UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

x ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

 

OR

 

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission file number: 333-110680

 

VIASPACE INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

  

Nevada   76-0742386
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)    
     
382 N. Lemon Ave, Suite 364    
Walnut, California   91789
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

   

(626) 768-3360

Issuer’s telephone number

 

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  o  No  x

   

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  o  No  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x  No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x  No  o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (ss.229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One):

 

Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  o
   
Non-accelerated filer  o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o  No  x

  

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $3,646,055

 

State the number of shares outstanding of each of issuer’s classes of common equity, as of March 31, 2017: 3,079,260,854

 

 

   
 

 

VIASPACE INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

    Page
Part I    
Item 1. Business 1
Item 1A. Risk Factors 5
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 11
Item 2. Properties 11
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 11
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 11
     
Part II    
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 11
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 12
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 12
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 16
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

16

F-1 to F-17

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 16
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 16
Item 9B. Other Information 18
     
Part III    
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, Control Persons and Corporate Governance 18
Item 11. Executive Compensation 20
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 23
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 25
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 26
     
Part IV    
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 27
     
Signatures 33

 

 

 

 

i  
 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This document and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain forward-looking statements. We have based these statements on our beliefs and assumptions, based on information currently available to us. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, our total market opportunity and our business plans and objectives set forth under the sections entitled “Description of Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. Our future results and requirements may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results and requirements are beyond our control. In addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed in “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” investors should consider those discussed under “Risk Factors Which May Affect Future Results” and, among others, the following:

 

  · our ability to successfully implement our business strategy,
     
  · market acceptance of our products and product development,
     
  · the effect of regulation on our ability to commercialize our products,
     
  · the impact of competition and changes to the competitive environment on our products and services, and
     
  · other factors detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. We do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in our business anticipated results of our operations, strategy or planned capital expenditures, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.

 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

VIASPACE Inc. (“we”, “us”, “VIASPACE”, or the “Company”) was founded in July 1998. Its business involves renewable energy and is based on biomass, in particular our license to a dedicated energy crop with the trademark “Giant King ® Grass” (“GKG”). Through a license for GKG we obtained from Guangzhou Inter-Pacific Arts Corp., a Chinese wholly-owned foreign enterprise registered in Guangdong province ("IPA China") which owned by VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. (“VGE”), we are able to commercialize GKG throughout the world, except for the People’s Republic of China (“China”) and the Republic of China (“Taiwan”).

 

GKG can be burned in 100% biomass power plants to generate electricity; made into pellets that can be burned together with coal to reduce carbon emissions from existing power plants; generate bio methane through anaerobic digestion, and can be used as a feedstock for low carbon liquid biofuels for transportation, biochemicals and bio plastics. Cellulosic ethanol, bio butanol and other liquid cellulosic biofuels, do not use corn or other food sources as feedstock. GKG can also be used as animal feed. GKG and other plants absorb and store carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as they grow. When they are burned, they release the carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere, but it is the same carbon dioxide that was removed from the atmosphere, and so this process is carbon neutral. Small amounts of fossil fuel are used by the farm equipment, transportation of GKG and fertilizer, so that the overall process of growing and burning GKG probably has some net carbon dioxide emissions, but much lower emissions than burning coal or other fossil fuels directly to create the same amount of energy. GKG has been independently tested by customers and been shown to have excellent energy content, high bio methane production, and the cellulosic sugar content needed for biofuels and biochemicals.

 

The Company’s web site is www.VIASPACE.com . Information contained on, or accessible through, our website should not be deemed as part of this report.

  

Corporate History

 

ViaSpace Technologies LLC (“ViaSpace LLC”) was founded in July 1998 as a private company to commercialize proven space and defense technologies from NASA and the Department of Defense. ViaSpace LLC had licensed patents, and software technology from California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”), which manages the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (“JPL”) for NASA. On June 22, 2005, ViaSpace LLC acquired the non-operating shell company Global-Wide Publication Ltd. (“GW”). GW was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 14, 2003. At the closing of the merger, GW was renamed VIASPACE Inc. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger and a recapitalization of the Company. VIASPACE became a public company on June 22, 2005.

 

 

 

1  
 

 

Grass Business

 

The Company focuses on GKG, a natural hybrid, non-genetically modified, fast-growing, perennial grass which we are growing as a dedicated energy crop that can be used to generate low carbon and renewable electricity by direct burning in a biomass power plant, and can be made into pellets that can replace some of the coal in existing power plants thus reducing carbon emissions. GKG may also be used to produce bio methane through anaerobic digestion and as a feedstock for non-food liquid biofuels such as bio ethanol and bio butanol. It can also be used as a feedstock for biochemicals and bio plastics. This perennial grass can grow up to 16 feet in height. It can be harvested at least twice a year in tropical and semitropical areas with a yield of up to 375 metric tons per hectare (freshly cut, referred to as wet yield). We believe that GKG has the highest yield of any crop. Note that one hectare (ha) is 10,000 square meters and equal to 2.47 US acres or approximately the size of two US football fields.

 

GKG has been independently tested by multiple potential customers. Proximate and ultimate analyses are available as well as ash composition, biogas production test data and sugar composition, pretreatment and hydrolysis data are available. To our knowledge, the results have been positive and consistent. GKG has excellent energy content of 18.4 megajoules (MJ) per dry kilogram. Its chemical and physical properties are very similar to corn straw, which is material left behind from the corn plant after the ear of corn has been harvested. Corn straw is used as fuel in many biomass power plants, and a leading international biomass power provider, has declared GKG as suitable for their power plants. The bio methane production from GKG has been tested in three customer laboratories and shows the outstanding production of 91 liters of methane per kilogram of fresh grass. The methane can be used to generate clean electricity or can be burned to produce process heat. There are potentially thousands of biogas plants worldwide that could use GKG. A large European electric utility has tested GKG and examined prototype pellets. In addition to these current markets, GKG can be used as animal feed and has been tested for this purpose.

 

GKG can also be used as a feedstock to make cellulosic biofuels such as bio ethanol, bio butane and green gasoline. GKG has previously been tested as a potential feedstock for producing biofuels, biochemicals and bio plastics through fermentation method. Laboratory results from these tests show that GKG has almost identical composition including sugar content as corn straw or wheat straw which are the agricultural waste products often targeted as a feedstock for cellulosic biofuels. The projected bio ethanol yield is approximately 80 gallons per dry ton of GKG based on these tests.

 

Corn straw and wheat straw are the by-products after food production. This agricultural waste material can only be collected after the food is harvested which means that the feedstock supply is very seasonal and must be stored for a long time--up to one year-- between harvests. To support a single biofuel or power plant, agricultural waste must be collected from farms up to 50 or more miles away. Giant King Grass is a high yield dedicated nonfood energy crop that can be harvested at any time in a tropical or subtropical climate. If the biofuel or power plant is co-located with a GKG plantation, the collection radius will only be about three miles. The high yield and logistical advantages mean that GKG can be grown and delivered to a co-located plant at a substantially lower price than currently paid for agricultural waste. The largest operating cost of a biomass power plant or biofuels plant is the cost of the fuel or feedstock, and the low cost and high quality of GKG are of major interest to these customers.

 

Energy pellets made from dried GKG can be used as a replacement for coal in electricity generating power plants. Reports by the U.S. Department of Energy state that 15% to 20% of coal used in the power plant may be replaced by burning grass in an existing power plant with only minor modifications. This process called co-firing allows utilization of the large capital investment in existing coal fired power plants while reducing their carbon dioxide emissions by 15 to 20%. GKG and other biomass have lower mercury, arsenic and sulfur emissions than coal.

 

During 2012-2016, we entered into Giant King Grass collaborative supply agreements with partners in the Philippines, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Jamaica, Guyana, California, Arizona, St. Croix Virgin Islands, Nicaragua, South Africa and Myanmar. We have shipped Giant King Grass to these states/countries as part of the collaborative agreements. The first phase for each of these partners is for the joint operation of test plots to establish that GKG grows well in the area and optimal agronomic practices are developed. If this initial phase is completed successfully, each partner would then expand the initial growing site as they develop more land to grow GKG. Each partner has different planned uses for the Giant King Grass.

  

We grow Giant King Grass on leased land in San Diego County, California and Hawaii. These locations serve as nurseries for our Giant King Grass and places from which we can harvest Giant King Grass seedlings and send it to customers in the US and throughout the world.

 

We plan to expand our grass business into other areas of the world, and are in discussions with developers of power plants, pellet mills and biogas facilities throughout the world other than China and Taiwan.

 

 

 

 

2  
 

 

Having a reliable source of feedstock is critical for all energy users of biomass. Today, power plants and pellet mills use agricultural and forestry waste such as corn straw, wheat straw, rice husks and wood waste as feedstock. Increasing demand for biomass has caused the price of this agricultural and forestry waste to rise dramatically and in some places it is in short supply. Biomass supply issues have caused some power plants to become unprofitable, idle or abandoned. We believe that dedicated energy crops such as GKG may be necessary and advantageous for successful operation of biomass processing facilities. Agricultural waste will still be used, but the dedicated energy crop could provide a reliable and consistent base. The feedstock uncertainty issue may contribute to the difficulties that many proposed biomass power plant and biogas projects have been unable to obtain financing. A dedicated energy crop may help alleviate this obstacle.

 

Because of its high yield, GKG provides feedstock with less use of land and we believe therefore lower costs compared to its alternatives. Other energy crops providing half the yield will require twice the land and therefore land and other costs could be nearly doubled.

 

Another major advantage of GKG is that it can be harvested at any time-- particularly in a tropical or subtropical area. When corn straw is used, there is a delay for the corn to mature before any feedstock is produced. Then at the corn harvest, a lot of feedstock is available all at one time. This corn straw has to be collected, stored and used until the next corn harvest which will be one year later. This creates a major logistics issue. If the climate permits, GKG can be planted so that it matures continuously and allows just-in-time harvesting.

  

Higher food prices have led to food shortages around the globe. This argument has resonated with many world leaders and resulted in a global effort to derive biofuels from plants that are not in the human food chain. Using such plants as fuel sources helps avoid the political issue and perception that prices are rising because foods are being diverted for use as biofuels. These plants are called cellulosic biofuels.

 

Cellulosic biofuels are based on nonfood plants including grass, shrubs and trees. These plants do not have a lot of sugar and cannot be fermented directly like corn. They do, however, have a lot of cellulose in their leaves, stalks and branches which contain carbon and hydrogen which can then be converted into ethanol called cellulosic ethanol. GKG has been recently tested and shown to have potential for producing cellulosic biofuels including ethanol and for making biochemicals and bio plastics using a fermentation process.

 

The Company has four revenue models for GKG: 1. grass plantation integrated with a power plant or processing facility such as a pellet mill under company or joint venture control; 2. contract plantation establishment, support and licensing for a customer that owns and operates the plantation and power plant; 3. collaborative agreements to establish a test plot in the customer’s location to determine that GKG grows sufficiently for the customer to use in their particular application; and 4. consulting agreement services for customers considering the establishment of a grass plantation in their particular country or location.

 

Under a contract plantation establishment and licensing model, the customer would provide the land, labor and management and be responsible for growing GKG. We will provide initial seedlings, crop management services and knowledge transfer for a negotiated price. In addition, there would be an ongoing license fee based on grass production.

 

Management believes both models will be important contributors to our revenue streams. We believe all our revenues initially will result from the integrated plantation & end-user model. Rapid global expansion requires local joint venture partners that have land and labor, but lack the energy crop and the expertise to grow it. The contract plantation establishment and licensing model with joint venture partners will be used for most of these projects. We may also serve as a developer for integrated Giant King Grass plantations and bioenergy projects.

 

Other VIASPACE Projects

 

The Company retains a worldwide nonexclusive license to certain patents and patent applications in the areas of interactive radio technology; however, the Company is devoting no attention to this license.

   

Research and Development

 

The Company did not record any research and development activities in 2016 or 2015. If we do in the future, it will be expensed as incurred.

 

Competition

 

Many companies, universities and research laboratories worldwide are investigating grass as a feedstock for cellulosic ethanol and other applications. Monsanto is an example of a large company focusing on grass as a biofuel. Ceres is an example of a company focusing on biomass and grass in particular. Much of the competition is looking at miscanthus or switchgrass. These grasses are suitable for temperate areas. Much of the competition also is focused on selling seeds. GKG is a natural hybrid that is not genetically modified nor generally available, and to our knowledge no one else is growing GKG besides VIASPACE Green Energy, Inc. (“VGE”), as a commercial crop. Based on publicly available data on switchgrass and miscanthus, compared to our data on GKG, we believe that GKG has higher productivity than these and other competing grasses. GKG is most suitable for tropical and subtropical areas, which are the focus of the company’s efforts. Because GKG is propagated by seedlings and not by seeds, it is not an invasive species. The Company is focusing on projects involving growing the grass and securing long-term supply contracts for biofuel production, as a replacement for coal and electricity generation, and as animal feed. With long-term supply contracts and joint ventures, we plan to capture these recurring revenue streams.

 

 

 

3  
 

 

Other grasses such as alfalfa are suitable for animal feed and are also competitors of GKG.

 

Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, research, human resources, and product development capabilities. In addition, many of our competitors have greater experience in marketing such technologies and products and greater potential to develop revenue streams. As a result, our competitors may be able to develop and expand their competing product offerings more rapidly, adapt to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements more quickly, devote greater resources to marketing and sales of their products and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can.

 

Customers

 

The Company has a relatively small number of customers that have planted Giant King Grass. We believe this concentration of sales made to a small number of customers will continue in the near future. A loss of any customer by the Company could significantly reduce our future revenues.

 

Intellectual Property

 

On or about October 20, 2008, IPA China entered into an agreement with China Gate whereby VGE purchased seedlings of GKG and other grasses from China Gate and the parties agreed to assist each other in growing, developing and commercializing GKG. The agreement does not limit IPA China’s right to grow, harvest and market the grass anywhere in the world. No term was specified in the agreement. To our knowledge, China Gate has not entered into similar agreements with any other party.

 

On September 30, 2012, IPA China granted to VGE a reciprocal worldwide license for GKG, not to exceed the rights IPA China had in GKG.  Additionally, on September 30, 2012, VIASPACE and VGE entered into a Supply, License and Commercialization Agreement (“License Agreement”) pursuant to which VGE granted to VIASPACE a nontransferable, royalty-bearing exclusive license to commercialize Giant King Grass everywhere in the world other than China and Taiwan. Additionally, the License Agreement allows VIASPACE to use the Giant King Grass intellectual property and VIASPACE Green Energy trade name in connection with its efforts to commercialize Giant King Grass.

 

Executed on April 4, 2016 and effective as of March 28, 2016, the Company, VGE and IPA China, entered into the Global Supply, License, and Commercialization Agreement (the “New Agreement”).

 

Prior to the New Agreement, IPA China and VGE had entered into a certain Supply and Commercialization Agreement dated September 30, 2012 regarding a license and supply arrangement between IPA China and VGE regarding Giant King Grass (“IPA-VGE Agreement”). In turn, VGE and the Company also entered into a certain Supply and Commercialization Agreement dated September 30, 2012 regarding a license and supply arrangement between VGE and the Company regarding Giant King Grass (“VGE-VIASPACE Agreement”).

  

Under the New Agreement, VGE and the Company terminated the VGE-VIASPACE Agreement and IPA China directly granted the Company an exclusive, perpetual license to commercialize its intellectual property rights to three (3) types of high yield, non-genetically modified grasses (“Three GK Grasses”) throughout the world except Cambodia, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Thailand, Myanmar, Malaysia, Laos, Vietnam and Singapore (“VIASPACE Territory”). It and VGE agreed to subordinate the terms of the IPA-VGE Agreement to the terms of the New Agreement. IPA China also granted the Company the right to use and market the name “Giant King Grass” and other related names.

 

The Company would owe royalty payments on the Net Sales of the Three GK Grasses. This license would be sublicenseable in the VIASPACE Territory. IPA China held all rights of ownership to the intellectual property relating to the Three GK Grasses. The Company would own any grasses resulting from any modifications or improvements to the Three GK Grasses. IPA China would use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain its intellectual property rights. The Company would use commercially reasonable efforts to commercialize the Three GK Grasses throughout the VIASPACE Territory.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2016, we have 1 full time employee and 2-part time employees based in the US. We believe that our relations with our employees are good. We have never had a work stoppage, and our employees are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

 

Regulatory Issues

 

None

 

 

 

4  
 

 

Trademarks

 

The Company has a trademark registration for “VIASPACE”.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

Our business is subject to a number of risks. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report, before you decide whether to purchase our common stock. The risks set out below are not the only risks we face. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. We wish to caution that the following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in the future could affect our actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of us.

 

Risks Related To Our Business

 

We have incurred losses and anticipate continued losses for the foreseeable future.

