Washington, D.C. 20549
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile
number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b)
of the Act:
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g)
of the Act:
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Act:
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Issuer’s
classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
126,733,266 ordinary shares, excluding 277,746 ADSs representing
1,110,984 ordinary shares reserved for future grants under our share incentive plans and 1,723,200 ordinary shares as treasury
stock, as of December 31, 2016.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
¨
No
x
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous
question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17
¨
Item 18
¨
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
x
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents
and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution
of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes
¨
No
¨
Unless otherwise indicated and except where the context otherwise
requires, references in this annual report on Form 20-F to:
Names of certain companies provided in this
annual report are translated or transliterated from their original Chinese legal names.
Discrepancies in any table between the amounts
identified as total amounts and the sum of the amounts listed therein are due to rounding.
This annual report on Form 20-F includes our
audited consolidated financial statements for 2014, 2015 and 2016 and as of December 31, 2015 and 2016.
PART I
|
ITEM 1.
|
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
|
Not Applicable.
|
ITEM 2.
|
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
|
Not Applicable.
|
A.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
Our Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following table presents the selected consolidated
financial information of our company. The selected consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) from continuing operations
data for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 and the selected consolidated balance sheets data as of December 31,
2015 and 2016 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are included in this annual report beginning
on page F-1. The selected consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) from continuing operations data for the years
ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the selected consolidated balance sheets data as of December 31, 2013 and 2014 are derived
from our unaudited financial statements and reflect the impact of retrospective adjustments for our disposition of Jiangxi Jinko
Engineering, which has been classified as discontinued operations. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction
with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” included elsewhere in this annual report. Our consolidated financial
statements are prepared and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
or U.S. GAAP. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future periods.
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
(US$)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share, per share and per ADS data)
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
4,793,161.4
|
|
|
|
6,465,937.9
|
|
|
|
9,740,876.5
|
|
|
|
15,454,374.4
|
|
|
|
21,400,638.1
|
|
|
|
3,082,333.0
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
(4,556,937.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5,095,392.3
|
)
|
|
|
(7,643,687.8
|
)
|
|
|
(12,522,913.8
|
)
|
|
|
(17,531,299.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2,525,032.3
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
236,223.9
|
|
|
|
1,370,545.6
|
|
|
|
2,097,188.7
|
|
|
|
2,931,460.6
|
|
|
|
3,869,338.9
|
|
|
|
557,300.7
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(1,465,002.3
|
)
|
|
|
(761,124.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1,253,134.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,809,655.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2,520,235.8
|
)
|
|
|
(362,989.5
|
)
|
Income/(loss) from operations
|
|
|
(1,228,778.4
|
)
|
|
|
609,420.9
|
|
|
|
844,054.1
|
|
|
|
1,121,805.2
|
|
|
|
1,349,103.2
|
|
|
|
194,311.3
|
|
Interest expenses, net
|
|
|
(221,804.2
|
)
|
|
|
(205,213.0
|
)
|
|
|
(226,342.6
|
)
|
|
|
(311,018.6
|
)
|
|
|
(359,296.3
|
)
|
|
|
(51,749.4
|
)
|
Convertible senior notes issuance costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(26,052.9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Subsidy income
|
|
|
44,290.5
|
|
|
|
7,583.1
|
|
|
|
48,829.6
|
|
|
|
101,873.6
|
|
|
|
168,646.6
|
|
|
|
24,290.2
|
|
Exchange (loss)/ gain
|
|
|
(36,113.2
|
)
|
|
|
(39,585.2
|
)
|
|
|
(139,566.6
|
)
|
|
|
(86,517.7
|
)
|
|
|
208,811.4
|
|
|
|
30,075.1
|
|
Other income/(expense), net
|
|
|
8,279.2
|
|
|
|
6,871.7
|
|
|
|
(1,558.6
|
)
|
|
|
1,036.3
|
|
|
|
8,768.4
|
|
|
|
1,262.9
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,902.5
|
|
|
|
706.1
|
|
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,017.9
|
|
|
|
722.7
|
|
Change in fair value of forward contracts
|
|
|
(9,043.1
|
)
|
|
|
48,390.4
|
|
|
|
(714.7
|
)
|
|
|
56,931.9
|
|
|
|
(52,561.8
|
)
|
|
|
(7,570.5
|
)
|
Change in fair value of call spread options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(370.4
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,096.0
|
)
|
|
|
24,573.3
|
|
|
|
3,539.3
|
|
Change in fair value of convertible senior notes and capped call options
|
|
|
(97,160.7
|
)
|
|
|
(212,906.6
|
)
|
|
|
64,101.6
|
|
|
|
(14,571.2
|
)
|
|
|
(110,242.5
|
)
|
|
|
(15,878.2
|
)
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,540,329.9
|
)
|
|
|
214,561.3
|
|
|
|
562,750.0
|
|
|
|
867,073.1
|
|
|
|
1,247,722.6
|
|
|
|
179,709.4
|
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit
|
|
|
8,917.6
|
|
|
|
(18,532.4
|
)
|
|
|
135,393.0
|
|
|
|
(100,533.8
|
)
|
|
|
(257,487.0
|
)
|
|
|
(37,085.8
|
)
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,531,412.2
|
)
|
|
|
196,028.9
|
|
|
|
698,142.9
|
|
|
|
766,539.3
|
|
|
|
990,235.6
|
|
|
|
142,623.6
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
(US$)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share, per share and per ADS data)
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,007,884.1
|
|
|
|
145,165.5
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(12,403.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6,537.0
|
)
|
|
|
29,112.9
|
|
|
|
105,089.6
|
|
|
|
48,146.3
|
|
|
|
6,934.5
|
|
Income tax expense, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,058.9
|
)
|
|
|
(11,329.8
|
)
|
|
|
(54,466.1
|
)
|
|
|
(7,844.7
|
)
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(12,403.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6,537.0
|
)
|
|
|
28,054.0
|
|
|
|
93,759.8
|
|
|
|
1,001,564.3
|
|
|
|
144,255.3
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(1,543,816.1
|
)
|
|
|
189,491.9
|
|
|
|
726,196.9
|
|
|
|
860,299.1
|
|
|
|
1,991,799.8
|
|
|
|
286, 878.8
|
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests from continuing operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(63.3
|
)
|
|
|
(432.5
|
)
|
|
|
(62.3
|
)
|
Less: Net income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interests from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,394.0
|
)
|
|
|
1,480.1
|
|
|
|
851.2
|
|
|
|
4,270.5
|
|
|
|
6,044.5
|
|
|
|
870.6
|
|
Less: Accretion to redemption value of redeemable non-controlling interests of discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
52,320.7
|
|
|
|
172,340.4
|
|
|
|
159,477.9
|
|
|
|
22,969.6
|
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.’s ordinary shareholders
|
|
|
(1,542,422.1
|
)
|
|
|
188,011.8
|
|
|
|
673,025.1
|
|
|
|
683,751.5
|
|
|
|
1,826,710.0
|
|
|
|
263,101.0
|
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.’s ordinary shareholders per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(17.25
|
)
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
|
|
6.15
|
|
|
|
7.87
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(17.25
|
)
|
|
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
7.63
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.’s ordinary shareholders per ADS from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(69.00
|
)
|
|
|
8.36
|
|
|
|
22.68
|
|
|
|
24.60
|
|
|
|
31.48
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(69.00
|
)
|
|
|
8.16
|
|
|
|
16.08
|
|
|
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
30.52
|
|
|
|
4.40
|
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.’s ordinary shareholders per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
|
(0.66
|
)
|
|
|
6.64
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.’s ordinary shareholders per ADS from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
|
(2.64
|
)
|
|
|
26.56
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
(2.60
|
)
|
|
|
25.60
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
88,752,706
|
|
|
|
94,018,394
|
|
|
|
122,980,870
|
|
|
|
124,618,416
|
|
|
|
125,870,272
|
|
|
|
125,870,272
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
88,752,706
|
|
|
|
96,035,985
|
|
|
|
153,786,531
|
|
|
|
127,802,961
|
|
|
|
130,590,441
|
|
|
|
130,590,441
|
|
Weighted average ADS outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
22,188,177
|
|
|
|
23,504,560
|
|
|
|
30,745,218
|
|
|
|
31,154,604
|
|
|
|
31,467,568
|
|
|
|
31,467,568
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
22,188,177
|
|
|
|
24,008,996
|
|
|
|
38,446,633
|
|
|
|
31,950,740
|
|
|
|
32,647,610
|
|
|
|
32,647,610
|
|
|
(1)
|
Each ADS represents four ordinary shares.
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(US$)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
275,075.7
|
|
|
|
400,583.8
|
|
|
|
1,316,175.7
|
|
|
|
2,392,591.1
|
|
|
|
2,501,417.5
|
|
|
|
360,279.1
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
140,760.8
|
|
|
|
398,299.7
|
|
|
|
517,055.4
|
|
|
|
555,723.9
|
|
|
|
318,784.9
|
|
|
|
45,914.6
|
|
Restricted short-term investments
|
|
|
722,461.3
|
|
|
|
729,593.3
|
|
|
|
1,134,362.9
|
|
|
|
1,160,518.1
|
|
|
|
3,333,450.4
|
|
|
|
480,116.7
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
112,000.0
|
|
|
|
29,427.1
|
|
|
|
71,301.1
|
|
|
|
10,269.5
|
|
Account receivable, net – related parties
|
|
|
105,531.4
|
|
|
|
284,142.0
|
|
|
|
174,533.98
|
|
|
|
60,973.8
|
|
|
|
1,414,084.1
|
|
|
|
203,670.5
|
|
Accounts receivable, net – third parties
|
|
|
1,712,569.0
|
|
|
|
1,591,022.5
|
|
|
|
2,947,680.1
|
|
|
|
2,690,519.0
|
|
|
|
4,753,715.3
|
|
|
|
684,677.4
|
|
Notes receivable – related parties
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
42,900.0
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
610,200.0
|
|
|
|
87,887.1
|
|
Notes receivable, net – third parties
|
|
|
1,423.8
|
|
|
|
233,886.4
|
|
|
|
70,080.6
|
|
|
|
515,441.9
|
|
|
|
915,314.8
|
|
|
|
131,832.7
|
|
Advances to suppliers, net – related parties
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,183.8
|
|
|
|
1,021.1
|
|
|
|
661.8
|
|
|
|
95.3
|
|
Advances to suppliers, net – third parties
|
|
|
58,064.1
|
|
|
|
68,986.0
|
|
|
|
80,922.3
|
|
|
|
251,389.9
|
|
|
|
325,766.3
|
|
|
|
46,920.1
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
527,962.4
|
|
|
|
708,679.0
|
|
|
|
1,891,148.1
|
|
|
|
3,203,325.0
|
|
|
|
4,473,514.7
|
|
|
|
644,320.1
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,985,609.2
|
|
|
|
5,342,722.6
|
|
|
|
10,407,319.6
|
|
|
|
22,494,804.1
|
|
|
|
19,695,296.4
|
|
|
|
2,836,712.7
|
|
Project assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
55,063.5
|
|
|
|
7,930.8
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,080,421.7
|
|
|
|
3,061,606.8
|
|
|
|
2,968,484.7
|
|
|
|
3,766,435.6
|
|
|
|
4,738,681.4
|
|
|
|
682,512.1
|
|
Land use rights, net
|
|
|
365,749.2
|
|
|
|
359,084.9
|
|
|
|
371,932.2
|
|
|
|
349,914.1
|
|
|
|
450,940.6
|
|
|
|
64,949.0
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
8,372,320.3
|
|
|
|
10,611,225.1
|
|
|
|
19,087,636.4
|
|
|
|
27,144,548.5
|
|
|
|
26,090,639.8
|
|
|
|
3,757,833.8
|
|
Accounts payable – related parties
|
|
|
30,045.2
|
|
|
|
2,468.4
|
|
|
|
1,478.5
|
|
|
|
1,478.5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts payable – third parties
|
|
|
1,347,467.0
|
|
|
|
1,764,812.9
|
|
|
|
2,402,625.3
|
|
|
|
3,783,304.9
|
|
|
|
4,290,070.5
|
|
|
|
617,898.7
|
|
Notes payable – third parties
|
|
|
1,149,136.5
|
|
|
|
1,212,994.1
|
|
|
|
1,653,082.7
|
|
|
|
1,924,495.8
|
|
|
|
4,796,766.3
|
|
|
|
690,878.0
|
|
Accrued payroll and welfare expenses
|
|
|
206,425.1
|
|
|
|
237,012.3
|
|
|
|
304,601.8
|
|
|
|
454,210.9
|
|
|
|
582,275.7
|
|
|
|
83,865.1
|
|
Advance from related parties
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60,541.5
|
|
|
|
8,719.8
|
|
Advance from third parties
|
|
|
121,031.2
|
|
|
|
147,583.3
|
|
|
|
423,028.7
|
|
|
|
1,299,491.4
|
|
|
|
1,376,919.5
|
|
|
|
198,317.7
|
|
Bonds payable and accrued interests
|
|
|
313,689.8
|
|
|
|
66,725.8
|
|
|
|
66,725.8
|
|
|
|
866,725.8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Short-term borrowings (including current portion of long-term borrowings)
|
|
|
2,245,630.8
|
|
|
|
1,970,593.9
|
|
|
|
2,547,366.5
|
|
|
|
2,589,864.1
|
|
|
|
5,488,629.0
|
|
|
|
790,527.0
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
6,238,443.5
|
|
|
|
7,237,114.3
|
|
|
|
10,523,364.6
|
|
|
|
18,622,441.9
|
|
|
|
18,362,656.9
|
|
|
|
2,644,772.7
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
167,000.0
|
|
|
|
8,000.0
|
|
|
|
8,000.0
|
|
|
|
1,308,679.8
|
|
|
|
488,519.6
|
|
|
|
70,361.5
|
|
Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
483,581.7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,540,398.6
|
|
|
|
856,064.4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,998,508.9
|
|
|
|
8,590,611.5
|
|
|
|
14,119,231.9
|
|
|
|
21,184,825.5
|
|
|
|
19,630,426.8
|
|
|
|
2,827,369.5
|
|
Redeemable non-controlling interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,435,585.3
|
|
|
|
1,607,925.7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
1,365,122.3
|
|
|
|
2,009,742.8
|
|
|
|
3,507,097.3
|
|
|
|
4,321,868.2
|
|
|
|
6,460,708.9
|
|
|
|
930,535.6
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
8,689.1
|
|
|
|
10,870.8
|
|
|
|
25,721.9
|
|
|
|
29,929.0
|
|
|
|
(495.9
|
)
|
|
|
(71.4
|
)
|
Total liabilities, redeemable non-controlling interests and shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
8,372,320.3
|
|
|
|
10,611,225.1
|
|
|
|
19,087,636.4
|
|
|
|
27,144,548.5
|
|
|
|
26,090,639.8
|
|
|
|
3,757,833.8
|
|
Exchange Rate Information
We publish our consolidated financial statements
in Renminbi. The conversion of Renminbi into U.S. dollars in this annual report is solely for the convenience of readers. The exchange
rate refers to the exchange rate as set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board. Unless otherwise noted,
all translations from Renminbi to U.S. dollars and from U.S. dollars to Renminbi in this annual report were made at a rate of RMB6.9430
to US$1.00, the noon buying rate in effect as of December 30, 2016. The Renminbi is not freely convertible into foreign currency.
We make no representation that any Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars or
Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all. On March 24, 2017, the exchange rate,
as set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board, was RMB6.8803 to US$1.00.
The following table sets forth information concerning
exchange rates between the RMB and the U.S. dollar for the periods indicated.
Period
|
|
Period
End
|
|
|
Average
(1)
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
(RMB per US$1.00)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6.2301
|
|
|
|
6.3043
|
|
|
|
6.3879
|
|
|
|
6.2221
|
|
2013
|
|
|
6.0537
|
|
|
|
6.1412
|
|
|
|
6.2438
|
|
|
|
6.0537
|
|
2014
|
|
|
6.2046
|
|
|
|
6.1704
|
|
|
|
6.2591
|
|
|
|
6.0402
|
|
2015
|
|
|
6.4778
|
|
|
|
6.2869
|
|
|
|
6.4896
|
|
|
|
6.1870
|
|
2016
|
|
|
6.9430
|
|
|
|
6.6549
|
|
|
|
6.9580
|
|
|
|
6.4480
|
|
September
|
|
|
6.6685
|
|
|
|
6.6702
|
|
|
|
6.6790
|
|
|
|
6.6600
|
|
October
|
|
|
6.7735
|
|
|
|
6.7303
|
|
|
|
6.7819
|
|
|
|
6.6685
|
|
November
|
|
|
6.8837
|
|
|
|
6.8402
|
|
|
|
6.9195
|
|
|
|
6.7534
|
|
December
|
|
|
6.9430
|
|
|
|
6.9198
|
|
|
|
6.9580
|
|
|
|
6.8771
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
6.8768
|
|
|
|
6.8907
|
|
|
|
6.9575
|
|
|
|
6.8360
|
|
February
|
|
|
6.8665
|
|
|
|
6.8694
|
|
|
|
6.8821
|
|
|
|
6.8517
|
|
March (through March 24, 2017)
|
|
|
6.8803
|
|
|
|
6.8976
|
|
|
|
6.9132
|
|
|
|
6.8785
|
|
|
(1)
|
Annual averages are calculated by averaging the rates on the last business day of each month during the annual period. Monthly
averages are calculated by averaging the rates on each business day during the month.
|
|
B.
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness
|
Not Applicable.
|
C.
|
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
Not Applicable.
Our business, financial condition and results
of operations are subject to various changing business, competitive, economic, political and social conditions in China and worldwide.
In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this annual report, the following are some of the important factors that could
adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and business prospects, and cause our actual results to differ materially
from those projected in any forward-looking statements.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Our future growth and profitability depend on the demand
for and the prices of solar power products and the development of photovoltaic technologies.
The rate and extent of market acceptance for
solar power depends on the availability of government subsidies and the cost-effectiveness, performance and reliability of solar
power relative to conventional and other renewable energy sources. Changes in government policies towards solar power and advancements
in photovoltaic, or PV, technologies could significantly affect the demand for solar power products.
Demand for solar power products is also affected
by macroeconomic factors, such as energy supply, demand and prices, as well as regulations and policies governing renewable energies
and related industries. For example, in June 2016, the FIT in China for utility-scale projects was significantly cut down. As a
result, followed by robust demand in the first half of 2016, the domestic market was almost frozen and the competition in the global
market was also intensified in the second half of 2016. Meanwhile, in the U.S., another major solar market, the solar PV projects
faced great uncertainties after Donald Trump was elected as president whose administration was believed to favor traditional energy.
Despite the significant decrease in demand, the global solar module production capacity still increased by over 20%, inevitably
resulting in a price war. Consequently, the average selling price of our solar modules, which represented 97.3% of our total revenue
in 2016, decreased from RMB3.78 per watt for 2014 to RMB3.57 per watt for 2015, and further decreased to RMB3.33 per watt (US$0.50
per watt) for 2016.
Any reduction in the price of solar modules
will have a negative impact on our revenue and results of operations. As a result, we may not continue to be profitable on a quarterly
or annual basis. For example, we experienced net losses in each quarter from the fourth quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of
2013. In addition, if demand for solar power products weakens in the future, our business and results of operations may be materially
adversely affected.
The reduction, modification, delay or elimination of
government subsidies and other economic incentives in solar energy industry may reduce the profitability of our business and materially
adversely affect our business.
We believe that market demand for solar power
and solar power products in the near term will continue to substantially depend on the availability of government incentives because
the cost of solar energy currently exceeds, and we believe will continue to exceed in the near term, the cost of conventional fossil
fuel energy and certain non-solar renewable energy, particularly in light of the low level of oil prices in recent years. Examples
of government sponsored financial incentives to promote solar energy include subsidies from the central and local governments,
preferential tax rates and other incentives. The availability and size of such subsidies and incentives depend, to a large extent,
on political and policy developments relating to environmental concerns and other macro-economic factors. Moreover, government
incentive programs are expected to gradually decrease in scope or be discontinued as solar power technology improves and becomes
more affordable relative to other types of energy. Negative public or community response to solar energy projects could adversely
affect the government support and approval of our business. Adverse changes in government regulations and policies relating to
solar energy industry and their implementation, especially those relating to economic subsidies and incentives, could significantly
reduce the profitability of our business and materially adversely affect the state of the industry.
We received government grants totaling RMB142.2
million, RMB103.6 million and RMB168.6 million for 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, which included government grants for our
expansion of production scale, technology upgrades, the development of export markets and the development of solar power projects.
We cannot assure you that we will continue to receive a similar amount or any amount of government subsidy in future periods.
As substantially all of our operations are in
the PRC, the policies and regulations adopted by the PRC government towards the solar energy industry are important to the continuing
success of our business. Although regulatory support for solar power generation such as subsidies, preferential tax treatment and
other economic incentives has increased in recent years, future government policies may not be as supportive. The PRC central government
may reduce or eliminate existing incentive programs for economic, political, financial or other reasons. In addition, the local
or provincial governments may delay the implementation or fail to fully implement central government regulations, policies and
initiatives. Although we disposed of our downstream solar power project business in the PRC in November 2016, which relies more
heavily on governmental support, a significant reduction in the scope of or the discontinuation of government incentive programs
in the PRC or other jurisdictions could, until the solar energy industry becomes commercially profitable without subsidies, materially
adversely affect market demand for our solar power products and negatively impact our revenue and profitability.
Besides the PRC, various governments have used
policy initiatives to encourage or accelerate the development and adoption of solar power and other renewable energy sources, including
certain countries in Europe, notably Italy, Germany, France, Belgium and Spain; certain countries in Asia, including Japan, India
and South Korea; countries in North America, such as the United States and Canada; as well as Australia and South Africa. Examples
of government-sponsored financial incentives to promote solar power include capital cost rebates, FIT, tax credits, net metering
and other incentives to end-users, distributors, project developers, system integrators and manufacturers of solar power products.
Governments may reduce or eliminate existing
incentive programs for political, financial or other reasons, which will be difficult for us to predict. Reductions in FIT programs
may result in a significant fall in the price of and demand for solar power and solar power products. For example, subsidies have
been reduced or eliminated in some countries such as Germany, Italy, Spain and Canada. The German market represents a major portion
of the world’s solar market due in large part to government policies that established high FIT rates. However, since 2010,
the German government has introduced legislation to reduce the FIT program due to the strong growth of its domestic solar market.
In 2009, the Spanish government continued reductions in the FIT as a result of its government’s spending cut backs, which
resulted in a weakened solar market. In 2010, Italy also announced annual reductions to FIT beginning in 2011 in an effort to impede
overheating of its solar market. Starting from 2011, major export markets for solar power and solar power products such as Japan,
Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom continued to reduce their FIT as well as other incentive measures. For example, from
2012 to 2016, the Japanese government cut down its FIT from 40 Yen to 24 Yen for projects below 10KW and from 42 Yen to 31 Yen
for projects above 10 KW.
In 2016, we generated 61.5% of our total revenue
from overseas markets, and the United States, Japan and Chile, our three largest export markets, represented 36.0%, 4.6% and 4.2%
of our total revenue, respectively. As a result, any significant reduction in the scope or discontinuation of government incentive
programs in the overseas markets, especially where our major customers are located, could cause demand for our products and our
revenue to decline and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In addition, the announcement of a significant reduction in incentives in any major market may have an adverse effect on the trading
price of our ADSs.
We require a significant amount of cash to fund our
operations and future business developments; if we cannot obtain additional funding on terms satisfactory to us when we need it,
our growth prospects and future profitability may be materially adversely affected.
We require a significant amount of cash to
fund our operations, including payments to suppliers for our polysilicon feedstock. We may also require additional cash due to
changing business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue,
as well as our research and development activities in order to remain competitive. In addition, in October 2016, we entered into
a side agreement with Jiangxi Jinko Engineering and the investors of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering (the original redeemable preferred
shareholders of JinkoSolar Power), pursuant to which the investors of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering will have the right to have the
common shares of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering held by them redeemed, and, as a result of a guarantee issued by us, in the event that
Jiangxi Jinko Engineering fails to perform its redemption obligations, we will become liable for Jiangxi Jinko Engineering’s
obligations under the redemption, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Management believes that our current cash
position, the cash expected to be generated from operations, and funds available from borrowings under our bank facilities will
be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from March
29, 2017, the date of issuance of our consolidated financial statements for 2016 included in this annual report.
Our ability to obtain external financing is
subject to a number of uncertainties, including:
|
·
|
our future
financial condition, results of operations and cash flow;
|
|
·
|
the
general condition of the global equity and debt capital markets;
|
|
·
|
regulatory
and government support, such as subsidies, tax credits and other incentives;
|
|
·
|
the
continued confidence of banks and other financial institutions in our company and the solar power industry;
|
|
·
|
economic,
political and other conditions in the PRC and elsewhere; and
|
|
·
|
our
ability to comply with any financial covenants under the debt financing.
|
Any additional equity financing may be dilutive
to our shareholders and any debt financing may require restrictive covenants. Additional funds may not be available on terms commercially
acceptable to us. Failure to manage discretionary spending and raise additional capital or debt financing as required may adversely
impact our ability to achieve our intended business objectives. See “—Our substantial indebtedness could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
The oversupply of solar cells and modules in the solar
industry may cause substantial downward pressure on the prices of our products and reduce our revenue and earnings.
In 2011, the solar industry experienced oversupply
across the value chain, and by the end of the year, solar module, cell and wafer pricing all decreased. Demand for solar products
remained soft in 2012 and at the end of 2012, solar module, cell and wafer pricing had all further decreased. Although the global
economy has improved since 2013, demand for solar modules in Europe fell significantly in 2013. As a result, many solar power producers
that typically purchase solar power products from manufacturers like us were unable or unwilling to expand their operations.
Our average module selling price decreased from
RMB3.78 per watt for 2014 to RMB3.57 per watt for 2015, and further decreased to RMB3.33 per watt (US$0.50 per watt) for 2016.
Continued increases in solar module production in excess of market demand may result in further downward pressure on the price
of solar cells and modules, including our products. Increasing competition could also result in us losing sales or market share.
If we are unable, on an ongoing basis, to procure silicon, solar wafers and solar cells at reasonable prices, or mark up the price
of our solar modules to cover our manufacturing and operating costs, our revenue and gross margin will be adversely impacted, either
due to higher costs compared to our competitors or due to inventory write-downs, or both. In addition, our market share may decline
if our competitors are able to price their products more competitively.
Volatility in the prices of silicon raw materials makes
our procurement planning challenging and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The prices of polysilicon, the essential raw
material for solar cell and module products and silicon wafers have been subject to significant volatility. Historically, increases
in the price of polysilicon had increased our production costs. Since the first half of 2010, as a result of the growth of newly
available polysilicon manufacturing capacity worldwide, there has been an increased supply of polysilicon, which has driven down
its price and the price of its downstream products. Since the second half of 2011, the prices of polysilicon and silicon wafers
further fell significantly. From 2011 to 2012, the prices of solar products declined, and prices began to stabilize in the first
half of 2013. From 2013 to 2016, the price of polysilicon slightly fluctuated.
We expect that the prices of virgin polysilicon
feedstock may continue to be subject to volatility, making our procurement planning challenging. For example, if we refrain from
entering into fixed-price, long-term supply contracts, we may miss the opportunities to secure long-term supplies of virgin polysilicon
at favorable prices if the spot market price of virgin polysilicon increases significantly in the future. On the other hand, if
we enter into more fixed-price, long-term supply contracts, we may not be able to renegotiate or otherwise adjust the purchase
prices under such long-term supply contracts if the spot market price declines. As a result, our cost of silicon raw materials
could be higher than that of our competitors who source their supply of silicon raw materials through floating-price arrangements
or spot market purchases. To the extent we may not be able to fully pass on higher costs and expenses to our customers, our profit
margins, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
We may not be able to obtain sufficient silicon raw
materials in a timely manner or on commercially reasonable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
In 2014, 2015 and 2016, our five largest
suppliers accounted for approximately 62.1%, 52.8% and 59.2%, respectively, of our total silicon purchases by value. In 2016, one
of our suppliers individually accounted for more than 10% and our largest supplier accounted for 17.7% of our total silicon purchases
by value. In 2015, three of our suppliers individually accounted for more than 10% and our largest supplier accounted for 16.9%
of our total silicon purchases by value. In 2014, three of our suppliers individually accounted for more than 10% and our largest
supplier accounted for 16.0 % of our total silicon purchases by value.
Although the global supply of polysilicon has
increased significantly, we may experience interruption to our supply of silicon raw materials or late delivery in the future for
the following reasons, among others:
|
·
|
suppliers
under our silicon material supply contracts may delay deliveries for a significant period of time without incurring penalties;
|
|
·
|
our
virgin polysilicon suppliers may not be able to meet our production needs consistently or on a timely basis;
|
|
·
|
compared
with us, some of our competitors who also purchase virgin polysilicon from our suppliers have longer and stronger relationships
with and have greater buying power and bargaining leverage over some of our key suppliers; and
|
|
·
|
our
supply of silicon raw materials is subject to the business risk of our suppliers, some of whom have limited operating history
and limited financial resources, and one or more of which could go out of business for reasons beyond our control in the current
economic environment.
|
Our failure to obtain the required amounts of
silicon raw materials in a timely manner and on commercially reasonable terms could increase our manufacturing costs and substantially
limit our ability to meet our contractual obligations to our customers. Any failure by us to meet such obligations could have a
material adverse effect on our reputation, ability to retain customers, market share, business and results of operations and may
subject us to claims from our customers and other disputes. Furthermore, our failure to obtain sufficient silicon raw materials
would result in under-utilization of our production facilities and an increase in our marginal production costs. Any of the above
events could have a material adverse effect on our growth, profitability and results of operations.
The loss of, or a significant reduction in orders from,
any of our customers could significantly reduce our revenue and harm our results of operations.
In 2014, 2015 and 2016, sales to our top five
customers represented 17.2%, 20.0% and 28.5% of our total revenue, respectively. In 2016, our largest customer accounted for 9.7%
of our total revenue. In 2015, our largest customer accounted for 7.2% of our total revenue. In 2014, our largest customer accounted
for 4.4% of our total revenue. Our relationships with our key customers for solar modules have been developed over a relatively
short period of time and are generally in nascent stages. Our key module customers include sPower and ConEdison Development. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to generate significant revenue from these customers or that we will be able
to maintain these customer relationships. In addition, we purchase solar wafers and cells and silicon raw materials through toll
manufacturing arrangements that require us to make significant capital commitments to support our estimated production output.
In the event our customers cancel their orders, we may not be able to recoup prepayments made to suppliers, which could adversely
influence our financial condition and results of operations. The loss of sales to any of these customers could also have a material
adverse effect on our business, prospects and results of operations.
We manufacture a majority of our products in three locations
in China, which exposes us to various risks relating to long-distance transportation of our silicon wafers and solar cells in the
manufacturing process.
The geographical separation of our manufacturing
facilities in China necessitates constant long-distance transportation of substantial volumes of our silicon wafers and solar cells
between Jiangxi Province, Zhejiang Province and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. We produce silicon wafers in Jiangxi and Xinjiang,
solar cells in Zhejiang, and solar modules in Jiangxi and Zhejiang. As a result, we transport a substantial volume of our silicon
wafers and solar cells within China.
The constant long-distance transportation of
a large volume of our silicon wafers and solar cells may expose us to various risks, including (i) increases in transportation
costs, (ii) loss of our silicon wafers or solar cells as a result of any accidents that may occur in the transportation process;
(iii) delays in the transportation of our silicon wafers or solar cells as a result of any severe weather conditions, natural disasters
or other conditions adversely affecting road traffic; and (iv) disruptions to our production of solar cells and solar modules as
a result of delays in the transportation of our silicon wafers and solar cells. Any of these risks could have a material adverse
effect on our business and results of operations.
Prepayment arrangements to our suppliers for the procurement
of silicon raw materials expose us to the credit risks of such suppliers and may also significantly increase our costs and expenses,
which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
Our supply contracts generally include prepayment
obligations for the procurement of silicon raw materials. As of December 31, 2016, we had approximately RMB325.8 million (US$46.9
million) of advances to our suppliers. We generally do not receive collateral to secure such payments for these contracts and the
collateral we received are deeply subordinated and shared with all other customers and other senior lenders of the supplier.
Our prepayments, secured or unsecured, expose
us to the credit risks of our suppliers, and reduce our chances of obtaining the return of such prepayments in the event that our
suppliers become insolvent or bankrupt. Moreover, we may have difficulty recovering such prepayments if any of our suppliers fails
to fulfill its contractual delivery obligations to us. Accordingly, a default by our suppliers to whom we have made substantial
prepayment may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. For example, in
January 2013, we notified Wuxi Zhongcai Technological Co. Ltd., or Wuxi Zhongcai, one of our former polysilicon providers,
to terminate our long-term supply agreement, in response to adverse developments in Wuxi Zhongcai’s business. In February 2013,
we became involved in litigation with Wuxi Zhongcai over the supply agreement. We have fully provided for RMB93.2 million of the
outstanding balance of prepayments to Wuxi Zhongcai. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements
and Other Financial Information—Legal and Administrative Proceedings.”
Decreases in the price of solar power products, including
solar modules, may result in additional provisions for inventory losses.
We typically plan our production and inventory
levels based on our forecasts of customer demand, which may be unpredictable and can fluctuate materially. Recent market volatility
has made it increasingly difficult for us to accurately forecast future product demand trends. Due to the decrease in the prices
of solar power products, including solar modules, which have been our principal products since 2010, we recorded inventory provisions
of RMB75.9 million, RMB98.8 million and RMB439.0 million (US$63.2 million) in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. If the prices
of solar power products continue to decrease, the carrying value of our existing inventory may exceed its market price in future
periods, thus requiring us to make additional provisions for inventory valuation, which may have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations.
Shortage or disruption of electricity supply may adversely
affect our business.
We consume a significant amount of electricity
in our operations. With the rapid development of the PRC economy, demand for electricity has continued to increase. There have
been shortages or disruptions in electricity supply in various regions across China, especially during peak seasons, such as the
summer, or when there are severe weather conditions. We cannot assure you that there will not be disruptions or shortages in our
electricity supply or that there will be sufficient electricity available to us to meet our future requirements. Shortages or disruptions
in electricity supply and any increases in electricity costs may significantly disrupt our normal operations, cause us to incur
additional costs and adversely affect our profitability.
We face intense competition in solar power product markets.
If we fail to adapt to changing market conditions and to compete successfully with existing or new competitors, our business prospects
and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
The markets for solar power products are intensely
competitive. We compete with manufacturers of solar power products such as Trina Solar Ltd., Canadian Solar Inc. and JA Solar Holdings
Co., Ltd, in a continuously evolving market. Certain downstream manufacturers, some of which are also our customers and suppliers,
have also built out or expanded their silicon wafer, solar cell, or solar module production operations.
Some of our current and potential competitors
have a longer operating history, stronger brand recognition, more established relationships with customers, greater financial and
other resources, a larger customer base, better access to raw materials and greater economies of scale than we do. Furthermore,
some of our competitors are integrated players in the solar industry that engage in the production of virgin polysilicon. Their
business models may give them competitive advantages as these integrated players place less reliance on the upstream suppliers,
downstream customers or both.
The solar industry faces competition from other types
of renewable and non-renewable power industries.
The solar industry faces competition from other
renewable energy companies and non-renewable power industries, including nuclear energy and fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum
and natural gas. Technological innovations in these other forms of energy may reduce their costs or increase their safety. Large-scale
new deposits of fossil fuel may be discovered, which could reduce their costs. Local governments may decide to strengthen their
support for other renewable energy sources, such as wind, hydro, biomass, geothermal and ocean power, and reduce their support
for the solar industry. The inability to compete successfully against producers of other forms of power would reduce our market
share and negatively affect our results of operations.
Technological changes in the solar power industry could
render our products uncompetitive or obsolete, which could reduce our market share and cause our revenue and net income to decline.
The solar power industry is characterized by
evolving technologies and standards. These technological evolutions and developments place increasing demands on the improvement
of our products, such as solar cells with higher conversion efficiency and larger and thinner silicon wafers and solar cells. Other
companies may develop production technologies that enable them to produce silicon wafers, solar cells and solar modules with higher
conversion efficiencies at a lower cost than our products. Some of our competitors are developing alternative and competing solar
technologies that may require significantly less silicon than crystalline silicon wafers and solar cells, or no silicon at all.
Technologies developed or adopted by others may prove more advantageous than ours for commercialization of solar power products
and may render our products obsolete. As a result, we may need to invest significant resources in research and development to maintain
our market position, keep pace with technological advances in the solar power industry, and effectively compete in the future.
Our failure to further refine and enhance our products and processes or to keep pace with evolving technologies and industry standards
could cause our products to become uncompetitive or obsolete, which could materially adversely reduce our market share and affect
our results of operations.
Existing regulations and policies and changes to these
regulations and policies may present technical, regulatory and economic barriers to the purchase and use of solar power products,
which may significantly reduce demand for our products.
The market for electricity generation products
is heavily influenced by government regulations and policies concerning the electric utility industry, as well as by policies adopted
by electric utility companies. These regulations and policies often relate to electricity pricing and technical interconnection
requirements for customer-owned electricity generation. In a number of countries, these regulations and policies are being modified
and may continue to be modified. Customer purchases of, or further investment in the research and development of, alternative energy
sources, including solar power technology, could be deterred by these regulations and policies, which could result in a significant
reduction in the demand for our products. For example, without a regulatory mandated exception for solar power systems, utility
customers may be charged interconnection or standby fees for putting distributed power generation on the electric utility grid.
These fees could increase the cost of and reduce the demand for solar power, thereby harming our business, prospects, results of
operations and financial condition.
In addition, we anticipate that solar power
products and their installation will be subject to oversight and regulation in accordance with national and local regulations relating
to building codes, safety, environmental protection, utility interconnection, and metering and related matters. Any new government
regulations or utility policies pertaining to solar power products may result in significant additional expenses to the users of
solar power products and, as a result, could eventually cause a significant reduction in demand for our products.
We may face termination and late charges and risks relating
to the termination and amendment of certain equipment purchases contracts. Our reliance on equipment and spare parts suppliers
may also expose us to potential risks.
We transact with a limited number of equipment
suppliers for all our principal manufacturing equipment and spare parts, including our silicon ingot furnaces, squaring machines,
wire saws, diffusion furnaces, firing furnaces and screen print machine. We may rely on certain major suppliers to provide a substantial
portion of the principal manufacturing equipment and spare parts as part of our expansion plan in the future. If we fail to develop
or maintain our relationships with these and other equipment suppliers, or should any of our major equipment suppliers encounter
difficulties in the manufacturing or shipment of its equipment or spare parts to us, including due to natural disasters or otherwise
fail to supply equipment or spare parts according to our requirements, it will be difficult for us to find alternative providers
for such equipment on a timely basis and on commercially reasonable terms. As a result, our production and result of operation
could be adversely affected.
Selling our products on credit terms may increase our
working capital requirements and expose us to the credit risk of our customers.
To accommodate and retain customers in the negative
market environment, many solar module manufacturers, including us, shifted from demanding advance payments towards increasing credit
sales and providing longer credit terms to both existing and new customers. Most of our sales are made on credit terms and we allow
our customers to make payments after a certain period of time subsequent to the delivery of our products. The increased use of
credit sales and the longer credit terms have led to increased accounts receivable turnover and bad debt risks. Our accounts receivable
turnover were 102 days, 82 days and 108 days in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. In particular, in 2014, 2015 and 2016, our accounts
receivable turnover in the United States were 34 days, 25 days and 19 days, respectively, and our accounts receivable turnover
in China were 146 days, 131 days and 144 days, respectively. Correspondingly, we recorded provisions for accounts receivable of
RMB428.6 million, RMB335.7 million and RMB376.6 million (US$54.2 million) as of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
We had reversal of bad debt provisions of RMB161.4 million, RMB206.3 million and RMB191.5 million (US$27.6 million) for 2014, 2015
and 2016 as a result of the subsequent cash collection of long-aged accounts receivable.
We expect the use of credit sales to continue
in the industry and this trend will continue to negatively affect our liquidity and our accounts receivable turnover. Selling our
products on credit terms has increased, and may continue to increase our working capital requirements, which may negatively impact
our short-term liquidity. We may not be able to maintain adequate working capital primarily through cash generated from our operating
activities and may need to secure additional financing for our working capital requirements. Based on our ongoing assessment of
the recoverability of our outstanding accounts receivable, we may need to continue to provide for doubtful accounts and write off
overdue accounts receivable we determine as not collectible. If we fail to secure additional financing on a timely basis on terms
acceptable to us or at all, our financial conditions, results of operations and liquidity may be adversely affected. In addition,
we are exposed to the credit risk of customers to which we have made credit sales in the event that any of such customers becomes
insolvent or bankrupt or otherwise does not make timely payments.
We face risks associated with the manufacturing, marketing,
distribution and sale of our products internationally, and if we are unable to effectively manage these risks, our ability to expand
our business abroad may be restricted.
We commenced export sales in May 2008 when
we exported a small portion of our products to Hong Kong, and have since continued to increase export sales. In 2014, 2015 and
2016, we generated 57.7%, 62.7% and 61.5%, respectively, of our total revenue from export sales. We also have manufacturing facilities
in South Africa, Portugal and Malaysia. We plan to continue to increase manufacturing and sales outside China and expand our customer
base overseas. However, the manufacturing, marketing, distribution and sale of our products outside of China may expose us to a
number of risks, including those associated with:
|
·
|
fluctuations
in currency exchange rates;
|
|
·
|
costs
associated with understanding local markets and trends;
|
|
·
|
costs
associated with establishment of overseas manufacturing facilities;
|
|
·
|
marketing
and distribution costs;
|
|
·
|
customer
services and support costs;
|
|
·
|
risk
management and internal control structures for our overseas operations;
|
|
·
|
compliance
with the different commercial, operational, environmental and legal requirements;
|
|
·
|
obtaining
or maintaining certifications for production, marketing, distribution and sales of our products or, if applicable, services;
|
|
·
|
maintaining
our reputation as an environmentally friendly enterprise for our products or services;
|
|
·
|
obtaining,
maintaining or enforcing intellectual property rights;
|
|
·
|
changes
in prevailing economic conditions and regulatory requirements;
|
|
·
|
transportation
and freight costs;
|
|
·
|
employing
and retaining manufacturing, technology, sales and other personnel who are knowledgeable about, and can function effectively in,
overseas markets;
|
|
·
|
trade
barriers such as export requirements, tariffs, taxes and other restrictions and expenses, which could increase the prices of our
products and make us less competitive in some countries;
|
|
·
|
challenges
due to our unfamiliarity with local laws, regulation and policies, our absence of significant operating experience in local market,
increased cost associated with establishment of overseas operations and maintaining a multi-national organizational structure;
and
|
|
·
|
other
various risks that are beyond our control.
|
Our manufacturing capacity outside China requires
us to comply with different laws and regulations, including national and local regulations relating to production, environmental
protection, employment and the other related matters. Due to our limited experience in doing business in South Africa, Portugal
and Malaysia, we are unfamiliar with local laws, regulation and policies. Our failure to obtain the required approvals, permits,
licenses, filings or to comply with the conditions associated therewith could result in fines, sanctions, suspension, revocation
or non-renewal of approvals, permits or licenses, or even criminal penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we are exploring the opportunity
for development, construction and operation of solar power projects outside China. In March 2016, we, acting through our wholly-owned
subsidiary Jinkosolar Investment Pte. Ltd., were awarded the right to sign power purchase agreements with Comisión Federal
de Electricidad, Mexico’s state-owned electric utility, for three PV solar projects with a total capacity of approximately
188 MW under Mexico’s first electricity power auction since the country’s energy reform. However, if we fail in the
execution of the project in compliance with the auction instructions and the documents or agreements subsequently entered into
by us, our auction bond may be forfeited and we may be subject to further liquidated damages and our potential in participation
of auction or bidding process in the future may be limited.
As we enter into new markets in different jurisdictions,
we will face different regulatory regimes, business practices, governmental requirements and industry conditions. As a result,
our prior experiences and knowledge in other jurisdictions may not be relevant, and we may spend substantial resources familiarizing
ourselves with the new environment and conditions. To the extent that our business operations are affected by unexpected and adverse
economic, regulatory, social and political conditions in the jurisdictions in which we have operations, we may experience project
disruptions, loss of assets and personnel, and other indirect losses that could adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
We are subject to anti-dumping and countervailing duties
imposed by the U.S. government and quotas imposed by the European Union.
Our direct sales to the U.S. market accounted
for 18.1%, 26.8% and 36.0% of our total revenue in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
In 2011, SolarWorld Industries America Inc.,
a solar panel manufacturing companies in the United States, filed anti-dumping and countervailing duty petitions with the United
States Department of Commerce (the “U.S. Department of Commerce”) and United States International Trade Commission
(the “U.S. International Trade Commission”) against the Chinese solar industry, accusing Chinese producers of crystalline
silicon photovoltaic (“CSPV”) cells, whether or not assembled into modules, of selling their products (i.e., CSPV cells
or modules incorporating these cells) in the United States at less than fair value, and of receiving financial assistance from
the Chinese governments that benefited the production, manufacture, or exportation of such products. JinkoSolar is on the list
of the solar companies subject to such investigations by the U.S. Department of Commerce. On November 9, 2011, the U.S. Department
of Commerce announced that it launched the antidumping duty and countervailing duty investigation into the accusations. On December 7,
2012, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty order. As a result, the cash deposits
are required to pay on import into the U.S. of the CSPV cells, whether or not assembled into modules from China. The announced
cash deposit rates applicable to us are 13.94% (for dumping margin) and 15.24% (for subsidy rate). The actual antidumping duty
and countervailing duty rates at which entries of covered merchandise will be finally assessed may differ from the announced deposit
rates because they are subject to the following administrative reviews by U.S. Department of Commerce. In January 2014, the
U.S. Department of Commerce initiated the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty order
with respect to CSPV cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China. In July 2014, the U.S. Department of Commerce
issued the final results of this first administrative review, according to which, our tariff rates for dumping and subsidy are
9.67% and 20.94%, respectively. Such rates apply as the final rates on the import into the U.S. of the CSPV cells, whether or not
assembled into modules from China, from May 25, 2012 to November 30, 2013 for dumping, and from March 26, 2012 to
December 31, 2012 for subsidy, respectively. Such rates will be the cash deposit rates applicable to us from July 14,
2015. In February 2015 and February 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated the second administrative and the
third administrative review of the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty order with respect to CSPV cells, whether or
not assembled into modules, from China, respectively. In June 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued the final results of
this second administrative review. As we were not included in this second administrative review, the tariff rates applicable to
us remained at 9.67% (for dumping margin) and 20.94% (for subsidy rate) after this review. The third administrative review is pending
as of the date of this annual report. In February 2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated the fourth administrative
review of the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty order with respect to CSPV cells, whether or not assembled into modules,
from China. The fourth administrative reviews are pending as of the date of this annual report, and therefore, the final tariff
rates applicable to us are subject to change.
In 2013, SolarWorld Industries America Inc.
filed a separate petition with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission resulting in the institution
of new antidumping and countervailing duty investigations against import of certain CSPV products from China. The petitions accused
Chinese producers of such certain CSPV modules of dumping their products in the United States and receiving countervailable subsidies
from the Chinese government. This action excludes from its scope the CSPV cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China.
In February 2015, following the affirmative injury determination made by U.S. International Trade Commission, the U.S. Department
of Commerce issued the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty order. As a result, the final cash deposits are required
to pay on import into the U.S. of the CSPV modules assembled in China consisting of CSPV cells produced in a customs territory
other than China. The announced cash deposit rates applicable to us are 65.36% (for dumping margin) and 38.43% (for subsidy rate).
The actual antidumping duty and countervailing duty rates at which entries of covered merchandise will be finally assessed may
differ from the announced deposit rates because they are subject to the administrative reviews by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
In April 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order and
countervailing duty order with respect to CSPV modules assembled in China consisting of CSPV cells produced in a customs territory
other than China. Such first administrative reviews are pending as of the date of this annual report.
Our sales in the United States may be adversely
affected by these anti-dumping and countervailing duties, which may in turn materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations. We made provisions of RMB15.0 million (US$2.2 million) for preliminary U.S. countervailing
and anti-dumping duties in 2016. However, as the final tariff rates applicable to us are subject to the outcome of the administrative
reviews which may be substantially increased by the U.S. Department of Commerce, we cannot assure you that our provision made is
sufficient and our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if the outcome of the administrative
reviews turn out to be negative.
Our direct sales to the European market accounted
for 15.6%, 12.4% and 3.5% of our total revenue in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. On June 6, 2013, the European Union imposed
provisional anti-dumping duty on the solar panels originating in or consigned from China, including JinkoSolar’s products,
at the starting rate of 11.8% until August 5, 2013, and followed by an increased rate averaging 47.6%.
On July 27, 2013, the European Union and
Chinese trade negotiators announced that a price undertaking has been reached pursuant to which Chinese manufacturers, including
JinkoSolar, would limit their exports of solar panels to the European Union and for no less than a minimum price, in exchange for
the European Union agreeing to forgo the imposition of anti-dumping duties on these solar panels from China. The offer was approved
by the European Commission on August 2, 2013. The China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic
Products, or CCCME, is responsible for allocating the quota among Chinese export producers, and JinkoSolar has been allocated a
portion of the quota. Solar panels imported exceeding the annual quota will be subject to anti-dumping duties. On December 5,
2013, the European Council announced its final decision imposing definitive anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties on imports of
crystalline silicon PV cells and modules originating in or consigned from China. An average duty of 47.7%, consisting of the anti-dumping
and anti-subsidy duties, will be applied for a period of two years beginning on December 6, 2013 to Chinese solar panel exporters
who cooperated with the European Commission’s investigations. On the same day, the European Commission announced its decision
to confirm the acceptance of the price undertaking offered by Chinese export producers, including JinkoSolar, with CCCME in connection
with the anti-dumping proceeding and to extend the price undertaking to the anti-subsidy proceeding, which will exempt them from
both anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties. From November 17, 2016, we have officially withdrawn from the European Union price undertaking
agreement.
In May 2015, the European Commission initiated
expiry reviews of the existing countervailing measures and antidumping measures applicable to imports of CSPV modules and key components
(i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China. Such expiry reviews will determine whether
the existing countervailing measures and antidumping measures will expire or continue to apply. In March 2017, the European Commission
made final determination to continue the existing countervailing measures and antidumping measures for another 18 months.
In May 2015, the European Commission initiated
an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of antidumping measures and countervailing measures imposed on imports of
CSPV modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from China by imports of CSPV modules and key components
(i.e. cells) consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and Taiwan or not. In February 2016,
the European Commission made definitive result of this investigation. According to the definitive results, the 53.4% of the anti-dumping
duty and 11.5% of the countervailing duty are applicable to the imports of CSPV modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating
in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China, is hereby extended to imports of CSPV modules and key components (i.e.
cells) consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.
In March 2017, the European Commission initiated
a partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures applicable to imports of CSPV modules and key components
(i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from China. Such partial interim review will examine whether the European Union price
undertaking agreement can still be considered as an appropriate form for the measures. Such partial interim review is pending as
of the date of this annual report.
The European Union is one of the most important
markets for solar products. Anti-dumping, countervailing duties or both imposed on imports of our products into the European Union
could materially adversely affect our affiliated European Union import operations, increase our cost of selling into the European
Union, and adversely affect our European Union export sales.
In December 2014, Canada initiated the
anti-dumping and countervailing investigations on imports of CSPV modules from China. In June 2015, the Canada Border Services
Agency (“CBSA”) found that the CSPV modules under investigation have been dumped and subsidized. In July 2015,
the Canadian International Trade Tribunal found that the dumping and subsidizing of the above-mentioned goods have not caused injury,
but are threatening to cause injury to the domestic industry. As a result, import into Canada of our CSPV modules under investigation
from China is subject to the antidumping and countervailing duties. The countervailing duty rate (RMB per Watt) applicable to Jiangxi
Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko are 0.028 and 0.046, respectively. For antidumping duties, CBSA set normal value for the imported CSPV
modules and the anti-dumping duty will be the difference between the export price and normal value if the export price is lower
the normal value. No antidumping duties will apply if the export price is equal or more than the normal value.
In May 2014, Australian Anti-dumping Commission
initiated anti-dumping investigation against CSPV modules imported from China. In October 2015, the Australian Anti-dumping
Commission decided to terminate this investigation and decided no imposition of any anti-dumping duty on imported CSPV modules
from China. However, in January 2016, the Australian Antidumping Commission resumed this investigation. In October 2016, Australian
Anti-dumping Commission made final determination to uphold its original results, i.e. to terminate the investigation and decided
no imposition of any anti-dumping duty on imported CSPV modules from China.
In July 2016, Turkish Ministry of Economy initiated
anti-dumping investigation against photovoltaic cells whether or not assembled in modules or made up into panels, from China. Such
anti-dumping investigation is pending as of the date of this annual report.
Imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing
orders in one or more markets may result in additional costs to us, our customers or both, which could materially adversely affect
our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
We are exposed to various risks related to legal or
administrative proceedings or claims that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and reputation,
and may cause loss of business.
Litigation in general can be expensive, lengthy
and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. We and/or
our directors and officers may be involved in allegations, litigation or legal or administrative proceedings from time to time.
On October 11, 2011, JinkoSolar, along
with our directors and officers at the time of our initial public offering, or the Individual Defendants, and the underwriters
of our initial public offering were named as defendants in a putative shareholder class action lawsuit filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned
Marco Peters v. JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd., et al.
,
Case No. 11-CV-7133 (S.D.N.Y.). In an amended complaint filed on June 1, 2012, the plaintiff, representing a class
of all purchasers and acquirers of ADSs of JinkoSolar between May 13, 2010 and September 22, 2011, inclusive, alleged
that the defendants violated Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, by making material misstatements or failing to disclose material information regarding,
among other things, JinkoSolar’s compliance with environmental regulations at its Haining facility. The amended complaint
also asserted claims against the Individual Defendants for control person liability under Section 15 of the Securities Act
and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. On January 22, 2013, the District Court issued a Memorandum and Order dismissing
the amended complaint as against all defendants. The plaintiff appealed the District Court’s Order to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which issued an order on July 31, 2014 vacating the District Court’s Order and remanding
the case to the District Court for further proceedings. Defendants filed a further motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On
January 22, 2015, JinkoSolar agreed, subject to court approval, to settle the lawsuit. The settlement, if approved, will also
resolve all related claims against JinkoSolar’s officers and directors as well as the underwriters involved in JinkoSolar’s
public offerings during the relevant period. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the members of the proposed class will
receive a settlement fund of $5.05 million, less any court-approved fees. JinkoSolar will contribute a portion of the settlement
fund, and JinkoSolar’s insurers will fund the remaining portion. JinkoSolar will not take any charge in connection with the
settlement. JinkoSolar has denied, and continues to deny, the allegations and is entering into this settlement solely to eliminate
the uncertainty, burden and expense of further protracted litigation. On March 11, 2016, the District Court entered an Order
and Final Judgment approving such settlement, certifying the proposed class for settlement purposes, and dismissing the amended
complaint with prejudice.
In July 2008, Jiangxi Jinko entered into
a long-term supply agreement with Wuxi Zhongcai, a producer of polysilicon materials. Jiangxi Jinko provided a prepayment of RMB95.6
million pursuant to such contract. Wuxi Zhongcai subsequently halted production as a result of the adverse changes in the polysilicon
market. In February 2013, Jiangxi Jinko sued Wuxi Zhongcai in Shangrao City Intermediate People’s Court for the refund
of the outstanding balance of our prepayment of RMB93.2 million after deducting delivery made to Jiangxi Jinko by an affiliate
of Wuxi Zhongcai. In February 2013, Wuxi Zhongcai sued Jiangxi Jinko in Shanghai Pudong New Area People’s Court for
approximately RMB2.7 million for breaching the contract by failing to make allegedly required payments and reject the refund of
the prepayment of RMB 95.6 million to Jiangxi Jinko. In December 2015, Jiangxi Jinko made an alternation of the claim under which
it requested the refund of the prepayment of RMB93.2 million, the interests accrued from such prepayment, and the liquidated damages
in the amount of RMB93.2 million. In January, 2016, Wuxi Zhongcai also changed the plea, in which it claimed for the liquidated
damages amounting to approximately RMB102.0 million and the losses suffered from the termination of the agreement in the amount
of RMB150.0 million, and rejected the refund of the prepayment of RMB95.6 million to Jiangxi Jinko. The above two lawsuits are
pending before the Shanghai High People’s court as of the date of this annual report.
In 2010 and 2011, Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang
Qin Ye Construction Group Co., Ltd. (“Zhejiang Qin Ye”) entered into several agreements for construction projects.
In January 2014, Jiangxi Jinko sued Zhejiang Qin Ye for breach of contract due to the commercial bribery conducted by employees
of Zhejiang Qin Ye, the liquidated damages of which amounted to RMB22.3 million. In May 2015, Zhejiang Qin Ye sued Jiangxi Jinko,
claiming for the unpaid contract price in the amount of RMB23.1 million. As of the date of this annual report, the above two lawsuits
are still pending for judgment.
Regardless of the merits, responding to allegations,
litigation or legal or administration proceedings and defending against litigation can be time consuming and costly, and may result
in us incurring substantial legal and administrative expenses, as well as divert the attention of our management. Any such allegations,
lawsuits or proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business operations. Further, unfavorable outcomes from these
claims or lawsuits could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may continue to undertake acquisitions, investments,
joint ventures or other strategic alliances, and such undertakings may be unsuccessful.
We may continue to grow our operations through
acquisitions, participation in joint ventures or other strategic alliances with suppliers or other companies in China and overseas
along the solar power industry value chain in the future. Such acquisitions, participation in joint ventures and strategic alliances
may expose us to new operational, regulatory, market and geographical risks as well as risks associated with additional capital
requirements and diversion of management resources. Our acquisitions may expose us to the following risks:
|
·
|
There
may be unforeseen risks relating to the target’s business and operations or liabilities of the target that were not discovered
by us through our legal and business due diligence prior to such acquisition. Such undetected risks and liabilities could have
a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations in the future.
|
|
·
|
There
is no assurance that we will be able to maintain relationships with previous customers of the target, or develop new customer
relationships in the future. Loss of our existing customers or failure to establish relationships with new customers could have
a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
|
|
·
|
Acquisitions
will generally divert a significant portion of our management and financial resources from our existing business and the integration
of the target’s operations with our existing operations has required, and will continue to require, significant management
and financial resources, potentially straining our ability to finance and manage our existing operations.
|
|
·
|
There
is no assurance that the expected synergies or other benefits from any acquisition or joint venture investment will actually materialize.
If we are not successful in the integration of a target’s operations, or are otherwise not successful in the operation of
a target’s business, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue from its operations to recover costs and expenses
of the acquisition.
|
|
·
|
Acquisition
or participation in new joint venture or strategic alliance may involve us in the management of operation in which we do not possess
extensive expertise.
|
The materialization of any of these risks could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to non-competition or other similar
restrictions or arrangements relating to our business.
We may from time to time enter into non-competition,
exclusivity or other restrictions or arrangements of a similar nature as part of our sales agreements with our customers. Such
restrictions or arrangements may significantly hinder our ability to sell additional products, or enter into sales agreements with
new or existing customers that plan to sell our products, in certain markets. As a result, such restrictions or arrangements may
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In October 2016, we entered into a side
agreement with Jiangxi Jinko Engineering and the investors of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, pursuant to the non-compete provisions
of which we undertake not to develop any downstream solar power project with a capacity of over 2 MW in China after the disposition
of our equity interest in Jiangxi Jinko Engineering in the fourth quarter of 2016. As a result, we only operated several solar
power projects outside China as of December 31, 2016. This non-competition covenant may adversely affect our growth prospects in
China.
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We typically require a significant amount of
cash to meet our capital requirements, including the expansion of our production capacity, as well as to fund our operations. As
of December 31, 2016, we had approximately RMB5.49 billion (US$790.5 million) in outstanding short-term borrowings (including
the current portion of long-term bank borrowings) and RMB488.5 million (US$70.4 million) in outstanding long-term bank borrowings
(excluding the current portion).
In addition, we have substantial repayment obligations
under the debt securities we issued.
On January 22, 2014, we issued convertible
senior notes in the principal amount of US$150.0 million due 2019, bearing an annual interest rate of 4.0% and with an option for
holders to require us to repurchase their notes in February 2017 for the principal of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest,
to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A and in reliance of Regulation S of the Securities Act. In November 2014,
we signed a US$20.0 million two-year credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, or Wells Fargo. The credit limit
was raised to US$40.0 million in June 2015 and further to US$60.0 million in July 2016 through amendments to the credit
agreement. Borrowings under the new credit agreement will be used to support our working capital and business operations in the
United States.
In May 2015, we signed a
US$20.0 million bank facility agreement with Barclay Bank, which was subsequently raised to US$40.0 million, to support our working
capital and business operations. In August 2015, we signed a RMB700.0 million loan agreement with The Export-Import Bank
of China. In September 2015, we signed a line of credit of up to RMB10.0 billion strategic agreement with the Industrial
and Commercial Bank of China Jiangxi Provincial branch.
In July 2016, we signed a one-year JPY2
billion syndicated loan agreement with a bank consortium led by Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation to support our working capital
and business operations in Japan. In September 2016, we signed a US$25.0 million bank facility agreement with Malayan Banking Berhad
to support our working capital and business operations in Malaysia.
We may not have sufficient funds available to
meet our payment obligations in light of the amount of bank borrowings due in the near term future. This level of debt and the
imminent repayment of our notes and other bank borrowings could have significant consequences on our operations, including:
|
·
|
reducing
the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes
as a result of our debt service obligations, and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;
|
|
·
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to,
and increasing our vulnerability to, changes in our business, the industry in which we operate and the general economy; and
|
|
·
|
potentially increasing the cost of any additional financing.
|
Any of these factors and other consequences
that may result from our substantial indebtedness could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations as well as our ability to meet our payment obligations under our debt.
In addition, we are exposed to various types
of market risk in the normal course of business, including the impact of interest rate changes. As of December 31, 2016, RMB488.5
million (US$70.4 million) of our long-term borrowings bears interest at variable rates, generally linked to market benchmarks such
as the benchmark interest rate issued by People’s Bank of China, or PBOC. Any increase in interest rates would increase our
finance expenses relating to our variable rate indebtedness and increase the costs of refinancing our existing indebtedness and
issuing new debt.
We may also incur gain or loss in relation
to our change in the fair value of our financial instruments. For example, in 2016, we had net loss from a change in fair value
of convertible senior notes and capped call options of RMB110.2 million (US$15.9 million). The change in fair value of financial
instruments may fluctuate significantly from period to period due to factors that are largely beyond our control, and may result
in us recording substantial gains or losses as a result of such changes. As a result of the foregoing, you may not be able to rely
on period to period comparisons of our operating results as an indication of our future performance.
Our failure to maintain sufficient collateral under
certain pledge contracts for our short-term loans may materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
As of December 31, 2016, we had short-term
borrowings of RMB902.9 million (US$130.0 million), including the current portion of long-term bank borrowings, secured by certain
of our inventory with net book value of RMB61.0 million (US$8.8 million), land use rights, property, plant and equipment with total
net book value of RMB2.02 billion (US$290.9 million). We cannot assure you that we will not be requested by the pledgees to provide
additional collateral to bring the value of the collateral to the level required by the pledgees if our inventory depreciates in
the future. If we fail to provide additional collateral, the pledgees will be entitled to require the immediate repayment of the
outstanding bank loans. In addition, the pledgees may auction or sell the inventory. Furthermore, we may be subject to liquidated
damages pursuant to relevant pledge contracts. Although the pledgees have conducted regular site inspections on our inventory since
the pledge contracts were executed, they have not requested us to provide additional collateral or take other remedial actions.
However, we cannot assure you the pledgees will not require us to provide additional collateral in the future or take other remedial
actions or otherwise enforce their rights under the pledge contracts and loan agreements. If any of the foregoing occurs, our financial
condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
We rely principally on dividends and other distributions
on equity paid by our principal operating subsidiaries, and limitations on their ability to pay dividends to us could have a material
adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are a holding company and rely principally
on dividends paid by our principal operating subsidiaries, including Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko, for cash requirements. Applicable
PRC laws, rules and regulations permit payment of dividends by our PRC subsidiaries only out of their retained earnings, if any,
determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards. Our PRC subsidiaries are required to set aside a certain percentage of
their after-tax profit based on PRC accounting standards each year as reserve funds for future development and employee benefits,
in accordance with the requirements of relevant laws and provisions in their respective articles of associations. The percentage
should not be less than 10%, unless the reserve funds reach 50% of the company’s registered capital. In addition, under PRC
laws, our PRC subsidiaries are prohibited from distributing dividends if there is a loss in the current year. As a result, our
PRC subsidiaries may be restricted in their ability to transfer any portion of their net income to us whether in the form of dividends,
loans or advances. Any limitation on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us could materially adversely limit our
ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our businesses, pay dividends or otherwise fund and
conduct our business.
Any failure to maintain effective internal control
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and the market price of the ADSs.
The SEC, as required by Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, adopted rules requiring most public companies to include a management
report on such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual report, which contains management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. In addition, when a company meets
the SEC’s criteria, an independent registered public accounting firm must report on the effectiveness of the company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Our management and independent registered
public accounting firm have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 was effective.
However, we cannot assure you that in the future our management or our independent registered public accounting firm will not identify
material weaknesses during the Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act audit process or for other reasons. In addition, because
of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management
override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result,
if we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or should we be unable to prevent or detect material
misstatements due to error or fraud on a timely basis, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements,
which in turn could harm our business, results of operations and negatively impact the market price of the ADSs, and harm our reputation.
Furthermore, we have incurred and expected to continue to incur considerable costs and to use significant management time and other
resources in an effort to comply with Section 404 and other requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Failure to achieve satisfactory production volumes
of our products could result in higher unit production costs.
The production of silicon wafers, solar
cells, solar modules and recovered silicon materials involves complex processes. Deviations in the manufacturing process can cause
a substantial decrease in output and, in some cases, disrupt production significantly or result in no output. From time to time,
we have experienced lower-than-anticipated manufacturing output during the ramp-up of production lines. This often occurs during
the introduction of new products, the installation of new equipment or the implementation of new process technologies. As we bring
additional lines or facilities into production, we may operate at less than intended capacity during the ramp-up period. In addition,
the decreased demand in global solar power product market, including the demand for solar modules, may also cause us to operate
at less than intended capacity. This would result in higher marginal production costs and lower output, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Demand for solar power products may be adversely
affected by seasonality.
Demand for solar power products tends to
be weaker during the winter months partly due to adverse weather conditions in certain regions, which complicate the installation
of solar power systems, our operating results may fluctuate from period to period based on the seasonality of industry demand for
solar power products. Our sales in the first quarter of any year may also be affected by the occurrence of the Chinese New Year
holiday during which domestic industrial activity is normally lower than that at other times. Such fluctuations may result in the
underutilization of our capacity and increase our average costs per unit. In addition, we may not be able to capture all of the
available demand if our capacity is insufficient during the summer months. As a result, fluctuations in the demand for our products
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Unsatisfactory performance of or defects in our
products may cause us to incur additional expenses and warranty costs, damage our reputation and cause our sales to decline.
Our products may contain defects that are
not detected until after they are shipped or inspected by our customers.
