ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We were originally formed in the State
of Florida on October 6, 2009 as a limited liability company. On April 24, 2014 we reorganized as a Florida corporation. Since
inception we have been engaged in the design, development, marketing and sales of energy-efficient lighting systems and solutions.
Our business currently involves direct sales of Light Emitting Diode (“LED”) products, including customized resolution
of client lighting issues, which is where we have been generating our revenues to date.
In January 2016, we filed our
initial registration statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, registering 2,485,432 shares of our Common Stock. Our registration statement became effective April 7, 2016. In September 2016, our application to
trade our Common Stock on the OTCQB was approved by FINRA. However, since obtaining this approval we have experienced
difficulty in getting our Common Stock to trade because of issues with the entity that filed the application with FINRA,
Glendale Securities, Inc. See “Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities,” below.
Purchase of the Assets of Catalyst LED’s LLC
In order to expand our sales efforts, on
May 5, 2016, we purchased certain intangible assets including the tradename “Catalyst LED” (“Catalyst”),
its client list, its website domain, list of leads, current pending orders, current bid proposals, and all future orders made under
the Catalyst name, as well as its other unregistered trademarks, and goodwill.
Under the terms agreement we agreed to
pay ForceField Energy Inc., a Nevada corporation, the owner of the assets, $50,000, which was payable in three equal monthly increments
of $16,666, commencing on May 15, 2016. As of the date of this Report, we have made partial payments of $42,934 and currently owe
$7,066 to ForceField, who has agreed to wait to receive the remaining balance until we have enough cash to do so.
During 2016, the purchase of Catalyst
helped to significantly increase our sales over prior year levels, however, the Catalyst products were not profitable. Based
on an impairment analysis we performed at year end, we determined that the $50,000 in intangible assets we recorded when we
purchased Catalyst was fully impaired. As a result we incurred a $50,000 impairment charge for 2016 and wrote off the
intangible assets on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2016. The impairment was primarily attributable due to increased
competition in the LED industry which made the selling of our products more difficult. Given the level of competition in our
industry which is expected to increase in future years, we will more closely examine the prices we pay for future purchases
of LED assets should an opportunity materialize. See “Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements.”
Business Summary
In order to address market trends in the
LED industry and increase our revenue, in 2016 we expanded the markets we offered our products to new customers. Our current business
includes the following:
|
·
|
Direct Sales of Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”)
Products
. To date, all of our revenues have been derived from direct sales earned on products sold by us. These products have
been marketed and sold to electrical contractors focusing on large office complexes, arenas, correctional facilities, office warehouses,
hospitals and dealerships, schools, churches, real estate investment trusts (REIT’s) among others; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Solutions
. We provide our customers with expert advice on how to maximize their
savings on electricity usage by installing LED lighting. We do this by analyzing the lighting configuration of a particular
location, and by suggesting products that will yield cost savings as well producing lighting quality and color that meets the
expectation of our clients.
|
Target
Markets
Prior to 2016 we focused on five target
markets. In 2016 we reduced our efforts in the museum and gallery market and in the large/super retailers category due to our
lack of success in generating significant revenues in these markets. As a result,, we have identified three separate markets where
we have, or intend to direct our sales efforts, including:
|
·
|
Office complex and warehouses
– We provide site specific solutions through design and development of
specific fixtures including our custom, proprietary products not generally available in the marketplace. We attempt to generate
business in this market through referrals, including leads from manufacturers, attendance at trade shows and in-house sales calls
and mailings. This category accounted for in excess of 85% of our sales in 2016. We expect this category to account for a comparable
or higher percentage of our sales in 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Design and Consulting Services
- We provide these services for new construction
and retro fitting existing locations. Although this category accounted for a negligible portion of our sales in
2016, we believe opportunities exist in 2017 where our expertise in design and consulting services will provide
us with a competitive advantage over our competition. There
can be no assurance that we will generate sales in this market in 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Arenas and Gymnasiums
-
In addition, we have assessed the need to reduce power
and eliminate maintenance on gym lighting. Our product, a 150 watt, 15,750 lumen LED High Bay fixture, replaces 430 watt
metal halide fixtures that constantly require ballast and bulb replacements. With our product, we estimate the next time
these fixtures will need maintenance will be in the year 2030. Another advantage is that these LED High Bay fixtures do
not require a warm up period. They are instant off and on so that at down hours during the day there is no need to leave
the lighting on, thus saving even more on the electric bill. This category accounted for approximately 12% of our
business in 2016. We believe there are opportunities in this market in 2017.
|
Key
Strategic Business and Marketing Objectives
The LED market during the past few years
has become highly competitive in terms of pricing, the number of entities and concerns offering services, and the variety of high
quality LED products available from numerous manufacturers. We had hoped to differentiate ourselves from our competition by producing
new products and designs, however, our lack of available funding has caused us to change our strategy.
