Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the three months ended September
30, 2016
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Li3 Energy, Inc. (“Li3 Energy”
or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 24, 2005. In 2009, the Company
established its business focus and strategy toward identifying and pursuing business opportunities in lithium and industrial minerals
mining in the Americas.
Part of our strategic plan is to ensure
that Minera Li (of which the Company owns a non-controlling interest) explores and develops the existing Maricunga Project in Chile
while simultaneously identifying other synergistic opportunities with new projects with production potential that could also be
advanced in an accelerated manner, with the goal of becoming a company with valuable lithium, potassium, nitrates and other industrial
minerals properties.
The Company’s three wholly owned
subsidiaries include: Li3 Energy Peru SRL (“Li3 Peru”), a subsidiary formed in Peru to explore mining opportunities
in Peru and in South America; Alfredo Holdings, Ltd. (“Alfredo”), an exempted limited company incorporated under the
laws of the Cayman Islands; and Li3 Energy Copiapó, SA (“Li3 Copiapó”), a Chilean corporation, which
is a subsidiary of Alfredo.
Since October 22, 2014, the Company holds
40% of the shares in Noto Energy SA (“Noto”, an Argentinean corporation and a previously 100% owned subsidiary).
On January 27, 2014, the Company entered
into a transaction with a third party, Minera Salar Blanco SpA (“MSB”, previously BBL SpA), subsequent to which MSB
became the majority holder of Minera Li, holding 51% of the ownership interest. The Company retains a 49% ownership of Minera Li.
Minera Li holds 60% ownership of Sociedades Legales Mineras Litio1 a 6 de la Sierra Hoyada de Maricunga (“SLM Litio 1-6”),
a group of six private companies (the “Maricunga Companies”), and the Cocina Mining Concessions (together with SLM
Litio 1-6, the “Maricunga Project”).
We have generated no revenues to date and
do not anticipate generating any revenues in the near term. Our activities have been limited to capital formation, organization,
acquisition of interests in mining properties and limited exploration on the Maricunga Project, of which we currently hold a minority
interest. The Company´s operations will be subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a developing enterprise
and the uncertainties arising from the absence of a significant operating history. We may be unable to locate exploitable quantities
of mineral resources or operate on a profitable basis, or we may fail to secure additional funding to support our operations.
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements of Li3 Energy have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and should be read in conjunction
with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form
10-K”) filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been
reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited
financial statements for the most recent fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, as reported in the Form 10-K, have been omitted.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
a. Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Li3 Peru, Alfredo and Li3 Copiapó. As a result of the Company
disposing of its controlling interest in Minera Li on January 27, 2014, the Company deconsolidated Minera Li from its consolidated
financial statements and now accounts for its remaining 49% investment in Minera Li under the equity method. On October 22, 2014,
the Company sold 60% of its shares in Noto Energy SA and now accounts for its remaining 40% investment under the equity method.
All intercompany amounts have been eliminated in consolidation. All intercompany amounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
b. Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid
investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents
at September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents.
c. Investment in Minera Li
As of January 27, 2014, the Company’s
investment in Minera Li is accounted for under the equity method in accordance with ASC 323 –
Equity Investments and Joint
Ventures
. Under the equity method, the carrying value of the investment is adjusted for the Company’s share of Minera
Li earnings and losses, as well as any capital contributions to and distributions from associates. Distributions in excess of equity
method earnings are recognized as a return of investment and recorded as investing cash inflows in the accompanying consolidated
statements of cash flows. We classify operating income and losses as well as gains and impairments related to our equity investees
as a component of operating income or loss, as the Company’s equity investees is an extension of our core business.
We evaluate equity investments for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the investment may have experienced an ‘‘other-than-temporary’’
decline in value. If such conditions exist, we compare the estimated fair value of the investment to its carrying value to determine
if an impairment is indicated and determines whether the impairment is ‘‘other-than-temporary’’ based on
an assessment of all relevant factors, including consideration of our intent and ability to retain the investment.
d. Income Taxes
A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded
for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and for net operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax
expense (benefit) results from the net change during the year of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will
not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the
date of enactment.
For financial statement purposes, we recognize
the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be
sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than
a 50% likelihood of being sustained.
The Company recognizes interest related
to income tax matters in income tax expense and penalties related to income tax matters in general and administrative expenses.
