ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes
are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization and Nature of Operations
Legacy Card Company (“Legacy”)
was formed as a Limited Liability Company on August 29, 2001. On April 18, 2005, Legacy converted from a California Limited Liability
Company to a Nevada Corporation. On November 10, 2005, Legacy merged with Cardiff International, Inc. (“Cardiff”, the
“Company”), a publicly held corporation. In the first quarter of 2013, it was decided to restructure Cardiff into a
holding company that adopted a new business model known as "Collaborative Governance," a form of governance enabling
businesses to take advantage of the power of a public company. Cardiff began targeting the acquisition of undervalued, niche companies
with high growth potential, income-producing commercial real estate properties, and high return investments, all designed to pay
a dividend to the Company’s shareholders. The reason for this strategy was to protect the Company’s shareholders by
acquiring profitable small- to minimum-sized businesses with little to no debt, seeking support with both financing and management
that had the ability to offer a return to investors. The plan is to establish new classes of preferred stock to streamline voting
rights, negate debt, and acquire new businesses. By December of 2013, the Company had negated more than 90% of all its debt; by
July of 2014, the Company had completed the acquisition of three businesses: We Three, LLC; Romeo’s NY Pizza; and Edge View
Properties, Inc. The Company delayed the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the year ended
December 31, 2015 due to difficulty obtaining information from another acquisition, which was subsequently unwound.
Description of Business
Cardiff is a holding company that adopted
a new business model known as "Collaborative Governance.” To date, the Company is not aware of any other domestic holding
company using the same business philosophy or governing policies. The Company’s business footprint is to acquire strong companies
that meet the following criteria: (1) in business for a minimum of two years; (2) profitable; (3) good management team; (4) little
to no debt; and (5) assets of a minimum of $1,000,000. Cardiff continues to practice all business ethics under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”) and acknowledges that there are more than 43 successful Business Development Companies subject
to the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”), all of which may be considered competition to Cardiff and that
are established and available to the public for investment. These companies offer experienced management, dividends and financial
security.
To date, Cardiff consists of three subsidiaries:
We Three, LLC; Romeo’s NY Pizza; and Edge View Properties, Inc.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Cardiff International, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: We Three, LLC; Romeo’s NY Pizza; and Edge
View Properties, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period
amounts may have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation. These reclassifications would have no
material effect on the reported financial results.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid
investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Revenue Recognition
In general, the Company recognizes revenue
on an accrual basis. Revenue is generally realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: 1) persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists between the Company and our customer(s); 2) services have been rendered; 3) our price to our
customer is fixed or determinable; and 4) collectability is reasonably assured.
Rental Income
The Company’s rental income is derived
from the mobile home leases. The expired leases are considered month-to-month leases. In accordance with section 605-10-S99-1 of
the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition, the cost of property held for leasing by major classes of property
according to nature or function, and the amount of accumulated depreciation in total, is presented in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. There are no contingent rentals included in income in the accompanying statements
of operations. With the exception of the month-to-month leases, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis and amortized into
income on a monthly basis, over the lease term.
Restaurant Sales
Revenue from restaurant sales is recognized
when food and beverage products are sold. The Company reports revenue net of sales taxes collected from customers and remitted
to governmental taxing authorities.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures.
Management uses its historical records and knowledge of its business in making estimates. Accordingly, actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived brands are
not amortized, but are evaluated for impairment annually or when indicators of a potential impairment are present. Our impairment
testing of goodwill is performed separately from our impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangibles. The annual evaluation
for impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles is based on valuation models that incorporate assumptions and internal
projections of expected future cash flows and operating plans. The Company believe such assumptions are also comparable to those
that would be used by other marketplace participants. During the year ended December 31, 2014, goodwill of $1,707,153 resulted
from the business acquisitions in 2014 was impaired in full. There was no goodwill impairment in 2015.
Valuation of long-lived assets
In accordance with the provisions of Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360-10-5, “
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
”, all
long-lived assets such as plant and equipment and construction in progress held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability
of assets to be held and used is evaluated by a comparison of the carrying amount of assets to estimated discounted net cash flows
expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured
by the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceed the fair value of the assets. There has been no impairment charge
for the periods presented.
Valuation of Derivative Instruments
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-10,
Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815-10”)
, requires
that embedded derivative instruments be bifurcated and assessed, along with freestanding derivative instruments such as convertible
promissory notes, on their issuance date to determine whether they would be considered a derivative liability and measured at their
fair value for accounting purposes. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the convertible notes principal and accrued interest
totaled $32,010 were converted into 2,496 shares of Common Stock of the Company at the options of the noteholder. The Company used
a Black-Scholes pricing model to determine the appropriate fair value of $132,981 at the conversion date. The Company adjusted
its derivative liability to its fair value, and reflected the increase (decrease) in fair value of $35,590 for the year ended December
31, 2014 as Other Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The derivative liability of $132,981 was reclassified
as additional paid-in capital at the conversion. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the conversion price of a $10,000 convertible
note was changed from 50% of the market to $0.01 per share due to the market price falling below certain level. As a result, the
embedded derivative liabilities of $10,008 was reclassified as additional paid-in capital.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized based upon the
level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1)
market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs), and (2) an
entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances
(unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level
3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level Input
|
Input Definition
|
|
|
Level 1
|
Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
|
Level 2
|
Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, which are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
|
Level 3
|
Unobservable inputs that reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.
|
The following table presents certain investments
and liabilities of the Company’s financial assets measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s Consolidated
Balance Sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Liability – December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
13,948
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Liability – December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation – Employees
The Company accounts for its stock based
compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement
principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant
to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration
received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the
fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.
The measurement date used to determine
the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which
it is probable that performance will occur.
If the Company is a newly formed corporation
or shares of the Company are thinly traded, the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement
memorandum (based on sales to third parties), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than
the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked
quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
The fair value of share options and similar
instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions
for inputs are as follows:
|
·
|
Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term = ((vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
|
|
·
|
Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market
|
|
·
|
Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
|
|
·
|
Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
|
Generally, all forms of share-based payments,
including stock option grants, warrants and restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights are measured at their fair value
on the awards’ grant date, based on estimated number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest.
