Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant
to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant as of December 31, 2015, the last business day of the registrant's second fiscal quarter, was approximately $4,592,698.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of September
8, 2016 was 8,280,535.
Unless the context otherwise requires, in this annual report
on Form 10-K:
Names of certain PRC companies provided
in this Form 10-K are translated or transliterated from their original PRC legal names. Discrepancies, if any, in any table
between the amounts identified as total amounts and the sum of the amounts listed therein are due to rounding.
This Form 10-K contains certain statements
that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to statements regarding our projected growth, trends and strategies,
future operating and financial results, financial expectations and current business indicators are based upon current information
and expectations and are subject to change based on factors beyond our control. Forward-looking statements typically are identified
by the use of terms such as “look,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “might,”
“believe,” “plan,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate” and similar words,
although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. The accuracy of such statements may be impacted by a number
of business risks and uncertainties we face that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated,
including but not limited to the following:
Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to update
this forward-looking information. Nonetheless, the Company reserves the right to make such updates from time to time by press release,
periodic report or other method of public disclosure without the need for specific reference to this Report. No such update shall
be deemed to indicate that other statements not addressed by such update remain correct or create an obligation to provide any
other updates.
PART I
Overview
Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd.
(“Sino”), a Virginia corporation, was founded in the United States (“US”) in 2001. Sino is a
non-asset based global shipping and freight logistic integrated solution provider. Sino provides tailored solutions and value
added services to its customers to drive effectiveness and control in related aspects throughout the entire shipping and
freight logistic chain. Our current service offerings consist of shipping agency services and inland transportation
management services .We temporarily suspended our ship management services from the beginning of the fiscal year 2016,
primarily due to changes in market condition. We also temporarily suspended our shipping and chartering services primarily as
a result of the termination of vessel acquisition in December 2015.
The Company conducts its business primarily
through its wholly-owned subsidiaries in the U.S., China (including Hong Kong), Australia and Canada. Currently, a significant
portion of our business is generated from the clients located in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”),
and our operations are currently primarily conducted in the PRC.
Company Structure and Function
The Company conducts its business primarily
through its wholly-owned subsidiaries in China (including Hong Kong), Australia, Canada, and U.S. (New York and Los Angeles).
The Company’s subsidiary in
China, Trans Pacific Shipping Limited (“Trans Pacific Beijing”), a wholly owned foreign enterprise, invested in
one 90%-owned subsidiary, Trans Pacific Logistics Shanghai Limited (“Trans Pacific Shanghai”. Trans Pacific
Beijing and Trans Pacific Shanghai are referred to collectively as “Trans Pacific”). As PRC laws and regulations
restrict foreign ownership of local shipping agency service businesses, the Company provided its shipping agency services in
the PRC through Sino-Global Shipping Agency Ltd. (“Sino-China” or “VIE”), a Chinese legal entity,
which holds the licenses and permits necessary to operate local shipping agency services in the PRC. Trans Pacific Beijing
and Sino-China do not have a parent-subsidiary relationship. Trans Pacific Beijing has contractual arrangements with
Sino-China and its shareholders that enable the Company to substantially control Sino-China. Through Sino-China, the Company
was able to provide local shipping agency services in all commercial ports in the PRC. In light of the Company’s
decision not to pursue the local shipping agency business, the Company temporarily suspended its shipping agency services
through its VIE and has not undertaken any business through or with Sino-China since June 2014. Nevertheless, the Company
continues to maintain its contractual relationship with the VIE because Sino-China is one of the committee members of China
Association of Shipping Agencies & Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carriers
(“CASA”).
CASA was approved to form by China Ministry of Communications. Sino-China is also our only entity that is qualified to do
shipping agency business in China. We keep the VIE to prepare ourselves for the market to turn around.
The Company’s shipping
agency business was operated by its subsidiaries in Hong Kong and China. The Company’s ship management services
were originally operated by its subsidiary in Hong Kong. Due to changes in market condition, the Company temporarily
suspended the ship management services from fiscal year 2016. The Company’s shipping and chartering services are
operated by its offices in the US and subsidiaries in Hong Kong. The Company also temporarily suspended its shipping and
chartering services primarily as a result of the termination of vessel acquisition in December 2015. Currently, the
Company’s inland transportation management services are operated by its subsidiaries in China (including Hong
Kong) and the US.