The Company did not have any uncertain income tax positions or accrued interest included in our consolidated balance sheets at
September 30, 2016 or June 30, 2016, and did not recognize any interest in its consolidated statements of operations during the
three months ended September 30, 2016 or 2015.
e. Fair Value Measurements
As defined in FASB ASC Topic No. 820 -
10, fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC Topic No. 820 - 10 requires disclosure that establishes a framework
for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement requires fair value measurements be
classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:
|
Level 1:
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible
at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. The Company considers active markets as those in which
transactions for the assets or liabilities occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing
basis.
|
|
Level 2:
|
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs
which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. This category
includes those derivative instruments that the Company values using observable market data. Substantially all of these inputs
are observable in the marketplace throughout the term of the derivative instruments, can be derived from observable data, or supported
by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
|
|
Level 3:
|
Measured based on prices or valuation models that require
inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and less observable from objective sources (i.e. supported by little
or no market activity). The Company’s valuation models are primarily industry standard models. Level 3 instruments
include derivative warrant instruments. The Company does not have sufficient corroborating evidence to support classifying
these assets and liabilities as Level 1 or Level 2.
|
As required by FASB ASC Topic No. 820 -
10, financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may
affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The
fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities are estimated using a modified lattice valuation model.
f. Beneficial Conversion Feature
If the conversion features of conventional
convertible debt provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value at issuance, this feature is characterized as a beneficial
conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by the Company as a debt discount. In those circumstances, the convertible
debt is recorded net of the discount related to the BCF, and the Company amortizes the discount to interest expense, over the life
of the debt.
g. Earnings (Loss) per Share
Basic net earnings per share amounts are
computed by dividing the net income available to Li3 Energy, Inc. shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding over the reporting period. In periods in which the Company reports a net loss, dilutive securities are excluded from
the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended September 30,
2016 and 2015, the following convertible debt, stock options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock were excluded from
the computation of diluted net income or loss per share, as the inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
|
September 30,
2015
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
583,333
|
|
|
|
916,666
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock warrants
|
|
|
2,380,950
|
|
|
|
20,658,822
|
|
|
|
|
3,564,283
|
|
|
|
21,575,488
|
|
h. Foreign Currency
The Company has determined that the functional
currency of the parent company and each of its foreign subsidiaries is U.S. Dollars.
Foreign currency transaction gains and
losses are included in the statement of operations as other income (expense).
i. Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Management has made significant estimates related to the fair value of its mineral assets; the fair value of derivative liabilities;
stock-based payments; and contingencies.
j. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
There were various accounting standards and interpretations
issued recently, none of which are expected to a have a material impact on the Company´s consolidated financial position,
operations or cash flows.
k. Subsequent Events
The Company evaluated material events occurring
between September 30, 2016 and through the date when the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued for
disclosure consideration.
NOTE 3. GOING CONCERN
As of September 30, 2016, the Company had
no source of current revenue, a cash balance on hand of $212,874 and negative working capital of $1,232,752.
The Company’s current negative working
capital position is not sufficient to maintain its basic operations for at least the next 12 months.
In the course of its development activities,
the Company has sustained and continues to sustain losses. The Company cannot predict if and when the Company may generate
profits. In the event we identify commercial reserves of lithium or other minerals, we will require substantial additional
capital to develop those reserves and certain governmental permits to exploit such resources. The Company expects to
finance its future operations primarily through future equity or debt financing. However, there exists substantial doubt about
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern because there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such capital,
through equity or debt financing, or any combination thereof, on satisfactory terms or at all. Additionally, no assurance can be
given that any such financing, if obtained, will be adequate to meet the Company’s ultimate capital needs and to support
its growth. If adequate capital cannot be obtained on a timely basis and on satisfactory terms, then the Company’s operations
would be materially negatively impacted.
The Company’s ability to complete
additional offerings is dependent on the state of the debt and/or equity markets at the time of any proposed offering, and such
market’s reception of the Company and the offering terms. In addition, the Company’s ability to complete an offering
may be dependent on the status of its exploration activities, which cannot be predicted. There is no assurance that capital in
any form would be available to the Company, and if available, on terms and conditions that are acceptable.
These conditions raise substantial doubt
about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent
on its ability to obtain the necessary rights to exploit its mineral rights; meet its financial and operational obligations, to
obtain additional financing as may be required until such time as it can generate sources of recurring revenues and to ultimately
attain profitability. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
of these uncertainties.
