UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of
1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☑
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
☑ Definitive Proxy Statement
☐ Definitive Additional Materials
☐ Soliciting Material Under
§240.14a-12
Welltower Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☐
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and
0-11.
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
0-11
(set
forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
☐
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
☐
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2)
and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
2017 Proxy Statement
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
March 20, 2017
DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:
You are cordially
invited to attend Welltowers Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2017 in the Bruce G. Thompson Auditorium at the Companys headquarters, located at 4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio
43615. Details regarding admission to the meeting and the business to be conducted are more fully described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement.
I am honored to serve as your Chairman and feel incredibly proud to be a part of this remarkable company. Our Board diligently reviews the Companys strategy,
challenges, capabilities and leadership to ensure the Company is well-positioned to continue creating value for shareholders. The independent directors and I are committed to, and value, our dialogue with our first-rate management team regarding the
Companys disciplined portfolio review approach, capital allocation strategy and long-term plans for growth. I encourage you to read more about our Board, governance structures and practices, and compensation programs in the Proxy Statement.
Your vote is very important to us. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. Information about voting
methods is set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement. We continue to focus on saving costs and protecting the environment by using the Notice and Access method of delivery. Instead of
receiving paper copies of our proxy materials in the mail, many shareholders will receive a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, which provides an Internet website address where shareholders can access electronic copies of the proxy
materials and vote. This website also has instructions for voting by phone and for requesting paper copies of the proxy materials and proxy card.
On behalf of
everyone at Welltower, I thank you for your ongoing interest and investment in Welltower Inc.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey H. Donahue
Chairman
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF WELLTOWER INC.:
The
Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Welltower Inc. (the Annual Meeting) will be held on May 4, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time in the Bruce G. Thompson Auditorium at Welltowers corporate headquarters, 4500 Dorr Street,
Toledo, Ohio 43615, for the purpose of considering and acting upon:
1.
|
The election of ten directors named in the Proxy Statement accompanying this notice to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and
qualified;
|
2.
|
The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2017;
|
3.
|
The advisory vote to approve executive compensation;
|
4.
|
The advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation; and
|
5.
|
The transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
|
The Board of
Directors of Welltower Inc. unanimously recommends that you vote: (1) FOR each of the nominees for election to the Board (Proposal 1); (2) FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2017 (Proposal 2); (3) FOR the approval of executive compensation (Proposal 3); and (4) FOR the holding of advisory votes on executive compensation
every year (Proposal 4). Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 7, 2017 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Information relating to the matters to be considered and
voted on at the Annual Meeting is set forth in the Proxy Statement accompanying this notice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MATTHEW MCQUEEN
Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
Toledo, Ohio
March 20, 2017
|
|
|
|
Scan this QR code to
view digital versions of
the Companys Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual Report
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY
MATERIALS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 4, 2017:
The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, the Notice
of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and Proxy Statement and the Annual Report are available on the Internet free
of charge at www.welltower.com/proxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Information
|
|
|
Notice of Electronic Availability of Proxy Materials
As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), Welltower Inc. (the Company) is making these proxy materials
available to shareholders primarily via the Internet. By doing so, the Company reduces the printing and delivery costs and the environmental impact of its Annual Meeting. Accordingly, the Company is sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials (the Notice) to the Companys shareholders. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the Companys proxy materials and how to vote online or by telephone. If you would like to receive a paper copy of the
proxy materials, please follow the instructions in the Notice.
Why am I receiving these materials?
The Board of Directors of the Company has made these materials available to you on the Internet or has delivered printed copies to you by mail in connection with the
solicitation of proxies on its behalf to be used in voting at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting), which is scheduled to be held on Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time as set forth in
the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The approximate date on which these materials will be first made available or sent to shareholders is March 24, 2017.
What is included in these materials?
These materials include:
|
|
This proxy statement for the Annual Meeting (the Proxy Statement); and
|
|
|
The Companys Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual Report).
|
If you
received printed copies by mail, these materials also include the proxy card for the Annual Meeting. A copy of the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2016, including
the financial statements and the schedules thereto, as filed with the SEC, is available on the Companys website at www.welltower.com or may be obtained without charge by writing to the Senior Vice
President - General
Counsel & Corporate Secretary, Welltower Inc., 4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio 43615.
What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?
The
following proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting: (1) the election of ten directors (Proposal 1); (2) the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year 2017 (Proposal 2); (3) the advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Proposal 3); (4) the advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal 4); and (5) the
transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
How does the Board of Directors recommend I vote?
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote:
|
|
FOR each of the nominees to the Board of Directors (Proposal 1);
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2017 (Proposal 2);
|
|
|
FOR the approval of executive compensation (Proposal 3); and
|
|
|
FOR the holding of advisory votes on executive compensation every year (Proposal 4).
|
Who may
vote at the Annual Meeting?
As of March 7, 2017, the Company had outstanding 363,205,882 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share. The common
stock constitutes the only class of voting securities of the Company entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 7, 2017 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any
adjournments thereof. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters to come before the Annual Meeting.
If I am a shareholder of
record of the Companys shares, how do I vote?
A shareholder of record can vote in one of four ways:
Via the Internet:
You may vote by proxy via the Internet by following the instructions provided in the Notice or on your proxy card.
By telephone:
You may vote by proxy by calling the telephone number provided in the Notice or on your proxy card.
By mail:
If you receive printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote by proxy by marking, signing, dating and returning your proxy
card in the envelope provided.
In person:
You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting by requesting a ballot when you arrive. You must
bring valid picture identification, such as a drivers license or passport, and you may be requested to provide proof of stock ownership as of March 7, 2017. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and require directions, please call
(419) 247-2800
or write the Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, Welltower, Inc., 4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio 43615.
All shares that have been properly voted by proxy and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions contained in the proxy. Shares
represented by proxy cards that are signed and returned without any voting instructions will be voted consistent with the Boards recommendations.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Information
(continued)
|
Once I have submitted my proxy, is it possible for me to change or revoke my proxy?
Any shareholder giving a proxy has the right to revoke it any time before it is voted by: (1) filing a written revocation with the Senior Vice
President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary of the Company; (2) filing a duly executed proxy bearing a later date; or (3) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. A written revocation, as described in
(1) above, will not be effective until the notice thereof has been received by the Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary of the Company.
Who is paying for the cost of this proxy solicitation?
The
Company is paying the costs of the solicitation of proxies. Proxies may be solicited by directors and officers of the Company by mail, in writing, by telephone, electronically, by personal interview, or by other means of communication. The
Company will reimburse directors and officers for their reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses
in connection with such solicitation. The Company will request brokers and nominees who hold shares in their names to furnish these proxy materials to the persons for whom they hold shares and will reimburse such brokers and nominees for their
reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses in connection therewith. The Company has hired D.F. King to solicit proxies for a fee not to exceed $9,500, plus expenses and other
customary charges.
What constitutes a quorum at the Annual Meeting?
The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares of voting securities outstanding on the record
date shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business by such holders at the Annual Meeting.
How will votes be tabulated at the Annual
Meeting?
All votes will be tabulated by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and
negative votes, abstentions and broker
non-votes.
Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (Broadridge) will tabulate the votes and act as inspector of election. Matthew McQueen,
Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary of the Company, and Scott Estes, Executive Vice
President -
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, have been appointed to serve
as alternate inspectors of election in the event Broadridge is unable to serve.
How are abstentions and broker
non-votes
treated?
Abstentions will be counted as present or represented for purposes of determining the presence or
absence of a quorum for the Annual Meeting. In the election of the directors (Proposal 1), you may vote for, against or abstain with respect to each of the nominees. If you elect to abstain in the election of
directors, the abstention will not impact the election of directors. In tabulating the voting results for the election of directors, only for and against votes are counted. With respect to the advisory vote on the
frequency of holding advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal 4), you may vote 1 year, 2 years,
3 years, or abstain. If you elect to abstain in the advisory vote on the frequency of holding advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal 4), the abstention will
not have an effect on the outcome of the vote. For the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2017 (Proposal 2) and the advisory vote to approve executive
compensation (Proposal 3), you may vote for, against or abstain. If you elect to abstain, the abstention will have the same effect as an against vote.
A broker
non-vote
occurs when a broker or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner votes on one
proposal, but does not vote on another proposal because the broker does not have discretionary voting power for the other proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker
non-votes
will be counted as present or represented for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the Annual Meeting, but will not be counted for purposes of determining the
number of shares entitled to vote with respect to any proposal for which the broker lacks discretionary authority. Brokers do not have discretionary authority with respect to the election of the directors (Proposal 1), the
advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Proposal 3), or the advisory vote on the frequency of holding advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal 4).
I share an address with another shareholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy
materials?
The Company has adopted an
SEC-approved
procedure called householding. Under this procedure,
the Company delivers a single copy of the Notice and, if applicable, this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to multiple shareholders who share the same address unless the Company receives contrary instructions from any shareholder at that
address. This procedure is designed to reduce printing and mailing costs and the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting.
Shareholders residing at such an address
who wish to receive separate copies of the Notice and, if applicable, this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report in the future and shareholders who are receiving multiple copies of these materials now and wish to receive just one set of materials in
the future should write to the Senior Vice
President -
General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, Welltower Inc., 4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio 43615 or call
(419) 247-2800
to request a change. These materials are also available on the Internet at www.welltower.com/proxy.
Where are the Companys principal executive offices located and what is the Companys main telephone number?
The Companys principal executive offices are located at 4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio 43615. The Companys telephone number is
(419) 247-2800.
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Information
(continued)
|
|
|
What is the deadline to submit shareholder proposals intended for inclusion in the Companys proxy
materials for the 2018 Annual Meeting?
Any shareholder proposals intended for inclusion in the Companys proxy materials for the 2018 Annual Meeting
must be submitted to Matthew McQueen, Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary of the Company, in writing no later than November 24, 2017. In addition, under the Companys
By-Laws,
in order for a shareholder to present a proposal for consideration at an annual meeting other than by means of inclusion in the Companys proxy materials for such meeting, the shareholder must
provide a written notice to the Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary not
more than 120 days prior to the meeting and not less than 45 days before the date on which the Company first mailed or otherwise gave notice for the prior years annual meeting. For
purposes of the 2018 Annual Meeting, such a written notice must be received by the Senior Vice President -General Counsel & Corporate Secretary by February 7, 2018. If a shareholder does not meet this deadline, (1) the officer
presiding at the meeting may declare that the proposal will be disregarded because it was not properly brought before the meeting and (2) the persons named in the proxies solicited by the Board of Directors for the meeting may use their
discretionary voting authority to vote against the proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1Election of Directors
|
The Companys
By-Laws
provide that the Board of Directors shall have nine members unless changed by the Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors
annually considers the size, composition and needs of the Board and recommends nominees for directors to the Board for approval. In 2016, the Board increased the number of directors from nine to ten. There are ten Board nominees recommended for
election at the Annual Meeting.
The shares represented by the proxies will be voted for the election of each of the nominees named below,
unless you indicate in the proxy that your vote should be cast against any or all of them or that you abstain. Each nominee elected as a director will continue in office until his or her successor has been duly elected and
qualified, or until the earliest of his or her resignation, removal or death. If any nominee declines or is unable to accept such nomination to serve as a director, events which the Board does not now expect, the proxies reserve the right to
substitute another person as a Board nominee, or to reduce the number of Board nominees, as they shall deem advisable. The proxy solicited hereby will not be voted to elect more than ten directors.
Except in a contested election, each Board nominee will be elected only if the number of votes cast for the nominees election exceeds the number of
votes cast against such nominees election. In a contested election (where a determination is made that the number of director nominees is expected to exceed the number of directors to be elected at a meeting), the vote standard
will be a plurality of the votes cast with respect to such director.
Under the Companys
By-Laws,
any incumbent director
nominee who receives a greater number of votes against
his or her election than votes for such election will tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee will recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to such offer of resignation. The Board will then act on the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees recommendation within 90 days from the date of
the certification of election results and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it.
As discussed in more detail below under Corporate
Governance, the Board believes that its directors and nominees for director should, among other things, (1) have significant leadership experience at a complex organization, (2) be accustomed to dealing with complex problems, and
(3) have the education, experience and skills to exercise sound business judgment. In evaluating its directors and nominees for director, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee looks at the overall size and structure of the
Board and strives to assemble a Board that is skilled, diverse, well-rounded and experienced. The specific experiences, qualifications, skills and attributes of each of the directors are described in this proposal. These experiences, along with
the directors integrity, sound judgment and commitment to the Company, led the Board to conclude that each of these directors should be elected to serve on the Board.
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES. The backgrounds, business experience and principal occupations of each nominee follow here. Each nominee receiving more votes
for his or her election than votes against his or her election will be elected. If an incumbent director nominee receives a greater number of votes against his or her election than votes for such
election, he or she is required to tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in accordance with the Companys
By-Laws.
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1Election of
Directors
(continued)
|
|
|
Directors to be Elected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THOMAS J. DEROSA
Age:
59
Director Since:
2004
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Executive
|
|
Other Directorships:
Value Retail PLC
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
Education:
BS Economics and Finance, Georgetown University
MBA Management, Columbia University
|
Mr. DeRosa
is Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. DeRosa has served as Chief Executive Officer since April 2014.
Mr. DeRosa is former Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of The Rouse Company (real estate development and operations), a position he held from September 2002 until November 2004 when The Rouse Company merged with General Growth
Properties, Inc. From 1992 to September 2002, Mr. DeRosa held various positions at Deutsche Bank (Deutsche Bank AG) and Alex. Brown & Sons, including Global
Co-Head
of the Health Care Investment
Banking Group of Deutsche Bank and Managing Director in the Real Estate Investment Banking Group of Alex. Brown & Sons. Mr. DeRosa also serves as a director of Value Retail PLC (U.K.-based owner, operator and developer of luxury
shopping villages in Europe) and Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (owner, manager and operator of office and retail properties) and as a member of the board of advisors of Benchmark Senior Living (leading provider of senior living services in the
Northeast). Mr. DeRosa served as a director of Dover Corporation (global provider of equipment, specialty systems and services for various industrial and commercial markets) until 2010, Georgetown University (where he also served on the Audit
Committee) until 2014, and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (owner and developer of shopping centers) until 2015, and as a member of the Health Advisory Board of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health until 2009.
Mr. DeRosa has extensive knowledge of the real estate industry and capital markets from his experience as Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of The Rouse Company and his leadership roles at Deutsche Bank and Alex. Brown & Sons.
His
day-to-day
leadership of the Company as Chief Executive Officer provides him with intimate knowledge of the Companys business and operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JEFFREY H. DONAHUE
Age:
70
Director Since:
1997
Chairman;
Independent Director
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Executive (Chair)
Nominating/Corporate Governance (Chair)
|
|
Other Directorships:
National Development Company
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
|
|
Education:
BA International Economics, Cornell University
MBA Finance, Wharton School of the University of
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
Mr.
Donahue
is Chairman of the Company. Mr. Donahue has served as Chairman since April 2014.
Mr. Donahue is former President and Chief Executive Officer of Enterprise Community Investment, Inc. (provider of affordable housing), a position he held from 2003 to 2009. Mr. Donahue was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of The Rouse Company (real estate development and operations) from 1998 to 2002. Mr. Donahue serves as a director of the National Development Company (commercial development and property company) and as Chairman of Xenia
Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (public real estate investment trust). Mr. Donahue has also previously served on the boards of NewTower Trust Company
(non-depository
trust company specializing in real
estate investment) until 2016, Bentall Kennedy (institutional real estate investment advisor) until 2015, four T. Rowe Price mutual funds and the T. Rowe Price Savings Bank, plus numerous charitable boards. Mr. Donahue has extensive
knowledge of the real estate industry from his experience as President and Chief Executive Officer of Enterprise Community Investment, Inc. and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Rouse Company.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1Election of Directors
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KENNETH J. BACON
Age:
62
Director Since:
2016
Independent Director
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Compensation
|
|
Other Directorships:
Comcast Corporation
Ally Financial Inc.
Forest City Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
Education:
BA Anthropology, Stanford University
MSc International Relations, London School of Economics
MBA Finance & Strategy, Harvard Business School
|
Mr.
Bacon
is
Co-founder
and Managing Partner of RailField Realty
Partners (financial advisory and asset management firm). Prior to forming RailField, Mr. Bacon spent 19 years at Fannie Mae, most recently as the Executive Vice President and Head of the Multifamily Business from July 2005 to March 2012. He has
also served in senior positions at Morgan Stanley and the Resolution Trust Corporation. Mr. Bacon also serves as a director of Comcast Corporation (global media and technology company), Ally Financial Inc. (financial service company), and
Forest City Realty Trust, Inc. (commercial and residential real estate company). Mr. Bacons extensive experience in the financial services industry, government affairs, the housing industry and real estate investment make him a valuable
asset to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRED S.
KLIPSCH
Age:
75
Director Since:
2006
Independent Director
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Audit
Nominating/Corporate Governance
|
|
Other Directorships:
Hoosiers for Quality Education
The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice
Philanthropy Roundtable
|
|
Education:
BS Industrial Education, Purdue University
MBA Management, California State College Long Beach
PhD Technology, Purdue University
|
Mr.
Klipsch
is Founder and Chairman of Hoosiers for Quality Education (organization that seeks systemic
education improvement and economic growth in Indiana), a position he has held since 2007. Mr. Klipsch also serves as a director of The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice
(non-profit
organization
that educates families on school choice) and the Philanthropy Roundtable (network of charitable donors). From 2011 to 2014, Mr. Klipsch was Chairman of Klipsch Group, Inc. (global speaker manufacturer) and from 1989 until 2011, he was Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and majority owner of Klipsch Group, Inc. From 1982 until 1989, Mr. Klipsch was Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Development Officer of Forum Group Inc. (owner, operator and developer of
hospitals, retirement centers and nursing homes). From 1989 until 1996, Mr. Klipsch was Chairman and majority owner of National Guest Homes (developer and operator of assisted living centers in the southern part of the United States). In
addition, Mr. Klipsch was Chairman and majority owner of Hospital Affiliates Development Corporation (HADC) (medical properties development company) from 1989 until 2002, at which time it became part of Windrose Medical Properties
Trust (self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust focused on owning and developing acute care medical properties throughout the United States). Mr. Klipsch served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Windrose Medical
Properties Trust from its formation and initial public offering in 2002 until December 2006, when Windrose Medical Properties Trust merged with the Company. Mr. Klipsch served as Vice Chairman of the Company from December 2006 until May 2009.
In addition to his significant global operational and leadership experiences with Klipsch Group, Inc., Mr. Klipsch has extensive knowledge of the hospital, medical office building, retirement center, assisted living and nursing home sectors
from his ownership and operational experiences and leadership roles with the Forum Group Inc., National Guest Homes, HADC, Windrose Medical Properties Trust and the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1Election of
Directors
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GEOFFREY G.
MEYERS
Age:
72
Director Since:
2014
Independent Director
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Audit
Nominating/Corporate Governance
|
|
Other Directorships:
HCA
PharMerica
Trust Company of Toledo
|
|
Education:
BA History & Comparative Literature, Northwestern
University
MBA Finance, The Ohio State
University
|
Mr.
Meyers
is the retired Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of HCR ManorCare, Inc.
(provider of short-term, post-acute services and long-term care), a position he held from 1991 to 2006. Prior to his work at HCR ManorCare, Inc., Mr. Meyers served as Chief Financial Officer of the Health Care Division of Owens-Illinois, Inc.
(glass manufacturer and former holding company of HCR ManorCare, Inc.). Currently, Mr. Meyers serves as a director of HCA (hospital and freestanding surgery center operator in the United States and England) and is Chairman of its Audit
Committee. He is also Chairman of PharMerica (institutional pharmacy primarily for long-term care and assisted living facilities) and a director of Trust Company of Toledo (NW Ohio trust bank). Mr. Meyers has extensive experience in the
post-acute and acute-care industries, which provides valuable insight to the Company, and the knowledge he gained during his tenure as Chief Financial Officer of HCR ManorCare, Inc. expands the Boards expertise in the areas of risk management,
reimbursement, strategic planning, development and acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIMOTHY J. NAUGHTON
Age:
55
Director Since:
2013
Independent Director
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Compensation
|
|
Other Directorships:
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
|
|
Education:
BA Economics, University of Virginia
MBA Harvard Business School
|
Mr.
Naughton
is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (real estate investment
trust focused on developing, redeveloping, acquiring and managing high-quality apartment communities). Mr. Naughton has served as a director of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. since 2005, as its Chairman since May 2013, as its Chief Executive
Officer since January 2012, as its President since February 2005 and in a variety of other capacities with AvalonBay Communities, Inc. or its predecessors since 1989. Mr. Naughton serves as a director of Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
(lodging real estate company) and Chairman of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, and is a member of The Real Estate Roundtable, a member and past chairman of the Multifamily Council of the Urban Land Institute and a member of
the Real Estate Forum. As the current Chief Executive Officer of a leading, publicly-traded real estate investment trust, Mr. Naughton brings strategic insight gleaned from being the leader of one of the most progressive, well-managed companies
in a comparable industry. Mr. Naughton has 30 years of experience in the real estate investment trust and commercial real estate sectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARON M. OSTER
Age:
68
Director Since:
1994
Independent Director
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Compensation (Chair)
Executive
Nominating/Corporate Governance
|
|
Other Directorships:
|
|
Education:
BA Economics, Hofstra University
PhD Economics, Harvard University
|
Ms.
Oster
is Frederic D. Wolfe Professor of Management and Entrepreneurship, Professor of Economics, at Yale
University School of Management. From 2008 to 2011, she served as the Dean of the Yale University School of Management. Ms. Oster also served as a director of Bentall Kennedy (institutional real estate investment advisor) until 2015.
Ms. Oster served as a director of The Aristotle Corporation (holding company for a manufacturer and distributor of educational, health and agricultural products) and Transpro, Inc. (designer and manufacturer of precision transportation
products) until 2005. Ms. Osters expertise in competitive strategy, economic theory and management, and her leadership role at the Yale University School of Management and directorships with a variety of public companies give her a unique
perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1Election of Directors
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JUDITH C. PELHAM
Age:
71
Director Since:
2012
Independent Director
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Compensation
Nominating/Corporate Governance
|
|
Other Directorships:
Amgen Inc.
|
|
Education:
BA Government, Smith College
MPA Harvard University
|
Ms.