 

Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,201,000. We have not yet achieved profitability and expect to continue to incur net losses until we recognize increased revenues from GKG related sales. We rely solely on the GKG licensing agreement we have put in place effective March 28, 2016, to generate revenues or our GKG grass business. Because we do not have an operating history upon which an evaluation of our prospects can be based, our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies seeking to develop new and rapidly evolving technologies. To address these risks, we must, among other things, respond to competitive factors, continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel and continue to develop our technologies. We may not be successful in addressing these risks. We can give no assurance that we will achieve or sustain profitability.

 

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on future revenues or future financing.

 

MaloneBailey LLC, our independent registered public accounting firm, included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our financial statements for 2016, which expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The inclusion of a going concern explanatory paragraph in MaloneBailey LLP’s report on our financial statements could have a detrimental effect on our stock price and our ability to raise additional capital if needed. However, on November 30, 2016, as discussed in Note 5, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Mr. Haris Basit, CEO and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, whereby Mr. Basit agreed to fund the Company up to $100,000 over a two-year period in accordance with such agreement. In addition, on February 23, 2017, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Dr. Kevin Schewe, Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, whereby Dr. Schewe agreed to fund the Company up to $100,000 over a two-year period in accordance with such agreement. The Company expects loans from Mr. Basit and Dr. Schewe and revenue generated from future contracts using the license it has for Giant King Grass to fund operations for the foreseeable future.

  

Our financial statements were prepared on the basis of a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have not made any adjustments to the financial statements as a result of the outcome of the uncertainty described above. Accordingly, the value of the Company in liquidation may be different from the amounts set forth in our financial statements.

 

Our continued success will depend on our ability to achieve profitability or to raise capital in order to fund the development and commercialization of our products. Failure to be profitable or to raise additional capital may result in substantial adverse circumstances, including our inability to continue the development of our products and our liquidation.

 

If we fail to comply with our obligations in our intellectual property licenses, we could lose license rights that are important to our business.

 

Executed on April 4, 2016 and effective as of March 28, 2016, the Company, VGE and IPA China, entered into the Global Supply, License, and Commercialization Agreement (the “New Agreement”).

 

Under the New Agreement, VGE and the Company terminated the VGE-VIASPACE Agreement and IPA directly granted the Company an exclusive, perpetual license to commercialize its intellectual property rights to three (3) types of high yield, non-genetically modified grasses (“Three GK Grasses”) throughout the world except Cambodia, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Thailand, Myanmar, Malaysia, Laos, Vietnam and Singapore (“VIASPACE Territory”). It and VGE agreed to subordinate the terms of the IPA-VGE Agreement to the terms of the New Agreement. IPA China also granted the right to use and market the name “Giant King Grass” and other related names.

 

The Company would owe royalty payments on the Net Sales of the Three GK Grasses. This license would be sublicenseable in the VIASPACE Territory. IPA China held all rights of ownership to the Three GK Grasses. The Company would own any grasses resulting from any modifications or improvements to the Three GK Grasses. IPA China would use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain its intellectual property rights. The Company would use commercially reasonable efforts to commercialize the Three GK Grasses throughout the VIASPACE Territory.

 

 

 

 

5  
 

 

If the Company does not make its required royalty payments, it could lose its license.

   

Our growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to produce Giant King Grass in sufficient quantities for our customer or if our competitors develop products that are favored by our customers.

 

We believe the future growth of our Company will depend on the value of our grass business for biofuel, power plant, or animal feed purposes. The ability to develop orders from customers, if at all, is uncertain due to several factors, many of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to produce Giant King Grass to meet the initial demands of our customers, or if our competitors develop products that are favored by our customers, our growth will be adversely affected.

 

In addition, our business depends on the success of our Giant King Grass business. To mitigate this risk, the Company leases land in San Diego County, California where it grows Giant King Grass. The Company also grows GKG in Hawaii. If we are unable to generate our existing products in sufficient quantities - our growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected and our revenues and profitability may decline.

 

If we lose key personnel or are unable to hire additional qualified personnel, it could impact our ability to grow our business.

 

We believe our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing, finance and operations personnel. We face intense competition for all such personnel, and we may not be able to attract and retain these individuals. Our failure to do so could delay product development, affect the quality of our products and services, and/or prevent us from sustaining or growing our business. In addition, employees may leave our company and subsequently compete against us. Key personnel include Mr. Haris Basit, our chief executive officer and Dr. Carl Kukkonen, our chief technology officer. The loss of key personnel, especially if without advanced notice, could harm our ability to maintain and build our business operations. Furthermore, we have no key man life insurance for any of our key employees.

 

Our revenues to date have been to a few customers, the loss of which could result in a material decline in revenues.

 

In 2015 and 2016, the Company has recorded a minor amount of grass revenues related to several Giant King Grass supply contract agreements to a few customers. We believe this concentration of sales made to a small number of customers will continue in the near future. A loss of any customer by the Company could significantly reduce our future revenues.

 

Our success depends upon market acceptance of our technologies and product development.

 

The markets for our renewable energy technologies are either new or non-existent at the present time. Our success will depend upon the market acceptance of Giant King Grass. This acceptance may require in certain instances a modification to the culture and behavior of customers to be more accepting of other forms of technology. Potential customers may be reluctant or slow to adopt changes or new ways of performing processes. There is no assurance that our current or future products or services will gain widespread acceptance or that we will generate sufficient revenues to allow us to ever achieve profitability.

 

In addition, our products require continuing improvement and development. Our products may not succeed or may not succeed as intended. As a result, we may need to change our product offerings, discontinue certain products and services or pursue alternative product strategies. There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully improve our current products or that we will continue to develop or market some of our products and services.

  

We operate in competitive markets against companies that have significantly greater resources than we have.

 

Overall, the markets for our products are highly competitive and many of our competitors have greater resources and better name recognition than we do. We intend to compete primarily by leveraging our intellectual property rights and our unique product value added features.

  

Due to uncertainties in our business, the capital on hand may not be sufficient to fund our operations until we achieve positive cash flow.

 

We have expended and will continue to expend substantial amounts of money for research and development, capital expenditures, working capital needs and manufacturing and marketing of our products and services. Although we have reduced expenses significantly, our business requires funds for operations.

 

 

 

 

6  
 

 

The exact timing and amount of spending required cannot be accurately determined and will depend on several factors, including:

 

  · progress of our research and development efforts;

 

  · competing technological and market developments;

 

  · commercialization of products currently under development by us and our competitors; and

 

  · market acceptance and demand for our products and services.

  

The cost of developing our technologies may require financial resources greater than we currently have available. Therefore, in order to successfully complete development of our technologies, we may be required to obtain additional financing. We cannot assure you additional financing will be available if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If adequate and acceptable financing is not available, we may have to delay development or commercialization of certain of our products and services or eliminate some or all of our development activities. We may also reduce our marketing or other resources devoted to our products and services. Any of these options could reduce our sales growth and result in continued net losses.

 

Failure of our internal controls over financial reporting could harm our business and financial results.

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that we would prevent or detect a misstatement of our financial statements or fraud. Any growth in our business may place significant additional pressure on our system of internal control over financial reporting. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud. A significant financial reporting failure or material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could cause a loss of investor confidence and decline in the market price of our common stock.

 

Risks Related to our Grass Business

 

We currently have a few meaningful customers for our grass business and are starting to make progress. If we are unable to attract any customers or our existing customers do not continue operations, our grass business will suffer.

 

We commenced our grass business in October 2008. Our revenues increased from 2015 to 2016 but revenues are still not at a material or significant level. While we believe we will be able to attract more customers and achieve meaningful revenues, we cannot assure you we will. There is no assurance that our potential customers will determine that using GKG for biomass or animal feed purposes will be commercially viable. Further such customers may find other grass or plant products superior to GKG for their needs. Furthermore, our customers may not be able to attract their internal financing to expand or continue their project using GKG. If any of these occur, our grass business will fail.

 

We may be subject to intellectual property rights claims regarding the seedlings.

 

We are subject to the risk that the seedlings we license infringe or will infringe upon patents, copyrights, trademarks or other intellectual property rights held by third parties. We acquired rights to grow GKG from a seller which we believe held such rights.  If that party does not hold such rights, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims relating to the intellectual property of others. If any such claim arises in the future, litigation or other dispute resolution proceedings may be necessary to retain our ability to offer our current and future products, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management resources and attention even if we prevail in contesting such claims. If we are found to have violated the intellectual property rights of others, we may be enjoined from using such intellectual property rights, incur additional costs to license or develop alternative products and be forced to pay fines and damages, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations, or terminate our grass business entirely.

  

Natural or man-made disasters could damage our crop production, which would cause us to suffer losses of production and a material reduction of revenues.

 

GKG is subject to the risks associated with growing crops, including natural disasters such as drought, pestilence, plant diseases and insect infestations, and man-made disasters such as environmental contamination. Other man-made incidents may damage our products, such as arson or other acts that may adversely affect our grass inventory in the winter storage season. Furthermore, natural or man-made disasters may cause farmers to migrate from the farmland, which would decrease the number of end users of our products. We are particularly susceptible to disasters or other incidents in San Diego, California or Hawaii, where we have the greatest concentration of our operations. In the event of a widespread failure of our grass, we could likely sustain substantial loss of revenues and suffer substantial operating losses. We do not have insurance to protect against such a risk.

 

 

 

7  
 

 

Our growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to develop or acquire new products or to produce our existing products in sufficient quantities.

 

We believe the future growth of our Company will depend on the value of our grass business for biofuel, power plant, or animal feed purposes. The ability to develop orders from customers, if at all, is uncertain due to several factors, many of which are beyond our control. These include changing customer preferences, competitive price pressures, the failure to adapt products to meet the evolving demands of customers, the development of higher-quality products by our competitors, and general economic conditions. If we are unable to develop or acquire additional products that meet the demands of our customers, if our competitors develop products that are favored by our customers, or if we are unable to produce our existing products in sufficient quantities, our growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected and our revenues and profitability may decline.

  

Our plans to increase production capacity in the grass business and expand into new markets may not be successful, which will adversely affect our operating results.

 

Our plans to develop our grass business and its production capacity has placed and will continue to place, substantial demands on our managerial, operational, technological and other resources. We are addressing three markets for GKG: feedstock for low-carbon liquid biofuels for transportation; fuel to burn in electricity generating power plants; and animal feed. We are also reviewing opportunities to grow grass in other areas of China, India, Indonesia, other areas of Southeast Asia and South America. These represent great opportunities for the company, but also represent a potential risk in losing focus and diluting management attention. If we fail to establish and manage the growth of our product offerings, operations and distribution channels effectively and efficiently in such business, we could suffer a material and adverse effect on our operations and our ability to capitalize on new business opportunities, either of which could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

 

We will need to develop new sales channels into the biofuel, electric power plant, and animal feed markets. Expansion into new markets may present operating and marketing challenges. If we are unable to anticipate the changing demands that expanding operations will impose on our production systems and distribution channels, or if we fail to develop our production systems and distribution channels to meet the demand, we could experience an increase in expenses and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

Our financial results are sensitive to fluctuations in market prices of the products that we offer.

 

The profitability of our operations is affected by the selling prices of our products. We intend to benchmark the prices of our grass against the prevailing domestic market prices of grass of similar quality and attributes, and set the prices accordingly. Historically, prices of grass and other agricultural products worldwide have been volatile, primarily due to fluctuations in supply and demand. If the prices for such products decline in the future, and we are unable sell more products and/or reduce our cost of sales, our revenues will decrease and our profitability will be adversely affected.

 

If we are unable to estimate customers’ future needs accurately and to match our production to the demand of our direct customers, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

 

Due to the nature of the grass industry, we normally grow according to our production plan before we sell and deliver grass to distributors and our direct customers. The potential end users of our grass, such as biofuel providers and livestock owners, generally make purchasing decisions for our products based on market prices, economic and weather conditions and other factors that we may not be able to anticipate accurately in advance. If we fail to accurately estimate the volume and types of products sought by our customers, we may produce more grass that is in demand by our distributors resulting in aged crops. In the event we decide not to sell the crop due to our concerns about the quality, the aged inventory could eventually be sold at greatly reduced prices. Aged inventory could result in asset impairment, in which case we would suffer a loss and incur an increase in our operating expenses. On the other hand, if we underestimate demand, we may not able to satisfy our customers’ demand for grass, and thus damage our customer relations and end-user loyalty. Our failure to estimate our customers’ future needs and to match our production to the demand of our direct customers may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Grass prices and sales volumes may decrease in any given year with a corresponding reduction in sales, margins and profitability.

 

There may be periods of instability during which commodity prices and sales volumes may fluctuate greatly. Commodities can be affected by general economic conditions, weather, disease outbreaks and factors affecting demand, such as availability of financing and competition. Our attempts to differentiate our products from those of other grass producers have not prevented the grass market from having the characteristics of a commodity market. As a result, the price we are able to demand for our grass is dependent on the size of the supply of our grass and the grass of other producers. Therefore, the potential exists for fluctuation in supply, and consequently in price, in our own markets, even in the absence of significant external events that might cause volatility. As a result, the amount of revenue that we receive in any given year is subject to change. As production levels are determined prior to the time that the volume and the market price for orders is known, we may have too much or too little product available, which may materially and adversely affect our revenues, margins and profitability.

   

 

 

8  
 

 

Risks Related To An Investment In Our Stock

 

Any future sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could depress the trading price of our common stock, lower our value and make it more difficult for us to raise capital.

 

Any sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock (or the prospect of sales) may depress the price of our common stock. In particular, we will need to raise additional capital to maintain any ongoing business. We anticipate that the issuance of newly-issued shares to maintain our business will likely be very dilutive. In addition, these sales could lower our value and make it more difficult for us to raise capital. Further, the timing of the sale of the shares of our common stock may occur at a time when we would otherwise be able to obtain additional equity capital on terms more favorable to us.

 

The Company has 3,900,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, of which 2,919,472,132 were accounted for by our transfer agent as issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016. Of these issued and outstanding shares, 1,578,776,014 shares (54.1%) are currently held by our executive officers, directors, and principal shareholders including related parties (including Mr. Haris Basit, CEO and Director; Dr. Carl Kukkonen, CTO and Director; Mr. Stephen J. Muzi, CFO; Ms. Angelina Galiteva, Director; Dr. Kevin L. Schewe, Director; Mr. Sung Hsien Chang, former director of the Company; Inter Pacific Arts Corporation, a former subsidiary of the Company; and Almaden Energy Group, a related party).  Of the shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016, 1,701,463,737 are accounted by our transfer agent as restricted under Rule 144.  These shares could be released in the future if requested by the holder of the shares, subject to volume and manner of sale restrictions under Rule 144.  1,218,008,395 shares of the Company’s common stock are accounted for by our transfer agent as free trading at December 31, 2016. 100,000,000 common shares are accounted for by our transfer agent as issued and outstanding, however, for accounting purposes the Company accounts for these as unissued since they are forfeitable. Outstanding common shares excluding these forfeitable shares are 1,819,472,132 at December 31, 2016.

 

We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our common stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of shares of our common stock will have on the market price of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock (including shares currently held by management and principal shareholders), or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.

 

Our executive officers, directors (including current and former) and principal shareholders own 54.1% of our common stock and one director holds a share of Series A Preferred Stock entitling it to votes of 50.1% on outstanding voting matters, which allows him to control substantially all matters requiring shareholder approval, and their interests may not align with the interests of our other shareholders.

 

Our executive officers, directors (including current and former) and principal shareholders hold 54.1% of our outstanding shares as of December 31, 2016. In addition, on May 14, 2010, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada a Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock. The Certificate was approved by the Board and did not require shareholder vote. The Certificate created a new class of preferred stock known as Series A Preferred Stock. There is one share designated as Series A Preferred Stock. One share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to 50.1% of the outstanding votes on all shareholder voting matters. Series A Preferred Stock has no dividend rights and no rights upon a liquidation event and is subject to cancellation when certain conditions are met.

 

On May 14, 2010, the Company issued one share of Series A Preferred Stock to Mr. Chang related to the acquisition of IPA by VIASPACE and VGE. This empowers Chang with supermajority voting rights even after he holds less than a majority of outstanding voting securities. Under the term sheet relating to the VGE Recapitalization, Chang gave a proxy to Director Dr. Schewe during the term of any GKG sublicense from VGE. Dr. Schewe may be willing to provide additional financing to the Company. In the event he provides such financing, his ownership in the Company will further increase.

 

Effective as of September 30, 2012, and pursuant to an Agreement to Grant Voting Rights and Transfer Preferred Share executed by Chang and Director Kevin Schewe, Chang granted Schewe an irrevocable proxy that permitted Schewe to vote the Preferred Share. This proxy lasts so long as the License remained exclusive to the Company. Upon the earlier of (i) the expiration of five years or (ii) the date when the Company reached a market capitalization of at least $50 million, the proxy would be cancelled as the Preferred Share would be transferred from Chang to Schewe.

