Item 1. Business
Information Regarding Forward Looking
Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We
caution readers that any forward-looking statement is not a guarantee of future
performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained
in the forward-looking statement. These statements are based on current
expectations of future events. You can find many of these statements by looking
for words like believes, expects, anticipates, intend, estimates,
may, should, will, could, plan, predict, potential, or similar
expressions in this document or in documents incorporated by reference in this
document. These forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and
expectations of our management and are subject to significant risks and
uncertainties. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or unknown risks or
uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from current
expectations and projections.
All subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements
attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in
their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this
section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to
these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the
date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events,
except as may be required under applicable U.S. securities law. If we do update
one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we
will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking
statements.
U.S. Geothermal Inc. (the Company, we or us or words of
similar import) is in the renewable green energy business. Through our
subsidiary, U.S. Geothermal Inc., an Idaho corporation (Geo-Idaho, although
our references to the Company include and refer to our operations through
Geo-Idaho), we are engaged in the acquisition, development and utilization of
geothermal resources in the Western United States and the Republic of Guatemala.
Geothermal energy is the natural heat energy stored within the earths crust. In
some areas of the earth, economic concentrations of heat energy result from a
combination of geological conditions that allow water to penetrate into hot
rocks at depth, become heated, and then circulate to a near surface environment.
In these settings, commercially viable extraction of the geothermal energy and
its conversion to electricity become possible and a geothermal resource is
present.
-5-
Development of Business
U.S. Geothermal Inc. was originally incorporated on March 10,
2000 in the State of Delaware. The Company constructs, manages and operates
power plants that utilize geothermal resources to produce electricity. The
Companys operations have been, primarily, focused in the Western United States.
The Company currently owns and operates the following
geothermal power plant projects: Raft River, Idaho; San Emidio, Nevada; and Neal
Hot Springs, Oregon. The Company also has geothermal property interests in the
Republic of Guatemala; the Geysers in California; Vale, Oregon; Crescent Valley,
Nevada; Ruby Hot Springs, Nevada; Lee Hot Springs, Nevada; and Gerlach, Nevada,
some of which are under development or exploration.
History
Geo-Idaho was formed as an Idaho corporation in February 2002
to conduct geothermal resource development.
U.S. Cobalt Inc. entered into a merger agreement with Geo-Idaho
on February 28, 2002, which was amended and restated on November 30, 2003, and
closed on the reverse take-over on December 19, 2003. In accordance with the
merger agreement, the Company acquired Geo-Idaho through the merger of Geo-Idaho
with a subsidiary, EverGreen Power Inc., an Idaho corporation formed for that
purpose. Geo-Idaho was the surviving corporation and is the subsidiary through
which the Company conducts operations. As part of this acquisition, the Company
name was changed to U.S. Geothermal Inc.
Plan of Operations
Our business strategy is to identify, evaluate, acquire,
develop, and operate geothermal assets and resources economically, safely and
efficiently. Our management evaluates our operating projects based on revenues
and expenses, and our projects under development, based on costs attributable to
each project. We examine different factors when assessing projects at different
stages of development or potential acquisitions, such as the internal rate of
return of the investment, technical and geological matters and other relevant
business considerations.
We intend to execute this strategy in several steps outlined
below:
-
Maximize Our Operations
Our operating power plants and operations
team provide revenue to the Company through both power sales and Operations
& Maintenance contracts. We strive to optimize plant operations though
high safety standards, quality preventative maintenance programs, operator
education, equipment selection and by exceeding our annual budgetary goals.
-
Leverage Management Team Capabilities and Experience
Our strategy
is focused on the identification and acquisition of resources that can be
developed in a cost-effective manner to produce attractive returns. In
particular, we seek to acquire projects that have already undergone geothermal
resource discovery. In addition, we intend to operate and manage construction
of the projects, while using internal personnel and third-party contractors to
efficiently and cost-effectively develop those resources. We believe that we
have the strategic personnel in place to determine which resources provide the
greatest opportunity for efficient development and operation. We have
developed relationships and employed personnel that will allow us to develop
and utilize geothermal resources as efficiently as possible.
-6-
-
Develop Our Pipeline of Quality Projects
Our project pipeline
currently consists of several projects that we believe are aligned with our
growth strategy. These projects typically have consulting reports from various
industry experts supporting our belief in those projects potential. We are
evaluating the potential of those projects and expect to negotiate Power
Purchase Agreements (PPAs) for power deliveries with counterparties for some
of these growth opportunities. If realized, our identified project pipeline
will greatly expand our renewable power generation capacity as we move forward
with the development of those opportunities.
-
Utilize Production Tax Credits, Investment Tax Credits and Other
Incentives
Although geothermal power production can be cost competitive
with fossil fuel power generating facilities on a life cycle cost basis,
government incentives such as production tax credits (PTC) and Investment
Tax Credits (ITC) available to geothermal power producers help offset the
high upfront project capital cost by enhancing the project economics and
attracting capital investment. For the Raft River Unit I project, we partnered
with Goldman Sachs as a tax equity partner to fully utilize production tax
credits available to the project. Our strategy is to structure project
ownership to optimize project economics. Under current legislation, a company
may elect to take 30% ITC for certain qualified investments (or the PTC)
provided construction of the project was started prior to the end of 2016. We
believe that the second phase of our San Emidio project, our WGP Geysers
project, and our Crescent Valley project each qualify for this credit.
-
Pursue Acquisition Strategy
The geothermal market, particularly in
the United States, is fragmented and characterized by a few large players and
a number of smaller ones. Geothermal exploration and development is capital
intensive, technically challenging and requires long lead times before a
project will produce revenue. We believe that geothermal technical and
managerial talent is limited in the industry and that access to capital to
develop projects will not be equally available to all participants. As a
result, we believe that there will be opportunities in the future to pursue
acquisitions of geothermal projects and/or geothermal development companies
with attractive project pipelines.
-
Evaluate Other Potential Revenue Streams from Geothermal Resources
In addition to electricity generation, we may evaluate additional applications
for our geothermal resources including industrial, agriculture, and
aquaculture purposes. These uses generally constitute lower temperature
applications where, after driving a turbine generator, residual hot water can
be cycled for secondary processes before being returned to the geothermal
reservoir by injection wells, which can provide incremental revenue streams.
We may evaluate the optimal use for each geothermal resource and determine whether selling heat for industrial
purposes or generating and subsequently selling power to a grid will generate
the highest return on the asset.
-7-
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company was
focused on these specific items:
-
operating and optimizing the Neal Hot Springs, San Emidio and Raft River
power plants;
-
conducting annual maintenance outages at all three projects;
-
drilling and flow testing two wells at San Emidio II;
-
permitting the deepening of three additional temperature gradient wells at
San Emidio II;
-
continuing to optimize and engineer the power plant/hybrid cooling design,
obtaining the Conditional Use Permit, and pursuing PPA opportunities for the
WGP Geysers project;
-
drilling and flow testing a well at El Ceibillo;
-
drilling a second leg on a production well at Raft River
-
preparing for and drilling a water well at Neal Hot Springs; and
-
evaluating potential new geothermal projects and acquisition
opportunities.
Project Overview
The following are lists of projects that are in operation and
projects that are under development or under exploration. Projects in operation
currently have producing geothermal power plants. Projects under development
have a geothermal resource discovery and have wells in place, but require the
drilling of additional production and injection wells in order to supply enough
geothermal fluid sufficient to operate a commercial power plant. Projects under
exploration may have a discovery well or do not have a geothermal resource
discovery occurrence yet, but have significant thermal and other physical
evidence that warrants the expenditure of capital in search of the discovery of
a geothermal resource. Due to inflation and marketplace increases in the costs
of labor and construction materials, estimates provided for project development
costs could understate actual costs.
Projects in Operation
Although other factors may impact our operations and financial
condition, including many that we do not or cannot foresee, we believe that our
results of operations and financial condition for the foreseeable future will be
affected by the factors discussed below. A summary of the Companys operations
is as follows:
Projects in Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generating
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
Project
|
|
Location
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Capacity (megawatts)
|
|
Power Purchaser
|
|
Expiration
|
Neal Hot Springs
|
|
Oregon
|
|
JV
(1)
|
|
22.0
|
|
Idaho Power
|
|
2036
|
San Emidio (Unit I)
|
|
Nevada
|
|
100%
|
|
10.0
|
|
Sierra Pacific
|
|
2038
|
Raft River (Unit I)
|
|
Idaho
|
|
JV
(2)
|
|
13.0
(3)
|
|
Idaho Power
|
|
2032
|
|
(1)
|
The Companys equity interest in the project is 60% and
Enbridges equity interest is 40%.
|
|
(2)
|
The Companys membership interest in the project to 95%.
Goldman Sachs Group retains a 5% membership interest, and is the tax
equity partner.
|
|
(3)
|
The annual average net output design for the plant is 13
megawatts. The output of the Raft River Unit I plant currently is
approximately 9.4 megawatts annual average.
|
-8-
Neal Hot Springs, Oregon
Neal Hot Springs is located
in Eastern Oregon near the town of Vale, the county seat of Malheur County. The
Neal Hot Springs facility achieved commercial operation on November 16, 2012,
and is designed as a 22 megawatt net annual average power plant. The facility
consists of three separate 12.2 megawatt (gross) modules, with each module
having a design output of 7.33 megawatts (net) annual average, based on a
specific flowrate and temperature of the geothermal brine.
For the fourth quarter of 2016, generation was 57,036
megawatt-hours with an average of 26.3 net megawatts per hour of operation and
plant availability was 98.2% . For the same period in 2015, the plant generated
52,641 megawatt-hours with an average of 24.1 net megawatts per hour and plant
availability was 97.6% . The total annual generation for 2016 was 179,559
megawatt-hours compared to 176,871 megawatt-hours for 2015.
All three high pressure refrigerant pumps were replaced by the
manufacturer under warranty and 70% of the Air Cooled Condenser (ACC) fan motors
were rebuilt under the terms of the ESA settlement agreement during the year.
The remainder of the ACC motors are scheduled to be rebuilt by the end of the
second quarter 2017. The Unit 3 annual maintenance outage was taken in
September. Scale was cleaned out of the vaporizers, and the pump in production
well NHS-8 was replaced due to declining output. With the replacement of the
pump in NHS-8, brine flow was increased through the plant by 7% resulting in an
increase in generation.
A third water supply well for the project was drilled in
December, but due to extreme winter weather, has not been completed and tested
to date. Productive water zones were intersected in the well, but a liner must
be installed before the well can be flow tested. A fourth site has been selected
and will be drilled once weather allows. The project currently has one well
available from drilling in 2015 that can supply approximately 170 gallons per
minute. The minimum amount of water needed for a hybrid cooling system is
approximately 200-300 gallons per minute for each unit.
Subsequent to the end of the year, on January 5, 2017 the
facility tripped off line during extreme cold weather conditions and Unit 1
suffered frozen tubes in the vaporizers. The failed and damaged tubes were
plugged, and the unit was restarted on February 12, 2017. Insurance coverage is
in place to cover equipment repairs with a deductible level of $50,000. Lost
generation is also covered by insurance once the unit was out of service for
over 30 days.
The PPA for the project was signed on December 11, 2009 with
the Idaho Power Company. It has a 25-year term, and a variable percentage annual
price escalation. The PPA has a seasonal pricing structure that pays 120% of the
average price for four months (July, August, November, December), 100% of the
average price for five months (January, February, June, September, October) and
73.3% of the average price for three months (March, April, May). The annual
average price paid under the PPA for 2016 was $109.27 per megawatt-hour and for
2017 the price has increased to $111.83 per megawatt-hour.
San Emidio Unit I, Nevada
The Unit I power plant at
San Emidio is located approximately 100 miles north-east of Reno, Nevada near
the town of Gerlach, and achieved commercial operation on May 25, 2012. The San
Emidio facility is a single 14.7 megawatt (gross) module, with
a design output of 9 megawatts (net) annual average based on a specific flow and
temperature of geothermal brine.
-9-
For the fourth quarter of 2016, generation was 20,803
megawatt-hours with an average of 9.6 net megawatts per hour of operation and
plant availability was 98.2% . For the same period in 2015, the plant generated
20,369 megawatt-hours with an average of 9.4 net megawatts per hour and plant
availability was 98.2% . The total annual generation for 2016 was 75,049
megawatt-hours compared to 79,539 megawatt-hours for 2015.
The high pressure refrigerant pump, which had been replaced
under warranty during the scheduled spring maintenance outage experienced high
vibrations shorty after starting. The plant was able to operate at a reduced
generation level for 19 days and required a second outage to replace the faulty
pump. The plant went back on line July 1
st
and has run without
incident since.
On June 1, 2011, an amended and restated PPA was signed with
Sierra Pacific Power Company d/b/a NV Energy for the sale of up to 19.9
megawatts of electricity on an annual average basis from two units. The option
for the second unit expired in December 2015. The PPA has a 25-year term with a
base price of $89.75 per megawatt-hour, and an annual escalation rate of 1
percent. The annual average price paid under the PPA for 2016 was $93.01 per
megawatt-hour and for 2017 the price has increased to $93.94.
Raft River, Idaho
Raft River Unit I is located in
Southern Idaho, near the town of Malta, and achieved commercial operation on
January 3, 2008. The Raft River facility is a single 18 megawatt (gross) module,
with a design output of 13 megawatts (net) annual average based on a specific
flow and temperature of geothermal brine.
For the fourth quarter of 2016, generation was 20,039
megawatt-hours with an average of 9.1 net megawatts per hour of operation and
plant availability was 100%. For the same period in 2015, the plant generated
21,755 megawatt-hours with an average of 9.8 net megawatt hours and plant
availability was 99.9% . Total annual generation for 2016 was 71,991
megawatt-hours compared to 75,599 megawatt-hours for 2015.
The lower year over year production is primarily due to the
breakdown of the production pump in well RRG-2 on February 9, 2016 and the
extended length of time the well was kept out of service to allow the planned
drilling of a second production leg. Due to a delay in financing, drilling of
the second leg began on June 13
th
and was completed on July
29
th
to a depth of 5,605 feet. Several small zones of
permeability were encountered in the new production leg. After testing the well,
a new pump was installed and the well resumed production in early September. The
well temperature has plateaued at approximately 277°F, down from the original
production temperature of 283°F, and the well is now producing approximately 180
gallons per minute less flow than before drilling. It is believed that during
drilling operations, the original production leg of the well was damaged by
scale formation, which blinded off its producing fractures. Current production
is believed to be coming mostly from the newly drilled production leg.
Operations to recover the damaged production leg with an industry standard
chemical treatment will be considered in the future. Additionally, on September
27, 2016 the pump in well RRG-1 suffered a sheared coupling and was back on line
in early November.
-10-
Additional production is now planned from well RRG-5, an idle
well with significant permeability that has been used for injection in the past.
Flow testing and reservoir modeling was performed during the 4
th
quarter of 2016 to evaluate the well for conversion to production. Flow test
results showed an initial flowing temperature of over 249°F, which is expected
to increase to approximately 265°F once under production. Reservoir modeling
shows that RRG-5 is capable of producing up to 1,000 gpm, yielding approximately
1.5 to 2 additional net megawatts of generation from the plant. A production
pump has been ordered, and is expected to be installed by the end of the first
quarter 2017. Generation is expected to ramp up during the second quarter as the
production wellfield is rebalanced to maximize its output. Additional sources of
geothermal fluid from other wells on the project are also under study to further
increase the generation level of the plant.
Well RRG-9, which has been used as part of an $11.4 million
thermal stimulation grant funded primarily by the Department of Energy, has
significantly increased the injection capacity to 1,200 gallons per minute from
an original level of 20 gallons per minute. This increase in injection capacity
can provide all of the additional volume needed to accept the flow from well
RRG-5 without requiring any new drilling.
The PPA for the project was signed on September 24, 2007 with
the Idaho Power Company and allows for the sale of up to 13 megawatts of
electricity on an annual average basis. The PPA has a 25 year term with a
starting average price for the year 2007 of $52.50 that escalates at 2.1% per
year through 2020 and then at 0.6% per year until the end of the contract in
2034. The Idaho Power PPA has a seasonal pricing structure that pays 120% of the
average price for four months (July, August, November, December), 100% of the
average price for five months (January, February, June, September, October) and
73.5% of the average price for three months (March, April, May). The annual
average price paid under the PPA for 2016 was $63.30 per megawatt-hour, and for
2017 the price has increased to $64.63.
In addition to the price paid for energy by Idaho Power, Raft
River Unit I currently receives $4.75 per megawatt-hour under a separate
contract for the sale of Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) to Holy Cross Energy,
a Colorado electric cooperative. Starting in calendar year 2018, 51% of the RECs
produced by the project will be owned by the Idaho Power Company and 49% by the
project. For the 49% of RECs owned by the Raft River project, a new, 10 year REC
contract with the Public Utility District No. 1 of Clallam County, Washington
will replace the current contract, also in 2018.