We have experience in submitting
patent applications so we are familiar with what new designs have merit and which are “patentable.” As of the
date of this Report we have created the packaging and secured the products for 100 samples of one product currently in beta
testing which we believe could be manufactured and marketed in 2017. It is a proprietary portable light source that we
called the “Multitasker-LED” with several applications. The cost to market and manufacture enough of this product
to determine whether it is commercially viable and profitable, is approximately $25,000 per year. There can be no assurance
that this product will be successfully marketed or generate any material revenues.
Product Fulfillment
We purchase all our products from
US manufacturers including Orion Energy System, MSI, Deep Roof, Green Giant Lighting LLC, AMAX, Cireon, Deco Lighting,
PlanLED and Sunpark to supply products to our targeted market. Due to the competitiveness of the LED industry, we do not
believe the loss of any one or several of these suppliers would have a material impact on our business. As we believe is
traditional in our industry, we do not have contracts with these companies but submit purchase orders on an individual basis
for each product order we submit. Generally, turn around delivery takes between 4 to 12 weeks from the date we submit the
purchase order, depending upon the complexity of the order product, as many of these products are custom solutions. We have
analyzed delivery and financing needs and believe that we have a logical and achievable plan for satisfying larger orders in
this manner. We work with the aforesaid contract manufacturers from design to completion insuring the desired results. By
partnering with manufacturers we take advantage of their ability to bring our designs quickly to market thereby relieving
ourselves of the heavy investment in machinery.
Sales and Revenue/
Strategy
During 2016, we increased our sales to $731,657,
compared to 206,733 in 2015. In 2016, approximately 48% of our revenue was generated from a sale of $348,000 in lighting to an
electrical contractor, Marathon Electric, who completed a very large installation at an office warehouse facility. Additionally
in 2016, we completed one project for an arena at a cost of $85,000, an office warehouse at a cost of $73,000, a hospital for $57,000,
a correctional facility for $38,000 and two projects for REITS with revenue of $41,000. The seven projects described above account
for 92% of our revenue in 2016. The remaining 8% of our business was comprised of approximately 30 smaller projects in a variety
of industries, averaging approximately $2,000 in size.
We are a contract business whose product
mix changes from year to year because once LED lighting is installed, there is very little, if any, opportunity for repeat business
due to the efficacy of LED lighting.
Currently our sales efforts and growth
are directed towards larger projects in excess of $30,000. Through their network of contacts and their relationship with suppliers,
our salespeople have identified potential large corporate customers who control large property portfolios in the millions of square
feet. As a result, as of the date of this Report we have submitted a bid with a large auto manufacturer covering hundreds of thousands
of square feet of factory space. There can be no assurances we will be successful in winning this bid.
We either develop and sell LED lights,
or sell existing product lines, fixtures and components, or partner with innovative manufacturers to provide commercial and institutional
users with state-of-the-art technology. Ultimately, we believe that the performance in terms of payback and longevity will enable
us to penetrate the highest levels of institutional decision makers and achieve high volume sales to prestigious clients. In turn,
this will enable us to establish large scale brand recognition that will be vital to future success in this rapidly emerging industry.
There are no assurances that our efforts in this regard will be successful.
Sales revenue is currently generated
through the efforts of our management and through our two salesmen, each of whom operates from their respective home offices
located in Florida and Idaho, and who travel to client locations when needed. They each have exclusive accounts
and territories and are paid on a commission basis. Sales made by our management are not subject to any commission payment.
For the periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we paid $45,501 and $-0- in sales commissions, respectively.
Seasonality
Our lighting solutions are sold to customers
primarily in the retrofit markets. Additionally, our business exhibits some seasonality, with net sales being affected by the impact
of weather and seasonal demand on construction, availability of rebate programs and retrofit and installation programs, particularly
during the winter months in the northeast. Because of these seasonal factors, we have experienced, and generally expect to experience
inconsistent quarterly revenue.