 

Our stock price is likely to be highly volatile because of several factors, including a limited public float.

 

The market price of our stock is likely to be highly volatile because there has been a relatively thin trading market for our stock, which causes trades of small blocks of stock to have a significant impact on our stock price. You may not be able to resell our common stock following periods of volatility because of the market’s adverse reaction to volatility.

 

Other factors that could cause such volatility may include:

 

  · actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
     
  · announcements concerning our business or those of our competitors or customers;

 

 

 

 

9  
 

 

  · changes in financial estimates by securities analysts or our failure to perform as anticipated by the analysts;
     
  · announcements of technological or agricultural innovations;
     
  · conditions or trends in the industry;
     
  · introduction or withdrawal of products and services;
     
  · variation in quarterly results due to the fact our revenues are generated by sales to a limited number of customers which may vary from period to period;
     
  · litigation;
     
  · patents or proprietary rights;
     
  · departure of key personnel;
     
  · failure to hire key personnel; and
     
  · general market conditions.

 

Because our common stock is considered a “penny stock” any investment in our common stock is considered to be a high-risk investment and is subject to restrictions on marketability.

 

Our common stock is currently traded on the OTC Capital Markets (“OTCQB”) and is considered a “penny stock.” The OTCQB is generally regarded as a less efficient trading market than the NASDAQ Small Cap Market.

 

The SEC adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks.” Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, which specifies information about penny stocks and the nature and significance of risks of the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and any salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements indicating the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock.

 

Since our common stock is subject to the regulations applicable to penny stocks, the market liquidity for our common stock could be adversely affected because the regulations on penny stocks could limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and thus your ability to sell our common stock in the secondary market. There is no assurance our common stock will be quoted on NASDAQ or the NYSE or listed on any exchange, even if eligible.

    

We have additional securities available for issuance, including preferred stock, which if issued could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock.

 

Our articles of incorporation authorize issuance of 3,900,000,000 shares of common and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The common and preferred stock can be issued by, and the terms of the preferred stock, including dividend rights, voting rights, liquidation preference and conversion rights can generally be determined by, our Board of Directors (“BOD”) without shareholder approval. Any issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the rights of the holders of common stock by, among other things, establishing preferential dividends, liquidation rights or voting powers. Accordingly, our shareholders will be dependent upon the judgment of our management in connection with the future issuance and sale of shares of our common and preferred stock, in the event buyers can be found therefore. Any future issuances of common or preferred stock would further dilute the percentage ownership of our Company held by the public shareholders. Furthermore, the issuance of preferred stock could be used to discourage or prevent efforts to acquire control of our Company through acquisition of shares of common stock.

 

In addition, on May 14, 2010, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada a Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock. The Certificate was approved by the BOD and did not require shareholder vote. The Certificate created a new class of preferred stock known as Series A Preferred Stock. There is one share designated as Series A Preferred Stock. One share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to 50.1% of the outstanding votes on all shareholder voting matters. Series A Preferred Stock has no dividend rights and no rights upon a liquidation event and is subject to cancellation when certain conditions are met. On May 14, 2010, the Company issued one share of Series A Preferred Stock to Mr. Chang related to the acquisition of IPA by VIASPACE and VGE as discussed in footnotes. This empowers Chang with supermajority voting rights even after he holds less than a majority of outstanding voting securities.

 

 

 

 

10  
 

 

Effective as of September 30, 2012, and pursuant to an Agreement to Grant Voting Rights and Transfer Preferred Share executed by Chang and Director Kevin Schewe, Chang granted Schewe an irrevocable proxy that permitted Schewe to vote the Preferred Share. This proxy lasts so long as the License (discussed in Note 2) remained exclusive to the Company. Upon the earlier of (i) the expiration of five years or (ii) the date when the Company reached a market capitalization of at least $50 million, the proxy would be cancelled as the Preferred Share would be transferred from Chang to Schewe.

 

Stock options issued by the Company may have an adverse impact on the market value of our common stock.

 

The sale of stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued or issuable, or even the possibility of their sale, may adversely affect the trading market for our common stock and adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock. The existence of rights under such warrants to acquire our common stock at fixed prices may prove a hindrance to our efforts to raise future equity and debt funding, and the exercise of such rights will dilute the percentage ownership interest of our shareholders and may dilute the value of their ownership.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

The Company currently has no long-term office lease. The Company leases land in San Diego County, California where it grows Giant King Grass. It maintains a mailing address in California, and its principal executive officers work in California.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

None.

  

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

None.

 

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Market Prices

 

The shares of our common stock are principally quoted on the OTC Capital Markets (“OTCQB”) under the trading symbol “VSPC” since from June 22, 2005. Prior to June 22, 2005, the Company’s common stock was traded on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) under the symbol “GWPL.OB”. The first day of trading for the Company’s common stock was June 4, 2004.

 

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low sale price for our common stock, as reported on the OTCBB or OTCQB. The price information in the table below reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 

  

Quarterly period   High     Low  
             
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2015:                
First Quarter   $ 0.0099     $ 0.0065  
Second Quarter   $ 0.0077     $ 0.0033  
Third Quarter   $ 0.0052     $ 0.0026  
Fourth Quarter   $ 0.0041     $ 0.0019  
                 
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016:                
First Quarter   $ 0.0039     $ 0.0013  
Second Quarter   $ 0.0048     $ 0.0022  
Third Quarter   $ 0.0031     $ 0.0011  
Fourth Quarter   $ 0.0022     $ 0.0012  

 

 

 

11  
 

 

Holders

 

As of March 31, 2017, there were approximately 56 shareholders of record of the Company’s Common Stock.

 

Dividends

 

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends in the future. Our future dividend policy will be examined periodically by our Board of Directors based upon conditions then existing, including our earnings and financial condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors.

 

Equity Compensation Plan

 

Our discussion regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance are discussed under the section titled “Equity Compensation Plan Information” under “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stock Matters” below.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

On October 24, 2016, the Registrant issued 83,333,333 shares of Registrant common stock to Dr. Kevin Schewe, Director of the Company. The Registrant relied upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the offer and sale of its stock. It believed that Section 4(2) was available because the offer and sale was not a public offering of its securities and there was not general solicitation or general advertising involved in the offer or sale.

 

On November 9, 2016, the Registrant issued 130,000,000 shares of Registrant common stock to Dr. Kevin Schewe, Director of the Company. The Registrant relied upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the offer and sale of its stock. It believed that Section 4(2) was available because the offer and sale was not a public offering of its securities and there was not general solicitation or general advertising involved in the offer or sale.

 

On November 30, 2016, the Registrant issued 66,312,997 shares of Registrant common stock to Mr. Haris Basit, CEO and Director of the Company. The Registrant relied upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the offer and sale of its stock. It believed that Section 4(2) was available because the offer and sale was not a public offering of its securities and there was not general solicitation or general advertising involved in the offer or sale.

 

On December 2, 2016, the Registrant issued 457,143 shares of Registrant common stock to a consultant of the Company. The Registrant relied upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the offer and sale of its stock. It believed that Section 4(2) was available because the offer and sale was not a public offering of its securities and there was not general solicitation or general advertising involved in the offer or sale.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

None.

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

None required for Company.

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

VIASPACE Overview

 

VIASPACE Inc. (“we”, “us”, “VIASPACE”, or the “Company”) was founded in July 1998. Its business involves renewable energy and is based on biomass, in particular our license to a dedicated energy crop with the trademark “Giant King ® Grass” (“GKG”). Through a sublicense for GKG we obtained from Guangzhou Inter-Pacific Arts Corp., a Chinese wholly-owned foreign enterprise registered in Guangdong province ("IPA China") which owned by VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. (“VGE”), we are able to commercialize GKG throughout the world, except for the People’s Republic of China (“China”) and the Republic of China (“Taiwan”).

 

 

12  
 

 

GKG can be burned in 100% biomass power plants to generate electricity; made into pellets that can be burned together with coal to reduce carbon emissions from existing power plants; generate bio methane through anaerobic digestion, and can be used as a feedstock for low carbon liquid biofuels for transportation, biochemicals and bio plastics. Cellulosic ethanol, bio butanol and other liquid cellulosic biofuels, do not use corn or other food sources as feedstock. GKG can also be used as animal feed. GKG and other plants absorb and store carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as they grow. When they are burned, they release the carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere, but it is the same carbon dioxide that was removed from the atmosphere, and so this process is carbon neutral. Small amounts of fossil fuel are used by the farm equipment, transportation of GKG and fertilizer, so that the overall process of growing and burning GKG probably has some net carbon dioxide emissions, but much lower emissions than burning coal or other fossil fuels directly to create the same amount of energy. GKG has been independently tested by customers and been shown to have excellent energy content, high bio methane production, and the cellulosic sugar content needed for biofuels and biochemicals.

 

The Company’s web site is www.VIASPACE.com . Information contained on, or accessible through, our website should not be deemed as part of this report.

 

Critical accounting policies and estimates

 

Financial Reporting Release No. 60, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies” (“FRR60”) issued by the SEC, suggests companies provide additional disclosure and commentary on those accounting policies considered most critical. FRR 60 considers an accounting policy critical if it is important to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and requires significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in its application. For a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies, including the critical accounting policies discussed below, see the accompanying notes to the financial statements.

  

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, which are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The result of these evaluations forms the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported amount of expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions. The following accounting policies discussed below require significant management judgments and estimates.

 

The Company has four revenue models for GKG: 1. grass plantation integrated with a power plant or processing facility such as a pellet mill under company or joint venture control; 2. contract plantation establishment, support and licensing for a customer that owns and operates the plantation and power plant; 3. collaborative agreements to establish a test plot in the customer’s location to determine that GKG grows sufficiently for the customer to use in their particular application; and 4. consulting agreement services for customers considering the establishment of a grass plantation in their particular country or location. Revenue earned from collaborative agreements is comprised of negotiated payments for the operations of the test plots. Deferred revenue represents payments received which are related to future performance. For the year ending December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has recognized revenues under revenue models 3 and 4.

 

With regard to revenue recognition in connection with agreements that include multiple deliverables, management reviews the relevant terms of the agreements and determines whether such deliverables should be accounted for as a single unit of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC 605-25, Multiple-Element Arrangements. If it is determined that the items do not have stand-alone value, then such deliverables are accounted for as a single unit of accounting and any payments received pursuant to such agreement, including any upfront or development milestone payments and any payments received for support services, will be deferred and included in deferred revenue within our balance sheet until such time as management can estimate when all of such deliverables will be delivered, if ever. Management reviews and reevaluates such conclusions as each item in the arrangement is delivered and circumstances of the development arrangement change.

 

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 505-50, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services” and “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other than Employees”. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor's performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 505-50, an asset acquired in exchange for the issuance of fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments should not be presented or classified as an offset to equity on the grantor's balance sheet once the equity instrument is granted for accounting purposes. Accordingly, the Company records the fair value of the fully vested, non-forfeitable common stock issued for future consulting services as prepaid expenses in its balance sheet.

 

The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. There is no assurance that actual results will not differ from these estimates.

 

 

 

13  
 

 

Results of Operations

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to December 31, 2015

 

Revenues

 

Revenues were $205,000 and $188,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, an increase of $17,000. The revenues relate to collaborative agreements for the joint operation of test plots to establish whether Giant King Grass grows well in the applicable customer’s countries and optimal agronomic practices are developed, and also for consulting and engineering work performed for customers requesting assistance in power plant design and feasibility studies for customers considering using Giant King Grass in their energy project.

  

Cost of Revenues

 

Costs of revenues were $58,000 and $87,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease of $29,000. The costs incurred by the Company to support the collaborative agreements include travel costs and external consulting costs. The Company will send personnel or consultants to oversee the initial plantings of Giant King Grass in the customer’s locations.

 

Gross Profit

 

The resulting effect on these changes in revenues and cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 was an increase in gross profit from a gross profit of $101,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015 to gross profit of $147,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $46,000.

 

Operations Expenses

 

Operations expenses were $36,000 and $61,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, a decrease of $25,000. Labor and consulting costs were lower by $9,000 in 2016 as the Company hired less labor to work in the Giant King Grass field in San Diego County. Laboratory fees were lower in 2016 by $8,000 in 2016 as compared to the same period of 2015 due to less testing of Giant King Grass in 2016. Water and rent costs were higher by $5,000 during 2016 as compared with 2015 due to higher rent and more water usage. Travel costs related to operations were lower by $5,000 in 2016 as compared to 2015 due to fewer trips to the fields. Supplies were lower by $5,000 in 2016 compared with 2015 due to lower supplies required. Other operations expenses were lower by $3,000 in 2016 as compared with the same period in 2015. Operations expenses consist of plantation expenses related to the Company’s test plot in California and costs associated with agronomy support and travel for potential customers.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $984,000 and $1,376,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease of $392,000. Stock option compensation expense decreased $186,000 in 2016 as compared with 2015 due to reduced stock option grants in 2016. Payroll and benefit costs were higher by $68,000 in 2016 compared with the same period of 2015 due to the Company hiring a new CEO in July 2015. Stock compensation expense was higher by $61,000 in 2016 versus 2015 due to compensation expense related to an officer or officer family member purchasing common stock of the Company at a discount to market. Accounting fees decreased $24,000 in 2016 as compared with 2015 due lower audit costs. Legal fees decreased $22,000 in 2016 due to lower legal fees. Consulting fees decreased $180,000 in 2016 as compared with same period in 2015 as the Company did not use a lobbyist in 2016 to assist the Company in obtaining government contracts and also did not use an outside service provider. Insurance costs decreased $61,000 in 2016 compared to 2015 due to reduced directors’ and officers’ insurance costs. Travel costs decreased $28,000 in 2016 as compared with the same period of 2015, due to reduced travel associated with conferences and new business travel costs. Royalty expense was lower in 2016 by $10,000 compared to 2015 due to lower royalty owed to VGE. Other costs decreased $10,000 in 2016 as compared to 2015.

  

Loss from Operations

 

The resulting effect on these changes in gross profits, operations expenses, and selling, general and administrative expenses was a decrease in loss from operations in 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had a loss from operations of $873,000 compared with a loss from operations of $1,336,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $463,000.

 

 

 

 

14  
 

 

Interest Expense

 

Interest expense was $333,000 and $710,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease of $377,000. This is due to a decrease in the amount of the discount recognized by Kevin Schewe, in 2016 as compared to 2015, related to convertible loans made to the Company during 2016 and 2015.

 

Other Expense

 

The Company recorded other expense of $27,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $44,000 for the same period in 2015. Other expense was recorded in 2016 and 2015 primarily due to a decrease in the fair value of the Company’s minority interest in AEG.

 

Other Income

 

The Company recorded other income of $32,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. In 2016, the Company reversed royalty expense no longer owed to VGE of $16,000, that was accrued on the Company’s Balance Sheet at December 31, 2015, as a result of a new Global Supply, License, and Commercialization Agreement the Company entered into with VGE and Guangzhou Inter-Pacific Arts Corp. effective March 28, 2016 which eliminated any past claims either party had with each other, among other things as explained in Commitments and Contingencies footnote. In addition, the Company recorded $16,000 of other income in 2016 related to a forfeitable deposit the Company received on a collaborative agreement with a customer for its Giant King Grass.

 

The Company recorded other income of $84,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Other income in 2015 is comprised of a gain on minority interest in AEG. The fair value of the Company’s minority interest in AEG exceeded the fair value of the asset contributed which resulted in the Company recording other income.

    

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The Company’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,201,000. Non-cash expenses totaled $836,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to stock options expense, stock compensation expense, amortization of debt discount and loss on minority interest. Changes in operating assets and liabilities used $5,000 of cash in 2016. Net cash used by operating activities for operations was $370,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

The Company has incurred significant losses from operations, resulting in an accumulated deficit of $53,448,000 at December 31, 2016. The Company expects such losses to continue. However, on December 31, 2012, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Director Kevin Schewe whereby Dr. Schewe agreed to fund the Company up to $1,000,000 over a five-year period. Schewe completed the funding of $1,000,000 on January 13, 2016. On January 25, 2016, Schewe entered into a new Loan Agreement whereby he agreed to fund the Company an additional $300,000 over a one-year period.  Schewe completed the funding of $300,000 on November 9, 2016. On November 30, 2016, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with CEO Haris Basit whereby Mr. Basit agreed to fund the Company up to $100,000 over a two-year period. On February 23, 2017, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Dr. Schewe whereby Dr. Schewe agreed to fund the Company up to $100,000 over a two-year period.

