expiration dates that generally range from 24 to 36 months from the date of manufacture. We need to exercise judgment in estimating these reserves. The actual amounts could be materially different from our estimates, and differences will need to be accounted for in the period in which they become known. If we determine that the actual amounts exceed our reserve amounts, we will record a charge to earnings to approximate the difference. A material reduction in earnings resulting from a charge could have a material adverse effect on our net income, results of operations and financial condition.

 

If we raise additional funds through collaboration, licensing, or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish potentially valuable rights to our current products, potential products, or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us .

 

If adequate funds are not available to us, our ability to achieve profitability or to respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited, and we may be required to delay, significantly curtail or eliminate the sales of one or more of our current products and/or the development of one or more of our potential products.

 

Risks Related to the Development and Commercialization of Our Product Candidates

 

If our product candidates are found to cause undesirable side effects we may need to delay or abandon our development and commercialization efforts.

 

Any undesirable side effects that might be caused by our product candidates could interrupt, delay or halt the commercialization and marketing of the products. In addition, if we start selling any of our product candidates and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by the product. This could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product or could substantially increase the costs and expenses of commercializing the product, which in turn could delay or prevent us from generating significant revenues from its sale.

 

  14  

 

 

The commercial success of any product candidates that we may develop will depend upon the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, and consumers.

 

Any products that we bring to the market may not gain market acceptance by physicians, patients, and consumers. If these products do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues and we may not become profitable. Physicians will not recommend our product candidates until we can demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates as compared to other treatments. Even if the clinical safety and efficacy of our product candidates are established, physicians may elect not to recommend these products, and consumers may choose not to purchase our products. The degree of market acceptance of our product candidates will depend on a number of factors, including:

  

the willingness and ability of patients, the healthcare community, and consumers to adopt our products;
the ability to manufacture our product candidates in sufficient quantities with acceptable quality and to offer our product candidates for sale at competitive prices;
the perception of patients, the healthcare community, and consumers regarding the safety, efficacy and benefits of our product candidates compared to those of competing products or therapies;
the convenience and ease of administration of our product candidates relative to existing treatment methods; and
marketing and distribution support for our product candidates.

 

We face substantial competition in the development of our product candidates which may result in others developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than we do.

 

We are engaged in segments of the cosmeceuticals industry that are characterized by intense competition and rapidly evolving technology. Many large companies, academic institutions, and other public and private research organizations are pursuing the development of competing products. We face, and expect to continue to face, intense and increasing competition as new products enter the market and advanced technologies become available. Many of our potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical and human resources than we have and may be better equipped to discover, develop, manufacture, and commercialize product candidates.

 

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

 

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our competitors may develop and market similar or identical products that may reduce demand for our products, and we may be prevented from establishing collaborative relationships on favorable terms.

 

The following factors are important to our success:

 

receiving patent protection for our product candidates;

 

maintaining our trade secrets;

 

not infringing on the proprietary rights of others; and

 

  preventing others from infringing on our proprietary rights.

 

We will be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our proprietary rights are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. We try to protect our proprietary position by filing U.S. and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development of our business. There are currently no patents issued in favor of the Company.

 

Our pending patent applications, those we may file in the future, or those we may license from third parties, may not result in patents being issued. If patents do not issue with claims encompassing our products, our competitors may develop and market similar or identical products that compete with ours. Even if such patents are issued, they may not provide us with proprietary protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar technology. Failure to obtain effective patent protection for our technology and products may reduce demand for our products and prevent us from establishing collaborative relationships on favorable terms.

  

We also rely on trade secrets, know-how and technology, which are not protected by patents, to maintain our competitive position. We try to protect this information by entering into confidentiality agreements with parties that have access to it, such as potential corporate partners, collaborators, employees and consultants. Any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our confidential information or our competitors may learn of the information in some other way. Furthermore, others may independently develop similar technologies or duplicate any technology that we have developed. If any trade secret, know-how or other technology not protected by a patent were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

 

  15  

 

 

The laws of many foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Accordingly, the fact that we have obtained certain patent rights in the United States does not guarantee that we will be able to obtain the same or similar rights elsewhere. Even if we are granted patents in foreign countries, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to enforce our rights effectively.

 

If we are unable to obtain and maintain protection for our intellectual property, the value of our technology and products may be adversely affected, which would materially affect our business .

 

Patents . Our commercial success will continue to depend in part on the patent rights we plan to obtain related to future products we may market. We currently have four U.S. provisional patent applications, and four pending international applications based on the same four U.S. provisional patents. The principal claims made in these applications cover wound scar and burn treatment creams, the methods of preparing stem cells and the formulations for stem cell media containing products. There are currently no patents issued in favor of the Company. Our success also depends on our and our licensors’, collaborators’, and suppliers’ ability to maintain these patent rights against third-party challenges to their validity, scope, or enforceability of these patent rights.

 

Our patent position (and those of our licensors, collaborators, and suppliers) is subject to the same uncertainty as other pharmaceutical and consumer product companies. Our patent applications (as well as the patents and patent applications of our licensors, collaborators and suppliers) may not protect our technologies and products because, among other things, our pending applications may not result in issued patents; we may develop additional proprietary technologies that are not patentable; patents issued to us may not provide a basis for future commercially viable products; and patents issued to us may not provide us with any competitive advantage, or may be challenged, circumvented, invalidated or rendered unenforceable by third parties. For example, the USPTO or the courts may deny, narrow, or invalidate patent claims, particularly those that concern biotechnology and pharmaceutical inventions. Inventors or third parties of whom we are unaware, may challenge the ownership of patents and applications we own, license or benefit from through supply agreements with our collaborators and suppliers. We, our licensors, collaborators, and suppliers may not be successful in securing or maintaining proprietary or patent protection for our products, and protection that is secured may be challenged and possibly lost.

 

Trade Secrets and Proprietary Know-how . We, our licensors, collaborators, and suppliers also rely upon trade secrets, proprietary know-how, and other technological innovation, particularly when patent protection is not appropriate or available. However trade secrets are difficult to protect, and we have limited control over the protection of trade secrets used by our licensors, collaborators, and suppliers. Although we attempt to protect our trade secrets by requiring our employees, consultants, advisors and current and prospective business partners to enter into confidentiality agreements prohibiting them from disclosing or taking our proprietary information and technology, these agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets and proprietary know-how. If our employees or consultants breach these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies for any of these breaches. Further, third parties that are not parties to confidentiality agreements may obtain access to our trade secrets or know-how. Others may independently develop similar or equivalent trade secrets or know-how. If our confidential or proprietary information is divulged to third parties, including our competitors, our competitive position in the marketplace will be harmed and our ability to successfully penetrate our target markets could be severely compromised.

 

Trademarks . Our trademarks will continue to be important to our success and competitive position. We have received U.S. trademark registration for our corporate name, NuGene ® , and own or have rights to use our product and component names. We also have a license for the use of Kathy Ireland ®  who acts as our brand ambassador. We also will need to pursue trademark registration for any new trademarks that we select. We may not be able to secure any of our trademark registrations with the PTO or comparable foreign authorities. If we do not adequately protect our rights in our various trademarks from infringement (and we are involved in two separate ongoing disputes with respect to trademarks), any goodwill that has been developed in those marks would be lost or impaired. We could also be forced to cease using any of our trademarks that are found to infringe upon or otherwise violate the trademark or service mark rights of another company, and, as a result, we could lose all the goodwill that has been developed in those marks and could be liable for damages caused by any infringement or violation.

   

We may be subject to claims that we, or our employees, have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information of our employees’ former employers.

 

We employ individuals who were previously employed at other personal care product or nutritional supplement companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. To the extent that our employees are involved in research areas that are similar to those in which they were involved with their former employers, we may be subject to claims that such employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed the alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information of the former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against such claims.

 

  16  

 

 

Claims by other parties that we infringe or have misappropriated their proprietary technology may result in liability for damages, royalties, or other payments, or stop our development and commercialization efforts.

 

Competitors and other third parties may initiate patent litigation against us in the United States or in foreign countries based on existing patents or patents that may be granted in the future. Many of our competitors may have obtained patents covering products and processes generally related to our products and processes, and they may assert these patents against us. Moreover, there can be no assurance that these competitors have not sought or will not seek additional patents that may cover aspects of our technology. As a result, there is a greater likelihood of a patent dispute than would be expected if our competitors were pursuing unrelated technologies.

 

While we conduct patent searches to determine whether the technologies used in our products infringe patents held by third parties, numerous patent applications are currently pending and may be filed in the future for technologies generally related to our technologies, including many patent applications that remain confidential after filing. Due to these factors and the inherent uncertainty in conducting patent searches, there can be no guarantee that we will not violate third-party patent rights that we have not yet identified.

 

There may be U.S. and foreign patents issued to third parties that relate to aspects of our product candidates. There may also be patent applications filed by these or other parties in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions that relate to some aspects of our product candidates, which, if issued, could subject us to infringement actions. The owners or licensees of these and other patents may file one or more infringement actions against us. In addition, a competitor may claim misappropriation of a trade secret by an employee hired from that competitor. Any such infringement or misappropriation action could cause us to incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit and could distract our management from our business, even if the allegations of infringement or misappropriation are unwarranted. A need to defend multiple actions or claims could have a disproportionately greater impact. In addition, either in response to or in anticipation of any such infringement or misappropriation claim, we may enter into commercial agreements with the owners or licensees of these rights. The terms of these commercial agreements may include substantial payments, including substantial royalty payments on revenues received by us in connection with the commercialization of our products.

 

Payments under such agreements could increase our operating losses and reduce our resources available for development activities. Furthermore, a party making this type of claim could secure a judgment that requires us to pay substantial damages, which would increase our operating losses and reduce our resources available for development activities. A judgment could also include an injunction or other court order that could prevent us from making, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing our products or prevent our customers from using our products. If a court determined or if we independently concluded that any of our products or manufacturing processes violated third-party proprietary rights, our clinical trials could be delayed and there can be no assurance that we would be able to reengineer the product or processes to avoid those rights, or to obtain a license under those rights on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

 

RISKS RELATED TO REGULATORY MATTERS

 

While we believe that that our principal cosmeceutical products and product candidates do not require FDA approval as new drugs, the FDA could disagree and we may be required to conduct clinical trials to establish efficacy and safety or cease to market these product s.

 

Our cosmeceutical products are marketed on the basis that they are generally recognized as safe and effective for their intended use and thus do not require new drug approval. The FDA has not challenged this position. The FDA may at any time disagree with our position for a variety of reasons, including new information about the particular product or its active ingredients, how the product is promoted, if another company obtains FDA approval for a prescription drug with the same active ingredient, or based on a change of FDA regulatory policy. This could require us to seek new drug approval for these products to remain on the market or to withdraw a product until required clinical trials are performed and new drug approval is obtained.  

 

If the active ingredients of the products are finally determined by the FDA not to be generally recognized as safe and effective for over-the-counter, or OTC use, the FDA may seek to apply those findings to prescription products as well, leading to potential objections to the continued marketing of the products or a demand that marketing continue only on the basis of a new drug approval. Either of these outcomes could affect the way our products are marketed or our ability to market them at all. Further, the FDA could decide that growth factors derived from human adipose stem cells do not come within this policy and thus must seek new drug approval to remain on the market or must be withdrawn until approval is obtained.

 

Our wound healing-wound care products under development may not be approved by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, and any failure or delay associated with our product development and clinical trials or obtaining regulatory approval of these products would increase our product development costs and time to market. We face substantial risks of failure inherent in developing stem cell growth factor derived products that may be determined by the FDA to fall under the classification as pharmaceutical products. The pharmaceutical industry is subject to stringent regulation by many different agencies at the federal, state, and international levels. If determined to be pharmaceutical products, then the product candidates will be required to satisfy rigorous standards of safety and efficacy before the FDA approves them, and before any foreign regulatory authorities approve them for commercial use in any countries outside the U.S. where we decide to market them. Even if a regulatory filing is accepted, the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities may request additional information from us, including data from additional clinical trials, and, ultimately, may not grant marketing approval for some of our products or may grant approval only under conditions that are less commercially attractive than anticipated. To the extent that these products do not perform successfully in our planned pivotal clinical trials, we may need to develop alternative candidates. Product development is generally a long, expensive, and uncertain process. Successful development of our new wound healing-wound care product formulations, including our incisional and or burn cream will depend on many factors, including:

 

  17  

 

 

Our ability to select key components, establish a stable formulation and optimize characteristics;
Our ability to develop a formulation that demonstrates our intended safety and efficacy profile; and
Our ability to transfer from an early-stage company to commercial-scale operations and the costs associated with commercial manufacturing.

 

If we are unable to develop suitable clinical formulations of our wound healing-wound care product candidates or are significantly delayed in doing so, our ability to commercialize these products will be adversely affected. Once we have manufactured a formulation that we believe is suitable for pivotal clinical testing, we will need to complete our clinical testing, and failure can occur at any stage of testing. These clinical tests must comply with FDA and other applicable regulations. We may suffer significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after showing promising results in earlier trials. The results of later clinical trials may not replicate the results of prior clinical trials. Based on results at any stage of clinical trials, we may decide to discontinue development of a product candidate. We, or the FDA, may suspend clinical trials at any time if the patients participating in the trials are exposed to unacceptable health risks or if the FDA finds deficiencies in our applications to conduct the clinical trials or in the conduct of our trials. Moreover, not all products in clinical testing will receive timely, or any, regulatory approval. Even if clinical trials are completed as planned, their results may not support our assumptions or our product claims. The clinical process may fail to demonstrate that our products are safe for humans or effective for intended uses. In addition, these failures could cause us to abandon a product entirely. If we fail to take any current or future product candidate from the development stage to market, we will have incurred significant expenses without the possibility of generating revenues, and our business will be adversely affected.

   

We will be subject to ongoing regulatory review of products currently under development that may be marketed in the future.

 

Any of our pharmaceutical products under development will be subject to extensive regulation. These regulations will impact many aspects of our operations, including the manufacture, labeling, packaging, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, and record keeping related to the products. The FDA also may require post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the effects of approved products or place conditions on any approvals that could restrict the commercial applications of these products. In addition, the subsequent discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product, including withdrawal of the product from the market. If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we may be subject to fines, suspension, or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, injunctions against their distribution, disgorgement of money, operating restrictions, and criminal prosecution.

 

In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing of pharmaceutical products, several other types of state and federal laws have been applied to restrict certain marketing practices in the pharmaceutical industry in recent years. These laws include anti-kickback statutes and false claims statutes. Violations of the federal anti-kickback statute are punishable by imprisonment, criminal fines, civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. Although there are a number of statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution or other regulatory sanctions under the federal anti-kickback statute, the exemptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration intended to induce prescribing, purchasing, arranging for or recommending prescription or purchase may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for a statutory exemption or safe harbor. Federal false claims laws prohibit any person from knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false claim to the federal government, or knowingly making, or causing to be made a false statement to have a false claim paid. The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to the federal anti-kickback law and false claims laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor. Sanctions under these federal and state laws may include civil monetary penalties, exclusion of a manufacturer’s products from reimbursement under government programs, criminal fines, and imprisonment.

 

In addition, as part of the sales and marketing process, pharmaceutical companies frequently provide samples of approved drugs to physicians. This practice is overseen by the FDA and other governmental authorities under regulations that include, in particular, requirements concerning record keeping and control procedures. Any failure to comply with these regulations may result in significant criminal and civil penalties as well as damage to our credibility in the marketplace. Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the safe harbors, it is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of these laws, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

   

The regulatory status of our cosmeceutical products could change, and we may be required to conduct clinical trials to establish efficacy and safety or cease to market these products .

 

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act does not recognize “cosmeceuticals” as a category of products. We use the term “cosmeceuticals” as a marketing term to describe our non-prescription, cosmetic products. The FDA does not have a premarket approval system for cosmetic products outside of new color additives, and we believe we are permitted to market our cosmeceutical products and have them manufactured without submitting safety or efficacy data to the FDA. However, the FDA may in the future determine to regulate what we term as cosmeceuticals or the ingredients included in our cosmeceuticals as drugs or biologics, rather than cosmetics. If any of our products are deemed to be drugs or biologics, rather than cosmetics, we would be required to conduct clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our cosmeceutical products in order to continue to market and sell them. In such event, we may not have sufficient resources to conduct any required clinical trials and we may not be able to establish sufficient efficacy or safety data to resume the sale of our cosmeceutical products. Any inquiries by the FDA or any foreign regulatory authorities into the regulatory status of our cosmeceutical products and any related interruption in the marketing and sale of our cosmeceutical products could severely damage our brands and image in the marketplace, including our relationships with physicians and their patients.

 

  18  

 

 

If we choose, or are required, to seek FDA approval to market and sell any of our products, we may be unable to demonstrate the necessary safety and efficacy to obtain such FDA approval.

 

Our current business strategy is focused on developing and commercializing product opportunities as cosmeceuticals not requiring FDA approval. In the future we, alone or with project partners, may seek FDA regulatory approval to market and sell one or more of our products assets as an FDA-approved drug. The FDA may also seek to classify one or more of our products as drug rather a cosmeceutical. If we choose, or are required, to obtain FDA approval to market and sell any of our products, the approval process is costly, time consuming, uncertain, and subject to unanticipated delays. The FDA or other regulatory agencies may not approve a product candidate on a timely basis or at all. Before we obtain FDA approval for the sale of any product, we will be required to demonstrate through preclinical studies and clinical trials that it is safe and effective for each intended use, which we may not be able to do. A failure to demonstrate safety and efficacy of a product candidate to the FDA’s satisfaction would result in our failure to obtain FDA approval. Moreover, even if the FDA were to grant regulatory approval of a product candidate, the approval may be limited to specific therapeutic areas or limited as to its distribution, which could reduce revenue potential, and we will be subject to extensive and costly post-approval requirements and oversight with respect to commercialization of the product candidate.

 

Delays in the completion of, or the termination of, any clinical or non-clinical trials for any product candidates for which we may seek FDA approval could adversely affect our business.  

 

Clinical trials are very expensive, time consuming, unpredictable and difficult to design and implement. The results of clinical trials may be unfavorable, they may continue for several years, and they may take significantly longer to complete and involve significantly more costs than expected. Delays in the commencement or completion of clinical testing could significantly affect product development costs and plans with respect to any product candidate for which we seek FDA approval. The commencement and completion of clinical trials can be delayed and experience difficulties for a number of reasons, including delays and difficulties caused by circumstances over which we may have no control. For instance, approvals of the scope, design or trial site may not be obtained from the FDA and other required bodies in a timely manner or at all, agreements with acceptable terms may not be reached in a timely manner or at all with clinical research organizations to conduct the trials, a sufficient number of subjects may not be recruited and enrolled in the trials, and third-party manufacturers of the materials for use in the trials may encounter delays and problems in the manufacturing process, including failure to produce materials in sufficient quantities or of an acceptable quality to complete the trials. If we were to experience delays in the commencement or completion of, or if we were to terminate, any clinical or non-clinical trials we pursue in the future, the commercial prospects for the applicable product candidates may be limited or eliminated, which may prevent us from recouping our investment in research and development efforts for the product candidate and would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

 

Even if we successfully develop any product candidate into an FDA-approved drug, failure to comply with continuing federal and state regulations could result in the loss of approvals to market the drug.

 

Even if we successfully develop any product candidate into an FDA-approved drug, we will be subject to extensive continuing regulatory requirements and review, including review of adverse drug experiences and clinical results from any post-marketing tests or continued actions required as a condition of approval. The manufacturer and manufacturing facilities we would use to produce any drug preparations would be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA. We will be reliant on third parties to maintain their manufacturing processes in compliance with FDA and all other applicable regulatory requirements. Any changes to a product that has been approved, including the way it is manufactured or promoted, will often require FDA approval again before the product, as modified, may be marketed and sold. In addition, we and the manufacturers of the drug will be subject to ongoing FDA requirements for submission of safety and other post-market information. If we or the manufacturers of the drug failed to comply with these or any other applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency may, among other things, issue warning letters, impose civil or criminal penalties, suspend or withdraw regulatory approval, impose restrictions on our operations, close the facilities of the manufacturers, seize or detain products or require a product recall.

   

Regulatory review of the manner in which we market and promote our products could result in classification of a product as a drug, which could adversely affect our business.

 

Regulatory review also covers a company’s activities in the marketing and promotion of its products. The FDA could review the manner in which we market and promote our products, including though not limited to claims and information provided on our packaging, in product descriptions and details, and on our website. If the FDA determines that such marketing and promotion classifies a product as a drug, we would be forced to obtain FDA approval for such product. We could also face significant potential penalties and restrictions for promotion of a drug for an unapproved use. Sales and marketing programs are under scrutiny for compliance with various mandated requirements, such as illegal promotions to health care professionals. Failure to comply with these requirements could expose us to negative publicity, fines and penalties that could harm our business.

 

  19  

 

 

If our manufacturers do not comply with U.S. and federal regulations, our supply of product could be disrupted or terminated .

 

Our manufacturers must comply with U.S. regulations and corresponding foreign standards, including the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations for drug manufacturing and processing, or “cGMPs”, applicable to the manufacturing processes related to ingredients sold to us for use in our products, and their facilities must be inspected and approved by the FDA and other regulatory agencies as part of their business. We will have limited control over the FDA compliance of our third-party manufacturers. If any of our manufacturers fail to meet or are found to be non-compliant with the cGMPs or any other FDA requirements or similar regulatory requirements outside of the U.S., obtaining the required regulatory approvals, including from the FDA, to use alternative suppliers may be a lengthy and uncertain process. A lengthy interruption in the manufacturing of one or more of our products as a result of non-compliance could adversely affect our product inventories and supply of products available for sale which could reduce our sales, margins and market share, as well as harm our overall business and financial results. Additionally, the Federal Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) may hold labelers/specification developers (brands selling a product) criminally and civilly liable for the violations, acts, and omission of their manufacturers.

 

Under the FDCA, cosmetics (which we refer to as cosmeceuticals) are defined as articles applied to the human body to cleanse, beautify, or alter the appearance. The manufacturing of cosmetics is subject to the misbranding and adulteration sections of the FDCA applicable to cosmetics. Cosmetics are not subject to premarket approval by the FDA but the product and ingredients must be tested to assure safety. If the product or ingredients are not tested for safety, a specific warning is required. The FDA monitors compliance of cosmetic products through random inspections of cosmetic manufacturers and distributors. The FDA utilizes an “intended use” doctrine to determine whether a product is a drug or cosmetic by the labeling claims made for the product. If a cosmetic product is intended for a disease condition or to affect the structure or any function of the human body, the FDA will regulate the product as a drug rather than as a cosmetic. The product will then be subject to all drug requirements under the FDCA. The labeling of cosmetic products is subject to the requirements of the FDCA, the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act and other FDA regulations.

  

We have only limited experience in regulatory affairs, which may affect our ability or the time we require to obtain necessary regulatory approvals. We have only limited experience in regulatory affairs, including the preparation and filing of applications to gain the regulatory approvals necessary for pharmaceutical product candidates. Moreover, some of the products that are likely to result from our product development, licensing and acquisition programs may be based on new technologies that have not been extensively tested in humans. As a result, we may experience a longer than customary regulatory process in connection with obtaining regulatory approvals for any products that we develop, license or acquire. 

 

If we move forward with production of an FDA regulated product, and we are found not to be in compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices, then our operations could be harmed.

 

In the United States, FDA regulations on Good Manufacturing Practices and Adverse Event Reporting requirements require us and our vendors to maintain good manufacturing processes, including stringent vendor qualifications, ingredient identification, manufacturing controls and record keeping.  The ingredient identification requirement, which requires us to confirm the levels, identity, and potency of ingredients listed on our product labels within a narrow range, is particularly burdensome and difficult for us with respect to products that contain many different ingredients. We are also required to report serious adverse events associated with consumer use of our products. Our operations could be harmed if regulatory authorities make determinations that we, or our vendors, are not in compliance with these regulations or public reporting of adverse events harms our reputation for quality and safety. A finding of noncompliance may result in administrative warnings, penalties, or actions impacting our ability to continue selling certain products.  In addition, compliance with these regulations has increased and may further increase the cost of manufacturing certain of our products as we work with our vendors to assure they are qualified and in compliance.