Corporate History and Our Business
Since our inception in 2001 and through
our fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, our sole business was providing shipping agency services. In general, we provide two types
of shipping agency services, loading/discharging services and protective agency services, in which we act as a general agent to
provide value added solutions to our customers. For loading/discharging agency services, we receive the total payment from our customers
and pay the port charges on behalf of our customers. For protective agency services, we charge a fixed amount as agent fee while
customers are responsible for the payment of port costs and expenses. Under these circumstances, we generally require payments
in advance from customers and bill the balances within 30 days after the transactions are completed. We believe the most significant
factors that directly or indirectly affect our shipping agency service revenues are:
|
·
|
the number of ship-times to which we provide port loading/discharging services;
|
|
·
|
the size and types of ships we serve;
|
|
·
|
the type of services we provide;
|
|
·
|
the rate of service fees we charge;
|
|
·
|
the number of ports at which we provide services; and
|
|
·
|
the number of customers we serve.
|
While we were able to consistently generate
net revenues from shipping agency business, this business does not become profitable largely due to the rising operating costs
associated with doing business in China. In light of consecutive years of operating losses and concerns raised by the US regulators
over our VIE structure, the Company decided to reorganize its business structure in fiscal year 2013. Commencing in the later part
of fiscal year 2013 and continuing in fiscal year 2014, we took various actions to restructure our business with the goal of achieving
a certain level of profitability. As a result of these business reorganization efforts, we optimized our cost structure, reduced
our dependency on shipping agency business, and shifted our shipping agency operation from our VIE to our wholly-owned subsidiaries
in China including Hong Kong.
In June 2013, the Company executed a 5-year
global logistic service agreement with TEWOO Chemical & Light Industry Zhiyuan Trade Co., Ltd, which is controlled by Tianjin
Zhi Yuan Investment Group Co., Ltd (“Zhiyuan”). Zhiyuan is controlled by Mr. Zhong
Zhang, who purchased 1,800,000 shares of our common stock for approximately $3 million in April 2013 as approved by our Board of
Directors and shareholders, which made Mr. Zhang our largest shareholder. Leveraging our business relationship with Zhiyuan, we expanded our service offerings to include shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management
services to diversify our business. Leveraging our in-depth knowledge and extensive resources of shipping industry, inland transportation
management services are our tailored value-added solution developed for Zhiyuan to prevent high-priced bulk from damage or loss
during its inland transportation from warehouses to factories. Given the industry norm of 12% of loss rate during transportation,
our integrated inland transportation solution significantly reduced the bulk losses and effectively addressed the issues in freight
logistic chain. Furthermore, after we have conducted an effective trial for Zhiyuan to reduce their bulk losses at end of September
2014, Tengda Northwest
Ferroalloy Co., Ltd. (“Tengda Northwest”)
signed a contract with us to mitigate their bulk losses through our inland transportation management services.
In May 2014, the Company signed a strategic
cooperation agreement with Qingdao Zhenghe Shipping Group Limited (“Zhenghe”), one of the largest shipping and transportation
companies in China, to jointly explore mutually beneficial business development opportunities. In June 2014, Mr. Deming Wang, a
major owner of Zhenghe, acquired 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In August 2014, the Company executed an agreement
to acquire all of the equity of Longhe Ship Management (Hong Kong) Co., Limited (“LSM”) from Mr. Wang, to further broaden
our scope of services and expertise in the ship management business. Due to market condition and high operating costs associated
with this business line, the Company decided to temporarily suspend the ship management business starting from the fiscal year
2016.
On April 10, 2015, the Company entered
into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Rong Yao International Shipping Limited, a Hong Kong company (the “Vessel Seller”),
pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire, subject to a number of closing conditions, “Rong Zhou,” an 8,818 gross
tonnage oil/chemical transportation tanker (the “Vessel”) from the Vessel Seller; and in connection therewith, the
Company issued to the Vessel Seller 1.2 million shares of its restricted common stock representing $2,220,000 of the $10.5 million
purchase price for the Vessel. 9 On December 7, 2015, the Company and the Vessel Seller entered into a supplemental agreement to
terminate the proposed Vessel acquisition.
The Company received the cash of $330,000
from the Vessel Seller in December 2015 in connection with the termination. The 1.2 million shares was returned to the Company
on February 12, 2016 and was cancelled thereafter.