The expense resulting from share-based
payments is recorded in general and administrative expense in the statements of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation – Non
Employees
Equity Instruments Issued to Parties
Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services
The Company accounts for equity instruments
issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).
Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all
transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for
based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably
measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on
which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is
a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s
most recent private placement memorandum, or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the
use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked
quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
The fair value
of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.
The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
|
·
|
Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
|
|
·
|
Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
|
|
·
|
Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Risk-free rate(s).
An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The
risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the
expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
|
Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7,
if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for
goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the
elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached.
A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether
the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity
under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph
505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested,
non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services
(and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall
not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments.
The transferability (or lack thereof) of
the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which
equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance
on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.
Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and
505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only
after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified
performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner
as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using,
the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a share option and similar instrument
that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.
Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1,
if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity
instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are
not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should
be recorded.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost.
Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures
for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is provided
using the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes at rates based on the following estimated useful lives:
Classification
|
|
Useful Life
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
|
5 - 7 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
10 years or lease term, if shorter
|
During the years ended December 31, 2015
and 2014, depreciation and amortization expense was $84,752 and $39,992, respectively.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are determined
in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income
Taxes
” (“ASC 740”). Under this method, deferred tax assets
and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted income tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. Any effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment date.
ASC 740 prescribes
a comprehensive model for how companies should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in their financial statements uncertain
tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under ASC 740, tax positions must initially be recognized in the financial
statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions
must initially and subsequently be measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and relevant facts.
For the years ended
December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not have any interest and penalties associated with tax positions. As of December 31,
2015 and 2014, the Company did not have any significant unrecognized uncertain tax positions.
Earnings (Loss) per Share
FASB ASC Subtopic 260,
Earnings Per
Share
(“ASC 260”), provides for the calculation of "Basic" and "Diluted" earnings per share.
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number
of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available
to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period increased to include
the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been
issued. Potentially dilutive securities include outstanding stock options, warrants, and debts convertible into common shares.
The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted earnings per common share by application of the
treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, an increase in the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock
can result in a greater dilutive effect from potentially dilutive securities.
The following table sets forth the computation
of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. During a period of net loss, all
potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive. Accordingly, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, potentially dilutive
securities have been excluded from the computations since they would be anti-dilutive. However, these dilutive securities could
potentially dilute earnings per share in the future:
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
$
|
(3,944,421
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,131,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,644,291
|
|
|
|
1,152,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11.39
|
)
|
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared using the going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization
of assets and liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company is in the development stage and, as such,
has sustained operating losses since its inception and has negative working capital and an accumulated deficit. These factors raise
substantial doubts about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had shareholders’
deficit of $594,557. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustments relating to the recoverability
and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might result if the Company
is unable to continue as a going concern. As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its
report on the Company’s December 31, 2015 consolidated financial statements, has raised substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern.
The ability of the Company to continue
as a going concern and the appropriateness of using the going concern basis is dependent upon, among other things, additional cash
infusions. Management has prospective investors and believes the raising of capital will allow the Company to pursue new acquisitions.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain sufficient capital from debt or equity transactions or from operations
in the necessary time frame or on terms acceptable to it. Should the Company be unable to raise sufficient funds, it may be required
to curtail its operating plans. In addition, increases in expenses may require cost reductions. No assurance can be given that
the Company will be able to operate profitably on a consistent basis, or at all, in the future. Should the Company not be able
to raise sufficient funds, it may cause cessation of operations.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2014, the FASB issued ASU
2014-15,
Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.
This ASU describes
how an entity should assess its ability to meet obligations and sets disclosure requirements for how this information should be
disclosed in the financial statements. The standard provides accounting guidance that will be used with existing auditing standards.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim
periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will be examined for the year ended December
31, 2016, and if applicable at that time, will require management to make the appropriate disclosures.
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2015-03,
Interest—Imputation of Interest (Topic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of
Debt Issuance Costs
(“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized
debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent
with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs is not affected by ASU 2015-03. ASU 2015-03
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption, the Company will reclassify debt issuance costs from prepaid expenses
and other current assets and other assets as a reduction to debt in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company is not
planning to early adopt ASU 2015-03 and does not anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2015-03will materially impact its condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-11,
Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying
the Measurement of Inventory
(“ASU 2015-11”), which applies guidance on the subsequent measurement of inventory.
ASU 2015-11 states that an entity should measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value
is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonable predictable costs of completion, disposal and
transportation. The guidance excludes inventory measured using last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method. ASU 2015-11 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company
is not planning to early adopt ASU 2015-11 and is currently evaluating ASU 2015-11 to determine the potential impact to its condensed
consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Other pronouncements issued by the FASB
or other authoritative accounting standards groups with future effective dates are either not applicable or are not expected to
be significant to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In April 2015, the Company closed 2 pizza
restaurants located in Alpharetta, Georgia and Lawrenceville, Georgia due to continuing losses in operations and slow traffic at
these 2 locations.
3. PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Plant and equipment, net as of December
31, 2015 and 2014 was $540,024 and $534,212, respectively, consisting of the following:
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, fixture and equipment
|
|
$
|
261,882
|
|
|
$
|
268,055
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
635,972
|
|
|
|
545,830
|
|
|
|
|
897,854
|
|
|
|
813,885
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(357,830
|
)
|
|
|
(279,673
|
)
|
Plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
540,024
|
|
|
$
|
534,212
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2015
and 2014, depreciation expense was $84,752 and $39,992, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2015,
the Company disposed 2 smart cars for cash payment of $30,902, resulting in gain of $12,007 from disposal of fixed assets.
4. LAND
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
had land of $603,000 located in Salmon, Idaho with area of approximately 30 acres, which was in connection with the acquisition
of Edge View Properties, Inc. in July 2014. The Company issued 241,199 shares of Series E Preferred Stock as consideration for
this acquisition. Based on the price of $2.50 per share, the acquisition consideration represents a $603,000 valuation. The land
is currently vacant and is expected to be developed into residential community. The value of the land is not subject to be depreciated.