 

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

 

Our products and product candidates may not achieve or maintain widespread market acceptance.

 

We may not achieve or maintain widespread market acceptance of our products or product candidates among physicians, patients, or healthcare providers. Our products’ success is highly dependent on physician and patient preference and market acceptance. We have a limited history of promoting our cosmeceutical products. Our significant marketing efforts to date have been focused primarily on dermatologists and plastic surgeons.

 

We believe that market acceptance of our products will depend on many factors including:

 

The perceived advantages of our products over competing products;
The effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts;
The convenience and ease of administration of our products;
The safety and efficacy of our products and the prevalence and severity of any possible adverse side effects;
The availability and success of alternative treatments;
Our product pricing and cost effectiveness;
Publicity concerning our products, product candidates or competitive products;

 

  20  

 

 

Whether or not patients routinely use our products and purchase additional product, and
Our ability to respond to changes in physician, aestheticians, and patient preferences for the treatment of dermatological conditions and the improvement of the appearance of skin.

 

If our products fail to achieve or maintain market acceptance or if new products or technologies are introduced by others that are more favorably received than our products, are more cost effective or that otherwise render our products obsolete, we may experience a decline in the demand for our products.

 

If we are unable to market and sell our products successfully, our business, financial condition, results of operation and future growth would suffer. Our ability to compete depends upon the success of our business development activities and our ability, and the ability of our collaborators, to innovate, develop, and commercialize new products and product enhancements, as well as to identify new markets for our products.

  

Our business strategy requires us to develop or acquire new and innovative applications of our products, identify new markets for our existing products, and develop or acquire new technology. We are currently developing products for the treatment of burns and exploring several delivery technologies to improve our existing products. However, our development efforts may not lead to new commercial products. To successfully expand our product offerings, we must:

 

Develop or acquire new products that either add to or significantly improve our current product lines;
Convince our target customers that any new cosmeceutical products or line extensions would be an attractive revenue-generating addition to their practices;
Protect our products with defensible intellectual property; and
Satisfy and maintain all regulatory requirements for commercialization.

 

The process of developing product candidates involves a high degree of risk and may take several years. Product candidates we may acquire or license in the future that appear promising in the early phases of development may fail to reach the market for several reasons, including:

 

Pharmaceutical product candidates may fail to receive regulatory approvals required to bring the products to market;
Manufacturing costs or other factors may make our pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical product candidates uneconomical;
The proprietary rights of others and their competing products and technologies may prevent our product candidates from being commercialized;
Success of pharmaceutical product candidates in nonclinical and early clinical studies does not ensure that later stage clinical trials will be successful;
The length of time necessary to complete clinical trials and to submit an application for marketing approval of pharmaceutical product candidates for a final decision by a regulatory authority varies significantly and may be difficult to predict; and
Developing pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical product candidates is very expensive and will have a significant impact on our operating expenses.

 

We may be unable to continue to develop new products, enhancements to our existing products and other technologies in the near term, if at all, in part because new products or enhancements to our existing products must meet regulatory standards and receive requisite regulatory approvals.

 

Our failure to introduce new products or enhancements to our existing products could adversely affect our expected growth rate and adversely affect our overall business and financial results.

 

Our marketed products and our products under development could be rendered obsolete by technological or medical advances .

 

The development of medical advances to treat the conditions that our products are designed to address may render our marketed products and our products under development obsolete or uneconomical. The enhancement to the appearance of skin, the regeneration of hair growth and the treatment of burns, acne or other skin disorders are the subjects of active research and development by many potential competitors, including major pharmaceutical companies, specialized biotechnology firms, universities and other research institutions, as well as other major cosmeceutical companies which develop wrinkle reduction or age defying skin and hair care products. While we intend to expand our technological capabilities to remain competitive, research and development by others may render our technology or products obsolete or noncompetitive or result in treatments superior to any therapy we develop.

 

Technological advances affecting costs of production also could adversely affect our ability to sell products. Our products could become more expensive to produce, or not competitive, which would decrease our revenues and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

  

  21  

 

 

Our future success depends on our ability to retain our chief executive officer and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.

 

We are highly dependent on Steven Carlson, our Chief Executive Officer. The loss of the services of Mr. Carlson might impede the achievement of our research, development, and commercialization objectives. Replacing Mr. Carlson may be difficult and time-consuming because of the limited number of individuals in our industry with the skills and experiences required to successfully develop and commercialize our products. We generally do not maintain key person life insurance to cover the loss of any of our employees.

 

Recruiting and retaining qualified scientific personnel, clinical personnel and sales and marketing personnel will also be critical to our success. We may not be able to attract and retain these personnel on acceptable terms, if at all, given the competition for similar personnel. In addition, we rely on consultants and advisors, including production, marketing, medical, and clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategy. Our consultants and advisors may be employed by employers other than us and may have commitments under consulting or advisory contracts with other entities that may limit their availability to us.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the majority of our revenues were derived from two wholesale distributors. The loss of the distributors could have a material negative effect on our financial condition.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we derived 31.1% and 15.7% of our revenues from two wholesale distributors. These two distributors purchase products from us on a purchase order basis on negotiated terms of payment. The distributors are under no obligation to continue to purchase our products. The loss of either of the distributors, a material reduction in their purchases or the cancellation of product orders or unexpected returns of unsold products could decrease our revenues and impede our future growth prospects. We do not have long-term purchase commitments with our distributors. We are actively seeking to expand our products’ distribution channels in order to reduce the impact the loss of any one distributor would have on our Company, however we can give no assurance that we will be successful in doing so.

 

If we breach any of our key license or supply agreements, we could lose exclusivity rights or the agreements could be terminated .

 

We have an international licensing agreement with kiWW for all cosmetic products for a term of eight years. These rights are important to our business, and any breach of the agreement could result in a termination of the respective rights, which, in turn, would prevent us from marketing the affected products or developing the affected product candidates. Our agreement with kiWW require milestone and royalty payments, minimum revenue requirements or minimum annual royalty payments and other obligations. If we have insufficient demand for these products or otherwise fail to meet the minimum purchase requirements or any of the other requirements set forth in the agreement, we could lose the exclusive nature of our right to market products under the kiWW brand. Additionally, we are overdue in payments owed to kiWW. Should we not be able to cure this breach of our payment obligations under the agreement within a mutually agreeable timeframe, we face the possibility that the agreement could be terminated. In that event, others could obtain rights to sell products that compete directly with our products and our revenues and market share would correspondingly decrease. The loss of any rights under the license agreement would adversely affect our ability to sell our products and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

 

At the current time we do not have any material supply agreements. Materials are procured using purchase orders, and we do not rely upon any single vendor for materials or supplies. There may come a time in the future when we enter into supply agreements for materials. If we fail to comply with any of the requirements under these prospective supply agreements, we may lose rights under these agreements or they may be terminated in their entirety. As of the date of this prospectus, we remain committed to not entering into any such supply agreements. In that event, others could obtain rights to sell products that compete directly with our products and our revenues and market share would correspondingly decrease. The loss of any rights under any of our license and supply agreements would adversely affect our ability to sell our products and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

   

We face risks due to our reliance on third parties to perform many necessary commercial services for our products, including services related to the distribution, storage, transportation, and regulatory monitoring of our products.

 

We rely on third parties to perform a variety of functions related to the sale and distribution of our cosmeceutical products. These services include distribution, logistics management, inventory storage and transportation, invoicing and collections, the key aspects of which are out of our direct control. If any third-party service provider fails to comply with applicable laws and regulations, fails to meet expected deadlines or otherwise does not carry out its contractual duties to us, our ability to deliver products to meet commercial demand would be significantly impaired. In addition, we may retain one or more third parties to perform various regulatory monitoring services for our products, including adverse event reporting, safety database management and other product maintenance services. If the quality or accuracy of the data maintained by these regulatory service providers is insufficient, our ability to continue to market our approved products could be jeopardized or we could be subject to regulatory sanctions.

 

  22  

 

 

If our competitors develop and market products faster than we do or if the products of our competitors are considered more desirable than our products, revenues of our existing or new products may be adversely affected .

 

The dermatology market is highly competitive and includes a number of established, large, and mid-sized pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical companies, as well as smaller emerging companies and specialty pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical companies, whose activities are focused on our target markets and areas of expertise. We face and will continue to face, competition for our products and in the commercialization, development, licensing and discovery of our product candidates. This could negatively impact our ability to achieve significant market acceptance of our products and product candidates. Furthermore, new developments including the development of other drug technologies, delivery methods and improved formulations, occur in the pharmaceutical industry at a rapid pace. These developments may render our currently marketed products and product candidates or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive.

 

Compared to us, many of our competitors and potential competitors have substantially greater:

 

Capital resources;
Research and development resources, including personnel and technology;
Regulatory experience
Favorable brand name awareness
Clinical trial experience; and
Manufacturing, distribution and sales and marketing experience.

 

As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products more rapidly than us. Our competitors may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that limit our ability to develop or commercialize our product candidates or technologies. Our competitors may also develop pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical products that are more effective and less costly than ours and may also be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing their products.

 

Other competitors may invest significant amounts in achieving production economies of scale .

 

It is possible that our competitors may be able to reduce their cost of production so that they can aggressively price their products and increase their greater market share. Our competitors may also be able to attract and retain qualified personnel and to secure capital resources. Any of these events could adversely affect our ability to compete and our results of operations could suffer.

 

Our products and product candidates may cause undesirable side effects that could limit their use .

 

Skin irritation is a reported side effect of cosmeceutical products. Although these side effects generally are not severe, they may limit the use of our products, particularly if physicians or patients perceive the risks to outweigh the benefits or the side effects of competitive products to be less significant. If more severe side effects associated with any of our cosmeceutical products were to be reported or observed, we could be required to suspend our marketing of the products, conduct additional safety tests, and potentially cease the sale of the products. In addition, we face the potential for product liability claims from any patients who experience side effects, whether or not any action is taken by a regulatory authority.

  

Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could interrupt, delay or halt our development programs, including clinical trials, and could result in the denial of any required regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities.

 

We may face liability and indemnity claims that could result in unexpected costs and damage to our reputation.

 

Our business exposes us to potential liability risks that arise from the testing, manufacture and sale of our cosmeceutical products. Plaintiffs in the past have received substantial damage awards against pharmaceutical companies based upon claims for injuries allegedly caused by the use of their products. Although we currently maintain product liability insurance, there is no guarantee that any claims brought against us would be within our existing or future insurance policy coverage or limits. Any judgment against us that is in excess of our policy limits would have to be paid from our cash reserves, which would reduce our capital resources. Further, we may not have sufficient capital resources to pay a judgment, in which case our creditors could levy against our assets. Also, it may be necessary for us to recall products that do not meet approved specifications, which would result in adverse publicity, potentially significant costs in connection with the recall and a loss of revenues. Any product liability claim or series of claims brought against us could harm our business significantly, particularly if a claim results in adverse publicity or damage awards outside or in excess of our insurance policy limits.

 

Failure to adequately comply with information security policies or to safeguard against breaches of such policies could adversely affect our operations and could damage our business, reputation, financial position, and results of operations .  

 

In the process of making sales using consumer credit cards as a method of payment, we may handle and transfer such information as part of our business. These activities are subject to laws and regulations, as well as industry standards, in the United States and other jurisdictions in which our products and services are available. These requirements, which often differ materially and sometimes conflict among the many jurisdictions in which we operate, are designed to protect the privacy of consumers’ personal information and to prevent that information from being inappropriately used or disclosed. We maintain and review technical and operational safeguards designed to protect this information and generally require others with whom we work to do so as well. However, despite those safeguards, it is possible that hackers, employees acting contrary to our policies, third-party agents or others could improperly access relevant systems or improperly obtain or disclose data about our consumers, or that we may be determined not to be in compliance with applicable legal requirements and industry standards for data security, such as the Payment Card Industry guidelines. A breach or purported breach of relevant security policies that compromises consumer data or determination of non-compliance with applicable legal requirements or industry standards for data security could expose us to regulatory enforcement actions, card association or other monetary fines or sanctions, or contractual liabilities, limit our ability to provide our products and services, subject us to legal action and related costs and damage our business reputation, financial position, and results of operations.

 

  23  

 

 

Changes in economic conditions could materially affect our ability to maintain or increase sales.

 

The cosmeceutical industry depends on consumer discretionary spending.  The United States in general or the specific markets in which we operate may suffer from depressed economic activity, recessionary economic conditions, higher fuel or energy costs, low consumer confidence, high levels of unemployment, reduced home values, increases in home foreclosures, investment losses, personal bankruptcies, reduced access to credit or other economic factors that may affect consumers’ discretionary spending. Economic conditions may remain volatile and may depress consumer confidence and discretionary spending in the future. Negative economic conditions, if and when they exist, might cause consumers to make changes to their discretionary spending behavior, including spending currently made on our cosmeceutical line of products. If such sales decrease, our profitability could decline as we spread fixed costs across a lower level of sales and this could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

  

The cosmeceutical industry in which we operate is highly competitive and increased competition could reduce our sales and profitability .

 

We compete in different markets within the cosmeceutical industry on the basis of the uniqueness of our product offerings, the quality of our products, customer service, price, and distribution.  Our markets are highly competitive.  Our competitors vary in size and many may have greater financial and marketing resources than we do.  If we cannot maintain quality and pricing that are comparable or superior to our competitors, we may not be able to grow our revenues and operating profits and we may lose market share.  Competitive conditions could result in our experiencing reduced revenues, gross margins, and operating results and could cause an investor in our Company to lose a substantial amount or all of its investment in our Company.

 

The loss of suppliers or shortages in ingredients could harm our business.

 

We acquire ingredients and products from third-party suppliers and manufacturers under purchase orders and not under supply agreements . A loss of any of these suppliers and any difficulties in finding or transitioning to alternative suppliers could harm our business. In the event we are unable to procure certain ingredients, we may need to discontinue some products or develop substitute products, which could harm our revenue. In addition, if we experience supply shortages or regulatory impediments with respect to the raw materials and ingredients we use in our products, we may need to seek alternative supplies or suppliers and may experience difficulties in finding ingredients that are comparable in quality and price. Some of our products incorporate products that may have limited supplies. If demand exceeds forecasts, we may have difficulties in obtaining additional supplies to meet the excess demand. If we are unable to successfully respond to such issues, our business could be harmed.

 

Risks Related to Our Common Stock and Warrants

 

The recent public market for our shares has been and may continue to be volatile. This volatility may affect the ability of our investors to sell their shares and warrants as well as the price at which they sell their shares and warrants.

 

The market price for our shares and warrants may be significantly affected by factors such as variations in the volume of trading activity, quarterly and yearly operating results, general trends in the markets we serve, press releases announcing developments and changes in state or federal regulations affecting us and our industry. Furthermore, in recent years the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the affected companies. Such broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and warrants.

 

Because our stock price is volatile, purchasers of our common stock and warrants could incur substantial losses.

 

Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile. The stock market in general and the market for biotechnology companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The market price for our common stock and warrants may be influenced by many factors, including:

 

results of clinical trials of our product candidates or those of our competitors;
regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries;
variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
developments or disputes concerning patents or other proprietary rights;
the recruitment or departure of key personnel;
market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors and issuance of new or changed securities analysts’ reports or recommendations;

 

  24  

 

 

general economic, industry and market conditions; and
the other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section.

 

The application of the “penny stock” rules to our common stock and warrants could limit the trading and liquidity of our common stock and warrants, adversely affect the market price of our common stock and warrants, and increase your transaction costs to sell those shares and warrants .  

 

As long as the trading price of our common stock is below $5 per share, and our common stock and warrants are not listed on a national securities exchange, the open-market trading of our common stock and warrants will be subject to the “penny stock” rules, unless we otherwise qualify for an exemption from the “penny stock” definition. The “penny stock” rules impose additional sales practice requirements on certain broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets, excluding principal residence, in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse). These regulations, if they apply, require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the associated risks. Under these regulations, certain brokers who recommend such securities to persons other than established customers or certain accredited investors must make a special written suitability determination regarding such a purchaser and receive such purchaser’s written agreement to a transaction prior to sale. These regulations may have the effect of limiting the trading activity of our common stock, reducing the liquidity of an investment in our common stock and warrants, and increasing the transaction costs for sales and purchases of our common stock as compared to other securities. The stock market in general and the market prices for penny stock companies in particular, have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our stock, regardless of our operating performance.  Stockholders should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include 1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; 2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; 3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; 4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and 5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the volatility of our share price. Although we intend to ask our shareholders to approve a reverse stock split to increase the price per share of our common stock such that it would not be subject to the “penny stock” rules, no assurance can be given that we will be able to effect such reverse stock split or that the per share price of our common stock will improve following the reverse stock split such that our stock will no longer be subject to these rules.

 

We may not be able to attract the attention of brokerage firms, which could have a material adverse impact on the market value of our common stock and warrants.  

 

Security analysts of brokerage firms are unlikely to provide coverage of our common stock warrants since there is no incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock and warrants. The absence of such coverage limits the likelihood that an active market will develop or be maintained for our common stock and warrants. It will also likely make it more difficult to attract new investors at times when we require additional capital.

 

Future sales of our equity securities could put downward selling pressure on our securities, and adversely affect the stock and warrant price.   

 

There is a risk that this downward pressure may make it impossible for an investor to sell his or her securities at any reasonable price, if at all. Future sales of substantial amounts of our equity securities in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could put downward selling pressure on our securities, and adversely affect the market price of our common stock and warrants.

   

Our directors and principal stockholders beneficially own or control a substantial portion of our outstanding common stock, which may limit the ability of our stockholders, whether acting alone or together, to propose or direct the management on the overall direction of our Company

 

This concentration of ownership could discourage or prevent a potential takeover of our Company that might otherwise result in an investor receiving a premium over the market price for his shares. A substantial portion of our outstanding shares of common stock is beneficially owned and controlled by a group of insiders, including our officers and directors. Accordingly, our principal stockholders together with our directors, Chief Executive Officer, and insider shareholders have the power to control the election of our directors and the approval of actions for which the approval of our stockholders is required. If you acquire shares of our common stock, you may have no effective voice in the management of our Company.  Such concentrated control of our Company may adversely affect the price of our common stock. Our principal stockholders may be able to control matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors, mergers or other business combinations. Such concentrated control may also make it difficult for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock in the event we merge with a third party or enter into different transactions that require stockholder approval. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock and warrants. See the Section titled “Management” for a detailed discussion of the percentage of ownership controlled by our directors and principal stockholders.

 

  25  

 

 

Our outstanding warrants may be exercised, our convertible promissory notes may be converted, and our outstanding shares of preferred stock may be converted, in the future, which would increase the number of shares in the public market and result in dilution to our stockholders.

 

We are currently authorized to issue 100,000,000 of our common stock. As of December 31, 2016 we had 40,666,086 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, excluding shares of common stock earned but unissued, issuable upon exercise of our outstanding warrants, options, convertible promissory notes, and shares of common stock into which our issued shares of preferred stock may be converted. To the extent the shares of common stock are issued, options and warrants are exercised, convertible promissory notes are converted, or preferred stock is converted, holders of our common stock will experience dilution. In addition, in the event of any future financing of equity securities or securities convertible into or exchangeable for, common stock, holders of our common stock may experience dilution. As of December 31, 2016 outstanding warrants to purchase 6,989,625 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of approximately $0.72 per share. In addition, as of December 31, 2016 we had outstanding options to purchase 4,352,619 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of approximately $0.58 per share; and, our issued shares of preferred stock can be converted into 1,917,720 shares of our common stock. In addition, we also had approximately $3,871,056 outstanding principal amount and interest of convertible debt as of December 31, 2016 for which the conversion price varies depending on the average trading price of shares of our common stock. Accordingly, if our stock price decreases, we could be required to issue a greater number of shares of our common stock upon conversion of this debt than originally anticipated, which could lead to dilution of your investment in our Company.

 

There is a limited trading market for our common stock, and shareholders may have difficulty trading and obtaining quotations for our common stock and warrants.

 

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “NUGN” and we will apply to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. There has been limited trading in our common stock. As a result, investors may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, our securities. A limited market may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and could also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares of capital stock and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or assets by using common stock as consideration.

   

We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

We have paid no cash dividends on our common stock to date. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. In addition, the terms of any future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, and payment of cash dividends, if any, will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors and will be at the discretion of our board of directors. Furthermore, we may in the future become subject to contractual restrictions on, or prohibitions against, the payment of dividends. Capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be investors’ sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.

 

Our articles of incorporation allow for our board to create series of preferred stock without further approval by our stockholders, which has and could further adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock and warrants.

 

Our articles of incorporation authorize the Board of Directors to issue up to 25,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined at the time of issuance by the Board of Directors without further action by the stockholders. These terms may include preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion rights, redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. We have issued 1,917,720 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to NuGene’s two founders, both of whom also serve on our Board of Directors. The Series A Preferred Stock is initially convertible into common stock at a ratio of one to one, has the right to elect a majority of the board of directors, and has in connection with any other vote of shareholders three votes for every vote available to the common stock. These outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock diminish and any future issuances of other series of preferred stock could further diminish the rights of holders of our common stock, and therefore could reduce the value of such common stock and warrants. In addition, the Series A Preferred Stock could be used to restrict our ability to merge with, or sell assets to, a third party. The Series A Preferred Stock makes it more difficult, and could delay, discourage, prevent or make it more costly to acquire or effect a change-in-control, which in turn could prevent our stockholders from recognizing a gain in the event that a favorable offer is extended and could materially and negatively affect the market price of our common stock. This summary description of the Series A Preferred Stock is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Certificate of Designations filed with Secretary of State of Nevada on December 24, 2014 and included in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 6, 2015.

 

  26  

 

 

CORPORATE AND OTHER RISKS

 

We incur substantial costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management is required to devote substantial time to comply with public company regulations.

 

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and other federal and state laws. These requirements may place a strain on our people, systems, and resources. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly, and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, significant resources and management oversight are required. This may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have limited experience in these roles in a public company.  

 

To serve in the roles of officer and/or director for a public company, an individual needs to be aware of responsibilities in addition to those shouldered by the leader of a private company.  Among such additional responsibilities, a senior executive officer must be able to communicate fairly and effectively with the stakeholders of a public company, be aware of the controls required to be maintained by a public company and act in accordance with the legal requirements incumbent upon such senior executives and directors. While our CEO has experience in managerial positons in large public companies and led another company through a public offering, he does not have extensive experience in operating a public company. Our CFO has never held a positon in a public company and he is not a trained financial expert. The absence of such extensive experience (and training in the case of our CFO) could increase our exposure to untimely compliance with applicable regulation that could result in possible added liability and cost to the material detriment of our operations and financial interests.  Our CFO is a medical doctor by training and has assumed the title and responsibility of a chief financial officer but has not had any prior experience in the traditional services to be rendered but has rather relied on staff and consultants in his acting in this capacity.

 

We have added and are continuing to add full-time resources to our finance team and we have hired additional external consultants with public company and technical accounting experience to facilitate accurate and timely accounting closes, and to accurately prepare and review financial statements and related footnote disclosures. As a result of the additional resources added to the finance function, we are allowing for separate preparation and review of the reconciliations and other account analyses. In addition, these additional finance resources are allowing us to develop a more structured close process, including enhancing our existing policies and procedures, to improve the completeness, timeliness, and accuracy of our financial reporting and disclosures including, but not limited to, those regarding proper financial statement classification and assessing more judgmental areas of accounting. The actions that have been taken are subject to continued review, supported by confirmation and testing by management, as well as audit committee oversight. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to hire and retain qualified individuals to create and maintain appropriate internal control over financial reporting. Competition for these individuals is intense.

   

We do not have an Audit Committee and we do not have a majority of independent persons serving on our Board of Directors .  

 

We do not have an independent Audit Committee. An Audit Committee qualitatively enhances a company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Among its functions, independent Audit Committees review the financial reporting, internal controls safeguarding Company assets, interact with auditors, may oversee material financial decisions and provide a sounding board for individuals who believe that there are irregularities in a Company’s accounting policies and procedures.  Our Board of Directors consists of our two founders and one independent director. With our lack of an independent Audit Committee and only one independent director, we run a greater risk that a significant error or irregularity could occur that could be materially damaging to our shareholders.

 

For as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies.”