 

The Company expects to continue as a going concern, however no assurance can be given that Dr. Schewe or Mr. Basit will continue to fund the Company or that sales contracts will be obtained in the future, or if obtained, that such contracts will be profitable or generate cash for the Company. The Company received $305,000 from Dr. Schewe related to these Loan Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company received $25,000 from Mr. Basit related to these Loan Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2016. During 2016, we received capital of $20,000 through the sales of unregistered shares of common stock to Almaden Energy Group, LLC, a related party. During 2016, we also received capital of $24,000 from Dr. Carl Kukkonen, CTO of the Company and immediate family members of Dr. Kukkonen. Other non-related investors also purchased $5,000 of unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock. Without proceeds from additional equity financings, future revenues from its Giant King Grass, or loans from Dr. Schewe and Mr. Basit, the Company could not continue as a going concern.

 

As of March 31, 2017, the Company had remaining availability under Dr. Schewe’s note of $85,000 remaining availability under Mr. Basit’s note of $63,500. The Company expects contracts related to Giant King Grass, loans from Dr. Schewe and Mr. Basit, and occasional direct purchases of stock from investors to fund the operations of the Company for the foreseeable future.  

 

Based upon our cash requirements for our plan of operations and our current dividend policy of investing any available cash back into our operations, we do not plan to distribute any cash to our shareholders.

 

 

 

15  
 

 

Contractual Obligations

 

There are no long-term contractual obligations other than employment agreements as detailed below.

 

Employment Agreements

 

Effective July 10, 2015, the Company entered into a two-year employment agreement with Haris Basit, CEO of the Company. Mr. Basit will receive $120,000 per annum and be entitled to a bonus as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses in the course of his employment. Additionally, Mr. Basit is to receive 20 business days paid leave per year. On July 10, 2015, the Company agreed to issue Mr. Basit 25,000,000 stock options at fair market value based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as traded on the OTC Market as of July 10, 2015. These stock options are vested immediately but otherwise shall be subject to the terms of the 2015 option plan. Additionally, the Company agreed to issue Mr. Basit 18,750,000 stock options to be issued every three months (quarterly) over the term of his employment agreement which runs from July 10, 2015 through July 9, 2017, with the first issuance on October 10, 2015, at fair market value based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as traded on the OTC Market on the date of each grant. Stock options shall vest immediately upon each issuance and shall be otherwise subject to the terms of the 2015 option plan. In the case of a change of control of the Company, the issuance schedule shall be accelerated by one year. Stock options shall have an exercise term of ten years from date of issuance, not to exceed the expiration date of the 2015 option plan.

 

Effective October 1, 2016, the Company entered into one-year employment agreements with Carl Kukkonen and Stephen Muzi. Dr. Kukkonen serves as Chief Technology Officer of the Company and Mr. Muzi serves as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Dr. Kukkonen will receive a salary of $84,000 per annum and Mr. Muzi would receive $64,000 per annum. Each of them would also be entitled to customary insurance and health benefits, and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses in the course of his employment. Dr. Kukkonen is to receive 20 business days paid leave per year and Mr. Muzi is to receive 10 business days paid leave. Additionally, Dr. Kukkonen will be awarded a bonus of 10% of the gross revenue generated by the Company up to a maximum of $100,000.

 

Inflation and Seasonality

 

We have not experienced material inflation during the past five years. Seasonality has historically not had a material effect on our operations.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2016.

   

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

This information is not required of smaller reporting companies.

  

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The financial statements to be provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are included following Part IV, Item 15, commencing on page F-1.

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.

 

Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

 

 

 

 

16  
 

 

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

 

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting are or will be capable of preventing or detecting all errors or all fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.

 

Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements, due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns may occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk.

 

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management's report in this annual report. During the most recently completed fiscal quarter, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. This rule defines internal control over financial reporting as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

· Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions;

 

· Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
     
· Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2016, as the result of a material weakness. The material weakness results from significant deficiencies in internal control that collectively constitute a material weakness.

 

A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness; yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the registrant's financial reporting. We had the following material weakness at December 31, 2016:

 

· The Company has a lack of proper segregation of duties.
     
· The Company's internal control structure lacks multiple levels of review and oversight.

  

Remediation of Deficiencies and Material Weaknesses

 

We are unable to remedy the all material weaknesses present in our internal controls until we are able to hire additional employees, so that we may then introduce checks and balances on internal controls. We have put systems in place to deal with the revenue recognition deficiencies which include: having persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists in the form of a signed agreement, the price is fixed and determinable by having a purchase order signed by our customer and the company, written confirmation that goods or services have been delivered. The collectability aspect of revenue recognition will be met when we establish a collection history with our customers.

 

 

 

17  
 

 

  

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Not applicable.

  

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, CONTROL PERSONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

  

(a)             Executive Officers

 

The following table sets forth our executive officers, their ages and the positions held by them. The Company’s named executive officers as of December 31, 2016 include the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. In addition, one additional officer of the Company’s subsidiary VGE is included in accordance with disclosure requirements.

 

Name   Age   Position Held
Mr. Haris Basit   55   Chief Executive Officer and Director
Dr. Carl Kukkonen   71   Chief Technology Officer and Director
Mr. Stephen Muzi   53   Chief Financial Officer

 

Haris Basit. Mr. Basit is the Chief Executive Officer and Director of VIASPACE Inc. since July 10, 2016. He co-founded Almaden Energy Group (AEG), LLC which partners with VIASPACE to grow Giant King Grass in the United States for animal feed. Since 2012, Mr. Basit has been providing Corporate Strategy Consulting to senior executives of publicly traded companies to help identify new growth opportunities and partnerships. Mr. Basit currently serves on a technical advisory committee to UNOS, a private, non-profit organization that manages the nation’s organ transplant system. He was a consultant to Liebman and Associates, the premier clean energy lobbying firm in Washington, DC. He has provided entrepreneurship mentoring for University of California Berkeley MBA students. He started his career as a Staff Engineer at IBM moving on to became a Manager at Rockwell International, a Manager at Bell Labs, Vice President of Business Development for OEA International and then Founder/CEO of both Multigig, Inc. and Mobius Power, LLC. He received his MSEE from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign in 1986. He also earned a BSEE from University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign in 1984.

 

Carl Kukkonen.    Dr. Kukkonen is the Chief Technology Officer and Director of VIASPACE Inc. since 2005. He had been the Chief Executive Officer and Director of VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. since October 2008. On July 10, 2016, Dr. Kukkonen’s title changed from CEO to Chief Technology Officer (“CTO”) after the Company hired Mr. Haris Basit to be the CEO of the Company. He was the Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of ViaSpace Technologies LLC (predecessor of VIASPACE Inc.) from 1998 to 2005. Previously, he served as CEO and director of SpectraSensors, Inc. and ViaLogy Corp., spun-off former subsidiaries of VIASPACE Inc.; and Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Corporation and Ionfinity LLC, previous subsidiaries of VIASPACE Inc. Dr. Kukkonen served as the Director of the Center for Space Microelectronics Technology and Manager of Supercomputing at the Caltech NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory from 1984 to 1998. From 1977 to 1984, he was the Principal Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company. Dr. Kukkonen has a B.S. in physics from the University of California at Davis and an M.S. and Ph.D. in physics from Cornell University. He was also a Post-doctoral fellow at Purdue University.

 

Stephen Muzi. Mr. Muzi has been the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of VIASPACE Inc. since June 2005. He was Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. from October 2008 to March 2016. He was the controller for SpectraSensors, Inc., a spun-off former subsidiary of VIASPACE from 2003 to 2005. He was also a controller for ViaLogy Corp., a spun-off former subsidiary of VIASPACE Inc. from 2003 to 2005. From 2004 to 2005, he also served as a consultant to Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Corporation and Ionfinity LLC, subsidiaries of VIASPACE Inc. from 2004 to 2005. Mr. Muzi joined ViaSpace Technologies LLC (predecessor of VIASPACE Inc.) in May 2000. Mr. Muzi obtained his B.S. degree from Rochester Institute of Technology and an M.B.A. from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He is a Certified Public Accountant.

 

(b)             Directors

 

The Company’s directors are as follows:

 

Name   Age   Position Held
Mr. Haris Basit   55   Chief Executive Officer and Director
Dr. Carl Kukkonen   71   Chief Technology Officer and Director
Ms. Angelina Galiteva   50   Director
Dr. Kevin L. Schewe   60   Director

  

 

 

18  
 

 

Haris Basit   – See background in Item 9 (a) under Executive Officers

 

Carl Kukkonen   – See background in Item 9 (a) under Executive Officers

 

Angelina Galiteva. Director Since: April 28, 2006. Committee Memberships of Company: Member of the Compensation Committee, Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Independent Director: Yes. Principal Occupations for the last five years: Angelina Galiteva was appointed by California’s Governor Jerry Brown and subsequently approved by the State Senate to the California Independent System Operator Corporation Board of Governors. The Independent System Operator is responsible for the reliable operation of the electrical grid in the state of California and for the efficient integration of the 33% Renewable Portfolio Standard mandate. Ms. Galiteva is also a Principal at NEOptions, Inc., a renewable energy and new technology product design and project development firm. Her industry experience includes serving as Executive Director of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and head of its Green LA, Environmental Affairs and New Product Development Organization. While at the municipal utility, she was responsible for strategic positioning and the environmental compliance departments. Her career includes working with the California ISO and Power Exchange on their initial launches and she also worked as a power analyst for the New York Power Authority. Ms. Galiteva works to advance the use of renewable energy and distributed energy technologies worldwide. In the non-government organization (NGO) arena, she is the founder of the Renewables 100 Policy Institute and also serves as the Chairperson for the World Council for Renewable Energy. Both organizations are dedicated to the successful deployment of renewable energy technologies and the policies that support them on a global scale. Ms. Galiteva graduated from Pace University School of Law with a Juris Doctor degree and an LL.M. degree in Environmental and Energy Law. She specialized in electric utility strategic policy analysis and decision making focusing on pending industry transition and integration of renewable energy technologies in the utility mix.

 

Kevin L. Schewe, MD. Director Since: January 19, 2012. Kevin L. Schewe, MD, was appointed to the Board of Directors on January 19, 2012 as an independent director. He has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors since October 1, 2012. Dr. Schewe is a Board-Certified Radiation Oncologist and a Fellow of the American College of Radiation Oncology. Dr. Schewe has devoted his 27-year medical career and practice in the fight against cancer. He currently serves as Medical Director of Radiation Oncology at the Red Rocks Medical Center in Golden, Colorado. The Red Rocks Radiation Oncology Center is co-owned by Dr. Schewe and HealthONE, the Colorado Division of Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) which is the largest private operator of healthcare facilities in the world and listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Dr. Schewe has also developed a premium line of skin care and cosmetic products designed to help naturally heal, protect, repair and subsequently maintain not only the damaged skin of cancer patients, but also individuals who have experienced skin damage resulting from aging, dryness, UV exposure, other illnesses, and environmental pollution. These products are manufactured and sold by Dr. Schewe’s company Elite Therapeutics. Dr. Schewe received his Bachelor of Arts Degree in Biology at the University of Missouri and his medical degree at the University of Missouri School of Medicine.

 

Family Relationships

 

There are no family relationships between or among any of the current directors, executive officers or persons nominated or charged by the Company to become directors or executive officers.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

None of our directors or executive officers has, during the past five years:

 

  · been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);
     
  · had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
     
  · been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities or banking activities; or
     
  · been found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.
     
  · been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:.

  

  (i) any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation;

 

 

 

19  
 

 

  (ii) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or
     
  (iii) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

 

  · been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member. (covering stock, commodities or derivatives exchanges, or other SROs).

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Not applicable.

 

Code of Ethics

 

The Company adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal: executive officers, financial officer, accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The text of the Company’s code of ethics is available on the Company’s website, www.viaspace.com. A copy of the Company’s code of ethics may be obtained free of charge by contacting the Company at the address or telephone number listed on the cover page hereof.

 

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

Audit Committee. On October 20, 2005, our BOD established an Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee has the authority to retain and terminate the services of our independent accountants, reviews annual financial statements, considers matters relating to accounting policy and internal controls and reviews the scope of annual audits. The Company does not currently have an independent member of the BOD serving as the audit committee’s financial expert that meets the definition under Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K. The Audit Committee held no meetings in 2016.

 

Compensation Committee. On October 20, 2005, our BOD established a Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee reviews, approves and makes recommendations regarding our compensation policies, practices and procedures to ensure that legal and fiduciary responsibilities of the BOD are carried out and that such policies, practices and procedures contribute to our success. The Compensation Committee is responsible for the determination of the compensation of our chief executive officer, and shall conduct its decision-making process with respect to that issue without the chief executive officer present. The Compensation Committee held no meetings in 2016.

 

Governance and Nominating Committee. On October 20, 2005, our BOD established a Governance and Nominating Committee. This committee’s role is to make recommendations to the full BOD as to the size and composition of the BOD and its committees, and to evaluate and make recommendations as to potential candidates. The Governance and Nominating Committee may consider candidates recommended by shareholders as well as from other sources such as other directors or officers, third party search firms or other appropriate sources. For all potential candidates, the Governance and Nominating Committee may consider all factors it deems relevant, such as a candidate’s personal integrity and sound judgment, business and professional skills and experience, independence, knowledge of the industry in which we operate, possible conflicts of interest, diversity, the extent to which the candidate would fill a present need on the BOD, and concern for the long-term interests of the shareholders. In general, persons recommended by shareholders will be considered on the same basis as candidates from other sources. The Governance and Nominating Committee held no meetings in 2016.

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The following table shows the annual compensation paid by us to Mr. Haris Basit, our principal executive officer, for the year ended December 31, 2016 and our executive officers who were paid more than $100,000 per annum. Other than the officers listed, no other officer had total compensation during either of the previous two years of more than $100,000. The Named Executive Officers are the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

   

 

 

20  
 

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

(a)   (b)     (c)     (d)     (e)     (f)     (g)     (h)  
Name and Principal Position   Year     Salary
($)
    Bonus
($)
    Stock Awards
($) (3)
    Option Awards
($)(1)
    All Other Compensation
($)(2)
    Total
($)
 
                                           
Haris Basit     2016       120,000                   157,499             277,499  
Chief Executive     2015       57,097                   139,631             196,728  
Officer of Company                                                        
                                                         
Carl Kukkonen,     2016       111,000       19,931             21,264       19,966       172,161  
Chief Technology     2015       129,017       1,429             95,941       19,966       246,353  
Officer of Company     2014       166,036                   18,334       19,894       204,264  
                                                         
Stephen J. Muzi,     2016       64,000                   14,352       13,233       91,585  
Chief Financial Officer,     2015       63,740                   43,392       15,874       123,006  
Treasurer and Secretary of Company     2014       62,264                   9,167       16,635       88,066  

 

(1) Column (f) represents the dollar amount recognized as compensation expense for financial statement reporting purposes for each year under FASB ASC Topic 718, Share-Based Payment, and not an amount paid to or realized by the Named Executive Officer. Assumptions used in the calculation of this amount are included in the footnotes to the Company’s audited financial statements. There can be no assurance that the amounts determined by FASB ASC Topic 718 will ever be realized.
(2) In 2014-2016, Dr. Kukkonen’s health insurance coverage was reimbursed to him directly in cash, which amount is included above in column g. Amounts shown for Mr. Muzi represent health insurance coverage paid by the Company directly to the health insurance provider on his behalf.
(3) Dr. Kukkonen deferred a portion of his 2009, 2010 and 2011 stock awards and is entitled to the following unregistered shares of Company common stock at December 31, 2016: 11,195,707 shares for deferred 2009 compensation; 8,467,939 shares for deferred 2010 compensation; and 24,730,678 shares for deferred 2011 compensation. These shares have not been issued yet.

 

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

 

Employment Agreements and Arrangements

 

Effective July 10, 2015, the Company entered into a two-year employment agreement with Haris Basit, CEO of the Company. Mr. Basit will receive $120,000 per annum and be entitled to a bonus as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses in the course of his employment. Additionally, Mr. Basit is to receive 20 business days paid leave per year. On July 10, 2015, the Company agreed to issue Mr. Basit 25,000,000 stock options at fair market value based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as traded on the OTC Market as of July 10, 2015. These stock options are vested immediately but otherwise shall be subject to the terms of the 2015 option plan. Additionally, the Company agreed to issue Mr. Basit 18,750,000 stock options to be issued every three months (quarterly) over the term of his employment agreement which runs from July 10, 2015 through July 9, 2017, with the first issuance on October 10, 2015, at fair market value based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as traded on the OTC Market on the date of each grant. Stock options shall vest immediately upon each issuance and shall be otherwise subject to the terms of the 2015 option plan. In the case of a change of control of the Company, the issuance schedule shall be accelerated by one year. Stock options shall have an exercise term of ten years from date of issuance, not to exceed the expiration date of the 2015 option plan.