In January 2016, the Company formed a new
subsidiary, Sino-Global Shipping LA Inc. (“Sino LA”), for the purpose of expanding its business to provide import security
filing services with U.S Customs and Department of Homeland Security, on behalf of importers who ship goods into the U.S. and also
providing inland transportation services to these importers in the U.S. On April 18, 2016, Sino LA signed a Memorandum of Understanding
(“MOU”) with Yaxin International Co., Ltd.(“Yaxin”), pursuant to which Sino LA will provide logistics services
to Yaxin, who ships goods via containers into the U.S. and places them on
Amazon.com
. The services include cargo forwarding,
customs filing and declaration, trucking and others.
In May 2016, the Company entered into a
strategic partnership with Shandong Hi-speed TEU Logistics Co., LTD. ("Shandong Hi-speed TEU"), which belongs to one
of China's largest state-owned enterprises, Shandong Hi-Speed Group Co., Ltd., to jointly establish a platform for coordinated
transport between China and North America. The Company and Shandong Hi-speed TEU intend to cooperate in creating a standardized
network that will unite carriers of the twenty-foot equivalent units or TEUs in China via sea and rail and coordinate with parties
in North America and Australia. The companies will serve both upstream and downstream customers through the platform, establish
a door-to-door logistics and provide supply chain service.
Our Strategy
Our strategy is to:
|
·
|
Provide better solutions for issues and challenges faced by the entire shipping and freight logistic chain to better serve
our customers and explore additional growth avenues.
|
|
·
|
Diversify our current service offerings organically or through acquisitions and/or strategic
alliance; continue to grow our business in the US market;
|
|
·
|
Continue to streamline our business practice, optimize our cost structure and improve our operating efficiency through effective
planning, budgeting, execution and cost control;
|
|
·
|
Continue to reduce our dependency on our legacy business and few key customers; and
|
|
·
|
Continue to monetize our relationships with our strategic partners and leverage their support and our innovation to expand
our business.
|
Our Management Team
We believe we have a strong and experienced
management team including our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Mr. Lei Cao; our Acting Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Tuo Pan;
our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Zhikang Huang; and our Chief Technical Officer, Mr. Africa Li, who, together as a team, have many
years of experience, extensive business connections in the shipping industry in China, substantial experience in SEC reporting
and compliance, business reorganization, mergers and acquisitions, accounting, risk management and operating both public and private
companies.
Business Segments
As of June 30, 2016, Sino-Global delivers
shipping agency services and inland transportation management services to customers.
Historically, the Company was in the
business of solely providing shipping agency services. In the fiscal year of 2014, by leveraging the support of
Sino-Global’s largest shareholder, Mr. Zhang and the company he controls, Zhiyuan Investment Group, the Company
expanded its service platform to include shipping and chartering services during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and
inland transportation management services during the quarter ended December 31, 2013. We temporarily suspended shipping and
chartering services as a result of the termination of the vessel acquisition in December 2015. With the acquisition of LSM in
2014, we added ship management services to our service platform but we temporarily suspended it in 2016 primarily due to
market conditions. With the establishment of Sino-LA, we added cargo forwarding services to our service platform in the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2016, which is included in our inland transportation business line.
Our Goals and Strategic Plan
By leveraging our fine reputation, extensive
business relationships, technical ability and in-depth knowledge of the shipping industry, our goal is to further strengthen our
position as a leading global logistic solution provider who offers innovative resolutions to better address complex issues in different
aspects in the entire shipping and freight logistic chain.
We historically focused our business on
providing our customers with customized shipping agency services. In the past, our business came predominately from our strong
business relationships with our key strategic partners in China. To reduce our dependency on a single business line, we have leveraged,
and will continue to leverage, our business relationships with strategic partners to introduce new service offerings to the market
and to diversify our business. In light of the slowdown of the Chinese economy and its negative impact on the shipping business
across Pacific Ocean, our strategic plan for the next 5 years is to continue to diversify our service mix and actively seek new
growth opportunities to expand our business footprint in the U.S. market to reduce our dependency on the revenue generated from
China. For decades, the shipping industry has been operated under traditional business models without many meaningful changes.
Today, technological innovation has already played a big role in changing every conventional industry. We believe
internet
is going to be a big part of future logistic chain services and a transformative era in shipping and freight logistic business
is coming. As an innovative solution provider, we plan to apply our technical ability and industry expertise and to utilize
cutting-edge information technology in the conventional shipping business to
better connect supply and demand
and to develop seamless linkages in logistic chains.