Advantages
of LED Lights
An LED is a semiconductor device which
converts electricity into light. LED lighting has been around since the 1960’s, but is just now becoming integral in the
lighting industry. At the end of 2007, Congress enacted the Energy Independence and Security Act, which gave the directive to end
production of most incandescent bulbs between 2012 and 2014. The United States Department of Energy estimates that the adoption
of LED lighting across the US would reduce greenhouse emissions by 246 metric tons, reduce electric consumption by 25% percent,
and save the energy equivalent to 24 large power plants. While LEDs make up only about 2 to 3% of the $80 Billion lighting market
today, analysts estimate that by 2020 they will comprise over 85%.
LED lighting has been used in low-tech
items for over ten years in everyday appliances, digital equipment that requires continual lighted read-outs, traffic lights, mining
lights, automobile dashboards and other applications, but it has only been recently that the LED lighting industry has been able
to make the advances in technology that is transforming the lighting industry. We now have powerful every day lamps that use as
little as 15% to 20% of the electric power needed for existing light bulbs.
LED’s are highly energy efficient,
contain no mercury and have a longer (up to 80%) life span than their incandescent light bulb counterparts. Although diodes come
in different sizes most are about ¼ inch in diameter and uses about 10 milliamps to operate at about a tenth of a watt.
LED’s are small in size and provide higher intensity.
LEDs are better at placing light in a single
direction than incandescent or fluorescent bulbs. They are more rugged and damage-resistant than compact fluorescents and incandescent
bulbs. LEDs are durable, and resistant to thermal and vibration shock. They turn on instantly from -40C to 185C, making them ideal
for multiple applications in “every walk of life.” LEDs don’t flicker and are consistent, as opposed to the pulsating
image from florescent lighting.
LED lighting is also a function of the
“greener” style of living. The conversion to LED lighting continues to gain momentum and traction, and we believe LEDs
are emerging as the #1 lighting option because they use a fraction of the energy used in today’s incandescent light bulbs
and last 10 times longer
.
They are also considered environmentally safer than florescent lights, which contain mercury.
LEDs have many energy efficient advantages over traditional lighting methods. These include: low energy consumption, long service
life, and no infrared or ultraviolet radiation which degrades fine art. LEDs also have more consistent color temperatures making
it ideal for museums, galleries and retail applications. The adoption of LEDs and global energy conservation are new ways of managing
energy efficiency. LED lighting is a perfect example of low cost, consumer friendly technology that has a real impact on the amount
of energy consumed.
The latest analysis “2017 Global
Lighting Market Outlook” published on November 2, 2016 by LEDinside, a division of TrendForce, finds that the LED lighting market
was worth US $29.6 billion in 2016 and is to rise to US $ 33.1 billion in 2017. Meanwhile, the penetration rate of LED lighting
is expected to reach 52%. Thanks to regional lighting development, LED lighting is expected to account for 23% of total lightings
in Europe by 2016, which is the highest across the world. The second and third highest region are to be found in North America
and China. However, the Asia-Pacific region is experiencing the fastest growth rate in LED lighting.
This has created a massive window of opportunity
that must be met due to eight primary reasons for replacement and new installation applications:
|
1.
|
Substantial direct energy savings.
|
|
2.
|
LEDs produce 50%-80% less heat than conventional light sources thereby providing substantial reduction in HVAC (air conditioning) savings.
|
|
3.
|
LEDs last considerably longer than conventional lighting (50-150,000 hours).
|
|
4.
|
LEDs do not typically burn out like traditional bulbs but rather decrease in light output.
|
|
5.
|
Reduction of labor and replacement costs.
|
|
6.
|
Non Toxic, recyclable product.
|
|
7.
|
Federal, State, Municipal Tax incentives.
|
The transition from conventional lighting
to LED has raised several issues and brought forth tremendous opportunity. For those seeking to market to the residential community
the issues are minor and therefore lends itself to high volume producers and mass merchandisers. For those like us, who have chosen
to concentrate on industrial and commercial applications; the issues are more complex and require true expertise. It is this expertise
that we believe will enable us to build long lasting relationships. By promoting our solution-based approach in one area, clients
tend to ask us to look at other areas of need rather than sourcing products through general supply based companies.
