NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS, HISTORY AND PRESENTATION
Nature of Operations
General Cannabis Corporation (the Company, we, us, our, or GCC) (formerly, Advanced Cannabis Solutions, Inc.), was incorporated on June 3, 2013, and provides products and services to the regulated cannabis industry. On April 28, 2015, our common stock was uplisted and resumed quotation on the OTC Markets OTCQB on May 6, 2015. Our operations are segregated into the following four segments:
Security and Cash Management Services
In March 2015, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Iron Protection Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, which will continue to do business as Iron Protection Group. Iron Protection Group (IPG) provides advanced security, including on-site professionals, video surveillance and cash transport, to licensed cannabis cultivators and retail shops. As of December 31, 2015, Iron Protection Group had approximately 80 guards who serve 14 clients throughout Colorado.
Marketing and Products
In September 2015, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Chiefton Supply Co., and established a dba of Chiefton Supply Co., incorporated in Colorado (Chiefton). Chiefton is an apparel and design company. We design, distribute and sell apparel featuring graphic designs. Our apparel is purchased and screen printed by third parties, for which there are numerous suppliers. Chiefton also provides high-level design and branding services to various clients, from grow stores and dispensaries to wholesale cannabis companies.
Our wholesale supply business, GC Supply, is a reseller of supplies to the cannabis market. GC Supply works with industry leaders and innovators to deliver high-quality products that are compliant with applicable regulations and with a focus on products that are manufactured in the United States. GC Supply operates out of a leased, 1,800 square-foot warehouse located in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Consulting and Advisory
Through Next Big Crop we deliver comprehensive consulting services to the cannabis industry that include obtaining licenses, compliance, cultivation, retail operations, logistical support, facility design and building services, and expansion of existing operations. Our business plan is based on the future growth of the regulated cannabis market in the United States.
Finance and Real Estate
Real Estate Leasing
Our real estate leasing business primarily includes the acquisition and leasing of cultivation space and related facilities to licensed marijuana growers and dispensary owners for their operations. Management anticipates that these facilities will range in size from 5,000 to 50,000 square feet. These facilities will only be leased to tenants that possess the requisite state licenses to operate cultivation facilities. The leases with the tenants will provide certain requirements that permit us to continually evaluate our tenants compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
As of the date of this report, we owned one cultivation property that is located in a suburb of Pueblo, Colorado (the Pueblo West Property). The property consists of approximately three acres of land, which currently includes a 5,000 square foot steel building, and parking lot. The property is zoned for cultivating cannabis and is leased to a medical cannabis grower until December 31, 2022. We are evaluating strategic options for this property.
Shared Office Space, Networking and Event Services
In October 2014, we purchased a former retail bank located at 6565 East Evans Owner, Denver, Colorado 80224, which has been branded as The Greenhouse (The Greenhouse). The building is a 16,056 square-foot facility, which will be converted to serve as the largest shared workspace for entrepreneurs, professionals and others serving the cannabis industry. Clients will be able to lease space to use as offices, meeting rooms, lecture, educational and networking facilities, and individual workstations.
F-8
The Greenhouse has approximately 10,000 square feet of existing office space and 5,000 square feet on its ground floor that is dedicated to a consumer banking design. The banking space includes a vault with safety deposit boxes, three drive through teller windows and five secure teller windows inside.
We plan to continue to acquire commercial real estate and lease office space to participants in the cannabis industry. These participants include media, internet, packaging, lighting, cultivation supplies, and financial services. In exchange for certain services that may be provided to these tenants, we expect to receive rental income in the form of cash. In certain cases, we may acquire equity interests or provide debt capital to these businesses.
Industry Finance and Equipment Leasing Services
We lease cultivation equipment and facilities to customers in the cannabis industry. We expect we will enter into sale lease-back transactions of grow lights, tenant improvements and other grow equipment. Since Colorado State law does not allow entities operating under a cannabis license to pledge the assets or the license of the cannabis operation for any type of general borrowing activity, we intend to provide loans to individuals and businesses in the cannabis industry on an unsecured basis. Equipment will only be leased to tenants that possess the requisite state licenses to operate such facilities. The leases with the tenants will provide certain requirements that permit us to continually evaluate its tenants compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
We are exploring lending opportunities in Oregon, Washington, Colorado, and Arizona. Our finance strategy will include making direct term loans and providing revolving lines of credit to businesses involved in the cultivation and sale of cannabis and related products. These loans will generally be secured to the maximum extent permitted by law. We believe there is a significant demand for this financing. We are pursuing other finance services including customized finance, capital formation, and banking, for participants in the cannabis industry.
On November 4, 2015, we entered into an agreement (the DB Option Agreement) with Infinity Capital, a related party. Pursuant to the DB Option Agreement, Infinity Capital granted us a six month option to purchase all of its interest in DB Products Arizona, LLC (DB) at Infinity Capitals actual cost, plus $1.00, or $600,001. The interests for which the option has been granted are Infinity Capitals 50% equity interest in the membership interests of DB, and any outstanding unpaid principal and interest owed on promissory note(s) issued by DB in favor of Infinity Capital for up to $600,000. DB is involved in the production and distribution of Dixie Brands, Inc.s full line of medical cannabis Dixie Elixirs and Edible products in Arizona. DB expects to begin sales in 2016. We have no obligation to exercise the option.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of GCC, and its five wholly-owned subsidiary companies: (a) ACS Colorado Corp., a Colorado corporation formed in 2013; (b) Advanced Cannabis Solutions Corporation, a Colorado corporation formed in 2013; (c) 6565 E. Evans Avenue LLC, a Colorado limited liability company formed in 2014; (d) General Cannabis Capital Corporation, a Colorado corporation formed in 2015; and (e) GC Security LLC, a Colorado limited liability company formed in 2015. Advanced Cannabis Solutions Corporation has one wholly-owned subsidiary company, ACS Corp., which was formed in Colorado on June 6, 2013. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Although these estimates are based on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from these estimates and assumptions. Furthermore, when testing assets for impairment in future periods, if management uses different assumptions or if different conditions occur, impairment charges may result.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on net loss, total assets, or total stockholders equity (deficit).
Going Concern
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes we will be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our generating profitable operations in the future and / or obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management believes that actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate additional revenues provide opportunity for us to continue as a going concern. While we believe in the viability of our strategy to generate additional revenues and our ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.
F-9
We had an accumulated deficit of $16,427,378 at December 31, 2015, and further losses are anticipated in the development of our business. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.
Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits with banks, and investments that are highly liquid and have maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. We had no cash equivalents at December 31, 2015 or 2014.
We maintain our cash balances in financial institutions that from time to time exceed amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (up to $250,000 per financial institution as of December 31, 2015). At December 31, 2015 and 2014, our deposits did not exceed insured amounts. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Inventory
Our inventory consists of finished goods, including apparel and supplies for the cannabis market. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, using the first-in, first-out method (FIFO) to determine cost. We monitor inventory cost compared to selling price in order to determine if a lower of cost or market reserve is necessary. For the year ended December 31, 2015, cost of goods sold includes $75,048 of expense for inventory adjusted down to market value.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at historical cost. The cost of maintenance and repairs, which are not significant improvements, are expensed when incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets: thirty years for buildings, the lesser of five years or the life of the lease for leasehold improvements, and three to five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Land is not depreciated. Construction in progress, consisting of land development costs, pre-construction costs, construction costs, interest incurred on financing, architectural plans, is not depreciated until the related asset is placed in service.
Business Combinations
Amounts paid for acquisitions are allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of identifiable intangible assets is based on detailed valuations that use information and assumptions provided by management, including expected future cash flows. We allocate any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets and liabilities acquired to goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Acquisition-related costs, including advisory, legal, accounting, valuation and other costs, are expensed in the periods in which the costs are incurred. The results of operations of acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Goodwill is the cost of an acquisition less the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business.
Intangible assets consist primarily of customer relationships, non-compete agreements with key employees, and marketing-related intangibles. Our intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of two to ten years.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets and Goodwill
We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit containing goodwill is less than its carrying amount. The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if necessary. The first step is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. We typically use discounted cash flow models to determine the fair value of a reporting unit. The assumptions used in these models are consistent with those we believe hypothetical marketplace participants would use. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the second step of the impairment test must be performed in order to determine the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.
F-10
We periodically evaluate whether the carrying value of property, equipment and intangible assets has been impaired when circumstances indicate the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. The carrying amount is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If the carrying value is not recoverable, the impairment loss is measured as the excess of the assets carrying value over its fair value.
Our impairment analyses require management to apply judgment in estimating future cash flows as well as asset fair values, including forecasting useful lives of the assets, assessing the probability of different outcomes, and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows. If the carrying value is not recoverable, we assess the fair value of long-lived assets using commonly accepted techniques, and may use more than one method, including, but not limited to, recent third party comparable sales and discounted cash flow models. If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and estimates, or our assumptions and estimates change due to new information, we may be exposed to an impairment charge in the future.
Deferred Financing Costs
We capitalize the amounts paid to obtain financing, such as legal expenses of our lenders, and amortize the amount over the life of the underlying financing agreement.
Debt
We issue debt that may have separate warrants, conversion features, or no equity-linked attributes.
Debt with warrants
When we issue debt with warrants, we treat the warrants as a debt discount, record as a contra-liability against the debt, and amortize the balance over the life of the underlying debt as amortization of debt discount expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The offset to the contra-liability is recorded as additional paid in capital in our consolidated balance sheet. We determine the value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model (Black-Scholes) using the stock price on the date of issuance, the risk free interest rate associated with the life of the debt, and the volatility of our stock. If the debt is retired early, the associated debt discount is then recognized immediately as amortization of debt discount expense in the consolidated statement of operations. The debt is treated as conventional debt.
Convertible debt
derivative treatment
When we issue debt with a conversion feature, we must first assess whether the conversion feature meets the requirements to be treated as a derivative, as follows: a) one or more underlyings, typically the price of our common stock; b) one or more notional amounts or payment provisions or both, generally the number of shares upon conversion; c) no initial net investment, which typically excludes the amount borrowed; and d) net settlement provisions, which in the case of convertible debt generally means the stock received upon conversion can be readily sold for cash. An embedded equity-linked component that meets the definition of a derivative does not have to be separated from the host instrument if the component qualifies for the scope exception for certain contracts involving an issuers own equity. The scope exception applies if the contract is both a) indexed to its own stock; and b) classified in stockholders equity in its statement of financial position.
If the conversion feature within convertible debt meets the requirements to be treated as a derivative, we estimate the fair value of the convertible debt derivative using Black-Scholes upon the date of issuance. If the fair value of the convertible debt derivative is higher than the face value of the convertible debt, the excess is immediately recognized as interest expense. Otherwise, the fair value of the convertible debt derivative is recorded as a liability with an offsetting amount recorded as a debt discount, which offsets the carrying amount of the debt. The convertible debt derivative is revalued at the end of each reporting period and any change in fair value is recorded as a gain or loss in the consolidated statement of operations. The debt discount is amortized through interest expense over the life of the debt.