Pelham
is the President Emeritus of Trinity Health (national health care system). From May 2000 to December 2004,
Ms. Pelham served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Trinity Health. Ms. Pelham served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Mercy Health Services (health care system) from 1993 to 2000, the President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Daughters of Charity Health Services, Austin, TX (network of hospitals, home care and ambulatory services) from 1982 to 1992, and the Assistant Vice President of Brigham and Womens Hospital from 1976 to 1980.
Ms. Pelham also serves as a director of Amgen Inc. (biotechnology company). Ms. Pelham has extensive knowledge and leadership experience in the health care industry from her service as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Trinity
Health, Mercy Health Services and the Daughters of Charity Health Services, Austin, TX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERGIO D. RIVERA
Age:
54
Director Since:
2014
Independent Director
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Audit
|
|
Other Directorships:
ILG, Inc.
The Nature Conservancy Florida Chapter Trustee
American Resort Development Association
University of Central Florida Rosen College of Hospitality Management Advisory
Board
Florida International University Chaplin School of Hospitality &
Tourism Management Deans Advisory Council
|
|
Education:
BBA Finance, Florida International University
MBA International Business, Florida International University
|
Mr.
Rivera
is the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Vacation Ownership segment of ILG, Inc. (leading
provider of professionally delivered vacation experiences in vacation ownership). Mr. Rivera is the former President of The Americas for Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. (hotel and leisure company), a position he held from 2012 to
2016, and Chief Executive Officer and President of Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc., formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., a position he held from 2007 to 2016. Mr. Rivera had served in a
variety of capacities with Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. since 1998. Mr. Rivera serves as a director of ILG, Inc., a director and trustee of the American Resort Development Association and trustee of the Florida Chapter of
The Nature Conservancy. Additionally, he serves as a member of the University of Central Florida Rosen College of Hospitality Management Advisory Board, the Florida International University Chaplin School of Hospitality & Tourism Management
Deans Advisory Council, the Urban Land Institute and the CEO Roundtable of the U.S. Travel Association. Mr. Riveras extensive experience in real estate development and investment strategy, corporate finance and accounting, and
operating matters relevant to management of complex global businesses with one of the leading hotel and leisure companies in the world provides valuable insight to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. SCOTT TRUMBULL
Age:
68
Director Since:
1999
Independent Director
|
|
Welltower Inc. Committees:
Audit (Chair)
Executive
|
|
Other Directorships:
Artisan Partners Funds, Inc.
Schneider National, Inc.
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
ProMedica Trustee
|
|
Education:
BA Economics, Denison University
MBA General Management, Harvard Business School
|
Mr.
Trumbull
is the retired Chairman of the Board of Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (manufacturer of water and fuel
pumping systems), a position he held from 2003 to 2015. From 2003 to 2014, Mr. Trumbull was also Chief Executive Officer of Franklin Electric Co., Inc. From 2001 through 2002, Mr. Trumbull was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Owens-Illinois, Inc. (manufacturer of glass containers). From 1993 to 2001, Mr. Trumbull served as Executive Vice President, International Operations & Corporate Development of Owens-Illinois, Inc. Mr. Trumbull also
serves as a director of Schneider National, Inc. (privately-held leader in freight delivery and logistics), Artisan Partners Funds, Inc. (registered mutual fund) and Columbus McKinnon Corporation (designer, manufacturer and marketer of material
handling systems and services) and is a member of the Board of Trustees of ProMedica (leading healthcare system with facilities located throughout Northwest Ohio and Southeast Michigan). Mr. Trumbulls leadership experience as Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Franklin Electric Co., Inc. and in various capacities at Owens-Illinois, Inc. provides the Board with a global perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Compensation
|
|
|
The table below summarizes the compensation paid in 2016 to the Companys
non-employee
directors.
2016 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards($)
(5)
|
|
|
Total($)
|
|
Kenneth J. Bacon
|
|
|
70,856
|
|
|
|
115,546
|
|
|
|
186,402
|
(6)
|
Jeffrey H. Donahue
|
|
|
226,500
|
(1)
|
|
|
125,011
|
|
|
|
351,511
|
|
Fred S. Klipsch
|
|
|
85,250
|
(2)
|
|
|
125,011
|
|
|
|
210,261
|
|
Geoffrey G. Meyers
|
|
|
76,500
|
|
|
|
125,011
|
|
|
|
201,511
|
|
Timothy J. Naughton
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
125,011
|
|
|
|
205,011
|
|
Sharon M. Oster
|
|
|
108,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
125,011
|
|
|
|
233,511
|
|
Judith C. Pelham
|
|
|
79,500
|
|
|
|
125,011
|
|
|
|
204,011
|
|
Sergio D. Rivera
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
125,011
|
|
|
|
200,011
|
|
R. Scott Trumbull
|
|
|
109,500
|
(4)
|
|
|
125,011
|
|
|
|
234,511
|
|
(1)
|
Includes $125,000 additional fee for serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors, $15,000 additional fee for serving as Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Chair and $7,500 additional fee for his services in
2016 in connection with strategic planning sessions of the Executive Committee.
|
(2)
|
Includes $6,250 additional fee for special services provided to the Audit Committee during 2016.
|
(3)
|
Includes $20,000 additional fee for serving as Compensation Committee Chair and $7,500 additional fee for her services in 2016 in connection with strategic planning sessions of the Executive Committee.
|
(4)
|
Includes $25,000 additional fee for serving as Audit Committee Chair and $7,500 additional fee for his services in 2016 in connection with strategic planning sessions of the Executive Committee.
|
(5)
|
Amounts set forth in this column represent the grant-date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for deferred stock units granted to the
non-employee
directors in 2016 and are based on the share price of $54.40 on February 12, 2016, the date of grant. As of December 31, 2016, (a) each
non-employee
director (other than Mr. Bacon, Mr. Meyers
and Mr. Rivera) held an aggregate of 2,860 deferred stock units that have not yet been converted into shares of common stock, (b) Mr. Bacon held an aggregate of 2,124 deferred stock units that have not yet been converted into shares
of common stock, (c) Mr. Meyers held an aggregate of 2,559 deferred stock units that have not yet been converted into shares of common stock, and (d) Mr. Rivera held an aggregate of 2,464 deferred stock units that have not yet
been converted into shares of common stock.
|
(6)
|
Mr. Bacon was appointed to the Board of Directors on January 29, 2016 and he received a pro rata portion of his compensation in 2016 based on the time he served as a director.
|
The form and amount of
non-employee
director compensation is determined by the Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the
Compensation Committee. Generally, the Boards policy is to pay its
non-employee
directors appropriate and competitive compensation so as to ensure the Companys ability to attract and retain
highly-qualified directors in a manner consistent with recognized corporate governance best practices. Directors who are also employees do not receive additional compensation for their Board service. The Compensation Committee generally reviews
non-employee
director compensation on a
bi-annual
basis with its independent compensation consultant, which advises the Compensation Committee on the design and amount of
compensation for
non-employee
directors.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Compensation
(continued)
|
The
compensation program for
non-employee
directors for the 2016 calendar year consisted of:
Cash Compensation
|
|
$75,000 annual cash fee
|
|
|
Additional Chairman of the Board fee of $125,000 per year
|
|
|
Additional Committee Chair fees of $25,000 per year for the Chair of the Audit Committee, $20,000 for the Chair of the Compensation Committee and $15,000 for the Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
|
|
|
If the Board of Directors holds more than four meetings in a year, each director will receive $1,500 for each meeting attended in excess of four meetings
|
|
|
If any of the Audit, Compensation, Executive or Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees holds more than four meetings in a year, each member will receive $1,000 for each meeting attended in excess of four meetings
|
|
|
Each
non-employee
member of the Executive Committee received $7,500 for his or her services in 2016 in connection with strategic planning sessions of the Executive Committee
|
|
|
Mr. Klipsch received $6,250 in 2016 as compensation for special services provided to the Audit Committee during 2016
|
Equity Compensation
In 2016, the
non-employee
directors each received grants of deferred stock units with a value of approximately $125,000 pursuant to the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The deferred stock units granted in 2016 will be
converted into shares of common stock on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Recipients of the deferred stock units also are entitled to dividend equivalent rights.
Director Compensation Changes for 2017
The Compensation
Committee has approved the following limited changes to the compensation of
non-employee
directors, which became effective January 1, 2017:
|
|
|
The annual cash fee was increased from $75,000 to $85,000
|
|
|
|
The grant of deferred stock units, pursuant to the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, was increased in value from $125,000 to $140,000
|
DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
In February 2013, the Compensation Committee revised the Companys minimum stock ownership policy to require each
non-employee
director, within five years of joining the Board or February 7, 2013, whichever is later, to own shares of common stock or deferred stock units with a fair market value of at least four times his
or her annual cash fee. As of December 31, 2016, each of the
non-employee
directors was in compliance with these ownership requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNAPSHOT OF BOARD & GOVERNANCE INFORMATION
|
|
Number of Independent Directors Standing for Election
|
|
|
9
|
|
Total Number of Director Nominees
|
|
|
10
|
|
Average Age of Directors Standing for Election
|
|
|
65.4
|
|
Average Tenure of Directors Standing for Election (years)
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Separate Chairman and CEO
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Independent Chairman
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Annual Election of All Directors
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Majority Voting for Directors
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
New Director Orientation
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Annual Review of Management Succession Plans
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Policies and Practices to Align Executive Compensation with Long-Term Shareholder Interests
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Stock Ownership Requirements for Executives
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Stock Ownership Requirements for Directors
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Clawback Policy
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
The Board is responsible for the selection of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes it is in the best interests of the
Company for the Board to make a determination regarding whether to separate the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer based upon the circumstances. Accordingly, these roles may be filled by one individual or by two different individuals
(and during the course of its history, the Company has utilized each leadership model).
In April 2014, the Board separated the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer. The Board believes the current separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles allows the Chief Executive Officer to focus his time and energy on operating and managing the Company and increases the Boards independent
oversight.
The Board periodically reviews and assesses the Companys leadership structure in connection with its review of succession planning. During this
review, the Board, in addition to its consideration of the separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles, consults with Mr. DeRosa regarding future candidates for senior leadership positions, succession timing for those
positions, and development plans for the candidates with the greatest potential. This process facilitates a meaningful discussion regarding all senior leadership positions, ensures continuity of leadership over the long term and forms the basis
on which the Company makes ongoing leadership assignments. See Executive Officers below for a description of the roles, background and experience of the executive officers of the Company.
Mr. Donahue, the
non-executive
Chairman, presides at all meetings of the shareholders and of the Board of Directors.
The Board met six times during the year ended December 31, 2016. Executive sessions of independent directors are
held after regularly scheduled meetings of the Board. Mr. Donahue, the
non-executive
Chairman, presides at all such sessions or meetings of the independent directors.
In 2016, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee facilitated a Board written evaluation and self-assessment process to evaluate the effectiveness of the Board, its
committees and the Chairman of the Board.
The Board and its committees complete self-assessment questionnaires to evaluate the effectiveness in several areas
including composition, structure and processes. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee utilizes the results of this process to recommend changes to Board process, to determine critical skills required of prospective director candidates and to
make recommendations for committee assignments.
As part of the Boards desire to stay at the forefront of best practices and to give each member of the Board an
opportunity to speak confidentially to an independent governance expert, the Board engaged an outside consultant in 2015 to conduct
one-on-one
confidential interviews
with each Board member on a broad range of topics to assess the performance of the Board and its committees. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee believes such interviews, conducted at least once every three years, coupled with the
Boards written evaluation and self-assessment processes, optimize transparency and foster continued Board engagement.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Governance
(continued)
|
INDEPENDENCE AND MEETINGS
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that meet the listing standards adopted by the New York Stock Exchange and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
that meets the New York Stock Exchanges listing standards and complies with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on the Companys
website at www.welltower.com/investors/governance.
Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board undertook a review of director independence in February
2017. During this review, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director, or any member of his or her immediate family, and the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The purpose of this review was to determine
whether any relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that a director is independent.
The Board determined that other than
Mr. DeRosa, all of the directors (Mr. Bacon, Mr. Donahue, Mr. Klipsch, Mr. Meyers, Mr. Naughton, Ms. Oster, Ms. Pelham, Mr. Rivera and Mr. Trumbull) meet the specific minimum independence
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. The Board also determined that other than Mr. DeRosa, all of the directors (Mr. Bacon, Mr. Donahue, Mr. Klipsch, Mr. Meyers, Mr. Naughton, Ms. Oster, Ms. Pelham,
Mr. Rivera and Mr. Trumbull) have no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company) and are therefore independent under the
general independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. DeRosa is not independent because he is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
The Board determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee (Mr. Klipsch, Mr. Meyers, Mr. Rivera and
Mr. Trumbull) are independent under the general independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the Corporate Governance Guidelines and under the separate independence standards for audit committee members under Rule
10A-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Additionally, the Board determined that all of the members of the
Compensation Committee (Mr. Bacon, Mr. Naughton, Ms. Oster and Ms. Pelham) are independent,
non-employee
and outside directors, as the case may be, under the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange, Securities and Exchange Commission and Internal Revenue Service.
Finally, the Board determined that all of the members of the Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee (Mr. Donahue, Mr. Klipsch, Mr. Meyers, Ms. Oster and Ms. Pelham) are independent under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
The Companys policy is to schedule a meeting of the Board on the date of the annual meeting of shareholders and all of the directors are encouraged to attend that
meeting. All directors attended last years annual meeting of shareholders.
The Board has standing Audit, Compensation, Executive and Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committees.
In 2016, all incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served.
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS AND ROTATION
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews committee assignments and makes recommendations to the Board for rotations of assignments and
appointment of committee chairs, as appropriate.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee has the authority and responsibility to engage and discharge the independent registered public accounting firm;
pre-approve
all audit and
non-audit
services to be provided by such firm; review the plan and results of
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Governance
(continued)
|
|
|
the auditing engagement; review managements evaluation of the adequacy of the Companys system of internal control over financial reporting; review the appointment, qualifications,
independence, performance and replacement of the internal auditor; oversee and monitor the information technology function of the Company as it relates to implementing business objectives and managing risks related to the Companys internal
controls over financial reporting; review communications made through the Companys Corporate Governance Hotline; direct and supervise investigations into matters within the scope of its duties; and perform the duties set forth in its written
charter and such other duties as are required by applicable laws or securities exchange rules.
The Audit Committee met four times during the year ended
December 31, 2016. The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Klipsch, Mr. Meyers, Mr. Rivera and Mr. Trumbull, with Mr. Trumbull serving as Chair.
The Audit Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of the Company and who the Board has determined have the requisite financial
literacy to serve on the Audit Committee. Additionally, the Board determined that no member of the Committee has any material relationship with the Company that might interfere with the exercise of the members independent judgment and that
each member meets the standards of independence established by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. See Independence and Meetings above for a discussion of independence determinations.
The Board, after reviewing all of the relevant facts and circumstances, determined that Mr. Klipsch, Mr. Meyers, Mr. Rivera and Mr. Trumbull are
audit committee financial experts.
The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. The charter is available on
the Companys website at www.welltower.com/auditcharter.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the nature and amount of compensation for executive officers. The Compensation Committee met six times during
the year ended December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Meyers, Mr. Naughton, Ms. Oster and Ms. Pelham served on the Compensation Committee. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Mr. Bacon,
Mr. Naughton, Ms. Oster and Ms. Pelham, with Ms. Oster serving as Chair. The Board determined that the members of the Compensation Committee are independent,
non-employee
and outside
directors under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, Securities and Exchange Commission and Internal Revenue Service.
The Compensation Committee is governed by
a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. The charter is available on the Companys website at
www.welltower.com/
investors/governance. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional information regarding the Compensation Committee.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The function of the Executive
Committee is to exercise all of the powers of the Board (except any powers specifically reserved to the Board) between meetings of the Board. The Executive Committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving the Companys investments
between meetings of the Board. The Executive Committee met four times during the year ended December 31, 2016. The members of the Executive Committee are Mr. DeRosa, Mr. Donahue, Ms. Oster and Mr. Trumbull, with
Mr. Donahue serving as Chair.
NOMINATING/CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Responsibilities and Members.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and interviewing qualified candidates to serve on
the Board, making nominations to fill vacancies on the Board and selecting the nominees for the directors to be elected by the shareholders at each annual meeting. In addition, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for
evaluating, implementing and overseeing the standards and guidelines for the governance of the Company, including monitoring compliance with those standards and guidelines, developing and implementing succession plans and evaluating the performance
of the Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for evaluating and implementing environmental sustainability policies and monitoring the Companys performance as it relates to the environmental sustainability of
its communities, partners and other key stakeholders. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee met five times during the year ended December 31, 2016. The members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are Mr. Donahue,
Mr. Klipsch, Mr. Meyers, Ms. Oster and Ms. Pelham, with Mr. Donahue serving as Chair.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is
comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of the Company. The Board has determined that no member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has any material relationship with the Company that might interfere with the
members exercise of his or her independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the New York Stock Exchange.
The
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. The charter is available on the Companys website at www.welltower.com/investors/governance.
Consideration of Director Nominees.
The Board believes that a nominee for director should be or have been a senior manager, chief operating officer, chief
financial officer or chief executive officer of a complex organization such as a corporation, university, foundation or governmental entity or unit or, if in a professional capacity, be accustomed to
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Governance
(continued)
|
dealing with complex problems, or otherwise have obtained and excelled in a position of leadership. In addition, directors and nominees for director should have the education, experience,
intelligence, independence, fairness, reasoning ability, practical wisdom and vision to exercise sound business judgment and should have high personal and professional ethics, strength of character, integrity and values. Also, directors and nominees
for director should be available and willing to attend regularly scheduled meetings of the Board and its committees and otherwise able to contribute a reasonable amount of time to the Companys affairs, with participation on other boards of
directors encouraged to provide breadth of experience to the Board. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, no person shall be nominated for election as a director after his or her 75
th
birthday. The Board determined that it was in the best interests of the Company to nominate Mr. Klipsch, who celebrated his 75
th
birthday in August 2016, for election to the Board.
In identifying and evaluating nominees for director, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee first looks at the overall size and structure of the Board each year to
determine the need to add or remove directors. Second, taking into consideration the characteristics mentioned above, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee determines if there are any specific qualities or skills that would complement the
existing strengths of the Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee takes diversity into account in identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers diversity in terms of
(1) professional experience, including experience in the Companys primary business segments and in areas of possible future expansion, (2) educational background and (3) age, race, gender and national origin.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee uses multiple sources for identifying and evaluating nominees for director, including referrals from current directors and
management, and may seek input from third party executive search firms retained at the Companys expense. If the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee retains one or more search firms, such firms may be asked to identify possible nominees,
interview and screen such nominees and act as a liaison between the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and each nominee during the screening and evaluation process.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will review the résumé and qualifications of each candidate based on the criteria described above and
determine whether the candidate would add value to the Board. With respect to candidates that are determined by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to be potential nominees, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will obtain such
background and reference checks as it deems necessary, and the Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and the Chairman of the Board will interview qualified candidates. Once it is determined that a candidate is a good prospect, the
candidate will be invited to meet the other members of the Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee. If the candidate is approved by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, the candidate will have an opportunity to meet with the remaining directors and management. At
the end of this process, if the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee determines that the candidate will be able to add value to the Board and the candidate expresses his or her interest in serving on the Board, the Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee will then recommend to the Board that the candidate stand for election by the shareholders or fill a vacancy or newly created position on the Board. Each year, the Board and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee evaluate
the size, composition and diversity of the Board as part of the Board and Committee self-evaluation process. These self-evaluations help the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee assess the effectiveness of the foregoing procedures for
identifying and evaluating nominees for director.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider qualified nominees recommended by shareholders who may
submit recommendations to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in care of the Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, Welltower Inc., 4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio 43615. The Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee requires that shareholder recommendations for director nominees be submitted by November 24, 2017 and be accompanied by (1) the name, age, business address and, if known, residence address of the nominee, (2) the principal
occupation or employment of the nominee for at least the last five years and a description of the qualifications of the nominee, (3) the class or series and number of shares of the Companys stock that are owned beneficially or of record
by the nominee and (4) any other information relating to the nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors under Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, together
with a written statement from the nominee that he or she is willing to be nominated and desires to serve, if elected.
Also, the shareholder making the nomination
should include (1) his or her name and record address, together with the name and address of any other shareholder known to be supporting the nominee and (2) the class or series and number of shares of the Companys stock that are
owned beneficially or of record by the shareholder making the nomination and by any other supporting shareholders. Nominees for director who are recommended by shareholders will be evaluated in the same manner as any other nominee for director.
In addition to the right of shareholders to recommend director nominees to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, the
By-Laws
provide that a shareholder entitled to vote for the election of directors may make nominations at a meeting of shareholders of persons for election to the Board if the shareholder has complied with
specified prior notice requirements. To be timely, a shareholders notice of an intent to nominate a director at a meeting of shareholders must be in writing and delivered to the Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate
Secretary not more
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Governance
(continued)
|
|
|
than 120 days prior to the meeting and not less than 45 days before the date on which the Company first mailed or otherwise gave notice for the prior years annual meeting of shareholders.
With respect to the 2018 Annual Meeting, such a notice must be received by the Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary by February 7,
2018. The
By-Laws
further require that such a notice include all of the information specified in the preceding paragraph for shareholder recommendations to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee for
director nominees.
The Company may require that the proposed nominee furnish other information as the Company may reasonably request to assist in determining
the eligibility of the proposed nominee to serve as a director. At any meeting of shareholders, the Chairman of the Board may disregard the purported nomination of any person not made in compliance with these procedures.
LEADERSHIP TEAM
The Leadership Team guides the
organization in developing and delivering the strategic plan, achieving Company goals and objectives, and successfully positioning the Company in the market. The Leadership Team consists of all executive officers and senior vice presidents of
the Company.
RISK MANAGEMENT
The Board of
Directors and Leadership Team play a vital role in overseeing the management of the Companys risks. The Board reviews the Companys significant risk exposure, including operational, strategic, financial, legal, environmental
sustainability and regulatory risks. The Leadership Team is responsible for identification, assessment and management of risks, and has established an Enterprise Risk Management Committee to assure that appropriate risk identification and mitigation
procedures are incorporated into the daily activities and decision-making of the Company. The Committee is led by the Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary and includes three additional members of the Leadership Team.
Additionally, periodic risk reviews are performed with business unit leaders to review the likelihood of adverse effects, the potential impact of those risks, risk tolerances and mitigating measures.
The Board meets at regular intervals with the Leadership Team and key members of management with primary responsibility for risk management to review the Companys
significant risk exposures. A report detailing risks identified and the results of mitigation efforts is provided to the Board on a regular basis, including results of risk mitigation testing performed by Internal Audit.