Material Projects Under
Development/Exploration
In addition to our projects in operation, we have projects
under development and under exploration. Projects under development have at
least a geothermal resource discovery or may have wells in place, but require
the drilling of new or additional production and injection wells in order to
supply enough geothermal fluid sufficient to operate a commercial power plant.
Projects under exploration do not have a geothermal resource discovery
occurrence yet, but have significant thermal and other physical evidence that
warrants the expenditure of capital in search of the discovery of a geothermal resource. Due to inflation and
marketplace increases in the costs of labor and construction materials,
estimates of property development costs may be low.
-11-
A summary of projects under development and under exploration
is as follows:
Projects Under Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
Projected
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
Development
|
Commercial
|
Required
|
Power
|
Project
|
Location
|
Ownership
|
(Megawatts)
|
Operation Date
|
($million)
|
Purchaser
|
Raft River
|
Idaho
|
100%
|
1-3
|
1
st
Quarter 2017
|
4
|
IDPC
|
Neal Hot Springs
|
Oregon
|
60%
|
3
|
3
rd
Quarter 2017
|
10
|
IDPC
|
San Emidio Phase II
|
Nevada
|
100%
|
35-45
|
4
th
Quarter 2019*
|
145
|
TBD
|
WGP Geysers
|
California
|
100%
|
30
|
4
th
Quarter 2018*
|
150
|
TBD
|
El Ceibillo Phase I
|
Guatemala
|
100%
|
25
|
2
nd
Quarter 2019*
|
140
|
TBD
|
Crescent Valley Phase I
|
Nevada
|
100%
|
25
|
2
nd
Quarter 2020*
|
130
|
TBD
|
|
* - Commercial operation dates are projections only.
Actual dates can only be provided after power purchase agreements have
been obtained.
|
|
Properties Under Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Development
|
Project
|
|
Location
|
|
Ownership
|
|
*(Megawatts)
|
Gerlach
|
|
Nevada
|
|
67.4%
|
|
10
|
Vale
|
|
Oregon
|
|
100%
|
|
15
|
El Ceibillo Phase II
|
|
Guatemala
|
|
100%
|
|
25
|
Neal Hot Springs II
|
|
Oregon
|
|
100%
|
|
10
|
Raft River Phase II
|
|
Idaho
|
|
100%
|
|
13
|
Crescent Valley Phase II
|
|
Nevada
|
|
100%
|
|
25
|
Crescent Valley Phase III
|
|
Nevada
|
|
100%
|
|
25
|
Lee Hot Springs
|
|
Nevada
|
|
100%
|
|
20
|
Ruby Hot Springs Phase I
|
|
Nevada
|
|
100%
|
|
20
|
|
* - Target development sizes are predevelopment estimates
of resource potential of unproven resources. The estimates are based on
our evaluation of available information regarding temperature, and where
available, flow.
|
|
-12-
Property Details
|
|
|
Property Size
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(square
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
miles)
|
|
Temperature (
º
F)
|
|
Depth (Ft)
|
|
Technology
|
Neal Hot Springs
|
|
9.6
|
|
286-311
|
|
2,500-3,000
|
|
Binary
|
San Emidio
|
|
27.9
|
|
289-316
|
|
1,500-3,000
|
|
Binary
|
Raft River
|
|
10.8
|
|
275-302
|
|
4,500-6,000
|
|
Binary
|
Gerlach
|
|
4.7
|
|
338-352
|
|
2,000-3,000
|
|
Binary
|
El Ceibillo
|
|
38.6
|
|
410-526
|
|
1,800-TBD
|
|
Steam/Flash
|
WGP Geysers
|
|
6.0
|
|
380-598
|
|
6,000-10,000
|
|
Steam
|
Crescent Valley
|
|
33.3
|
|
326-351
|
|
2,000-3,000
|
|
Binary
|
Lee Hot Springs
|
|
4.0
|
|
280-320
|
|
1,250-5,000
|
|
Binary
|
Ruby Hot Springs
|
|
3.3
|
|
315-340
|
|
1,670-4,500
|
|
Binary
|
Vale
|
|
0.6
|
|
290-300
|
|
2,450-5,000
|
|
Binary
|
Binary Cycle Geothermal Power Plants
In a binary
cycle geothermal power plant hot water is produced to a piping and gathering
system from wells drilled into the geothermal reservoir. The hot water flows,
with to a heat exchanger called a vaporizer where it vaporizes a secondary
working fluid, with its heat extracted, causing the original hot water to become
cool. All of the cooled water is then pumped to injection wells where it is
injected back into the reservoir to help recharge the geothermal reservoir. The
vaporized working fluid passes through a turbine which drives an electrical
generator that is tied into the electrical transmission grid. Upon discharging
the turbine the secondary working fluid is condensed before piping it back to
the vaporizer where the process is repeated.
Dry Steam Geothermal Power Plants
An example of a
vapor dominated geothermal system is at The Geysers in central California. Dry
super-heated steam is produced from wells through a piping system and run
directly through a turbine. The turbine drives an electrical generator that
delivers power to the electrical transmission grid. Steam discharges from the
turbine into a condenser where it is condensed forming water. The water is
pumped to a cooling tower where it can be used as water for the cooling process.
The cooled water from the cooling tower is recycled back to the condenser to
repeat the process. Any excess water from the cooling tower is
pumped through a piping system to injection wells where it is injected back into
the reservoir which helps to recharge the geothermal reservoir.
-13-
Flash Geothermal Power Plants
In hot water
geothermal systems (temperatures greater than approximately 400 degrees
Fahrenheit), flash production systems are often used. The hot water is produced
from wells drilled into the geothermal reservoir. The hot water from the various
production wells is piped to a flash tank where the pressure is reduced. The
reduction in pressure in the flash tank causes part of the hot water to flash to
form steam and part to remain as water. The flash tank also acts a separator,
separating the steam from the water. The hot water separated from the steam is
pumped through a pipeline system to injection wells and injected into the
reservoir for reservoir recharge. The steam coming off the flash tank/separator
is piped directly to a turbine where the process is identical to that used for
dry steam geothermal power plants.
-14-
El Ceibillo Phase I, Republic of Guatemala
A
geothermal energy rights concession, located 14 kilometers southwest of
Guatemala City, was awarded to U.S. Geothermal Guatemala S.A., a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company in April 2010. The concession agreement contains a
schedule that requires the development and construction of a power plant. In
July 2015, the Guatemalan Ministry of Energy and Mines approved a modified
construction schedule that extended the development and construction period to
June 1, 2018. There are 24,710 acres (100 square kilometers) in the concession,
which is at the center of the Aqua and Pacaya twin volcano complex.
Production well EC-5 was completed to a depth of 1,450 feet
(442 meters) on August 20, 2016 and intersected a high permeability zone at
1,299 feet (396 meters). EC-5 underwent a series of flow tests, with field wide
monitoring, beginning on September 5th and ran until September 13th. Data was
collected from three monitoring wells during the test (EC-2A, EC-3, and EC-4) to
provide pressure data for the reservoir model. Fluid samples taken at the end of
the flow test indicate a potential reservoir temperature of 450 to 523°F (232 to
273°C).
With the shallow, commercial resource now indicated, a deep
well is planned in 2017 to test the producing structure down dip from well EC-5
to a projected depth of 1,970 to 2,300 feet (600-800 meters). A deeper
intersection in the reservoir could increase the reservoir capacity and
production temperature, and change the design of the power plant. Well EC-1,
which was drilled in 2013 to a depth of 5,650 feet (1,722 meters) found a
measured bottom-hole temperature of 526°F (274°C), but did not intersect
permeability. The comparative geology between EC-5 and EC-1 suggests a fault or
other structure feeding the reservoir may be located in the area between the two
wells.
On January 10, 2017, the Guatemalan government, through the
National Electrical Energy Commission (COMISIÓN NACIONAL DE ENERG¥A
ELÉCTRICACNEE),
announced that it is preparing to issue an RFP later
this year for 420 megawatts of power, of which 40 megawatts is to be reserved specifically for geothermal energy.
When the RFP is issued, the El Ceibillo project will be bid into the
process.
-15-
San Emidio Phase II, Nevada
The Phase II expansion
is dependent on successful development of additional production and injection
well capacity. We expect that approximately 75% of the Phase II development may
be funded by non-recourse project debt, with the remainder funded through equity
financing. We anticipate the project qualifying for the 30% Federal Investment
Tax Credit, which when monetized, can meet most of the equity financing
requirements.
The updated reservoir model (announced January 11, 2017)
resulted in a significant increase in the potential size of the San Emidio Phase
II reservoir of up to 47 net megawatts. Data from flow tests that took place in
late 2016 from two wells were incorporated into a Probabilistic Power Density
model, which estimates the Net generation potential of a reservoir. The power
density model is not a Monte Carlo style heat in place estimate. Based on the
flow rate and temperature produced by the two wells, and by measurement of
pressure response both in the wells and across the wellfield, the model
estimates that the Most Likely Outcome (50% probability) is 47 net megawatt of
generation capacity within a 1.4 square mile area. The Minimum level of
generation capacity (90% probability) occurs in a 0.18 square mile area, and has
18.8 net megawatts of generation capacity.
These two wells are approximately 1,700 feet apart, along the
new structural trend identified in the Southwest Zone which is still open for
expansion. Temperature gradient well data and seismic information indicate a
potential strike length for the Southwest Zone of up to 2,700 feet. This
compares to a strike length for the primary producing wellfield at San Emidio
Phase I of 800 feet, suggesting the potential for a much larger resource in this
Southwest Zone. Permits to deepen three remaining temperature gradient wells
were received from the Bureau of Land Management in December 2016. These three
wells will be deepened to the targeted reservoir depth to further explore the
Southwest Zone when weather allows. If successful, it could extend the length of
the productive reservoir by 1,000 feet.
The three power plant units that were purchased in 2016 are
available to provide this project with the major, long lead equipment
requirements for 35-45 net megawatts of power (depending upon cooling system
used). The increased San Emidio II reservoir capacity with a 320°F+ temperature
fits the design range of the equipment. These new, unused components represent
approximately 70% of the equipment needed for a complete facility similar to the
Companys Neal Hot Springs operation.
Given the larger resource capacity at San Emidio II, we have
cancelled our Small Generator Interconnection Agreement that was completed in
2016, and are preparing to apply for a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement
in support of the higher expected output. Additionally, transmission studies
that contemplate power sales into Southern California will also be conducted,
since there is now a transmission path from Northern Nevada going south on the
new 500KV, 800 megawatt transmission line that was completed in January 2014.
In July 2016, the Company was awarded a $1.5 million Department
of Energy cost share grant under the Development of Technologies for Sensing,
Analyzing, and Utilizing Novel Subsurface Signals in Support of the Subsurface Technology and
Engineering (SubTER) Crosscut Initiative. The program approved under the
grant includes using new subsurface technologies at both San Emidio and Crescent
Valley to identify fluid flow paths in the geothermal resource. The data
collection phase of the program was completed at San Emidio in December. The
data is being interpreted to determine whether viable targets have been
identified. Upon approval from the DOE, a second phase of the grant program is
designed to confirm the findings by drilling. The total program cost is $1.9
million with the Company providing $400,000 in cost share.
-16-
WGP Geysers, California
The WGP Geysers project is
located in the broader Geysers geothermal field located approximately 75 miles
north of San Francisco, California. The broader Geysers geothermal field is the
largest producing geothermal field in the world generating more than 850
megawatts of power for more than 30 years. Acquisition of the WGP Geysers
Project from Ram Power was completed on April 22, 2014 for $6.4 million. We
expect that approximately 75% of the development may be funded by non-recourse
project debt, with the remainder funded through equity financing. We anticipate
the project qualifying for the 30% Federal Investment Tax Credit, which when
monetized can meet most of the equity financing requirements.
The Conditional Use Permit from Sonoma County, which approves
the construction plan for the WGP Geysers power plant, was received on December
16, 2016. Combined with the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement that was
received from the California Independent System Operator and Pacific Gas &
Electric, this completes the long lead permits and agreements that are needed
for the project. Once final engineering design is finished, and a PPA is
executed, an air quality permit and building permit will be needed before on
site construction will begin.
We received the signed Large Generator Interconnection
Agreement for the project on March 6, 2016 with the California Independent
System Operator and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). This agreement allows
the project to connect to the transmission grid and deliver up to 35 megawatts
of energy. The Company has paid the total interconnection cost of $1.9 million
for the grid operators portion of the work in the substation. An additional 1.7
mile long transmission line will be required to connect from the plant to the
substation. PG&E has undertaken engineering studies to determine the cost
for the line.
Engineering optimization of the new, hybrid power plant design
is continuing and budgetary quotes for the major equipment have been received.
Our engineers and consultants are working in concert with EPC contractors to
examine all aspects of the construction cycle with a focus on reducing
construction costs. The hybrid design will dramatically increase the volume of
water available for injection back into the reservoir, which will result in
increased power generation over the life of the project. Traditional water
cooled geothermal steam plants re-inject approximately 20 to 25% of the water
that is extracted from the steam, while a hybrid design may re-inject 65% or
more of the water. This higher injection rate will provide longer term, stable
steam production, and will result in increased power generation over the life of
the project.
Based on flow test data generated from well flow testing
performed in mid-2015, a third party expert reported in September 2015, that the
four production wells already drilled are capable of delivering an initial
capacity of 28.1 MW (gross) or 25.4 MW (net) based on current power plant steam conversion rates from a detailed design for a 28.8 MW
(net) power plant. These tests show the wells would initially produce a combined
total of 458,000 pounds per hour. Using the average steam production rate from
these wells and an assumed interference factor of 30%, the third party expert
estimates that an additional two to three production wells would be needed to
support the long term operation of a 28.8 MW (net) plant.
-17-
Recent discussions have been held with a number of potential
power purchasers in California for the generation from the WGP Geysers plant and
are continuing. Interest has been expressed by a number of them for base load,
renewable power to replace fossil fuel based power generation that is being
phased out of some of their portfolios.
Crescent Valley Phase I, Nevada
The Crescent Valley
prospect consists of approximately 21,300 acres (33.3 square miles) of private
and Federal geothermal leases. It is located in Eureka County, Nevada,
approximately 15 miles south of the Beowawe geothermal power plant and about 33
miles southeast of Battle Mountain. The project was acquired as part of the
Earth Power Resources merger which was completed in December 2014.
In light of federal legislation that extended the qualification
for the 30% Investment Tax Credit to projects that began construction prior to
December 31, 2014, drilling of the first production/injection well CVP-001
(67-3) was initiated in December of 2014, following completion of gravity
surveys, and analysis of prior temperature gradient drilling data. Well CVP-001
was completed on March 27, 2015 to a depth of 2,746 feet. The well exhibited
modest permeability with a flowing temperature of 213°F, which makes the well
suited for duty as an injection well. The next phase of development work is in
the planning stages and is currently on hold due to market conditions.
This project is expected to benefit from the Department of
Energy cost share grant awarded in July 2016. The details of this award are
discussed in the San Emidio Phase II project discussion above.
Gerlach, Nevada
The Gerlach Joint Venture, located
adjacent to the town of Gerlach in Washoe County, Nevada is made up of both
private and BLM geothermal leases. The Peregrine well, a historic exploration
slim hole that encountered a lost circulation zone at a depth of 975 feet, was
redrilled in 2010 and the hole was opened from a 6.5 inch diameter well to a
12.5 inch diameter well. Lost circulation was confirmed within three zones
through the 900 to 1,024 foot interval. The well was stopped at 1,070 feet total
depth. Temperature surveys and a short clean out flow test were conducted on the
well. The well flowed at an estimated 300-400 gallons per minute and the flowing
temperature was 208°F. Geochemistry indicates an average potential source
temperature of 374°F for the Gerlach site.
Drilling commenced on observation well 18-10a on October 30,
2014. 18-10a is a twin well to a well originally drilled in 1994 (the 18-10
well). The upper section of the well was drilled to 826 feet deep and an 8 inch
liner was cemented in place. Temperature measurements in the well have provided
the highest measured temperature in the field to date at 268°F within 160 feet
of surface and a temperature gradient of 6.4°F per 100 in the bottom section of
the hole. There are two previously identified lost circulation targets from the
original well at 1,600 and 2,800 feet deep that will be targeted when drilling
is resumed.
-18-
Drilling resumed on well 18-10a on April 14, 2012 and was
stopped on April 18, 2012 at 1,943 feet deep. Circulation was lost in minor
zones at 1,530 and 1,595 feet deep. Drilling resumed again on well 18-10a on
August 14, 2014, and was completed in late November. The well was drilled to a
total depth of 2,889 feet and encountered a maximum temperature of 275°F.