 

These exceptions provide for, but are not limited to, relief from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, less extensive disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, exemptions from the requirements to hold a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved and an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” We may remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years. To the extent we use exemptions from various reporting requirements under the JOBS Act, we may be unable to realize our anticipated cost savings from those exemptions.

 

Pursuant to the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for so long as we are characterized as an “emerging growth company.”  Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, starting with the second annual report that we file with the SEC as a public company, and generally requires in the same report a report by our independent registered public accounting firm on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. However, under the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until we are no longer an “emerging growth company”.

 

We are also currently able to take advantage of certain of these exemptions as a smaller reporting company. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

   

  27  

 

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES

 

We previously sub-leased of our sole corporate facilities at 17912 Cowan, Suite A, Irvine, California, in Orange County, California from ASP, an affiliate of our Company, for approximately $17,109 per month (including common area maintenance), consistent with the amount that is charged to ASP by the property owner. On February 5, 2015, ASP entered into a new five-year lease for the property directly with the owner beginning July 1, 2015 and subsequently amended to begin June 1, 2015. The lease was subsequently amended to increase the square footage under lease beginning in January 2016. The lease includes annual increases in the monthly lease payments of approximately 3% each year.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

From time to time, we may be involved in routine legal proceedings, as well as demands, claims and threatened litigation that arise in the normal course of our business. The ultimate amount of liability, if any, for any claims of any type (either alone or in the aggregate) may materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. In addition, the ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain. Any outcome, whether favorable or unfavorable, may materially and adversely affect us due to legal costs and expenses, diversion of management attention and other factors. We expense legal costs in the period incurred. We cannot assure you that additional contingencies of a legal nature or contingencies having legal aspects will not be asserted against us in the future, and these matters could relate to prior, current or future transactions or events.

  

On July 10, 2015, Stemage Skin Care, LLC (the “Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California entitled “Stemage Skin Care LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company vs. NuGene International, Inc. et al.” (Civil Action No.8:15-cv-01078-AG-JCG). The complaint also names as defendants NuGene, Inc., Ali Kharazmi, Saeed Kharazmi, Kathy Ireland Worldwide, Stephen Roseberry, Steve Rosenblum and Erik Sterling. The complaint contains allegations of damage asserted to be grounded on: (i) copyright infringement; (ii) interference with contract; (iii) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; (iv) negligent interference with prospective economic advantage; and (v) conspiracy. The complaint allegedly arises out of an August 20, 2012 agreement among the Plaintiff and kathy ireland inc. (“KI”) pursuant to which KI made Kathy Ireland available to perform “Ambassador Services” as defined within that agreement. That agreement effectively terminated in October 2014 and is the subject of a separate arbitration with KI and Kathy Ireland before the American Arbitration Association. On or around August 4, 2016 the Company settled the litigation. All parties to this litigation executed a settlement agreement resolving and waiving all claims, with a full dismissal, with prejudice, of the action. Pursuant to the settlement, in December 2016 the Company paid the total sum of $50,000 to the Plaintiff.

 

On July 31, 2015 Star Health & Beauty, LLC (“SH&B”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entitled “Star Health & Beauty, LLC vs. NuGene, Inc. and NuGene International, Inc. Defendants” (Case No. 1:15-cv-02634-CAP). The complaint alleges that our use of the NuGene name and trademark infringes on SH&B’s NUGEN name. SH&B seeks cancelation of our NuGene trademark, as well as unspecified monetary damages. In February, 2017 the parties agreed upon terms to settle the matter, subject to execution of a definitive written settlement agreement to include the following terms: (i) $60,000 to be paid by the Company to SH&B, in installments of $5,000 upon execution of a Settlement Agreement, $25,000 90-days thereafter, and $30,000 60-days thereafter; (ii) issuance of 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to SH&B upon execution of a Settlement Agreement; (iii) each side continues to use their names as the wish; (iv) full mutual releases of known and unknown claims; (v) each bears its respective cost of litigation; and, (vi) dismissal with prejudice of the action. The written Settlement Agreement is being finalized and should be executed within the next 30 days.

 

In May 2016, we were informed that the California Labor Commissioner scheduled a hearing in connection with two individuals that claimed our Company did not fulfill its obligations to pay a final paycheck. The two individuals are seeking back pay and penalties totaling approximately $31,000. A trial/hearing was scheduled for March 14, 2017 to decide each matter. In February 2017 we settled both matters. In exchange for a complete release from the first claimant, we will pay the first claimant a total of $9,000 in accordance with the following schedule: $4,500 on or before March 10, 2017; four additional payments of $1,000 each on the 15 th day of April, May, June, and July 2017; and, a final payment of $500 on or before the 15 th day of August. In exchange for a complete release from the second claimant, we will pay the second claimant a total of $4,000 on or before March 10, 2017.

 

On May 6, 2016, we were presented with a demand for payment of compensation for a former executive employee (the “Former Executive”) pursuant to his employment contract with our Company. The amount of the compensation claimed by the Former Executive totaled $49,998. The Company’s management is evaluating the merits of this matter. We believe that no amounts are due to the Former Executive and we have not accrued a liability as of December 31, 2016.

 

In December 2016, we were informed by the four holders of our promissory notes totaling $480,000 (the “Holders”) that they would not honor their obligation to provide an additional $600,000 in similar financing. The Holders allege that certain breaches of the notes by the Company relieve them of their obligation. The Company firmly believes there is no merit whatsoever to the claims of the Holders. Rather than pursue litigation against the Holders, the Company has elected to pursue other sources of financing. However, should the Holders seek any acceleration or damages of any kind under the Notes, NuGene is committed to aggressively protect its rights, including though not limited to seeking damages from the Holders.

 

On February 24, 2017, we were informed that the Company will need to respond to a lawsuit filed by Habib American Bank (“Habib”) in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange. The action names Advanced Surgical Partners, LLC (“ASP”) as a defendant, as well as a number of additional named parties including though not limited to NuGene, Inc.; our Chairman of the Board, Mohammad Ali Kharazmi (“Ali”); and, our Acting Chief Financial Officer and Board Member, Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi (“Saeed”). The action is based on a purported default under a commercial loan from Habib to ASP on or around January 2008 (the “Loan”). According to the complaint, ASP currently owes Habib approximately $2.7 million under the Loan and that ASP has defaulted on the Loan. The Loan was arranged by Ali on behalf of ASP. Ali and Saeed are owners of, and control, ASP; they are also guarantors on the Loan. Additional family members of Ali and Saeed are alleged to be additional guarantors on the Loan, as are additional business entities owned by, or affiliated with, Ali and Saeed. The Loan is secured, in part, by the pledge of real estate owned by family members of Ali and Saeed (the “Pledged Real Estate”). A Deed of Trust was recorded by Habib against the Pledged Real Estate, and there appears to be more than sufficient equity in the Pledged Real Estate to pay off the Loan. NuGene is also alleged to be an additional guarantor on the Loan. A thorough search of NuGene records and files has failed to yield any documents or indication that NuGene was in fact a guarantor on the Loan. The Company has no documentation of the Loan or its purported guaranty, and there was no business relationship between ASP and NuGene which would suggest that a guaranty would have been provided. There was no prior knowledge by the Company of the existence of the Loan or the purported guaranty. Ali has steadfastly rejected the existence of the guaranty and has affirmatively assured the Company that he never authorized NuGene to guaranty the Loan, and that he never signed any documents on behalf of NuGene regarding the Loan. At this time, the Company intends to aggressively defend its rights and reject any status as a guarantor of the Loan. We believe that the Company’s risk and liability exposure under the Loan is minimal based upon (i) good faith and evidentiary defenses; and, (ii) the fact that there is more than adequate value/equity in the Pledged Real Estate to pay off the loan.

 

On April 4, 2017, Habib agreed to dismiss the Company from the litigation brought by Habib. A formal Settlement Agreement and Release has been executed by and between the Company and Habib.

 

Other than that described above, we are not currently a party to any other material legal proceedings. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us that in our view would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, or operating results. However, legal claims are inherently uncertain, and we cannot assure you that we will not be adversely affected in the future by legal proceedings.

 

  28  

 

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Market Information . Since January 22, 2015, our common stock has been traded in the over-the-counter market on the OTCQB trading platform under the symbol “NUGN.” Prior thereto, our common stock was listed on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “BLMK.”

 

To our knowledge, there was limited or no trading in our common stock under the BLMK trading symbol prior to the Merger Agreement on December 29, 2014. Accordingly, the following table only sets forth the high and low bid information for our common stock for the periods indicated since the completion of the Merger Agreement on December 29, 2014. The following price information reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions:

  

    Completion of Merger
Agreement
(December 29, 2014)
through
 
    December 31, 2016  
    High       Low    
Period ended December 31, 2014   $ 0.002     $ 0.002  
Period ended March 31, 2015   $ 2.500     $ 0.002  
Period ended June 30, 2015   $ 4.310     $ 2.115  
Period ended September 30, 2015   $ 3.871     $ 1.450  
Period ended December 31, 2015   $ 1.850     $ 1.120  
Period ended March 31, 2016   $ 1.140     $ 0.458  
Period ended June 30, 2016   $ 0.680     $ 0.420  
Period ended September 30, 2016   $ 0.850     $ 0.540  
Period ended December 31, 2016   $ 0.650     $ 0.330  

 

As of April 10, 2017, the last reported sales price or our common stock on the OTCQB market was $0.19 per share .

 

Holders of Record . As of April 10, 2017, an aggregate of 42,260,211 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding and were owned by approximately 56 holders of record, based on information provided by our transfer agent. The foregoing number of record holders does not include any persons who may be deemed to hold their shares of stock in a “street name.”

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

 

In December 2014, we issued securities in connection with the merger transaction described above in the Overview Section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results.

 

On December 29, 2014, we completed the sale of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock to 18 purchasers for proceeds totaling $2,000,000, including (a) $1,625,000 of cash and (b) automatic conversion of promissory notes in the principal amount of $375,000.

 

  29  

 

 

On August 14, 2015, we granted an option to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock to each of two employees. 

 

On September 25, 2015, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement and issued a 15% Promissory Note with the principal face value of $500,000 (the “15% Note”) to an accredited investor. Under the terms of the 15% Note, all principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable to the noteholder upon the earlier of: (i) September 25, 2016; or (ii) within ten business days after the consummation of an equity or convertible debt financing with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $1,000,000.

 

In November 2015, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with PCG Advisory Group to provide strategic advisory and investor relations services over six months. The Company agreed to pay the consultant 90,000 in shares of the Company’s restricted stock, which were issued over six months. The Company issued 30,000 shares of restricted stock in February 2016, and the remaining 60,000 shares were issued in June 2016.  The grant date value of the restricted stock award was $38,000 and was recognized in full as stock based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2016. 

 

During November 2015, we issued a one year 10% promissory notes payable (the “10% Note”) to a purchaser for cash proceeds totaling $50,000. In the event that we secure any future financing with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $1 million while the 10% Note is outstanding, the 10% Note and all accrued interest therefrom will be immediately due and payable within ten business days of the closing of such financing. The holder may also convert any unpaid principal under the 10% Note into any funding instrument entered into by our Company for a period of 180 days after the date of the 10% Note. The full interest of 10% of the borrowings under the 10% Note ($5,000) is due irrespective of whether paid at maturity or when required to be prepaid.

 

On November 30, 2015 and on four subsequent dates during December 2015, four accredited investors (the “Lenders”) advanced a total of $410,000 to the Company. The borrowings (“Advances”) were not accompanied by documentation of the terms of the Advances. However, there were various discussions as to the repayment terms, the interest expected to be paid to the Lenders and additional equity of our Company to be issued to the Lenders in connection with the Advances.

 

On March 17, 2016, we entered into a consulting agreement with Dignitas Consulting to provide business development and advisory services over one year. In connection with the agreement, we granted the consultant 200,000 shares of our fully vested common stock as consideration for the consultant’s services.  The grant date value of the restricted stock award was $128,000 and was recognized in full as stock based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2016. 

 

On March 30, 2016, an accredited investor advanced our Company $244,975. The advance was undocumented. The advance was subsequently documented on April 4, 2016 in the form of our $275,000 promissory note. We also issued 50,000 shares of our common stock to the investor. The note bears interest at rate of 8% per annum and is convertible into shares of our common stock at the rate of $0.70 per share.

 

On April 4, 2016, we issued our promissory note in the amount of $575,000 to an accredited investor in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $575,000. The terms of the Note call for an interest rate of 15%, due one year from the date of issuance, though all accrued and unpaid interest and all other amounts payable under the Note are due to the investor within ten (10) business days after the closing by the Company of an equity or convertible debt financing in one or more series of transactions, with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $1 million.

 

In May 2016, we entered into agreements with two employees that hold options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock each. The agreements modified the strike price of their outstanding options from the previous strike prices of $1.50 to $0.55 per share. All other terms of the previous option agreements remained unchanged.

 

During January through June 2016, three accredited investors (the “Lenders”) advanced a total of $140,000 to the Company. The borrowings were not accompanied by documentation of the nature of the borrowings. However, there were general discussions as to the repayment terms and the interest expected of 10% per annum to be paid to the Lenders in connection with the borrowings.

 

On July 19, 2016, we issued a sixty day 15% promissory note payable to an accredited investor for cash proceeds totaling $35,000. In the event that we secure any future financing with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $500,000 while the promissory note is outstanding, the promissory note and all accrued interest therefrom will be immediately due and payable within ten business days of the closing of such financing.

 

  30  

 

 

During July and August 2016, four accredited investors (the “Lenders”) advanced a total of $435,000 to the Company. The borrowings (“Advances”) were not accompanied by documentation of the nature of the Advances. However, there were general discussions as to the repayment terms and the interest expected to be paid to the Lenders in connection with the Advances.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, certain accredited investors advanced a total of $925,000 (the “Advances”) to the Company with a right to convert at no greater than $0.40 per share. We received aggregate proceeds in the amount of $925,000. In connection with the Advances, the Company also issued warrants to purchase 462,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price $0.60 per share with a 5 year term. The Advances were not accompanied by documentation. However, there were general discussions as to the repayment terms and the interest expected of 10% per annum to be paid to the Lenders in connection with the borrowings.

 

On September 22, 2016, the Company entered into new compensation agreements and arrangements with two of its directors. Our Chairman was issued (i) 2,000,000 shares of our fully vested common stock; (ii) restricted stock units for 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock; and, (iii) a stock option to acquire 2,352,619 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price of $0.61 per share. Our interim chief financial officer/board member was issued (i) restricted stock units for 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock; and, (iii) a stock option to acquire 2,352,619 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price of $0.61 per share.

 

On October 21, 2016, the Company issued an accredited investor a promissory note in the total principal amount of $267,500 with 9% annual interest rate, which will be due on October 21, 2017. The Company received $250,000 of gross proceeds and granted a warrant to purchase 222,916 shares of common stock at $0.60 per share.

 

On November 2, 2016, the Company issued certain accredited investors promissory notes (the “Notes”) in the total principal amount of $480,000 with a 5% annual interest rate, which will be due on April 28, 2017. The Company received $400,000 of gross proceeds from the Notes. The Company also granted to the investors warrants to purchase 1,428,572 shares of common stock at no greater than $0.47 per share.

 

On December 15, 2016, the Company issued to Brian Kenney (“Kenney”) a promissory note in the total principal amount of $77,778 with a 10% annual interest rate, which will be due on the earlier of (i) December 15, 2017; or, (ii) the closing of the public offering under this Registration Statement (the “Secondary Offering”). The Company received $75,000 of gross proceeds from the Note. Kenney has the right to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock during the 15-days immediately following the closing of the Secondary Offering at a conversion price equal to 65% of the share price in the Secondary Offering. The Company also granted to Kenney warrants to purchase 77,778 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share.

 

No underwriters were used in the foregoing transactions. The securities were issued in reliance on the exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 701 promulgated under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act as a transaction pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan or contract relating to compensation. Each purchaser received written disclosures that the securities had not been registered under the Securities Act and that any resale must be made pursuant to a registration statement or an available exemption from registration. All of the foregoing securities were deemed restricted securities for the purposes of the Securities Act.

 

Re-Purchase of Equity Securities.

 

None.

 

Dividends.

 

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future. Any payments of cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors, and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, legal and contractual restrictions, and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.

 

We have no compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance.

 

  31  

 

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

 

We are a smaller reporting company, as defined by § 229.10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, that is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

  

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Overview

 

The following analysis of the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements because of a number of factors. An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Readers of this prospectus should carefully consider the risks set forth in the Risk Factors section of this prospectus. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” or similar expressions, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements specified in the following information have been compiled by our management on the basis of assumptions made by management and considered by management to be reasonable. Our future operating results, however, are impossible to predict and no representation, guaranty, or warranty is to be inferred from those forward-looking statements.

 

The assumptions used for purposes of the forward-looking statements specified in the following information represent estimates of future events and are subject to uncertainty as to possible changes in economic, legislative, industry, and other circumstances. As a result, the identification and interpretation of data and other information and their use in developing and selecting assumptions from and among reasonable alternatives require the exercise of judgment. To the extent that the assumed events do not occur, the outcome may vary substantially from anticipated or projected results, and, accordingly, no opinion is expressed on the achievability of those forward-looking statements. No assurance can be given that any of the assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements specified in the following information are accurate, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.  

 

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 30, 2013 under the name “Bling Marketing, Inc.”  Until December 29, 2014, we were a wholesaler of jewelry, principally earrings, rings, and pendants (“BMI Business”). We recognized a minimal amount of revenues from operations prior to the three months ended September 30, 2014. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, we began working with several distributors to sell our jewelry products to retail outlets and as a result, recognized sales revenue of $22,025. On September 11, 2014, we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K indicating that we were no longer a shell company as defined by Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act in light of our operations through the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

 

On December 26, 2014, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with NuGene Inc., a California corporation (“NuGene”), and on December 29, 2014 (the “Closing Date”) we filed a certificate of merger in the State of California whereby our subsidiary, NG Acquisition Inc. (“Acquisition Sub”) merged with NuGene. As a result, NuGene (the surviving entity) became our wholly owned subsidiary. The transaction contemplated under the Merger Agreement is deemed to be a reverse merger. Under reverse merger accounting, our Company (the legal acquirer) was considered to have been acquired by NuGene. The assets, liabilities, and operations of NuGene were brought forward at their book value and no goodwill was recognized.

 

In connection with the Merger Agreement, we entered into a Business Transfer and Indemnity Agreement dated December 29, 2014 (the “Indemnity Agreement”) with our former Chief Executive Officer and Director, Dena Kurland providing for:

 

1. The transfer of our jewelry business operations existing on the date of the Indemnity Agreement (the “BMI Business”);
2. The assumption by Ms. Kurland of all liabilities of our Company and the indemnification by Ms. Kurland holding our Company harmless for any and all liabilities arising at or before the date of the Indemnity Agreement;
3. The payment by NuGene to Ms. Kurland of $350,000 in cash; and
4. The surrender by Ms. Kurland of 15,000,000 shares (before giving effect to the Stock Split discussed below) (the "Indemnity Shares") of our Company’s common stock representing 95% of the then outstanding common stock (all of which shares have been deemed cancelled by our Company).

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, our Company issued 26,052,760 shares of Company common stock and 1,917,720 Company Series A Preferred Stock to the former NuGene, Inc. shareholders. The Series A Preferred Stock is initially convertible into common stock at a ratio of one to one. Additionally, as long as there are a minimum of 900,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have the right to elect a majority of the board of directors as long as there are a minimum of 900,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding. Finally, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, generally voting as a class with the holders of common stock, have for each share of Series A Preferred Stock owned, three times the number of votes permitted to each share of common stock.

 

On December 26, 2014, our board of directors approved a 15.04 to one stock split (“Stock Split”) in the form of a stock dividend to holders of our common stock as of that date.   To effect that board action, shareholders received as a stock dividend 14.04 additional shares of common stock for every share of common stock held. Unless otherwise noted, all share numbers shown in this Registration Statement give effect to the Stock Split.

  

  32  

 

 

On December 29, 2014, we completed the sale of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock to 18 purchasers (“Stock Placement”) for proceeds totaling $2,000,000, including (a) $1,625,000 of cash and (b) automatic conversion of promissory notes in the principal amount of $375,000.  

  

At the Closing Date subsequent to the transactions described above (and giving effect to the Stock Split), we had approximately 39,197,400 shares of common stock outstanding and 1,917,720 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding. At the time of the merger, an outstanding warrant to acquire shares of NuGene Inc. was exchanged for a warrant of Bling Marketing Inc. The warrant on its issuance, after giving effect to the Stock Split, evidenced the right of the holder to acquire up to 500,000 shares of common stock of our Company. The warrant has a strike price of $2.50 per share and was not exercisable for 12 months (the "Initial Exercise Date"). Any shares acquired thereunder upon exercise thereafter cannot be sold for six months following the Initial Exercise Date.

 

On January 22, 2015, we were advised that the Financial Industry Regulatory Association had approved our (i) 15.04 to one Stock Split, (ii) name change from Bling Marketing Inc. to NuGene International, Inc., and (iii) change of trading symbol from BLMK to NUGN.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015

 

    2016     2015  
             
Revenues   $ 509,460     $ 2,084,939  
Cost of revenues     718,856       588,882  
 Gross profit (loss)     (209,396 )     1,496,057  
                 
Operating expenses:                
Advertising and promotion     385,641       373,738  
Personnel     5,825,750       3,447,762  
Selling, general and administrative     1,216,323       1,329,184  
Research and development     115,391       360,489  
Professional fees     1,334,721       1,146,936  
Total operating expenses     8,877,826       6,658,109  
Loss from operations     (9,087,222 )     (5,162,052 )
                 
Other income (expenses):                
Interest income     5       -  
Interest expense     (1,541,255 )     (57,015 )
Other expense     (50,000 )     -  
Loss on issuance of debt     (2,136,481 )     -  
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities     998,432       -  
Total other expenses     (2,729,299 )     (57,015 )
                 
Net loss   $ (11,816,521 )   $ (5,219,067 )

 

Revenues

 

Revenues generated during the year ended December 31, 2016 totaled approximately $509,000 resulted primarily from the sale of our cosmeceutical products to wholesale distributors, physicians and consumers, including 12.3% and 12.2% of our revenues from two customers. Our customers generally purchase products from us on a purchase order basis on standard terms but future product sales to distributors and physicians will be tied directly to their success in reselling our products. Our customers are under no obligation to continue to purchase our products. The loss of significant customers, a material reduction in their purchases or the cancellation of product orders or unexpected returns of unsold products could significantly decrease our revenues and adversely affect our future growth prospects. We do no have long-term purchase commitments from our customers.

 

Revenues generated during the year ended December 31, 2015 totaling approximately $2,085,000 resulted primarily from the sales of our cosmeceutical products to distributors, online marketers and consumer online sales. Our revenue in 2016 decreased by $1,575,000 or 76% from 2015. While our revenue decrease could be attributed in part to decreases in customer demand for our products of which we are unaware at present, we believe our severe lack of liquidity was a significant contributing factor. Our cash constraints made it difficult to afford and to recruit qualified senior level employees, especially in the area of marketing. Our plans for launching a television direct marketing campaign have also been delayed for the same reasons. We estimate that absent successful procurement of the funding that we currently seek, we will be unable to build revenue in accordance with our corporate plans and revenue could continue to be stagnant or decrease significantly.

 

  33  

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

Cost of revenues during the year ended December 31, 2016 totaled approximately $719,000, representing 141% of revenues. These costs consisted primarily of an obsolescence charge of $437,000 as the Company is rebranding and repackaging its products, direct costs of labor and overhead of $153,000 as production was reduced and $129,000 primarily attributed to the cost of raw materials and product packaging of our cosmeceutical products, as well as shipping and handling. Cost of revenues during the year ended December 31, 2015 of approximately $589,000 represented 28.2% of revenues. Such costs related primarily to the cost of raw materials, product packaging, and direct labor in the manufacturing of our cosmeceutical products, as well as shipping and handling.

  

Advertising and promotion

 

Advertising and promotion totaled approximately $386,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to approximately $374,000 for 2015, resulting in a $12,000 increase from 2015 to 2016. The majority of the increase was related to marketing consultants and brand management expenses.