5. ACCRUED EXPENSES
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
had accrued expenses of $1,087,304 and $626,330, respectively, consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued salaries
|
|
$
|
502,500
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
Accrued expenses - other
|
|
|
584,804
|
|
|
|
176,330
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,087,304
|
|
|
$
|
626,330
|
|
6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Due to Officers and Officer Compensation
The Company borrows funds from Daniel Thompson,
who is a Shareholder and Officer of the Company. The terms of repayment stipulate the loans are due 24 months after the launch
of the Legacy Tuition Card (or prior to such date) at an annual interest rate of six percent. As of December 31, 2015, the Company
had $81,905 due to Daniel Thompson.
In addition, the Company has an employment
agreement, renewed May 15, 2014, with Daniel Thompson whereby the Company changed Daniel Thompson’s compensation to $20,000
per month from $25,000. Accordingly, a total salary of $240,000 and $262,500 were accrued and reflected as an expense to Daniel
Thompson during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The accrued salaries payable to Daniel Thompson was $502,500
and $450,000 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The Company has an employment agreement
with a former President, Ms. Roberton, whereby the Company provides for compensation of $25,000 per month beginning May 15, 2014.
A total salary of $187,500 was reflected as an expense during the year ended December 31, 2014. On June 1, 2015, Ms. Roberton resigned
from all her positions of the Company and agreed to waive all unpaid salary earned during her employment. Accordingly, the Company
reclassified the accrued salaries of $187,500 into additional paid-in capital. The total balance due to Ms. Roberton for accrued
salaries at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $0 and $0, respectively.
The Company had an employment agreement
with a former Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Levy, whereby the Company provided for compensation of $15,000 per month. A total salary
of $180,000 was accrued and reflected as an expense during the year ended December 31, 2015. The total balance due to Mr. Levy
for accrued salaries at December 31, 2015 was $180,000.
The Company had an employment agreement
with the Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Cunningham, whereby the Company provided for compensation of $15,000 per month. A total salary
of $180,000 was accrued and reflected as an expense during the year ended December 31, 2015. The total balance due to Mr. Cunningham
for accrued salaries at December 31, 2015 was $180,000.
Notes Payable – Related Party
The Company has entered into several loan
agreements with related parties (see above; Footnote 7, Notes Payable – Related Party; and Footnote 8, Convertible Notes
Payable – Related Party).
7. NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable at December 31, 2015 and
2014 are summarized as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable – Unrelated Party
|
|
$
|
60,811
|
|
|
$
|
129,032
|
|
Notes Payable – Related Party
|
|
|
119,500
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Discount on notes
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
180,311
|
|
|
$
|
229,032
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(180,311
|
)
|
|
|
(129,032
|
)
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Notes Payable – Unrelated Party
On March 12, 2009, the Company entered
into a preferred debenture agreement with a shareholder for $20,000. The note bore interest at 12% per year and matured on September
12, 2009. In conjunction with the preferred debenture, the Company issued 2,000,000 warrants to purchase its Common Stock, exercisable
at $0.10 per share and expired on March 12, 2014. As a result of the warrants issued, the Company recorded a $20,000 debt discount
during 2009 which has been fully amortized. The Company assigned all of its receivables from consumer activations of the rewards
program as collateral on this debenture. On March 24, 2011, the Company amended the note and the principal balance was reduced
to $15,000. The Company was due to pay annual principal payments of $5,000 plus accrued interest beginning March 12, 2012. On July
20, 2011, the Company repaid $5,000 of the note. As of December 31, 2012, the warrants had not been exercised. As of December 31,
2015, the Company is in default on this debenture. The balance of the note was $10,989 and $10,989 at December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively.
The balance of $49,822 in notes payable
to unrelated party was due to the auto loan for the vehicles used in the Pizza restaurants.
Notes Payable – Related Party
On September 7, 2011, the Company entered
into a Promissory Note agreement (“Note 1”) with a related party for $50,000. Note 1 bears interest at 8% per year
and matures on September 7, 2016. Interest is payable annually on the anniversary of Note 1, and the principal and any unpaid interest
will be due upon maturity. In conjunction with Note 1, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of its Common Stock to the lender. As
a result of the shares issued in conjunction with Note 1, the Company recorded a $50,000 debt discount during 2011. The balance
of Note 1, net of debt discount, was $50,000 and $50,000 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
On November 17, 2011, the Company entered
into a Promissory Note agreement (“Note 2”) with a related party for $50,000. Note 2 bears interest at 8% per year
and matures on November 17, 2016. Interest is payable annually on the anniversary of Note 2, and the principal and any unpaid interest
will be due upon maturity. In conjunction with Note 2, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of its Common Stock to the lender. As
a result of the shares issued in conjunction with Note 2, the Company recorded a $50,000 debt discount during 2011. The balance
of Note 2, net of debt discount, was $50,000 and $50,000 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
On August 4, 2015, the Company entered
into a Promissory Note agreement (“Note 3”) with a related party for $19,500. Note 3 bears interest at 6% per year
and matures on December 31, 2016. Interest is payable annually on the anniversary of Note 3, and the principal and any unpaid interest
will be due upon maturity. The balance of Note 3 was $19,500 at December 31, 2015.
The following is a schedule showing the
future minimum loan payments in the future 5 years.
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
60,811
|
|
2016
|
|
|
119,500
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
180,311
|
|
8. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
Some of the Convertible Notes issued as
described below included an anti-dilution provision that allowed for the adjustment of the conversion price. The Company considered
the guidance provided by the FASB in “
Determining Whether an Instrument Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock
,”
the result of which indicates that the instrument is not indexed to the issuer’s own stock. Accordingly, the Company determined
that, as the conversion price of the Notes issued in connection therewith could fluctuate based future events, such prices were
not fixed amounts. As a result, the Company determined that the conversion features of the Notes issued in connection therewith
are not considered indexed to the Company’s stock and characterized the value of the conversion feature of such notes as
derivative liabilities upon issuance.