Further work is dependent upon additional funding from the partners.
Vale, Oregon
The property consists of 368 acres of
geothermal energy and surface rights located in Malheur County, located
approximately one-half mile east of the town of Vale, Oregon. The property is
within the Vale Butte geothermal resource area and provides the opportunity to
evaluate development of a known resource. A prolific, shallow reservoir located
along the north edge of the leasehold area has been used for many years in an
agricultural drying facility and a mushroom growing operation.
An extensive database of geophysical and geological information
from previous geothermal exploration in the Vale Butte area was used in the
evaluation of the prospect. Geochemical analysis of samples taken from shallow
hot wells results in a calculated geothermometer that indicates a potential
reservoir temperature of 311°F to 320°F. Past exploration drilling near the site
by Trans Pacific Geothermal and Sandia National Laboratory encountered
temperatures in excess of 300°F in the basement rocks. The leases for this
project were acquired in January and February 2014.
Raft River Phase II, Idaho
In 2011, the Raft River
Phase II project was awarded an $11.4 million cost-shared, thermal stimulation
program grant from the Department of Energy with the University of Utah Energy
And Geoscience Institute as the project lead. The goal of the project is to
create an Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) by creating thermal fractures and
developing a corresponding increase in permeability in the low permeability
rock. Well RRG-9 was made available for the program and the first stage of
injection into the well began in June 2013.
Initially the well was only capable of receiving 20 gallons per
minute (gpm) of water due to the low permeability of the rock. After several
moderate pressure stimulations, the injection of cold power plant discharge
fluid was started and has continued to date. The lower temperature fluid causes
thermal fracturing within the higher temperature host rock of the reservoir. At
the current plant generation level, the flow into the well has continued to
increase and is now approximately 1,200 gpm.
Well RRG-9 continues to be used temporarily as an injection
well as an extension of the DOE EGS program, which is expected at this time to
continue through until mid-2017. The Companys contributions for the thermal
stimulation program are made in-kind by the use of the RRG-9 well, well field
data provided by the Company, and through ongoing monitoring support.
-19-
Lee Hot Springs, Nevada
Lee Hot Springs is in
Churchill County, 18 miles south of Fallon. The area was originally explored by
Occidental Geothermal Company, a subsidiary of the oil company Occidental
Petroleum Corporation. The project is comprised of 2,560 acres (four square
miles) of BLM leases. ENEL Green Energy, a subsidiary of ENEL Group, the Italian
based, multi-national power company, has completed a 15 megawatt binary plant at
Salt Wells, 6 miles to the east of Lee. The project was acquired as part of the
Earth Power Resources merger which was completed in November 2014.
Dating back to 1930, the area has had numerous water wells,
thermal gradient holes, and geothermal slim hole tests. From 1977-1982
Occidental Geothermal, Inc. drilled four temperature gradient holes to depths of
500 feet, two stratigraphic test wells to 2,000-3,000 feet, and one
large-diameter production test to 3,000 feet (well 72-33). The 3,000 foot test
well flowed 280°F hot water from a zone at 1,200 ft. The A33-4 well, 1,000 feet
southwest of well 72-33, was drilled to 2,400 feet and reportedly had
temperatures in excess of 300°F and a steadily increasing temperature gradient.
The Great Basin Research Institute has had the leasehold mapped
in detail, showing several large silica deposits. The reservoir temperature has
been estimated using geochemistry as ranging from 320°F to 340°F by the US
Geological Survey and other sources in the 1970s.
Ruby Hot Springs, Nevada
The property is located 30
miles southwest of Elko. EPR filed a BLM lease application for 2,140 acres in
February 2001 and the lease application was rejected by the BLM in December 2005
due to cultural issues. The decision was appealed to the Interior Board of Land
Appeals (IBLA) and the IBLA remanded the application back to the BLM for
further action. No further action has been taken by BLM on issuance of the lease
pending the completion of cultural and ethnographic studies that are required
for further review. The project was acquired as part of the Earth Power
Resources merger which was completed in November 2014.
The area around Ruby was first leased by Union Oil Company (now
Chevron) in the late 1970s. A 3,149 foot test well was drilled and reportedly
flowed at over 300°F. A second well in the area, Ruby Valley 65-10, was drilled
to 1,075 feet deep and encountered lost circulation zones, but no temperature
data is available. In the early 1980s, Aminoil drilled twelve 500 foot deep
temperature gradient wells and two 1,000 foot stratigraphic test wells. Data
from these wells have been incorporated into generalized heat-flow contour maps
of the area.
Employees
At December 31, 2016, the Company had 48 full-time and one part
time employees (14 administrative and project development, and 35 field and
plant operations). The Company continuously considers acquisition opportunities,
and if the Company is successful in making acquisitions, additional management
and administrative staff may be added.
The Company did not experience any labor disputes or labor
stoppages during the current fiscal year.
-20-
Principal Products
The principal product is based upon activities related to the
production of electrical power from the utilization of the Companys geothermal
resources. The primary product will be the direct sale of power generated by our
interests in our geothermal power plants. Currently, our principal revenues
consist of energy sales and energy credit sales. All power plants currently in
operation, as well as all sites under exploration or development, are sites
located in the Western United States or in the Republic of Guatemala in Central
America.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
Geothermal energy is natural heat energy stored within the
Earths crust at economically accessible depth. In some areas of the Earth,
economic concentrations of heat energy result from a combination of geological
conditions that allow water to penetrate into hot rocks at depth, become heated,
and then circulate to a near surface environment. In these settings,
commercially viable extraction of the geothermal energy and its conversion to
electricity become possible and a geothermal resource is present.
There are four major components (or factors) to a geothermal
resource:
|
1.
|
Heat source and temperature
The economic
viability of a geothermal resource is related to the amount of heat
generated. The higher the temperature, the more valuable the geothermal
resource.
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Fluid
A geothermal resource is commercially
viable only when the system contains water and/or steam as a medium to
transfer the heat energy to the surface.
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Permeability
The fluid present underground must
be able to move. In general, significant porosity and permeability within
the rock formation are needed to create a viable reservoir.
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Depth
The cost of development increases with
depth, as do resource temperatures. The proximity of the reservoir to the
surface is therefore a key factor in the economic valuation of a
geothermal resource.
|
Electrical power is directly produced through the utilization
of geothermal resources; however, these resources are not a direct component of
the final product.
Unless major geological changes occur that impact the
geothermal reservoirs, the condition of the existing resources is expected to
remain relatively consistent over time.
-21-
Significant Government Permits
The Company maintains all permits necessary for operating its
three plants located in Idaho, Nevada and Oregon. In addition, in December 2016
the Company received the primary operating permit necessary for construction and
operation of the WGP Geysers project.
Neal Hot Springs, Oregon.
The Neal Hot Springs project
has four primary permits governing power plant operations. The permits include:
|
1.
|
Geothermal Well Permits issued by the Department of
Geology.
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
A Right-of-Way issued by the Bureau of Land
Management.
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
A Conditional Use Permit issued by the Malheur County
Commission.
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Underground Injection Control Permit issued by the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality.
|
San Emidio, Nevada.
The San Emidio project has five
primary permits governing power plant operations. The permits include:
|
1.
|
Geothermal well permits issued by the Nevada Division of
Minerals.
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
A Special Use Permit issued by the Washoe County Board of
Commissioners.
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
An Air Quality Permit to Operate from Washoe
County.
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
A Surface Discharge Permit from Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection.
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
An Underground Injection Permit from Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection.
|
Raft River, Idaho.
The Raft River project has four
primary permits governing power plant operations. The permits include:
|
1.
|
Geothermal well permits issued by the Idaho Department of
Water Resources.
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
A Conditional Use Permit issued by the Cassia County
Planning and Zoning Commission.
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Air Quality Permit to Construct issued by the Idaho
Department of Environmental Quality.
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
A Wastewater Reuse Permit issued by the Idaho Department
of Environmental Quality.
|
WGP Geysers, California
. Western GeoPower had previously
been issued all necessary permits for construction and operation of up to a 38.5
megawatt geothermal power plant. The Sonoma County Conditional Use Permit
administratively expired in 2015. A new Conditional Use was issued in December
2016 for an initial term of 10 years including administrative extensions of 5
years. The primary permits include:
|
1.
|
Geothermal well permits for production and injection
wells issued by the California Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal
Resources.
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
A Conditional Use Permit that has been issued by the
Sonoma County.
|
-22-
|
3.
|
Air Quality Permit to Construct issued by the Northern
Sonoma Air Quality Board.
|
Seasonality of Business
The Company has been producing energy revenues under the terms
of three PPAs. Two of these contracts specify favorable rate periods and all
three plants experience changes in levels of production through the year. The
Raft River Energy I LLC (Raft River, Idaho) and USG Oregon LLC (Neal Hot
Springs, Oregon) contracts pay higher rates in the months of July/August and
November/December. Energy production can be influenced by the seasonal
temperatures. The Companys binary geothermal plants can operate more
efficiently in cooler temperatures. Cooler temperatures facilitate the cooling
process of the secondary fluid that is used to power the turbines. The Neal Hot
Springs plant, since it utilizes air cooling rather than water cooling, is
impacted more in the summer (lower generation) than the Raft River or San Emidio
plants. Neal Hot Springs produces higher generation in the winter. Drilling and
other construction activities can be negatively impacted by inclement weather
that can occur, primarily, during the winter months.
Industry Practices/Needs for Working Capital
The Company is heavily involved in exploration and development
operations. Once the decision is made to construct a project, high levels of
working capital are committed, either directly or indirectly to the construction
efforts. After a plant becomes commercially operational and the necessary
operating reserves have been funded, the needs for working capital are typically
low. The Company is expecting to be significantly involved in exploration and
development activities for the next 5 to 10 years.
Dependence on a Few Customers
Ultimately, the market for electrical power is vast; however,
the numbers of entities that can physically, logistically and economically
purchase the commodity in large quantities are limited. The Companys primary
revenues originate from energy sales and the sale of energy credits. Currently,
the Company generates energy revenues and energy credits from three sources.
Idaho Power Company purchases energy generated by both Raft River Energy I LLC
and USG Oregon LLC. NV Energy purchases energy from USG Nevada LLC. Energy
credits earned by Raft River plant are sold to Holy Cross Energy. Under the
current PPAs, energy credits that are earned by USG Oregon LLC and USG Nevada
LLC plants are bundled with energy sales. Based upon current operations and
expected project completions, it is expected that the Company will have a small
number of direct customers that may amount to less than 10 over the next 5 to 10
years.
-23-
Competitive Conditions
Although the market for different forms of energy is large and
dominated by very powerful players, we perceive our industrial competition to be
independent power producers and in particular those producers who provide
green renewable power. Our definition of green power is electricity derived
from a source that does not pollute the air, water or earth. Sources of green
power, in addition to geothermal, include wind, solar, biomass and run-of-the
river hydroelectric. A number of states have instituted renewable portfolio
standards (RPS) that require utilities and retail sellers of electricity to
purchase a minimum percentage of their power from renewable sources. For
example, RPS statutes in California require 50% by 2030, Oregon requires 50% by
2040 and Nevada requires 25% by 2015. According to the Department of Energys
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy department, approximately 38 states
nationwide have established renewable portfolio standards or goals encouraging
the procurement of green, renewable power. As a result, we believe green power
is an important sub-market in the broader electric market, in which many power
purchasers are increasing or committing to increase their investments.
Accordingly, the conventional energy producers do not provide direct
competition.
In the Pacific Northwest there are currently only two
commercial geothermal facilities, both operated by the Company. There are a
number of wind farms, as well as biomass and run-of-the river hydroelectric
facilities. However, the Company believes that the combination of greater
reliability and the baseload generation profile provided by geothermal power,
with access to infrastructure for deliverability, and a low "full life" cost of
power will allow geothermal to successfully compete for long term PPAs.
Factors that can influence the overall market for our product
include some of the following:
-
number of market participants buying and selling electricity;
-
availability and cost of transmission;
-
availability of low cost natural gas as an alternate fuel source
-
amount of electricity normally available in the market;
-
fluctuations in electricity supply due to planned and unplanned outages of
competitors generators;
-
fluctuations in electricity demand due to weather and other factors;
-
cost of fuel used by generators, which could be impacted by efficiency of
generation technology and fluctuations in fuel supply;
-
environmental regulations that impact us and our competitors;
-
availability of production tax credits and other benefits allowed by tax
law;
-
relative ease or difficulty of developing and constructing new facilities;
and
-
credit worthiness and risk associated with buyers.
Environmental Compliance
Geothermal drilling, construction and power plant operations
are subject to federal, state and local environmental requirements and
construction oversight. Applicable laws may include but are not limited to the
Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy
Act, state specific geothermal drilling rules, state and
federal injection well requirements and standards and local building codes.
-24-
Prior to acquiring an existing geothermal development, USG
retains an independent, licensed engineer or geologist to conduct a Site
Assessment and evaluate the property and performs detailed due diligence to
minimize the potention of an unrecognized financial liability from being passed
to U.S. Geothermal Inc. or our subsidiaries.
Our geothermal operations involve significant quantities of
geothermal brine that is returned to the local subsurface, geologic formation.
We also use isopentane and R-134A refrigerant working fluids, and numerous
industrial lubricants that are considered contaminants if released or spilled.
We are not aware of any mismanagement of these materials and we are required to
promptly report any release of specified volumes of oil, lubricants, and
chemicals used in our operations.
The requisite approvals and permits for our operations have
been independently reviewed and verified prior to obtaining project financing.
Independent legal reviews have verified that USG and our subsidiaries are
operated in accordance with applicable laws. Existing laws and regulations may
be revised or reinterpreted, or new laws and regulations may become applicable
to us. Under those circumstances we work with the appropriate agency or entity
to ensure that our operations remain in compliance with the applicable rules. As
of the date of this memorandum, all of the permits and approvals required to
operate our plants have been obtained and are valid.
Neal Hot Springs, Oregon
The Neal Hot Springs
project is situated approximately 12 miles west of Vale, Oregon in an area with
two nearby residents. There are no unique plants or animal communities in the
area and no unique cultural or environmental constraints.
Because the power plant is air-cooled the only environmental
reporting required is a monthly production and injection report and an annual
water quality summary. Both reports are sent to the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality and Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.
Semi-annual water monitoring has been conducted since 2008 and will continue
throughout power plant operations. The Neal project files a quarterly energy
generation report with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. An independent
legal team has reviewed all regulatory requirements, permits and approvals for
the project.
Adjoining rangelands are privately and federally managed and
there are no rangeland or cropland management obligations.
The Neal project is in compliance with all environmental
permitting, monitoring and reporting requirements and has received no formal or
informal notices from any local, state, or federal agency.
San Emidio, Nevada
The San Emidio project is located
approximately 14 miles south of Gerlach Nevada. The nearest residence is over
four miles from the plant site.
-25-
The San Emidio staff files monthly, quarterly and annual water
reports with the Department of Environmental Protection and Department of Water
Resources. Similar to other projects San Emidios monthly geothermal production
and injection volumes are submitted the Division of Minerals and Division of
Environmental Protection. Water quality reporting is also submitted regularly to
the Division of Environmental Protection.
San Emidio is in compliance with all environmental permitting,
monitoring and reporting requirements and has received no formal or informal
notices from any local, state, or federal agency.
Raft River, Idaho
The Raft River project is located
approximately 12 miles south of Malta, Idaho in a rural agricultural area with
the nearest residence approximately two miles from the plant site. There are no
unique plants or animal communities in the area and no unique cultural or
environmental constraints.
Wastewater reuse requires a significant level of environmental
reporting and data management. Water quality data is collected a minimum of four
times annually. Monthly production and injection reports are filed with the
Idaho Department of Water Resources, a land application and cooling water
quality reports filed with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality and
Idaho Department of Water Resources annually. The Projects private lands are
managed on an ongoing basis for weed control, water management, irrigation, and
fencing infrastructure.
The Raft River project is in compliance with all environmental
permitting, monitoring and reporting requirements and has received no formal or
informal notices from any local, state, or federal agency.
WGP Geysers, California
The Geysers project is
located approximately 30 minutes north-east of the city of Healdsburg, CA. The
property encompasses a ridgetop and a north facing hillside that has been
developed and used for geothermal operations from l979 to l989. There are no
unique plant or animal communities on the project site and no unique cultural or
environmental constraints. The North Coast Regional Water Quality Board (NCRWQB)
has required, prior to new construction, that WGP submit a plan to remove or
reuse existing steam pipelines. The pipelines may contain mineral scale that has
arsenic levels that exceed 150 parts per million.