Our silicon wafer sales contracts normally
require our customers to conduct inspection before delivery. We may, from time to time, allow those of our silicon wafer customers
with good credit to return our silicon wafers within a stipulated period, which normally ranges from 7 to 15 working days after
delivery, if they find our silicon wafers do not meet the required specifications. Our standard solar cell sales contract requires
our customer to notify us within 7 days of delivery if such customer finds our solar cells do not meet the specifications stipulated
in the sales contract. If our customer notifies us of such defect within the specified time period and provides relevant proof,
we will replace those defective solar cells with qualified ones after our confirmation of such defects.
Our solar modules are typically sold with
a 10-year warranty for material and workmanship and a 25-year linear power output warranty against the maximum degradation of the
actual power output for each year after the warranty start date. If a solar module is defective during the relevant warranty period,
we will either repair or replace the solar module. As we continue to increase our sales to the major export markets, we may be
exposed to increased warranty claims.
In May 2011, we engaged PowerGuard
Specialty Insurance Services, or PowerGuard, a firm specialized in unique insurance and risk management solutions for the wind
and solar energy industries, to provide insurance coverage for the product warranty services of our solar modules worldwide effective
from May 1, 2011. Since May 2011, we have renewed the insurance policy upon its expiration in May for each year
for a period of one year. The policy offers back-to-back coverage through a maximum of ten-year limited product defects warranty,
as well as a 12-year and 25-year linear warranty against declines of more than 10.0% and 20.0%, respectively, from the initial
minimum power generation capacity at the time of delivery.
If we experience a significant increase
in warranty claims, we may incur significant repair and replacement costs associated with such claims. In addition, product defects
could cause significant damage to our market reputation and reduce our product sales and market share, and our failure to maintain
the consistency and quality throughout our production process could result in substandard quality or performance of our products.
If we deliver our products with defects, or if there is a perception that our products are of substandard quality, we may incur
substantially increased costs associated with returns or replacements of our products, our credibility and market reputation could
be harmed and our sales and market share may be materially adversely affected.
Fluctuations in exchange rates could adversely affect
our results of operations.
We derive a substantial portion of our sales
from international customers and a significant portion of our total revenue have been denominated in foreign currencies, particularly,
Euros and U.S. dollars. Our export sales represented 57.7%, 62.7% and 61.5% of our total revenue in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
As a result, we may face significant risks resulting from currency exchange rate fluctuations, particularly, among Renminbi, Euros
and U.S. dollars. Furthermore, we have outstanding debt obligations, and may continue to incur debts from time to time, denominated
and repayable in foreign currencies. We incurred foreign-exchange losses of approximately RMB139.6 million and RMB86.5 million
in 2014 and 2015, respectively and foreign-exchange gain of approximately RMB208.8 million (US$30.1 million) in 2016. We cannot
predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our results of operations and may incur net foreign currency losses
in the future.
Our consolidated financial statements are
expressed in Renminbi. The functional currency of our principal operating subsidiaries, Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko, is also
Renminbi. To the extent we hold assets denominated in Euros or U.S. dollars, any appreciation of Renminbi against the Euro or U.S.
dollar could reduce the value of our Euro-or U.S. dollar-denominated consolidated assets. On the other hand, if we decide to convert
our Renminbi amounts into Euros or U.S. dollars for business purposes, including foreign debt service, a decline in the value of
Renminbi against the Euro or U.S. dollar would reduce the Euro or U.S. dollar equivalent amounts of the Renminbi we convert. In
addition, a depreciation of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar could reduce the U.S. dollar equivalent amounts of our financial results
and the dividends we may pay in the future, if any, all of which may have a material adverse effect on the price of our ADSs.
Since June 2010, the Renminbi has fluctuated
against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably. On November 30, 2015, the Executive Board of the International
Monetary Fund completed the regular five-year review of the basket of currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right, or the
SDR, and decided that with effect from October 1, 2016, Renminbi will be a freely usable currency and will be included in the SDR
basket as a fifth currency, along with the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen and the British pound. In the fourth quarter
of 2016, the RMB has depreciated significantly in the backdrop of a surging U.S. dollar and persistent capital outflows of China.
With the development of the foreign exchange market and progress towards interest rate liberalization and Renminbi internationalization,
the PRC government may in the future announce further changes to the exchange rate system and we cannot assure you that the Renminbi
will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is difficult to predict how
market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar
in the future. Any currency exchange losses we recognize may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict
our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency.
Limited hedging transactions are available
in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. Although we have entered into a number of foreign-exchange forward
contracts and call spread options with local banks to manage our risks associated with foreign-exchange rates fluctuations, we
cannot assure you that our hedging efforts will be effective. Our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control
regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency. As a result, fluctuations in exchange rates may
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our operating history may not be a reliable predictor
of our prospects and future results of operations.
We commenced processing recoverable silicon
materials in June 2006, and manufacturing silicon wafers in 2008. We commenced producing solar cells in July 2009 following
our acquisition of Zhejiang Jinko, which has manufactured solar cells since June 2007, and we commenced producing solar modules
in August 2009. We commenced our solar power generation and solar system integration service business in late 2011 and disposed
of our downstream solar power project business in the PRC to a related party in November 2016.
Although our revenue experienced significant
growth in the past, we cannot assure you that our revenue will increase at previous rates or at all, or that we will be able to
continue to operate profitably in future periods. We also experienced net losses in each quarter from the fourth quarter of 2011
to the first quarter of 2013. Our operating history may not be a reliable predictor of our future results of operations, and past
revenue growth experienced by us should not be taken as indicative of the rate of revenue growth, if any, that can be expected
in the future. We believe that period to period comparisons of our operating results and our results for any period should not
be relied upon as an indication of future performance.
Our operations are subject to natural disasters,
adverse weather conditions, operating hazards, environmental incidents and labor disputes.
We may experience earthquakes, floods, mudslides,
snowstorms, typhoon, power outages, labor disputes or similar events beyond our control that would affect our operations. Our manufacturing
processes involve the use of hazardous equipment, such as furnaces, squaring machines and wire saws. We also use, store and generate
volatile and otherwise dangerous chemicals and waste during our manufacturing processes, which are potentially destructive and
dangerous if not properly handled or in the event of uncontrollable or catastrophic circumstances, including operating hazards,
fires and explosions, natural disasters, adverse weather conditions and major equipment failures, for which we cannot obtain insurance
at a reasonable cost or at all.
In addition, our silicon wafer and solar
module production and storage facilities are located in close proximity to one another in the Shangrao Economic Development Zone
in Jiangxi Province, and our solar cell production and storage facilities are located in close proximity to one another in Haining,
Zhejiang Province. The occurrence of any natural disaster, unanticipated catastrophic event or unexpected accident in either of
the two locations could result in production curtailments, shutdowns or periods of reduced production, which could significantly
disrupt our business operations, cause us to incur additional costs and affect our ability to deliver our products to our customers
as scheduled, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, such events could
result in severe damage to property, personal injuries, fatalities, regulatory enforcement proceedings or in our being named as
a defendant in lawsuits asserting claims for large amounts of damages, which in turn could lead to significant liabilities.
Our Haining facility suspended operation
from September 17, 2011 to October 9, 2011 due to an environmental incident. See “—Compliance with environmentally
safe production and construction regulations can be costly, while noncompliance with such regulations may result in adverse publicity
and potentially significant monetary damages, fines and suspension of our business operations.” Occurrences of natural disasters,
as well as accidents and incidents of adverse weather in or around Shangrao, Haining and Penang in the future may result in significant
property damage, electricity shortages, disruption of our operations, work stoppages, civil unrest, personal injuries and, in severe
cases, fatalities. Such incidents may result in damage to our reputation or cause us to lose all or a portion of our production
capacity, and future revenue anticipated to be derived from the relevant facilities.
Our founders collectively have significant influence
over our management and their interests may not be aligned with our interests or the interests of our other shareholders.
As of the date of this annual report, our
founders, Xiande Li who is our chairman, Kangping Chen who is our chief executive officer, and Xianhua Li who is our vice president,
beneficially owned approximately 15.9%, 9.5% and 4.8%, respectively, or approximately 30.2% in the aggregate, of our outstanding
ordinary shares. If the founders act collectively, they will have a substantial influence over our business, including decisions
regarding mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors, dividend policy
and other significant corporate actions. They may take actions that are not in the best interest of our company or our securities
holders. For example, this concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which
could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and might
reduce the price of our ADSs. On the other hand, if the founders are in favor of any of these actions, these actions may be taken
even if they are opposed by a majority of our other shareholders, including you and those who invest in ADSs. In addition, under
our current articles of association, the quorum required for the general meeting of our shareholders is two shareholders entitled
to vote and present in person or by proxy or, if the shareholder is a corporation, by its duly authorized representative representing
not less than one-third in nominal value of our total issued voting shares. As such, a shareholders resolution may be passed at
our shareholders meetings with the presence of our founders only and without the presence of any of our other shareholders, which
may not represent the interests of our other shareholders, including holders of ADSs.
We have limited insurance coverage and may incur
losses resulting from product liability claims, business interruption or natural disasters.
We are exposed to risks associated with
product liability claims in the event that the use of our products results in property damage or personal injury. Since our products
are ultimately incorporated into electricity generating systems, it is possible that users could be injured or killed by devices
that use our products, whether as a result of product malfunctions, defects, improper installations or other causes. Due to our
limited operating history, we are unable to predict whether product liability claims will be brought against us in the future or
to predict the impact of any resulting adverse publicity on our business. The successful assertion of product liability claims
against us could result in potentially significant monetary damages and require us to make significant payments. We carry limited
product liability insurance and may not have adequate resources to satisfy a judgment in the event of a successful claim against
us. In addition, we do not carry any business interruption insurance. As the insurance industry in China is still in its early
stage of development, even if we decide to take out business interruption coverage, such insurance available in China offers limited
coverage compared with that offered in many other countries. Any business interruption or natural disaster could result in substantial
losses and diversion of our resources and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The grant of employee share options and other share-based
compensation could adversely affect our net income.
As of the date of annual report, share options
with respect to 9,325,122 ordinary shares have been granted to our directors, officers and employees pursuant to our 2009 Long
Term Incentive Plan, and there are 3,578,106 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options granted under
the plan. As of the date of annual report, share options with respect to 11,077,980 ordinary shares have been granted to our directors,
officers and employees pursuant to our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, and there are 11,077,980 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise
of outstanding options granted under the plan. U.S. GAAP requires us to recognize share-based compensation as compensation expense
in the consolidated statement of operations based on the fair value of equity awards on the date of the grant, with the compensation
expense recognized over the period in which the recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the equity award. If we
grant more share options to attract and retain key personnel, the expenses associated with share-based compensation may adversely
affect our net income. However, if we do not grant share options or reduce the number of share options that we grant, we may not
be able to attract and retain key personnel.
Our lack of sufficient patent protection in and
outside of China may undermine our competitive position and subject us to intellectual property disputes with third parties, both
of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We have developed various production process
related know-how and technologies in the production of our products. Such know-how and technologies play a critical role in our
quality assurance and cost reduction. In addition, we have implemented a number of research and development programs with a view
to developing techniques and processes that will improve production efficiency and product quality. Our intellectual property and
proprietary rights from our research and development programs will be crucial in maintaining our competitive edge in the solar
power industry. As of the date of this annual report, we had 253 patents and 203 pending patent applications in China. We plan
to continue to seek to protect our intellectual property and proprietary knowledge by applying for patents for them. However, we
cannot assure you that we will be successful in obtaining patents in China in a timely manner or at all. Moreover, even if we are
successful, China currently affords less protection to a company’s intellectual property than some other countries, including
the United States. We also use contractual arrangements with employees and trade secret protections to protect our intellectual
property and proprietary rights. Nevertheless, contractual arrangements afford only limited protection and the actions we may take
to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights may not be adequate.
In addition, others may obtain knowledge
of our know-how and technologies through independent development. Our failure to protect our production process, related know-how
and technologies, our intellectual property and proprietary rights or any combination of the above may undermine our competitive
position. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary technologies or other intellectual property and proprietary
rights. Policing unauthorized use of proprietary technology can be difficult and expensive. Litigation, which can be costly and
divert management attention and other resources away from our business, may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights,
protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights. We cannot assure you that the outcome
of such potential litigation will be in our favor. An adverse determination in any such litigation will impair our intellectual
property and proprietary rights and may harm our business, prospects and reputation.
We may be exposed to intellectual property infringement
or misappropriation claims by third parties, which, if determined adversely to us, could cause us to pay significant damage awards
and subject us to injunctions prohibiting sale of our products in certain markets.
Our success depends on our ability to use
and develop our technology and know-how, and to manufacture and sell our recovered silicon materials, silicon wafers, solar cells
and solar modules, develop solar power projects or otherwise operate our business in the solar industry without infringing the
intellectual property or other rights of third parties. We may be subject to litigation involving claims of patent infringement
or violation of intellectual property rights of third parties. The validity and scope of claims relating to solar power technology
patents involve complex scientific, legal and factual questions and analyses and, therefore, may be highly uncertain. The defense
and prosecution of intellectual property suits, patent opposition proceedings, trademark disputes and related legal and administrative
proceedings can be both costly and time consuming and may significantly divert our resources and the attention of our technical
and management personnel. An adverse ruling in any such litigation or proceedings could subject us to significant liability to
third parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties, to pay ongoing royalties, or to redesign our products or subject
us to injunctions prohibiting the manufacture and sale of our products or the use of our technologies. Protracted litigation could
also result in our customers or potential customers deferring or limiting their purchase or use of our products until resolution
of such litigation.
Our business depends substantially on the continuing
efforts of our executive officers and key technical personnel, as well as our ability to maintain a skilled labor force. Our business
may be materially adversely affected if we lose their services.
Our success depends on the continued services
of our executive officers and key personnel, in particular our founders, Mr. Xiande Li, Mr. Kangping Chen and Mr. Xianhua
Li. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on any of our executive officers and key personnel. If one or more of our executive
officers and key personnel are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may not be able to readily replace
them, if at all. As a result, our business may be severely disrupted and we may have to incur additional expenses in order to recruit
and retain new personnel. In addition, if any of our executives joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we may lose some
of our customers. Each of our executive officers and key personnel has entered into an employment agreement with us that contains
confidentiality and non-competition provisions. However, if any dispute arises between our executive officers or key personnel
and us, we cannot assure you, in light of uncertainties associated with the PRC legal system, that these agreements could be enforced
in China where most of our executive officers and key personnel reside and hold most of their assets. See “—Risks Related
to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could have a material adverse effect on us”
in this annual report.
Furthermore, recruiting and retaining capable
personnel, particularly experienced engineers and technicians familiar with our products and manufacturing processes, is vital
to maintain the quality of our products and improve our production methods. There is substantial competition for qualified technical
personnel, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract or retain qualified technical personnel. If we are unable to
attract and retain qualified employees, key technical personnel and our executive officers, our business may be materially adversely
affected.
Compliance with environmentally safe production
and construction regulations can be costly, while non-compliance with such regulations may result in adverse publicity and potentially
significant monetary damages, fines and suspension of our business operations.
We are required to comply with all national
and local environmental protection regulations for our operations in China, Malaysia, South Africa and Portugal. For example, regulations
on emission trading and pollution permits in Zhejiang Province allow entities to increase their annual pollution discharge limit
by purchasing emissions trading credits. Entities that purchase emission credits can increase their annual discharge limit by registering
the credits with the relevant environmental authorities and amending their pollution permits or obtaining new ones. We have entered
into several emissions trading contracts to purchase credits to increase our annual discharge limit and registered all credits
as required under a local regulation that became effective on October 9, 2010. However, as our business grows, we may increase
our discharge level in the future and we cannot guarantee you that we will continue to be below our annual discharge limit. The
penalties for exceeding the annual discharge limit may include corrective orders, fines imposed by the local environmental authority
of up to RMB50,000 or, in extreme circumstances, revocation of our pollution permit. Some of our subsidiaries need to obtain and
maintain pollution discharge permits, which are subject to renewal or extension on an annual basis or within a longer period. We
cannot assure you that we are or will be able to renew or extend these permits in a timely manner or at all.
We use, store and generate volatile and
otherwise dangerous chemicals and wastes during our manufacturing processes, and are subject to a variety of government regulations
related to the use, storage and disposal of such hazardous chemicals and waste. In accordance with the requirements of the Regulations
on the Safety Management of Hazardous Chemicals, which became effective on December 1, 2011 and were amended on December 7,
2013, we are required to engage state-qualified institutions to conduct the safety evaluation on our storage instruments related
to our use of hazardous chemicals and file the safety evaluation report with the competent safety supervision and administration
authorities every three years. In compliance with Jiaxing City environmental authority’s requests, we commenced efforts to
meet their targets for hazardous chemical and wastes in May 2012. Environmental authorities of Haining City and Jiaxing City
evaluated our efforts and confirmed that we satisfied their targets in September 2012. Moreover, we also need to timely file
a report with the competent safety supervision and administration authorities and public security agencies concerning the actual
storage situation of our hyper-toxic chemicals and other hazardous chemicals that constitute major of hazard sources. We have not
conducted the safety evaluation or filed safety evaluation reports with respect to certain of our storage instruments in compliance
with the revised Regulation on the Safety Management of Hazardous Chemicals and we cannot assure you that we will be able to file
the safety evaluation reports on time. Failure to conduct such safety evaluation or to make such filing on time may subject us
to an order to rectify such conduct within a prescribed time period, fines of up to RMB100,000 or a revocation of our qualification
certification and business license.
Moreover, we are required to obtain construction
permits before commencing constructing production facilities. We are also required to obtain the approvals from PRC environmental
protection authorities before commencing commercial operations of our manufacturing facilities. We commenced construction of a
portion of our solar cell and solar module production facilities prior to obtaining the construction permits and commenced operations
of certain of our production facilities prior to obtaining the environmental approvals for commencing commercial operation and
completing the required safety evaluation procedure. Although we have subsequently obtained all required environmental approvals
covering all of our existing production capacity except a portion of our solar cell and solar module production capacity, we cannot
assure you that we will not be penalized by the relevant government authorities for our non-compliance with the PRC environmental
protection, safe production and construction regulations.
In late August 2011, our Haining facility
experienced a suspected leakage of fluoride into a nearby small water channel due to extreme and unforeseen weather conditions.
On September 15, 2011, residents of Hongxiao Village in proximity to the Haining facility gathered to protest the discharge.
The Haining facility suspended production on September 17, 2011. We also took steps recommended by an environmental engineering
firm licensed by the PRC government (“Licensed Engineers”). On September 28, 2011, a committee of experts (the
“Experts Committee”) established by the Haining government approved a set of recommendations developed by the Licensed
Engineers with our assistance and the Haining government to be implemented by us. On October 6, 2011, the Experts Committee,
the Environmental Bureau of the Haining government and representatives of Hongxiao Village reviewed the steps taken by us based
on the recommendations of the Experts Committee and provided their comments to JinkoSolar’s management. On October 9,
2011, the Experts Committee notified us that the Experts Committee was satisfied with the steps taken by us and we resumed production
at the Haining facility. In 2012, we carried out a series of environmental protection efforts intended to ensure our compliance
with relevant standards and requirements. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Environmental
Matters.” In January 2013, Haining City environmental authority issued the “Environmental Management Compliance
Certificate for 2012” to us, confirming our compliance with environmental requirements.
Although we will try to take measures to
prevent similar incidents from occurring again in the future, we cannot assure you that our operations will not be disrupted by
similar or other environmental incidents. In addition, the relevant authorities may issue more stringent environmental protection,
safe production and construction regulations in the future that may impact our manufacturing facilities in China or abroad, and
the costs of compliance with new regulations could be substantial. If we fail to comply with the future environmentally safe production
and construction laws and regulations, we may be required to pay fines, suspend construction or production, or cease operations.
Moreover, any failure by us to control the use of, or to adequately restrict the discharge of, dangerous substances could subject
us to potentially significant monetary damages and fines or the suspension of our business operations.
Risks Related to Doing Business in China
We may fail to comply with laws and regulations
regarding PV production in China.
On March 25, 2015, the MIIT promulgated
the Standard Conditions of Photovoltaic Production Industry, or the Photovoltaic Production Rule, in place of its old version,
which establishes a basic regulatory framework for PV production industry. The Photovoltaic Production Rule provides, among other
matters, requirements in relation to the production layout, project establishment filing and enterprise qualification, requirements
with regard to the production scale, product quality, cell efficiency, energy consumption and operational life span of various
PV products, and requirements related to quality management and obtaining the pollution discharge permits and other environmental
requirements. Our failure to comply with the Photovoltaic Production Rule and the laws and regulations related thereto could result
in fines, sanctions, suspension, revocation or non-renewal of approvals, permits or licenses, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We cannot assure you that we will be able
to promptly and adequately respond to changes of laws and regulations, or that our employees and contractors will act in accordance
with our internal policies and procedures. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations relating to PV production may materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
PCAOB registered public accounting firms in China,
including our independent registered public accounting firm, are not inspected by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board, which deprives us and our investors of the benefits of such inspection.
Auditors of companies whose shares are registered
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and traded publicly in the United States, including our independent registered
public accounting firm, must be registered with the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and
are required by the laws of the United States to undergo regular inspections by the PCAOB to assess their compliance with the laws
of the United States and professional standards applicable to auditors. Our independent registered public accounting firm is located
in, and organized under the laws of, the PRC, which is a jurisdiction where the PCAOB, notwithstanding the requirements of U.S.
law, is currently unable to conduct inspections without the approval of the Chinese authorities. In May 2013, PCAOB announced
that it had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on Enforcement Cooperation with the CSRC and the MOF, which establishes
a cooperative framework between the parties for the production and exchange of audit documents relevant to investigations undertaken
by PCAOB, the CSRC or the MOF in the United States and the PRC, respectively. PCAOB continues to be in discussions with the CSRC
and the MOF to permit joint inspections in the PRC of audit firms that are registered with PCAOB and audit Chinese companies that
trade on U.S. exchanges.
This lack of PCAOB inspections in China
prevents the PCAOB from fully evaluating audits and quality control procedures of our independent registered public accounting
firm. As a result, we and investors in our common stock are deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The inability of
the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our independent
registered public accounting firm’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China
that are subject to PCAOB inspections, which could cause investors and potential investors in our stock to lose confidence in our
audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of our financial statements.
If additional remedial measures are imposed on the
Big Four PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, in administrative proceedings
brought by the SEC alleging the firms’ failure to meet specific criteria set by the SEC, we may have difficulties complying
with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
In December 2012, the SEC instituted
administrative proceedings against the Big Four PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting
firm, alleging that these firms had violated U.S. securities laws and the SEC’s rules and regulations thereunder by failing
to provide to the SEC the firms’ audit work papers with respect to certain PRC-based companies that are publicly traded in
the United States. On January 22, 2014, the administrative law judge presiding over the matter rendered an initial decision
that each of the firms had violated the SEC’s rules of practice by failing to produce audit work papers to the SEC. The initial
decision censured each of the firms and barred them from practicing before the SEC for a period of six months. The Big Four PRC-based
accounting firms appealed the administrative law judge’s initial decision to the SEC. The administrative law judge’s
decision does not take effect unless and until it is endorsed by the SEC.
In February 2015, the four China-based
accounting firms each agreed to a censure and to pay a fine to the SEC to settle the dispute and avoid suspension of their ability
to practice before the SEC and audit U.S.-listed companies. The settlement required the firms to follow detailed procedures and
to seek to provide the SEC with access to PRC firms’ audit documents via the CSRC. If future document productions fail to
meet specified criteria, the SEC retains the authority to impose a variety of additional remedial measures on the firms depending
on the nature of the failure.
While we cannot predict if the SEC will
further review the four China-based accounting firms’ compliance with specified criteria or if the results of such a review
would result in the SEC imposing penalties such as suspensions or restarting the administrative proceedings, if the accounting
firms are subject to additional remedial measures, our ability to file our financial statements in compliance with SEC requirements
could be impacted. A determination that we have not timely filed financial statements in compliance with SEC requirements could
ultimately lead to the delisting of our ADSs from NYSE or the termination of the registration of our ADSs under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of our ADSs in the United
States.
The approval of the MOFCOM for or in connection
with our corporate restructuring in 2007 and 2008 may be subject to revocation, which will have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results and trading price of our ADSs.
On August 8, 2006, six PRC governmental
and regulatory agencies, including the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, or the MOFCOM, and the CSRC
promulgated a rule entitled “Provisions Regarding Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors”,
or Circular 10, which became effective on September 8, 2006 and was amended in June 2009. Article 11 of Circular 10
requires PRC domestic enterprises or domestic natural persons to obtain the prior approval of MOFCOM when an offshore company
established or controlled by them proposes to merge with or acquire a PRC domestic company with which such enterprises or persons
have a connected relationship.
We undertook a restructuring in 2007, or
the 2007 Restructuring, and our founders and JinkoSolar Technology Limited, previously Paker Technology Limited, or JinkoSolar
Technology, obtained the approval of Jiangxi MOFCOM, for the acquisition of certain equity interest in Jiangxi Desun and the pledge
by our founders of their equity interest in Jiangxi Desun to Jinko Solar Technology, or the 2007 acquisition and pledge. However,
because our founders are PRC natural persons and they controlled both JinkoSolar Technology and Jiangxi Desun, the 2007 acquisition
and pledge would be subject to Article 11 of Circular 10 and therefore subject to approval by MOFCOM at the central government
level. To remedy this past non-compliance, we undertook another corporate restructuring in 2008, or the 2008 Restructuring, under
which the share pledge was terminated on July 28, 2008 and JinkoSolar Technology transferred all of its equity interest in
Jiangxi Desun to Long Faith Creation Limited, or Long Faith, an unrelated Hong Kong company, on July 31, 2008. In addition,
on November 11, 2008, we received written confirmation from Jiangxi MOFCOM in its reply to our inquiry that there had been
no modification to the former approvals for the 2007 acquisition and pledge and JinkoSolar Technology’s transfer of its equity
interest in Jiangxi Desun to Long Faith, and we might continue to rely on those approvals for further transactions. Nevertheless,
we cannot assure you that MOFCOM will not revoke such approval and subject us to regulatory actions, penalties or other sanctions
because of such past non-compliance. If the approval of Jiangxi MOFCOM for the 2007 acquisition and pledge were revoked and we
were not able to obtain MOFCOM’s retrospective approval for the 2007 acquisition and pledge, Jiangxi Desun may be required
to return the tax benefits to which only a foreign-invested enterprise was entitled and which were recognized by us during the
period from April 10, 2007 to December 31, 2007, and the profit distribution to JinkoSolar Technology in December 2008
may be required to be unwound. Under an indemnification letter issued by our founders to us, our founders have agreed to indemnify
us for any monetary losses we may incur as a result of any violation of Circular 10 in connection with the restructuring we undertook
in 2007. We cannot assure you, however, that this indemnification letter will be enforceable under the PRC law, our founders will
have sufficient resources to fully indemnify us for such losses, or that we will not otherwise suffer damages to our business and
reputation as a result of any sanctions for such non-compliance.
Meanwhile, given the uncertainty with respect
to what constitutes a merger with or acquisition of a PRC domestic enterprise and what constitutes circumvention of its approval
requirements under the Circular 10, we cannot assure you that the 2008 Restructuring is in all respects compliance with Circular
10. If MOFCOM subsequently determines that its approval of the 2008 Restructuring was required, we may face regulatory actions
or other sanctions by MOFCOM or other PRC regulatory agencies. Such actions may include compelling us to terminate the contracts
between Jiangxi Desun and us, the limitation of our operating privileges in China, the imposition of fines and penalties on our
operations in China, restrictions or prohibition on the payment or remittance of dividends by Jiangxi Jinko or others that may
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as
the trading price of our ADSs.
Adverse changes in political and economic policies
of the PRC government could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of the PRC, which could reduce the demand
for our products and materially adversely affect our competitive position.
Our business is primarily based in the PRC
and a portion of our sales are made in the PRC. Accordingly, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects
are affected significantly by economic, political and legal developments in the PRC. The PRC economy differs from the economies
of most developed countries in many respects, including:
|
·
|
the level of government involvement;
|
|
·
|
the level of development;
|
|
·
|
the control of foreign exchange; and
|
|
·
|
the allocation of resources.
|
While the PRC economy has grown significantly
in the past 30 years, the growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. The PRC government
has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures benefit
the overall PRC economy, but may have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may
be materially adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are applicable
to us.
The PRC economy has been transitioning from
a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy. Although in recent years the PRC government has implemented measures emphasizing
the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment
of sound corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of the productive assets in China is still owned by
the PRC government. The continued control of these assets and other aspects of the national economy by the PRC government could
materially adversely affect our business. The PRC government also exercises significant control over China’s economic growth
through allocating resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing
preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. We cannot predict whether changes in China’s political, economic
and social conditions, laws, regulations and policies will have any material adverse effect on our current or future business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system
could have a material adverse effect on us.
We are incorporated in Cayman Islands and
are subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investment in China and, in particular, laws applicable to wholly foreign
owned companies. The PRC legal system is based on written statutes. Prior court decisions have limited precedential value. Since
1979, PRC legislation and regulations have significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments
in China. However, since these laws and regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system continues to rapidly evolve, the
interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules
involve uncertainties, which may limit legal protections available to us. For example, we may have to resort to administrative
and court proceedings to enforce the legal protection that we enjoy either by law or contract. However, since PRC administrative
authorities and courts have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be
more difficult than in more developed legal systems to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level
of legal protection we enjoy. These uncertainties may impede our ability to enforce the contracts we have entered into with our
business partners, clients and suppliers. In addition, such uncertainties, including the inability to enforce our contracts, could
materially adversely affect our business and operations. Furthermore, intellectual property rights and confidentiality protections
in China may not be as effective as in the United States or other countries. Accordingly, we cannot predict the effect of future
developments in the PRC legal system, including the promulgation of new laws, changes to existing laws or the interpretation or
enforcement thereof, or the preemption of national laws by local regulations. These uncertainties could limit the legal protections
available to us and other foreign investors, including you. In addition, any litigation in China may be protracted and result in
substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.
PRC regulations may subject our future mergers and
acquisitions activity to national security review.
In February 2011, the State Council
promulgated Circular 6, a notice on the establishment of a security review system for mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises
by foreign investors. Circular 6 became effective on March 3, 2011. To implement Circular 6, MOFCOM promulgated the MOFCOM
Security Review Rules on August 25, 2011, which became effective on September 1, 2011. According to Circular 6 and the
MOFCOM Security Review Rules, national security review is required to be undertaken to complete mergers and acquisitions (i) by
foreign investors of enterprises relating to national defense and (ii) through which foreign investors may acquire de facto
control of a domestic enterprise that could raise national security concerns. When determining whether to subject a specific merger
or acquisition to national security review, the MOFCOM will look at the substance and actual impact of the transaction. Bypassing
national security review by structuring transactions through proxies, trusts, indirect investments, leases, loans, control through
contractual arrangements or offshore transactions by foreign investors is prohibited.
In addition, even if a merger or acquisition
by foreign investors is not currently subject to national security review, or is determined to have no impact on national security
after such review, it may still be subject to future review. A change in conditions (such as change of business activities, or
amendments to relevant documents or agreements) may trigger the national security review requirement, then the foreign investor
to the merger or acquisition must apply for the relevant approval with the MOFCOM.
Currently, there are no public provisions
or official interpretations specifically providing that our current businesses fall within the scope of national security review
and there is no requirement that foreign investors to those merger and acquisition transactions completed prior to the promulgation
of Circular 6 take initiatives to submit such transactions to MOFCOM for national security review. However, as the MOFCOM Security
Review Rules and Circular 6 are relatively new and there is no clear statutory interpretation on their implementation, there is
no assurance that the relevant PRC regulatory authorities will have the same view as us when applying them. If our future merger
and acquisition transactions are subject to the national security review, the application of the MOFCOM Security Review Rules and
Circular 6 may further complicate our future merger and acquisition activities, and our expansion strategy may be adversely affected
as a result.
PRC regulations relating to overseas investment
by PRC residents may restrict our overseas and cross-border investment activities and adversely affect the implementation of our
strategy as well as our business and prospects.
On July 4, 2014, the SAFE issued the
Circular on the Administration of Foreign Exchange Issues Related to Overseas Investment, Financing and Roundtrip Investment by
Domestic Residents through Offshore Special Purpose Vehicles, or the SAFE Circular 37, which replaced the former circular commonly
known as “SAFE Circular 75” promulgated on October 21, 2005. The SAFE Circular 37 requires PRC residents to register
with the competent local SAFE branch in connection with their direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore special purpose
vehicle, for the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such PRC residents’ legally owned assets or equity interests
in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests. The SAFE Circular 37 further requires amendment to the registration in
the event of any significant changes with respect to the special purpose vehicle, such as increase or decrease of capital contribution
by PRC individuals, share transfer or exchange, merger, division or other material event. In the event that a PRC shareholder holding
interests in a special purpose vehicle fails to fulfill the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of that special purpose
vehicle may be prohibited from making profit distributions to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent cross-border
foreign exchange activities, and the special purpose vehicle may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital
into its PRC subsidiary. Moreover, failure to comply with the various SAFE registration requirements described above could result
in liability under PRC law for evasion of foreign exchange controls.
We believe that all of our beneficial owners
who are PRC citizens or residents have completed their registrations with the competent local SAFE branch in accordance with the
SAFE Circular 75 before the promulgation of SAFE Circular 37. However, we may not at all times be fully aware or informed of the
identities of all of our beneficial owners who are PRC citizens or residents, and we may have little control over either our present
or prospective direct or indirect PRC resident beneficial owners or the outcome of such registration procedures. We cannot assure
you that the SAFE registrations of our present beneficial owners or future beneficial owners who are PRC citizens or residents
have been or will be amended to reflect, among others, the shareholding information or equity investment as required by the SAFE
Circular 37 and subsequent implementation rules at all times. The failure of these beneficial owners to comply with the registration
procedures set forth in the SAFE Circular 37 may subject such beneficial owners and our PRC subsidiaries to fines and legal sanctions.
Such failure may also result in restrictions on our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute profits to us or our ability
to inject capital into our PRC subsidiaries or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations. Furthermore, since the SAFE Circular 37 was recently promulgated and it is unclear how this regulation, and any
future regulation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions, will be interpreted and implemented by the relevant PRC government
authorities. We cannot predict how these regulations will affect our business operations or future strategy.
On December 25, 2006, the People’s
Bank of China promulgated the Measures for Administration of Individual Foreign Exchange, and on January 5, 2007, the SAFE
promulgated relevant Implementation Rules. On February 15, 2012, the SAFE promulgated the Notice on Various Issues Concerning
Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Equity Incentive Plans of Overseas Listed Companies,
or the Stock Option Notice. The Stock Option Notice terminated the Application Procedures of Foreign Exchange Administration of
Domestic Individuals’ Participating in an Employee Stock Holding Plan or Stock Option Plan of an Overseas Listed Company
issued by the SAFE on March 28, 2007. According to the Stock Option Notice, PRC citizens who are granted shares or share options
by a company listed on an overseas stock market according to its employee stock holding plan or stock incentive plan are required
to register with the SAFE or its local counterparts by following certain procedures.
We and our employees who are PRC citizens
and individual beneficiary owners, or have been granted restricted shares or share options, are subject to the Individual Foreign
Exchange Rules and its relevant implementation regulations. The failure of our PRC individual beneficiary owners and the restricted
holders to complete their SAFE registrations pursuant to the SAFE’s requirement or the Individual Foreign Exchange Rules
may subject these PRC citizens to fines and legal sanctions. It may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital into
our PRC subsidiaries, and limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to us, or otherwise materially adversely
affect our business.
Our China-sourced income is subject to PRC withholding
tax under the CIT Law, and we may be subject to PRC corporate income tax at the rate of 25%.
We are a Cayman Islands holding company
with substantially all of our operations conducted through our operating subsidiaries in China. Under the Corporate Income Tax
Law of the PRC, or the CIT Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008 and was amended on February 24, 2017, and the Regulation
on the Implementation of the CIT Law, or the Implementation Rules of the CIT Law, both of which became effective on January 1,
2008, China-sourced passive income of non-PRC tax resident enterprises, such as dividends paid by a PRC subsidiary to its overseas
parent, is generally subject to a 10% withholding tax. Under an arrangement between China and Hong Kong, such dividend withholding
tax rate is reduced to 5% if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a Hong Kong tax resident enterprise which directly owns at
least 25% of the PRC company distributing the dividends and has owned such equity for at least 12 consecutive months before receiving
such dividends. For example, as JinkoSolar Technology is a Hong Kong company and has owned 100% of the equity interest in Jiangxi
Jinko and 25% of the equity interest in Zhejiang Jinko directly for more than 12 consecutive months to date, any dividends
paid by Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko to JinkoSolar Technology will be entitled to a withholding tax at the reduced rate of
5% after obtaining approval from the competent PRC tax authority, provided that JinkoSolar Technology is deemed the beneficial
owner of such dividends and that JinkoSolar Technology is not deemed to be a PRC tax resident enterprise as described below. However,
according to the Circular of the State Administration of Taxation on How to Understand and Identify a “Beneficial Owner”
under Tax Treaties, effective on October 27, 2009, and the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on the Determination
of “Beneficial Owners” in the Tax Treaties, effective on June 29, 2012, an applicant for treaty benefits, including
benefits under the arrangement between China and Hong Kong on dividend withholding tax, that does not carry out substantial business
activities or is an agent or a conduit company may not be deemed a “beneficial owner” of the PRC subsidiary and therefore,
may not enjoy such treaty benefits. If JinkoSolar Technology is determined to be ineligible for such treaty benefits, any dividends
paid by Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko to JinkoSolar Technology will be subject to the PRC withholding tax at a 10% rate instead
of a reduced rate of 5%.
The CIT Law, however, also provides that
enterprises established outside China whose “de facto management bodies” are located in China are considered “PRC
tax resident enterprises” and will generally be subject to the uniform 25% PRC corporate income tax rate as to their global
income. Under the Implementation Rules of the CIT Law, “de facto management bodies” is defined as the bodies that have,
in substance, overall management control over such aspects as the production and business, personnel, accounts and properties of
an enterprise. On April 22, 2009, the State Administration of Taxation, or the SAT, promulgated the Notice Regarding the Determination
of Chinese-Controlled Offshore Incorporated Enterprises as PRC Tax Resident Enterprises on the Basis of De Facto Management Bodies,
or SAT Circular 82. According to SAT Circular 82, an offshore-incorporated enterprise controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise
group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its “de facto management body” in China only if certain
conditions are met. Despite of those conditions, as SAT Circular 82 only applies to enterprises incorporated outside China controlled
by PRC enterprises or a PRC enterprise, it remains unclear how the PRC tax authorities will determine the location of “de
facto management bodies” for offshore enterprises that are controlled by individual PRC tax residents or non-PRC enterprises,
as our Company and JinkoSolar Technology. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the PRC tax authorities would regard our Company
or JinkoSolar Technology as PRC tax resident enterprises. If our Company and JinkoSolar Technology are regarded by PRC tax authorities
as PRC tax resident enterprises for PRC corporate income tax purposes, any dividends distributed from Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang
Jinko to JinkoSolar Technology and ultimately to our company could be exempt from the PRC withholding tax, while our Company and
JinkoSolar Technology will be subject to the uniform 25% corporate income tax rate on our global income at the same time.
Dividends payable by us to our foreign investors
and gains on the sale of our shares or ADSs may become subject to PRC corporate income tax liabilities.
The Implementation Rules of the CIT Law
provide that (i) if the enterprise that distributes dividends is domiciled in China, or (ii) if gains are realized from
transferring equity interests of enterprises domiciled in China, then such dividends or capital gains are treated as China-sourced
income. It is not clear how “domicile” will be interpreted under the CIT Law. It may be interpreted as the jurisdiction
where the enterprise is incorporated or where the enterprise is a tax resident. Therefore, if our company and our subsidiaries
in Hong Kong are considered PRC tax resident enterprises for tax purposes, any dividends we pay to our overseas shareholders or
ADS holders, as well as any gains realized by such shareholders or ADSs holders from the transfer of our shares or ADSs, may be
viewed as China-sourced income and, as a consequence, be subject to PRC corporate income tax at 10% or a lower treaty rate. If
we are required to withhold PRC income tax on dividends we pay to our overseas shareholders or ADS holders, or if you are required
to pay PRC income tax on gains from the transfer of our shares or ADSs, the value of your investment in our shares or ADSs may
be materially adversely affected.
Our ability to make distributions and other payments
to our shareholders depends to a significant extent upon the distribution of earnings and other payments made by our subsidiaries
in the PRC.
We conduct substantially all of our operations
through our operating subsidiaries in China. Our ability to make distributions or other payments to our shareholders depends on
payments from these operating subsidiaries in China, whose ability to make such payments is subject to PRC regulations. Regulations
in the PRC currently permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits as determined in accordance with accounting standards
and regulations in China. According to the relevant PRC laws and regulations applicable to our operating subsidiaries in China
and their respective articles of association, these subsidiaries are each required to set aside at least 10% of their after-tax
profits based on PRC accounting standards each year as general reserves until the accumulative amount of these reserves reaches
50% of their registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. As of December 31, 2016, these general
reserves amounted to RMB466.2 million (US$67.2 million), accounting for 7.6% of the total registered capital of all of our operating
subsidiaries in China. In addition, under the CIT Law and its Implementation Rules, which became effective January 1, 2008,
dividends from our operating subsidiaries in China to us are subject to withholding tax to the extent that we are considered a
non-PRC tax resident enterprise under the CIT Law. See “—Our China-sourced income is subject to PRC withholding tax
under the CIT Law, and we may be subject to PRC corporate income tax at the rate of 25%.” Furthermore, if our operating subsidiaries
in China incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends
or make other distributions to us.
Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our
ability to receive and use our revenue effectively.
Certain portions of our revenue and expenses
are denominated in Renminbi. If our revenue denominated in Renminbi increases or expenses denominated in Renminbi decrease in the
future, we may need to convert a portion of our revenue into other currencies to meet our foreign currency obligations, including,
among others, payment of dividends declared, if any, in respect of our ADSs. Under China’s existing foreign exchange regulations,
foreign currency under current account transactions, such as dividend payments and trade-related transactions are generally convertible.
Accordingly, our operating subsidiaries in China are able to pay dividends in foreign currencies without prior approval from the
SAFE, by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, the SAFE recently started to tighten such foreign exchange transactions.
Among other things, the SAFE issued the Circular on Further Promoting the Reform of Foreign Exchange Administration and Improving
Examination of Authenticity and Compliance on January 26, 2017, pursuant to which the SAFE restated the procedures and reemphasized
the bona-fide principle for banks to follow during their review of certain cross-border profit remittance. We cannot assure you
that the PRC government would not take further measures in the future to restrict access to foreign currencies for current account
transactions. Foreign exchange transactions by our operating subsidiaries in China under capital accounts continue to be subject
to significant foreign exchange controls and require the approval of, or registration with, PRC governmental authorities. In particular,
if one of our operating subsidiaries in China borrows foreign currency loans from us or other foreign lenders, these loans must
be registered with the SAFE.
If we finance our subsidiaries in China
by means of additional capital contributions, these capital contributions must be approved by certain government authorities, including
the MOFCOM or its local counterparts. On August 29, 2008, the SAFE promulgated Circular 142, which used to regulate the conversion
by a foreign-invested company of foreign currency into Renminbi by restricting how the converted Renminbi may be used. On March
30, 2015, the SAFE issued the Circular on Reforming the Administration Approach Regarding the Foreign Exchange Capital Settlement
of Foreign-invested Enterprises, or Circular 19, which became effective on June 1, 2015 and replaced Circular 142. Circular 19
provides that the conversion from foreign currency registered capital of foreign-invested enterprises into the Renminbi capital
may be at foreign-invested enterprises’ discretion, which means that the foreign currency registered capital of foreign-invested
enterprises for which the rights and interests of monetary contribution has been confirmed by the local foreign exchange bureau
(or the book-entry of monetary contribution has been registered) can be settled at the banks based on the actual operational needs
of the enterprises. However, Circular 19 does not materially change the restrictions on the use of foreign currency registered
capital of foreign-invested enterprises that Circular 142 has set forth. On June 9, 2016, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on
Reforming and Standardizing the Administrative Provisions on Capital Account Foreign Exchange, or Circular 16, which applies to
all domestic enterprises in China. Circular 19 and Circular 16 continue to prohibit foreign-invested enterprises from, among other
things, spending Renminbi capital converted from its foreign currency registered capital on expenditures beyond its business scope.
Therefore, Circular 19 and Circular 16 may significantly limit the ability of our operating subsidiaries in China to transfer and
use Renminbi funds from its foreign currency denominated capital, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
The expiration or reduction of tax incentives by
the PRC government may have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
The CIT Law imposes a uniform tax rate of
25% on all PRC enterprises, including foreign-invested enterprises, and eliminates or modifies most of the tax exemptions, reductions
and preferential treatments available under the previous tax laws and regulations. Under the CIT Law, enterprises that were established
before March 16, 2007 and already enjoyed preferential tax treatments have (i) in the case of preferential tax rates,
continued to enjoy such tax rates that were gradually increased to the new tax rates within five years from January 1, 2008
or, (ii) in the case of preferential tax exemptions or reductions for a specified term, continued to enjoy the preferential
tax holiday until the expiration of such term.
Zhejiang Jinko, Jiangxi Jinko and Jiangxi
Materials were designated by the relevant local authorities as “High and New Technology Enterprises” under the CIT
Law. Jiangxi Jinko, Jiangxi Materials and Zhejiang Jinko were subject to a preferential tax rate of 15% for 2014, 2015 and 2016.
In 2015, Zhejiang Jinko successfully renewed this qualification and will continue to enjoy the preferential tax rate of 15% in
2017, if the relevant conditions are met. In 2016, Jiangxi Jinko and Jiangxi Materials successfully renewed this qualification
and will continue to enjoy the preferential tax rate of 15% in 2017 and 2018, if the relevant conditions are met. However, we
cannot assure you that Zhejiang Jinko, Jiangxi Jinko or Jiangxi Materials will continue to qualify as “High and New Technology
Enterprises” when subject to reevaluation in the near future. In addition, there are uncertainties on how the CIT Law and
its Implementation Rules will be enforced, and whether its future implementation will be consistent with its current interpretation.
If the corporate income tax rates of some of our PRC subsidiaries increase, our financial condition and results of operations
would be materially adversely affected. According to the Interim Regulations on Value-added Tax as amended on February 6, 2016,
and the Implementing Rules of the Interim Regulations on Value-added Tax as amended on October 28, 2011, gross proceeds from
sales and importation of goods and provision of services are generally subject to a value-added tax, or VAT, of 17% with exceptions
for certain categories of goods that are taxed at a rate of 13%.
The State Council promulgated the Circular
of the State Council on Cleaning up and Standardizing Preferential Policies on Tax and Other Aspects, or Circular 62, on November 27,
2014 in an effort to render the preferential policies on tax, non-tax income, fiscal expenditure, and other aspects of the local
government consistent with the PRC central laws and regulations. According to the Circular 62, the local tax authorities shall
conduct the special clean-up action, which leads to preferential policies violating PRC central laws and regulations being declared
ineffective and repealed and preferential policies not violating PRC central laws and regulations being retained. In addition,
the special clean-up action requires that all provincial governments and relevant authorities shall, prior to the end of March 2015,
report the outcome of the special clean-up action in respect of preferential policies on tax and other aspects to the MOF, and
the MOF shall then forward the outcome to the State Council for final determination. On May 10, 2015, the State Council issued
the Circular on Matters Relating to Preferential Policies for Tax and Other Aspects, or Circular 25, which suspended the implementation
of special clean-up action of Circular 62. Circular 25 provides that in respect of existing local preferential policies with specified
time limit, such time limit shall still apply; if there is no specified time limit, the local governments shall have the discretion
to set up a transitional period to adjust the policies. Furthermore, it provides that preferential tax policies stipulated in the
agreements between local governments and enterprises remain valid and the implemented part of the policies shall not be retrospectively
affected. However, it is not clear whether or not and when the special clean-up action will resume. The repeal of any preferential
policy on tax and other aspects may materially adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.
We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers
of equity interests in PRC tax resident enterprises by non-PRC holding companies.
Under the current PRC tax regulations, indirect
transfers of equity interests and other properties of PRC tax resident enterprises by non-PRC holding companies may be subject
to PRC tax. Pursuant to the Notice on Strengthening Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident
Enterprises, or SAT Circular 698, issued by the SAT on December 10, 2009 with retroactive effect from January 1, 2008,
where a non-PRC tax resident enterprise transfers the equity interests of a PRC tax resident enterprise indirectly by disposing
of the equity interests of an overseas holding company (exclusive of trading the stocks of a PRC tax resident enterprise in a public
capital market), gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10%. On February 3,
2015, the SAT issued the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Several Issues concerning the Enterprise Income
Tax on the Indirect Transfers of Properties by Non-Resident Enterprises, or SAT Announcement 7, which expanded and further strengthened
certain rules of SAT Circular 698.
According to SAT Announcement 7, where a
non-resident enterprise indirectly transfers equity interests or other properties of PRC tax resident enterprises, or PRC Taxable
Property to avoid its tax liabilities by implementing arrangements without reasonable commercial purpose, such indirect transfer
shall be recharacterized and recognized as a direct transfer of PRC Taxable Property. As a result, gains derived from such indirect
transfer and attributable to PRC Taxable Property may be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10%. In the case of
an indirect transfer of property of establishments of a foreign enterprise in the PRC, the applicable tax rate would be 25%. SAT
Announcement 7 imposes tax filing obligations of such indirect transfers on both parties to the transfer transaction, compared
to merely the transferor as required by Circular 698, as well as the PRC tax resident entity being indirectly transferred. Furthermore,
SAT Announcement 7 illustrates certain circumstances which would indicate a lack of reasonable commercial purpose. SAT Announcement
7 also sets forth certain “safe harbors” which would be deemed to have a reasonable commercial purpose. As a general
principle, the SAT also issued the Administration of General Anti-Tax Avoidance (Trial Implementation), or GATA, which became effective
on February 1, 2015 and empowers the PRC tax authorities to apply special tax adjustments for “tax avoidance arrangements.”
There is uncertainty as to the application
of SAT Circular 698 as well as the newly issued SAT Announcement 7 and GATA. For example, it may be difficult to evaluate whether
or not the transaction has a reasonable commercial purpose, and such evaluation may be based on ambiguous criteria which have not
been formally declared or stated by tax authorities. As a result, any of our disposals or acquisitions of the equity interests
of non-PRC entities which indirectly hold PRC Taxable Property or any offshore transaction related to PRC Taxable Property, including
potential overseas restructuring, might be deemed an indirect transfer under PRC tax regulations. Therefore, we may be at risk
of being taxed under SAT Circular 698 and SAT Announcement 7 and we may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with
SAT Circular 698 and SAT Announcement 7 or to establish that we should not be taxed thereunder, which may materially adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations.
As a foreign company, our acquisitions of PRC companies
may take longer and be subject to higher level of scrutiny by the PRC government, which may delay or prevent any intended acquisition.
Circular 10 established additional procedures
and requirements including the requirements that in certain instances foreign investors obtain MOFCOM’s approval when they
acquire equity or assets of a PRC domestic enterprise. In the future, we may want to grow our business in part by acquiring complementary
businesses, although we do not have plans to do so at this time. Complying with Circular 10 to complete these transactions could
be time-consuming and costly, and could result in an extensive review by the PRC government and its increased control over the
terms of the transaction, and any required approval processes may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which
could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.
Our failure to make payments of statutory social
welfare and housing funds to our employees could adversely and materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.
According to the relevant PRC laws and regulations,
we are required to pay certain statutory social security benefits, including medical care, injury insurance, unemployment insurance,
maternity insurance and pension benefits, and housing funds, for our employees. Our failure to comply with these requirements may
subject us to monetary penalties imposed by the relevant PRC authorities and proceedings initiated by our employees, which could
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In line with local customary practices,
we have made contributions to the social insurance funds which met the requirement of the local minimum wage standard, instead
of the employees’ actual salaries as required, and have not made full contribution to the housing funds. We estimate the
aggregate amount of unpaid social security benefits and housing funds to be RMB208.7 million, RMB281.0 million and RMB355.8 million
(US$51.2 million), respectively, as of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016. We may be required by the relevant PRC authorities
to pay these statutory social security benefits and housing funds within a designated time period. In addition, an employee is
entitled to seek compensation by resorting to labor arbitration at the labor arbitration center or filing a labor complaint with
the labor administration bureau within a designated time period. We have made provisions for such unpaid social security benefits
and housing funds of our former and current PRC subsidiaries. All employee participants in our share incentive plans who are domestic
individual participants may be required to register with SAFE. We may also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our
ability to adopt additional option plans for our directors and employees under PRC law.
All employees participating in our share incentive
plans who are domestic individual participants may be required to register with SAFE. We may also face regulatory uncertainties
that could restrict our ability to adopt additional option plans for our directors and employees under PRC law.
On February 15, 2012, SAFE released
the Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals’ Participating in Equity
Incentive Plans of Overseas Listed Companies, or the Stock Option Notice, which superseded the Application Procedures of Foreign
Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in an Employee Stock Holding Plan or Stock Option Plan of an Overseas-Listed
Company, issued by SAFE in 2007. According to the Stock Option Notice, PRC individual participants include directors, supervisors,
senior management personnel and other employees who are PRC citizens (which includes citizens of Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) or
foreign individuals who reside in the PRC for 12 months consecutively. Under the Stock Option Notice, PRC and foreign citizens
who receive equity grants from an overseas listed company are required, through a PRC agent or PRC subsidiary of such listed company,
to register with SAFE and complete certain other bank and reporting procedures. In addition, according to the Stock Option Notice,
domestic individual participants must complete the registration with SAFE or its local branch within three days rather than 10
days from the beginning of each quarter.
Failure to comply with such provisions may
subject us and the participants of our share incentive plans who are domestic individual participants to fines and legal sanctions
and prevent us from further granting options under our share incentive plans to our employees, and we may become subject to more
stringent review and approval processes with respect to our foreign-exchange activities, such as in regards to our PRC subsidiaries’
dividend payment to us or in regards to borrowing foreign currency, which could adversely affect our business operations.
It may be difficult to effect service of process
on, or to enforce any judgments obtained outside the PRC against, us, our directors, or our senior management members who live
inside the PRC.
Substantially all of our existing directors
and senior management members reside in the PRC and substantially all of our assets and the assets of such persons are located
in the PRC. Accordingly, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process on any of these persons or to enforce judgments
obtained outside of the PRC against us or any of these persons. The PRC does not have treaties providing for the reciprocal recognition
and enforcement of judgments awarded by courts in many developed countries, including the Cayman Islands, the United States and
the United Kingdom. Therefore, the recognition and enforcement in the PRC of judgments of a court in any of these jurisdictions
in relation to any matter not subject to a binding arbitration provision may be difficult or even impossible.
Higher labor costs and inflation in China may adversely
affect our business and our profitability.
Labor costs in China have risen in recent
years as a result of the enactment of new labor laws and social development. In addition, inflation in China has increased. According
to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, consumer price inflation in China was 2.0%, 1.4% and 2.0% in 2014, 2015 and 2016,
respectively. Because we purchase raw materials from suppliers in China, higher labor cost and inflation in China increases the
costs of labor and raw materials we must purchase for manufacturing. It is possible that China’s inflation rates may rise
further in 2017. As we expect our production staff to increase and our manufacturing operations to become more labor intensive
when we commence silicon wafer and solar module production, rising labor costs may increase our operating costs and therefore negatively
impact our profitability.
Because we source contractors and purchase
raw materials in China, higher labor cost and inflation in China increases the costs of labor and raw materials we procure for
production. In addition, our suppliers may also be affected by higher labor costs and inflation. Rising labor costs may increase
our operating costs and partially erode the cost advantage of our China-based operations and therefore negatively impact our profitability.
We face risks related to health epidemics and other
outbreaks.
Our business could be adversely affected
by the effects of Ebola virus disease, influenza A, or H1N1, avian flu, severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, or other epidemic
outbreak. In April 2009, an outbreak of influenza A caused by the H1N1 virus occurred in Mexico and the United States, and
spread into a number of countries rapidly. There have also been reports of outbreaks of a highly pathogenic avian flu, caused by
the H1N1 virus, in certain regions of Asia and Europe. In past few years, there were reports on the occurrences of avian flu in
various parts of China, including a few confirmed human cases. In April 2013, there were reports of cases of H7N9 avian flu
in southeast China, including deaths in Shanghai and Zhejiang Province. An outbreak of avian flu in the human population could
result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets of many countries, particularly
in Asia. Additionally, any recurrence of SARS, a highly contagious form of atypical pneumonia, similar to the occurrence in 2003
which affected China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, Vietnam and certain other countries, would also have similar adverse effects.
These outbreaks of contagious diseases and other adverse public health developments in China would have a material adverse effect
on our business operations. These could include our ability to travel or ship our products outside China as well as temporary closure
of our manufacturing facilities. Such closures or travel or shipment restrictions would severely disrupt our business operations
and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We have not adopted any written preventive measures or
contingency plans to combat any future outbreak of avian flu, SARS or any other epidemic.
Risks Related to Our ADSs
The market price for our ADSs has been volatile,
which could result in substantial losses to investors.
The market price for our ADSs has been and
may continue to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations, which could result in substantial losses to investors. The
closing prices of our ADSs ranged from US$12.87 to US$27.27 per ADS in 2016. The price of our ADSs may continue to fluctuate in
response to factors including the following:
|
·
|
announcements of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
technological breakthroughs in the solar and other renewable power industries;
|
|
·
|
reduction or elimination of government subsidies and economic incentives for the solar industry;
|
|
·
|
news regarding any gain or loss of customers by us;
|
|
·
|
news regarding recruitment or loss of key personnel by us or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
announcements of competitive developments, acquisitions or strategic alliances in our industry;
|
|
·
|
changes in the general condition of the global economy and credit markets;
|
|
·
|
general market conditions or other developments affecting us or our industry;
|
|
·
|
the operating and stock price performance of other companies, other industries and other events or factors beyond our control;
|
|
·
|
regulatory developments in our target markets affecting us, our customers or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
announcements regarding patent litigation or the issuance of patents to us or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
announcements of studies and reports relating to the conversion efficiencies of our products or those of our competitors;
|
|
·
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations;
|
|
·
|
changes in financial projections or estimates about our financial or operational performance by securities research analysts;
|
|
·
|
changes in the economic performance or market valuations of other solar power technology companies;
|
|
·
|
release or expiry of lock-up or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding ordinary shares or ADSs;
|
|
·
|
sales or perceived sales of additional ordinary shares or ADSs; and
|
|
·
|
commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation.
|
Any of these factors may result in large
and sudden changes in the volume and price at which our ADSs will trade.
We cannot give any assurance that these
factors will not occur in the future again. In addition, the securities market has from time to time experienced significant price
and volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may
also have a material adverse effect on the market price of our ADSs. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market
price of their stock, many companies have been the subject of securities class action litigation. See “—We are exposed
to various risks related to legal or administrative proceedings or claims that could adversely affect our financial condition,
results of operations and reputation, and may cause loss of business.” If we become involved in similar securities class
action litigation in the future, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and resources
and could harm our stock price, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
You may not receive dividends or other distributions
on our ordinary shares and you may not receive any value for them, if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to you.
Under Cayman Islands law, we may only pay
dividends out of our profits or our share premium account subject to our ability to service our debts as they fall due in the ordinary
course of our business. Our ability to pay dividends will therefore depend on our ability to generate sufficient profits. We cannot
give any assurance that we will declare dividends of any amounts, at any rate or at all in the future. We have not paid any dividends
in the past. Future dividends, if any, will be paid at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our future
operations and earnings, capital expenditure requirements, general financial conditions, legal and contractual restrictions and
other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Our shareholders may, by ordinary resolution, declare a dividend,
but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our board of directors. See “—Risks Related to Doing Business
in China—We rely principally on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our principal operating subsidiaries,
and limitations on their ability to pay dividends to us could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations”
above for additional legal restrictions on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to us.
The depositary of our ADSs has agreed to
pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on ordinary shares or other deposited securities
underlying our ADSs, after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of
ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary is not responsible for making such distribution if it decides that
it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. For example, it would be unlawful to make
a distribution to a holder of ADSs if it consists of securities that require registration under the Securities Act but that are
not properly registered or distributed under an applicable exemption from registration. The depositary may also determine that
it is not feasible to distribute certain property through the mail. Additionally, the value of certain distributions may be less
than the cost of mailing such distributions. In these cases, the depositary may determine not to distribute such property. We have
no obligation to register under U.S. securities laws any ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or other securities received through such
distributions. We also have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, ordinary shares, rights
or anything else to holders of ADSs. This means that you may not receive distributions we make on our ordinary shares or any value
for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you. These restrictions may cause a material decline
in the value of our ADSs.
Holders of ADSs have fewer rights than shareholders
and must act through the depositary to exercise those rights.
As a holder of ADSs, you will not be treated
as one of our shareholders and you will not have shareholder rights. Instead, the depositary will be treated as the holder of the
shares underlying your ADSs. However, you may exercise some of the shareholders’ rights through the depositary, and you will
have the right to withdraw the shares underlying your ADSs from the deposit facility.
Holders of ADSs may only exercise the voting
rights with respect to the underlying ordinary shares in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under our current
articles of association, the minimum notice period required to convene a general meeting is ten days. When a general meeting is
convened, you may not receive sufficient notice of a shareholders’ meeting to permit you to withdraw the ordinary shares
underlying your ADSs to allow you to cast your vote with respect to any specific matter. In addition, the depositary and its agents
may not be able to send voting instructions to you or carry out your voting instructions in a timely manner. We plan to make all
reasonable efforts to cause the depositary to extend voting rights to you in a timely manner, but we cannot assure you that you
will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote your ADSs. Furthermore, the depositary
and its agents will not be responsible for any failure to carry out any instructions to vote, for the manner in which any vote
is cast or for the effect of any such vote. As a result, you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and you may lack recourse
if the shares underlying your ADSs are not voted as you requested. In addition, in your capacity as an ADS holder, you will not
be able to call a shareholder meeting.
You may be subject to limitations on transfers of
your ADSs.
Your ADSs are transferable on the books
of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its transfer books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient
in connection with the performance of its duties. In addition, the depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers
of ADSs generally when our books or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary deem it advisable
to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or government body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement,
or for any other reason.
We are a Cayman Islands company and, because judicial
precedent regarding the rights of shareholders is more limited under Cayman Islands law than that under U.S. law, you may have
less protection for your shareholder rights than you would under U.S. law.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our
memorandum and articles of association, as amended and restated from time to time, Companies Law (2016 Revision) of the Cayman
Islands and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority
shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common
law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent
in the Cayman Islands as well as that from English common law, which has persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the
Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly
established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the
Cayman Islands have a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. In addition, some U.S. states, such as Delaware,
have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands.
In addition, Cayman Islands companies may
not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action before federal courts of the United States.
As we are a Cayman Islands company and substantially
all of our consolidated assets are located outside of the United States and substantially all of our current operations are conducted
in China, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands or China would recognize or enforce judgments of
U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state against us
and our officers and directors, most of whom are not residents of the United States and the substantial majority of whose assets
are located outside the United States. In addition, it is uncertain whether the Cayman Islands or PRC courts would entertain original
actions brought in the Cayman Islands or in China against us or our officers and directors predicated on the federal securities
laws of the United States. There is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the federal or state
courts of the United States (and the Cayman Islands are not a party to any treaties for the reciprocal enforcement or recognition
of such judgments), a judgment obtained in such jurisdiction will be recognized and enforced in the courts of the Cayman Islands
at common law, without any re-examination of the merits of the underlying dispute, by an action commenced on the foreign judgment
debt in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, provided such judgment (a) is given by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction,
(b) imposes on the judgment debtor a liability to pay a liquidated sum for which the judgment has been given, (c) is final, (d)
is not in respect of taxes, a fine or a penalty, and (e) was not obtained in a manner and is not of a kind the enforcement of which
is contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands. However, the Cayman Islands courts are unlikely to enforce
a judgment obtained from the U.S. courts under civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities law if such judgment is
determined by the courts of the Cayman Islands to give rise to obligations to make payments that are penal or punitive in nature.
Because such a determination has not yet been made by a court of the Cayman Islands, it is uncertain whether such civil liability
judgments from U.S. courts would be enforceable in the Cayman Islands.
As a result of all of the above, shareholders
of a Cayman Islands company may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management,
members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as shareholders of a company incorporated in a jurisdiction
in the United States. For example, contrary to the general practice in most corporations incorporated in the United States, Cayman
Islands incorporated companies may not generally require that shareholders approve sales of all or substantially all of a company’s
assets. The limitations described above will also apply to the depositary who is treated as the holder of the shares underlying
your ADSs.
Our current articles of association contain anti-takeover
provisions that could prevent a change in control even if such takeover is beneficial to our shareholders.
Our current articles of association contain
provisions that could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of our company that could be beneficial to our shareholders.
These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors
and take other corporate actions. As a result, these provisions could limit the price that investors are willing to pay in the
future for our ADSs. These provisions might also discourage a potential acquisition proposal or tender offer, even if the acquisition
proposal or tender offer is at a price above the then current market price of our ADSs. These provisions provide that our board
of directors has authority, without further action by our shareholders, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to
fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences,
any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our ordinary shares, in the form of ADSs or otherwise. Our board
of directors may decide to issue such preferred shares quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of
our company or make the removal of our management more difficult. If our board of directors decides to issue such preferred shares,
the price of our ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs may be materially adversely
affected.
As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands,
we may adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters. These practices may afford less protection
to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
As a non-U.S. company with ADSs listed on
the NYSE, we are subject to the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. However, in reliance on Section 303A.11 of the
NYSE Listed Company Manual, which permits a foreign private issuer to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country,
we have adopted certain corporate governance practices that may differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance listing
standards. For example, we may include non-independent directors as members of our compensation committee and nominating and corporate
governance committee, and our independent directors are not required to hold regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent
directors are present. Such home country practice differs from the NYSE corporate governance listing standards, because there are
no specific provisions under the Companies Law (2016 Revision) of the Cayman Islands imposing such requirements. Accordingly, executive
directors, who may also be our major shareholders or representatives of our major shareholders, may have greater power to make
or influence major decisions than they would if we complied with all the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. While we
may adopt certain practices that are in compliance with the laws of the Cayman Islands, such practices may differ from more stringent
requirements imposed by the NYSE rules and as such, our shareholders may be afforded less protection under Cayman Islands law than
they would under the NYSE rules applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance.”
We may be classified as a passive foreign investment
company, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of our ADSs or ordinary shares.
Based on the composition of our assets and
income, we believe that we were not a passive foreign investment company, or a PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes with
respect to our 2016 taxable year and we do not currently intend or anticipate becoming a PFIC for 2017 or any future taxable year.
However, we must make a separate determination each taxable year as to whether we are a PFIC (after the close of each taxable year).
Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will not be a PFIC for our next taxable year ending December 31, 2017 or any future
taxable year. A non-U.S. corporation will be considered a PFIC for any taxable year if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income
is passive income or (2) at least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets during
the taxable year) is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. The value of our assets
for purposes of the PFIC asset test will generally be determined based on the market price of our ADSs and ordinary shares, which
may fluctuate from time to time. If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item
10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Taxation—Passive Foreign Investment Company”)
holds an ADS or a share, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to such U.S. Holder. See “Item
10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Taxation—Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
We may issue additional ordinary shares, other equity
or equity-linked or debt securities, which may materially adversely affect the price of our ordinary shares or ADSs. Hedging activities
may depress the trading price of our ordinary shares.