Convertible notes at December 31, 2015 and 2014 are summarized
as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Notes Payable – Unrelated Party
|
|
$
|
29,700
|
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
Convertible Notes Payable – Related Party
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
Discount on notes
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total - Current
|
|
$
|
194,700
|
|
|
$
|
174,000
|
|
Convertible Notes Payable – Unrelated Party
On April 17, 2014, the Company entered
into an unsecured Convertible Note (“Note 4”) in the amount of $9,000. Note 4 was convertible into Common Shares of
the Company at $0.005 per share at the option of the holder. Note 4 bore interest at eight percent per year, matured on June 17,
2014, and was unsecured. All principal and unpaid accrued interest was due at maturity. The Company is currently in default on
Note 4. On August 17, 2015, a portion of principal of $1,500 was converted into 300,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company upon
the request of the holder. The balance of the note was $7,500 and $9,000 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
On May 6, 2015, the Company entered into
a 10% convertible promissory note (“Note 5”) with an unrelated entity in the amount of $12,200. Note 5 bore interest
at ten percent per year, matured on September 3, 2015, and was unsecured. Note 5 was convertible into Common Shares of the Company
at the conversion ratio of 50% discount to market at the lowest traded price within 20 business days prior to “Notice of
Conversion”. This gives rise to derivative liability accounting related to this Note since the conversion ratio is considered
floorless.
Accordingly, Note 5 has been evaluated
with respect to the terms and conditions of the conversion features contained in Note 5 to determine whether they represent embedded
or freestanding derivative instruments under the provisions of ASC 815. The Company determined that the conversion features contained
in Note 5 for $12,200 carrying value represents a freestanding derivative instrument that meets the requirements for liability
classification under ASC 815. As a result, the fair value of the derivative financial instrument in the note is reflected in the
Company’s balance sheet as a liability. The fair value of the derivative financial instrument of the convertible note was
measured using the Black-Scholes valuation model at the inception date of Note 5 and will do so again on each subsequent balance
sheet date. Any changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments are recorded as non-operating, non-cash income
or expense at each balance sheet date.
The table below sets forth the assumptions
for Black-Scholes valuation model on May 6, 2015 (inception) and December 31, 2015, respectively. For the period ended December
31, 2015, the Company had initial loss of $10,295 due to derivative liabilities, and decreased the derivative liability of $22,495
by $8,547, resulting in a derivative liability of $13,948 at December 31, 2015.
Reporting Date
|
Fair Value
|
Term (Years)
|
Assumed Conversion Price
|
Market Price on Issuance Date
|
Volatility Percentage
|
Risk-free Rate
|
5/6/2015
|
$22,495
|
0.33
|
$0.825
|
$1.69
|
507%
|
0.0002
|
12/31/2015
|
$13,948
|
0.003
|
$0.035
|
$0.075
|
533%
|
0.0014
|
The Company is currently in default on
Note 5. As of December 31, 2015, the carrying values of Note 5 were $12,200 and the debt discount was $0. The Company recorded
interest expense related to Note 5 in amount of $799 during the year ended December 31, 2015. The accrued interest of Note 5 was
$799 as of December 31, 2015.
The Notes
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
$
|
12,200
|
|
Less derivative liabilities on initial recognition
|
|
|
(12,200
|
)
|
Value of the Notes on initial recognition
|
|
|
0
|
|
Add accumulated accretion expense
|
|
|
12,200
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
12,200
|
|
On July 29, 2015, the Company entered into
an 8% convertible promissory note (“Note 6”) with an unrelated entity in the amount of $10,000. Note 6 bore interest
at eight percent per year, matured on November 26, 2015, and was unsecured. Note 6 was convertible into Common Shares of the Company
at the conversion ratio of 50% discount to market at the conversion date. However, if the closing bid price of the Company’s
Common Shares falls below $0.10 per share, the conversion price will be changed to $0.01 per share and remain intact from that
point forward. Since the Company’s common stock was $0.075 per share at December 31, 2015, the conversion feature contained
in Note 6 no longer meets the requirements for liability classification under ASC 815. As a result, the embedded derivative liabilities
of $10,008 at December 31, 2015 was reclassified as additional paid-in capital.
The table below sets forth the assumptions
for Black-Scholes valuation model on July 29, 2015 (inception) and December 31, 2015, respectively. For the period ended December
31, 2015, the Company had initial loss of $8,041 due to derivative liabilities, and decreased the derivative liability of $18,041
by $8,033, resulting in a derivative liability of $10,008 at December 31, 2015.
Reporting Date
|
Fair Value
|
Term (Years)
|
Assumed Conversion Price
|
Market Price on Issuance Date
|
Volatility Percentage
|
Risk-free Rate
|
7/29/2015
|
$18,041
|
0.33
|
$0.30
|
$0.60
|
513%
|
0.0006
|
12/31/2015
|
$10,008
|
0.003
|
$0.038
|
$0.075
|
533%
|
0.0014
|
The Company is currently in default on
Note 6 and bears default interest at ten percent per year. As of December 31, 2015, the carrying values of Note 6 were $10,000
and the debt discount was $0. The Company recorded interest expense related to Note 6 in amount of $359 during the year ended December
31, 2015. The accrued interest of Note 6 was $359 as of December 31, 2015.
The Notes
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Less derivative liabilities on initial recognition
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
Value of the Notes on initial recognition
|
|
|
0
|
|
Add accumulated accretion expense
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Convertible Notes Payable – Related Party
On April 21, 2008, the Company entered
into an unsecured Convertible Debenture (“Debenture 1”) with a shareholder in the amount of $150,000. Debenture 1 was
convertible into Common Shares of the Company at $0.03 per share at the option of the holder no earlier than August 21, 2008. Debenture
1 bore interest at 12% per year, matured in August 2009, and was unsecured. All principal and unpaid accrued interest was due at
maturity. In conjunction with the Debenture 1, the Company also issued warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s
Common Stock at $0.03 per share. The warrants expired on April 20, 2013. As a result of issued warrants, the Company recorded a
$150,000 debt discount during 2008 which has been fully amortized. The Company is in default on Debenture 1, and the warrants have
not been exercised. The balance of Debenture 1 was $150,000 and $150,000 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
On March 11, 2009, the Company entered
into an unsecured Convertible Debenture (“Debenture 2”) with a shareholder in the amount of $15,000. Debenture 2 was
convertible into Common Shares of the Company at $0.03 per share at the option of the holder. Debenture 2 bore interest at 12%
per year, matured on March 11, 2014, and was unsecured. All principal and unpaid accrued interest was due at maturity. The Company
is in default on Debenture 2. The balance of Debenture 2 was $15,000 and $15,000 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The following is a schedule showing the
future minimum loan payments in the future 5 years.