SUCCESSION PLANNING
The Board of Directors are
actively engaged in succession planning. The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review of the Chief Executive Officers performance and oversees the performance evaluations of the Named Executive Officers.
Annually, the Board discusses succession plans for the Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management.
Succession planning addresses both succession in the ordinary course of business and contingency planning in case of unexpected events. Each of the Chief Executive Officers direct reports meets quarterly with the Chief Executive Officer to
discuss development plans and opportunities.
CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY
Incorporating sustainability principles into the Companys business practices is fundamental to managing corporate risk, promoting wellness and demonstrating a
meaningful contribution to a more inclusive and environmentally-respectful economy.
The Company is dedicated to being a leader of corporate social responsibility in
its sector and is committed to applying the principles of sustainability to transform healthcare infrastructure and to drive total shareholder value.
The Company is
focused on effectively managing its resource consumption, GHG emissions and environmental impacts. The Company seeks to build, improve and operate its real estate portfolio to reach the highest possible efficiency and quality standards. To ensure a
comprehensive sustainability program, the Company engages and incorporates the interests of its communities and stakeholders in its business priorities wherever possible. Finally, the Company is committed to conducting its affairs with integrity and
transparency.
The Company has grown its sustainability program transparency efforts by completing the CDP and GRESB surveys and by publishing its fourth corporate
social responsibility report. In addition, the Company enhanced its sustainability reporting by completing the ROBECOSAM-DJSI Survey in 2016 for the first time.
The
Company is committed to the ongoing improvement of its sustainability program. These efforts were recognized by GRESB as the Company continues to be listed on the Green Star List. The Company remains in the CDP leadership band, scoring an
A-.
The Companys sustainability performance was also recognized with its inclusion in the DJSI North American Index. Finally, the Company was recognized as the 2016 Leader in the Light for the Health Care Real
Estate sector by NAREIT. The Company continued to expand and enhance its sustainability management system and governance by adding sustainability oversight to the Boards Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter.
To view the Companys latest corporate social responsibility report and learn more about its corporate responsibility actions, visit
www.welltower.com/responsibility/sustainability.
PLEDGING AND HEDGING
The Companys insider trading policy prohibits the Companys directors and executive officers from entering into hedging or monetization transactions with
respect to the Companys securities and from holding the Companys
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Governance
(continued)
|
securities in margin accounts or otherwise pledging such securities as collateral for loans.
CLAWBACK POLICY
If the Company is required to prepare a financial restatement due to the Companys material
non-compliance
with any financial reporting requirement, the Compensation Committee may require any of the Companys executive officers and certain other covered officers to repay to the Company that part
of the incentive compensation received by such officer during the three-year period preceding the publication of the restated financial statement that the Compensation Committee determines was in excess of the amount that such officer would have
received had such incentive compensation been calculated based on the financial results reported in the restated financial statement. The amount and form of the compensation to be recouped is determined by the Compensation Committee in its
discretion.
COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
Shareholders and other parties interested in communicating with the Board of Directors or any specific directors, including the
non-executive
Chairman or the
non-employee
or independent directors as a group, may do so by writing to the Board of Directors, Welltower Inc., 4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio 43615.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has approved a process for handling letters received by the Company and addressed to members of the Board. Under that
process, the Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary of the Company reviews all such correspondence and regularly forwards to the Board a summary of the correspondence (with copies of the correspondence attached) that, in
the opinion of the Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, relates to the functions of the Board or committees thereof or that he otherwise determines requires their attention (for example, if the communication received
relates to questions, concerns or complaints regarding accounting, internal control over financial reporting and auditing matters, it will be summarized and forwarded to the Chair of the Audit Committee for review). Directors may at any time review
a log of all correspondence received by the Company that is addressed to members of the Board and request copies of such correspondence.
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Officers
|
|
|
The following information is furnished as to the executive officers of the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THOMAS J.
DEROSA
Age:
59
|
|
Mr.
DeRosa
has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company since April 2014. Mr. DeRosas
biographical information is set forth under Directors to be Elected above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCOTT A.
ESTES
Age:
46
|
|
Mr.
Estes
has served as Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of the Company since January 2009.
Mr. Estes served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from March 2006 to January 2009 and as Vice President of Finance of the Company from April 2003 to March 2006. From January 2000 to April 2003, Mr. Estes
served as a Senior Equity Research Analyst and Vice President with Deutsche Bank Securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MERCEDES T.
KERR
Age:
48
|
|
Ms.
Kerr
has served as Executive Vice President - Business & Relationship Management of the Company since
January 2017. Ms. Kerr served as Executive Vice President Business Development of the Company from July 2016 to January 2017, as Senior Vice President - Business Development of the Company from July 2015 to July 2016, as Senior Vice
President - Marketing of the Company from September 2010 to July 2015 and as Vice President - Marketing of the Company from April 2008 to September 2010. Ms. Kerr served as a real estate consultant for Monument Realty Investors, Inc. from 2006
to 2008. Ms. Kerr served in various capacities with HCP, Inc. from 1997 to 2006, including as Vice President-Acquisitions and Dispositions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MATTHEW
MCQUEEN
Age:
44
|
|
Mr.
McQueen
has served as Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary of the Company
since July 2016. Mr. McQueen served as Senior Vice President - Legal of the Company from March 2015 to July 2016. From 2007 to 2015, Mr. McQueen served as of counsel and a partner in the Corporate and Securities group at the law firm of
Sidley Austin LLP. Mr. McQueen served as an associate and a partner at the law firm of Ball Eggleston PC from 2002 to 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHANKH
MITRA
Age:
36
|
|
Mr.
Mitra
has served as Senior Vice President - Finance & Investments of the Company since January 2016. From
July 2013 to December 2015, Mr. Mitra served as Portfolio Manager, Real Estate Securities at Millennium Management. Mr. Mitra served as Senior Analyst at Citadel Investment Group from April 2012 to June 2013 and Fidelity Investments
from June 2009 to March 2012. Mr. Mitra attended Columbia Business School from July 2007 to May 2009, where he received his MBA, and served as a manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers from June 2002 to July 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Directors and Management and Certain Beneficial Owners
|
The table below sets forth, as of March 7, 2017, unless otherwise specified, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Companys
shares of common stock by each director of the Company, each Named Executive Officer, and the directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Unless noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power regarding the
Companys shares. Also, unless noted below, the beneficial ownership of each person represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares Held
of Record
(2)
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
Within 60 Days
|
|
|
Total Shares
Beneficially
Owned
(3)
|
|
Kenneth J. Bacon
(1)
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
Scott M. Brinker
|
|
|
102,563
|
|
|
|
8,782
|
|
|
|
111,345
|
(4)
|
Thomas J. DeRosa
|
|
|
250,446
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
250,446
|
(5)
|
Jeffrey H. Donahue
|
|
|
36,815
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
36,815
|
|
Scott A. Estes
|
|
|
117,607
|
|
|
|
43,787
|
|
|
|
161,394
|
|
Mercedes T. Kerr
|
|
|
30,545
|
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
34,887
|
|
Fred S. Klipsch
|
|
|
18,513
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
18,513
|
|
Jeffrey H. Miller
|
|
|
120,302
|
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
|
|
125,122
|
(6)
|
Geoffrey G. Meyers
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
Timothy J. Naughton
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
Sharon M. Oster
|
|
|
49,065
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
49,065
|
(7)
|
Judith C. Pelham
|
|
|
7,833
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,833
|
|
Sergio D. Rivera
|
|
|
5,259
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,259
|
|
R. Scott Trumbull
|
|
|
66,021
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
66,021
|
(8)
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)
|
|
|
635,340
|
|
|
|
48,129
|
|
|
|
683,469
|
(9)
|
(1)
|
Mr. Bacon was appointed to the Board of Directors on January 29, 2016.
|
(2)
|
Includes all restricted shares granted under the Companys Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan) and the Companys 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan
beneficially owned by such directors and Named Executive Officers and all directors and executive officers as a group as of March 7, 2017.
|
(3)
|
Does not include 2,142 deferred stock units granted to each
non-employee
director in February 2017. These deferred stock units will be converted into shares of common stock on the
next anniversary of the date of grant.
|
(4)
|
On January 3, 2017, Mr. Brinkers position as the Executive Vice President - Chief Investment Officer of the Company was eliminated. Mr. Brinker is included in this table because he is a Named
Executive Officer. Mr. Brinkers shares held of record are reported as of January 3, 2017, his last day as an employee of the Company. Mr. Brinker exercised all outstanding stock options on February 24, 2017.
|
(5)
|
Does not include 5,206 restricted stock units granted to Mr. DeRosa pursuant to a performance-based restricted stock unit grant agreement. See the 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page
54 for additional information regarding this award. These restricted stock units will vest on April 13, 2017. Settlement of these restricted stock units is automatically deferred under the terms of the grant agreement until the earliest of
Mr. DeRosas separation from service (as defined under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended), his death or a change in control of the Company.
|
(6)
|
On January 31, 2017, Mr. Miller retired as the Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Mr. Miller is included in this table because he is a Named Executive Officer.
Mr. Millers shares held of record are reported as of January 31, 2017, his last day as an employee of the Company. Mr. Miller exercised all outstanding stock options on March 1, 2017.
|
(7)
|
Ms. Osters total shares beneficially owned include 17,000 shares owned by her spouse.
|
(8)
|
Mr. Trumbulls total shares beneficially owned include 23,362 shares held in trust for the benefit of his immediate family, as to which his spouse is the trustee. Mr. Trumbull disclaims beneficial
ownership of these 23,362 shares.
|
(9)
|
Total beneficial ownership represents 0.19% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company as of March 7, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Directors and
Management and Certain Beneficial Owners
(continued)
|
|
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Companys directors and executive officers, and persons who own beneficially
more than 10% of the shares of common stock of the Company, to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. Copies of all filed reports are required to be
furnished to the Company pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely on the reports received by the Company and on written representations from reporting persons, the Company believes that the directors and executive officers complied with all
applicable filing requirements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
Based upon filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission in January
and February 2017 (with respect to holdings as of December 31, 2016), the only shareholders known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Companys common stock are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Percent of
Outstanding
Common Stock
(4)
|
|
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100
Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
|
|
|
50,921,235
|
(1)
|
|
|
14.02%
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd
Street
New York, NY 10055
|
|
|
37,655,712
|
(2)
|
|
|
10.37%
|
|
State Street Corporation
State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
|
|
|
21,137,936
|
(3)
|
|
|
5.82%
|
|
(1)
|
Includes 468,365 shares beneficially owned by Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., and 1,113,238 shares beneficially owned by Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc. In the aggregate, The Vanguard Group, Inc., Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. have sole voting power over 1,029,441 shares, shared voting power over 458,662
shares, sole dispositive power over 49,900,708 shares and shared dispositive power over 1,020,527 shares. In addition, the number of shares reported as beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group, Inc. includes the 27,156,344 shares separately reported
as beneficially owned by Vanguard Specialized Funds in its filing made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Vanguard Specialized Funds has sole voting power over 27,156,344 shares.
|
(2)
|
In the aggregate, BlackRock, Inc. and its affiliates have sole voting power over 33,878,646 shares and sole dispositive power over 37,655,712 shares.
|
(3)
|
In the aggregate, State Street Corporation and its affiliates have shared voting power over 21,137,936 shares and shared dispositive power over 21,137,936 shares.
|
(4)
|
The percentages set forth in the table reflect percentage ownership as of March 7, 2017. The actual filings of these beneficial owners provide percentage ownership as of December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Directors and Management and Certain Beneficial Owners
(continued)
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Policies and Procedures for Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Party Transactions
The Company has a written policy requiring all material transactions with related parties to be approved or ratified by the
Board. The policy covers any transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) in which (1) the aggregate amount involved will or
may be expected to exceed $100,000 in any calendar year, (2) the Company is a participant, and (3) any related party has or will have a direct or indirect interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or a less than 10%
beneficial owner of another entity).
In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction, the Board will take into account, among other factors it deems
appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related partys interest in the transaction. The
Board has determined that transactions that involve any employment by the Company of an executive officer of the Company shall be deemed to be
pre-approved
if the related compensation is required to be
reported in the Companys
proxy statement under Item 402 of Regulation
S-K
because the person is a Named Executive Officer, or if the executive officer is not a Named Executive
Officer and the compensation would have been reported in the Companys proxy statement if the executive officer had been a Named Executive Officer (and the Companys Compensation Committee approved or recommended that the Board
approve such compensation). The Board also has
pre-approved
certain transactions that involve (1) any compensation paid to a director if the compensation is required to be reported in the Companys
proxy statement under Item 402 of Regulation
S-K;
(2) any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by the Company to a charitable organization, foundation or university at which a related
persons only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) or a director, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the lesser of $1,000,000 or 2% of the charitable organizations total annual receipts; and
(3) any transaction where the related partys interest arises solely from the ownership of the Companys common stock and all holders of the Companys common stock receive the same benefit on a pro rata basis.
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
Proposal 2Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
|
|
|
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation, evaluation and oversight of the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee considers whether the independent registered public accounting firm is best positioned and qualified to provide the most effective and efficient service, based on
factors such as the independent registered public accounting firms familiarity with the Companys business, personnel, culture, accounting systems or risk profile; the appropriateness of fees charged; and whether provision of the service
by the independent registered public accounting firm would enhance the Companys ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. The Audit Committee obtains and reviews a report from the independent registered public accounting firm
at least annually regarding: (a) the independent registered public accounting firms internal quality-control procedures, (b) any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the
independent registered public accounting firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the preceding five years respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the independent registered public
accounting firm, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues, and (c) all relationships between the independent registered public accounting firm and the Company (in order to assess the independent registered public accounting firms
independence). The Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, including considering whether its quality controls are adequate and the provision of permitted
non-audit
services is compatible with maintaining its independence, and taking into account the opinions of management and the internal auditors.
The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017. Ernst & Young LLP has served as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm since the Companys inception in 1970. The Audit Committee periodically
considers whether, in order to assure continuing auditor independence, it should adopt a policy requiring the regular rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee (and in particular the Chair of the Audit
Committee) ensures the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit partner every five years as mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, and is directly involved in the selection of Ernst & Young LLPs lead audit
partner. The Companys current lead audit partner was appointed beginning with the 2013 audit. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Although the submission of this matter for approval by shareholders is not
legally required, the Board believes that such submission follows sound business practice and is in the best interests of the shareholders. If this appointment is not ratified by the holders of a majority of the shares of voting securities present
in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee will consider the selection of another accounting firm. If such a selection were made, it may not become effective until 2018 because of the difficulty and expense of making a
substitution. Representatives of the firm of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in each of the last two fiscal years, in each of the following categories, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
3,050,971
|
|
|
$
|
3,182,750
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
2,810
|
|
|
|
4,189
|
|
Tax Fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Compliance
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
160,488
|
|
Tax Planning and Tax Advice
|
|
|
45,229
|
|
|
|
504,472
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
3,099,010
|
|
|
$
|
3,851,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 2Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(continued)
|
Audit fees include fees associated with the annual audit, the review of the Companys quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and services that generally only the independent registered public accounting firm can provide such as accounting consultations billed as audit services, comfort letters, consents and assistance with
review of documents to be filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Audit-related fees include fees associated with assurance and related
services that are traditionally performed by an independent accountant, and include access to research databases and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards not billed as audit services.
Tax fees include fees for tax compliance and tax planning and tax advice services. Tax compliance involves the
preparation of original and amended tax returns, claims for refund and tax payment-planning services and assistance with tax audits and appeals. Tax planning and tax advice encompass a diverse
range of services, including advice related to acquisitions, and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.
None of the foregoing fees were
paid for services, the sole business purpose of which was tax avoidance, or the tax treatment of which would not be supported by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) and related regulations.
The decrease in fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP from 2015 to 2016 is primarily due to a decrease in
tax-related
professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in 2016.
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of voting securities present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting
will be required for such ratification.
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
Proposal 2Ratification of the
Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(continued)
|
|
|
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee has developed policies and procedures concerning its
pre-approval
of the performance of audit and
non-audit
services for the Company by Ernst & Young LLP and is responsible for the audit fee negotiations
associated with the engagement of Ernst & Young LLP. At its quarterly meetings, the Audit Committee
pre-approves
particular audit and
non-audit
services within
the following categories of services that it desires the independent registered public accounting firm to undertake: audit services, audit-related services, tax compliance services, tax planning and tax advice services and other services. Prior to
giving its approval, the Committee reviews the written descriptions of these services provided by Ernst & Young LLP and the estimated fees for these services. All other
non-audit
services must be
pre-approved
on an individual engagement basis.
If there is any question as to whether a proposed service has been
pre-approved,
management and the independent registered public accounting firm together
must contact the Audit Committee to obtain clarification or, if necessary,
pre-approval.
All of the audit services,
audit-related services, tax compliance services, tax planning and tax advice services and other services provided to the Company by Ernst & Young LLP during the year ended December 31, 2016 were
pre-approved
by the Audit Committee.
Where specific Audit Committee approval of
non-audit
services is required, the Chair of the Audit Committee may
pre-approve
the engagement subject to a presentation to the full Audit Committee at its next
regularly scheduled meeting.
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee oversees the Companys financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management
has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities this past year, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial
statements with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the audited
financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, its judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Companys accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit
Committee under generally accepted auditing standards (including Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board). In addition, the Audit Committee has
received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding such firms communications with the Audit
Committee concerning
independence. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm such firms independence from management and the Company and considered the
compatibility of
non-audit
services with such firms independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee met with such firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluations of the Companys
internal controls, and the overall quality of the Companys financial reporting. The Audit Committee held four meetings during the year ended December 31, 2016.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited
financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee and the Board have also
recommended, subject to shareholder ratification, the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017. Mr. Klipsch, Mr. Meyers,
Mr. Rivera and Mr. Trumbull were each members of the Audit Committee in 2016 and participated in the reviews and discussions described above.
Submitted by the Audit Committee
R. Scott Trumbull, Audit Committee Chair
Fred S. Klipsch, Audit Committee Member
Geoffrey G. Meyers, Audit Committee Member
Sergio D. Rivera, Audit Committee Member
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 3Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
|
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Companys shareholders have the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory or
non-binding
basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SECs compensation disclosure rules.
The Companys compensation programs, which are detailed in Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement, are
designed to link pay to performance and to reward the Named Executive Officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and increased shareholder returns. This compensation philosophy is central to the
Companys ability to attract, retain and motivate individuals who can achieve superior financial results. This approach, which has been used consistently over the years, has resulted in the Companys ability to attract and retain the
executive talent necessary to guide the Company. Please refer to Executive CompensationExecutive Summary in this Proxy Statement for an overview of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers and the Companys key
financial and strategic achievements in 2016 that drove compensation decisions. We also encourage shareholders to read the Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement, which describes the
details of the Companys compensation programs and the decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2016.
Shareholders are being asked to vote on the
following advisory resolution:
Resolved, that the compensation paid to the Companys Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy
Statement in accordance with the SECs compensation disclosure rules, which disclosures include the disclosures under Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative
disclosures that accompany the compensation tables, is hereby approved.
This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the
overall compensation of the Named Executive Officers and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. The
Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of the Companys shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the Named Executive Officers compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, the Company will
consider shareholders concerns, and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY OR
NON-BINDING
BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SEC. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of voting securities present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting will be
required for advisory approval of this proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
Proposal
4Advisory Vote on Frequency of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Section 14A of the Exchange Act also enables the Companys shareholders to vote at least once every six years, on an advisory or
non-binding
basis, on how frequently they would like to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers. By voting on this proposal, shareholders may indicate whether they would
prefer an advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation once every one, two, or three years.
In 2011, the Companys shareholders voted in favor of
holding advisory votes on executive compensation every year and the Board implemented this standard. The Board recommends that shareholders approve continuing to hold the advisory vote on executive compensation every year. The Board believes that
conducting an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis is appropriate for the Company and its shareholders at this time. This will allow the shareholders to provide timely, direct input on the Companys executive compensation
philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement each year. The Board will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation. However,
because this vote is advisory and not binding, the Board may decide that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to hold an advisory vote more or less frequently than the alternative that has been selected by the
shareholders.
Shareholders may cast their advisory vote to conduct advisory votes on executive compensation every 1 Year, 2 Years,
3 Years, or Abstain.
It is expected that the next vote on the frequency of holding advisory votes on executive compensation will occur
at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
FOR THE HOLDING OF ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EVERY YEAR. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of voting securities present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting will be required
for advisory approval of this proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
The
Compensation Committee is responsible for the Companys executive compensation program and implementing its underlying philosophy and policies. An overview and analysis of the Companys executive compensation program, philosophy and
policies is set forth below.
The Companys named executive officers for 2016 (the Named Executive Officers or NEOs) were:
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
|
Title
|
Thomas J. DeRosa
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Scott A. Estes
|
|
Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
|
Mercedes T. Kerr
|
|
Executive Vice President - Business & Relationship Management
|
Scott M. Brinker
|
|
Former Executive Vice President - Chief Investment Officer (on January 3, 2017, Mr. Brinkers position as Executive Vice President - Chief Investment
Officer of the Company was eliminated)
|
Jeffrey H.
Miller
|
|
Former Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer (on January 31, 2017, Mr. Miller retired as Executive Vice President -
Chief Operating Officer of the Company)
|
Executive Summary
COMPENSATION PRINCIPLES
The Companys executive compensation program is
designed to attract, motivate and retain top executive talent. Competing successfully in this dynamic sector requires highly skilled, knowledgeable individuals who are committed to delivering outstanding shareholder returns while effectively
building relationships across the industry. The Compensation Committee continually reviews and refines the Companys compensation practices so that the compensation system is in line with the market, is responsive to concerns of
shareholders, and takes into account best compensation practices. To that end, the Companys compensation program is based on three core principles:
|
|
|
Align pay and performance, utilizing absolute and relative goals that measure performance both on an annual and multi-year basis.
|
|
|
|
Align management and shareholder interests, by establishing rigorous goals that balance and measure value creation over both the short and long term.
|
|
|
|
Pay the majority of compensation in the form of equity that vests over an extended number of years.
|
COMPENSATION
PLAN CHANGES
In response to evolving market best practices and shareholder input, the Compensation Committee continued to refine and enhance the compensation
program in 2016. The revisions to the program were designed with the assistance of the Companys compensation advisor, FPL Associates (FPL), and in consultation with outside legal counsel (to assure that the Compensation
Committee was receiving independent advice on legal aspects of the compensation program).