Convertible debt beneficial conversion feature
If the conversion feature is not treated as a derivative, we assess whether it is a beneficial conversion feature (BCF). A BCF exists if the conversion price of the convertible debt instrument is less than the stock price on the commitment date. This typically occurs when the conversion price is less than the fair value of the stock on the date the instrument was issued. The value of a BCF is equal to the intrinsic value of the feature, the difference between the conversion price and the common stock into which it is convertible, and is recorded as additional paid in capital and as a debt discount in the consolidated balance sheet. We amortize the balance over the life of the underlying debt as amortization of debt discount expense in the consolidated statement of operations. If the debt is retired early, the associated debt discount is then recognized immediately as amortization of debt discount expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
F-11
If the conversion feature does not qualify for either the derivative treatment or as a BCF, the convertible debt is treated as traditional debt.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, as follows:
|
|
Level 1
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 2
|
Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 3
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
Our financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payables and tenant deposits. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value due to their short maturities. The carrying amount of our debt approximates fair value because the interest rates on these instruments approximate the interest rate on debt with similar terms available to us. Our derivative liability was adjusted to fair market value at the end of each reporting period, using Level 3 inputs.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when the four revenue recognition criteria are met, as follows:
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists
our customary practice is to obtain written evidence, typically in the form of a contract or purchase order;
Delivery
when services are completed in accordance with the underlying contract, or for the sale of goods when custody is transferred to our customers either upon shipment to or receipt at our customers locations, with no right of return or further obligations;
The price is fixed or determinable
prices are typically fixed and no price protections or variables are offered; and
Collectability is reasonably assured
we typically work with businesses with which we have a long standing relationship, as well as continually monitoring and evaluating customers ability to pay.
Refunds and returns, which are minimal, are recorded as a reduction of revenue.
Share-based Payments
Nonemployees
We may enter into agreements with nonemployees to make share-based payments in return for services. These payments may be made in the form of common stock or common stock warrants. We recognize expense for fully-vested warrants at the time they are granted. For awards with service or performance conditions, we generally recognize expense over the service period or when the performance condition is met; however, there may be circumstances in which we determine that the performance condition is probable before the actual performance condition is achieved. In such circumstances, the amount recognized as expense is the pro rata amount, depending on the estimated progress towards completion of the performance condition. Nonemployee share-based payments are measured at fair value, based on either the fair value of the equity instrument issued or on the fair value of the services received. Typically, it is not practical to value the services received, so we determine the fair value of common stock grants based on the price of the common stock on the measurement date (which is the earlier of the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, if there are sufficient disincentives to ensure performance, or the date at which the counterpartys performance is complete), and the fair value of common stock warrants using Black-Scholes. We use historical data to estimate the expected price volatility, the expected stock option life and expected forfeiture rate. The risk-
F-12
free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the stock option. For awards that are recognized when a performance condition is probable, the fair value is estimated at each reporting date. The cost ultimately recognized is the fair value of the equity award on the date the performance condition is achieved. Accordingly, the expense recognized may change between interim reporting dates and the date the performance condition is achieved.
Awards of common stock with a service or performance condition, where the ultimate number of shares to be issued is uncertain, are classified as liabilities. All other non-employee awards are classified as equity.
Employees
We issue options to purchase our common stock to our employees, which are
measured at fair value using Black-Scholes. We use historical data to estimate the expected price volatility, the expected stock option life and expected forfeiture rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the stock option. We recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the service period, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, resulting in a compensation cost for only those shares expected to vest. Awards to employees
are classified as equity.
Shipping and Handling
Payments by customers to us for shipping and handling costs are included in revenue on the consolidated statements of operations, while our expense is included in cost of goods sold. Shipping and handling for inventory is included as a component of inventory on the consolidated balance sheets, and in cost of revenues in the consolidated statements of operations when the product is sold.
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the income tax and financial reporting carrying amount of our assets and liabilities. We monitor our deferred tax assets and evaluate the need for a valuation allowance based on the estimate of the amount of such deferred tax assets that we believe do not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition criteria. We also evaluate whether we have any uncertain tax positions and would record a reserve if we believe it is more-likely-than-not our position would not prevail with the applicable tax authorities. Our assessment of tax positions as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, determined that there were no material uncertain tax positions.
Reportable Segments
Our reporting segments consist of: a) Security and Cash Management Services; b) Marketing and Products; c) Consulting and Advisory; and d) Finance and Real Estate. Our Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the chief decision maker. Our operations are conducted primarily within the United States of America.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Update, or ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which will require lessees to recognize almost all leases on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting, but without explicit bright lines. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 18, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
FASB ASU 2015-17Income Taxes (Topic 740)
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, which simplifies the presentation of deferred tax assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. Previous GAAP required an entity to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts on the balance sheet. The amendment requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
F-13
FASB ASU 2015-16 Business Combinations (Topic 805), or ASU 2015-16
- In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, which requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with the option to early adopt for financial statements that have not been issued. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
FASB ASU 2015-11 Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, or ASU 2015-11
- In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, which requires an entity to measure in scope inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The amendments apply to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with the option to early adopt as of the beginning of an annual or interim period. We do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
FASB ASU 2015-03 Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Cost, or ASU 2015-03
- In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. We do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
FASB ASU 2015-02 Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, or ASU 2015-02
- In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, which changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and we are currently assessing the impact of adoption of this ASU on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
NOTE 2.
BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
IPG Acquisition
On March 26, 2015, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the IPG APA) by and among us and Iron Protection Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (Seller), whereby we agreed to acquire substantially all of the assets of Seller (the IPG Acquisition). This acquisition expands our service offerings in the cannabis industry and provides a new revenue stream.
Pursuant to the terms of the IPG APA, we will deliver to Seller 500,000 restricted shares of our common stock, which will vest over a one-year period (100,000 shares on October 1, 2015; 200,000 shares on January 1, 2016; and 200,000 shares on April 1, 2016).
In addition, we delivered to Seller three-year warrants (the IPG Warrants) to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of: (i) $4.50 for warrants to purchase 250,000 shares, and (ii) $5.00 for warrants to purchase another 250,000 shares. The IPG APA contains certain provisions that require Seller to forfeit a portion of the stock consideration in the event that Seller violates its obligations under the IPG APA relating to non-competition and non-disclosure. The closing date of the IPG Acquisition was March 26, 2015 and we calculated the purchase price of the IPG Acquisition to be approximately $1,887,000. At the acquisition date and pursuant to the IPG APA, we did not assume any of the Sellers liabilities and there were no tangible assets of significance.
The aggregate consideration was as follows:
|
|
|
Common stock payable
|
$
|
1,054,000
|
Warrants issued with $4.50 exercise price
|
|
421,000
|
Warrants issued with $5.00 exercise price
|
|
412,000
|
|
$
|
1,887,000
|
F-14
The 500,000 shares of common stock were valued based on the closing price per share on March 26, 2015, or $2.48, reduced by a discount of 15% due to restrictions in the ability to trade our common stock. The $1,054,000 value of stock consideration was recorded as accrued stock payable on the consolidated balance sheet, which is reduced as we issue common stock according to the vesting schedule. See Note 11 for a discussion of the warrants.
The purchase price allocation is as follows:
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
Customer relationship intangible
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
Marketing-related intangibles
|
|
200,000
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
500,000
|
Goodwill
|
|
187,000
|
|
$
|
1,887,000
|
We finalized the purchase price allocation in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2015.
In connection with our acquisition of IPG, we agreed to issue to the sole shareholder of the Seller 100,000 fully vested warrants to purchase shares of our common stock if revenues of the Security segment exceeded $3,000,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, with an exercise price of $2.48. This condition was not met during the year ended December 31, 2015, so no value was recorded for these warrants.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of IPG from the date of acquisition, March 26, 2015. The pro forma effects of the acquisition on the results of operations as if the transaction had been completed on January 1, 2014, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2015
(Unaudited)
|
|
2014
(Unaudited)
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
2,132,724
|
$
|
921,931
|
Net loss
|
|
(8,733,016)
|
|
(6,816,227)
|
Net loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.60)
|
$
|
(0.49)
|
Chiefton Acquisition
On September 25, 2015, we closed an asset purchase agreement for the purchase of substantially all the assets of Chiefton Supply Co., a Colorado corporation, and established a dba within GCC of Chiefton. This acquisition expands our service offerings in the cannabis industry and provides a new revenue stream.
We acquired the Chiefton assets for consideration of 80,000 restricted shares of our common stock. The shares shall remain in escrow for six months for the exclusive purpose of being available to indemnify us for any claims that may be made by any person or governmental entity related to or arising from Chieftons intellectual property during the six month period after closing. After such period, the shares will be released if no claims have been made, provided that if any claims have been made the shares will remain in escrow until the claim is resolved, at which time the shares will be released less the value of any and all settlement amounts, penalties, damages or other liabilities arising from the claim.
The aggregate consideration was as follows:
|
|
|
Cash
|
$
|
12,249
|
Common stock
|
|
69,400
|
Aggregate consideration
|
$
|
81,649
|
The value of the common stock consideration was estimated based on our closing common stock price on September 25, 2015, or $1.02 per share, reduced by a discount of 15% due to restrictions in the ability to trade our shares. The $69,400 value of stock consideration is included in accrued stock payable on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.
The purchase price allocation is as follows:
|
|
|
Inventory
|
$
|
12,249
|
Intangible assets Chiefton brand and graphic designs
|
|
69,400
|
|
$
|
81,649
|
F-15
We finalized the purchase price allocation in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2015.
NOTE 3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Our receivables consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Accounts receivable
|
$
|
133,692
|
$
|
18,319
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
(9,139)
|
|
--
|
Total
|
$
|
124,553
|
$
|
18,319
|
Future minimum lease payments due us consist of:
|
|
|
Year ending December 31
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
110,536
|
2017
|
|
112,753
|
2018
|
|
115,008
|
2019
|
|
117,308
|
2020
|
|
119,655
|
Thereafter
|
|
126,548
|
Total
|
$
|
701,808
|
NOTE 4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Land
|
$
|
812,340
|
$
|
812,340
|
Buildings
|
|
871,767
|
|
724,284
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
41,534
|
|
45,000
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
66,044
|
|
15,792
|
Construction in progress
|
|
--
|
|
138,056
|
|
|
1,791,685
|
|
1,735,472
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
(66,417)
|
|
(28,062)
|
|
$
|
1,725,268
|
$
|
1,707,410
|
Depreciation expense was $38,355 and $28,062, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
NOTE 5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consisted of the following as of December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Net
|
|
Estimated Life
(in years)
|
Customer relationships
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
$
|
76,712
|
$
|
923,288
|
|
10
|
Marketing-related
|
|
200,000
|
|
30,685
|
|
169,315
|
|
5
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
500,000
|
|
127,854
|
|
372,146
|
|
3
|
Chiefton brand and graphic designs
|
|
69,400
|
|
9,222
|
|
60,178
|
|
2
|
Intangible assets, net
|
$
|
1,769,400
|
$
|
244,473
|
$
|
1,524,927
|
|
|
F-16
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
|
|
|
Year ending December 31
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
342,302
|
2017
|
|
203,739
|
2018
|
|
140,000
|
2019
|
|
140,000
|
2020
|
|
140,000
|
Amortization expense was $244,473 and $38,200 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Amounts capitalized in 2014 for the development of educational and marketing webinars on various cannabis industry topics were fully expensed as of December 31, 2014. We did not recognize any impairment during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Goodwill
In connection with our acquisition of IPG, we recorded goodwill of $187,000. We have not recognized any impairment as of December 31, 2015.
NOTE 6. DEBT
Line of Credit Related Party
In February 2015, we issued a senior secured note to Infinity Capital, LLC (Infinity Capital), as amended in April 2015, bearing interest at 5% payable monthly in arrears commencing June 30, 2015, until the maturity date of August 31, 2015 (the Infinity Note). Infinity Capital, an investment management company, was founded and is controlled by our chairman of the board, Michael Feinsod, a related party. On July 1, 2015, the outstanding principal and interest of $309,000 was settled by our issuing a 10% private placement note. Subsequent to the settlement on July 1, 2015, we continued to borrow under the Infinity Note. Interest expense for the Infinity Note for the year ended December 31, 2015, was approximately $60,000, of which approximately $11,700 was accrued as of December 31, 2015.