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
194,700
|
|
9. DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
As of December 31, 2015, the Company’s
derivative liabilities are embedded derivatives associated with the Company’s convertible note payable (see Footnote 8).
Due to the Notes’ conversion feature, the actual number of shares of common stock that would be required if a conversion
of the note as described in Footnote 8 was made through the issuance of the Company’s common stock cannot be predicted. As
a result, the conversion feature requires derivative accounting treatment and will be bifurcated from the note and “marked
to market” each reporting period through the statement of operations.
The Company measured the fair value of
the derivative liabilities as $40,536 on the inception date, and remeasured the fair value as $23,956 on December 31, 2015, of
which $10,008 was reclassified as additional paid-in capital due to the change in conversion price from discounted market price
to fixed price. The Company recorded the change of fair value of $1,756 in the statements of operations for the year ended December
31, 2015.
There was no derivative liabilities as
of December 31, 2014.
10. PAYROLL TAXES
The Company previously reported that it
has failed to remit payroll tax payments since 2006, as required by various taxing authorities. Payroll taxes and estimated penalties
were accrued in recognition of accrued salaries subsequently settled via stock issue and other agreements that did not result in
reportable or taxable payroll transactions. These accruals were reversed for prior years, and a similar estimated accrual established
for 2015 and 2014. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company estimated the amount of taxes, interest, and penalties that the
Company could incur as a result of payroll related taxes and penalties to be $38,902 and $38,400, respectively.
11. NET LOSS PER SHARE
Basic net loss per share is computed using
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the years. There were no dilutive earnings per share
for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 due to net loss during the years.
The following table sets forth the computation
of basic net loss per share for the years indicated:
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
$
|
(3,944,421
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,131,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,644,291
|
|
|
|
1,152,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11.39
|
)
|
12. CAPITAL STOCK
Reverse Stock Split:
In August 2014, the Board of Directors
approved new Articles of Incorporation per the effectuated domicile change which authorized four classes of Preferred Stock: 4
Series A shares authorized, 5,000,000 Series B shares authorized, 250 Series C shares and 100,000,000 Blank Check Preferred shares
authorized.
The principal features of the Company's
capital stock are as follows:
In August 2014, the Board of Directors
approved an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to amend Series B Preferred Stock Authorized & Designations,
Rights & Privileges and to authorize three additional classes of Preferred Stock. After this action, the Company has five classes
of Common Stock and Preferred Stock.
Series A Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
has designated four shares of preferred stock as Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A”), with a par value of $.0001
per share, of which one share of preferred stock is issued and outstanding. Series A is authorized to have four shares which do
not bear dividends and converts to common shares at four times the sum of: all shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding at
time of conversion plus all shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding at time of conversion divided by the number
of issued Class A shares at the time of conversion, and have voting rights four times the sum of: all shares of Common Stock issued
and outstanding at time of voting plus all shares of Series B Preferred Stocks issued and outstanding at time of voting divided
by the number of Class A shares issued at the time of voting.
Series B Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
has designated 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock as Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B”), with a par value $0.001
and $2.50 price per share, of which 4,978,028 and 5,270,693 shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding, respectively.
Shares of Series B are anti-dilutive to reverse splits. The conversion rate of shares of Series B, however, would increase proportionately
in the case of forward splits, and may not be diluted by a reverse split following a forward split. Each one share of Series B
shall have no voting rights. The price of each share of Series B may be changed either through a majority vote of the Board of
Directors through a resolution at a meeting of the Board of Directors, or through a resolution passed at an Action Without Meeting
of the unanimous Board of Directors, until such time as a listed secondary and/or listed public market develops for the shares.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company sold 81,993 shares of Series B to various investors at a price of $2.50 per share, or totaled $204,983 in cash.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company issued 600,000 shares of Series B preferred stock to officers for services rendered. The fair value of this stock issuance
was determined by the private placement price of $2.5 per share in the arms-length transactions. Accordingly, the Company recognized
stock based compensation of $1,500,000 to employees.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company issued 11,999 shares of Series B preferred stock and 1 share of Series C preferred stock to certain consultants for
marketing services rendered. The fair value of this stock issuance was determined by the private placement price of $2.5 per share
in the arms-length transactions. Accordingly, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $30,000 to non-employees.
During the year ended December 31, 2015,
325,862 shares of Series “B” Preferred Stock were converted into 1,610,206 shares of Common Stock of the Company per
the preferred shareholder’s instruction.
During the year ended December 31, 2015,
the Company issued 33,197 shares of Series “B” Preferred stock and 3 shares of Series “C” Preferred Stock
to several investors for total cash payment of $82,500 pursuant to the executed subscription agreements.
Series C Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
has designated 250 shares of preferred stock as Series C Preferred Stock (“Series C”), with a par value of $.00001
per share, of which 118 and 113 shares are issued and outstanding, respectively. Shares of Series C are non-dilutive to reverse
splits. The conversion rate of shares of Series C, however, would increase proportionately in the case of forward splits, and may
not be diluted by a reverse split following a forward split. Each one share of Series C converts to 100,000 shares of Common Stock.
Each share of Series C shall have one vote for any election or other vote placed before the shareholders of the Company. The price
of each share of Series C may be changed either through a majority vote of the Board of Directors through a resolution at a meeting
of the Board of Directors, or through a resolution passed at an Action Without Meeting of the unanimous Board of Directors, until
such time as a listed secondary and/or listed public market develops for the shares. Shares of Series C may not be converted into
shares of Common Stock for a period of: a) six months after purchase, if the Company voluntarily or involuntarily files public
reports pursuant to Section 12 or 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; or b) 12 months if the Company does not file such
public reports.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company sold 33 shares of Series C to various investors at a price of $2.50 per share, or totaled $83 in cash.
During the year ended December 31, 2015,
the Company sold 4 shares of Series C to various investors at a price of $2.50 per share and 1 share at a price of $4.00 per share,
or totaled $14 in cash.
Blank Check Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
has designated 100,000,000 shares of Blank Check Preferred Stock, of which 1,094,019 and 1,077,771 shares have been issued with
Designations, Rights & Privileges. The following Series have been assigned from the inventory of Blank Check Preferred Shares.