Based on strong shareholder support last year and with input from FPL, the
management team, outside legal counsel, and shareholder groups, the Compensation Committee implemented the following limited modifications to the compensation program in 2016:
|
|
|
Completed the implementation of an executive long-term incentive program that measures Company achievement over a forward-looking, multi-year performance period.
|
|
|
|
Replaced the net real estate investments component of the annual cash bonus program with a leverage metric (page 40).
|
|
|
|
Introduced a strategic plan metric for the 2016-2018 long-term incentive program that tracks private pay percentage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
|
|
2016 PERFORMANCE
The Company had a strong year in 2016 that validated the
strength of its platform. The Companys strategy is based on acquiring and developing a well-diversified, high quality portfolio located in strong high barrier to entry and growing markets operated or managed by
best-in-class
seniors housing and care organizations and health systems. The Company significantly improved its balance sheet, portfolio and risk profile through
strategic acquisitions and dispositions during 2016.
The Compensation Committee evaluates all
pre-established
qualitative and
quantitative metrics and factors in making its compensation decisions. Among the important metrics and factors the Compensation Committee considered were the management teams success in the following areas:
GROWTH
|
|
|
Delivered strong annual earnings growth in 2016, including normalized funds from operations growth and normalized funds available for distribution growth.
|
|
|
|
Generated strong same-store net operating income growth across the portfolio in 2016.
|
|
|
|
Outpatient Medical portfolio generated solid NOI growth, supported by strong occupancy of 95% at
year-end
and a tenant retention rate of 87% for the year.
|
PORTFOLIO AND BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
Completed $3.0 billion in pro rata gross new investments during the year, including $1.15 billion premier West Coast seniors housing portfolio (page 34).
|
|
|
|
Significantly improved the portfolio quality by disposing of nearly $2.8 billion of
non-strategic
assets (page 35).
|
|
|
|
Increased percentage of revenues generated by private pay sources by 400 basis points to 92.8% in 2016.
|
|
|
|
Improved key balance sheet metrics, including net debt to undepreciated book capitalization (37.4% at the end of 2016 as compared to 39.5% at the end of 2015) (page 35).
|
CORPORATE
|
|
|
Received corporate credit ratings upgrades from two rating agencies.
|
|
|
|
Paid a cash dividend of $3.44 per share in 2016, which represents an increase of 4% over dividends paid during 2015 (page 36).
|
|
|
|
Enhanced financial flexibility with expanded, extended and lower-priced $3.7 billion unsecured credit facility.
|
SUSTAINABILITY
|
|
|
Named to the Dow Jones North America Sustainability Index (DJSI). DJSI is considered among the most important global indicators of sustainability performance.
|
|
|
|
Designated as a Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) Green Star for sustainability performance for second consecutive year.
|
|
|
|
Received the NAREIT Leader in the Light (health care) award, which recognizes companies that have demonstrated superior and sustained sustainability practices.
|
|
|
|
Received recognition for 29 additional outpatient medical buildings for their sustainability leadership through the Green Arrow Building Certification (GABC) program. Since the start of the GABC program 69 outpatient
medical buildings have received certification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
To assist shareholders in finding important information, this CD&A
is organized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION CONSULTANT
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
INPUT OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ON COMPENSATION
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH INITIATIVES
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
IMPROVEMENTS TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM STRUCTURE
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
COMPENSATION PEER GROUP
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
2016 COMPANY PERFORMANCE
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
CEO PAY OVERVIEW
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
|
|
COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AND RESULTS
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
1.
|
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
|
The philosophy underlying the Companys executive compensation program
is to provide competitive pay for achieving rigorous performance goals. The objective is to attract and retain the caliber of executive officers and other key employees necessary for the Company to deliver sustained high performance to shareholders.
The short-term and long-term metrics built into the compensation program are specifically designed to align management and shareholder interests directly. Outlined below are the principles underlying the Companys executive compensation
program.
|
|
|
Strongly align pay and performance, utilizing absolute and relative goals across annual and multi-year performance periods
|
|
¡
|
|
Payouts vary based upon the degree to which performance measures are achieved.
|
|
¡
|
|
Multiple performance measures are used to ensure a focus on overall Company performance.
|
|
¡
|
|
Variable reward payouts are designed to provide competitive compensation for achieving expected performance, and enhanced compensation for performance that exceeds
expectations.
|
|
|
|
Attract and retain top management talent
|
|
¡
|
|
The executive compensation program is structured to attract and retain individuals with the skills necessary to effectively manage a complex, growing international
business.
|
|
¡
|
|
The Compensation Committee regularly benchmarks its executive compensation program to compensate executives to approximate the median level for target performance,
with above median payouts for superior performance.
|
|
¡
|
|
Individual performance is a key element in the annual cash bonus program, which is designed to motivate executives to perform at the highest levels.
|
|
|
|
Link compensation realized to the achievement of the Companys short and long-term financial and strategic goals
|
|
¡
|
|
A majority of each Named Executive Officers total direct compensation opportunity is in the form of annual and long-term incentive compensation.
|
|
¡
|
|
Performance measures are selected based on careful assessment of measures that will encourage profitable growth and increase shareholder value.
|
|
¡
|
|
Actual compensation may be above or below the targeted level, depending on achievement relative to
pre-established
performance
goals that reflect the Companys short and long-term business plans.
|
|
|
|
Align management and shareholder interests by engaging in long-term shareholder value creation
|
|
¡
|
|
Long-term incentive awards are granted in the form of equity awards that vest based on performance and continued employment over multiple years, which aligns
managements interests with those of the Companys shareholders.
|
|
¡
|
|
The current incentive programs include an annual cash bonus component and a three-year forward-looking component emphasizing both short and long-term shareholder
value creation.
|
|
¡
|
|
Stock ownership guidelines require that Board members and executives maintain significant levels of stock ownership, further emphasizing the focus on long-term
shareholder return and alignment with shareholder interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
|
2.
|
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
|
The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the nature and amount of
compensation for the Companys Chief Executive Officer and for reviewing and approving the compensation for the other four executive officers listed on page 17. The Committee consists of four
non-employee
directors. Ms. Oster is the Chair of the Compensation Committee and Mr. Bacon, Mr. Naughton and Ms. Pelham are Compensation Committee members.
The Companys compensation policies and programs are designed to implement the philosophy described above. The Company has implemented a number of measures in an
effort to drive performance and align the interests of the Companys executives with shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What the Company Does
|
|
|
|
What the Company Doesnt Do
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pays for performance
. A significant portion of executive pay is not guaranteed, but rather is
at-risk
and tied to key financial and
value-creation metrics that are disclosed to the shareholders. All of the incentive compensation (both cash and equity) is subject to the achievement of various performance objectives.
|
|
|
|
Guarantee salary increases, bonuses or equity grants
. The
Company does not guarantee annual salary increases or bonuses to anyone. It currently has no guaranteed commitments to grant any equity-based awards. Finally, the entire long-term program is predicated on the achievement of performance metrics. This
ensures that the Company is able to base all compensation awards on measurable performance factors and business results.
Provide excise tax
gross-up
payments
. The Company will not enter into any new agreements that include excise tax
gross-up
payments.
Reprice options
. Since its
initial public offering in 1978, the Company has not repriced or otherwise reduced the
per-share
exercise price of any outstanding stock options. Repricing of stock options is not permitted under the 2005
Long-Term Incentive Plan or the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Pledging or hedging
.
The Companys insider trading policy prohibits the Companys directors and executive officers from entering into hedging or monetization transactions with respect to the Companys securities and from holding the Companys
securities in margin accounts or otherwise pledging such securities as collateral for loans.
Dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance shares
. Performance share award agreements do not provide for the payment of dividends until the
shares are earned.
|
|
|
Balances short-term and long-term incentives
. The incentive programs provide an appropriate balance of annual and longer-term incentives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caps award payouts
. Amounts or shares that can be earned under the annual incentive program and long-term incentive program are capped. No guaranteed minimum amounts or awards are
provided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintains share ownership guidelines
. The Company has established the following minimum share ownership requirements: CEO five times base salary; executive officers
three times base salary; and outside directors four times the annual cash fee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provides enhanced change in control protections only after double-trigger
. The CEOs employment agreement includes double trigger severance provisions requiring
both a change in control and a subsequent qualifying termination of employment
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilizes an independent compensation consulting firm
. The Compensation Committee has engaged an independent compensation consulting firm that specializes in the REIT
industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintains a clawback policy
. The Compensation Committee adopted a clawback policy that, in the event of a financial restatement, allows the Company to recoup incentive
compensation (including stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units) paid to executive officers based on the misstated financial information.
|
|
|
|
|
Conducts a risk assessment
. The Compensation Committee annually conducts a compensation risk assessment to determine whether the compensation policies and practices, or components
thereof, create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
3.
|
ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION CONSULTANT
|
The Compensation Committee has engaged FPL as its independent compensation
consultant to advise the Committee on compensation program design, the components of the Companys executive compensation programs and the amounts the Company should pay its executive officers.
FPL performs no services for management unless requested by and on behalf of the Chair of the Compensation Committee. The consultant generally attends meetings of the
Compensation Committee, and the Chair of the Compensation Committee frequently interacts with the consultant between meetings to define the nature of work to be conducted, review materials to be presented at meetings and obtain the consultants
opinion and perspective on proposals prepared by management.
During 2016, FPL performed the following specific services:
|
|
|
Re-evaluated
the peer group
|
|
|
|
Conducted a comprehensive review of executive and board compensation
|
|
|
|
Developed a new long-term incentive program design
|
As part of the process of assessing the effectiveness of the
Companys compensation programs and assisting with implementation, the consultant also interacts with members of management. The consultants primary contacts with management are the Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and
the Senior Vice President - Human Capital. The independence of FPL was assessed by the Compensation Committee and no conflicts of interest were found.
|
4.
|
INPUT OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ON COMPENSATION
|
The Compensation Committee receives input from certain executive
officers on a variety of issues related to compensation.
|
|
|
The Chief Executive Officer considers the performance of each other NEO and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding each other NEOs individual performance score associated with the annual
cash bonus program, and future increases to base salary and incentive compensation opportunities. The Compensation Committee takes these recommendations into consideration when determining earned incentive compensation and when setting compensation
opportunities for the coming year.
|
|
|
|
Each year, management establishes an annual plan for the Boards review, which includes financial budgets and key strategic objectives for the Company. The Compensation Committee has designed the compensation
programs to encompass key financial and strategic objectives included in the annual plan.
|
|
|
|
The Companys Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer assists the Compensation Committee in assessing the financial and legal impact of compensation decisions.
|
|
|
|
The Companys Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary along with the Senior Vice President - Human Capital assist the Compensation Committee in administering the compensation programs,
including the Companys 2005 and 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plans as well as the three-year rolling executive Long-Term Incentive Programs, and ensuring that all relevant documentation and disclosures are completed (e.g., filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and legal documents).
|
|
5.
|
SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH INITIATIVES
|
At the 2016 Annual Meeting, approximately 94% of shareholder votes were cast in
favor of the compensation of the NEOs (also commonly referred to as
Say-on-Pay).
This represents a similar voting result for the 2015
Say-on-Pay
proposal (97% in favor). The Compensation Committee and management were pleased with these results, but continue to engage with shareholders as part of their
continuing efforts to refine and enhance the executive compensation program.
The Compensation Committee, with assistance from FPL, considered the opinions provided
during shareholder and investor meetings during the past few years in the development of the 2017 compensation program. Investors have been pleased with the Companys continuing efforts to enhance the connection between pay and performance. The
Companys efforts include the implementation of a three-year forward-looking long-term incentive program that features consecutive, rolling three-year tranches.
In 2016, members of senior management conducted over 300 meetings with investors and analysts to discuss a number of topics, including, but not limited to, financial
results, Company strategy, objectives and performance, compensation metrics, corporate governance initiatives and industry trends.
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
|
6.
|
IMPROVEMENTS TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM STRUCTURE
|
The Compensation Committee continues to work with FPL,
considers feedback from proxy advisory firms, and engages shareholders to ensure all potential compensation concerns are evaluated and its pay for performance practices are supported.
Changes to the Annual Cash Bonus Program
The Compensation Committee removed the net real estate investments component of the annual cash bonus program and replaced it with a leverage metric in order to emphasize
the health of the balance sheet. The Compensation Committee also modified the weightings for Mr. Brinker for the cash NOI versus underwritten projections metric. The weightings for the measures vary among the NEOs based on their operational
responsibility and sphere of influence. For example, Mr. Brinker has a more direct impact on cash NOI versus underwritten projections than other NEOs, so his weighting for that metric is greater than the other NEOs. All NEOs have at least a 5%
weighting for each measure.
2016 Annual Incentive Cash Bonus Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metric
|
|
DeRosa
|
|
Estes
|
|
Kerr
|
|
Brinker
|
|
Miller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normalized FFO per share
|
|
30%
|
|
25%
|
|
25%
|
|
25%
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store NOI growth
|
|
25%
|
|
25%
|
|
25%
|
|
25%
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage
|
|
15%
|
|
15%
|
|
15%
|
|
10%
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash NOI vs. underwritten projections on 2015 operating acquisitions
|
|
5%
|
|
5%
|
|
5%
|
|
10%
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Goals
|
|
25%
|
|
30%
|
|
30%
|
|
30%
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
Changes to the Long-Term Incentive Plan
In response to investor feedback and in consultation with FPL, the Compensation
Committee has transitioned to a long-term incentive program based entirely on forward-looking performance. The program features consecutive, rolling three-year tranches and includes the following metrics:
2015 2017
3-Year
Long-Term Incentive Program
|
|
|
Metric
|
|
Weighting
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return v. NAREIT Health Care Index
|
|
35%
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return v. Morgan Stanley (MSCI) US REIT Index
|
|
15%
|
|
|
Absolute Total Shareholder Return
|
|
15%
|
|
|
Adjusted Fixed Charge Coverage
|
|
20%
|
|
|
Relative Same Store NOI Growth
|
|
15%
|
2016 2018
3-Year
Long-Term Incentive Program
|
|
|
Metric
|
|
Weighting
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return v. NAREIT Health Care Index
|
|
35%
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return v. Morgan Stanley (MSCI) US REIT Index
|
|
15%
|
|
|
Absolute Total Shareholder Return
|
|
15%
|
|
|
Adjusted Fixed Charge Coverage
|
|
20%
|
|
|
Private Pay
|
|
15%
|
The transition from the prior split program, which featured awards made after the completion of the performance period (i.e.
backward-looking), to the three-year forward-looking program, which features the upfront grant of performance shares, is now complete. The NEOs received grants under the prior program (reflecting previous achievement of performance goals) for the
final time in February 2016. In accordance with SEC rules, the February 2016 grants are included in the Summary Compensation Table on pages 48-49 (even though they relate to performance in 2015).
For 2016, 84% of the CEOs 2016 total target compensation was performance-based and not guaranteed and 54% was in the form of long-term equity compensation (see page
38). Likewise, an average of 78% of the other NEOs 2016 total target compensation was performance-based and not guaranteed, and an average of 39% was in the form of long-term equity compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
|
7.
|
COMPENSATION PEER GROUP
|
As part of its annual compensation review, the Compensation Committee conducts a
comprehensive review of the executive compensation programs relative to a relevant peer group of comparable REITs. The competitive review is one of the compensation elements the Compensation Committee takes into account in making compensation
decisions. Along with Company performance, the Compensation Committee also considers the experience, tenure and past performance of each of the executive officers.
Across the public REIT Industry, the Company is now the 7th largest measured by enterprise value and the 9
th
largest
measured by market capitalization, and the Company is included in the S&P 500 Index. As illustrated below, the peer group was selected because its members are similar in size to the Company, share a similar business model, geographic footprint,
regulatory environment and/or competitive dynamics. The peer group represents the industries with which it currently competes for executive talent, and also includes the Companys principal business competitors. The peer group has evolved over
time as the Company has grown, but it did not change in 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer
|
|
Industry
|
|
Market
Capitalization
|
|
Simon Property Group, Inc.
|
|
Regional Mall
|
|
$
|
64.3 billion
|
|
American Tower Corp.
|
|
Specialty
|
|
$
|
45.1 billion
|
|
Public Storage
|
|
Self-Storage
|
|
$
|
38.8 billion
|
|
Prologis, Inc.
|
|
Industrial
|
|
$
|
28.8 billion
|
|
Equity Residential
|
|
Multi-Family
|
|
$
|
24.5 billion
|
|
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
|
|
Multi-Family
|
|
$
|
24.3 billion
|
|
Welltower Inc.
|
|
Health Care
|
|
$
|
24.3 billion
|
|
Ventas, Inc.
|
|
Health Care
|
|
$
|
22.3 billion
|
|
General Growth Properties, Inc.
|
|
Regional Mall
|
|
$
|
22.3 billion
|
|
Boston Properties, Inc.
|
|
Office
|
|
$
|
21.6 billion
|
|
Vornado Realty Trust
|
|
Diversified
|
|
$
|
20.9 billion
|
|
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
|
|
Hotel
|
|
$
|
14.1 billion
|
|
HCP, Inc.
|
|
Health Care
|
|
$
|
14.1 billion
|
|
Source: Key Banc, data as of 12/30/16.
Source: Key Banc, data as of 12/30/16.
The Compensation Committee believes that market data plays an important role in the design and implementation of optimal
compensation programs. FPL and the Compensation Committee consider multiple factors and types of internal and external data in making both individual and plan-level compensation decisions. The benchmarking data provides an important reference
point when evaluating whether pay levels are appropriate, however, it is a single point of reference and one of several factors utilized when ultimately making pay decisions. Although the Compensation Committee does not precisely benchmark to a
specific market percentile, the market median is typically an initial focus and point of reference.
Findings from the peer group review indicated that Mr. DeRosas total target remuneration (sum of base salary,
cash bonus and equity awards) ranked at the 27
th
percentile among the CEOs in the peer group. The review also indicated that the target total remuneration for the NEOs (other than Mr. DeRosa,
in the aggregate) is below the market median relative to the
non-CEO
named executive officers (in the aggregate) in the peer group (see chart on page 34).
The Compensation Committee will continue to evaluate and adjust target compensation and corresponding incentive opportunity levels over time to make sure the
Companys compensation programs are competitive and consistent with the Companys compensation philosophy.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
The Companys relative compensation levels compared to relative enterprise growth, total capitalization growth and
total shareholder return during the period 2014 2016 is depicted in the chart to the right.
Sources: Key Banc, data as of 12/30/16.
SNL Financial, data as of 12/30/16.
|
8.
|
2016 COMPANY PERFORMANCE
|
The primary goal of the Compensation Committee is to link relative pay to relative, and
in some instances absolute, performance. 2016 was another strong year for the Company. Throughout the year, as a result of experienced and steady leadership, the Company continued to seize opportunities and further differentiate itself from the
competition. Some of the accomplishments that the Compensation Committee considered in determining compensation levels included:
PRO RATA GROSS INVESTMENTS
The Company completed $3.0 billion in pro rata gross new investments in 2016, including
$1.15 billion of premier West Coast seniors housing investments.
Demonstrating the success of our relationship investing approach, 92% of the
Companys 2016 investments were originated through existing relationships.
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
PRO RATA DISPOSITION PROCEEDS
The Company continued to proactively recycle capital in an effort to enhance the value of the portfolio
and position the Company in an evolving health care industry. In 2016, the Company generated $2.8 billion of pro rata proceeds from the disposition of
non-strategic
assets.
NET DEBT TO UNDEPRECIATED BOOK CAPITAL
The Company improved key balance sheet metrics, including net debt to undepreciated book capitalization
(37.4% at the end of 2016 as compared to 39.5% at the end of 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
The Company increased percentage of revenues generated by private pay sources by 400 basis points to
92.8% in 2016, thereby reducing revenue payment risk attributable to government pay sources.
Increasing private pay revenues is a result of
performance in several key core areas within the Companys strategic plan. Specifically, private pay improves as a result of increasing RIDEA as a percentage of the portfolio, growing health system and outpatient medical relationships and
right-sizing
post-acute care.
183 CONSECUTIVE DIVIDENDS
The Company paid a cash dividend of $3.44 per share in 2016, which represents a 4% increase over
dividends paid in 2015.
The Board of Directors also approved a new 2017 cash dividend of $3.48, commencing with the February 2017 dividend.
The dividend paid in February 2017 represents the Companys 183rd consecutive dividend payment.
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
This section highlights the terms of Mr. DeRosas amended and restated employment
agreement, which was entered into on January 3, 2017 and will become effective on April 13, 2017, and outlines the compensation paid to him in 2016 in light of the Companys performance.
Mr. DeRosas Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
In 2016, the Company had an employment agreement with Thomas J. DeRosa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which expires on April 13, 2017. Under that original
employment agreement, Mr. DeRosa receives a base salary that is reviewed and adjusted each year by the Compensation Committee and he is eligible to receive discretionary annual bonuses and equity awards under the Companys long-term incentive
plans. The Company also provides Mr. DeRosa with an automobile allowance to cover the cost of leasing a vehicle during the term of his employment agreement. Mr. DeRosa received a one-time grant of $1,000,000 of performance-based restricted stock
units (15,618 units) on July 30, 2014 in connection with the commencement of his employment as CEO. See the 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 54 for additional information regarding these performance-based restricted
stock units. In addition, to the extent the Company no longer maintains the health plan in which Mr. DeRosa is participating as of May 1, 2014 and, if he elects to not participate in any other group health plan sponsored or maintained by the
Company, he may receive a cash payment in lieu of such benefits up to $2,000 per month. Mr. DeRosa is entitled to severance protections and benefits in connection with certain qualifying termination events, some of which are enhanced following a
change in corporate control of the Company. For a description of the provisions of the agreement regarding compensation and benefits payable upon termination or a change in corporate control, see Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change
in Corporate Control on pages 55-56.