We may issue additional equity, equity-linked
or debt securities for a number of reasons, including to finance our operations and business strategy (including in connection
with acquisitions, strategic collaborations or other transactions), to satisfy our obligations for the repayment of existing indebtedness,
to adjust our ratio of debt to equity, to satisfy our obligations upon the exercise of outstanding warrants or options or for other
reasons. Any future issuances of equity securities or equity-linked securities could substantially dilute your interests and may
materially adversely affect the price of our ordinary shares or ADSs. We cannot predict the timing or size of any future issuances
or sales of equity, equity-linked or debt securities, or the effect, if any, that such issuances or sales may have on the market
price of our ordinary shares or ADSs. Market conditions could require us to accept less favorable terms for the issuance of our
securities in the future.
Substantial future sales of our ordinary shares
or ADSs in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could cause the price of our ordinary shares or ADSs
to decline.
Sales of our ordinary shares or ADSs in
the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline.
As of December 31, 2016, we had 126,733,266 ordinary shares outstanding, excluding 277,746 ADSs representing 1,110,984 ordinary
shares reserved for future grants under our share incentive plans and 1,723,200 ordinary shares as treasury stock. The number
of ordinary shares outstanding and available for sale will increase when our employees and former employees who are holders of
restricted share units and options to acquire our ordinary shares become entitled to the underlying shares under the terms of
their units or options. To the extent these shares are sold into the market, or are converted to ADSs which are sold into the
market place, the market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs could decline.
Your right to participate in any future rights offerings
may be limited, which may cause dilution to your holdings.
We may from time to time distribute rights
to our shareholders, including rights to acquire our securities. However, we cannot make these rights available in the United States
unless we register the rights and the securities to which the rights relate under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration
requirements is available. We are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to any such rights or securities
or to endeavor to cause a registration statement to be declared effective. Moreover, we may not be able to establish an exemption
from registration under the Securities Act. Accordingly, you may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience
dilution in your holdings.
|
ITEM 4.
|
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
|
|
A.
|
History and Development of the Company
|
Our legal and commercial name is JinkoSolar
Holding Co., Ltd. Our principal executive office is located at 1 Jingke Road, Shangrao Economic Development Zone, Jiangxi Province,
334100, People’s Republic of China. Our telephone number at this address is (86-793) 846-9699 and our fax number is (86-793)
846-1152. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is Cricket Square, Hutchins Drive, P.O. Box 2681, Grand Cayman, KY1-1111,
Cayman Islands.
We commenced our operations in June 2006
through our then consolidated subsidiary Jiangxi Desun Energy Co., Ltd. We were incorporated as a limited liability company in
the Cayman Islands on August 3, 2007. Following a series of equity transactions, we established a holding company structure
with us being the ultimate holding company in 2009. We conduct our business principally through our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries
in China, Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko. We have six production facilities in Jiangxi, Zhejiang and Xinjiang Provinces, China,
Malaysia, Portugal and South Africa, 18 global sales offices in China, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, United
Arab Emirates, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, Morocco, Ghana, Kenya, Costa Rica, Colombia, Brazil and Mexico and
15 oversea subsidiaries in Japan, Singapore, India, Turkey, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil,
Chile, Australia and South Africa.
On May 19, 2010, we completed our initial
public offering, in which we offered and sold 5,835,000 ADSs representing 23,340,000 ordinary shares, raising US$64.2 million in
proceeds before expenses to us. Our ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “JKS.”
On November 10, 2010, we completed
a follow-on public offering of 3,500,000 ADSs representing 14,000,000 ordinary shares, of which 2,000,000 ADSs were sold by us
and 1,500,000 ADSs were sold by the selling shareholders.
On May 17, 2011, we completed an offering
of US$125 million of 4.0% convertible senior notes due 2016.
On September 25, 2013, we completed
a follow-on public offering of 4,370,000 ADSs representing 17,480,000 ordinary shares, including 570,000 ADSs sold pursuant to
the underwriters’ full exercise of their option to purchase additional ADSs.
On January 22, 2014, we completed a
follow-on public offering of 3,750,000 ADSs representing 15,000,000 ordinary shares and a concurrent offering of US$150.0 million
in aggregate amount of 4.0% convertible senior notes due 2019.
In July 2014, China Development Bank,
the Macquarie Greater China Infrastructure Fund and New Horizon Capital agreed to invest a total of US$225.0 million in JinkoSolar
Power, our then majority-owned subsidiary conducting our solar power generation business. The three investors together held approximately
45% of JinkoSolar Power’s equity after their investment.
In August 2014, we opened a solar module
factory with annual production capacity of 120 MW in Cape Town, South Africa.
In March 2015, we opened a solar cell
and module manufacturing facility with the production capacity of 450 MW and 500 MW, respectively, in Penang, Malaysia.
In November 2016, as a result of the sale
of all of the 55% equity interest indirectly held by us in Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, we disposed of our downstream solar power
project business in China and received US$250 million in cash.
We are a global leader in the PV industry
based in Jiangxi and Zhejiang Provinces in China. We have built a vertically integrated solar power product value chain, from recovering
silicon materials to manufacturing solar modules. We sell most of our solar modules under our own “JinkoSolar” brand,
with a small portion of solar modules on an OEM
basis. We also sell silicon wafers and solar cells not used in our solar
module production.
We sell our products in major export markets
and China. We have 18 global sales offices in China, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, United Arab
Emirates, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, Morocco, Ghana, Kenya, Costa Rica, Colombia, Brazil and Mexico and 15
oversea subsidiaries in Japan, Singapore, India, Turkey, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Chile,
Australia and South Africa to conduct sales, marketing and brand development for our products around the world. As of December 31,
2016, we had an aggregate of more than 1,100 customers for our solar modules globally, including distributors, project developers
and system integrators.
Our solar modules utilize advanced solar
technologies. All of our solar modules sold in Europe are CE, IEC, MCS and TÜV certified, all of our solar modules sold in
Japan are JET certified, all of our solar modules sold in North America are UL certified and our monocrystalline solar modules
sold in China are CQC certified. In 2013, our solar modules passed TÜV Nord’s Dust & Sand Certification Test, demonstrating
their suitability for installation in desert regions. We also unveiled our “Eagle II” solar modules, which represent
a new standard for performance and reliability. The “Eagle II” solar modules can reach peak power output of approximately
260 to 270 watts for a 60-cell module. We have also begun research on our “Eagle+” solar modules, which will be composed
of multicrystalline cells that reached conversion efficiencies of approximately 20.4% in lab tests by a third party.
We leverage our vertically integrated platform
and cost-efficient manufacturing capabilities in China to produce high quality products at competitive costs. Our solar cell and
silicon wafer operations support our solar module production. As of December 31, 2016, we had an integrated annual capacity
of 5.0 GW for silicon ingots and wafers, 4.0 GW for solar cells and 6.5 GW for solar modules. Our manufacturing facilities are
primarily located in Jiangxi Province, Zhejiang Province and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China and Penang of Malaysia,
providing convenient and timely access to key resources and suppliers.
We no longer have any downstream solar power
projects in China after we disposed of our downstream solar power projects business in China in the fourth quarter of 2016, but
still have a few overseas solar power projects in Italy and Mexico.
Our Products and Services
Our product mix has evolved rapidly since
our inception, as we have incorporated more of the solar power value chain through the expansion of our production capabilities
and acquisitions. We currently manufacture a series of products from recovered silicon materials to solar modules. Our principal
product is solar modules, but we also sell silicon wafers and solar cells from time to time to meet our customers’ demand.
In 2016, sales of solar modules, silicon wafers and solar cells represented 97.3%, 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively, of our total revenues.
In addition, we also sell small volumes of recovered silicon materials to optimize the utilization of our production capacity.
Leveraging our expertise in manufacturing
high quality solar modules and substantial experience in the solar industry, we commenced developing solar power projects and providing
solar system integration services in late 2011. In November 2016, we disposed of our downstream solar power project business in
China and received US$250 million in cash.
Unless otherwise specified, the results
presented in this annual report do not include the results of our downstream solar power project business in China, a discontinued
operation.
The following table sets forth details of
our revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Products
|
|
(MW, except
recovered
silicon
materials)
|
|
|
(RMB in
thousands)
|
|
|
(MW, except
recovered
silicon
materials)
|
|
|
(RMB in
thousands)
|
|
|
(MW, except
recovered
silicon
materials)
|
|
|
(RMB in
thousands)
|
|
|
(US$ in
thousands)
|
|
Recovered
silicon materials (metric tons)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
11,272.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
5,201.8
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
860.0
|
|
|
|
123.9
|
|
Silicon wafers
|
|
|
229.6
|
|
|
|
286,585.0
|
|
|
|
118.2
|
|
|
|
138,293.4
|
|
|
|
156.3
|
|
|
|
136,079.7
|
|
|
|
19,599.6
|
|
Solar cells
|
|
|
134.2
|
|
|
|
200,643.6
|
|
|
|
172.8
|
|
|
|
215,048.3
|
|
|
|
126.9
|
|
|
|
155,016.3
|
|
|
|
22,327.0
|
|
Solar modules
|
|
|
2,423.1
|
|
|
|
9,155,396.1
|
|
|
|
4,207.6
|
|
|
|
15,086,256.8
|
|
|
|
6,225.3
|
|
|
|
20,825,750.0
|
|
|
|
2,999,531.9
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar system EPC
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,209.6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
269,661.7
|
|
|
|
38,839.4
|
|
Processing services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
69,581.4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Revenue
from generated electricity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,188.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,574.1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,270.4
|
|
|
|
1,911.3
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,740,876.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,454,374.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,400,638.1
|
|
|
|
3,082,333.0
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2014,
2015 and 2016, revenues from sales of products and provision of processing services to subsidiaries of ReneSola Ltd., one of our
related parties, amounted to RMB557,097, nil and nil, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2014,
2015 and 2016, revenues from sales of products to subsidiaries of Gansu Heihe Hydropower Industrial Investment LLC, one of our
related parties, amounted to nil, nil and RMB102,998,133, respectively.
Solar Modules
We commenced producing solar modules in
August 2009. In 2016, we sold 6,225.3 MW of solar modules and generated RMB20.83 billion (US$3.0 billion) of revenue from
sales of solar modules. We expect that sales of solar modules will continue to be our largest revenue source in the future. In
2016, we generated 61.5% of our total revenue from overseas markets, and the United States, Japan and Chile, our three largest
export markets, represented 36.0%, 4.6% and 4.2% of our total revenue, respectively. As the domestic market in China grows, we
expect to sell increasing volumes of solar modules in the domestic market in China.
In 2013, we unveiled our “Eagle”
and “Eagle II” solar modules, which represent new standards for performance and reliability. The “Eagle”
solar modules are the world’s first potential induced degradation (“PID”) free modules to be certified under
weather conditions of 85 degrees Celsius and 85% relative humidity. They can reach 260 watts peak power output and resist PID under
inclement weather conditions. The “Eagle II” solar modules can reach peak power output of approximately 260 to 270
watts for a 60-cell module.
In 2014, the “Eagle II” could
reach power output of approximately 305 to 325 watts for a 72-cell module.
In 2015, the “Eagle Max” could
reach power output of approximately 325 watts for a 72-cell module.
In 2016, our 1-Volt Eagle Modules became
available for delivery in North America following UL 1703 certification.
Solar Cells
We commenced production of solar cells in
July 2009 following our acquisition of Zhejiang Jinko. The efficiency of a solar cell converting sunlight into electricity
is represented by the ratio of electrical energy produced by the solar cell to the energy from sunlight that reaches the solar
cell. The conversion efficiency of solar cells is determined to a large extent by the quality of silicon wafers used to produce
the solar cells. All of our monocrystalline solar cells have dimensions of 125 mm x 125 mm and 156 mm x 156 mm. All of our multicrystalline
solar cells have dimensions of 156 mm x 156 mm. As of December 31, 2016, our solar cells using monocrystalline silicon wafers
had an average conversion efficiency rate of 21.0% and our solar cells using multicrystalline silicon wafers had an average conversion
efficiency rate of 18.7%.
Silicon Wafers
We commenced production of monocrystalline
silicon wafers and multicrystalline silicon wafers in March 2008 and July 2008, respectively.
Recovered Silicon Materials
We commenced processing of recoverable silicon
materials into recovered silicon materials in June 2006. We are able to process and recover a broad range of recoverable silicon
materials, which enables us to reduce our overall silicon material costs and improve product quality and yield.
Solar Power Generation and Solar System EPC Services
We commenced developing solar power projects
in China in 2011 and generated revenue from sales of electricity generated by our own solar power projects when they were connected
to the grid. In November 2016, we disposed of our downstream solar power project business in China.
In addition, we obtained two small solar
power projects as the repayment of our accounts receivable in Italy and commenced developing solar power projects overseas in 2016.
Manufacturing
We manufacture and sell solar modules, solar
cells, silicon wafers and recovered silicon materials.
Manufacturing Capacity and Facilities
Manufacturing Capacity
The following table sets forth our annual
production capacity for silicon wafers, solar cells and solar modules as of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016:
|
|
Annual Production Capacity as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(GW)
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar modules
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Solar cells
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Silicon wafers
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Property and Plant
We both own and lease properties for our
operations. When we state that we own certain properties in China, we own the relevant land use rights because land is owned by
the PRC state under the PRC land system. As of the date of this annual report, we had obtained land use rights to approximately
1.0 million square meters of land. The following table sets forth the size, use and the location of the land, to which we had obtained
the land use rights, as the date of this annual report:
Location
|
|
Industrial Use
(square meters)
|
|
|
Residential Use
(square meters)
|
|
Shangrao, Jiangxi Province
|
|
|
646,826
|
|
|
|
191,840
|
|
Haining, Zhejiang Province
|
|
|
187,034
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
Yuhuan, Zhejiang Province
|
|
|
92,540
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
926,400
|
|
|
|
197,228
|
|
We also lease manufacturing facilities with
a total gross floor area of approximately 32,067 square meters in Shangrao from Jiangxi Desun for production use. We also lease
office space and manufacturing facilities in various locations around the world where we maintain subsidiaries and offices.
Except as indicated otherwise, we own the
facilities completed and under construction and own the right to use the relevant land for the durations described below (including
capacities and major equipment):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Manufacturing
Capacities by Product Category
as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
Location
|
|
Facility
No.
|
|
|
Plant Size
(square
meters)
|
|
|
Duration of Land Use Right
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Major equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(GW)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Ingots
and Wafers
|
|
Shangrao
Economic
Development
Zone
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
68,396.80
|
|
|
(i) March 16, 2010 to February 3, 2057;
(ii) December 9, 2009 to September 23, 2058; (iii) July 6, 2009 to August 10, 2059; (iv) July 10, 2009 to
February 7, 2057; (v) January 6, 2009 to August 10, 2059
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
Monocrystalline furnaces, multicrystalline furnaces, wire saws, wire squarers
|
Silicon Ingots
|
|
Yilin,Xinjiang
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
165,333.00
|
|
|
(i) May 28,2016 to May 27, 2026;(ii)January 1,2017 to December 31,2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monocrystalline furnaces
|
Solar Cells
|
|
Yuanhua
Town,
Haining
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
107,864.90
|
|
|
(i) November 23, 2009 to June 6, 2057; (ii) October 29, 2009 to May 26, 2058; (iii)
August 17, 2010 to July 25, 2060
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
Diffusion furnaces, sintering furnaces, PECVD antireflection coatings manufacturing equipment, automatic printers
|
|
|
Penang,
Malaysia
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8,191.00
|
|
|
January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar
Modules
|
|
Shangrao
Economic
Development
Zone
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
134,950.58
|
|
|
July 6, 2009 to August 10, 2059
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
Laminating machine, solar cell module production line before and after component lamination, automatic glue spreads’ working station, solar cell module testing devices
|
|
|
Yuanhua
Town,
Haining
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
98,497.00
|
|
|
September 9, 2016 to September 8, 2066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yuanhua
Town,
Haining
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
89,543.00
|
|
|
(i) October 29, 2009 to May 26, 2058; (ii) August 17, 2010 to July 25, 2060; (iii)
September 15, 2010 to August 29, 2060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penang,
Malaysia
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12,679
|
|
|
January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, there is an electric power
transformation and distribution substation constructed by the Shangrao Economic Development Zone Management Committee and Shangrao
County Power Supply Co., Ltd. with an annual capacity of 619.8 million kWh and a gross floor area of 13,127 square meters at Jiangxi
Jinko’s manufacturing site to support its operations and assure it of priority supply of electricity. We had our own electric
power transformation and distribution substation with an annual capacity of approximately 23.2 million kWh and a gross floor area
of approximately 6,667 square meters in Shangrao as of December 31, 2016.
As of December 31, 2016, short-term borrowings
of RMB902.9 million (US$130.0 million) and long-term borrowings of RMB75.1 million (US$10.8 million) were secured by land use rights,
plant and equipment. We believe our current land use rights, existing facilities and equipment are adequate for our current requirements.
Major Plans to Construct, Expand or Improve
Facilities
As of December 31, 2016, we had an
integrated annual capacity of 5.0 GW for silicon ingots and wafers, 4.0 GW for solar cells and 6.5 GW for solar modules.
See “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—We may continue to undertake acquisitions, investments, joint
ventures or other strategic alliances, and such undertakings may be unsuccessful.”
We have entered into purchase agreements
for purchasing additional manufacturing equipment. Our purchase capital commitments under these contracts amounted to approximately
RMB878.8 million (US$126.6 million) as of December 31, 2016, of which RMB783.5 million (US$112.9 million) will be due in 2017 and
RMB95.3 million (US$13.7 million) will be due after one year but within five years. As we have shifted our focus from capacity
expansion to improving our efficiency, we may terminate these equipment purchase agreements or revise their terms in line with
our new plan and as a result, may be subject to cancellation, late charges and forfeiture of prepayments. See “Item 3. Key
Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—We may face termination and late charges
and risks relating to the termination and amendment of certain equipment purchases contracts.”
Manufacturing Process
Silicon Ingot Manufacturing
We produce monocrystalline silicon ingots
in electric furnaces. We place silicon materials, consisting of virgin polysilicon feedstock and recovered silicon materials of
various grades according to formulas developed in-house into a quartz crucible in the furnace, where the silicon materials are
melted. While heating the silicon materials, we pump a stream of argon, a chemically inert gas, into the furnace to remove the
impurities vaporized during the heating process and to inhibit oxidation, thus enhancing the purity of the silicon ingots. A thin
crystal “seed” is dipped into the molten silicon to determine the crystal orientation and structure. The seed is rotated
and then slowly extracted from the molten silicon, which adheres to the seed and is pulled vertically upward to form a cylindrical
silicon ingots consisting of a single large silicon crystal as the molten silicon and crucible cool. We have modified some of our
monocrystalline furnaces to allow us to apply our furnace reloading production process, which enables us to increase the size of
our silicon ingots while lowering our unit production costs by enhancing the utilization rate of our furnaces and reducing unit
costs of consumables and utilities. After the silicon ingot is pulled and cooled, we square the silicon ingots in our squaring
machines into blocks.
We produce multicrystalline silicon ingots
in electric furnaces. We place silicon materials, consisting of virgin polysilicon feedstock and recovered silicon materials of
various grades mixed according to our proprietary formula, into a quartz crucible in the furnace, where the silicon materials are
melted. While heating the silicon materials, we pump argon into the furnace to remove impurities and inhibit oxidation. The molten
silicon is cast into a block and crystallized, forming a multicrystalline structure as the molten silicon and crucible cool. After
the multicrystalline silicon block is cast and cooled, we square it in our squaring machine and cut it into individual blocks.
We have improved our high-precision wire squarers and squaring techniques, which allows us to reduce the sizes of silicon ingot
tops, tails and other off-cuts during the squaring process, thus increasing the sizes of silicon ingot blocks available to be cut
into silicon wafers.
We test monocrystalline and multicrystalline
silicon ingots as to their minority carrier lifetime, which is an important measurement of impurity levels of crystalline silicon
material, as well as resistivity, electric properties and chemical properties and cut off the unusable parts before they are cut
into silicon wafers.
Silicon Wafer Cutting
We cut silicon ingots into silicon wafers
with high-precision wire saws which use steel wires carrying slurry to cut silicon wafers from the silicon ingot blocks. Using
proprietary know-how and our process technology, we have improved these wire saws to enable us to cut silicon ingot blocks longer
than the size that the wire saws were originally designed to cut as well as to increase the number of quality conforming silicon
wafers produced from each silicon ingot block, produce silicon wafers with thickness of a high degree of consistency and improve
the quality of silicon wafers. We currently manufacture our monocrystalline silicon wafers in 125 mm x 125 mm dimensions with an
average thickness 180 microns and our multicrystalline silicon wafers in 156 mm x 156 mm dimensions with an average thickness of
180 microns. The dimensions of the silicon wafers we produce are dictated by current demands for market standard products. However,
our production equipment and processes are also capable of producing silicon wafers in other dimensions if market demand should
so require.
After silicon wafers are cut from silicon
ingots, they are cleaned and inserted into frames. The framed silicon wafers are further cleaned, dried and inspected before packaging.
Solar Cell Manufacturing
Solar cell manufacturing process starts
with an ultrasonic cleaning process to remove grease and particles from the wafer surface, followed by chemical cleaning and texturing
in wet benches to remove organic and metallic contaminate, as well as to create suede-like or pyramid-like topograph, depending
on multi- or mono-crystalline wafer used, on the wafer surface. This rough surface could reduce the optical loss of solar cells
due to lowering light reflection and creating longer optical path beneficial for light absorption. The wafer then receives a high
temperature diffusion process to form p-n junction, which is the heart of solar cell to separate light generated carriers. An edge
isolation process is adapted to electrically isolate diffused front and rear surfaces, followed by an anti-reflection coating process
to deposit a thin layer of silicon nitride on the sunward side of the wafer to further enhance the light absorption. Metallization
is then applied by screen printed metal paste on both sides of the wafer, followed by a high temperature co-firing process through
a belt furnace to form ohmic-contact electrodes. The finished solar cells are tested and sorted, and ready for the solar module
manufacturing process.
Solar Module Manufacturing
Solar modules are produced by interconnecting
multiple solar cells into desired electrical configurations through welding. The interconnected solar cells are laid out and laminated
in a vacuum with laboratory details involved. Through these processes and designs, the solar modules are weather-sealed, and thus
are able to withstand high levels of ultraviolet radiation, moisture, wind, transportation damage and sand. Assembled solar modules
are packaged in a protective aluminum frame prior to testing.
Raw and Ancillary Materials
The raw materials used in our manufacturing
process consist primarily of virgin polysilicon and recoverable silicon materials, and the ancillary materials used in our manufacturing
process consist primarily of metallic pastes, EVA, tempered glass, aluminum frames, back sheets, junction boxes and other related
consumables. The prices of polysilicon and silicon wafers have been subject to significant volatility. See “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Volatility in the prices of silicon raw materials makes our
procurement planning challenging and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.”
Raw Materials
The principal raw material used in our manufacturing
process is virgin polysilicon. We also use recoverable silicon materials in our production. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, virgin polysilicon
accounted for approximately 86.4%, 87.3% and 92.3%, respectively, and recoverable silicon materials accounted for approximately
13.6%, 12.7% and 7.7%, respectively, of our total silicon raw material purchases by value. We procure our raw materials from diversified
sources. In 2016, purchases from foreign suppliers and domestic suppliers accounted for 87.0% and 13.0% of our total silicon raw
material purchases, respectively.
In 2014, 2015 and 2016, our five largest
suppliers provided approximately 62.1%, 52.8% and 59.2%, respectively, of our total silicon purchases by value. In 2014, three
of our suppliers individually accounted for more than 10% and our largest supplier accounted for 16.0% of our total silicon purchases
by value. In 2015, three of our suppliers individually accounted for more than 10% and our largest supplier accounted for 16.9%
of our total silicon purchases by value. In 2016, one of our suppliers individually accounted for more than 10%, and our largest
supplier accounted for 17.7% of our total silicon purchases by value.
Our supply contracts generally include prepayment
obligations for the procurement of silicon raw materials. As of December 31, 2016, we had approximately RMB325.8 million (US$46.9
million) of advances to suppliers.
Virgin Polysilicon
We purchase solar grade virgin polysilicon
from both domestic and foreign suppliers. We purchase our virgin polysilicon through spot market purchases to take advantage of
decreasing virgin polysilicon prices.
Recoverable Silicon Materials
We purchase pre-screened recoverable silicon
materials from our suppliers which are delivered to our facilities for chemical treatment, cleaning and sorting into recovered
silicon materials. Currently, we purchase most of our recoverable silicon materials on the spot market.
Ancillary Materials
We use metallic pastes as raw materials
in our solar cell production process. Metallic pastes are used to form the grids of metal contacts that are printed on the front
and back surfaces of the solar cells through screen-printing to create negative and positive electrodes. We procure metallic pastes
from third parties under monthly contracts. In addition, we use EVA, tempered glass, aluminum frames and other raw materials in
our solar module production process. We procure these materials from third parties on a monthly basis.
Customers and Markets
We primarily sell solar products in both
China and overseas markets, and before the disposition of our downstream solar power project business in China in November 2016,
we sold electricity generated by our solar power projects in China. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, we generated 42.3%, 36.3% and 38.5%
of our revenues from domestic sales and 57.7%, 62.7% and 61.5% of our revenues from export sales, respectively. As of December 31,
2016, we had more than 600 customers for our solar modules from China and 500 from other countries, including the United States,
the United Kingdom, Chile, South Africa, Japan, Holland, India, Australia and France. The following table sets forth our net revenues
generated from sales of products and provision of processing services to customers in respective geographic locations, with percentage
of net revenues, for the periods indicated.
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Inside China (including Hong Kong and Taiwan)
|
|
|
4,119,710.4
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
5,608,964.0
|
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
|
8,249,043.1
|
|
|
|
1,188,109.3
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
Outside China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
1,766,283.0
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
4,146,330.9
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
7,701,560.2
|
|
|
|
1,109,255.4
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
%
|
UK
|
|
|
1,266,982.3
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
839,243.3
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
342,655.7
|
|
|
|
49,352.7
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Chile
|
|
|
580,383.7
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,018,522.7
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
898,465.1
|
|
|
|
129,405.9
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Turkey
|
|
|
50,119.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
377,663.5
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
366,929.8
|
|
|
|
52,848.9
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
Thailand
|
|
|
65,578.6
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
328,505.8
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
97,904.5
|
|
|
|
14,101.2
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
South Africa
|
|
|
534,571.3
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
346,904.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
37,324.0
|
|
|
|
5,375.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Japan
|
|
|
486,201.3
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
997,526.3
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
992,645.5
|
|
|
|
142,970.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
India
|
|
|
272,142.4
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
280,481.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
775,458.2
|
|
|
|
111,689.2
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
Brazil
|
|
|
5,033.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
44,251.7
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
479,569.2
|
|
|
|
69,072.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
593,870.6
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
4,146,330.9
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,459,082.8
|
|
|
|
210,151.6
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
5,621,166.1
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
%
|
|
|
9,845,410.4
|
|
|
|
62.7
|
%
|
|
|
13,151,595.0
|
|
|
|
1,894,223.7
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
9,740,876.5
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
15,454,374.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
21,400,638.1
|
|
|
|
3,082,333.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Sales of solar modules are our largest revenue
contributor, which accounted for 97.3% of our total revenues in 2016. We sell silicon wafers and solar cells to the extent we do
not consume them for our own production. We expect that our sales of solar modules will continue to be our largest revenue contributor.
None of our customers accounted for more
than 10% of our total revenues in 2014, 2015 and 2016.The following table sets forth the primary products sold to our top five
customers and the percentage of total revenues generated by sales to our top five customers for the periods indicated:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Products
|
|
(%)
|
|
Top five customers
|
|
|
Solar modules
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
Solar modules
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
Solar modules
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
We sell our solar modules under our own
brand “JinkoSolar” as well as on an OEM basis. Our customers for solar modules include distributors, project developers
and system integrators. We have been able to establish strong relationships with a number of major customers, based on the quality
of our products and our market reputation. Our module customers include leading players in the PV industry, such as sPower, ConEdison
Development, BayWa r.e. Solarsysteme GmbH, AMEC, the Juwi Group, Energiebau Solarstrom System GmbH, WBHO Build Energy (Pty) Ltd,
Solar Century Holding Ltd and Solairedirect S.A.
Sales and Marketing
We sell solar modules under short-term contracts
and by spot market sales. We negotiate payment terms on a case by case basis and we allow most of our overseas’ customers
to make full payment within 90 days and our domestic customers to make 90%-95% of payment within 180 days after delivery and the
rest will be paid when the Retainage Period (as defined below) ends.
We expect to retain a substantial portion
of our solar cells for our own solar module production, while maintaining our flexibility to respond to market changes and price
fluctuations by selling a portion of our solar cells in the spot market under favorable circumstances. We sell our solar cells
under short-term contracts and by spot market sales. We negotiate payment terms of our solar cell sales contracts on a case-by-case
basis, and we allow most of our customers to make full payment within 15 to 90 days after delivery. See “Item 5. Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operational Results—Principal Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Industry
Trend for Credit Sales.”
Historically, we made substantial sales
of silicon wafers. Currently, we retain a substantial portion of our silicon wafers for our own solar cell production, while selling
the remaining to our solar cell suppliers to set off a portion of our payment obligations for our solar cell purchases.
We made substantial sales of recovered silicon
materials and silicon ingots before we built out our silicon wafer, solar cell and solar module production capacity. We currently
sell a small volume of recovered silicon materials.
As we continue to diversify our product
lines, we have successfully expanded our global marketing footprint. We established a sales and marketing center in Shanghai in
January 2009, which provides us with convenient access to domestic and international sales channels. In November 2009,
we established JinkoSolar International Limited in Hong Kong to get easy access to major export markets. We began exporting our
silicon wafers to Hong Kong in May 2008, and have since expanded our sales to Taiwan, India, the Netherlands, Singapore and
Korea. With our entry into the downstream solar module markets, we have further successfully marketed our products to customers
in Germany, Italy, Belgium, Spain, France, Israel, U.S. Canada, South Africa, Australia, Singapore, and other countries and regions.
We have 18 global sales offices in China, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, Morocco, Ghana, Kenya, Costa Rica, Colombia, Brazil and Mexico and 15 oversea subsidiaries in Japan, Singapore,
India, Turkey, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Australia and South Africa. We intend
to establish additional subsidiaries and sales offices in the major overseas markets to expand our customer base and increase our
market penetration.
In addition, we have devoted significant
resources to developing solar module customers and a stable end-user customer base through establishing diversified sales channels
comprising project developers, system integrators, distributors and sales agents and diversified marketing activities, including
advertising on major industry publications, attending trade shows and exhibits worldwide as well as providing high quality services
to our customers.
In July 2015, we entered into a new
strategic partnership with the Golden State Warriors for a term of two years, which names us as the team’s official solar
panel partner. We believe that our global marketing practice and strategy have and will continue to enable us to explore the overseas
market, increase our sales, expand our customer base and increase recognition of our brand domestically and internationally.
In 2015, we entered into advertising agreements
with several TV stations and several major city airports. Furthermore, we continued to sponsor major PV industry conferences and
participated in some industry associations.
In 2014, we were ranked 313
th
on the List of Top 500 Private Enterprises in China by All-China Federation of Industry & Commerce. We were awarded 2014 China’s
Outstanding Corporate Citizen and ranked among the 2014 List of Top 50 Outstanding Corporate Citizens by China Committee of Corporate
Citizenship. We were ranked among the List of Top Ten Solar Companies in China by SolarStar, an online media platform covering
the solar industry. We were ranked among the List of Top 50 Energy Enterprises with Most Growth Potential in 2014 by
Energy,
a Chinese magazine covering the energy sector in China. We were the only Chinese solar company that received the 2014 Best
Employer in China Award by International Public Management Association for Human Resources Association.
In 2015, we were ranked 437
th
in the “Fortune 500” Chinese Enterprise List. Furthermore, we have been awarded the “Today’s Transformative
Step 2015” at COP21 and the only Chinese PV manufacturer recognized as the “Global Growth Company” at the 2015
World Economic Forum.
In July 2016, we made a big leap forward
in the latest China Fortune 500 list from 437
th
to 330
th
. Furthermore, we were awarded the 2016 BlueSky Award
for Global Top Investment Scenarios to Apply New Technologies for Renewable Energy Utilization.
In October 2016, we were ranked 16
th
among Fortune magazine’s 100 Fastest-Growing Companies in 2016. We were also appointed as co-chair of the B20 ECRE Taskforce
under the 2017 Germany G20 Presidency.
Quality Control
We employ strict quality control procedures
at each stage of the manufacturing process in accordance with ISO9001 and IEC TS 62941 quality management standards to ensure the
consistency of our product quality and compliance with our internal production benchmarks. Our quality management systems in Shangrao,
Jiangxi Province, Haining, Zhejiang Province and Penang, Malaysia have all received the SGS ISO90001:2015 certification. In addition,
our manufacturing facilities in Shangrao, Jiangxi Province and Haining, Zhejiang Province have passed the TUV-NORD IEC TS62941
test in November 2016.
In addition, we have also received international
and domestic certifications for certain models of our solar modules. For example, we have received CE, IEC, MCS and TÜV certifications
for all of our solar modules sold in Europe, UL certifications for all solar modules sold in North America and CQC and CGC certification
for all of our solar modules in China. In August 2012, our modules became the first to pass TÜV-SÜD’s stringent
potential induced degradation test under 85 degrees Celsius and 85% relative humidity conditions, and our testing facility received
certification from China National Accreditation Service for its industry leading quality controls. In May 2013, our modules
became the first to pass TÜV NORD’s dynamic mechanical load testing with maximum 1000 Pascal downward load. In 2013,
our solar modules also passed TÜV Nord’s Dust & Sand Certification Test, demonstrating their suitability for installation
in desert regions. In December 2014, our modules became the first to pass TÜV NORD’s transportation and shipping
of PV Module stacks test. Our solar modules received the highest testing result, class 1, in the fire resistance test conducted
by Italy’s Istituto Giordano. We also obtained the JIS Q 8901 Certification from TÜV Rheinland. In May 2016, we became
the first Chinese PV manufacturer that received Qualification Plus certification from TÜV Rheinland for solar modules.
We conduct systematic inspections of incoming
raw materials, ranging from silicon raw materials to various ancillary materials. We have formulated and adopted guidelines and
continue to devote efforts to developing and improving our inspection measures and standards on recycling recoverable silicon materials,
silicon ingots, silicon wafer, solar cell and solar module production. We conduct a final quality check before packing to ensure
that our solar power products meet all our internal standards and customers’ specifications. In addition, we provide periodic
training to our employees to ensure the effectiveness of our quality control procedures.
In February 2012, we opened our PV
module testing laboratory in Jiangxi, China, which can conduct over 16 different kinds of tests, ranging from basic pressure and
impact tests to challenging hot spot, pre-decay and UV aging tests, all of which conform to UL and International Electrotechnical
Commission regulations. In February 2012, the facility was awarded the UL Witness Testing Data Program (“WTDP”)
Certificate and, in August 2012, the facility was certified by China National Accreditation Service (“CNAS”).
We have a dedicated team overseeing our
quality control processes. In addition, we have established operation management and project-based customer service teams, aiming
to supervise the whole installation process and service our customers in a timely manner. They work collaboratively with our sales
team to provide customer support and after-sale services. We emphasize gathering customer feedback for our products and addressing
customer concerns in a timely manner.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive and rapidly
evolving market. As we build out our solar cell and solar module production capacity and increase the output of these products,
we mainly compete with integrated as well as specialized manufacturers of solar cells and solar modules such as Trina Solar Ltd.,
Canadian Solar Inc. and JA Solar Holdings Co., Ltd in a continuously evolving market. Recently, some upstream polysilicon manufacturers
as well as downstream manufacturers have also built out or expanded their silicon ingots, silicon wafer, solar cell and solar module
production operations. We expect to face increased competition as other silicon ingots, silicon wafer, solar cell and solar module
manufacturers continue to expand their operations. Some of our current and potential competitors may have a longer operating history,
greater financial and other resources, stronger brand recognition, better access to raw materials, stronger relationships with
customers and greater economies of scale than we do. Moreover, certain of our competitors are highly-integrated producers whose
business models provide them with competitive advantages as these companies are less dependent on upstream suppliers and/or downstream
customers in the value chain.
We compete primarily in terms of product
quality and consistency, pricing, timely delivery, ability to fill large orders and reputation for reliable customer support services.
We believe that our high quality products, our low manufacturing costs and easy access to key resources from our strategically
located production bases in China, Malaysia and South Africa, our recoverable silicon material processing operations and our proprietary
process technologies enhance our overall competitiveness.
In addition, some companies are currently
developing or manufacturing solar power products based on new technologies, including thin film materials and CSPV. These new alternative
products may cost less than those based on monocrystalline or multicrystalline technologies while achieving the same or similar
levels of conversion efficiency in the future. Furthermore, the solar industry generally competes with other renewable energy and
conventional energy sources.
See “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—We face intense competition in solar power product markets.
If we fail to adapt to changing market conditions and to compete successfully with existing or new competitors, our business prospects
and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.”
Production Safety
We are subject to extensive PRC laws and
regulations in relation to labor and safety. We have adopted stringent safety procedures at our facilities to limit potential damage
and personal injury in the event of an accident or natural disaster, and have devised a number of internal guidelines as well as
instructions for our manufacturing processes, including the operation of equipment and handling of chemicals. We distribute safety-related
manuals to employees and post bulletins setting forth safety instructions, guidelines and policies throughout our facilities. Failure
by employees to follow these guidelines and instructions result in monetary fines. All of our new employees undergo extensive safety
training and education. We require our technical staff to attend weekly training programs taught by instructors to enhance their
work safety awareness and ensure safe equipment operation. We conduct regular inspections and our experienced equipment maintenance
team oversees the operation of our manufacturing lines to maintain proper and safe working conditions. As a result, our occupational
health and safety management systems are certified to fulfill the OHSAS 18001:2007 standards starting from March 2012. Since
our inception, we have not experienced any major work-related injuries.
We use, store and generate volatile and
otherwise dangerous chemicals and wastes during our manufacturing processes, and are subject to a variety of government regulations
related to the use, storage and disposal of such hazardous chemicals and waste. In accordance with the requirements of the Regulations
on the Safety Management of Hazardous Chemical, which became effective on December 1, 2011 and were amended on December 7,
2013, we are required to engage state-qualified institutions to conduct the safety evaluation on our storage instruments related
to our use of hazardous chemicals and file the safety evaluation report with the competent safety supervision and administration
authorities every three years. Moreover, we also need to timely file a report with the competent safety supervision and administration
authorities and public security agencies concerning the actual storage situation of our hyper-toxic chemicals and other hazardous
chemicals that constitute major of hazard sources. We have not conducted the safety evaluation or filed safety evaluation reports
with respect to certain of our storage instruments in compliance with the revised Regulation on the Safety Management of Hazardous
Chemicals and we cannot assure you that we will be able to file the safety evaluation reports on time. Failure to conduct such
safety evaluation or to make such filing on time may subject us to an order to rectify such conduct within a prescribed time period,
fines of up to RMB100,000 or a revocation of our qualification and business license.
Environmental Matters
We generate and discharge chemical wastes,
waste water, gaseous waste and other industrial waste at various stages of our manufacturing process as well as during the processing
of recovered silicon material. We have installed pollution abatement equipment at our facilities to process, reduce, treat, and
where feasible, recycle the waste materials before disposal, and we treat the waste water, gaseous and liquid waste and other industrial
waste produced during the manufacturing process before discharge. We also maintain environmental teams at each of our manufacturing
facilities to monitor waste treatment and ensure that our waste emissions comply with PRC environmental standards. Our environmental
teams are on duty 24 hours. We are required to comply with all PRC national and local environmental protection laws and regulations
and our operations are subject to periodic inspection by national and local environmental protection authorities. PRC national
and local environmental laws and regulations impose fees, and from January 1, 2018, taxes for the discharge of waste materials
above prescribed levels, require the payment of fines for serious violations and provide that the relevant authorities may at their
own discretion close or suspend the operation of any facility that fails to comply with orders requiring it to cease or remedy
operations causing environmental damage. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business
and Industry—Compliance with environmentally safe production and construction regulations can be costly, while non-compliance
with such regulations may result in adverse publicity and potentially significant monetary damages, fines and suspension of our
business.”
Our factories are equipped with state-of-the-art
equipment that has been designed to not only produce the highest quality products, but to also minimize the environmental impact.
Our manufacturing facilities in Shangrao, Jiangxi Province have received the ISO 9001:2015 certification and our manufacturing
facilities in Haining, Zhejiang Province have received the ISO 9001 and the ISO14001 certification. In January 2012, we joined
the PV Cycle Association for the collection and recycling of end-of-life solar modules at European level. In September 2016, we
helped create the first PV recycling network in the U.S.
We are required to obtain construction permits
before commencing constructing production facilities. We are also required to obtain approvals from PRC environmental protection
authorities before commencing commercial operations of our manufacturing facilities. We commenced construction of a portion of
our solar cell and solar module production facilities prior to obtaining the construction permits and commenced operations of certain
of our production facilities prior to obtaining the environmental approvals for commencing commercial operation and completing
the required safety evaluation procedure. Although we have subsequently obtained all required environmental approvals covering
all of our existing production capacity except a portion of our solar cell and solar module production capacity, we cannot assure
you that we will not be penalized by the relevant government authorities for any prior non-compliance with the PRC environmental
protection, safe production and construction regulations.
In late August 2011, our Haining facility
experienced a suspected leakage of fluoride into a nearby small water channel due to extreme and unforeseen weather conditions.
On September 15, 2011, residents of Hongxiao Village in proximity to the Haining facility gathered to protest the discharge.
The Haining facility suspended production on September 17, 2011. We also took steps recommended by an environmental engineering
firms licensed by the PRC government (“Licensed Engineers”). On September 28, 2011, a committee of experts (the
“Experts Committee”) established by the Haining government approved a set of recommendations developed by the Licensed
Engineers with our assistance and the Haining government to be implemented by us. On October 6, 2011, the Experts Committee,
the Environmental Bureau of the Haining government and representatives of Hongxiao Village reviewed the steps taken by us based
on the recommendations of the Experts Committee and provided their comments to JinkoSolar’s management. On October 9,
2011, the Experts Committee notified us that the Experts Committee was satisfied with the steps taken by us and we resumed production
at the Haining facility.
On March 22, 2012, our 600 MW solar
cell manufacturing line passed the Haining City environmental authority’s environmental evaluation. In May 2012, pursuant
to a request from the Haining City environmental authority as a part of a program directed to all local manufacturing companies,
we took additional steps intended to improve our program for handling hazardous waste, which was approved in September 2012.
In November 2012, we were selected on a random basis for an audit of our energy conservation and emission-reduction management
systems by the Haining City environmental authority, which we completed successfully.
We continued to implement several environmental
protection related projects at the Haining facility between 2013 and 2015, aiming to improve the waste treatment as well as to
reduce carbon dioxide emission. We have invested to establish a new water recycle system, install roof-top solar panels, replace
fluorescent tubes with LED light in the production lines, and upgrade waste chemical discharge sewers. In 2016, we completed the
upgrade of the existing wastewater treatment station and improved the wastewater treatment of the Haining facility to comply with
the new PRC environmental standards for the solar industry.
Seasonality
Demand for solar power products tends to
be weaker during the winter months partly due to adverse weather conditions in certain regions, which complicate the installation
of solar power systems. Our operating results may fluctuate from period to period based on the seasonality of industry demand for
solar power products. Our sales in the first quarter of any year may also be affected by the occurrence of the Chinese New Year
holiday during which domestic industrial activity is normally lower than that at other times.
Insurance
We have insurance policies covering certain
machinery such as our monocrystalline and multicrystalline furnaces. These insurance policies cover damages and losses due to fire,
flood, design defects or improper installation of equipment, water stoppages or power outages and other events stipulated in the
relevant policies. Insurance coverage for Jiangxi Jinko’s fixed assets other than land amounted to approximately RMB2,567.7
million (US$369.8 million) as of December 31, 2016. Insurance coverage for Zhejiang Jinko’s fixed assets and inventory
amounted to approximately RMB4,506.4 million (US$649.1 million) as of December 31, 2016. Insurance coverage for Jinko Malaysia’s
fixed assets and inventory amounted to approximately RMB920.1 million (US$132.5 million) as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31,
2016, we had product liability insurance coverage for Jiangxi Jinko, Zhejiang Jinko, Jinko Solar Import and Export Co. Ltd. (“Jinko
Import and Export”) and Zhejiang Jinko Trading Co., Ltd. (“Zhejiang Trading”) of up to US$2,000 million, export
credit insurance coverage for Jiangxi Jinko, Zhejiang Jinko and Jinko Import and Export of up to US$246.8 million and product transportation
liability insurance coverage for Jiangxi Jinko, Zhejiang Jinko, Jinko Import and Export, Zhejiang Trading, JinkoSolar GmbH, JinkoSolar
Canada Co., Ltd. and JinkoSolar (U.S.) Inc. of up to RMB25.4 billion (US$3.7 billion).
We engage PowerGuard, a firm specializing
in unique insurance and risk management solutions for the wind and solar energy industries to provide insurance coverage for the
product warranty services for our solar modules worldwide. The policy offers back-to-back coverage through a maximum of ten-year
limited product defects warranty, as well as a 12-year and 25-year warranty against declines of more than 10.0% and 20.0%, respectively,
from the initial minimum power generation capacity at the time of delivery.
In addition, in November 2012, we also
purchased a policy for environmental liabilities insurance covering our operations in Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, as required by
the Environmental Protection Bureau of Jiaxing City. We believe that our overall insurance coverage is consistent with the market
practice in China. However, significant damage to any of our manufacturing facilities and buildings, whether as a result of fire
or other causes, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In accordance with customary practice in China,
we do not carry any business interruption insurance. Moreover, we may incur losses beyond the limits, or outside the coverage,
of our insurance policies. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—We
have limited insurance coverage and may incur losses resulting from product liability claims, business interruption or natural
disasters.” We paid an aggregate of approximately RMB27.3 million, RMB34.3 million and RMB25.3 million (US$3.6 million)
in insurance premiums in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Regulation
This section sets forth a summary of the
most significant regulations or requirements that affect our business activities in the PRC or our shareholders’ right to
receive dividends and other distributions from us.
Renewable Energy Law and Other Government Directives
The
Renewable Energy Law,
which originally
became effective on January 1, 2006 and was amended on December 26, 2009, sets forth policies to encourage the development
and on-grid application of solar energy and other renewable energy. The law also sets forth a national policy to encourage the
installation and use of solar energy water heating systems, solar energy heating and cooling systems, PV systems and other systems
that use solar energy. It also provides financial incentives, such as national funding, preferential loans and tax preferential
treatment for the development of renewable energy projects.
The
PRC Energy Conservation Law
,
which became effective on April 1, 2008 and was amended on July 2, 2016, encourages the utilization and installation of solar power
facilities on buildings for energy-efficiency purposes. The law also encourages and supports the development of solar energy system
in rural areas.
On October 10, 2010, the State Council
of the PRC promulgated a decision to accelerate the development of seven strategic new industries. Pursuant to this decision, the
PRC government will promote the popularization and application of solar thermal technologies by increasing tax and financial policy
support, encouraging investment and providing other forms of beneficial support.
On March 27, 2011, the NDRC promulgated
the revised
Guideline Catalogue for Industrial Restructuring
which categorizes the solar power industry as an encouraged
item. On February 16, 2013, the NDRC promulgated the 2013 revised Guideline Catalogue for Industrial Restructuring to be effective
on May 1, 2013, the solar power industry is still categorized as an encouraged item.
In response to the increased pace of market
development, the PRC State Council, in a statement dated July 4, 2013, announced to support the development of PV production
enterprises with high technology and strong market competitiveness, among other matters.
In March 2016, the National People’s
Congress approved the
Outline of the Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the PRC
,
which mentions a national commitment to continuing to support the development of PV generation industry.
On March 22, 2016, the NEA promulgated the
Guide Opinion on Energy for 2016
, which encouraged the development of solar power.
On November 29, 2016, the State Council
released the
Thirteen Five-Year Development Plan for National Strategic New Industries
, which aims to promote the diversification
and large-scale development of solar power industry.
On December 8, 2016, the NEA officially
released the
Thirteen Five-Year Plan on Solar Power Development
, pursuant to which, the NEA will provide market support
to advanced technology and product and lead the PV technical advances and industry upgrading.
On December 30, 2016, the MIIT, NDRC, the
Ministry of Science and Technology and MOF jointly promulgated the
Development Guide Regarding the New Materials Industry
to
support and provide details for the development of the PRC solar power industry.
Environmental Protection
The construction processes of our solar
power projects generate material levels of noise, waste water, gaseous emissions and other industrial wastes. Therefore, we are
subject to a variety of government regulations related to the storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials and to the protection
of the environment of the community. The major environmental regulations applicable to our business activities in the PRC include
the Environmental Protection Law of the PRC, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Noise Pollution, the Law on the Prevention
and Control of Air Pollution, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, the Law on the Prevention and Control of
Solid Waste Pollution, the Environmental Impact Evaluation of Law,
and
the Regulations on the Administration of Environmental
Protection In Construction Projects.
On December 25, 2016, the Standing Committee
of the National People's Congress promulgated
the Law on Environmental Protection Tax
, which will become effective on January
1, 2018.
The Law on Environmental Protection Tax
reforms and replaces the pollutant discharge fee system, which had been
implemented over decades in China.
The Law on Environmental Protection Tax
provides that, among others, from the effective
date, the enterprises, entities and other producers and operators that directly emit taxable pollutants into the environment within
the territory and other sea areas under the jurisdiction of the PRC shall pay environmental protection tax instead of pollutant
discharge fees. Under
the Law on Environmental Protection Tax
, taxable pollutants include air and water pollutants, solid
waste and noise.
See “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Compliance with environmentally safe production and construction
regulations can be costly, while noncompliance with such regulations may result in adverse publicity and potentially significant
monetary damages, fines and suspension of our business operations.”
Foreign Investment in Solar Power Business
The principal regulation governing foreign
ownership of solar power businesses in the PRC is
the Foreign Investment Industrial Guidance Catalog.
Under the current
catalog, which was amended in 2015 and became effective on April 10, 2015, the solar power industry is classified as an “encouraged
foreign investment industry.” Foreign-invested enterprises in the encouraged foreign investment industry are entitled to
certain preferential treatment, such as exemption from tariff on equipment imported for their operations, after obtaining approval
from the PRC government authorities.
Work Safety
We are subject to laws and regulations in
relation to work safety and occupational disease prevention, including the
Work Safety Law of the PRC,
which became effective
on November 1, 2002 and was amended on August 31, 2014, the
Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases of the PRC
,
which was effective on May 1, 2002, and was amended on July 2, 2016, and the Photovoltaic Production Rule and other relevant laws
and regulations.
Employment
Pursuant to
the Labor Law of the PRC
,
the Labor Contract Law of the PRC
and
the Implementing Regulations of the Labor Contract Law of the PRC
, employers
must enter into written employment contracts with full-time employees. If an employer fails to do so within one year from the date
on which the employment relationship is established, the employer must rectify the situation by entering into a written employment
contract with the employee and pay the employee twice the employee’s salary for the period during which the written contract
is not signed.
The Labor Contract Law
and its implementing rules also require all employers must comply with local minimum
wage standards. If the wage paid to the employee by the employer is lower than the local minimum wage standard, the competent labor
authorities may order the employer to pay the difference; in the event of any failure to pay within the time limit, the employer
may be ordered to pay additional compensation to the employee at the standard of more than 50% but less than 100% of the payable
amount. Violations of
the Labor Law
,
the Labor Contract Law
and its implementing rules may result in the imposition
of fines and other administrative liabilities.
Enterprises in the PRC are required by the
PRC laws and regulations to participate in certain employee benefit plans covering pension insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity
insurance, work-related injury insurance, medical insurance and housing funds, and contribute to the plans or funds in amounts
equal to certain percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances, of the employees as specified by the local government
from time to time at locations where they operate their businesses or where they are located. According to
the Social Insurance
Law of the PRC
, which came into effect on July 1, 2011, an employer that fails to make social insurance contributions
may be ordered to pay the required contributions within a stipulated deadline and be subject to a late fee at the rate of 0.05%
per day from the date on which the contribution becomes due. If the employer still fails to rectify the failure to make social
insurance contributions within the stipulated deadline, it may be subject to a fine ranging from one to three times the amount
overdue. According to
the Regulations on the Administration of Housing Fund
, which came into force on March 24, 2002,
an enterprise that fails to make housing fund contributions may be ordered to rectify the noncompliance and pay the required contributions
within a stipulated deadline; otherwise, an application may be made to a local court for compulsory enforcement.
Taxation
PRC Corporate Income Tax
Prior to January 1, 2008, under
the
PRC Income Tax Law on Foreign-invested Enterprise and Foreign Enterprise
, or the former Income Tax Law, and the related implementing
rules, foreign-invested enterprises incorporated in the PRC were generally subject to a corporate income tax rate of 30% on taxable
income and a local income tax rate of 3% on taxable income. The former Income Tax Law and the related implementing rules also provided
certain favorable tax treatments to foreign-invested enterprises.
On March 16, 2007, the CIT Law was
passed, which, together with
the Implementation Rules of the CIT Law
issued on December 6, 2007, became effective on
January 1, 2008. The CIT Law applies a uniform 25% corporate income tax rate to both foreign invested enterprises and domestic
enterprises and eliminates many of the preferential tax policies afforded to foreign investors. Furthermore, dividends paid by
a foreign invested enterprise to a non-resident shareholder are now subject to a withholding tax rate of 10%, which may be reduced
under any applicable bilateral tax treaty between the PRC and the jurisdiction where the non-resident shareholder resides.
The CIT Law provided a five-year grandfathering
period, starting from its effective date, for enterprises established before the promulgation date of the CIT Law that were entitled
to enjoy preferential tax policies under the former Income Tax Law or the related implementing rules. However, subject to the
Circular
on Implementing the Grandfathering Preferential Policies of the Enterprise Income Tax
, or the Implementing Circular, promulgated
by the State Council on December 26, 2007, only a certain number of the preferential policies provided under the former Income
Tax Law and the related implementing rules were eligible to be grandfathered in accordance with the Implementing Circular.
With respect to our PRC operations, only
the “two-year exemption” and “three-year half deduction” tax preferential policy enjoyed by Jiangxi Jinko
and Zhejiang Jinko was grandfathered by the Implementation Circular. Both Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko were subject to a preferential
tax rate of 12.5% in 2011 and 2012. Zhejiang Jinko, Jiangxi Jinko and Jiangxi Materials were designated by the relevant local authorities
as “High and New Technology Enterprises” under the CIT Law. Jiangxi Jinko, Jiangxi Materials and Zhejiang Jinko were
subject to a preferential tax rate of 15% for 2014, 2015 and 2016. In 2015, Zhejiang Jinko successfully renewed this qualification
and will continue to enjoy the preferential tax rate of 15% in 2017, if the relevant conditions are met. In 2016, Jiangxi Jinko
and Jiangxi Materials successfully renewed this qualification and will continue to enjoy the preferential tax rate of 15% in 2017
and 2018, if the relevant conditions are met.
Certain solar power project entities enjoy
the preferential tax policies in connection with the development of the western region of China and are subject to a preferential
tax rate of 15%. The enterprises which are eligible for such preferential tax policy must engage in the business falling in the
scope of the Western Catalogue promulgated by the NDRC. Enterprises that are eligible for the preferential tax rate of 15% may
be able to enjoy such preferential tax rate and tax holiday simultaneously where certain criteria are met.
According to the
Circular of the State
Administration of Taxation on How to Understand and Identify “Beneficial Owner” under Tax Treaties
, which became
effective on October 27, 2009, and the
Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on the Determination of “Beneficial
Owners”
in the Tax Treaties, effective on June 29, 2012, the PRC tax authorities must evaluate whether an applicant
for treaty benefits in respect of dividends, interest and royalties qualifies as a “beneficial owner” on a case-by-case
basis and following the “substance over form” principle. This circular sets forth the criteria to identify a “beneficial
owner” and provides that an applicant that does not carry out substantial business activities, or is an agent or a conduit
company may not be deemed a “beneficial owner” of the PRC subsidiary and therefore may not enjoy tax treaty benefits.
According to Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Recognition of Beneficial Owners in
Entrusted Investments, effective on June 1, 2014, nonresidents may be recognized as “beneficial owners” and enjoy
treaty benefits for the income derived from the PRC from certain investments.
An enterprise registered under the laws
of a jurisdiction outside China may be deemed a PRC tax resident enterprise if its place of effective management is in China. If
an enterprise is deemed to be a PRC tax resident enterprise, its worldwide income will be subject to the corporate income tax.
According to the Implementation Rules of the CIT Law, the term “de facto management bodies” is defined as bodies that
have, in substance, and overall management and control over such aspects as the production and the business, personnel, accounts
and properties of the enterprise. In addition, under the CIT Law and the Implementation Rules of the CIT Law, foreign shareholders
could become subject to a 10% withholding tax on any gains they realize from the transfer of their shares, if such gains are regarded
as income derived from sources within China, which includes gains from transfer of shares in an enterprise considered a “tax
resident enterprise” in China. Once a non-PRC company is deemed to be a PRC tax resident enterprise by following the “de
facto management bodies” concept and any dividend distributions from such company are regarded as income derived from sources
within China, PRC income tax withholding may be imposed and applied to dividend distributions from the deemed PRC tax resident
enterprise to its foreign shareholders.
VAT
Pursuant to the
Interim Regulations on
Value-added Tax
as amended on February 6, 2016, and the
Implementing Rules of the Interim Regulations on Value-added Tax
as amended on October 28, 2011, all entities and individuals that are engaged in the sale of goods, the provision of repairs
and replacement services and the importation of goods in the PRC are required to pay VAT. The Interim Regulations on Value-added
Tax and their Implementing Rules also provide that gross proceeds from sales and importation of goods and provision of services
are generally subject to a VAT rate of 17% with exceptions for certain categories of goods that are taxed at a rate of 13%.
Foreign Currency Exchange
Foreign currency exchange regulation in
the PRC is primarily governed by
the Regulations on the Administration of Foreign Exchange
, and
the Provisions on the
Administration of Settlement
,
Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange
. Currently, the Renminbi is convertible for current
account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest payments, trade and service related foreign exchange transactions.
On January 26, 2017, the SAFE issued the
Circular on Further Promoting the Reform of Foreign Exchange Administration and Improving
Examination of Authenticity and Compliance
, pursuant to which the SAFE restated the procedures and reemphasized the bona-fide
principle for banks to follow during their review of certain cross-border profit remittance. Conversion of Renminbi for most capital
account items, such as direct investment, security investment and repatriation of investment, however, is still subject to registration
with the SAFE. Foreign-invested enterprises may buy, sell and remit foreign currencies at financial institutions engaged in foreign
currency settlement and sale after providing valid commercial documents and, in the case of most capital account item transactions,
obtaining approval from the SAFE. Capital investments by foreign enterprises are also subject to limitations, which include approvals
by the NDRC, the MOC, and registration with the SAFE.
In August 2008, the SAFE issued the
Circular on the Relevant Operating Issues Concerning the Improvement of the Administration of Payment and Settlement of Foreign
Currency Capital of Foreign-Invested Enterprises
, or the Circular 142, regulating the conversion by a foreign invested enterprise
of foreign currency-registered capital into RMB by restricting how the converted RMB may be used. Pursuant to the Circular 142,
the RMB capital converted from foreign currency registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise may only be used for purposes
within the business scope approved by the applicable government authority and may not be used for equity investments within the
PRC. In addition, the SAFE strengthened its oversight of the flow and use of the RMB capital converted from foreign currency registered
capital of foreign-invested enterprises. The use of such RMB capital may not be changed without the SAFE’s approval, and
such RMB capital may not in any case be used to repay RMB-denominated loans if the proceeds of such loans have not been used. Violations
may result in severe monetary or other penalties. Furthermore, on March 30, 2015, the SAFE issued the
Circular on Reforming
the Administration Approach Regarding the Foreign Exchange Capital Settlement of Foreign-invested Enterprises
, or Circular
19, which became effective on June 1, 2015 and replaced Circular 142. Circular 19 provides that, the conversion from foreign
currency registered capital of foreign-invested enterprises into the Renminbi capital may be at foreign-invested enterprises’
discretion, which means that the foreign currency registered capital of foreign-invested enterprises for which the rights and interests
of monetary contribution has been confirmed by the local foreign exchange bureau (or the book-entry of monetary contribution has
been registered) can be settled at the banks based on the actual operational needs of the enterprises. However, Circular 19 does
not materially change the restrictions on the use of foreign currency registered capital of foreign-invested enterprises. On June
9, 2016, SAFE promulgated the
Circular on Reforming and Standardizing the Administrative Provisions on Capital Account Foreign
Exchange
, or Circular 16, which applies to all domestic enterprises in China. Circular 19 and Circular 16 continue to prohibit
foreign-invested enterprises from, among other things, spending Renminbi capital converted from its foreign currency registered
capital on expenditures beyond its business scope.
In February 2012, the SAFE promulgated
the Notice on the Administration of Foreign Exchange Matters for Domestic Individuals Participating in the Stock Incentive Plans
of Overseas Listed Companies
, or the Stock Option Notice. The Stock Option Notice replaced a prior rule issued by SAFE in 2007,
the Application Procedure of Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in an Employee Stock Holding
Plan or Stock Option Plan of an Overseas-Listed Company
. Under the Stock Option Notice, domestic individuals who participate
in equity incentive plans of an overseas listed company are required, through a PRC agent or PRC subsidiary of such listed company,
to register with SAFE and complete certain other bank and reporting procedures. The Stock Option Notice simplifies the requirements
and procedures for the registration of stock incentive plan participants, especially in respect of the required application documents
and the absence of strict requirements on offshore and onshore custodian banks, as were stipulated in the previous rules.
The
Circular of Further Improving and
Adjusting Foreign Exchange Administration Policies on Foreign Direct Investment
issued by the SAFE on November 19, 2012
and amended on May 4, 2015 substantially amends and simplifies the foreign exchange procedure. Pursuant to this circular,
the opening of various special purpose foreign exchange accounts (e.g. pre-establishment expenses account, foreign exchange capital
account, guarantee account), the reinvestment of lawful incomes derived by foreign investors in the PRC (e.g. profit, proceeds
of equity transfer, capital reduction, liquidation and early repatriation of investment), and purchase and remittance of foreign
exchange as a result of capital reduction, liquidation, early repatriation or share transfer in a foreign-invested enterprise no
longer require the SAFE’s approval, and multiple capital accounts for the same entity may be opened in different provinces,
which was not possible before. In addition, the SAFE promulgated
the Circular on Printing and Distributing the Provisions on
Foreign Exchange Administration over Domestic Direct Investment by Foreign Investors and the Supporting Documents
in May 2013,
which specifies that the administration by the SAFE or its local branches over direct investment by foreign investors in the PRC
must be conducted by way of registration and banks shall process foreign exchange business relating to the direct investment in
the PRC based on the registration information provided by the SAFE and its branches. On February 13, 2015, the SAFE promulgated
the
Circular on Further Simplification and Improvement of Foreign Currency Administration Policies on Direct Investment
,
effective on June 1, 2015, which further simplifies the approval requirements of SAFE upon the direct investment by foreign
investors. In particular, instead of applying for approvals from SAFE, entities and individuals are required to apply for foreign
exchange registrations of foreign direct investment and overseas direct investment from qualified banks, while the qualified banks,
under the supervision of the SAFE, will directly examine the applications and conduct the registration accordingly.
On July 4, 2014, the SAFE issued
the
Circular on the Administration of Foreign Exchange Issues Related to Overseas Investment, Financing and Roundtrip Investment by
Domestic Residents through Offshore Special Purpose Vehicles
, or the SAFE Circular 37, which replaced the former circular commonly
known as “SAFE Circular 75” promulgated on October 21, 2005. The SAFE Circular 37 requires PRC residents to register
with the competent local SAFE branch in connection with their direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore special purpose
vehicle, for the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such PRC residents’ legally owned assets or equity interests
in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests. The SAFE Circular 37 further requires amendment to the registration in
the event of any significant changes with respect to the special purpose vehicle, such as any change of basic information (including
change of the PRC residents, name and operation term), increase or decrease of capital contribution by the PRC residents, share
transfer or exchange, merger, division or other material events. In the event that a PRC resident holding interests in a special
purpose vehicle fails to fulfill the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of that special purpose vehicle may be prohibited
from making profit distributions to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent cross-border foreign exchange activities,
and the special purpose vehicle may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital into its PRC subsidiary. Moreover,
failure to comply with the various SAFE registration requirements described above could result in liability under the PRC law for
evasion of foreign exchange controls.
Dividend Distribution
The principal laws and regulations governing
distribution of dividends paid by wholly foreign owned enterprises include
the Company Law of the PRC
as amended on December 28,
2013,
the Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law of the PRC
as amended on October 31, 2000, and
the Implementing Rules
of the Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law of the PRC
as amended on February 19, 2014.
Under these laws and regulations, foreign-invested
enterprises in the PRC may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, as determined in accordance with the PRC
accounting standards and regulations. In addition, a wholly foreign owned enterprise in the PRC is required to set aside as general
reserves at least 10% of its after-tax profit, until the accumulative amount of such reserves reaches 50% of its registered capital.
These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. A wholly foreign owned enterprise is not permitted to distribute any profits
until any losses from prior fiscal years have been offset. Profits retained from prior fiscal years may be distributed together
with distributable profits from the current fiscal year. A wholly foreign owned enterprise has the discretion to allocate a portion
of its after-tax profits to staff welfare and bonus funds and expansion funds, which may not be distributed to equity owners except
in the event of liquidation.
Intellectual Property Rights
Patent
The PRC has domestic laws for the protection
of rights in copyrights, patents, trademarks and trade secrets. The PRC is also a signatory to the world’s major intellectual
property conventions, including:
|
·
|
Convention establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO Convention) (June 4, 1980);
|
|
·
|
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (March 19, 1985);
|
|
·
|
Patent Cooperation Treaty (January 1, 1994); and
|
|
·
|
The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) (November 11, 2001).
|
Patents in the PRC are governed by the
China
Patent Law
(March 12, 1984), as amended and its Implementing Regulations (January 19, 1985), as amended.
The PRC is a signatory to the Paris Convention
for the Protection of Industrial Property, in accordance with which any person who has duly filed an application for a patent in
one signatory country shall enjoy, for the purposes of filing in the other countries, a right of priority during the period fixed
in the convention (12 months for inventions and utility models, and 6 months for industrial designs).
The
China Patent Law
covers three
kinds of patents, namely, patents for inventions, utility models and designs. The Chinese patent system adopts the principle of
first to file, which means where multiple patent applications are filed for the same invention, a patent will be granted only to
the party that filed the application first. Consistent with international practice, the PRC only allows the patenting of inventions
or utility models that possess the characteristics of novelty, inventiveness and practical applicability. For a design to be patentable,
it must not be identical with or similar to any design which has been publicly disclosed in publications in the country or abroad
before the date of filing or has been publicly used in the country before the date of filing, and must not be in conflict with
any prior right of another.
PRC law provides that anyone wishing to
exploit the patent of another must enter into a written licensing contract with the patent holder and pay the patent holder a fee.
One rather broad exception to this, however, is where a party possesses the means to exploit a patent for inventions or utility
models under certain circumstances but cannot obtain a license from the patent holder on reasonable terms and in a reasonable period
of time, the State Intellectual Property Office of the PRC is authorized to grant a compulsory license. A compulsory license can
also be granted where a national emergency or any extraordinary state of affairs occurs or where the public interest so requires.
The patent holder may appeal such a decision within three months from receiving notification by filing a suit in people’s
court in the PRC.