The amount of Blank Check Preferred Stock is 98,905,981 as of December 31, 2015.
Series D Preferred Stock
On June 30, 2014, the Company completed
the acquisition of Romeo’s NY Pizza. The Company issued 400,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock (“Series D”)
as consideration for this acquisition. Based on the price of $2.50 per share, the acquisition consideration represents a $1,000,000
valuation. Shares of Series D are anti-dilutive to reverse splits. The conversion rate of shares of Series D, however, would increase
proportionately in the case of forward splits, and may not be diluted by a reverse split following a forward split. Each one share
of Series D shall have voting rights equal to one vote of Common Stock. With respect to all matters upon which stockholders are
entitled to vote or to which stockholders are entitled to give consent, the holders of the outstanding shares of Series D shall
vote together with the holders of Common Stock, without regard to class, except as to those matters on which separate class voting
is required by applicable law or the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws. The initial price of each share
of Series D shall be $2.50.
There was no change in Series D Preferred
Stock in 2015.
Series E Preferred Stock
On July 11, 2014, the Company completed
the acquisition of Edge View Properties, Inc. The Company issued 241,199 shares of Series E Preferred Stock (“Series E”)
as consideration for this acquisition. Based on the price of $2.50 per share, the acquisition consideration represents a $603,000
valuation. Shares of Series E are anti-dilutive to reverse splits. The conversion rate of shares of Series E, however, would increase
proportionately in the case of forward splits, and may not be diluted by a reverse split following a forward split. Each one share
of Series E shall have voting rights equal to one vote of Common Stock. With respect to all matters upon which stockholders are
entitled to vote or to which stockholders are entitled to give consent, the holders of the outstanding shares of Series E shall
vote together with the holders of Common Stock, without regard to class, except as to those matters on which separate class voting
is required by applicable law or the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws. The initial price of each share
of Series E shall be $2.50.
There was no change in Series E Preferred
Stock in 2015.
Series F Preferred Stock
On May 15, 2014, the Company completed
the acquisition of We Three, LLC (d/b/a Affordable Housing Initiative) (“AHI”). The Company issued 280,069 shares of
Series F Preferred Stock (“Series F”) as consideration for this acquisition. The fair value of We Three LLC was $1,000,000
(see Note 2). Based on the price of $2.50 per share for the Series F Preferred Stock, the fair value of the stock issuance of Series
F Preferred Stock was $700,174, resulting in the gain of $299,826 on investment in We Three, which was offset the goodwill impairment
at the end of 2014. In addition, the Company sold 156,503 shares of Series F1 Preferred Stock (Series F1”), to various investors
at a price of $2.50 per share, or totaled $391,248 in cash. Shares of Series F are anti-dilutive to reverse splits. The conversion
rate of shares of Series F, however, would increase proportionately in the case of forward splits, and may not be diluted by a
reverse split following a forward split. Each one share of Series F shall have voting rights equal to five votes of Common Stock.
With respect to all matters upon which stockholders are entitled to vote or to which stockholders are entitled to give consent,
the holders of the outstanding shares of Series F shall vote together with the holders of Common Stock, without regard to class,
except as to those matters on which separate class voting is required by applicable law or the Corporation’s Certificate
of Incorporation or Bylaws. The initial price of each share of Series F shall be $2.50.
During the year ended December 31, 2015,
the Company issued 6,249 shares of Series “F-1” Preferred stock and 1 share of Series “C” Preferred Stock
to an investor for total cash payment of $25,000 pursuant to the executed subscription agreement.
During the year ended December 31, 2015,
the Company issued 9,999 shares of Series “F-1” Preferred stock and 1 share of Series “C” Preferred Stock
to an investor for total cash payment of $25,000 pursuant to the executed subscription agreement.
Common Stock
2014
In September 2014, the Board of Directors
approved increasing the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 250,000 to 50,000,000, par value of $0.001.
On August 22, 2014, the Company effectuated
a Reverse Stock Split of its outstanding and authorized shares of Common Stock at a ratio of one for twenty five thousand (1:25,000).
As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the Company’s authorized shares of Common Stock were decreased from 5,000,000,000
to 250,000 shares and it authorized four-- classes of Preferred Stock. Upon the effectiveness of the Reverse Stock Split, which
occurred on September 12, 2014, the Company’s issued, outstanding and authorized shares of Common Stock was decreased from
2,516,819,560 to 100,673 issued and outstanding shares and 250,000 authorized shares, all with a par value of $0.00001. Accordingly,
all share and per share information has been restated to retroactively show the effect of the Reverse Stock Split.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company issued 4,427,200 shares of common stock to officers for services rendered. The fair value of the common stock issuance
was determined by the fair value of our common stock on the grant date, at a price of approximately $2.3 per share. Accordingly,
the Company recognized stock based compensation of $10,182,560 to employees.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company issued 417,896 shares of common stock for note conversion in amount of $36,930 per the requests from the noteholders.
2015
On April 15, 2015, the Company entered
into three consulting service agreements with three Consultants for marketing, management and financial strategies in exchange
for 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company. The fair value of this stock issuance was determined by the fair value of
the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date, at a price of approximately $1.78 per share. Accordingly, the Company
calculated the stock based compensation of $2,670,000 at its fair value and included it in the consolidated statements of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2015.
On June 3, 2015, the Company entered into
a consulting service agreement with a Consultant for marketing, management and financial strategies in exchange for 150,000 shares
of Common Stock of the Company. The fair value of this stock issuance was determined by the fair value of the Company’s Common
Stock on the grant date, at a price of approximately $0.84 per share. Accordingly, the Company calculated the stock based
compensation of $126,000 at its fair value and included it in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December
31, 2015.
On September 1, 2015, the Company entered
into a consulting service agreement with a Consultant for marketing, management and financial strategies in exchange for 500,000
shares of Common Stock of the Company. The fair value of this stock issuance was determined by the fair value of the Company’s
Common Stock on the grant date, at a price of approximately $0.42 per share. Accordingly, the Company calculated the stock
based compensation of $210,000 at its fair value and included $209,800 in the consolidated statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2015 due to the receipt of $200 cash from the Consultant.