 

Effective October 1, 2016, the Company entered into one-year employment agreements with Carl Kukkonen and Stephen Muzi. Dr. Kukkonen serves as Chief Technology Officer of the Company and Mr. Muzi serves as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Dr. Kukkonen will receive a salary of $84,000 per annum and Mr. Muzi would receive $64,000 per annum. Each of them would also be entitled to customary insurance and health benefits, and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses in the course of his employment. Dr. Kukkonen is to receive 20 business days paid leave per year and Mr. Muzi is to receive 10 business days paid leave. Additionally, Dr. Kukkonen will be awarded a bonus of 10% of the gross revenue generated by the Company up to a maximum of $100,000.

   

Stock Option Grants

 

The following table provides information on stock options granted in 2016 to each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers. There can be no assurance that the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards will ever be realized.

 

 

 

21  
 

 

VIASPACE INC.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

        Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
  All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stocks or   All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying   Exercise or Base Price of Option   Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option  
Name   Grant Date   Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold ($)   Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Units
(#)
  Options
(#) (1)
  Awards
($/Sh)
  Awards
(2)
 
Haris Basit   1/11/16                                 18,750,000   $ 0.0017   $ 29,302  
Haris Basit   4/11/16                                 18,750,000   $ 0.0033   $ 57,101  
Haris Basit   7/11/16                                 18,750,000   $ 0.0025   $ 43,269  
Haris Basit   10/10/16                                 18,750,000   $ 0.0016   $ 27,827  
Haris Basit   12/14/16                                 25,000,000   $ 0.0017   $ 39,667  
Carl Kukkonen   12/14/16                                

25,000,000

  $ 0.0017   $

39,667

 
Steve Muzi   12/14/16                                 25,000,000   $ 0.0017     $ 39,667  

 

(1) Options allow the grantee to purchase a share of VIASPACE common stock for the fair market value of a share of VIASPACE Common Stock on the grant date. Options above vested immediately. If a grantee’s employment is terminated, options that are then vested expire within three months of termination and unvested options expire immediately.
   
(2) Represents the aggregate FASB ASC Topic 718 values of options granted during the year. There can be no assurance that the options will ever be exercised (in which case no value will be realized by the executive) or that the value on exercise will equal the FASB ASC Topic 718 value.

  

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

 

The following table shows the number of equity awards held by the Company’s Named Executive Officers on December 31, 2016.

 

VIASPACE INC.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

DECEMBER 31, 2016

 

OPTION AWARDS   STOCK AWARDS  

Name

(a)

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Exercisable

(b)

   

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Unexercisable

(c)

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards:

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options

(#)

(d)

 

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

(e)

 

Option

Expiration

Date

(f)

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested

(#)

(g)

 

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested

($)

(h)

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested

(#)

(i)

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested

(#)

(j)

 
Carl Kukkonen     9,890,111               –     $ 0.0028   7/30/22          
Stephen Muzi     7,417,580           $ 0.0028   7/30/22          
Carl Kukkonen     7,072,500           $ 0.0040   6/22/25          
Haris Basit     25,000,000           $ 0.0031   7/10/25          
Carl Kukkonen     28,437,500       6,562,500     $ 0.0041   9/18/25          
Stephen Muzi     18,890,625       4,359,375     $ 0.0041   9/18/25          
Haris Basit     18,750,000           $ 0.0040   10/9/25          
Haris Basit     18,750,000           $ 0.0017   1/11/26          
Haris Basit     18,750,000           $ 0.0033   4/11/26          
Haris Basit     18,750,000           $ 0.0025   7/11/26          
Haris Basit     18,750,000           $ 0.0016   10/10/26          
Haris Basit           25,000,000     $ 0.0017   12/14/26          
Carl Kukkonen           25,000,000     $ 0.0017   12/14/26          
Steve Muzi           25,000,000     $ 0.0017   12/14/26          

  

There were no shares of the Company’s common stock acquired during 2016 upon the exercise of the options.

 

 

 

22  
 

 

Director Compensation

 

The following chart summarizes the annual compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors during 2016.

 

Director Compensation

 

(a)   (b)     (c)     (d)     (e)     (f)  
Name   Fees Earned
($)
    Stock Awards
($)
    Option Awards
($) (1)
    All Other
Compensation ($)
    Total
($)
 
Angelina Galiteva               $ 19,834           $ 19,834  
Kevin L. Schewe               $ 39,667           $ 39,667  

 

(1) Column (d) represents the dollar amount recognized as compensation expense for financial statement reporting purposes for 2016 under FASB ASC Topic 718, and not an amount paid to or realized by the Director. The amount shown includes all awards granted. Assumptions used in the calculation of this amount are included in the Company’s financial statement footnotes. There can be no assurance that the amounts determined by FASB ASC Topic 718 will ever be realized.

   

Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table

 

Compensation of Non-Employee Directors

 

On December 14, 2016, 25,000,000 stock options were granted to Dr. Kevin Schewe as a stock award for board of director services and 12,500,000 stock options were granted to Ms. Galiteva as a stock award for board of director services. The price of the stock options was the closing market price on the date of grant. The stock options for Dr. Schewe and Ms. Galiteva vested quarterly over one year beginning January 1, 2017. During 2016, no cash compensation was paid to non-employee directors. Directors of the Company, who are employees of the Company, do not receive additional compensation for their services as Directors.

 

Retirement Plans

 

The Company does not have any retirement plans at December 31, 2016.

  

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

 

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2017 by (i) each person who beneficially owns more than 5% of all outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) each director and the executive officer identified below, and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group. The mailing address for each person identified in this table is 382 N. Lemon Ave., Suite 364, Walnut, California 91789.

  

Name   Number of
Shares Beneficially
Owned
    Exercisable
Options
Beneficially
Owned (a)
    Total Number of
Shares and
Exercisable
Options
Beneficially
Owned
    Percent of
Class of
Common Stock
(b)
 
                         
Directors:                                
Haris Basit, CEO     94,908,315       125,000,000       219,908,315       6.6%  
Carl Kukkonen, CTO (c)     74,322,025       53,837,861       128,159,886       3.9%  
Angelina Galiteva     903,764       9,906,250       10,810,014       0.3%  
Kevin L. Schewe, MD     1,209,038,693       46,500,000       1,255,538,693       37.9%  
                                 
Other Named Officers:                                
Stephen J. Muzi, CFO     19,443,694       34,011,330       53,455,024       1.6%  
                                 
All Named Executive Officers and Directors as a group (5 persons)     1,398,616,491       269,255,441       1,667,871,932       50.3%  
                                 
Other Shareholders:                                
Sung Hsien Chang (d)     203,915,297             203,915,927       6.2%  

 

 

 

23  
 

 

(a) Includes only options that become exercisable on or before May 31, 2017 and excludes options that become exercisable after such date.
   
(b) The percent of Common Stock owned is calculated using the sum of the number of shares of Common Stock owned as of March 31, 2017 and the number of options of the beneficial owner that are exercisable on or before May 31, 2017 divided by the sum of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and the number of options of the beneficial owner that are exercisable on or before May 31, 2017.
   
(c) Dr. Kukkonen deferred a portion of his 2009, 2010 and 2011 salary and is entitled to 44,394,324 unregistered shares of Company common stock which is not included in the number of shares beneficially owned since they have not been issued yet.
   
(d) Mr. Chang is a former director of the Company, President of VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. and CEO of IPA BVI and IPA China, all former subsidiaries of the Company. Shares shown include those owned by Mr. Chang directly and shares held by Changs LLC, the Chang Family Foundation, and Inter Pacific Arts Corporation (an entity controlled by Mr. Chang).

  

Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table summarizes information about the options and warrants under the Company’s equity plans as of the close of business on December 31, 2016:

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

    Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)
    Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
    Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders for VIASPACE     380,730,000     $ 0.0028       520,547,252  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders                  
Total     380,730,000     $ 0.0028       520,547,252  

 

Our current stock option plans (the “Plans”) are explained in detail in the footnotes to the accompanying financial statements and provide for the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other awards to the Company’s employees, officers, directors or consultants.

 

Our BOD, with assistance from the executive officers of the Company, administers the Plans, selects the individuals to whom options will be granted, determines the number of options to be granted, and the term and exercise price of each option. Stock options granted pursuant to the terms of each of the Plans generally cannot be granted with an exercise price of less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of the grant for incentive stock options (110% of the fair market value on the date of the grant for employees that own 10% or more of Company stock). In the case of non-qualified stock options, the exercise price shall not be less than 85% of fair market value on the date of the grant. The term of the options granted under the Plans cannot be greater than 10 years. Options vest at varying rates for employees, directors and consultants.

 

Changes in Control Arrangements

 

No change in control arrangements existed at December 31, 2016.

 

 

 

24  
 

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Other than as listed below, we have not been a party to any significant transactions, proposed transactions, or series of transactions, and in which, to our knowledge, any of our directors, officers, five percent beneficial security holders, or any member of the immediate family of the foregoing persons has had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

 

Due to Dr. Carl Kukkonen

 

The Company has a payable of $640,000, at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 owed to Dr. Carl Kukkonen, CTO. Of the amount owed to Dr. Kukkonen, there is a cash component totaling $136,000 and a common stock component totaling $504,000. Dr. Kukkonen deferred a portion of his 2009, 2010 and 2011 stock awards and is entitled to the following unregistered shares of Company common stock at December 31, 2016: 11,195,707 shares for deferred 2009 compensation; 8,467,939 shares for deferred 2010 compensation; and 24,730,678 shares for deferred 2011 compensation. These shares have not been issued yet.

  

Loan Agreement with Dr. Kevin Schewe

 

Effective September 30, 2012, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Director Kevin Schewe whereby Dr. Schewe agreed to loan up to $1 million to the Company over a five-year period based on requests from the Company. The loans would be evidenced by a Secured Convertible Note. Each individual loan will accrue interest at 6% per annum and are secured by all assets of the Company. Each note would mature on the second anniversary of the issuance date of such note. Each note is convertible at Dr. Schewe’s request, into a fixed number of shares of the Company’s common stock based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty trading days prior to the issuance of the loan, less an 80% discount. In connection with the separation from VGE on September 30, 2012, Dr. Schewe was granted an irrevocable proxy that permits him to vote the Preferred Share, giving him the majority shareholder vote. As the controlling shareholder of the Company he has the ability to increase the number of authorized shares without additional shareholder approval. As such, if the outstanding balance on the loan was convertible into more shares than the Company has authorized, he has the ability to increase the authorized shares. As a result, the conversion feature is not deemed to be a derivative instrument subject to bifurcation. Schewe completed the funding of $1,000,000 on January 13, 2016 with a funding of $5,000.

 

On January 25, 2016, Schewe entered into a new Loan Agreement whereby he agreed to fund the Company an additional $300,000 over a one-year period. From January 14, 2016 through November 9, 2016, Dr. Schewe made loans of $300,000 to the Company and completed the funding. Including the loan of $5,000 on January 13, 2016, the Company recorded a discount on the loans of $300,000 as a result of a beneficial conversion feature, which will be amortized over the term of the note on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method. During 2016, Dr. Schewe converted loans totaling $305,000 into 655,714,285 common shares of the Company. At the time of the conversions, the company recorded the discount as additional interest expense. There are no loans outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had remaining availability under the note of $0.

 

Loan Agreement with Haris Basit

 

Effective November 30, 2016, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with CEO Haris Basit whereby Mr. Basit agreed to loan up to $100,000 to the Company over a two-year period based on requests from the Company. Each individual loan will accrue interest at 8% per annum. Each note would mature on the first anniversary of the issuance date of such note. Each note is convertible at Mr. Basit’s request, into a fixed number of shares of the Company’s common stock based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty trading days prior to the issuance of the loan, less an 80% discount. The Loan Agreement states that the Mr. Basit will not convert any loan into a number of shares that would exceed the number of available authorized common shares calculated as of the date of the conversion. As a result, the conversion feature is not deemed to be a derivative instrument subject to bifurcation.

 

From November 30, 2016 through December 31, 2016, Mr. Basit made loans of $25,000 to the Company. The Company recorded a discount on the loans of $25,000 as a result of a beneficial conversion feature, which will be amortized over the term of the note on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method. During 2016, Mr. Basit converted loans totaling $25,000 into 66,312,997 common shares of the Company. At the time of the conversions, the company recorded the discount as additional interest expense. There are $0 loans outstanding at December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had remaining availability under the note of $75,000.

  

Almaden Energy Group, LLC

 

On April 13, 2015, the Company entered into a Giant King Grass supply contract with Almaden Energy Group, LLC. (“AEG”). AEG is developing an animal feed project in the United States for the domestic and global market. The Company granted AEG a license to grow Giant King Grass only for animal feed, nursery and research purposes anywhere within the 48 contiguous United States. AEG is permitted to sell Giant King Grass anywhere in the world with the exception of the State of Hawaii. AEG will provide funding to the Company in return for the Company providing seedlings and technical support and training to establish the initial 25 acres plantation in Imperial County, CA. Twenty-six acres were leased of which 20 acres were planted in August 2015.

 

 

 

 

25  
 

 

At December 31, 2016, the Company has an 18.75% equity ownership in AEG and one designated board seat provided that the Company maintains an equity ownership position greater than 5%. At December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $14,000 as an Investment in AEG on its Balance Sheet under equity method of accounting (see Note 3).

 

Director Independence

 

Our BOD has determined that it currently has one member who qualifies as “independent” as the term is used in Item 407 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the SEC and in the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. - Marketplace Rule 4200. The independent director is: Ms. Angelina Galiteva.

   

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

    2016     2015  
Audit Fees – Hein & Associates LLP   $ 30,091     $ 71,389  
Audit Fees – MaloneBailey, LLP     18,000        
    $ 48,091     $ 71,389  

 

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-audit Services of Independent Auditors

 

Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence, our Audit Committee has the responsibility for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of the independent auditor. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditor.

 

Prior to engagement of the independent auditor for the next year’s audit, management will submit an aggregate of services expected to be rendered during that year for each of four categories of services to the Audit Committee for approval.

 

  1. Audit services include audit work performed in the preparation of financial statements, as well as work that generally only the independent auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, including comfort letters, statutory audits, and attest services and consultation regarding financial accounting and/or reporting standards.

 

  2. Audit-Related services are for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor, including due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, employee benefit plan audits, and special procedures required to meet certain regulatory requirements.

 

  3. Tax services include all services performed by the independent auditor's tax personnel except those services specifically related to the audit of the financial statements, and includes fees in the areas of tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice.

 

  4. Other Fees are those associated with services not captured in the other categories.

 

Prior to the engagement, the Audit Committee pre-approves these services by category of service. The fees are budgeted and the Audit Committee requires the independent auditor and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year by category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent auditor for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging the independent auditor.

 

The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

 

 

 

 

26  
 

 

  

PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

Exhibit Number   Description of Exhibit
3.1 (i)   Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Company’s SB-2 Registration Statement filed on November 21, 2003).
3.2 (i)   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated August 3, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Item 5.03 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 9, 2005).
3.3 (i)   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated May 9, 2005 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).
3.4 (i)   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated June 1, 2005 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).
3.5 (i)   Articles of Merger between Global-Wide Publication Ltd. and ViaSpace Technologies LLC dated June 17, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).
3.6 (i)   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated October 12, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Item 5.03 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 17, 2006).
3.7 (i)   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated December 7, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 13, 2007).
3.8 (i)   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated February 14, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 21, 2008).
3.9 (i)   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated December 31, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 3, 2014).
3.9 (j)   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated August 5, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 10, 2015).
3.9 (k)   Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated December 8, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 10, 2015).
3.1 (ii)   Bylaws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s SB-2 Registration Statement filed on November 21, 2003).
3.2 (ii)   Amendment to Bylaws of the Company December 7, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 13, 2007).
3.3   Certificate of Designation dated May 14, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 18, 2010).
10.1   VIASPACE Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan dated October 20, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2005).
10.1A   Amendment to 2005 Stock Incentive Plan dated May 18, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2006).
10.1B   Amendment to 2005 Stock Incentive Plan dated December 7, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2007).
10.1C   Amendment to 2005 Stock Incentive Plan dated February 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 21, 2008).
10.1D   Amendment to 2005 Stock Incentive Plan dated February 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K/A filed on April 4, 2008).
10.1E   VIASPACE Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan dated August 5, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 10, 2015).
10.2   VIASPACE Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Option Plan dated October 20, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2005).
10.3   VIASPACE Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Director Option Plan dated February 13, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 16, 2006).
10.4   Compensation Package for Outside Members of the Board Directors of VIASPACE Inc. dated October 20, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2005).
10.5   2006 Compensation Package for Outside Members of the Board of Directors of VIASPACE Inc. dated February 13, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 16, 2006).
10.6   Service and Support Agreement dated February 28, 2008 between the Company and E2 Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 5, 2008).