NOTE 4. INVESTMENT IN MINERA LI
The Company´s equity investment at
September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 relates to its 49% investment in Minera Li. The activity of the investment for the three months
ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
September 30, 2015
|
|
Opening balance - July 1, 2016 and 2015
|
|
$
|
6,779,337
|
|
|
$
|
7,336,375
|
|
Less: Equity in loss of Minera Li
|
|
|
(65,120
|
)
|
|
|
(213,384
|
)
|
Closing balance – September 30, 2016 and 2015
|
|
$
|
6,714,217
|
|
|
$
|
7,122,991
|
|
Summarized Financial Information of
Minera Li
Set out below is the summarized financial
information of Minera Li, which is accounted for using the equity method. The information reflects the amounts presented in the
financial statements of Minera Li adjusted for differences in accounting policies between the Company and Minera Li. Our share
of income and losses from our equity method investment in Minera Li is included in loss from Minera Li equity investment in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Summarized Balance Sheets
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
12,106
|
|
|
$
|
47,973
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
17,383,642
|
|
|
|
17,383,067
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
17,395,748
|
|
|
$
|
17,431,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,967,663
|
|
|
$
|
1,870,056
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
15,428,085
|
|
|
|
15,560,984
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
17,395,748
|
|
|
$
|
17,431,040
|
|
Summarized Statements of Operations
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
September 30, 2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
(42,857
|
)
|
|
|
(357,238
|
)
|
General & administrative expenses
|
|
|
(90,042
|
)
|
|
|
(78,240
|
)
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(132,899
|
)
|
|
|
(435,478
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(132,899
|
)
|
|
$
|
(435,478
|
)
|
NOTE 5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
MSB
As of June 30, 2016, MSB owned 51% of Minera
Li with the Company retaining a 49% ownership interest. MSB is a private Chilean corporation with an objective to advance a business
in the production of lithium. MSB is controlled by a Chilean entrepreneur.
As of June 30, 2015, the Company had received
a total of $1,220,000 of loans from MSB (of which $980,000 was received during the year ending June 30, 2015), bearing interest
of 8.5% per annum and due within 18 months from the date of receipt. On January 19, 2016, the Company entered into an additional
agreement with MSB whereby the Company and MSB agreed to offset the $1,000,000 Additional Payment MSB previously agreed to provide
to the Company against $1,000,000 of the Company’s notes payable to MSB and $134,901 of accrued interest owed to MSB was
rolled into the Company’s existing note payable. In addition, MSB loaned an additional $100,000 to the Company and MSB waived
the 13 shares in Minera Li which were pledged by the Company to MSB as security for its notes payable. The resulting $454,901 loan
payable and accrued interest is due on January 18, 2018, bears interest at 8.5% per annum, and is secured by 5 of the Company’s
shares in Minera Li.
The total interest accrued on the loans
from MSB as of September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 was $27,014 and $17,268, respectively. For the three months ended September
30, 2016 and 2015, $9,746 and $25,361, respectively, of interest expense was recognized in our consolidated statements of operations.
On July 20, 2016, MSB entered into an agreement
with Lithium Power International Limited (“LPI”), an Australian company, regarding a joint venture to explore and develop
the Maricunga Project in accordance with a term sheet dated July 14, 2016. On August 30, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement
with MSB, pursuant to which, the Company and MSB, as the current shareholders of Minera Li, unanimously agreed to approve the transactions
contemplated by the term sheet (the “Transaction”).
As part of the Transaction, Mineral Li
and MSB will contribute their Maricunga lithium brine assets to a new joint venture (the “Maricunga JV”) and LPI will
contribute $27.5 million in cash to the Maricunga JV to cover exploration and development costs for the next 2.5 years until the
completion of a definitive feasibility study in late 2018. Following the completion of the Transaction, the Company will own a
direct 17.67% equity interest of the Maricunga JV, with LPI and MSB owning 50.0% and 32.33%, respectively. The Company will be
entitled to appoint one director of the Maricunga JV (so long as it holds at least 10% of the equity interests of the joint venture),
with LPI and MSB holding three and two director seats, respectively.
On September 1, 2016, LPI announced that
it had satisfactorily completed the legal and technical due diligence regarding the Maricunga JV.
NOTE 6. NOTES PAYABLE
On January 29, 2016, the Company executed
a non-binding letter of intent (“LOI”) with Wealth Minerals Ltd ("Wealth") for a transaction between the
companies and on signing the LOI, the Company received a payment of $50,000 from Wealth which was recorded as notes payable in
the consolidated balance sheet. On March 22, 2016, the parties extended the LOI for an additional 60 days and on April 29, 2016,
the Company received a further payment of $150,000 from Wealth, also recorded as notes payable in the consolidated balance sheet.
As of September 30, 2016, and June 30, 2016, the Company has recorded notes payable to Wealth of $200,000.
If the transaction is completed, the payments
from Wealth will remain a non-interest bearing shareholder loan. If the transaction is terminated by Li3, the Company is required
to repay the amounts within 30 days. If the transaction is terminated by Wealth, the payments will be converted into common shares
of Li3 at a price equal to the greater of $0.02 per share or the 10-day volume weighted average price of the common shares of Li3
as quoted on the OTCBB.
On November 15, 2016, the Company entered
into an agreement with Wealth pursuant to which the LOI with Wealth was terminated and the Company’s obligation to repay
the notes payable to Wealth of $200,000 was also terminated.