To facilitate our business of providing
state of-the-art and custom solutions, we have assembled a network of strategic partners that include professional sales representatives,
manufacturers and distributors. Our vision is to use our expertise and knowledge in the area of commercial lighting to identify
and bring together opportunities for our advanced LED lighting products. Our goal is to avoid having to compete strictly on price.
disadvantages
of LED Lights
Numerous high profile companies both domestically
and internationally have recently transitioned, or are in process of changing the lighting in their offices, warehouses, hospitals,
municipal buildings, schools, outdoor lighting venues and other locations, to LED lighting from conventional lighting. Nevertheless,
the LED lighting market is a relatively new market compared to conventional non-LED lighting market and as such has certain disadvantages.
The disadvantages of LED lighting include the following:
|
·
|
Pricing
– although LED pricing continues to fall as technology improves,
it currently remains initially priced significantly higher than conventional lighting, although over the long run, savings on energy consumption and less frequent replacement makes LED lighting less expensive than conventional lighting. The amount and timing of these savings will be dependent on the price of electricity within the jurisdiction where the lighting is installed, and on the amount of time during the day and night the LED lighting is used;
|
|
·
|
Design characteristics
– due to the design of the LED bulbs, retrofitting or replacing current lighting is sometimes difficult to accomplish;
|
|
·
|
Lighting color-
the lighting color of LED technology is currently limited and may be unsatisfactory as a replacement for some existing conventional lighting applications; and
|
|
·
|
Shape or Look of LED bulb –
in some applications that shape or look of the bulb may not suitable
|
Emerging
Growth Company
We qualify as an “emerging growth
company” under the JOBS Act. As a result, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure
requirements. For so long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required to:
|
·
|
have an auditor report on our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
|
|
·
|
comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm
rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements
(i.e., an auditor discussion and analysis);
|
|
·
|
submit certain executive compensation matters to shareholder advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency;”
and
|
|
·
|
disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and
comparisons of the CEO’s compensation to median employee compensation.
|
In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act
also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B)
of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay
the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies.
We will remain an “emerging growth
company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual
gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which would occur if the market value of our ordinary shares that is held by non-affiliates
exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which
we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.
Forward Split
In December 2015, prior to our becoming
a trading, reporting company, we undertook a forward split of our issued and outstanding Common Stock whereby each share of Common
Stock was exchanged for 1.2847603145 shares, with fractional shares rounded to the nearest round number. All references in this
Report to our outstanding Common Shares is presented on a post-forward split basis, unless indicated otherwise.
Subsequent Event
Grom Letter of Intent
On January 11, 2017, we executed a non-binding
Letter of Intent (“LOI”) with Grom Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Grom”), whereby we reached
an agreement in principle to acquire all of Grom’s issued and outstanding common stock. Darren Marks, Melvin Leiner and Dr.
Thomas Rutherford are directors of both Grom and our company and Messrs. Marks and Leiner are the principal shareholders of both
companies. Under the terms of the LOI we will issue an aggregate of approximately 105,000,000 shares of our Common Stock (4.17
shares of our common stock in exchange for every share of Grom common stock issued and outstanding) at closing. Grom is expected
to have approximately 25 million of its common shares issued and outstanding immediately prior to the closing date.
The proposed transaction is subject to
various conditions, including but not limited to execution of applicable Exchange Agreements, approval of the same by both company’s
shareholders, completion of independent financial audits of Grom for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the issuance of
an order of effectiveness to a registration statement we intend to file with the SEC and various other matters.
If and when this proposed transaction closes,
of which there can be no assurance, our current LED business will be transferred to a new wholly owned subsidiary. In addition,
Messrs. Llera and Andrews will resign as officers and directors of our Company and become the officers and directors of this new
subsidiary company. Management of Grom shall assume the positions of management of the resulting holding company, including the
appointment of Darren Marks as Chief Executive Officer and Melvin Leiner as Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer.
Grom Holdings, Inc. is a holding company,
incorporated in Delaware in March 2015, that conducts all of its operations through its three wholly owned subsidiaries, Grom Social,
Inc., Grom Educational Services Inc.(“GES”) and TD Holdings Limited. Grom Social, Inc. is a Florida corporation, incorporated
in March 2012, which operates a social media network for children. TD Holdings Limited, which Grom acquired in July 2016, is a
Hong Kong corporation and the parent company of Top Draw Animation, Inc., a corporation formed and operating in Manila, Philippines,
which operates an animation business. GES is a newly formed educational subsidiary that was formed concurrent with Grom’s
acquisition of the assets and business of an entity that provides web filtering services to children (described below).