WGPs ongoing environmental reports include a monthly well
report that is filed with the California Department of Oil, Gas and Geothermal
Resources and an annual water quality report that is filed with the California
Regional Water Board.
The Geysers project is in compliance with all environmental
permitting, monitoring and reporting requirements and has received no formal or
informal notices from any local, state, or federal agency.
-26-
Gerlach, El Ceibillo, Crescent Valley, Lee Hot Springs, Ruby
Hot Springs, and Vale
No power plant operations are being conducted on
these properties at this time. The Company is in compliance with all
environmental and regulatory requirements and has received no formal or informal
notices from any local, state, or federal agency. There are no monthly,
quarterly, or annual reporting requirements associated with these projects.
Financial Information about Geographic Areas
The Company has interests in operational power plants in three
locations in the Western United States. The Raft River Energy I LLC power plant
is located in the southeastern part of the State of Idaho. Raft River Unit I
became operational on January 3, 2008. USG Nevada LLC constructed a new power
plant located in the northwestern part of the State of Nevada in the San Emidio
Desert. This power plant owned by USG Nevada LLC became commercially operational
May 25, 2012. The three units owned by USG Oregon LLC became commercially
operational November 16, 2012. These units are located in the Eastern part of
the State of Oregon near the Idaho border. A summary of total energy and energy
credit sales by location is as follows:
|
|
For
the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USG Oregon LLC located in
Eastern Oregon
|
$
|
19,561,718
|
|
$
|
18,823,799
|
|
USG Nevada LLC located in Northwestern Nevada
|
|
6,980,358
|
|
|
7,324,484
|
|
Raft River Energy I LLC
located in Southeastern Idaho
|
|
4,939,599
|
|
|
5,051,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy and energy credits sales
|
$
|
31,481,675
|
|
$
|
31,200,098
|
|
Financial Information about Business Segments
The Company has two reporting segments: operating plants and
corporate and development. For more information about the business segments,
please see Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements.
Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and periodic reports, proxy
statements and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). You may obtain and copy any document we file with the SEC at
the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580;Washington D.C.
20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the SECs Public Reference
Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet website
at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and other information
statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with
the SEC. Our SEC filings are accessible via the internet at that website.
We make available, free of charge through our Internet website
at http://www.usgeothermal.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after such
material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information on
our website is not incorporated into this report and is not a part of this
report.
-27-
Governmental Approvals and Regulations
The geothermal energy industry in the United States is
regulated by federal, state and local agencies and commissions. Those agencies
and commissions regulate geothermal drilling, power generation activities and
environmental protection through permitting, licensing and bonding requirements.
The following information is a general summary of the electric utility industry
and applicable regulations in the United States and is not a full statement of
the law or all issues pertaining to electric industry requirements.
Regulatory oversight of the industry can be broadly divided
between rules governing geothermal exploration and rules governing actual energy
generation, power sales and delivery. Geothermal fluid production is regulated
under federal and state rules and regulations that require permits for drilling
operations, geothermal fluid production and injection, and well abandonment.
Prior to drilling agencies will review plans and ensure that natural resource
values such as air, water, wildlife and vegetation are protected. Geothermal
energy generation is regulated under federal, state and local rules and
regulations. Permits are required for power plant construction and operation and
ensure that a project site is suitable and that natural resource values and
community concerns, if any, are evaluated and mitigated during the planning and
design phase.
Federal Electric Utility Industry Regulation
.
Electricity production and public utilities are regulated by both the
federal government and state utility commissions. State utility commissions
traditionally exercise their jurisdiction over an electric utilitys retail
operations. There are two primary pieces of federal legislation that have
governed public utilities since the 1930s, the Federal Power Act (FPA) and
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA). These statutes have been
amended and supplemented by subsequent legislation, including Public Utility
Regulatory Protection Act (PURPA), the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and Energy
Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005).
Federal Power Act
.
Pursuant to the FPA the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has exclusive jurisdiction over
the rates for most wholesale sales of electricity and transmission in interstate
commerce. These rates may be based on a cost of service approach or may be
determined on a market basis through competitive bidding or negotiation. FERC's
regulations under PURPA exempt owners of small power production Qualifying
Facilities that use geothermal resources as their primary source and other
Qualifying Facilities that are 30 megawatts or under in size from many
provisions of the FPA.
Under the FPA and FERCs regulations, the wholesale sale of
power at market-based or cost-based rates requires that the seller have
authorization issued by FERC to sell power at wholesale pursuant to a
FERC-accepted rate schedule. FERC grants market-based rate authorization based
on several criteria, including a showing that the seller and its affiliates lack
market power in generation and transmission, that the seller and its affiliates
cannot erect other barriers to market entry and that there is no opportunity for abusive transactions
involving regulated affiliates of the seller. All of the Companys facilities
are qualifying facilities and have been granted market-based rate authority to
make wholesale sales of electrical energy by FERC. For the Neal Hot Springs
power plant, USG Oregon files electronic quarterly reports of the contract and
transaction data.
-28-
Energy Policy Act of 2005
.
EPAct 2005
contains provisions to prohibit the manipulation of the electric energy and
natural gas markets and increase the ability of FERC to enforce and promote
compliance with the statutes, orders, rules, and regulations that FERC
administers. To implement the market manipulation provision of EPAct 2005, FERC
amended its regulations to prohibit a company, in connection with the purchase
or sale of natural gas, electric energy, or transportation or transmission
services subject to FERCs jurisdiction, from (1) using or employing any device,
scheme, or artifice to defraud, (2) declaring any untrue statement of a material
fact or omitting to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made,
not misleading, or (3) engaging in any act, practice, or course of business that
operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. The EPAct 2005
made a number of other changes to laws affecting the regulation of electricity.
These include, but are not limited to, giving FERC explicit authority to
proscribe and enforce rules governing market transparency, giving FERC authority
to oversee and enforce electric reliability standards, requiring FERC to
promulgate rules providing for incentive ratemaking to encourage investments
that promote transmission reliability and reduce congestion, giving FERC certain
siting authority for transmission lines in critical transmission corridors,
requiring FERC to promulgate rules granting incentives for transmission owners
to join Regional Transmission Organizations, authorizing FERC to require
unregulated utilities to provide open access transmission, and ensuring that
load serving entities can retain transmission rights necessary to serve native
load requirements. EPAct 2005 promulgated PUHCA 2005, which repeals PUHCA 1935,
effective as of February 8, 2006.
Public Utility Holding Company Act
.
Under
PUHCA 2005, the books and records of a utility holding company, its affiliates,
associate companies, and subsidiaries are subject to FERC and state commission
review with respect to transactions that are subject to the jurisdiction of
either FERC or the state commission or costs incurred by a jurisdictional
utility in the same holding company system. However, if a company is a utility
holding company solely with respect to Qualifying Facilities, exempt wholesale
generators, or foreign utility companies, it will not be subject to review of
books and records by FERC under PUHCA 2005. Qualifying Facilities that make only
wholesale sales of electricity are not subject to state commissions rate,
financial, and organizational regulations and, therefore, would not be subject
to any review of their books and records by state commissions pursuant to PUHCA
2005 as long as the Qualifying Facility is not part of a holding company system
that includes a utility subject to regulation in that state.
Our power plants are Qualifying Facilities that make only
wholesale sales of electricity and are not subject to rate, financial and
organizational regulations applicable to electric utilities in those states. The
power plants each sell their electrical output under power purchase agreements
to electric utilities. The utilities are regulated by their respective state
public utilities commissions. Neither USG nor our subsidiaries are considered
utility holding companies under FPA, FERC, the EPAct2005, or PUHCA2005 and those
regulations have had no direct adverse impact on our ability to develop
geothermal resources or deliver power under our contracts.
-29-
Geothermal Development Concession in
Guatemala
.
The following summary of certain aspects of the
electric industry in Guatemala should not be considered a full statement of the
laws of Guatemala or all of the issues pertaining thereto.
In Guatemala, the General Electricity Law of 1996, Decree
93-96, created a wholesale electricity market and established a new regulatory
framework for the electricity sector. The law created a regulatory commission,
the CNEE, and a new wholesale power market administrator, the AMM, for the
regulation and administration of the sector. The AMM is a private not-for-profit
entity. The CNEE functions as an independent agency under the Ministry of Energy
and Mines and is in charge of regulating, supervising, and controlling
compliance with the electricity law, overseeing the market and setting rates for
transmission services, and distribution to medium and small customers. All
distribution companies must supply electricity to such customers pursuant to
long-term contracts with electricity generators. Large customers can contract
directly with the distribution companies, electricity generators or power
marketers, or buy energy in the spot market. Guatemala has approved a Law of
Incentives for the Development of Renewable Energy Power plants, Decree 52-2003,
in order to promote the development of renewable energy power plants. This law
provides certain benefits to companies utilizing renewable energy, including a
10-year exemption from corporate income tax and an import tax exemption for
generation equipment, transmission lines and substation equipment. In September
2008, CNEE issued a resolution which approved the Technical Norms for the
Connection, Operation, Control and Commercialization of the Renewable
Distributed Generation and Self-producers Users with exceeding amounts of
energy. This technical norm was created to regulate all aspects of generation,
connection, operation, control and commercialization of electric energy produced
with renewable sources to promote and facilitate the installation of new
generation plants, and to promote the connection of existing generation plants
which have exceeding amounts of electric energy for commercialization. It is
applicable to projects with a capacity of up to 5 megawatts.
Environmental Credits
In the past several years, there has been increased demand for
energy generated from geothermal resources in the United States as production
costs for electricity generated from geothermal resources have become
competitive relative to fossil fuel generation. This is partly due to newly
enacted legislative and regulatory incentives, such as production tax credits
and state renewable portfolio standards. State renewable portfolio standards
laws require that an increasing percentage of the electricity supplied by
electric utility companies operating in states with such standards will be
derived from renewable energy resources until certain pre-established goals are
met. We expect increasing demand for energy generated from geothermal and other
renewable resources in the United States as additional states adopt or extend
renewable portfolio standards.
As a green power producer, environmental-related credits,
such as renewable energy credits or carbon credits, are also available for sale
to power companies (to allow them to meet their green power requirements) or
to businesses which produce carbon based pollution. In all of the Companys
projects, these credits have been sold separately, or bundled with the
electricity to provide an additional source of revenue.
-30-
We expect the following key incentives to influence our results
of operations:
Production Tax Credits and Investment Tax
Credits
.
A PTC provides project owners with a federal tax credit
for the first ten years of plant operation. The PTC enhances the annual revenues
of the projects by as much as 25 percent per year for the first 10 years.
Facilities that begin construction after December 31, 2016 will not be eligible
to use this production tax credit. The federal production tax credit available
for geothermal energy in 2014 was 2.3 cents per kilowatt-hour. Alternatively,
certain projects under construction before the end of 2016, are eligible to
elect to take a 30% ITC in lieu of the PTC. The ITC may be taken after the plant
has gone into operation and may be monetized. Both PTC and ITC credits require a
tax equity partner to monetize.
The WGP Geysers project, San Emidio II project, and the
Crescent Valley project all began construction prior to December 31, 2014, and
the Company believes all three projects currently qualify for the 30% ITC in
lieu of the PTC.
Renewable Energy Credits
.
Renewable Energy
Certificates, or RECs, are tradable environmental commodities that represent
proof that one megawatt-hour of electricity was generated from an eligible
renewable energy resource. A renewable energy provider is credited with one REC
for every 1,000 kilowatt-hours or one megawatt-hour of electricity it produces.
The electrical energy is fed into the electrical grid and the accompanying REC
can either be delivered to the purchaser of the power (bundled) or can be sold
on the open market providing the renewable energy producer with an additional
source of income.
On July 29, 2006, the Company signed a $4.6 million renewable
energy credits purchase and sales agreement with Holy Cross Energy, a Colorado
cooperative electric association. The agreement is capped at 87,600 RECs (10
megawatt s average over the year). Holy Cross Energy began purchasing the
renewable energy credits associated with the RREI power production on October
2007, and is expected to continue purchasing through 2017. Under the revised
RREI agreement, Idaho Power keeps all RECs above 87,600 RECs per year. In
addition, we retain 49% of the renewable energy credits associated with power
production from RREI after 2017 and Idaho Power retains the other 51%. We expect
to receive a majority of the annual revenue from the ten-year renewable energy
credits sales arrangement with Holy Cross Energy.
On December 10, 2010, a second REC contract was signed with
Public Utility District No. 1 of Clallam County, Washington. The term of the
agreement is from 2018 to 2034 and includes sales of an estimated 50,000
megawatt hours of RECs annually, representing the 49% ownership in RECs retained
by RREI under the Idaho Power PPA.
The PPAs for the existing San Emidio and Neal Hot Springs power
plants require the bundling of power sales and RECs. Therefore, under these
contracts all RECs are delivered with the net power sold to the utility.
-31-
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the
other information in this 10-K filing and related financial statements, before
deciding whether to invest in shares of our common stock. The occurrence of any
of the following risks, or other risks that are currently unknown or unforeseen
by us, or that we currently believe are not material, could harm our business,
financial condition, results of operation or growth prospects. In that case, you
may lose all or a portion of your investment.
We have organized the following risk factors into categories to
present related risks together. As a consequence of this, it is highly
recommended that you read this entire risk factor section completely. The risks
we have identified have been grouped into the following categories:
-
Risks Related to Our Business;
-
Risks Related to Our Growth;
-
Risks Related to Our Power Purchase Agreements;
-
Risks Related to Our Liquidity and Capital Resources;
-
Risks Related to Government Regulation;
-
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our geothermal power plants have numerous pieces of
equipment that are subject to breakdown or failure, many beyond our control.
Failure of critical equipment could have a material impact on electrical
generation and associated revenues.
Our financial performance depends on
the successful operation of our geothermal power plants, which are subject to
numerous operational risks that are outside of our control. The continued
operation of our geothermal power plants involves many risks, including
breakdown or failure of power generation equipment, transmission lines,
pipelines, pumps or other equipment or processes, and performance below expected
levels of output or efficiency. If any of these risks were to materialize, they
could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
A breakdown or failure in our geothermal power plants, our
power generation equipment, the transmission lines, pipelines, pumps or other
equipment or processes would also mean lost revenue because such a failure or
breakdown could prevent us from selling electricity to our customers. For
instance, because we rely on transmission lines owned by third parties to
deliver all of the power that we generate to the purchasers of our electricity,
any interruption in a transmission lines service could result in lost revenue.
Any such interruption in our ability to provide electricity to our customers on
a timely basis could therefore materially and adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
-32-
Our geothermal reserves could decline in the future.
Declines greater than those that we expect would reduce our electricity
production levels, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating
revenues.
We currently derive all of our revenue from geothermal
energy and anticipate that we will continue to generate substantially all of our
revenue from our current geothermal power plants for the next several years.
Electricity production from geothermal properties can decline as the water
resources in the earth are used, with the rate of water or temperature decline
depending on reservoir characteristics and our ability to re-inject water
effectively back into the earth. Therefore, we try to minimize the decline in
water and temperature of the water in the ground and maximize the resources that
we use to generate electricity. For each of our geothermal power plants, we
estimate the productivity of the geothermal resource and the expected decline in
productivity. We base our operating plans and financial models on these
estimates of resources. However, because the development and operation of
geothermal energy resources are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties,
the productivity of a geothermal resource may decline more than anticipated,
resulting in insufficient reserves being available for sustained generation of
the electrical power capacity desired. Factors that could adversely affect our
geothermal reserves and result in decline rates greater than we forecast
include, among others:
-
significant changes in the characteristic of the geothermal resource;
-
drilling in areas in and around our facilities by third parties; and
-
the total amount of recoverable reserves.
An unexpected decline in productivity of our geothermal
resources would therefore reduce the amount of electricity that we can produce
and, therefore, the revenue that we will be able to generate from our geothermal
resources.
We cannot assure you that our estimates of future
generation resources, production capacity and cash flows are accurate.
Estimates of future generation resources
and the
corresponding future net cash flows attributable to those resources are prepared
by independent engineers, geologists and geoscientists. There are numerous
uncertainties inherent in estimating these resources and the potential future
cash flows attributable to such resources. Reserve engineering is a subjective
process of estimating underground accumulations that cannot be measured in an
exact manner. The accuracy of an estimate of quantities of resources, or of cash
flows attributable to such resources, is a function of the available data,
assumptions regarding future electricity prices and expenditures for future
development and exploitation activities, and of engineering and geological
interpretation and judgment. In order to undertake these estimates and studies,
independent third parties must often rely to some extent on our own estimates
and data, which we believe are reasonable and accurate but which may ultimately
be proved to be incorrect. Actual future production, revenue, taxes, development
expenditures, operating and royalty expenses, quantities of recoverable
resources and the value of cash flows from such resources may vary significantly
from the assumptions and underlying information set forth herein. In addition,
different reserve engineers may make different estimates of resources and cash
flows based on the same available data. We cannot assure you that we will
accurately estimate the quantity or productivity of our geothermal resources.