 

 

 

27  
 

 

Exhibit Number   Description of Exhibit
10.7   Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 21, 2008 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc., Sung Hsien Chang and China Gate Technology Co. Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 27, 2008).
10.8   Shareholders Agreement dated October 21, 2008 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc., and Sung Hsien Chang (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 27, 2008).
10.9   Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 22, 2009 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc., Sung Hsien Chang and China Gate Technology Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 26, 2009).
10.10   Amendment No. 2 to Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 21, 2009 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc., Sung Hsien Chang and China Gate Technology Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 25, 2009).
10.11   Amendment No. 3 to Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 21, 2009 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc., Sung Hsien Chang and China Gate Technology Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-Q filed November 16, 2009).
10.12   Amendment No. 4 to Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 21, 2009 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. and Sung Hsien Chang (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 23, 2009).
10.13   Amendment No. 5 to Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 25, 2009 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. and Sung Hsien Chang (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 30, 2009).
10.14   Amendment No. 6 to Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 18, 2009 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. and Sung Hsien Chang (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 21, 2009).
10.15   Share Purchase Agreement dated April 16, 2010 by and among the Registrant and Sung Hsien Chang (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 20, 2010).
10.16   Amendment to Share Purchase Agreement dated May 14, 2010 by and among Registrant, Sung Chang, certain other VGE shareholders and the other parties set forth therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 18, 2010).
10.17   Security Agreement dated May 14, 2010 by and between the Registrant and Sung Chang (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 18, 2010).
10.18   Stock Pledge Agreement dated May 14, 2010 by and between the Registrant and Sung Chang (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 18, 2010).
10.19   Registration Rights Agreement dated May 14, 2010 by and between the Registrant and Chang (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 18, 2010).
10.20   Secured Promissory Note dated May 14, 2010 by and between Registrant and Chang (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 18, 2010).
10.20A   Amendment to Secured Promissory Note dated May 16, 2011 by and between Registrant and Chang (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 16, 2011).
10.21   Recapitalization Agreement dated September 30, 2012 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. (“VGE”), Sung Chang, Changs LLC, Carl Kukkonen and Stephen Muzi (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 5, 2012).
10.22   Supply License and Commercialization Agreement dated September 30, 2012 by and among the Registrant and VGE (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 5, 2012).
10.23   Loan Agreement dated September 30, 2012 by and between the Registrant and Dr. Kevin Schewe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 5, 2012).
10.24   Form of Secured Convertible Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.04 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 5, 2012).
10.24A   Amendment to Form of Secured Convertible Note dated October 28, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014).
10.25   Security Agreement dated September 30, 2012 by and between the Registrant and Dr. Kevin Schewe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.05 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 5, 2012).
10.26   Mutual Limited Release dated September 30, 2012 by and among the Registrant, VGE, Schewe, Kukkonen, Muzi, Chang and the other parties listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.06 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 5, 2012).
10.27   Lock-up Agreement dated September 30, 2012 by and among VIASPACE and the other parties listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.07 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 5, 2012).
10.28   Kukkonen Employment Agreement dated October 10, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 11, 2012).

 

 

28  
 

 

Exhibit Number   Description of Exhibit
10.28A   Kukkonen Employment Agreement dated October 9, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 11, 2013).
10.28B   Kukkonen Employment Agreement dated October 28, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014).
10.28C   Amendment to Kukkonen Employment Agreement dated June 22, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 23, 2015).
10.28D   Kukkonen Employment Agreement dated October 8, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 14, 2015).
10.28E   Kukkonen Employment Agreement dated May 13, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 17, 2016).
10.28F   Kukkonen Employment Agreement dated October 24, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 25, 2016).
10.29   Muzi Employment Agreement dated October 10, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 11, 2012).
10.29A   Muzi Employment Agreement dated October 9, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 11, 2013).
10.29B   Muzi Employment Agreement dated October 28, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014).
10.29C   Muzi Employment Agreement dated September 24, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 30, 2015).
10.29D   Muzi Employment Agreement dated October 24, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 25, 2016).
10.30   Kukkonen, Muzi and Galiteva Lock Up Agreement dated October 10, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 11, 2012).
10.31   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated October 23, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 23, 2012).
10.32   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated November 27, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 29, 2012).
10.33   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 31, 2012).
10.34   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated January 30, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 31, 2013).
10.35   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated February 25, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 25, 2013).
10.36   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated March 28, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 1, 2013).
10.37   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated April 25, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 30, 2013).
10.38   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated May 29, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 31, 2013).
10.39   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated June 24, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 25, 2013).
10.40   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated July 29, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 31, 2013).
10.41   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated August 28, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 29, 2013).
10.42   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated September 24, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 26, 2013).
10.43   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated October 25, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 28, 2013).
10.44   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated January 29, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 31, 2014).
10.45   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated February 26, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 27, 2014).
10.46   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated March 19, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 19, 2014).
10.47   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated April 23, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 24, 2014).
10.48   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated May 21, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 22, 2014).

 

 

29  
 

 

Exhibit Number   Description of Exhibit
10.49   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated June 20, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 20, 2014).
10.50   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated July 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 18, 2014).
10.51   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated August 20, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 20, 2014).
10.52   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated September 23, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 23, 2014).
10.53   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated October 29, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014).
10.54   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated November 6, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 6, 2014).
10.55   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated December 9, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 9, 2014).
10.56   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated January 21, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 22, 2015).
10.57   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated February 19, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 19, 2015).
10.58   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated March 25, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 25, 2015).
10.59   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated April 14, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 15, 2015).
10.60   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Haris Basit dated April 14, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 17, 2015).
10.61   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Asad Cochinwala dated April 14, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 17, 2015).
10.62   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated May 26, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 26, 2015).
10.63   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated June 25, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 25, 2015).
10.64   Haris Basit Employment Agreement dated July 10, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 15, 2015).
10.65   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated July 14, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 14, 2015).
10.66   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated July 28, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 29, 2015).
10.67   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Lajpat Rai dated July 31, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 5, 2015).
10.68   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated August 19, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 19, 2015).
10.69   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Lajpat Rai dated August 20, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 21, 2015).
10.70   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated September 2, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 8, 2015).
10.71   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated September 25, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 25, 2015).
10.72   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Mark Monahan dated October 6, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 8, 2015).
10.73   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated November 9, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 10, 2015).
10.74   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Dr. Carl Kukkonen dated November 9, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 10, 2015).
10.75   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated November 23, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 25, 2015).
10.76   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated December 22, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2015).
10.77   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Dr. Carl Kukkonen dated December 22, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2015).

 

 

 

30  
 

 

Exhibit Number   Description of Exhibit
10.78   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated January 13, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 20, 2016).
10.79   Loan Agreement dated January 25, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Dr. Kevin Schewe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 28, 2016).
10.80   Security Agreement dated January 25, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Dr. Kevin Schewe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 28, 2016).
10.81   Form of Secured Convertible Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 28, 2016).
10.82   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated January 25, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 28, 2016).
10.83   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated February 26, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 2, 2016).
10.84   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Dr. Carl Kukkonen dated February 26, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 2, 2016).
10.85   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Almaden Energy Group, LLC dated February 25, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 2, 2016).
10.86   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated March 28, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 28, 2016).
10.87   Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Dr. Carl Kukkonen dated March 28, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 28, 2016).
10.88   Global Supply, License, and Commercialization Agreement dated as of March 28, 2016 by and among the Registrant, VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. and Guangzhou Inter-Pacific Arts Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 8, 2016).
10.89   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated April 12, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 14, 2016).
10.90   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated May 4, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 10, 2016).
10.91   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated May 12, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 17, 2016).
10.92   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated May 31, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 3, 2016).
10.93   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated June 9, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 14, 2016).
10.94   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated July 14, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 19, 2016).
10.95   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated July 26, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 1, 2016).
10.96   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated August 26, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 30, 2016).
10.97   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated September 19, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 22, 2016).
10.98   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated October 24, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 25, 2016).
10.99   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated November 9, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 14, 2016).
10.100   Loan Agreement dated November 30, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Haris Basit (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 2, 2016).
10.101   Form of Secured Convertible Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 2, 2016).
10.102   Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note between Registrant and Haris Basit dated November 30, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 2, 2016).

14.1

  VIASPACE Inc. Code of Ethics for Senior Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers dated October 20, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2005).

 

 

31  
 

 

Exhibit Number   Description of Exhibit
21   * List of subsidiaries of Company.
23.1   * Consent of Hein & Associates LLP dated March 31, 2017.
23.2   * Consent of MaloneBailey LLP dated March 31, 2017.
31.1   * Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2   * Certification of President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32   * Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS   * XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH   * XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL   * XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF   * XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB   * XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE   * XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

__________

* Filed herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32  
 

 

Signatures

 

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 31, 2017.

 

  VIASPACE INC.
  (Registrant)
   
By:    /s/ HARIS BASIT
  Name: Haris Basit
  Title: Chief Executive Officer
  (Principal Executive Officer and Director)
   
By:   /s/ STEPHEN J. MUZI
  Name: Stephen J. Muzi
  Title: Chief Financial Officer
  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

SIGNATURE   TITLE   DATE
         
/s/ HARIS BASIT   Chief Executive Officer   March 31, 2017
Haris Basit   (Principal Executive Officer and Director)    
         
/s/ STEPHEN J. MUZI   Chief Financial Officer   March 31, 2017
Stephen J. Muzi   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)    
         
/s/ CARL KUKKONEN   Chief Technology Officer and Director   March 31, 2017
Carl Kukkonen        
         
/s/ ANGELINA GALITEVA   Director   March 31, 2017
Angelina Galiteva        
         
/s/ KEVIN L. SCHEWE   Director   March 31, 2017
Kevin L. Schewe        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33  
 

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

VIASPACE INC.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  PAGE
   
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS F-2 and F-3
   
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015  
   
Balance Sheets F-4
Statements of Operations F-5
Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit F-6
Statements of Cash Flows F-7
Notes to Financial Statements F-8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F- 1  
 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

VIASPACE Inc.


We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of VIASPACE Inc. as of December 31, 2015, and the related statement of operations, shareholders' deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of VIASPACE Inc. as of December 31, 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

The accompanying financial statements were prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and its total liabilities exceed its total assets. Recurring losses have resulted in an accumulated deficit of $52,247,000 as of December 31, 2015. The Company expects such losses to continue. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters also are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ Hein & Associates LLP

 

Hein & Associates LLP

Irvine, California

April 14, 2016

 

 

 

F- 2  
 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Stockholders

VIASPACE, Inc.

 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of VIASPACE, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the entity’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of VIASPACE, Inc. as of December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

Houston, Texas

March 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F- 3  
 

 

VIASPACE INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

    December 31, 2016     December 31, 2015  
ASSETS                
CURRENT ASSETS:                
Cash and equivalents   $ 19,000     $ 10,000  
Accounts receivable           41,000  
Prepaid expenses     14,000       69,000  
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS     33,000       120,000  
                 
OTHER ASSETS:                
Investment in Almaden Energy Group     14,000       40,000  
Other assets     2,000       2,000  
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS     16,000       42,000  
                 
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 49,000     $ 162,000  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT                
CURRENT LIABILITIES:                
Accounts payable   $ 68,000     $ 93,000  
Accrued expenses     29,000       73,000  
Unearned revenue     20,000       47,000  
Related party payables     640,000       656,000  
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES     757,000       869,000  
                 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10)                
                 
SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:                
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value in 2016 and 2015, 10,000,000 shares authorized, one share of Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding in 2016 and 2015            
Common stock, $0.0001 par value in 2016 and 2015, 3,900,000,000 shares authorized, 2,919,472,132 shares issued and 2,819,472,132 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016, and 1,995,451,343 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015     282,000       200,000  
Additional paid in capital     52,458,000       51,340,000  
Accumulated deficit     (53,448,000 )     (52,247,000 )
Total shareholders’ deficit     (708,000 )     (707,000 )
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT   $ 49,000     $ 162,000  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

F- 4  
 

 

VIASPACE INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  

    Years Ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
REVENUES   $ 183,000     $ 170,000  
REVENUES FROM RELATED PARTY     22,000       18,000  
TOTAL REVENUES     205,000       188,000  
COST OF REVENUES     58,000       87,000  
GROSS PROFIT     147,000       101,000  
                 
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Operations     36,000       61,000  
Selling, general and administrative     984,000       1,376,000  
Total operating expenses     1,020,000       1,437,000  
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS     (873,000 )     (1,336,000 )
                 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                
Interest expense     (333,000 )     (710,000 )
Other expense     (27,000 )     (44,000 )
Other income     32,000       84,000  
Total other expense     (328,000 )     (670,000 )
                 
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES     (1,201,000 )     (2,006,000 )
Income taxes            
NET LOSS   $ (1,201,000 )   $ (2,006,000 )
                 
LOSS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK — Basic and diluted   $ *     $ *  
                 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING — Basic and diluted     2,433,356,365       1,704,277,945  

__________

* Less than $0.01 per common share.

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

 

F- 5  
 

 

VIASPACE INC.

STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

 

    Common Stock     Additional
Paid in
    Accumulated     Total Shareholders’  
    Shares     Amount     Capital     Deficit     Deficit  
BALANCE, January 1, 2015     1,562,431,607     $ 1,562,000     $ 48,115,000     $ (50,241,000 )   $ (564,000 )
                                         
Shares issued for consulting services     10,991,009       11,000       83,000             94,000  
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt                 709,000             709,000  
Stock issued upon conversion of note payable     321,767,290       202,000       186,000             388,000  
Stock issued upon purchase of common shares     80,975,723       82,000       118,000             200,000  
Stock issued to officer at discount     19,285,714       6,000       33,000             39,000  
Non cash compensation related to stock options                   433,000             433,000  
Par value adjustment           (1,663,000 )     1,663,000              
Net loss                       (2,006,000 )     (2,006,000 )
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2015     1,995,451,343     $ 200,000     $ 51,340,000     $ (52,247,000 )   $ (707,000 )
                                         
Shares issued for consulting services     1,636,364             4,000             4,000  
Reclass earned consultant shares     30,000,000       3,000       146,000             149,000  
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt                 330,000             330,000  
Stock issued upon conversion of note payable     722,027,282       72,000       258,000             330,000  
Stock issued to related parties upon purchase of common shares     66,785,714       7,000       37,000             44,000  
Stock issued to non-related parties upon purchase of common shares     3,571,429             5,000             5,000  
Non cash compensation related to stock options                 247,000             247,000  
Non cash stock compensation expense related to stock issued to related parties                 91,000             91,000  
Net loss                         (1,201,000 )     (1,201,000 )
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2016     2,819,472,132     $ 282,000     $ 52,458,000     $ (53,448,000 )   $ (708,000 )

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

 

F- 6  
 

 

VIASPACE INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

    Years Ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                
Net loss   $ (1,201,000 )   $ (2,006,000 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:                
Stock option and stock compensation     338,000       463,000  
Amortization of prepaid expenses     139,000       268,000  
Stock issued for expense     4,000       4,000  
Amortization of debt discount     330,000       709,000  
Loss (gain) on minority investment in Almaden Energy Group     25,000       (40,000 )
Decrease (increase) in:                
Accounts receivable     41,000       (41,000 )
Prepaid expenses     65,000       103,000  
Increase (decrease) in:                
Accounts payable     (25,000 )     35,000  
Accrued expenses and other     (43,000 )     1,000  
Unearned revenue     (27,000 )     (18,000 )
Related party payables     (16,000 )     16,000  
Net cash used in operating activities     (370,000 )     (506,000 )
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                
Net cash used in investing activities            
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
Proceeds from convertible notes payable- related party     330,000       388,000  
Stock issued for investment by related parties     44,000       9,000  
Stock issued for investment by non-related parties     5,000       200,000  
Payments on financed insurance           (94,000 )
Net cash provided by financing activities     379,000       503,000  
                 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS     9,000       (3,000 )
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of year     10,000       13,000  
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, End of year   $ 19,000     $ 10,000  
                 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:                
Cash paid during the period for:                
Interest   $     $  
Income taxes   $     $  

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Activities for 2015 :

 

  · The Company issued 40,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for future services valued at $239,000. $90,000 of this amount representing 10,000,000 shares was recorded at issuance as prepaid expenses valued at $90,000. The remaining 30,000,000 shares with a value of $149,000 was not recorded to prepaid expenses since the shares were unvested at December 31, 2015.  The shares are not recorded for accounting purposes until they are vested.
  · The Company recorded a discount on the loans from Dr. Schewe of $709,000 as a result of a beneficial conversion feature. During 2015, Dr. Schewe converted loans of $388,000 to equity.
  · The Company financed its annual director and officer insurance premium in the amount of $93,000.