 

Personnel

 

Personnel expenses totaled approximately $5,826,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to approximately $3,448,000 for 2015, resulting in a $2,378,000 increase from 2015 to 2016. The majority of the increase was related to an increase in stock based compensation expense of approximately $1,865,000 related to the issuance of stock awards and amortization of stock options and $513,000 related to wage related expenses.

 

Selling, general and administrative (“SGA”)

 

SGA totaled approximately $1,216,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to approximately $1,329,000 for 2015. The decreases of approximately $113,000 was primarily related to a decrease of approximately $233,000 in marketing spend and departmental allocations and overhead of $93,000 partially offset by increases in travel expenses of $77,000 and bad debt expense of $138,000.

 

Research and development

 

Expenses related to research and development totaled approximately $115,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to approximately $360,000 for 2015. This represented a decrease of approximately $245,000 which was primarily attributable to the expensing of intellectual property in 2015 of $150,000 combined with reduced clinical spend of $121,000 partially offset by increased materials cost of $26,000.

 

Professional fees

 

Professional fees totaled approximately $1,335,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to approximately $1,147,000 for 2015. The increase of $188,000 was primarily attributable to an increase in marketing, operational, and administrative consulting and professional services of $188,000.

 

Other income (expenses)

 

Interest expense totaled approximately $1,541,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $57,000 for 2015. The increase in interest expense was primarily attributable to the increase of our borrowings outstanding. While there was no cash interest due during the period, interest expense resulted from the accretion to face value of borrowings advanced to our Company as well as accruing interest on all debt outstanding.

 

Loss on issuance of debt of approximately $2,136,481 arose from the recording of our derivative instruments associated with certain borrowings received during the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities of approximately $998,000 resulted from the revaluation of our derivative instrument, which was primarily related to the reduction of our stock price from the date of issuance to the date of revaluation.

 

  34  

 

 

Related Party Transactions  

 

On July 18, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) appointed Steven R. Carlson to serve as Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of NuGene International, Inc. (the “Company”). His appointment is to be effective as of and on July 25, 2016. In connection with the hiring of Mr. Carlson, Ali Kharazmi resigned his position as our CEO. Mr. Kharazmi’s resignation will coincide with Mr. Carlson’s start date, July 25, 2016. Mr. Kharazmi will continue to render significant services to the Company and will continue to serve as the Company’s Chairman of the Board.

 

The following individuals and entities have been identified as related parties based on their affiliation with the Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Financial Officer:

 

Ali Kharazmi   Chairman of the Board and greater than 10% shareholder
Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi  

Acting Chief Financial Officer, Board Member and greater than 10% shareholder

Genetics Institute of Anti-Aging   Company with common ownership and management
Applied M.A.K. Enterprises, Inc. (“MAK”)   Company with common ownership and management
Advanced Surgical Partners, LLC (“ASP”)   Company with common ownership and management
Center for Weight Management & Plastic Surgery (“CWM”)   Company with common ownership and management
Center for Regenerative Science, LLC   Company with common ownership and management

 

The following amounts were owed to related parties, affiliated with the Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Financial Officer as of December 31, 2015:

 

ASP   $ 70,890  
CWM     34,000  
Ali Kharazmi     25,641  
Applied MAK     -  
Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi     2,405  
Less amounts advanced to ASP and repaid in January 2016     (95,000 )
Accounts payable - related parties   $ 37,936  

 

The amount owed to ASP relates to legal and administrative services provided by ASP employees to our Company. Our Company temporarily advanced $95,000 to ASP prior to December 31, 2015 and was repaid in full prior to January 5, 2016. The amounts owed to Saeed Kharazmi at December 31, 2015 related to expense reimbursements incurred in the ordinary course of business. The amount owed to CWM relates to medical procedures provided to NuGene consultants as compensation for advertising and marketing services provided to NuGene. The amount owed to Ali Kharazmi and all amounts outstanding represent advances that bore no interest and were due on demand or expense reimbursements incurred in the ordinary course of business. Prior to the sale of the related party advances in November 2016, the amounts owed were as follows:

 

ASP   $ 226,188  
CWM     34,000  
Ali Kharazmi     91,175  
Applied MAK     -  
Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi     30,698  
Less amounts advanced to ASP and repaid in January 2016     -  
Accounts payable - related parties   $ 382,061  

 

On November 7, 2016, the amounts owed to related parties totaling $382,061 were sold to two unrelated investors. The Company issued a note to each investor in the amount of $191,030 (see Note 6). The notes have an interest rate of 5% per annum and mature on the earlier of: (i) May 7, 2017; (ii) the date the Company raises a total of $2 million, subsequent to the issuance of these notes. The notes have a conversion feature under which the note holder can convert at any time at a conversion price of $0.40 per share.

 

As of December 31, 2016, the Company has no outstanding related party liabilities.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

 

We had cash and cash equivalents of $44,507 as of December 31, 2016 and a working capital deficit of $5,918,733 as of December 31, 2016. During the fourth quarter of 2016 and through the date of this Annual Report, we have faced an increasingly challenging liquidity situation that has severely hamstrung our operations and ability to execute our operating plan. Further, we have increasingly fallen behind on agreed upon repayment terms with our lenders, products and service providers. We attempted to obtain from multiple sources new capital required to alleviate these liquidity shortfalls, but to date the amounts provided have been insufficient to meet our operating needs. Our officers have personally advanced our Company over $57,700 in funding through the date of this Annual Report, however we believe that new funding totaling at least $1.5 million will be required to satisfy the outstanding claims of our lenders and suppliers and to provide sufficient funds to execute our current operating plan. There is no assurance that our Company will be able to secure such funding on acceptable (or any) terms.  

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we reported a net loss of $11,816,521, and had negative cash flows from operating activities totaling $2,003,860 for the same period. Combined with $4,540 in cash flows used for investing activities, we had total negative cash flows of $2,008,400 in 2016 that was offset by cash flows from financing activities of $2,030,000 (all related to the issuance of notes payable). Combined with a beginning cash balance of $22,907 as of January 1, 2016, we had a positive net change in cash during 2016 of $21,600.

 

  35  

 

 

On April 4, 2016, we issued a note payable to Canyon Assets Holdings, Inc. (“Lender”) dated March 28, 2016 in the principal amount of $575,000. The note was issued to the Lender in consideration for the Lender’s having satisfied on the Company’s behalf an outstanding note payable (the “CAH Note”) of the Company (the “JTS Note”). The JTS Note issued September 25, 2015 was repaid in full ($500,000 face value and accrued interest of $75,000) by the Lender with the payment of $575,000 in cash. The terms of the CAH Note call for an interest rate of 15%, due one year from the date of the CAH Note.

  

On April 4, 2016, we issued a $275,000 face value note payable and 50,000 shares of our common stock to Gemini Master Fund, LTD (“Gemini”) pursuant to a Security Purchase Agreement dated March 30, 2016 (the date the funds were received by our Company). Under the terms of the related note payable (the “Gemini Note”), the Company received $245,000, net of costs and original issue discount.

 

On October 28, 2016, the Gemini Note was purchased in full, including accrued interest of approximately $13,000, by another lender in exchange for a convertible note (“the 4% Convertible Note”) issued by the Company. The 4% Convertible Note accrues interest at 4% per annum, is entitled to the same conversion features as the Gemini Note and matures on June 30, 2017. The lender charged the Company $45,000 in fees, which were added to the balance, and converted approximately $62,000 of the 4% Convertible Note balance into 331,413 shares of the Company’s common stock, resulting in a balance of $270,350 at December 31, 2016.

 

During January through June 2016, three individuals (the “Lenders”) advanced a total of $140,000 to the Company. The borrowings were not accompanied by documentation of the nature of the borrowings. However, there were general discussions as to the repayment terms and the interest expected of 10% per annum to be paid to the Lenders in connection with the borrowings. Accordingly, we have accounted for the borrowings based on estimates of their still undocumented final terms.

 

In July 19, 2016, we issued a sixty day 15% promissory note payable to a purchaser for cash proceeds totaling $35,000. In the event that we secure any future financing with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $500,000 while the promissory note is outstanding, the promissory note and all accrued interest therefrom will be immediately due and payable within ten business days of the closing of such financing.

 

From July through September 30, 2016, certain investors advanced a total of $925,000 (the “Advances”) to the Company with a right to convert at no greater than $0.40 per share. In connection with the Advances, the Company also issued warrants to purchase 770,833 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share with a 5 year term.

 

On October 21, 2016, we issued a $267,500 face value convertible note that accrues interest at 9% per annum and matures on October 21, 2017 (“the 9% Convertible Note”). The Company received proceeds of $240,000, net of costs and original issuance discount. Upon holding the note for six months, the conversion terms allow the holder to convert outstanding principal into the Company’s common stock at the lower of (i) $0.40 per share or (ii) 65% of the lowest closing bid price of the common stock for the fifteen prior trading days, including upon which the conversion notice is received by the Company. The 9% Convertible Note allows for prepayment within 180 days from the date of issuance. If the note is outstanding for 90 days or less, the prepayment rate is 125% of principal plus accrued interest; and if the note is outstanding for more than 90 days but less than 180 days, the prepayment rate is 150% of principal plus accrued interest.

 

On October 28, 2016, we issued a $480,000 face value convertible note that accrues interest at 5% per annum and matures on April 28, 2017 (“the 5% Convertible Note”). The Company received proceeds of $375,000, net of costs and original issuance discount. The conversion terms allow the holder to convert outstanding principal into the Company’s common stock if an event of default occurs, or if the Company does not repay the note in full at the original maturity date, at 60% of the lowest closing bid price of the common stock for the thirty prior trading days immediately preceding the trading date. Prepayment rates are 115% if the note is repaid within the first sixty days from the date of issuance and 125% thereafter

 

On December 15, 2016, we issued a $77,779 face value convertible note that accrues interest at 10% per annum and matures on June 15, 2017 (“the 10% Convertible Note”). The Company received proceeds of $70,000, net of original issuance discount. The conversion terms allow the holder to convert outstanding principal into the Company’s common stock at 65% of the price of the common stock when the Company a capital raise transaction of at least $15,000,000 in debt, and or equity subsequent to the issuance date. The 10% Convertible Note allows for prepayment any time after 90 days from the date of issuance at a prepayment rate of 110% of principal and accrued interest outstanding.

 

During November 2015, we issued a one year 10% promissory notes payable (the “10% Note”) to a purchaser for cash proceeds totaling $50,000. In the event that we secure any future financing with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $1 million while the 10% Note is outstanding, the 10% Note and all accrued interest therefrom will be immediately due and payable within ten business days of the closing of such financing. The holder may also convert any unpaid principal under the 10% Note into any funding instrument entered into by our Company for a period of 180 days after the date of the 10% Note. The full interest of 10% of the borrowings under the 10% Note ($5,000) is due irrespective of whether paid at maturity or when required to be prepaid.

 

On November 30, 2015 and on three subsequent dates during December 2015, four individuals (the “Lenders”) provided an advance to the Company with a face value of $361,111 for cash proceeds totaling $322,500. The borrowings (“2015 Advances”) were not accompanied by documentation of the nature of the 2015 Advances. However, there were general discussions as to the repayment terms, the interest expected to be paid to the Lenders and additional equity of the Company to be issued to the Lenders in connection with the 2015 Advances. Accordingly, we have accounted for the Advances based on estimates of their final terms.

 

  36  

 

 

On December 11, 2015, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement and issued a 10% Convertible Promissory Note with the principal face value of $110,000 (the “10% 2015 Note”) to an accredited investor for cash proceeds of $87,500, net of issuance costs. Under the terms of the 10% 2015 Note, all principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable to the noteholder upon the earlier of: (i) December 10, 2016; or (ii) in the event that the Company completes a financing or a series of financings, with the same or different investors, that in the aggregate result in gross proceeds to the Company of at least $3 million, then the Company is required to pre-pay and redeem the entire remaining outstanding principal amount plus Interest of this Note in cash, provided that (A) the Company shall pay the Holder one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the principal plus interest outstanding in repayment and (B) such amount must be paid in cash on the next Business Day after receipt of the gross proceeds. While any amounts are outstanding under the 10% 2015 Note, such amounts outstanding are convertible into share of the Company’s Common Stock at the lesser of: 1) $0.90 per share and 2) 75% of the price per share of the Company’s Common Stock sold in a future financing with gross proceeds of at least $1 million, subject to adjustments as stated in the Note agreement.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

 

Inflation

 

Inflation and changing prices have had no effect on our net sales and revenues or on our income from continuing operations over our two most recent fiscal years.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Because a precise determination of many assets and liabilities is dependent upon future events, the preparation of financial statements for a period necessarily involves the use of estimates which have been made using careful judgment.

 

The financial statements have, in management’s opinion, been properly prepared within reasonable limits of materiality and within the framework of the significant accounting policies summarized below.

 

We have identified the following critical accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The following is a review of the more critical accounting policies and methods used by us:

 

Use of Estimates

Conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires the use of estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates form the basis for judgments we make about the carrying values of our assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We base our estimates and judgments on historical information and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments in several areas, including but not limited to, those related to revenue recognition, collectibility of accounts receivable, contingent liabilities, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, excess and obsolete inventory, deferred tax asset valuation and income taxes. These estimates are based on management’s knowledge about current events and expectations about actions we may undertake in the future. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

 

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company operates in an industry that is subject to rapid change. The Company's operations are subject to significant risk and uncertainties including financial, operational, technological, regulatory and other risks, including the potential of business failure.

 

Inventories

The Company’s skin and hair care inventories consist of raw materials and finished goods and are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. The Company evaluates its inventory for excess quantities and obsolescence on a regular basis. To determine if the cost of the Company's inventory should be written down, current and anticipated demand, customer preferences and the age of the merchandise are considered. During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recorded charges of approximately $437,000 to operations as a result of excess and obsolete inventory related to the rebranding and repackaging of products. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company did not recognize any charges to operations associated with excess and obsolete inventory.

 

Valuation of long-lived Assets

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment at least annually, or more frequently when a triggering event is deemed to have occurred. This assessment is subjective in nature and requires significant management judgment to forecast future operating results, projected cash flows and current period market capitalization levels. If the Company’s estimates and assumptions change in the future, it could result in a material write-down of long-lived assets. The Company recognizes an impairment charge as the difference between the net book value of such assets and the fair value of the assets on the measurement date 

 

  37  

 

 

Revenue Recognition

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605 - Revenue Recognition , the Company recognizes revenue from product sales when the product has been ordered by the customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable, the product is shipped to the customer, title has transferred and collectibility is reasonably assured.

 

Research and Development

Internal research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Third-party research and development costs are expensed when the contracted work has been performed. Research and development consists of consulting fees, direct labor and raw materials associated with the development of new products to be commercialized by our Company. Research and development expenses totaled $115,391 and $360,489 in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Our Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $532,661 and $177,140 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Bad debt expense totaled $361,336 and $223,631, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

Convertible Financial Instruments

The Company bifurcates conversion options and warrants from their host instruments and accounts for them as free standing derivative financial instruments if certain criteria are met. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. An exception to this rule is when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional, as that term is described under applicable GAAP.

 

When the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options and warrants should not be bifurcated from their host instruments, discounts are recorded for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in the instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the instrument.

 

Debt Discounts - Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the earlier of the term of the related debt or their earliest date of redemption.

 

Loss on Issuance - The conversion features of the notes and certain warrants were bifurcated from the host instrument as its conversion terms were not indexed to the Company’s own stock. In addition, the warrants associated with the debt instruments were also treated as a free standing derivative liability. The total fair value of the embedded conversion feature and the warrants exceeded the net proceeds received and resulted in a loss on issuance of $2.1 million.

 

Common Stock Purchase Warrants and Derivative Financial Instruments - Common stock purchase warrants and other derivative financial instruments are classified as equity if the contracts (1) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (2) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). Contracts which (1) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company), (2) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or (3) that contain reset provisions that do not qualify for the scope exception are classified as liabilities. The Company assesses classification of its common stock purchase warrants and other derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between equity and liabilities is required.

 

  38  

 

 

Beneficial conversion feature - The issuance of the convertible debt generated a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”), which arises when a debt or equity security is issued with an embedded conversion option that is beneficial to the investor or in the money at inception because the conversion option has an effective strike price that is less than the market price of the underlying stock at the commitment date. The Company recognized the BCF by allocating the intrinsic value of the conversion option, which is the number of shares of common stock available upon conversion multiplied by the difference between the effective conversion price per share and the fair value of common stock per share on the commitment date, resulting in a discount on the convertible debt (recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital).

 

Share Based Payments

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity-based payments in accordance with ASC 718 - Share-based payments . Under ASC 718’s fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity-based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award.

 

Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations based on the fair values of the related payments. Such expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).

 

The Company accounts for share-based payments granted to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505 - Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees . The Company determines the fair value of the stock based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete.

   

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of SEC Regulation.

 

  39  

 

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

  

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES

 

CONTENTS:   PAGE #
     
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms   41- 42
     
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015   43
     
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015   44
     
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015   45
     
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015   46
     
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements   47

 

  40  

 

 

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

NuGene International, Inc.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of NuGene International, Inc. (a Nevada corporation) and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor have we been engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NuGene International, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses and negative cash flow from operations since inception. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 

 

/s/ BPM LLP  
   
San Jose, California  
April 11, 2017  

 

  41  

 

 

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

NuGene International, Inc.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of NuGene International, Inc. and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of NuGene International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the notes to the financial statements, the Company has not established sufficient revenues to cover its operating costs and has suffered from continued losses from operations. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a working capital deficit and does not have the sufficient cash resources available to meet its planned business objectives. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan regarding these matters is also described in the notes to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ Dov Weinstein & Co. C.P.A. (Isr)

www.wcpa.co.il

Jerusalem, Israel

March 30, 2016

 

  42  

 

 

NuGene International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

    2016     2015  
             
Assets                
Current assets:                
Cash   $ 44,507     $ 22,907  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $532,661 and $177,140 in 2016 and 2015, respectively     11,892       347,048  
Inventories     51,039       177,492  
Prepaid inventories and other current assets     38,217       100,555  
Total current assets     145,655       648,002  
Property and equipment, net     158,289       208,350  
Deposits     21,321       21,321  
Total assets   $ 325,265     $ 877,673  
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit                
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable and accrued expenses   $ 1,613,992     $ 327,623  
Accounts payable and advances - related parties     -       37,936  
Notes payable and advances     2,801,417       842,504  
Accrued interest     181,700       35,052  
Derivative liabilities     1,276,479       -  
Other current liabilities     190,800       17,924  
Total liabilities     6,064,388       1,261,039  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)                
Stockholders’ deficit:                
Convertible preferred stock; $0.0001 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 Series A convertible preferred stock: 2,000,000 shares authorized; 1,917,720  shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015     192       192  
Common stock; $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 40,666,086 and 39,894,673 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively      4,040       3,990  
Additional paid-in capital     12,641,673       6,180,959  
Accumulated deficit     (18,385,028 )     (6,568,507 )
Total stockholders' deficit     (5,739,123 )     (383,366 )
    $ 325,265     $ 877,673  

 

See accompanying notes.

 

  43  

 

 

NuGene International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

    2016     2015  
             
Revenues   $ 509,460     $ 2,084,939  
Cost of revenues     718,856       588,882  
 Gross profit (loss)     (209,396 )     1,496,057  
                 
Operating expenses:                
Advertising and promotion     385,641       373,738  
Personnel     5,825,750       3,447,762  
Selling, general and administrative     1,216,323       1,329,184  
Research and development     115,391       360,489  
Professional fees     1,334,721       1,146,936  
Total operating expenses     8,877,826       6,658,109  
Loss from operations     (9,087,222 )     (5,162,052 )
                 
Other income (expenses):                
Interest income     5       -  
Interest expense     (1,541,255 )     (57,015 )
Other expense     (50,000 )     -  
Loss on issuance of debt     (2,136,481 )     -  
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities     998,432       -  
Total other expenses     (2,729,299 )     (57,015 )
                 
Net loss   $ (11,816,521 )   $ (5,219,067 )
                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted     40,227,691       39,730,875  
                 
Net loss per share - basic and diluted   $ (0.29 )   $ (0.13 )

 

See accompanying notes.

 

  44  

 

 

NuGene International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

                            Total  
    Preferred Stock     Common Stock     Additional         Stockholders'  
    Shares    

Par 
Value

    Shares    

Par 
Value

    Paid-In
Capital
    Accumulated
Deficit
    Equity
(Deficit)
 
                                           
Balance as of December 31, 2014     1,917,720     $ 192       39,197,400     $ 3,920     $ 2,713,016     $ (1,349,440 )   $ 1,367,688  
                                                         
Issuance of common stock for services     -       -       460,000       46       1,505,767       -       1,505,813  
Stock based compensation     -       -       -       -       1,483,867       -       1,483,867  
Issuance of warrants in connection with notes payable     -       -       -       -       138,333       -       138,333  
Issuance of common stock in exchange for cash     -       -       237,273       24       339,976       -       340,000  
Net loss     -       -       -       -       -       (5,219,067 )     (5,219,067 )
                                                         
Balance as of December 31, 2015     1,917,720       192       39,894,673       3,990       6,180,959       (6,568,507 )     (383,366 )
                                                         
Issuance of common stock for services     -       -       260,000       26       165,774       -       165,800  
Employee stock based compensation     -       -       -       -       1,473,835       -       1,473,835  
Common stock earned but unissued for advisory services     -       -       -       -       82,806       -       82,806  
Issuance of previously earned by unissued common stock     -       -       130,000       13       (13 )     -       -  
Common stock granted but unissued to directors     -       -       -       -       1,475,000       -       1,475,000  
Issuance of warrants to directors     -       -       -       -       1,291,292       -       1,291,292  
Vesting of restricted stock units issued to directors     -       -       -       -       259,360       -       259,360  
Beneficial conversion feature in connection with notes payable     -       -       -       -       1,246,741       -       1,246,741  
Issuance of common stock in connection with notes payable     -       -       50,000       5       26,637       -       26,642  
Issuance of warrants in connection with notes payable     -       -       -       -       374,894       -       374,894  
Issuance of common stock in connection with conversion of note payable     -       -       331,413       6       64,388       -       64,394  
Net loss     -       -       -       -       -       (11,816,521 )     (11,816,521 )
                                                         
Balance as of December 31, 2016     1,917,720     $ 192       40,666,086     $ 4,040     $ 12,641,673     $ (18,385,028 )   $ (5,739,123 )

 

See accompanying notes.

 

  45  

 

 

NuGene International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

  

    2016     2015  
             
Cash flows from operating activities:                
Net loss   $ (11,816,521 )   $ (5,219,067 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:                
Stock based compensation and stock issued for services     4,748,093       2,989,680  
Non-cash portion of interest expense     281,392       55,889  
Depreciation and amortization     54,601       39,365  
Amortization of debt discount     1,258,210       -  
Loss associated with issuance of debt     2,136,481       -  
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities     (998,432 )     -  
Bad debt expense     361,336       223,631  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                
Accounts receivable     (26,180 )     (555,112 )
Inventories     185,116       (66,539 )
Prepaid inventories and o ther assets     3,675       (93,556 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses     1,291,368       492,060  
Accounts payable and advances - related parties     344,125       (84,148  
Deferred revenues     -       (234,916 )
Other liabilities     172,876       17,924  
Net cash used in operating activities     (2,003,860 )     (2,434,789 )
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:                
Purchases of property and equipment     (4,540 )     (187,041 )
Net cash used in investing activities     ( 4,540 )     (187,041 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:                
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable     2,030,000       960,000  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock     -       340,000  
Net cash provided by investing activities     2,030,000       1,300,000  
                 
Increase (decrease) in cash     21,600       (1,321,830 )
Cash, beginning of year     22,907       1,344,737  
Cash, end of year   $ 44,507     $ 22,907  
                 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:                
Cash paid the interest   $ 1,653     $ 1,126  

 

    2016     2015  
Noncash investing and financing activities:                
Issuance of common shares in connection with notes payable   $ 26,642     $ -  
Issuance of common warrants in connection with notes payable     374,894       -  
Issuance of common stock in connection with conversion notes payable     64,394       -  
Derivative liabilities     138,430       -  
Beneficial conversion feature in connection with notes payable     1,246,741       -  
Issuance of previously earned but unissued common stock     13       -  
Accrued interest converted to notes payable     87,778       -  
Transfer of prepaid inventory to inventory     58,663       -  
Conversion of amounts due to related parties to notes payable     382,061       -  
Issuance of common stock for intellectual property             250,000  
Cancellation of common stock for intellectual property             100,000  

 

See accompanying notes.  