Notes Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
10.0% private placement notes
|
$
|
659,000
|
$
|
--
|
14.0% mortgage note payable (The Greenhouse)
|
|
600,000
|
|
600,000
|
12.0% convertible notes - December 2013
|
|
--
|
|
530,000
|
12.0% convertible notes - January 2014
|
|
--
|
|
1,120,000
|
8.5% convertible note payable (Pueblo West Property)
|
|
158,307
|
|
164,644
|
|
|
1,417,307
|
|
2,414,644
|
Unamortized debt discount
|
|
(279,435)
|
|
(1,352,510)
|
|
|
1,137,872
|
|
1,062,134
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
(986,475)
|
|
(6,337)
|
Long-term portion
|
$
|
151,397
|
$
|
1,055,797
|
10% Private Placement Notes
In May, 2015, we initiated a private placement pursuant to a Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the 10% Agreement) with certain accredited investors, bearing interest at 10% payable quarterly, with a maturity date of May 1, 2016. Under the 10% Agreement, we can issue up to $2,000,000 of notes to investors, bearing interest at 10%, with a minimum denomination of $25,000 (each such note, a 10% Note, and collectively, the 10% Notes). Subject to the terms and conditions of the 10% Agreement, each investor is granted fully-vested warrants equal to their note principal divided by two (the 10% Warrants) (with standard dilution clauses). The 10% Warrants are exercisable for a period of eighteen months after grant date and have an exercise price of $1.08 per share. The debt is treated as conventional debt. The 10% Notes are collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of our assets.
$309,000 of the 10% Notes are due to a related party, Infinity Capital, at December 31, 2015. Approximately $14,000 of interest expense and $7,300 of accrued interest under the 10% Notes relates to Infinity Capital.
F-17
14% Mortgage Note Payable (The Greenhouse)
In October 2014, we executed a mortgage on The Greenhouse in the amount of $600,000, bearing 14.0% interest payable monthly, with a maturity date of October 21, 2016 (the Greenhouse Mortgage). The debt is treated as conventional debt.
In addition, we granted warrants to Evans Street Lendco LLC (Evans Lendco), the note holder of the Greenhouse Mortgage, which expire on October 21, 2016. The warrants vested immediately and allowed for Evans Lendco to purchase 600,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $4.40 per share, (with standard dilution clauses). Due to the drop in our stock price, on July 29, 2015, we agreed with Evans Lendco to replace the warrants previously issued to Evans Lendco with warrants to purchase 225,000 shares of our stock at $1.20 per share with a term of two years. The estimated fair value of the replacement warrants is less than the fair value of the original warrants on their date of grant. Accordingly, we will continue to amortize the remaining fair value of the original warrants over the remaining life of the underlying debt.
12% Convertible Notes
December 2013 Issuance
In December 2013, we entered into convertible promissory notes with various third parties totaling $530,000 (the December 2013 Issuance). The principal amounts of these notes range between $10,000 and $150,000. The notes mature on October 31, 2018, bear interest at 12.0% payable quarterly, and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of $5.00 per share (with standard dilution clauses).
Derivative treatment is not required, as the conversion feature meets the scope exception. The conversion feature is not beneficial, because the conversion price was higher than the stock price on the commitment date. Accordingly, we treated the December 2013 Issuance as conventional debt.
January 2014 Issuance
In January 2014, we entered into various convertible promissory notes with various third parties totaling $1,605,000 (the January 2014 Issuance). The principal amounts of these notes range between $10,000 and $200,000. Under the terms of these notes, they mature on October 31, 2018, bear interest at 12.0% payable quarterly, and are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of $5.00 per share (with standard dilution clauses). These notes are convertible at the election of the noteholder at any time on or before maturity date.
Derivative treatment is not required, as the conversion feature met the scope exception. Since the initial conversion price was less than the market value of the common stock at the time of issuance, it was determined that a beneficial conversion feature existed. The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature and the combined value of the debt discount resulted in a value greater than the value of the debt and, as such, the total discount was limited to the value of the debt balance of $1,605,000.
Conversion of 12% Convertible Notes
During the year ended December 31, 2014, lenders converted $488,669 of 12% Convertible Notes in exchange for 97,773 shares of our common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2015, lenders converted $321,123 of 12% Convertible Notes for 64,225 shares of our common stock.
The December 2013 Issuance and the January 2014 Issuance (collectively, the 12% Convertible Notes) included a provision that if the trading stock price exceeded $10 for twenty consecutive trading days and the daily volume for those twenty consecutive trading days exceeds 25,000 shares, then the 12% Convertible Notes convert into shares of our common stock on or after December 1, 2015. As of April 24, 2014, these parameters were met. On December 1, 2015, the remaining $1,330,000 of convertible notes was automatically converted to 266,000 shares of our common stock.
8 ½% Convertible Note Payable (Pueblo West Property)
In December 2013, we executed a mortgage on our Pueblo West Property in the amount of $170,000, bearing 8 ½% interest with monthly principal and interest payments totaling $1,674, with the balance due on December 31, 2018 (the Pueblo Mortgage). This note is convertible at any time at $5.00 per share.
F-18
Derivative treatment is not required, as the conversion feature meets the scope exception. The conversion feature is not beneficial, because the conversion price was higher than the stock price on the commitment date. Accordingly, we treated the Pueblo Mortgage as conventional debt.
Annual maturities of long-term debt (excluding unamortized discount) for the next four years, consist of:
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
1,265,910
|
2017
|
|
7,507
|
2018
|
|
143,890
|
|
$
|
1,417,307
|
NOTE 7. ACCRUED STOCK PAYABLE
The following tables summarize the changes in accrued common stock payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
December 31, 2013
|
$
|
--
|
|
--
|
Feinsod Agreement - accrual
|
|
409,349
|
|
300,000
|
Architectural Services
|
|
114,693
|
|
50,000
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
524,042
|
|
350,000
|
Architectural Services - issued
|
|
(114,693)
|
|
(50,000)
|
IPG acquisition -- accrued
|
|
1,054,000
|
|
500,000
|
IPG acquisition -- issued
|
|
(210,800)
|
|
(100,000)
|
Chiefton acquisition -- accrued
|
|
69,400
|
|
80,000
|
Feinsod Agreement -- accrual
|
|
723,851
|
|
--
|
Feinsod Agreement - issued
|
|
(663,000)
|
|
(150,000)
|
Employment agreements - accrued
|
|
131,608
|
|
50,000
|
Consulting services - accrued
|
|
18,012
|
|
50,000
|
December 31,2015
|
$
|
1,532,420
|
|
730,000
|
Feinsod Agreement
On August 4, 2014, we entered into an agreement with Michael Feinsod in consideration for serving as Executive Chairman of the Board and as a member of the Board and pursuant to the terms of the Executive Board and Director Agreement (the Feinsod Agreement). The Board approved the issuance to Infinity Capital of (a) 200,000 shares of our common stock on August 4, 2014; (b) 1,000,000 shares of our common stock upon the uplisting of our common stock to the OTC Markets OTCQB; (c) 150,000 shares of our common stock on August 4, 2015; and (d) 150,000 shares of our common stock on August 4, 2016. Mr. Feinsod must remain a member of the Board in order for the common stock to be issued. In addition, the Feinsod Agreement requires the issuance of a number of shares of our common stock to Infinity Capital equal to 10% of any new issuances not to exceed 600,000 shares of our common stock in the aggregate during the time that Mr. Feinsod remains a member of the Board (the New Issuance Allowance). Under the terms of the Feinsod Agreement, the New Issuance Allowance will not be triggered upon issuances relating to convertible securities existing as of the date of the Feinsod Agreement. For illustrative purposes, if we issue 7,000,000 new shares of common stock, then the New Issuance Allowance issued to Infinity Capital would be capped at 600,000 shares of our common stock. No shares have been issued under the New Issuance Allowance.
The 1,000,000 shares of our common stock were valued at $2.97 per share, based on the closing price of our common stock of $3.49 on April 27, 2015, and then reduced by 15% due to restrictions on the ability to trade our shares. The other shares under the Feinsod Agreement were valued at $4.42 per share, based on the closing price of our common stock of $5.20 on August 4, 2014, and then reduced by 15% due to restriction on the ability to trade our common stock. We are recognizing expense for the unissued shares ratably over the vesting period.
Architectural Services
On December 12, 2014, we agreed to issue 50,000 shares of our common stock to an architectural firm to prepare architectural plans for The Greenhouse. The firm also received warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.40 per share, at any time on or before December 12, 2016. The shares of common stock were issued in 2015. We capitalized the cost of the architectural plans as part of Buildings within Property and Equipment on the consolidated balance sheet.
F-19
Employment Agreements
On May 13, 2015, we hired two individuals from Next Big Crop (NBC), an unaffiliated entity serving the cannabis industry, to service our new and existing clients. We did not purchase any existing client base from NBC and upon execution of employment agreements, granted these persons a total of 100,000 shares of our common stock with a vesting date of January 1, 2016. On the date of grant, the 100,000 shares had an initial fair value of $311,000, based on a closing price per share of our common stock of $3.11 on May 13, 2015. Due to restrictions in the ability to trade our shares, a discount of fifteen percent (15%) was applied to the fair value of the shares. After taking into consideration the illiquidity of the shares, the fair value was determined to be $264,350. One individual forfeited his shares, so expense was only recognized for 50,000 shares.
Consulting Agreement
On July 15, 2015, we entered into an agreement with an individual to provide consulting services to customers in exchange for 50,000 shares of our common stock to be delivered on March 15, 2016. The fair value of the common stock is determined at the end of each reporting period and the pro rata amount earned is recognized as accrued stock payable over the term of the agreement.
NOTE 8. DERIVATIVE WARRANT LIABILITY
On January 21, 2014, in connection with a Securities Purchase Agreement (the SPA) we entered into with Full Circle Capital Corporation (Full Circle), for $500,000 we issued to Full Circle, fully-vested warrants (Series C Warrants), which allow Full Circle to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at any time on or prior to January 21, 2017 at a price of $5.50 per share. As part of the $500,000 proceeds from the issuance of the Series C Warrants, $100,000 was retained by Full Circle to cover legal and deal related expenses of future financing transactions, which was recorded as deferred financing costs. On September 24, 2014, we and Full Circle entered into Amendment No. 1 to the SPA, which changed the exercise price of the warrants issuable to $4.00 per share of our common stock, and increased the amount of warrants issuable to 1,400,000 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.
The Series C Warrants have non-standard anti-dilution protection provisions and, under certain conditions, grant the right to the holder to require us to adjust the warrants exercise price to a lower price. Accordingly, these warrants were accounted for as derivative liabilities.
We used the binomial pricing model and assumptions that consider, among other factors, the fair value of the underlying stock, risk-free interest rate, volatility, expected life and dividend rates in estimating fair value for the warrants considered to be derivative instruments. Our common stock has been thinly traded since being delisted in the first quarter of 2014, and all conversions of debt from the January 2014 Issuance during 2014 were converted using a stock price of $5.00 per share. Using the binomial pricing model and a stock price of $5.00 per share, management utilized initial scenario stock prices of $3.00, $4.00, $6.00, and $7.00. Initially assuming a three-year expected term, management assessed the probabilities of the stock prices for each year, with probabilities more heavily weighted toward lower stock prices, in light of our delisted status, changes in leadership, and our current inability to execute our initial financing with Full Circle.
