NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS
The Company was an active business from 2005 through 2006 and was involved in the artificial sport surface. From 2007 through September 2010, the Company was looking for new business and commenced the Carbon Credits (CER'S) business. In the 2009, the Company acquired a participation in Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. and became
an integrated and complementary network of environmentally focused technology company. The Company
currently has operations but limited revenues.
EcoloCap Solutions Inc. is an integrated and complementary network of environmentally focused technology companies that utilize advanced nanotechnology to design, develop and sell cleaner alternative energy products. We bring together the technology, engineering, and operational management for the successful development of environmentally significant products and projects. Our business approach combines science, innovation, and market-ready solutions to achieve environmentally sustainable and economically advantageous, power and energy management practices in the following areas:
M-Fuel
EcoloCap Solutions Inc. developed M-Fuel, an innovative suspension fuel that far exceeds all conventional fuels' costs and efficiencies. This environmentally-friendly and economical product is designed to offer fully scalable and customizable fuel solutions that will increase efficiency, lower operating costs, and reduce emissions. M -Fuel is a suspension mixture of 60% heavy oil, 40% H plus O2 molecules, and a 0.3% stabilizing additive. The production of M-Fuel takes place in our Nano Processing Units (NPU), a self contained device that is sized for output. The NPU's can be configured to operate in conjunction with an engine or burner to sully M-Fuel on demand, or pre-manufactured for delivery. M-Fuels unique burning process facilitates increased efficiency, resulting in reduced emissions by 60%, reduced fuel consumption by 40%, and cut costs by up to 25%.
ECOS/BIO-ART
ECOS/Bio-ART is a patented air injected high-speed aerobic biological fermentation technology, utilizing uniquely cultured Bacillus, and incorporated into a specifically designed in-vessel unit. The remediation process takes seven days and reduces moisture content to an average between 12%-25% on an output equal to 1/3 the input. The output can be used as organic fertilizer, animal feed, animal bedding or biomass. The computer controlled process monitors the temperature on 3 different levels. The technology reduces the costs associated with food waste disposal and in the process reduces the environmental impact or methane greenhouse gas production, provide a healthier life for all and create viable organic byproducts.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
CASH
The Company maintains cash balances at various financial institutions. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company's accounts at these institutions may, at times, exceed the federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
F-6
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures", which defines fair value as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements.
The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, deposits, prepaid expenses, notes payable, and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
-
|
level l - quoted prices in active markets for Identical assets or liabilities
|
-
|
level 2 - quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
|
-
|
level 3 - inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)
|
The carrying amounts of cash, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amounts of our short term credit obligations approximate fair value because the effective yields on these obligations, which include contractual interest rates taken together with other features such as concurrent issuance of warrants, are comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk.asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit
INCOME TAXES
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, "Income Taxes." Under this method, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of: (i) taxes payable or refundable for the current year and (ii) deferred tax consequences of temporary differences resulting from matters that have been recognized in an entity's financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if based on the weight of the available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
ASC Topic 740.10.30 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740.10.40 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. We have no material uncertain tax positions for any of the reporting periods presented.
USE OF ESTIMATES
In preparing financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet and revenue and expenses in the income statement. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F-7
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company's business plan is to sell machinery used to prepare M-fuel. The machinery is manufactured for the Company by a third-party in Korea. Revenue is recognized when the following conditions are satisfied:
i)
persuasive evidence that an agreement exists;
ii)
the risks and rewards of ownership pass to the purchaser including delivery of the product;
iii)
the selling price is fixed and determinable; or,
iv)
collectively is reasonably assured.
CONVERTIBLE INSTRUMENTS
We evaluate and account for conversion options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815 "Derivatives and Hedging Activities".
Applicable GAAP requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under other GAAP with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument.
We account for convertible instruments (when we have determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments) as follows: We record when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their stated date of redemption.
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss, adjusted on an "as if converted" basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
We recognize compensation expense for stock-based compensation for employees in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For employee stock-based awards, we calculate the fair value of the award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes method for stock options and the quoted price of our common stock for unrestricted shares; the expense is recognized over the service period for awards expected to vest. For non-employee stock-based awards, we calculate the fair value of the award on the date of grant in the same manner as employee awards, however, the awards are revalued at the end of each reporting period in accordance with ASC 505 and the pro rata compensation expense is adjusted accordingly until such time the nonemployee award is fully vested, at which time the total compensation recognized to date equals the fair value of the stock-based award as calculated on the measurement date, which is the date at which the award recipient's performance is complete. The estimation of stock-based awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from original estimates, such amounts are recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. We consider many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including types of awards, employee class, and historical experience.