 

  46  

 

 

NUGENE INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2016

 

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION  

 

NuGene International, Inc. (also refer to as “we”, “us”, “our”, “the “Company”, “NuGene” or “NGI”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 31, 2013. NuGene, Inc. (our wholly owned subsidiary) was incorporated in the state of California in December 2006. On January 20, 2015, we formed NuGene BioPharma, Inc. (“BioPharma”) as a wholly owned California incorporated subsidiary of NGI. On November 6, 2015, we formed The Aesthetic Group, Inc. (“TAG”) as a wholly owned California incorporated subsidiary of NGI. Both BioPharma and TAG have had no significant independent operations since inception.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of our Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The consolidated financial statements reflect the accounts of NuGene International, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries BioPharma and TAG. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

We have incurred net losses through the date of these financial statements and have yet to establish profitable operations. Our consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that our business is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with a business with high short-term debt, limited commercial product revenues, including limitations on our operating capital resources and uncertain demand for our products. We have incurred recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows since inception and through December 31, 2016, and we expect to continue to incur operating losses and negative operating cash flows at least through the near future. Members of our Company’s management have been required to advance our Company funding in order to partially meet our most critical cash requirements including payroll along with those associated with certain critical goods and services. In the process of managing these situations, our management may have made representations implying their personal guarantee of certain of our Company’s obligations. For further discussion of the advances made by management to meet the Company’s most critical cash needs, see the titled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”.

 

As a result of the aforementioned factors, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on our 2016 consolidated financial statements, raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.   Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 do not contain any adjustments for this uncertainty. In response to our Company’s cash needs, we raised funding as described in our footnotes that follow. Any additional amounts raised will be used for our future investing and operating cash flow needs. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional amounts of financing.

 

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Use of Estimates

 

Conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires the use of estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates form the basis for judgments we make about the carrying values of our assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We base our estimates and judgments on historical information and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments in several areas, including but not limited to, those related to revenue recognition, collectibility of accounts receivable, contingent liabilities, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, excess and obsolete inventory, deferred tax asset valuation and income taxes. These estimates are based on management’s knowledge about current events and expectations about actions we may undertake in the future. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

 

Risks and Uncertainties

 

Our Company operates in an industry that is subject to rapid change. Our Company's operations are subject to significant risk and uncertainties including financial, operational, technological, regulatory and other risks, including the potential of business failure.

  

Reclassifications

 

For comparability, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified, where appropriate, to conform to the current year’s financial statement presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on net loss.

 

  47  

 

 

Cash Equivalents

 

Cash equivalents include investments with initial maturities of three months or less. Our Company maintains its cash balances at credit-worthy financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000.

 

Inventories

 

Our Company’s skin and hair care inventories consist of raw materials and finished goods and are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Our Company evaluates its inventory for excess quantities and obsolescence on a regular basis. To determine if the cost of our Company's inventory should be written down, current and anticipated demand, customer preferences and the age of the merchandise are considered. For the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recorded charges of approximately $437,000 to operations as a result of excess and obsolete inventory related to the rebranding and repackaging of products. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company did not recognize any charges to operations associated with excess and obsolete inventory.

 

Valuation of long-lived Assets

 

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment at least annually, or more frequently when a triggering event is deemed to have occurred. This assessment is subjective in nature and requires significant management judgment to forecast future operating results, projected cash flows and current period market capitalization levels. If the Company’s estimates and assumptions change in the future, it could result in a material write-down of long-lived assets. The Company recognizes an impairment charge as the difference between the net book value of such assets and the fair value of the assets on the measurement date.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment consist of office furniture, computer equipment, laboratory equipment, purchased software, website development and improvements made to our leased offices and are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the three or five year useful lives of the assets or the remaining term of the lease. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605 - Revenue Recognition , the Company recognizes revenue from product sales when the product has been ordered by the customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable, the product is shipped to the customer, title has transferred and collectibility is reasonably assured.

 

Concentration of Revenues

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we derived 12.3% and 12.2% of our revenues from two wholesale distributors (neither of these customers have balances in accounts receivable at December 31, 2016). During the year ended December 31, 2015, we derived 31.1% and 15.7% of our revenues from two wholesale distributors (ending balances in accounts receivable totaling $173,790 and $327,893, respectively). Our distributors purchase products from us on a purchase order basis on standard terms. The distributors are under no obligation to continue to purchase our products. The loss of any of our major distributors, a material reduction in their purchases or the cancellation of product orders or unexpected returns of unsold products could significantly decrease our revenues and impede our future growth prospects. We do not have long-term purchase commitments with our distributors.

 

Cost of Revenues

 

Cost of revenues include all of the costs to manufacture our Company’s products. For products manufactured in our Company’s own facilities, such costs include raw materials and supplies, direct labor and factory overhead. For products manufactured for our Company by third-party contractors, such cost represents the amounts invoiced by the contractors.

 

Research and Development

 

Internal research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Third-party research and development costs are expensed when the contracted work has been performed. Research and development consists of consulting fees, direct labor and raw materials associated with the development of new products to be commercialized by our Company.

 

  48  

 

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

Our Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $532,661 and $177,140 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Bad debt expense totaled $361,336 and $223,631, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

Convertible Financial Instruments

 

The Company bifurcates conversion options and warrants from their host instruments and accounts for them as free standing derivative financial instruments if certain criteria are met. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. An exception to this rule is when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional, as that term is described under applicable GAAP.

 

When the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options and warrants should not be bifurcated from their host instruments, discounts are recorded for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in the instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the instrument.

 

Debt Discounts - Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the earlier of the term of the related debt or their earliest date of redemption.

 

Loss on Issuance - The conversion features of the notes and certain warrants were bifurcated from the host instrument as its conversion terms were not indexed to the Company’s own stock. In addition, the warrants associated with the debt instruments were also treated as a free standing derivative liability. The total fair value of the embedded conversion feature and the warrants exceeded the net proceeds received and resulted in a loss on issuance of $2.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. 

 

Common Stock Purchase Warrants and Derivative Financial Instruments - Common stock purchase warrants and other derivative financial instruments are classified as equity if the contracts (1) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (2) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). Contracts which (1) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company), (2) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or (3) that contain reset provisions that do not qualify for the scope exception are classified as liabilities. The Company assesses classification of its common stock purchase warrants and other derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between equity and liabilities is required.

 

Beneficial conversion feature - The issuance of the convertible debt generated a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”), which arises when a debt or equity security is issued with an embedded conversion option that is beneficial to the investor or in the money at inception because the conversion option has an effective strike price that is less than the market price of the underlying stock at the commitment date. The Company recognized the BCF by allocating the intrinsic value of the conversion option, which is the number of shares of common stock available upon conversion multiplied by the difference between the effective conversion price per share and the fair value of common stock per share on the commitment date, resulting in a discount on the convertible debt (recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital).

 

Share Based Payments

 

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity-based payments in accordance with ASC 718 - Share-based payments . Under ASC 718’s fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity-based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award.

 

Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations based on the fair values of the related payments. Such expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).

 

The Company accounts for share-based payments granted to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505 - Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees . The Company determines the fair value of the stock based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete.

  

  49  

 

 

Net Loss per Share of Common Stock

 

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260 - Earnings Per Shar e. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted net loss per share on the face of the statements of operations. Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to common shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is determined by adjusting the loss attributable to common shareholders and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the effects of all potential dilutive common shares, such as stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock warrants or the conversion of preferred stock into common stock.

 

Common stock equivalents totaling, 26,077,697 and 4,767,720 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share on the consolidated statements of operations because the Company reported a net loss during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and therefore the effect would be anti-dilutive.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

We measure assets and liabilities at fair value based on an expected exit price as defined by the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements. Fair value represents the estimated amount that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs used in valuation techniques are assigned a hierarchical level. The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:

 

- Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments;
- Level 2: Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments);
- Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs (including assumptions in determining the fair value of certain investments).

 

The carrying values for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and deferred revenue approximate their fair value due to their short maturities. Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms, the carrying value of the notes payable approximate fair value.

 

Website Development

 

Costs and expenses incurred during the planning and operating stages of our Company’s website development are expensed as incurred. The Company accounts for the development of its website by expensing all costs associated with the planning of the website as incurred and capitalizing the costs to develop the website. Once the website is available for use, the related costs will be amortized over their estimated useful life on a straight-line basis (generally estimated to be 3 years). These costs are included in property and equipment in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

Common Stock Purchase Warrants and Derivative Financial Instruments

 

Common stock purchase warrants and other derivative financial instruments are classified as equity if the contracts (1) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (2) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). Contracts which (1) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company), (2) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or (3) that contain reset provisions that do not qualify for the scope exception are classified as equity or liabilities. The Company assesses classification of its common stock purchase warrants and other derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between equity and liabilities is required.

 

Beneficial conversion feature – The issuance of the convertible debt generated a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”), which arises when a debt or equity security is issued with an embedded conversion option that is beneficial to the investor or in the money at inception because the conversion option has an effective strike price that is less than the market price of the underlying stock at the commitment date. The Company recognized the BCF by allocating the intrinsic value of the conversion option, which is the number of shares of common stock available upon conversion multiplied by the difference between the effective conversion price per share and the fair value of common stock per share on the commitment date, to additional paid-in capital, resulting in a discount on the convertible debt (recorded as a component of additional paid in capital).

 

Royalty Expense

 

We recognize royalty expenses in accordance with the terms of our license agreement with a celebrity product endorser. Royalties are expensed in the statements of operation in the period that the related revenues are recognized, in cost of goods sold.

 

  50  

 

 

Income Taxes

 

Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 740 - Income Taxes . Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future consequences of differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases (temporary differences). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are recovered or settled. Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets are established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

 

Management evaluates its tax positions on an annual basis and has determined that as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, no additional accrual for income taxes is necessary. The federal and state income tax returns of the Company are subject to examination by the IRS and state taxing authorities, generally for three years after they were filed.

 

Recent Accounting Standards Updates

 

In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15,  Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,  which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this new pronouncement on its consolidated statements of cash flows.

 

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10,  Revenue from Contracts with Customer (“ASU No. 2016-10”) . The new guidance is an update to ASC No. 606 and provides clarity on identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation. For public companies, ASU No. 2016-10 is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company does not expect ASU No. 2016-10 to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “ Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ”. The amendment is to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in ASU No. 2016-09 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU No. 2016-09 on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “ Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations”. The purpose of ASU No. 2016-08 is to clarify the implementation of guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU No. 2016-08 on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 - Leases (Topic 842): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“Topic 842”). Topic 842 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for virtually all of their leases. The liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments. The asset will be based on the liability, subject to adjustment, such as for initial direct costs. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Operating leases will result in straight-line expense while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current capital leases). Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting, but without explicit bright lines. Topic 842 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and includes interim periods within that year. Topic 842 will be applied using a modified retrospective transition, providing for certain practical expedients. Early application is permitted and the Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that adoption may have on its consolidated financial statements.

  

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 - Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“Topic 330”). Topic 330 requires measuring inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value based on estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation (changed from the previous guidance of lower of cost or market). This update also clarified various other inventory measurement and disclosure requirements. The update does not apply to inventory measured using the LIFO or retail inventory methods. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period, and should be applied prospectively. Early application is permitted and the Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that adoption may have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09). ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the new standard. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

  51  

 

 

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption. The Company does not discuss recent pronouncements that are not anticipated to have an impact on or are unrelated to its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

 

NOTE 3 - INVENTORIES

 

Inventories consist of the following:

 

    December 31, 2016     December 31, 2015  
Raw materials   $ 7,296     $ 72,287  
Finished goods     43,743       105,205  
Total Inventories   $ 51,039     $ 177,492  

  

NOTE 4 - LICENSE AGREEMENTS

 

In November 2014, we entered into a License Agreement with kathy ireland Worldwide ® ("kiWW ® ") under which we licensed the right to utilize the trademarks and rights to the name, likeness and visual representations of Kathy Ireland (“KI”) in connection with our cosmeceutical line of products. The initial term of the license is for eight years and it may be renewed at the option of our Company for up to an additional four years. In accordance with the License Agreement, we will pay 5% of the net sales for all licensed products sold and collected under the licensed marks or a minimum guaranteed royalty of $100,000 in year one, which includes the period from approximately November 4, 2014 through December 31, 2015 (“Contract Year 1”) of the License Agreement. The minimum guaranteed royalty increases $50,000 each year in years two through eight of the License Agreement. We recognized $163,893 and $100,000 in royalty fees during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

Additionally, we are obligated to pay an annual Brand Participation Fee to kiWW ® which provides for general advertising, good will and promotion of the KI brand. NuGene prepaid kiWW $350,000 effective upon execution of the License as a Brand Participation fee for Contract Year 1. The Brand Participation Fee for Contract Years 2 through 8 is $50,000 annually (Year 2 having been completely recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2016) with an additional 1% of the total gross sales of Licensed Products of the prior year beginning in Contract Year 4. The Company is currently in arrears with respect to the payment of the Year 2 fee that was due in November 2015. We recognized $50,000 and $50,000 in brand participation fees during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

On March 17 , 2015, we entered into an Intellectual Property Asset Purchase Agreement (“IP Agreement”) with an individual (“IP Seller”) to acquire all of the rights, title and interest in certain intellectual property connected with a product named SkinGuardian (“SGIP”). Upon the acquisition of SGIP, the Company issued 150,000 shares of restricted common stock (net, as amended) to the IP Seller valued at $150,000. The consideration paid for SGIP was expensed during the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

Property and equipment, net consist of the following:

 

    December 31, 2016     December 31, 2015  
Software / website development   $ 8,219     $ 8,219  
Equipment     141,125       136,585  
Leasehold improvements     104,166       104,166  
Property and equipment, gross     253,510       248,970  
Accumulated depreciation     (95,221 )     (40,620 )
Property and equipment, net   $ 158,289     $ 208,350  

 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $54,601 and $39,365, respectively.

 

  52  

 

 

NOTE 6 - PROMISSORY NOTES PAYABLE AND ADVANCES

 

Borrowings under notes payable and advances as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are summarized as follows:

 

          Amounts converted     Carrying Value as of     Carrying Value as of     Accrued Interest     Accrued Interest        
    Company     to Common Stock as of     December 31,     December 31,     as of December 31,     as of December 31,     Principal Value  
    Proceeds     December 31, 2016     2016     2015     2016     2015     as of Maturity  
15% Note   $ 500,000      $ -     $ -     $ 500,000     $ -     $ 31,479     $ -  
10% Note     50,000       -       50,000       50,000       5,726       1,383       50,000  
10% Note (2015)     87,500       -       110,000       62,949       11,633       548       110,000  
10% Note (2015 Advances)     322,500       -       361,111       229,555       37,852       1,642       361,111  
10% Note (2016 Advances)     1,065,000       -       799,024       -       43,492       -       1,080,556  
8% Convertible Note     245,000       -       -       -       -       -       -  
4% Convertible Note     -       62,428       270,350       -       360       -       270,350  
15% Note (2016 Advances)     35,000       -       35,000       -       2,373       -       35,000  
9% Convertible Note     240,000       -       52,034       -       4,683       -       267,500  
10% Convertible Note     70,000       -       6,837       -       341       -       77,779  
5% Convertible Note - conversion of Related Party     -       -       382,061       -       5,668       -       382,061  
5% Convertible Note     375,000       -       160,000       -       3,879       -       480,000  
15% CAH Note     -       -       575,000       -       65,693       -       575,000  
    $ 2,990,000     $ 62,428     $ 2,801,417     $ 842,504     $ 181,700     $ 35,052     $ 3,689,357  

 

2016 activity

 

On April 4, 2016, we issued a note payable to Canyon Assets Holdings, Inc. (“Lender”) dated March 28, 2016 in the principal amount of $575,000. The note was issued to the Lender in consideration for the Lender’s having satisfied on the Company’s behalf an outstanding note payable (the “CAH Note”) of the Company (the “JTS Note”). The JTS Note issued September 25, 2015 was repaid in full ($500,000 face value and accrued interest of $75,000) by the Lender with the payment of $575,000 in cash. The terms of the CAH Note call for an interest rate of 15%, due one year from the date of the CAH Note. However, all accrued and unpaid interest and all other amounts payable under the CAH Note are due to the Lender within ten (10) business days after the closing by the Company of an equity or convertible debt financing in one or more series of transactions, with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $1 million.

  

On April 4, 2016, we issued a $275,000 face value note payable and 50,000 shares of our common stock to Gemini Master Fund, LTD (“Gemini”) pursuant to a Security Purchase Agreement dated March 30, 2016 (the date the funds were received by our Company). Under the terms of the related note payable (the “Gemini Note”), the Company received $245,000, net of costs and original issue discount. Other significant terms of the Gemini Note include:

 

· A maturity date of December 31, 2016 in the absence of events triggering mandatory early repayment (as summarized below);
· Interest accrues at the rate of 8% on the $275,000 face value (18% in the event of an event of default as defined in the Gemini Note);
· The Gemini Note is convertible in part (subject to a $10,000 minimum) at the option of Gemini into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of $0.70 per share (subject to adjustment summarized below);
· The Company has the option to prepay the Gemini Note;
· All prepayments of the Gemini Note, whether effected at the option of the Company or subject to mandatory early repayment (as summarized herein), require the Company to repay Gemini 112% of the outstanding principal and all outstanding accrued interest through the date of prepayment;
· All principal and interest outstanding under the Gemini Note are required to be immediately repaid should the Company complete a financing or series of financings totaling $1.5 million or more;
· The conversion price of the Gemini Note is adjusted for the following: 1) loss of Company DTC eligibility - conversion price adjusts to $0.25 per share; 2) stock dividends and splits - as described in the Gemini Note; 3) a rights offering below the market price (as defined) - as described in the Gemini Note; 4) fundamental transactions (as defined) - as described in the Gemini Note; 5) subsequent equity sales below $0.70 per share - as more particularly detailed and described in the Gemini Note; and
· The Gemini Note is convertible into 392,857 shares of common stock

 

The embedded conversion feature of the Gemini Note was bifurcated and valued at $106,278.

 

  53  

 

 

Management used a Monte Carlo valuation model to estimate the fair value of the embedded conversion option at issuance of the convertible note, with the following weighted average key inputs:

 

    At issuance  
Stock price   $ 0.68  
Term (years)     0.76  
Volatility     98.9 %
Risk-free rate of interest     0.5 %
Dividend yield     0.0 %

 

The embedded conversion feature is separately measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in current operations.  The embedded conversion has been reduced by $58,962 during the year ended December 31, 2016 (see Note 7).

 

In connection with the issuance of the Gemini Note, we recorded additional debt discounts related to the following:

 

· Issuance of 50,000 shares of our common stock resulting in the relative fair value of $27,000;

· Recording of a beneficial conversion feature of $43,785; and

· Original issuance discount of $25,000.

 

The debt discounts are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the notes. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of approximately $202,000 resulting from the amortization of the entire debt discount noted above resulting in a Gemini Note balance of $275,000.

 

On October 28, 2016, the Gemini Note was purchased in full, including accrued interest of approximately $13,000, by another lender in exchange for a convertible note (“the 4% Convertible Note”) issued by the Company. The 4% Convertible Note accrues interest at 4% per annum, is entitled to the same conversion features as the Gemini Note and matures on June 30, 2017. The lender charged the Company $45,000 in fees, which were added to the balance, and converted approximately $62,000 of the 4% Convertible Note balance into 331,413 shares of the Company’s common stock, resulting in a balance of $270,350 as of December 31, 2016.

 

During January through June 2016, three individuals (the “Lenders”) advanced a total of $140,000 to the Company. The borrowings were not accompanied by documentation of the nature of the borrowings. However, there were general discussions as to the repayment terms and the interest expected of 10% per annum to be paid to the Lenders in connection with the borrowings. Accordingly, we have accounted for the borrowings based on estimates of their still undocumented final terms.

 

In July 19, 2016, we issued a sixty day 15% promissory note payable to a purchaser for cash proceeds totaling $35,000. In the event that we secure any future financing with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $500,000 while the promissory note is outstanding, the promissory note and all accrued interest therefrom will be immediately due and payable within ten business days of the closing of such financing.

 

From July through September 30, 2016, certain investors advanced a total of $925,000 (the “Advances”) to the Company with a right to convert at no greater than $0.40 per share. In connection with the Advances, the Company also issued warrants to purchase 770,833 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share with a 5 year term. The relative fair value of the warrants compared to the Advances was $295,540, which was recorded as a component of stockholders’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount on the Advances. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model (see Note 8). The Company then computed the effective conversion price of the Advances on the issuance date, noting that the Advances gave rise to a BCF of $629,460. The sum of the relative fair value of the warrants and the BCF was recorded as a debt discount to be amortized over the term of the advances.

 

The debt discounts are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the Advances. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $643,469, from the amortization of the debt discount, resulting in the Advances balance of $643,469. 

 

The Advances contain an embedded conversion feature that the Company has determined is a derivative requiring bifurcation in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815. The embedded conversion feature of the Notes was valued at inception using the Monte Carlo simulation at $1,212,384 and was recorded as a loss on the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2016, the derivative was remeasured to $491,218 (see Note 7) and the difference was recorded as a change in fair value of derivative liabilities on the consolidated statements of operations.

 

  54  

 

 

Management used a Monte Carlo valuation model to estimate the fair value of the embedded conversion option at issuance of the Advances, with the following weighted average key inputs:

 

    At issuance  
Stock price   $ 0.74  
Term (years)     0.75  
Volatility     116 %
Risk-free rate of interest     0.5 %
Dividend yield     0.0 %

 

On October 21, 2016, we issued a $267,500 face value convertible note that accrues interest at 9% per annum and matures on October 21, 2017 (“the 9% Convertible Note”). The Company received proceeds of $240,000, net of costs and original issuance discount. Upon holding the note for six months, the conversion terms allow the holder to convert outstanding principal into the Company’s common stock at the lower of (i) $0.40 per share or (ii) 65% of the lowest closing bid price of the common stock for the fifteen prior trading days, including upon which the conversion notice is received by the Company. The 9% Convertible Note allows for prepayment within 180 days from the date of issuance. If the note is outstanding for 90 days or less, the prepayment rate is 125% of principal plus accrued interest; and if the note is outstanding for more than 90 days but less than 180 days, the prepayment rate is 150% of principal plus accrued interest. In connection with the 9% Convertible Note, the Company also issued warrants to purchase 222,916 shares of our common stock at an exercise price $0.60 per share with a 4 year term. The relative fair value of the warrants compared to the 9% Convertible Note was $56,737, which was recorded as a component of stockholders’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the 9% Convertible Note. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model (see Note 8). The Company then computed the effective conversion price of the 9% Convertible Note on the issuance date, noting that the 9% Convertible Note gave rise to a BCF of $151,112.

 

The 9% Convertible Note contains an embedded conversion feature that the Company has determined is a derivative requiring bifurcation in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815. The embedded conversion feature of the 9% Convertible Note was valued at inception using the Monte Carlo simulation at $296,786 with $32,150 being recorded as a discount to the 9% Convertible Note and $264,633, the remainder, being recorded as a loss on the consolidated statements of operations. Management used a Monte Carlo valuation model to estimate the fair value of the embedded conversion option at issuance of the 9% Convertible Notes, with the following weighted average key inputs:

 

    At issuance  
Stock price   $ 0.50  
Term (years)     1.03  
Volatility     116 %
Risk-free rate of interest     0.7 %
Dividend yield     0.0 %

 

The sum of the relative fair value of the warrants, BCF, original issuance discount, issuance costs and applicable portion of the embedded conversion option that was recorded as a debt discount is to be amortized over the term of the 9% Convertible Note. The debt discounts are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the 9% Note. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $52,034, from the amortization of the debt discount, resulting in the 9% Convertible Note balance of $52,034. 

 

As of December 31, 2016, the derivative was remeasured to $215,873 (see Note 7) and the difference was recorded as a change in fair value of derivative liabilities on the statement of operations.  