On January 21, 2014, the value of the initial warrant derivative liability was calculated to be $1,368,908. We received $500,000 in cash, resulting in an initial loss on the fair value of the derivative liability of $868,908 on the grant date. The price of $5.00 per share of the Series A and Series B Warrants granted in connection with the December 2013 Issuance and the January 2014 Issuance resulted in the revaluation of the Series C Warrants granted to Full Circle and an increase to the derivative liability of $153,994.
On January 21, 2015, Full Circle executed a cashless exercise of 1,215,000 warrants in exchange for 660,263 common shares of our common stock. At the time of the cashless exercise, the fair value of the common stock was determined to be $3,314,520 based on the closing share price of $5.02 on January 21, 2015. Accordingly, we decreased the derivative liability by $3,314,520, and increased common stock by $660 and additional paid in capital by $3,313,860.
On May 1, 2015, we and Full Circle entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Series C Warrants, pursuant to which Full Circle executed a cashless exercised of 160,000 warrants and received 100,000 shares of our common stock. On May 4, 2015, Full Circle exercised its remaining warrants under the Series C Warrants for $100,000 and purchased 25,000 shares of our common stock for $4.00 per share. Immediately preceding Full Circles exercises the fair value of the Series C Warrants was determined to be $593,394. The fair value of the 125,000 common shares issued to Full Circle was determined to be approximately $468,750, based on closing prices per share of $3.75 on May 1, 2015. Accordingly, we decreased the derivative liability by $601,617, and increased common stock by $125 and additional paid in capital by $454,796, and $86,171 in cash received from Full Circle, net of $13,829 of settlement expenses paid. We recorded a net gain in the settlement of the warrant liability of $210,634 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Following these transactions, there are no more Series C Warrants outstanding.
F-20
The underlying assumptions used in the binomial model to determine the fair value of the derivative warrant liability were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2015
|
|
May 4, 2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
Current stock price
|
$
|
3.75
|
$
|
3.50
|
$
|
5.02
|
Exercise price of warrant
|
$
|
4.00
|
$
|
4.00
|
$
|
4.00
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.60 %
|
|
0.60 %
|
|
0.60 %
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
1.8
|
|
1.8
|
|
3.0
|
Expected volatility
|
|
133 %
|
|
133 %
|
|
129 %
|
Early exercise factor
|
|
1.33
|
|
1.33
|
|
1.33
|
Changes in fair value of the derivative financial instruments are recognized in our consolidated statements of operations as a derivative gain or loss and are included in other income (expense). The primary underlying risk exposure pertaining to the warrants was the change in fair value of the underlying common stock for each reporting period.
Changes in the derivative warrant liability and cumulative expense since inception are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
Cumulative Expense (Gain)
|
January 1, 2014
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
--
|
Fair value of warrants issued
|
|
1,368,908
|
|
868,908
|
Increase in derivative liability resulting from anti-dilution provision in agreement, with Full Circle
|
|
153,994
|
|
153,994
|
Increase in the fair value of warrant liability
|
|
2,371,002
|
|
2,371,002
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
3,893,904
|
|
3,393,904
|
Increase in the fair value of warrant liability
|
|
14,010
|
|
14,010
|
Reclassification to APIC for shares issued for Full Circle as a result of warrant exercises, net of cash received
|
|
(3,683,270)
|
|
--
|
Gain on settlement of derivative
|
|
(224,644)
|
|
(224,644)
|
Balance after all warrants were exercised
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
3,183,270
|
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
We entered into a month-to-month lease agreement for corporate office space in July 2013, to lease 2,000 square feet for an annual rate of $12,000, paid monthly. This lease was terminated effective April 1, 2014. On April 2, 2014, we entered into a three-year lease agreement for 3,000 square feet for our corporate offices, which was canceled without penalty, effective November 1, 2014. We entered into a three-year agreement effective April 21, 2014, for a 1,800 square foot warehouse supply and distribution facility, through April 30, 2017.
Lease expense was approximately $3,192 and $9,150 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The future obligations under the warehouse lease are approximately $13,200 for 2016, and $4,500 for 2017.
DB Option Agreement
On November 4, 2015, we entered into an agreement (the DB Option Agreement) with Infinity Capital, a related party. Pursuant to the DB Option Agreement, Infinity Capital granted us a six month option to purchase all of its interest in DB Products Arizona, LLC (DB) at Infinity Capitals actual cost, plus $1.00, or $600,001. The interests for which the option has been granted are Infinity Capitals 50% equity interest in the membership interests of DB, and any outstanding unpaid principal and interest owed on promissory note(s) issued by DB in favor of Infinity Capital for up to $600,000. DB is involved in the production and distribution of Dixie Brands, Inc.s full line of medical cannabis Dixie Elixirs and Edible products in Arizona. DB expects to begin sales in 2016. We have no obligation to exercise the option.
Legal
To the best of our knowledge and belief, no legal proceedings of merit are currently pending or threatened.
F-21
NOTE 10. DEFERRED TAXES
The components of net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Long-lived assets
|
$
|
26,875
|
$
|
(4,917)
|
Equity-based instruments
|
|
851,230
|
|
1,471,138
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
4,689,600
|
|
1,189,262
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
(5,567,705)
|
|
(2,655,483)
|
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
--
|
A reconciliation of our income tax provision and the amounts computed by applying statutory rates to income before income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Income tax benefit at statutory rate
|
$
|
(2,987,334)
|
$
|
(2,356,247)
|
State income tax benefit, net of Federal benefit
|
|
(406,805)
|
|
(320,866)
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
|
561,936
|
|
291,937
|
Gain on derivative
|
|
(81,368)
|
|
--
|
Other
|
|
1,349
|
|
2,869
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
2,912,222
|
|
2,382,307
|
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
--
|
NOTE 11. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Common Stock
On January 5, 2014, we reacquired 1,750,000 shares of our common stock from stockholders for no consideration, and returned them to our authorized but unissued share account.
On December 2, 2014, we entered into a settlement agreement with a former stockholder, whereby 1,185,000 share of our common stock were returned and subsequently cancelled.
Employee Stock Options
On October 29, 2014, the Board authorized the adoption of and on June 26, 2015, our stockholders ratified our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan). The Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of up to 10 million shares of our common stock, and is designed to provide an additional incentive to executives, employees, directors and key consultants, aligning our long term interests with participants.
Share-based compensation costs for award grants to employees and directors (Employee Awards) are recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period for the entire award, with the amount of compensation cost recognized at any date equaling at least the portion of the award that is vested. We recognized expense for Employee Awards of $1,500,783 for the year ended December 31, 2015. No Employee Awards were granted prior to 2015.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using Black-Scholes. We use historical data to estimate the expected price volatility. We estimate forfeiture rates based on expected turnover of employees by category. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the option. The following summarizes the Black-Scholes assumptions used for Employee Awards granted during the year ended December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
Exercise price
|
$
|
0.60 3.75
|
Stock price on date of grant
|
$
|
0.55 -- 3.75
|
Volatility
|
|
151 169 %
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.9 2.5 %
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
3.0 10.0
|
Dividend yield
|
|
--
|
F-22
We use an estimated forfeiture rate of 25% for our hourly employees, who were granted 282,000 options during the year ended December 31, 2015. We assume options granted to salaried employees will all vest.
The following summarizes Employee Awards activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted-average Exercise Price per Share
|
|
Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
2,662,000
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(153,000)
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
2,509,000
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
3.1
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2015
|
|
347,500
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
3.5
|
$
|
--
|
As of December 31, 2015, there was approximately $1,393,459 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested Employee Awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.8 years.
Warrants for Consulting Services
As needed, we may issue warrants to third parties in exchange for consulting services. Stock-based compensation costs for award grants to third parties for consulting services (Consulting Awards) are recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period for the entire award, with the amount of compensation cost recognized at any date equaling at least the portion of the award that is vested. Service Awards are revalued at each reporting date until fully vested, which may generate an expense or benefit. We recognized expense for Consulting Awards of $77,918 for the year ended December 31, 2015.
On December 12, 2014, we entered into a contract with an architectural firm to prepare plans for The Greenhouse. The firm received fully-vested warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.40 per share, with a term of two years.
On April 24, 2015, we entered into a one-year contract with an individual to provide consulting services to raise capital. We granted to this individual warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.75 per share, with a one year vesting period and a term of two years.
On April 27, 2015, we entered into a one-year contract with a company to provide investor relations services. We granted to this company warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.49 per share, with a one year vesting period and a term of two years.
On June 26, 2015, we granted an individual who provides management consulting services fully-vested warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.10 per share with a term of three years. On August 31, 2015, we granted this individual fully-vested warrants to purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.03 per share, with a term of three years. On December 18, 2015, we granted this individual warrants to purchase 7,500 shares our common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, with a one year vesting period and a term of three years.
On June 26, 2015, we granted an individual serving as our chief financial officer fully-vested warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.10 per share, with a term of three years.
On July 1, 2015, we entered into a one-year contract with an individual to provide management consulting services. We granted warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.88 per share, with a one year vesting period and a term of three years.
F-23
The fair value of each warrant grant is estimated using Black-Scholes. We use historical data to estimate the expected price volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of valuation for the estimated life of the option. The following summarizes the Black-Scholes assumptions used for Consulting Awards granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Exercise price
|
$
|
0.60 3.75
|
$
|
4.40
|
Stock price, date of valuation
|
$
|
0.52 0.89
|
$
|
1.20
|
Volatility
|
|
150 157 %
|
|
134 %
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.1 1.3 %
|
|
0.6 %
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
2.0 3.0
|
|
2.0
|
Dividend yield
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
The following summarizes Consulting Awards activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted-average Exercise Price per Share
|
|
Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
Granted
|
|
150,000
|
$
|
4.40
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
|
150,000
|
|
4.40
|
|
0.9
|
|
--
|
Granted
|
|
127,500
|
|
2.40
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(25,000)
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
252,500
|
|
3.62
|
|
1.4
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2015
|
|
175,000
|
$
|
4.07
|
|
1.2
|
|
--
|
As of December 31, 2015, there was approximately $9,885 of total unrecognized expense related to unvested Consulting Awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.4 years.
IPG Acquisition Warrants
In connection with the IPG APA, we issued to IPG 500,000 fully-vested warrants to purchase a) 250,000 shares of our common stock at $4.50 per share, (the IPG $4.50 Warrants), and b) 250,000 shares of our common stock at $5.00 per share (the IPG $5.00 Warrants) (collectively, the IPG Warrants). The IPG Warrants are subject to customary adjustments in the event of our reclassification, consolidation, merger, subdivision of shares of our common stock, combination of shares of our common stock or payment of dividends in the form of the our common stock. The IPG Warrants expire three years after their initial issuance date. On the date of grant, the IPG $4.50 Warrants and the IPG $5.00 Warrants had fair values of approximately $421,000 and $412,000, respectively, based on the Black-Scholes.