Our results are subject to quarterly and seasonal
fluctuations.
Our results of operations are subject to seasonal
variations. This is primarily because some of our power plants receive higher
energy payments during certain summer and winter months. Some of our air cooled
power plants may also experience reduced generation during hot summer months due
to the lower differential between the temperature of the geothermal fluid and
the ambient surroundings. Such seasonal variations could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition, and cash flow.
-33-
If our operating results fall below the publics or analysts
expectations, the market price of our common stock can fall in such periods.
Operating hazards, natural disasters or other
interruptions of our geothermal power plant operations could result in potential
liabilities, which may not be fully covered by our insurance.
The
geothermal business involves certain operating hazards such as:
-
well blowouts;
-
casing deformation;
-
casing corrosion;
-
uncontrollable flows of steam and hot water;
-
spills, releases, and other accidental environmental impacts; and
-
induced seismic activity.
The occurrence of any one of the above may result in injury,
loss of life, suspension of operations, environmental damage and remediation
and/or governmental investigations and penalties.
In addition, all of our operations are susceptible to damage
from natural disasters, such as earthquakes and fires, which involve increased
risks of personal injury, property damage and service interruptions. Any of
these events could cause serious injuries, fatalities or property damage, which
could expose us to liabilities. The payment of any of these liabilities could
reduce, or even eliminate, the funds available for exploration, development and
acquisition, or could result in a loss of our properties. Our insurance policies
are subject to deductibles, limits and exclusions that are customary or
reasonable given the cost of procuring insurance, current operating conditions
and insurance market conditions. There can be no assurance that such insurance
coverage will continue to be available to us on an economically feasible basis,
nor that all events that could give rise to a loss or liability are insurable,
nor that the amounts of insurance will at all times be sufficient to cover each
and every loss or claim that may occur involving the operations of our assets.
If we incur substantial liability and the damages are not covered by insurance
or are in excess of policy limits, or if we incur liability at a time when we do
not have liability insurance, our business, results of operations and financial
condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Threats of terrorism and cyber-attacks could impact our
operations and could adversely affect our business and operating revenues.
We are subject to the potentially adverse operating and financial
effects of terrorist acts and threats, as well as cyberattacks. Our generation
and transmission facilities, information technology systems and other
infrastructure facilities could be directly or indirectly affected by such
activities. Terrorist acts or other similar events could harm our business by
limiting our ability to generate or transmit power and by delaying the
development of new generating facilities. These events could result in a
material decrease in revenues and significant additional costs to repair and
insure our assets. We operate in an industry that requires the continued
operation of sophisticated information technology systems vulnerable to security
breaches, and failures. Those breaches and events may result from acts of our
employees, contractors, or third parties. If our technology systems were to be
breached and we were unable to recover in a timely way, we would be unable to
fulfill critical business functions, which could adversely affect our business.
-34-
Our geothermal resource leases may terminate if not
placed into production, which could require us to enter into new leases or
secure rights to alternate geothermal resources, none of which may be available
on terms as favorable to us as any such terminated lease, if at all.
Most of our geothermal resource leases are originally for a
fixed term but provide for continuation for so long as we extract geothermal
resources in commercial quantities or pursuant to other terms of extension.
Most of the leases have been producing in commercial quantities for many
years. The land covered by a few of our periphery leases have yet to produce
commercial quantities of geothermal resources. Leases covering land that
remains undeveloped and does not produce geothermal resources in commercial
quantities may terminate. In the event that we determine that a terminated lease
is subsequently required for a project, we would need to enter into one or more
new leases in order to develop and exploit these geothermal resources. It may
not be possible to enter into new leases or these new leases could be on less
favorable financial terms than the prior leases, which could materially and
adversely affect our ability to achieve commercial success on the applicable
project.
Pursuant to the terms of our leases with the BLM, we are
required to conduct our operations on BLM-leased land in a workmanlike manner
and in accordance with all applicable laws and BLM directives and to take all
mitigating actions required by the BLM to protect the surface of and the
environment surrounding the relevant land. In the event of a default under any
BLM lease, or the failure to comply with such requirements, or any
non-compliance with any applicable regulations governing our use of the land,
the BLM may, thirty days after notice of default is provided to our relevant
project subsidiary, suspend our operations until the requested action is taken
or terminate the lease, either of which could materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.
Claims have been made that thermal fracturing and well
drilling at some geothermal plants may cause seismic activity and related
property damage.
There are approximately two-dozen steam geothermal
plants operating within a fifty-square-mile region known as The Geysers
located near the community of Anderson Springs, in Northern California, and
there is general agreement that the operation of these plants causes a generally
low level of seismic activity. Some residents in the Anderson Springs area have
asserted property damage claims against those plant operators. There are
significant issues whether the plant operators are liable, and to date no court
has found in favor of such claimants. While we do not believe the areas where
our current projects are located will present the same geological or seismic
risks, there can be no assurance that we would not be subject to similar claims
and litigation, which may adversely impact our operations and financial
condition.
As an SEC reporting company, failure to achieve and
maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could harm our
business and operating results and/or result in a loss of investor confidence in
our financial reports, which could in turn have a material and adverse effect on
our business and stock price.
We are required to document and test our
internal control over financial reporting so that our management can certify as
to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We cannot
be certain as to the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and
remediation actions, if any, related to internal controls and other SEC rules or
the impact of the same on our operations. The assessment of our internal control
over financial reporting will require us to expend significant management and
employee time and resources and incur significant additional expense.
-35-
During the course of our assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting, we may identify material weaknesses
in our internal control over financial reporting, as well as any other
significant deficiencies that may exist or hereafter arise or be identified,
which could harm our business and operating results, and could result in adverse
publicity, regulatory scrutiny and a loss of investor confidence in the accuracy
and completeness of our financial reports. In turn, this could have a materially
adverse effect on our stock price, and, if such weaknesses are not properly
remediated, could adversely affect our ability to report our financial results
on a timely and accurate basis. Although we believe we would be able to take
steps to remediate any material weaknesses we may discover, we cannot assure you
that this remediation would be successful or that additional deficiencies or
weaknesses in our controls and procedures would not be identified. Moreover, we
expect to continue to operate at a relatively low staffing level. Our control
procedures have been designed with this staffing level in mind; however, they
are highly dependent on each individuals performance of controls in the
required manner. The loss of accounting personnel, particularly our chief
financial officer, would adversely impact the effectiveness of our control
environment and our internal controls, including our internal control over
financial reporting.
Our participation in joint ventures is subject to risks
relating to working with a co-venturer
. We are subject to risks in
working with a co-venturer that could adversely impact our current projects as
well as anticipated development of expansion projects. Involving a joint
venturer may result in issues related to funding challenges, control issues, and
other general disputes. Its possible that the proposed project expansions may
utilize the geothermal resource within the current joint venture boundaries. Our
required contribution to the joint venture could also exceed returns from the
joint venture.
We are a holding company and our revenues depend
substantially on the performance of our subsidiaries and the projects they
operate.
We are a holding company whose primary assets are our ownership
of the equity interests in our subsidiaries. We conduct no other business and,
as a result, we depend entirely upon our subsidiaries earnings and cash flow.
Our subsidiaries and projects may be
restricted in their ability to pay
dividends, make distributions or otherwise transfer funds to us prior to the
satisfaction of other obligations, including the payment of operating expenses
or debt service.
Counterparty credit default could have an adverse effect
on the Company.
Our revenues are generated under contracts with various
counterparties. Results of operations would be adversely affected as a result of
non-performance by any of these counterparties of their contractual obligations
under the various contracts. A counterpartys default or non-performance could
be caused by factors beyond our control. A default could occur as a result of
circumstances relating directly to the counterparty, or due to circumstances
caused by other market participants having a direct or indirect relationship
with such counterparty. We seek to mitigate the risk of default by evaluating
the financial strength of potential counterparties and utilizing industry
standard credit provisions in our contracts, however, despite our mitigation
efforts, defaults by counterparties may occur from time to time, and this could
negatively impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Environmental liabilities and compliance costs could
adversely affect our financial condition.
The geothermal business is subject to environmental hazards,
such as leaks, ruptures and discharges of geothermal fluids and hazardous substances,
emissions of toxic gases and disposal of hazardous substances. These
environmental hazards could expose us to material liabilities for property
damages, personal injuries or other environmental harm, including costs of
investigating and remediating contaminated properties. In addition, we also may
be liable for environmental damages caused by the previous owners or operators
of properties we have purchased or are currently operating.
-36-
A variety of stringent federal, state and local laws and
regulations govern the environmental aspects of our business and impose strict
requirements for, among other things:
-
water extraction from surface streams and lakes;
-
well drilling or workover, operation and abandonment;
-
waste management;
-
injection well classifications;
-
land reclamation;
-
financial assurance, such as posting bonds; and
-
controlling air, water and waste emissions.
Any noncompliance with these laws and regulations could subject
us to material administrative, civil or criminal penalties or other liabilities
and could lead to a curtailment or shut down of one or more of our plants.
Additionally, our compliance with these laws may result in increased costs to
our operations or our exploration, acquisition and development of new plants or
may result in decreased production from our existing plants. We are unable to
predict the ultimate cost of complying with these regulations. Pollution and
similar environmental risks generally are not fully insurable.
We use industrial lubricants and other substances at our
projects that are or could become classified as hazardous substances. If any
hazardous substances are found to have been released into the environment at or
by the projects, we could become liable for the investigation and removal of
those substances, regardless of their source or time of release. If we fail to
comply with these laws, ordinances or regulations, we could be subject to civil
or criminal liability, the imposition of liens or fines, and large expenditures
to bring the projects into compliance. Furthermore, we can be held liable for
the cleanup of releases of hazardous substances at other locations where we
arranged for disposal of those substances, even if we did not cause the release
at that location. The cost of any remediation activities in connection with a
spill or other release of such substances could be significant.
Our geothermal facilities have been in operation for a
substantial length of time, and current or future local, state and federal
environmental and other laws and regulations may require substantial
expenditures to remediate the properties or to otherwise comply with these laws
and regulations.
We depend on our senior management, geothermal resource
and other technical employees. The loss of these employees could harm our
business.
Our future operating results depend to a large extent upon the
continued contribution of key senior managers and personnel.
-37-
Our success depends on the skills, experience and efforts of
our people, particularly our senior management, geothermal resource and other
technical employees. The geothermal industry is relatively small with a limited
number of individuals with the management, technical and operational expertise
necessary to run and operate facilities. In addition, many of our workers have
significant and unique knowledge on how to manage and operate geothermal
facilities. The loss of the services of one or more members of our senior
management or of numerous employees with critical skills could have a material
adverse effect upon us. As of the date of this report, the Company has executed
employment agreements with key senior managers, but does not have key-man
insurance on any of them.
There are some risks for which we do not or cannot carry
insurance.
Because our current operations are limited in scope, the
Company carries property, public liability insurance and directors and
officers liability coverage, but does not currently insure against other risks.
As its operations progress, the Company will acquire additional coverage
consistent with its operational needs, but the Company may become subject to
liability for pollution or other hazards against which it cannot insure or
cannot insure at sufficient levels or against which it may elect not to insure
because of high premium costs or other reasons.
Our officers and directors may have conflicts of
interests arising out of their relationships with other companies.
Several of our directors and officers serve (or may agree to serve) as
directors or officers of other companies or have significant shareholdings in
other companies. To the extent that such other companies may participate in
ventures in which the Company may participate, the directors may have a conflict
of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such
participation.
Risks Related to Our Growth
Our growth prospects depend in part on our ability to
further develop or acquire geothermal or other renewable energy power generation
facilities and resources, which are subject to substantial risks.
Because production from geothermal properties generally declines as both
water and temperature is depleted, with the rate of decline depending on
reservoir characteristics, our geothermal resources will decline as we continue
to produce electricity unless we conduct other successful exploration and
development activities or supplement the current amounts of water that we inject
into the reservoir with sufficient water from other sources, or both. The
acquisition and development of geothermal power generation facilities and
resources is complex, expensive, time consuming and subject to substantial
risks, many of which are outside of our control. In connection with the
development of geothermal power generation facilities and resources, we must:
-
identify suitable locations and appropriate technology;
-
secure rights to exploit the resources;
-
obtain sufficient capital and revenue sources;
-
obtain appropriate governmental permits;
-
maintain cost controls during construction;
-
identify, hire and retain a qualified work force;
-38-
-
obtaining Power Purchase Agreements; and
-
negotiating engineering, construction, and procurement agreements.
We may be unsuccessful in accomplishing any of these matters or
in doing so on a timely basis. In our exploration efforts, we may not find
commercially productive reservoirs or, if we do, the remote location of the
resource may hinder our access to markets or delay our production. In addition,
project development is subject to various environmental, engineering and
construction risks. Although we may attempt to minimize the financial risks in
the development of a power generation facility by obtaining all required
governmental permits and approvals and arranging adequate financing prior to the
commencement of construction, the development of a power project may require us
to expend significant sums for preliminary engineering, permitting, legal and
other expenses before we can determine whether a project is feasible,
economically attractive or financeable.
In addition, community opposition could delay or prevent us
from obtaining the necessary approvals The process for obtaining initial
environmental, siting and other governmental permits and approvals is
complicated and lengthy, often taking more than one year, and is subject to
significant uncertainties. If we are unable to complete the development of a
facility, we would most likely not recover any of our investment in the project.
We cannot assure you that we will be successful in the acquisition of additional
geothermal resources or development of power generation facilities in the future
or that we will be able to successfully complete construction of our facilities
currently in development, nor can we assure you that any of these facilities of
resources will be profitable or generate consistent and reliable cash flow.
We may decide not to implement, or may not be successful
in implementing, our 5 year strategic plan for the growth of the Company.
There are uncertainties and risks associated with the achieving our 5
year growth target. It is possible that we may not be successful in implementing
one or more elements of the plan. It is also possible that we may decide to
change, or not implement, one or more elements of the plan. The growth goals are
provided as a target only, as we do not have direct control over the timing
associated with the solicitation for power purchase agreements, transmission
interconnection agreements, or use permits allowing for the building of a new
power plant. These or other factors could mean that we decide to change or even
abandon, or are otherwise unable to implement, one or more elements of the plan.
Early stage project development costs may not be recovered, in whole or in part,
if one or more elements of the plan are not successfully implemented. These
costs could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition,
and cash flow and the price at which our common stock is traded.
Our business development activities may not be successful
and our projects under construction may not commence operation as scheduled.
We are in the process of developing and constructing a number of new
power plants. Our success in developing a particular project is contingent upon
successfully obtaining Power Purchase Agreements, satisfactorily negotiating
engineering, procurement, and construction agreements, obtaining required
permits, and securing adequate financing. These are followed by the satisfactory
completion of the power plant construction and commissioning. We may be
unsuccessful in accomplishing any of these tasks on a timely basis. Though we
try to minimize our expenses before we can determine whether a project is feasible, we may incur significant expense prior for
preliminary engineering, permitting and legal support prior to securing
financing.
-39-
Actual costs of construction or operation of a power
plant may exceed estimates used in negotiation of power purchase and power
financing agreements.
If the actual costs of construction or operations
exceed the costs used in our economic model, the Company may not be able to
build the contemplated power plants, or if constructed, may not be able to
operate profitably. The Companys financing agreements may provide for a
priority payback to our lender or partner. If the actual costs of construction
or operations exceed the anticipated costs, we may not be able to operate
profitably or receive the planned share of cash flow and proceeds from the
project.
Our acquisition strategy could fail or present
unanticipated problems for our business in the future, which could adversely
affect our ability to make acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits of those
acquisitions.
Our growth strategy may include acquiring geothermal and
other renewable energy businesses and properties. We may not be able to identify
suitable acquisition opportunities or finance and complete any particular
acquisition successfully. Furthermore, acquisitions involve a number of risks
and challenges, including:
-
diversion of managements attention;
-
the need to integrate acquired operations;
-
potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies;
-
greater geographic dispersion of employees;
-
the potential that we may make bad acquisitions;
-
potential lack of operating experience in a geographic market of the
acquired business; and
-
an increase in our expenses and working capital requirements.
Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our
ability to achieve anticipated levels of cash flows from the acquired businesses
or realize other anticipated benefits of those acquisitions.
We may not be able to successfully integrate companies
that we may acquire in the future, which could materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition, future results and cash flow.
Our
strategy is to continue to expand in the future, including through acquisitions.