Given recent changes in the market condition
in China and the increases in labor costs, our operating costs increased significantly in recent years and we incurred operating
loss for the year ended June 30, 2016. To address our rising operating costs, our plan is to continue to optimize our service mix
and cost structure by streamlining our operations, adding more high-margin services and closing out inefficient, unprofitable or
non-operating business.
As a result of our continued restructuring
efforts, we implemented two new services of shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management services to our
business lines in fiscal year 2014. Although we temporarily suspended our shipping and chartering services in December 2015 due
to the termination of vessel acquisition, and we also temporarily suspended our ship management services segment since fiscal year
2016, the inland transportation management service segment diversified our business platform and enhanced our profit margin to
a certain extent. As shown in the table below, the restructuring efforts have reduced our dependency on the shipping agency business
and improved our overall gross margin from 34.6% as of June 30, 2014 to 48.9% as of June 30, 2016 as we changed our service mix
and focused on delivering higher-margin services as mentioned above.
|
|
Fiscal Year 2016
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2015
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2014
|
|
Key Services
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
GM
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
GM
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
GM
|
|
Shipping Agency & Ship Management
|
|
$
|
2,507,800
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,185,653
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
%
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,523,983
|
|
|
|
64.6
|
%
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
Shipping & Chartering
|
|
$
|
462,218
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
349,125
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
47.7
|
%
|
|
|
1,937,196
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
33.4
|
%
|
Inland Transportation Management
|
|
$
|
4,340,522
|
|
|
|
59.4
|
%
|
|
|
68.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,785,850
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
84.2
|
%
|
|
|
2,183,213
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
85.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
7,310,540
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,320,628
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
47.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,644,392
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
Our Customers
Since our initial public offering, our
revenues come primarily from key customers. In light of our strategic relationship with Zhiyuan Investment Group that began with
the signing of a 5-year global logistic service agreement in June 2013, we expanded our business platform to include additional
service offerings. We started to provide inland transportation management services to a third-party customer, Tengda Northwest
Ferroalloy Co., Ltd. (“Tengda”), since the quarter ended September 2014. Revenue from Tengda amounted to approximately
$1.9 million and $2.3 million, respectively, or approximately 27% and 20% of total revenues for fiscal year 2016 and 2015, respectively.
As we continue to diversify our service platform, our goal is to reduce our dependency on the key customers. For the year ended
June 30, 2016, two customers accounted for approximately 31% and 27% of the Company’s revenues, respectively. For the year
ended June 30, 2015, two customers accounted for approximately 23% and 20% of the Company’s revenues, respectively.
Our Suppliers
Our operations consist of working directly
with our customers to understand in detail their needs and expectations and then managing local suppliers to ensure that our customers’
needs are met. Our significant suppliers include Monson Agencies Australia Pty Ltd, Baoshan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. and Shanghai
Gangcheng Dangerous Goods Logistics Co., Ltd. For the year ended June 30, 2016, three suppliers accounted for 27%, 15% and 10%
of the total cost of revenues, respectively. For the year ended June 30, 2015, two suppliers accounted for 51% and 14% of the total
cost of revenues, respectively.
Our Strengths
We believe that the following strengths
differentiate us from our competitors:
|
·
|
Proven industry experience and problem-solving reputation
. We are a non-asset based global shipping and freight logistic
solution provider. Unlike a traditional shipping agent, we provide tailored solutions and value added services to our customers
to drive effectiveness and control in related aspects throughout the entire shipping and freight logistic chain. We believe that
our years’ of successful track record of applying integrated solutions to complex issues in the global shipping logistic
business gives us a competitive advantage in attracting large clients and helps us maintain strong long term business relationship
with them.
|
|
·
|
Strong leadership and competent professional team
. Our CEO is an industry veteran with more
than thirty years of extensive industry experiences including ten years’ working for COSCO, one of the largest shipping companies
in the world. Most of our employees have marine business working experience, and many of our managers/chief operators served in
other large Chinese shipping companies prior to joining us. With these professionals and experienced staff, we believe that we
can provide best services to our customers at competitive prices.
|
|
·
|
Extensive network and positive industry recognition.
Doing business in China often requires a strong business network
and support of key strategic partners. The Company served as one of the executive directors of China Association of Shipping Agencies
& Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carriers (CASA), the authoritative industry association in China. We are the only non-state-owned
enterprise represented on the CASA board guiding the development of the industry. Our good reputation and industry recognition
enables us to maintain strong relationships with our business partners and have extensive network of contacts throughout the industry,
which helps us gain necessary support to execute our business plans.
|
|
·
|
Lean organization and flexible business model.