The following summarizes the Black-Scholes assumptions used for IPG Warrants:
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
134 %
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.0 %
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
3.0
|
Dividend yield
|
|
--
|
Warrants with Debt
The fair value of each warrant grant is estimated using Black-Scholes. We use historical data to estimate the expected price volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the warrant. The following summarizes the Black-Scholes assumptions used for warrants granted for debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Volatility
|
|
125 132 %
|
|
129 171 %
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.4 0.5 %
|
|
0.6 1.8 %
|
Expected option life (years)
|
|
1.5
|
|
2.0 4.8
|
Dividend yield
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
F-24
The following summarizes warrants issued with debt activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted-average Exercise Price per Share
|
|
Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
|
|
10,600
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
4.8
|
$
|
4,982
|
Granted
|
|
632,100
|
|
4.43
|
|
2.1
|
|
--
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
|
642.700
|
|
4.44
|
|
1.9
|
|
--
|
Granted
|
|
554,500
|
|
1.13
|
|
1.7
|
|
--
|
Cancelled
|
|
(600,000)
|
|
4.40
|
|
|
|
--
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
597,200
|
|
1.41
|
|
1.0
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2015
|
|
597,200
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
1.0
|
|
--
|
Series A Warrants
Between July 11, 2013 and August 8, 2013, we issued 707,000 shares of our common stock and 707,000 fully-vested Series A Warrants for cash consideration of $1.00 per share. Each Series A Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $10.00 per share. The Series A Warrants expire on the earlier of August 1, 2016, or twenty days following written notification from that our common stock had a closing bid price at or above $12.00 for any ten consecutive trading days. This condition was met as of April 30, 2014; however, we have not forced conversion of the warrants at this time.
Between August 14, 2013 and September 19, 2013, we issued 266,000 shares and 266,000 fully-vested Series A Warrants of our common stock for cash consideration of $1.00 per share. The Series A Warrants expire on the earlier of August 1, 2016, or twenty days following written notification from that our common stock had a closing bid price at or above $12.00 for any ten consecutive trading days. This condition was met as of April 30, 2014; however, we have not forced conversion of the warrants at this time.
As of December 31, 2015, all 973,000 warrants are outstanding and exercisable.
NOTE 12. NET LOSS PER SHARE
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net loss per share is computed similarly to basic loss per share, except that it includes the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities are exercised.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the denominators used in the computation of net loss per share basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(8,786,277)
|
$
|
(6,930,139)
|
Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock
|
|
14,017,095
|
|
13,462,396
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
Common stock and equivalents
|
|
14,017,095
|
|
13,462,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share Basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.63)
|
$
|
(0.51)
|
Outstanding stock options and common stock warrants are considered anti-dilutive because we are in a net loss position. The following summarizes equity instruments that may, in the future, have a dilutive effect on earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Common stock upon conversion of debt
|
|
31,661
|
|
330,000
|
Stock options
|
|
2,509,000
|
|
--
|
Warrants
|
|
1,822,700
|
|
3,165,700
|
Stock payable
|
|
630,000
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
4,993,361
|
|
3,845,700
|
F-25
NOTE 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
There were no events subsequent to December 31, 2015, and up to the date of this filing that would require disclosure.
NOTE 14. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Our operations are organized into four segments: Security and Cash Management Services; Marketing and Products; Consulting and Advisory; and Finance and Real Estate. All revenue originates and all assets are located in the United States. We have revised our disclosure to correspond to the information provided to the chief operating decision maker.
Year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Security and Cash Management
|
|
Marketing and Products
|
|
Consulting and Advisory
|
|
Finance and Real Estate
|
|
Total
|
Revenues
|
$
|
1,490,832
|
$
|
60,564
|
$
|
110,800
|
$
|
100,782
|
$
|
1,762,978
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
(1,611,201)
|
|
(248,646)
|
|
(162,428)
|
|
(32,051)
|
|
(2,054,326)
|
Interest expense
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(44,166)
|
|
(44,166)
|
|
$
|
(120,369)
|
$
|
(188,082)
|
$
|
(51,628)
|
$
|
24,565
|
|
(335,514)
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,450,763)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(8,786,277)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Security and Cash Management
|
|
Marketing and Products
|
|
Consulting and Advisory
|
|
Finance and Real Estate
|
|
Total
|
Revenues
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
85,147
|
$
|
40,000
|
$
|
115,059
|
$
|
240,206
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
--
|
|
(125,489)
|
|
(30)
|
|
(33,008)
|
|
(158,527)
|
Interest expense
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(15,961)
|
|
(15,961)
|
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(40,342)
|
$
|
39,970
|
$
|
66,090
|
|
65,718
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,995,857)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(6,930,139)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
Total assets
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Security and Cash Management Services
|
$
|
132,314
|
$
|
--
|
Marketing and Products
|
|
127,345
|
|
72,312
|
Consulting and Advisory
|
|
22,268
|
|
--
|
Finance and Real Estate
|
|
431,639
|
|
443,987
|
Corporate
|
|
2,969,145
|
|
1,550,765
|
|
$
|
3,682,711
|
$
|
2,067,064
|
F-26
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the Quarters ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
GENERAL CANNABIS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2016
(Unaudited)
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,064,606
|
$
|
58,711
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
267,694
|
|
124,553
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
59,055
|
|
46,734
|
Inventory, net
|
|
27,145
|
|
15,518
|
Total current assets
|
|
1,418,500
|
|
245,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
1,700,813
|
|
1,725,268
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
1,268,668
|
|
1,524,927
|
Goodwill
|
|
187,000
|
|
187,000
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
4,574,981
|
$
|
3,682,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
457,526
|
$
|
293,532
|
Interest payable
|
|
63,032
|
|
84,720
|
Line of credit related party
|
|
1,297,500
|
|
800,000
|
Notes payable (net of debt discount of $279,435 as of December 31, 2015), current portion
|
|
--
|
|
986,475
|
Deferred rental revenue and customer deposits
|
|
66,138
|
|
33,146
|
Accrued stock payable
|
|
663,000
|
|
1,532,420
|
Derivative warrant liability
|
|
15,386,000
|
|
--
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
17,933,196
|
|
3,730,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable (net of debt discount of $2,419,800 and $ --, respectively, as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015), less current portion
|
|
580,200
|
|
151,397
|
Tenant deposits
|
|
8,854
|
|
9,204
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
18,522,250
|
|
3,890,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 5,000,000 share authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 15,495,421 shares and 14,915,421 shares issued and outstanding on September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
|
|
15,495
|
|
14,915
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
19,436,411
|
|
16,204,280
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
(33,399,175)
|
|
(16,427,378)
|
Total Stockholders Deficit
|
|
(13,947,269)
|
|
(208,183)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Stockholders Deficit
|
$
|
4,574,981
|
$
|
3,682,711
|
See Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-27
GENERAL CANNABIS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
$
|
704,489
|
$
|
554,458
|
$
|
1,988,584
|
$
|
948,561
|
Tenant
|
|
25,565
|
|
29,365
|
|
93,398
|
|
93,954
|
Product Sales
|
|
80,326
|
|
9,494
|
|
122,452
|
|
34,861
|
Total revenues
|
|
810,380
|
|
593,317
|
|
2,204,434
|
|
1,077,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service revenues
|
|
477,287
|
|
416,838
|
|
1,393,445
|
|
673,926
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
77,252
|
|
28,144
|
|
112,649
|
|
67,786
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
488,543
|
|
406,711
|
|
1,300,051
|
|
1,027,394
|
Share-based expense
|
|
872,217
|
|
863,709
|
|
1,974,191
|
|
4,967,799
|
Professional fees
|
|
95,520
|
|
70,594
|
|
276,706
|
|
321,091
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
97,988
|
|
54,160
|
|
292,329
|
|
130,038
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
2,108,807
|
|
1,840,156
|
|
5,349,371
|
|
7,188,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING LOSS
|
|
(1,298,427)
|
|
(1,246,839)
|
|
(3,144,937)
|
|
(6,110,658)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt discount and deferred
financing costs
|
|
111,837
|
|
285,090
|
|
327,455
|
|
661,915
|
Interest expense
|
|
5,276,550
|
|
166,306
|
|
5,381,125
|
|
314,011
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
1,728,280
|
|
--
|
|
2,086,280
|
|
--
|
Net loss (gain) on derivative liability
|
|
6,032,000
|
|
--
|
|
6,032,000
|
|
(210,634)
|
Total other expense (income)
,
net
|
|
13,148,667
|
|
451,396
|
|
13,826,860
|
|
765,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS
|
$
|
(14,447,094)
|
$
|
(1,698,235)
|
$
|
(16,971,797)
|
$
|
(6,875,950)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER SHARE DATA Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
$
|
(0.93)
|
$
|
(0.12)
|
$
|
(1.11)
|
$
|
(0.50)
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
15,495,421
|
|
14,399,029
|
|
15,270,968
|
|
13,847,561
|
See Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-28
GENERAL CANNABIS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
$
|
(16,971,797)
|
$
|
(6,875,950)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt discount and deferred financing costs
|
|
327,455
|
|
663,747
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
2,086,280
|
|
--
|
Initial fair value of derivative warrant liability included as interest expense
|
|
5,189,000
|
|
--
|
Loss (gain) on derivative liability, net
|
|
6,032,000
|
|
(210,634)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
292,329
|
|
130,038
|
Equity-based payments
|
|
1,974,191
|
|
4,964,218
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of amounts acquired):
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
(143,141)
|
|
(72,264)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
(12,321)
|
|
(89,405)
|
Inventory
|
|
(11,627)
|
|
40,013
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
174,948
|
|
335,150
|
Net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
(1,062,683)
|
|
(1,115,087)
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
(11,615)
|
|
(54,960)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
(11,615)
|
|
(54,960)
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under notes payable
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
659,000
|
Increase in line of credit -- related party
|
|
497,500
|
|
365,000
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
(917,307)
|
|
(4,701)
|
Proceeds from warrant exercises
|
|
--
|
|
86,171
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
2,080,193
|
|
1,105,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
|
1,005,895
|
|
(64,577)
|
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
58,711
|
|
165,536
|
CASH, END OF PERIOD
|
$
|
1,064,606
|
$
|
100,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
$
|
213,813
|
$
|
173,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock and warrants from accrued stock payable
|
$
|
1,069,775
|
$
|
114,693
|
Derivative warrant liability recorded as debt discount
|
|
2,450,000
|
|
--
|
Warrants issued in connection with debt recorded as debt discount
|
|
31,100
|
|
297,931
|
10% Notes and 14% Mortgage Note Payable converted to 12% Notes
|
|
550,000
|
|
--
|
Convertible notes payable settled in common stock
|
|
--
|
|
320,000
|
Issuance of common stock upon cashless conversion of warrants by Full Circle
|
|
--
|
|
3,683,270
|
Acquisition of IPG with common stock payable and warrants
|
|
--
|
|
1,887,000
|
Acquisition of Chiefton with common stock payable
|
|
--
|
|
69,400
|
See Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-29
GENERAL CANNABIS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS, HISTORY AND PRESENTATION
Nature of Operations
General Cannabis Corporation (the Company, we, us, our, or GCC) (formerly, Advanced Cannabis Solutions, Inc.), was incorporated in Colorado on June 3, 2013, and provides products and services to the regulated cannabis industry. On April 28, 2015, our common stock was uplisted and resumed quotation on the OTC Markets OTCQB on May 6, 2015. Our operations are segregated into the following four reportable segments:
Security and Cash Management Services
In March 2015, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Iron Protection Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, which continues to do business as Iron Protection Group. Iron Protection Group (IPG) provides advanced security, including on-site professionals, video surveillance and cash transport, to licensed cannabis cultivators and retail shops. As of September 30, 2016, IPG had approximately 71 security guards on staff who serve 16 clients throughout Colorado.
Marketing and Products
In September 2015, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Chiefton Supply Co., and established a dba of Chiefton Supply Co., incorporated in Colorado (Chiefton). Chiefton is an apparel and design company. Chiefton Supply designs, distributes and sells apparel featuring graphic designs. Our apparel is purchased and screen printed by third parties, for which there are numerous suppliers. Chiefton Design provides design, branding and marketing strategy consulting services to the cannabis community.