On October 8, 2015, the Company entered
into a consulting service agreement with a Consultant for marketing, management and financial strategies in exchange for 362,000
shares of Common Stock of the Company. The fair value of this stock issuance was determined by the fair value of the Company’s
Common Stock on the grant date, at a price of approximately $0.36 per share. Accordingly, the Company calculated the stock
based compensation of $130,320 at its fair value and included it in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2015.
During the year ended December 31, 2015,
the Company issued 250,000 shares of Common Stock to five investors for total cash payment of $25,000, or $0.10 per share, pursuant
to the executed subscription agreements.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
The Company had operating leases of $255,535
and $92,351 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, consisting of the followings.
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurants
|
|
$
|
155,666
|
|
|
$
|
90,000
|
|
Lot
|
|
|
62,255
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Office
|
|
|
33,620
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Equipment Rentals
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
255,535
|
|
|
$
|
92,351
|
|
There was no rent expense for office in
2014 as such office space was contributed at no cost by Daniel Thompson, the imputed effects of which are immaterial to the consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole.
14. INCOME TAXES
At December 31, 2015, the Company had federal
and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $43,000,000 that expire in various years through the year 2035.
Due to operating losses, there is no provision
for current federal or state income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax
effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the
amount used for federal and state income tax purposes.
The Company’s deferred tax asset
at December 31, 2015 and 2014 consists of net operating loss carry forwards calculated using federal and state effective tax rates
equating to approximately $16,770,000 and $15,210,000, respectively, less a valuation allowance in the amount of approximately
$16,770,000 and $15,210,000, respectively. Because of the Company’s lack of earnings history, the deferred tax asset has
been fully offset by a valuation allowance in both 2015 and 2014. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $1,560,000
for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The Company’s total deferred tax
asset as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
16,770,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,210,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(16,770,000
|
)
|
|
|
(15,210,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
The reconciliation of income taxes computed at the federal and
state statutory income tax rate to total income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Income tax computed at the federal statutory rate
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
Income tax computed at the state statutory rate
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(39%
|
)
|
|
|
(39%
|
)
|
Total deferred tax asset
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
15. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company has two reportable operating
segments as determined by management using the “management approach” as defined by the authoritative guidance on
Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information
: (1) Mobile home lease (We Three), and (2) Company-owned
Pizza Restaurants (Romeo’s NY Pizza). These segments are a result of differences in the nature of the products
and services sold. Corporate administration costs, which include, but are not limited to, general accounting, human
resources, legal and credit and collections, are partially allocated to the two operating segments. Other revenue consists
of nonrecurring items.
The mobile home lease segment establishes
mobile home business as an option for a homeowner wishing to avoid large down payments, expensive maintenance costs, monthly mortgage
payments and high property taxes. If bad credit is an issue preventing people from purchasing a traditional house, the Company
will provide a financial leasing option with "0" interest on the lease providing a "lease to own" option for
their family home.
The Company-owned Pizza Restaurant segment
includes sales and operating results for all Company-owned restaurants. Assets for this segment include equipment, furniture
and fixtures for the Company-owned restaurants.
Corporate administration and other assets
primarily include the deferred tax asset, cash and short-term investments, as well as furniture and fixtures located at the corporate
office and trademarks and other intangible assets. All assets are located within the United States.
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We Three
|
|
$
|
168,621
|
|
|
$
|
56,870
|
|
Romeo’s NY Pizza
|
|
|
1,210,880
|
|
|
|
833,531
|
|
Others
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Consolidated revenues
|
|
$
|
1,389,601
|
|
|
$
|
890,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We Three
|
|
$
|
134,912
|
|
|
$
|
35,535
|
|
Romeo’s NY Pizza
|
|
|
862,818
|
|
|
|
618,336
|
|
Others
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Consolidated cost of sales
|
|
$
|
997,730
|
|
|
$
|
653,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) before taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We Three
|
|
$
|
14,216
|
|
|
$
|
(21,373
|
)
|
Romeo’s NY Pizza
|
|
|
14,667
|
|
|
|
(22,156
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
(3,973,304
|
)
|
|
|
(13,088,168
|
)
|
Consolidated loss before taxes
|
|
$
|
(3,944,421
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,131,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31, 2014
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We Three
|
|
$
|
243,134
|
|
|
$
|
169,417
|
|
Romeo’s NY Pizza
|
|
|
76,386
|
|
|
|
159,039
|
|
Others
|
|
|
892,959
|
|
|
|
922,400
|
|
Combined assets
|
|
$
|
1,212,479
|
|
|
$
|
1,250,856
|
|
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In accordance with ASC Topic 855-10, the
Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to December 31, 2015 to the date these consolidated financial statements were issued,
and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose in these financial statements other than those
specified below.
First Acquisition:
As previously disclosed on June 30, 2016,
the Company completed the acquisition of Titancare, LLC. The acquisition became effective (the “Effective day”) on
June 27, 2016, a Pennsylvania At Home Care franchise. The acquisition is subject to Franchisor approval and the completion of an
independent audit.
In connection with the closing of the acquisition,
at the Effective Time, each outstanding class of preferred shares of Titan, par value $0.17 per share ("Titan Preferred Class
Stock"), was converted into $0.17 preferred shares (the "Stock Consideration") of the Company’s Preferred
Class “G” Stock, par value $0.001 per share ("CDIF Preferred “G” Stock"). The preferred share
Consideration was adjusted as a result of the authorization and declaration of a special distribution to the preferred Titan stockholders
at $0.17 per share with a conversion rate of 1 to 1.3 Common Stock payable to Titan shareholders of record as of the close of business
on June 27, 2016 (the "Special Conversion"). The Special Conversion right is granted as a result of the closing of the
sale of certain interests in assets of Titan to certain parties designated the Company, which closed on June 27, 2016 (the "Asset
Sale"). Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition.
Pending Franchisor approval and the completion
of the independent audit, CDIF will issue approximately 977,247 shares of CDIF Preferred “G” Shares to Titancare shareholders
as Stock Consideration in the Acquisition. Based on the price of CDIF’s Common stock as of June 27 and 29, 2016 at $0.17
per share, the acquisition consideration represents an approximate value of $166,132. The LLC has filed to convert to a Pennsylvania
Corporation.