Although we are a small business with limited
resources, we have a cohesive and effective organization structure with the idea to maximize customer value while minimizing waste.
Our unique flexible business model allows us to quickly respond to changing market demand and offer our customers innovative problem
solving solutions, quality customer service, and competitive prices to achieve greater market acceptance and gain additional market
share.
|
|
·
|
U.S.-registered and NASDAQ-listed public company. We believe our status as a US corporation gives us more credibility among
existing and potential customers, suppliers, and other business partners than we might have as a privately owned company would
have in our industry. Our ability to raise capital through the capital market or use our common stock as “currency”
to facility potential merger and acquisition transactions can also help us carry out or accelerate our growth strategies.
|
Our Opportunities
For more than thirty years, the shipping
and freight logistic industry has been operated under traditional business models without many meaningful changes. Many of these
business practices are inefficient and problematic, therefore, maintaining an innovative mindset is critical to achieving continuous
business success and growth. We are a value-added logistic solution provider with successful past performance and individuals that
have been in the industry for a long time. Instead of playing the traditional logistic broker role, we focus on providing technology
solutions and innovative leading-edge services to bridge the asset-based world with the digital world. We shape our industry practice
and profit model by analyzing wider developments both in the global markets and the technology industry so we can address unique
problems that are currently pervasive across the shipping and freight logistic industry.
We believe we can capture the business
opportunity and grow our business organically or through acquisitions or strategic alliance by:
|
·
|
Continuing to streamline our business operations and improve our operating efficiency through effective planning, budgeting,
execution and cost control;
|
|
·
|
Restructuring our business to focus on providing innovative technology based solution to our customers to promote our sustainable
business growth;
|
|
·
|
Developing new service lines along the shipping and freight logistic industry value chain, and leveraging our relationships
with COSCO, Zhiyuan Investment Group and other potential strategic business partners to expand our global business footprint.
|
Our Challenges
We are facing significant challenges when
executing our strategy, including:
|
·
|
Our limited operating history in general and our recent years’ uncertain profitability could affect our ability to grow
our business and maintain profitability in the long-run;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Given the complexity and length of restructuring our business, we face the challenges to generate sufficient cash from our
current limited business activities to support our daily operations during the transition;
|
|
·
|
Limited funding support may restrict our ability from expanding professional team and research and development of new solutions
to solve the critical issues in today’s shipping logistic industry;
|
|
·
|
We may not have or not be able to get the necessary funds to continue to expand our service offerings and market our services
successfully;
|
|
·
|
From time to time, we may have difficulty carrying out services effectively and in a profitable way due to the cyclicality
nature of the shipping industry, which could lead to prolonged period of sluggish demand for our services;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to respond to competitive pressures as we are facing increasing pressure on our growth and margins as a result
of increasing competition from our competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Our ability to respond to competitive pressures as we are facing increasing pressure on our growth and margins as a result
of increasing competition from our competitors;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to continue to maintain and further monetize our relationship with our strategic partners;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Our ability to gain further expertise and to serve new customers in new service areas;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to respond promptly to a changing regulatory environment, macroeconomic conditions, industry trends, and competitive
landscape; and
|
|
·
|
Developing a winning business model takes time and a new business models may not be recognized by market immediately. As a
publicly traded company, management may be forced to fulfill near-term performance goals that may not be consistent with the Company’s
long-term vision.
|
Our Competition
The market segments that we serve do not
have high entry barriers. There are many companies ranging from small to large in China that provide shipping and freight related
logistic services. At present, the state-owned companies still dominate the industry and generate majority of the revenues in the
industry. These companies have greater service capabilities, customer base and financial, marketing, network and human resources
than we do. Most of them concentrate their business on shipping agency services to meet general market demand. However, we focus
on providing tailored solutions and value added services to selected high-profile customers to drive effectiveness and control
in related aspects throughout the entire shipping and freight logistic chain. As a boutique company that provides specialized services
with limited resources and history, we face intense competition in the particular market segments that we serve. Our primary competitors
are LBH Group and Gulf Agency Company Ltd. Our ability to be successful in our industry depends on our deep understanding of the
complexity of industry issues and challenges and our technical ability to develop best solutions to respond to the identified issues
and provide effective problem solving strategies to our targeted customers to achieve the fastest and most cost-effective outcomes.