In April 2016, we relaunched GC Supply, dedicated to providing wholesale equipment and supplies to participants in the regulated cannabis industry. We provide turnkey sourcing and stocking services to cultivation, retail and infused products manufacturing facilities. Offerings will include infrastructure, equipment, consumables, various delivery technologies (vaporizers and capsules) and compliance packaging. GC Supply operates out of a leased, 1,800 square-foot warehouse located in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Consulting and Advisory
Through Next Big Crop we deliver comprehensive cannabis industry consulting services that include obtaining licenses, compliance, cultivation, retail operations, logistical support, facility design and building services, and expansion of existing operations. Next Big Crops business plan is based on the future growth of the regulated cannabis market in the United States.
Finance and Real Estate
Real Estate Leasing
We own a cultivation property in a suburb of Pueblo, Colorado, consisting of approximately three acres of land, which currently includes a 5,000 square foot steel building and parking lot. The property is zoned for cultivating cannabis and is leased to a medical cannabis grower until December 31, 2022.
Our real estate leasing business plan includes the potential future acquisition and leasing of cultivation space and related facilities to licensed marijuana growers and dispensary owners for their operations. Management anticipates that these facilities would range in size from 5,000 to 50,000 square feet. These facilities would only be leased to tenants that possess the requisite state licenses to operate cultivation facilities. The leases with the tenants would include certain requirements that permit us to continually evaluate our tenants compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
F-30
Shared Office Space, Networking and Event Services
In October 2014, we purchased a former retail bank located at 6565 East Evans Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80224, which has been branded as The Greenhouse (The Greenhouse). The building is a 16,056 square-foot facility, which we use as our corporate headquarters and Chieftons retail location.
The Greenhouse has approximately 10,000 square feet of existing office space and 5,000 square feet on its ground floor that is dedicated to a consumer banking design. We continue to assess the opportunity to lease shared workspace for entrepreneurs, professionals and others serving the cannabis industry. Clients would be able to lease space to use as offices, meeting rooms, lecture, educational and networking facilities, and individual workstations.
Industry Finance
Our industry finance strategy includes evaluating opportunities to make direct term loans or to provide revolving lines of credit to businesses involved in the cultivation and sale of cannabis and related products. These loans would generally be secured to the maximum extent permitted by law. We believe there is a significant demand for this financing. We are assessing other finance services including customized finance, capital formation, and banking, for participants in the cannabis industry.
On November 4, 2015, we entered into an agreement (the DB Option Agreement) with Infinity Capital, a related party, which was amended on March 29, 2016 (the Amended DB Option Agreement) and on September 16, 2016 (the Second Amended DB Option Agreement). Pursuant to the Amended DB Option Agreement, we have the right to purchase all of Infinity Capitals interest in DB Products Arizona, LLC (DB) at Infinity Capitals actual cost, plus $1.00, or $800,001. The interests for which the option has been granted are Infinity Capitals 50% equity interest in the membership interests of DB, and any outstanding unpaid principal and interest owed on promissory note(s) issued by DB in favor of Infinity Capital for up to $800,000. DB is involved in the production and distribution of Dixie Brands, Inc.s full line of medical cannabis Dixie Elixirs and Edibles products in Arizona. DB expects to begin sales in 2016. We have no obligation to exercise the option, which expires September 30, 2018.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying (a) condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2015, has been derived from audited financial statements and (b) condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the 2015 Annual Report), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 25, 2016. It is managements opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statements presentation. The condensed consolidated financial statements include all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to make the condensed consolidated financial statements not misleading as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of GCC and its five wholly-owned subsidiary companies: (a) ACS Colorado Corp., a Colorado corporation formed in 2013; (b) Advanced Cannabis Solutions Corporation, a Colorado corporation formed in 2013; (c) 6565 E. Evans Avenue LLC, a Colorado limited liability company formed in 2014; (d) General Cannabis Capital Corporation, a Colorado corporation formed in 2015; and (e) GC Security LLC (GCS), a Colorado limited liability company formed in 2015. Advanced Cannabis Solutions Corporation has one wholly-owned subsidiary company, ACS Corp., which was formed in Colorado on June 6, 2013. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on net loss, total assets, or total stockholders equity (deficit).
F-31
Going Concern
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes we will be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our generating profitable operations in the future and / or obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management believes that actions presently being taken to further implement our business plan and generate additional revenues provide opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While we believe in the viability of our strategy to generate additional revenues and our ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.
We had an accumulated deficit of $33,399,175 and $16,427,378, respectively, at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and further losses are anticipated in the development of our business. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.
Significant Accounting Policy Updates
Debt and Derivative Liability
If we issue debt with warrants that have certain terms, such as a clause requiring repricing, the warrants are considered to be a derivative that is recorded as a liability at fair value. If the initial value of the warrant derivative liability is higher than the fair value of the associated debt, the excess is recognized immediately as interest expense. The warrant derivative liability is adjusted to its fair value at the end of each reporting period, with the change being recorded as expense. Due to the complexity of such warrant derivatives, we use the binomial model to estimate their fair value. The derivative warrant liability is a level three fair value measurement.
Modification of Debt Instruments
Modifications or exchanges of debt, which are not considered a troubled debt restructuring, are considered extinguishments if the terms of the new debt and the original instrument are substantially different. The instruments are considered substantially different when the present value of the cash flows under the terms of the new debt instrument are at least 10% different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the terms of the original instrument. The fair value of non-cash consideration associated with the new debt instrument, such as warrants, are included as a day one cash flow in the 10% cash flow test. If the original and new debt instruments are substantially different, the original debt is derecognized and the new debt is initially recorded at fair value, with the difference recognized as an extinguishment gain or loss.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Update, or FASB ASU 2016-15 Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)
In August 2016, the FASB issued 2016-15. Stakeholders indicated that there is a diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this ASU will not have a significant impact on our statement of cash flows.
FASB ASU 2016-12 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
In May 2016, the FASB issued 2016-12. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2016-12 provides clarification on assessing collectability, presentation of sales taxes, noncash consideration, and completed contracts and contract modifications. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with the option to adopt as early as December 15, 2016. We are currently assessing the impact of adoption of this ASU on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
FASB ASU 2016-11 Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)
In May 2016, the FASB issued 2016-11, which clarifies guidance on assessing whether an entity is a principal or an agent in a revenue transaction. This conclusion impacts whether an entity reports revenue on a gross or net basis. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with the option to adopt as early as December 15, 2016. We are currently assessing the impact of adoption of this ASU on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
F-32
FASB ASU 2016-10 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, clarify identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with the option to adopt as early as December 15, 2016. We are currently assessing the impact of adoption of this ASU on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
FASB ASU 2016-09 Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718)
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which includes multiple provisions intended to simplify various aspects of accounting for share-based payments. While aimed at reducing the cost and complexity of the accounting for share-based payments, the amendments are expected to significantly impact net income, earnings per share, and the statement of cash flows. Implementation and administration may present challenges for companies with significant share-based payment activities. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
FASB ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which will require lessees to recognize almost all leases on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting, but without explicit bright lines. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 18, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
NOTE 2.
BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
IPG Acquisition
On March 26, 2015, GCS, our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the IPG APA) by and among us, GCS and Iron Protection Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (the Seller), whereby GCS agreed to acquire substantially all of the assets of Seller (the IPG Acquisition). Pursuant to the terms of the IPG APA, we delivered to Seller 500,000 restricted shares of our common stock, which vested over a one-year period (100,000 shares on October 1, 2015; 200,000 shares on January 1, 2016; and 200,000 shares on April 1, 2016).
In addition, we delivered to Seller three-year warrants (the IPG Warrants) to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of: (i) $4.50 for warrants to purchase 250,000 shares, and (ii) $5.00 for warrants to purchase another 250,000 shares. The IPG APA contains certain provisions that require Seller to forfeit a portion of the stock consideration in the event that Seller violates its obligations under the IPG APA relating to non-competition and non-disclosure. The closing date of the IPG Acquisition was March 26, 2015, and we calculated the purchase price of the IPG Acquisition to be approximately $1,887,000. At the acquisition date and pursuant to the IPG APA, we did not assume any of the Sellers liabilities and there were no tangible assets of significance.
The aggregate consideration was as follows:
|
|
|
Common stock payable
|
$
|
1,054,000
|
Warrants issued with $4.50 exercise price
|
|
421,000
|
Warrants issued with $5.00 exercise price
|
|
412,000
|
|
$
|
1,887,000
|
The 500,000 shares of common stock were valued based on the closing price per share on March 26, 2015, or $2.48, reduced by a discount of 15% due to restrictions in the ability to trade our common stock. The $1,054,000 value of stock consideration was originally recorded as accrued stock payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, which was then reduced as we issued common stock according to the vesting schedule. As of September 30, 2016, all common stock has been issued.
F-33
The purchase price allocation was as follows:
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
Customer relationship intangible
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
Marketing-related intangibles
|
|
200,000
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
500,000
|
Goodwill
|
|
187,000
|
|
$
|
1,887,000
|
We finalized the purchase price allocation in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2015.
In connection with our acquisition of IPG, we agreed to issue to the sole shareholder of the Seller 100,000 fully vested warrants to purchase shares of our common stock if revenues of the Security segment exceeded $3,000,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, with an exercise price of $2.48. This condition was not met during the year ended December 31, 2015, so no value was recorded for these warrants.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of IPG from the date of acquisition, March 26, 2015. The pro forma effects of the acquisition on the results of operations as if the transaction had been completed on January 1, 2015, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2015
(Unaudited)
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
1,447,122
|
Net loss
|
|
(6,822,689)
|
Net loss per common share:
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.48)
|
Chiefton Acquisition
On September 25, 2015, we closed an asset purchase agreement for the purchase of substantially all the assets of Chiefton Supply Co., a Colorado corporation, and established a dba within GCC of Chiefton. This acquisition expands our service offerings in the cannabis industry and provides a new revenue stream.
We acquired the Chiefton assets for consideration of 80,000 restricted shares of our common stock. The aggregate consideration was as follows:
|
|
|
Cash
|
$
|
12,249
|
Common stock
|
|
69,400
|
Aggregate consideration
|
$
|
81,649
|
The value of the common stock consideration was estimated based on our closing common stock price on September 25, 2015, or $1.02 per share, reduced by a discount of 15% due to restrictions in the ability to trade our shares. The $69,400 value of stock consideration was originally included in accrued stock payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of September 30, 2016, all common stock has been issued.
The purchase price allocation is as follows:
|
|
|
Inventory
|
$
|
12,249
|
Intangible assets intellectual property
|
|
69,400
|
|
$
|
81,649
|
We finalized the purchase price allocation in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2015.
F-34
NOTE 3. LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Property and Equipment
Depreciation expense was $11,944 and $5,574, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, and $36,070 and $16,723, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. We have not recognized any impairment as of September 30, 2016.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consisted of the following as of September 30, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Net
|
|
Estimated Life
(in years)
|
Customer relationship intangible
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
$
|
151,782
|
$
|
848,218
|
|
10
|
Marketing-related intangibles
|
|
200,000
|
|
60,712
|
|
139,288
|
|
5
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
500,000
|
|
252,968
|
|
247,032
|
|
3
|
Chiefton brand and graphic designs
|
|
69,400
|
|
35,270
|
|
34,130
|
|
2
|
Intangible assets, net
|
$
|
1,769,400
|
$
|
500,732
|
$
|
1,268,668
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $86,044 and $55,452, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, and $256,259 and $113,315, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. We have not recognized any impairment as of September 30, 2016.
Goodwill
In connection with our purchase of IPG, we recorded goodwill of $187,000. We have not recognized any impairment as of September 30, 2016.