PRC law defines patent infringement as the
exploitation of a patent without the authorization of the patent holder. A patent holder who believes his patent is being infringed
may file a civil suit or file a complaint with a local PRC intellectual property administrative authority, which may order the
infringer to stop the infringing acts. A preliminary injunction may be issued by the people’s court upon the patentee’s
or the interested parties’ request before any legal proceedings are instituted or during the proceedings. Evidence preservation
and property preservation measures are also available both before and during the litigation. Damages in the case of patent infringement
are determined as either the loss suffered by the patent holder arising from the infringement or the benefit gained by the infringer
from the infringement. If it is difficult to ascertain damages in this manner, damages may be determined with reference to the
license fee under a contractual license.
Trademark
The
PRC Trademark Law
, adopted in
1982 and revised in 1993, 2001 and 2013, with its implementation rules adopted in 2002 and revised in 2014, protects registered
trademarks. The Trademark Office of the State Administration of Industry and Commerce handles trademark registrations and grants
trademark registrations for a term of ten years which are renewable upon maturity. Trademark license agreements must be filed
with the Trademark Office for record.
|
C.
|
Organizational Structure
|
The following table sets out our significant
subsidiaries as of the date of this annual report:
Subsidiaries
|
|
Date of
Incorporation
/Acquisition
|
|
Place of
Incorporation
|
|
Percentage of
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Technology Limited (“Paker”)*
|
|
November 10, 2006
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (“Jiangxi Jinko”)
|
|
December 13, 2006
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.(“Zhejiang Jinko”)
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd.
|
|
December 24, 2009
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar GmbH
|
|
April 1, 2010
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zhejiang Jinko Trading Co., Ltd.
|
|
June 13, 2010
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xinjiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
|
|
May 30, 2016
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yuhuan Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
|
|
July 29, 2016
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar (U.S.) Inc.
|
|
August 19, 2010
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jiangxi Photovoltaic Materials Co., Ltd (“Jiangxi Materials”)
|
|
December 1, 2010
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar (Switzerland) AG
|
|
May 3, 2011
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar (US) Holdings Inc.
|
|
June 7, 2011
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Italy S.R.L.
|
|
July 8, 2011
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar SAS
|
|
September 12, 2011
|
|
France
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Canada Co., Ltd
|
|
November 18, 2011
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Australia Holdings Co. Pty Ltd
|
|
December 7, 2011
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Pty Ltd.
|
|
April 13, 2012
|
|
South Africa
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Japan K.K.
|
|
May 21, 2012
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Power Engineering Group Limited (“JinkoSolar Power”)
|
|
November 12, 2013
|
|
Cayman
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar WWG Investment Co., Ltd.
|
|
April 8, 2014
|
|
Cayman
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Comércio do Brazil Ltda
|
|
January 14, 2014
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projinko Solar Portugal Unipessoal LDA.
|
|
February 20, 2014
|
|
Portugal
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Mexico S.DE R.L. DE C.V.
|
|
February 25, 2014
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai Jinko Financial Information Service Co., Ltd
|
|
November 7, 2014
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Technology SDN.BHD.
|
|
January 21, 2015
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Power International (Hongkong) Limited
|
|
July 10, 2015
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar International Development Limited**
|
|
August 28, 2015
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinkosolar Household PV System Ltd.***
|
|
January 12, 2015
|
|
BVI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canton Best Limited
|
|
September 16, 2013
|
|
BVI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wide Wealth Group Holding Limited (“Wide Wealth Hong Kong”) ****
|
|
June 11, 2012
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
*In the fourth quarter of 2016, Paker disposed of Zhejiang Jinko
Financial Leasing Co., Ltd with the consideration of RMB183 million (US$26.4 million). Loss of disposal amounted to RMB15.2 million
(US$2.2 million) was recognized. Considerations associated with the transaction had not been collected as of December 31, 2016.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, Paker closed down JinkoSolar
International Limited. Accumulated translation differences associated with the entity in the amount of RMB4.7 million (US$0.7 million)
was recognized in net income upon the liquidation of the entity.
**In the fourth quarter of 2016, JinkoSolar International Development
Limited disposed of Jinko Solar (Thailand) Co. Ltd with the consideration of RMB2.4 million (US$0.4 million). Loss of disposal
amounted to RMB0.1 million (US$0.02 million) was recognized. Considerations associated with the transaction had not been collected
as of December 31, 2016.
***In the fourth quarter of 2016, Jinkosolar Household PV System
Ltd. disposed of its household solar project business with the consideration of RMB27 million (US$3.9 million). Gain on disposal
amounted to RMB15.4 million (US$2.2 million) was recognized. Considerations associated with the transaction had been collected
as of December 31, 2016.
****In the fourth quarter of 2016, Wide Wealth Hong Kong disposed
all of the 55% equity interest indirectly held by the Company in Jiangxi Jinko Engineering to Shangrao Kangsheng Technology Co.,
Ltd., a company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, formed by a buyer consortium
led by Mr. Xiande Li, chairman of our board of directors for a total consideration of US$250 million.
In conjunction, JinkoSolar Power repurchased all of its Series
A, Series A-1 and Series A-2 redeemable convertible preferred shares with considerations of US$225 million from the preferred shareholders,
while Wide Wealth Hong Kong agreed to transfer the 45% equity interest of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering to related entities of the
preferred shareholders with a total consideration of US$225 million. These two transactions were net-settled as agreed among JinkoSolar
Power, Wide Wealth Hong Kong and the preferred shareholders.
|
D.
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
For information regarding our material property,
plant and equipment, see “—B. Business Overview—Manufacturing—Manufacturing Capacity and Facilities”
in this annual report.
|
ITEM 4A.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
|
ITEM 5.
|
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
We are a global leader in the PV industry
based in China. We have built a vertically integrated solar power product value chain, from recovering silicon materials to manufacturing
solar modules. We sell most of our solar modules under our own “JinkoSolar” brand, with a small portion of solar modules
on an OEM basis. We also sell silicon wafers and solar cells not used in our solar module production. As of December 31, 2016,
we had an integrated annual capacity of 5.0 GW for silicon ingots and wafers, 4.0 GW for solar cells and 6.5 GW for solar modules.
Our revenues were RMB9.74 billion, RMB15.45
billion and RMB21.40 billion (US$3.08 billion) in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. We had net income of RMB698.1 million,
RMB766.5 million and RMB990.2 million (US$142.6 million) in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Principal Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
We believe that the following factors have
had, and we expect that they will continue to have, a significant effect on the development of our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Industry Demand
Our business and revenue growth depends
on the industry demand for solar power and solar power products. In the second half of 2009, demand for solar power and solar power
products was significantly affected by the global financial crisis. In early 2010, as the effect of the global financial crisis
started to subside, industry demand for solar power and solar power products started to revive. Access to financing continued to
improve from 2010 to the first half of 2011, driven by increasing awareness of renewable energy, stronger balance sheets for financing
providers and sustainable government incentives to develop solar as an alternative energy solution. However, in 2011, a decrease
in payment to solar power producers, in the form of FIT and other reimbursements, and a reduction in available financing caused
a decrease in the demand for solar power products, including solar modules, in the European markets. Payments to solar power producers
decreased as governments in Europe, under pressure to reduce public debt levels, reduced subsidies such as FIT. Furthermore, many
downstream purchasers of solar power products were unable to secure sufficient financing for the solar power projects due to the
global credit crunch. Demand for solar modules in Europe fell significantly in 2013. As a result, many solar power producers that
purchase solar power products from manufacturers like us were unable or unwilling to expand their operations. Our business and
revenue increased in Europe in 2014, partly due to the significant increase in demand for solar modules in the U.K. Compared with
2014, our revenue increased in North America in 2015 mainly attributable to the significant increase in demand for solar modules
in the U.S. China had become the largest solar market in 2016, whereas the demand in India continued to grow rapidly, second to
only China and the United States. A strong presence in these markets led to an increase in our revenue despite the decreasing module
price as a result of the China FIT cut as well as the uncertainties brought by the new president of the United States.
We believe the steady reduction in the manufacturing
cost of solar power products will stimulate demand for solar power and solar power products in the long term. In particular, decreases
in the price of silicon feedstock, improvements in manufacturing techniques for solar power products and economies of scale have
continually reduced the unit production costs of solar power products in recent years, which in turn have increased the competitiveness
of solar power on an unsubsidized basis relative to conventional power and other renewable energy sources. We expect significant
market opportunities to be created as demand continues to grow and the price of solar power approaches that of conventional energy
in a number of markets. In the long term, we believe that solar power will continue to have significant growth potential and that
demand for our products and services will continue to grow.
Industry Trend for Credit Sales
Most of our sales are made on credit terms
and we allow our customers to make payments after a certain period of time subsequent to the delivery of our products. Selling
products on credit terms has increased, and may continue to increase our working capital requirements and have a negative impact
on our short-term liquidity. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Selling our products on credit terms
may increase our working capital requirements and expose us to the credit risk of our customers.”
In 2011, the PV industry experienced a series
of adverse developments. For more detailed discussions of such adverse developments, see “—Industry Demand” and
“—Government Subsidies, Policies and Economic Incentives.” The softened demand for PV products, coupled with
the over-supply caused by significantly increased manufacturing capacity in the industry, led to intensified competition among
PV module manufacturers.
To accommodate and retain customers, many
PV module manufacturers, including us, shifted from demanding advance payments towards increased use of credit sales and the provision
of longer credit terms to both existing and new customers. Starting from the third quarter of 2011, we began to offer new customers
credit terms of 60 to 120 days as well as extend similar credit terms to certain existing customers under new contracts.
Due to the increase of credit sales, especially
in China and other emerging markets, our accounts receivable turnover increased in 2016. Our accounts receivable turnover were
102 days, 82 days and 108 days in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. In particular, in 2014, 2015 and 2016, our accounts receivable
turnover in the U.S. were 34 days, 25 days and 19 days, respectively; our accounts receivable turnover in China were 146 days,
131 days and 144 days, respectively. Correspondingly, our provisions for accounts receivables increased. We recorded provisions
for accounts receivable of RMB428.6 million, RMB335.7 million and RMB376.6 million (US$54.2 million) as of December 31, 2014,
2015 and 2016, respectively. Considering the increase in credit sales, we will continue to make assessment and properly provide
the provision on doubtful accounts.
Pricing of Solar Power Products
The price of our solar modules is influenced
by a variety of factors, including polysilicon prices, supply and demand conditions, the competitive landscape and processing technologies.
The implementation of the capacity expansion
plans by major solar power product manufacturers in 2009 and 2010 resulted in significant increases in the supply of solar power
products in the global market, which contributed to a general decrease in the average selling prices of solar power products in
recent years, including solar modules. The slowdown in the growth of demand for solar power products in recent years has further
reduced the market prices of solar power products. In addition, decreases in the price of silicon feedstock, improvements in manufacturing
techniques for solar power products and economies of scale have continually reduced the unit production costs of solar power products
in recent years, which in turn have increased the competitiveness of solar power on an unsubsidized basis relative to conventional
power and other renewable energy.
The pricing of solar power products began
to stabilize in 2013, as weaker players exited the market. Nonetheless, we expect the market prices of solar power products to
continue to decline in the long term due to continued advancements in processing technologies. See “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry—Our future growth and profitability depend on the demand for
and the prices of solar power products and the development of photovoltaic technologies.”
Government Subsidies, Policies and Economic Incentives
We believe that market demand for solar
power and solar power products in the near term will continue to substantially depend on the availability of government incentives,
because the cost of solar power currently exceeds, and we believe will continue to exceed in the near term, the cost of conventional
fossil fuel energy and certain non-solar renewable energy. Various governments have used policy initiatives to encourage or accelerate
the development and adoption of solar power and other renewable energy sources.
Countries in Europe, notably Italy, Germany,
France, Belgium and Spain, certain countries in Asia, including China, Japan and India, as well as Australia and the United States
have adopted renewable energy policies. Examples of government sponsored financial incentives to promote solar power include capital
cost rebates, FIT, tax credits, net metering and other incentives to end users, distributors, project developers, system integrators
and manufacturers of solar power products.
Governments may reduce or eliminate existing
incentive programs for political, financial or other reasons, which will be difficult for us to predict. Reductions in FIT programs
may result in a significant fall in the price of and demand for solar power products. For example, the German government has introduced
legislation to reduce the FIT program since 2010 due to the strong growth of its domestic solar market. From 2012 to 2016, the
Japanese government cut down its FIT from 40 Yen to 24 Yen for projects below 10KW and from 42 Yen to 31 Yen for projects above
10 KW.
Our revenue and operating results may be
adversely impacted by unfavorable policy revisions if FIT in the United States and Japan, our two largest export markets, and
certain other major markets for solar power and solar power products are further reduced. Electric utility companies or generators
of electricity from fossil fuels or other renewable energy sources could also lobby for a change in the relevant legislation in
their markets to protect their revenue streams. Government economic incentives could be reduced or eliminated altogether. A significant
reduction in the scope or discontinuation of government incentive programs, especially those in our target markets, could cause
demand for our products and solar power to decline and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects. We believe that the growth of the solar power industry in the short term will continue to depend
largely on the availability and effectiveness of government incentives for solar power products and the competitiveness of solar
power in relation to conventional and other renewable energy resources in terms of cost.
Our business may also be affected by the
trade policies of government or international trade bodies, particularly in our major export markets, such as the U.S. and Europe.
See “Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business and Industry — We are subject
to anti-dumping and countervailing duties or import quotas imposed by certain overseas markets, including the U.S., European Union
and Canada.” We expect our exports to both the U.S. market and European market to be adversely affected by these duties or
measures. Our direct sales to the U.S. market and European market accounted for 36.0% and 3.5% of our total revenue in 2016, respectively.
Changing Product and Service Mix
Our product mix has evolved rapidly since
our inception, as we expanded our production capabilities to manufacture and sell downstream solar power products and to capture
the efficiencies of our vertically-integrated production process. Before 2009, our sales consisted of silicon wafers, silicon ingots
and recovered silicon materials. We commenced production and sale of solar cells and solar modules in the second half of 2009.
In 2010, we successfully achieved fully vertically-integrated solar module production and made sales of solar modules our largest
source of revenue. As of December 31, 2016, we had an integrated annual capacity of 5.0 GW for silicon ingots and wafers,
4.0 GW for solar cells and 6.5 GW for solar modules. By creating a fully vertically-integrated production chain, we have succeeded
in continually driving down average solar modules manufacturing cost per watt.
Manufacturing Technologies
Solar modules are our principal products.
As solar modules are priced based on the number of watts of electricity they generate, the advancement of manufacturing technologies
in increasing the conversion efficiency of solar cells and production efficiency will enable us to improve our gross profit margin.
We continually make efforts to develop advanced manufacturing technologies to increase the conversion efficiency of our solar cells
while striving to reduce our average production cost. In addition to our own research and development team, we collaborate with
third-party research institutes to improve our manufacturing technologies and the conversion efficiency of our solar cells. As
a result of these efforts, in 2014, 2015 and 2016, the average conversion efficiency rate of our solar cells using our monocrystalline
silicon wafers was 19.6%, 19.6% and 21.0%, respectively, and the conversion efficiency rate of our solar cells using our multicrystalline
silicon wafers was 18.2%, 18.3% and 18.7%, respectively.
Selected Statement of Operations Items
Revenues
Currently, we derive our revenues primarily
from the sale of solar modules and to a lesser extent from the sales of silicon wafers and solar cells. We also derive a small
portion of revenues from the sale of electricity generated by our projects and solar system integration services. We expect the
sale of solar modules to continue to be our primary revenue source. The following table presents our revenues, net of VAT, by products
and services, as sales amounts and as percentages of total revenues, for the periods indicated:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(RMB in
thousands)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(RMB in
thousands)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(RMB in
thousands)
|
|
|
(US$ in
thousands)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovered silicon materials
|
|
|
11,272.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
5,201.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
860.0
|
|
|
|
123.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Silicon wafers
|
|
|
286,585.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
138,293.4
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
136,079.7
|
|
|
|
19,599.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Solar cells
|
|
|
200,643.6
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
215,048.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
155,016.3
|
|
|
|
22,327.0
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Solar modules
|
|
|
9,155,396.0
|
|
|
|
91.8
|
|
|
|
15,086,256.8
|
|
|
|
93.8
|
|
|
|
20,825,750.0
|
|
|
|
2,999,531.9
|
|
|
|
97.3
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar system EPC
|
|
|
11,209.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
269,661.7
|
|
|
|
38,839.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Processing services
|
|
|
69,581.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Revenue from generated electricity
|
|
|
6,188.2
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
9,574.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
13,270.4
|
|
|
|
1,911.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,740,876.5
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
15,454,374.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
21,400,638.1
|
|
|
|
3,082,333.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Our revenues are affected by sales volumes,
product mix and average selling prices. The following table sets forth, by products, the sales volumes and approximate average
selling prices for the periods indicated:
Continuing operations
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Sales volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovered silicon materials (metric tons)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Silicon wafers (MW)
|
|
|
229.6
|
|
|
|
118.2
|
|
|
|
156.3
|
|
Solar cells (MW)
|
|
|
134.2
|
|
|
|
172.8
|
|
|
|
126.9
|
|
Solar modules (MW)
|
|
|
2,423.1
|
|
|
|
4,207.6
|
|
|
|
6,225.3
|
|
Average selling price (RMB):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovered silicon materials (per kilogram)
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Silicon wafers (per watt)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Solar cells (per watt)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Solar modules (per watt)
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues primarily consists of:
(i) raw materials, which primarily consist of both virgin polysilicon and recoverable silicon materials; (ii) consumables
and components, which include crucibles for the production of monocrystalline and multicrystalline silicon ingots, steel alloy
saw wires, slurry, chemicals for raw material cleaning and silicon wafer cleaning, and gases such as argon and silane, as well
as silicon wafers and solar cells we procure from third parties for the production of solar modules; (iii) direct labor costs,
which include salaries and benefits for employees directly involved in manufacturing activities; (iv) overhead costs, which consist
of equipment maintenance costs, cost of utilities including electricity and water; (v) depreciation of property, plant, equipment
and project assets; (vi) processing fees paid to third party factories relating to the outsourced production of solar cells and
solar modules; and (vii) subcontractor cost and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies
and tools. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, our cost of revenues was RMB7.64 billion, RMB12.52 billion and RMB17.53 billion (US$2.53 billion),
respectively.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses include selling and
marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses, research and development expenses, impairment of long-lived assets and
provision for advance to suppliers.
Selling and Marketing Expenses.
Our
selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of shipping and handling expenses, warranty cost, exhibition costs, salaries,
bonuses and other benefits for our sales personnel as well as sales-related travel and entertainment expenses. In 2014, 2015 and
2016, our selling and marketing expenses were RMB768.3 million, RMB1,144.6 million and RMB1,434.0 million (US$206.5 million), respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for our administrative, finance and human resources
personnel, amortization of land use rights, office expenses, entertainment expenses, business travel expenses, professional service
fees, impairment of long-lived assets as well as provision for bad debts. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, our general and administrative
expenses were RMB369.3 million, RMB521.4 million and RMB778.8 million (US$112.2 million), respectively.
Research and Development Expenses.
Research
and development expenses consist primarily of silicon materials used in our research and development activities and salaries, bonuses
and other benefits for research and development personnel, and depreciation of equipment for research and development In 2014,
2015 and 2016, our research and development expenses were RMB106.6 million, RMB143.7 million and RMB181.1 million (US$26.1 million),
respectively.
Provision for advance to suppliers.
We
did not make a provision for the outstanding balances of inventory purchase prepayments in 2015. We made RMB2.7 million and RMB0.8
million provision for the outstanding balances of inventory purchase prepayments in 2014 and 2016, respectively.
Impairment of long-lived assets.
Impairment
of long-lived assets consist primarily as a result of the obsolescence of certain equipment in our wafer and cell production line.
In 2014, 2015 and 2016, we recognized impairment of long-lived assets of RMB6.2 million, nil and RMB125.5 million (US$18.1 million),
respectively.
Interest Expenses, Net
Our interest expenses consist primarily
of interest expenses with respect to the issuance of convertible senior notes, long-term bonds, short-term and long-term borrowings
from banks and other lenders. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, we incurred net interest expenses of RMB226.3 million, RMB311.0 million and
RMB359.3 million (US$51.7 million), respectively.
Convertible Senior Notes Issuance Costs
We incurred costs in association with the
issuance of convertible senior notes in the principal amount of US$150 million in January 2014. Our convertible senior notes
issuance costs consist primarily of legal fees, initial purchasers’ discount and printing fees. Since we elected to measure
the convertible senior notes in their entirety, at fair value, issuance costs of RMB26.1 million associated with the offering were
expensed upon issuance of the notes.
Government Grants
From time to time we apply for and receive
government incentives in the form of subsidies from local and provincial governments. Government grants which are not subject
to any condition and are not related to assets are recognized as subsidy income when received. The governments grant subsidies
to encourage and support large-scale enterprises and high technology enterprises based in the relevant locations to upgrade their
technology and develop the overseas market. We record such subsidies as subsidy income as there are no further obligations for
us. The amount of government subsidies we receive may vary from period to period and there is no assurance that we will continue
to receive government subsidy in the future periods. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, our government subsidy income, which was not assets
related, was RMB49.8 million, RMB103.6 million and RMB168.6 million (US$24.3 million), respectively.
Government grants related to assets are
initially recorded as other payables and accruals. These grants will be deducted from the carrying amount when the assets are ready
for use and approved by related government. We received government grants related to assets of RMB92.4 million, nil and nil in
2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Exchange Gain / (Loss)
In 2014, we incurred foreign exchange loss
of RMB139.6 million, primarily due to the depreciation of the Euro and Japanese Yen against the Renminbi. In 2015, we incurred
foreign exchange loss of RMB86.5 million, primarily due to the net impact of depreciation of the Euro and appreciation of the U.S.
dollars against the Renminbi in 2015. In 2016, we incurred foreign exchange gain of RMB208.8 million (US$30.1 million) due to the
appreciation of the U.S. dollars against the Renminbi.
Other Income/(Expenses), Net
Other income/(expenses) consists primarily
of guarantee income from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering in 2016 and expenses related to charitable donations. We had net expense of
RMB1.6 million in 2014, net income of RMB1.0 million in 2015, and net income of RMB8.8 million (US$1.3 million) in 2016.
Change in Fair Value of Forward Contracts
We recognized losses of RMB0.7 million and
RMB52.6 million (US$7.6 million) in 2014 and 2016, respectively. In 2015, we recognized a gain of RMB56.9 million.
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Senior Notes
and Capped Call Options
In 2014, we recognized gain from a change
in fair value of convertible senior notes and capped call option of RMB64.1 million. We recognized loss from a fair value of convertible
senior notes and capped call option of RMB14.6 million and RMB110.2 million (US$15.9 million) in 2015 and 2016, respectively.
We completed the repurchase of almost all of the convertible senior notes in February 2017.
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability
In 2016, we recognized a gain in fair value
of warrant liability of RMB24.6 million (US$3.5 million), compared with a loss in fair value of warrant liability of RMB2.1 million
in 2015.
To finance our overseas power station business
operations and expansion, our operating subsidiaries located in Mexico will obtain long-term bank borrowings from local banks,
which will carry variable interest rates. With an aim to reduce our interest rate exposure, we entered into a long-term interest
rate cap contract in 2016 to fix the interest rate as a fixed rate payer. The rate cap is a derivative which needs to be fair valued
at each reporting period end. In 2016, we recognized loss from the fair value change of the rate cap derivative of RMB10.4 million
(US$1.5 million).
Share-based Compensation
Our Company
We adopted our 2009 Long Term Incentive
Plan on July 10, 2009, as amended, and options for a total of 3,578,106 ordinary shares were outstanding as of December 31,
2016. We adopted our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan on August 18, 2014 and options for a total of 11,077,980 ordinary shares were
outstanding as of December 31, 2016. All share-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of employee stock
options, are measured based on the fair value of the stock options at the grant date. We have categorized these share-based compensation
expenses in our (i) cost of revenues; (ii) selling and marketing expenses; (iii) general and administrative expenses;
and (iv) research and development expenses, depending on the job functions of the grantees of our restricted shares and share options.
The following table sets forth the allocation of our share-based compensation expenses both in terms of the amounts and as a percentage
of total share-based compensation expenses in 2014, 2015 and 2016:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
(RMB in
thousands)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(RMB in
thousands)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(RMB in
thousands)
|
|
|
(US$ in
thousands)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
203.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
118.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
333.3
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Selling and marketing expense
|
|
|
6,397.9
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
23,625.8
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
15,908.5
|
|
|
|
2,301.7
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
34,164.5
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
%
|
|
|
81,024.7
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
%
|
|
|
67,152.5
|
|
|
|
9,672.0
|
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
1,924.4
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
7,945.6
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
6,101.4
|
|
|
|
878.8
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Total share-based compensation expenses
|
|
|
42,689.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
112,714.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
89,567.7
|
|
|
|
12,900.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
The increase in share-based compensation
expenses in 2015 was mainly due to the new grants under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. As the share options granted under our
2014 Equity Incentive Plan are graded vested in five successive equal annual installments, the share-based compensation expenses
decreased in 2016.
JinkoSolar Power
In October 2014, JinkoSolar Power adopted
its 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “JinkoSolar Power 2014 Plan”), which permits the grant of stock options, restricted
shares and restricted share units of JinkoSolar Power to its employees, directors and consultants of JinkoSolar Power. Under the
plan, a total of 12,766 ordinary shares (12,766,000 shares post the thousand-for-one share split by JinkoSolar Power in April 2015)
of JinkoSolar Power were initially reserved for issuance.
On May 4, 2015, JinkoSolar Power granted
8,680,880 share options to its directors, officers and employees, under JinkoSolar Power 2014 Plan to purchase ordinary shares
of JinkoSolar Power. The exercise price of the share option is US$3.9166 per share and the term is 10 years from the date of grant.
Subject to the individuals’ continued employment with JinkoSolar Power, and only upon the completion of an IPO of JinkoSolar
Power, the option shall vest and become exercisable with respect to the vesting schedule as following.
|
·
|
7,021,300 share options granted to directors and employees will vest and exercisable in 5 successive equal annual installments
on the last day of each year from grant date.
|
|
·
|
1,659,580 share options granted to an officer will vest by 40% on the grant date, and 30% on each of the second and third anniversaries
of the grant date. In addition, if the officer’s employment with JinkoSolar Power is terminated as a result of certain defined
events or situations, any then unvested share options for this officer will immediately become fully vested.
|
The disposition of our downstream solar
power projects business in China triggered immediate vesting of the share options pursuant to the terms of the share option agreements.
We fully recognized share-based compensation expenses amounted to RMB113.7 million in the discontinued operations for the year
ended December 31, 2016. At the same time, JinkoSolar Power signed agreements with the relevant employees to cancel and terminate
the share options granted irrevocably and unconditionally with no consideration.
Taxation
We derive net income primarily from Jiangxi
Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko, our operating subsidiaries in China. Under the CIT Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008,
domestic and foreign invested companies in China are generally subject to corporate income tax at the rate of 25%. However, according
to the CIT Law and the Implementation Rules of the CIT Law, the “two-year exemption” and “three-year half deduction”
tax preferential policy was grandfathered, under which a foreign invested enterprise of a production nature scheduled to operate
for no less than ten years would be eligible for a corporate income tax exemption of two years followed by a three-year 50% reduction
on its applicable corporate income tax rate, in each case beginning with its first year of profitability. As a result, Jiangxi
Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko were exempted from corporate income tax in 2009 and subject to corporate income tax at the reduced rate
of 12.5% from 2010 to 2012. Zhejiang Jinko, Jiangxi Jinko and Jiangxi Materials were designated by the relevant local authorities
as “High and New Technology Enterprises” under the CIT Law. Jiangxi Jinko, Jiangxi Materials and Zhejiang Jinko were
subject to a preferential tax rate of 15% for 2014, 2015 and 2016. In 2015, Zhejiang Jinko successfully renewed this qualification
and will continue to enjoy the preferential tax rate of 15% in 2017, if the relevant conditions are met. In 2016, Jiangxi Jinko
and Jiangxi Materials successfully renewed this qualification and will continue to enjoy the preferential tax rate of 15% in 2017
and 2018, if the relevant conditions are met.
In addition, under the CIT Law, an enterprise
established outside China with “de facto management bodies” within China may be considered a PRC tax resident enterprise
and will normally be subject to the PRC corporate income tax at the rate of 25% on its global income. Under the Implementation
Rules of the CIT Law, the term “de facto management bodies” refers to management bodies which have, in substance, overall
management and control over such aspects as the production and business, personnel, accounts, and properties of the enterprise.
On April 22, 2009, the SAT promulgated a circular that sets out procedures and specific criteria for determining whether “de
facto management bodies” for overseas incorporated, domestically controlled enterprises are located in China. However, as
this circular only applies to enterprises incorporated under laws of foreign jurisdictions that are controlled by PRC enterprises
or groups of PRC enterprises, it remains unclear how the tax authorities will determine the location of “de facto management
bodies” for overseas incorporated enterprises that are controlled by individual PRC tax residents such as our Company, JinkoSolar
Technology and Wide Wealth Group Holdings Limited. As such, it is still unclear if the PRC tax authorities would subsequently determine
that, notwithstanding our status as the Cayman Islands holding company of our operating business in China, we should be classified
as a PRC tax resident enterprise, whereby our global income will be subject to PRC income tax at a tax rate of 25%. In any event,
our Company, JinkoSolar Technology and Wide Wealth Group Holdings Limited do not have substantial income from operations outside
of China, and we do not expect to derive substantial earnings from operations outside of China in the foreseeable future.
Under the CIT Law and the Implementation
Rules of the CIT Law, a withholding tax at the rate of 10% will normally be applicable to dividends payable to investors that
are “non-resident enterprises,” to the extent such dividends have their source within China. Under the tax arrangement
between Hong Kong and China, a reduced tax rate of 5% for dividends paid to a Hong Kong company will be applied provided that
the beneficial owner of the dividends is a Hong Kong resident enterprise which directly owns at least a 25% equity interest in
the PRC subsidiary. Both JinkoSolar Technology and Wide Wealth Group Holdings Limited are our Hong Kong subsidiaries. 100% of
the equity interests in Jiangxi Jinko, 25% of the equity interests in Zhejiang Jinko and 100% of the equity interests in JinkoSolar
(Shanghai) Management Co., Ltd. are owned directly by JinkoSolar Technology. 100% of the equity interests in Jiangxi Jinko Engineering
are owned directly by Wide Wealth Group Holdings Limited. If neither JinkoSolar Technology nor Wide Wealth Group Holdings Limited
is deemed a PRC tax resident enterprise and is treated as the beneficial owner of the dividends paid by Jiangxi Jinko, Zhejiang
Jinko and JinkoSolar (Shanghai) Management Co., Ltd. to JinkoSolar Technology, or the dividends paid by Jiangxi Jinko Engineering
to Wide Wealth Group Holdings Limited, as the case may be, and owns such equity for at least 12 consecutive months before receiving
such dividends, such dividends could be subject to a 5% withholding tax pursuant to the tax arrangement between Hong Kong and
China as discussed above. According to the Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on the Issues concerning the Application
of the Dividend Clauses of Tax Agreements issued on February 20, 2009, a non-resident enterprise that intends to enjoy the
preferential treatment under the relevant tax agreement is required to own the requisite amount of equity of a PRC enterprise
specified by the relevant tax agreement for at least 12 consecutive months before obtaining the dividends. According to the Administrative
Measures for Non-Residents Enjoying Tax Treaty Benefits (Trial Implementation) issued by the SAT on August 24, 2009 which
became effective on October 1, 2009, the application of the preferential withholding tax rate under a bi-lateral tax treaty
is subject to the approval of competent PRC tax authorities. According to the Circular of the State Administration of Taxation
on How to Understand and Identify a “Beneficial Owner” under Tax Treaties which became effective on October 27,
2009, and the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on the Determination of “Beneficial Owners” in
the Tax Treaties, effective on June 29, 2012, the PRC tax authorities must evaluate whether an applicant for treaty benefits
in respect of dividends, interest and royalties qualifies as a “beneficial owner” on a case-by-case basis and following
the “substance over form” principle. The circular sets forth the criteria to identify a “beneficial owner”
and provides that an applicant that does not carry out substantial business activities, or is an agent or conduit company may
not be deemed a “beneficial owner” of the PRC subsidiary and therefore may not enjoy tax treaty benefits. According
to Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Recognition of Beneficial Owners in Entrusted
Investments, effective on June 1, 2014, non-residents may be recognized as “beneficial owners” and enjoy the
treaty benefits for the income derived from the PRC from certain investments.
Pursuant to the Provisional Regulation of
the PRC on Value Added Tax issued by the State Council of China, effective on January 1, 1994 and lately amended and effective
on February 6, 2016, or the Provisional Regulation, and its Implementing Rules, all entities and individuals that are engaged
in the sale of goods, the provision of processing, repairs and installation services and the importation of goods in China are
required to pay VAT. According to the Provisional Regulation, gross proceeds from sales and importation of goods and provision
of services are generally subject to a VAT rate of 17% with exceptions for certain categories of goods that are taxed at a VAT
rate of 13%. In addition, under the current Provisional Regulation, the input VAT for the purchase of fixed assets is deductible
from the output VAT, except for goods or services that are used in non-VAT taxable items, VAT exempted items and welfare activities,
or for personal consumption. According to former VAT levy rules, equipment imported for qualified projects is entitled to import
VAT exemption and the domestic equipment purchased for qualified projects is entitled to VAT refund. However, such import VAT exemption
and VAT refund were both eliminated as of January 1, 2009. On the other hand, if a foreign-invested enterprise obtained the
confirmation letter of Domestic or Foreign Invested Project Encouraged by the State before November 10, 2008 and declared
importation of equipment for qualified projects before June 30, 2009, it may still be qualified for the exemption of import
VAT. The importation of equipment declared after July 1, 2009 will be subject to the import VAT.
Effective on January 1, 2012, the MOF
and the SAT launched the Pilot Program in Shanghai. On April 10, 2013, the State Council announced the nationwide implementation
of the Pilot Program, which took effect from August 1, 2013. VAT payable on taxable services provided by a general VAT taxpayer
for a taxable period is the net balance of the output VAT for the period after crediting the input VAT for the period. The amount
of VAT payable does not result directly from output VAT generated from taxable services provided. In addition, the MOF and the
SAT released a notice, which further expanded the scope of taxable services subject to VAT on December 12, 2013, effective
from January 1, 2014, replacing the Business Tax to Value Added Tax Circular 37 released by the MOF and the SAT on May 24,
2013. On March 23, 2016, the MOF and the SAT issued a notice, pursuant to which, effective from May 1, 2016, pilot program
of replacing the business tax with VAT will be implemented nationwide, and the industry of construction, real estate, finance,
life services will fall within the scope of taxable services subject to VAT instead of the business tax.
Under the current law of the Cayman Islands,
we are not subject to any income or capital gains tax. In addition, dividend payments made by us are not subject to any withholding
tax in the Cayman Islands.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements
in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) disclosure of our contingent assets and liabilities at the end of each reporting period,
and (iii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each reporting period. We continually evaluate these estimates and
assumptions based on historical experience and various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, our actual results could
differ from those estimates. Some of our accounting policies require a higher degree of judgment than others in their application.
When reviewing the consolidated financial
statements, you should consider (i) our selection of critical accounting policies, (ii) the judgments and other uncertainties
affecting the application of such policies, and (iii) the sensitivity of reported results to changes in conditions and assumptions.
We believe the following accounting policies involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of consolidated
our financial statements.
Revenue recognition
We recognize revenue for product sales when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product has occurred and title and risk of loss has passed to the
customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and the collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. For
all sales, we require a contract or purchase order which quantifies pricing, quantity and product specifications.
For sales of PV products from the PRC to
foreign customers, delivery of the products generally occurs at the point in time the product is delivered to the named port of
shipment, which is when the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the customer. For sales of PV products to domestic
customers in the PRC or by foreign subsidiaries, delivery of the product generally occurs at the point in time the product is received
by the customer, which is when the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred. In the case of sales that are contingent
upon customer acceptance, revenue is not recognized until the deliveries are formally accepted by the customers.
We entered into certain sales contracts
with retainage terms since 2012, under which customers were allowed to withhold payment of 5% to 10% of the full contract price
as retainage for a specified period which generally range from one year to two years (the “Retainage Period”). Given
our limited experience with respect to the collectability of the retainage, we defer recognition of the retainage as revenue until
the customers pay us after the Retainage Period expires. As of December 31, 2015 and 2016, the total amounts of retainage
that were not recognized as revenue were RMB156.2 million and RMB144.9 million (US$20.9 million), respectively. Additions of retainages
in 2014, 2015 and 2016 were RMB 69.6 million, RMB 35.7 million and RMB 19.8 million, respectively. Revenue recognized upon the
cash collection of the retainages in 2014, 2015 and 2016 was RMB45.0 million, RMB73.8 million and RMB31.1 million, respectively.
All of the retainages are within the Retainage Period.
Advance payments received from customers
for the future sale of inventory are recognized as advances from third party customers in the consolidated balance sheets. Advances
from third party customers are recognized as revenues when the conditions for revenue recognition described above have been satisfied.
Advances from third party customers have been recognized as a current liability because the amount at each balance sheet date is
expected to be recognized as revenue within 12 months.
We recognize electricity generation revenue
when persuasive evidence of a power purchase arrangement with the power grid company exists, electricity has been generated and
be transmitted to the grid and the electricity generation records are reconciled with the grid companies, the price of electricity
is fixed or determinable and the collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
We recognize revenue related to solar system
integration projects on the percentage-of-completion basis. We estimate our revenues using the cost-to-cost method, whereby it
derives a ratio by comparing the costs incurred to date to the total costs expected to be incurred on the project. We apply the
ratio computed in the cost-to-cost analysis to the contract price to determine the estimated revenues earned in each period. When
we determine that total estimated costs will exceed total revenues under a contract, we record a loss accordingly. No loss provision
was recorded in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016.
In the PRC, VAT at a general rate of 17%
on the invoiced amount is collected by us on behalf of tax authorities in respect of sales of product and is not recorded as revenue.
VAT collected from customers, net of VAT paid for purchases is recorded as a liability until it is paid to the tax authorities.
Segment report
We use the management approach in determining
reportable operating segments. The management approach considers the internal organization and reporting used by our chief operating
decision maker for making operating decisions, allocating resources and assessing performance as the source for determining our
reportable segments. Management has determined that we currently operate our business in one segment, as that term is defined by
FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment reporting.
Our only segment is the vertically integrated
solar power products manufacturing business (“manufacturing segment”), under which we manufacture and sell silicon
wafers, cells and solar modules.
Our downstream solar power projects business,
under which we developed, constructed and operated solar power projects in China, including (i) power generation, (ii) engineering,
procurement, and construction (“EPC”), and (iii) connecting solar power projects to the grid and operation and maintenance
of the solar power projects, was reported in prior years as the solar power projects segment. We disposed of this segment in the
fourth quarter of 2016.
Accounts receivable
Specific provisions are made against accounts
receivable for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make payments. We periodically assess accounts
receivable balances to determine whether an allowance for doubtful accounts should be made based upon historical bad debts, specific
customer creditworthiness and current economic trends. Accounts receivable in the balance sheets are stated net of such provision,
if any. Before approving sales to each customer, we conduct a credit assessment for each customer to evaluate the collectability
of such sales. The assessment usually takes into consideration the credit worthiness of such customer and its guarantor, if any,
our historical payment experience with such customer, industry-wide trends with respect to credit terms, including the terms offered
by competitors, and the macro-economic conditions of the region to which sales will be made. We will execute a sales order with
a customer and arrange for shipment only if its credit assessment concludes that the collectability with such customer is reasonably
assured. We may also from time to time require security deposits from certain customers to minimize its credit risk. After the
sales are made, we closely monitor the credit situation of each customer on an on-going basis for any subsequent change in its
financial position, business development and credit rating, and evaluate whether any of such adverse change warrants further action
to be taken us, including asserting claims and/or initiating legal proceedings against the customer and/or its guarantor, as well
as making provisions. The receivable from insurance is only recorded when insurance claim has been submitted to the insurance company
and been accepted and acknowledged by the carrier and recovery is considered reasonably assured. Upon recording the recovery, the
bad debt expense is reduced.
Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable
were RMB428.6 million, RMB335.7 million and RMB376.6 million (US$54.2 million) for 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost
or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average method. Provisions are made for excessive, slow moving and obsolete inventories
as well as for inventories with carrying values in excess of market value. Certain factors could impact the realizable value of
inventory. Therefore, we continually evaluate the recoverability based on assumptions about customer demand and market conditions.
The evaluation may take into consideration historical usage, expected demand, anticipated sales price, new product development
schedules, the effect new products might have on the sale of existing products, product obsolescence, customer concentrations,
and other factors. The reserve or write-down is equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market
value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those
projected by management, additional inventory reserves or write-downs may be required, which could negatively impact our gross
profit margin and operating results. If actual market conditions are more favorable, we may have higher gross profit margin when
products that have been previously reserved or written down are eventually sold. The sale of previously reserved inventory did
not have a material impact on our gross margin percentage for any of the years presented. Provisions for inventories valuation
were RMB75.9 million, RMB98.8 million and RMB439.0 million (US$63.2 million) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and
2016, respectively. The increase of inventory provisions in 2016 was mainly attributable to a sharp decline in the average selling
prices of solar modules since the third quarter of 2016.
In addition, we analyze our firm purchase
commitments, if any, at each period end. Provision is made in the current period if the net realizable value after considering
estimated costs to convert polysilicon into saleable finished goods is higher than market selling price of finished goods as of
the end of a reporting period. There was no loss provision recorded related to these long-term contracts for each of the three
years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Property, plant and equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment are stated
at cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost includes the prices paid to acquire or construct the assets, interest capitalized during
the construction period and any expenditure that substantially extends the useful life of an existing asset. We compute depreciation
using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Buildings
|
|
20 years
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
10 years
|
Furniture, fixture and office equipment
|
|
3~5 years
|
Motor vehicles
|
|
4~5 years
|
Construction in progress primarily represents
the construction of new production lines. Costs incurred in the construction are capitalized and transferred to property, plant,
and equipment upon completion, at which time depreciation commences.
We record expenditures for repairs and maintenance
as expenses as incurred. The gain or loss on disposal of property, plant, and equipment, if any, is the difference between the
net sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the disposed assets, and is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations
upon disposal.
Interest Capitalization
The interest cost associated with major
development and construction projects is capitalized and included in the cost of the property, plant and equipment or project assets.
Interest capitalization ceases once a project is substantially complete or no longer undergoing construction activities to prepare
it for its intended use. When no debt is specifically identified as being incurred in connection with a construction project, we
capitalize interest on amounts expended on the project at our weighted average cost of borrowing money. Interest expense capitalized
for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were RMB4.1 million, RMB74.3 million and RMB67.5 million (US$9.7 million),
respectively.
Project assets
Project assets represented the costs of
solar power plants held for generation of electricity revenue and solar power plants under construction. Project assets are stated
in the consolidated balance sheets at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment provision, if any.
Costs of project assets consist primarily
of costs relating to construction of solar power plants at various stages of development. These costs include costs for procurement
of solar module and other equipment (including intercompany purchases), cost of land on which solar power plants are developed
and other direct costs for developing and constructing solar power plants, such as costs for obtaining permits required for solar
power plants and costs for designing, engineering, interest costs capitalized and installation in the course of construction. Such
costs are capitalized starting from the point when it is determined that development of the solar power plant is probable. For
a solar power project asset acquired from third parties, the initial cost is the acquisition cost which includes the consideration
transferred and certain direct acquisition costs.
Costs capitalized in the construction of
solar power plants under development will be transferred to solar power plants upon completion and when they are ready for intended
use, which is at the point of time when the solar power plants are connected to the grids and begin to generate electricity. Depreciation
of the completed solar power plant commences once the solar power plant is ready for the intended use. Depreciation is computed
using the straight-line method over the expected life of 20 years.
As of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016,
the balances of project assets were nil, nil and RMB55.1 million (US$7.9 million), respectively.
Land use rights
Land use rights represent acquisition costs
to purchase land use rights from the PRC government, which are evidenced by property certificates. The periods of these purchased
land use rights are either 50 years or 70 years. We classify land use rights as long-term assets on the balance sheet and cash
outflows related to acquisition of land use right as investing activities.
Land use rights are carried at cost less
accumulated amortization and impairment losses, if any. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the term specified
in the land use right certificate for 50 years or 70 years, as applicable.
Investments in affiliates
We hold equity investments in affiliates
for which we do not have a controlling financial interest, but have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating
and financial policies of the investee. These investments are accounted for under equity method of accounting wherein we record
our proportionate share of the investees’ income or loss in our consolidated financial statements. Cost method is used for
investments over which we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence.
Investments are evaluated for impairment
when facts or circumstances indicate that the fair value of the investment is less than its carrying value. An impairment is recognized
when a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary. We review several factors to determine whether a loss is
other-than-temporary. These factors include, but are not limited to, (1) nature of the investment; (2) cause and duration
of the impairment; (3) extent to which fair value is less than cost; (4) financial conditions and near term prospects
of the issuers; and (5) ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery
in fair value.
Our equity investments in affiliates were
disposed as part of our disposition of downstream solar power project segment, and investment income of affiliated companies was
recorded in discontinued operations.
Leases
Our leases are classified as capital or
operating leases. A lease that transfers to the lessee substantially all the benefits and risks incidental to ownership is classified
as a capital lease. At inception, a capital lease is recorded at the present value of minimum lease payments or the fair value
of the asset, whichever is less. Assets under capital leases are amortized on a basis consistent with that of similar fixed assets
or the lease term, whichever is less. Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
For a sale-leaseback transaction, when the
transaction involves real estate or integral equipment, sale-leaseback accounting shall be used by a seller-lessee only if the
transaction includes all of the following a) A normal leaseback; b) Payment terms and provisions that adequately demonstrate the
buyer-lessor’s initial and continuing investment in the property; c) Payment terms and provisions that transfer all of the
other risks and rewards of ownership as demonstrated by the absence of any other continuing involvement by the seller-lessee.
Equipment is determined to be integral when
the cost to remove the equipment from its existing location, ship and reinstall at a new site, including any diminution in fair
value, exceeds 10% of the fair value of the equipment at the time of original installation.
If a sale-leaseback of real estate qualifies
for sale-leaseback accounting, an analysis is performed to determine if the Company can record a sale and remove the assets from
the balance sheet and recognize the lease; and if so, to determine whether to record the lease as either an operating or capital
lease.
If a sale-leaseback transaction does not
qualify for sale-leaseback accounting because of any form of continuing involvement by the seller-lessee other than a normal leaseback,
it is accounted for as a financing, whichever is appropriate under ASC 360.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Our long-lived assets include property,
plant and equipment, solar power project assets and other intangible assets with finite lives. Our business requires heavy investment
in manufacturing equipment that is technologically advanced, but can quickly become significantly under-utilized or rendered obsolete
by rapid changes in demand for solar power products produced with those equipment.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Factors considered
important that could result in an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected
future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of acquired assets and significant negative industry or economic
trends. We may recognize impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds the future undiscounted
cash flows attributable to these assets. If the total of the expected undiscounted future net cash flows is less than the carrying
amount of the asset, a loss, if any, is recognized for the difference between the fair value of the asset and its carrying value.
The impairment of long-lived assets related to the retirement of certain equipment in the wafer and cell production line that had
become obsolete were RMB6.2 million, nil and RMB125.5 million (US$18.1 million) in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The provision
for impairment of long-lived assets in 2016 was attributable to the replacement of certain equipment for the upgrade of production
automation.
Warranty cost
We typically sell our solar modules with
either a 2-year or 5-year warranty for product defects and a 10-year and 25-year warranty against declines of more than 10.0% and
20.0%, respectively, from the initial minimum power generation capacity at the time of delivery. Therefore, we are exposed to potential
liabilities that could arise from these warranties. The potential liability is generally in the form of product replacement or
repair.
Consistent with the practice of the
solar industry, we have adopted the equivalent of 1% of product revenues to estimate the cost of our warranty obligation and
recorded a warranty liability on that basis. In light of the historical sharp decline and the anticipated long-term
decreasing trend of module prices, which we estimate to reflect replacement cost, as well as based on the accumulation of
longer operating experience, we reassessed and updated the estimation of future warranty costs with effect from December 31,
2016. The updated accrual basis consists two major inputs, which are the 1% expected failure rate and the product replacement
cost. Based on our actual claims incurred during the past years as well as the market practice, we projected the expected
failure rate as 1% for the whole warranty period, which is consistent with prior assumptions. Based on our actual claims
experience in the historical periods as well as management’s current best estimation, we believe that the average
selling price of solar modules over the past two years more accurately reflects the estimated warranty cost liability in
connection with the products sold by us, as opposed to the current and past spot prices. According to the updated product
replacement cost included in the warranty liability estimation, we reversed previous years’ recorded warranty liability
of RMB92.1 million in 2016.
The warranty costs were classified as current
liabilities under a balance sheet item named other payables and accruals and non-current liabilities under a balance sheet item
named accrued warranty costs – non-current, respectively, which reflect our estimate of the timing of when the warranty expenditures
will likely be made. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, warranty cost expenses were RMB92.3 million, RMB149.3 million and RMB257.5 million
(US$37.1 million), respectively. The utilization of the warranty accruals for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and
2016 were RMB0.4 million, RMB18.2 million and RMB12.0 million (US$1.7 million), respectively.
We purchase warranty insurance policy which
provides coverage for the product warranty services of our solar modules worldwide. Prepayment for warranty insurance premium is
initially recorded as other assets and is amortized over the insurance coverage period. Prepayment for warranty insurance premium
is not recorded as a reduction of estimated warranty liabilities. Once we receive insurance recoveries, warranty expenses will
be credited.
Government grants
Government grants related to technology
upgrades and development of export markets are recognized as subsidy income when received. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, we received
financial subsidies of RMB49.8 million, RMB103.6 million and RMB168.6 million (US$24.3 million) from the local PRC government authorities,
respectively. These subsidies were non-recurring, not refundable and with no conditions, including none related to specific use
or disposition of the funds, attached. There are no defined rules and regulations to govern the criteria necessary for companies
to enjoy such benefits and the amount of financial subsidy is determined at the discretion of the relevant government authority.
Government grants related to assets are
initially recorded as other payables and accruals which are deducted to the carrying amount when the assets are ready for use.
We received government grant for assets of RMB92.4 million, nil and nil in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Repurchase of share
When our shares are retired, or purchased
for constructive retirement (with or without an intention to retire the stock formally in accordance with applicable laws), the
excess of the purchase prices over their par value is recorded entirely to additional paid-in capital subject to the limitation
of the additional paid in capital when the shares were originally issued. When our shares are acquired for purposes other than
retirement, the purchase prices over their par value is shown separately as treasury stock.
Share-based compensation
Our share-based payment transactions with
employees, including share options, are measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instrument issued. The fair value
of the award is recognized as compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the period during which an employee is required
to provide service in exchange for the award, which is generally the vesting period.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the
asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable
to temporary differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and any
tax loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected
to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates or tax laws is recognized in the period the change in tax
rates or tax laws is enacted. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the amount of deferred income tax assets if it is considered
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Deferred income taxes are
not provided on undistributed earnings of the Company’s subsidiaries that are intended to be permanently reinvested in China.
Cumulative undistributed earnings of the Company’s PRC subsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested total RMB2,869.5
million (US$413.3 million) and the amount of the unrecognized deferred taxes liabilities on the permanently reinvested earnings
was RMB143.5 million (US$20.7 million) as of December 31, 2016.
Valuation allowances are determined by assessing
both positive and negative evidence and have been provided against the net deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty surrounding
their realization. As of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, valuation allowances of RMB67.3 million, RMB54.8 million and RMB66.2
million (US$9.5 million) were provided against deferred tax assets because it was more likely than not that such portion of
deferred tax would not be realized based on our estimate of the future taxable income of all our subsidiaries. If events occur
in the future that allow us to realize more of our deferred tax assets than the presently recorded amount, an adjustment to the
valuation allowances will result in a non-cash income statement benefit when those events occur. Certain valuation allowances were
reversed in 2014, 2015 and 2016, when certain subsidiaries generated sufficient taxable income to utilize the deferred tax assets.
Due to the strong financial performance and the cumulative income position of certain subsidiaries, we have determined that the
future taxable income of those subsidiaries is sufficient to realize the benefits of such deferred tax assets. As a result, we
reversed the valuation allowance of RMB26.9 million in 2016.
The accounting for uncertain tax positions
requires that we recognize in the consolidated financial statements the impact of an uncertain tax position, if that position is
more likely than not of being sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. Recognized income tax
positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement
are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. Our policy is to recognize, if any, tax related interest as
interest expenses and penalties as general and administrative expenses. For periods presented, we did not have any interest and
penalties associated with tax positions. As of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, we did not record any liability for any uncertain
tax positions.
Fair value of financial instruments
We do not have any non-financial assets
or liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined
as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date (also referred to as an exit price). A hierarchy is established for inputs used in measuring fair value
that gives the highest priority to observable inputs and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. Valuation techniques used
to measure fair value shall maximize the use of observable inputs.
When available, we measure the fair value
of financial instruments based on quoted market prices in active markets, which is a valuation technique that uses observable market-based
inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. We internally validate pricing information obtained from third
parties for reasonableness prior to use in the consolidated financial statements. When observable market prices are not readily
available, we generally estimate the fair value using valuation techniques that rely on alternate market data or inputs that are
generally less readily observable from objective sources and are estimated based on pertinent information available at the time
of the applicable reporting periods. In certain cases, fair values are not subject to precise quantification or verification and
may fluctuate as economic and market factors vary and our evaluation of those factors changes. Although we use our best judgment
in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique. In these
cases, a minor change in an assumption could result in a significant change in our estimate of fair value, thereby increasing or
decreasing the amounts of our consolidated assets, liabilities, equity and net income.
Our financial instruments consist principally
of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, restricted short-term investments, accounts and notes receivable, forward contract
receivable, call spread options, other receivables, prepayments and other current assets, capped call options, accounts and notes
payable, other payables and accruals, forward contracts payable, short-term borrowings, long-term borrowings, convertible senior
notes, rate cap derivative and warrants.
The forward contracts receivable and payable,
call spread options, capped call options, rate cap derivative, convertible senior notes and warrants are measured at fair value.
Except for these financial instruments and long-term borrowing, the carrying values of our other financial instruments approximated
their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of long-term borrowing approximates
their fair value due to the fact that the related interest rates approximate rates currently offered by financial institutions
for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities.
We classify the cash flows related to realized
gain or loss on settlement of foreign exchange forward contracts as operating activities, which are based on the nature of the
cash flows the derivative is economically hedging.
Call spread combined option contract
We held foreign exchange call spread combined
option contracts with a total notional value of US$70 million and nil as of December 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively. These foreign
exchange call spread matures within 12 months. We adopted the Black-Scholes Option Pricing(“B-S”) Model to value the
currency option contracts. The B-S Model is widely used and accepted as a common valuation practice in valuing such currency option.
The significant inputs used in the aforementioned model are unobservable inputs which there are little or no market data and therefore
the fair value measurements are classified as level 3. Our foreign currency call spread is an over-the-counter instrument.
Warrants
We adopted Binominal Tree option pricing
model to assess the warrants’ fair value. Management is responsible for determining the fair value and assessing a number
of factors. The valuation involves complex and subjective judgments as well as our best estimates on the valuation date. Key inputs
related to the Binomial Tree option pricing model for the valuation of the fair value of warrants are: probabilities assigned among
IPO and non-IPO scenarios, time to maturity, volatility, dividend yield, as well as risk-free rate, of which probabilities assigned
among IPO and non-IPO scenarios, volatility, and risk-free rate are most significant to valuation determination of the warrants.
Available-for-sale investment
On a recurring basis, we measure available-for-sale
investment at fair value. Since the available-for-sale investment does not have quoted price in active markets, we have adopted
Binomial Tree option pricing model to assess their fair value. Management is responsible for determining the fair value and assessing
a number of factors. The valuation involves complex and subjective judgments as well as our best estimates on the valuation date.
Inputs related to the Binomial Tree option
pricing model for the valuation of the fair value of available-for-sale investment are: spot price, conversion price, time to maturity,
expected dividend yield, expected share volatility, risk free interest rate, and yield-to-maturity. The following methods were
adopted for each input:
|
a.
|
Spot price: quoted closing price of listed shares of Kinexia SpA(KNX IM) as of each re-measurement date;
|
|
b.
|
Conversion price: according to the indenture of the subject available-for-sale investment;
|
|
c.
|
Time to maturity: time period from the respective re-measurement date to maturity date. Maturity date was referred from the
indenture of the subject available-for-sale investment;
|
|
d.
|
Expected dividend yield: based on indicative dividend yield of the underlying company (i.e. KNX.IM) as of each re-measurement
date;
|
|
e.
|
Expected share volatility: based on the implied volatility of the listed shares of Kinexia (i.e. KNX.IM) with a time period
equal to the time to maturity as of each re-measurement date;
|
|
f.
|
Risk free interest rate: based on the yield of Italy Treasury Bonds with a maturity equal to the time to maturity as of each
re-measurement date; and
|
|
g.
|
Yield-to-maturity: based on the average yield-to-maturity of comparable corporate bullet bonds with similar remaining maturity
period and credit risk as of each re-measurement date.
|
In 2013, we recognized gain from a change
in fair value of available-for-sales investment of RMB6.0 million. In 2014, we recognized loss from a change in fair value
of available-for-sales of RMB5.8 million. In December 2015, upon the maturity of such available-for-sales investment, we decided
to waive the conversion right and chose to collect the total outstanding balance in cash. Considering the uncertainties of the
cash collection, we provided full provision for the outstanding receivable of RMB10,287,626 in 2016.
Convertible senior notes and capped call options
We have adopted valuation models to assess
the fair value for capped call options and convertible senior notes as the capped call options are not publicly traded and the
trading of the convertible senior notes is considered inactive. Management is responsible for determining these fair values and
assessing a number of factors. Both capped call options and the convertible senior notes are valued using the Binominal Tree option
pricing model. The valuation involves complex and subjective judgments as well as our best estimates on the valuation date. Inputs
related to the Binomial models for convertible debt fair value are: spot price, conversion price, time to maturity, expected dividend
yield, expected share volatility, risk free interest rate, yield-to-maturity and put option exercisable period.
A summary of changes in fair value of capped
call options for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
107,223,601
|
|
|
|
21,098,263
|
|
|
|
17,490,323
|
|
Foreign exchange gain
|
|
|
563,725
|
|
|
|
2,562,342
|
|
|
|
736,212
|
|
Change in fair value of capped call options
|
|
|
(86,689,063
|
)
|
|
|
(6,170,282
|
)
|
|
|
(18,226,535
|
)
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
21,098,263
|
|
|
|
17,490,323
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
A summary of the assumptions used in the
valuation of convertible senior notes and Capped call options due 2016 was as follows:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
Before
repurchase in
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Fair value of ADS
|
|
US$
|
19.71
|
|
|
US$
|
27.67
|
|
|
US$
|
20.91
|
|
Strike price
|
|
US$
|
33.75
|
|
|
US$
|
33.75
|
|
|
US$
|
33.75
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
|
|
0.52
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Standard Volatility
|
|
|
64.31
|
%
|
|
|
46.14
|
%
|
|
|
64.13
|
%
|
A summary of the assumptions used in the
valuation of convertible senior notes due 2019 was as follows:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Fair value of ADS
|
|
US$
|
19.71
|
|
|
US$
|
27.67
|
|
|
US$
|
15.80
|
|
Strike price
|
|
US$
|
45.83
|
|
|
US$
|
45.83
|
|
|
US$
|
45.83
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Standard Volatility
|
|
|
66.31
|
%
|
|
|
40.44
|
%
|
|
|
76.09
|
%
|
Guarantees
We issue debt payment guarantees in favor
of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, a related party. The guarantees require us to make payments to reimburse the holders of these guarantees
for losses they incur when Jiangxi Jinko Engineering fails to make repayments to the holders when its liability to the holders
falls due.
In addition, we also issue redemption guarantees
in favor of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, a related party. According to the side agreement among us, Jiangxi Jinko Engineering and
investors of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering (the original redeemable preferred shareholders of JinkoSolar Power), the investors of
Jiangxi Jinko Engineering will have the right to have the common shares of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering held by them redeemed, and,
as a result of a guarantee issued by us, in the event that Jiangxi Jinko Engineering fails to perform its redemption obligations,
we will become liable for Jiangxi Jinko Engineering’s obligations under the redemption.
A guarantee liability is initially recognized
at the estimated fair value in our consolidated balance sheets unless it becomes probable that we will reimburse the holder of
the guarantee for an amount higher than the carrying amount, in which case the guarantee is carried in our consolidated balance
sheets at the expected amount payable to the holder. The fair value of the guarantee liability is measured by the total consideration
to be received in connection with the provision of guarantee. The guarantee liability would be amortized in straight line during
the guarantee period.
Results of Operations
Unless otherwise specified, the results
presented in this annual report do not include the results of our downstream solar power project business in China, a discontinued
operation.
The following table sets forth a summary,
for the periods indicated, of our consolidated results of operations and each item expressed as a percentage of our total net revenues.
Our historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(US$)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentage)
|
|
Consolidated Statement
of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
9,740,876.5
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
15,454,374.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
21,400,638.1
|
|
|
|
3,082,333.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Sales of solar modules
|
|
|
9,155,396.0
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
|
|
|
15,086,256.8
|
|
|
|
97.6
|
|
|
|
20,825,750.1
|
|
|
|
2,999,531.9
|
|
|
|
97.3
|
|
Sales of silicon wafers
|
|
|
286,585.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
138,293.4
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
136,079.7
|
|
|
|
19,599.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Sales of solar cells
|
|
|
200,643.6
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
215,048.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
155,016.3
|
|
|
|
22,327.0
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Sales of recovered silicon materials
|
|
|
11,272.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
5,201.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
860.0
|
|
|
|
123.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Processing service fees
|
|
|
69,581.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Solar system integration projects
|
|
|
11,209.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
269,661.7
|
|
|
|
38,839.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Revenue from generated electricity
|
|
|
6,188.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
9,574.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
13,270.4
|
|
|
|
1,911.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
(7,643,687.8
|
)
|
|
|
(78.5
|
)
|
|
|
(12,522,913.8
|
)
|
|
|
(81.0
|
)
|
|
|
(17,531,299.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2,525,032.3
|
)
|
|
|
(81.9
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,097,188.7
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
2,931,460.6
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
3,869,338.9
|
|
|
|
557,300.7
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(1,253,134.5
|
)
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1,809,655.3
|
)
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2,520,235.8
|
)
|
|
|
(362,989.5
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
844,054.1
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
1,121,805.2
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
1,349,103.2
|
|
|
|
194,311.3
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Interest expenses, net
|
|
|
(226,342.6
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(311,018.6
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(359,296.3
|
)
|
|
|
(51,749.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
Convertible senior notes issuance costs
|
|
|
(26,052.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Subsidy income
|
|
|
48,829.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
101,873.6
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
168,646.6
|
|
|
|
24,290.2
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Exchange gain/(loss)
|
|
|
(139,566.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(86,517.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
208,811.4
|
|
|
|
30,075.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(US$)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentage)
|
|
Other (expenses)/income, net
|
|
|
(1,558.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
1,036.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
8,768.4
|
|
|
|
1,262.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,902.5
|
|
|
|
706.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,017.9
|
|
|
|
722.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Change in fair value of forward contracts
|
|
|
(714.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
56,931.9
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(52,561.8
|
)
|
|
|
(7,570.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Change in fair value of call spread options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(370.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change in fair value of convertible senior notes and capped call
options
|
|
|
64,101.6
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(2,096.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
24,573.3
|
|
|
|
3,539.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,571.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(110,242.5
|
)
|
|
|
(15,878.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Income tax (expenses)/benefit
|
|
|
135,393.0
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
(100,533.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(257,487.0
|
)
|
|
|
(37,085.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
698,142.9
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
766,539.3
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
990,235.6
|
|
|
|
142,623.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,007,884.1
|
|
|
|
145,165.5
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
29,112.9
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
105,089.6
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
48,146.3
|
|
|
|
6,934.5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Income tax expense, net
|
|
|
(1,058.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
(11,329.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(54,466.1
|
)
|
|
|
(7,844.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
28,054.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
93,759.8
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1,001,564.3
|
|
|
|
144,255.3
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
726,196.9
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
860,299.1
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
1,991,799.8
|
|
|
|
286,878.8
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Less: Net loss attributable to the non-controlling interests from
continuing operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(63.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
(432.5
|
)
|
|
|
(62.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
Less: Net income attributable to the non-controlling interests from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
851.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
4,270.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
6,044.5
|
|
|
|
870.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Less: Accretion to redemption value of redeemable non-controlling
interests of discontinued operations
|
|
|
52,320.7
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
172,340.4
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
159,477.9
|
|
|
|
22,969.6
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Net income attributable to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.’s
ordinary shareholders
|
|
|
673,025.1
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
683,751.5
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
1,826,710.0
|
|
|
|
263,101.0
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Reportable Segments
We use the management approach in determining
reportable operating segments. The management approach considers the internal organization and reporting used by our chief operating
decision maker for making operating decisions, allocating resources and assessing performance as the source for determining our
reportable segments. In prior years, management determined that we operated our business in two segments, as that term is defined
by FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment reporting: (i) the manufacturing segment and (ii) the solar power projects segment.
Our manufacturing segment comprises our
vertically integrated solar power product manufacturing business, under which we manufacture and sell silicon wafers, cells and
solar modules.
Our solar power projects business, which
comprised the downstream solar power generation, construction and operation business in China, including (i) power generation,
(ii) engineering, procurement, and construction, or EPC, and (iii) connecting solar power projects to the grid and operation
and maintenance, or O&M, of the solar power projects, was reported in prior years as the solar power projects segment. We disposed
of our solar power projects segment in the fourth quarter of 2016, and classified it as a discontinued operation in all periods.
2016 compared with 2015
Revenues.
Our revenues increased
by 38.5% from RMB15.45 billion in 2015 to RMB21.40 billion (US$3.08 billion) in 2016, primarily due to the increase in shipments
of solar modules, which was partially offset by the decline in average selling prices.
Our sales of solar modules increased by
38.0% from RMB15.09 billion in 2015 to RMB20.83 billion (US$3.0 billion) in 2016, primarily due to the significant increase in
sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in average selling prices. The sales volume of our solar modules increased by 47.5%
from 4,207.6 MW in 2015 to 6,225.3 MW in 2016. The average selling price of our solar modules decreased by 3.5% from RMB3.59 per
watt in 2015 to RMB3.33 per watt (US$0.50 per watt) in 2016, primarily due to over-supply of solar power products in the market
which led to a decrease in the market value of solar modules.
Our sales of silicon wafers decreased by
1.6% from RMB138.3 million in 2015 to RMB136.1 million (US$19.6 million) in 2016. The sales volume of our silicon wafers increased
by 32.2% from 118.2 MW in 2015 to 156.3 MW in 2016. The average selling price of our silicon wafers decreased by 25.0% from RMB1.2
per watt in 2015 to RMB0.9 per watt in 2016.
Our sales of solar cells decreased by 27.9%
from RMB215.0 million in 2015 to RMB155.0 million (US$22.3 million) in 2016. The sales volume of our solar cells decreased by 26.6%
from 172.8 MW in 2015 to 126.9 MW in 2016. The average selling price of our solar cells remained stable from 2015 to 2016.
Our revenue generated from providing solar
system integration services increased from nil in 2015 to RMB269.6 million (US$38.8 million) in 2016, primarily due to the continued
growth of our household solar project business. We disposed of our household solar project business in the fourth quarter of 2016.