Integrating acquisitions is often costly, and we may not be able to successfully
integrate our acquired companies with our existing operations without
substantial costs, delays or other adverse operational or financial
consequences. Integrating our acquired companies involves a number of risks that
could materially and adversely affect our business, including:
-
failure of the acquired companies to achieve the results we expect;
-
inability to retain key personnel of the acquired companies;
-
risks associated with unanticipated events or liabilities; and
-
the difficulty of establishing and maintaining uniform standards,
controls, procedures and policies, including accounting controls and
procedures.
-40-
If any of our acquired companies suffers performance problems,
the same could adversely affect the reputation of our group of companies and
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, future
results and cash flow.
Our development activities are inherently very
risky
.
The high risks involved in the development of a geothermal
resource must be emphasized. The development of geothermal resources at our
projects is such that there cannot be any assurance of success. Exploration
costs are high and are not fixed. The geothermal resource cannot be relied upon
until substantial development, including drilling and testing, has taken place.
The costs of development drilling are subject to numerous variables such as
unforeseen geologic conditions underground which could result in substantial
cost overruns. Drilling for geothermal resources can result in well depths that
are relatively deep with well costs typically proportionate to the depth and
geology encountered. Drilling may involve unprofitable efforts, not only from
dry wells, but also from wells that do not produce sufficient volumes to
generate net revenues that provide a profit after drilling, operating and other
costs.
Our drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled
as a result of numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including
economic conditions, mechanical problems, title problems, weather conditions,
compliance with governmental requirements and shortages or delays of equipment
and services. If our drilling activities are not successful, we could experience
a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and financial
condition.
In addition to the substantial risk that wells drilled will not
be productive, or may decline in productivity after commencement of production,
hazards such as unusual or unexpected geologic formations, pressures, downhole
conditions, mechanical failures, blowouts, cratering, explosions, chemical
corrosion, uncontrollable flows of well fluids, pollution and other physical and
environmental risks are inherent in geothermal exploration and production. These
hazards could result in substantial losses to us due to injury and loss of life,
severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, pollution and other
environmental damage and suspension of operations.
Our exploration and development activities may not be
commercially successful.
Exploration activities involve numerous risks,
including the risk that no commercially productive reservoirs will be
discovered. In addition, the future cost and timing of drilling, completing and
producing wells is often uncertain. Furthermore, drilling operations may be
curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors, including:
-
unexpected drilling conditions; irregularities in formations; equipment
failures or accidents;
-
compliance with governmental regulations;
-
unavailability or high cost of drilling rigs, equipment or labor;
Our decisions to purchase, explore, develop and exploit
prospects or properties depend in part on data obtained through geophysical and
geological analyses, production data and engineering studies, the results of
which are often uncertain. Because of these factors, we could incur losses as a
result of exploratory drilling expenditures. Poor results from exploration
activities could have a material adverse effect on our future cash flows,
results of operations and financial position.
-41-
Development and expansion are dependent on the ability to
successfully complete drilling activity.
Drilling and exploration are
the main methods of establishing new reserves. However, drilling and exploration
may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of:
-
availability of equipment, particularly drilling rigs and well casing;
-
lack of acceptable prospective acreage;
-
inadequate capital resources;
-
weather;
-
compliance with governmental regulations; and
-
mechanical difficulties;
-
opposition to development.
The power generation industry is characterized by intense
competition, and we encounter pricing pressure from electric utilities,
community choice aggregators and other power producers and power marketers, that
could materially and adversely affect our growth plans.
The power generation industry is characterized by intense
competition. In recent years, there has been increasing competition in the sale
of electricity, in part due to excess capacity in a number of U.S. markets and
an emphasis on short duration contracts or spot market power. This increased
competition has contributed to a reduction in electricity prices. We expect that
power purchasers interested in long-term power purchase agreements will engage
in competitive bid solicitations to satisfy their demands. This competition
could adversely affect our ability to obtain PPAs and the price paid for
electricity by the relevant power purchasers. There is also increasing
competition between electric utilities, municipal power companies, and community
choice aggregatorsthat is putting further pressure on power purchasers to reduce
the prices at which they purchase electricity from us.
Natural gas prices and oil prices are volatile, and lower
prices for these commodities could affect the electricity prices we are able to
obtain in future PPA contracts.
Development of our new plants depends on
the prices we are able to negotiate in our long term PPAs. The prices of those
PPAs in todays market are associated with both the demand for renewable energy,
as well as the prices and demand for natural gas in the United States markets
and the price of oil in our Central American markets. The markets for these
commodities are volatile, and modest drops in prices can affect
significantlyprice levels obtainable on new PPA contracts. Prices fluctuate
widely in response to relatively minor changes in the supply and demand for oil
and gas, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors beyond our
control, such as:
-
domestic and foreign supply of oil and gas;
-
price and quantity of foreign imports;
-
actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and
state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and production controls;
-
domestic and foreign governmental regulations;
-
political conditions in or affecting other oil producing and gas producing
countries, including conflicts in the Middle East and conditions in South
America and Russia;
-42-
-
weather conditions, as evidenced by recent hurricanes;
-
technological advances affecting oil and gas consumption;
-
overall U.S. and global economic conditions; and
-
price and availability of alternative fuels.
Further, oil and gas prices do not necessarily fluctuate in
direct relationship to each other. Because our geothermal reserves are valued
similar to gas reserves, our financial results are more sensitive to movements
in gas prices. Lower gas prices decrease our potential revenues available from
future long term PPAs, but have little impact on the actual proved reserves we
can produce economically, unlike typical oil and gas fields that require
extensive ongoing drilling to sustain production.
Our foreign projects expose us to risks related to the
application of foreign laws, taxes, economic conditions, labor supply and
relations, political conditions and policies of foreign governments, any of
which risks may delay or reduce our ability to profit from such
projects.
We have development projects outside of the United States. For
example, the El Ceibillo project is located in Guatemala. Our foreign
development is subject to regulation by various foreign governments and
regulatory authorities and is subject to the application of foreign laws. Such
foreign laws or regulations may not provide for the same type of legal certainty
and rights, in connection with our contractual relationships in such countries,
as are afforded to our projects in the United States, which may adversely affect
our ability to receive revenues or enforce our rights in connection with our
foreign operations. In addition, the laws and regulations of some countries may
limit our ability to hold a majority interest in some of the projects that we
may develop or acquire, thus limiting our ability to control the development,
construction and operation of such projects. Our foreign development is also
subject to significant political, economic and financial risks, which vary by
country, and include:
-
Changes in government policies or personnel;
-
Changes in general economic conditions;
-
Restrictions on currency transfer or convertibility;
-
Changes in labor relations;
-
Political instability and civil unrest;
-
Changes in the local electricity market;
-
Breach or repudiation of important contractual undertakings by
governmental entities; and
-
Expropriation and confiscation of assets and facilities.
We plan to obtain political risk insurance in connection with
our foreign project, when appropriate, but note that such political risk
insurance does not mitigate all of the above-mentioned risks. In addition,
insurance proceeds received pursuant to a political risk insurance policy, where
applicable, may not be adequate to cover all losses sustained as a result of any
covered risks and may at times be pledged in favor of the lenders to a project
as collateral. Also, insurance may not be available in the future with the scope
of coverage and in amounts of coverage adequate to insure against such risks and
disturbances.
-43-
Our foreign project may expose us to risks related to
fluctuations in currency rates, which may reduce our profits from such projects
and operations.
Risks attributable to fluctuations in currency exchange
rates can arise when any foreign subsidiary borrows funds or incurs operating or
other expenses in one type of currency but receive revenues in another. In such
cases, an adverse change in exchange rates can reduce such subsidiary's ability
to meet its debt service obligations, reduce the amount of cash and income we
receive from such foreign subsidiary or increase such subsidiary's overall
expenses. In addition, the imposition by foreign governments of restrictions on
the transfer of foreign currency abroad or restrictions on the conversion of
local currency into foreign currency would have an adverse effect on the
operations of our foreign project and may limit or diminish the amount of cash
and income that we receive from such foreign projects.
Changes in costs and technology may significantly impact
our business by making our power plants less competitive.
A basic
premise of our business model is that generating baseload power at central
geothermal power plants achieves economies of scale and produces electricity at
a competitive price. However, gas-fired systems may under certain economic
conditions produce electricity at lower average short term prices than our
geothermal plants. In addition, there are other technologies that can produce
electricity at competitive prices, most notably fossil fuel power systems,
hydroelectric systems, wind-turbines and photovoltaic (solar) cells. Research
and development activities are ongoing to seek improvements in such alternate
technologies and their cost of producing electricity is gradually declining. It
is possible that advances will further reduce the cost of alternate methods of
power generation to a level below that of most geothermal power generation
technologies such that the competitive advantage of our projects may be
significantly impaired. Intermittent renewable energy sources such as solar and
wind, have already seen such cost reductions allowing them to offer their
intermittent power and substantially lower prices.
Risks Related to Our Power Purchase Agreements
A force majeure event, disruption of existing
transmission or a forced outage affecting a project or unexpected operating
expenses could reduce our net income and materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition, future results and cash flow.
If a plant
experiences a force majeure event, such as a fire, earthquake or flood, we would
be excused from our obligations to deliver electricity under the PPAs to which
we are parties. However, the power purchasers under those PPAs may/will not be
required to make any energy payments with respect to the affected project or
plant so long as the force majeure event continues and, pursuant to certain of
our PPAs, will have the right to prematurely terminate the PPA altogether.
Additionally, to the extent that a forced outage has occurred, a power purchaser
may not be required to make any energy payments to the affected project, and if
as a result the project fails to attain certain performance requirements under
certain of our PPAs, the purchaser may have the right to prematurely terminate
the PPA altogether. As a consequence, we may not receive any net revenues from
the affected project or plant other than the proceeds from any business
interruption insurance that may apply to the force majeure event or forced
outage after the relevant waiting period, and we may incur significant
liabilities in respect of past amounts required to be refunded.
-44-
In addition, we rely on transmission lines owned by local
utilities to deliver all of the electricity that we generate to the purchasers
of our electricity. If the transmission system were to experience a force
majeure event or a forced outage which prevented it from transmitting the
electricity from our projects to a power purchaser, the power purchaser would
not be required to make energy payments for that electricity with respect to the
affected project so long as such force majeure event or forced outage
continues.
Any of these events could significantly increase the expenses
incurred by our projects or reduce the overall generating capacity of our
projects and could significantly reduce or entirely eliminate the revenues
generated by one or more of our projects, which in turn would reduce our net
income and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, future results and cash flow.
Payments under our PPAs may be reduced if we are unable
to forecast our production adequately
. Under the terms of certain of our
PPAs, if we do not deliver electricity output within 90% to 110% of our
forecasted amount, payments for the amount delivered will be reduced, possibly
significantly. For example if the plant produces more than 110% of the power as
forecasted then we would receive reduced revenue for the amount over the
forecast figure. If the plant produces less than 90% of the forecast amount for
unexcused reasons, such as normal plant breakdowns and maintenance, then we may
be subject to a replacement power costs, depending on the prevailing power
market conditions. The agreement moves the power price to the market price
instead of contracted price, and the reduction in revenue could be perhaps 30
percent of that amount. As a risk mitigation element, we are not subject to this
adjustment until year three of the contract and then we are able to submit a new
forecast every three months thereby limiting this exposure.
Our failure to supply the contracted capacity under some
of our PPAs with investor-owned electric utilities in states that have renewable
portfolio standards may result in the imposition of penalties.
The terms
of certain of our PPAs require that we make payments to the relevant power
purchaser in an amount equal to such purchaser's replacement costs for renewable
energy that we are required to but do not provide as required under the PPA and
which such power purchaser obtains from an alternate source. In addition, we may
be required to make payments to the relevant power purchaser in an amount equal
to its replacement costs relating to any renewable energy credits we do not
provide as required under the relevant PPA. All of which could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition, future results and cash
flow.
Industry competition may impede our growth and ability to
enter into PPAs on terms favorable to us, or at all, which would negatively
impact our revenue
. The electrical power generation industry, of which
geothermal power is a sub-component, is highly competitive and we may not be
able to compete successfully or grow our business. We compete in areas of
pricing, grid access and markets. The industry in the Western United States is
complex as it is composed of public utility districts, cooperatives and
investor-owned power companies. Many of the participants produce and distribute
electricity. Their willingness to purchase electricity from an independent
producer may be based on a number of factors and not solely on pricing and
surety of supply. If we cannot enter into PPAs on terms favorable to us, or at
all, it would negatively impact our revenue and our decisions regarding
development of additional properties.
-45-
Additionally, the credit quality of newly formed power
purchasers may negatively impact our ability to finance our power purchase
projects and may negatively impact their ability to pay for the contracted power
in the future.
Changes in costs and technology of other baseload
renewable electricity sources may significantly impact our business by making
our power plants less competitive.
A basic premise of our business model
is that our geothermal power plants generate baseload power at a competitive
price. While there are other renewable energy technologies that can also produce
baseload electricity, such as biomass, fuel cell, and hydroelectric systems,
most of these alternative technologies currently produce electricity at a higher
average price than our geothermal plants. However, research and development
activities are ongoing to seek improvements in such alternate technologies and
their cost of producing electricity may gradually decline. It is possible that
advances will further reduce the cost of alternate methods of power generation
to a level that is equal to or below that of most geothermal power generation
technologies. If this were to happen, the competitive advantage of our power
plants may be significantly impaired.
Risks Related to Our Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Substantial leverage and debt service obligations may
adversely affect our cash flows, liquidity and operations.
We have
substantial indebtedness that we may be unable to service and that restricts our
activities. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and repay, extend,
or refinance our outstanding indebtedness will depend primarily upon the
operational performance of our geothermal power generation, the prices that we
receive for the electricity that we generate, risk management activities, as
well as general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and
other factors that are beyond our control. In addition, this indebtedness has
important consequences, including:
-
limiting our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital,
capital expenditures, debt service requirements, entering into other renewable
energy businesses, or other purposes;
-
limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our
business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to
service the debt;
-
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry
conditions;
-
limiting our ability to or increasing the costs of refinance indebtedness;
and
-
limiting our ability to enter into marketing, hedging, optimization and
trading transactions by reducing the number of counterparties with whom we can
transact and the volume of those transactions.
We have a need for substantial additional financing and
will have to significantly delay, curtail or cease operations if we are unable
to secure such financing.
The Company requires substantial additional
financing to fund the cost of continued expansion of and the development of our
projects. Also, the Company requires funds for other operating activities, and
to finance the growth of our business, including the construction and
commissioning of power generation facilities. We may not be able to obtain the
needed funds on terms acceptable to us or at all. Further, if additional funds
are raised by issuing equity securities, significant dilution to our current shareholders may occur and new investors may get rights
that are preferential to current shareholders. Alternatively, we may have to
bring in joint venture partners to fund further development work, which would
result in reducing our interests in the projects.
-46-
We may be unable to obtain the financing we need to
pursue our growth strategy and any future financing we receive may be less
favorable to us than our current financing arrangements, either of which may
adversely affect our ability to expand our operations.
Our geothermal
power plants generally have been financed using leveraged financing structures,
consisting of non-recourse debt obligations and partnership arrangements. Each
of our projects under development and those projects and businesses we may seek
to acquire will require substantial capital investment. Our continued access to
capital with acceptable terms is necessary for the success of our growth
strategy. Our attempts to obtain future financings may not be successful or on
favorable terms,
and are dependent on numerous factors including general
economic and capital market conditions, investor confidence, the continued
success of current projects, the credit quality of the projects being financed,
the political situation in the state in which the project is located and the
continued existence of tax laws which are conducive to raising capital. Market
conditions and other factors may not permit future project and acquisition
financings on terms similar to those previously received. If we are not able to
obtain financing for our power plants on a non-recourse basis, we may have to
finance them using direct equity investments which may have a dilutive effect on
our common stock. or incur additional recourse debt.
It is very costly to place geothermal resources into
commercial production
.
Before the sale of any power can occur, it
will be necessary to construct a gathering and disposal system, a power plant,
and a transmission line, and considerable administrative costs would be
incurred, together with the drilling of production and injection wells. Future
expansion of power production and other opportunities may result in
significantly increased capital costs related to increased production and
injection well drilling and higher costs for labor and materials. To fund
expenditures of this magnitude, we may have to find a joint venture participant
with substantial financial resources or expand the current ownership of existing
joint venture partners. There can be no assurance that a participant can be
found and, if found, it would result in us having to substantially reduce our
interest in the project.
We may be unable to realize our strategy of utilizing the
tax and other incentives available for developing geothermal power projects to
attract strategic alliance partners, which may adversely affect our ability to
complete these projects.