NOTE 4. DEBT
Line of Credit Related Party
In February 2015, we issued a senior secured note to Infinity Capital, LLC (Infinity Capital), as amended in April 2015, bearing 5% interest payable monthly in arrears commencing June 30, 2015 (the Infinity Note). Infinity Capital, an investment management company, was founded and is controlled by our chairman of the board, Michael Feinsod, a related party. On July 1, 2015, the outstanding principal and interest of $309,000 was settled by our issuing a 10% private placement note. Subsequent to the settlement on July 1, 2015, we continued to borrow under the Infinity Note. Interest expense for the Infinity Note for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, was approximately $26,540, and approximately $38,268 was accrued as of September 30, 2016. The maturity date of the Infinity Note was August 31, 2015, however, under the terms of the 12% Notes no payments may be made before those notes are retired.
Notes Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
12% September 2016 notes
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
$
|
--
|
10% private placement notes
|
|
--
|
|
659,000
|
14% mortgage note payable (The Greenhouse)
|
|
--
|
|
600,000
|
8.5% convertible note payable (Pueblo West Property)
|
|
--
|
|
158,307
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
1,417,307
|
Unamortized debt discount
|
|
(2,419,800)
|
|
(279,435)
|
|
|
580,200
|
|
1,137,872
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
--
|
|
(986,475)
|
Long-term portion
|
$
|
580,200
|
$
|
151,397
|
F-35
12% September 2016 Notes
In September 2016, we completed a $3,000,000 private placement pursuant to a promissory note and warrant purchase agreement (the 12% Agreement) with certain accredited investors, bearing interest at 12%, with interest and principal due September 21, 2018 (each such note, a 12% Note, and collectively, the 12% Notes). In the event of default, the interest rate increases to 18%. The 12% Notes are collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of our assets. We may prepay the 12% Notes at any time, but in any event must pay at least one year of interest.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the 12% Agreement, each investor was granted fully-vested warrants equal to their note principal times three (the 12% Warrants), or nine million warrants, with a life of three years. 4.5 million warrants have an exercise price of $0.35 per share and the other 4.5 million warrants have an exercise price of $0.70 per share. Should we issue any equity-based instruments at a price lower than the exercise price(s) of the 12% Warrants, other than under our Incentive Plan, the exercise price(s) of the 12% Warrants will be adjusted to the lower price. The 12% Warrants may be exercised at the option of the holder (a) by paying cash, (b) by applying the amount due under the 12% Notes as consideration, or (c) if there is no effective registration statement for the 12% Warrants within six months of being granted, the holder may exercise on a cashless basis. Since the 12% Warrants include a clause requiring repricing, the warrants are considered to be a derivative that is recorded as a liability at fair value.
We received $2,450,000 of cash for issuing the 12% Notes. $300,000 of 10% Notes and $250,000 of the 14% Mortgage Note Payable were converted into 12% Notes. We concluded that these conversions met the criteria for a debt extinguishment and, accordingly, recorded a loss on extinguishment of $1,728,280 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. The loss on extinguishment represents the fair value of the 12% Warrants issued to the previous 10% Note holders and the 14% Mortgage Note Payable lender. The fair value of the 12% Warrants not associated with the conversions was recorded as a debt discount of $2,450,000 and interest expense of $5,189,000. The 12% Notes are otherwise treated as conventional debt.
8% August 2016 Notes
In August 2016, we completed a private placement pursuant to a promissory note and warrant purchase agreement (the 8% Notes) with two accredited investors, bearing interest at 8%, payable on demand by the lenders. Subject to the terms of the 8% Notes, we issued 100,000 warrants having an exercise price of $0.78 per share, with a life of three years. We received cash of $50,000. The debt is treated as conventional debt and the fair value of the warrants is included in additional paid-in capital. Since the 8% Notes are payable on demand, the $31,100 fair value of the warrants was expensed immediately, included in amortization of debt discount on the condensed statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. One of the 8% Notes was with one of our board members. Both 8% Notes were paid off with proceeds from the 12% Notes in September 2016.
10% Private Placement Notes
In September 2016, we extinguished the 10% Notes by paying cash of $359,000 and converting $300,000 into 12% Notes.
In 2015, we completed a private placement pursuant to a promissory note and warrant purchase agreement (the 10% Agreement) with certain accredited investors, bearing interest at 10% payable quarterly (each such note, a 10% Note, and collectively, the 10% Notes). Subject to the terms and conditions of the 10% Agreement, each investor is granted fully-vested warrants equal to their note principal divided by two (the 10% Warrants) (with standard dilution clauses). The 10% Warrants are exercisable for a period of eighteen months after grant date and have an exercise price of $1.08 per share. The debt is treated as conventional debt. The 10% Notes are collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of our assets.
$309,000 of the 10% Notes were due to a related party, Infinity Capital. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, approximately $22,500 of interest expense under the 10% Notes relates to Infinity Capital. The Infinity Capital portion of the principle and accrued interest of the 10% Notes was settled for cash of $347,000, in September 2016.
On June 3, 2016, we reached an agreement with the 10% Note holders to extend the maturity date from May 1, 2016 to January 31, 2017. In exchange for the extension, we issued the holders an aggregate of 659,000 additional warrants to purchase our common stock at $1.07 per share for a period of five years, with an aggregate fair value of $358,000, determined using Black-Scholes, a risk-free rate of 1.2% and volatility of 151%. We concluded that this modification of the debt instruments met the criteria for a debt extinguishment and, accordingly, recorded additional paid-in capital and a loss on extinguishment of debt of $358,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2016, . Absent the warrants, the fair value of the new debt remained the same as the fair value of the original debt.
F-36
14% Mortgage Note Payable (The Greenhouse)
In September 2016, we extinguished the Greenhouse Mortgage by paying cash of $350,000 and converting $250,000 into 12% Notes. The remaining unamortized debt discount of $13,280 was included in loss on extinguishment of debt in the condensed statements of operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.
In October 2014, we executed a mortgage on The Greenhouse in the amount of $600,000, bearing 14.0% interest payable monthly, with a maturity date of October 21, 2016 (the Greenhouse Mortgage). The debt is treated as conventional debt.
In addition, we granted warrants to Evans Street Lendco LLC (Evans Lendco), the note holder of the Greenhouse Mortgage, which expire on October 21, 2016. The warrants vested immediately and allowed for Evans Lendco to purchase 600,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $4.40 per share, (with standard dilution clauses). Due to the drop in our stock price, on July 29, 2015, we agreed with Evans Lendco to replace the warrants previously issued to Evans Lendco with warrants to purchase 225,000 shares of our stock at $1.20 per share with a term of two years. The estimated fair value of the replacement warrants is less than the fair value of the original warrants on their date of grant. Accordingly, we continued to amortize the remaining fair value of the original warrants over the remaining life of the underlying debt until the debt was extinguished in September 2016.
8.5% Convertible Note Payable (Pueblo West Property)
In September 2016, we extinguished the Pueblo Mortgage by paying cash of $153,189.
In December 2013, we executed a mortgage on our Pueblo West Property in the amount of $170,000, bearing 8.5% interest with monthly principal and interest payments totaling $1,674, with the balance due on December 31, 2018 (the Pueblo Mortgage). This note is convertible at any time at $5.00 per share.
Derivative treatment is not required, as the conversion feature meets the scope exception. The conversion feature is not beneficial, because the conversion price was higher than the stock price on the commitment date. Accordingly, we treated the Pueblo Mortgage as conventional debt.
12% Convertible Notes
Conversion of 12% Convertible Notes
During the year ended December 31, 2015, lenders converted $321,123 of 12% Convertible Notes for 64,225 shares of our common stock. The December 2013 Issuance and the January 2014 Issuance (collectively, the 12% Convertible Notes) included a provision that if the trading stock price exceeded $10 for twenty consecutive trading days and the daily volume for those twenty consecutive trading days exceeds 25,000 shares, then the 12% Convertible Notes convert into shares of our common stock on or after December 1, 2015. As of April 24, 2014, these parameters were met. On December 1, 2015, the remaining $1,330,000 of convertible notes was automatically converted to 266,000 shares of our common stock.
December 2013 Issuance
In December 2013, we entered into convertible promissory notes with various third parties totaling $530,000 (the December 2013 Issuance). The principal amounts of these notes ranged between $10,000 and $150,000. The notes required quarterly interest payments at 12%, and were convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of $5.00 per share (with standard dilution clauses).
Derivative treatment was not required, as the conversion feature met the scope exception. The conversion feature was not beneficial, because the conversion price was higher than the stock price on the commitment date. Accordingly, we treated the December 2013 Issuance as conventional debt.
January 2014 Issuance
In January 2014, we entered into convertible promissory notes with various third parties totaling $1,605,000 (the January 2014 Issuance). The principal amounts of these notes ranged between $10,000 and $200,000. The notes required quarterly interest payments at 12%, and were convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of $5.00 per share (with standard dilution clauses).
F-37
Derivative treatment was not required, as the conversion feature met the scope exception. Since the initial conversion price was less than the market value of the common stock at the time of issuance, it was determined that a beneficial conversion feature existed. The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature and the combined value of the debt discount resulted in a value greater than the value of the debt and, as such, the total discount was limited to the value of the debt balance of $1,605,000.
Annual maturities of long-term debt (excluding unamortized discount) for the next three years, consist of:
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
--
|
2017
|
|
--
|
2018
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
NOTE 5. ACCRUED STOCK PAYABLE
The following tables summarize the changes in accrued common stock payable during the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Number of Shares
|
December 31, 2015
|
$
|
1,532,420
|
$
|
730,000
|
IPG acquisition -- issued
|
|
(843,200)
|
|
(400,000)
|
Chiefton acquisition -- issued
|
|
(69,400)
|
|
(80,000)
|
Feinsod Agreement -- accrual
|
|
192,800
|
|
--
|
Consulting services -- accrual
|
|
6,988
|
|
--
|
Consulting services -- issued
|
|
(25,000)
|
|
(50,000)
|
Employment agreements -- accrual
|
|
567
|
|
--
|
Employment agreements -- issued
|
|
(132,175)
|
|
(50,000)
|
September 30, 2016
|
$
|
663,000
|
$
|
150,000
|
Feinsod Agreement
On August 4, 2014, we entered into an agreement with Michael Feinsod in consideration for serving as Executive Chairman of the Board and as a member of our Board of Directors (the Board) and pursuant to the terms of the Executive Board and Director Agreement (the Feinsod Agreement). The Board approved the issuance to Infinity Capital of (a) 200,000 shares of our common stock on August 4, 2014; (b) 1,000,000 shares of our common stock upon the uplisting of our common stock to the OTC Markets OTCQB; (c) 150,000 shares of our common stock on August 4, 2015; and (d) 150,000 shares of our common stock on August 4, 2016. All shares, except the final tranche of 150,000 shares, have been issued as of September 30, 2016. Mr. Feinsod must remain a member of the Board in order for the common stock to be issued. In addition, the Feinsod Agreement requires the issuance of a number of shares of our common stock to Infinity Capital equal to 10% of any new issuances not to exceed 600,000 shares of our common stock in the aggregate during the time that Mr. Feinsod remains a member of the Board (the New Issuance Allowance). Under the terms of the Feinsod Agreement, the New Issuance Allowance will not be triggered upon issuances relating to convertible securities existing as of the date of the Feinsod Agreement. For illustrative purposes, if we issue 7,000,000 new shares of common stock, then the New Issuance Allowance issued to Infinity Capital would be capped at 600,000 shares of our common stock. No shares have been issued under the New Issuance Allowance.