In anticipation of the expiration of his original employment agreement and in recognition of his exemplary performance, on
January 3, 2017, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. DeRosa, which will become effective on April 13, 2017, after the expiration of his current employment agreement. As was the case under
Mr. DeRosas original employment agreement that was in effect during 2016, his amended and restated employment agreement includes the provisions listed below, which the Company considers best practices.
|
|
|
|
BEST PRACTICES CEO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
No evergreenterm is defined and there is no automatic renewal feature
|
|
|
|
|
No severance payable upon expiration of the term
|
|
|
|
|
No automatic compensation increases
|
|
|
|
|
No guaranteed bonus payments
|
|
|
|
|
Any severance payments are conditioned upon a general release and continued compliance with
non-competition,
nonsolicitation and
confidentiality requirements
|
|
|
|
|
Double-trigger required for both severance and acceleration of equity awards following a change in corporate control
|
|
|
|
|
No excise tax
gross-ups
|
|
|
|
|
Limited perquisites and no perquisites upon
retirement
|
Pursuant to his amended and restated employment agreement, Mr. DeRosa will continue to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company until April 13, 2020. He will receive an annual base salary of $1,000,000, together with a target bonus opportunity under the Companys annual cash bonus program equal to 175% of his annual base salary and long-term stock awards
under terms and conditions determined by the Compensation Committee. The Company will also reimburse Mr. DeRosa for reasonable costs of an annual medical exam and continue to provide an automobile allowance during the term of his employment
agreement. His severance protections under his new employment agreement essentially remain the same as the severance protections afforded by his original employment agreement that was in effect in 2016.
In negotiating the terms of Mr. DeRosas new employment agreement, the Compensation Committee took into account Mr. DeRosas exemplary performance
over the course of the first three years of his tenure as Chief Executive Officer, which included his successful vision, leadership, interaction with the investment community and strong track record of financial performance (including strong
normalized funds from operations growth, same-store net operating income growth and improvements to key balance sheet metrics), combined with the Compensation Committees desire to adjust his pay from ranking as the lowest of the peer group to
a total opportunity that approximates the market median (which is consistent with market best practices).
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
The
compensation program balances a variety of key performance metrics, measures performance on both an absolute and relative basis to protect against rising/falling markets, evaluates performance over both short and long-term performance periods, and
is rigorous and heavily weighted toward incentive pay and equity in particular.
2016 Compensation Components
The Compensation Committee established the following key components of Mr. DeRosas 2016 compensation:
|
|
|
Base Salary:
Mr. DeRosas 2016 base salary was set at $950,000.
|
|
|
|
Annual Cash Incentive:
The target opportunity percentage for Mr. DeRosa in 2016 was set at 150% of base compensation and the maximum opportunity percentage was set at 300%.
|
|
|
|
2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program:
Any award earned will be based on Company performance during the three-year period ending December 31, 2017 against the five metrics listed on pages 32 and
44. The target opportunity was set at $4.0 million.
|
|
|
|
2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program:
Any award earned will be based on Company performance during the three-year period ending December 31, 2018 against the five metrics listed on pages 32 and
45. The target opportunity was set at $5.7 million.
|
|
10.
|
COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AND RESULTS
|
This section describes how the Compensation Committee applied the compensation
program and the Companys performance in determining the compensation of all NEOs.
The elements used to achieve the compensation objectives, and which enable
the Company to retain, motivate, engage, and reward the NEOs and other executives, include base salary, annual cash incentives, long-term incentives, and other perquisites and benefits, and are described in more detail below. In allocating
compensation among these components, the Company seeks to provide reasonable and competitive levels of fixed compensation (base salary), while emphasizing performance-based compensation that varies based on Company and individual performance.
The following charts illustrate each NEOs base salary, target annual cash incentive compensation and target three-year long-term incentive compensation as a percent
of total target compensation for 2016. On average, 79% of total target compensation is based on Company performance.
Base Salary
Base salaries are established at levels that will attract and retain talented executives. To that end, base salaries are generally targeted to approximate the market
median, but may deviate from this competitive position based on the scope of the individuals role in the organization, the individuals experience in the current position, and individual performance. Base salaries are reviewed annually
and may be adjusted to better match market competitive levels and/or to recognize an individuals growth and development. Base salaries for the NEOs were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
2015
Salary
|
|
|
2016
Salary
|
|
|
% Increase
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. DeRosa
|
|
$
|
950,000
|
|
|
$
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
Scott A. Estes
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
Mercedes T. Kerr
|
|
|
324,612
|
|
|
|
484,500
|
(1)
|
|
|
49%
|
|
|
|
Scott M. Brinker
|
|
|
484,500
|
|
|
|
484,500
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey H. Miller
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On July 29, 2016, Ms. Kerr was appointed to serve as Executive Vice President - Business Development of the Company. In connection with this promotion, Ms. Kerrs salary was increased from
$324,612 to $484,500. Ms. Kerr received a blended base salary in the amount of $391,232 in 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
Mr. DeRosa, Mr. Estes, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller did not receive base salary increases in February of 2016. Ms. Kerr received a base salary
increase in connection with her promotion to Executive Vice President - Business Development of the Company.
For 2017, the Compensation Committee did not increase the base salaries for Mr. Estes or
Ms. Kerr.
Annual Incentives
Annual incentives reward the executives for the achievement of certain performance objectives tied to the Companys annual business plan, as well as achievement of
individual performance objectives. Under this program, a range of earnings opportunities is established for each executive at the beginning of the performance period, expressed as percentages of base salary and corresponding to three levels of
performance (threshold, target and high).
The rigorous corporate performance measures and weightings set by the Compensation Committee for 2016 under the annual
incentive program were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Normalized Funds from Operations (FFO) per share.
|
|
Weighting
|
2016 Goal:
|
|
Threshold: $4.45, +1.6% growth
Target: $4.55, +3.9% growth
High: $4.65, +6.2% growth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why the Company chose this
measure:
FFO is a common
non-GAAP
measure of earnings performance for REITs because it provides insight into the earnings generated from the real estate
platform. FFO means net income attributable to common stockholders, computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate and impairments of depreciable assets, plus real estate depreciation and amortization,
and after adjustments for unconsolidated entities and noncontrolling interests. Normalized FFO for 2016 represents FFO adjusted for transaction costs, provision for loan losses, net gains (or losses) on derivatives and extinguishments of debt,
nonrecurring income tax benefits, certain other expenses or income and normalizing items relating to unconsolidated/noncontrolling interests. This measure is included in the compensation program because it is the measure most commonly used by
analysts to assess the performance of REITs. If the Company achieves a level of normalized FFO per share as a result of inappropriate amounts of leverage, the Compensation Committee may determine that bonuses should not be paid for this goal.
How the Compensation Committee set the 2016
goal:
In its 2016 initial public guidance, the Company projected normalized FFO in a range of $4.50 to $4.60 per diluted share. Target performance was set at $4.55 or the midpoint of the initial
guidance range. The range of $0.10 around target results in a threshold of $4.45 and a high of $4.65. The high score was set at $0.05 above the high end of initial public guidance. High performance would only be achieved if the Company significantly
exceeded the high end of such guidance.
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store NOI Growth.
|
|
Weighting
|
2016 Goal:
|
|
Threshold: +2.0%
Target: +3.0%
High: +4.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why the Company chose this
measure:
Net operating income (NOI) is used to evaluate the operating performance of the Companys properties. NOI means total revenues, including tenant reimbursements, less
property operating expenses, which represent costs associated with managing, maintaining and servicing tenants for the Companys seniors housing operating and outpatient medical properties. Same store NOI (SSNOI) is used to evaluate
the operating performance of the Companys properties under a consistent population which eliminates changes in the composition of the portfolio. For purposes of SSNOI, same store is generally defined as those revenue-generating properties in
the portfolio for the relevant year-over-year reporting periods. Land parcels, loans,
sub-leases
and any properties acquired, developed/redeveloped, transitioned, sold or classified as held for sale during
those periods are excluded from the same store amounts. SSNOI
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
represents NOI for same store properties adjusted for elimination of
non-cash
NOI, adjustments to translate Canadian
properties at a USD/CAD rate of 1.3495 and UK properties at a GBP/USD rate of 1.4950, adjustments to reflect consistent ownership
percentages, and other adjustments as disclosed in the Companys quarterly financial supplements.
How the Compensation Committee set the 2016 goal:
In its 2016 initial public guidance, the Company projected blended SSNOI growth in a range of
2.5%-3.0%.
The Compensation Committee set target performance at 3.0% or the high end of the initial guidance. The range of 1.0% around target results in a threshold of 2.0% and a high of 4.0%. The high score is a
full 1.0% greater than the initial public guidance.
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage.
|
|
Weighting
|
2016 Goal:
|
|
Threshold: 42.0%
Target: 39.5%
High: 37.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why the Company chose this
measure:
For 2016, the Company has included a leverage measure (net debt to undepreciated book capitalization) to emphasize balance sheet strength, which has been a hallmark of the Company. The
Compensation Committee believes it is important that the Company does not sacrifice its balance sheet to grow in other areas of the business. Net debt to undepreciated book capitalization is a ratio (expressed as a percentage) of net debt to
undepreciated book capitalization. Net debt represents total debt less cash and cash equivalents. Undepreciated book capitalization represents net debt plus total equity (including noncontrolling interests), after adding back accumulated
depreciation and amortization.
How the Compensation
Committee set the 2016 goal:
The Compensation Committee set target performance for leverage at 39.5%, which is consistent with leverage at the end of 2015. The range of 2.5% around target results
in a threshold of 42.0% and a high score of 37.0%.
|
|
|
|
|
Cash NOI of 2015 Operating Acquisitions vs. Underwritten Projections.
|
|
Weighting
|
2016 Goal:
|
|
Threshold: >90% of underwritten projections
Target: >100% of underwritten projections
High: >110% of underwritten projections
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why the Company chose this
measure:
This measure compares the cash NOI of the Companys 2015 operating acquisitions against underwritten expectations. Cash NOI represents NOI (as defined on page 39) as adjusted for
the elimination of certain
non-cash
items. Operating acquisitions is a term used to encompass RIDEA investments and outpatient medical investments. The Company chose to limit the metric to
operating acquisitions because they are the only investments over which it has influence on operating budgets. The Company believes it is appropriate to align the integration and success of recent investments with managements annual incentive
measures. This measure also serves to help bridge part of the gap left by the SSNOI measure, which only includes investments that have been in the portfolio for certain year-over-year reporting periods as discussed on page 39.
How the Compensation Committee set the 2016 goal:
The Compensation Committee believes the Company should reach or exceed 100% of its expected underwritten Cash NOI projections for the 2015 operating acquisitions in order to achieve target performance. Threshold
performance (greater than 90% of expected Cash NOI) represents solid performance for these investments (in light of the Companys high expectations) and high performance (greater than 110% of expected Cash NOI) represents excellent performance.
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance.
|
|
Weighting
|
2016 Goal:
|
|
Each of the NEOs
is evaluated against a set of individual
strategic goals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why the Company chose this
measure:
The Company tailors individual goals to the roles and responsibilities of each NEO, including, among other things, the implementation and execution of targeted investment
strategies, communication with investors, effective capital raising and promotion in the capital markets and participation in succession planning for management. Individual goals allow the Compensation Committee to evaluate the performance of each
executive and the business segments or functions that an executive leads. An important component of this metric is whether the executive achieves business results in a manner that is consistent with corporate strategic plans and objectives.
How the Compensation Committee set the 2016
goals:
The Compensation Committee established individual goals based on the Companys key strategic objectives for 2016 (and, as applicable, objectives for business segments or
functions for which the executive is primarily responsible), as well as personal initiatives for 2016 for each executive that the Compensation Committee deemed were important.
2016 Individual Performance
For Mr. DeRosa, 75% of the annual cash bonus was determined by corporate performance and 25% by individual performance. The corporate component was set at 75%
because the Compensation Committee believes that the vast majority of the Chief Executive Officers annual cash bonus should be based on overall corporate performance given his ultimate accountability for the Companys performance.
For Mr. Estes, Ms. Kerr, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller, 70% of the annual cash bonus was determined by corporate performance and 30% by individual
performance. The Compensation Committee believes that overall corporate performance should be the primary basis for determining annual cash incentives for all of its executives.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
Mr. DeRosa
|
|
|
Actively championed and positioned the Companys strategic plan and value proposition in the market with investors, health care leaders, clients and prospective clients delivering strong normalized FFO and FAD
per share increases versus 2015.
|
|
|
|
Positioned the Company as a thought leader in the health care sector and elevated the Company profile by serving as a Governor of the World Economic Forum and speaking at high visibility events including The Aspen
Ideas Festival: Spotlight Health and the EY Strategic Growth Forum. Served on the Board of Argentum, the largest senior living association in the U.S.
|
|
|
|
Developed new strategic relationships and elevated existing relationships, including new sources of capital such as sovereign funds and international investors, including a joint venture with Cindat Capital
Management Limited (Cindat) and Union Life Insurance Co. Ltd. This U.S. $930 million transaction represents Cindats first U.S. health care real estate investment.
|
|
|
|
Directed the repositioning of the Companys portfolio including the generation of approximately $1.6 billion of proceeds from the sale of Genesis Healthcare, Inc. post-acute care properties. The
Companys disposition activities drove several strategic benefits including significantly increasing private pay revenue mix across the portfolio, reducing the long-term/post-acute care concentration of the portfolio and improving
long-term/post-acute care payment coverage.
|
|
|
|
Oversaw $3.0 billion of gross investments, including $1.15 billion premier west coast seniors housing portfolio.
|
|
|
|
Elevated the Companys profile and vision in support of advancing the quality of care and life for the aging population and was recognized as the Alzheimers Association National Brain Ball Honoree, an
event that elevates the profile of Alzheimers disease and its impact on families and raises funds for research and critical support services for individuals, families and caregivers facing the daily challenges of the disease.
|
|
|
|
Improved strength of the Companys balance sheet, including ratings upgrades from two rating agencies, creating additional value for shareholders and reducing the cost of capital.
|
Mr. Estes
|
|
|
Drove strong financial and cash flow management generating year over year increases in FFO and FAD.
|
|
|
|
Led the Companys Capital Markets and Finance teams responsible for making significant enhancements to the Companys balance sheet in 2016:
|
|
¡
|
|
37.4% net debt/undepreciated book cap (improvement of 210 basis points as compared to 2015)
|
|
|
¡
|
|
Improved net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio from
year-end
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Created additional shareholder value by improving the Companys credit ratings from two ratings agencies.
|
|
|
|
Raised $700 million of
10-year
unsecured debt capital in March 2016 priced to yield 4.345%, which represented the largest single-tranche debt offering in the
Companys history.
|
|
|
|
Increased and extended the unsecured credit facility by $500 million to a total of $3.7 billion during the year while lowering pricing by 2.5 basis points.
|
|
|
|
Successfully raised over $238 million of equity through the ATM program at a significantly lower cost.
|
|
|
|
Deepened relationships with the financial community and was actively involved in industry coalitions including as a member of the Executive Committee and as Treasurer of The National Investment Center for Seniors
Housing & Care (NIC).
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
Ms. Kerr
|
|
|
Led business development activities to identify, build and manage relationships with health systems, seniors housing operators, real estate developers and financial institutions to grow Welltowers
high-quality health care property portfolio leading to transformational transactions with key partners including Belmont Senior Living, Benchmark, Brandywine, Senior Star, SRG and others.
|
|
|
|
Integrated the Seniors Housing and Outpatient Medical Business Development functions into a streamlined management structure and oversaw the expansion of the Companys West Coast (U.S.) offices.
|
|
|
|
Reframed the Investment Committee decision-making process to enhance discipline, employee development and decentralization.
|
|
|
|
Created decision-making framework to systemize the use of joint venture structures. Directed the Companys strategic relationships with Johns Hopkins Medicine and with Hines, a privately-owned global real
estate investment firm, through which the Company is developing a senior living community in Midtown Manhattan.
|
|
|
|
Provided market insights throughout the development of the Companys strategic plan.
|
|
|
|
Served as the Companys representative to important industry groups through her participation on the Executive Committee of the American Seniors Housing Association (ASHA), the Board of Counselors for the
University of Southern Californias Davis School of Gerontology and the Board of the California Assisted Living Association (CALA).
|
Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Brinkers separation agreement with the Company and Mr. Millers retirement agreement with the Company, the Company agreed that
the portion of each of Mr. Brinkers and Mr. Millers 2016 annual bonuses with respect to individual performance would be paid at target level. For additional information regarding Mr. Brinkers separation agreement, see Mr.
Brinkers Separation Agreement on pages 57-58, and for additional information regarding Mr. Millers retirement agreement, see Mr. Millers Retirement Agreement on page 58.
Annual Incentive Payments
The
table below illustrates each executives total annual incentive earnings opportunity, taking into consideration both corporate and individual performance, under the annual incentive program, and the actual bonuses for 2016 performance that were
approved at the Compensation Committees February 9, 2017 meeting. For individual performance results, please refer to pages 41-43.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Annual Incentive
Opportunity
|
|
|
2016 Bonus Earned
|
|
|
|
(as a % of Base Salary)
|
|
|
% of
Base Salary
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
DeRosa
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
|
193
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,829,950
|
|
Estes
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
260
|
%
|
|
|
166
|
%
|
|
|
845,382
|
|
Kerr
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
|
190
|
%
|
|
|
920,321
|
|
Brinker
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
|
180
|
%
|
|
|
872,591
|
|
Miller
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
225
|
%
|
|
|
158
|
%
|
|
|
808,061
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Companys long-term incentive plan consists of rolling three-year forward-looking programs, including the 2015-2017 and 2016-2018 programs and a similar program
for 2017-2019, which examine performance across
pre-determined
key financial metrics (as detailed below). These programs balance both absolute and relative performance and examine how the Company performs
across multiple criteria spanning total shareholder return (the largest portion of the program), leverage, growth and revenue sources. The Company believes the long-term incentive program fosters sustained performance and creates short and long-term
shareholder value. Under the program, dividends on any unearned shares are not paid until and unless the underlying shares vest, which the Compensation Committee believes is in line with best practices. Taken as a whole, this program emphasizes a
pay-for-performance
philosophy and promotes enhanced retention of executives.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program Opportunity
This three-year forward looking program covers the three-year period
ending December 31, 2017. The Compensation Committee established goals in early 2015 for the five measures described below (with percentage weightings) based on the Companys internal projections for the three years ending
December 31, 2017. The components of the three-year program are consistent with the Companys long-term strategic objectives. As of December 31, 2016, the Company is trending as follows under the program:
|
|
|
|
|
Metric
|
|
Weighting
|
|
Goal Tracking
|
Total Shareholder Return v. NAREIT Health Care Index
|
|
35%
|
|
Below Threshold
|
Total Shareholder Return v. Morgan Stanley (MSCI) US REIT Index
|
|
15%
|
|
Below Threshold
|
Absolute Total Shareholder Return
|
|
15%
|
|
Below Threshold
|
Adjusted Fixed Charge Coverage
|
|
20%
|
|
Between Target/High
|
Relative Same-Store NOI Growth
|
|
15%
|
|
Between High/Extraordinary
|
The Compensation Committee has established four achievement levels for each performance measure (threshold, target, high and
extraordinary). For Total Shareholder Return v. NAREIT Health Care Index and Total Shareholder Return v. Morgan Stanley (MSCI) US REIT Index, target was set at Index, with threshold 4.0% below Index, high 4.0% above Index and extraordinary 6.0%
above Index. For Absolute Total Shareholder Return, target was set at 10.0%, with threshold at 6.0%, high at 14.0% and extraordinary at 18.0%. For the fixed charge coverage metric, target was set in line with the Companys long-term strategic
goal. For the same store growth metric, target was set at the average same store growth for a defined group of the Companys health care peers. Awards will be granted based on observed results relative to these measures.
These measures will be evaluated as of December 31, 2017 and any awards granted to the executives under this program will vest as follows:
one-third
in early 2018,
one-third
on December 31, 2018 and
one-third
on December 31, 2019. For each executive, 100% of the
award will be based on predefined corporate performance targets. See pages 55-61 for a detailed discussion of potential payments upon termination or change in corporate control.
For the Named Executive Officers, the aggregate award opportunities for the 2015 to 2017 performance period are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program Opportunities
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary
|
|
DeRosa
|
|
|
$2,000,000
|
|
|
|
$4,000,000
|
|
|
|
$7,500,000
|
|
|
|
$10,000,000
|
|
Estes
|
|
|
687,500
|
|
|
|
1,375,000
|
|
|
|
1,718,750
|
|
|
|
2,062,500
|
|
Brinker
|
|
|
712,500
|
|
|
|
1,425,000
|
|
|
|
1,781,250
|
|
|
|
2,137,500
|
|
Miller
|
|
|
637,500
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
|
|
|
1,593,750
|
|
|
|
1,912,500
|
|
(1)
|
Ms. Kerr is not included in this table because she was not a Named Executive Officer when long-term incentive opportunities were awarded under the 2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program.
|
The Company intends to provide disclosure regarding actual performance relative to the targets in the proxy materials for the 2018 annual meeting, which will be the first
annual meeting following the completion of the three-year performance period.
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program Opportunity
This three-year forward looking program covers the three-year period ending December 31, 2018. The Compensation Committee established goals in early 2016 for the
five measures described below (with percentage weightings) based on the Companys internal projections for the three years ending December 31, 2018. The components of the three-year program are consistent with the Companys
long-term strategic objectives. As of December 31, 2016, the Company is trending as follows under the program:
|
|
|
|
|
Metric
|
|
Weighting
|
|
Goal Tracking
|
Total Shareholder Return v. NAREIT Health Care Index
|
|
35%
|
|
Below Threshold
|
Total Shareholder Return v. Morgan Stanley (MSCI) US REIT Index
|
|
15%
|
|
Below Threshold
|
Absolute Total Shareholder Return
|
|
15%
|
|
Below Threshold
|
Adjusted Fixed Charge Coverage
|
|
20%
|
|
Between Target/High
|
Private Pay
|
|
15%
|
|
Between Target/High
|
The Compensation Committee has established four achievement levels for each performance measure (threshold, target, high and
extraordinary). For Total Shareholder Return v. NAREIT Health Care Index and Total Shareholder Return v. Morgan Stanley (MSCI) US REIT Index, target was set at Index, with threshold 4.0% below Index, high 4.0% above Index and extraordinary 6.0%
above Index. For Absolute Total Shareholder Return, target was set at 8.0%, with threshold at 5.0%, high at 11.0% and extraordinary at 14.0%. For the fixed charge coverage metric and the private pay metric, target was set in line with the
Companys long-term strategic goals. Private pay was included as a metric in this program in order to emphasize the importance of reducing revenue payment risk and to align this program with the Companys strategic plan. Awards will be
granted based on observed results relative to these measures.
These measures will be evaluated as of December 31, 2018 and any awards granted to the executives
under this program will vest as follows:
one-third
in early 2019,
one-third
on December 31, 2019 and
one-third
on
December 31, 2020. For each executive, 100% of the award will be based on predefined corporate performance targets. See pages 55-61 for a detailed discussion of potential payments upon termination or change in corporate control.