 

On October 28, 2016, we issued a $480,000 face value convertible note that accrues interest at 5% per annum and matures on April 28, 2017 (“the 5% Convertible Note”). The Company received proceeds of $375,000, net of costs and original issuance discount. The conversion terms allow the holder to convert outstanding principal into the Company’s common stock if an event of default occurs, or if the Company does not repay the note in full at the original maturity date, at 60% of the lowest closing bid price of the common stock for the thirty prior trading days immediately preceding the trading date. Prepayment rates are 115% if the note is repaid within the first sixty days from the date of issuance and 125% thereafter. The Company computed the effective conversion price of the 5% Convertible Note on the issuance date, noting that the 5% Convertible Note gave rise to a BCF of $375,000.

 

The sum of the BCF, original issuance discount and issuance costs that was recorded as a debt discount is to be amortized over the term of the 5% Convertible Note. The debt discounts are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the 5% Convertible Note. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $160,000, from the amortization of the debt discount, resulting in the 5% Convertible Note balance of $160,000. 

 

In connection with the 5% Convertible Note, the Company also issued warrants with a 7 year term to purchase 1,428,572 shares of our common stock at an exercise price per share equal to the lower of (a) $0.47; or (b) 75% of the closing bid price of the common stock on the effective date of the Company’s first public offering following the issuance date. The Company determined that the warrants are derivatives requiring bifurcation in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815. The warrants were valued at inception using the Monte Carlo simulation at $579,451 and recorded as a loss on the consolidated statements of operations. Management used a Monte Carlo valuation model to estimate the fair value of the warrant derivative at issuance of the 5% Convertible Note, with the following weighted average key inputs:

 

  55  

 

  

    At issuance  
Stock price   $ 0.45  
Term (years)     7.00  
Volatility     112 %
Risk-free rate of interest     1.6 %
Dividend yield     0.0 %

 

As of December 31, 2016, the warrant derivatives were remeasured to $443,816 (see Note 7) and the difference was recorded as a change in fair value of derivative liabilities on the statement of operations. 

 

The 5% Convertible Note also contains an embedded conversion feature that the Company has determined is a derivative requiring bifurcation in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815. The embedded conversion feature of the 5% Convertible Note was valued at inception using the Monte Carlo simulation at $36,130 and recorded as a loss on the consolidated statements of operations. Management used a Monte Carlo valuation model to estimate the fair value of the embedded conversion option at issuance of the 5% Convertible Note, with the following weighted average key inputs:

 

    At issuance  
Stock price   $ 0.45  
Term (years)     0.50  
Volatility     118 %
Risk-free rate of interest     0.5 %
Dividend yield     0.0 %

 

  As of December 31, 2016, the derivative was remeasured to $34,517 (see Note 7) and the difference was recorded as a change in fair value of derivative liabilities on the statement of operations.  

 

On November 7, 2016, the amounts owed to related parties totaling $382,061 were sold to two unrelated investors. The Company issued a note to each investor in the amount of $191,030. The notes have an interest rate of 5% per annum and mature on the earlier of: (i) May 7, 2016; (ii) the date the Company raises a total of $2 million, subsequent to the issuance of these notes. The notes have a conversion feature under which the note holder can convert at any time at a conversion price of $0.40 per share.

 

On December 15, 2016, we issued a $77,779 face value convertible note that accrues interest at 10% per annum and matures on June 15, 2017 (“the 10% Convertible Note”). The Company received proceeds of $70,000, net of original issuance discount. The conversion terms allow the holder to convert outstanding principal into the Company’s common stock at 65% of the price of the common stock when the Company a capital raise transaction of at least $15,000,000 in debt, and or equity subsequent to the issuance date. The 10% Convertible Note allows for prepayment any time after 90 days from the date of issuance at a prepayment rate of 110% of principal and accrued interest outstanding. In connection with the 10% Convertible Note, the Company also issued warrants to purchase 77,778 shares of our common stock at an exercise price $0.50 per share with a 4 year term. The relative fair value of the warrants compared to the 10% Convertible Note was $22,616, which was recorded as a component of stockholders’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the 10% Convertible Note. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model (see Note 8). The Company then computed the effective conversion price of the 10% Convertible Note on the issuance date, noting that the 10% Convertible Note gave rise to a BCF of $47,384.

 

The sum of the relative fair value of the warrants, BCF and original issuance discount was recorded as a debt discount is to be amortized over the term of the 10% Convertible Note. The debt discounts are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the 10% Convertible Note. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $6,838, from the amortization of the debt discount, resulting in the 10% Convertible Note balance of $6,838. 

 

The 10% Convertible Note contains an embedded conversion feature that the Company has determined is a derivative requiring bifurcation in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815. The embedded conversion feature of the 10% Convertible Note was valued at inception using the Monte Carlo simulation at $43,883 and recorded as a loss on the consolidated statements of operations. Management used a Monte Carlo valuation model to estimate the fair value of the embedded conversion option at issuance of the 10% Convertible Notes, with the following weighted average key inputs:

 

    At issuance  
Stock price   $ 0.41  
Term (years)     0.41  
Volatility     118 %
Risk-free rate of interest     0.6 %
Dividend yield     0.0 %

 

 

As of December 31, 2016, the derivative was remeasured to $43,739 (see Note 7) and the difference was recorded as a change in fair value of derivative liabilities on the statement of operations.  

 

  56  

 

 

2015 activity

 

On September 25, 2015, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement and issued a 15% Promissory Note with the principal face value of $500,000 (the “15% Note”) to an accredited investor. Under the terms of the 15% Note, all principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable to the noteholder upon the earlier of: (i) September 25, 2016; or (ii) within ten business days after the consummation of an equity or convertible debt financing with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $1,000,000.

  

Borrowings made pursuant to the 15% Note bear interest at the annual rate of 15% (or $75,000), irrespective of whether paid at or prior to September 25, 2016.  If any amount payable pursuant to the note payable is not paid when due (without regard to any applicable grace periods as set forth in the Note), whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, such overdue amount shall bear interest at the rate of 15% from the date of such non-payment until such amount is paid in full. We have recognized $31,479 in interest expense through December 31, 2015 based on an estimated repayment date of May 15, 2016.  

 

During November 2015, we issued a one year 10% promissory notes payable (the “10% Note”) to a purchaser for cash proceeds totaling $50,000. In the event that we secure any future financing with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $1 million while the 10% Note is outstanding, the 10% Note and all accrued interest therefrom will be immediately due and payable within ten business days of the closing of such financing. The holder may also convert any unpaid principal under the 10% Note into any funding instrument entered into by our Company for a period of 180 days after the date of the 10% Note. The full interest of 10% of the borrowings under the 10% Note ($5,000) is due irrespective of whether paid at maturity or when required to be prepaid. The 10% Note remains outstanding and we have recognized $5,726 and $1,383 in interest expense through December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. 

 

On November 30, 2015 and on three subsequent dates during December 2015, four individuals (the “Lenders”) provided an advance to the Company with a face value of $361,111 for cash proceeds totaling $322,500. The borrowings (“2015 Advances”) were not accompanied by documentation of the nature of the 2015 Advances. However, there were general discussions as to the repayment terms, the interest expected to be paid to the Lenders and additional equity of the Company to be issued to the Lenders in connection with the 2015 Advances. Accordingly, we have accounted for the Advances based on estimates of their final terms.

 

On December 11, 2015, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement and issued a 10% Convertible Promissory Note with the principal face value of $110,000 (the “10% 2015 Note”) to an accredited investor for cash proceeds of $87,500, net of issuance costs. Under the terms of the 10% 2015 Note, all principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable to the noteholder upon the earlier of: (i) December 10, 2016; or (ii) in the event that the Company completes a financing or a series of financings, with the same or different investors, that in the aggregate result in gross proceeds to the Company of at least $3 million, then the Company is required to pre-pay and redeem the entire remaining outstanding principal amount plus Interest of this Note in cash, provided that (A) the Company shall pay the Holder one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the principal plus interest outstanding in repayment and (B) such amount must be paid in cash on the next Business Day after receipt of the gross proceeds.

 

While any amounts are outstanding under the 10% 2015 Note, such amounts outstanding are convertible into share of the Company’s Common Stock at the lesser of: 1) $0.90 per share and 2) 75% of the price per share of the Company’s Common Stock sold in a future financing with gross proceeds of at least $1 million, subject to adjustments as stated in the Note agreement.

 

In connection with the 10% 2015 Note, the Company also issued a five-year warrant to purchase up to 61,111 shares of its common stock to the Note holder. The exercise price of the warrant is $1.50 per share, subject to adjustments provided in the warrant agreement (but in no event at an exercise price below $0.50 per share). The consideration upon exercise may also be paid on a cashless basis as detailed in the Note.

 

The Company accounted for warrants to be issued in connection the 2015 Advances under similar terms as the warrant granted for the 10% 2015 Note.

 

In connection with the warrants expected to be issued in connection with the 2015 Advances and the 10% 2015 Note, we have estimated a relative fair value of $138,333 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Total 2015 Advances and 10% 2015 Note face value   $ 471,111  
Warrants to be issued     256,172  
Term     5 years  
Strike price   $ 1.50  
Fair market value   $ 0.95  
Expected volatility     128 %
Risk-free interest rate     1.56 %

 

The sum of the relative fair value of the warrants and the original issuance discount of $51,111 was recorded as a debt discount to be amortized over the term of the advances. The debt discounts are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the 10% 2015 Note and the 2015 Advances. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, the Company recognized interest expense of $166,107 and $20,837, respectively, from the amortization of the debt discount, resulting in the 10% 2015 Note and 2015 Advances balance of $471,111. 

 

  57  

 

 

NOTE 7 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 by level within the fair value hierarchy, are as follows:

 

    Quoted prices in active
markets
    Significant other
observable inputs
    Significant unobservable
inputs
 
    (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Embedded conversion options   $ -     $ -     $ 832,663  
Warrant derivatives   $ -     $ -     $ 443,816  

 

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

As of December 31, 2016, the embedded conversion options (as discussed in Note 6) and warrant derivatives have aggregate fair values of $832,663 and $443,816, respectively. The table below presents changes in fair value for the embedded conversion options and warrant derivatives, which is a Level 3 fair value measurement:

  

Rollforward of Level 3 Fair Value Measurement for the Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

    Balance as of
December 31,
          Change in Fair
Market
    Balance as of
December 31,
 
    2015     Issuance     Value     2016  
Embedded conversion options   $ -     $ 1,695,460     $ (862,797 )   $ 832,663  
Warrant derivatives   $ -     $ 579,451     $ (135,635 )   $ 443,816  

 

The Company’s derivative liabilities are measured at fair value using the Monte Carlo simulation valuation methodology. A summary of the weighted average (in aggregate) significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs) used in measuring the Company’s embedded conversion options that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2016 is as follows:

 

    As of December 31, 2016  
Stock price   $ 0.36  
Term (years)     2.72  
Volatility     116 %
Risk-free rate of interest     1.18 %
Dividend yield     0.0 %

 

A summary of the weighted average significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs) used in measuring the Company’s warrant derivatives that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2016 is as follows:

 

    As of December 31, 2016  
Stock price   $ 0.36  
Term (years)     6.84  
Volatility     112 %
Risk-free rate of interest     2.23 %
Dividend yield     0.0 %

 

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

Preferred Stock

 

Our Company’s articles of incorporation authorize 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001. We designated 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A convertible preferred stock. The Series A convertible preferred stock is convertible into common stock at a ratio of one to one. Additionally, as long as there are a minimum of 900,000 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock outstanding, the holders of the Series A convertible preferred stock have the right to elect a majority of our Company’s Board of Directors. Finally, in all manners brought to a vote of the shareholders, the holders of the Series A convertible preferred stock have three votes to every one vote of common stock. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were 1,917,720 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock outstanding which were issued to the founders of NuGene, Ali and Saeed Kharazmi. Ali and Saeed Kharazmi each own 50% of the outstanding Series A convertible preferred stock and are our Company’s Chairman of the Board and Director, respectively.

 

  58  

 

 

Common Stock

 

Our Company has Advisory Agreements with members of its Advisory Board. The terms of the individual Advisory Agreements vary and provide for up to 50,000 initial sign-on shares vesting for a maximum of an 18-month period, and up to 50,000 shares of common stock per annum issued on the anniversary of the effective date of the agreement. Expenses for the issuance of common stock for services related to these share issuances was recognized over the service period in which the shares are earned or over the respective vesting period, as applicable, and was calculated by multiplying the number of shares earned for the respective reporting period by the share price on the date earned, during the respective quarter, as quoted on the OTC Marketplace. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SGA”) recognized in connection with the Advisory Agreements totaled $82,806 and $572,216 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

2016 activity

 

On April 4, 2016, we issued a $275,000 face value note payable and 50,000 shares of our common stock to Gemini Master Fund, LTD (“Gemini”) pursuant to a Security Purchase Agreement dated March 30, 2016 (the date the funds were received by our Company).

  

In June 2016, Theodore Schwarz executed an Offer Letter whereby Mr. Schwarz agreed to become a member of our Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). Under the Offer Letter the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Schwarz $2,500 for each Board of Directors meeting attended. Additionally, Mr. Schwarz may be granted 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in the future that may vest at the rate of 166,666 shares per year, over a three-year period provided Mr. Schwarz continues to serve on the Board. The stock has not been issued as of December 31, 2016. The grant date fair value of the common stock was $330,000. The Company recognized stock based compensation of $55,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. 

 

In connection with the purchase of the Gemini note on October 28, 2016 (see Note 6), the new lender converted $62,428 of the outstanding note balance and $1,966 of interest expense into 331,413 shares of our common stock over the course of November and December 2016.

 

2015 activity

 

On March 31, 2015, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with a shareholder of our Company (the “Buyer”) resulting in the issuance of 50,000 shares of common stock to the Buyer for proceeds of $50,000. Under the agreement, we extended to the Buyer an option to purchase an additional 60,000 shares of common stock at $1 per share within 45 days of the Closing. On May 8, 2015, the Buyer exercised his option to purchase the remaining shares under the stock purchase agreement and accordingly, we issued the Buyer an additional 60,000 shares of our common stock for cash proceeds of $60,000. On April 20, 2015, our Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with an unaffiliated accredited investor for the sale of 27,273 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share, resulting in total cash proceeds of $30,000. On June 2, 2015, our Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with an unaffiliated accredited investor for the sale of 100,000 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share, resulting in total cash proceeds of $200,000.

 

During 2015, offered positions on our Company’s Board of Directors to two individuals, although one of the offers was later rescinded. In addition to annual cash stipends of $30,000, the candidates were granted a total of 200,000 shares of our Company’s common stock vesting 25% on the third, sixth, ninth and twelfth month following the inception of the proposed Board service. SGA totaling $164,416 was recognized in connection with these shares over the service periods in which the shares were earned and was calculated based on the average closing price per share of our common stock, during the respective quarter, as quoted on the OTC Marketplace. 

 

In February 2015, we entered into a six-month consulting agreement with an investor relations firm. In addition to a $27,000 retainer, the consulting agreement (as amended) called for the vesting of 110,000 shares of our common stock over the six-month term, issuable upon the conclusion of the agreement. On August 17, 2015, we issued the 110,000 shares of common stock owed to the investor relations firm. We recognized $167,092 of SGA in connection with the consulting agreement during the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

In March 2015, we purchased technology from an individual in exchange for 150,000 (as amended) shares of our common stock. The common stock was valued at the closing price per share of our common stock, on the date of issuance resulting in the recognition of $150,000 in SGA for the year ended December 31, 2015. During 2015, we issued 200,000 fully vested shares of our common stock to three consultants as compensation for services rendered. The common stock was valued at the closing price per share of our common stock, on the date of issuance, as quoted on the OTC Marketplace resulting in the recognition of $452,100 in stock based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

  59  

 

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

2016 activity  

 

On March 17, 2016, we entered into a consulting agreement for services over one year. In connection with the agreement, we granted the consultant 200,000 shares of our fully vested common stock as consideration for the consultant’s services. The stock was issued on April 25, 2016. The grant date value of the restricted stock award was $128,000 and was recognized in full as stock based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2016. 

 

On September 22, 2016, the Company entered into new compensation agreements and arrangements with two of its directors. As part of the agreements, our Chairman was granted 2,000,000 shares of our fully vested common stock. The stock has not been issued as of December 31, 2016. The grant date fair value of stock award was $1,420,000 and was immediately recognized as stock based compensation. 

 

2015 activity

 

In November 2015, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a third party for consulting services over six months. The Company agreed to pay the consultant 90,000 in shares of the Company’s restricted stock, which were issued over six months. The Company issued 30,000 shares of restricted stock in February 2016, and the remaining 60,000 shares were issued in June 2016, resulting in approximately $38,000 of stock based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2016.

    

Restricted Stock Units

 

In connection with the agreements the Company entered into with two of its directors, each director was granted restricted stock units for 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (“ RSUs ”). The RSUs vest at the rate of 33.33% each year anniversary of the issuance date (September 22, 2016). There is also 100% vesting upon a change in control of the Company.

 

The grant date fair value of the RSUs was $2,840,000. The Company recognized stock based compensation of $259,360 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Common Stock Options

 

On August 14, 2015, we granted two employees an option to each purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. The options have a strike price of $1.50 per share, have a term of five years from the date of grant, vest evenly over 24 months and have a cashless exercise feature. The fair value of these options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following assumptions: expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 130%, risk-free interest rate 1.61% and expected life of 5 years. On May 2, 2016, we reduced the exercise price from $1.50 per share to $0.54 per share for these options. All other terms of the previous option agreements remained unchanged. We remeasured the options on the modification date using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 113%, risk-free interest rate 0.96% and expected life of 3 years . The incremental fair value of vested options was approximately $71,000 and was recognized immediately. The sum of the incremental compensation cost and the remaining unrecognized compensation cost for the unvested option shares was approximately $1.7 million on the modification date and will be amortized ratably over the remaining vesting period.   We recognized $1,317,321 and $483,719 of Personnel expense as stock based compensation in connection with the vesting of the options during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  

 

On July 18, 2016, we granted our Chief Executive Office a stock option to acquire 2,352,619 shares of our common stock with a 10 year term, which represented approximately 5% of our fully-diluted issued and outstanding shares on the date of grant. The exercise price of the option was $0.61 per share, which was the closing price for the Company stock at the date of issuance, and will vest ratably monthly over 3 years, with 100% vesting upon a change in control of the Company. In accordance with the employment agreement, the Chief Executive Officer will be issued stock options to acquire 5% of our fully-diluted issued and outstanding shares through our next significant financing transaction or series of significant financing transactions. The grant date fair value of the option was calculated by using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 97%, risk-free interest rate 1.27% and expected life of 6 years. The grant date fair value of this option was $1,126,899 and will be amortized ratably over the vesting period. We recognized $156,514 of Personnel expense as stock based compensation in connection with the vesting of the options during the year ended December 31, 2016 .

 

  60  

 

 

A summary of the stock options activity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

 

    Number of Shares     Weighted Average
Exercise Price
    Weighted Average
Contractual
Life
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014     -     $ -       -  
Granted     2,000,000       0.54       5  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015     2,000,000     $ 0.54       4.62  
Granted     2,352,619       0.61       10  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016     4,352,619       0.58       6.82  
Options vested     1,660,086     $ 0.55       4.78  

  

Stock based compensation associated with stock options was $1,473,835 and $483,719 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Unamortized stock based compensation expense amounted to $1,770,273 as of December 31, 2016, and will be amortized over approximately 3 years.  

  

Common Stock Warrants

 

Our Company has issued warrants to purchase shares of our common stock to accredited investors and consultants as compensation for services rendered, as well as, in conjunction with the purchase of our common stock. A summary of the Company’s warrants activity and related information as of December 31, 2016 is provided below. 

 

In connection with the agreements the Company entered into with two of its directors, we issued a fully vested warrant with a ten year term to each director to purchase shares of common stock equal to the greater of 1,000,000 shares or 2.5% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company during the first 24 months immediately following the issuance. On the date of issuance, each director was issued a warrant to purchase 1,008,367 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.71 per share, which was the closing price for the Company stock at the date of issuance. On December 30, 2016, the warrants to purchase shares of common stock were increased by 8,285 shares of common stock for each director at an exercise price of $0.36 per share, which was the closing price for the stock at the date of issuance. The aggregate grant date fair value of these warrants was calculated by using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 102%, risk-free interest rate 1.63% and expected life of 10 years. The grant date fair value of these warrants was $1,291,292 and the entire fair value was recorded as Personnel expense as of December 31, 2016.

 

In connection with the Advances (see Note 6), the Company issued warrants to purchase 770,883 shares of our common stock at an exercise price $0.60 per share with a 5 year term. The relative fair value of the warrants compared to the Advances was $295,541, which was recorded as a component of stockholders’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount on the Advances. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common stock price on date of grant $0.74, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 98%, risk-free interest rate 1.1% and expected life of 5 years.

 

In connection with the 5% Convertible Note, the Company issued warrants with a 7 year term to purchase 1,428,572 shares of our common stock at an exercise price per share equal to the lower of (a) $0.47; or (b) 75% of the closing bid price of the common stock on the effective date of the Company’s first public offering following the issuance date. The Company determined that the warrants are a derivative requiring bifurcation in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815. The warrants were valued at inception using the Monte Carlo simulation (see Note 6) at $579,450 and recorded as a loss on the consolidated statements of operations.

 

In connection with the 9% Convertible Note (see Note 6), the Company issued warrants to purchase 222,916 shares of our common stock at an exercise price $0.60 per share with a 4 year term. The relative fair value of the warrants compared to the 9% Convertible Note was $56,737, which was recorded as a component of stockholders’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the 9% Convertible Note. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: common stock price on date of grant $0.50, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 97%, risk-free interest rate 1.12% and expected life of 4 years.

 

In connection with the 10% Convertible Note (see Note 6), the Company issued warrants to purchase 77,778 shares of our common stock at an exercise price $0.50 per share with a 4 year term. The relative fair value of the warrants compared to the 10% Convertible Note was $22,616, which was recorded as a component of stockholders’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the 10% Convertible Note. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: common stock price on date of grant $0.41, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 97%, risk-free interest rate 1.86% and expected life of 4 years.

 

On August 14, 2015, we granted a five-year fully vested warrant to purchase up to 150,000 shares of our common stock to each of two consultants as compensation for financial services rendered. The warrants have a strike price of $2.00 per share and have a cashless exercise feature. The fair value of the warrants was estimated to be $377,327 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following assumptions: expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 130%, risk-free interest rate 1.61%, and expected life of 5 years and is included in SGA as stock based compensation in the accompanying statement of operations.

 

  61  

 

 

On August 14, 2015, we granted a three-year fully vested warrant to purchase up to 50,000 shares of our common stock to a former consultant of our Company in satisfaction of amounts previously owed to him. The warrant has a strike price of $1.50 per share and has a cashless exercise feature. The fair value of the warrants was estimated to be $55,821 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following assumptions: expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 130%, risk-free interest rate 1.08%, and expected life of 3 years and is included in SGA as stock based compensation in the accompanying statement of operations.

 

On December 11, 2015, we entered into a service agreement (the “SA”) with KBHJJ, LLC (“KBHJJ”). KBHJJ will provide media awareness services to the Company over the five-year life of the SA. In consideration for these services, our Company agreed to compensate KBHJJ as follows:

 

· The grant of a two-year warrant to purchase up to 1,350,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.001 per share of the Company’s Common Stock vested as follows: 450,000 shares upon execution of the agreement; 450,000 shares upon the six-month anniversary of the SA; and 450,000 shares upon the one-year anniversary of the SA, contingent upon the completion of certain conditions.
· Payment of $50,000 upon execution of the SA.
· Payment of $50,000 due January 4, 2016.
· Up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock that can be earned over the first 18 months of the SA, contingent on hitting benchmarks defined in the SA.

 

We recognized $567,000 of SGA as stock based compensation in connection with the SA in the accompanying statements of operations in the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

In connection with the 10% 2015 Note, the Company issued a five-year warrant to purchase up to 61,111 shares of its common stock to the Note holder. The exercise price of the warrant is $1.50 per share, subject to adjustments provided in the warrant agreement (but in no event at an exercise price below $0.50 per share). The Company accounted for warrants to be issued in connection the 2015 Advances under similar terms as the warrant granted for the 10% 2015 Note.