Second Acquisition:
As previously disclosed on June 29, 2016,
the Company completed the acquisition of York County In Home Care, Inc. The acquisition became effective (the “Effective
day”) on June 27, 2016, a Pennsylvania At Home Care franchise. The acquisition is subject to Franchisor approval and the
completion of an independent audit.
In connection with the closing of the acquisition,
at the Effective Time, each outstanding class of preferred shares of York, par value $0.17 per share ("York Preferred Class
Stock"), was converted into $0.17 preferred shares (the "Stock Consideration") of the Company’s Preferred
Class “G” Stock, par value $0.001 per share ("CDIF Preferred “G” Stock"). The preferred share
Consideration was adjusted as a result of the authorization and declaration of a special distribution to the preferred York stockholders
at $0.17 per share with a conversion rate of 1 to 1.3 Common Stock payable to York shareholders of record as of the close of business
on June 29, 2016 (the "Special Conversion"). The Special Conversion right is granted as a result of the closing of the
sale of certain interests in assets of York to certain parties designated by the Company, which closed on June 29, 2016 (the "Asset
Sale"). Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition.
Pending Franchisor approval and the completion
of the independent audit, CDIF will issued approximately 8,235,294 shares of CDIF Preferred “G” Shares as Stock Consideration
in the Acquisition. Based on the price of the Company’s Preferred “G” Class of stock on June 29, 2016. The acquisition
consideration (based on the value of $0.17 in CDIF Preferred Stock, represents approximately $1,400,000.00.
Third Acquisition:
On August 10
th
, 2016, Cardiff
International, Inc. (CDIF) completed the acquisition of Refreshment Concepts, LLC. The acquisition became effective (the "Effective
day") on August 10
th
, 2016.
In connection with the closing of the acquisition,
at the Effective Time, each outstanding class of preferred shares of Refreshment Concepts, par value $0.20 per share ("Refreshment
Concepts Preferred Class Stock"), was converted into $0.20 preferred shares (the "Stock Consideration") of CDIF’s
Preferred Class “H” Stock, par value $0.001 per share ("CDIF Preferred “H” Stock"). The preferred
share Consideration was adjusted as a result of the authorization and declaration of a special distribution to the preferred Refreshment
Concepts stockholders at $0.20 per share with a conversion rate of 1 to 1.25 Common Stock payable to Refreshment Concepts shareholders
of record as of the close of business on July 22, 2016 (the "Special Conversion"). The Special Conversion right is granted
as a result of the closing of the sale of certain interests in assets of Refreshment Concepts to certain parties designated by
CDIF, which closed on July 22, 2016 (the "Asset Sale"). Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition.
CDIF issued approximately 1,440,000 shares
of CDIF Preferred “H” Shares as Stock Consideration in the Acquisition. Based on the price of CDIF’s Preferred
“H” Class of stock on July 1
st
, 2016. The acquisition consideration (based on the value of $0.20 in CDIF
Preferred Stock, represents approximately $288,000.00. The LLC has filed to convert to a Georgia Corporation. An amended 8K will
be filed with audited financials by October 10
th
, 2016.
Fourth Acquisition:
On August 10
th
, 2016, Cardiff
International, Inc. (CDIF) completed the acquisition of F.D.R. Enterprises. The acquisition became effective (the "Effective
day") on August 10th, 2016.
In connection with the closing of the acquisition,
at the Effective Time, each outstanding class of preferred shares of F.D.R. Enterprises par value $0.20 per share ("F.D.R.
Enterprises Preferred Class Stock"), was converted into $0.20 preferred shares (the "Stock Consideration") of CDIF’s
Preferred Class “H” Stock, par value $0.001 per share ("CDIF Preferred “H” Stock"). The preferred
share Consideration was adjusted as a result of the authorization and declaration of a special distribution to the preferred F.D.R.
Enterprises stockholders at $0.20 per share with a conversion rate of 1 to 1.25 Common Stock payable to F.D.R. Enterprises shareholders
of record as of the close of business on July 22, 2016 (the "Special Conversion"). The Special Conversion right is granted
as a result of the closing of the sale of certain interests in assets of F.D.R. Enterprises to certain parties designated by CDIF,
which closed on July 22, 2016 (the "Asset Sale"). Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition.
CDIF issued approximately 1,206,870 shares
of CDIF Preferred “H” Shares as Stock Consideration in the Acquisition. Based on the price of CDIF’s Preferred
“H” Class of stock on July 1
st
, 2016. The acquisition consideration (based on the value of $0.20 in CDIF
Preferred Stock, represents approximately $241,374.00. The LLC has filed to convert to a Tennessee Corporation. An amended 8K will
be filed with audited financials by October 10
th
, 2016.
Fifth Acquisition:
On August 10
th
, 2016, Cardiff
International, Inc. (CDIF) completed the acquisition of Repicci’s Franchise Group. The acquisition became effective (the
"Effective day") on August 10
th
, 2016.
In connection with the closing of the acquisition,
at the Effective Time, each outstanding class of preferred shares of Repicci’s Franchise Group par value $0.20 per share
("Repicci’s Franchise Group Preferred Class Stock"), was converted into $0.20 preferred shares (the "Stock
Consideration") of CDIF’s Preferred Class “H” Stock, par value $0.001 per share ("CDIF Preferred “H”
Stock"). The preferred share Consideration was adjusted as a result of the authorization and declaration of a special distribution
to the preferred Repicci’s Franchise Group stockholders at $0.20 per share with a conversion rate of 1 to 1.25 Common Stock
payable to Repicci’s Franchise Group shareholders of record as of the close of business on July 22, 2016 (the "Special
Conversion"). The Special Conversion right is granted as a result of the closing of the sale of certain interests in assets
of Repicci’s Franchise Group to certain parties designated by CDIF, which closed on July 22, 2016 (the "Asset Sale").
Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition.
CDIF issued approximately 1,770,000 shares
of CDIF Preferred “H” Shares as Stock Consideration in the Acquisition. Based on the price of CDIF’s Preferred
“H” Class of stock on July 1
st
, 2016. The acquisition consideration (based on the value of $0.20 in CDIF
Preferred Stock, represents approximately $354,000.00. The LLC has filed to convert to a Tennessee Corporation. An amended 8K will
be filed with audited financials by October 10
th
, 2016.