For the Named Executive Officers, the aggregate award opportunities for the 2016 to 2018 performance period are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program Opportunities
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary
|
|
DeRosa
|
|
$
|
2,850,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,687,500
|
|
|
$
|
14,250,000
|
|
Estes
|
|
|
862,500
|
|
|
|
1,725,000
|
|
|
|
2,156,250
|
|
|
|
2,587,500
|
|
Kerr
|
|
|
887,500
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
|
|
|
2,218,750
|
|
|
|
2,662,500
|
|
Brinker
|
|
|
887,500
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
|
|
|
2,218,750
|
|
|
|
2,662,500
|
|
Miller
|
|
|
637,500
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
|
|
|
1,593,750
|
|
|
|
1,912,500
|
|
The Company intends to provide disclosure regarding actual performance relative to the targets in the proxy materials for the 2019 annual
meeting, which will be the first annual meeting following the completion of the three-year performance period.
Compensation
Overview for 2016 and 2015 Performance
In order to provide shareholders with a more complete picture of the compensation of the NEOs, the Company is
providing additional compensation information not required by the SEC. The table below discloses the grant date fair value of equity awards granted on February 12, 2016 as being compensation for the Named Executive Officers in 2015 because
these grants are based on the Companys performance in 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
The table
below does not include the same information as the Summary Compensation Table. Rather, it is intended to provide supplemental information. The following table and notes should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation
Table and the tables and narrative descriptions that follow such table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Performance
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Annual
Incentive
Cash Award
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Backward-
Looking Long-
Term Incentive
Program
($)
(2)(3)
|
|
|
Forward-
Looking Long-
Term Incentive
Program
($)
(3)(4)
|
|
|
Total
Compensation
($)
(5)
|
|
DeRosa
|
|
2016
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
1,829,950
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,700,000
|
|
|
|
8,479,950
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
2,291,705
|
|
|
|
4,515,363
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
11,757,068
|
|
Estes
|
|
2016
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
845,382
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,725,000
|
|
|
|
3,080,382
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
1,091,691
|
|
|
|
815,021
|
|
|
|
1,375,000
|
|
|
|
3,791,712
|
|
Kerr
|
|
2016
|
|
|
391,232
|
|
|
|
920,321
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
|
|
|
3,086,553
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
324,612
|
|
|
|
286,314
|
|
|
|
789,126
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,400,052
|
|
Brinker
|
|
2016
|
|
|
484,500
|
|
|
|
872,591
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
|
|
|
3,132,091
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
484,500
|
|
|
|
1,150,964
|
|
|
|
846,954
|
|
|
|
1,425,000
|
|
|
|
3,907,418
|
|
Miller
|
|
2016
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
808,061
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
|
|
|
2,593,061
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
961,769
|
|
|
|
735,162
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
|
|
|
3,481,931
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts reported in this column are the same as the amounts reported in the
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation
Table on pages 48-49.
|
(2)
|
The amounts reported in this column reflect the fair value on the grant date of the awards given to the NEOs shortly following the particular year and that, in the Compensation Committees view, are intended to
serve as compensation for that particular year (e.g., the grant-date fair value of the awards that were granted on February 12, 2016 are shown as compensation for 2015; and the grant-date fair value of the awards that were granted on
February 5, 2015 are excluded as they were viewed as compensation for 2014). The aggregate value of the awards granted to the NEOs with respect to 2015 performance was comprised entirely of restricted stock. The closing price of the
Companys common stock on the grant date (February 12, 2016) was $54.40.
|
(3)
|
For a discussion of the assumptions and methodologies used to determine the grant-date fair value of the equity awards, please see note 5 to the Summary Compensation Table on pages 48-49.
|
(4)
|
For the 2016-2018 program, the values are based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date for the awards, which were $5,700,000 for Mr. DeRosa, $1,725,000 for Mr. Estes,
$1,775,000 for Ms. Kerr, $1,775,000 for Mr. Brinker and $1,275,000 for Mr. Miller. The maximum value of the awards under the 2016-2018 program (determined on the grant date) (assuming that the highest level of performance is achieved)
are $14,250,000 for Mr. DeRosa, $2,587,500 for Mr. Estes, $2,662,500 for Ms. Kerr, $2,662,500 for Mr. Brinker and $1,912,500 for Mr. Miller.
|
|
For the 2015-2017 program, the values are based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date for the awards, which were $4,000,000 for Mr. DeRosa, $1,375,000 for Mr. Estes,
$1,425,000 for Mr. Brinker and $1,275,000 for Mr. Miller. The maximum value of the awards under the 2015-2017 program (determined on the grant date) (assuming that the highest level of performance is achieved) are $10,000,000 for
Mr. DeRosa, $2,062,500 for Mr. Estes, $2,137,500 for Mr. Brinker and $1,912,500 for Mr. Miller. Ms. Kerr did not participate in the 2015-2017 program.
|
(5)
|
The amounts reported in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table (or that will be included in such column in future proxy statements) are excluded from the table above
and are not reflected in the Total Compensation column.
|
Benefits and Perquisites
The following summarizes various benefits and perquisites received by the NEOs.
NEOs
are eligible to participate in the same benefit programs as all other Company employees, including health and dental insurance, group life insurance, short and long-term disability coverage, partial reimbursement of health club/gym membership fees
and participation in the Companys
tax-qualified
retirement plan and trust (the 401(k) Plan). In addition, Mr. DeRosa received certain perquisites in 2016, including:
|
|
Automobile allowancemonthly allowance to cover expenses incurred with the lease of an automobile.
|
|
|
Medical insurance premiumsincludes medical insurance premiums to provide Mr. DeRosa and his family with coverage consistent with his prior individual health insurance coverage.
|
|
|
Spousal travel expensesthe spouses (and, in certain circumstances, immediate family members) of executives, including Mr. DeRosas spouse, are invited to attend certain of the Companys business
events.
|
In 2016, Mr. Estes, Ms. Kerr and Mr. Miller also received spousal travel expenses.
The Compensation Committee reviews the Companys policies with respect to perquisites on a regular basis. The NEOs are entitled to receive these perquisites in 2017.
See note 7 to the Summary Compensation Table for additional information regarding perquisites, including the dollar values of the perquisites provided by the Company in 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive CompensationCD&A
(continued)
|
|
|
Ownership Guidelines
Executive
officers are required to own shares of the Companys common stock with a fair market value of at least three times their base salary (five times for the Chief Executive Officer).
Non-employee
directors
are required to own shares of the Companys common stock with a fair market value of at least four times the annual cash fees. Shares owned directly and indirectly, restricted shares and deferred stock units count towards these ownership
requirements, but unexercised stock options do not. Executive officers have five years from their date of hire to achieve the required ownership level and
non-employee
directors have five years from their date
of appointment or February 7, 2013, whichever is later, to achieve the required ownership level. As of December 31, 2016, each of the NEOs and the
non-employee
directors were in compliance with these
ownership requirements.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee has considered the anticipated tax treatment to the Company regarding the compensation and benefits paid to the NEOs under Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). In general, Section 162(m) places a limit on the amount of compensation that may be deducted annually by the Company with respect to certain executive officers. The
Compensation Committee will strive to provide executive officers with attractive, well-designed compensation packages that will generally preserve the deductibility of such payments for the Company. Certain types of compensation payments and their
deductibility depend upon the timing of an executive officers vesting or exercise of previously granted rights. Moreover, interpretations of any changes in the tax laws and other factors beyond the Compensation Committees control may
affect the deductibility of certain compensation payments. Because the Company operates in such a manner that it will qualify as a REIT under the Code, and therefore is not subject to federal income taxes to the extent the Company distributes at
least 90% of its REIT taxable income, the possible loss of this deduction would not be expected to have material adverse consequences for the Company. If deductibility becomes an issue, the Compensation Committee will consider various
alternatives to preserve the deductibility of compensation payments to executive officers and benefits to the extent reasonably practical and to the extent consistent with its other compensation objectives, but the Compensation Committee reserves
the right to make incentive-based awards not exempt from these limits where such awards are appropriate.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of the Company with management. Based on such review and discussions, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee
Sharon M. Oster, Compensation Committee Chair
Kenneth J. Bacon, Compensation Committee Member
Timothy J. Naughton, Compensation
Committee Member
Judith C. Pelham, Compensation Committee Member
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
Summary Compensation Table
The table below presents the total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid
to the NEOs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
($)
(5)
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
(7)
|
|
|
|
Total
Compensation
($)
(8)
|
|
Thomas J. DeRosa
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
10,215,363
|
|
|
|
1,829,950
|
|
|
|
739,041
|
|
|
|
13,734,354
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(1)
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
7,677,105
|
|
|
|
2,291,705
|
|
|
|
48,436
|
|
|
|
10,967,246
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
590,721
|
|
|
|
5,960,000
|
|
|
|
1,530,926
|
(6)
|
|
|
95,174
|
|
|
|
8,176,821
|
|
Scott A. Estes
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
2,540,021
|
|
|
|
845,382
|
|
|
|
516,792
|
|
|
|
4,412,195
|
|
Executive Vice President -
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
2,303,949
|
|
|
|
1,091,691
|
|
|
|
56,381
|
|
|
|
3,962,021
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
467,893
|
|
|
|
526,781
|
|
|
|
1,078,177
|
|
|
|
27,319
|
|
|
|
2,100,170
|
|
Mercedes T. Kerr
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
391,232
|
|
|
|
2,564,126
|
|
|
|
920,321
|
|
|
|
14,958
|
|
|
|
3,890,637
|
|
Executive Vice President - Business & Relationship Management
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott M. Brinker
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
484,500
|
|
|
|
2,621,954
|
|
|
|
872,591
|
|
|
|
482,957
|
|
|
|
4,462,002
|
|
Former Executive Vice President -
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
484,500
|
|
|
|
2,382,438
|
|
|
|
1,150,964
|
|
|
|
29,295
|
|
|
|
4,047,197
|
|
Chief Investment Officer
(3)
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
457,477
|
|
|
|
556,778
|
|
|
|
1,164,244
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
2,191,499
|
|
Jeffrey H. Miller
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
2,010,162
|
|
|
|
808,061
|
|
|
|
518,440
|
|
|
|
3,846,663
|
|
Former Executive Vice President -
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
2,132,931
|
|
|
|
961,769
|
|
|
|
56,302
|
|
|
|
3,661,002
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
(4)
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
467,893
|
|
|
|
516,763
|
|
|
|
926,888
|
|
|
|
27,031
|
|
|
|
1,938,575
|
|
(1)
|
On April 13, 2014, Mr. DeRosa was appointed to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. This table does not include compensation paid to Mr. DeRosa in 2014 as a
non-employee
director before he became the Chief Executive Officer. Please see the 2014 Director Compensation Table in the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the
SEC on March 27, 2015 for information regarding Mr. DeRosas compensation as a
non-employee
director prior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer.
|
(2)
|
No compensation information is provided for the years in which Ms. Kerr was not a Named Executive Officer.
|
(3)
|
On January 3, 2017, Mr. Brinkers position as the Executive Vice President - Chief Investment Officer of the Company was eliminated.
|
(4)
|
On January 31, 2017, Mr. Miller retired as the Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer of the Company.
|
(5)
|
Amounts set forth in this column represent the grant-date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (excluding the effect of possible forfeitures (in accordance with SEC rules) for awards subject to
time-based vesting and awards subject to performance conditions).
|
The amounts for 2016 represent the following:
For the Named Executive Officers:
|
|
|
the value of restricted stock awards ($4,515,363 for Mr. DeRosa, $815,021 for Mr. Estes, $789,126 for Ms. Kerr, $846,954 for Mr. Brinker and $735,162 for Mr. Miller) granted in early 2016 for
2015 performance, which represent the final grants under the prior backward-looking long-term incentive program; and
|
|
|
|
the awards for the aggregate 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program (see below and page 45 for additional information regarding this program).
|
The amounts for 2015 represent the following:
For the
Named Executive Officers (except for Ms. Kerr):
|
|
|
the value of restricted stock awards granted in early 2015 for 2014 performance; and
|
|
|
|
the awards for the aggregate 2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program (see below and page 44 for additional information regarding this program).
|
The amounts for 2014 represent the following:
For
Mr. DeRosa:
|
|
|
$4,960,000 of awards for the aggregate 2013-2015 Long-Term Incentive Program (the grant date for these awards was on April 13, 2014, the date Mr. DeRosa was appointed to serve as Chief Executive Officer); and
|
|
|
|
$1,000,000 of performance-based restricted stock units (15,618 units) that were granted pursuant to a performance-based restricted stock unit grant agreement. See the 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Table on page 54 for additional information regarding this award. The value of this award was based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date for the award, which was $1,000,000.
|
For all other Named Executive Officers (except for Ms. Kerr):
|
|
|
the value of the restricted stock awards granted in early 2014 for 2013 performance.
|
For the 2013-2015
program, the values are based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date for the awards, which was $4,960,000 for Mr. DeRosa. The maximum value of the awards under the 2013-2015 program (determined on the grant
date) (assuming that the highest level of performance is achieved) is $7,300,685 for Mr. DeRosa.
For the 2015-2017 program, the values are based
upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date for the awards, which were $4,000,000 for Mr. DeRosa, $1,375,000 for Mr. Estes, $1,425,000 for Mr. Brinker and $1,275,000 for Mr. Miller. The maximum
value of the awards under the 2015-2017 program (determined on the grant date) (assuming that the highest level of performance is achieved) are $10,000,000 for Mr. DeRosa, $2,062,500 for Mr. Estes, $2,137,500 for Mr. Brinker and
$1,912,500 for Mr. Miller.
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
|
|
For the 2016-2018 program, the values are based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date for the awards, which were
$5,700,000 for Mr. DeRosa, $1,725,000 for Mr. Estes, $1,775,000 for Ms. Kerr, $1,775,000 for Mr. Brinker and $1,275,000 for Mr. Miller. The maximum value of the awards under the 2016-2018 program (determined on the grant
date) (assuming that the highest level of performance is achieved) are $14,250,000 for Mr. DeRosa, $2,587,500 for Mr. Estes, $2,662,500 for Ms. Kerr, $2,662,500 for Mr. Brinker and $1,912,500 for Mr. Miller.
For restricted stock grants to the Named Executive Officers, the values are based on the share prices on the respective dates of grant (or, if the date of
grant was not a trading day, the last trading day prior to the date of grant), which were $54.40, $81.63, and $56.28 for grants on February 12, 2016, February 5, 2015 and February 6, 2014, respectively.
(6)
|
Mr. DeRosas annual cash incentive award for 2014 is prorated based on the portion of 2014 during which he served as Chief Executive Officer.
|
(7)
|
All Other Compensation includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Company
Contribution to
401(k) Plan
($)
|
|
|
|
Value of DER
Payments
on
Deferred
Stock
Units
($)
(a)
|
|
|
|
Value of DER
Payments on
2013-2015
LTIP
Awards
($)
(b)
|
|
|
|
Spousal
Travel
Expenses
($)
(c)
|
|
|
|
Automobile
Allowance
($)
(c)
|
|
|
|
Medical
Insurance
Premiums
($)
(c)
|
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
DeRosa
|
|
|
13,250
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
691,021
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
17,281
|
|
|
|
16,272
|
|
|
|
739,041
|
|
Estes
|
|
|
13,250
|
|
|
|
54,513
|
|
|
|
447,907
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
516,792
|
|
Kerr
|
|
|
13,250
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
14,958
|
|
Brinker
|
|
|
13,250
|
|
|
|
21,800
|
|
|
|
447,907
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
482,957
|
|
Miller
|
|
|
13,250
|
|
|
|
54,513
|
|
|
|
447,907
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
518,440
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents dividend equivalent rights (DER) payments on certain deferred stock unit awards that were paid on February 15, 2016 upon vesting of the underlying performance awards (rather than currently).
The value of such DER payments was not included in the grant date fair value of the performance awards.
|
|
(b)
|
Represents DER payments on certain awards for the 2013-2015 Long-Term Incentive Program that were paid upon vesting of the underlying awards (rather than currently). The value of such DER payments was not included in
the grant date fair value of the awards.
|
|
(c)
|
See Compensation Discussion and AnalysisBenefits and Perquisites for additional information regarding (i) the automobile allowance paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. DeRosa; (ii) the
medical insurance premiums paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. DeRosa; and (iii) the spousal travel expenses paid by the Company.
|
(8)
|
As explained in note 5 above, the Total Compensation amounts for 2016 include $5,700,000 for Mr. DeRosa, $1,725,000 for Mr. Estes, $1,775,000 for Mr. Brinker, $1,775,000 for Ms. Kerr and $1,275,000
for Mr. Miller for aggregate awards they might receive under the 2016-2018 program. Amounts for 2015 include $4,000,000 for Mr. DeRosa, $1,375,000 for Mr. Estes, $1,425,000 for Mr. Brinker and $1,275,000 for Mr. Miller for
aggregate awards they might receive under the 2015-2017 program. Amounts for 2014 include $4,960,000 for Mr. DeRosa for aggregate awards he might receive under the 2013-2015 program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The table below provides information regarding grants of awards to
the NEOs under the Companys long-term incentive plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payments
Under
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payments
Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
|
|
|
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
($)
(4)
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
High
($)
|
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. DeRosa
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
712,500
|
|
|
|
1,425,000
|
|
|
|
2,850,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/6/16
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,850,000
|
|
|
|
5,700,000
|
|
|
|
10,687,500
|
|
|
|
14,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,003
|
|
|
|
4,515,363
|
|
Scott A. Estes
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
382,500
|
|
|
|
765,000
|
|
|
|
1,326,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/6/16
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862,500
|
|
|
|
1,725,000
|
|
|
|
2,156,250
|
|
|
|
2,587,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,725,000
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,982
|
|
|
|
815,021
|
|
Mercedes T. Kerr
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
363,375
|
|
|
|
726,750
|
|
|
|
1,453,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/6/16
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887,500
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
|
|
|
2,218,750
|
|
|
|
2,662,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
789,126
|
|
Scott M. Brinker
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
363,375
|
|
|
|
726,750
|
|
|
|
1,453,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/6/16
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887,500
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
|
|
|
2,218,750
|
|
|
|
2,662,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,569
|
|
|
|
846,954
|
|
Jeffrey H. Miller
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
382,500
|
|
|
|
765,000
|
|
|
|
1,147,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/6/16
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
637,500
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
|
|
|
1,593,750
|
|
|
|
1,912,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,514
|
|
|
|
735,162
|
|
(1)
|
Represents annual incentive program earnings opportunity for 2016. The actual amount earned by each of the NEOs under the annual incentive program in 2016 was paid in 2017 and is shown in the
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.
|
(2)
|
Represents long-term incentive earnings opportunity under the 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program. The performance measures under this program will be evaluated as of December 31, 2018. Any award earned will be
paid in shares of restricted stock. Any restricted shares granted will vest as follows:
one-third
in early 2019,
one-third
on December 31, 2019 and
one-third
on December 31, 2020 (subject to earlier evaluation and vesting in connection with a change in corporate control or a qualified termination of employment). See page 45 for additional information
regarding the 2016-2018 program.
|
(3)
|
Shares of restricted stock were granted on February 12, 2016 for performance in 2015. The restrictions on restricted stock lapse in four equal installments25% on the grant date and 25% on each of the first
three anniversaries of the date of grant. The grant date fair value is based on a per share grant price of $54.40, the closing price of the Companys common stock on February 12, 2016, the date of the grant.
|
(4)
|
Amounts set forth in this column represent the grant-date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For the assumptions and methodologies used to value the awards reported in this column, see note 5
to the Summary Compensation Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
|
|
Employment Agreements
The Company has employment agreements with each of Mr. DeRosa, Mr. Estes and Ms. Kerr. During 2016, the Company also had employment agreements with each of
Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller; however, on January 3, 2017, Mr. Brinkers position as the Executive Vice President - Chief Investment Officer of the Company was eliminated and his employment agreement was terminated as of that date and,
on January 31, 2017, Mr. Miller retired as the Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer of the Company and his employment agreement was terminated as of that date.
For a description of the provisions of the agreements regarding compensation and benefits payable upon termination or a change in corporate control, see Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Corporate Control on pages 55-58.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH THOMAS J. DEROSA
For a description of Mr. DeRosas employment agreement, see Mr. DeRosas Amended and Restated Employment Agreement on page 37.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH SCOTT A. ESTES AND MERCEDES T. KERR
The Company
has entered into employment agreements with each of Scott A. Estes, Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Mercedes T. Kerr, Executive Vice President - Business & Relationship Management of the Company, which
expire on January 31, 2019 and January 31, 2018, respectively, and provide for optional successive
two-year
renewal terms. Each of these NEOs receives a base salary that is reviewed and adjusted each
year by the Compensation Committee and is eligible to receive discretionary annual bonuses and equity awards under the Companys long-term incentive plans.
EMPLOYMENT AND SEPARATION AGREEMENTS WITH SCOTT M. BRINKER
On January 3,
2017, Mr. Brinkers position as the Executive Vice President - Chief Investment Officer of the Company was eliminated and his employment agreement was terminated as of that date. Mr. Brinker, under his employment agreement, received a
base salary that was reviewed and adjusted each year by the Compensation Committee and was eligible to receive discretionary annual bonuses and equity awards under the Companys long-term incentive plans. In connection with his departure, the
Company and Mr. Brinker entered into a separation agreement pursuant to which Mr. Brinker received certain benefits set forth in his employment agreement.