F-8
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Long-lived assets, including fixed assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In reviewing for impairment, the carrying value of such assets is compared to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. If such cash flows are not sufficient to support the asset's recorded value, an impairment charge is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the long-lived asset to its estimated fair value. The determination of future cash flows, as well as the estimated fair value of long-lived assets, involves significant estimates on the part of management. In order to estimate the fair value of a long-lived asset, the Company may engage a third-party to assist with the valuation. If there is a material change in economic conditions or other circumstances influencing the estimate of future cash flows or fair value, the Company could be required to recognize impairment charges in the future.
IMPAIRMENT:
At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is any indication that its intangible assets, or property, plant and equipment are impaired. If any such indication exists, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the asset and the impairment loss if any. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired. If an asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from those of other assets or groups of assets, recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. The recoverable amount of an asset is the higher of its fair value less cost to sell and its value in use. Value in use is the present value of future cash flows from the asset or cash-generating unit discounted at a rate that reflects market interest rates adjusted for risks specific to the asset or cash- generating unit that have not been reflected in the estimation of future cash flows. If the recoverable amount of an intangible or tangible asset is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss and the carrying value of the asset reduced by the amount of the loss. A reversal of an impairment loss on intangible assets (excluding goodwill) or property, plant and equipment is recognised as it arises provided the increased carrying value does not exceed that which it would have been had no impairment loss been recognised. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed.
The amounts recorded as fixed impairment loss during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are $0 and $302,750.
This impairment loss relates to our testing equipment as our management has adjusted downward the carrying value of our testing equipment because the equipment has not been generated the income over the past year.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT AND DEPRECIATION POLICY
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided for in amounts sufficient to amortize the costs of the related assets over their estimated useful lives on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset ranging from 3 to 7 years.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. For the year ended 2014 and 2013 the amounts charged to research and development expenses was $0 and $0.
NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN
The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company incurred a net loss of $2,139,966 for the year ended December 31, 2014.The Company has negative working capital of $5,310,283 at December 31, 2014 and a stockholders' deficit of $5,310,283 at December 31, 2014. These factors among others raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
F-9
Management's plans for the Company's continued existence include selling additional stock and borrowing additional funds to pay overhead expenses.
With the opportunities
created by the Batteries and M Fuel, management has begun the process of redeploying its assets, identifying business strategies that offers above average profit potential and identifying the resources necessary to successfully execute it new strategic direction.
Recognizing the opportunity this new market represents, the Company has developed an integrated development approach that focuses upon both existing and needed infrastructure facilities to produce substantial new value.
The Company's future success is dependent upon its ability to achieve profitable operations, generate cash from operating activities and obtain additional financing. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to generate sufficient cash from operations, sell additional shares of common stock or borrow additional funds.
The Company's inability to obtain additional cash could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations and its ability to continue in existence. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
NOTE-4 - NOTE RECEIVABLE
On December 17, 2013, the Company signed a receivable note with a KMBT, a manufacturer of machinery, in the aggregate amount of $285,000, at an interest rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. The drawdown notes can be prepaid upon five days notice and is payable thirteen months following its issuance. The amount receivable from KMBT at December 31, 2014, is shown net of the remaining unearned interest of $0 and a provision for bad debt of $290,827 resulting in a balance of $0.
NOTE 5
–
ACCRUED EXPENSES AND SUNDRY CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses consisted of the following at December 31:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
$
|
111,436
|
|
|
$
|
103,405
|
|
Accrued interest-related party
|
|
|
86,117
|
|
|
|
32,352
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
425,517
|
|
|
|
302,861
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
Accrued operating expenses
|
|
|
445,042
|
|
|
|
297,378
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,308,112
|
|
|
$
|
975,996
|
|
NOTE 6
– CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE
During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company received the proceeds of various loans which are convertible at amounts ranging from 40% to 60% of the market price of the common shares of the Company at the time of conversion and bear interest at 8% per annum. The amounts received during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are $86,500 in cash, $140,000 in non-cash borrowings related to the default on Tonaquint loans in 2014 and $668,983, respectively.