NOTE 7. CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE
During May 2016, the Company issued unsecured
convertible promissory notes to various individuals for aggregate proceeds of $525,000, bearing an interest rate of 10% per annum,
due 12 months from the date of issuance and convertible at a price of $0.0125 per share. The Company assessed the embedded
conversion feature and determined that the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature at inception exceeded the face
value of this note and accordingly recorded at beneficial conversion feature of $395,200. Such beneficial conversion feature was
accounted for as a debt discount, which is amortized to interest expense over the life of the note. During the three months ended
September 30, 2016, the Company recorded amortization of debt discount and interest expense of $99,612 and $13,233, respectively,
on these convertible notes. Total unamortized debt discount and interest accrued on the loans as of September 30, 2016 was $249,469
and $19,445, respectively. Total unamortized debt discount and interest accrued on the loans as of June 30, 2016 was $349,081 and
$6,212, respectively.
NOTE 8. DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
Warrants
The Company determined that certain warrants
that the Company issued contained provisions that protected holders from future issuances of the Company’s common stock at
prices below such warrants’ respective exercise prices and these provisions could have resulted in modification of the warrants
exercise price based on a variable that was not an input to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” option as defined
under FASB ASC Topic No. 815 - 40. As of September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016, all derivative warrant instruments had expired.
Activity for derivative warrant instruments
during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
fair value of
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
derivative
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Second 2010 Unit Offering warrants
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
15,147
|
|
|
$
|
15,147
|
|
Third 2010 Unit Offering warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27,464
|
|
|
|
27,464
|
|
Lender warrants
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
6,420
|
|
|
|
10,219
|
|
Warrants for advisory services and arranger warrants
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,040
|
|
|
$
|
49,380
|
|
|
$
|
53,420
|
|
There were no warrants exercised during
the three months ended September 30, 2015.
The following is a summary of the assumptions
used in the modified lattice valuation model as of September 30, 2015:
|
|
Valuation as of
September 30,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants
|
|
|
20,658,822
|
|
Market value of common stock on measurement date (1)
|
|
$
|
0.028
|
|
Adjusted exercise price
|
|
$
|
0.04-$0.24
|
|
Risk free interest rate (2)
|
|
|
0.08%-0.33
|
%
|
Warrant lives in years
|
|
|
0.1-0.6
|
|
Expected volatility (3)
|
|
|
197
|
%
|
Expected dividend yields (4)
|
|
|
None
|
|
Assumed stock offerings per year over next two years (5)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Probability of stock offering in any year over next two years (6)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Range of percentage of existing shares offered (7)
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Offering price range (8)
|
|
$
|
0.03 - $0.04
|
|
(1)
|
The market value of common stock is the stock price at the close of trading on the date of issuance or at period-end, as applicable.
|
(2)
|
The risk-free interest rate was determined by management using the 0.5 or 1 - year Treasury Bill as of the respective offering or measurement date.
|
(3)
|
The historical trading volatility was determined by the Company’s trading history.
|
(4)
|
Management determined the dividend yield to be -0-% based upon its expectation that it will not pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
|
(5)
|
Management estimates the Company will have at least one stock offering in the next two years.
|
(6)
|
Management estimates that the probability of a stock offering is 100% during the next two years.
|
(7)
|
Management estimates that the range of percentages of existing shares offered in each stock offering will be 14% of the shares outstanding.
|
(8)
|
Represents the estimated offering price range in future offerings as determined by management.
|
NOTE 9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stock Option Awards
There were no stock options issued during
the three months ended September 30, 2016. A summary of stock option activity is presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term (years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2016
|
|
|
916,666
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired/Forfeited
|
|
|
(333,333
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016
|
|
|
583,333
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2016
|
|
|
583,333
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
NOTE 10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table sets forth a reconciliation
of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,040
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49,380
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
53,420
|
|
Change in unrealized losses included in earnings
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
49,380
|
|
NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As previously discussed, on January 29,
2016, the Company executed a non-binding LOI with Wealth for a transaction between the companies under the following terms:
|
•
|
Wealth will undertake an equity financing of CAD$3 million.
|
|
•
|
Post-financing, Wealth and Li3 shareholders will each hold 50% of the new company.
|
|
•
|
The use of proceeds of the financing will be to advance Li3's Maricunga lithium project in Chile and pursue other corporate initiatives.
|
|
•
|
The new company will have seven Board seats, with Wealth holding four and Li3 holding the remaining three seats. The management of Wealth will largely remain intact and Li3's current management team will support the new company as necessary.
|
|
•
|
Wealth will have a 60-day exclusivity period to complete its due diligence and financing.
|
NOTE 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to September 30, 2016, the Company
issued 4,967,831 shares of common stock to officers and directors for services.
On November 15, 2016, the Company entered
into an agreement with Wealth pursuant to which the LOI with Wealth was terminated and the Company’s obligation to repay
the notes payable to Wealth of $200,000 was also terminated.