 

In connection with the warrants expected to be issued in connection with the 2015 Advances and the 10% 2015 Note, we have estimated a relative fair value of $138,333 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Total 2015 Advances and 10% 2015 Note face value   $ 471,111  
Warrants to be issued     256,172  
Term     5 years  
Strike price   $ 1.50  
Fair market value   $ 0.95  
Expected volatility     128 %
Risk-free interest rate     1.56 %

 

We have a warrant outstanding held by an investor to purchase up to 500,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $2.50 per share through December 26, 2020, exercisable beginning on December 26, 2015.

  

Stock Warrants Outstanding as of December 31, 2016  
Exercise     Warrants     Remaining     Warrants  
Price     Granted     Life (Years)     Exercisable  
$ 0.001       1,350,000       0.94       900,000  
$

0.36

     

16,570

     

10.0

     

16,570

 
$ 0.47       1,428,572       6.82       1,428,572  
$ 0.50       77,778       3.96       77,778  
$ 0.60       993,799       4.46       993,799  
$ 0.71       2,016,734       9.73       2,016,734  
$ 1.50       306,172       3.56       306,172  
$ 2.00       300,000       3.62       300,000  
$ 2.50       500,000       3.99       500,000  
$ 0.72      

6,989,625

      5.68      

6,539,625

 

 

  62  

 

 

NOTE 9 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

On July 18, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) appointed Steven R. Carlson to serve as CEO of the Company. His appointment was effective on July 25, 2016. In connection with the hiring of Mr. Carlson, Ali Kharazmi resigned his position as our CEO. Mr. Kharazmi’s resignation coincided with Mr. Carlson’s start date. Mr. Kharazmi will continue to render significant services to the Company and will continue to serve as the Company’s Chairman of the Board.

 

The following individuals and entities have been identified as related parties based on their affiliation with the Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Financial Officer:

 

Ali Kharazmi   Chairman of the Board and greater than 10% shareholder
Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi  

Acting Chief Financial Officer, Board Member and greater than 10% shareholder

Genetics Institute of Anti-Aging   Company with common ownership and management
Applied M.A.K. Enterprises, Inc. (“MAK”)   Company with common ownership and management
Advanced Surgical Partners, LLC (“ASP”)   Company with common ownership and management
Center for Weight Management & Plastic Surgery (“CWM”)   Company with common ownership and management
Center for Regenerative Science, LLC   Company with common ownership and management

 

The following amounts were owed to related parties, affiliated with the Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Financial Officer as of December 31, 2015:

 

ASP   $ 70,890  
CWM     34,000  
Ali Kharazmi     25,641  
Applied MAK     -  
Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi     2,405  
Less amounts advanced to ASP and repaid in January 2016     (95,000 )
Accounts payable - related parties   $ 37,936  

 

The amount owed to ASP relates to legal and administrative services provided by ASP employees to our Company. Our Company temporarily advanced $95,000 to ASP prior to December 31, 2015 and was repaid in full prior to January 5, 2016. The amounts owed to Saeed Kharazmi at December 31, 2015 related to expense reimbursements incurred in the ordinary course of business. The amount owed to CWM relates to medical procedures provided to NuGene consultants as compensation for advertising and marketing services provided to NuGene. The amount owed to Ali Kharazmi and all amounts outstanding represent advances that bore no interest and were due on demand or expense reimbursements incurred in the ordinary course of business. Prior to the sale of the related party advances in November 2016, the amounts owed were as follows:

  

ASP   $ 226,188  
CWM     34,000  
Ali Kharazmi     91,175  
Applied MAK     -  
Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi     30,698  
Less amounts advanced to ASP and repaid in January 2016     -  
Accounts payable - related parties   $ 382,061  

 

On November 7, 2016, the amounts owed to related parties totaling $382,061 were sold to two unrelated investors. The Company issued a note to each investor in the amount of $191,030 (see Note 6). The notes have an interest rate of 5% per annum and mature on the earlier of: (i) May 7, 2017; (ii) the date the Company raises a total of $2 million, subsequent to the issuance of these notes. The notes have a conversion feature under which the note holder can convert at any time at a conversion price of $0.40 per share.

 

As of December 31, 2016, the Company has no outstanding related party liabilities.

 

NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Commitments

 

We occupy our sole corporate facilities at 17912 Cowan, Suite A, Irvine, California, 92614 from ASP, an affiliate of our Company, for approximately $17,109 per month (including common area maintenance), consistent with the amount that is charged to ASP by the property owner. On February 5, 2015, ASP entered into a new five-year lease for the property with the owner beginning July 1, 2015 and subsequently amended to begin June 1, 2015. The lease was subsequently amended to increase the square footage under lease beginning in January 2016. The lease includes annual increases in the monthly lease payments of approximately 3% each year.

 

As of December 31, 2016, aggregate future minimum payments under the lease, including common area maintenance costs, are as follows:

 

2017   $ 198,935  
2018     204,585  
2019     210,234  
2020     106,530  
Total   $ 720,284  

 

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we incurred rent expense totaling $202,751 and $167,454, respectively.

 

On February 3, 2017, the Company finalized and executed a Confirmation and Continuation Agreement (the “Agreement”) with kathy ireland WORLDWIDE, INC. (“kiWW“) (See Note 12). In order to settle all disputes under the License Agreement previously entered by the Company and kiWW, the Company agreed to, among other things, (i) issue to kiWW warrants in the form of a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the “Warrant”) to acquire 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the Warrant expires five years from the date of issuance and is exercisable for $0.01 per share, with a cash-less exercise option); and, (ii) issue to kiWW 500,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, which will be subject to the same lock-up agreement placed on executives of the Company pursuant to the Company’s proposed secondary offering. In exchange, kiWW agreed that (i) the Company has performed, paid, and otherwise satisfied all of its obligations under the License Agreement for calendar year 2016; (ii) as of the end of 2016, the Company was not in breach of the License Agreement in any respect; and, (iii) the License Agreement is in full force and effect.

 

  63  

 

 

Legal Proceedings

 

On July 10, 2015, Stemage Skin Care, LLC (the “Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California entitled “Stemage Skin Care LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company vs. NuGene International, Inc. et al.” (Civil Action No.8:15-cv-01078-AG-JCG). The complaint also names as defendants NuGene, Inc., Ali Kharazmi, Saeed Kharazmi, Kathy Ireland Worldwide, Stephen Roseberry, Steve Rosenblum and Erik Sterling. The complaint contains allegations of damage asserted to be grounded on: (i) copyright infringement; (ii) interference with contract; (iii) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; (iv) negligent interference with prospective economic advantage; and (v) conspiracy. The complaint allegedly arises out of an August 20, 2012 agreement among the Plaintiff and kathy ireland inc. (“KI”) pursuant to which KI made Kathy Ireland available to perform “Ambassador Services” as defined within that agreement. That agreement effectively terminated in October 2014 and is the subject of a separate arbitration with KI and Kathy Ireland before the American Arbitration Association. On or around August 4, 2016 the Company settled the litigation. All parties to this litigation executed a settlement agreement resolving and waiving all claims, with a full dismissal, with prejudice, of the action. Pursuant to the settlement, in December 2016 the Company paid the total sum of $50,000 to the Plaintiff.

 

On July 31, 2015 Star Health & Beauty, LLC (“SH&B”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entitled “Star Health & Beauty, LLC vs. NuGene, Inc. and NuGene International, Inc. Defendants” (Case No. 1:15-cv-02634-CAP). The complaint alleges that our use of the NuGene name and trademark infringes on SH&B’s NUGEN name. SH&B seeks cancelation of our NuGene trademark, as well as unspecified monetary damages. In February, 2017 the parties agreed upon terms to settle the matter, subject to execution of a definitive written settlement agreement to include the following terms: (i) $60,000 to be paid by the Company to SH&B, in installments of $5,000 upon execution of a Settlement Agreement, $25,000 90-days thereafter, and $30,000 60-days thereafter; (ii) issuance of 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to SH&B upon execution of a Settlement Agreement; (iii) each side continues to use their names as the wish; (iv) full mutual releases of known and unknown claims; (v) each bears its respective cost of litigation; and, (vi) dismissal with prejudice of the action. The written Settlement Agreement is being finalized and should be executed within the next 30 days.

 

In May 2016, we were informed that the California Labor Commissioner scheduled a hearing in connection with two individuals that claimed our Company did not fulfill its obligations to pay a final paycheck. The two individuals are seeking back pay and penalties totaling approximately $31,000. A trial/hearing was scheduled for March 14, 2017 to decide each matter. In February 2017 we settled both matters. In exchange for a complete release from the first claimant, we will pay the first claimant a total of $9,000 in accordance with the following schedule: $4,500 on or before March 10, 2017; four additional payments of $1,000 each on the 15 th day of April, May, June, and July 2017; and, a final payment of $500 on or before the 15 th day of August. In exchange for a complete release from the second claimant, we will pay the second claimant a total of $4,000 on or before March 10, 2017.

 

On May 6, 2016, we were presented with a demand for payment of compensation for a former executive employee (the “Former Executive”) pursuant to his employment contract with our Company. The amount of the compensation claimed by the Former Executive totaled $49,998. The Company’s management is evaluating the merits of this matter. We believe that no amounts are due to the Former Executive and we have not accrued a liability as of December 31, 2016.

 

In December 2016, we were informed by the four holders of our promissory notes totaling $480,000 (the “Holders”) that they would not honor their obligation to provide an additional $600,000 in similar financing. The Holders allege that certain breaches of the notes by the Company relieve them of their obligation. The Company firmly believes there is no merit whatsoever to the claims of the Holders. Rather than pursue litigation against the Holders, the Company has elected to pursue other sources of financing. However, should the Holders seek any acceleration or damages of any kind under the Notes, NuGene is committed to aggressively protect its rights, including though not limited to seeking damages from the Holders.

 

On February 24, 2017, we were informed that the Company will need to respond to a lawsuit filed by Habib American Bank (“Habib”) in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange. The action names Advanced Surgical Partners, LLC (“ASP”) as a defendant, as well as a number of additional named parties including though not limited to NuGene, Inc.; our Chairman of the Board, Mohammad Ali Kharazmi (“Ali”); and, our Acting Chief Financial Officer and Board Member, Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi (“Saeed”). The action is based on a purported default under a commercial loan from Habib to ASP on or around January 2008 (the “Loan”). According to the complaint, ASP currently owes Habib approximately $2.7 million under the Loan and that ASP has defaulted on the Loan. The Loan was arranged by Ali on behalf of ASP. Ali and Saeed are owners of, and control, ASP; they are also guarantors on the Loan. Additional family members of Ali and Saeed are alleged to be additional guarantors on the Loan, as are additional business entities owned by, or affiliated with, Ali and Saeed. The Loan is secured, in part, by the pledge of real estate owned by family members of Ali and Saeed (the “Pledged Real Estate”). A Deed of Trust was recorded by Habib against the Pledged Real Estate, and there appears to be more than sufficient equity in the Pledged Real Estate to pay off the Loan. NuGene is also alleged to be an additional guarantor on the Loan. A thorough search of NuGene records and files has failed to yield any documents or indication that NuGene was in fact a guarantor on the Loan. The Company has no documentation of the Loan or its purported guaranty, and there was no business relationship between ASP and NuGene which would suggest that a guaranty would have been provided. There was no prior knowledge by the Company of the existence of the Loan or the purported guaranty. Ali has steadfastly rejected the existence of the guaranty and has affirmatively assured the Company that he never authorized NuGene to guaranty the Loan, and that he never signed any documents on behalf of NuGene regarding the Loan. At this time, the Company intends to aggressively defend its rights and reject any status as a guarantor of the Loan. We believe that the Company’s risk and liability exposure under the Loan is minimal based upon (i) good faith and evidentiary defenses; and, (ii) the fact that there is more than adequate value/equity in the Pledged Real Estate to pay off the loan.

 

On April 4, 2017, Habib agreed to dismiss the Company from the litigation brought by Habib. A formal Settlement Agreement and Release has been executed by and between the Company and Habib (see Note 12).

 

Other than that described above, we are not currently a party to any other material legal proceedings. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us that in our view would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, or operating results. However, legal claims are inherently uncertain, and we cannot assure you that we will not be adversely affected in the future by legal proceedings.

 

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES

 

The components of the Company’s loss before the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2016 consisted of the following:

 

    2016     2015  
United States of America   $ (11,816,521 )   $ (5,219,066 )
Total   $ (11,816,521 )   $ (5,219,066 )

 

A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

 

    2016     2015  
Tax, computed at the federal statutory rate     34.00 %     34.00 %
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit     6.94 %     8.83 %
Nondeductible interest on convertible debt     (3.95 )%     0.00 %
Loss on derivative liability     (6.15 )%     0.00 %
Change in derivative liability value     2.87 %     0.00 %
Other permanent differences     (0.08 )%     (0.04 )%
Change in valuation allowance     (33.63 )%     (42.79 )%
                 
Provision for income taxes     0.00 %     0.00 %

 

  64  

 

 

Significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

  

    2016     2015  
Stock based compensation   $ 2,456,636     $ 654,360  
Net operating losses     3,529,664       1,595,546  
Accruals and reserves     317,900       80,823  
Gross deferred tax assets     6,304,200       2,330,728  
Less:  Valuation allowance     (6,293,979 )     (2,320,506 )
Total deferred tax assets     10,221       10,221  
                 
Property and equipment     (10,221 )     (10,221 )
Total deferred tax liabilities     (10,221 )     (10,221 )
                 
Net deferred tax assets   $ 0     $ 0  

 

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial statement and tax basis of the assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

 

The Company has evaluated the available positive and negative evidence supporting the realization of its gross deferred tax assets, including the Company’s cumulative losses, and the amount and timing of future taxable income, and has determined it is more likely than not that the federal and state deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its federal and state deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016.

 

The change in the valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows

 

    2016     2015  
Valuation allowance, beginning of year   $ 2,320,506     $ 87,469  
Increase in valuation allowance     3,973,473       2,233,037  
Valuation allowance, end of year     6,293,979       2,320,506  

  

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had U.S federal and California income tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $8.2 million and $8.2 million, respectively. The federal and California net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2034 and 2034, respectively unless previously utilized.

 

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 382, use of the Company's federal and California net operating loss carryforwards may be limited if a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% has occurred within a three-year period. The Company is in the process of determining whether or not an ownership change has occurred and any amount of net operating losses that may not be realized. Due to its valuation allowance position, the Company does not believe the ultimate determination will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

 

  65  

 

 

The Company adopted the provisions in ASC 740-10 which clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions. The guidance requires that the Company recognize the impact of a tax position in the financial statements if the position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities with full knowledge of all relevant information, based solely on the technical merits of the position. If it is not more likely than not that a position will be sustained, then the effect of the position must be measured. The Company must determine the probable outcomes of each position, the likelihood of each outcome, and the amount of the outcome with a cumulative likelihood of more than 50%. As of December 31, 2016, no reserve for unrecognized tax benefits was recorded.

 

The Company does not anticipate any material change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will occur within the next twelve months. The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had no accrual for interest or penalties on the Company’s balance sheets as of December 31, 2016, and has not recognized interest and/or penalties in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and California. The Company's federal and California tax returns are open for examination for tax years 2013 and forwards.

 

NOTE 12 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

On January 9, 2017, the Company issued an investor a promissory note in the total principal amount of $277,778 with a 10% annual interest rate, which will be due on the earlier of (i) January 9, 2018; or, (ii) the closing of the Secondary Offering. The Company received $250,000 of gross proceeds from the Note. The investor has the right to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock during the 15-days immediately following the closing of the Secondary Offering at a conversion price equal to 65% of the share price in the Secondary Offering. The Company also granted to the investor warrants to purchase 277,778 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. The investor will also be issued 150,000 shares of our common stock.

 

On January 20, 2017, the Company issued an investor a promissory note in the total principal amount of $114,000 with an 8% annual interest rate, which will be due 9-months after the issuance of the note. The Company received $100,000 of gross proceeds from the Note. The investor has the right to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock following 180-days after the issuance of the note at a conversion price equal to 60% of the three (3) lowest closing bid prices for our common stock during the prior 15 trading day period.

 

On February 3, 2017, the Company finalized and executed a Confirmation and Continuation Agreement (the “Agreement”) with kathy ireland WORLDWIDE, INC. (“kiWW“).In order to settle all disputes under the License Agreement previously entered by the Company and kiWW, the Company agreed to, among other things, (i) issue to kiWW warrants in the form of a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the “Warrant”) to acquire 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the Warrant expires five years from the date of issuance and is exercisable for $0.01 per share, with a cash-less exercise option); and, (ii) issue to kiWW 500,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, which will be subject to the same lock-up agreement placed on executives of the Company pursuant to the Company’s proposed secondary offering. In exchange, kiWW agreed that (i) the Company has performed, paid, and otherwise satisfied all of its obligations under the License Agreement for calendar year 2016; (ii) as of the end of 2016, the Company was not in breach of the License Agreement in any respect; and, (iii) the License Agreement is in full force and effect.

 

On February 8, 2017, the Company issued an investor a promissory note in the total principal amount of $277,778 with a 10% annual interest rate, which will be due 9-months after the issuance of the note. The Company received $250,000 of gross proceeds from the Note. The investor has the right to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock commencing at the earlier of (i) the closing of the Secondary Offering; or, (ii) 120-days after the issuance of the note, at a conversion price equal to (y) upon closing of the Secondary Offering until 120-days from issuance of the note, 65% of the pricing in the Secondary Offering; (z) 121 days after issuance of the note, 60% of the lowest trade price of our common stock during the 15 trading days immediately preceding conversion, but in no event less than $0.01 (however, in the event that the price falls below $0.01 then 50% of the lowest trade price of during 15 trading days immediately preceding the conversion). The Company also granted to the investor warrants to purchase 277,778 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. Investor will also be issued 150,000 shares of our common stock.

 

On February 8, 2017, the Company issued an investor a promissory note in the total principal amount of $240,411 with a 2% annual interest rate, which will be due at the earlier of (i) August 8, 2017; or, (ii) the closing of the Secondary Offering. The Company received $190,411 of gross proceeds from the Note. As a condition to the note, all of the gross proceeds received by the Company were immediately used to pay-in-full the promissory note issued by the Company on March 30, 2016 in the original principal amount of $275,000, thereafter amended and restated as the 4% convertible note Due June 30, 2017. The investor has the right to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock commencing at a conversion price equal to 65% of the pricing of the shares in the Secondary Offering.

 

On February 17, 2017, the Company issued an investor a promissory note in the total principal amount of $277,778 with a 10% annual interest rate, which will be due at the earlier of (i) the closing of the Secondary Offering; or, (ii) 9-months after the issuance of the note. The Company received $250,000 of gross proceeds from the Note. The investor has the right to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock commencing at the earlier of (i) the closing of the Secondary Offering; or, (ii) 120-days after the issuance of the note, at a conversion price equal to (y) upon closing of the Secondary Offering until 120-days from issuance of the note, 65% of the pricing in the Secondary Offering; (z) 121 days after issuance of the note, 60% of the lowest trade price of our common stock during the 15 trading days immediately preceding conversion, but in no event less than $0.01 (however, in the event that the price falls below $0.01 then 50% of the lowest trade price of during 15 trading days immediately preceding the conversion). The Company also granted to the investor warrants to purchase 277,778 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. Investor will also be issued 150,000 shares of our common stock.

 

On February 27, 2017, the Company issued an investor a promissory note in the total principal amount of $58,000 with an 8% annual interest rate, which will be due 9-months after the issuance of the note. The Company received $50,000 of gross proceeds from the Note. The investor has the right to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock following 180-days after the issuance of the note at a conversion price equal to 60% of the three (3) lowest closing bid prices for our common stock during the prior 15 trading day period.

 

On March 23, 2017, the Company issued an investor a promissory note in the total principal amount of $110,000 with a 10% annual interest rate, which will be due 6-months after the issuance of the note. The Company received $100,000 of gross proceeds from the Note. The investor has the right to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock commencing at the earlier of (i) the closing of the Secondary Offering; or, (ii) 90-days after the issuance of the note, at a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest closing bid or traded price, whichever is lower, of the Company’s Common Stock during the fifteen (15) trading days immediately preceding Issuance or Conversion Date, whichever is lower. The Company also granted to the investor warrants to purchase 110,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. Investor will also be issued 60,000 shares of our common stock. The Company also issued 275,000 shares of common stock to the investor as “Returnable Shares”. The Returnable Shares will be returned to the Company and canceled in the event (i) the note is prepaid in full within the initial 180-days after issuance, or (ii) if investor elects to convert the Note within the initial 180-days after issuance. 

 

Effective March 20, 2017, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with I|M1, LLC (“I|M1”) for I|M1 to provide assistance and advice regarding the promotion, marketing, and branding of men’s products to be sold by the Company. The Company agreed to issue to I|M1 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted stock, which were to be immediately issued and earned. The Company also agreed to pay I|M1 $50,000 at the earlier of (i) June 30, 2017; or, (ii) a debt or equity offering closed by the Company for an amount at least $10,000,000.

On March 23, 2017, the Company issued to Labrys Fund, LP (“Labrys”) a promissory note in the total principal amount of $110,000 with a 10% annual interest rate, which will be due 6-months after the issuance of the note. The Company received $100,000 of gross proceeds from the Note. Labrys has the right to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock commencing at the earlier of (i) the closing of the Secondary Offering; or, (ii) 90-days after the issuance of the note, at a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest closing bid or traded price, whichever is lower, of the Company’s Common Stock during the fifteen (15) trading days immediately preceding Issuance or Conversion Date, whichever is lower. The Company also granted to Labrys warrants to purchase 110,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. Labrys will also be issued 60,000 shares of our common stock. The Company also issued 275,000 shares of common stock to Labrys as “Returnable Shares”. The Returnable Shares will be returned to the Company and canceled in the event (i) the note is prepaid in full within the initial 180-days after issuance, or (ii) if Labrys elects to convert the Note within the initial 180-days after issuance. 

On March 31, 2017, the Company and kiWW agreed to amend the Confirmation and Continuation Agreement discussed above. Pursuant to an Amendment to Confirmation and Continuation Agreement, kiWW agreed that of the 2,916,666 shares of common stock kiWW was to receive under the exercise of its warrants, 2,277,778 shares were instead to be allocated and issued to I|M1 as payment under the consulting agreement between the Company and I|M1.

 

The Company entered into a License Agreement (the “License”), with I|M1, LLC (“I|M1”) effective March 31, 2017. Under the License the Company we licensed the right to utilize the trademarks and rights to the name, likeness, visual representations, and related intellectual property of I|M1 in connection with our cosmeceutical line of men’s products containing adult human adipose stem cell derived or containing biologically active or biologically derived ingredients. While NuGene is obligated to utilize commercially reasonable efforts to promote and grow the I|M1 brand, the License contains no minimum sales requirements. NuGene will begin shipping licensed products under the License on a date to be determined by NuGene in its sole and absolute discretion.  There are no annual fees, brand participation fees, or minimum fees due under the License. NuGene will pay to I|M1 a royalty fee in the amount of 5% of gross sales of products under the License. The term of the License is 5-years.

 

On April 4, 2017, Habib agreed to dismiss the Company from the litigation brought by Habib. A formal Settlement Agreement and Release has been executed by and between the Company and Habib.

 

  66  

 

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the Company carried out an evaluation with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and the Company's Acting Chief Financial Officer ("Acting CFO"), of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the year ended December 31, 2016. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's CEO and Acting CFO concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2016 due to the Company’s limited internal resources and lack of ability to have multiple levels of transaction review.

 

Management is in the process of determining how best to change our current system and implement a more effective system to insure that information required to be disclosed in this annual report on Form 10-K has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately. Our management acknowledges the existence of this problem, and intends to developed procedures to address them to the extent possible given limitations in financial and manpower resources. While management is working on a plan, no assurance can be made at this point that the implementation of such controls and procedures will be completed in a timely manner or that they will be adequate once implemented.

  

Management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting.

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, as amended). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our CEO and Acting CFO, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“ COSO ”) in  Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework) . Based on our assessment, management identified significant deficiencies related to: (i) our internal review functions, and (ii) a lack of segregation of duties within accounting functions. As a result, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting were not effective based on the criteria established in  Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework) . Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with any policies and procedures may deteriorate. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. We are in the process of determining how best to change our current system and implement a more effective system however there can be no assurance that implementation of any change will be completed in a timely manner or that it will be adequate once implemented. To the extent possible, we will implement procedures to assure that the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions will be performed by separate individuals. We believe that the foregoing steps will help remediate the significant deficiencies identified above, and we will continue to monitor the effectiveness of these steps and make any changes that our management deems appropriate.