Our revenue from the sale of electricity
generated by our solar power projects in continuing operations increased from RMB9.6 million in 2015 to RMB13.3 million (US$1.9
million) in 2016, primarily due to our acquisition of two solar power projects in Italy in 2016.
Cost of Revenues.
Our cost of revenues
increased by 40.0% from RMB12.52 billion in 2015 to RMB17.53 billion (US$2.52 billion) in 2016, primarily due to the increase in
shipments of solar modules.
Gross Profit.
Our gross profit increased
by 32.0% from RMB2,931.5 million in 2015 to RMB3,869.3 million (US$557.3 million) in 2016. Our gross margin decreased from 19.0%
in 2015 to 18.1% in 2016, primarily due to the sharp decline in the average selling prices of solar modules since the third quarter
of 2016.
Operating Expenses.
Our operating
expenses increased by 39.3% from RMB1,809.7 million in 2015 to RMB2,520.2 million (US$363.0 million) in 2016, primarily as a result
of the increase of shipping cost, impairment of property, plant and equipment, partially offset by the impact of warranty expense
reversals. Based on the updated warranty estimation, we reversed the warranty expense related to prior years by RMB92.1 million
(US$13.3 million) in 2016.
Our selling and marketing expenses increased
by 25.3% from RMB1,144.6 million in 2015 to RMB1,434.0 million (US$206.5 million) in 2016, primarily due to the increase in transportation
expenses and warranty costs, which were in line with the increase in our sales.
Our general and administrative expenses
increased by 73.6% from RMB521.4 million in 2015 to RMB905.1 million (US$130.3 million) in 2016, primarily due to the provision
for disposal and impairment of property, plant and equipment, and the provision for allowance of doubtful accounts.
Our research and development expenses increased
by 26.1% from RMB143.7 million in 2015 to RMB181.1 million (US$26.1 million) in 2016.
Income from Operations.
As a result
of the foregoing, our income from operations increased by 20.3% from RMB1,121.8 million in 2015 to RMB1,349.1 million (US$194.3
million) in 2016. Our operating profit margin was 7.3% in 2015 and 6.3% in 2016.
Interest Expenses.
Our interest expenses
increased by 15.5% from RMB311.0 million in 2015 to RMB359.3 million (US$51.7 million) in 2016.
Subsidy Income.
Our subsidy income
increased significantly from RMB101.9 million in 2015 to RMB168.6 million (US$24.3 million) in 2016, primarily due to more one-time
nature of government subsidies.
Exchange Gain / (Loss).
We recognized
foreign exchange loss of RMB86.5 million in 2015 and a foreign exchange gain of RMB208.8 million (US$30.1 million) in 2016, primary
due to the exchange fluctuations of the U.S. dollars against the Renminbi.
Other Income/(Expense).
We had other
income of RMB8.8 million (US$1.3 million) in 2016, compared with other income of RMB1.0 million in 2015.
Change in Fair Value of Forward Contracts.
We recognized a loss in fair value of foreign currency forward contracts of RMB52.6 million (US$7.6 million) in 2016, compared
with a gain of RMB56.9 million in 2015, primarily due to the fluctuation of Renminbi against the U.S. dollars in 2016.
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Senior
Notes and Capped Call Options.
We recorded a loss of RMB24.6 million (US$3.5 million) in 2016, compared with a gain of RMB2.1
million in 2015, primary due to the volatility of our stock prices.
Income Tax Expense.
We recorded an
income tax expense of RMB257.5 million (US$37.1 million) in 2016, compared with an income tax expense of RMB100.5 million in 2015.
The effective tax rate was negative 20.6% in 2016, compared with 11.6% in 2015. We determined that the future taxable income of
certain of our subsidiaries with strong financial performance would be sufficient to realize the benefits of such tax assets and
reversed the valuation allowance of RMB26.9million (US$3.9 million) in 2016, resulting in a 8.9% increase in effective tax rate
in 2016.
Net Income attributable to JinkoSolar
Holding Co., Ltd.
As a result of the foregoing, our net income attributable to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. increased from
RMB683.8 million in 2015 to RMB1,826.7 million (US$263.1 million) in 2016. Our net profit margin increased from 4.4% in 2015 to
8.5% in 2016.
2015 compared with 2014
Revenues.
Our revenues increased
by 58.7% from RMB9.74 billion in 2014 to RMB15.45 billion in 2015, primarily due to the increase in shipments of solar modules
which was partially offset by the decline in average selling prices. The increase in electricity revenues generated from solar
power projects was primarily due to the increase in the number and capacity of projects in 2015.
Our sales of solar modules increased by
64.8% from RMB9.16 billion in 2014 to RMB15.09 billion in 2015, primarily due to the significant increase in sales volume, partially
offset by a decrease in average selling prices. The sales volume of our solar modules increased by 73.6% from 2,423.1 MW in 2014
to 4,207.6 MW in 2015. The average selling price of our solar modules decreased by 5.6% from RMB3.78 per watt in 2014 to RMB3.59
per watt in 2015, primarily due to over-supply of solar power products in the market which makes the market value of solar modules
decrease.
Our sales of silicon wafers decreased by
51.7% from RMB286.6 million in 2014 to RMB138.3 million in 2015 due to the increase of internal use and, accordingly, decreased
sales to third parties. The sales volume of our silicon wafers decreased by 48.5% from 229.6 MW in 2014 to 118.2 MW in 2015. The
average selling price of our silicon wafers decreased by 45.4% from 2014 to 2015.
Our sales of solar cells increased by 7.2%
from RMB200.6 million in 2014 to RMB215.0 million in 2015. The sales volume of our solar cells increased by 28.8% from 134.2 MW
in 2014 to 172.8 MW in 2015. The average selling price of our solar cells decreased by 16.8% from 2014 to 2015.
Our revenue generated from providing solar
system integration services decreased from RMB11.2 million in 2014 to nil in 2015.
Our processing service fee decreased from
RMB69.6 million in 2014 to nil in 2015 due to the full utilization of production capacity.
Cost of Revenues.
Our cost of revenues
increased by 63.8% from RMB7,643.7 million in 2014 to RMB12.52 billion in 2015, primarily due to the significant increase in sales
volume of our solar modules, and to a lesser extent, our silicon wafers, and solar cells.
Gross Profit.
Our gross profit increased
by 39.8% from RMB2,097.2 million in 2014 to RMB2,931.5 million in 2015. Our gross margin decreased from 22.4% in 2014 to
20.3% in 2015, primarily due to the slight decline in average selling prices of solar modules.
Operating Expenses.
Our operating
expenses increased by 44.4% from RMB1,253.1 million in 2014 to RMB1,809.7 million in 2015, primarily as a result of a significant
increase in our selling and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses.
Our selling and marketing expenses increased
by 48.8% from RMB768.3 million in 2014 to RMB1,144.6 million in 2015, primarily due to the increase in transportation expenses,
commission expenses and warranty costs, which were in line with the increase in our sales.
Our general and administrative expenses
increased by 38.8% from RMB375.6 million in 2014 to RMB521.4 million in 2015, primarily due to increased salary and welfare expenses
and stock-based compensation expenses.
Our research and development expenses increased
by 34.7% from RMB106.6 million in 2014 to RMB143.7million in 2015, primarily due to the investment in improving the conversion
rate of solar modules.
Income from Operations.
As a result
of the foregoing, our income from operations increased by 32.9% from RMB844.1 million in 2014 to RMB1,121.8 million in 2015. Our
operating profit margin was 9.3% in 2014 and 8.2% in 2015.
Interest Expenses.
Our interest expenses
increased by 37.4% from RMB226.3 million in 2014 to RMB311.0 million in 2015, primarily due to the increase in bank borrowings
used for the construction of downstream solar power projects in 2015.
Subsidy Income.
Our subsidy income
increased from RMB48.8 million in 2014 to RMB101.9 million in 2015, primarily due to more one-time nature of government subsidies
that we received in 2015.
Exchange Loss.
Our exchange loss
decreased from RMB139.57 million in 2014 to RMB86.52 million in 2015.
Other Income/(Expense).
We had other
income of RMB1.04 thousand in 2015, compared with other expense of RMB1.56 million in 2014.
Change in Fair Value of Forward Contracts.
We recognized a gain in fair value of foreign currency forward contracts of RMB56.9 million in 2015 due to the fluctuation
of the Euro against the U.S. dollars in 2015, compared with a loss of RMB0.7 million in 2014 due to the fluctuation of the Euro
against the Renminbi in 2014.
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Senior
Notes and Capped Call Options.
We recorded a loss of RM14.6 million in 2015 in relation to a change in fair value of our convertible
senior notes and capped call options, primarily due to changes in our stock price, compared with a gain of RMB64.1 million in 2014,
in relation to a change in fair value of our convertible senior notes and capped call options.
Change in Fair Value of Call Spread Options.
We recognized a loss in fair value of call spread options of RMB370.4 thousand in 2015, compared with nil in 2014.
Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability.
We recognized a loss in fair value of warrant liability of RMB2.1 million in 2015, compared with nil in 2014.
Income Tax (Expense)/Benefit.
We
recorded an income tax expense of RMB100.5 million in 2015, compared with an income tax benefit of RMB135.4 million in 2014. The
effective tax rate was 11.6% in 2015, compared with negative 23.1% in 2014. Based on the strong financial performance of certain
subsidiaries, we determined that the future taxable income of certain subsidiaries would be sufficient to realize the benefits
of such tax assets and reversed the valuation allowance of RMB222.2 million in 2014 resulting in a negative effective tax rate
in 2014.
Net income attributable to JinkoSolar
Holding Co., Ltd.
As a result of the foregoing, our net income attributable to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. increased from
RMB673.0 million in 2014 to RMB683.8 million in 2015. Our net profit margin decreased from 6.74% in 2014 to 4.25% in 2015.
Disposition of Downstream Solar Power Project Business
In the fourth quarter of 2016, we completed
the sale of all 55% equity interest we indirectly held in Jiangxi Jinko Engineering through JinkoSolar Power, our then indirect
subsidiary, to Shangrao Kangsheng Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Buyer”), a company formed by a buyer consortium led by
Mr. Xiande Li, our chairman of the board of directors, pursuant to the a share purchase agreement between Wide Wealth Group Holding
Limited, our indirect subsidiary, and the Buyer. As a result of the sale, we disposed of our downstream solar power project business
in China and received US$250 million in cash.
Assets and liabilities related to Jiangxi
Jinko Engineering were reclassified as assets/liabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2015, while results of operations related
to JinkoSolar Power, including comparatives, were reported as loss from discontinued operations.
We recognized a gain of RMB1.01 billion
(US$145.2 million) because of the disposition.
|
B.
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
We have financed our operations and capital
expenditures primarily through equity contributions from our shareholders, the net proceeds of our equity and debt securities offerings,
cash flow generated from operations, as well as short-term and long-term debt financing.
As of December 31, 2016, we had RMB2.5
billion (US$360.3 million) in cash and cash equivalents and RMB318.8 million (US$45.9 million) in restricted cash. Our cash and
cash equivalents represent cash on hand and demand deposits with original maturities of three months or less that are placed with
banks and other financial institutions. Our restricted cash represents deposits legally held by banks which are not available for
general use. These deposits are held as collateral for issuance of letters of credit and bank acceptable notes to vendors for purchase
of machinery and equipment and raw materials.
We have entered into purchase agreements
for purchasing additional manufacturing equipment. Our purchase capital commitments under these contracts amounted to approximately
RMB878.8 million (US$126.6 million) as of December 31, 2016, of which RMB783.5 million (US$112.9 million) will be due in 2017.
We plan to use the remaining available cash for research and development and for working capital and other day-to-day operating
purposes.
As of December 31, 2016, we had total
bank credit facilities available of RMB9.85 billion (US$1.42 billion) with various banks, of which RMB6.75 billion (US$0.97 billion)
were drawn down and RMB3.10 billion (US$0.45 billion) were available.
As of December 31, 2016, we had short-term
borrowings (including the portion of long-term borrowings due within one year) of RMB5.49 billion (US$790.53 million). As of December
31, 2016, we had short-term borrowings outstanding of RMB3.17 billion (US$456.48 million), RMB1.49 million (US$0.21 million), RMB2.21
billion (US$318.2 million) and RMB108.53 million (US$15.63 million), which were denominated in RMB, EUR, U.S. dollars and JPY,
respectively, and bearing a weighted average interest rates of 4.48%, 3.06%, 3.07% and 0.51% per annum, respectively.
As of December 31, 2016, we had short-term
borrowings (including the portion of long-term borrowings due within one year) of RMB5.49 billion (US$790.53 million). As of December
31, 2016, we had short-term borrowings outstanding of RMB3.17 billion (US$456.48 million), RMB1.49 million (US$0.21 million),
RMB2.21 billion (US$318.2 million) and RMB108.53 million (US$15.63 million), which were denominated in RMB, EUR, U.S. dollars
and JPY, respectively, and bearing a weighted average interest rates of 4.48%, 3.06%, 2.79% and 0.51% per annum, respectively.
We have long-term borrowings (excluding
the portion of long-term borrowings due within one year) of RMB488.5 million (US$70.4 million), which bore interest at an average
annual rate of 3.58% as of December 31, 2016. In connection with most of our long-term borrowings, we have granted security interests
over significant amounts of our assets. As of December 31, 2016, we pledged property of a net book value of RMB194.5 million (US$28.0
million) to secure repayment of borrowings of RMB75.1 million (US$10.8 million). As of December 31, 2016, long-term loans in the
amount of RMB413.4 million (US$59.6 million) will be due for repayment after one year, but within five years.
In addition, we have repayment obligations
under our convertible senior notes. On January 22, 2014, we issued convertible senior notes in the principal amount of US$150.0
million due 2019, bearing an annual interest rate of 4.0% and with an option for holders to require us to repurchase their notes
in February 2017 for the principal of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, to qualified institutional buyers under
Rule 144A and in reliance upon Regulation S of the Securities Act. We repurchased an aggregate principal amount of US$88.9
million of such notes for a total consideration of RMB85.6 million in 2016. As of December 31, 2016, we had in the principal
amount of US$61.1 million of the convertible senior notes due 2019 outstanding. We completed the repurchase of substantially all
of the notes in February 2017.
The relevant PRC laws and regulations permit
payments of dividends by our PRC subsidiaries only out of their retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC
GAAP. In addition, the statutory general reserve fund requires annual appropriations of 10% of net after-tax income to be set aside
prior to payment of any dividends by our PRC subsidiaries that are registered as wholly owned foreign investment enterprises or
domestic enterprises. As a result of these and other restrictions under PRC laws and regulations, the PRC subsidiaries are restricted
in their ability to transfer a portion of their net assets to us either in the form of dividends, loans or advances. Even though
we do not currently require any such dividends, loans or advances from the our PRC subsidiaries for working capital or other funding
purposes, it may in the future require additional cash resources from the PRC subsidiaries due to changes in business conditions,
to fund future acquisitions and development, or merely declare dividends or make distributions to the our shareholders. Our net
assets subject to the above restrictions were RMB4,188,460,756, representing 65% of our total consolidated net assets as of December
31, 2016.
On January 29, 2013, Jiangxi Jinko,
our wholly owned operating subsidiary incorporated in the PRC, issued six-year bonds with a principal amount of RMB800.0 million,
bearing a fixed annual interest rate of 8.99%. At the end of the third year in the life of the bonds, Jiangxi Jinko has the option
to raise the interest rate by up to 100 basis points, and the bondholders will have the right to require Jiangxi Jinko to repurchase
all or part of their bonds upon Jiangxi Jinko’s announcement of whether or not we decide to raise the interest rate, and
by how much, at such time. We repurchased all of the bonds in 2016.
On September 25, 2013, we completed
a follow-on public offering of 4,370,000 ADSs, receiving aggregate net proceeds of approximately US$67.8 million, after deducting
discounts and commissions and offering expenses. On January 22, 2014, we completed a follow-on public offering of 3,750,000
ADSs representing 15,000,000 ordinary shares, receiving aggregate net proceeds of approximately US$126.2 million after deducting
discounts and commissions and offering expenses.
In July 2014, we entered into a five-year
RMB1.0 billion strategic financing agreement with China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. In November 2014, we signed a US$20.0
million two-year credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, or Wells Fargo. The credit limit was raised to US$40.0
million in June 2015 and further to US$60.0 million in July 2016 through amendments to the credit agreement. Borrowings under
the new credit agreement will be used to support JinkoSolar US’s working capital needs and business operations.
In May 2015, we signed a US$20.0 million
bank facility agreement with Barclay Bank, which was subsequently raised to US$40.0 million, to support our working capital and
business operations. In August 2015, we signed a RMB700.0 million loan agreement with The Export-Import Bank of China. In
September 2015, we signed a line of credit of up to RMB10.0 billion strategic agreement with the Industrial and Commercial
Bank of China Jiangxi Provincial branch.
In July 2016, we signed a one-year JPY2
billion syndicated loan agreement with a bank consortium led by Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation to support our working capital
and business operations in Japan. In September 2016, we signed a US$25.0 million bank facility agreement with Malayan Banking Berhad
to support our working capital and business operations in Malaysia.
Our management believes that our current
cash position as of December 31, 2016, the cash expected to be generated from operations and funds available from borrowings
under the bank credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least
the next 12 months from March 29, 2017, the date of issuance of our consolidated financial statements for 2016 included in this
annual report.
Cash Flows and Working Capital
The following table sets forth a summary
of our cash flows for the periods indicated:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
|
(US$)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net cash provided by/ (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
187,067.6
|
|
|
|
1,339,049.5
|
|
|
|
(1,802,967.7
|
)
|
|
|
(259,681.4
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(4,158,754.5
|
)
|
|
|
(3,314,637.7
|
)
|
|
|
(6,908,979.8
|
)
|
|
|
(995,100.1
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
5,303,692.9
|
|
|
|
3,850,632.5
|
|
|
|
7,455,061.2
|
|
|
|
1,073,752.2
|
|
Net increase/ (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,320,944.5
|
|
|
|
1,906,643.4
|
|
|
|
(1,182,246.6
|
)
|
|
|
(170,278.9
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
|
|
|
456,076.2
|
|
|
|
1,777,020.7
|
|
|
|
2,392,591.1
|
|
|
|
344,604.8
|
|
Cash balance recorded in the held-for-sale assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,291,072.9
|
|
|
|
185,953.2
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
|
|
|
1,777,020.7
|
|
|
|
3,683,664.1
|
|
|
|
2,501,417.5
|
|
|
|
360,279.1
|
|
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities in
2016 was RMB1,803.0 million, consisting primarily of (i) an increase in accounts receivables of RMB3,040.0 million due to the increase
in sales; (ii) an increase in inventory of RMB2,001.0 million due to the increase of purchase; (iii) an increase in notes receivable
– third parties of RMB426.1 million due to the increased sales; and (iv) an increase in other assets of RMB355.8 million,
partially offset by (i) increase in accounts payables – third parties of RMB885.1 million due to an increase in purchase
and longer credit terms; (ii) depreciation of property, plant and equipment of RMB449.1 million; (iii) provision of inventory of
RMB439.0 million; (iv) depreciation of project assets of RMB328.2 million; and (v) share-based compensation charges of RMB203.3
million.
Net cash provided by operating activities
in 2015 was RMB1,339.0 million, consisting primarily of (i) an increase in advance from customers of RMB873.4 million due
to an increase in sales; (ii) an increase in accounts payable of RMB591.2 million due to an increase in purchase and longer
credit terms; (iii) depreciation of property, plant and equipment of RMB393.2 million; and (iv) exchange loss of RMB117.7 million
due to the appreciation of U.S. dollars against Renminbi, partially offset by (i) an increase in inventory of RMB1,411.0 million
due to the increase of purchase; and (ii) an increase in accounts receivable and notes receivable of RMB390.1 million attributable
to the increased sales.
Net cash provided by operating activities
in 2014 was RMB187.1 million, consisting primarily of (i) an increase in accounts payable of RMB1,380.0 million due to an
increase in purchase and longer credit terms; (ii) depreciation of property, plant and equipment of RMB348.0 million; (iii)
exchange loss of RMB147.1 million due to the depreciation of Euro and Japanese Yen against RMB, partially offset by (i) an
increase in accounts receivable and notes receivable of RMB1,293.4 million due to the increase of sales; (ii) an increase
in inventory of RMB1,255.1 million due to an increase in purchase to meet the production demand and increase in stock for sales;
(iii) deferred income tax of RMB170.8 million, which was recognized since 2014; and (iv) a change in fair value of convertible
senior notes of RMB150.8 million.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in
2016 was RMB6,909.0 million, consisting primarily of (i) cash paid for short-term investments and restricted short-term investment
of RMB4,628.7 million, (ii) the purchase of property, plant and equipment of RMB1,975.4 million; (iii) cash paid for construction
of project assets of RMB1,956.5 million related to our disposed downstream solar power project business in China before its disposition,
which we subsequently disposed of in 2016, partially offset by cash collected from short-term investments of RMB2,289.2 million.
Net cash used in investing activities in
2015 was RMB3,314.6 million, consisting primarily of (i) cash paid for short-term investments and restricted short-term investment
of RMB2,672.4 million, (ii) cash paid for construction of project assets of RMB2,129.3 million related to the disposed downstream
solar power project business in China, (iii) the purchase of property, plant and equipment of RMB860.6 million, and (iv) cash paid
for acquisition of subsidiaries of RMB75.2 million, partially offset by cash collected from short-term investments of RMB2,594.7
million.
Net cash used in investing activities in
2014 was RMB4,158.8 million, consisting primarily of (i) cash paid for short-term investments and restricted short-term of
RMB2,398.4 million, (ii) cash paid for construction of project assets of RMB2,511.7 million related to the disposed downstream
solar power project business in China, (iii) the purchase of property, plant and equipment of RMB490.0 million, and (iv) cash paid
for acquisition of subsidiaries of RMB129.0 million, partially offset by cash collected from short-term investments of RMB1,421.2
million.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
in 2016 was RMB7,455.1 million, consisting primarily of (i) borrowings of RMB21.18 billion, and (ii) increase in notes payable
of RMB2,477.8 million, partially offset by (i) repayment of borrowings to third parties of RMB13.35 billion, and (ii) repurchase
of embedded warrants of RMB938.6 million; (iii) repayment of convertible senior notes of RMB1,218.7 million; and (iv) repayment
of bond payable of RMB800.0 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities
in 2015 was RMB3,850.6 million, consisting primarily of (i) borrowings of RMB10.14 billion, and (ii) proceeds from warrants
of RMB862.1 million, partially offset by (i) repayment of borrowings to third parties of RMB7,030.6 million, and (ii) repurchase
of convertible bonds of RMB113.0 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities
in 2014 was RMB5,303.7 million, consisting primarily of (i) borrowings of RMB5,220.6 million, (ii) proceeds from issuance
of convertible senior bonds of RMB914.9 million (iii) proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares in follow-on offerings of
RMB770.2 million, and (iv) proceeds from preferred shares of RMB1,383.3 million, partially offset by repayment of borrowings to
third parties of RMB3,984.4 million.
Restrictions on Cash Dividends
For a discussion on the ability of our subsidiaries
to transfer funds to our company and the impact this has on our ability to meet our cash obligations, see “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—We rely principally on dividends and other distributions on equity
paid by our principal operating subsidiaries, and limitations on their ability to pay dividends to us could have a material adverse
effect on our business and results of operations,” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Dividend
Distribution.”
Capital Expenditures
We had capital expenditures, representing
the payments that we had made, of RMB3,011.0 million, RMB3,034.0 million and RMB4,038.8 million (US$581.7 million) in 2014, 2015
and 2016, respectively. Our capital expenditures were used primarily to construct our manufacturing facilities and purchase equipment
for the production of silicon wafers, solar cells and solar modules, acquire land use rights, and construction of project assets.
We have been focusing on improving our efficiency to reduce our unit cost and have entered into purchase agreements for purchasing
additional manufacturing equipment. Our purchase capital commitments under these contracts amounted to approximately RMB878.8 million
(US$126.6 million) as of December 31, 2016, of which RMB783.5 million (US$f112.9 million) will be due in 2017 and RMB95.3
million (US$13.7 million) will be due after one year but within five years. We may terminate these equipment purchase agreements
or revise their terms in line with our new plan and as a result, may be subject to cancellation and late charges. See “Item
3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—We rely on a limited number of
third-party suppliers for supplying key manufacturing equipment and we may face termination and late charges and risks relating
to the termination and amendment of certain equipment purchases contracts.”
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No.
2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern”. This standard requires management to evaluate
for each annual and interim reporting period whether it is probable that the reporting entity will not be able to meet its obligations
as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. If the entity is in such a position,
the standard provides for certain disclosures depending on whether or not the entity will be able to successfully mitigate its
going concern status. This guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We have adopted ASU 2014-15 in 2016.
We had positive working capital as of December
31, 2016. Our management believes that the current cash position as of December 31, 2016, the cash expected to be generated from
operations and funds available from borrowings under the bank credit facilities will be sufficient to meet the our working capital
and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from March 29, 2017, the date of issuance of our consolidated
financial statements for 2016 included in this annual report.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. This guidance was
issued to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and developing a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International
Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). In addition, in August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2015-14 (ASU 2015-14): “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This update was issued to defer the effective
date of ASU No, 2014-09 by one year. Therefore, the effective date of ASU No, 2014-09 for public business entities is for annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier
application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods
within that reporting period.
In March, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-08 (ASU 2016-08), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, which amends the principal-versus-agent
implementation guidance and illustrations in the Board’s new revenue standard (ASU 2014-09). The FASB issued the ASU 2016-08
in response to concerns identified by stakeholders, including those related to (1) determining the appropriate unit of account
under the revenue standard’s principal-versus-agent guidance and (2) applying the indicators of whether an entity is a principal
or an agent in accordance with the revenue standard’s control principle.
In April, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-10 (ASU 2016-10), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, which amends certain
aspects of the guidance in ASU 2014-09 (the Board’s new revenue standard) on (1) identifying performance obligations and
(2) licensing.
In May 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-12 (ASU2016-12), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements
and Practical Expedients” (“ASU 2016-12”). The amendments in this ASU do not change the core principle of the
guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this ASU affect only the narrow aspects of Topic 606. The areas improved include:
(1) Assessing the Collectability Criterion in Paragraph 606-10-25-1(e) and Accounting for Contracts That Do Not Meet the Criteria
for Step 1; (2) Presentation of Sales Taxes and Other Similar Taxes Collected from Customers; (3) Noncash Consideration; (4) Contract
Modifications at Transition; (5) Completed Contracts at Transition; and (6) Technical Correction. The effective date and transition
requirements for the amendments in this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any
other Topic amended by ASU 2014-09).
We are continuing to evaluate the future
impact and method of adoption of ASU 2014-09 and related amendments on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
We are considering adoption of the new standard using the modified retrospective method in fiscal 2018. Our ability to adopt the
standard is dependent on system readiness and the completion of the analysis necessary to meet the requirements under ASU 2014-09.
In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2015-11 (ASU 2015-11), "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory" which applies
to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out ("FIFO") or average cost. Under the updated guidance, an entity
should measure inventory that is within scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling prices
in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Subsequent measurement
is unchanged for inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out ("LIFO"). This ASU is effective for annual and interim
periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively with early adoption permitted at the beginning of
an interim or annual reporting period. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2015-16 (ASU 2015-16), “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period
Adjustments”. Under this ASU, an acquirer must recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the
measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The effect on earnings of changes in
depreciation or amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated
as if the accounting had been completed as of the acquisition date, must be recorded in the reporting period in which the adjustment
amounts are determined rather than retrospectively. This standard is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim
reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim reporting periods within those annual periods. We are in the process of evaluating
the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2015-17 (ASU 2015-17), “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.”
This guidance was issued to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes. The amendments in this update require that deferred
tax liabilities and assets to be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. This ASU is effective
for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively with early adoption permitted
at the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We have not early adopted this update. As of December 31, 2015 and 2016,
the Company recorded current deferred tax assets amounted to RMB 79,100,567 and RMB 130,675,655, respectively, and current deferred
tax liabilities amounted to RMB 9,266,399 and RMB 17,074,064, respectively. We believe that adoption of this ASU will not have
a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-01 (ASU 2016-01), “Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement
of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The main objective of this update is to enhance the reporting model for financial
instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. The new guidance addresses certain
aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual
reporting periods, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption by public entities
is permitted only for certain provisions. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-02 (ASU 2016-02), “Leases”. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize
a lease liability and a lease asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on its balance
sheet. The update also expands the required quantitative and qualitative disclosures surrounding leases. This update is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with earlier application permitted.
We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-06 (ASU 2016-06), “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt
Instruments”. This new standard simplifies the embedded derivative analysis for debt instruments containing contingent call
or put options by removing the requirement to assess whether a contingent event is related to interest rates or credit risks. This
new standard will be effective for us on January 1, 2017. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on our
consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-07 (ASU 2016-07), “Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying
the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting,” which eliminates the requirement to retrospectively apply the equity
method in previous periods. Instead, the investor must apply the equity method prospectively from the date the investment qualifies
for the equity method. The amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process
of evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-09 (ASU 2016-09), “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718),” which simplifies
several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions for both public and nonpublic entities, including
the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement
of cash flows. The new guidance, which is part of the Board’s simplification initiative, also contains two practical expedients
under which nonpublic entities can use a simplified method to estimate the expected term of an award and make a one-time election
to switch from fair value measurement to intrinsic value measurement for liability-classified awards. The ASU is effective for
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adopt is permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of
the standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-13 (ASU 2016-13), “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses”, which introduces new guidance
for credit losses on instruments within its scope. The new guidance introduces an approach based on expected losses to estimate
credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including, but not limited to, trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity
debt securities, loans and net investments in leases. The new guidance also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale
debt securities and requires the entities to determine whether all or a portion of the unrealized loss on an available-for-sale
debt security is a credit loss. The standard also indicates that entities may not use the length of time a security has been in
an unrealized loss position as a factor in concluding whether a credit loss exists. The ASU is effective for public companies for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for
all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are in
the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-15 (ASU 2016-15), “Statement of Cash Flows,” a proposed ASU on restricted cash in response
to an EITF consensus-for-exposure. The proposed ASU would require an entity to include in its cash and cash-equivalent balances
in the statement of cash flows those amounts that are deemed to be restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The proposal’s
primary purpose is to eliminate the diversity in practice related to how entities classify and present changes in restricted cash
in the cash flow statement in accordance with ASC 230. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December
15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial
statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-16 (ASU 2016-16), “Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory”.
The new guidance requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than
inventory when the transfer occurs, rather than when the asset is sold to an outside party. The guidance is effective for annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption
is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period (as of the first interim period if an entity issues interim financial
statements). The new guidance requires adoption on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly
to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard
on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2016-18 (ASU 2016-18), “Statement of Cash Flows,” which amends ASC 230 to add or clarify guidance
on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for annual and interim
periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the
standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update 2017-01 (ASU 2017-01), “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,”
which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as
acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard introduces a screen for determining when assets acquired are not
a business and clarifies that a business must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that contribute to an output
to be considered a business. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods
within that reporting period. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2017-04 (ASU 2017-04), “Simplifies Goodwill Impairment Test,” which removes the requirement to
compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. As a result,
under the ASU, “an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of
a reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount
exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated
to that reporting unit.” The ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We are in
the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements.
|
C.
|
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.
|
Research and Development
We focus our research and development efforts
on improving our manufacturing efficiency, the quality of our products and next generation PV technology. As of December 31,
2016, our research and development team consisted of 194 experienced researchers and engineers, of which, 91 experienced engineers
were located in the Shangrao Economic Development Zone of Jiangxi Province and 103 experienced engineers were located in Haining,
Zhejiang Province. In July 2012, we were selected as a finalist for the “Solar power projects in North America”
category of the Intersolar Award 2012, which is presented each year to award innovation in the international solar industry. In
January 2013, we were honored as the most promising enterprise by China Energy News and the China Institute of Energy Economics
Research.
In addition to our full time research and
development team, we also involve employees from our manufacturing department to work on our research and development projects
on a part-time basis. We plan to enhance our research and development capability by recruiting additional experienced engineers
specialized in the solar power industry. Certain members of our senior management spearhead our research and development efforts
and set strategic directions for the advancement of our products and manufacturing processes.
We have entered into a cooperative agreement
with Nanchang University in Jiangxi Province, China and established a joint PV materials research center on the campus of Nanchang
University. Under the terms of the agreement, the research center is staffed with faculty members and students in doctoral and
master programs from the material science and engineering department of Nanchang University as well as our technical personnel.
The research center focuses on the improvement of our manufacturing process, solution of technical problems in our silicon wafer
and solar module production process and the research and development of new materials and technologies. The research center also
provides on-site technical support to us and training for our employees. Under the agreement, any intellectual property developed
by the research center will belong to us. The research center has assisted us in improving the quality of our silicon wafers, including
the conversion efficiency of our silicon wafers, as well as our silicon wafer production process. We also engage other universities
in our research and development efforts. For example, in December 2013, we announced that we will partner with Beijing University’s
Solar Power Engineering Center to construct the university’s first experimental PV power plant on campus, which will be used
for collecting and analyzing data the power generation capabilities of PV modules when exposed to various conditions. In 2014,
we established a long-term cooperative relationship with the State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials of Zhejiang University and
have launched a number of research and development projects since then. In 2015, we started to work with the Australian National
University to explore certain cutting-edge battery technologies. In 2016, we established cooperative relationship with Sun Yat-Sen
University and the National University of Singapore in the research of solar modules and solar cells, respectively.
We believe that the continual improvement
of our research and development capability is vital to maintaining our long-term competitiveness. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, our research
and development expenses were approximately RMB106.6 million, RMB143.7 million and RMB181.1 million (US$26.1 million), respectively.
We intend to continue to devote management and financial resources to research and development as well as to seek cooperative relationships
with other academic institutions to further lower our overall production costs, increase the conversion efficiency rate of our
solar power products and improve our product quality.
Intellectual Property
As of the date of this annual report, we
have been granted 253 patents by the State Intellectual Property Office of the PRC, including 230 utility model patents, 20 invention
patent and 3 design patents. We also have 231 pending patent applications. These patents and patent applications relate to
the technologies utilized in our manufacturing processes. We intend to continue to assess appropriate opportunities for patent
protection of critical aspects of our technologies. We also rely on a combination of trade secrets and employee and third-party
confidentiality agreements to safeguard our intellectual property. Our research and development employees are required to enter
into agreements that require them to assign to us all inventions, designs and technologies that they develop during the terms of
their employment with us. We have not been a party to any intellectual property claims since our inception.
We filed trademark registration applications
with the PRC Trademark Office, World Intellectual Property Organization, or WIPO and trademark authorities in other countries and
regions. As of the date of this annual report, we have been granted 223 trademarks in the PRC, such as “
”, “
”
and “
”, and six trademarks in Hong Kong and Taiwan, including “
”, and “
”.We also have
three trademarks registered in WIPO. We have pending trademark applications of 42 trademarks in 33 countries and regions, including
India, Thailand, and South Africa. In addition, we have registered four trademarks in the United States, three trademarks in Canada
and eleven trademarks in Europe.
Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this
annual report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events for 2016 that are reasonably likely
to have a material effect on our net revenues, income, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause reported
consolidated financial information not necessarily to be indicative of future operating results or financial conditions.
|
E.
|
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
|
Other than disclosed in this annual report,
we have no other outstanding financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of our related parties.
We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as shareholder’s equity or
that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest
in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do
not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to
us or that engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us. We have not entered into nor do we expect
to enter into any off-balance sheet arrangements.
|
F.
|
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
|
The following table sets forth our contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2016:
Continuing operations
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
less than
1 year
|
|
|
2-3 years
|
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
|
more than
5 years
|
|
|
|
(RMB in thousands)
|
|
Short-term Debt Obligations*
|
|
|
5,585,583
|
|
|
|
5,585,583
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Long-term Debt Obligations*
|
|
|
531,543
|
|
|
|
19,011
|
|
|
|
212,645
|
|
|
|
245,030
|
|
|
|
54,857
|
|
Convertible Senior Notes*
|
|
|
425,226
|
|
|
|
425,226
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
86,417
|
|
|
|
43,826
|
|
|
|
25,414
|
|
|
|
5,178
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Capital Commitment
|
|
|
878,794
|
|
|
|
783,540
|
|
|
|
95,254
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,507,563
|
|
|
|
6,857,186
|
|
|
|
333,312
|
|
|
|
250,208
|
|
|
|
66,857
|
|
* Includes accrued interests.
We make “forward-looking statements”
throughout this annual report. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement of historical fact (such as when we
describe what we “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” will occur, what “will” or
“could” happen, and other similar statements), you must remember that our expectations may not be correct, even though
we believe that they are reasonable. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described in this annual report will
happen as described or that they will happen at all. You should read this annual report completely and with the understanding that
actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward-looking statements made in this annual report
relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation, beyond that required by law,
to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made, even
though our situation will change in the future.
Whether actual results will conform to our
expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, and reflect
future business decisions that are subject to change. Some of the assumptions, future results and levels of performance expressed
or implied in the forward-looking statements we make inevitably will not materialize, and unanticipated events may occur which
will affect our results. “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” describes the principal contingencies and
uncertainties to which we believe we are subject. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
|
ITEM 6.
|
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
|
A.
|
Directors and Senior Management
|
The following table sets forth information
regarding our directors and executive officers:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Xiande Li
|
|
42
|
|
Chairman of the board of directors
|
Kangping Chen
|
|
44
|
|
Director and chief executive officer
|
Xianhua Li
|
|
43
|
|
Director and vice president
|
Longgen Zhang
|
|
53
|
|
Director and financial advisor
|
Wing Keong Siew
|
|
66
|
|
Independent director
|
Steven Markscheid
|
|
63
|
|
Independent director
|
Yingqiu Liu
|
|
67
|
|
Independent director
|
Haiyun (Charlie) Cao
|
|
40
|
|
Chief financial officer
|
Musen Yu
|
|
68
|
|
Vice president
|
Zhiqun Xu
|
|
50
|
|
Vice president
|
Mr. Xiande Li
is a founder of
our company, the chairman of our board of directors. Prior to founding our company, he served as the marketing manager at Zhejiang
Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. from 2003 to 2004, where his responsibilities included overseeing and optimizing day-to-day
operations. From 2005 to 2006, he was the chief operations supervisor of ReneSola, a related company listed on the AIM market of
the London Stock Exchange in 2006, then dual listed on the NYSE in 2008, where he was in charge of marketing and operation management.
Mr. Li is a brother of Mr. Xianhua Li and the brother-in-law of Mr. Kangping Chen.
Mr. Kangping Chen
is a founder,
director and the chief executive officer of our company. Prior to founding our company, he was the chief financial officer of Zhejiang
Supor Cookware Company Ltd., a company listed on the PRC A share market, from October 2003 to February 2008, where his
major responsibilities included establishing and implementing its overall strategy and annual business plans. Mr. Chen is
the brother-in-law of Mr. Xiande Li.
Mr. Xianhua Li
is a founder,
director and vice president of our company. Prior to founding our company, Mr. Li served as the chief engineer of Yuhuan Automobile
Company, where his major responsibilities included conducting and managing technology research and development activities and supervising
production activities, from 1995 to 2000. From 2000 to 2006, he was the factory director of Zhejiang Yuhuan Solar Energy Source
Co., Ltd., where he was responsible for managing its research and development activities. Mr. Li is a brother of Mr. Xiande
Li.
Mr. Longgen Zhang
has been our
director since May 2014 and our financial advisor since September 2014. He was our chief financial officer from September 2008
to September 2014. Prior to joining us, Mr. Zhang served as a director and the chief financial officer of Xinyuan Real
Estate Co., Ltd., a company listed on the NYSE, from August 2006 to October 2008. Mr. Zhang served as the chief
financial officer at Crystal Window and Door Systems, Ltd. in New York from 2002 to 2006. He has a master’s degree in professional
accounting and a master’s degree in business administration from West Texas A&M University and a bachelor’s degree
in economic management from Nanjing University in China. Mr. Zhang is a U.S. certified public accountant.
Mr. Wing Keong Siew
has been
a director of our company since May 2008. Mr. Siew founded Hupomone Capital Partners in 2003. Mr. Siew was the president
of H&Q Asia Pacific China and Hong Kong from 1998 to 2003 and a general manager of Fairchild Systems for Asia, managing director
of Mentor Graphics Asia Pacific and managing director of Compaq Computer Corporation from January 1988 to September 1988.
In 1995, he formed a joint venture with UBS AG to raise a China Private Equity Fund. He worked as senior vice president of H&Q
Singapore from 1989 to 1995. Mr. Siew received his bachelor’s degree in electrical and electronics engineering from
Singapore University in 1975 and his presidential/key executive MBA from Pepperdine University in 1999.
Mr. Steven Markscheid
has been
an independent director of our company since September 15, 2009. Mr. Markscheid is a venture partner at DealGlobe, a Shanghai
based investment bank. He serves as independent non-executive director of CNinsure, Inc., Ener-Core Inc., ZZ Capital International
Ltd., ChinaCast Education Corporation, and is also a trustee of Princeton-in-Asia. From 1998 to 2006, Mr. Markscheid worked for
GE Capital. During his time with GE, he led GE Capital's business development activities in China and Asia Pacific, primarily acquisitions
and direct investments. Prior to GE, he worked with the Boston Consulting Group throughout Asia. Mr. Markscheid was a commercial
banker for ten years in London, Chicago, New York, Hong Kong and Beijing with Chase Manhattan Bank and First National Bank of Chicago.
He began his career with the US-China Business Council, in Washington D.C. and Beijing. He received his bachelor’s degree
in East Asian Studies from Princeton University in 1976, his master’s degree in international affairs from Johns Hopkins
University in 1980 and an MBA from Columbia University in 1991.
Mr. Yingqiu Liu
has been an
independent director of our company since April 2015. Mr. Liu is a member of the China Federation of Industry and Commerce
Committee, a Specially Invited Vice President of the China Association of Small and Medium Enterprises, a Vice Director of China
Research Society of Urban Development, a member of the Chinese Economic Social Development Council, a member of China International
Culture Exchange Centre and the Director General of the Center for Private Economic Studies in the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
(“CASS”). Mr. Liu was previously the President of the University of CASS, the Vice Director General of Scientific
Research Bureau of CASS, a visiting professor in University of Michigan, the Vice-Governor of Hulun Buir League in Inner-Mongolia,
the Director of Macroeconomics Research Department of the Economic Institute in CASS and the Vice-Director of Socialist economic
theory Research Department in Nankai University. Mr. Liu graduated from Nankai University with a doctor degree in economics
in April 1991. In 1993, Mr. Liu was recognized as an expert who enjoys the life-time special allowance by the State Council.
Mr. Haiyun (Charlie) Cao
has
been our chief financial officer since September 2014. He was our financial controller from February 2012 to September 2014.
Prior to joining us, Mr. Cao served as a senior audit manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers from 2002 to 2012. Mr. Cao holds
professional accounting qualifications, including AICPA and CICPA. He has a master’s degree in management science and engineering
from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics in 2002 and a bachelor’s degree in accounting from Jiangxi University in
1999.
Mr. Musen Yu
is vice president
of our company. Prior to joining us in 2007, he was a researcher of the Coal and Gold Production Bureau of the Shangrao Municipality
from 2005 to 2007, head of the Coal and Gold Production Bureau of the Shangrao Municipality from 2000 to 2005 and the deputy head
of the Coal and Gold Production Bureau of the Shangrao Municipality from 1992 to 2002. Mr. Yu was the party committee secretary
of the Mining Affairs Bureau of Le Municipality from 1986 to 1992. Mr. Yu was the deputy secretary of the Party Committee and secretary
of the Party Disciplinary Committee of the Mining Affairs Bureau of Yinggang Ling from 1984 to 1986. Mr. Yu received his bachelor’s
degree in mining engineering from the China University of Mining and Technology in 1984.
Mr. Zhiqun Xu
is the vice president
of our company and the general manager of wafer division of our company. Prior to joining us in December 2008, Mr. Xu
served as an executive Vice President of Hareon Solar Technology Co., Ltd. from October 2007 to November 2008. From January 2005
to September 2007, Mr. Xu was a sales and marketing manager of Saint Gobain Quartz (Jinzhou) Co., Ltd. Mr. Xu was
a technical director of semiconductor wafer division in Shanghai Shenhe Thermo-Magnetics Electronics Co., Ltd. from April 2002
to December 2004. In addition, he was a project manager and deputy general manager of production of Shanghai General Silicon
Material Co., Ltd. from February 2000 to March 2002. Mr. Xu was a manager of production and technology department
of MCL Electronics Material Co., Ltd. from April 1996 to January 2000. In 1990, he joined Luoyang Monocrystalline Silicon
Factory as a monocrystalline growth process engineer. Mr. Xu received a bachelor’s degree in science from Jilin University
in 1990.
The business address of our directors and
executive officers is c/o JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd., 1 Jingke Road, Shangrao Economic Development Zone, Jiangxi Province, 334100,
People’s Republic of China.
|
B.
|
Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers
|
All directors receive reimbursements from
us for expenses necessarily and reasonably incurred by them for providing services to us or in the performance of their duties.
Our directors who are also our employees receive compensation in the form of salaries in their capacity as our employees.
In 2016, we paid cash compensation in the
aggregate amount of RMB23.8 million (US$3.4 million) to our executive officers and directors. The total amount we set aside for
the pension or retirement or other benefits of our executive officers and directors was approximately RMB399.1 thousand (US$57.5
thousand) in 2016.
Share Incentive Plans
2009 Long Term Incentive Plan
We adopted our 2009 Long Term Incentive
Plan on July 10, 2009, which was subsequently amended and restated. Our 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan provides for the grant
of incentive plan options, restricted shares, restricted share units, share appreciation rights and other share-based awards, referred
to as the “Awards.” The purpose of the 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan is to attract, retain and motivate key directors,
officers and employees responsible for the success and growth of our company by providing them with appropriate incentives and
rewards and enabling them to participate in the growth of our company. We have reserved 9,325,122 ordinary shares for issuance
under our 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan.
Plan Administration.
Our 2009 Long
Term Incentive Plan is administered by a committee appointed by our board of directors or in the absence of a committee, our board
of directors. In each case, our board of directors or the committee will determine the provisions and terms and conditions of each
award grant, including, but not limited to, the exercise price, time at which each of the Awards will be granted, number of shares
subject to each Award, vesting schedule, form of payment of exercise price and other applicable terms. The plan administrator may
also grant Awards in substitution for options or other equity interests held by individuals who become employees of our company
as a result of our acquisition or merger with the individual’s employer. If necessary to conform the Awards to the interests
for which they are substitutes, the plan administrator may grant substitute Awards under terms and conditions that vary from those
that the 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan otherwise requires. Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing to the contrary, any Award
to any participant who is a U.S. taxpayer will be adjusted appropriately to comply with Code Section 409A or 424, if applicable.
Award Agreement.
Awards granted
under our 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan are evidenced by an Award Agreement that sets forth the terms, conditions and limitations
for each award grant, which includes, among other things, the vesting schedule, exercise price, type of option and expiration date
of each award grant.
Eligibility.
We may grant awards
to an employee, director or consultant of our company, or any business, corporation, partnership, limited liability company or
other entity in which our company holds a substantial ownership interest, directly or indirectly, but which is not a subsidiary
and which in each case our board of directors designates as a related entity for purposes of the 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan.
Option Term.
The term of each option
granted under the 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. If an incentive stock option is
granted to an eligible participant who owns more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of our share capital, the term of
such option shall not exceed five years from the date of grant.
Exercise Price.
In the case of non-qualified
stock option, the per share exercise price of shares purchasable under an option shall be determined by our board of directors
and specified in the Award Agreement. In the case of incentive stock option, the per share exercise price of shares purchasable
under an option shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value per share at the time of grant. However, if we grant an incentive
stock option to an employee, who at the time of that grant owns shares representing more than 10% of the total combined voting
power of all classes of our share capital, the exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of our ordinary shares
on the date of that grant.
Amendment and Termination.
Our
board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan at any time and for any reason, provided that
no amendment, suspension, or termination shall be made that would alter or impair any rights and obligations of a participant under
any award theretofore granted without such participant’s consent. Unless terminated earlier, our 2009 Long Term Incentive
Plan shall continue in effect for a term of ten years from the effective date of the 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan.
2014 Equity Incentive Plan
We adopted our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan
in August 2014. Our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of options, share appreciation rights and other share-based
awards such as restricted shares, referred to as “Awards,” to our directors, key employees or consultants up to 12,796,745
of our ordinary shares. The purpose of the plan is to aid us and our affiliates in recruiting and retaining key employees, directors
or consultants of outstanding ability and to motivate such employees, directors or consultants to exert their best efforts on behalf
of us and our affiliates by providing incentives through the granting of awards. Our board of directors expects that it will benefit
from the added interest which such key employees, directors or consultants will have in our welfare as a result of their proprietary
interest in our success. The following paragraphs summarize the terms of the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan.
Types of Awards.
The 2014 Equity
Incentive Plan permits the awards of options, share appreciation rights or other share-based awards.
Administration.
Our 2014 Equity Incentive
Plan is administered by our compensation committee. The compensation committee is authorized to interpret the plan, to establish,
amend and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the plan, and to make any other determinations that it deems necessary
or desirable for the administration of the plan. The compensation committee will determine the provisions, terms and conditions
of each award consistent with the provisions of our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, including, but not limited to, the exercise price
for an option, vesting schedule of options and restricted shares, forfeiture provisions, form of payment of exercise price and
other applicable terms.
Option Exercise.
The term of options
granted under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The consideration to be paid
for our ordinary shares upon exercise of an option or purchase of shares underlying the option may include cash, or its equivalent,
ordinary shares of our company, or any combination of the foregoing methods of payment, or consideration received by us in a cashless
exercise.
Change in Control.
In the case of
a change in control event, which is the sale or disposal of all, or substantially all of our assets, the acquisition by a third
party of more than 50% of the voting power in our company by way of a merger, consolidation, tender or exchange offer or otherwise,
the compensation committee may decide that all outstanding awards that are unexercisable or otherwise unvested or subject to lapse
restrictions will automatically be deemed exercisable or otherwise vested or no longer subject to lapse restrictions, as the case
may be, as of immediately prior to such change in control event. The compensation committee may also decide to cancel such awards
for fair value (as determined in its sole discretion), provide for the issuance of substitute awards that will substantially preserve
the otherwise applicable terms of any affected awards previously granted, or provide that affected options will be exercisable
for a period of at least 15 days prior to the change in control event but not thereafter.
Amendment and Termination of Plan.
Our
board of directors may at any time amend, alter or discontinue our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. Amendments or alterations to our
2014 Equity Incentive Plan are subject to shareholder approval if they increase the total number of shares reserved for the purposes
of the plan or change the maximum number of shares for which awards may be granted to any participant, provided in each case only
to the extent such shareholder approval is required by stock exchange rules. Amendment, alteration or discontinuation of our 2014
Equity Incentive Plan cannot be made without the consent of a recipient of awards if such action would diminish the rights of that
recipient under the awards, provided that the board may amend the plan as it deems necessary to permit the granting of awards to
meet the requirements of applicable laws and stock exchange rules.
Unless terminated earlier, our 2014 Equity
Incentive Plan shall continue in effect for a term of ten years from the date of adoption.
2014
Equity Incentive Plan of JinkoSolar Power
In
October 2014, JinkoSolar Power adopted its 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “JinkoSolar Power 2014 Plan”), which permits
the grant of stock options, restricted shares and restricted share units of JinkoSolar Power to its employees, directors and consultants
of JinkoSolar Power. Under the plan, a total of 12,766 ordinary shares (12,766,000 shares post the thousand-for-one share split
by JinkoSolar Power in April 2015) of JinkoSolar Power were initially reserved for issuance.
On
May 4, 2015, JinkoSolar Power granted 8,680,880 share options to its directors, officers and employees, under JinkoSolar Power
2014 Plan to purchase ordinary shares of JinkoSolar Power. The exercise price of the share option is US$3.9166 per share and the
term is 10 years from the date of grant. Subject to the individuals’ continued employment with JinkoSolar Power, and only
upon the completion of an IPO of JinkoSolar Power, the option shall vest and become exercisable with respect to the vesting schedule
as following.
|
·
|
7,021,300 share options granted to directors and employees will vest and exercisable
in 5 successive equal annual installments on the last day of each year from grant date.
|
|
·
|
1,659,580 share options granted to an officer will vest by 40% on the grant date, and
30% on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date. In addition, if the officer’s employment with JinkoSolar
Power is terminated as a result of certain defined events or situations, any then unvested share options for this officer will
immediately become fully vested.
|
The
disposition of our downstream solar power projects business triggered immediate vesting of the share options pursuant to the terms
of the share option agreements. We fully recognized share based compensation expense amounted to RMB113.7 million in the discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. At the same time, JinkoSolar Power signed agreements with the relevant employees
to cancel and terminate the share options granted irrevocably and unconditionally with no consideration.
Share Options
As of the date of this annual report, options
to purchase 14,616,086 ordinary shares are outstanding. The following table summarizes the outstanding options that we granted
to our directors and executive officers and to other individuals as a group under our share incentive plans as of the date of
this annual report. We did not grant our directors and executive officers any outstanding options other than the individuals named
below.
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
(US$)
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Expiration Date
|
Kangping Chen
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3.2875
|
|
|
October 10, 2014
|
|
October 9, 2024
|
Xiande Li
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3.2875
|
|
|
October 10, 2014
|
|
October 9, 2024
|
Haiyun (Charlie) Cao
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1.42475
|
|
|
December 21, 2012
|
|
January 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3.2875
|
|
|
October 10, 2014
|
|
October 9, 2024
|
Xianhua Li
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3.2875
|
|
|
October 10, 2014
|
|
October 9, 2024
|
Steven Markscheid
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3.2875
|
|
|
October 10, 2014
|
|
October 9, 2024
|
Yingqiu Liu
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3.2875
|
|
|
April 13, 2015
|
|
April 13, 2025
|
Wing Keong Siew
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3.2875
|
|
|
October 10, 2014
|
|
October 9, 2024
|
Zhiqun Xu
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1.42475
|
|
|
October 1, 2011
|
|
September 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3.2875
|
|
|
October 10, 2014
|
|
October 9, 2024
|
Longgen Zhang
|
|
|
680,000
|
**
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
August 28, 2009
|
|
October 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
672,840
|
**
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
|
November 3, 2011
|
|
October 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
**
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
October 1, 2013
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
160,000
|
**
|
|
|
3.2875
|
|
|
October 10, 2014
|
|
October 9, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 28, 2009 to
|
|
August 28, 2016 to
|
Other Employees
|
|
|
8,096,504
|
|
|
|
1.42~6.50
|
|
|
December 21, 2012
|
|
January 31,2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2013
|
|
September 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2013
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 10, 2014
|
|
October 9, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 15,2016
|
|
November 15,2026
|
|
*
|
Upon exercise of all share options, would beneficially own less than 1.0% of our then outstanding share capital.
|
|
**
|
The outstanding shares will be beneficially owned upon exercise of all options.
|
Board of Directors
Our board of directors currently consists
of seven directors. The law of our home country, which is the Cayman Islands, does not require a majority of the board of directors
of our company to be composed of independent directors, nor does the Cayman Islands law require that of a compensation committee
or a nominating committee. We intend to follow our home country practice with regard to composition of the board of directors.
A director is not required to hold any shares in the company by way of qualification. A director who is in any way, whether directly
or indirectly, interested in a contract or transaction or proposed contract or transaction with our company must declare the nature
of his interest at a meeting of the directors. Subject to the NYSE rules and disqualification by the chairman of the relevant board
meeting, a director may vote in respect of any contract or transaction or proposed contract or transaction notwithstanding that
he may be interested therein and if he does so his vote shall be counted and he may be counted in the quorum at the relevant board
meeting at which such contract or transaction or proposed contract or transaction is considered. Our board of directors may exercise
all of the powers of our company to borrow money, and to mortgage or charge our undertakings, property and uncalled capital, and
to issue debentures or other securities whenever money is borrowed or pledged as security for any debt, liability or obligation
of our company or of any third party.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We have an audit committee, a compensation
committee and a nominating committee under the board of directors. We have adopted a charter for each of the three committees.
Each committee’s members and functions are described below.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee consists of Steven Markscheid,
Yingqiu Liu and Wing Keong Siew, and is chaired by Steven Markscheid. All of the members of the audit committee satisfy the “independence”
requirements of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, Section 303A, and meet the criteria for “independence” under Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act. The audit committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the financial
statements of our company. The audit committee is responsible for, among other things:
|
·
|
selecting the independent auditors and pre-approving all auditing and non-auditing services permitted to be performed by the
independent auditors;
|
|
·
|
reviewing with the independent auditors any audit problems or difficulties and management’s response;
|
|
·
|
reviewing and approving all proposed related-party transactions, as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities
Act;
|
|
·
|
discussing the annual audited financial statements with management and the independent auditors;
|
|
·
|
reviewing major issues as to the adequacy of our internal controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of material
control deficiencies;
|
|
·
|
meeting separately and periodically with management and the independent auditors; and
|
|
·
|
reporting regularly to the full board of directors.
|
Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee consists of Xiande
Li, Kangping Chen and Steven Markscheid, and is chaired by Xiande Li. Steven Markscheid satisfies the “independence”
requirements of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, Section 303A, and meets the criteria for “independence” under
Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Our home country practice differs from the NYSE rules that require the compensation committees
of listed companies to be comprised solely of independent directors. There are, however, no specific requirements under Cayman
Islands law on the composition of compensation committees. The compensation committee assists the board in reviewing and approving
the compensation structure, including all forms of compensation, relating to our directors and executive officers. The compensation
committee is responsible for, among other things:
|
·
|
reviewing and approving the total compensation package for our three most senior executives;
|
|
·
|
reviewing and recommending to the board the compensation of our directors;
|
|
·
|
reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our chief executive officer, evaluating
the performance of our chief executive officer in light of those goals and objectives, and determining the compensation level of
our chief executive officer based on this evaluation;
|
|
·
|
reviewing periodically and making recommendations to the board regarding any long-term incentive compensation or equity plans,
programs or similar arrangements, annual bonuses, employee pension and welfare benefit plans; and
|
|
·
|
reporting regularly to the full board of directors.
|
Nominating Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance
committee consists of Yingqiu Liu, Xiande Li and Steven Markscheid, and is chaired by Xiande Li., Yingqiu Liu and Steven Markscheid
satisfy the “independence” requirements of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, Section 303A, and meet the criteria
for “independence” under Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Our home country practice differs from the NYSE rules
that require the nominating committees of listed companies to be comprised solely of independent directors. There are, however,
no specific requirements under Cayman Islands law on the composition of nominating committees. The nominating and corporate governance
committee assists the board of directors in selecting individuals qualified to become our directors and in determining the composition
of the board and its committees. The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for, among other things:
|
·
|
identifying and recommending to the board nominees for election by the shareholders or appointment by the board, or for appointment
to fill any vacancy;
|
|
·
|
reviewing annually with the board the current composition of the board with regard to characteristics such as knowledge, skills,
experience, expertise and diversity required for the board as a whole;
|
|
·
|
identifying and recommending to the board the directors to serve as members of the board’s committees;
|
|
·
|
developing and recommending to the board of directors a set of corporate governance guidelines and principles applicable to
the company;
|
|
·
|
monitoring compliance with our code of business conduct and ethics, including reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our
procedures to ensure proper compliance; and
|
|
·
|
reporting regularly to the full board of directors.
|
Duties of Directors
Under Cayman Islands law, our directors
owe to us fiduciary duties, including a duty of loyalty, a duty to act honestly and a duty to act in good faith and in what they
consider to be our best interests. Our directors also have a duty to exercise the skill they actually possess and such care and
diligence that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. In fulfilling their duty of care to us,
our directors must ensure compliance with our memorandum and articles of association, as amended and restated from time to time.
Our Company has the right to seek damages if a duty owed by our directors is breached.
Terms of Directors and Executive Officers
One-third of our directors for the time
being (or, if the number of our directors is not a multiple of three, the number nearest to but not greater than one-third) will
retire from office by rotation at each annual general meeting. However, the chairman of our board of directors will not be subject
to retirement by rotation or be taken into account in determining the number of our directors to retire in each year. A director
will cease to be a director if, among other things, the director (i) becomes bankrupt or makes any arrangement or composition
with his creditors, (ii) dies or is found by our company to be or becomes of unsound mind, (iii) resigns his office by notice
in writing to our Company, (iv) without special leave of absence from our board of directors, is absent from meetings of our board
of directors for six consecutive months and the board resolves that his office be vacated or (v) is removed from office pursuant
to any other provision of our memorandum and articles of association.
Our officers are appointed by and serve
at the discretion of the board of directors.
Employment Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements
with each of our executive officers. These employment agreements became effective on the signing date and will remain effective
through 2017. We may terminate an executive officer’s employment for cause, at any time, without prior notice or remuneration,
for certain acts of the officer, including, but not limited to, failure to satisfy our job requirements during the probation period,
a material violation of our regulations, failure to perform agreed duties, embezzlement that causes material damage to us, or conviction
of a crime. An executive officer may terminate his or her employment for cause at any time, including, but not limited to, our
failure to pay remuneration and benefits or to provide a safe working environment pursuant to the employment agreement, or our
engagement in deceptive or coercive conduct that causes him or her to sign the agreement. If an executive officer breaches any
terms of the agreement, which leads to results, including, but not limited to, termination of the agreement, resignation without
notice, or failure to complete resignation procedures within the stipulated period, he or she shall be responsible for our economic
losses and shall compensate us for such losses. We may renew the employment agreements with our executive officers.
As of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016,
we had a total of 10,268, 14,035 and 16,920 employees, respectively. Substantially all of these employees are located in China
with a small portion of employees based in the U.S., Europe and other countries and regions. The following table sets forth the
number of our employees categorized by main category of activities and as a percentage of our workforce as of dates indicated:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Manufacturing and engineering
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
14,149
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
Quality control
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Purchasing and logistics
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,268
|
|
|
|
14,035
|
|
|
|
16,920
|
|
We believe we maintain a good working relationship
with our employees, and we have not experienced any labor disputes or any difficulty in recruiting staff for our operations. In
October 2013 and 2014, we were named one of the Top 100 Best Employers in China in 2013 by the World Executive Journal in
conjunction with the World HR Laboratory, Bossline and CEO-ZINE.
Our employees are not covered by any collective
bargaining agreement. In line with the expansion of our operations, we plan to hire additional employees, including additional
accounting, finance and sales, marketing personnel as well as manufacturing and engineering employees.
In line with local customary practices,
we have made contributions to the social insurance funds which met the requirement of the local minimum wage standard, instead
of the employees’ actual salaries as required, and have not made full contribution to the housing funds. We estimate the
aggregate amount of unpaid social security benefits and housing funds to be RMB208.7 million, RMB281.0 million and RMB355.8 million
(US$51.2 million), respectively, as of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Our failure to make statutory social welfare and housing funds to
our employees could adversely and materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.”
The following table sets forth information
with respect to the beneficial ownership of our shares as of the date of this annual report by:
|
·
|
each of our directors and executive officers; and
|
|
·
|
each person known to us to own beneficially more than 5.0% of our shares.
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
%
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xiande Li
(3)
|
|
|
20,172,750
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
Kangping Chen
(4)
|
|
|
12,005,700
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
Xianhua Li
(5)
|
|
|
6,057,100
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Longgen Zhang
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Wing Keong Siew
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Steven Markscheid
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Yingqiu Liu
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Haiyun (Charlie) Cao
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group
|
|
|
38,235,550
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
Principal Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brilliant Win Holdings Limited
(3)
|
|
|
20,172,750
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
Yale Pride Limited
(4)
|
|
|
12,005,700
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
Peaky Investments Limited
(5)
|
|
|
6,057,100
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange
Act, and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities.
|
|
(2)
|
The percentage of beneficial ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned
by such person or group by 126,773,266 ordinary shares, being the number of shares outstanding as of the date of this annual report
(excluding 867,746 ADSs representing 3,470,984 ordinary shares reserved for future grants under our share incentive plans and 1,723,200
ordinary shares as treasury stock), and the number of ordinary shares underlying options exercisable by such person or group within
60 days of the date of this annual report.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents 20,172,750 ordinary shares held by Brilliant Win Holdings Limited, a British Virgin Islands company which is wholly
owned by HSBC International Trustee Limited in its capacity as trustee of an irrevocable trust constituted under the laws of the
Cayman Islands, with Xiande Li as the settlor and Yixuan Li, daughter of Xiande Li and Cypress Hope Limited, a British Virgin Islands
company wholly owned by Xiande Li, as the beneficiaries. The trust was established for the purposes of Xiande Li’s wealth
management and family succession planning. HSBC International Trustee Limited as trustee of the irrevocable trust will indirectly
hold the shares of Brilliant Win Holdings Limited which in turn holds our ordinary shares. HSBC International Trustee Limited is
a professional trustee company wholly owned by HSBC Holdings plc, a public company and is ultimately controlled by the board of
directors of HSBC Holdings plc which is answerable to the shareholders of HSBC Holdings plc. Xiande Li is the sole director of
Brilliant Win Holdings Limited and as such has the power to vote and dispose of the ordinary shares held by Brilliant Win Holdings
Limited, subject to the powers of HSBC International Trustee Limited as trustee. Therefore, Xiande Li is the beneficial owner of
all our ordinary shares held by Brilliant Win Holdings Limited. The beneficiaries are also beneficial owners of our ordinary shares
held by Brilliant Win Holdings Limited. The registered address of Brilliant Win Holdings Limited is Quastisky Building, PO Box
4389, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Mr. Li is a brother of Mr. Xianhua Li and the brother-in-law of Mr. Kangping
Chen.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents 12,005,700 ordinary shares held by Yale Pride Limited, a British Virgin Islands company which is wholly owned by
HSBC International Trustee Limited in its capacity as trustee of an irrevocable trust constituted under the laws of the Cayman
Islands, with Kangping Chen as the settlor and Min Liang, Dong Chen, Xuanle Chen and Xiaoxuan Chen, all of whom are family members
of Kangping Chen, and Charming Grade Limited, a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned by Kangping Chen, as the beneficiaries.
The trust was established for the purposes of Kangping Chen’s wealth management and family succession planning. HSBC International
Trustee Limited as trustee of the irrevocable trust will indirectly hold the shares of Yale Pride Limited which in turn holds our
ordinary shares. HSBC International Trustee Limited is a professional trustee company wholly owned by HSBC Holdings plc, a public
company and is ultimately controlled by the board of directors of HSBC Holdings plc which is answerable to the shareholders of
HSBC Holdings plc. Kangping Chen is the sole director of Yale Pride Limited and as such has the power to vote and dispose of the
ordinary shares held by Yale Pride Limited, subject to the powers of HSBC International Trustee Limited as trustee. Therefore,
Kangping Chen is the beneficial owner of all our ordinary shares held by Yale Pride Limited. The beneficiaries are also beneficial
owners of our ordinary shares held by Yale Pride Limited. The registered address of Yale Pride Limited is Quastisky Building, PO
Box 4389, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Mr. Chen is the brother-in-law of Mr. Xiande Li.
|
|
(5)
|
Represents 6,057,100 ordinary shares held by Peaky Investments Limited, a British Virgin Islands company which is wholly owned
by HSBC International Trustee Limited in its capacity as trustee of an irrevocable trust constituted under the laws of the Cayman
Islands, with Xianhua Li as the settlor and Jianfen Sheng, Sheng Li and Muxin Li, all of whom are family members of Xianhua Li,
and Talent Galaxy Limited, a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned by Xianhua Li, as the beneficiaries. The trust was established
for the purposes of Xianhua Li’s wealth management and family succession planning. HSBC International Trustee Limited as
trustee of the irrevocable trust will indirectly hold the shares of Peaky Investments Limited which in turn holds our ordinary
shares. HSBC International Trustee Limited is a professional trustee company wholly owned by HSBC Holdings plc, a public company
and is ultimately controlled by the board of directors of HSBC Holdings plc which is answerable to the shareholders of HSBC Holdings
plc. Xianhua Li is the sole director of Peaky Investments Limited and as such has the power to vote and dispose of the ordinary
shares held by Peaky Investments Limited, subject to the powers of HSBC International Trustee Limited as trustee. Therefore, Xianhua
Li is the beneficial owner of all our ordinary shares held by Peaky Investments Limited. The beneficiaries are also beneficial
owners of our ordinary shares held by Peaky Investments Limited. The registered address of Peaky Investments Limited is Quastisky
Building, PO Box 4389, Road Town, Tortola, and British Virgin Islands. Mr. Li is a brother of Mr. Xiande Li.
|
Our ADSs are traded on the NYSE and brokers
or other nominees may hold ADSs in “street name” for customers who are the beneficial owners of the ADSs. As a result,
we may not be aware of each person or group of affiliated persons who beneficially own more than 5.0% of our ordinary shares.