EMPLOYMENT AND RETIREMENT AGREEMENTS WITH JEFFREY H. MILLER
On
January 31, 2017, Mr. Miller retired as the Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer of the Company and his employment agreement was terminated as of that date. Mr. Miller, under his employment agreement, received a base
salary that was reviewed and adjusted each year by the Compensation Committee and was eligible to receive discretionary annual bonuses and equity awards under the Companys long-term incentive plans. In connection with Mr. Millers
retirement, he and the Company entered into a retirement agreement pursuant to which Mr. Miller received certain benefits set forth in his employment agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
2016 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End
Table
The table
below provides information regarding outstanding equity-based awards granted to the NEOs under the Companys
long-term
incentive plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
# of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
|
|
|
# of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
|
# of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
# of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Yet Vested
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market
or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Yet Vested
($)
|
|
Thomas J. DeRosa
(1)
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,252
|
|
|
|
4,166,526
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/5/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,522
|
|
|
|
1,507,397
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/30/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
|
|
348,438
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/13/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,193
|
|
|
|
2,355,467
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/5/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,764
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,164
|
|
|
|
5,700,000
|
(11)
|
Scott A. Estes
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
19,444
|
|
|
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
57.33
|
|
|
|
1/26/22
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/27/11
|
|
|
|
19,482
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
49.17
|
|
|
|
1/27/21
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/28/10
|
|
|
|
23,776
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
43.29
|
|
|
|
1/28/20
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/29/09
|
|
|
|
3,192
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37.00
|
|
|
|
1/29/19
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,236
|
|
|
|
752,025
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/5/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,690
|
|
|
|
380,832
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/6/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
156,616
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/7/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,356
|
|
|
|
960,847
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/7/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,610
|
|
|
|
643,197
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,826
|
|
|
|
189,144
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,360
|
|
|
|
291,815
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/5/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,544
|
|
|
|
1,375,000
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
|
1,725,000
|
(11)
|
Mercedes T. Kerr
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
57.33
|
|
|
|
1/26/22
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/27/11
|
|
|
|
2,239
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
49.17
|
|
|
|
1/27/21
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/28/10
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
43.29
|
|
|
|
1/28/20
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
970,887
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/5/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,062
|
|
|
|
271,870
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/6/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
167,191
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/7/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
|
|
172,813
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
36,477
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,521
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
(11)
|
Scott M. Brinker
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
57.33
|
|
|
|
1/26/22
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/27/11
|
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
49.17
|
|
|
|
1/27/21
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/28/10
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
43.29
|
|
|
|
1/28/20
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,676
|
|
|
|
781,475
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/5/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,864
|
|
|
|
392,478
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/6/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
165,518
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/7/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,356
|
|
|
|
960,847
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/7/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,439
|
|
|
|
698,682
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
140,084
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
116,726
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/5/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,291
|
|
|
|
1,425,000
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,521
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
(11)
|
Jeffrey H. Miller
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
|
|
57.33
|
|
|
|
1/26/22
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,135
|
|
|
|
678,336
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/5/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,254
|
|
|
|
351,650
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/6/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
153,604
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/7/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,356
|
|
|
|
960,847
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/7/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,610
|
|
|
|
643,197
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
187,538
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/26/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,360
|
|
|
|
291,815
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/5/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,050
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
2/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,050
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
|
|
(1)
|
Outstanding equity awards for Mr. DeRosa do not include outstanding deferred stock unit awards granted in connection with his service as a
non-employee
director prior to his
appointment as Chief Executive Officer as listed in the table below. The market value of these awards is based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016.
These deferred stock unit grants vest in three equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Number of Units
That Have Not
Vested
|
|
|
|
Market Value of
Units That Have
Not Vested
($)
|
|
2/6/14
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
$37,615
|
|
(2)
|
These options vest ratably over five years on the first five anniversaries of the date of grant and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.
|
(3)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016. On February 12, 2016,
one-fourth
of the shares of restricted stock vested. The remaining shares of restricted stock vest in three equal installments on January 15, 2017, January 15, 2018 and January 15, 2019.
|
(4)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016. On each of February 5, 2015, and January 15, 2016,
one-fourth
of the shares of restricted stock vested. The remaining shares of restricted stock vest in two equal installments on January 15, 2017 and January 15, 2018.
|
(5)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016. In connection with his appointment as CEO, Mr. DeRosa was granted
15,618 performance-based restricted stock units on July 30, 2014 pursuant to a performance-based restricted stock unit grant agreement. In 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. DeRosa had met the performance vesting criteria
for these performance-based restricted stock units because he and the Company satisfied certain performance conditions during the
one-year
performance period ending April 12, 2015.
One-third
of the performance-based restricted stock units vested on May 6, 2015;
one-third
vested on April 13, 2016; and
one-third
will vest on April 13, 2017. See the 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 54 for additional information regarding these performance-based restricted stock units.
|
(6)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016. The number and market or payout value of the awards under the 2013-2015
Long-Term Incentive Program was based on corporate performance during the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2015. These awards vest in three equal installments
one-third
vested on
February 26, 2016, the date that the Compensation Committee determined the size of the awards;
one-third
vested on December 31, 2016; and
one-third
will vest
on December 31, 2017.
|
(7)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016. On each of February 6, 2015, January 15, 2015 and
January 15, 2016,
one-fourth
of the shares of restricted stock vested. The remaining shares of restricted stock vest on January 15, 2017.
|
(8)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016. The restrictions on the shares of restricted stock lapse ratably over five
years on the first five anniversaries of the grant date.
|
(9)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016. On each of January 31, 2012, 2015, 2016 and 2017,
one-fourth
of the deferred stock units vest.
|
(10)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016. The number and market or payout value of the awards under the 2015-2017
Long-Term Incentive Program is based on target performance because corporate performance in the first two years of the three-year performance period exceeded threshold performance. See page 44 for additional information regarding the 2015-2017
program.
|
(11)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016. The number and market or payout value of the awards under the 2016-2018
Long-Term Incentive Program is based on target performance because corporate performance in the first year of the three-year performance period exceeded threshold performance. See page 45 for additional information regarding the 2016-2018 program.
|
2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The table below provides information regarding the dollar amounts realized pursuant to the vesting or exercise of equity-based awards during 2016 for the NEOs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
|
# of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Value Realized
Upon Exercise
($)
|
|
|
|
# of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
|
|
|
|
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
|
|
Thomas J. DeRosa
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
108,680
|
|
|
|
6,987,813
|
|
Scott A. Estes
|
|
|
15,962
|
|
|
|
612,107
|
|
|
|
51,918
|
|
|
|
3,372,343
|
|
Mercedes T. Kerr
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
|
|
337,900
|
|
Scott M. Brinker
|
|
|
19,718
|
|
|
|
452,353
|
|
|
|
47,677
|
|
|
|
3,100,057
|
|
Jeffrey H. Miller
|
|
|
23,277
|
|
|
|
518,149
|
|
|
|
51,322
|
|
|
|
3,337,191
|
|
(1)
|
Includes 1,074 deferred stock units that vested in connection with his service as a
non-employee
director prior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
In connection with his appointment as CEO, Mr. DeRosa
was granted 15,618 performance-based restricted stock units pursuant to a performance-based restricted stock unit grant agreement. In 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. DeRosa had met the performance vesting criteria for these
performance-based restricted stock units because he and the Company satisfied certain performance conditions during the
one-year
performance period ending April 12, 2015.
One-third
of the performance-based restricted stock units vested on May 6, 2015;
one-third
vested on April 13, 2016; and
one-third
will vest on April 13, 2017. Under the terms of the grant agreement, settlement of the award will be automatically deferred until the earliest of Mr. DeRosas separation from
service (as defined under Section 409A of the Code), his death or a change in control of the Company. The performance-based restricted stock units are paid in shares of common stock on a
one-for-one
basis. The table below sets forth the value, as of the vesting date, of the portion of the performance-based restricted stock units that vested in 2016 and the aggregate value, as of December 30,
2016, the last trading day of 2016, of the portion of the performance-based restricted stock units that were vested as of December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
|
|
|
|
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FY
|
|
Thomas J. DeRosa
|
|
$
|
362,546
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,906)
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
696,875
(3)
|
|
(1)
|
Based on a share price of $69.64, the closing price of the Companys common stock on April 13, 2016. The amount in this column represents the value, as determined on April 13, 2016, of 5,206 shares of
common stock underlying the performance-based restricted stock units granted to Mr. DeRosa, which vested on April 13, 2016. Settlement of these units was mandatorily deferred pursuant to the terms of the award. The grant date fair value of
the award is included in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2014.
|
(2)
|
Consists of: (a) $17,909 of accrued dividends on the performance-based restricted stock units that vested on May 6, 2015 for the year ended December 31, 2016; (b) $13,088 of accrued dividends on the
performance-based restricted stock units that vested on April 13, 2016 from the vesting date to December 31, 2016; and (c) a $33,903 decrease in the value of the performance-based restricted stock units (calculated by subtracting the
value of the units at each vesting date from the value of the units at December 31, 2016).
|
(3)
|
Based on a share price of $66.93, the closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
|
|
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Corporate Control
THOMAS J. DEROSA
Severance Payments and Benefits
.
Under his original employment agreement that was in effect during 2016, if Mr. DeRosa terminated his
employment for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement) or was terminated without cause (as defined in the employment agreement) by the Company, he would receive a series of semi-monthly severance payments for 24
months. Each semi-monthly severance payment would be an amount equal to
one-twenty-fourth
(1/24) of the sum of his annual base salary and target annual cash bonus opportunity at the time of termination.
If Mr. DeRosa terminated his employment for good reason or was terminated without cause by the Company during the 24 months following a
change in corporate control (as defined in the employment agreement) and during the term of the employment agreement, he would have received a lump sum severance payment equal to the present value of a series of monthly severance
payments for 36 months. Each monthly severance payment would be an amount equal to
one-twelfth
(1/12) of the sum of his annual base salary and the average of the annual bonuses paid to Mr. DeRosa for
the three fiscal years immediately preceding the change in corporate control.
If Mr. DeRosa terminated his employment for good reason or was
terminated without cause by the Company (whether or not following a change in corporate control), he also would be entitled to receive a prorated portion of the annual bonus that he would have earned if he had remained employed for the
entire year and continued coverage under any group health plan maintained by the Company for the period during which he elected to receive continuation coverage under Section 4980B of the Code at an
after-tax
cost to him comparable to the cost he would have incurred for the same coverage had he remained employed during such period.
If determined that any payment by the Company to Mr. DeRosa in connection with a change in corporate control would constitute an excess parachute payment
within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, the amount of such payment would be the greater, on an
after-tax
basis, of either the full payment or a lesser amount which would result in no portion of
any such payment being subject to the excise tax.
In the event of Mr. DeRosas death or disability, Mr. DeRosa or his beneficiary, as applicable,
would receive a prorated portion of the annual bonus that Mr. DeRosa would have earned if he had remained employed for the entire year.
If Mr. DeRosa
voluntarily terminated his employment or was terminated for cause, Mr. DeRosa only would be entitled to accrued but unpaid base salary and paid time off, any bonuses earned but unpaid and any nonforfeitable benefits under the
Companys deferred compensation, incentive and other benefit plans.
Mr. DeRosas severance protections, both before and following a change in corporate
control, essentially remain
the same under his amended and restated employment agreement, which was entered into on January 3, 2017 and becomes effective on April 13, 2017, although the definition of change in
corporate control was changed to align with the Companys 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan. For additional information regarding Mr. DeRosas new employment agreement, see Mr. DeRosas Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement on page 37.
Vesting of Incentive Awards.
Mr. DeRosas stock option, restricted stock and deferred stock unit awards with
time-based vesting granted under the Companys incentive plans would become vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Mr. DeRosa terminates his employment for good reason or is terminated without cause by
the Company (whether or not following a change in corporate control), or upon his death, disability or retirement.
The performance awards granted to Mr. DeRosa
under the 2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program and the 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program will be deemed earned as of the date of a change in corporate control based on the Compensation Committees evaluation of corporate performance
relative to the performance targets as of the day prior to the change in corporate control. In the event that Mr. DeRosa terminates his employment for good reason or is terminated without cause by the Company or upon his
death, disability or retirement, the Compensation Committee will determine corporate performance relative to the performance targets as of the end of the calendar quarter immediately preceding the termination and Mr. DeRosa would receive a pro
rata portion of the performance awards based on the number of months that he was employed by the Company in the performance period. In the event of such a termination after the end of the performance period, any shares granted to Mr. DeRosa
under these programs would become vested.
The performance-based restricted stock units granted to Mr. DeRosa pursuant to his performance-based restricted stock
unit grant agreement would become fully vested in the event that Mr. DeRosa terminates his employment for good reason, is terminated without cause by the Company, or upon his death or disability.
Settlement of the performance-based restricted stock units is automatically deferred under the terms of the performance-based restricted stock unit grant agreement until
the earliest of Mr. DeRosas separation from service (as defined by Section 409A of the Code), a change in control of the Company or his death.
Non-Competition,
Non-Solicitation
and
Non-Disparagement.
In the event of a termination of employment of Mr. DeRosa for any reason, Mr. DeRosa would be subject to a non-competition agreement for a period of one year from the time
his employment ceases, or, if later, during any period in which he is receiving any severance or change in corporate control payments (the Restricted Period). Mr. DeRosa would also be subject to a
non-solicitation
and non-
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
disparagement agreement during the Restricted Period. Under his amended and restated employment agreement, Mr. DeRosas non-disparagement obligation is indefinite in duration.
SCOTT A. ESTES
Severance Payments and Benefits.
Under his
employment agreement with the Company, if Mr. Estes is terminated without cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or he resigns other than voluntarily (as described in his employment agreement), he would receive a lump sum
severance payment equal to the present value of a series of monthly severance payments for each month during the remaining term of his employment agreement or for 12 months, whichever is greater (the Severance Period). If
Mr. Estes resigns or is terminated without cause during the 12 months following a change in corporate control (as defined in his employment agreement), he would receive a lump sum severance payment equal to the present value of
a series of monthly severance payments for 24 months. Each monthly severance payment would be an amount equal to
one-twelfth
of the sum of his annual base salary and the greater of the annual bonus for
the fiscal year immediately preceding the termination or change in corporate control or a minimum bonus equal to 35% of his annual base salary. Mr. Estes also would be entitled to continued benefits under any life, health and disability
insurance programs maintained by the Company for the remaining term of his employment agreement (but not less than six months and not more than the period during which he would be entitled to continuation coverage under Section 4980B of the
Code, if he elected such coverage and paid the applicable premiums), or until the date he obtains comparable coverage from a new employer. If Mr. Estes is terminated without cause or resigns other than voluntarily and he obtains a
replacement position with a new employer, Mr. Estes would be obligated to repay to the Company an amount equal to all amounts he receives as compensation for services performed during the Severance Period; provided that the aggregate repayment
obligation will not exceed the amount of the lump sum severance payment. If it is determined that any payment by the Company to Mr. Estes in connection with a change in corporate control would be a golden parachute subject to excise tax, the
Company would be obligated to make an additional payment to him to cover such excise tax.
In the event of Mr. Estes death, his beneficiary would receive a
lump sum payment equal to the present value of a series of monthly payments for each month during the remainder of the term of his employment agreement (but not less than 12 months), each in an amount equal to
one-twelfth
of the sum of his annual base salary and the greater of the annual bonus for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of death or a minimum bonus equal to 35% of his annual base salary. In
addition, the death benefits payable under any retirement, deferred compensation, life insurance or other employee benefit plan maintained by the Company will be paid to the beneficiary designated by Mr. Estes.
In the event of Mr. Estes disability, Mr. Estes would receive monthly payments for each month during the
remainder of the term of his employment agreement (but not less than 12 months), each in an amount equal to
one-twelfth
of the sum of his annual base salary and the greater of the annual bonus for the
fiscal year immediately preceding the date of disability or a minimum bonus equal to 35% of his annual base salary. These payments would terminate if Mr. Estes returns to active employment, either with the Company or otherwise. In addition,
these payments would be reduced by any amounts paid to Mr. Estes under any long- term disability plan or other disability program or insurance policies maintained by the Company.
If Mr. Estes voluntarily terminates his employment or is terminated for cause, Mr. Estes only would be entitled to accrued but unpaid base salary
and vacation pay, any bonuses earned but unpaid and any nonforfeitable benefits under the Companys deferred compensation, incentive and other benefit plans.
Vesting of Incentive Awards.
Mr. Estes stock option, restricted stock and deferred stock unit awards with time-based vesting granted under the
Companys incentive plans would become vested and immediately exercisable in the event Mr. Estes is terminated without cause by the Company, resigns other than voluntarily, upon the expiration of the term of his employment
agreement if such expiration is as a result of
non-renewal
of such agreement by the Company, upon a change in corporate control or upon his death, disability or retirement.
The performance awards granted to Mr. Estes under the 2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program and the 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program will be deemed earned as of
the date of a change in corporate control based on the Compensation Committees evaluation of corporate performance relative to the performance targets as of the day prior to a change in corporate control. In the event that Mr. Estes
terminates his employment for good reason or is terminated without cause by the Company, or upon the
non-renewal
of his employment agreement by the Company or his death, disability or
retirement, the Compensation Committee will determine corporate performance relative to the performance targets as of the end of the calendar quarter immediately preceding the termination and Mr. Estes would receive a pro rata portion of the
performance awards based on the number of months that he was employed by the Company in the performance period. In the event of such a termination after the end of the performance period, any shares granted to Mr. Estes under these programs
would become vested.
Non-Competition
and
Non-Solicitation.
In the event
of a voluntary termination by Mr. Estes, the election by Mr. Estes not to extend the term of his employment agreement or a termination for cause by the Company, Mr. Estes would be subject to a
one-year
non-competition
agreement. In addition, upon the termination of his employment for any reason, Mr. Estes would be subject to a
non-solicitation
agreement for a period of one year from the time his employment ends, or if later, during the Severance Period (in the event of an involuntary termination by
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
|
|
the Company) or for a period of 24 months after an involuntary termination or voluntary resignation following a change in corporate control.
SCOTT M. BRINKER
Severance Payments and Benefits.
Under his
employment agreement with the Company, if Mr. Brinker terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in his employment agreement) or is terminated without cause (as defined in his employment agreement) by the
Company, he would receive a series of monthly severance payments for each month during the remaining term of his employment agreement or for 12 months, whichever is greater. Each monthly severance payment would be an amount equal to
one-twelfth
of the sum of his annual base salary and the average of the annual bonuses paid to Mr. Brinker for the prior three fiscal years immediately preceding the termination date. Mr. Brinker also
would be entitled to continued benefits under any life, health and disability insurance programs maintained by the Company for the remaining term of his employment agreement (but not less than six months and not more than the period during which he
would be entitled to continuation coverage under Section 4980B of the Code, if he elected such coverage and paid the applicable premiums), or until the date he obtains comparable coverage from a new employer. Mr. Brinker also would be
entitled to receive accrued but unpaid base salary and vacation pay, any bonuses earned but unpaid and any nonforfeitable benefits under the Companys deferred compensation, incentive and other benefit plans.
If Mr. Brinker terminates his employment for good reason or is terminated without cause during the 24 months following a change in
corporate control (as defined in his employment agreement), he would receive a lump sum severance payment equal to the present value of a series of monthly severance payments for 24 months. Each monthly severance payment would be an amount
equal to
one-twelfth
of the sum of his annual base salary and the average of the annual bonuses paid to Mr. Brinker for the prior three fiscal years ending prior to the change in corporate control.
Mr. Brinker also would be entitled to continued benefits under any life, health and disability insurance programs maintained by the Company for the remaining term of his employment agreement (but not less than six months and not more than the
period during which he would be entitled to continuation coverage under Section 4980B of the Code, if he elected such coverage and paid the applicable premiums), or until the date he obtains comparable coverage from a new employer. If it is
determined that any payment by the Company to Mr. Brinker in connection with a change in corporate control would be a golden parachute subject to excise tax, and if reducing the amount of the payments would result in greater benefits to
Mr. Brinker, the payments will be reduced by the amount necessary to maximize the benefits received by Mr. Brinker, determined on an
after-tax
basis.
If Mr. Brinker voluntarily terminates his employment, is terminated for cause, is terminated as a result of the expiration of the term of his employment
agreement, or upon
his death or disability, Mr. Brinker only would be entitled to accrued but unpaid base salary and vacation pay, any bonuses earned but unpaid and any nonforfeitable benefits under the
Companys deferred compensation, incentive and other benefit plans.
Vesting of Incentive Awards.
Mr. Brinkers stock option, restricted
stock and deferred stock unit awards with time-based vesting granted under the Companys incentive plans would become vested and immediately exercisable in the event that Mr. Brinker terminates his employment for good reason or
is terminated without cause by the Company, upon the expiration of the term of his employment agreement if such expiration is as a result of
non-renewal
of such agreement by the Company, upon a
change in corporate control or upon his death, disability or retirement.
The performance awards granted to Mr. Brinker under the 2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive
Program and the 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program will be deemed earned as of the date of a change in corporate control based on the Compensation Committees evaluation of corporate performance relative to the performance targets as of the
day prior to a change in corporate control. In the event that Mr. Brinker terminates his employment for good reason or is terminated without cause by the Company, or upon the
non-renewal
of his employment agreement by the Company or his death, disability or retirement, the Compensation Committee will determine corporate performance relative to the performance targets as of the end
of the calendar quarter immediately preceding the termination and Mr. Brinker would receive a pro rata portion of the performance awards based on the number of months that he was employed by the Company in the performance period. In the event
of such a termination after the end of the performance period, any shares granted to Mr. Brinker under these programs would become vested.
Non-Competition
and
Non-Solicitation.
Upon the termination of his employment agreement for any reason (other than the expiration of the term of his employment
agreement as a result of the Companys election not to renew such agreement), Mr. Brinker will be subject to (1) a
one-year
non-competition
agreement and
(2) a
non-solicitation
agreement for a period of one year from the later of the time his employment agreement ceases or when monthly severance payments under such agreement cease.
Mr.
Brinkers Separation Agreement.
On January 3, 2017, Mr. Brinkers position as the Executive Vice
President - Chief Investment Officer of the Company was eliminated and his employment agreement was terminated as of that date. In connection with his departure, the Company and Mr. Brinker entered into a separation agreement pursuant to which
the Company agreed to pay Mr. Brinker a series of semi-monthly severance payments for 25 months, each in an amount equal to
one-twenty-fourth
of the sum of his base salary of $484,500 and the average of
the annual cash bonuses paid to him for 2014, 2015, and 2016, which was $1,062,600. Mr. Brinker is also entitled to continued coverage at the Companys expense under the Companys health and life insurance benefits through January 31, 2019
(but no longer
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
than the period during which he would be entitled to continuation coverage under Section 4980B of the Code) or until, if earlier, the date he obtains comparable coverage from a new employer. The
Company also agreed to provide outplacement benefits to Mr. Brinker until December 31, 2017 in an amount not to exceed $25,000 and to reimburse Mr. Brinker for professional fees in connection with the preparation of his 2016 and 2017
tax returns up to $2,500 annually.
In connection with Mr. Brinkers departure, 48,645 shares of restricted stock and deferred stock units and options for
the purchase of 3,600 shares of the Companys common stock held by Mr. Brinker became fully vested as of January 4, 2017. Mr. Brinker also received a $629,619 stock award as a
pro-rated
payment under the 2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program and $254,494 stock award as a
pro-rated
payment under the 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program, in each case based on performance through
December 31, 2016.
The separation agreement also includes a customary release by Mr. Brinker of claims against the Company and its affiliates and a mutual
non-disparagement
covenant. Mr. Brinker is also obligated to comply with various restrictive covenants, including a
non-compete,
non-solicitation
and protection of the Companys confidential information.