The 1,000,000 shares of our common stock were valued at $2.97 per share, based on the closing price of our common stock of $3.49 on April 27, 2015, and then reduced by 15% due to restrictions on the ability to trade our shares. The other shares under the Feinsod Agreement were valued at $4.42 per share, based on the closing price of our common stock of $5.20 on August 4, 2014, and then reduced by 15% due to restriction on the ability to trade our common stock. We are recognizing expense for the unissued shares ratably over the vesting period.
Employment Agreements
On May 13, 2015, we hired two individuals from Next Big Crop, an unaffiliated entity serving the cannabis industry, to service our new and existing clients. We did not purchase any existing client base from Next Big Crop and upon execution of employment agreements, granted these persons a total of 100,000 shares of our common stock with a vesting date of January
F-38
1, 2016. On the date of grant, the 100,000 shares had an initial fair value of $311,000, based on a closing price per share of our common stock of $3.11 on May 13, 2015. Due to restrictions in the ability to trade our shares, a discount of fifteen percent (15%) was applied to the fair value of the shares. After taking into consideration the illiquidity of the shares, the fair value was determined to be $264,350. One individual forfeited his shares, so expense was only recognized for 50,000 shares. These shares were issued in April 2016.
Consulting Agreement
On July 15, 2015, we entered into an agreement with an individual to provide consulting services to customers in exchange for 50,000 shares of our common stock to be delivered on March 15, 2016. The fair value of the common stock is determined at the end of each reporting period and the pro rata amount earned is recognized as accrued stock payable over the term of the agreement. These shares were issued in March 2016.
NOTE 6. DERIVATIVE WARRANT LIABILITY
On September 21, 2016, in connection with the 12% Notes, we issued the 12% Warrants, which are treated as a derivative liability and adjusted to fair value at the end of each period. The underlying assumptions used in the binomial model to determine the fair value of the derivative warrant liability were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 21, 2016
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
Current stock price
|
$
|
1.20
|
$
|
1.91
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.92 %
|
|
0.77%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
3.0
|
|
3.0
|
Expected volatility
|
|
146 %
|
|
146 %
|
Number of iterations
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
The initial fair value of the derivative warrant liability was recorded as follows:
|
|
|
Extinguishment of debt
|
$
|
1,715,000
|
Interest expense
|
|
5,189,000
|
Debt discount
|
|
2,450,000
|
Initial fair value of warrants issued
|
$
|
9,354,000
|
Changes in the derivative warrant liability were as follows:
|
|
|
January 1, 2016
|
$
|
--
|
Initial fair value of warrants issued
|
|
9,354,000
|
Increase in fair value
|
|
6,032,000
|
September 30, 2016
|
$
|
15,386,000
|
NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal
To the best of the Companys knowledge and belief, no legal proceedings of merit are currently pending or threatened against the Company.
NOTE 8. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Share-based expense consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Employee Awards
|
$
|
740,844
|
$
|
695,788
|
$
|
1,574,906
|
$
|
1,319,355
|
Consulting Awards
|
|
103,869
|
|
24,196
|
|
151,385
|
|
41,650
|
Feinsod Agreement
|
|
27,504
|
|
143,725
|
|
192,800
|
|
3,606,794
|
DB Option Agreement
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
55,100
|
|
--
|
|
$
|
872,217
|
$
|
863,709
|
$
|
1,974,191
|
$
|
4,967,799
|
F-39
Employee Stock Options
On October 29, 2014, the Board authorized the adoption of and on June 26, 2015, our stockholders ratified our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan). The Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of up to 10 million shares of our common stock, and is designed to provide an additional incentive to executives, employees, directors and key consultants, aligning our long term interests with participants. In April 2016, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the Registration Statement), which automatically became effective in May 2016. The Registration Statement relates to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, which are issuable pursuant to, or upon exercise of, options that have been granted or may be granted under our Incentive Plan.
Share-based compensation costs for award grants to employees and directors (Employee Awards) are recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period for the entire award, with the amount of compensation cost recognized at any date equaling at least the portion of the award that is vested. The following summarizes the Black-Scholes assumptions used for Employee Awards granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
|
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
$ 0.61 -- 1.01
|
Stock price on date of grant
|
|
$ 0.63 -- 1.01
|
Volatility
|
|
146 -- 153 %
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.71 0.90 %
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
3.0
|
Dividend yield
|
|
--
|
The following summarizes Employee Awards activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted-average Exercise Price per Share
|
|
Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
2,509,000
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
6,440,800
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(263,350)
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016
|
|
8,686,450
|
|
0.97
|
|
2.8
|
$
|
8,918,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2016
|
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
2.3
|
$
|
883,960
|
As of September 30, 2016, there was approximately $3,658,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested Employee Awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of eight months.
Warrants for Consulting Services
As needed, we may issue warrants to third parties in exchange for consulting services. Stock-based compensation costs for award grants to third parties for consulting services (Consulting Awards) are recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period for the entire award, with the amount of compensation cost recognized at any date equaling at least the portion of the award that is vested. Consulting Awards are revalued at each reporting date until fully vested, which may generate an expense or benefit.
The following summarizes the Black-Scholes assumptions used for Consulting Awards granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
|
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
$ 0.60 -- 1.20
|
Stock price on valuation date
|
|
$ 1.91
|
Volatility
|
|
146 -- 150 %
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.77 1.14 %
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
2.2 4.8
|
Dividend yield
|
|
--
|
F-40
The following summarizes Consulting Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted-average Exercise Price per Share
|
|
Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
252,500
|
$
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
55,000
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016
|
|
307,500
|
|
3.15
|
|
1.3
|
$
|
64,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2016
|
|
300,000
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
1.2
|
$
|
54,700
|
As of September 30, 2016, there was approximately $2,600 of total unrecognized expense related to unvested Consulting Awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three months.
IPG Acquisition Warrants
In connection with the IPG APA, we issued to IPG 500,000 fully-vested warrants to purchase a) 250,000 shares of our common stock at $4.50 per share, (the IPG $4.50 Warrants), and b) 250,000 shares of our common stock at $5.00 per share (the IPG $5.00 Warrants) (collectively, the IPG Warrants). The IPG Warrants are subject to customary adjustments in the event of our reclassification, consolidation, merger, subdivision of shares of our common stock, combination of shares of our common stock or payment of dividends in the form of the our common stock. The IPG Warrants expire three years after their initial issuance date.
As of September 30, 2016, all of the IPG Warrants are outstanding and exercisable.
Warrants with Debt
The following summarizes warrants issued with debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted-average Exercise Price per Share
|
|
Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
597,200
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
9,759,000
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016
|
|
10,356,200
|
|
0.61
|
|
3.0
|
$
|
13,564,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2016
|
|
10,356,200
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
3.0
|
$
|
13,564,795
|
DB Option Agreement warrants
In order to extend the DB Option Agreement with Infinity Capital, in March 2016 we granted Infinity Capital warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.67 per share with a five year life. The fair value of $55,100 is included in equity-based expense. The following summarizes the Black-Scholes assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the DB Option Agreement warrants:
|
|
|
Stock price on date of grant
|
|
$ 0.61
|
Volatility
|
|
150 %
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.2 %
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
5.0
|
Dividend yield
|
|
--
|
F-41
2013 Warrants
Between July 11, 2013 and September 19, 2013, we issued 973,000 shares of our common stock and 973,000 fully-vested warrants (the 2013 Warrants) for cash consideration of $1.00 per share. Each 2013 Warrant entitled the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $10.00 per share. The 2013 Warrants expired unexercised on August 1, 2016.
NOTE 9. NET LOSS PER SHARE
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net loss per share is computed similarly to basic loss per share, except that it includes the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities are exercised.
Outstanding stock options and common stock warrants are considered anti-dilutive because we are in a net loss position. Accordingly, the number of weighted average shares outstanding for basic and fully diluted net loss per share are the same.
NOTE 10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
As described in Note 1, as of September 30, 2016, Infinity Capital, a related party, had a 50% equity interest in DB and an $800,000 loan to DB. We have an option to purchase all of Infinity Capitals interest in DB. In October 2016, we loaned $75,000 to DB, which bears interest at 14% and is payable in May 2017. Infinity Capital has agreed to subordinate its right to repayment and security interest to our rights under our loan to DB.
NOTE 11. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Our operations are organized into four segments: Security and Cash Management Services; Marketing and Products; Consulting and Advisory; and Finance and Real Estate. All revenue originates and all assets are located in the United States. We have revised our disclosure to correspond to the information provided to the chief operating decision maker.
Three months ended September 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Security and Cash Management
|
|
Marketing and Products
|
|
Consulting and Advisory
|
|
Finance and Real Estate
|
|
Total
|
Revenues, net
|
$
|
560,713
|
$
|
106,402
|
$
|
117,700
|
$
|
25,565
|
$
|
810,380
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
(528,916)
|
|
(164,543)
|
|
(162,404)
|
|
(13,352)
|
|
(869,215)
|
Other expense
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(6,414)
|
|
(6,414)
|
|
$
|
31,797
|
$
|
(58,141)
|
$
|
(44,704)
|
$
|
5,799
|
|
(65,249)
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,381,845)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(14,447,094)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Security and Cash Management
|
|
Marketing and Products
|
|
Consulting and Advisory
|
|
Finance and Real Estate
|
|
Total
|
Revenues, net
|
$
|
503,703
|
$
|
9,494
|
$
|
52,295
|
$
|
27,825
|
$
|
593,317
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
(521,099)
|
|
(28,328)
|
|
(63,519)
|
|
(3,157)
|
|
(616,103)
|
Other expense
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(3,385)
|
|
(3,385)
|
|
$
|
(17,396)
|
$
|
(18,834)
|
$
|
(11,224)
|
$
|
21,283
|
|
(26,171)
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,672,064)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(1,698,235)
|
Nine months ended September 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Security and Cash Management
|
|
Marketing and Products
|
|
Consulting and Advisory
|
|
Finance and Real Estate
|
|
Total
|
Revenues, net
|
$
|
1,599,907
|
$
|
222,541
|
$
|
288,588
|
$
|
93,398
|
$
|
2,204,434
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
(1,604,932)
|
|
(325,640)
|
|
(345,967)
|
|
(36,731)
|
|
(2,313,270)
|
Other expense
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(10,876)
|
|
(10,876)
|
|
$
|
(5,025)
|
$
|
(103,099)
|
$
|
(57,379)
|
$
|
45,791
|
|
(119,712)
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,852,085)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(16,971,797)
|
F-42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Security and Cash Management
|
|
Marketing and Products
|
|
Consulting and Advisory
|
|
Finance and Real Estate
|
|
Total
|
Revenues, net
|
$
|
897,807
|
$
|
34,861
|
$
|
52,295
|
$
|
92,413
|
$
|
1,077,376
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
(929,421)
|
|
(112,919)
|
|
(63,519)
|
|
(24,880)
|
|
(1,130,739)
|
Other expense
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(9,200)
|
|
(9,200)
|
|
$
|
(31,614)
|
$
|
(78,058)
|
$
|
(11,224)
|
$
|
58,333
|
|
(62,563)
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,813,387)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(6,875,950)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
Security and Cash Management
|
$
|
110,127
|
$
|
132,314
|
Marketing and Products
|
|
57,999
|
|
127,345
|
Consulting and Advisory
|
|
125,497
|
|
22,268
|
Finance and Real Estate
|
|
1,247,281
|
|
431,639
|
Corporate
|
|
3,034,077
|
|
2,969,145
|
|
$
|
4,574,981
|
$
|
3,682,711
|
All assets are located in the United States.
F-43