As of the date of this annual report, 126,773,266
ordinary shares are issued and outstanding (excluding 867,746 ADSs representing 3,470,984 ordinary shares reserved for future
grants under our share incentive plans and 1,723,200 ordinary shares as treasury stock). As of the date of this annual report,
we have one record shareholder in the United States, our depositary. We cannot ascertain the exact number of beneficial shareholders
with addresses in the United States.
None of our shareholders has different voting
rights from other shareholders as of the date of this annual report. We are currently not aware of any arrangement that may, at
a subsequent date, result in a change of control of our company.
|
ITEM 7.
|
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Please refer to “Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership.”
|
B.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
Related party balances
The following table sets forth the outstanding
amounts due from/to related parties as of December 31, 2015 and 2016.
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Accounts receivable from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable due from Gausu Jintai Electronic Power Company Ltd.("Gansu Jintai")*
|
|
|
60,973,795
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts receivable from Gansu Heihe Hydropower Industrial Investment LLC. (" Gansu Heihe", in which we own 9% equity interests)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44,616
|
|
Accounts receivable from JinkoSolar Power
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,414,039,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to ReneSola Ltd.
|
|
|
1,021,128
|
|
|
|
661,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivables from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivables from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for sales of solar modules
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
610,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances of travel and other business expenses to executive directors who are also shareholders
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68,106
|
|
Other receivables from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for miscellaneous transactions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,704,113
|
|
Other receivables from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for provision of guarantee
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62,352,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for provision of guarantee
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
173,375,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
61,994,923
|
|
|
|
2,277,446,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable due to a related party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable due to a subsidiary of ReneSola Ltd.
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts payable due to Jiangxi Desun (an entity in which each of the Shareholders holds more than 10%, and collectively hold 73%, of the equity interest)
|
|
|
1,465,985
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for sales of solar modules
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60,541,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables due to a related party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables to Jiangxi Desun for leasing of land and buildings
|
|
|
4,969,104
|
|
|
|
7,528,551
|
|
Payable of travel reimbursement
|
|
|
23,871
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other payables due to Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for payments on behalf of our Company
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68,505,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,471,504
|
|
|
|
136,575,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings due to subsidiaries of China Development Bank**
|
|
|
2,156,500,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest due to subsidiaries of China Development Bank**
|
|
|
3,252,783
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
*
|
Gansu Jintai is an affiliated company in which Jiangxi Jinko Engineering owns 28% equity interest after the disposition
of our downstream solar power projects business in China, and it is no longer our related party.
|
|
**
|
In connection with the issuance of preferred shares
by JinkoSolar Power in July 2014, China Development Bank, through its subsidiary, holds 21% equity interests of JinkoSolar Power
on an as-if-converted basis. The above borrowings represent borrowings from subsidiaries of China Development Bank. After the
disposition of our downstream solar power projects business in China, China Development Bank is no longer our related party.
|
|
(1)
|
Advances of travelling and other business expenses to executive directors who are also shareholders represent the amounts we
advanced to them for expected expenses, charges and incidentals relating to their business development activities.
|
|
(2)
|
Balances due to related parties are interest-free, not collateralized, and have no definitive repayment terms.
|
Related party transactions
In connection with our disposal of downstream
solar project business in China in 2016, we entered into a master service agreement with Jiangxi Jinko Engineering under which
we agreed to provide guarantee for Jiangxi Jinko Engineering’s financing obligations under its separate loan agreements.
In the event that Jiangxi Jinko Engineering fails to perform its obligations under the loan agreements or otherwise defaults thereunder,
we will become liable for Jiangxi Jinko Engineering’s obligations under the loan agreements, which amounted to RMB6.6 billion
(US$945.2 million) as of December 31, 2016.We charge Jiangxi Jinko Engineering service fees for the debt payment guarantee service
according the master service agreement.
In addition, according to the side agreement
among the Company, Jiangxi Jinko Engineering and investors of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering (the original redeemable preferred shareholders
of JinkoSolar Power), the investors of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering will have the right to have the common shares of Jiangxi Jinko
Engineering held by them redeemed, and, as a result of a guarantee issued by us, in the event that Jiangxi Jinko Engineering fails
to perform its redemption obligations, we will become liable for Jiangxi Jinko Engineering’s obligations under the redemption,
which amounted to US$297.3 million as of December 31, 2016. We will also charge Jiangxi Jinko Engineering service fees for the
redemption guarantee service according the master service agreement.
Pursuant to the master service agreement,
guarantee service fee would be settled semi-annually, and we believe that the service fees we charge for the guarantee services
are at market rates.
As of December 31, 2016, we recorded guarantee
fee income receivable of RMB235.7 million (US$33.9 million) and a guarantee liability fair value at fair value of RMB226.1 million
(US$32.6 million). The guarantee liability will be amortized over the expected guarantee period in the subsequent reporting periods.
Other income from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for the guarantee fee amortized during the period from November to December 2016 amounted
to RMB9.6 million (US$1.4 million).
For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015
and 2016, revenues from sales of products and provision of processing services to subsidiaries of ReneSola Ltd. amounted to RMB0.6
million, nil and nil, respectively.
For the year ended December 31,2016, revenues
from sales of products to subsidiaries of Gansu Heihe amounted to RMB103.0 million (US$14.8 million).
After the disposition date of our downstream
solar project business in China through December 31, 2016, sales of solar module products to subsidiaries of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering
amounted to RMB35.5 million (US$5.1 million).
For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015
and 2016, raw materials purchased from a subsidiary of ReneSola Ltd. amounted to RMB23.0 million, RMB0.06 million and nil, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015
and 2016, raw materials purchased from a subsidiary of Jiangxi Desun amounted to RMB1.3 million, nil and nil, respectively.
On January 1, 2008, Jiangxi Desun and Jiangxi
Jinko entered into an operating lease agreement pursuant to which Jiangxi Desun leased its buildings and land use rights to Jiangxi
Jinko for a ten-year period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017. Jiangxi Desun charged Jiangxi Jinko RMB1.1 million (US$0.2
million) in rent for each year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015
and the period from January 1, 2016 through the disposition date of our downstream solar project business in China, borrowings
from subsidiaries of China Development Bank amounted to RMB1,002.1 million, RMB1,210.0 million and RMB90.0 million, respectively.
For the same periods, repayment of borrowings to subsidiaries of China Development Bank amounted to RMB4.0 million, RMB409.6 million
and RMB82.0 million, respectively. For the same periods, interest charges in connection with the borrowings from China Development
Bank amounted to RMB52.9 million, RMB107.0 million and RMB100.8 million, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2015
and 2016, two of our shareholders provided guarantees for several of our short-term and long-term bank borrowings. As of December
31, 2015 and 2016, the balances of short-term borrowings guaranteed by these shareholders were RMB178.0 million and RMB nil, respectively.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2016, the balances of long-term borrowings guaranteed by these shareholders were nil and nil, respectively.
We entered into a RMB90.0 million (US$13.0
million) loan agreement with a domestic bank in 2016 which was collateralized on Jiangxi Desun’s equipment and land use right
amounted to RMB 25.5 million (US$3.7 million).
We entered into a RMB76.3 million (US$10.9
million) loan agreement with Pingan Bank in 2016 which was collateralized on the RMB80.0 million (US$11.5 million) bank deposit
owned by Shanghai JinkoSolar PV Electricity Co. Ltd, a subsidiary of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering.
Employment Agreements
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management
and Employees—C. Board Practices” for details regarding employment agreements with our senior executive officers.
Share Incentives
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management
and Employees—B. Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers” for a description of share options and stock purchase
rights we have granted to our directors, officers and other individuals as a group.
|
C.
|
Interests of Experts and Counsel
|
Not applicable.
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
A.
|
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
|
We have appended consolidated financial statements
filed as part of this annual report. See “Item 18 Financial Statements”.
Legal and Administrative Proceedings
In 2011, SolarWorld Industries America Inc.,
a solar panel manufacturing company in the United States, filed anti-dumping and countervailing duty petitions with the United
States Department of Commerce (the “U.S. Department of Commerce”) and United States International Trade Commission
(the “U.S. International Trade Commission”) against the Chinese solar industry, accusing Chinese producers of CSPV
cells, whether or not assembled into modules, of selling their products (i.e., CSPV cells or modules incorporating these cells)
in the United States at less than fair value, and of receiving financial assistance from the Chinese governments that benefited
the production, manufacture, or exportation of such products. JinkoSolar is on the list of the solar companies subject to such
investigations by the U.S. Department of Commerce. On November 9, 2011, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it
launched the antidumping duty and countervailing duty investigation into the accusations. On December 7, 2012, the U.S. Department
of Commerce issued the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty order. As a result, the cash deposits are required to pay
on import into the U.S. of the CSPV cells, whether or not assembled into modules from China. The announced cash deposit rates applicable
to us are 13.94% (for dumping margin) and 15.24% (for subsidy rate). The actual antidumping duty and countervailing duty rates
at which entries of covered merchandise will be finally assessed may differ from the announced deposit rates because they are subject
to the following administrative reviews by U.S. Department of Commerce. In January 2014, the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated
the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty order with respect to CSPV cells, whether
or not assembled into modules, from China. In July 2014, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued the final results of this
first administrative review, according to which, our tariff rates for dumping and subsidy are 9.67% and 20.94%, respectively. Such
rates apply as the final rates on the import into the U.S. of the CSPV cells, whether or not assembled into modules from China,
from May 25, 2012 to November 30, 2013 for dumping, and from March 26, 2012 to December 31, 2012 for subsidy,
respectively. Such rates will be the cash deposit rates applicable to us from July 14, 2015. In February 2015 and February 2016,
the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated the second administrative and the third administrative review of the antidumping duty
order and countervailing duty order with respect to CSPV cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China, respectively.
In June 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued the final result of this second administrative review. As we were not included
in this second administrative review, the tariff rates applicable to us remained at 9.67% (for dumping margin) and 20.94% (for
subsidy rate) after this review. The third administrative review is pending as of the date of this annual report. In February 2017,
the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated the fourth administrative review of the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty
order with respect to CSPV cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China. The fourth administrative reviews are pending
as of the date of this annual report, and therefore, the final tariff rates applicable to us are subject to change.
In 2013, SolarWorld Industries America Inc.
filed a separate petition with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission resulting in the institution
of new antidumping and countervailing duty investigations against import of certain CSPV products from China. The petitions accused
Chinese producers of such certain CSPV modules of dumping their products in the United States and receiving countervailable subsidies
from the Chinese government. This action excludes from its scope the CSPV cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from China.
In April 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order and countervailing
duty order with respect to CSPV modules assembled in China consisting of CSPV cells produced in a customs territory other than
China, which is pending as of the date of this annual report.
In February 2015, following the affirmative
injury determination made by U.S. International Trade Commission, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued the antidumping duty order
and countervailing duty order. As a result, the final cash deposits are required to pay on import into the U.S. of the CSPV modules
assembled in China consisting of CSPV cells produced in a customs territory other than China. The announced cash deposit rates
applicable to us are 65.36% (for dumping margin) and 38.43% (for subsidy rate). The actual antidumping duty and countervailing
duty rates at which entries of covered merchandise will be finally assessed may differ from the announced deposit rates because
they are subject to the administrative reviews by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Our sales in the United States may be adversely
affected by these anti-dumping and countervailing duties, which may in turn materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations. We made provisions of RMB15.0 million (US$2.2 million) for preliminary U.S. countervailing
and anti-dumping duties in 2016. However, as the final tariff rates applicable to us are subject to the outcome of the administrative
reviews which may be substantially increased by the U.S. Department of Commerce, we cannot assure you that our provision made is
sufficient and our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if the outcome of the administrative
reviews turn out to be negative.
On October 11, 2011, JinkoSolar, along
with our directors and officers at the time of our initial public offering, or the Individual Defendants, and the underwriters
of our initial public offering were named as defendants in a putative shareholder class action lawsuit filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned
Marco Peters v. JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd., et al.,
Case
No. 11-CV-7133 (S.D.N.Y.). In an amended complaint filed on June 1, 2012, the plaintiff, representing a class of all purchasers
and acquirers of ADSs of JinkoSolar between May 13, 2010 and September 22, 2011, inclusive, alleged that the defendants
violated Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, by making material misstatements or failing to disclose material information regarding, among other
things, JinkoSolar’s compliance with environmental regulations at its Haining facility. The amended complaint also asserted
claims against the Individual Defendants for control person liability under Section 15 of the Securities Act and Section 20(a)
of the Exchange Act. On January 22, 2013, the District Court issued a Memorandum and Order dismissing the amended complaint
as against all defendants. The plaintiff appealed the District Court’s Order to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit, which issued an order on July 31, 2014 vacating the District Court’s Order and remanding the case to
the District Court for further proceedings. Defendants filed a further motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On January 22,
2015, JinkoSolar agreed, subject to court approval, to settle the lawsuit. The settlement, if approved, will also resolve all related
claims against JinkoSolar’s officers and directors as well as the underwriters involved in JinkoSolar’s public offerings
during the relevant period. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the members of the proposed class will receive a settlement
fund of $5.05 million, less any court-approved fees. JinkoSolar will contribute a portion of the settlement fund, and JinkoSolar’s
insurers will fund the remaining portion. JinkoSolar will not take any charge in connection with the settlement. JinkoSolar has
denied, and continues to deny, the allegations and is entering into this settlement solely to eliminate the uncertainty, burden
and expense of further protracted litigation. On March 11, 2016, the District Court entered an Order and Final Judgment approving
such settlement, certifying the proposed class for settlement purposes, and dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice.
In July 2008, Jiangxi Jinko entered into
a long-term supply agreement with Wuxi Zhongcai, a producer of polysilicon materials. Jiangxi Jinko provided a prepayment of RMB95.6
million pursuant to such contract. Wuxi Zhongcai subsequently halted production as a result of the adverse changes in the polysilicon
market. In February 2013, Jiangxi Jinko sued Wuxi Zhongcai in Shangrao City Intermediate People’s Court for the refund
of the outstanding balance of our prepayment of RMB93.2 million after deducting delivery made to Jiangxi Jinko by an affiliate
of Wuxi Zhongcai. In February 2013, Wuxi Zhongcai sued Jiangxi Jinko in Shanghai Pudong New Area People’s Court for
approximately RMB2.7 million for breaching the contract by failing to make allegedly required payments and reject the refund of
the prepayment of RMB 95.6 million to Jiangxi Jinko. In December 2015, Jiangxi Jinko made an alternation of the claim under which
Jiangxi Jinko requested the refund of the prepayment of RMB93.2 million, the interests accrued from such prepayment, and the liquidated
damages in the amount of RMB93.2 million. In January 2016, Wuxi Zhongcai also changed the plea, in which Wuxi Zhongcai claimed
for the liquidated damages amounting to approximately RMB102.0 million, the losses suffered from the termination of the agreement
in the amount of RMB150.0 million and rejected the refund of the prepayment of RMB 95.6 million to Jiangxi Jinko. The above two
lawsuits are pending before the Shanghai High People’s court as of the date of this annual report.
In 2010 and 2011, Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang
Qin Ye entered into several agreements for construction projects. In January 2014, Jiangxi Jinko sued Zhejiang Qin Ye for breach
of contract due to the commercial bribery conducted by employees of Zhejiang Qin Ye, the liquidated damages of which amounted to
RMB22.3 million. In May 2015, Zhejiang Qin Ye sued Jiangxi Jinko, claiming for the unpaid contract price in the amount of RMB23.1
million. As of the date of this annual report, the above two lawsuits are still pending for judgment.
Other than as disclosed above, we are currently
not a party to any other material legal or administrative proceedings, and we are not aware of any other material legal or administrative
proceedings threatened against us. We may from time to time become a party to various legal or administrative proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of our business.
Dividend Policy and Dividend Distribution
We have never declared or paid dividends, nor
do we have any present plan to pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs in the foreseeable future. We currently intend
to retain our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business.
We are a holding company incorporated in the
Cayman Islands. We rely principally on dividends paid to us by our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries in China, Jiangxi Jinko
and Zhejiang Jinko, to fund the payment of dividends, if any, to our shareholders. PRC regulations currently permit our PRC subsidiaries
to pay dividends only out of their retained profits, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations.
In addition, our PRC subsidiaries are required to set aside a certain amount of their retained profits each year, if any, to fund
certain statutory reserves. These reserves may not be distributed as cash dividends. Furthermore, when Jiangxi Jinko, Zhejiang
Jinko or JinkoSolar Technology incurs debt on its own behalf, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay
dividends or make other distributions to us.
Subject to our memorandum and articles of association
and applicable laws, our board of directors has complete discretion on whether to pay dividends. Even if our board of directors
decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements
and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.
If we pay any dividends, we will pay our ADS holders to the same extent as holders of our ordinary shares, subject to the terms
of the deposit agreement, including the fees and expenses payable thereunder. Cash dividends on our ADSs,
if any, will be
paid in U.S. dollars.
The principal regulations governing distribution
of dividends paid by wholly foreign owned enterprises include:
|
·
|
Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law (1986), as amended; and
|
|
·
|
Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law Implementation Rules (1990), as amended.
|
Under these regulations, foreign-invested enterprises
in China may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards
and regulations. In addition, a wholly foreign owned enterprise in China is required to set aside at least 10.0% of their after-tax
profit based on PRC accounting standards each year to its general reserves until the accumulative amount of such reserves reach
50.0% of its registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. A foreign invested enterprise has the
discretion to allocate a portion of its after-tax profits to staff welfare and bonus funds and expansion funds, which may not be
distributed to equity owners.
Except as disclosed elsewhere in this annual
report, we have not experienced any significant changes since the date of our audited consolidated financial statements included
in this annual report.
|
ITEM 9.
|
THE OFFER AND LISTING
|
|
A.
|
Offering and Listing Details
|
Our ADSs, each representing four ordinary shares,
have been listed on the NYSE since May 14, 2010. Our ADSs trade under the symbol “JKS.” For the period from May 14,
2010 to December 31, 2016, the trading price of our ADSs on the NYSE has ranged from US$2.00 to US$41.75 per ADS. The following
table provides the high and low market prices for our ADSs on the NYSE.
|
|
Price per ADS
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
(US$)
|
|
Annual highs and lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (from May 14, 2010)
|
|
|
41.75
|
|
|
|
8.23
|
|
2011
|
|
|
32.21
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
|
2012
|
|
|
10.07
|
|
|
|
2.01
|
|
2013
|
|
|
34.88
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
|
2014
|
|
|
37.98
|
|
|
|
16.83
|
|
2015
|
|
|
32.28
|
|
|
|
14.32
|
|
2016
|
|
|
27.43
|
|
|
|
12.72
|
|
Quarterly highs and lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2015
|
|
|
27.57
|
|
|
|
16.10
|
|
Second Quarter 2015
|
|
|
32.28
|
|
|
|
25.35
|
|
Third Quarter 2015
|
|
|
30.37
|
|
|
|
14.32
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2015
|
|
|
29.50
|
|
|
|
21.08
|
|
First Quarter 2016
|
|
|
27.43
|
|
|
|
16.95
|
|
Second Quarter 2016
|
|
|
24.04
|
|
|
|
18.88
|
|
Third Quarter 2016
|
|
|
21.17
|
|
|
|
14.32
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2016
|
|
|
17.69
|
|
|
|
12.72
|
|
First Quarter 2017 (through March 24, 2017)
|
|
|
17.98
|
|
|
|
13.70
|
|
Monthly highs and lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2016
|
|
|
18.76
|
|
|
|
14.32
|
|
October 2016
|
|
|
17.69
|
|
|
|
15.03
|
|
November 2016
|
|
|
15.73
|
|
|
|
12.72
|
|
December 2016
|
|
|
16.43
|
|
|
|
13.76
|
|
January 2017
|
|
|
16.93
|
|
|
|
13.70
|
|
February 2017
|
|
|
17.98
|
|
|
|
14.13
|
|
March 2017 (through March 24, 2017)
|
|
|
17.58
|
|
|
|
14.95
|
|
Not Applicable.
Our ADSs, each representing four ordinary shares,
have been listed on the NYSE since May 14, 2010 under the symbol “JKS.”
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
|
ITEM 10.
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|
Not Applicable.
|
B.
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association
|
We incorporate by reference into this annual
report the description of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association contained in our F-1 registration statement
(File No. 333-164432), as amended, initially filed with the Commission on February 9, 2010. Our shareholders adopted our amended
and restated memorandum and articles of association on January 8, 2010 and effective upon completion of our initial public
offering of common shares represented by our ADSs.
We have not entered into any material contracts
other than in the ordinary course of business and other than those described in “Item 4. Information on the Company”
or elsewhere in this annual report.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B.
Business Overview—Regulation—Foreign Currency Exchange” and “—Dividend Distribution.”
The following summary of the material Cayman
Islands, Hong Kong, the PRC and United States federal income tax consequences of an investment in our ADSs or ordinary shares is
based upon laws and relevant interpretations thereof in effect as of the date of this annual report, all of which are subject to
change. This summary does not deal with all possible tax consequences relating to an investment in our ADSs or ordinary shares,
such as the tax consequences under United States state or local tax laws, or tax laws of jurisdictions other than the Cayman Islands,
Hong Kong, the PRC and the United States.
Cayman Islands Taxation
The Cayman Islands currently levy no taxes on
individuals or corporations based upon profits, income, gains or appreciation and there is no taxation in the nature of inheritance
tax or estate duty. No Cayman Islands stamp duty will be payable unless an instrument is executed in, or after execution, brought
within the jurisdiction of the Cayman Islands, or produced before a court of the Cayman Islands. The Cayman Islands is not a party
to any double tax treaties that are applicable to any payments made to or by our company. There are no exchange control regulations
or currency restrictions in the Cayman Islands.
Hong Kong Taxation
The following is a summary of the material Hong
Kong tax consequences of the ownership of the ADSs
by an investor that either holds the ADSs (or recognizes gains on a mark-to-market
basis for accounting purposes) or resells the ADSs. This summary does not purport to address all possible tax consequences of the
ownership of the ADSs, and does not take into account the specific circumstances of any particular investors (such as tax-exempt
entities, certain insurance companies, broker-dealers etc.), some of which may be subject to special rules. Accordingly, holders
or prospective purchasers (particularly those subject to special tax rules, such as banks, dealers, insurance companies and tax-exempt
entities) should consult their own tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of purchasing, holding or selling our ADSs. This
summary is based on the tax laws of Hong Kong as in effect on the date of this annual report and is subject to changes and does
not constitute legal or tax advice to you.
Under the current laws of Hong Kong:
|
·
|
No profits tax is imposed in Hong Kong in respect of capital gains from the sale of the ADSs.
|
However, revenue gains from the sale of ADSs
by persons carrying on a trade, profession or business in Hong Kong where the gains are derived from or arise in Hong Kong from
the trade, profession or business will be chargeable to Hong Kong profits tax, which is currently imposed at the rate of 16.5%
on corporations and at the rate of 15% on individuals and unincorporated businesses. Certain categories of taxpayers whose trade,
profession or business consists of buying and selling shares are likely to be regarded as deriving revenue gains rather than capital
gains (for example, financial institutions, insurance companies and securities dealers) unless these taxpayers can prove that the
investment securities are held as capital assets. Subject to the above, gains arising from the sale of ADSs, where the purchases
and sales of ADSs are effected outside of Hong Kong (
e.g
., on the New York Stock Exchange), should not be subject to Hong
Kong profits tax.
|
·
|
According to the current tax practice of the Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department, dividends paid by us on ADSs would not be
subject to any Hong Kong tax, even if received by investors in Hong Kong.
|
|
·
|
No Hong Kong stamp duty is payable on the purchase and sale of the ADSs.
|
People’s Republic of China Taxation
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B.
Business Overview—Regulation—Tax.”
U.S. Federal Income Taxation
Introduction
The following discussion describes the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs (evidenced by ADRs)
by U.S. Holders (as defined below). This discussion applies only to U.S. Holders that hold the ordinary shares or ADSs as capital
assets. This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury regulations
promulgated thereunder, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of
which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, or to different interpretation. This discussion is also based in
part on representations by the depositary and assumes that each obligation under the deposit agreement and any related agreement
will be performed in accordance with its terms. This discussion does not address all of the tax considerations that may be relevant
to specific U.S. Holders in light of their particular circumstances or to U.S. Holders subject to special treatment under U.S.
federal income tax law (such as banks, other financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, retirement plans,
regulated investment companies, partnerships, dealers in securities, brokers, U.S. expatriates, persons who have acquired the shares
or ADSs as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction or other integrated investment, persons that have a “functional
currency” other than the U.S. dollar or persons that own (or are deemed to own) 10% or more (by voting power) of our stock).
If a partnership holds ordinary shares or ADSs, the consequences to a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner
and upon the activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership holding ordinary shares or ADSs should consult its own tax
advisor regarding the U.S. tax consequences of its investment in the ordinary shares or ADSs through the partnership. This discussion
does not address any U.S. state or local or non-U.S. tax considerations or any U.S. federal estate, gift or alternative minimum
tax considerations.
As used in this discussion, the term “U.S.
Holder” means a beneficial owner of the ordinary shares or ADSs, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is (i) an
individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation, or other entity classified as a corporation
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any state thereof, or
the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of the source thereof,
or (iv) a trust with respect to which a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration
and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions, or certain electing trusts that were
in existence on August 19, 1996 and were treated as domestic trusts on that date.
PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX
ADVISORS AS TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO THEM RELATING TO THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF THE
ORDINARY SHARES OR AMERICAN DEPOSITARY SHARES, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY OF U.S. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL TAX LAWS OR NON-U.S.
TAX LAWS, ANY CHANGES IN APPLICABLE TAX LAWS AND ANY PENDING OR PROPOSED LEGISLATION OR REGULATIONS.
ADSs
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
a U.S. Holder of an ADS will be treated as the owner of the ordinary shares represented by the ADSs and exchanges of ordinary shares
for ADSs, and ADSs for ordinary shares, will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
The U.S. Treasury Department has expressed concerns
that intermediaries in the chain of ownership between the holder of an ADS and the issuer of the security underlying the ADS may
be taking actions that are inconsistent with the beneficial ownership of the underlying security, and the claiming of foreign tax
credits, by the holder of the ADS (which may include, for example, pre-releasing ADSs to persons that do not have the beneficial
ownership of the securities underlying the ADSs). These actions also may be inconsistent with the claiming of the reduced rate
of tax applicable to certain dividends received by non-corporate U.S. Holders of ADSs, including individual U.S. Holders. Accordingly,
among other things, the availability of foreign tax credits or the reduced tax rate for dividends received by non-corporate U.S.
Holders, each discussed below, could be affected by actions taken by intermediaries in the chain of ownership between the holder
of an ADS and our company if, as a result of such actions, the holders of ADSs are not properly treated as beneficial owners of
ordinary shares.
Dividends
Subject to the discussion below under “—Passive
Foreign Investment Company,” the gross amount of any distribution made by us on the ordinary shares or ADSs generally will
be treated as a dividend includible in the gross income of a U.S. Holder as ordinary income to the extent of our current or accumulated
earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, when received by the U.S. Holder, in the case of
ordinary shares, or when actually or constructively received by the Depositary, in the case of ADSs.
If dividends are converted
into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, you generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect
of the distribution. To the extent the amount of such distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits as
so computed, it will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax
basis in such ordinary shares or ADSs and, to the extent the amount of such distribution exceeds such adjusted tax basis, will
be treated as gain from the sale of such ordinary shares or ADSs. We, however, may not calculate earnings and profits in accordance
with U.S. tax principles. In this case, all distributions by us to U.S. Holders will generally be treated as dividends.
Certain dividends received by non-corporate
U.S. Holders, including individuals, generally will be subject to reduced rates of taxation. This reduced income tax rate is applicable
to dividends paid by “qualified foreign corporations” and only with respect to ordinary shares or ADSs held for a minimum
holding period of at least 61 days during a specified 121-day period, and if certain other conditions are met. A non-U.S.
corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares (or
ADSs backed by such shares) that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. We should be a
qualified foreign corporation because our ADSs are listed on the NYSE. Accordingly, subject to the conditions described above and
the discussions below under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company,” dividends paid by us on shares represented
by ADSs
generally will be eligible for the reduced income tax rate. A qualified foreign corporation also includes a foreign
corporation that is eligible for the benefits of an income tax treaty with the United States, so long as the Secretary of the United
States Treasury has determined such treaty is satisfactory for purposes of the reduced rate and such treaty includes an exchange
of information program. The Secretary of the United States Treasury has determined that the U.S. income tax treaty with China satisfies
these requirements. Accordingly, in the event that we are deemed to be a PRC tax resident enterprise under the CIT Law and if we
are eligible for the benefits of the income tax treaty between the United States and China, dividends we pay on the ordinary shares,
regardless of whether such shares are represented by ADSs, would be subject to the reduced rates of taxation described above (subject
to the general conditions for the reduced tax rate on dividends described above and the medicare tax described below). Dividends
paid by us will not be eligible for the “dividends received” deduction generally allowed to corporate shareholders
with respect to dividends received from U.S. corporations.
Dividends paid by us will constitute income
from sources outside the United States for U.S. foreign tax credit limitation purposes and will be categorized as “passive
category income” or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, as “general category income” for U.S. foreign tax credit
purposes. In the event that we are deemed to be a PRC tax resident enterprise under the CIT Law, PRC withholding taxes may be imposed
on dividends paid with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs, and, subject to certain conditions and limitations, such PRC withholding
taxes may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability. In certain circumstances,
however, if U.S. Holders have held the ordinary shares or ADSs for less than a specified minimum period during which such U.S.
Holders are not protected from risk of loss, or are obligated to make payments related to the dividends, such U.S. Holders will
not be allowed a U.S. foreign tax credit for any PRC withholding taxes imposed on dividends paid on the ordinary shares or ADSs.
The rules relating to the U.S. foreign tax credit are complex. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the
availability of a foreign tax credit in their particular circumstance.
A distribution of additional ordinary shares
or ADSs to U.S. Holders with respect to their ordinary shares or ADSs that is made as part of a pro rata distribution to all shareholders
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Sale or Other Disposition of Ordinary Shares or ADSs
Subject to the discussion below under “—Passive
Foreign Investment Company,” a U.S. Holder generally will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon
a sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized from
such sale or disposition and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such ordinary shares or ADSs. Such gain or loss generally
will be a capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain (taxable at a reduced rate for non-corporate U.S. Holders, including
individuals) or loss if, on the date of sale or disposition, such ordinary shares or ADSs were held by such U.S. Holder for more
than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant limitations. Any gain or loss on the sale or disposition
will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit limitation purposes. However, in the event that we are
deemed to be a PRC tax resident enterprise under the CIT Law, a U.S. Holder may be eligible for the benefits of the income tax
treaty between the United States and the PRC. Under that treaty, if any PRC tax was to be imposed on any gain from the disposition
of the ordinary shares or ADSs, the gain may be treated as PRC-source income. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors
regarding the tax consequences if a foreign withholding tax is imposed on a disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs, including
the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
Based on the composition of our assets and income,
we believe that we were not a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2016 taxable year, and we do not currently
intend or anticipate becoming a PFIC for our 2017 taxable year or any future taxable year. The determination of PFIC status is
a factual determination that must be made annually at the close of each taxable year. Changes in the nature of our income or assets,
the manner and rate at which we spend cash that we hold, or a decrease in the trading price of the ordinary shares or ADSs may
cause us to be considered a PFIC in the current or any subsequent year. However, as noted above, there can be no certainty in this
regard until the close of each taxable year.
In general, a non-U.S. corporation will be treated
as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which either (i) at least 75% of its gross income is
“passive income” or (ii) on average at least 50% of the value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce
passive income or are held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes, among other
things, dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions. Passive income does not include
rents and royalties derived from the active conduct of a trade or business. If we own at least 25% (by value) of the stock of another
corporation, we will be treated, for purposes of the PFIC tests, as owning our proportionate share of the other corporation’s
assets and receiving our proportionate share of the other corporation’s income.
If we are a PFIC in any year during which a
U.S. Holder owns the ordinary shares or ADSs, such U.S. Holder may experience certain adverse tax consequences. Such U.S. Holder
could be liable for additional taxes and interest charges upon (i) distributions received by the U.S. Holder on our ordinary
shares or ADSs during the year, but only to the extent that the aggregate of the distributions for the taxable year exceeds 125%
of the average amount of distributions received by the U.S. Holder during the shorter of the preceding three years or the U.S.
Holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares or ADSs, or (ii) upon a sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares
or ADSs at a gain, whether or not we continue to be a PFIC (each an “excess distribution”). The tax will be determined
by allocating the excess distribution ratably to each day of the U.S. Holder’s holding period. The amount allocated to the
current taxable year and any taxable year with respect to which we were not a PFIC will be taxed as ordinary income (rather than
capital gain) earned in the current taxable year. The amount allocated to other taxable years will be taxed at the highest marginal
rates applicable to ordinary income for such taxable years and, in addition, an interest charge will be imposed on the amount of
such taxes.
These adverse tax consequences may be avoided
if the U.S. Holder is eligible to and does elect to annually mark-to-market the ordinary shares or ADSs.
If a U.S. Holder
makes a mark-to-market election, such holder will generally include as ordinary income the excess, if any, of the fair market value
of the ordinary shares or ADSs at the end of each taxable year over their adjusted basis, and will be permitted an ordinary loss
in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted basis of the ordinary shares or ADSs over their fair market value at the end
of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the mark-to-market election).
Any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs will be treated as ordinary income. The mark-to-market
election is available only for “marketable stock,” which is stock that is regularly traded in other than
de minimis
quantities on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter on a qualified exchange or other market, as defined in the applicable
Treasury regulations. We expect the ADSs to be “marketable stock” because our ADSs are listed on the NYSE, but it is
unclear whether our ordinary shares would be so treated.
A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in
the ordinary shares or ADSs will be increased by the amount of any income inclusion and decreased by the amount of any deductions
under the mark-to-market rules. If a U.S. Holder makes a mark-to-market election it will be effective for the taxable year for
which the election is made and all subsequent taxable years unless the ordinary shares or ADSs are no longer regularly traded on
a qualified exchange or the Internal Revenue Service consents to the revocation of the election. U.S. Holders are urged to consult
their tax advisors about the availability of the mark-to-market election, and whether making the election would be advisable in
their particular circumstances.
The above results may also be eliminated if
a U.S. Holder is eligible for and makes a valid qualified electing fund election, or QEF election. If a QEF election is made, such
U.S. Holder generally will be required to include in income on a current basis its pro rata share of its ordinary income and its
net capital gains. We do not intend to prepare or provide the information that would entitle U.S. Holders to make a QEF election.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during
which you hold our ordinary shares or ADSs, we will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to you for all succeeding years
during which you hold the ordinary shares or ADSs, unless we cease to be a PFIC and you make a “deemed sale” election
with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs, as applicable. If such election is made, you will be deemed to have sold the ordinary
shares or ADSs you hold at their fair market value on the last day of the last taxable year for which we were a PFIC and any gain
from such deemed sale would be subject to the excess distribution rules described above. After the deemed sale election, your ordinary
shares or ADSs with respect to which such election was made will not be treated as shares in a PFIC unless we subsequently become
a PFIC.
If we are regarded as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder
of ordinary shares or ADSs must make an annual return containing such information as the Secretary of the United States Treasury
may require. Additionally, the reduced tax rate for dividend income, as discussed above under “—Dividends” is
not applicable to a dividend paid by us if we are a PFIC for either the year the dividend is paid or the preceding year.
Prospective investors should consult their own
tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in a PFIC.
Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting Requirements
Dividend payments made to U.S. Holders and proceeds
paid from the sale or other disposition of their ordinary shares or ADSs may be subject to information reporting to the Internal
Revenue Service and, possibly, to U.S. federal backup withholding. Certain exempt recipients are not subject to these information
reporting requirements. Backup withholding will not apply to a U.S. Holder who furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number
and makes any other required certification, or who is otherwise exempt from backup withholding. U.S. Holders who are required to
establish their exempt status generally must provide Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 (Request for Taxpayer Identification Number
and Certification).
Backup withholding is not an additional tax.
Amounts withheld as backup withholding may be credited against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. A U.S.
Holder may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for
refund with the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner and furnishing any required information.
Prospective investors should consult their own
tax advisors as to their qualification for an exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining this exemption.
Medicare Tax
Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals, estates,
or trusts are subject to an additional 3.8% tax on, among other things, dividends and gains from the sale or other disposition
of ordinary shares or ADSs. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this tax on their
ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs.
|
F.
|
Dividends and Paying Agents
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We have filed with the SEC registration statements
on Form F-1 (File Number 333-164432 and File Number 333-170146). We also filed with the SEC a related registration statement on
Form F-6 (File Number 333-164523) with respect to the ADSs. We have also filed with the SEC registration statements on Form F-3
(File Number 333-190273 and File Number 333-193379). With respect to our securities to be issued under our 2009 Long Term Incentive
Plan, we have filed with the SEC registration statements on Form S-8 (File Number 333-170693 and 333-180787). With respect to our
securities to be issued under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, we have filed with the SEC registration statement on Form S-8 (File
Number 333-204082).
We are subject to the periodic reporting and
other informational requirements of the Exchange Act as applicable to foreign private issuers. Under the Exchange Act, we are required
to file reports and other information with the SEC. Specifically, we are required to file annually a Form 20-F no later than four
months after the close of each fiscal year, which is December 31. Copies of reports and other information, when so filed with
the SEC, can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC. The
public may obtain information regarding the Washington, D.C. Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains a web site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding registrants that make electronic filings with the SEC using its EDGAR system. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt
from the rules of the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy statements, and our executive
officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained
in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial
statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.
We will furnish JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., the
depositary of our ADSs, with our annual reports, which will include a review of operations and annual audited consolidated financial
statements prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, and all notices of shareholders’ meetings and other reports and communications
that are made generally available to our shareholders. The depositary will make such notices, reports and communications available
to holders of ADSs and, upon our request, will mail to all record holders of ADSs the information contained in any notice of a
shareholders’ meeting received by the depositary from us.
|
I.
|
Subsidiary Information
|
Not applicable.
|
ITEM 11.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
Inflation
Since our inception, inflation in China
has not materially impacted our results of operations. According to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, inflation as measured
by the consumer price index in China was 2.0%, 1.4% and 2.0% in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Our sales in China are denominated in Renminbi
and our costs and capital expenditures are also largely denominated in Renminbi. Our export sales are generally denominated in
U.S. dollars, Euros, AUD, and Japanese Yen and we also incur expenses in foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars, Japanese Yen
and Euros, in relation to the procurement of silicon materials, equipment and consumables such as crucibles. In addition, we have
outstanding debt obligations, and may continue to incur debts from time to time, denominated and repayable in foreign currencies.
Accordingly, any significant fluctuations between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies including Japanese
Yen and Euro could expose us to foreign-exchange risk. In addition, as we expand our sales to major export markets, we expect our
foreign-exchange exposures will increase.
We have entered into foreign exchange forward
contracts with certain local banks to reduce volatility in our economic value caused by foreign currency fluctuations. These contracts
are not designated as hedges and are marked to market at each reporting date, with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated
statements of operations. As of December 31, 2016, our foreign exchange forward contracts had a total notional value of US$10 million
and GBP3 million. These contracts mature within 12 months. To determine fair value of these contracts, we use a discounted
cash-flow methodology to measure fair value, which requires inputs such as interest yield curves and foreign exchange rates. We
had a loss relating to change in fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts recognized in earnings of RMB52.6 million (US$7.6 million)
in 2016. However, we cannot predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our results of operations and may incur
net foreign currency losses in the future in relation to unhedged foreign currency exposure or loss on our hedging instruments.
We provide credit to our overseas customers.
We incurred foreign-exchange gain of RMB208.8 million (US$30.1 million) in 2016 due to the appreciation of the U.S. dollars against
the Renminbi. We incurred foreign-exchange loss of RMB86.5 million in 2015 and foreign-exchange loss of RMB139.6 million in 2014.
The value of your investment in our ADSs will
be primarily affected by the foreign-exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Renminbi. To the extent we hold assets denominated
in U.S. dollars any appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar could result in a change to our statement of operations
and a reduction in the value of our U.S. dollar denominated assets. On the other hand, a decline in the value of the Renminbi against
the U.S. dollar could reduce the U.S. dollar equivalent amounts of our financial results, the value of your investment in our company
and the dividends we may pay in the future, if any, all of which may have a material adverse effect on the prices of ADSs. See
“Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Fluctuations in exchange
rates could adversely affect our results of operations.”
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to interest rate risks relates
to interest expenses incurred in connection with our short-term and long-term borrowings, and interest income generated by excess
cash invested in demand deposits and liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
As of December 31, 2016, our total outstanding
RMB denominated short-term borrowings were RMB3.17 billion (US$456.48 million) with a weighted average interest rate of 4.48% per
annum and RMB denominated long-term borrowing were RMB315.09 million (US$45.38 million) with a weighted average interest rate of
4.11%. In addition, as of December 31, 2016, we had outstanding short-term loans of RMB1.49 million denominated and payable in
Euro with a weighted average interest rate of 0% per annum, outstanding short-term loans of RMB2.21 billion denominated and payable
in U.S. dollars with a weighted average interest rate of 2.79% per annum, and outstanding short-term loans of RMB108.53 million
denominated and payable in JPY with a weighted average interest rate of 0.51% per annum. In addition, we had outstanding long-term
loans of RMB173.43 million denominated and payable in U.S. dollars with a weighted average interest rate of 3.5% per annum.
In November 2014, we signed a US$20.0
million two-year credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, or Wells Fargo. The credit limit was raised to
US$40.0 million in June 2015 through amendments to the credit agreement. The credit limit was raised to US$60.0 million in
July 2016 through amendments to the credit agreement. Borrowings under the new credit agreement will be used to support JinkoSolar
US’s working capital and business operations.
In May 2015, we signed a US$20.0 million
bank facility agreement with Barclay Bank, which was subsequently raised to US$40.0 million, to support our working capital and
business operations. In August 2015, we signed a RMB700.0 million loan agreement with The Export-Import Bank of China. In
September 2015, we signed a line of credit of up to RMB10.0 billion strategic agreement with the Industrial and Commercial
Bank of China Jiangxi Provincial branch.
In July 2016, we signed a one-year JPY2
billion syndicated loan agreement with a bank consortium led by Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation to support our working capital
and business operations in Japan. In September 2016, we signed a US$25.0 million bank facility agreement with Malayan Banking Berhad
to support our working capital and business operations in Malaysia.
In light of the amount of bank borrowings
and bonds due in the near term future, sufficient funds may not be available to meet our payment obligations
We have not used any derivative financial instruments
to manage our interest rate risk exposure due to lack of such financial instruments in China. Historically, we have not been exposed
to material risks due to changes in interest rates; however, our future interest income may decrease or interest expenses on our
borrowings may increase due to changes in market interest rates. We are currently not engaged in any interest rate hedging activities.
|
ITEM 12.
|
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
|
D.
|
American Depositary Shares
|
Fees and Charges Our ADS Holders May Have to Pay
Our American depositary shares, each of which
represents four ordinary shares, are listed on the NYSE. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is the depositary of our ADS program and its
principal executive office is situated at 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza, Floor 58, New York, NY 10005-1401. The depositary collects
its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of
withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting
those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may
collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging
the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting
services until its fees for those services are paid.
Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay:
|
|
For:
|
|
|
|
$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)
|
|
·
Issuance
of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property
·
Cancellation
of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates
|
|
|
|
$.05 (or less) per ADS (or portion of each ADS)
|
|
·
Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders
|
|
|
|
$1.50 per ADR or ADRs
|
|
·
Transfer of ADRs
|
|
|
|
A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs
|
|
·
Distribution or sale of securities to holders of deposited securities that are distributed by the depositary to ADS registered holders
|
|
|
|
$.05 per ADSs per calendar year (or portion of each ADS)
|
|
·
Depositary services
|
|
|
|
Registration or transfer fees
|
|
·
Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares
|
|
|
|
Expenses of the depositary
|
|
·
Cable,
telex and facsimile transmissions and deliveries (at the request of persons depositing or ADS registered holders delivering shares,
ADRs and deposited securities)
·
Converting
foreign currency to U.S. dollars
|
|
|
|
Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes
|
|
·
As necessary
|
|
|
|
Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities
|
|
·
As necessary
|
Fees and Other Payments Made by the Depositary to Us
The depositary has agreed to reimburse us for
expenses we incur that are related to the administration and maintenance of our ADS facility including, but not limited to, investor
relations expenses, the annual NYSE listing fees, ADS offering expenses or any other program related expenses. There are limits
on the amount of expenses for which the depositary will reimburse us, but the amount of reimbursement available to us is not related
to the amounts of fees the depositary collects from investors. The annual reimbursement is also conditioned on certain requirements
and criteria and will be adjusted proportionately to the extent such requirements or criteria are not met. For 2016, the depositary
paid us an annual reimbursement of approximately US$257.7 thousand for legal and investor relations expenses.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014,
2015 AND 2016
1.
ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (the "Company") was incorporated
in the Cayman Islands on August 3, 2007. On May 14, 2010, the Company became listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”)
in the United States. The Company and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Group”) are principally engaged in the design,
development, production and marketing of photovoltaic products and provision of solar system integration services as well as developing
commercial solar power projects.
JinkoSolar Technology Limited (“Paker”, formally
known as Paker Technology Limited) was incorporated in Hong Kong as a limited liability company on November 10, 2006 by a
Hong Kong citizen and a citizen of People's Republic of China ("the PRC"), who held the investment on behalf of
three PRC shareholders (the "Shareholders") via a series of entrustment agreements. On December 16, 2008, all of
the then existing shareholders of Paker exchanged their respective shares of Paker for equivalent classes of shares of the Company
(the "Share Exchange"). As a result, Paker became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. On December 13, 2006,
Paker established Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (“Jiangxi Jinko”) as a wholly foreign owned enterprise in Shangrao, Jiangxi
province, the PRC.
The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s
major subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016:
Subsidiaries
|
|
Date of
Incorporation
/Acquisition
|
|
Place of
Incorporation
|
|
Percentage
of ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Technology Limited (“Paker”)*
|
|
November 10, 2006
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (“Jiangxi Jinko”)
|
|
December 13, 2006
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.("Zhejiang Jinko")
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. ("Jinko Import and Export")
|
|
December 24, 2009
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar GmbH (“Jinko GmbH”)
|
|
April 1, 2010
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zhejiang Jinko Trading Co., Ltd.("Zhejiang Trading")
|
|
June 13, 2010
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xinjiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
|
|
May 30,2016
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yuhuan Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
|
|
July 29,2016
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar (U.S.) Inc. ("Jinko US")
|
|
August 19, 2010
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jiangxi Photovoltaic Materials Co., Ltd ("Jiangxi Materials")
|
|
December 1, 2010
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar (Switzerland) AG(“Jinko Switzerland”)
|
|
May 3, 2011
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar (US) Holdings Inc.(“Jinko US Holding”)
|
|
June 7, 2011
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Italy S.R.L. (“Jinko Italy”)
|
|
July 8, 2011
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar SAS (“Jinko France”)
|
|
September 12, 2011
|
|
France
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Canada Co., Ltd (“Jinko Canada”)
|
|
November 18, 2011
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Australia Holdings Co. Pty Ltd (“Jinko Australia”)
|
|
December 7, 2011
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Pty Ltd. (“JinkoSolar South Africa”)
|
|
April 13, 2012
|
|
South Africa
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Japan K.K. (“JinkoSolar Japan”)
|
|
May 21, 2012
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
Date of
Incorporation
/Acquisition
|
|
Place of
Incorporation
|
|
Percentage
of ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Power Engineering Group Limited (“JinkoSolar Power”)
|
|
November 12,2013
|
|
Cayman
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar WWG Investment Co., Ltd. (“WWG Investment”)
|
|
April 8, 2014
|
|
Cayman
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Comércio do Brazil Ltda (“JinkoSolar Brazil”)
|
|
January 14, 2014
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projinko Solar Portugal Unipessoal LDA. (“JinkoSolar Portugal”)
|
|
February 20, 2014
|
|
Portugal
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar Mexico S.DE R.L. DE C.V. (“JinkoSolar Mexico”)
|
|
February 25, 2014
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai Jinko Financial Information Service Co., Ltd
|
|
November 7, 2014
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Solar Technology SDN.BHD. (“JinkoSolar Malaysia”)
|
|
January 21, 2015
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinko Power International (Hongkong) Limited
|
|
July 10, 2015
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JinkoSolar International Development Limited**
|
|
August 28, 2015
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinkosolar Household PV System Ltd.***
|
|
January 12,2015
|
|
BVI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canton Best Limited(“Canton Best BVI”)
|
|
September 16,2013
|
|
BVI
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wide Wealth Group Holding Limited(“Wide Wealth Hong Kong”) ****
|
|
June 11,2012
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
*In the fourth quarter of 2016, Paker disposed Zhejiang Jinko
Financial Leasing Co., Ltd with the consideration of RMB183 million (USD26.4 million). Loss on disposal amounted to RMB15.2 million
(USD2.2 million) was recognized. Considerations associated with the transaction have not been collected as of December 31, 2016.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, Paker closed JinkoSolar International
Limited. Accumulated translation differences associated with the entity amounted to RMB 4.7 million (USD 0.7 million) recognized
as a gain in net income upon the liquidation of the entity.
**In the fourth quarter of 2016, JinkoSolar International Development
Limited disposed Jinko Solar (Thailand) Co. Ltd with the consideration of RMB2.4 million (USD0.4 million). Loss of disposal amounted
to RMB0.1 million (USD0.02 million) was recognized. Considerations associated with the transaction have not been collected as of
December 31, 2016.
***In the fourth quarter of 2016, Jinkosolar Household PV System
Ltd. disposed its household solar project business with the consideration of RMB 27 million (USD 3.9 million) . Gain on disposal
amounted to RMB15.4 million (USD2.2 million) was recognized. Considerations associated with the transaction have been collected
as of December 31, 2016.
****In the fourth quarter of 2016, Wide Wealth Hong Kong disposed
all of the 55% equity interest indirectly held by the Company in Jiangxi JinkoSolar Engineering Co., Ltd. (“Jiangxi Jinko
Engineering”) to Shangrao Kangsheng Technology Co., Ltd., a company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of
the People’s Republic of China, formed by a buyer consortium led by Mr. Xiande Li, chairman of the board of directors of
the Company for a total consideration of US$250 million.
In conjunction, JinkoSolar Power repurchased all of its Series A, Series A-1 and Series A-2 redeemable convertible preferred shares
(Note 8) with considerations of US$225 million from the preferred shareholders, while Wide Wealth Hong Kong agreed to transfer
the 45% equity interest of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering to related entities of the preferred shareholders with a total consideration
of US$225 million. These two transactions were net-settled as agreed with JinkoSolar Power, Wide Wealth Hong Kong and the preferred
shareholders.
|
2.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
a. Basis of presentation and use of estimates
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity
with U.S. GAAP requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
Group bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
include allowance for doubtful receivables, provision for inventories and advances to suppliers, the purchase price allocation
with respect to business combinations, impairment of long-lived assets, the economic useful lives of property, plant and equipment,
project assets and intangible assets, certain accrued liabilities including accruals for warranty costs, guarantees, sales-leaseback,
accounting for share-based compensation, fair value measurements of share-based compensation and financial instruments, legal contingencies,
income taxes and related deferred tax valuation allowance.
b. Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the financial
statements of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant transactions and balances among the Company and its subsidiaries
have been eliminated upon consolidation.
For the Group’s majority-owned subsidiaries, non-controlling
interests is recognized to reflect the portion of their equity interests which are not attributable, directly or indirectly, to
the Group. Consolidated net income on the consolidated statement of operation includes the net income attributable to non-controlling
interests. The cumulative results of operations attributable to non-controlling interests are recorded as non-controlling interests
in the Group’s consolidated balance sheets. Cash flows related to transactions with non-controlling interests are presented
under financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
c. Discontinued operations
A component of a reporting entity or a group of components of
a reporting entity that are disposed or meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale, such as the management, having the
authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the disposal group, should be reported in discontinued operations if
the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial
results. Discontinued operations are reported when a component of an entity comprising operations and cash flows that can be clearly
distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the entity is classified as held for disposal
or has been disposed of, if the component either (1) represents a strategic shift or (2) have a major impact on an entity’s
financial results and operations. Examples include a disposal of a major geographical location, line of business, or other significant
part of the entity, or disposal of a major equity method investment. In the consolidated statement of operations, result from discontinued
operations is reported separately from the income and expenses from continuing operations and prior periods are presented on a
comparative basis. Cash flows for discontinuing operations are presented separately in note 3. In order to present the financial
effects of the continuing operations and discontinued operations, revenues and expenses arising from intra-group transactions are
eliminated except for those revenues and expenses that are considered to continue after the disposal of the discontinued operations.
Non-current assets or disposal groups are classified as assets
held for sale when the carrying amount is to be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing
use. For this to be the case, the asset or disposal group must be available for immediate sale in its present condition subject
only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such asset.
d. Foreign currency translation
The Group's reporting currency is the Renminbi (“RMB”),
the official currency in the PRC. The Company and certain subsidiaries use RMB as their functional currency. Transactions denominated
in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates quoted by the
People's Bank of China (the “PBOC”) prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Gains and losses resulting from foreign
currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies are translated into RMB using the applicable exchange rates quoted by the PBOC at the applicable balance sheet
dates. All such exchange gains or losses are included in exchange loss in the consolidated statements of operations.
For consolidation purpose, the financial statements of the Company’s
subsidiaries whose functional currencies are other than the RMB are translated into RMB using exchange rates quoted by PBOC. Assets
and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet date, equity accounts are translated at historical exchange
rates and revenues, expenses and gains and losses are translated using the average exchange rates for the year. Translation adjustments
are reported as cumulative translation adjustments and are shown as a separate component of in accumulated other comprehensive
income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income/ (loss).
The RMB is not a freely convertible currency. The PRC State
Administration for Foreign Exchange, under the authority of PBOC, controls the conversion of RMB into foreign currencies. The value
of the RMB is subject to changes in central government policies and to international economic and political developments affecting
supply and demand in China’s foreign exchange trading system market. The Company’s aggregate amount of cash, cash equivalents
and restricted cash denominated in RMB amounted to RMB1,721.1 million and RMB 4,136.5 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2016,
respectively.
e. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents represent cash on hand and demand
deposits placed with banks or other financial institutions, which have original maturities of three months or less.
f. Restricted cash
Restricted cash represents deposits legally held by banks which
are not available for the Group's general use. These deposits are held as collateral for issuance of letters of credit or guarantee,
bank acceptance notes to vendors for purchase of machinery and inventories and forward contracts.
g. Restricted short-term investments
Restricted short-term investments represent the time deposits
legally hold by banks with original maturities longer than three months and less than one year, which are held as collateral for
issuance of letters of credit, guarantee, bank acceptance notes or deposits for short-term borrowings.
h. Available-for-sale investment
Investments in debt and equity securities are, on initial recognition,
classified into the three categories: held-to-maturity securities, trading securities and available-for-sale securities. Debt securities
that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and reported
at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near
term are classified as trading securities and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.
Debt and equity securities not classified as either held-to-maturity securities or trading securities are classified as available-for-sale
investments and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Subsequent to initial recognition, available-for-sale investment
is measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income included in shareholders’
equity. When there is objective evidence that the investment is impaired, the cumulative losses from the declines in fair value
that had been recognized directly in accumulated other comprehensive income are removed from equity and recognized in the statement
of operations. When the available-for-sale investment is sold, the cumulative fair value adjustments previously recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive income are recognized in the statement of operations. The Group evaluates the investments periodically for
possible other-than temporary impairment. When other-than-temporary impairment has occurred for an available-for-sale debt security
and the Group intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its
amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, an impairment loss is recognized in earnings equal to the difference
between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. The new cost basis will not be
changed for subsequent recoveries in fair value. To determine whether a loss is other-than-temporary, the Group reviews the cause
and duration of the impairment, the extent to which fair value is less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects
of the issuer, and the Group’s intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated
recovery of its cost.
On September 20, 2013, the parent company (“Issuer”)
of one of the Company’s customers issued convertible bond (“Bond”) to the Company in order to settle the outstanding
receivables owed by that customer of EUR 2,948,489. The Bond matured on December 31, 2015. Each Bond is convertible into one share
at 1:1 ratio during September 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, or June 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. The Bond bears a simple interest
of 5% per annum and is payable every six months in arrears on June 30 and December 31 of each year from 2013 to 2015. The Issuer,
at any time, may redeem all the Bond outstanding by paying a sum of money at an amount equal to the greater of (1) the total nominal
value of the Bond plus outstanding interest and (2) the counter- value. Upon maturity, the outstanding Bond will be reimbursed
at the nominal value together with the accrued and unpaid interests.
The Company recorded such Bond as available-for-sale instruments
as its intent is to convert the Bond into common shares when the common share price appreciates over its nominal value during the
two convertible periods, and recorded the fair value change in the Bond in accumulated other comprehensive income.
In December 2015, upon the maturity of the
Bond, the Company decided to waive the conversion right and choose to collect the total outstanding balance in cash. On December
21, 2015, the customer entered into a repayment arrangement with the Company. Considering the uncertainties of the cash collection,
the Company provided full provision to the outstanding receivable of RMB21,923,756 for the year ended December 31, 2015, and reversed
provision amounted to RMB11,636,130 upon the cash collection during the year ended December 31, 2016.
i. Notes receivable and payable
Notes receivable represents bank or commercial drafts that have
been arranged with third-party financial institutions by certain customers to settle their purchases from the Group. The carrying
amount of notes receivable approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturity of the notes receivables.
The Group also issues bank acceptance notes to its suppliers
in China in the normal course of business. The Group classifies the changes in notes payable and the restricted cash held as collateral
for issuance of bank acceptance notes as financing activities.
Notes receivable and payable are typically non-interest bearing
and have maturities of less than six months.
j. Accounts receivable
Specific provisions are made against accounts receivable for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of the Group’s customers to make payments. The Group periodically assesses
accounts receivable balances to determine whether an allowance for doubtful accounts should be made based upon historical bad debts,
specific customer creditworthiness and current economic trends. Accounts receivable in the balance sheets are stated net of such
provision, if any. Before approving sales to each customer, the Group conducts a credit assessment for each customer to evaluate
the collectability of such sales. The assessment usually takes into consideration the credit worthiness of such customer and its
guarantor, if any, the Group’s historical payment experience with such customer, industry-wide trends with respect to credit
terms, including the terms offered by competitors, and the macro-economic conditions of the region to which sales will be made.
The Group will execute a sales order with a customer and arrange for shipment only if its credit assessment concludes that the
collectability with such customer is reasonably assured. The Group may also from time to time require security deposits from certain
customers to minimize its credit risk. After the sales are made, the Group closely monitors the credit situation of each customer
on an on-going basis for any subsequent change in its financial position, business development and credit rating, and evaluates
whether any of such adverse change warrants further action to be taken by the Group, including asserting claims and/or initiating
legal proceedings against the customer and/or its guarantor, as well as making provisions. It is also the Group’s general
practice to suspend further sales to any customer with significant overdue balances.
k. Advances to suppliers
The Group provides short-term and long-term advances to secure
its raw material needs, which are then offset against future purchases. The Group continually assesses the credit quality of its
suppliers and the factors that affect the credit risk. If there is deterioration in the creditworthiness of its suppliers, the
Group will seek to recover its advances to suppliers and provide for losses on advances which are akin to receivables in operating
expenses because of suppliers’ inability to return its advances. Recoveries of the allowance for advances to supplier are
recognized when they are received. The Company classified short-term and long-term advances to suppliers based on management’s
best estimate of the expected purchase in the next twelve-months as of the balance sheet date and the Group’s ability to
make requisite purchases under existing supply contracts. The balances expected to be utilized outside of the 12 months are recorded
in advances to suppliers to be utilized beyond one year. A provision of advance to suppliers of RMB2,694,857, nil and RMB799,889
was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
l. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost
is determined using the weighted average method. Provisions are made for excessive, slow moving and obsolete inventories as well
as for inventories with carrying values in excess of market. Certain factors could impact the realizable value of inventory, so
the Group continually evaluates the recoverability based on assumptions about customer demand and market conditions. The evaluation
may take into consideration historical usage, expected demand, anticipated sales price, new product development schedules, the
effect new products might have on the sale of existing products, product obsolescence, customer concentrations, and other factors.
The reserve or write-down is equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions
about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional
inventory reserves or write-downs may be required that could negatively impact the Group’s gross margin and operating results.
If actual market conditions are more favorable, the Group may have higher gross margin when products that have been previously
reserved or written down are eventually sold. The sale of previously reserved inventory did not have a material impact on our gross
margin percentage for any of the years presented.
In addition, the Group analyzes its firm purchase commitments,
if any, at each period end. Provision is made in the current period if the net realizable value after considering estimated costs
to convert polysilicon into saleable finished goods is higher than market selling price of finished goods as of the end of a reporting
period. There was no loss provision recorded related to these long-term contracts for each of the three years ended December 31,
2014, 2015 and 2016.
m. Property, plant and equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Cost includes the prices paid to acquire or construct the assets, interest capitalized during the construction period
and any expenditure that substantially extends the useful life of an existing asset. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over the following estimated useful lives:
Buildings
|
|
20 years
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
10 years
|
Furniture, fixture and office equipment
|
|
3-5 years
|
Motor vehicles
|
|
4-5 years
|
Construction in progress primarily represents the construction
of new production line and buildings. Costs incurred in the construction are capitalized and transferred to property, plant and
equipment upon completion, at which time depreciation commences.
Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
The gain or loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment, if any, is the difference between the net sales proceeds and the
carrying amount of the disposed assets, and is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations upon disposal.
n. Project Assets, net
Project assets represented the costs of solar power plants held
for generation of electricity revenue and solar power plants under construction. Project assets are stated in the consolidated
balance sheets at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment provision, if any.
Costs of project assets consist primarily of costs relating
to construction of solar power plants at various stages of development. These costs include costs for procurement of solar module
and other equipment (including intercompany purchases), cost of land on which solar power plants are developed and other direct
costs for developing and constructing solar power plants, such as costs for obtaining permits required for solar power plants and
costs for designing, engineering, interest costs capitalized and installation in the course of construction. Such costs are capitalized
starting from the point when it is determined that development of the solar power plant is probable. For a solar power project
asset acquired from third parties, the initial cost is the acquisition cost which includes the consideration transferred and certain
direct acquisition costs.
Costs capitalized in the construction of solar power plants
under development will be transferred to complete solar power plants upon completion and when they are ready for intended use,
which is at the point of time when the solar power plant is connected to grids and begins to generate electricity. Depreciation
of the completed solar power plant commences once the solar power plant is ready for intended use. Depreciation is computed using
the straight-line method over the expected life of 20 years.
After the disposition of the domestic downstream solar projects
business in the fourth quarter of 2016, project assets as of December 31, 2016 are all relate to solar power plants constructed
out of China. Projects assets associated with the domestic downstream solar projects business are recorded as held-for-sale assets
(note 3).
o. Assets held for sale
Long-lived assets to be sold shall be classified as held for
sale considering the recognition criteria in ASC 360-10-45-9 in which all of the following criteria are met:
|
·
|
Management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the asset.
|
|
·
|
The asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets.
|
|
·
|
An active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated.
|
|
·
|
The sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year,
|
|
·
|
The asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value.
|
|
·
|
Actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
|
p. Interest Capitalization
The interest cost associated with major development and construction
projects is capitalized and included in the cost of the property, plant and equipment or project assets. Interest capitalization
ceases once a project is substantially completed or no longer undergoing construction activities to prepare it for its intended
use. When no debt is specifically identified as being incurred in connection with a construction project, the Group capitalizes
interest on amounts expended on the project at the Group’s weighted average cost of borrowings. Interest expense capitalized
associated with the project assets of discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were RMB
nil, RMB66,896,537, and RMB58,624,205, respectively. Interest expense capitalized associated with the construction projects of
continuing operation for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were RMB4,103,426, RMB7,381,757, and RMB8,915,817,
respectively.
q. Land use rights and land lease
a. Land use rights
Land use rights represent acquisition costs to purchase land
use rights from the PRC government, which are evidenced by property certificates. The periods of these purchased land use rights
are either 50 years or 70 years. The Company classifies land use rights as long term assets on the balance sheet and cash outflows
related to acquisition of land use right as investing activities.
Land use rights are carried at cost less accumulated amortization
and impairment losses, if any. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the term specified in the land use
right certificate for 50 years or 70 years, as applicable.
b. Land lease
For certain of the Group’s solar power project, the Group
enters into land lease contracts with the owners of the land use rights. Under such lease arrangements, the owners retain the property
right of the land use rights. While the Group can only set up the solar panels on these leased lands but does not have the right
to sell, lease or dispose the land use rights.
Accordingly, land leases are classified as operating leases,
with the lease payments being recognised over the lease periods of 20 years to 50 years as operating expenses. Such land lease
payments are classified as operating cash outflows.
r. Intangible assets
Intangible assets include purchased software and fees paid to
register trademarks and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which are 5 or 10 years, respectively.
s. Business combination and assets acquisition
U.S. GAAP requires that all business combinations not involving
entities or businesses under common control be accounted for under the purchase method. The Group has adopted ASC 805 “Business
Combinations,” and the cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the fair values at the date of exchange of
the assets given, liabilities incurred and equity instruments issued. The transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition
are expensed as incurred. Identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired or assumed are measured separately
at their fair value as of the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any non-controlling interests. The excess of the
(i) the total of cost of acquisition, fair value of the non-controlling interests and acquisition date fair value of any previously
held equity interest in the acquiree over (ii) the fair value of the identifiable net tangible and intangible assets of the acquiree
is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the
difference is recognized directly in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
The determination and allocation of fair values to the identifiable
assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based on various assumptions and valuation methodologies requiring considerable management
judgment. The most significant variables in these valuations are discount rates, terminal values, the number of years on which
to base the cash flow projections, as well as the assumptions and estimates used to determine forecast the future cash inflows
and outflows. Management determines discount rates to be used based on the risk inherent in the related activity’s current
business model and industry comparisons. Terminal values are based on the expected life of products and forecasted life cycle and
forecasted cash flows over that period. Although management believes that the assumptions applied in the determination are reasonable
based on information available at the date of acquisition, actual results may differ from the forecasted amounts and the difference
could be material.