Our value added services and innovative approaches are highly recognized by our customers, which helps us to gain additional market
share and compete effectively with the companies that may be better capitalized than we are or may provide services we do not or
cannot provide to our customers.
Employees
As of the date of this report, we have
27 employees, 16 of whom are based in China. Of the total, four are in management, thirteen are in operations, seven are in finance
and accounting and three are in administration and technical support. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good.
We have never had a work stoppage, and our employees are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
Recent Development
In July 2016, the Company signed a Strategic
Cooperation Agreement (the "Agreement") with COSCO Logistics (Americas) Inc. ("COSCO Logistics"), which belongs
to China's largest integrated shipping company, China COSCO Holdings Company Ltd. Pursuant to the Agreement, both parties will
mutually provide logistics services between China and the United States and develop shipping customers as an end-to-end global
logistics service. The Company expects to work with COSCO Logistics to provide inland transportation services in the US for shipments
to and from China. According to the Agreement, the two companies will also assess locations in the US to potentially establish
warehouse / distribution facilities in the coming months and share pricing information for short-haul trucking services across
selected regions of the country. Since Sino-LA was established in January 2016, the Company has been working to integrate
inland trucking services including cargo forwarding, trucking and customs declaration and filing services to both coasts in the
US. The Company is seeking additional customer relationships and believes this partnership will broaden its potential customer
base.
In August 2016, the Company’s Board
of Directors authorized management to move forward with the development of a mobile application that will provide a full-service
logistics platform between the US and China for short-haul trucking services in the US. The decision follows an extensive review
by the Company's management team and Board in identifying Sino’s key competitive advantages as an expert in global logistics
between the US and China, and then leveraging that experience to both address the needs of its customer base and provide solutions
to current issues affecting logistics and supply chain. The Company completed a market analysis and feasibility study related to
building a mobile based logistics application for short-haul trucking in US ports to better manage the over 25 million containers,
or TEU moving between China and the US each year.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have a history of operating losses
and may not have sufficient liquidity to execute our business plan or to continue our operations without obtaining additional funding
or selling additional securities. We may not be able to obtain additional funding under commercially reasonable terms or issue
additional securities.
We reported a net
loss attributable to Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd. of approximately $2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016,
compared to approximately $0.7 million of net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2016, we
had an accumulated deficit of approximately $4.5 million.
As of June 30,
2016, we had $1.4 million in cash or cash equivalents. Our management believes that we will have sufficient liquidity in fiscal
year 2017 to finance our anticipated operations, as well as achieve projected cash collections from customers. Additionally, we
may enter into new business segments through selected merger and acquisitions that may require us to obtain additional funding
or issue additional securities. Changes in our business conditions or the financial markets could limit our access to existing
credit facilities or make new sources of financing more costly or commercially unviable. Changes in China’s currency exchange
control regulations could also limit our ability to access cash outside of China to meet liquidity requirements for our planned
operations or intended acquisitions in China. If additional funding is not obtained, we may need to reduce, defer or cancel development
programs to the extent necessary. The failure to fund our capital requirements would have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Our relatively limited operating
history makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and results of operations.
Founded in the US in
2001, we have a relatively limited operating history. Accordingly, you should consider our future prospects in light of the risks
and uncertainties typically experienced by companies such as ours in evolving industries. Some of these risks and uncertainties
relate to our ability to:
|
•
|
offer new and innovative solutions to attract new customers and retain existing customer base;
|
|
•
|
raise sufficient funding to sustain and expand our business;
|
|
•
|
maintain effective control of our costs and expenses;
|
|
•
|
respond to changes in market demand and regulatory environment;
|
|
•
|
manage risks associated with intellectual property rights;
|
|
•
|
attract and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
•
|
maintain or improve our position as an innovative global logistic solution provider.
|
If we are unsuccessful in addressing any
of these risks and uncertainties, our business may be materially and adversely affected.
We have historically relied on a
limited number of customers for a substantial portion of our business.