Grom’s consolidated revenues in
2016 including 6 months revenues attributable to Top Drawer, were approximately $4 million.
Grom’s core business is its social
media website for children, “Grom Social.” The Grom Social website is located at www.gromsocial.com. As of January
2017, Grom Social had approximately 4.3 million users in over 200 countries and territories. A "user" is defined as any
child between the ages of 5 and 16 who sign up for a Grom Social account. Each child must receive parental approval to gain full
access to the Grom Social platform. Grom communicates with its database both actively, through email and a parent/guardian portal
and passively, through messaging on the child’s profile page and through seventeen Grom characters.
Top Draw Animation produces
digital animation and provides pre-production and production services to a variety of international producers. Top Draw
Animation was established in 1999 by Wayne Dearing, who, along with Stella Dearing, his spouse, continues to be responsible
for its day to day operations. Eventually, it is Grom’s intention to utilize the animation expertise of Top Draw
Animation to provide animated content to Grom Social.
In addition, on January 11, 2017, Grom
acquired the assets of Norcross, Georgia based TeleMate.Net Software’s NetSpective Webfilter Division an entity that provides
web filtering services to approximately 400 school districts which encompasses an estimated 2.0 million children from the ages
from 5-17. This Webfilter division operates within our GES subsidiary
Growth
by Acquisitions
We are also looking to work with and/or
acquire other lighting companies that target specific end-users in need of cost saving LED solutions opening up what may be new
product opportunities for us. If we are successful, the acquisition of related, complimentary businesses is expected to increase
revenues and profits by providing a broader range of services in vertical markets which are consolidated under one parent, thus
reducing overhead costs by streamlining operations and eliminating duplicitous efforts and costs. There are no assurances that
we will reduce our operating losses or reach profitability if we are successful in acquiring other synergistic companies.
Management will seek out and evaluate related,
complimentary businesses for acquisition. The integrity and reputation of any potential acquisition candidate will first be thoroughly
reviewed to ensure it meets with management’s standards. Once targeted as a potential acquisition candidate, we will enter
into negotiations with the potential candidate and commence due diligence evaluation of each business, including its financial
statements, cash flow, debt, location and other material aspects of the candidate’s business. If we are successful in our
attempts to acquire synergistic companies utilizing our securities as part or all of the consideration to be paid, our current
shareholders will incur dilution.
In implementing a structure for a particular
acquisition, we may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, or licensing agreement with another
corporation or entity. We may also acquire stock or assets of an existing business. On the consummation of a transaction, we do
not intend that our present management and shareholders will no longer be in control of our Company.
As part of our investigation, our officers
and directors will meet personally with management and key personnel, may visit and inspect material facilities, obtain independent
analysis of verification of certain information provided, check references of management and key personnel, and take other reasonable
investigative measures, to the extent of our limited financial resources and management expertise. The manner in which we participate
in an acquisition will depend on the nature of the opportunity, the respective needs and desires of us and other parties, the management
of the acquisition candidate and our relative negotiation strength.
We will participate in an acquisition only
after the negotiation and execution of appropriate written agreements. Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted,
generally such agreements will require some specific representations and warranties by all of the parties thereto, will specify
certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by each of the parties prior
to and after such closing, will outline the manner of bearing costs, including costs associated with our attorneys and accountants,
will set forth remedies on default, and will include miscellaneous other terms.
Depending upon the nature of the acquisition,
including the financial condition of the acquisition company, as a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the “34 Act”), it may be necessary for such acquisition candidate to provide independent audited financial statements.
If so required, we will not acquire any entity which cannot provide independent audited financial statements within a reasonable
period of time after closing of the proposed transaction. If such audited financial statements are not available at closing, or
within time parameters necessary to insure our compliance with the requirements of the 34 Act, or if the audited financial statements
provided do not conform to the representations made by the candidate to be acquired in the closing documents, the closing documents
will provide that the proposed transaction will be voidable, at the discretion of our present management. If such transaction is
voided, the agreement will also contain a provision providing for the acquisition entity to reimburse us for all costs associated
with the proposed transaction.
Further, the aforesaid disclosure is not
intended to indicate that we have any immediate intention to engage in a merger or acquisition with any unidentified company or
companies, entity or person, nor is it intended to convey any such intention. Rather, we believe that there are many small independent
LED companies that may be interested in being acquired as part of a consolidation of the LED industry. Neither we nor any member
of our management or other of our affiliates intend for our company to be used as a vehicle for a private company to become a reporting
company.