MERCEDES T. KERR AND JEFFREY H. MILLER
The Companys employment and award agreements with Ms. Kerr are identical to the Companys employment and award agreements with Mr. Brinker.
The Companys
employment and award agreements with Mr. Miller are identical to the Companys employment and award agreements with Mr. Estes, except that, in the case of Mr. Miller, the
minimum bonus that may be used to calculate severance payments owed in the event of a change in corporate control, or upon death, disability or termination without cause is equal to 30% of annual base salary, rather than 35%.
Mr.
Millers Retirement Agreement.
On January 31, 2017, Mr. Miller retired as the Executive Vice President -
Chief Operating Officer of the Company and his employment agreement was terminated as of that date. In connection with his retirement, the Company and Mr. Miller entered into a retirement agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay
Mr. Miller $2,632,122, which represents a
lump-sum
retirement payment.
In connection with Mr. Millers
retirement, 28,544 shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Miller became fully vested as of January 31, 2017. Mr. Miller also received a $563,322 stock award as a
pro-rated
payment under the
2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program and $182,777 stock award as a
pro-rated
payment under the 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program, in each case based on performance through December 31, 2016.
The retirement agreement also includes a customary release by Mr. Miller of claims against the Company and its affiliates and a mutual
non-disparagement
covenant. Mr. Miller is also obligated to comply with various restrictive covenants, including a
non-compete,
non-solicitation
and protection of the Companys confidential information.
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
|
|
Quantification of Benefits
The table below reflects estimates of the amounts of compensation that would be paid to the NEOs in the event of their termination. The amounts assume that such
termination was effective as of December 31, 2016. The actual amounts to be paid to a NEO can only be determined at the time of such executives separation from the Company. The employment of each of Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller ended at the
beginning of 2017 (January 3 and January 31, respectively). The actual amounts to which Mr. Brinker became entitled pursuant to his separation agreement and the actual amounts to which Mr. Miller became entitled pursuant to his retirement agreement
are described above in the narrative disclosure of the section entitled Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Corporate Control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name/Type of Termination
|
|
|
Cash
Severance
($)
(5)
|
|
|
|
Continued
Benefits
($)
(6)
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
Vesting of
Unvested Equity
Compensation
($)
(7)
|
|
|
|
Excise Tax
Gross-Up
($)
(8)
|
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Thomas J. DeRosa
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause or Resignation without Good Reason
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,661,296
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,661,296
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason
|
|
|
4,724,858
|
|
|
|
29,686
|
|
|
|
10,661,296
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15,415,840
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation following a
Change in Corporate Control
|
|
|
8,517,366
|
|
|
|
29,686
|
|
|
|
13,227,963
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
21,775,015
|
|
Scott A. Estes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause or Resignation without Good Reason
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
1,597,583
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,166,959
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,764,542
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason
|
|
|
1,597,583
|
|
|
|
12,354
|
|
|
|
4,166,959
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,776,896
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation following a Change in Corporate Control
|
|
|
3,187,041
|
|
|
|
12,354
|
|
|
|
4,971,126
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,170,521
|
|
Non-Renewal
of the Employment Agreement by the Company
(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,166,959
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,166,959
|
|
Mercedes T. Kerr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause or Resignation without Good Reason
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,920,034
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,920,034
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason
|
|
|
826,876
|
|
|
|
10,668
|
|
|
|
1,920,034
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,757,578
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation following a Change in Corporate Control
|
|
|
1,522,982
|
|
|
|
10,668
|
|
|
|
2,511,701
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,045,351
|
|
Non-Renewal
of the Employment Agreement by the Company
(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,920,034
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,920,034
|
|
Scott M. Brinker
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause or Resignation without Good Reason
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,600,390
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,600,390
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason
|
|
|
1,449,561
|
|
|
|
13,254
|
|
|
|
3,600,390
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,063,205
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation following a Change in Corporate Control
|
|
|
2,891,751
|
|
|
|
13,254
|
|
|
|
4,890,404
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,795,409
|
|
Non-Renewal
of the Employment Agreement by the Company
(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,600,390
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,600,390
|
|
Jeffrey H. Miller
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Cause or Resignation without Good Reason
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
1,467,942
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,297,742
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,765,684
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason
|
|
|
1,467,942
|
|
|
|
12,354
|
|
|
|
4,297,742
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,778,038
|
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause or Resignation following a Change in Corporate Control
|
|
|
2,928,417
|
|
|
|
12,354
|
|
|
|
4,588,400
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,529,171
|
|
Non-Renewal
of the Employment Agreement by the Company
(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,297,742
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,297,742
|
|
(1)
|
On January 3, 2017, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. DeRosa, which will become effective on April 13, 2017, after the expiration of his current employment agreement. For
additional information regarding Mr. DeRosas new employment agreement, see Mr. DeRosas Amended and Restated Employment Agreement on page 37.
|
(2)
|
The employment agreements of Mr. Estes, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller in effect as of December 31, 2016 do not expire until January 31, 2019 and Ms. Kerrs employment agreement does not expire
until January 31, 2018. For purposes of this table, the amounts of compensation included in this row assume that the applicable employment agreement was terminated as of December 31, 2016 upon a
non-renewal
of such employment agreement by the Company.
|
(3)
|
On January 3, 2017, Mr. Brinkers position as the Executive Vice President - Chief Investment Officer of the Company was eliminated. In connection with his departure, the Company and Mr. Brinker
entered into a separation agreement. For additional information regarding Mr. Brinkers separation agreement, see Mr. Brinkers Separation Agreement on pages
57-58.
|
(4)
|
On January 31, 2017, Mr. Miller retired as the Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer of the Company and his employment agreement was terminated as of that date. In connection with his retirement,
the Company and Mr. Miller entered into a retirement agreement. For additional information regarding Mr. Millers retirement agreement, see Mr. Millers Retirement Agreement on page 58.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
Under the employment agreements for Mr. DeRosa, Mr. Estes, Ms. Kerr,
Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller, as of December 31, 2016, these executives would be entitled to: (a) a lump sum severance payment equal to the present value of a series of monthly severance payments, calculated using a discount rate
equal to the
90-day
treasury rate; (b) in the case of Ms. Kerr and Mr. Brinker upon an involuntary termination without cause or a resignation for good reason, a series of monthly severance
payments (rather than a lump sum); or (c) in the case of Mr. DeRosa upon an involuntary termination without cause or a resignation for good reason, a series of semi-monthly severance payments (rather than a lump sum). For Mr. DeRosa,
the monthly payment used to calculate the lump sum is equal to 1/12 of the sum of his base salary plus the average annual bonus paid during the last three or, if applicable, fewer fiscal years, and the semi-monthly payment is 1/24 of the sum of his
base salary plus the target annual cash bonus opportunity. For Mr. Estes and Mr. Miller, the monthly payment used to calculate the lump sum is equal to 1/12 of the sum of the executives base salary plus the greater of (a) the
annual bonus paid during the last year or (b) a minimum bonus as a percent of base salary, as specified for each executive in his respective employment agreement. The annual bonuses paid during the last year have been in excess of the minimums
specified in the agreement; thus the annual bonuses are used to calculate potential severance. For Ms. Kerr and Mr. Brinker, the monthly payment used to calculate the lump sum is equal to 1/12 of the sum of the executives base salary
plus the average annual bonus paid during the last three years and the monthly payment is equal to 1/12 of the sum of his or her base salary plus the average annual bonus paid during the last three years.
For Mr. DeRosa, Mr. Estes, Ms. Kerr, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller, the severance calculation varies depending on the termination
scenario:
|
|
|
If the termination is for cause by the Company or without good reason by the executive, no severance would be paid.
|
|
|
|
For Mr. DeRosa, upon the involuntary termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by the executive for good reason, not related to a change in corporate control, the calculation will be based
on semi-monthly payments for 24 months. For Ms. Kerr and Mr. Brinker, upon the involuntary termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by the executive for good reason, not related to a change in corporate control,
and for Mr. Estes and Mr. Miller, upon the death of the executive or the involuntary termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by the executive for good reason, not related to a change in corporate control, the
calculation will be based on the number of months remaining in the term of the agreement, but not less than 12 months for Mr. Estes, Ms. Kerr, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller. As of December 31, 2016, the remaining terms of each
of the agreements of Mr. Estes, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller were 1 month. The remaining term for Ms. Kerr was 13 months. Therefore, the figures in the above table assume the lump sum (or in the case of Mr. Brinker and
Ms. Kerr, the series of monthly payments) will be based on monthly payments for 12 months for Mr. Estes, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller, and 13 months for Ms. Kerr.
|
|
|
|
For Mr. DeRosa, upon involuntary termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by the executive for good reason within 24 months after a change in corporate control, the lump sum will be based
on monthly payments for 36 months. For Mr. Estes and Mr. Miller, upon involuntary termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by the executive for any reason within 12 months of a change in corporate control, the lump
sum will be based on monthly payments for 24 months. For Ms. Kerr and Mr. Brinker, upon involuntary termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by the executive for good reason within 24 months of a change in
corporate control, the lump sum will be based on monthly payments for 24 months.
|
The amounts reflected in the table above
represent the discounted present value of the monthly payments assuming a 0.51% annual discount rate (the
90-day
treasury rate as of December 31, 2016, the assumed date of termination).
Upon disability, as of December 31, 2016, Mr. Estes and Mr. Miller would be entitled to cash severance payable in a series of monthly
severance payments. For Mr. Estes and Mr. Miller, each monthly payment is equal to 1/12 of the sum of the executives base salary plus the greater of (a) the annual bonus paid during the last year or (b) a minimum bonus as a
percent of base salary, as specified for each executive in the employment agreement. Payments would be made for each month during the remaining term of the agreement, but not for less than 12 months for Mr. Estes and Mr. Miller. Based on
the remaining terms of their agreements, the figures in the above table assume payments would be provided for 12 months for Mr. Estes and Mr. Miller.
Under the employment agreement for Mr. DeRosa, as of December 31, 2016,
Mr. DeRosa would be entitled to continued coverage at the Companys expense under any group health plan in which he participated at the time of involuntary termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by him for good
reason for the period during which he elects to receive continuation coverage under Section 4980B of the Code at an
after-tax
cost comparable to the cost that Mr. DeRosa would have incurred for the
same coverage had he remained employed during such period. The monthly cost of such benefits is estimated to be the current 2016 monthly costs. The same benefits would apply for Mr. DeRosa upon involuntary termination without cause by the
Company or voluntary termination by the executive for good reason within 24 months of a change in corporate control.
Under the employment agreements
for Mr. Estes, Ms. Kerr, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller, as of December 31, 2016, these executives would be entitled to continued coverage at the Companys expense under life, health and disability insurance programs in
which the executive participated at the time of involuntary termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by the executive for good reason, for the remaining term of the agreement, but not less than six months and for each
executive not more than the period during which the executive would be entitled to continuation coverage under Section 4980B of the Code, if he or she elected such coverage and paid the applicable premiums. As of December 31, 2016, the
remaining terms of each of the agreements of Mr. Estes, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller were 1 month. The remaining term for Ms. Kerr was 13 months. Therefore, the figures in the above table assume continued benefits would be provided
for 6 months for Mr. Estes, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller and 13 months for Ms. Kerr. The monthly cost of such benefits is estimated to be the current 2016 monthly costs. The same benefits would apply for Mr. Brinker and
Ms. Kerr, upon involuntary termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by the executive for good reason within 24 months of a change in corporate control, and for Mr. Estes and Mr. Miller, upon involuntary
termination without cause by the Company or voluntary termination by the executive for any reason within 12 months of a change in corporate control.
(7)
|
Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Equity Compensation
|
Under the employment agreements for Mr. DeRosa,
Mr. Estes, Ms. Kerr, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller, as of December 31, 2016, upon involuntary termination without cause by the Company, voluntary termination for good reason by the executive or the death of the executive, or,
in the case of Mr. DeRosa, Ms. Kerr and Mr. Brinker, upon disability, all unvested stock and option awards would become fully vested. The numbers in this column represent the
in-the-money
value of unvested stock options and the full value of unvested restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2016 (the assumed termination date) where vesting would be accelerated
upon termination under these scenarios.
For performance awards granted under the 2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Program, in the event that
Mr. DeRosa, Mr. Estes, Mr. Brinker or Mr. Miller terminates his employment for good reason or is terminated without cause by the Company, or upon the
non-renewal
of his employment agreement
by the Company, if applicable, or his death, disability or retirement, the Compensation Committee will determine corporate performance relative to the performance targets as of the end of the calendar quarter immediately preceding the termination
and such executive would receive a pro rata portion of the performance awards based on the number of months that he was employed by the Company in the performance period. As of December 31, 2016,
two-thirds
of the performance period had been completed, so if such a termination occurred on December 31, 2016 and the Compensation Committee determined that an award
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
|
|
was earned, Mr. DeRosa, Mr. Estes, Mr. Brinker and Mr. Miller would receive
two-thirds
of the earned award. In the event of a change in
corporate control, the Compensation Committee will evaluate corporate performance relative to the performance targets as of the day prior to the change in corporate control to determine any award earned by each executive at the time of the change in
corporate control. The calculations included in this table for the performance awards are based on threshold achievement of the performance metrics during the completed portion of the performance period. Note that these amounts are different than
the Companys compensation expense for granting these awards and no portion of the awards will be deemed earned until after the Compensation Committee makes such a determination (either after completion of the performance period or in
connection with an executives termination or a change in corporate control). The assumed share price upon each termination scenario is $66.93, which was the closing price as of December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016.
For performance awards granted under the 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Program, in the event that Mr. DeRosa, Mr. Estes, Ms. Kerr,
Mr. Brinker or Mr. Miller terminates his or her employment for good reason or is terminated without cause by the Company, or upon the
non-renewal
of his or her employment agreement by the Company, if
applicable, or his or her death, disability or retirement, the Compensation Committee will determine corporate performance relative to the performance targets as of the end of the calendar quarter immediately preceding the termination and such
executive would receive a pro rata portion of the performance awards based on the number of months that he or she was employed by the Company in the performance period. As of December 31, 2016,
one-third
of the performance period had been completed, so if such a termination occurred on December 31, 2016 and the Compensation Committee determined that an award was earned, Mr. DeRosa, Mr. Estes, Ms. Kerr, Mr. Brinker and
Mr. Miller would receive
one-third
of the earned award. In the event of a change in corporate control, the Compensation Committee will evaluate corporate performance relative to the performance targets as
of the day prior to the change in corporate control to determine any award earned by each executive at the time of the change in corporate control. The calculations included in this table for the performance awards are based on threshold achievement
of the performance metrics during the completed portion of the performance period. Note that these amounts are different than the Companys compensation expense for granting these awards and no portion of the awards will be deemed earned until
after the Compensation Committee makes such a determination (either after completion of the performance period or in connection with an executives termination or a change in corporate control). The assumed share price upon each termination
scenario is $66.93, which was the closing price as of December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016.
For the performance-based restricted
stock units granted to Mr. DeRosa pursuant to a performance-based restricted stock unit grant agreement, in the event that Mr. DeRosa terminates his employment for good reason or is terminated without cause by the Company or upon his death
or disability, any outstanding performance-based restricted stock units would become fully vested. The assumed share price upon each termination scenario is $66.93, which was the closing price as of December 30, 2016, the last trading day
of 2016.
Under the employment agreements for
Mr. Estes and Mr. Miller, as of December 31, 2016, if any payments constitute excess parachute payments under Section 280G of the Code such that the executive incurs an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code,
the Company would provide an excise tax
gross-up
payment in an amount such that after payment of the excise tax and all income and excise taxes applicable to the
gross-up
payment, the executive would receive the same amount of severance had the excise tax not applied. Mr. DeRosa, Ms. Kerr and Mr. Brinker are not entitled to any excise tax
gross-up
payments under their employment agreements.
If a change in corporate control had occurred on
December 31, 2016 and each of the Named Executive Officers was terminated as a result, none of these Named Executive Officers would have been subject to excise tax. In arriving at this conclusion, the following assumptions were used:
|
|
|
Each officers base amount was calculated by taking the average
W-2
income (box 1) from the past five years (2011-2015).
|
|
|
|
The stock award parachute calculations for purposes of Code Section 280G were based on Black-Scholes valuation methodology using the most recent GAAP ASC Topic 718 option valuation assumptions (volatility of
25.85%, risk-free interest rate of 1.78%, dividend yield of 5.2%, and expected remaining term of 4.4 years). Under the Code Section 280G rules, the cost included in the parachute for the accelerated vesting of stock options, restricted shares
and unvested dividend equivalent rights is the sum of (1) the excess of the aggregate accelerated benefit over the present value of the accelerated benefit and (2) the lapse of service obligation (1% times the number of months of vesting
accelerated times the aggregate accelerated benefit).
|
|
|
|
The total parachute for each Named Executive Officer did not exceed the Code Section 280G safe harbor, which is three times the base amount minus $1. As a result, these Named Executive Officers would
not have incurred any excise tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
(continued)
|
Risk Management and Compensation
As described above in Executive CompensationCompensation
Discussion and Analysis, the Companys compensation programs are designed, among other things, to encourage long-term shareholder value creation, rather than short-term shareholder value maximization. Performance is evaluated based on
quantitative and qualitative factors and there is a review of not only what is achieved, but also how it is achieved. Consistent with this long-term focus, the compensation policies and practices for the NEOs and other
employees do not encourage excessive risk-taking. In fact, many elements of the executive compensation program serve to mitigate excessive risk-taking.
|
|
Balanced pay mix.
A balanced mix of base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity compensation is provided. Incentives tied to annual performance are balanced with incentives tied to multi-year
performance, as measured by total shareholder return on an absolute basis and relative to two indices in the long-term incentive programs. In this way, the executive officers are motivated to consider the impact of decisions over the short,
intermediate and long terms.
|
|
|
Balanced performance measurements.
The performance measures used in the annual and long-term incentive programs were chosen to provide appropriate safeguards against maximization of a single performance
goal at the expense of the overall health of the Companys business. The incentive programs are not completely quantitative. Various individual and qualitative objectives are incorporated, and the Compensation Committee has the discretion to
adjust earned bonuses based on the quality of the results as well as individual performance and behaviors.
|
|
|
Incentive payments are capped.
The annual and long-term incentive programs do not have unlimited upside potential.
|
|
|
Long-term incentive grants.
Restricted shares, which are well-aligned with shareholders because they have both upside potential and downside risk, make up 100% of the total value of the long-term incentive
compensation program.
|
|
|
Clawback Policy.
As discussed in Corporate GovernanceClawback Policy, the executive officers and certain other covered officers are subject to a clawback policy, which allows the Company
to recover incentive compensation (including stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units) received by such officers in the event the Company is required to prepare a financial restatement due to the Companys material
non-compliance
with any financial reporting requirement.
|
|
|
Stock ownership requirements.
As discussed in Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and AnalysisOwnership Guidelines the executive officers are subject to stock ownership
guidelines based on a multiple of base salary. These stock ownership guidelines align the interests of management with long-term shareholder interests.
|
To confirm the effectiveness of its approach to compensation, from time to time the Company reviews the potential risks associated with the structure and design of its
various compensation plans and programs for all employees. In conducting this assessment, the Company inventories its material plans and programs, with particular emphasis on incentive compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 2016, concerning shares of common stock authorized for issuance under all of the
Companys equity compensation plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
or Vesting of Options
and Rights
|
|
|
|
(b)
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
of
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
|
(c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders
|
|
|
735,940
|
(1)
|
|
|
$51.19
|
(2)
|
|
|
11,780,478
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
735,940
|
(1)
|
|
|
$51.19
|
(2)
|
|
|
11,780,478
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
This number reflects the options, restricted stock units and deferred stock units granted under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan. See notes 5, 9, 10 and 11 to the 2016
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End
Table and note 5 to 2016 Director Compensation Table for additional information regarding the restricted stock units and deferred stock units.
|
(2)
|
This price does not include restricted stock units or deferred stock units granted under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan or the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
(3)
|
This number reflects the 10,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as reduced by awards issued under the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and as increased by
shares granted under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan or the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan that were forfeited, cancelled, surrendered or terminated unexercised and are available for future issuance under the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Matters
|
Management is not aware of any matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the matters set forth above. If any other matters do properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, it is intended that the persons named in the proxy will vote in accordance with their judgment on such matters.
BY
ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Matthew McQueen
Senior Vice President - General
Counsel & Corporate Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and 2017 Proxy Statement
|
www.welltower.com
WELLTOWER INC.
4500 DORR STREET
TOLEDO, OHIO 43615
VOTE BY INTERNET -
www.proxyvote.com
or scan the QR Barcode above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day
before the meeting date. Follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
VOTE BY PHONE -
1-800-690-6903
Use
any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign
and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Welltower Inc., c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
If you have not voted via the Internet or by telephone, detach and return the bottom portion in the enclosed envelope.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR
BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E21537-P87991
|
|
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED
AND DATED.
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
|
WELLTOWER INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Election of ten directors to hold office until the next
annual meeting of shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees:
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1a. Kenneth J. Bacon
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1b. Thomas J. DeRosa
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1c. Jeffrey H. Donahue
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1d. Fred S. Klipsch
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1e. Geoffrey G. Meyers
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1f. Timothy J. Naughton
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1g. Sharon M. Oster
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1h. Judith C. Pelham
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1i. Sergio D. Rivera
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1j. R. Scott Trumbull
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
|
|
2. The ratification of the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2017; and
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
3. The advisory vote to approve executive compensation
as disclosed in the Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal:
|
|
1 Year
|
|
2 Years
|
|
3 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. The advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on
executive compensation.
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE:
The proxies named on the reverse side of this proxy card are authorized to vote in their discretion upon any other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other
fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners)
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V.1.1
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at
www.proxyvote.com.
E21538-P87991
WELLTOWER INC.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
May 4, 2017 9:00 A.M.
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoint(s) Matthew G. McQueen and Scott A. Estes, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power
to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them, or either of them, to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock of WELLTOWER INC. that the undersigned is/are entitled to vote
at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 9:00 A.M. Eastern Time on Thursday, May 4, 2017, in the Bruce G. Thompson Auditorium at Welltower Inc.s corporate headquarters, 4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, OH 43615, and any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such
direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors recommendations. This proxy will be voted in the discretion of the proxies on any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment
or postponement thereof.
Continued and to be marked, dated and signed on reverse side
V.1.1
Welltower OP (NYSE:WELL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Welltower OP (NYSE:WELL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024