The convertible feature of these loans, due to their potential settlement in an indeterminable number of shares of the Company's common stock has been identified as a derivative. The derivative component is fair value at the date of issuance of the obligation and this amount is allocated between the derivative and the underlying obligation. The difference is recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the life of the debt. The Redwood Management, LLC, Asher Enterprises Inc. and Tonaquint notes are in default as of December 31, 2014.
F-10
During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, other convertible debts were converted into common shares of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, note payable of $186,312 plus accrued interests of $28,547 and $462,330 plus accrued interests of $29,984 were made into 1,841,012 shares and 1,117,497 shares respectively.
A summary of the amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Debt discount
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
Tonaquint
|
|
$
|
554,666
|
|
|
$
|
33,026
|
|
|
$
|
521,640
|
|
|
$
|
117,327
|
|
Redwood Management, LLC
|
|
|
372,992
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
372,992
|
|
|
|
372,992
|
|
AES Capital Corp.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,016
|
|
LG Capital
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Asher Enterprises Inc
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
|
24,348
|
|
GSM Capital Group LLC
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
|
|
26,574
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
JMJ Financial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,009,658
|
|
|
$
|
36,452
|
|
|
$
|
973,206
|
|
|
$
|
563,683
|
|
NOTE 7 – NOTES PAYABLE – STOCKHOLDERS
The stockholders increase of $344,542, are additions for accrued salaries, net of payments made during the year. These were not actual cash proceeds. The amount owed to stockholders at December 31, 2014 is $1,311,180. These loans are non-interest bearing but interest is being imputed at 5.00% per annum and are payable on demand. An amount of $56,589 has been imputed in 2014.
The amount owed to Hanscom K. Inc. at December 31, 2014 and 2013 is $31,080. These loans are non-interest bearing and are payable on demand.
During 2014, the Company did not receive any loans from RCO Group Inc. The amount owed to RCO Group Inc. at December 31, 2014 and 2013 is $28,500. These loans are non-interest bearing and are payable on demand.
During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company received the proceeds of various loans which are convertible at amounts of 50% of the market price of the common shares of the Company at the time of conversion and bear interest at 8% per annum. The amounts received during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are $23,528 and $27,032, respectively.
The convertible feature of these loans, due to their potential settlement in an indeterminable number of shares of the Company's common stock has been identified as a derivative. The derivative component is fair valued at the date of issuance of the obligation and this amount is allocated between the derivative and the underlying obligation. The difference is recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the life of the debt.
During these same periods, other convertible debts were converted into common shares of the Company. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, total loan conversions of $48,616 plus accrued interests of $4,927 and $104,738 plus accrued interests of $482 were made into 655,621 and 126,149 shares respectively.
A summary of the amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Debt discount
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
Panache Capital LLC
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,293
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
1,311,180
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,311,180
|
|
|
|
966,638
|
|
Hanscom K. Inc.
|
|
|
31,080
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31,080
|
|
|
|
31,080
|
|
RCO Group Inc.
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,370,760
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,370,760
|
|
|
$
|
1,032,511
|
|
F-11
NOTE 8 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded various derivative liabilities associated with the convertible debts discussed in Notes 7 and 8. The Company computes the value of the derivative liability at the issuance of the related obligation using the Black Scholes Method using a risk free rate of 0.14%, volatility rates ranging between 228.63% and 352.00% and a forfeiture rate of 0.00%. The derivative liability at December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asher Enterprises Inc
|
|
$
|
72,222
|
|
|
$
|
125,853
|
|
Tonaquint
|
|
|
924,437
|
|
|
|
996,669
|
|
AES Capital Corp.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,350
|
|
AGS Capital Group LLC
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,553
|
|
JMJ Financial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
42,904
|
|
GSM Capital Group LLC
|
|
|
66,665
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
LG Capital
|
|
|
46,887
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Panache Capital LLC
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
Redwood Management, LLC
|
|
|
372,994
|
|
|
|
372,994
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,483,205
|
|
|
$
|
1,589,616
|
|
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in our balance sheets are categorized based upon a fair value hierarchy established by GAAP, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into the following levels:
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable and can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 — Inputs reflecting management's best estimates and assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation of the instruments.
