By Khadeeja Safdar
Before he stepped into the role of chief executive at Gap Inc.
in February 2015, company veteran Art Peck believed he had hit upon
one major problem at the slumping apparel maker: Its creative
directors had too much say over everything.
By the time Mr. Peck took the top job, the creative director of
the retailer's Gap brand had already been dismissed. A few months
later, the company's Banana Republic chain eased out its creative
head and eliminated the position.
The 61-year-old CEO is blunt in his criticism of the industry's
long fascination with creative executives who are given broad
powers to set the overall image of a brand. "We have cycled through
so many, and each has been proclaimed as the next savior," he said.
In the end, they were "false messiahs."
Under Mr. Peck, a former partner at Boston Consulting Group who
arrived at the company in 2005, Gap Inc. has instead put
operational executives in control of its major brands, including
Old Navy. It has also expanded the role of outside vendors -- some
of which have their own design teams.
Mr. Peck favors a model in which things are more decentralized.
Brand merchants, who serve as collection editors, are no longer
involved in every product category. Some items, like men's dress
shirts, can be stamped out by a foreign supplier without approval
from a head designer. He is also pushing executives to pay more
attention to Google analytics and market-research data to monitor
consumer tastes.
"There is now science and art, and they can come together," said
Mr. Peck in an interview.
The moves are part of an attempt to save an iconic apparel
company from fading into extinction. For decades, its flagship Gap
stores ruled America's malls and dictated the nation's casual
aesthetic with its khakis and white tees. Nowadays, many
millennials aren't willing to pay $80 for a pair of bluejeans,
forcing the brand to rely heavily on sales and markdowns.
Meanwhile, wardrobe basics have evolved since Gap's heyday, with
many customers swapping out denim for yoga pants. Chains such as
Uniqlo and Hennes & Mauritz AB's H&M are producing similar
items, but at lower price points. Gap is even getting squeezed by
its own sister brands, as Banana Republic chases a more affluent
crowd and Old Navy woos the frugal.
"Gap needs to be remade in a way that's relevant," Mr. Peck told
a group of investors in September.
Gap Inc.'s market value has shrunk to about $10 billion, from
roughly $40 billion at its 2000 peak. Revenue has stalled at about
$16 billion -- flat from a decade ago.
Last year, Mr. Peck told investors that spring 2016 was "no
excuses moment." But results have continued to disappoint. Earlier
this month, the company reported its seventh straight quarter of
declining sales, with Gap and Banana Republic posting the worst
results. Shares of the company have fallen by more than a third
since he took over, to about $26.
"If I have to self-critique, I may have underestimated the
amount of time" it would take to turn things around, Mr. Peck
recently said.
In interviews, more than a dozen former and current executives
said the company strains under the weight of bureaucracy. Some said
Mr. Peck's initiatives haven't been drastic enough and his decision
to promote company insiders to run its three major divisions,
rather than bring in outsiders with fresh ideas, has failed to
invigorate the retailer.
In the 1990s, when former CEO Mickey Drexler famously predicted
America's infatuation with a casual uniform, Gap was at the top of
its game. Back then, according to former executives, merchants were
guided by instinct, and planners adhered to the calendar with four
seasonal collections. Creative teams enjoyed lavish travel budgets
to scout far-flung places for inspiration.
As consumer tastes shifted and rivals began offering similar
merchandise at cheaper prices, Gap and other traditional U.S.
apparel companies fell behind. Mr. Drexler was forced out in 2002
after 24 straight months of same-store sales declines. Since then,
the retailer has cycled through a series of CEOs and creative
heads, and each has failed to arrest the slide.
Inditex SA, the Spanish company that owns Zara, has been a
particularly nimble competitor. Today, the fast-fashion chain --
with its constantly rotating offerings -- is the world's biggest
apparel retailer by sales and is now valued at roughly $100
billion, or more than 10 times Gap Inc.'s market
capitalization.
"A genetically superior breed of fish has been introduced into
the gene pool," said Ivan Wicksteed, Old Navy's former marketing
chief who departed from his role earlier this year. "Gap has sat on
the sidelines and watched fast fashion eat its lunch."
With the rise of online shopping, the retailer's scale -- it
still has about 3,700 stores around the globe -- has also become a
burden. The company is "simply too large in the new normal where
physical distribution has become a liability and uniformity is no
longer 'cool,' " said Nomura analyst Simeon Siegel in a research
note.
Earlier this year, Mr. Peck said he was open to the idea of
selling some products through Amazon.com Inc., but he hasn't
followed through.
When a recent fire destroyed millions of Gap and Banana Republic
products at a distribution center in New York, Stifel analyst
Richard Jaffe called it a "fortuitous reduction in inventory."
The flagship brand has even become a target for pop-culture
derision. In the 2011 movie "Crazy, Stupid, Love," the character
played by Ryan Gosling goes shopping with his frumpy friend and
implores him to "be better than the Gap!"
For years, the company has been studying rivals like Zara and
Uniqlo, the chain owned by Japanese retailer Fast Retailing Co.,
according to former executives. But thus far, it has little to show
for its efforts.