Competition
We currently face competition from both
traditional lighting companies that provide general lighting products, such as incandescent, fluorescent and neon lighting, and
from specialized lighting companies that are engaged in providing LED products. In general, we compete with both groups on the
basis of design, innovation, quality of light, maintenance costs, safety issues, energy consumption, price, product quality and
brightness.
We compete with traditional lighting companies,
including Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc., Cooper Lighting (a division of Cooper Industries, Inc.), Hubbell Lighting, Inc. (a division
of Hubbell Incorporated), Juno Lighting Group (a division of Schneider Electric SA), Osram Sylvania, and Royal Philips Lighting
(a division of Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.) in the general illumination market. Our LED products tend to be alternatives
to traditional lighting sources for applications within the commercial market. In these markets, we compete on the basis of energy
savings, lamp life and durability.
We also compete with providers of LED replacement
lamps and other energy efficient lighting products and fixtures. These companies include traditional lighting companies such as
Sylvania and Philips; specialized lighting companies such as Lighting Science Group Corporation; certain packaged LED suppliers
such as Cree, which is primarily a manufacturer of LEDs; as well as multiple low cost offshore providers. In the market for LED
lighting products, we compete on the basis of design, innovation, light quality, maintenance costs, safety issues, energy consumption,
price, product quality, Energy Star, ETL and UL certifications.
We have identified several other companies
with whom we compete in the commercial LED lighting market, including:
Lighting Science Group
.
Lighting Science Group has focused much of their efforts on the manufacture of replacement bulbs for conventional residential
and commercial fixtures. They also work on specialty design lighting for architects. However, within their catalog there are a
few fixtures that are direct competition to our product line, including:
|
·
|
Flat LowBay Light
– This fixture has been presented as competition with our series to be used in overhead applications inside of parking garages or under canopies. In head-to-head comparisons for canopy lighting products from our contracted manufacturers utilized by CVS for their 7700 drug stores, LSG’s fixture was considered and rejected as an option because of the difficulty to install and because of inconsistent light output and poor performance, having less foot candles, using more watts, and showed a lower efficiency of all products tested with a stand-alone Payback/ROI model.
|
|
·
|
LSR Series
– These fixtures are LSG’s parking lot lights. Like practically every parking lot fixture available right now, the LSR series does not achieve the requirements for public safety. This specific application is flooded with competition both domestic and international. Our manufacturing partner is close to developing a product that will achieve these safety requirements.
|
Acuity Brands
.
Acuity
has a similar catalog and approach to LSG. They have a considerable amount of architectural and bulb replacement products. They
also have done considerable work on high hat fixtures to help in the performance of their replacement bulbs. They also have a few
products which serve as competition to our product line, including their RTLED and TLED Series. These are Acuity’s Lithonia
fixture that serves as an indoor fluorescent replacement which competes directly with our panel series. These products are designed
to look more like a fluorescent replacement and less like a clean panel. We believe that our comparable replacements achieve a
much higher efficiency than anything in this series, are easier to install, and much more economical.
Lunera
.
Like us, Lunera
has directed their efforts to the commercial space. They do not have a large number of product lines but what they have is competitive
in certain applications with our fixtures. Lunera’s fluorescent replacement series include “The Grid” and “The
Suspended Family” which are comparable in cost and appearance to standard replacements, but not our fixture-free patent pending
alternative. We believe that our product line is slightly brighter but it is fair to describe these products as direct competition
to our standard series.
Albeo Lighting
.
Albeo
has focused their attention to warehouse and industrial applications. They market their “High Bay and Low Bay” series.
Our suppliers have gone up against Albeo over a dozen times in lighting shootouts and the comparison supports our products. We
believe our DL Series is superior in both brightness and at 1/4
th
the size of the Albeo fixture, it also has lower wattage
consumption, kelvin temperature and price.
Government
Regulation
We are not subject to any extraordinary
governmental regulations.
Employees
As of the date of this Report we have three
employees, Mr. Llera and Mr. Williams, both members of our management, one fulltime salesman and one commission only sales representatives.
We have consulted with and expect to continue to use the services of independent consultants and contractors with whom our management
has a pre-existing relationship to perform various professional services. We expect that we will continue to use contractors to
assist us with our clients.
Our employees work at will and are not
represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relationship with our employees is excellent. None of our employees
are members of any union.