Part of our business strategy is to utilize the
tax and other incentives available to developers of geothermal power generating
plants to attract strategic alliance partners with the capital sufficient to
complete these projects. Many of the incentives available for these projects are
new and highly complex. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in
structuring agreements that are attractive to potential strategic alliance
partners. If we are unable to do so, we may be unable to complete the
development of our geothermal power projects and our business could be
harmed.
-47-
Our debt instruments impose significant operating and
financial restrictions on us; any failure to comply with these restrictions
could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our operations.
The instruments governing our outstanding debt impose significant
operating and financial restrictions on our geothermal operating subsidiaries.
These restrictions could adversely affect us by limiting our ability to plan for
or react to market conditions or to meet our capital needs. These restrictions
limit our ability to, among other things:
-
make prepayments on or purchase indebtedness in whole or in part;
-
pay dividends to us or make other distributions to us thereby limiting our
ability to use available cash to pay dividends to stockholders, repurchase our
capital stock or make other investments in geothermal projects or other
renewable energy businesses;
-
make certain investments, including capital expenditures;
-
enter into transactions with affiliates;
-
create or incur liens to secure debt;
-
consolidate or merge with another entity, or allow one of our subsidiaries
to do so;
-
lease, transfer or sell assets and use proceeds of permitted asset leases,
transfers or sales;
-
incur dividend or other payment restrictions affecting certain
subsidiaries;
-
engage in certain business activities; and
-
acquire facilities or other businesses
In addition, any debt facilities that we enter into in the
future are likely to contain similar or additional covenants.
Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by
events beyond our control, and any material deviations from our forecasts could
require us to seek waivers or amendments of covenants or alternative sources of
financing or to reduce expenditures. We cannot assure you that such waivers,
amendments or alternative financing could be obtained, or if obtained, would be
on terms acceptable to us.
If we are unable to comply with the terms of the documents
governing our indebtedness, we may be required to refinance all or a portion of
our indebtedness or to obtain additional financing or sell assets. However, we
may be unable to refinance or obtain additional financing because of our
existing levels of indebtedness and the debt incurrence restrictions under our
existing indentures and other debt agreements. If our cash flow is insufficient
and refinancing or additional financing is unavailable, we may be forced to
default on our indebtedness. Such a default or other breach of the covenants or
restrictions contained in any of our existing or future debt instruments could
result in an event of default under those instruments and, due to cross-default
and cross-acceleration provisions, under our other debt instruments. Upon an
event of default under our debt instruments, the debt holders could elect to
declare the entire debt outstanding thereunder to be due and payable and could
terminate any commitments they had made to supply us with further funds. If any
of these events occur, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient funds
available to repay in full the total amount of obligations that become due as a
result of any such acceleration, or that we will be able to find additional or
alternative financing to refinance any accelerated obligations.
-48-
Risks Related to Government Regulation
We are subject to complex government regulation which
could adversely affect our operations.
Our activities are subject to complex and stringent
environmental and other governmental laws and regulations. The exploration and
production of geothermal energy requires numerous permits, approvals and
certificates from appropriate federal, state and local governmental agencies,
including state and local agencies, whose regulations typically are more
stringent than in other states or localities, as well as compliance with
environmental protection legislation and other regulations. While we believe
that we have obtained the requisite approvals and permits for our existing
operations and that our business is operated in accordance with applicable laws,
we remain subject to a varied and complex body of laws and regulations that both
public officials and private individuals may seek to enforce. Existing laws and
regulations could be changed or reinterpreted, or new laws and regulations may
become applicable to us that could increase our costs associated with compliance
or otherwise harm our business and results of operations. We may be unable to
obtain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals and certificates for proposed
projects. Intricate and changing environmental and other regulatory requirements
may necessitate substantial expenditures to obtain and maintain permits. If a
project is unable to function as planned due to changing requirements or local
opposition, it may create expensive delays, extended periods of non-operation or
significant loss of value in a project.
Under certain circumstances, the United States Office of
Natural Resource Revenue (ONR) may require that our operations on federal
leases be suspended or terminated. These circumstances include our failure to
pay royalties or our failure to comply with safety and environmental
regulations. The requirements imposed by these laws and regulations are
frequently changed and subject to new interpretations, and if such were to
occur, could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.
Rules adopted by the BLM, as directed by the Energy Policy Act
of 2005, require competitive auction of all geothermal leases on Federal lands.
Competitive leasing is significantly increasing the cost of obtaining leases on
Federal land, is adding to the capital costs needed to develop geothermal
projects, is increasing the total electrical power prices needed to make a
geothermal project viable and is making it more difficult to acquire additional
adjacent lands for reservoir protection and exploration.
If Federal lands or any Federal involvement are included in any
geothermal development, requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act
("NEPA") will be triggered. Most of the geothermal resources in the United
States are located in the western states, where the Federal Government often is
the largest landowner. If a NEPA action is triggered, such as an Environmental
Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment, a project delay of one to two
years and a cost of $1,000,000 to $2,000,000 or more may be incurred while the
environmental permitting process is completed. NEPA not only can impact the
property where the geothermal resource is located, but includes the siting and
construction of transmission lines. Environmental legislation is evolving in a
manner that means stricter standards, and enforcement, fines and penalties for
non-compliance are more stringent. Environmental assessments of proposed
projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and
directors, officers and employees. The cost of compliance with changes in governmental
regulations has a potential to reduce the profitability of operations.
-49-
In the states of Idaho, Nevada California, and Oregon, drilling
for geothermal resources is governed by specific rules. In Nevada drilling
operations are governed by the Division of Minerals (Nevada Administrative Code
Chapter 534A); in Idaho by the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDAPA 37
Title 03 Chapter 04); in California by the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal
Resources (Public Resources Code Title 14 Chapter 4); and in Oregon by the
Division of Oil, Gas and Mineral Industries (Division 20 Geothermal Regulation).
These rules require drilling permits and govern the spacing of wells, rates of
production, prevention of waste and other matters, and, may not allow or may
restrict drilling activity, or may require that a geothermal resource be
unitized (shared) with adjoining land owners. Such laws and regulations may
increase the costs of planning, designing, drilling, installing, operating and
abandoning our geothermal wells, the power plant and other facilities. State
environmental requirements and permits, such as the Idaho Department of
Environmental Quality, and Air Quality Permit to Construct, include public
disclosure and comment. It is possible that a legal protest could be triggered
through one of the permitting processes that would delay construction and
increase cost for one of our projects. The state of Oregon has an Energy
Facility Siting Council that must issue a site certificate for any geothermal
energy facilities of 35 megawatts or higher.
Because of these state and federal regulations, we could incur
liability to governments or third parties for any unlawful discharge of
pollutants into the air, soil or water, including responsibility for remediation
costs. We could potentially discharge such materials into the environment:
-
from a well or drilling equipment at a drill site;
-
leakage of fluids or airborne pollutants from gathering systems,
pipelines, power plant and storage tanks;
-
damage to geothermal wells resulting from accidents during normal
operations; and
-
blowouts, cratering and explosions.
Because the requirements imposed by such laws and regulations
are frequently changed, we cannot assure you that laws and regulations enacted
in the future, including changes to existing laws and regulations or bonding
requirements, will not adversely affect our business by increasing cost and the
time required to explore and develop geothermal projects. In addition, because
some of our project properties were previously operated by others, we may be
liable for environmental damage caused by such former operators.
Changes in the legal and regulatory environment affecting
our projects could significantly harm our business financial position and
results of operations
.
Our operations are subject to extensive
regulation and, therefore, changes in applicable laws or regulations, or
interpretations of those laws and regulations, could result in increased
compliance costs, the need for additional capital expenditures or the reduction
of certain benefits currently available to our projects. The structure of
federal and state energy regulation currently is, and may continue to be,
subject to challenges, modifications, the imposition of additional regulatory
requirements, and restructuring proposals. We may not be able to obtain all
regulatory approvals that may be required in the future, or any necessary
modifications to existing regulatory approvals, or maintain all required
regulatory approvals. In addition, the cost of operation and maintenance and the
operating performance of geothermal power plants may be adversely
affected by changes in certain laws and regulations, including tax laws.
-50-
The reduction or elimination of government incentives
could adversely affect our business, financial condition, future results and
cash flows.
Construction and operation of our geothermal power plants
have benefited, and may benefit in the future, from public policies and
government incentives that support renewable energy and enhance the economic
feasibility of these projects. The most important tax rule that affects our
business is the Production Tax Credit (PTC) or Investment Tax Credit (ITC),
which is available to encourage the development of new geothermal plants.
Legislation enacted as part of the 2016 Fiscal Cliff efforts resulted in the
extension of the 30% PTC or ITC with eligibility for projects that started
construction before December 31, 2016. There is not a cash grant component to
the ITC credit so there is a risk related to monetizing the credit. The loss of
the PTC or ITC is a risk that could result in making the development of new
projects uneconomic. Additionally, current IRS guidance states that projects
that are placed into service by December 31, 2018 do not have to show continuous
construction. Projects placed into service after that date could have some or
all of their tax credit eligibility challenged. Additional policies and
incentives include accelerated depreciation tax benefits, renewable portfolio
standards, carbon trading mechanisms, and rebates. Some of these measures have
been implemented at the federal level, while others have been implemented by
different states. The availability and continuation of these public policies and
government incentives have a significant effect on the economics and viability
of our development. Any changes to such public policies, or any reduction in or
elimination of such Government incentives could affect us negatively.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
The public market for our common stock is not that liquid
which could result in purchasers being unable to liquidate their investment.
The market price for shares of our common stock may be highly volatile
and could be subject to wide fluctuations. Some of the factors that could
negatively affect our share price include:
-
actual or anticipated variations in our reserve estimates and quarterly
operating results;
-
changes in electricity prices;
-
changes in our funds from operations or earnings estimates;
-
publication of research reports about us or the exploration and production
industry;
-
increases in market interest rates which may increase our cost of capital;
-
changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings and enforcement
and legal actions;
-
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
-
adverse market reaction to any increased indebtedness we incur in the
future;
-
additions or departures of key management personnel;
-
actions by our stockholders;
-
speculation in the press or investment community;
-51-
-
large volume of sellers of our common stock pursuant to our resale
registration statement with a relatively small volume of purchasers; and
-
general market and economic conditions.
The market price of our common stock could be volatile,
which could cause the value of your investment to decline.
Securities
markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This
market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions,
could reduce the market price of our common stock in spite of our operating
performance. In addition, our operating results could fall short of the
expectations of market analysts and investors, and in response, the market price
of our common stock could decrease significantly. You may be unable to resell
your shares of our common stock at or above the initial offering price.
The market for our common stock is volatile. The trading price
of our common stock on the NYSE MKT LLC (NYSE MKT) is subject to fluctuations
in response to, among other things, quarterly variations in operating and
financial results, and general economic and market conditions. In addition,
statements or changes in opinions, ratings, or earnings estimates made by
brokerage firms or industry analysts relating to our market or relating to our
company could result in an immediate and adverse effect on the market price of
our common stock. The highly volatile nature of our stock price may cause
investment losses for our shareholders.
You may experience dilution of your ownership interests
due to the future issuance of additional shares of our common stock.
We
may in the future issue our previously authorized and unissued securities,
resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present
stockholders. We are currently authorized to issue 250,000,000 shares of common
stock. The potential issuance of such additional shares of common stock may
create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. We may also
issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that are
convertible into or exercisable for common stock in connection with the hiring
of personnel, future acquisitions, future private placements of our securities
for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes.
Failure to comply with regulatory requirements may
adversely affect our stock price and business
.
As a public
company, we are subject to numerous governmental and stock exchange
requirements, with which we believe we are in compliance. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (SOX) and the SEC have requirements that we may fail to meet by the
required deadlines or we may fall out of compliance with, such as the internal
controls assessment, reporting and auditor attestation, as applicable, which are
required under Section 404 of SOX. The Company has documented and tested its
internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404
of SOX. SOX requires an annual assessment by management of the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting, as well as an
attestation report by the Companys independent auditors on internal controls
over financial reporting. If we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our
internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from
time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing
basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in
accordance with Section 404 of SOX. Moreover, effective internal controls are
necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help
prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or
prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our
reported financial information, and the trading price of our stock could drop
significantly. Our failure to meet regulatory requirements and exchange listing
standards may result in actions such as the delisting of our stock impacting our
stocks liquidity; SEC enforcement actions; and securities claims and
litigation.
-52-
We do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future.
We do not expect to declare or pay any cash or other dividends
in the foreseeable future on our common stock, as we intend to use cash flow
generated by operations to expand our business. We may enter into other
borrowing arrangements in the future that restrict our ability to declare or pay
cash dividends on our common stock.
A substantial percentage of our shares are held by a
small group of stockholders whose interests may conflict with the interests of
our other stockholders.
As of December 31, 2016, our largest three
shareholders consisted of JCP Investment Management, LLC beneficially owning
2,855,005 shares (15.1%), Bradley Louis Radoff beneficially owning 1,825,000
shares (9.6%), and Private Management Group, Inc. beneficially owning 1,591,847
shares (8.4%), collectively totaling approximately 33.1% of our outstanding
common stock. As a result of these stockholders beneficial ownership of our
outstanding common stock, they could exert significant influence on the election
of our directors and decisions on matters submitted to a vote of our
shareholders, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or
substantially all of our assets. This concentration of ownership of our shares
could delay or prevent proxy contests, mergers, tender offers, or other
purchases of our shares that might otherwise give our stockholders the
opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for our
shares. This concentration of ownership may also adversely affect our stock
price. Future sales of common stock by these stockholders could cause our stock
price to decline.
Future sales of common stock by some of our insider
stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.
As of the date of
this report, our directors and officers collectively held 4,614,133 shares of
and options for our common stock, representing approximately 24.3% of issued and
outstanding common stock. Sales of such shares in the public market, as well as
shares we may issue upon exercise of outstanding options, could cause the market
price of our common stock to decline.
If securities or industry equity analysts do not publish
research or reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could
be adversely affected.
To the extent one develops, the trading market
for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that
securities or industry equity analysts publish about us or our business. Our
common stock is not currently and may never be covered by securities and
industry equity analysts. If no securities or industry equity analysts commence
coverage of our company, the trading price of our stock would be negatively
impacted. In the event we obtain securities or industry equity analyst coverage
of our common stock, if one or more of the equity analysts who covers us
downgrades our stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of
these equity analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to regularly
publish reports on us, interest in the purchase of our stock could decrease,
which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.
Provisions under Delaware law, our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws could delay or prevent a change in control of our
company, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
The existence of some provisions
under Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could delay or
prevent a change in control of the Company, which could adversely affect the
price of our common stock. Delaware law imposes restrictions on mergers and
other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our
outstanding common stock. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws prohibit
our stockholders from taking action by written consent absent approval by all of
our Board of Directors. Further, our stockholders will not have the power to
call a special meeting of stockholders.
-53-
The sale of our common stock under our ATM to Lincoln
Park Capital (LPC) may cause dilution and the sale of the shares of common
stock acquired by LPC could cause the price of our common stock to decline.
The ATM allows for the sale of up to $10,000,000 in shares of our common
stock that we may issue and sell to LPC pursuant to the terms of the Purchase
Agreement, less any shares already sold under the Purchase Agreement. The number
of shares ultimately offered for sale by LPC is dependent upon the number of
shares purchased by LPC under the Purchase Agreement. The purchase price for the
common stock to be sold to LPC pursuant to the Purchase Agreement will fluctuate
based on the price of our common stock. It is anticipated that shares will be
sold over a period of up to 30 months from the date of the initial purchase
under the Purchase Agreement. Depending upon market liquidity at the time, a
sale of shares under the offering at any given time could cause the trading
price of our common stock to decline. We can elect to direct purchases in our
sole discretion. After LPC has acquired such shares, it may sell all, some or
none of such shares. Therefore, sales to LPC by us under the Purchase Agreement
may result in substantial dilution of the percentage ownership of other holders
of our common stock. The sale of a substantial number of shares of our common
stock under the offering, or anticipation of such sales, could make it more
difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a
time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales. However, we
have the right to control the timing and amount of any sales of our shares to
LPC and the Purchase Agreement may be terminated by us at any time at our
discretion without any cost to us.
Item 2. Property
The Company has interests in nine different geothermal resource
areas in the Western United States and one area in Guatemala, Central America.
The resource areas in the United States are located in Idaho (1), Oregon (2),
and Nevada (5) and California (1). The properties include the Raft River area
located in southeastern Idaho, the two properties located in southeastern
Oregon, and five properties in northwestern Nevada, the WGP Geysers area located
in northern California at the Geysers, and the El Ceibillo area located in
central Guatemala (near Guatemala City).