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Activities for 2016 :

 

  · The Company issued 100,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for future funding source but was not recorded to prepaid expenses since the shares were not cleared at December 31, 2016. 
  · The Company cleared 30,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for future services valued at $149,000.
  · The Company recorded a discount on the loans from Dr. Schewe and Haris Basit of $330,000 as a result of a beneficial conversion feature. During 2016, Dr. Schewe and Haris Basit converted loans of $330,000 to equity.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

 

F- 7  
 

 

VIASPACE INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

 

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Description of Business – VIASPACE Inc. (“we”, “us”, “VIASPACE”, or the “Company”) was founded in July 1998. Its business involves renewable energy and is based on biomass, in particular our license to a dedicated energy crop with the trademark “Giant King ® Grass” (“GKG”). Through a sublicense for GKG we obtained from Guangzhou Inter-Pacific Arts Corp., a Chinese wholly-owned foreign enterprise registered in Guangdong province ("IPA China") which owned by VIASPACE Green Energy Inc. (“VGE”), we are able to commercialize GKG throughout the world, except for the People’s Republic of China (“China”) and the Republic of China (“Taiwan”).

 

GKG can be burned in 100% biomass power plants to generate electricity; made into pellets that can be burned together with coal to reduce carbon emissions from existing power plants; generate bio methane through anaerobic digestion, and can be used as a feedstock for low carbon liquid biofuels for transportation, biochemicals and bio plastics. Cellulosic ethanol, bio butanol and other liquid cellulosic biofuels, do not use corn or other food sources as feedstock. GKG can also be used as animal feed. GKG and other plants absorb and store carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as they grow. When they are burned, they release the carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere, but it is the same carbon dioxide that was removed from the atmosphere, and so this process is carbon neutral. Small amounts of fossil fuel are used by the farm equipment, transportation of GKG and fertilizer, so that the overall process of growing and burning GKG probably has some net carbon dioxide emissions, but much lower emissions than burning coal or other fossil fuels directly to create the same amount of energy. GKG has been independently tested by customers and been shown to have excellent energy content, high bio methane production, and the cellulosic sugar content needed for biofuels and biochemicals.

 

Going Concern – The Company has incurred significant losses from operations, resulting in an accumulated deficit of $53,448,000. The Company expects such losses to continue. However, on September 30, 2012, as discussed in Note 5, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Dr. Kevin Schewe, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, whereby Dr. Schewe agreed to fund the Company up to $1,000,000 over a five-year period in accordance with such agreement. Schewe completed the funding of $1,000,000 on January 13, 2016. On January 25, 2016, Schewe entered into a new Loan Agreement whereby he agreed to fund the Company an additional $300,000 over a one-year period. Dr. Schewe completed the funding of $300,000 on November 9, 2016. On November 30, 2016, the Company entered in a Loan Agreement with CEO Haris Basit whereby he agreed to fund the Company $100,000 over a two-year period. The Company expects loans from Mr. Basit and revenue generated from future contracts using the sublicense it has for Giant King Grass to fund operations for the foreseeable future. However, no assurance can be given that Mr. Basit will continue to fund the Company or that sales contracts will be obtained in the future, or if they are obtained, that they will be profitable. Accordingly, there continues to be substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any other adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

 

Basis of Presentation – The accompanying audited financial statements of the Company were prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) for financial information and with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) instructions to Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain reclassifications were made to the December 31, 2015 financial statements to conform to the December 31, 2016 financial statement presentation.

 

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of the Financial Statements – The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with US GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents – The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2016 or 2015.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Trade accounts receivable are presented at face value, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for balances that appear to have specific collection issues. The collection process is based on the age of the invoice and requires attempted contacts with the customer at specified intervals. If, after a specified number of days, the Company has been unsuccessful in its collection efforts, a bad debt allowance is recorded for the balance in question. Delinquent accounts receivable are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts once uncollectibility has been determined. The factors considered in reaching this determination are the apparent financial condition of the customer and the Company’s success in contacting and negotiating with the customer. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

 

 

 

 

F- 8  
 

 

Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability approach, where deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

 

The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes using a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. An uncertain tax position is considered effectively settled on completion of an examination by a taxing authority if certain other conditions are satisfied. Should the Company incur interest and penalties relating to tax uncertainties, such amounts would be classified as a component of interest expense, net and other income (expense), net, respectively.

  

Revenue Recognition – The Company has four revenue models for GKG: 1. grass plantation integrated with a power plant or processing facility such as a pellet mill under company or joint venture control; 2. contract plantation establishment, support and licensing for a customer that owns and operates the plantation and power plant; 3. collaborative agreements to establish a test plot in the customer’s location to determine that GKG grows sufficiently for the customer to use in their particular application; and 4. consulting agreement services for customers considering the establishment of a grass plantation in their particular country or location. Revenue earned from collaborative agreements is comprised of negotiated payments for the operations of the test plots. Deferred revenue represents payments received which are related to future performance. For the year ending December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has recognized revenues under revenue models 3 and 4.

 

With regard to revenue recognition in connection with agreements that include multiple deliverables, management reviews the relevant terms of the agreements and determines whether such deliverables should be accounted for as a single unit of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC 605-25, Multiple-Element Arrangements. If it is determined that the items do not have stand-alone value, then such deliverables are accounted for as a single unit of accounting and any payments received pursuant to such agreement, including any upfront or development milestone payments and any payments received for support services, will be deferred and included in deferred revenue within our balance sheet until such time as management can estimate when all of such deliverables will be delivered, if ever. Management reviews and reevaluates such conclusions as each item in the arrangement is delivered and circumstances of the development arrangement change.

 

Major Customers – A relatively small number of customers account for a significant percentage of the Company’s sales. Five customers represented 100% of revenues for the year ending December 31, 2015 and three customers represented 100% of revenues for the year ending December 31, 2016.

 

Stock Based Compensation VIASPACE has a stock-based compensation plan. The Company has adopted the accounting and disclosure provisions of “Share-Based Payments”, codified in FASB ASC Topic 718, using the modified prospective application transition method. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values using the modified prospective transition method. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards to employees and directors on the date of grant using an option pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite services periods on a straight-line basis in the Company’s Statements of Operations. The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 505-50, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services” and “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other than Employees”. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of: (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor's performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 505-50, an asset acquired for the issuance of fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments should not be presented or classified as an offset to equity on the grantor's balance sheet once the equity instrument is granted for accounting purposes. Accordingly, the Company records the fair value of the fully vested, non-forfeitable common stock issued for future consulting services as prepaid expenses in its balance sheet.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

 

Under the provisions of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), there are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company had no Level 1 assets or liabilities during any period presented.

 

Level 2. Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company had no Level 2 assets or liabilities during any period presented.

 

 

 

 

F- 9  
 

 

Level 3. Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of assets or liabilities. The Company had no Level 3 assets or liabilities during any period presented.

 

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses, trade payables and accrued expenses, payables to related parties and deferred revenue approximates fair value due to the short period of time to maturity.

  

Net Income (Loss) Per Share The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with “Earnings per Share”, codified in FASB ASC Topic 260. Under the provisions of this topic, basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common shareholders for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

 

Research and Development – The Company did not record any research and development activities in 2016 or 2015. If we do in the future, it will be expensed as incurred.

 

Joint Venture - The Company entered into a joint venture with Corporacion Agricola, S.A. (“Agricorp”), a Nicaragua company, and formed Energia Reino Verde, S.A. (“ERV”) on January 30, 2014. The Company was granted an equity interest of 50% of outstanding shares of ERV for $0 on December 9, 2014. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the net assets of ERV were immaterial. The Company has accounted for their investment under the equity method and at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the investment was recorded at $0. Future plans are that ERV will own and operate a 12 MW biomass power plant that will be co-located with the 834 hectare (2,060 acre) Giant King ® Grass plantation project in Nicaragua.

 

Recent Accounting Standards In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance regarding the accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. In April 2016, May 2016 and December 2016, the FASB issued additional guidance, addressed implementation issues and provided technical corrections. The guidance may be applied retrospectively or using a modified retrospective approach to adjust retained earnings (deficit). The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our financial statements.

 

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entities Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15). The guidance in ASU 2014-15 sets forth management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern as well as required disclosures. ASU 2014-15 indicates that, when preparing financial statements for interim and annual financial statements, management should evaluate whether conditions or events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This evaluation should include consideration of conditions and events that are either known or are reasonably knowable at the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued, as well as whether it is probable that management's plans to address the substantial doubt will be implemented and, if so, whether it is probable that the plans will alleviate the substantial doubt. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods and annual periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

Subsequent Events – We have evaluated events and transactions subsequent to the balance sheet date. Based on this evaluation, we are not aware of any events or transactions (other than those disclosed in Note 11) that occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date but prior to filing that would require recognition or disclosure in our financial statements.

 

NOTE 2 – PREPAID EXPENSES

 

The Company has entered into agreements with certain of its consultants and vendors whereby the Company issued registered shares of its common stock under an existing registration statement on Form S-8 as well as unregistered shares of common stock in exchange for services to be provided to the Company. The Company has engaged a third party provider to pay certain expenses of the Company on behalf of the Company. As compensation for the payment of these expenses on behalf of the Company, the Company pays the provider in shares of common stock equivalent to the expense paid plus a fee equal to 15% of the expense paid. In 2015, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for future services valued at $90,000. In 2016, the Company issued 100,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for future services valued at $225,000. The Company cleared 30,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for future services valued at $149,000. As of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, included in prepaid expenses for this third-party provider is $13,000 and $3,000, respectively, for shares of stock issued to the provider in excess of amounts paid on the Company’s behalf. For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded $149,000 and $272,000, respectively, of stock related expenses.

 

 

F- 10  
 

 

Other prepaid expenses (non-stock related) were $1,000 and $66,000 at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

 

Note 3 – Investment in Almaden Energy Group

 

The investment in Almaden Energy Group, LLC (“AEG”) represents an 18.75% interest in that company’s outstanding member units which became effective April 15, 2015. The Company originally accounted for this investment by the cost method because the member units of that company is unlisted and the criteria for using the equity method of accounting are not satisfied as the Company is not able to exercise significant influence over AEG. However, upon the Company hiring the CEO of AEG as its CEO in July 2015, the Company changed the method of its investment in AEG to the equity method. Dividends are recognized in income when declared and totaled $0 for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2016. The carrying value of the investment is $14,000 and $40,000 as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. We recorded other expense of approximately $27,000 in the Company’s Statements of Operation during the year ended December 31, 2016, related to a loss on investment in AEG. See Note 9 for additional related party transactions with AEG.

   

NOTE 4 – STOCK OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND ISSUED STOCKS

 

VIASPACE Inc. 2005 and 2015 Stock Incentive Plans

 

On October 20, 2005, the BOD of the Company adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) including the 2005 Non-Employee Director Option Program (the “2005 Director Plan”). The Plan is designed to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants of the Company through awarding incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other awards. The Plan was also approved by the holders of a majority of the Company’s common stock. The Plan originally provided for issuance of up to 28,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On February 13, 2006, the BOD approved the 2006 Non-Employee Director Option Program (the “2006 Director Plan”) replacing the 2005 Director Plan and the 2006 Director Plan was approved by the holders of a majority of the Company’s common stock. On July 12, 2006, the Company filed a Form S-8 Registration Statement with the SEC registering 28,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On February 14, 2008, the BOD and the holders of a majority of the Company’s common stock approved an amendment to the Plan which increased the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be issued in the Plan to 99,000,000 shares. On April 30, 2008, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 registering 71,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, effective January 1, 2009 and each January 1 thereafter during the term of the Plan, the maximum number of shares under the Plan are to be increased so that the maximum number of shares is equivalent to 30% of the total number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on the immediately preceding December 31. On February 4, 2009, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 registering 146,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 31, 2008.

 

On August 5, 2015, the BOD of the Company adopted the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (the “New Plan”) reserving 800,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance. The New Plan is designed to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants of the Company through awarding incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other awards. On August 5, 2015, the New Plan was also approved by the holders of a majority of the Company’s common stock. The Company has not filed a Form S-8 Registration Statement with the SEC for the New Plan as of December 31, 2016.

 

The Company’s BOD administers the Plan, selects the individuals to whom options will be granted, determines the number of options to be granted, and the term and exercise price of each option. Stock options granted pursuant to the terms of the Plans generally cannot be granted with an exercise price of less than 100% of the fair market value on the grant date. The term of the options granted under the Plan cannot be greater than 10 years. The vesting term is determined by the BOD.

 

The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model has assumptions for risk free interest rates, dividends, stock volatility and expected life of an option grant. The risk free interest rate is based upon market yields for United States Treasury debt securities at a maturity near the term remaining on the option. Dividend rates are based on the Company’s dividend history. The stock volatility factor is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The expected life of an option grant is based on management’s estimate as no options have been exercised in the Plan to date. The Company calculated a forfeiture rate for employees and directors based on historical information. A forfeiture rate of 0% is used for options granted to employees, directors and consultants. The fair value of each option grant to employees, directors and consultants is calculated by the Black-Scholes method and is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of each stock option award.

 

 

 

F- 11  
 

 

For stock options issued to employees, director and consultants for 2016 and 2015, the fair value was estimated at the date of grant using the following range of assumptions: 

 

    2016     2015  
Risk free interest rate     1.27% - 2.34%       1.80% - 2.12%  
Dividends     0%       0%  
Volatility factor     132.88% - 139.28%       130.65% - 132.00%  
Expected life     6.67 years       6.67 years  
Annual forfeiture rate     0%       0%  

  

The following table summarizes activity for employees and directors in the Company’s Plan and New Plan at December 31, 2016:

 

    Number of
Shares
    Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price Per
Share
    Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term In Years
    Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015     183,230,000     $ 0.0038                  
Granted     197,500,000       0.0019                  
Exercised                            
Cancelled and forfeited                            
Outstanding at December 31, 2016     380,730,000     $ 0.0028       9.10     $  
Exercisable at December 31, 2016     236,649,000     $ 0.0033       8.69     $  

  

During 2016, stock options totaling 197,500,000 were granted. At December 31, 2016, there were 517,547,000 shares available for future grant. The Plan recorded $247,000 of compensation expense for employees and director stock options in 2016. At December 31, 2016, there was $261,000 of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements under the Plan that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately one year and nine months. At December 31, 2016, the fair value of options vested for employees and directors was $308,000. There were no options exercised during 2016.

 

During 2016, the Company issued 1,636,364 unregistered shares of common stock to a consultant for services provided to the Company. These share issuances were recorded at approximately $4,000 which is the fair market value determined by the price of the Company’s common stock trading on the OTC Markets on the date of grant.

 

NOTE 5 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTY

 

Loan Agreement with Dr. Kevin Schewe

 

Effective September 30, 2012, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Director Kevin Schewe whereby Dr. Schewe agreed to loan up to $1 million to the Company over a five-year period based on requests from the Company. The loans would be evidenced by a Secured Convertible Note. Each individual loan will accrue interest at 6% per annum and are secured by all assets of the Company. Each note would mature on the second anniversary of the issuance date of such note. Each note is convertible at Dr. Schewe’s request, into a fixed number of shares of the Company’s common stock based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty trading days prior to the issuance of the loan, less an 80% discount. In connection with the separation from VGE on September 30, 2012, Dr. Schewe was granted an irrevocable proxy that permits him to vote the Preferred Share, giving him the majority shareholder vote. As the controlling shareholder of the Company he has the ability to increase the number of authorized shares without additional shareholder approval. As such, if the outstanding balance on the loan was convertible into more shares than the Company has authorized, he has the ability to increase the authorized shares. As a result, the conversion feature is not deemed to be a derivative instrument subject to bifurcation. Schewe completed the funding of $1,000,000 on January 13, 2016 with a funding of $5,000.

 

On January 25, 2016, Schewe entered into a new Loan Agreement whereby he agreed to fund the Company an additional $300,000 over a one-year period. From January 14, 2016 through November 9, 2016, Dr. Schewe made loans of $300,000 to the Company and completed the funding. Including the loan of $5,000 on January 13, 2016, the Company recorded a discount on the loans of $300,000 as a result of a beneficial conversion feature, which will be amortized over the term of the note on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method. During 2016, Dr. Schewe converted loans totaling $305,000 into 655,714,285 common shares of the Company. At the time of the conversions, the company recorded the discount as additional interest expense. There are no loans outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had remaining availability under the note of $0.