Trademarks/Trade
names/Intellectual Property
We are in the process of submitting a patent
application, including a priority fixture patent that, unlike conventional fluorescent tube fixtures, holds the LED tube in what
we consider to be a more advantageous way, directing the LED light to achieve a broader and more even beam spread covering from
fixture to fixture. The product is intended for continuous lighting such as hallways, where fixtures are mounted perpendicular
to the direction of the hallway.
There are no assurances that these non-disclosure
agreements will prevent a third party from infringing upon our rights.
LED Lighting Industry
Trends
LED’s are semiconductor-based devices
that generate light. As the cost of LEDs decreases and their performance improves, we expect that they will continue to compete
more effectively in the general illumination market versus traditional lighting. High-brightness LEDs are the core, light-producing
components within an LED lighting system. We believe the LED lighting industry is experiencing the following trends:
|
·
|
Technological Innovations Expand LED Functionality
. Since the introduction of the first visible LED in the 1960s, the technology has offered an increasingly wide variety of colored lighting, beginning with red and expanding to green, yellow and orange. Initial rudimentary applications included traffic lights, automotive brake lights and indicator lights. In the mid-1990s, LEDs became capable of emitting blue light. With the advent of blue LEDs, combined with phosphor technology, LEDs made another technological leap by emitting white light. This breakthrough enabled LEDs to compete with traditional lighting solutions for applications in commercial, industrial and residential markets. In an effort to lower energy consumption, lighting companies are focusing on increasing “lumens per watt.” Lumens per watt (often referred to as “efficacy”) is an industry standard that measures the amount of light emitted per watt of electrical power used, meaning the more lumens per watt, the more energy-efficient the product. Traditional incandescent lighting sources can produce between 10 and 35 lumens per watt, while fluorescent and HID light sources can produce output exceeding 100 lumens per watt. Today’s LEDs are currently performing well over 100 lumens per watt at the LED level, making them comparable to, and often better than, fluorescent and HID light sources.
|
|
·
|
High Energy Costs Drive LED Adoption
.
As a result of high energy prices and the expectation that prices will continue to rise, businesses and consumers are increasingly adopting new technologies to reduce energy consumption. LED lighting technology is inherently more energy efficient and can result in more than 80% power savings over incandescent solutions. According to The Department of Energy, 22% of all energy consumption in the United States is from lighting applications. This combined rate represents approximately 35% of all energy consumption in commercial buildings as compared to approximately 15% for residential users and 5% for industrial companies. Despite safety issues and concerns, compact fluorescent (CFL) lamps are used for lighting energy conservation. However, recent technological advancements to LED lighting have made it more commercially viable in terms of brightness, efficiency, lamp life, safety and color-rendering (CRI). In addition, competitive pressures, declining LED costs and greater manufacturing efficiencies are driving down LED lamp prices. As a result of these gains and while there can be no assurances, we believe LED adoption should continue to expand. For example, LED lamps are currently outselling CFL lamps in Japan as the quality of light is far superior to CFLs. In 2011, an analysis of the global lighting market by Freedonia predicts that the LED market share for new construction will grow from 7% in 2010 to 70% in 2020. In the same period, LED market share for replacement lamps and retrofits will soar from 5% to 53%. In dollars, the same study estimated that the overall LED lighting market will grow by about 30% per year and reach approximately $84 billion in 2020.
|
|
·
|
Legislative Influences Spur Market Adoption of Energy Efficient LED Lighting.
Government regulations, such as initiatives by the United States Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency’s Energy Star Certification Program, are driving adoption of more energy efficient lighting solutions. Energy Star sets industry-wide international recommendations for lighting products that outline efficiency and performance criteria, helping manufacturers promote their products and purchasers better understand lighting products. Governments are also adopting or proposing legislation to promote energy efficiency and conservation. Lower energy consumption translates into lower electricity generation, often from coal power plants, and thus can significantly lower carbon emissions. Legislative actions to promote energy efficiency can beneficially impact the LED lighting market in the countries adopting such legislation and other countries, as well. For example, several countries have effectively banned the 40, 60, and 100-watt incandescent light bulbs and are expected to progressively apply these restrictions to lower-wattage bulbs. In addition, LED lighting solutions are free of hazardous materials such as mercury, which can be harmful to the environment. Any restrictions on the use of hazardous substances could adversely affect one of the LED lamp’s primary competitors, the CFL market.
|