A financial instrument's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2014
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,483,205
|
|
|
$
|
1,483,205
|
|
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2013
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,589,616
|
|
|
$
|
1,589,616
|
|
F-12
The following table summarizes the derivatives liability from January 1
st
through December 31, 2014
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
1,589,616
|
|
Addition of new derivative
|
|
|
80,325
|
|
Day one loss due to derivative
|
|
|
129,848
|
|
Loss on change in fair value of the derivative
|
|
|
306,696
|
|
Settled upon conversion of debt
|
|
|
(623,280
|
)
|
Balance December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
1,483,205
|
|
NOTE 9 – CAPITAL STOCK
The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000,000 shares of common stock (par value $0.0001) of which 3,934,026 were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 1,437,393 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2013.
During 2014, the following convertible debt owners converted loans plus accrued interests into common shares of the Company
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
converted
|
|
|
converted
|
|
|
Of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asher Enterprises Inc (note 6)
|
|
$
|
34,900
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
$
|
371,000
|
|
Tonaquint (note 6)
|
|
|
102,396
|
|
|
|
15,302
|
|
|
|
853,563
|
|
AES Capital Corp. (note 6)
|
|
|
24,016
|
|
|
|
5,949
|
|
|
|
299,646
|
|
AGS Capital Group LLC (note 7)
|
|
|
42,323
|
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
|
573,528
|
|
JMJ Financial (note 6)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
5,096
|
|
|
|
316,803
|
|
Panache Capital LLC (note 7)
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
82,093
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
234,928
|
|
|
$
|
33,474
|
|
|
$
|
2,496,633
|
|
During 2013, the following convertible debt owners converted loans plus accrued interests into common shares of the Company
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
converted
|
|
|
converted
|
|
|
Of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asher Enterprises Inc (note 6)
|
|
$
|
182,100
|
|
|
$
|
7,600
|
|
|
$
|
490,425
|
|
Tonaquint (note 6)
|
|
|
125,572
|
|
|
|
19,074
|
|
|
|
405,427
|
|
AES Capital Corp. (note 6)
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
66,500
|
|
AGS Capital Group LLC (note 7)
|
|
|
71,123
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
108,149
|
|
JMJ Financial (note 6)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
3,310
|
|
|
|
39,500
|
|
Panache Capital LLC (note 7)
|
|
|
33,615
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
Redwood Management, LLC (note 6)
|
|
|
123,008
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
115,645
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
567,068
|
|
|
$
|
30,466
|
|
|
$
|
1,243,646
|
|
F-13
NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES
The Company recognizes deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax purposes under enacted tax laws and rates.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets are presented below:
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
Statutory tax rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
(34.0
|
%)
|
|
|
(34.0
|
%)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
11,058,529
|
|
|
$
|
10,330,940
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(11,058,529
|
)
|
|
|
(10,330,940
|
)
|
Deferred tax asset net of valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following:
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
Federal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
As of December 31, 2014 the company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $11,058,529 which are being carried forward for subsequent years. Such net operating loss carry forwards expire as follows;
|
2024-2028
|
|
|
$
|
3,401,000
|
|
|
2029-2031
|
|
|
$
|
5,717,000
|
|
|
2032-2034
|
|
|
$
|
1,940,529
|
|
The Company's federal and state income tax returns for the tax years 2010 and forward remain subject to examination.
F-14
NOTE 11
–
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company was party to a lease for its Barrington office, at a minimum annual rent of approximately $24,000 per year. The Barrington lease expired in May 2013 and the Company remains in these premises on a month to month basis. The rent expense charged to operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $24,012 and $26,012, respectively.
NOTE 12
–
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The stockholders notes payable increase of $344,542, are additions for accrued salaries, net of payments made during the year. These were not actual cash proceeds.
These loans carry an interest of 5.00% and are payable on demand.
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, interest paid to related party totaled $97,525 and $76,635.
NOTE 13 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
FINRA advised us that 1 for 2,000 reverse-stock split would be announced on February 17, 2015 on FINRA's daily list and the reverse split would take effect at the opening of business on February 18, 2015. The new symbol will be ECOSD. The D will be removed in 20 business days.
Accordingly, the market price of our common stock now reflects the 1 for 2,000 share reverse-stock split. The reverse-stock split has been retroactively applied to all shares amount in this filing.
During the six month period ended June 30, 2015, the following convertible debt owners converted loans into common shares of the Company
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
converted
|
|
|
converted
|
|
|
of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonaquint (note 6)
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
393,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,973
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
393,000
|
|
On December 19, 2016, we entered into a Supply Agreement (the "Supply Agreement") with Lakeshore Recycling Systems LLC wherein we agreed to manufacture and supply equipment and products to LLC for resale or lease to Lakeshore and LLC's customers.