A non-controlling interest is recognized to reflect the portion
of a subsidiary’s equity which is not attributable, directly or indirectly, to the Company. Consolidated net income on the
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income includes the net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
when applicable. The cumulative results of operations attributable to non-controlling interests are also recorded as non-controlling
interests in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Cash flows related to transactions with non-controlling interests
are presented under financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows when applicable.
t. Investments in affiliates
The Group holds equity investments in affiliates in which it
does not have a controlling financial interest, but has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial
policies of the investee. These investments are accounted for under equity method of accounting wherein the Group records its'
proportionate share of the investees' income or loss in its consolidated financial statements. Cost method is used for investments
over which the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence.
Investments are evaluated for impairment when facts or circumstances
indicate that the fair value of the investment is less than its carrying value. An impairment is recognized when a decline in fair
value is determined to be other-than-temporary. The Group reviews several factors to determine whether a loss is other-than-temporary.
These factors include, but are not limited to, the: (1) nature of the investment; (2) cause and duration of the impairment; (3)
extent to which fair value is less than cost; (4) financial conditions and near term prospects of the issuers; and (5) ability
to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Upon the disposition
of downstream power business, the investment income of affiliated companies was recognized in the discontinuing operations.
u. Impairment of long-lived assets
The Group’s long-lived assets include property, plant
and equipment, project assets, land use rights and intangible assets with finite lives. The Group’s business requires heavy
investment in manufacturing equipment that is technologically advanced, but can quickly become significantly under-utilized or
rendered obsolete by rapid changes in demand for solar power products produced with those equipment.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Factors considered important that
could result in an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating
results, significant changes in the manner of use of acquired assets and significant negative industry or economic trends. The
Group may recognize impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds the future undiscounted
cash flows attributable to these assets. If the total of the expected undiscounted future net cash flows is less than the carrying
amount of the asset, a loss, if any, is recognized for the difference between the fair value of the asset and its carrying value.
Fair value is generally measured based on either quoted market prices, if available, or discounted cash flow analyses.
v. Leases
Leases are classified as capital or operating leases. A lease
that transfers to the lessee substantially all the benefits and risks incidental to ownership is classified as a capital lease.
At inception, a capital lease is recorded at the present value of minimum lease payments or the fair value of the asset, whichever
is less. Assets under capital leases are amortized on a basis consistent with that of similar fixed assets or the lease term, whichever
is less. Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
For a sale-leaseback transaction, when the transaction involves
real estate or integral equipment, sale-leaseback accounting shall be used by a seller-lessee only if the transaction includes
all of the following a) A normal leaseback; b) Payment terms and provisions that adequately demonstrate the buyer-lessor's initial
and continuing investment in the property; c) Payment terms and provisions that transfer all of the other risks and rewards of
ownership as demonstrated by the absence of any other continuing involvement by the seller-lessee.
Equipment is determined to be integral when the cost to remove
the equipment from its existing location, ship and reinstall at a new site, including any diminution in fair value, exceeds 10%
of the fair value of the equipment at the time of original installation.
If a sale-leaseback of real estate qualifies for sale-leaseback
accounting, an analysis is performed to determine if the Company can record a sale and remove the assets from the balance sheet
and recognize the lease; and if so, to determine whether to record the lease as either an operating or capital lease.
If a sale-leaseback transaction does not qualify for sale-leaseback
accounting because of any form of continuing involvement by the seller-lessee other than a normal leaseback, it is accounted for
as a financing, whichever is appropriate under ASC 360.
w. Guarantees
The Group issues debt payment guarantees in favor of Jiangxi
Jinko Engineering, a related party. The guarantees require the Group to make payments to reimburse the holders of these guarantees
for losses they incur when Jiangxi Jinko Engineering fails to make repayments to the holders, when its liability to the holders
falls due.
In addition, the Group also issues redemption guarantees in
favor of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, a related party. According to the side agreement among the Group, Jiangxi Jinko Engineering
and investors of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering (the original redeemable preferred shareholders of JinkoSolar Power), the investors
of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering will have the right to redeem the common shares of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering held by them, and, as
a result of a guarantee issued by the Company, in the event that Jiangxi Jinko Engineering fails to perform its redemption obligations,
the Company will become liable for Jiangxi Jinko Engineering’s obligations under the redemption.
A guarantee liability is initially recognized at the estimated
fair value in the Group’s consolidated balance sheets unless it becomes probable that the Group will reimburse the holder
of the guarantee for an amount higher than the carrying amount, in which case the guarantee is carried in the Group’s consolidated
balance sheets at the expected amount payable to the holder. The fair value of the guarantee liability is measured by the total
consideration to be received in connection with the provision of guarantee. The guarantee liability would be amortized in straight
line during the guarantee period.
Receivables have also been recorded for the guarantee payments
to be received (note 30).
Pursuant to the master service agreement signed with Jiangxi
Jinko Engineering, guarantee service fee would be settled on a half-year basis.
x. Revenue recognition
|
(a)
|
Revenue recognition on product
sales
|
The Group recognizes revenue for product sales when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product has occurred and title and risk of loss has passed to the customer,
the sales price is fixed or determinable and the collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. For all sales,
the Group requires a contract or purchase order which quantifies pricing, quantity and product specifications.
For sales of photovoltaic products from PRC to foreign customers,
delivery of the products generally occurs at the point in time the product is delivered to the named port of shipment or received
by the customers, which is when the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the customer. For sales of PV products to
domestic customers in PRC or by foreign subsidiaries, delivery of the product occurs generally at the point in time the product
is received by the customer, which is when the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred. In the case of sales that
are contingent upon customer acceptance, revenue is not recognized until the deliveries are formally accepted by the customers.
The Group
enters into certain sales contracts with retainage terms beginning in 2012, under which customers were allowed to withhold payment
of 5% to 10% of the full contract price as retainage after a specified period which generally range from one year to two years
(the “Retainage Period”). Given the limited experience the Group has with respect to the collectability of the
retainage, the Group defers recognition of the retainage as revenue until the customers pay it after the Retainage Period expires.
The total amounts of retainage that were not recognized as revenue were RMB156,158,834 and RMB 144,875,453 as of December 31, 2015
and 2016, respectively.
Additions of retainages in 2014, 2015 and 2016, were RMB 69,588,365,
RMB 35,682,215 and RMB 19,809,181, respectively. Revenue recognized upon the cash collection of the retainages in 2014, 2015 and
2016, were RMB 44,975,763, RMB 73,766,543 and RMB 31,092,562, respectively. All of the retainages are within the Retainage Period
of the sales contracts ranged from one year to two years.
Advance payments received from customers for the future sale
of products are recognized as advances from third party customers in the consolidated balance sheets. Advances from customers are
recognized as revenues when the conditions for revenue recognition described above have been satisfied. Advances from customers
have been recognized as a current liability because the amount at each balance sheet date is expected to be recognized as revenue
within twelve months.
|
(b)
|
Revenue on processing services
|
The Group provides solar power product processing services to
customers and the revenue of processing services is recognized upon completion which is generally evidenced by delivery of processed
products to the customers.
|
(c)
|
Revenue on electricity generation
|
The Group recognizes electricity generation revenue when persuasive
evidence of a power purchase arrangement with the power grid company exists, electricity has been generated and been transmitted
to the grid and the electricity generation records are reconciled with the grid companies, the price of electricity is fixed or
determinable and the collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
|
(d)
|
Revenue on solar system integration
projects
|
The Group recognizes revenue related to solar system integration
projects on the percentage-of-completion basis. The Company estimates its revenues using the cost-to-cost method, whereby it derives
a ratio by comparing the costs incurred to date to the total costs expected to be incurred on the project. The Company applies
the ratio computed in the cost-to-cost analysis to the contract price to determine the estimated revenues earned in each period.
When the Company determines that total estimated costs will exceed total revenues under a contract, it records a loss accordingly.
No loss provision was recorded in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016. There existed no unbilled receivables as of
December 31, 2015 and 2016.
In the PRC, value added tax (“VAT”) at a general
rate of 17% on invoice amount is collected on behalf of tax authorities in respect of the sales of product and is not recorded
as revenue. VAT collected from customers, net of VAT paid for purchases, is recorded as a liability until it is paid to the tax
authorities.
y. Segment report
The Group uses the management approach in determining reportable
operating segments. The management approach considers the internal organization and reporting used by the Group’s chief
operating decision maker for making operating decisions, allocating resources and assessing performance as the source for determining
the Group’s reportable segments. In prior years, management has determined that the Group operated its business in two segments,
as that term is defined by FASB ASC Topic 280,
Segment reporting
.
The Group’s first segment was and is the vertically integrated
solar power products manufacturing business (“manufacturing segment”), from silicon ingots, wafers, cells to solar
modules.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Group disposed of its downstream
solar projects business segment, through which the Group entities develop, constructdeveloped, constructed and operated the solar
projects, including (i) project development, (ii) engineering, procurement, and construction (“EPC”), (iii) connecting
solar projects to the grid, operating and maintenance (“O&M”).
z. Cost of revenue
Cost of revenue for sales of photovoltaic products includes
production and indirect costs, as well as shipping and handling costs for raw materials purchase and provision for inventories.
Costs of revenues for solar system integration projects include
all direct material, labor, subcontractor cost, and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor,
supplies and tools. The Group recognizes job material costs as incurred costs when the job materials have been installed. The Group
considers job materials to be installed materials when they are permanently attached or fitted to the solar power systems as required
by the engineering design.
Costs of electricity generation revenue include depreciation
of solar power project assets and costs associated with operation and maintenance of the project assets. Cost of electricity sales
was nil, nil and RMB0.6 million for years ended December 31, 2014,2015 and 2016, respectively.
aa. Warranty cost
Solar modules produced by the Group are typically sold with
either a 5-year or 10-year warranty for product defects, and a 10-year and 25-year warranty against declines of more than 10% and
20%, respectively, from the initial minimum power generation capacity at the time of delivery. Therefore, the Group is exposed
to potential liabilities that could arise from these warranties. The potential liability is generally in the form of product replacement
or repair.
Consistent with the practice of the solar industry, the Group
has adopted the equivalent of 1% of product revenues to estimate the cost of its warranty obligation and recorded a warranty liability
on that basis. In light of the historical sharp decline and the anticipated long-term decreasing trend of module prices, which
it estimates to reflect replacement cost, as well as based on the accumulation of longer operating experience, the Group reassessed
and updated the estimation of future warranty costs with effect from 31 December 2016. The updated accrual basis consists two
major inputs, which are the 1% expected failure rate and the product replacement cost. Based on the actual claims incurred during
the past years as well as the market practice, the Group projected the expected failure rate as 1% for the whole warranty period,
which is consistent with prior assumptions. Based on the Group’s actual claims experience in the historical periods as well
as management’s current best estimation, the Group believes that the average selling price of solar modules over the past
two years more accurately reflects the estimated warranty cost liability in connection with the products sold by the Group, as
opposed to the current and past spot prices. According to the updated product replacement cost included in the warranty liability
estimation, the Group reversed previous years’ recorded warranty liability of RMB92,083,351 in 2016.
The warranty costs were classified as current liabilities under
other payables and accruals, and non-current liabilities under accrued warranty costs – non-current, respectively, which
reflect our estimate of the timing of when the warranty expenditures will likely be made. For the years ended December 31, 2014,
2015 and 2016, warranty costs accrued were RMB92,255,203, RMB149,304,487 and RMB257,464,846, respectively. The utilization of the
warranty accruals for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were RMB402,425, RMB18,244,745 and RMB11,957,359, respectively.
The Group purchases warranty insurance policy which provides
coverage for the product warranty services of solar modules worldwide. Prepayment for warranty insurance premium is initially recorded
as other assets and is amortized over the insurance coverage period. Prepayment for warranty insurance premium is not recorded
as reduction of estimated warranty liabilities
.
Once the Group receives insurance recoveries, warranty expenses will
be credited.
ab. Shipping and handling
Costs to ship products to customers are included in selling
and marketing expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Costs to ship products to customers were RMB353,352,484, RMB542,857,593
and RMB831,693,851 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
ac. Research and development
Research and development costs are expensed when incurred.
ad. Start-up costs
The Group expenses all costs incurred in connection with start-up
activities, including pre-production costs associated with new manufacturing facilities (excluding costs that are capitalized as
part of property, plant and equipment) and costs incurred with the formation of new subsidiaries such as organization costs.
ae. Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and any tax
loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates or tax laws is recognized in the consolidated statements of
operations in the period the change in tax rates or tax laws is enacted. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the amount
of deferred income tax assets if it is considered more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets
will not be realized.
The accounting for uncertain tax positions requires that the
Company recognizes in the consolidated financial statements the impact of an uncertain tax position, if that position is more likely
than not of being sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. Recognized income tax positions are
measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected
in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Group's policy is to recognize, if any, tax related interest as interest
expenses and penalties as general and administrative expenses. The Group did not have any interest and penalties associated with
uncertain tax positions in the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 as there were no uncertain tax positions.
af. Commitments and Contingencies
Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments,
litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
can be reasonably estimated.
ag. Fair value of financial instruments
The Group does not have any non-financial assets or liabilities
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date (also referred to as an exit price). A hierarchy is established for inputs used in measuring fair value that
gives the highest priority to observable inputs and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. Valuation techniques used to measure
fair value shall maximize the use of observable inputs.
When available, the Group measures the fair value of financial
instruments based on quoted market prices in active markets, valuation techniques that use observable market-based inputs or unobservable
inputs that are corroborated by market data. Pricing information the Group obtains from third parties is internally validated for reasonableness
prior to use in the consolidated financial statements. When observable market prices are not readily available, the Group generally
estimates the fair value using valuation techniques that rely on alternate market data or inputs that are generally less readily
observable from objective sources and are estimated based on pertinent information available at the time of the applicable reporting
periods. In certain cases, fair values are not subject to precise quantification or verification and may fluctuate as economic
and market factors vary and the Group's evaluation of those factors changes. Although the Group uses its best judgment in estimating
the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique. In these cases, a minor
change in an assumption could result in a significant change in its estimate of fair value, thereby increasing or decreasing the
amounts of the Group's consolidated assets, liabilities, equity and net income.
The Group's financial
instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, restricted short-term investments, accounts and
notes receivable, forward contract receivable, call spread options, other receivables, prepayments and other current assets, capped
call options, accounts and notes payable, other payables and accruals, forward contracts payable, short-term borrowings, long-term
borrowings, convertible senior notes, rate cap derivative and warrants.
The forward contracts receivable and payable, call spread options,
capped call options, rate cap derivative, convertible senior notes and warrants are measured at fair value (Note 33). Except for
these financial instruments and long-term borrowing, the carrying values of the Group’s other financial instruments approximated
their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of long-term borrowing approximates
their fair value due to the fact that the related interest rates approximate rates currently offered by financial institutions
for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities.
ah. Government grants
Government grants related to technology upgrades and enterprise
development are recognized as subsidy income when received. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the Group
received financial subsidies of RMB49,785,321 , RMB103,578,019 and RMB168,646,557 from the local PRC government authorities, respectively.
These subsidies were non-recurring, not refundable and with no conditions, including none related to specific use or disposition
of the funds, attached. Such amounts were recorded as subsidy income in the consolidated statements of operations. There are no
defined rules and regulations to govern the criteria necessary for companies to enjoy such benefits and the amount of financial
subsidy is determined at the discretion of the relevant government authorities.
Government grants related to assets are initially recorded as
other payables and accruals which are then deducted from the carrying amount when the assets are ready for use and approved by
related government. The Company received government grant related to assets of RMB92,440,000, nil and nil during the years ended
December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
ai. Repurchase of share
When the Company’s shares are purchased for retirement,
the excess of the purchase price over its par value is recorded entirely to additional paid-in capital subject to the limitation
of the additional paid in capital when the shares were originally issued. When the Company’s shares are acquired for purposes
other than retirement, the purchase price is shown separately as treasury stock.
aj. Statutory reserves
Zhejiang Jinko, as sino-foreign owned joint venture incorporated
in the PRC, is required to make appropriations of net profits, after recovery of accumulated deficit, to (i) a general reserve
fund, (ii) an enterprise expansion fund, and (iii) a staff bonus and welfare fund prior to distribution of dividends
to investors. These reserve funds are set at certain percentage of after-tax profit determined in accordance with PRC accounting
standards and regulations (the "PRC GAAP"). The percentage of net profit for appropriation to these funds is at the discretion
of their board of directors.
Jiangxi Jinko, as wholly foreign owned enterprises incorporated
in the PRC, is required on an annual basis to make appropriations of net profits, after the recovery of accumulated deficit, to
a general reserve fund and a staff bonus and welfare fund. These reserve funds are set at certain percentage of after-tax profit
determined in accordance with the PRC GAAP. The percentage of the appropriation for general reserve fund is at least 10%, and the
percentage of the appropriation for staff bonus and welfare fund is at the discretion of its boards of directors.
Except for the aforementioned subsidiaries, the Company's other
subsidiaries, as domestic enterprises incorporated in the PRC, are required on an annual basis to make an appropriation of net
profits, after the recovery of accumulated deficit, to a statutory reserve fund. The statutory reserve fund is set at the percentage
of not lower than 10% of the after-tax profit determined in accordance with the PRC GAAP.
Once the level of the general reserve fund and the statutory
reserve fund reach 50% of the registered capital of the underlying entities, further appropriations to these funds are discretionary.
The Group's statutory reserves can only be used for specific purposes of enterprises expansion and staff bonus and welfare, and
are not distributable to the shareholders except in the event of liquidation. Appropriations to these funds are accounted for as
transfers from retained earnings to the statutory reserves.
During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the
Group made total appropriations to statutory reserves of RMB66,975,887, RMB99,858,201 and RMB115,487,297, respectively.
ak. Earnings/(Loss) per share
Basic earnings(loss) per share is computed by dividing net income(loss)
attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period using the
two-class method. Under the two-class method, net income is allocated between ordinary shares and other participating securities
based on their participating rights. Diluted earnings(loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income(loss) attributable to
ordinary shareholders, as adjusted for the change in income or loss as result from the assumed conversion of those participating
securities, if any, by the weighted average number of ordinary and dilutive ordinary equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
Ordinary share equivalents consist of the ordinary shares issuable upon the conversion of the convertible senior notes (using the
if-converted method) and ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding share options and warrants (using the treasury
stock method). Potential dilutive securities are not included in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share if the effect is
anti-dilutive.
Periodic accretion to redeemable non-controlling interests in
connection with the outstanding redeemable convertible preferred shares of a subsidiary (Note 8), and the remaining net profit
of the subsidiary (if any after deducting the accretion) that attributes to its outstanding redeemable convertible preferred shares
under the two-class method, are recorded as deductions to consolidated net income (loss) from discontinued operations to arrive
at net income (loss) available to the Company’s ordinary shareholders from discontinued operations.
Changes in income or loss as result from
the assumed conversion of the convertible senior notes, if any, are recorded as the adjustment to the consolidated net income (loss)
from continuing operations to arrive at the diluted net income (loss) available to the Company’s ordinary shareholders from
continuing operations.
al. Share-based compensation
The Company’s share-based payment transactions with employees,
including share options, are measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instrument issued. The fair value of the
award is recognized as compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the period during which an employee is required
to provide service in exchange for the award, which is generally the vesting period.
am. Other comprehensive income/(loss)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) is defined as the change in
equity during a period from non-owner sources. The Company’s other comprehensive income/(loss) for each period presented
is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustment of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries and unrealized gains and losses
on available-for-sale securities. .
an. Convenience translation
Translations of balances in the consolidated balance sheet,
consolidated statement of operation, consolidated statement of comprehensive income and statement of cash flows from RMB into United
States dollars ("US$" or "USD") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 are solely for the convenience
of readers and were calculated at the rate of RMB6.9430 to US$1.00, representing the exchange rate set forth in the H.10 statistical
release of the Federal Reserve Board. No representation is intended to imply that the RMB amounts could have been, or could be,
converted, realized or settled into US$ at that rate on December 31, 2016, or at any other rate.
ao. Recent accounting pronouncements
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation
of Financial Statements – Going Concern”. This standard requires management to evaluate for each annual and interim
reporting period whether it is probable that the reporting entity will not be able to meet its obligations as they become due within
one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. If the entity is in such a position, the standard provides for
certain disclosures depending on whether or not the entity will be able to successfully mitigate its going concern status. This
guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2016. The Group has adopted ASU 2014-15 in 2016.
The Group had positive working capital as of December 31, 2016.
The Group's management believes that the current cash position as of December 31, 2016, the cash expected to be generated from
operations and funds available from borrowings under the bank credit facilities will be sufficient to meet the Group's working
capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from March 29, 2017, the date of issuance of the
fiscal 2016 financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. This guidance was issued to clarify the
principles for recognizing revenue and developing a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting
Standards (“IFRS”). In addition, in August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-14 (ASU 2015-14):
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This update was issued to defer the effective date of ASU No,
2014-09 by one year. Therefore, the effective date of ASU No, 2014-09 for public business entities is for annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted
only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting
period.
In March, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2016-08 (ASU 2016-08), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, which amends the principal-versus-agent
implementation guidance and illustrations in the Board’s new revenue standard (ASU 2014-09). The FASB issued the ASU 2016-08
in response to concerns identified by stakeholders, including those related to (1) determining the appropriate unit of account
under the revenue standard’s principal-versus-agent guidance and (2) applying the indicators of whether an entity is a principal
or an agent in accordance with the revenue standard’s control principle.
In April, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2016-10 (ASU 2016-10), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, which amends certain aspects of the
guidance in ASU 2014-09 (the Board’s new revenue standard) on (1) identifying performance obligations and (2) licensing.
In May 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-12 (ASU2016-12), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”
(“ASU 2016-12”). The amendments in this ASU do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather,
the amendments in this ASU affect only the narrow aspects of Topic 606. The areas improved include: (1) Assessing the Collectability
Criterion in Paragraph 606-10-25-1(e) and Accounting for Contracts That Do Not Meet the Criteria for Step 1; (2) Presentation of
Sales Taxes and Other Similar Taxes Collected from Customers; (3) Noncash Consideration; (4) Contract Modifications at Transition;
(5) Completed Contracts at Transition; and (6) Technical Correction. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments
in this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by ASU 2014-09).
The Group is continuing to evaluate the future impact and method
of adoption of ASU 2014-09 and related amendments on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Group is
considering adoption of the new standard using the modified retrospective method in fiscal 2018. The Group’s ability to adopt
the standard is dependent on system readiness and the completion of the analysis necessary to meet the requirements under ASU 2014-09.
In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2015-11 (ASU 2015-11), "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory" which applies to inventory that
is measured using first-in, first-out ("FIFO") or average cost. Under the updated guidance, an entity should measure
inventory that is within scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary
course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged
for inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out ("LIFO"). This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively with early adoption permitted at the beginning of an interim
or annual reporting period. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2015-16 (ASU 2015-16), “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”.
Under this ASU, an acquirer must recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period
in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The effect on earnings of changes in depreciation or amortization,
or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been
completed as of the acquisition date, must be recorded in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined rather
than retrospectively. This standard is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those
periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2015, including interim reporting periods within those annual periods. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact
of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2015-17 (ASU 2015-17), "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes." This guidance
was issued to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes. The amendments in this Update require that deferred tax liabilities
and assets to be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. This ASU is effective for annual and
interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively with early adoption permitted at the beginning
of an interim or annual reporting period. The Group has not early adopted this Update. As of December 31, 2015 and 2016, the Company
recorded current deferred tax assets amounted to RMB79,100,567 and RMB130,675,655, respectively, and current deferred tax liabilities
amounted to RMB 9,266,399 and RMB 17,074,064, respectively. The Group believes that adoption of this ASU will not have a material
effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2016-01 (ASU 2016-01), "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities." The main objective of this update is to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments
to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. The new guidance addresses certain aspects of recognition,
measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual reporting periods, and
interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption by public entities is permitted only for certain
provisions. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2016-02 (ASU 2016-02), “Leases”. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability
and a lease asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on its balance sheet. The update
also expands the required quantitative and qualitative disclosures surrounding leases. This update is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with earlier application permitted. The Group
is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-06 (ASU 2016-06), “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments”.
This new standard simplifies the embedded derivative analysis for debt instruments containing contingent call or put options by
removing the requirement to assess whether a contingent event is related to interest rates or credit risks. This new standard will
be effective for us on January 1, 2017. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated
financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-07 (ASU 2016-07), “Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the
Equity Method of Accounting”, which eliminates the requirement to retrospectively apply the equity method in previous periods.
Instead, the investor must apply the equity method prospectively from the date the investment qualifies for the equity method.
The amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016,
and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact
of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In March, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2016-09 (ASU 2016-09), “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)”, which simplifies several aspects
of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions for both public and nonpublic entities, including the accounting
for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows.
The new guidance, which is part of the Board’s simplification initiative, also contains two practical expedients under which
nonpublic entities can use a simplified method to estimate the expected term of an award and make a one-time election to switch
from fair value measurement to intrinsic value measurement for liability-classified awards. The ASU is effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adopt is permitted. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard
on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-13 (ASU 2016-13), “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses”, which introduces new guidance for credit losses
on instruments within its scope. The new guidance introduces an approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on
certain types of financial instruments, including, but not limited to, trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities,
loans and net investments in leases. The new guidance also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities
and requires the entities to determine whether all or a portion of the unrealized loss on an available-for-sale debt security is
a credit loss. The standard also indicates that entities may not use the length of time a security has been in an unrealized loss
position as a factor in concluding whether a credit loss exists. The ASU is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Group is in the process of evaluating
the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In August, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2016-15 (ASU 2016-15), “Statement of Cash Flows”, a proposed ASU on restricted cash in response to an EITF consensus-for-exposure.
The proposed ASU would require an entity to include in its cash and cash-equivalent balances in the statement of cash flows those
amounts that are deemed to be restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The proposal’s primary purpose is to eliminate
the diversity in practice related to how entities classify and present changes in restricted cash in the cash flow statement in
accordance with ASC 230. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption
is permitted. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2016-16 (ASU 2016-16), “Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory”. The new
guidance requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory
when the transfer occurs, rather than when the asset is sold to an outside party. The guidance is effective for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted
as of the beginning of an annual reporting period (as of the first interim period if an entity issues interim financial statements).
The new guidance requires adoption on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained
earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on
its consolidated financial statements.
In November, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2016-18 (ASU 2016-18), “Statement of Cash Flows”, which amends ASC 230 to add or clarify guidance on the classification
and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning
after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on
its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2017-01 (ASU 2017-01), “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business”, which clarifies
the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or
disposals of assets or businesses. The standard introduces a screen for determining when assets acquired are not a business and
clarifies that a business must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that contribute to an output to be considered
a business. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that
reporting period. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2017-04 (ASU 2017-04), “Simplifies Goodwill Impairment Test”, which removes the requirement to compare the implied
fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. As a result, under the ASU,
“an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit
with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting
unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting
unit.” The ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Group is in the process
of evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
|
3.
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
On October 31, 2016, the Company completed the sale of all of
the 55% equity interest it indirectly held in Jiangxi Jinko Engineering to Shangrao Kangsheng Technology Co., Ltd. (the "Buyer"),
a company formed by a buyer consortium led by Mr. Xiande Li, chairman of the board of directors of the Company, for a total consideration
of US$ 250 million pursuant to the previously announced Share Purchase Agreement entered into by Wide Wealth Group Holding Limited,
a 55%-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, and the Buyer.
In Conjunction, the Company repurchased all of its Series A,
Series A-1 and Series A-2 redeemable convertible preferred shares (Note 8) with considerations of US$225 million from the preferred
shareholders, while the Company also agreed to transfer the 45% equity interest of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering to related entities
of the preferred shareholders with a total consideration of US$225 million. These two transactions were net-settled.
As a result of the above transactions, the Company disposed
of its downstream business and received US$250 million (RMB1,693.2 million) in cash.
Assets and liabilities related to Jiangxi Jinko Engineering
were reclassified as assets/liabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2015, while results of operations related to Jiangxi Jinko
Engineering, including comparatives, were reported as loss from discontinued operations.
A gain of RMB1,007.9 million (US$145.2 million) was recognized
because of the disposition. The disposal gain was comprised of i) premium of the consideration against the net assets of the discontinued
operations as of the disposition date; ii) recognition of the un-realized profit generated from the module sales transactions between
the continuing and discontinued operations before the disposition date, and reduced by the iii) recognition of warranty costs in
connection with the standard warranty, same as 3
rd
party sales, provided by the continuing operations to the discontinued
operations.
Income tax of RMB39,952,408 was recognized associated with
the gain on disposition and is included in the total 2016 tax provision of RMB 54,466,059 for discontinued operations.
Upon the disposition of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, the Company
provided the loan guarantee and redemption guarantee to Jiangxi Jinko Engineering (note 30).
Results of the discontinued operations
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
January 1 – October 31
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
237,652,141
|
|
|
|
622,107,137
|
|
|
|
952,968,658
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
(94,800,620
|
)
|
|
|
(283,766,608
|
)
|
|
|
(407,369,723
|
)
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
142,851,521
|
|
|
|
338,340,529
|
|
|
|
545,598,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
(753,011
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(54,540,610
|
)
|
|
|
(126,468,315
|
)
|
|
|
(276,685,730
|
)
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(55,293,621
|
)
|
|
|
(126,468,315
|
)
|
|
|
(276,685,730
|
)
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
87,557,900
|
|
|
|
211,872,214
|
|
|
|
268,913,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expenses, net
|
|
|
(61,325,089
|
)
|
|
|
(74,923,604
|
)
|
|
|
(215,226,564
|
)
|
Exchange loss
|
|
|
(7,491,271
|
)
|
|
|
(31,214,031
|
)
|
|
|
(25,441,221
|
)
|
Change in fair value of forward contracts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,455,731
|
|
Other income/(expenses), net
|
|
|
(133,616
|
)
|
|
|
(16,018,551
|
)
|
|
|
37,675
|
|
Subsidy income
|
|
|
955,703
|
|
|
|
1,704,445
|
|
|
|
141,496
|
|
Equity income in affiliated companies
|
|
|
9,549,289
|
|
|
|
13,669,111
|
|
|
|
15,265,937
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,007,884,060
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
29,112,916
|
|
|
|
105,089,584
|
|
|
|
1,056,030,319
|
|
Income tax expense, net
|
|
|
(1,058,939
|
)
|
|
|
(11,329,810
|
)
|
|
|
(54,466,059
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
28,053,977
|
|
|
|
93,759,774
|
|
|
|
1,001,564,260
|
|
Assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations
|
|
December 31,2015
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,291,072,949
|
|
Restricted short-term investments
|
|
|
599,048,331
|
|
Notes receivable, net - third parties
|
|
|
38,644,600
|
|
Accounts receivable, net - third parties
|
|
|
666,200,351
|
|
Other receivables, net - third parties
|
|
|
308,610,206
|
|
Prepayments and other current assets
|
|
|
11,004,290
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,914,580,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
109,587,142
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
5,019,914
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
730,794
|
|
Other assets - third parties
|
|
|
558,575,058
|
|
Restricted cash – non current
|
|
|
173,531,731
|
|
Project Assets
|
|
|
7,044,728,804
|
|
Deferred tax assets - non current
|
|
|
8,040,685
|
|
Total assets held for sale
|
|
|
10,814,794,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings from third parties, including current portion of long-term bank borrowings
|
|
|
700,285,077
|
|
Notes payable - third parties
|
|
|
589,266,149
|
|
Accrued payroll and welfare expenses
|
|
|
21,386,968
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
15,670,018
|
|
Advances from third parties
|
|
|
313,741
|
|
Other payables and accruals
|
|
|
1,314,766,124
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,641,688,077
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
3,319,224,224
|
|
Long-term payables
|
|
|
56,955,933
|
|
Deferred tax liability - non current
|
|
|
11,354,590
|
|
Total liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
6,029,222,824
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Cash flows generated from/(used in ) discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(406,886,606
|
)
|
|
|
(1,431,244,810
|
)
|
|
|
(2,017,319,542
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,511,677,528
|
)
|
|
|
(2,129,264,757
|
)
|
|
|
(2,048,843,302
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
3,323,916,670
|
|
|
|
4,390,737,581
|
|
|
|
5,074,465,592
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalent
|
|
|
405,352,536
|
|
|
|
830,228,014
|
|
|
|
1,008,302,748
|
|
The Group's revenues for the respective periods are detailed
as follows:
|
|
For the years ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Sales of solar modules
|
|
|
9,155,395,954
|
|
|
|
15,086,256,789
|
|
|
|
20,825,750,050
|
|
Sales of silicon wafers
|
|
|
286,585,049
|
|
|
|
138,293,365
|
|
|
|
136,079,690
|
|
Sales of solar cells
|
|
|
200,643,639
|
|
|
|
215,048,296
|
|
|
|
155,016,285
|
|
Sales of recovered silicon materials
|
|
|
11,272,636
|
|
|
|
5,201,794
|
|
|
|
860,047
|
|
Processing service fees
|
|
|
69,581,435
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Solar system integration projects
|
|
|
11,209,600
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
269,661,653
|
|
Revenue from generated electricity
|
|
|
6,188,194
|
|
|
|
9,574,122
|
|
|
|
13,270,367
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,740,876,507
|
|
|
|
15,454,374,366
|
|
|
|
21,400,638,092
|
|
The following table summarizes the Group's net revenues generated
in respective geographic locations:
|
|
For the years ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Inside China (including Hong Kong and Taiwan)
|
|
|
4,119,710,430
|
|
|
|
5,608,963,991
|
|
|
|
8,249,043,110
|
|
Outside China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
1,766,283,018
|
|
|
|
4,146,330,928
|
|
|
|
7,701,560,171
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
486,201,347
|
|
|
|
997,526,339
|
|
|
|
992,645,497
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
580,383,748
|
|
|
|
1,018,522,680
|
|
|
|
898,465,062
|
|
India
|
|
|
272,142,427
|
|
|
|
280,481,768
|
|
|
|
775,458,207
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
5,033,329
|
|
|
|
44,251,671
|
|
|
|
479,569,191
|
|
Turkey
|
|
|
50,119,561
|
|
|
|
377,663,473
|
|
|
|
366,929,805
|
|
UK
|
|
|
1,266,982,317
|
|
|
|
839,243,321
|
|
|
|
342,655,734
|
|
Thailand
|
|
|
65,578,638
|
|
|
|
328,505,810
|
|
|
|
97,904,537
|
|
South Africa
|
|
|
534,571,266
|
|
|
|
346,904,294
|
|
|
|
37,324,002
|
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
593,870,426
|
|
|
|
1,465,980,091
|
|
|
|
1,459,082,776
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,740,876,507
|
|
|
|
15,454,374,366
|
|
|
|
21,400,638,092
|
|
5. OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSES), NET
|
|
For the years ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Guarantee income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,641,685
|
|
Donations
|
|
|
(1,558,583
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(873,320
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,036,319
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(1,558,583
|
)
|
|
|
1,036,319
|
|
|
|
8,768,365
|
|
In 2016, the Group issued debt payment guarantees and redemption
guarantees in favor of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, a related party (note 30). The guarantee liability would be amortized in straight
line during the guarantee period by recoding credit to other income.
In accordance with FASB
ASC 280-010-50-22, the Company considered what financial information is included in the measures of segment profit or loss reviewed
by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) or are otherwise regularly provided to the CODM, to
determine whether to report or disclose a measure of profit or loss and total assets for each reportable segment. The specific
items or accounts included in the measure of segment profit or loss reviewed by the Company’s CODM or are otherwise regularly
provided to the CODM are: revenue from external customer, gross profit/(loss), interest income and expenses, and income /(loss)
before income taxes.
The basis of accounting
for recording revenue from external customer, interest income and expenses, and income/(loss) before income taxes is in conformity
with the accounting policies used in the consolidated financial statements, and such segment financial information is prepared
and disclosed in accordance with aforementioned accounting basis, is on the same basis by which the Company reports internally
to its chief operating decision maker.
The Company’s operating
segments had certain of their own dedicated administrative and corporate key functions, such as accounting, administration, procurements,
marketing, corporate legal and human resource. Costs for these functions are recorded and included in the respective selling,
general and administrative costs for each of our segment. The Company allocates corporate costs to each segments based upon the
estimated benefits, which are determined based on estimated time spent by corporate employees, provided to each segment from these
corporate functions.
The Company’s first
segment was and is the vertically integrated solar power products manufacturing business (“manufacturing segment”),
from silicon ingots, wafers, cells to solar modules.
The Company disposed the
downstream solar projects segment in the year ended December 31, 2016.
The Company and its subsidiaries
file separate income tax returns.
Cayman Islands
Under the current laws
of the Cayman Islands, the Company and its subsidiaries in Cayman Islands are not subject to tax on its income or capital gains.
In addition, upon any payment of dividends by the Company, no Cayman Islands withholding tax is imposed.
British Virgin Islands
Under the current laws
of the British Virgin Islands(“BVI”), the Company’s subsidiary in BVI is not subject to tax on its income or
capital gains. In addition, upon any payment of dividends by the Company, no British Virgin Islands withholding tax is imposed.
People’s Republic
of China
On March 16, 2007,
the National People's Congress approved the Corporate Income Tax Law of the People's Republic of China (the "CIT Law")
with effective on January 1, 2008. The CIT Law enacted a statutory income tax rate of 25%. As foreign invested enterprises,
Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko are entitled to a two year tax exemption from CIT and a 50% CIT reduction for the succeeding
three years thereafter. Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang Jinko are each subject to CIT rate of 12.5% from year 2010 to year 2012. Starting
from year 2013, three of the major subsidiaries of the Group, Jiangxi Jinko, Zhejiang Jinko and Jinko Materials were recognized
by State Administration of Taxation as a “National High and New Technology Enterprise”, entitling them to a preferential
tax rate of 15%. In November 2016, Jiangxi Jinko successfully renewed the qualification and continued to enjoy the preferential
tax rate of 15%.
Under the CIT Law, 10%
withholding income tax ("WHT") will be levied on foreign investors for dividend distributions from foreign invested
enterprises' profit earned after January 1, 2008. For certain treaty jurisdictions such as Hong Kong which has signed double
tax arrangement with the PRC, the applicable WHT rate could be reduced to 5% if foreign investors directly hold at least 25% shares
of invested enterprises at any time throughout the 12-month period preceding the entitlement to the dividends and they are also
qualified as beneficial owners to enjoy the treaty benefit. Deferred income taxes are not provided on undistributed earnings of
the Company's subsidiaries that are intended to be permanently reinvested in China. Cumulative undistributed earnings of the Company's
PRC subsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested totalled RMB1,259,750,077, RMB2,025,814,478 and RMB2,869,500,611 as of
December 31, 2014, 2015, 2016 respectively, and the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability, calculated based on the
5% rate, on the permanently reinvested earnings was RMB62,897,504, RMB101,290,724, RMB143,475,031 as of December 31, 2014, 2015,
2016 respectively .
Hong Kong
The Company's subsidiaries
established in Hong Kong are subject to Hong Kong profit tax at a rate of 16.5% on its assessable profit.
Luxemburg
Jinko Luxemburg is incorporated
in Luxemburg and is subject to corporate income tax at 28.8%.
Japan
Jinko Japan is incorporated
in Japan and is subject to corporate income tax at 38.0%.
European Countries
Jinko Switzerland is incorporated
in Switzerland and according to its current business model where it employs limited staff and generates income exclusively from
trading activities conducted outside Switzerland, is subject to a combined federal, cantonal and communal tax rate of 8.5% in
2016.
Jinko GMBH is incorporated
in Germany and is subject to Germany profit tax rate of approximately 33% on the assessable profit.
Jinko Italy is incorporated
in Italy and is subject to corporate income tax at 31.4%.
Jinko France is incorporated
in France and is subject to corporate income tax at 33.33%.
Jinko Portugal is incorporated
in Portugal and is subject to corporate income tax at 23%.
United States
Both Jinko US and Jinko
US Holding are incorporated in Delaware, the United States. Jinko US and Jinko US Holding do not conduct any business in Delaware,
thus, they are not subject to Delaware State income tax. Jinko US conducts business in California. It is subject to a progressive
federal corporate income tax from 15% to 35% and California state income tax of 8.84%, which is deductible for federal income
tax purpose.
Canada
Jinko Canada is
incorporated in Canada and is subject to a federal corporate income tax of 15% and provinces and territories income tax of 11.5%.
Australia
Jinko Australia is incorporated
in Australia and is subject to corporate income tax at 30%.
South Africa
Jinko South Africa is
incorporated in South Africa and is subject to corporate income tax at 28%.
Brazil
Jinko Brazil is incorporated
in Brazil and is subject to corporate income tax at 15%.
Mexico
Jinko Mexico is incorporated
in Mexico and is subject to corporate income tax at 30%.
Composition of Income
Tax Expense
Income/(loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were taxed within the following jurisdictions:
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Cayman Islands
|
|
|
73,715,803
|
|
|
|
(5,667,142
|
)
|
|
|
(122,966,973
|
)
|
PRC
|
|
|
684,876,769
|
|
|
|
786,947,233
|
|
|
|
1,394,413,594
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
(195,842,589
|
)
|
|
|
85,793,052
|
|
|
|
(23,724,060
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
562,749,983
|
|
|
|
867,073,143
|
|
|
|
1,247,722,561
|
|
For the year ended December
31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the earnings (losses) attributed to Cayman Islands was mainly due to the fair value gain (loss) from
convertible senior notes and capped call options.
The current and deferred
positions of income tax (expense)/benefit from continuing operations included in the consolidated statement of operations for
the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 are as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Current income tax expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
(28,241,780
|
)
|
|
|
(104,597,580
|
)
|
|
|
(234,278,825
|
)
|
Other countries
|
|
|
(7,722,360
|
)
|
|
|
(12,024,951
|
)
|
|
|
(35,469,815
|
)
|
Total current income tax expenses
|
|
|
(35,964,140
|
)
|
|
|
(116,622,531
|
)
|
|
|
(269,748,640
|
)
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
171,357,102
|
|
|
|
16,088,702
|
|
|
|
12,261,634
|
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit, net
|
|
|
135,392,962
|
|
|
|
(100,533,829
|
)
|
|
|
(257,487,006
|
)
|
Reconciliation of
the differences between statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate
Reconciliation between
the statutory CIT rate and the Company's effective tax rate from continuing operations is as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
Statutory CIT rate
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
Effect of permanent differences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—Share-based compensation expenses
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
—Change in fair value of convertible senior notes and capped call options
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
—Accrued payroll and welfare expenses
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
—Change of enacted tax rate
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
—Other permanent differences
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
Difference in tax rate of a subsidiary outside the PRC
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Effect of tax holiday for subsidiaries
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Effective CIT rate
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
Change of enacted tax
rate includes -9.2% impact (RMB51,987,023), -3.5% impact (RMB30,046,299), and 0.4% impact (RMB5,603,309) related to revaluation
of deferred tax assets and liabilities upon the change of certain tax holidays during the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and
2016, respectively.
The aggregate amount
and per share effect of reduction of CIT for certain PRC subsidiaries as a result of tax holidays are as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
The aggregate amount of effect
|
|
|
66,792,435
|
|
|
|
79,037,989
|
|
|
|
135,724,429
|
|
Per share effect—basic
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
Per share effect—diluted
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
Increase of the aggregate
amount of tax holidays effect in 2016 was mainly due to the increase of profits in Jiangxi Jinko, Zhejiang Jinko and Jinko Materials,
who were certified as “National High and New Technology Enterprise” entitling them to a preferential tax rate of 15%
Significant components
of deferred tax assets/(liability)—current
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,458,359
|
|
Provision for inventories, accounts receivable, other receivable
|
|
|
74,388,533
|
|
|
|
81,441,291
|
|
Change in fair value of forward contracts
|
|
|
(244,141
|
)
|
|
|
(96,131
|
)
|
Accrued warranty costs
|
|
|
20,135,070
|
|
|
|
10,505,141
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
1,112,954
|
|
|
|
637,754
|
|
Timing difference for revenue recognition
|
|
|
(17,679,078
|
)
|
|
|
10,974,242
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
18,498,176
|
|
|
|
18,278,850
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
96,211,514
|
|
|
|
139,199,506
|
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(17,110,947
|
)
|
|
|
(8,523,851
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets—current, net
|
|
|
79,100,567
|
|
|
|
130,675,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
(9,266,399
|
)
|
|
|
(17,074,064
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities—current, net
|
|
|
(9,266,399
|
)
|
|
|
(17,074,064
|
)
|
Significant components
of deferred tax assets/liability—non-current
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
|
37,681,060
|
|
|
|
57,699,650
|
|
Accrued warranty costs
|
|
|
73,807,284
|
|
|
|
118,214,437
|
|
Timing difference for project assets, property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
22,735,289
|
|
|
|
8,463,603
|
|
Timing difference for revenue recognition of retainage contract
|
|
|
21,260,336
|
|
|
|
8,113,322
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
155,483,969
|
|
|
|
192,491,012
|
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(37,681,059
|
)
|
|
|
(57,699,650
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets—non-current, net
|
|
|
117,802,910
|
|
|
|
134,791,362
|
|
Timing difference for project assets, property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(50,625,310
|
)
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
(25,220
|
)
|
|
|
(25,220
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities—non-current, net
|
|
|
(25,220
|
)
|
|
|
(50,650,530
|
)
|
Movement of valuation
allowances
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
At beginning of year
|
|
|
(229,484,242
|
)
|
|
|
(67,263,314
|
)
|
|
|
(54,792,006
|
)
|
Current year additions
|
|
|
(51,335,333
|
)
|
|
|
(20,392,519
|
)
|
|
|
(38,362,418
|
)
|
Utilization and reversal of valuation allowances
|
|
|
213,556,261
|
|
|
|
32,863,827
|
|
|
|
26,930,923
|
|
At end of year
|
|
|
(67,263,314
|
)
|
|
|
(54,792,006
|
)
|
|
|
(66,223,501
|
)
|
Valuation allowances were
determined by assessing both positive and negative evidence and have been provided on the net deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty
surrounding its realization. As of December 31, 2015 and 2016, valuation allowances of RMB54,792,006 and RMB66,223,501were provided
against deferred tax assets because it was more likely than not that such portion of deferred tax will not be realized based on
the Group’s estimate of future taxable incomes of all its subsidiaries. If events occur in the future that allow the Group
to realize more of its deferred tax assets than the presently recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation allowances will
result in a non-cash income statement benefit when those events occur. Certain valuation allowance was reversed in 2016 when certain
subsidiaries generated sufficient taxable income to utilize the deferred tax assets. Due to the strong financial performance and
cumulative income position of certain subsidiaries, the Company has determined that the future taxable income of those subsidiaries
is sufficient to realize the benefits of such deferred tax assets. As a result, the Company reversed the valuation allowance of
RMB213.6 million, RMB 32.9 million and RMB 26.9 million in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
8. REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING
INTERESTS
In
July 2014, JinkoSolar Power, one of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into preferred share agreements with
certain investors (“preferred shareholders”) to issue 25,532 shares of series A redeemable convertible preferred shares,
26,809 shares of series A-1 redeemable convertible and preferred shares and 5,106 shares of series A-2 redeemable convertible
preferred shares, respectively, at the price of US$3,917 per share for an aggregate issuance price of US$ 225 million (RMB1,385
million). The preferred shares on an as-if-converted basis represented approximately 45% of the aggregate issued and outstanding
share capital of JinkoSolar Power on the closing date, with the Company holding the remaining 55%.
Pursuant
to the preferred share agreement, the preferred shareholders have the right to convert all or any portion of their preferred shareholdings
into ordinary shares of JinkoSolar Power at the initial conversion ratio of 1:1 at any time after the date of issuance of the
preferred shares. Conversion ratio is subject to adjustment for dilution, including but not limited to stock splits, stock dividends
and recapitalization, In addition, the Preferred Shares will automatically convert into the Company’s ordinary shares upon
the occurrence of a qualified initial public offering (IPO), at the then effective and applicable conversion price. The shareholders
also have the right to require JinkoSolar Power, the Company and WWG Investment, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
and the intermediate holding company that directly holds JinkoSolar Power, to redeem the preferred shares under certain conditions.
Because the series A preferred
shares issued by JinkoSolar Power are redeemable at a determinable price on a determinable date, at the option of the holder,
or upon occurrence of an event that is not solely within the control of the issuer. Accordingly, the redeemable preferred shares
issued by JinkoSolar Power are recorded and accounted for as redeemable non-controlling interests outside of permanent equity
in the Group’s consolidated balance sheets in accordance with ASC 480-10-S99-3A. Because the applicable operative agreements
do not give the preferred shareholders a contractual right to participate in JinkoSolar Power’s earnings or dividends on
an actual or if-convertible basis, no earnings or loss of JinkoSolar Power will be allocated at the Company level to the redeemable
noncontrolling interests. The Group accretes for the difference between the initial carrying value and the ultimate redemption
price to the earliest possible redemption date using the effective interest method. The accretion, which increases the carrying
value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests, is recorded against retained earnings, or in the absence of retained earnings,
by increasing the accumulated deficit.
Together with the disposition
of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, Jinko Solar Power repurchased all of the Series A redeemable convertible preferred shares (Note 8) with considerations of USD 225 million. At the same time, Wide Wealth Group Holding Limited transferred 45% of its equity interest
of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, a holding company of downstream business in China. The two transactions were net-settled as agreed
by Jinkosolar Power Engineering Group Limited and the preferred shareholders.
After
the disposition Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, the Company agreed to provide guarantee to the redemption right of the preferred shareholders
associated with their 45% equity interest of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering (note 30).
The change in the carrying
amount of redeemable non-controlling interests for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 is as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
|
1,435,585,290
|
|
|
|
1,607,925,732
|
|
Accretion to redemption value of redeemable non-controlling interests
|
|
|
172,340,442
|
|
|
|
159,477,930
|
|
Disposition of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,767,403,662
|
)
|
Ending Balance
|
|
|
1,607,925,732
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
9.
|
ACQUISITION OF SOLAR POWER
PLANTS
|
In August 2016, the Group
completed the transactions to acquire 100% equity interest of a solar power project company located in Yanshan, which has started
production since 2015. The purchase consideration is RMB114 million. These two transactions were accounted as business acquisitions
under ASC 805. The results of the acquired entities’ operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements
of the Company since the acquisition date. On the acquisition date, the allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on their fair values was as follows:
|
|
RMB
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
574,202,912
|
|
Total liabilities acquired
|
|
|
(502,202,912
|
)
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
71,670,000
|
|
Total considerations
|
|
|
71,670,000
|
|
Based on the Group’s
assessment, the revenue and net earnings of Yanshan were not considered material to the Group both individually and in aggregate
for the year ended December 31, 2016. Pro forma results of operations for the acquisitions described above have not been presented
because they are not material to the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, either individually or in
aggregate.
Assets acquired through
the acquisition were mainly project assets related to the solar power plant in Yanshan, and liabilities mainly represented payables
in connection with the construction of the solar power plants.
The above power plant
was disposed of as part of the disposition of downstream solar project business.
|
10.
|
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET—THIRD
PARTIES
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Accounts receivables
|
|
|
3,026,232,432
|
|
|
|
5,130,289,380
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(335,713,383
|
)
|
|
|
(376,574,061
|
)
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
2,690,519,049
|
|
|
|
4,753,715,319
|
|
As of December 31, 2015
and 2016, accounts receivable with net book value of RMB420,422,895 and nil were pledged as collateral for the Group’s borrowings
(Note 22).
Movement of allowance
of doubtful accounts
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
At beginning of year
|
|
|
445,956,167
|
|
|
|
428,570,077
|
|
|
|
335,713,383
|
|
Addition
|
|
|
188,572,147
|
|
|
|
151,959,676
|
|
|
|
274,128,700
|
|
Write-off
|
|
|
(44,538,077
|
)
|
|
|
(38,500,106
|
)
|
|
|
(41,816,165
|
)
|
Reversal
|
|
|
(161,420,160
|
)
|
|
|
(206,316,264
|
)
|
|
|
(191,451,857
|
)
|
At end of year
|
|
|
428,570,077
|
|
|
|
335,713,383
|
|
|
|
376,574,061
|
|
Group assesses creditworthiness
of customers before granting any credit terms. This assessment is primarily based on reviewing of customer’s financial statements
and historical collection records, discussion with customers’ senior management, and reviewing of information provided by
third parties, such as Dun & Bradstreet and the insurance company that ultimately insures the Group against customer credit
default.
The significant bad debt
reversal represents the cash collection of the fully reserved long-term receivables. The Company made bad debt provisions for
certain long-term receivables in prior years which were in line with the adverse economic environment in solar industry. With
the recovery of solar industry since 2013, the Company made its best effort to improve the cash collection for the long-aged accounts
receivables. The cash received was recorded as the reversal of prior year bad debt allowance.
|
11.
|
ADVANCES TO SUPPLIERS,
NET – THIRD PARTIES
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Advances to suppliers - current
|
|
|
258,114,710
|
|
|
|
333,291,005
|
|
Provision for advances to suppliers
|
|
|
(6,724,857
|
)
|
|
|
(7,524,746
|
)
|
Advances to suppliers, net
|
|
|
251,389,853
|
|
|
|
325,766,259
|
|
The Company recorded provisions
of RMB2,694,857, nil and RMB799,889, against advances with other suppliers for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2015
and 2016, advances to suppliers with term of less than 1 year mainly represent payments for procurement of recoverable silicon
materials, virgin polysilicon and solar cells and the Group has delivery plan with the respective suppliers to receive the materials
in the next twelve months.
Inventories consisted
of the following:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
530,073,129
|
|
|
|
943,958,480
|
|
Work-in-progress
|
|
|
591,775,978
|
|
|
|
809,571,580
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
2,081,475,935
|
|
|
|
2,719,984,637
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,203,325,042
|
|
|
|
4,473,514,697
|
|
Write-down of the carrying
amount of inventory to its estimated market value was RMB75,935,281, RMB98,791,960 and RMB439,000,231 for the years ended December
31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, and were recorded as cost of revenues in the consolidated statements of operations. Inventory
write downs were mainly related to the inventories whose market value is lower than its carrying amount due to lower photoelectric conversion efficiencies.
As of and December 31,
2015 and December 31, 2016, inventories with net book value of RMB420,422,895 and RMB61,000,000 were pledged as collateral for
the Group’s borrowings (Note 22).
|
13.
|
PREPAYMENTS AND OTHER CURRENT
ASSETS
|
Prepayments and other
current assets consisted of the following:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Value-added tax deductible
|
|
|
443,761,055
|
|
|
|
286,198,731
|
|
Deposit for customer duty, bidding and others
|
|
|
93,536,791
|
|
|
|
154,023,704
|
|
Assets held for sale related to land use right
|
|
|
38,832,489
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Prepayment for income tax
|
|
|
29,879,013
|
|
|
|
24,323,033
|
|
Receivables related to land use right disposal
|
|
|
20,435,188
|
|
|
|
23,172,107
|
|
Prepaid commission
|
|
|
18,970,826
|
|
|
|
2,013,070
|
|
Prepaid insurance premium
|
|
|
16,851,945
|
|
|
|
19,237,805
|
|
Rental deposit and prepayment
|
|
|
4,297,689
|
|
|
|
5,897,704
|
|
Employee advances
|
|
|
7,285,193
|
|
|
|
8,584,936
|
|
Receivables of option exercised
|
|
|
10,210,003
|
|
|
|
6,135,783
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
7,277,406
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Prepaid professional service fee
|
|
|
4,057,488
|
|
|
|
4,095,436
|
|
Receivable related to disposal of subsidiaries (note 1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
185,380,069
|
|
Others
|
|
|
20,053,820
|
|
|
|
47,581,875
|
|
Total
|
|
|
715,448,906
|
|
|
|
766,644,253
|
|
Value-added tax deductible
represented the balance that the Group can utilize to deduct its value-added tax liability within the next 12 months.
As of December 31, 2015
and 2016, all of the employee advances were business related, interest-free, not collateralized and will be repaid or settled
within one year from the respective balance sheet dates.
Derivative assets as of
December 31,2015 represented the foreign exchange call spread option purchased in 2015 and matured prior to December 31,2016.
|
14.
|
INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES
|
Investments accounted
for under the equity method.
On December 20, 2012,
Jinko Power Co., Ltd, a fully owned subsidiary of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Jinchuan
Group Co., Ltd. (“Jinchuan Group”), a Chinese state-owned enterprise, to jointly invest in and establish a company
named Gansu Jintai Electronic Power Co., Ltd. (“Gansu Jintai” or “investee”), to develop 200 MW photovoltaic
(“PV”) solar power plant in Jinchang, Gansu Province, China. Jinko Power Co., Ltd holds 28% equity interest in Gansu
Jintai and accounts for its investment in Gansu Jintai using the equity method as Jinko Power Co., Ltd has the ability to exercise
significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee. Jinko Power Co., Ltd’s share of Gansu Jintai’s
results of operations is included in equity (loss)/gain in affiliated companies in the income from discontinued operations, with
an amount of RMB 9,549,284, RMB13,669,112 and RMB15,265,937 for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
The above investment is
disposed as part of the disposition of downstream solar project segment (note 3).
Investments accounted
for under the cost method
In May 2012, the Group
acquired a 9% stake in Heihe Hydropower Development Co., Ltd, a company in Gansu province, China, for a consideration of RMB7,200,000.
The Group accounted for the RMB7.2 million using the cost method of accounting.
|
15.
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT,
NET
|
Property, plant and equipment
used in continuing operation and related accumulated depreciation are as follows:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
843,434,718
|
|
|
|
1,429,839,237
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
4,109,495,144
|
|
|
|
4,886,493,031
|
|
Motor vehicles
|
|
|
32,196,288
|
|
|
|
34,434,859
|
|
Furniture, fixture and office equipment
|
|
|
88,284,199
|
|
|
|
136,797,799
|
|
|
|
|
5,073,410,349
|
|
|
|
6,487,564,926
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,731,339,034
|
)
|
|
|
(2,028,991,593
|
)
|
Less: Impairment
|
|
|
(35,263,789
|
)
|
|
|
(51,439,373
|
)
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,306,807,526
|
|
|
|
4,407,133,960
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
459,628,038
|
|
|
|
331,547,393
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,766,435,564
|
|
|
|
4,738,681,353
|
|
Depreciation expenses
were RMB348,022,445, RMB392,197,508 and RMB449,079,007 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Construction in progress
primarily represents the construction of new production line. Costs incurred in the construction are capitalized and transferred
to property and equipment upon completion, at which time depreciation commences.
In the years ended December
31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the Group recorded impairment of RMB6,217,151, nil and RMB 125,524,021 related to the retirement of certain
equipment in production lines that had become obsolete.
As of December 31, 2015
and 2016, certain property, plant and equipment with net book value amounting of RMB2,063,567,296 and RMB 1,899,053,100 are pledged
as collateral for the Group’s borrowings (Note 22).
Project assets represent
the overseas solar projects operated by the Company after the disposition of downstream solar projects. In the year ended December
31,2016, the Company obtained two small solar projects in Italy as the settlement of the accounts receivables. In addition, the
Company commenced developing solar power projects in overseas which are still under construction. Project assets and related accumulated
depreciation are as follows:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Completed
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,188,445
|
|
Under construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31,935,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,060,303
|
)
|
Project Assets, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
55,063,496
|
|
Land use rights represent
fees paid to the government to obtain the rights to use certain lands over periods of 50 to 70 years, as applicable, in the PRC.
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Land use rights
|
|
|
386,633,770
|
|
|
|
495,555,226
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(36,719,630
|
)
|
|
|
(44,614,631
|
)
|
Land use rights, net
|
|
|
349,914,140
|
|
|
|
450,940,595
|
|
Amortization expense was
RMB6,882,863, RMB6,300,488 and RMB7,895,001 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. As of December 31,
2016, estimated amortization expense in each of the next five years is RMB8,909,209.
The Company disposed certain
of its land use rights and recognized the gain of nil, RMB3,013,258 and RMB3,727,161 for the year ended 2014, 2015, and 2016 respectively.
As of December 31, 2015
and 2016, certain land use rights with net book value of RMB303,519,533 and RMB120,325,828 were pledged as collateral for the
Company’s borrowings (Note 22).
|
18.
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
|
Intangible assets and
their related amortization are as follow:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Trademark
|
|
|
3,071,480
|
|
|
|
3,071,480
|
|
Computer software
|
|
|
22,709,977
|
|
|
|
24,964,233
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(5,309,010
|
)
|
|
|
(7,738,986
|
)
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
20,472,447
|
|
|
|
20,296,727
|
|
Amortization expense was
RMB1,136,953, RMB2,223,458 and RMB3,202,787,for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
|
19.
|
OTHER ASSETS – THIRD
PARTIES
|
Other assets consisted
of the following:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Prepayment for warranty insurance premium
|
|
|
87,195,213
|
|
|
|
103,714,696
|
|
Prepayments for purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
71,631,287
|
|
|
|
491,201,438
|
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
59,874,717
|
|
|
|
22,863,614
|
|
Others
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
227,701,217
|
|
|
|
617,779,748
|
|
|
20.
|
OTHER PAYABLES AND ACCRUALS
|
Other payables and accruals
consisted of the following:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables for purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
323,124,629
|
|
|
|
410,326,566
|
|
Freight payables
|
|
|
142,678,891
|
|
|
|
208,186,310
|
|
Value-added tax and other tax payables
|
|
|
73,936,622
|
|
|
|
84,469,920
|
|
Accrued warranty cost
|
|
|
88,911,062
|
|
|
|
64,045,947
|
|
Accrued utilities, rentals and interest
|
|
|
52,704,521
|
|
|
|
36,748,524
|
|
Government grants related to assets
|
|
|
39,359,068
|
|
|
|
21,436,902
|
|
Contracted labor fee
|
|
|
37,451,104
|
|
|
|
25,873,505
|
|
Countervailing and anti-dumping duty
|
|
|
30,052,841
|
|
|
|
15,033,545
|
|
Accrued professional service fees
|
|
|
17,283,935
|
|
|
|
11,378,367
|
|
Commission payables
|
|
|
17,106,323
|
|
|
|
1,125,092
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
7,409,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Insurance premium payables
|
|
|
2,557,415
|
|
|
|
735,408
|
|
Sale-lease back payable (note 23)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
59,553,667
|
|
Public offering issuance cost
|
|
|
2,328,174
|
|
|
|
2,328,174
|
|
Others
|
|
|
63,270,002
|
|
|
|
78,178,444
|
|
Total
|
|
|
898,173,587
|
|
|
|
1,019,420,371
|
|
|
21.
|
BONDS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED
INTEREST
|
On January 29, 2013, Jiangxi
Jinko issued a six-year bond with an aggregate principal amount of RMB800,000,000 which bears a fixed annual interest rate of
8.99% and will mature on January 28, 2019. At the end of the third year in the life of the bonds, the Group has the option
to raise the interest rate by up to 100 basis points, and the bondholders will have the right to require Jiangxi Jinko to repurchase
all or part of their bond, at such time. The bond is recorded on amortized cost basis with the interest rate of 8.99%. Interest
payable related to the bond was RMB66,725,778 and nil for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
Bonds payable are all
issued at face value, unsecured from the issuance date.
The Company has repurchased
the bond with the face value of RMB800,000,000 and settled all the interests in the year ended December 31, 2016.
(a) Short-term borrowings
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Short-term bank borrowings
|
|
|
2,562,383,328
|
|
|
|
5,245,641,157
|
|
Long-term bank borrowings—current portion
|
|
|
27,480,800
|
|
|
|
242,987,883
|
|
Total short-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,589,864,128
|
|
|
|
5,488,629,040
|
|
The short-term bank borrowings outstanding as of December 31,
2015 and 2016 carried a weighted average interest rate of 4.72% and 3.72% per annum, respectively. Included in the balance
of short-term bank borrowings as of December 31, 2016 were borrowings of RMB1,489,987, RMB2,209,265,547 and RMB108,530,522
which are denominated and repayable in EURO, USD and JPY, respectively.
In August 2015, Jiangxi Jinko entered into a 20-month RMB700.0
million loan agreement with The Export-Import Bank of China. As of December 31, 2016, Jiangxi Jinko has drawn down RMB 388,800,000
which is due and payable in 2017. The effective interest rate of the borrowing was 4.47% as of December 31, 2016.
As of December 31, 2016, the Group had short-term bank borrowings
of RMB1,580,871,978 credit loans and RMB 849,600,000 letter of credit loan. The remaining short-term bank borrowings of RMB3,058,157,062
were either guaranteed by other parties and/or collateralized on the Group’s assets, detailed as following:
• Borrowings of RMB270,000,000 guaranteed by Jiangxi Jinko,
RMB286,458,230 guaranteed by Jinko Solar Holding, RMB33,000,000 guaranteed by Jiangxi Jinko and Jiangxi Import & Export, RMB335,858,000
guaranteed by Zhejiang Jinko and Jinko Solar Holding, RMB487,999,100 guaranteed by Heji, respectively.
• Borrowings of RMB50,000,000 collateralized on bank note.
• Borrowings of RMB76,307,000 collateralized on bank deposit
owned by Shanghai JinkoSolar PV Electricity Co.Ltd, a subsidiary of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering .
• Borrowings of RMB234,114,732 collateralized on letter
of guarantee issued by Jiangxi Jinko.
• Borrowings of RMB381,535,000 collateralized on the Zhejiang
Jinko’s share pledge, and guaranteed by Jiangxi Jinko.
•
Borrowings of
RMB902,885,000 collateralized on the Group's certain building and equipment, including RMB540,758,000 which were also
collateralized on the Group's certain land use rights, RMB136,000,000 were also collateralized on the Group's certain
inventory. In addition, included in these borrowings there were borrowings of RMB184,900,000 guaranteed by Jiangxi Jinko,
RMB20,000,000 guaranteed by Jiangxi Jinko and Jiangxi Import & Export, RMB283,855,116 guaranteed by Zhejiang Jinko and
Jinko Solar Holding, RMB90,000,000 guaranteed by related party’s equipment. The net book value of the land use right,
building, equipment and inventory was RMB120,325,828, RMB1,899,053,100 and RMB61,000,000, respectively as of December 31,
2016.
(b) Long-term bank
borrowings
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Long-term bank borrowings
|
|
|
1,336,160,627
|
|
|
|
731,507,442
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(27,480,800
|
)
|
|
|
(242,987,883
|
)
|
Total long-term borrowings
|
|
|
1,308,679,827
|
|
|
|
488,519,559
|
|
Future principal repayments
on the long-term borrowings are as follows:
Year ended December 31,
|
|
RMB
|
|
2017
|
|
|
242,987,883
|
|
2018
|
|
|
184,370,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
304,149,559
|
|
Total
|
|
|
731,507,442
|
|
1) Long-term bank borrowings
·
In 2016, the Company entered into a 3-year loan agreement with Jiangxi Guochuang Investment
Co., Ltd. (“Guochuang”) with the principle amount of RMB 20,000,000 which was interest free. Guochuang is a government
background entity who provided the interest free loan to the Company to support its daily operations. The borrowing was collateralized
on Jiangxi Jinko’s share pledge.
·
In 2015, the Company entered into a 3-year loan agreement with Finance and Investment Management
Center of Jiangxi Province in China with the principle amount of RMB20, 000,000 and interest rate of 3.0%. The borrowing was collateralized
on the Jiangxi Jinko’s share pledge and guaranteed by Jiangxi Jinko. The loan was not discounted as the impact was immaterial.
·
In 2015 and 2016, the Company entered into loan agreements with the Export-Import Bank of China
for an aggregate amount of RMB 609,283,000, which were repayable from April 2017 to June 2020. As of December 31 2016, balance
of these borrowings amounted to RMB 609,283,000, including RMB235,858,000 due in 2017. The effective interest rate of the borrowings
was 3.94% in 2016. The Borrowings were guaranteed by Zhejiang Jinko and Jinko Solar Holding.