  

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting since one is not required.

 

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

 

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

 

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

 

  67  

 

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Executive Officers and Directors

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our executive officers and directors.

 

Name   Position Held   Age   Date First Appointed
             
Ali Kharazmi   Chairman of the Board   58   December 29, 2014
M. Saeed Kharazmi   Director, Secretary, Treasurer, Acting Chief Financial Officer   52   December 29, 2014
Theodore Schwartz   Director   55  

June 15, 2016

Steven Carlson   Chief Executive Office   60   July 25, 2016

 

Biographical Information

 

As our Board of Directors consists of our Chief Executive Officer, Ali Kharazmi, and his brother, M. Saeed Kharazmi, it is not considered independent as defined in the NASDAQ rules governing members of boards of directors.

 

The following describes the backgrounds of current executive officers and directors.

  

Steven Carlson – Chief Executive Officer

 

Steve was appointed as NuGene’s Chief Executive Officer on July 25, 2016. Steve is an accomplished pharmaceutical skin care and cosmetic products executive with broad management skills, including strategic planning and business development, go-to-market execution, business integration, and federal health and safety compliance for consumer products. He has over 35 years of industry experience, having worked at such notable companies as Allergan and Obagi Medical Products. Steve began his career at Allergan (NYSE: AGN). During his 15-year tenure he rose to the position of Senior Vice President of Marketing, leading the licensing, development, and early commercialization of one of the world’s most recognized brands - Botox®. Steve subsequently served as CEO, President, and Director of Obagi Medical Products (OMP), a global pharmaceutical skin care line, where he successfully led the company’s public offering in 2006. Valeant Pharmaceuticals ultimately acquired Obagi Medical Products for over $400 million.

 

More recently Steve served as: (i) CEO, President, and a Director of Eyenetra Inc. (2014 to 2016), where he helped the organization develop one of the first smart phone based vision testing systems for providing prescriptions for glasses through telemedicine; (ii) CEO, President, and Director of Apnicure, Inc. (2011 to 2013), where he was responsible for corporate strategy and execution for the development of a medical device alternative to CPAP in the treatment of sleep apnea; and, (iii) CEO, President, and Director of Obagi Medical Products, Inc. (2005-2010), where he was responsible for corporate strategies and execution for a specialty skin health pharmaceutical company focused on physician-dispensed medical aesthetics and therapeutic dermatology. Steve is a graduate of the University of Minnesota, where he earned his B.S. degree in Biology.

 

M. Ali Kharazmi – Chairman of the Board

 

Ali was appointed to our Board of Directors in December, 2014. Ali Kharazmi was the co-founder of NuGene in November 2006 and was appointed Chief Executive Officer, President, and a Board Member of the Company on December 29, 2014. During the last 10-years Ali has devoted substantially all of his time to NuGene and the development of its products and processes. He has also worked extensively in the medical industry since 1986. In 1998, Ali co-founded Medical Information Networks, one of the first medical technology companies to provide electronic prescription services and formulary control with e-detailing to physicians by pharmaceutical companies.  In 2003, he co-founded Newport Beach Plastic Surgery, one of the largest staff model plastic surgery multi-site medical groups in California. In 2005, Ali co-founded the Genetic Institute of Anti-Aging, the Center for Weight Management and the Plastic Surgery Institute, as well as, Advanced Surgical Partners. In 2012, he founded the Regenerative Institute, a research lab that works exclusively on stem cell related research and treatment methods and also co-founded Ortho Regeneration, a sport and orthopedic regenerative company specializing in Platelet Rich Plasma (“PRP”) and Adult Human Adipose stem cell based regenerative services. Ali received his Bachelors of Arts in Economics from University of California, Irvine in 1980, his Masters in Business Administration from American Graduate School of International Management, Thunderbird in 1983 and his Juris Doctorate from Western State University College of Law in 1997. Ali’s status as a founder of our Company, his longstanding service with us, and his entrepreneurial investment career in early stage businesses qualify him to serve as our director.

 

  68  

 

 

M. Saeed Kharazmi, MD - Director, Secretary, Treasurer and Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

Saeed was appointed to our Board of Directors in December, 2014. Saeed obtained his Medical Degree from University of California, Irvine in 1992 and completed his Residency and Chief Residency at St. Mary’s Medical Center/UCLA in 1996. In 2014 Saeed joined University of California, Riverside (“UCR”) as Health Services Assistant Clinical Professor and became the Medical Director of UCR Health, a university hospitalist group. He is also the acting Medical Director for Advanced Surgical Partners, a multispecialty surgical facility that he and his brother started in 2005. His interest in age management and research led to the development of Genetic Institute of Anti-Aging in 2005 where he became co-founder of NuGene. During the last 10-years Saeed has devoted a majority of his productive time and efforts leading the NuGene scientific team in the development and formulation of NuGene’s products, with an emphasis on the introduction of new active ingredients for skin rejuvenation, and wound healing. Saeed’s status as a founder of our Company, his longstanding service with us, and his extensive business, managerial, executive and leadership experience in the healthcare industry make him qualified to serve as our director.

 

Ted Schwarz – Independent Director

 

Ted joined the NuGene Board in June, 2016. Ted previously served as President of SkinMedica, a leading topical medical aesthetics company. During the last 5-years, and throughout his entire nine year tenure at SkinMedica, he directed the commercial, new product and R&D teams allowing for seven straight years of market leading growth positioning SkinMedica for its successful acquisition by pharmaceutical giant Allergan for $350MM. Within the last 5-years Ted also served as President of Sienna Labs where he co-developed the business plan to bring to market topical solutions based on plasmonic resonance for treatment of both aesthetic and disease based dermatological indications. Sienna Labs recently completed $34 million Series A financing led by ARCH Venture Partners. Ted received his BA degree in Marketing and Business from Michigan State University. His background also includes 15 years of Pharmaceutical executive sales and marketing leadership at Galderma and La Roche-Posay, a L’Oreal company. Ted’s extensive knowledge of our industry, experience in managing a cosmeceuticals company, and his knowledge of and experience in the commercialization of cosmeceutical products qualify him to serve as our director.

 

Director Qualifications and Diversity

 

Our Board of Directors has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity when evaluating candidates for election to the Board. However, our Board believes that membership should reflect diversity in its broadest sense, but should not be chosen nor excluded based on race, color, gender, national origin or sexual orientation. In this context, the Board does consider a candidate’s experience, education, industry knowledge, history with the Company, and differences of viewpoint when evaluating his or her qualifications for election to the Board. Whenever our Board evaluates a potential candidate, the Board considers that individual in the context of the composition of the Board as a whole.

 

The standards that our Board considers in selecting candidates (although candidates need not possess all of the following characteristics, and not all factors are weighted equally) include the director’s or nominee’s, Industry knowledge and contacts in industries served by the Company, independent judgment, ability to broadly represent the interests of all stockholders and other constituencies, maturity and experience in policy making decisions, business skills, background and relevant expertise that are useful to the company and its future needs, and other factors determined to be relevant by the Board.

 

Board Committees

 

We presently do not have an audit committee, compensation committee or nominating committee or committee performing similar functions.  Our new Board has not formulated any plan to establish an audit or compensation committee in the near future. We envision that the audit committee, should it be formed, will be primarily responsible for reviewing the services performed by our independent auditors and evaluating our accounting policies and systems of internal controls. We envision that the compensation committee, should it be formed, will be primarily responsible for reviewing and approving our salary and benefits policies and other compensation of our executive officers. Until these committees are established, these decisions will continue to be made by our Board of Directors.

 

  69  

 

 

Family Relationships

 

M. Ali Kharazmi, our Chief Executive Officer and M. Saeed Kharazmi, our Chairman of the Board, are brothers. Aside from these individuals, there are no family relationships among the Company’s directors, executive officers, or persons nominated or chosen by the Company to become directors or executive officers.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

To our knowledge except as may be noted above or under "Legal Proceedings", none of our directors or executive officers has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors, or has been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past ten years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws, except for matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement.  

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

 

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. A copy of our code of ethics will be furnished without charge to any person upon written request. Requests should be sent to: NuGene International, Inc., 17912 Cowan, Suite A, Irvine, California 92614

 

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Summary Compensation Table . The following table sets forth the compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 for services rendered to us by all persons who served as executive officers and directors during that time.

 

Summary Compensation Table

Name and
Principal Position
  Fiscal
Year
Ended
12/31
    Salary
($)
    Bonus
($)
    Stock
Awards
($)
    Option
Awards
($)
    All Other
Compensation
($) (1)
    Total
($)
 
                                           
M. Ali Kharazmi, Chairman     2016       $32,667       -     $ 1,420,000 (1 )   -     $ 775,326     $ 2,227,993  
      2015       -       -       -       -       -       -  
M. Saeed Kharazmi, Director/Secretary/Acting CFO     2016       $32,667       -       -       -     $ 775,326     $ 807,993  
      2015       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Donna Queen, Director (2)     2016       -       -       -       -       -       -  
      2015     $ 7,500       -       -       -       -     $ 7,500  
Theodore Schwarz Director (3)     2016       -             $ 55,000       -       -     $ 55,000  
      2015       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Steven Carlson, CEO     2016     $ 251,433     $ 200,000       -     $ 156,514       -     $ 607,947  
      2015       -       -       -       -       -       -  

 

Salary and bonus represent amounts earned with respect to the years indicated.

 

Stock awards, option awards and all other compensation represents the vested portion of the grant date fair value of the respective equity instruments, with respect to the years indicated.

 

(1) All other compensation only includes warrants to purchase common stock granted to the Company’s Chairman and Acting CFO.

 

(2) Donna Queen was a member of our Company’s Board of Directors from May 26, 2015 to January 19, 2016. Her agreement with the Company called for her to be paid an annual stipend of $30,000 and to receive 100,000 shares of our common stock that vested quarterly.

 

(3) In June 2016, the Company agreed to issue Mr. Schwarz 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that will vest at the rate of 166,666 shares per year, over a three-year period provided Mr. Schwarz continues to serve on the Board.

 

Steve Carlson Employment Agreement

 

On July 18, 2016, we entered into a written employment agreement with Steve Carlson for Mr. Carlson to serve as our Chief Executive Officer (the “ Employment Agreement ”). Under the Employment Agreement we agreed to compensate Mr. Carlson as follows: annual salary of $400,000; $100,000 draw against salary upon closing of the first $250,000 in bridge or similar financing; annual incentive bonuses based upon performance targets to be mutually agreed upon; and, vacation, sick leave, and other employee benefits afforded by the Company. Mr. Carlson was also issued stock options to acquire 5% of our issued and outstanding shares, to be determined through our next significant financing transaction or series of significant financing transactions. The exercise price of the options was fixed on July 18, 2016 and equal to the closing price of our shares on the OTC Marketplace. The options vest ratably monthly over 3-years, and vest 100% upon a change in control of the Company.

 

Ali Kharazmi Agreements

 

On September 22, 2016, we entered into the following agreements with our Chairman, M. Ali Kharazmi:

 

(i)          Chairman Agreement : Under the Chairman Agreement we agreed to compensate Ali for his service as our Chairman of the Board as follows: annual salary of $120,000; annual incentive bonuses in the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors; and, reimbursement of expenses. Ali was also issued 2,000,000 shares of our common stock. Ali was also issued the warrant described below, and the restricted stock agreement described below. In the event within twelve (12) months following a change of control (as defined in the Chairman Agreement) either: (1) Ali is removed from his position as Chairman of the Board without cause; or, (2) Ali resigns as the Chairman, then the Company shall provide Ali with a single lump sum payment equal to the greater of (y) the amount of compensation remaining over the remainder of the 3-year term of the agreement; or, (z) 200% of the annual compensation then in effect, to be paid within 30-days after the change in control.

 

(ii)         Warrant Agreement : Ali was granted the right, during the first 24-months immediately following the issuance, to acquire that number of shares of our common stock equal to the greater of (i) (1,000,000) shares; or, (ii) two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the issued and outstanding common shares the Company, determined on an as if converted and issued basis. Upon the expiration of that 24-month period, the number of shares available for purchase shall be fixed in accordance with the above formula, and such number shall be fixed up to and until the expiration of the Warrant Agreement. Exercise price for the warrant is $0.71 per share, which was the closing stock price for the Company Stock on the date of the issuance, September 22, 2016. The term of the Warrant Agreement is 10-years, and it is non-assignable without the written consent of the Company.

 

  70  

 

 

(iii)       Restricted Sock Units Agreement : Ali was granted restricted stock units for 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (“ RSUs ”). The RSUs vest at the rate of 33.33% each year anniversary of the issuance date (September 22, 2016). There is also 100% vesting upon a change in control of the Company, as defined in the agreement.

 

Saeed Kharazmi Agreements

 

On September 22, 2016, we entered into the following agreements with our Secretary, Interim CFO, and Board Member, M. Saeed Kharazmi:

 

(i)         Executive Employment Agreement : Under this Agreement we agreed to compensate Saeed for his service as our Vice-Chairman of the Board and our Chief Medical Officer as follows: annual salary of $120,000; annual incentive bonuses in the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors; and, reimbursement of expenses. Saeed was also issued the warrant described below, and the restricted stock agreement described below. In the event within twelve (12) months following a change of control (as defined in the agreement) either: (1) Saeed is removed from his position without cause; or, (2) Saeed resigns, then the Company shall provide Saeed with a single lump sum payment equal to the greater of (y) the amount of compensation remaining over the remainder of the 3-year term of the agreement; or, (z) 200% of the annual compensation then in effect, to be paid within 30-days after the change in control.

 

(ii)        Warrant Agreement : Saeed was granted the right, during the first 24-months immediately following the issuance, to acquire that number of shares of our common stock equal to the greater of (i) (1,000,000) shares; or, (ii) two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the issued and outstanding common shares the Company, determined on an as if converted and issued basis. Upon the expiration of that 24-month period, the number of shares available for purchase shall be fixed in accordance with the above formula, and such number shall be fixed up to and until the expiration of the Warrant Agreement. Exercise price for the warrant is $0.71 per share, which was the closing stock price for the Company Stock on the date of the issuance, September 22, 2016. The term of the Warrant Agreement is 10-years, and it is non-assignable without the written consent of the Company.

 

(iii)        Restricted Sock Units Agreement : Saeed was granted restricted stock units for 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (“ RSUs ”). The RSUs vest at the rate of 33.33% each year anniversary of the issuance date (September 22, 2016). There is also 100% vesting upon a change in control of the Company, as defined in the agreement.

 

  71  

 

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2016, regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock, (ii) by each of our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table and our directors and (iii) by all of our executive officers and directors as a group. Each of the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to common stock beneficially owned. Unless otherwise noted in the table, the address for each of the persons identified is 17912 Cowan, Irvine, California.

 

Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner
  Amount and Nature
of Beneficial
Ownership  (1)
    Percent
of Common
Stock
 

M. Ali Kharazmi (2)

Chairman

    7,751,892 shares       14.48 % (5)
                 

M. Saeed Kharazmi (3)

Director, Acting CFO

    12,251,892 shares       22.88 % (6)
 Steven Carlson, CEO (4)     457,453 shares        0.85 % (7)
All directors and named executive officers as a group (3 persons)     20,461,237 shares       38.21 % (8)

 

 

(1) Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person's actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding.

 

(2) Common stock beneficially owned by M. Ali Kharazmi includes (i) 958,860 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; (ii) 2,000,000 shares of common stock which the Company has agreed to issue to Mr. Kharazmi which have not yet been issued; (iii) 1,016,652 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant issued to Mr. Kharazmi; and, (iv) 3,776,380 shares of common stock held of record. The number does not include any shares Mr. Kharazmi may be entitled to receive in the form of restricted stock units granted to him for 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as none of the units have vested.

 

(3) Common stock beneficially owned by M. Saeed Kharazmi includes (i) 958,860 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; (ii) 1,032,116 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant issued to Mr. Kharazmi; and (iii) 10,276,380 shares of common stock held of record. The number does not include any shares Mr. Kharazmi may be entitled to receive in the form of restricted stock units granted to him for 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as none of the units have vested.

 

(4) Common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Carlson is limited to his right to acquire 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company. Said option vests ratably on a monthly basis starting on Mr. Carlson’s employment (July 2016) over 3-years. Mr. Carlson is vested with the right to acquire 457,453 shares over the next 60-days.

 

(5) Percentage of common stock beneficially owned by M. Ali Kharazmi is calculated by dividing the total amount of common stock beneficially owned by him by 53,547,552, which includes 41,132,754 shares of common stock outstanding and committed to be issued; 958,860 shares of common stock issuable to him upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; 958,860 shares of common stock issuable to M. Saeed Kharazmi upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; 2,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued to M. Ali Kharazmi; 2,033,304 shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of warrants owned by M. Ali Kharazmi and M. Saeed Kharazmi; 457,453 shares issuable to Mr. Carlson upon exercise of options over the next 60-days; and 6,006,321 shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of vested options and warrants.

 

(6) Percentage of common stock beneficially owned by M. Saeed Kharazmi is calculated by dividing the total amount of common stock beneficially owned by him by 53,547,552, which includes 41,132,754 shares of common stock outstanding and committed to be issued; 958,860 shares of common stock issuable to him upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; 958,860 shares of common stock issuable to M. Saeed Kharazmi upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; 2,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued to M. Ali Kharazmi; 2,033,304 shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of warrants owned by M. Ali Kharazmi and M. Saeed Kharazmi; 457,453 shares issuable to Mr. Carlson upon exercise of options over the next 60-days; and 6,006,321 shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of vested options and warrants.

 

(7) Percentage of common stock beneficially owned by Steven Carlson is calculated by dividing the total amount of common stock beneficially owned by him by 53,547,552, which includes 41,132,754 shares of common stock outstanding and committed to be issued; 958,860 shares of common stock issuable to him upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; 958,860 shares of common stock issuable to M. Saeed Kharazmi upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; 2,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued to M. Ali Kharazmi; 2,033,304 shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of warrants owned by M. Ali Kharazmi and M. Saeed Kharazmi; 457,453 shares issuable to Mr. Carlson upon exercise of options over the next 60-days; and 6,006,321 shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of vested options and warrants.

 

(8) Percentage of common stock beneficially owned by all named executives is calculated by dividing the total amount of common stock beneficially owned by 53,547,552, which includes 41,132,754 shares of common stock outstanding and committed to be issued; 958,860 shares of common stock issuable to him upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; 958,860 shares of common stock issuable to M. Saeed Kharazmi upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock; 2,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued to M. Ali Kharazmi; 2,033,304 shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of warrants owned by M. Ali Kharazmi and M. Saeed Kharazmi; 457,453 shares issuable to Mr. Carlson upon exercise of options over the next 60-days; and 6,006,321 shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of vested options and warrants.

 

  72  

 

 

Changes in Control . We are not aware of any arrangements that may result in “changes in control” as that term is defined by the provisions of Item 403 of Regulation S.

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Director Independence . We have two directors, who are also brothers. Our directors are not independent within the definition of “independence” as defined in the NASDAQ rules governing members of boards of directors.

 

Related Party Transactions . Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and operating decisions. A related party transaction is considered to be a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties, regardless of whether or not a price is charged.

 

The following individuals and entities have been identified as related parties based on their affiliation with our CEO and Chairman of the Board:

 

Ali Kharazmi   Chairman of the Board and greater than 10% shareholder
Saeed  Kharazmi   Acting Chief Financial Officer, Board Member and greater than 10% shareholder
Genetics Institute of Anti-Aging   Company with common ownership and management
Applied M.A.K. Enterprises, Inc. (“MAK”)   Company with common ownership and management
Advanced Surgical Partners, LLC (“ASP”)   Company with common ownership and management
Center for Weight Management & Plastic Surgery (“CWM”)   Company with common ownership and management
Center for Regenerative Science, LLC   Company with common ownership and management

 

The following amounts were owed to related parties, affiliated with the CEO and Chairman of the Board, as of December 31, 2015:

 

ASP   $ 70,890  
MAK     -  
CWM     34,000  
Ali Kharazmi     25,641  
Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi     2,405  
Less amounts advanced to ASP and repaid in January 2016     (95,000 )
Accounts payable - related parties   $ 37,936  

 

The amount owed to ASP relates to legal and administrative services provided by ASP employees to our Company. Our Company temporarily advanced $95,000 to ASP prior to December 31, 2015 and was repaid in full prior to January 5, 2016. The amounts owed to Saeed Kharazmi at December 31, 2015 related to expense reimbursements incurred in the ordinary course of business. The amount owed to CWM relates to medical procedures provided to NuGene consultants as compensation for advertising and marketing services provided to NuGene. The amount owed to Ali Kharazmi and all amounts outstanding represent advances that bore no interest and were due on demand or expense reimbursements incurred in the ordinary course of business. Prior to the sale of the related party advances in November 2016, the amounts owed were as follows:

 

ASP   $ 226,188  
CWM     34,000  
Ali Kharazmi     91,175  
Applied MAK     -  
Mohammad Saeed Kharazmi     30,698  
Less amounts advanced to ASP and repaid in January 2016     -  
Accounts payable - related parties   $ 382,061  

 

On November 7, 2016, the amounts owed to related parties totaling $382,061 were sold to two unrelated investors. The Company issued a note to each investor in the amount of $191,030 (see Note 6). The notes have an interest rate of 5% per annum and mature on the earlier of: (i) May 7, 2016; (ii) the date the Company raises a total of $2 million, subsequent to the issuance of these notes. The notes have a conversion feature under which the note holder can convert at any time at a conversion price of $0.40 per share.

 

As of December 31, 2016, the Company has no outstanding related party liabilities.

 

  73  

 

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

 

The Board of Directors has appointed BPM LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2016. Weinstein & CO. CPA was our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2015. The following table shows the fees that were paid or accrued by us for audit and other services provided:

 

    2016     2015  
Audit Fees (1)   $ 90,201     $ 25,000  
Audit-Related Fees (2)     -       -  
Tax Fees (3)     -       -  
All Other Fees     -       -  
Total   $ 90,201     $ 25,000  

 

(1)

Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and the review of our quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements and those services normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements including comfort letters, consents and other services related to SEC matters. This information is presented as of the latest practicable date for this annual report.

(2) Audit-related fees represent fees for consultation on accounting related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and not reported above under “Audit Fees.”
(3) Neither BPM nor Weinstein & Co. CPA provided us with tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning services.

  

PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

The Company’s financial statements and related notes thereto are listed and included in this Annual Report (Item 8). The following exhibits are filed with, or are incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report.

 

2.1   Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 26, 2014, among the Company, NG Acquisition, Inc. and NuGene Inc. +
3.1   Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, (increase of authorized, new class of preferred). +
3.2   Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, name change. +
4.1   Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock. +
10.1   Form of Lock Up Agreement-NuGene Shareholders+
10.2   Form of Lock Up/Leak Out Agreement- Stock Placement Investors+
10.3   License Agreement between the Registrant and kathy ireland Worldwide, Inc. +
10.4   Sublease Agreement between the Registrant and Advanced Surgical Partners, Inc. +
10.5   Form of Convertible Promissory Note. +
10.6   Business Transfer and Indemnity Agreement, dated December 29, 2014, between the Registrant and Dena Kurland. +
21.1   List of subsidiaries of the Registrant. *
31.1   Certification of Principal Executive Officer of NuGene International, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
31.2   Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of NuGene International, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1   Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of NuGene International, Inc.  pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
101.INS   XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

  

* Included herein.

+ Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s filing on a Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 6, 2015.

 

  74  

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the company caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

NuGene International, Inc.

(Registrant)

 
       
Date: April 10, 2017 By: /s/ STEVEN CARLSON  
    Steve Carlson  
    Chief Executive Officer  

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Name   Title   Date
         
/s/ Steven Carlson   Chief Executive Officer, President   April 10, 2017
         
         
/s/ M. Saeed Kharazmi   Treasurer, Secretary, and Acting Chief Financial Officer   April 10, 2017

 

  75  

NuGene (PK) (USOTC:NUGN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more NuGene (PK) Charts.
NuGene (PK) (USOTC:NUGN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more NuGene (PK) Charts.