 

Loan Agreement with Haris Basit

 

Effective November 30, 2016, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with CEO Haris Basit whereby Mr. Basit agreed to loan up to $100,000 to the Company over a two-year period based on requests from the Company. Each individual loan will accrue interest at 8% per annum. Each note would mature on the first anniversary of the issuance date of such note. Each note is convertible at Mr. Basit’s request, into a fixed number of shares of the Company’s common stock based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty trading days prior to the issuance of the loan, less an 80% discount. The Loan Agreement states that the Mr. Basit will not convert any loan into a number of shares that would exceed the number of available authorized common shares calculated as of the date of the conversion. As a result, the conversion feature is not deemed to be a derivative instrument subject to bifurcation.

 

 

F- 12  
 

 

From November 30, 2016 through December 31, 2016, Mr. Basit made loans of $25,000 to the Company. The Company recorded a discount on the loans of $25,000 as a result of a beneficial conversion feature, which will be amortized over the term of the note on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method. During 2016, Mr. Basit converted loans totaling $25,000 into 66,312,997 common shares of the Company. At the time of the conversions, the company recorded the discount as additional interest expense. There are $0 loans outstanding at December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had remaining availability under the note of $75,000.

 

NOTE 6 – SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

Preferred Stock

 

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the number of authorized shares of the Company’s preferred stock was 10,000,000. The par value of the preferred stock is $0.0001.

 

At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there is one share of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding.

  

Common Stock

 

As of January 1, 2016, the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock was 3,900,000,000. The par value of the common stock is $0.0001.

 

During 2016 and 2015, the Company issued 100,000,000 and 40,000,000 unregistered restricted shares of common stock respectively to a funding source so that the funding source can pay for future expenses on behalf of the Company. The shares are issued to the funding source to cover the amount of future expenses plus a fee of 15% of such future expenses. At the time of the future payment of the expenses incurred by the Company, the common stock and additional paid in capital are credited for the amount of the future payment plus 15%. During the period ending December 31, 2016 there is no accounting impact from this transaction because the shares remain in the Company's possession.

 

On February 24, 2016, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with Almaden Energy Group, LLC (“AEG”) in which AEG agreed to purchase 12,500,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.0016 per share for $20,000. The purchase price per share was equal to 50% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of the investment. Mr. Basit is CEO of the Company and of AEG, a customer of the Company as discussed in Note 9. The Company issued such common stock on the date of such Subscription Agreement.

 

On February 26, 2016, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with Dr. Kukkonen, CTO of the Company, to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.0006 per share for $3,000. The purchase price per share was equal to 20% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of the investment. The Company issued such common stock on the date of such Subscription Agreement.

 

On March 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with Dr. Kukkonen, CTO of the Company, to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.0006 per share for $3,000. The purchase price per share was equal to 20% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of the investment. The Company issued such common stock on the date of such Subscription Agreement.

 

On June 6, 2016, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with the Carl Kukkonen III Trust, to purchase 4,285,714 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.0007 per share for $3,000. The purchase price per share was equal to 20% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of the investment. The Company issued such common stock on the date of such Subscription Agreement.

 

On June 14, 2016, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with Dan Kukkonen, to purchase 10,000,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.0006 per share for $6,000. The purchase price per share was equal to 20% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of the investment. The Company issued such common stock on the date of such Subscription Agreement.

    

On July 29, 2016, the Company entered into Subscription Agreement with a non-related party to purchase 3,571,429 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.0014 per share for $5,000. The purchase price per share was equal to 50% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of the investment. The Company issued such common stock on the date of such Subscription Agreement.

 

 

 

F- 13  
 

 

On September 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with the Carl Kukkonen III Trust, to purchase 15,000,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.0003 per share for $4,500. The purchase price per share was equal to 20% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of the investment. The Company issued such common stock on the date of such Subscription Agreement.

  

On September 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with Dan Kukkonen, to purchase 15,000,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.0003 per share for $4,500. The purchase price per share was equal to 20% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of the investment. The Company issued such common stock on the date of such Subscription Agreement.

 

During 2016, the Company issued 1,636,364 shares of common stock to a consultant of the Company. The shares were issued at fair market value of approximately $4,000 on the date of the issuance.

 

During 2016, the Company issued 655,714,285 shares of common stock to Director Kevin Schewe as he converted loans into shares of common stock as allowed under an agreement he has with the Company as discussed in Note 5. During 2016, the Company issued 66,312,997 shares of common stock to CEO Haris Basit as he converted loans into shares of common stock as allowed under an agreement he has with the Company as discussed in Note 5.

 

As of December 31, 2016, there were 2,819,472,132 shares of common stock outstanding.

  

NOTE 7 – INCOME TAX

 

The Company recorded valuation allowances to fully reserve its deferred tax assets, as management believes it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $694,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015 and increased by $174,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. It is possible that management’s estimates as to the likelihood of realization of its deferred tax assets could change as a result of changes in estimated operating results. Should management conclude that it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets are, at least in part, realizable, the valuation allowance will be reduced and recognized as a deferred income tax benefit in the statement of operations in the period of change.

 

The Company has Federal net operating loss carryovers of approximately $21,038,000 available at December 31, 2016 and State net operating loss carryovers of approximately $20,039,000 available at December 31, 2016. The federal and California net operating losses will begin to expire in 2024 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, the Company has capital loss carryforwards of approximately $13,231,000 available at December 31, 2016, which expire through 2019. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of the capital loss carryforwards in future tax returns, the tax effect of the capital loss carryforwards is not recognized in the income tax provision.

 

FASB ASC 740 also addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC 740, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not recognize any tax liabilities related to uncertain tax positions and does not have a balance for such liabilities as of December 31, 2016.

 

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties, if any, associated with uncertain tax positions as part of the income tax provision. There was no accrued interest or penalties associated with uncertain tax positions recognized in the Company’s balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company is subject to income tax in the United States federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions and has identified its federal tax return and tax returns in state jurisdictions below as “major” tax filings. These jurisdictions, along with the years still open to audit under the applicable statutes of limitation, are as follows:

 

Jurisdiction   Tax Years
Federal   2013 – 2015
California   2012 – 2015

 

 

 

 

F- 14  
 

 

The following table reconciles the US statutory rates to the Company’s effective tax rate for 2016 and 2015:

 

    2016     2015  
U.S Statutory rates     34.0%       34.0%  
State taxes, net of Federal benefit     5.8%       5.6%  
Permanent differences           (1.0% )
Change in Valuation allowance     (39.8% )     (38.6% )
Other            
Effective income tax rate     0.0%       0.0%  

 

The following are the components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

    2016     2015  
Deferred Tax Assets:                
Net operating loss carryforwards   $ 8,322,000     $ 8,285,000  
Stock compensation expense     4,302,000       4,166,000  
Other     5,000       4,000  
Total Deferred Tax Assets     12,629,000       12,455,000  
Less: Valuation allowance     (12,629,000 )     (12,455,000 )
Net Deferred Tax Assets   $     $  

  

NOTE 8 – NET LOSS PER SHARE

 

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260. Under its provisions, basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted earnings would customarily include, if dilutive, potential shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and warrants is reflected in earnings per share in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260 by application of the treasury stock method. For the periods presented, the computation of diluted loss per share equaled basic loss per share as the inclusion of any dilutive instruments would have had an antidilutive effect on the earnings per share calculation in the periods presented.

 

The following table sets forth common stock equivalents (potential common stock) at December 31, 2016 and 2015 that are not included in the loss per share calculation since their effect would be anti-dilutive for the periods indicated:

  

    2016     2015  
Stock Options     380,730,000       183,230,000  

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for 2016 and 2015, respectively:

 

    2016     2015  
Basic and diluted net loss per share:                
Numerator:                
Net loss attributable to common stock   $ (1,201,000 )   $ (2,006,000 )
Denominator:                
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding     2,433,356,365       1,704,277,945  
                 
Net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted   $ *     $ *  

__________

*  Less than $0.01

 

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Included in the Company’s balance sheets at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are Related Party Payables of $640,000 and $656,000, respectively. The Company has a payable of $640,000, at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 owed to Dr. Carl Kukkonen, CTO. Of the amount owed to Dr. Kukkonen, there is a cash component totaling $136,000 and a common stock component totaling $504,000. Dr. Kukkonen deferred a portion of his 2009, 2010 and 2011 stock awards and is entitled to the following unregistered shares of Company common stock at December 31, 2016: 11,195,707 shares for deferred 2009 compensation; 8,467,939 shares for deferred 2010 compensation; and 24,730,678 shares for deferred 2011 compensation.

 

At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company also has a royalty payable to VGE of $0 and $16,000, respectively. On March 28, 2016, the Giant King Grass license with VGE was renegotiated which resulted in the Company not owing VGE any royalties for past revenues recorded by the Company. The $16,000 was recorded as other income in the Company’s Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

The Company has a loan agreement with Director Dr. Kevin Schewe and CEO Haris Basit which is described in Note 5.

   

 

 

F- 15  
 

 

On April 13, 2015, the Company entered into a Giant King Grass supply contract with Almaden Energy Group, LLC. (“AEG”). AEG is developing an animal feed project in the United States for the domestic and global market. The Company granted AEG a license to grow Giant King Grass only for animal feed, nursery and research purposes anywhere within the 48 contiguous United States. AEG is permitted to sell Giant King Grass anywhere in the world with the exception of the State of Hawaii. AEG will provide funding to the Company in return for the Company providing seedlings and technical support and training to establish the initial 25 acres plantation in Imperial County, CA. Twenty-six acres were leased of which 20 acres were planted in August 2015. The CEO of AEG is also the CEO of the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded $22,000 and $18,000, respectively, in revenues from AEG.

 

At December 31, 2016, the Company has an 18.75% equity ownership in AEG and one designated board seat provided that the Company maintains an equity ownership position greater than 5%. At December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $14,000 as an Investment in AEG on its Balance Sheet under equity method of accounting (see Note 3).

 

NOTE 10 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Leases

 

The Company currently has no long-term office lease. The Company leases land in San Diego County, California where it grows Giant King Grass. Rent and utility expense charged to operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, was $17,000 and $12,000, respectively.

 

Collaborative Agreements

 

We are a party to certain collaborative agreements with various entities for the joint operation of test plots to establish that GKG grows well in the area and optimal agronomic practices are developed. These agreements are in the form of development collaborations and licensing agreements. Under these agreements, we have granted rights to grow and use of GKG. In return, we are entitled to receive certain payments for the operations of the test plots and license fees on the harvesting of GKG should it ultimately be commercialized.

 

All of our collaborative agreements are subject to termination by either party, without significant financial penalty. Under the terms of these agreements, upon a termination we are entitled to reacquire all rights in our technology at no cost and are free to re-license the technology to other collaborative partners.

   

Revenue earned from collaborative agreements is comprised of negotiated payments for the establishment, evaluation and operations of GKG test plots. Deferred revenue represents customer payments received which are related to future performance. Generally, for collaborative agreements establishing test plots, the Company recognizes revenue only after the Giant King Grass is planted in the customer’s location. Until that time any money received is recorded as deferred revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company received $193,000 and $129,000, respectively, in payments under these collaborative agreements. The Company recognized revenue from these collaborative agreements of $205,000 and $188,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

Global Supply, License, and Commercialization Agreement

 

Executed on April 4, 2016 and effective as of March 28, 2016, the Company, VGE and Guangzhou Inter-Pacific Arts Corp., a Chinese wholly-owned foreign enterprise registered in Guangdong province ("IPA") owned by VGE, entered into the Global Supply, License, and Commercialization Agreement (the "New Agreement").

 

Prior to the New Agreement, IPA and VGE had entered into a certain Supply and Commercialization Agreement dated September 30, 2012 regarding a license and supply arrangement between IPA and VGE regarding Giant King Grass ("IPA-VGE Agreement"). In turn, VGE and the Company also entered into a certain Supply and Commercialization Agreement dated September 30, 2012 regarding a license and supply arrangement between VGE and the Company regarding Giant King Grass ("VGE-VIASPACE Agreement").

 

Under the New Agreement, VGE and the Company terminated the VGE-VIASPACE Agreement and IPA directly granted the Company an exclusive, perpetual license to commercialize its intellectual property rights to three (3) types of high yield, non-genetically modified grasses ("Three GK Grasses") throughout the world except Cambodia, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Thailand, Myanmar, Malaysia, Laos, Vietnam and Singapore ("VIASPACE Territory"). It and VGE agreed to subordinate the terms of the IPA-VGE Agreement to the terms of the New Agreement. IPA also granted the right to use and market the name "Giant King Grass" and other related names.

 

The Company would owe royalty payments on the Net Sales of the Three GK Grasses. This license would be sublicenseable in the VIASPACE Territory. IPA held all rights of ownership to the Three GK Grasses. The Company would own any grasses resulting from any modifications or improvements to the Three GK Grasses. IPA would use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain its intellectual property rights. The Company would use commercially reasonable efforts to commercialize the Three GK Grasses throughout the VIASPACE Territory.

 

 

 

 

F- 16  
 

 

Employment Agreements

 

Effective July 10, 2015, the Company entered into a two-year employment agreement with Haris Basit, CEO of the Company. Mr. Basit will receive $120,000 per annum and be entitled to a bonus as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses in the course of his employment. Additionally, Mr. Basit is to receive 20 business days paid leave per year. On July 10, 2015, the Company agreed to issue Mr. Basit 25,000,000 stock options at fair market value based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as traded on the OTC Market as of July 10, 2015. These stock options are vested immediately but otherwise shall be subject to the terms of the 2015 option plan. Additionally, the Company agreed to issue Mr. Basit 18,750,000 stock options to be issued every three months (quarterly) over the term of his employment agreement which runs from July 10, 2015 through July 9, 2017, with the first issuance on October 10, 2015, at fair market value based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as traded on the OTC Market on the date of each grant. Stock options shall vest immediately upon each issuance and shall be otherwise subject to the terms of the 2015 option plan. In the case of a change of control of the Company, the issuance schedule shall be accelerated by one year. Stock options shall have an exercise term of ten years from date of issuance, not to exceed the expiration date of the 2015 option plan.

 

Effective October 1, 2016, the Company entered into one-year employment agreements with Carl Kukkonen and Stephen Muzi. Dr. Kukkonen serves as Chief Technology Officer of the Company and Mr. Muzi serves as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Dr. Kukkonen will receive a salary of $84,000 per annum and Mr. Muzi would receive $64,000 per annum. Each of them would also be entitled to customary insurance and health benefits, and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses in the course of his employment. Dr. Kukkonen is to receive 20 business days paid leave per year and Mr. Muzi is to receive 10 business days paid leave. Additionally, Dr. Kukkonen will be awarded a bonus of 10% of the gross revenue generated by the Company up to a maximum of $100,000.

 

Litigation

 

The Company is not party to any material legal proceedings at the present time.

  

NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

On January 9, 2017, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with a non-affiliate investor to purchase 5,586,592 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.000895 per share for $5,000. The purchase price per share was equal to 50% of the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding.

 

On January 10, 2017, pursuant to an Employment Agreement entered on July 10, 2015, between the Company and Mr. Haris Basit, CEO, the Registrant issued 18,750,000 non-qualified stock options out of its existing stock plan to Mr. Basit. The stock options will vest immediately and were issued at $0.0015 per share which represented fair market value on the date of grant.

 

On January 27, 2017, Mr. Haris Basit, CEO and Director of the Company, advanced $5,500 pursuant to a convertible loan agreement and immediately converted the $5,500 loan into 14,102,564 shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.00039 per common share.

 

On February 23, 2017, Dr. Kevin Schewe, Director of the Company, entered into a new convertible loan Agreement whereby he agreed to fund the Company an additional $100,000 over a two-year period. The loans would be evidenced by a convertible note. The notes accrue interest at 8% per annum, and are convertible into shares of Company common stock at a price equal to 20% of the average closing price for the 20 trading days prior to the issuance of the loan.

 

On February 24, 2017, Mr. Haris Basit, CEO and Director of the Company, advanced $6,000 pursuant to a convertible loan agreement and immediately converted the $6,000 loan into 14,492,754 shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.000414 per common share.

 

On February 24, 2017, Dr. Kevin Schewe, Director of the Company, advanced $15,000 pursuant to a convertible loan agreement and immediately converted the $15,000 loan into 36,231,884 shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.000414 per common share.

 

On March 27, 2017, Dr. Kevin Schewe, Director of the Company, advanced $10,000 pursuant to a convertible loan agreement and immediately converted the $10,000 loan into 26,666,667 shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.000375 per common share.

 

On March 29, 2017, Mr. Haris Basit, CEO and Director of the Company, advanced $4,500 pursuant to a convertible loan agreement and immediately converted the $4,500 loan into 12,228,261 shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.000368 per common share.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F- 17  

 

Viaspace (CE) (USOTC:VSPC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Viaspace (CE) Charts.
Viaspace (CE) (USOTC:VSPC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Viaspace (CE) Charts.