·
In 2016, the Company entered into a 10-year loan agreement with China Merchants Bank for a principle
amount of RMB87, 880,000 with the interest rate of 5.39%, which was repayable from February 2016 to January 2026. As of December
31, 2016, the total outstanding balances amounted to RMB82, 224,442, including RMB 7,129,883 due in 2017. The borrowing was collateralized
on the Group’s certain buildings with the net book value of RMB194, 531,251.
2) Long-term borrowings
with embedded warrants
In July 2015, JinkoSolar
Power entered into a loan agreement with Credit Suisse and 6 other financial institutions for an eighteen months loan in the principle
amount of USD150,000,000 to develop power plant projects. The interest rate is 6% plus LIBOR per annum, and accrued interest is
due and payable at the end of every six months. Total debt issuance cost of USD4,000,000 was deducted from the proceeds directly.
The loan shall become immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of an IPO of JinkoSolar Power or change of control of JinkoSolar
Holding, or any unlawful matter occurs. This financing was guaranteed by Canton Best BVI, Jinko Power Co., Ltd., and a subsidiary
of Jinkosolar Holding.
In conjunction with the
loan agreement, JinkoSolar Power issued 6,750 warrants or entitlement of 0.675% of JinkoSolar Power's fully diluted share capital
to these 7 financial institutions to acquire JinkoSolar Power’s fully-paid ordinary shares. The warrant holders can purchase
ordinary shares anytime during the term of the above loan at exercise price which is the Par Value of US$0.0000001. The entitlement
of shares expressed as a percentage of JinkoSolar Power’s fully diluted share capital is adjusted based on the time when
IPO occurs, as: a) 0.675% if an IPO occurs within 6 months from July 24, 2015 (“Utilisation Date”); b) 1.425%
if an IPO occurs after 6 months and within 12 months Utilisation Date; and c) 2.10% if an IPO occurs after 12 months of the
Utilisation Date. The entitlement of the shares is also subject to adjustment in the case of a non-qualifying IPO event of JinkoSolar
Power. Warrant holders can elect for net cash settlement if IPO of JinkoSolar Power occurs.
The warrant holders have
the put rights to request JinkoSolar Power to purchase all or part of its outstanding warrants in case of a put event, where a)
an IPO occurs prior to the Final Maturity Date of the loan (January 10, 2017); b) an IPO has not occurred as at the Final
Maturity Date; c) all of the Loan is repaid, or becomes due and payable, prior to the Final Maturity Date of the loan facility;
or d) an event of default occurs and (if the Loan is then outstanding) there is an acceleration of the loan prior to the Final
Maturity Date. The repurchase price is equal to the aggregate of: (a) an amount that would give an internal rate of return of
10% on the aggregate principal amount of the loan, calculated from the Utilisation Date until the later of (i) the date of full
repayment of the loan and (ii) the date that falls twelve months after the Utilisation Date; less the aggregate principal
amount of the loan which has been repaid and all interest paid by JinkoSolar Power at the time of a warrant holder's exercise
of the warrant put rights.
In accordance with ASC
subtopic 480, the warrants are legally detachable and separately exercisable from the loan and thus accounted for as a freestanding
instrument. As the warrant holder can either exercise the warrant to subscribe for fully-paid ordinary shares, or elect for net
cash settlement upon the exercise of the warrants, which falls within the scope of ASC 480. Accordingly, the warrants are liability
derivatives which need to be fair valued on day one and marked to market subsequently at each reporting period end. The fair value
gain or loss arising from the remeasurement is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
Therefore, the loan proceeds
are allocated first to the warrants based on their fair value, and the residual is allocated to the base loan facility and creating
a discount on debt. The discount on debt resulted from the allocation of the proceeds to warrants and transactions fees allocated
to the loan are accounted for under the effective interest method.
The fair value of the
warrants at the issuance date of July 24, 2015 was US$10,190,000 (RMB 62,331,211), and the residual allocated to the loan was
US$139,810,000 (RMB 855,203,789). Total transaction cost was US$ 4,358,118 (RMB 26,658,170), among which US$ 296,061 (RMB 1,810,978)
allocated to warrants were charged to financial costs as incurred during the year ended December 31, 2015, and US$ 4,062,057 (RMB
24,847,192) allocated to the loan were recorded as debt discount as the Group has early adopted ASU 201503 in 2015.
The fair value of the
warrants at December 31, 2015 was US$ 10,530,000 (RMB 68,377,608) and the fair value change of US$ 340,000 (RMB 2,096,024) was
recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The effective interest rate of
the loan was 13.95% per annum. Total interest cost associated with the loan incurred during the year ended December 31, 2015 was
US$ 8,017,525 (RMB 49,954,794). The carrying value of the loan as of December 31, 2015 was US$139,453,836 (RMB 905,557,426) due
to debt discount amortization of US$ 3,705,892 (RMB 24,064,580).
In September 2016, JinkoSolar
Power refinanced and repaid the loan in advance and the warrants were repurchased at the same time. Total interest cost associated
with the loan incurred during the year ended December 31, 2016 was US$18,109,126 (RMB119,050,121).
3) Financings associated
with failed sale-lease back transactions
In 2015, certain subsidiaries
of JinkoSolar Power (“seller-lessee”) sold 317MW self-built solar projects (“leased assets”) with carrying
amount of RMB 1,276,496,254 to different domestic financial leasing companies (“buyer-lessors”) for cash consideration
of RMB2,033,000,000 and simultaneously entered into the contracts to lease back the leased assets from the buyer-lessors for 5
to 12 years. As of December 31, 2015, the seller-lessee received RMB1,589,704,880 proceeds in total netting off the transaction
costs of RMB 53,295,120. Pursuant to the terms of the agreements, seller-lessee is required to pay to the buyer-lessors lease
payment over the lease period and is entitled to obtain the ownership of these equipment at a nominal price upon the expiration
of the lease.
As the leased assets are
considered integral with real estate under ASC 360, the sale-leaseback rules related to real estate are applied. The lease transactions
do not qualify as a sale-leaseback transaction as these solar projects are initially invested and build up by seller-lessee with
expected useful life of 20 years, and are continuingly maintained by seller-lessee. Seller-lessee has an obligation to repurchase
the leased assets upon the expiry of the lease. In addition, after the lease period, seller-lessee will keep using the assets
and has no plans to sell or early-disposal.
Accordingly, these transactions
are accounted for as financing transactions in accordance with ASC 840. Internal rate of return is used in the computation of
interest cost.
As of December 31, 2015,
the Company recorded RMB1,268,724,225 under long-term borrowings and RMB 149,481,917 as current portion. The weighted average
effective interest rate of the financing was 6.55% and interest costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2015 were RMB
9,813,448. These sale-leaseback financings were collateralized by each seller-lessee’s solar power project assets, equity
interests, accounts receivable, and also guaranteed by a shareholder, Jinko Power Co., Ltd., and Jiangxi Jinko. The net book value
of solar power project assets, equity interest and accounts receivable collateralized were RMB1,276,496,254, RMB 862,082,542 and
RMB 98,147,637 respectively, as of December 31, 2015.
Financings associated
with the failed sale-lease back transactions are disposed of as part of the disposition of downstream solar project business.
Interest costs incurred during the period from January 1, 2016 through the disposition date amounted to RMB142,644,823 was
recorded in the discontinued operations (note 3).
23.
LONG-TERM PAYABLES
Zhejiang Jinko Finance
Leasing Co., Ltd. (“Zhejiang leasing”) was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On November 7, 2016, the Company
disposed Zhejiang Leasing with the consideration of RMB183 million (USD26.4 million). The transaction was closed on November 30,
2016. Loss of disposal amounted to RMB15.2 million (USD2.2 million) was recognized. Considerations associated with the transaction
have not been collected as of December 31, 2016.
During the year ended
December 31, 2015 and 2016, the Company sold certain module equipment (“leased assets”) to Zhejiang Leasing (the “purchaser-lessor”)
and simultaneously entered into one or three-year contracts to lease back the leased assets from the purchaser-lessor. Pursuant
to the terms of the contracts, the Company is required to pay to the purchaser-lessor quarterly lease payment over three years
and is entitled to obtain the ownership of these equipment at a nominal price upon the expiration of the lease. The accounting
was eliminated as intercompany transaction in the consolidated financial statements of the Company in previous periods. Upon the
disposition of Zhejiang leasing, the lease is classified as capital lease. In connection with these sale-leaseback transactions,
the Company immediately recognized a loss of RMB 13,719,493 in the year ended December 31,2016.
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount of the equipment sold
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
173,699,493
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
159,980,000
|
|
Loss recognized
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,719,493
|
|
As of December 31, 2015
and 2016, the net value of the leased assets are:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
159,980,000
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11,440,625
|
)
|
Net Value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
148,539,375
|
|
As of December 31,
2016, future minimum payments required under non-cancellable capital and financing lease are:
Year ending December 31,
|
|
RMB
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
61,379,772
|
|
2018
|
|
|
39,341,865
|
|
2019
|
|
|
5,033,868
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
105,755,505
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(2,186,207
|
)
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
103,569,298
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
59,553,667
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
44,015,631
|
|
24.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share
and diluted earnings per share have been calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
698,142,945
|
|
|
|
766,539,314
|
|
|
|
990,235,555
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
28,053,977
|
|
|
|
93,759,774
|
|
|
|
1,001,564,260
|
|
Total net income
|
|
|
726,196,922
|
|
|
|
860,299,088
|
|
|
|
1,991,799,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
698,142,945
|
|
|
|
766,539,314
|
|
|
|
990,235,555
|
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests from continuing operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(63,348
|
)
|
|
|
(432,541
|
)
|
Net income
attributable to Jinkosolar’s ordinary shareholders from continuing operations
|
|
|
698,142,945
|
|
|
|
766,602,662
|
|
|
|
990,668,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
28,053,977
|
|
|
|
93,759,774
|
|
|
|
1,001,564,260
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests from discontinued operations
|
|
|
851,167
|
|
|
|
4,270,460
|
|
|
|
6,044,451
|
|
Less: Accretion to redemption value of redeemable non-controlling interests from discontinued operations
|
|
|
52,320,700
|
|
|
|
172,340,442
|
|
|
|
159,477,930
|
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to Jinkosolar’s ordinary shareholders from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(25,117,890
|
)
|
|
|
(82,851,128
|
)
|
|
|
836,041,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Jinkosolar’s ordinary shareholders from continuing operations
|
|
|
698,142,945
|
|
|
|
766,602,662
|
|
|
|
990,668,096
|
|
Dilutive effects of Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
(79,967,781
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,142,661
|
|
Numerator for diluted income per share for continuing operations
|
|
|
618,175,164
|
|
|
|
766,602,662
|
|
|
|
996,810,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted income/(loss) per share for discontinued operations
|
|
|
(25,117,890
|
)
|
|
|
(82,851,128
|
)
|
|
|
836,041,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
122,980,870
|
|
|
|
124,618,416
|
|
|
|
125,870,272
|
|
Dilutive effects of share options
|
|
|
3,934,741
|
|
|
|
3,184,545
|
|
|
|
2,246,095
|
|
Assumed conversion of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
26,870,920
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,474,074
|
|
Denominator for diluted calculation - weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
153,786,531
|
|
|
|
127,802,961
|
|
|
|
130,590,441
|
|
Continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to Jinkosolar's ordinary shareholders from continuing operations
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
|
|
6.15
|
|
|
|
7.87
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Jinkosolar's ordinary shareholders from continuing operations
|
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
7.63
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Jinkosolar's ordinary shareholders from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
|
(0.66
|
)
|
|
|
6.64
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share attributable to Jinkosolar's ordinary shareholders from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
As disclosed in Note 8,
redeemable non-controlling Interests, JinkoSolar Power issued redeemable convertible preferred shares, which are accounted for
as redeemable non-controlling interest and are accreted from the initial carrying value to the ultimate redemption price on the
earliest possible redemption date. For the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, accretion of RMB52,320,700, RMB172,340,442
and RMB159,477,930, respectively, for redeemable non-controlling interests was recorded as a charge to decrease net income from
discontinued operations to arrive at net income from discontinued operations attributable to JinkoSolar Holding’s ordinary
shareholders.
25.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
According to the guidance
promulgated by the central government, companies (and employees) are required to contribute, in specified portions, to the social
insurance funds (including medical care insurance, work injury insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity insurance and pension
benefits) as well as the housing funds (collectively, “employee welfare funds”) on a monthly basis for all of the
employees based on such employees’ actual salaries or the applicable capped salary base, whichever is lower. An employee
is entitled to request its employer to make the required portion of contributions in the statutory amounts to the employee welfare
funds.
In line with local customary
practices, the Company has made contributions to the social insurance funds which met the requirement of the local minimum wage
standard, instead of its employees’ actual salaries as required by the above described guidance, and has not made full contribution
to the housing funds.
Based on the Company’s
observation of local practices and consultation with relevant government authorities, the Company believes its practice has been
consistent with the common practice adopted by businesses in Shangrao and Haining, where the Company’s main subsidiaries
operate.
However, the Company believes it is probable that it will be required to make additional contributions to the employee
welfare funds if (i) the government authorities were to strictly enforce the statutory contribution requirements, or (ii) the
employees were to request the Company to make full contributions to their employee welfare funds (such request, if made, would
most likely be supported by the labor arbitration center or the labor administrative bureau). Therefore, the Company recognizes
the difference between the amount of its actual contributions and the statutory contribution requirements under the guidance promulgated
by the central government as a liability for employee welfare benefits. The unpaid balance of accrued liability accrued for the
welfare benefits were RMB 281,029,823 and RMB 355,766,607 as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
On
October 28, 2010, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress issued and adopted the Social Insurance Law (the
“Social Insurance Law”), which became effective on July 1, 2011. The Social Security Law imposes certain fines for
the aggregated amount of any outstanding contributions if such contributions are not made within a prescribed time period. In
light of this requirement, the Company had accrued a penalty on the basis of a daily rate of 0.05% of the outstanding contributions
as provided under the Social Insurance Law prior to 2014. The unpaid balance of penalty accrued for employee welfare benefits
were RMB12,063,712 and RMB25,807,949 as of December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
On September 26, 2013,
the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the People's Republic of China announced “Regulations on the Declaration
and Payment of Social Welfare” (“New Social Security Regulation”), which took effect on November 1, 2013. The
New Social Security Regulation clarifies that the local social security authority should issue a notification to the employers
who fail to make appropriate contribution of social security and a late-payment penalty charge will only be imposed to employers
who fail to pay the outstanding contribution within five days upon the receipt of the notification. However, there were different
interpretations of the New Social Security Regulation as to applicability of the penalty charge by different local authorities
in difference cities and provinces in late 2013, therefore, the Company performed investigation and legal assessment as well as
communicating with relevant local authorities. Legal assessment was completed in late 2014. In the opinion of the management,
the probability that the Company would be required to pay late-payment penalty in connection with the unpaid contribution is remote,
given that the Company has received certificates from local social security authorities which confirmed that the Company was in
compliance with the local social insurance regulations as of December 31, 2014 and that local social security authorities have
not issued any notification for payment of outstanding contribution to the Company. Accordingly, the Company did not accrue for
late-payment penalty since then.
26.
CONVERTIBLE SENIOR NOTES AND CAPPED CALL OPTIONS
2016 Convertible Notes
The
Company issued USD 125 million of convertible senior notes on May 17, 2011, which matures on May 15, 2016 (the “2016
Notes). The interest rate is 4% per annum payable semi-annually, in arrears. No accrued interest is to be paid on the 2016 Notes
when they are converted.
Holders
have the option to convert their Notes from the earlier of (i) when the registration statement of the 2016 Notes becomes
effective and (ii) the first anniversary of the date on which the 2016 Notes are first issued, through to and including the
business day prior to the maturity date, into ADSs representing the ordinary shares initially at a conversion rate of 29.6307
ADSs per US$1,000 principal amount of Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately US$33.75 per ADS).
The
conversion rate is subject to change on anti-dilution and upon certain fundamental changes. Fundamental changes are defined as
1) any “person” or “group” beneficially owns (directly or indirectly) 50% or more of the total voting
power of all outstanding classes of Company’s shares or has the power to elect a majority of the members of the board of
directors; 2) Company consolidates with, or merge with or into, another person or the Company sells, assigns, conveys, transfers,
leases or otherwise disposes of all or substantially all of its assets, or any person consolidates with, or merges with or into,
the Company; 3) Termination of trading of Company’s ADSs; and 4) adoption of a plan relating to our liquidation or dissolution.
The
holders have the option to require the Company to repurchase the 2016 Notes, in whole or in part, in the event of a fundamental
change for an amount equal to the 100% of the principal amount and any accrued and unpaid interest in the event of fundamental
changes. Management assessed that the likelihood of fundamental change is remote.
The
holders will have the right to require the Company to repurchase for cash all or any portion of their notes on May 15, 2014 at
a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to,
but excluding, the repurchase date. No repurchase request was received by the Company.
As
a result of the depressed market conditions, the Company repurchased 2016 Notes with face value of US$2 million or 1.6% of the
Notes at approximately 41% of the face value up to December 31, 2011. There were no repurchase of 2016 Notes in the years ended
December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014. The Company repurchased 2016 Notes with face value of US$22.5 million or 18% of the Notes at
approximately 96% of the face value during the year ended December 31, 2015.The Company repurchased the remaining 2016 Notes with
face value of US$100.5 million or 80.4% of the Notes at approximately 99% of the face value during the year ended December 31,
2016.
2019 Convertible Notes
The Company issued USD
150 million of convertible senior notes on January 22, 2014, which will mature on February 1st, 2019 (the “2019 Notes”).
The interest rate is 4% per annum payable semi-annually, in arrears. No accrued interest to be paid on the 2019 Notes when they
are converted.
Holders
have the option to convert their Notes from the earlier of (i) when the registration statement of the 2019 Notes becomes effective
and (ii) the first anniversary of the date on which the Notes are first issued, through to and including the business day prior
to the maturity date into ADSs representing the ordinary shares initially at a conversion rate of 21.8221 ADSs per US$1,000 principal
amount of Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately US$45.83 per ADS).
The
conversion rate is subject to change on anti-dilution and upon certain fundamental changes. Fundamental changes are defined as
1) any “person” or “group” beneficially owns (directly or indirectly) 50% or more of the total voting
power of all outstanding classes of Company’s shares or has the power to elect a majority of the members of the board of
directors; 2) Company consolidates with, or merge with or into, another person or the Company sells, assigns, conveys, transfers,
leases or otherwise disposes of all or substantially all of its assets, or any person consolidates with, or merges with or into,
the Company; 3) Termination of trading of Company’s ADSs; and 4) adoption of a plan relating to our liquidation or dissolution.
The
holders have the option to require the Company to repurchase the 2019 Notes, in whole or in part, in the event of a fundamental
change for an amount equal to the 100% of the principal amount and any accrued and unpaid interest in the event of fundamental
changes. Management assessed that the likelihood of fundamental change is remote.
The holders will have
the right to require the Company to repurchase for cash all or any portion of their notes on February 1, 2017 at a repurchase
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding,
the repurchase date.
While the 2019 Notes remain
outstanding, the Company or its subsidiaries will not create or permit to subsist any security upon its property, assets or revenues
(present or future) to secure any international investment securities or to secure any guarantee of or indemnity of any international
investment securities unless the obligations under the Notes and the indenture (a) are secured equally and ratably therewith,
or (b) have the benefit of such other security, guarantee, indemnity or other arrangement as shall be approved by holders
of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding.
As a result of the depressed
market conditions, the Company repurchased 2019 Notes with a face value of US$88.9 million or 59.3% of the Notes at approximately
96% of the face value up to during the year ended December 31, 2016.
A
ccounting for 2016
Convertible Notes and 2019 Convertible Notes
The
Company has RMB as its functional currency, and the 2016 Notes and 2019 Notes are denominated in USD. As a result, the conversion
feature is dual indexed to the Company’s stock as well as the RMB and USD exchange rate, and is considered an embedded derivative
which needs to be bifurcated from the host instrument in accordance with ASC 815.
ASC
815-15-25 provides that if an entity has a hybrid financial instrument that would require bifurcation of embedded derivatives
under ASC 815, the entity may irrevocably elect to initially and subsequently measure a hybrid financial instrument in its entirety
at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. The fair value election can be made instrument by instrument
and shall be supported by concurrent documentation or a preexisting documented policy for automatic election.
The
Company elected to measure the 2016 Notes and 2019 Notes in their entirety at fair value with changes in fair value recognized
as non-operating income or loss at each balance sheet date in accordance with ASC 815-15-25. Further, as the functional currency
of the Company is RMB, the fair value of the Notes is translated into RMB at each balance sheet date with the difference being
reported as exchange gain or loss. In addition, all issuance costs associated with the 2016 Notes and 2019 Notes offering has
been expensed as incurred in accordance with ASC 825-10-25-3, which states that upfront costs and fees related to items for which
the fair value option is elected shall be recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive as incurred
and not deferred.
As
of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the estimated fair value of the 2016 Notes amounted to approximately RMB721,541,380,
RMB650,916,976 and nil, respectively. The Company recorded foreign exchange loss of RMB3,039,266, RMB44,945,341 and RMB392,924
for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Gain from change in fair value of the 2016 notes was RMB51,983,783
in the year ended December 31, 2014. Loss from change in fair value of convertible senior notes was RMB22,926,918 and RMB5,533,892
in the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively. (Note 33).
As
of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the estimated fair value of the 2019 Notes amounted to approximately RMB 818,857,265,
RMB856,064,385 and RMB423,739,708, respectively. The Company recorded foreign exchange loss of RMB 2,814,189, RMB51,733,120 and
RMB43,055,871 for the year ended December 31, 2014,2015 and 2016, respectively. Gain from change in fair value of the 2019 notes
was RMB98,806,924 and RMB14,526,000 in the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Loss from change in fair
value of convertible senior notes was RMB86,482,065 in the year ended December 31, 2016. (Note 33).
Capped Call Options
Concurrent
with the Company’s issuance of the 2016 Notes on May 17, 2011, the Company entered into a capped call option transactions
with an affiliate of the initial purchaser of the 2016 Notes. The capped call transaction was designed to reduce the potential
dilution that would otherwise occur as a result of new ordinary share issuances upon conversion of the 2016 Notes and effectively
increase the conversion price of the 2016 Notes for the Company to $48.21 per ADS from the actual conversion price to the 2016
Notes holders of $33.75 per ADS. The total premium paid by the Company for the capped call transactions was US$18 million. The
purchaser of the 2016 Notes have the right to require the Company to repurchase for cash all or any portion of their notes on
May 15, 2014 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.
The
Company’s functional currency is different from the denomination of the capped call. Therefore, in accordance with ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging, the Company accounted for the capped call transactions as freestanding derivative assets in the consolidated
balance sheets. The derivative assets are measured and recorded at fair value at initial recognition and is subsequently marked
to market each reporting period utilizing the binomial model.
The
fair value of capped call options was RMB21,098,263 and RMB17,490,323 as of December 31, 2014, 2015, respectively. In the second
quarter of 2016, the capped call options were expired upon the Company’s repurchase of all the 2016 Notes. We recorded loss
of RMB86,689,063, RMB6,170,282 and RMB18,226,535 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 in change in fair value
of capped call options.
27.
REPURCHASE
OF ORDINARY SHARES
On May 6, 2011, the Board
of Directors approved a share repurchase program to repurchase up to US$30 million of outstanding ADS of the Company from time
to time over the next 12 months, depending on market conditions, share price and other factors, as well as subject to the memorandum
and articles of association of the Company, the relevant rules under United States securities laws and regulations and the relevant
stock exchange rules. The share repurchases may be made on the open market, in block trades or otherwise and is expected to include
derivative transactions. The program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
For the year ended December
31, 2012, 173,570 outstanding ADSs (694,280 shares) were repurchased with a total consideration of RMB5,521,130, which is shown
as treasury stock. As of December 31, 2015 and 2016, total of 430,800 ADSs (1,723,200 shares) were repurchased but have not been
retired with a total consideration of RMB13,875,553 which is shown as treasury stock.
28. ISSUANCE OF ORDINARY
SHARES
The Company’s authorized
share capital is US$10,000 comprising 500,000,000 ordinary shares with a par value of US$0.00002 each. On January 22, 2014, the
Company closed a follow-on public offering of 15,000,000 ordinary shares (3,750,000 ADSs) and received aggregated net proceeds
of approximately $126.3million, after deducting discounts and commissions but before offering expenses.
As of December 31, 2015
and 2016 the Company’s issued and outstanding shares were 125,473,930 and 126,733,266, respectively.
29.
SHARE BASED
COMPENSATION
The Company adopted a
long-term incentive plan (the "2009 Plan") in July 2009 which was subsequently amended and restated. The 2009 plan provided
for the issuance of options of 9,325,122 ordinary shares. The options have a contractual life of 7 years except for certain options
granted to an employee in August 2009 that can be exercised until October 1, 2013. The share options will vest in 5 successive
equal annual installments on the last day of each year from the grant date, provided that the personnel's service with the Company
has not terminated prior to each such vesting date. For 953,200 options granted to one employee in August 2009, the share options
vested in a series of 36 months, on the last day of each month, commencing from October 1, 2008.
The Company adopted a
new long-term incentive plan (the "2014 Plan") in August 2014. The 2014 Plan provides for the issuance of options of
12,796,745 ordinary shares. The options have a contractual life of 10 year. The share options will vest in 5 successive equal
annual installments on the last day of each year from the grant date, provided that the personnel's service with the Company has
not terminated prior to each such vesting date.
On October 10, 2014, under
the 2014 Plan, the Company granted to certain officers options to purchase 9,940,000 ordinary shares of the Company at an exercise
price of US$5.93 per share. The share options will vest in 5 successive equal annual installments on the last day of each year
from October 10, 2014, provided that the personnel's service with the Company has not terminated prior to each such vesting date.
On August 13, 2013, the
Company extended the expiration date of the stock options granted to an officer from October 1, 2013 to October 1, 2014. As a
result of this modification, the Company recorded additional stock-based compensation expense of RMB 1,608,968 for the year ended
December 31, 2013.
On August 18, 2014, the
Company extended the expiration date of 873,200 stock options granted to an officer from October 1, 2014 to October 1, 2015. As
a result of this modification, the Company recorded additional stock-based compensation expense of RMB35,513 for the year ended
December 31, 2014.
On March 1, 2015, under
the 2009 and 2014 Plan, the Company granted to certain officers options to purchase 320,000 ordinary shares of the Company at
an exercise price of US$5.93 per share. The share options will vest in 5 successive equal annual installments on the last day
of each year from March 1, 2015, provided that the personnel's service with the Company has not terminated prior to each such
vesting date.
On April 13, 2015, under
the 2014 Plan, the Company granted to certain officers options to purchase 160,000 ordinary shares of the Company at an exercise
price of US$5.93 per share. The share options will vest in 5 successive equal annual installments on the last day of each year
from April 13, 2015, provided that the personnel's service with the Company has not terminated prior to each such vesting date.
On August 20, 2015, the
Company extended the expiration date of 1,352,840 stock options granted to an officer from October 1, 2015 to October 1, 2016.
As a result of this modification, the Company recorded additional stock-based compensation expense of RMB180,553 for the year
ended December 31, 2015.
On August 25, 2016, the
Company extended the expiration date of 600,000 stock options granted to an officer from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017.On
September 23, 2016, the Company extended the expiration date of 1,352,840 stock options granted to an officer from October 1,
2016 to October 31, 2017.As a result of this modification, the Company recorded additional share-based compensation expense of
RMB1,410,137 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
On November 15, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Company
changed the exercise price of the total 9,472,000 outstanding options under the 2014 Plan from US$5.9275 per share to US$3.2875
per share, and recognized additional share-based compensation expense of RMB 19,545,720 associated with the price modification
for the year ended December 31, 2016.
On November 16, 2016,
under the 2014 Plan, the Company granted to certain officers to purchase 1,760,000 ordinary shares of the Company at an exercise
price of US$3.2875 per share.
A summary of activities
under the Company’s share-based compensation plan is as follow:
|
|
Number of
option
outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price
|
|
|
Weighted-average
remaining
contractual term
|
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(US$/share)
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
(RMB)
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2016
|
|
|
14,627,422
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,760,000
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
(1,259,336
|
)
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(472,000
|
)
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
14,656,086
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
|
6.47
|
|
|
|
75,543,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest as of December
31, 2016
|
|
|
10,301,274
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
|
|
|
59,982,288
|
|
Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
7,268,086
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
|
|
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
49,148,244
|
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market price of ordinary shares, US$3.81 (RMB 26.45) per
share as of December 31, 2016 and the exercise prices of the options.
Total
intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were RMB67,877,828, RMB152,515,116
and RMB81,059,329 respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31,
2014, 2015 and 2016 was RMB28.42, RMB27.73 and RMB17.48 per share, respectively.
A summary of non-vested
shares activity under the share-based compensation plan is as follow:
|
|
Number of option
outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair
value on grant date (RMB/Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2016
|
|
|
9,152,000
|
|
|
|
26.52
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,760,000
|
|
|
|
17.48
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(3,244,000
|
)
|
|
|
20.89
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(280,000
|
)
|
|
|
24.17
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
7,388,000
|
|
|
|
14.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to vest as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
3,033,188
|
|
|
|
14.52
|
|
The
total fair value of shares vested for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were RMB20,422,248, RMB67,627,740
and RMB67,773,486, respectively.
The
share-based compensation expense of continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 was recorded
in the respective items:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Costs of revenues
|
|
|
203,140
|
|
|
|
118,301
|
|
|
|
333,338
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
6,397,902
|
|
|
|
23,625,827
|
|
|
|
15,980,509
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
34,164,506
|
|
|
|
81,024,667
|
|
|
|
67,152,462
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
1,924,447
|
|
|
|
7,945,590
|
|
|
|
6,101,390
|
|
Total
|
|
|
42,689,995
|
|
|
|
112,714,385
|
|
|
|
89,567,699
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016, the company had 14,656,086 options outstanding. Total share-based compensation cost, determined based on
the fair value of the options on the grant dates as well as on the repricing date, if any, applying an estimated forfeiture rate
of 10%, amounted to approximately RMB314,315,271 of which the amounts of RMB42,689,995, RMB112,714,385 and RMB89,567,699 was recognized
for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
As
of December 31, 2016, the Company had unrecognized share-based compensation expense RMB57,514,872 related to non-vested share
options. That deferred cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.0 years. For the year ended December 31,
2016, total cash received from the exercise of share options was RMB 21,730,663.
The
fair value of options grant during the year ended December 31, 2016 is estimated on the date of grant using Black-Scholes model
with the following assumptions:
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
93.29
|
%
|
83.49% - 91.68%
|
|
77.72% - 79.56%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0
|
%
|
0
|
%
|
0
|
%
|
Expected terms
|
|
6.5
|
|
6.5
|
|
5.3 - 6.5
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
1.50% - 1.74%
|
|
1.74% - 1.94%
|
|
Fair value per option at grant date (RMB)
|
|
28.42
|
|
25.62 – 35.31
|
|
16.94 - 17.93
|
|
The
risk-free interest rate is based on the China government bond yield denominated in US$ for a term consistent with the expected
life of the awards in effect at the time of grant.
The
expected term is based on the contractual term of the option and expected employee exercise and post-vesting employment termination
behavior. Currently, it is based on the simplified approach.
The
Company has no history or expectation of paying dividends on its ordinary shares.
The
Company chooses to use the historical volatility for a period equal to the expected term preceding the grant date.
In October 2014, JinkoSolar
Power adopted its 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “JinkoSolar Power 2014 Plan”), which permits the grant of stock
options, restricted shares and restricted share units of JinkoSolar Power to its employees, directors and consultants of the JinkoSolar
Power. Under the plan, a total of 12,766 ordinary shares (12,766,000 shares post the thousand-for-one share split by JinkoSolar
Power in April 2015) of JinkoSolar Power were initially reserved for issuance.
On May 4, 2015, JinkoSolar
Power granted 8,680,880 share options to its directors, officers and employees, under JinkoSolar Power 2014 Plan to purchase ordinary
shares of JinkoSolar Power. The exercise price of the share option is US$3.9166 per share and the term is 10 years from the date
of grant. Subject to the individuals’ continued employment with JinkoSolar Power, and only upon the completion of an IPO
of JinkoSolar Power, the option shall vest and become exercisable with respect to the vesting schedule as following.
- 7,021,300 share options
granted to directors and employees will vest and exercisable in 5 successive equal annual installments on the last day of each
year from grant date.
- 1,659,580 share options
granted to an officer will vest by 40% on the grant date, and 30% on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date.
In addition, if the officer’s employment with JinkoSolar Power is terminated as a result of certain defined events or situations,
any then unvested share options for this officer will immediately become fully vested.
The share options have
a contractual term of 10 years from the date of grant. The share options shall not become exercisable until JinkoSolar Power’s
IPO has occurred prior to the expiry of the contractual option term. The exercise of these options will create non-controlling
interest at the parent level. Given the exercise restriction, the recognition of share-based compensation expense is delayed.
The grant date fair value
of each option is calculated using a binomial option pricing model by the Company. The fair value of each option grant was estimated
on the date of grant with the following assumptions:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
53.56
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0
|
%
|
Option term
|
|
10 years
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.36
|
%
|
Expected forfeiture rate (post-vesting)
|
|
0% or 10%
|
|
Fair value per option at grant date
(USD)
|
|
1.88-2.01
|
|
The Company’s disposition
of the downstream solar projects business triggered immediate vesting of the share options pursuant to the terms of the share
option agreements. The Company fully recognized share based compensation expense amounted to RMB113,701,932 in the discontinued
operations in the year ended December 31, 2016. At the same time, the JinkoSolar Power signed the agreements with its relevant
employees to cancel and terminate the Share Options granted irrevocably and unconditionally with no consideration.
30.
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES
(a) Related party
balances
Outstanding amounts due
from/to related parties as of December 31, 2015 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Accounts receivable from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable due from Gausu Jintai Electronic Power Company Ltd.("Gansu Jintai")*
|
|
|
60,973,795
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts receivable from Gansu Heihe Hydropower Industrial Investment LLC. (" Gansu Heihe", in which the Group owns 9% equity interests)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44,616
|
|
Accounts receivable from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for sales of solar modules
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,414,039,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to ReneSola Ltd.
|
|
|
1,021,128
|
|
|
|
661,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivables from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivables from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for sales of solar modules
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
610,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances of travel and other business expenses to executive directors who are also shareholders
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68,106
|
|
Other receivables from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for miscellaneous transactions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,704,113
|
|
Other receivables from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for provision of guarantee
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62,352,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for provision of guarantee
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
173,375,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
61,994,923
|
|
|
|
2,277,446,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable due to a related party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable due to a subsidiary of ReneSola
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts payable due to Jiangxi Desun Energy Co., Ltd. (Desun, an entity in which the Shareholders, each holds more than 10%, and collectively hold 73%, of the equity interest)
|
|
|
1,465,985
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for sales of solar modules
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60,541,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables due to a related party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables to Desun for leasing of land and buildings
|
|
|
4,969,104
|
|
|
|
7,528,551
|
|
Payable of travel reimbursement
|
|
|
23,871
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other payables due to Jiangxi Jinko Engineering for payments on behalf of the Company
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68,505,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,471,504
|
|
|
|
136,575,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings due to subsidiaries of China Development Bank**
|
|
|
2,156,500,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest due to subsidiaries of China Development Bank**
|
|
|
3,252,783
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
*Gansu Jintai is an
affiliated company in which Jiangxi Jinko Engineering owns 28% equity interest after the disposition of the Group’s downstream
solar projects business, and it is no longer of the Group’s related party.
** In connection with
the issuance of preferred shares by JinkoSolar Power in July 2014, China Development Bank, through its subsidiary, holds 21% equity
interests of JinkoSolar Power on an as-if-converted basis. The above borrowings represent borrowings from subsidiaries of China
Development Bank. After the disposition of the Group’s downstream solar projects business, China Development Bank is no
longer of the Group’s related party.
|
(1)
|
Advances
of travelling and other business expenses to executive directors who are also shareholders
represent the amounts the Company advanced to them for expected expenses, charges and
incidentals relating to their business development activities.
|
|
(2)
|
Balances
due to related parties are interest-free, not collateralized, and have no definitive
repayment terms.
|
(b) Related party
transactions
In connection with the Company’s disposal of JinkoSolar
Power downstream business in 2016, the Group entered into a master service agreement with Jiangxi Jinko Engineering under which
the Group agreed to provide guarantee for Jinko Engineering’s financing obligations under its separate loan agreements.
In the event that Jiangxi Jinko Engineering fails to perform its obligations under the loan agreements or otherwise defaults thereunder,
the Company will become liable for Jiangxi Jinko Engineering’s obligations under the loan agreements, which amounted to
RMB 6.6 billion (US$945.2 million) as of December 31, 2016. The Company will charge Jiangxi Jinko Engineering service fees for
the debt payment guarantee service according the master service agreement.
In addition, according to the side agreement signed among the
Company, Jiangxi Jinko Engineering and investors of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering (the original redeemable preferred shareholders of
JinkoSolar Power), the investors of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering will have the right to redeem the common shares of Jiangxi Jinko
Engineering held by them, and, as a result of a guarantee issued by the Company, in the event that Jiangxi Jinko Engineering fails
to perform its redemption obligations, the Company will become liable for Jiangxi Jinko Engineering’s obligations under the
redemption, which amounted to US$297.3 million as of December 31, 2016. The Company will also charge Jiangxi Jinko Engineering
service fees for the redemption guarantee service according the master service agreement.
Pursuant to the master service agreement, guarantee service
fee would be settled semi-annually, and the management of the Company believes the guarantee fee charges are at market rates.
As of December 31, 2016,
the Company recorded the guarantee fee income receivable amounted to RMB235,728,241 and a guarantee liability fair value at fair
value of RMB226,086,556. The guarantee liability will be amortized over the expected guarantee period in the subsequent reporting
periods. Other income from Jiangxi Jinko for the guarantee fee amortized during the period from November to December, 2016 amounted
to RMB9,641,685.
For the years ended December 31,
2014, 2015 and 2016, revenues from sales of products and provision of processing services to subsidiaries of ReneSola amounted
to RMB557,097, nil and nil, respectively.
For the year ended December 31,
2016, revenues from sales of products to subsidiaries of Gansu Heihe amounted to RMB102,998,133.
After the disposition
date of downstream solar project business through December 31, 2016, sales of solar module products to subsidiaries of Jiangxi
Jinko Engineering amounted to RMB35,526,817.
For the years ended December 31,
2014, 2015 and 2016, raw materials purchased from a subsidiary of ReneSola amounted to RMB22,977,148, RMB 62,640 and nil, respectively.
For the years ended December 31,
2014, 2015 and 2016, raw materials purchased from a subsidiary of Desun amounted to RMB1,252,979 nil and nil, respectively.
On January 1, 2008,
Desun and Jiangxi Jinko entered into an operating lease agreement pursuant to which Desun leased its buildings and land use rights
to Jiangxi Jinko for a ten-year period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017. Desun charged Jiangxi Jinko RMB1,100,304
in rent for each year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 respectively.
For the years ended December
31, 2014, 2015 and the period from January 1 2016 through the disposition date of downstream solar project business, borrowings
from subsidiaries of China Development Bank amounted to RMB1,002,140,000, RMB 1,210,000,000, RMB 90,000,000, respectively. Repayment
of borrowings to subsidiaries of China Development Bank amounted to RMB 4,000,000 and RMB 409,640,000, RMB 82,000,000, respectively.
Interest charges in connection with the borrowings from China Development Bank amounted to RMB 52,883,293, RMB 107,011,736, RMB
100,832,419, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, the
Shareholders provided guarantees for the Group's several short-term and long-term bank borrowings. As of December 31, 2015
and 2016, the balances of short-term borrowings guaranteed by the Shareholders were RMB177,994,478 and RMB nil, respectively. As
of December 31, 2015 and 2016, the balances of long-term borrowings guaranteed by the Shareholders were nil and nil, respectively
(Note 22).
The Company entered into a RMB90,000,000 loan agreement with
a domestic bank in 2016 which was collateralized on Desun's equipment and land use right amounted to RMB 25,473,000 and the Group’s
certain building and equipment. .
The Company entered into a RMB76,307,000 loan agreement with
Pingan Bank in 2016 which was collateralized on the RMB80,000,000 bank deposit owned by Shanghai JinkoSolar PV Electricity Co.,
Ltd, a subsidiary of Jiangxi Jinko Engineering.
31.
CERTAIN
RISKS AND CONCENTRATION
a) Concentrations
of credit risk
Financial instruments
that potentially subject the Group to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, restricted short-term investments, accounts receivable, prepayments and other current assets. As of December
31, 2015 and 2016, substantially all of the Group's cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted short-term investments
were held by major financial institutions located in the PRC.
The Group is also exposed
to the credit and financial risks of its suppliers to which the Group made advances. The Group’s financial condition and
results of operations may be materially affected if the suppliers fail to meet their obligations of supplying silicon materials
according to the contractually agreed schedules.
b) Foreign
currency risk
The Group has contracts
for the sales of products, purchases of materials and equipment which are denominated in foreign currencies, including US Dollars,
and Euros. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 61.5% of the Group's revenues are dominated in foreign currencies, including
US Dollars, Euros, Yen, Australian Dollars, Canadian Dollars, South African Rand and Pounds. Renminbi, the functional currency
of the Group, is not freely convertible into foreign currencies.
c) Major
customers
The Group performs ongoing
credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition whenever deemed necessary and generally does not require collateral.
The Group maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected collectability of all accounts receivable, which
takes into consideration an analysis of historical bad debts, specific customer creditworthiness and current economic trends.
There is no accounts receivable
represented by customers with balances over 10% of accounts receivables as of December 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively:
d) Interest
rate
The Group's main interest
rate exposure relates to long-term borrowings. The Group does not hedge against interest rate. Any increase in interest rates
would increase the Group's finance expenses relating to our variable rate indebtedness and increase the costs of issuing new debt
or refinancing its existing indebtedness.
32.
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) Operating lease
commitments
From January 1, 2008,
Jiangxi Jinko leased buildings and land use rights from Desun, under a non-cancelable operating lease expiring in January 2018.
In addition, the Group also leased office buildings for its offices under non-cancelable operating lease from third parties.
Future minimum obligations
for operating leases are as follows:
Year ending December 31,
|
|
RMB
|
|
2017
|
|
|
43,825,570
|
|
2018
|
|
|
18,637,336
|
|
2019
|
|
|
6,776,200
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2,777,707
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
86,416,813
|
|
Rental expense under all
operating leases were RMB11,379,778, RMB14,375,422 and RMB20,574,072 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
(b) Capital commitments
The Group entered into
several purchase agreements and supplementary agreements with certain suppliers to acquire machineries to be used in the manufacturing
of its products. The Group's total future payments under these purchase agreements amounted to RMB878,794,179 as of December 31,
2016.
Year ending December 31,
|
|
RMB
|
|
2017
|
|
|
783,540,388
|
|
2018
|
|
|
92,543,074
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,710,717
|
|
Total
|
|
|
878,794,179
|
|
(c) Contingencies
In July 2008, Jiangxi
Jinko entered into a long-term supply agreement with Wuxi Zhongcai, a producer of polysilicon materials. Jiangxi Jinko provided
a prepayment of RMB95.6 million pursuant to such contract. Wuxi Zhongcai subsequently halted production as a result of the adverse
changes in the polysilicon market. In February 2013, Jiangxi Jinko sued Wuxi Zhongcai in Shangrao City Intermediate People’s
Court for the refund of the outstanding balance of our prepayment of RMB93.2 million after deducting delivery made to Jiangxi
Jinko by an affiliate of Wuxi Zhongcai. In February 2013, Wuxi Zhongcai sued Jiangxi Jinko in Shanghai Pudong New Area People’s
Court for approximately RMB2.7 million for breaching the contract by failing to make allegedly required payments and reject the
refund of the prepayment of RMB 95.6 million to Jiangxi Jinko. In December, 2015, Jiangxi Jinko made an alternation of the claim
under which Jiangxi Jinko requested the refund of the prepayment of RMB93.2 million, the interests accrued from such prepayment,
and the liquidated damages in the amount of RMB93.2 million. In January, 2016, Wuxi Zhongcai also changed the plea, in which Wuxi
Zhongcai claimed for the liquidated damages amounting to approximately RMB102 million, the losses suffered from the termination
of the agreement in the amount of RMB 150 million and rejected the refund of the prepayment of RMB 95.6 million to Jiangxi Jinko
The above two lawsuits are pending before the Shanghai High People’s court as of the date of this annual report. The Company
is unable to reliably estimate the probability of prevailing in the case and the scope of any liabilities.
During the period from
2010 to 2011, Jiangxi Jinko and Zhejiang Qin Ye Construction Group Co., Ltd. (“Zhejiang Qin Ye”) entered into several
agreements for the construction projects. In January 10, 2014, Jiangxi Jinko sued Zhejiang Qin Ye for breach of contract due to
the commercial bribery conducted by the employee of Zhejiang Qin Ye, the liquidated damages of which is amounting to RMB22.3 million.
In May 5, 2015, Zhejiang Qin Ye sued Jiangxi Jinko, claiming for the unpaid contract price in the amount of approximately RMB23.1
million. As of the date of this annual report, the above two lawsuits are still pending for judgment.
(d) Guarantees
Upon the disposition of
Jiangxi Jinko Engineering, the Company provided the loan guarantee and redemption guarantee to Jiangxi Jinko Engineering (note
3 & note 30).
33.
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
A hierarchy is established
for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs
by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use
in pricing the asset or liability, developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable
inputs are inputs that reflect the Company's assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. As such, fair value is a market-based measure
considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific
measure. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs
such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted price in active markets that are observable either
directly or indirectly, or quoted prices in less active markets; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs with respect to which there
is little or no market data, which require the Company to develop its own assumptions. Fair value of cash equivalents, restricted
cash and restricted short-term investment are categorized as level 1 under the fair value hierarchy, as they based on quoted prices
in active markets. Short-term borrowings and long-term borrowing are categorized as level 2 under the fair value hierarchy, as
they based on quoted prices in less active markets.
Fair value change
in forward contracts and call spread
The Company has entered
into foreign exchange forward contracts with local banks to reduce the exposure of significant changes in exchange rates between
Renminbi and foreign currencies. Authoritative guidance requires companies to recognize all of the derivative financial instruments
as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets based upon quoted market prices for comparable
instruments. The Company's forward contracts have not met the criteria for hedge accounting within authoritative guidance. Therefore,
the foreign currency forward contracts have been recorded at fair value, with the gain or loss on these transactions recorded
in the consolidated statements of operations within "Change in fair value of forward contracts" in the period in which
they occur. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company held foreign
exchange forward contracts with a total notional value of USD10 million, and GBP3 million as of December 31, 2016. These foreign
exchange forward contracts mature within 12 months. The Company used a discounted cash-flow methodology to measure fair value,
which requires inputs such as interest yield curves and foreign exchange rates. The significant inputs used in the aforementioned
model can be corroborated with market observable data and therefore the fair value measurements are classified as level 2. Typically,
any losses or gains on the forward exchange contracts are offset by re-measurement losses or gains on the underlying balances
denominated in non-functional currencies. The Company's foreign currency exchange contract is an over-the-counter instrument.
The Group classified the
cash flows related to realized gain or loss on settlement of foreign exchange forward contracts as operating activities, which
are based on the nature of the cash flows the derivative is economically hedging.
The Company purchased
foreign exchange call spread combined option contracts with a total notional value of US$70 million during the year ended December
31, 2015. These foreign exchange call spread mature within 12 months. The Company adopted the Black-Scholes Option Pricing (“B-S”)
Model to value the Currency Option Contracts. The B-S Model is widely used and accepted as a common valuation practice in valuing
such currency option. The significant inputs used in the aforementioned model are unobservable inputs which there are little or
no market data and therefore the fair value measurements are classified as level 3. The Company's foreign currency call spread
is an over-the-counter instrument.
The call spread option
is asset derivatives which need to be fair valued on day one and marked to market subsequently at each reporting period end. The
fair value gain or loss arising from the re-measurement is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value of the call spread option was RMB 7,277,406 which was recorded as derivative assets
under Prepayments and Other Current Assets (Note 13). The fair value change was a loss of RMB 370,437 for the year ended December
31, 2015.
Derivative assets as of
December 31,2015 represented the foreign exchange call spread option purchased in 2015. The call spread option matured in the
fourth quarter of 2016 and the Company recognised the gain of RMB4.9 million.
Convertible Senior
Notes and Capped Call Options
The Company has adopted
valuation models to assess the fair value for capped call options and the Notes, as the capped call options are not publicly traded
and the trading of the Notes is considered inactive. Management is responsible for determining these fair values and assessing
a number of factors. Both capped call options and the Notes are valued using the Binominal Tree option pricing model. The valuation
involves complex and subjective judgments as well as the Company’s best estimates on the valuation date. Inputs related
to the Binomial models for convertible debt fair value are: spot price, conversion price, time to maturity, expected dividend
yield, expected share volatility, risk free interest rate, yield-to-maturity and put option exercisable period, of which spot
price and expected share volatility are most significant to valuation determination of convertible debt.
Available-for-sale
investment
On a recurring basis,
the Company measures available-for-sale investment at fair value. Since the available-for-sale investment does not have quoted
price in active markets, the Company has adopted Binomial Tree option pricing model to assess their fair value. Management is
responsible for determining the fair value and assessing a number of factors. The valuation involves complex and subjective judgements
as well as the Company's best estimates on the valuation date.
Inputs related to the
Binomial Tree option pricing model for the valuation of the fair value of available-for-sale investment are: spot price, conversion
price, time to maturity, expected dividend yield, expected share volatility, risk free interest rate, and yield-to-maturity, of
which spot price is most significant to valuation determination. The following methods were adopted for each input:
|
a.
|
Spot price: quoted closing price of listed
shares of Kinexia SpA(KNX IM) as of each re-measurement date;
|
|
|
|
|
b.
|
Conversion price: according to the indenture of the subject
available-for-sale investment;
|
|
|
|
|
c.
|
Time to maturity: time period from the respective re-measurement
date to maturity date. Maturity date was referred from the indenture of the subject available-for-sale investment;
|
|
|
|
|
d.
|
Expected dividend yield: based on indicative dividend
yield of the underlying company (i.e. KNX.IM) as of each re-measurement date;
|
|
|
|
|
e.
|
Expected share volatility: based on the implied volatility
of the listed shares of Kinexia (i.e. KNX.IM) with a time period equal to the time to maturity as of each re-measurement date;
|
|
|
|
|
f.
|
Risk free interest rate: based on the yield of Italy
Treasury Bonds with a maturity equal to the time to maturity as of each re-measurement date; and
|
|
|
|
|
g.
|
Yield-to-maturity: based on the average yield-to-maturity
of comparable corporate bullet bonds with similar remaining maturity period and credit risk as of each re-measurement date;
and
|
Warrants
The Company adopted Binominal
Tree option pricing model to assess the warrants’ fair value. Management is responsible for determining the fair value and
assessing a number of factors. The valuation involves complex and subjective judgments as well as the Company’s best estimates
on the valuation date. Key inputs related to the Binomial Tree option pricing model for the valuation of the fair value of warrants
are: probabilities assigned among IPO and non-IPO scenarios, time to maturity, volatility, dividend yield, as well as risk-free
rate, of which probabilities assigned among IPO and non-IPO scenarios, volatility, and risk-free rate are most significant to
valuation determination of the warrants.
Rate Cap Derivative
The Company’s exposure
to the risk of changes in market interest rates primarily relates to its bank borrowings. To finance its overseas power station
business operation and expansion, the Company’s operating subsidiaries located in Mexico will obtain long-term bank borrowings
from local bank, which carries variable interest rates. With an aim to reduce its interest rate exposure, the Company entered
into one long-term interest rate cap contract in 2016 to fix the interest rate as a fixed rate payer. The rate cap is a derivative
which needs to be fair valued at each reporting period end. The fair value gain or loss arising from the remeasurement is recognized
in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of the rate cap
was RMB10,364,075, which was recorded as a derivative liability. The fair value change was a loss of RMB10,364,075 for the year
ended December 31, 2016.
Recurring change in
fair value
As of December 31,
2014, 2015 and 2016, information about the hierarchy of the fair value measurements for the Company's assets and liabilities that
are measured at fair value on a recurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition is as follows:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance as of
December 31,
2014
|
|
|
Quote prices in
active market
for identical
assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant other
observable
inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
47,712,744
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47,712,744
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Capped call options
|
|
|
21,098,263
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,098,263
|
|
Available-for-sale investment
|
|
|
20,875,725
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,875,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
30,901,012
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,901,012
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
1,540,398,645
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,540,398,645
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance as of
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
Quote prices in
active market
for identical
assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant other
observable
inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call spread option
|
|
|
7,277,406
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,277,406
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
7,038,537
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,038,537
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Capped call options
|
|
|
17,490,323
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,490,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
4,295,737
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,295,737
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
1,506,981,361
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,506,981,361
|
|
Warrant liability
|
|
|
68,377,608
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68,377,608
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance as of
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
Quote prices in
active market
for identical
assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant other
observable
inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantee receivables
|
|
|
235,728,241
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
235,728,241
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
640,876
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
640,876
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
423,739,708
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
423,739,708
|
|
Guarantee liabilities
|
|
|
226,086,556
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
226,086,556
|
|
Rate cap derivative
|
|
|
10,364,075
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,364,075
|
|
Assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 valuation)
A summary of changes in
Level 3 fair value of convertible senior notes for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
770,485,897
|
|
|
|
1,540,398,645
|
|
|
|
1,506,981,361
|
|
Issuance of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
914,850,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Foreign exchange (gain)/loss
|
|
|
5,853,455
|
|
|
|
96,678,461
|
|
|
|
43,448,795
|
|
Change in fair value of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
(150,790,707
|
)
|
|
|
8,400,918
|
|
|
|
92,015,957
|
|
Repurchase of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(138,496,663
|
)
|
|
|
(1,218,706,405
|
)
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
1,540,398,645
|
|
|
|
1,506,981,361
|
|
|
|
423,739,708
|
|
A summary of changes in
Level 3 fair value of capped call options for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
107,223,601
|
|
|
|
21,098,263
|
|
|
|
17,490,323
|
|
Foreign exchange (gain)/loss
|
|
|
563,725
|
|
|
|
2,562,342
|
|
|
|
736,212
|
|
Change in fair value of capped call options
|
|
|
(86,689,063
|
)
|
|
|
(6,170,282
|
)
|
|
|
(18,226,535
|
)
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
21,098,263
|
|
|
|
17,490,323
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The
capped call options were expired upon the full repurchase of 2016 Notes in 2016 (note 26).
A summary of changes in
Level 3 fair value of available-for-sale investment for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
30,117,797
|
|
|
|
20,875,725
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Receipt of available-for-sale investment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Foreign exchange gain/(loss)
|
|
|
(3,446,112
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change in fair value of available-for-sale investment
|
|
|
(5,795,960
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Transfer to receivable (Note 2 (h))
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(20,875,725
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
20,875,725
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
A summary
of changes in Level 3 fair value of call spread options for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2015, 2016 was as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,277,406
|
|
Purchase of call spread option
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,647,843
|
|
|
|
4,761,603
|
|
Change in fair value of call spread
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(370,437
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercise of call spread options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,039,009
|
)
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,277,406
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
A summary of changes in
Level 3 fair value of warrant liability for the year ended December 31 2016 were as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68,377,608
|
|
Issuance of warrant liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62,331,211
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exchange loss on warrant liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,950,373
|
|
|
|
2,256,314
|
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,096,024
|
|
|
|
(34,937,341
|
)
|
Repurchase of warrant liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(35,696,581
|
)
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68,377,608
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
A summary of changes in
Level 3 fair value of rap cap derivative for the year ended December 31 2016 were as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change in fair value of rate cap derivative
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,364,075
|
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,364,075
|
|
Change in fair value
of derivatives
The Change in fair value
of derivatives recognized in earnings was as follows:
|
|
Type of derivatives
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
Foreign exchange forward
contracts
|
|
|
Call spread
|
|
|
Rate cap
|
|
|
Capped call
|
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
derivative
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
liability
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(In RMB)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
15,553,224
|
|
|
|
(16,267,966
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(86,689,063
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(87,403,805
|
)
|
2015
|
|
|
71,000,875
|
|
|
|
(14,068,932
|
)
|
|
|
(370,437
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,170,282
|
)
|
|
|
(2,096,024
|
)
|
|
|
48,295,200
|
|
2016
|
|
|
(53,202,660
|
)
|
|
|
640,876
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10,364,075
|
)
|
|
|
(18,226,535
|
)
|
|
|
34,937,341
|
|
|
|
(46,215,053
|
)
|
Non-recurring change
in fair value
As of December 31,
2014
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance as of
December 31,
2014
|
|
|
Quote Prices
in active
market for
identical
assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
other
observable
input (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
input (Leval 3)
|
|
|
Total
(losses)
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,101,795,172
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,101,795,172
|
|
|
|
6,217,151
|
|
As of December 31,
2015
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance as of
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
Quote Prices
in active
market for
identical
assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
other
observable
input (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
input (Leval 3)
|
|
|
Total
(losses)
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,766,435,564
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,766,435,564
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
As of December 31,
2016
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance as of
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
Quote Prices
in active
market for
identical
assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
other
observable
input (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
input (Leval 3)
|
|
|
Total
(losses)
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,738,681,353
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,738,681,353
|
|
|
|
125,524,021
|
|
In accordance with the
provisions of the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets Subsections of ASC 360-10, long-lived assets held and used
with a carrying amount of RMB6,217,157, nil and RMB125,524,021 as of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were written down to their
fair value of zero, resulting in an impairment charge of 6,217,151, nil and RMB125,524,021 for the year ended December 31, 2014,
2015 and 2016, respectively, which was calculated based on Level 3 Inputs and included in earnings for the respective years.
34. RESTRICTED NET
ASSETS
Relevant PRC laws and
regulations permit payments of dividends by the Company's PRC subsidiaries only out of their retained earnings, if any, as determined
in accordance with PRC GAAP. In addition, the statutory general reserve fund requires annual appropriations of 10% of net after-tax
income to be set aside prior to payment of any dividends by the Company's PRC subsidiaries that are registered as wholly owned
foreign investment enterprises or domestic enterprises. As a result of these and other restrictions under PRC laws and regulations,
the PRC subsidiaries are restricted in their ability to transfer a portion of their net assets to the Company either in the form
of dividends, loans or advances. Even though the Company does not currently require any such dividends, loans or advances from
the Company's PRC subsidiaries for working capital or other funding purposes, it may in the future require additional cash resources
from the PRC subsidiaries due to changes in business conditions, to fund future acquisitions and development, or merely declare
dividends or make distributions to the Company's shareholders.
In July 2014, Jiangxi
Jinko Engineering entered into agreements with certain investors for the issuance of redeemable convertible preferred shares to
such investors. Pursuant to the investment agreements, Jiangxi Jinko Engineering shall use all of the proceeds from the issuance
of redeemable convertible preferred shares for the sole purpose of funding Jiangxi Jinko Engineering and its subsidiaries’
construction, commissioning and operations of new solar power projects in the PRC and no proceeds shall be used for any existing
projects prior to the preferred share issuance. The redeemable convertible preferred shares were repurchased in conjunction with
the disposal of downstream solar project business in the fourth quarter of 2016 (note 8).
The Group’s net
assets subject to the above restrictions were RMB4,188,460,756, representing, 65 % of the Company’s total consolidated net
assets as of December 31, 2016.
35.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In February 2017, the Company completed the repurchase of the
2019 Notes with a face value of US$61,074,000. After the repurchase, the outstanding face value of the 2019 Notes amounted to US$10,000.
36. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
– CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE PARENT COMPANY
The separate condensed
financial statements of the Company as presented below have been prepared in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-X Rule 5-04 and Rule 12-04 and present the Company's investments in its subsidiaries under the equity method
of accounting. Such investment is presented on separate condensed balance sheets of the Company as "Investments in subsidiaries
" and the Company's shares of the profit or loss of subsidiaries are presented as "Share of (loss) / income from subsidiaries"
in the statements of operations.
As disclosed in Note 30b. the Company provided guarantee for redemption of series A preferred
shares issued by JinkoSolar Power.
Except for the guarantees as disclosed in Note 30b, the Company
did not have any other significant contingency, commitment, or off balance sheet long term obligation as of December 31, 2015
and 2016.
Certain information and
footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed and
omitted. The footnote disclosures contain supplemental information relating to the operations of the Company, as such, these statements
should be read in conjunction with the notes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Condensed statements
of operations:
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2 (an))
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(12,422,770
|
)
|
|
|
(11,992,992
|
)
|
|
|
(9,937,095
|
)
|
|
|
(1,431,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(12,422,770
|
)
|
|
|
(11,992,992
|
)
|
|
|
(9,937,095
|
)
|
|
|
(1,431,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes issuance costs
|
|
|
(26,052,881
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Share of income from subsidiaries and affiliates
|
|
|
610,091,593
|
|
|
|
692,117,271
|
|
|
|
1,949,659,745
|
|
|
|
280,809,412
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
27,261,325
|
|
|
|
26,434,242
|
|
|
|
4,089,083
|
|
|
|
588,950
|
|
Exchange gain/(loss)
|
|
|
10,046,144
|
|
|
|
(8,235,787
|
)
|
|
|
(10,073,699
|
)
|
|
|
(1,450,914
|
)
|
Change in fair value of convertible senior notes and capped call option
|
|
|
64,101,644
|
|
|
|
(14,571,200
|
)
|
|
|
(110,242,492
|
)
|
|
|
(15,878,222
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,214,433
|
|
|
|
462,974
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
673,025,055
|
|
|
|
683,751,534
|
|
|
|
1,826,709,975
|
|
|
|
263,100,961
|
|
Income tax expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net income attributable to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.’s ordinary shareholders
|
|
|
673,025,055
|
|
|
|
683,751,534
|
|
|
|
1,826,709,975
|
|
|
|
263,100,961
|
|
Condensed
balance sheets:
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2 (an))
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalent
|
|
|
55,685,082
|
|
|
|
4,815,606
|
|
|
|
693,592
|
|
Due from subsidiaries
|
|
|
353,584,018
|
|
|
|
892,393,364
|
|
|
|
128,531,379
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
11,910,526
|
|
|
|
12,231,081
|
|
|
|
1,761,642
|
|
Capped call option
|
|
|
17,490,323
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
438,669,949
|
|
|
|
909,440,051
|
|
|
|
130,986,613
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
4,249,348,844
|
|
|
|
6,403,914,947
|
|
|
|
922,355,602
|
|
Due from subsidiaries-non current
|
|
|
1,228,006,309
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,916,025,102
|
|
|
|
7,313,354,998
|
|
|
|
1,053,342,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to subsidiaries
|
|
|
62,633,444
|
|
|
|
415,199,410
|
|
|
|
59,801,154
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
24,542,051
|
|
|
|
13,706,994
|
|
|
|
1,974,218
|
|
Convertible senior notes-current
|
|
|
650,916,976
|
|
|
|
423,739,708
|
|
|
|
61,031,212
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
738,092,471
|
|
|
|
852,646,112
|
|
|
|
122,806,584
|
|
Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
856,064,385
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,594,156,856
|
|
|
|
852,646,112
|
|
|
|
122,806,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares (US$0.00002 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 125,473,930 and 126,733,266 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively)
|
|
|
17,711
|
|
|
|
17,881
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,924,336,179
|
|
|
|
3,145,262,253
|
|
|
|
453,011,991
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
12,582,041
|
|
|
|
104,784,173
|
|
|
|
15,092,060
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost: 1,723,200 shares of ordinary shares as of December 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively
|
|
|
(13,875,553
|
)
|
|
|
(13,875,553
|
)
|
|
|
(1,998,495
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,398,807,868
|
|
|
|
3,224,520,132
|
|
|
|
464,427,500
|
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
|
|
4,321,868,246
|
|
|
|
6,460,708,886
|
|
|
|
930,535,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
|
5,916,025,102
|
|
|
|
7,313,354,998
|
|
|
|
1,053,342,215
|
|
The balance due from subsidiaries
represented the expenses paid on behalf by the Company for its subsidiaries.
Other current assets mainly
represented the prepaid insurance premium, prepaid rent and other miscellaneous expenses.
The balance due to subsidiaries
represented the professional service fees paid by Jiangxi Jinko.
Other current liabilities
represented accrual for unpaid professional service fees.
Condensed statements
of cash flows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
RMB
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note2(an))
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
673,025,055
|
|
|
|
683,751,534
|
|
|
|
1,826,709,975
|
|
|
|
263,100,961
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change in fair value of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
(150,790,707
|
)
|
|
|
8,400,918
|
|
|
|
92,015,957
|
|
|
|
13,253,054
|
|
Change in fair value of capped call option
|
|
|
86,689,063
|
|
|
|
6,170,282
|
|
|
|
18,226,535
|
|
|
|
2,625,167
|
|
Share of loss from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(610,091,593
|
)
|
|
|
(692,117,271
|
)
|
|
|
(1,949,659,745
|
)
|
|
|
(280,809,412
|
)
|
Convertible senior notes issuance cost
|
|
|
26,052,881
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exchange (gain)/loss
|
|
|
(10,046,144
|
)
|
|
|
8,235,787
|
|
|
|
10,073,699
|
|
|
|
1,450,914
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in due from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(572,172,865
|
)
|
|
|
104,043,486
|
|
|
|
809,466,119
|
|
|
|
116,587,371
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in other current assets
|
|
|
299,752
|
|
|
|
(1,080,514
|
)
|
|
|
(4,394,605
|
)
|
|
|
(632,955
|
)
|
Increase/(Decrease) in due to a subsidiary
|
|
|
26,234,900
|
|
|
|
21,721,556
|
|
|
|
352,565,966
|
|
|
|
50,780,061
|
|
(Decrease)/increase in other current liabilities
|
|
|
16,276,144
|
|
|
|
316,410
|
|
|
|
(10,835,057
|
)
|
|
|
(1,560,573
|
)
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(514,523,514
|
)
|
|
|
139,442,188
|
|
|
|
1,144,168,844
|
|
|
|
164,794,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
(1,141,190,434
|
)
|
|
|
(5,620,197
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,141,190,434
|
)
|
|
|
(5,620,197
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares
|
|
|
770,201,158
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of share options
|
|
|
14,528,109
|
|
|
|
7,613,965
|
|
|
|
21,730,663
|
|
|
|
3,129,866
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
888,797,119
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Repurchase of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,025,510
|
)
|
|
|
(1,218,706,405
|
)
|
|
|
(175,530,233
|
)
|
Cash paid for capped call option
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Prepayment for share repurchase
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,673,526,386
|
|
|
|
(105,411,545
|
)
|
|
|
(1,196,975,742
|
)
|
|
|
(172,400,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(94,929
|
)
|
|
|
2,227,375
|
|
|
|
1,937,422
|
|
|
|
279,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
17,717,509
|
|
|
|
30,637,821
|
|
|
|
(50,869,476
|
)
|
|
|
(7,326,728
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
7,329,752
|
|
|
|
25,047,261
|
|
|
|
55,685,082
|
|
|
|
8,020,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
|
25,047,261
|
|
|
|
55,685,082
|
|
|
|
4,815,606
|
|
|
|
693,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of share options received in subsequent period
|
|
|
226,952
|
|
|
|
10,210,003
|
|
|
|
6,135,783
|
|
|
|
883,737
|
|
Payment of issuance cost for follow-on offering in subsequent period
|
|
|
2,328,174
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|