The Company operates three commercial power plants located in
the Western United States. The Raft River Unit I, Idaho plant became
commercially operational on January 3, 2008. The Neal Hot Springs, Oregon plant
achieved commercial operation on November 16, 2012. The San Emidio, Nevada plant
was acquired in May 2008. The acquired facility was replaced with a new power
plant, located on private land that became commercially operational in May
2012.
-55-
-56-
Neal Hot Springs, Oregon
Neal Hot Springs is a
geothermal resource located in Eastern Oregon. The Company acquired the Neal Hot
Springs geothermal energy and surface
rights in September 2006. A 22
megawatt (net) annual average geothermal power plant was developed by USG Oregon
LLC, and is currently in operation at this site. The project has four production
wells and nine injection wells at the project.
Significant Lease/Royalty Terms
Approximately 521
acres of geothermal rights at Neal Hot Springs are owned by Cyprus Gold
Exploration Corporation (50%), JR Land and Livestock (25%), and USG Oregon LLC
(25%). Royalty for the two private leases is paid on the gross revenue from
energy sales paid by Idaho Power Company under the PPA. The JR Land &
Livestock lease has a 3% royalty for the first five years of production,
increases to 4% for years 6-15, and then to 5% for the remainder of the lease
term. The Cyprus lease establishes a 2% royalty for the first ten years and then
escalates to 3% for the remainder of the lease.
-57-
San Emidio, Nevada
In 2008, the
Company acquired a 3.6 megawatt operating geothermal power plant and all
associated private and federal geothermal leases and certain ground water rights
in the San Emidio Valley and at Gerlach, Nevada. The San Emidio project is
located approximately 75 air miles north of Reno, Nevada. The Gerlach property
is locate immediately northwest of Gerlach Nevada. The San Emidio assets include
the geothermal power project, 17,846 (27.9 square miles) acres of geothermal
leases, and ground water rights used for cooling water. The Gerlach assets
include 2,986 acres (4.7 square miles) of BLM and private geothermal leases. The
Gerlach leases are located along a geologic structure known to host geothermal
features including the Great Boiling Spring and the Fly Ranch Geyser.
In 2012, USG completed the San Emidio Phase I repower project;
a 9.0 megawatt (net) annual average facility located on private land owned by
USG Nevada. Phase I repowering was completed utilizing the existing production
and injection wells.
Significant Lease/Royalty Terms
A geothermal unit
was established for the operating project by the Company in 2010 with the
approval and oversight of the Bureau of Land Management. The Unit allows USG
Nevada LLC to allocate expenses among the federal and private geothermal leases
within the Unit and legally establishes the percentage of private and federal
land that contributes to geothermal production known as the Participating Area.
The Participating Area at San Emidio totals 583.68 acres and includes 336.93 acres (57.7%) of private property and 246.75
acres (42.3%) of federally managed land.
-58-
The lease agreement with the Kosmos Company establishes a 1.75%
royalty on gross electricity sales for the first 120 months of production and
3.5% royalty thereafter. The federal leases have a 10% netback royalty. The
netback calculation is based on gross electricity sales less the transmission
and generation cost deductions. In 2014 the equivalent federal royalty is 1.6%
of gross electricity sales.
Raft River, Idaho
The Raft River
project comprises two packages of property that include the Raft River Energy I
LLC (RREI) leases, and leases held by the Company. RREI operates the Unit I
facility at Raft River which became commercially operational on January 3, 2008.
Leases assigned to RREI by the Company included eight private geothermal leases,
one of which is owned by the Company. The Company retains direct control over
four private leases and one federal lease outside the RREI position.
All of the leases may be extended indefinitely as long as
production is maintained from the lease either individually or as a geothermal
unit. The Company and RREI hold a total of 6,002 acres; 1,686 acres of federal
geothermal rights and 4,316 acres of private leases.
-59-
Significant Lease/Royalty Terms
The private leases
have 10 year primary terms with the rights of unitization and extensions.
Private leases have varying royalty rates commensurate with other federal and
private leases held by the Company and our subsidiaries. Most of the private
leases are subject to a 10% netback royalty which is based on gross electricity
sales less the transmission and generation cost deductions. In 2014, USGs
equivalent federal netback royalty was equivalent to 1.6% of gross electricity
sales where it was applied.
The federal lease, established on August 1, 2007, is held by
the Company and has a primary term of 10 years. After the primary term, The
Company has the right to extend the contract in accordance with regulation 43
CFR subpart 3207. The royalty under the lease is 1.75% of gross proceeds for the
first 10 years of production and 3.5% thereafter. At Raft River, royalty rates
have not exceeded rental payments.
A private geothermal unit was established for the operating
project in December 2015. The Unit establishes the geologic production area. A
Participating Area of 1640 was established in May 2015. The Participating Areea
is that area that is reasonably expected to contribute to power production.
Production is allocated based on the percentage of each property in relation to
the entire Participating Area.
-60-
El Ceibillo, Republic of Guatemala
The Company successfully acquired a geothermal energy rights
concession in the Republic of Guatemala, which was granted by the Guatemalan
government. It consists of 24,710 acres (100 square kilometers) and is located
14 miles southwest of Guatemala City, the capital. The concession provides
sub-surface geothermal rights only, and does not provide access to the surface
that is owned by private landowners. The concession had an initial five year
term for the development and construction of a power plant, which was extended
by three years in 2015. There are no royalties due to the government for use of
the geothermal resource.
The primary area of interest within the concession is the El
Ceibillo project, located near the town of Amatitlan, in a developed industrial
zone immediately adjacent to the highway that connects Guatemala City to the
Port of San Jose on the Pacific coast. An office and staff are located in
Guatemala City, and 80 acres of surface land within the concession area is under
lease.
-61-
Crescent Valley and Lee Hot Springs, Nevada
On December 16, 2014, U.S. Geothermal completed the acquisition of EPR
and EPRs lease holdings at Crescent Valley and Lee Hot Springs, Nevada.
The Crescent Valley property encompasses 21,319 acres of
private and federal geothermal resources leased by EPR and 2,640 acres of
geothermal resources leased by U.S. Geothermal Inc. Upon closing the acquisition
the Company began drilling the projects first production well. The well is
located on private surface and mineral estate in section 3, Township 28 North
Range 49 East and is intended to qualify potential future power plant
construction for the 30% renewable energy investment tax credit. The Crescent
Valley property includes 55 independent leases ranging in size from 10 acres to
4,100 acres and an average parcel size of 314 acres. EPRs private leases have a
15 year term with annual rent that escalates at year five and at year 10.
Significant Lease/Royalty Terms
Annual lease rental
payment obligations at Crescent Valley are approximately $109,138 and royalty
obligations during potential future power production vary for private leases
from 3% to 5% of gross sales. Royalty rates for federal geothermal leases are
1.75% of gross revenue for the first 10 years and 3.5% thereafter.
The Lee Hot Springs property encompasses 2,560 acres of federal
lands located approximately 17 miles south of Fallon, NV. The federal leases are
N-73679 and N-73930. The annual rental is $2,560 and a standard federal royalty is 1.75% of gross
revenue for the first 10 years and 3.5% thereafter.
-62-
WGP Geysers, California
Western
GeoPower Inc. (WGP) is a wholly owned subsidiary of U.S. Geothermal Inc. WGPs
property includes surface and geothermal rights that consist of two federal
geothermal leases (CA-51000 & CA-51001), and one private geothermal lease
with no expiration. The total project acreage is 3,808 acres. The site has been
re-permitted with Sonoma County for construction and operation of up to a 38.5
megawatt geothermal power plant.
The project is located at the site of the former Pacific Gas
and Electric (PG&E) Unit 15 project, which once had a 62 megawatt (gross)
capacity power plant. During 10 years of operation, the PG&E plant declined
in production to approximately 38 megawatts before it was shut down in l989 and
all of the wells were plugged and abandoned. The project is located within the
broader Geysers geothermal field which covers a total of approximately 20,000
acres in the Mayacamas Mountains in Sonoma County and Lake County, California,
approximately 75 miles north of San Francisco. The Geysers geothermal resource
is the largest producing geothermal field in the world, and has been generating
greater than 850 megawatts of power for more than 30 years.
Significant Lease/Royalty Terms
There is no annual
rental or royalty for the 421 acre private parcel owned by WGP. The Abril Ranch
rental payment for 410 acres of surface and geothermal rights was $16,783 in
2014 and is annually adjusted by the San Francisco/San Jose CPI index. The
Filly-Brown properties include 214 acres of surface access rights and 50% of the mineral
rights owned by Western GeoPower. The Geothermal royalty payments for Abril
Ranch are being adjusted to 4.25% of gross revenue at a power price of $100/MW
or less and is consistent with market conditions.
-63-
Vale Butte, Oregon
Vale Butte and the
Vale Butte Geothermal Resource Area is located in Eastern Oregon and borders the
east side of the City of Vale. In the first quarter of 2014, U.S. Geothermal
Inc. acquired 393 acres of geothermal energy and surface rights under six (6)
leases. The leased area is immediately adjacent to the City of Vale and includes
private surface and mineral estate, Vale City owned resources and Malheur County
owned resources. The Vale Butte resource area has been used for direct use
heating for many years. Geochemical analysis indicates a potential reservoir
temperature of 311ºF to 320ºF and historical drilling in the area has
encountered ground (rock) temperatures in excess of 300°F. Fault structures and
hydrologic characteristics have been identified that are similar to the Neal Hot
Springs site, and those geologic structures are contained within the acquired
leases.
-64-
Significant Lease/Royalty Terms
Four private leases
and the Vale City lease are issued for a period of 10 years with renewal options
while the Malheur County lease was issued for a period of 40 years with renewal
options. The lease agreements are consistent in terms of financial and
development requirements and have a 2% royalty payment on actual energy paid for
by Idaho Power for the first 10 years of commercial production.
Boise Administration Office, Idaho
On
August 12, 2013, the Company signed a five year lease agreement for office space
and janitorial services. The lease payments are due in monthly installments
starting February 1, 2014. The monthly payments that begin February 1, 2014 have
two components which include a base rate of $3,234 that is not subject to
increase and a rate beginning at $6,418 that is adjusted annually according to
the cost of living index. The contract includes a five year extension option.
Land and Leases
The Company and its domestic subsidiaries control 65,434 acres
of land in California, Idaho, Nevada, and Oregon. U.S. Geothermal owns
approximately 2,536 acres of surface rights and 2,539 acres of geothermal rights
while approximately 64,064 acres are controlled through geothermal development
leases signed with the BLM, local governmental entities and private owners. The
companys average per acre lease rate is $9.00 per acre/year.
BLM Leases
The Company and its
subsidiaries have 26 federal geothermal leases issued in accordance with the
Geothermal Steam Act by the BLM.
BLM geothermal leases grant the lessee the right to drill for,
extract, produce, remove, utilize, sell, and dispose of geothermal resources
from the leased lands, along with the right to build and maintain necessary
improvements on the leased land. Ownership of the geothermal resources and other
minerals beneath the land is retained in the federal mineral estate. The
geothermal lease grants exclusive geothermal development rights. The BLM will,
through authority granted by federal regulations and planning requirements,
ensure that other federal activities do not unreasonably interfere with the
geothermal lessees uses of the same land. Most federal leases include
stipulations and are governed by federal regulations, that require geothermal
development to be conducted in a workmanlike manner and in accordance with all
applicable laws and BLM directives and to take all actions required by the BLM
to protect the surface of and the environment surrounding the land. Surface
protections and environmental protection requirements include protection of
water quality, cultural and archeological resources, threatened or endangered
plants or animals, migratory birds, wildlife, and visual quality standards.
The BLM also authorizes geothermal lessees to enter into unit
agreements on federal lands to cooperatively develop a geothermal resource. The
BLM reserves the right to specify rates of development and to require the
geothermal lessee to commit to a unitization agreement.
Typical BLM leases have a primary term of ten years and may be
renewed as long as geothermal resources are being explored. If resources are
produced or utilized in commercial quantities, the lease can be renewed for up to forty years. If at the end of
the forty-year period geothermal steam is still being produced or utilized in
commercial quantities and the lands are not needed for other purposes, the
geothermal lessee will have a preferential right to renew the lease for a second
forty-year term, under terms and conditions as the BLM deems appropriate. During
the lease term the lessee is required to pay an annual per acre rental fee. The
fee escalates according to a schedule until geothermal production begins. After
production has commenced, the geothermal lessee is required to pay royalties on
the amount or value of energy production, and any by-products that may be
derived from geothermal production.
-65-
BLM leases issued after August 8, 2005 (The Energy Policy Act
of 2005) also have a primary term of ten years. If the geothermal lessee does
not reach commercial production within the primary term, the BLM may grant two
five-year extensions. If the lessee is drilling a well for the purposes of
commercial production, the lease may be extended for five years and thereafter
as long as steam is being produced and used in commercial quantities the lease
may be extended for up to thirty-five years. If, at the end of the extended
thirty-five year term, geothermal steam is still being produced or utilized in
commercial quantities and the lands are not needed for other purposes, the
geothermal lessee will have a preferential right to renew the lease under terms
and conditions as the BLM deems appropriate.
BLM leases are issued either competitively or
non-competitively. Under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Lessees who obtain leases
issued through a non-competitive process pay an annual rental fee equal to $1.00
per acre for the first ten years and $5.00 per acre each year thereafter.
Lessees who obtain a lease through a competitive bid process pay a rental of
$2.00 per acre for the first year, $3.00 per acre for the second through tenth
year and $5.00 per acre each year thereafter. For BLM leases issued, effective,
or pending on August 8, 2005, royalty rates are fixed between 1.0 -2.5% of the
gross proceeds from the sale of electricity during the first ten years of
production under the lease.
The royalty rate set by the BLM for geothermal resources
produced for the commercial generation of electricity but not sold in an arms
length transaction is 1.75% for the first ten years of production and 3.5%
thereafter. The royalty rate for geothermal resources sold by the geothermal
lessee or an affiliate in an arms length transaction is 10.0% of the gross
proceeds from the arms length sale.
Private Geothermal Leases
U.S.
Geothermal and its subsidiaries hold geothermal rights through leases with 73
individuals and companies. The leases authorize geothermal development and
operations on privately owned geothermal estates. In some cases, the surface
ownership is split from the mineral or geothermal ownership.
Geothermal leases grant the exclusive right and privilege to
drill for, produce, extract, take and remove water, brine, steam, steam power,
minerals (other than oil), salts, chemicals, gases (other than gases associated
with oil), and other products produced or extracted through geothermal
development. The Company and its project subsidiaries are also granted
non-exclusive rights pertaining to the construction and operation of plants,
structures, and facilities on the leased land. The leases also grant the right
to dispose of waste brine and other waste products as well as the right to
re-inject into the leased land water, brine, steam, and gases in a well or wells
for the purpose of maintaining or restoring pressure in the productive
zones beneath the leased land or other land in the vicinity.
-66-
Lessors reserve the right to conduct other activities on the
leased land in a manner that does not unreasonably interfere with the geothermal
lessees uses of the same land. Activities include agricultural use (farming or
grazing), recreational use and other energy developments. Geothermal leases are
typically issued for a primary term of 10 years and continue for as long as
leased products are being produced or the lessee is drilling, exploring,
extracting, processing, or reworking operations on the leased land.
Lease payments typically include annual rental that is based on
a rate per acre under lease and royalty payments on gross revenue from the
generation of electricity. Leases also include a provision for royalty payment
on all revenue from geothermal by-products. Leases typically have requirements
for drilling, extraction or processing operations on the leased land within the
primary term or to conduct operations with reasonable diligence until lease
products have been found, extracted and processed in quantities deemed paying
quantities by the lessee. The lessee has the right at any time within the
primary term to terminate the lease and surrender the relevant land. If the
lessee has not commenced operations on leased land within the primary term, the
annual rentals typically increase. The purpose of the increasing annual rental
is to encourage development which, in some cases may generate higher payment to
the lessor in the form of monthly royalty.
Our leases typically require the lessee to carry insurance,
conduct operations in accordance with all local, state, and federal regulations,
prevent waste, protect environmental quality, and promptly address any default
by lessee. The lessor and lessee are protected from automatic lease termination
through a notice requirement which must be received by the lessee by certified
mail, and a 30 day period in which the lessee must make diligent efforts to
correct the alleged default.
Geothermal Development Concession in Guatemala
U.S. Geothermal Guatemala S.A. has acquired a 24,700 acre geothermal
concession from the Ministry of Energy and Mines Guatemala C.A. The site is
located 12.5 miles southwest of Guatemala City and 2.5 miles west southwest of
the City of Amatitlan. The geothermal concession grants the rights for
subsurface geothermal development, and established milestones for development
and production. The Company has negotiated and acquired a surface lease from one
landowner and controls 80 acres enabling geothermal development. The lease is
similar in term and conditions to our leases with private landowners in the
United States for surface fee land.