In recent months, Gap and Banana Republic have both been touting
fabric innovations -- a concept made popular by Uniqlo. A $98.50
pair of men's wool pants at Banana Republic is advertised as stain
and wrinkle resistant; a $108 pair of men's skinny jeans at Gap is
made with stretchy fabric. "We see this as the beginning of a
reinvention of active and ready-to-wear coming together," Mr. Peck
said.
Unlike fast-fashion stalwarts, which continually buy small
quantities of merchandise, Gap would buy inventory for most of a
season at one time, former executives said. Unless a style was
selling well, it was destined for a series of markdowns until the
next large inventory purchase.
Zara, by comparison, sends small batches of apparel to stores
and waits for consumer reaction. Using real-time data, the company
airlifts additional products to stores within days to meet demand.
The chain is also known for few markdowns.
Orders at Gap require corporate approvals, while Zara permits an
employee or agent to authorize new stock on the spot, according to
a supplier who makes garments for both companies.
The Spanish retailer is "afraid of not making a quick decision,"
whereas Gap is "more fearful of making the wrong decision," said an
executive at the shared supplier.
Former executives said Gap's broader aversion to risk -- from
old-school supply-chain systems to a lack of fashion daring -- has
kept it behind.
"There are not many retailers with more resources than Gap to
create the next trend," said Rajiv Malik, who was vice president of
global product operations at Gap Inc. until last year. "In this
retail environment, you have to take risky bets to even have a
chance."
To get items more quickly, Mr. Peck has shifted some
manufacturing from Asia to the Caribbean. He also wants to stagger
product releases throughout the year and shorten the time it takes
for items to go from the drafting table to stores to take into
account the most recent data trends.
The CEO now encourages employees to share information across the
company's five brands, which also include activewear retailer
Athleta and Intermix, a store concept that features of-the-moment
designer fashions.
The Gap chain has copied some of Old Navy's processes, many of
which were instituted under the brand's former president, Stefan
Larsson. For instance, Old Navy, which now accounts for about 42%
of revenue at the parent company, saves time and money by buying
large quantities of fabric before deciding what to do with it -- a
strategy now being used at Gap.
Mr. Larsson, who hailed from Sweden's H&M and led a
turnaround at Old Navy, left in October 2015 and is now CEO at
Ralph Lauren Corp. In April, Mr. Peck gave his job to Sonia Syngal,
a Gap Inc. veteran who previously oversaw the company's supply
chain.
Product teams meet on a regular basis to compare notes -- such
as best-selling items and fabric innovations. Mr. Peck wants the
company to "think like a portfolio and act like portfolio," said
Nancy Green, president of Athleta.
There is a potential downside to so much togetherness. With its
similar merchandise, Old Navy has cannibalized sales at Gap stores,
according to some analysts. Gap, Old Navy and Athleta all sell yoga
pants -- but at different price points -- turning a specialty item
into more of a commodity.
"You knew what Gap stood for when Mickey Drexler was running
it," said Garrett Bennett, a retail consultant at Merchandising
Metrics. "When you don't have a creative visionary leading a
company, you can't really establish a consistent look over a period
of time and reinforce the brand's purpose."
Mr. Drexler is chairman and CEO of privately held J. Crew Group
Inc., which has seen slumping sales over the past two years.
Recently the company began selling some merchandise through
Nordstrom Inc. department stores.
Several people who held creative roles at Gap Inc. said that
even basic aesthetic decisions had become complicated. Collections
needed signoffs from various management layers, and the final
lineups ended up looking very different from their initial vision,
these people said.
"Gap is not a design-led company and thus I had very little say
in what ended up in the store," said Rebekka Bay, who left as the
flagship brand's creative director in early 2015 when Mr. Peck took
over.
Mr. Peck's new approach is about "taking out the voice of one
creative head and allowing a creative ecosystem to exist," said
Wendi Goldman, chief product officer for the Gap brand.
Some company alumni are circumspect, saying too many viewpoints
can water down the product. "Anything that has to become a
consensus is an equation for dilution," said Todd Oldham, a former
creative director at Old Navy. "Without a distinct point of view,
you become like everyone else."
Mr. Oldham was fired in 2009 after he filed a lawsuit against
Old Navy alleging it had breached a licensing agreement. The two
parties reached an undisclosed settlement in 2013.
Executives still see the company as a cut above. Mr. Peck
recently announced plans to ramp up marketing, including the first
national TV ads for the Gap brand since 2014. Banana Republic is
revisiting its catalog tradition. "I think the product is better
than the business right now in Banana Republic and Gap," said Mr.
Peck on a conference call with analysts. "Not perfect by a long
shot but better than our business."
Many young consumers aren't convinced. "Gap's brand is not
terribly cool, and it's overpriced," said Andrew Martin, 24, a
shopper from Los Angeles. "If I'm going to splurge on clothes, I
would be so much more likely to buy things I think are cool."
Write to Khadeeja Safdar at khadeeja.safdar@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
November 27, 2016 16:53 ET (21:53 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Gap (NYSE:GPS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2024 to Mar 2024
Gap (NYSE:GPS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2023 to Mar 2024