In fiscal year 2014,
we commenced providing shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management services to a single customer, the
Zhiyuan Investment Group, an entity controlled by Mr. Zhang, our largest shareholder. We temporarily suspended our shipping and
chartering services in fiscal year 2016 as a result of the termination of the vessel acquisition. The nature of our business is
driven by the needs of our clients, and we cannot predict when, or if ever, we will receive another order for our services from
the Zhiyuan Investment Group. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, $2,269,346 (or 31%) and $2,545,009 (or 22.5%)
of our net revenues, respectively, resulted from providing inland transportation management services to the Zhiyuan Investment
Group. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 $1,977,996 (or 69%) and $2,143,606 (or 39.8%) of our gross profit, respectively,
came from providing inland transportation management services to the Zhiyuan Investment Group. If we do not provide inland transportation
management services to the Zhiyuan Investment Group in the future, our business and results of operations would be materially adversely
affected. Further, we cannot guarantee that we would be able to replace this customer with one or more new customers of similar
size. In fiscal year 2015, we commenced providing inland transportation management services to a third-party customer Tengda. For
the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, Tengda accounted for approximately 27% and 20% of the Company’s total net
revenues, respectively. Our business will be materially and adversely affected if we fail to retain any of these key customers
or our collaborative partners over whom we are very dependent fail to perform as expected.
We have limited operating history
in inland transportation management services businesses and cannot guarantee that we will be able to operate well and compete effectively
in this business area.
Prior to fiscal year
2014, our sole line of business was providing shipping agency services. We expanded our services to include inland transportation
management services in the quarter ended December 31, 2013. As we are a fairly new entrant into this business line, we do not have
a significant market presence. Currently, we only provide inland transportation services to two customers: the Zhiyuan Investment
Group and Tengda. We may not have been able to enter into this business line without our relationship with Mr. Zhang, and we cannot
guarantee that we will be successful in securing and providing inland transportation management services contracts for other customers
on acceptable terms, if at all. We may not be able to retain our existing customers as the proprietary rights of our solutions
are not protected and our customers could terminate the business relationship with us after they have mastered the skills to solve
the problems. In addition, we may not be able to fully collect our outstanding accounts receivable within a reasonable time frame
as Chinese economy is slowing resulting in the shipping business gets scaled down.
We recently established Sino LA to
provide cargo forwarding services in the US and cannot guarantee that we will be able to operate successfully and compete effectively
in this business area.
In fiscal year 2016, the Company formed
a new subsidiary Sino LA and signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Yaxin International Co., Ltd. to provide cargo forwarding,
customs filing and declaration, trucking and other related services. If we are not able to successfully retain this customer, we
may not be able to compete effectively in this business location and acquire new customers as it is a highly competitive market.
In addition, this particular industry has a standardized three months of payment term that might increase the pressure on our operating
cash flow.
The fees that we received from the
Zhiyuan Investment Group for our shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management services may not be indicative
of the fees that we may receive for the same services provided to unaffiliated customers and may be materially lower, which would
have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We cannot provide
any assurances that the fees we have received from the Zhiyuan Investment Group for our shipping and chartering and inland transportation
management services are indicative of the fees that we may receive if we are able to obtain non-affiliated customers for these
services. The fees that we may receive from non-affiliated customers may be less than what we have received from our affiliated
customer, and could possibly be so low as to make these lines of business unprofitable, which would have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations and could require us to terminate such service lines.
Our revenue will be materially and
adversely affected if our new service offerings does not gain market acceptance.
Our new service offerings
may not gain market acceptance in the shipping logistic industry. To directly market and offer our service offerings, we and/or
our collaborative partners may require a marketing and sales force with appropriate technical expertise and supporting distribution
capabilities. We may not be able to further establish sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or enter into arrangements
with third parties on acceptable terms. If we or our partners cannot successfully promote our new services, our ability to generate
additional revenue will be limited.
We have entered into a number of
business arrangements that are significant to us with two of our shareholders including Mr. Zhang, our largest shareholder, and
through Mr. Zhang, the Zhiyuan Investment Group, who is controlled by Mr. Zhang. The failure to maintain our business relationship
with either or both of such shareholders would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In April 2013, as
approved by our Board of Directors and shareholders, Mr. Zhang purchased 1,800,000 shares of our common stock for approximately
$3 million, which as of the date of this report represents approximately 21.6% of our issued and outstanding common stock, resulting
in Mr. Zhang becoming our largest shareholder. As a result of Mr. Zhang’s desire to find business opportunities that would
mutually benefit us and the Zhiyuan Investment Group, a company controlled by Mr. Zhang, which owns a number of businesses in China,
in June 2013, we signed a 5-year Global Logistic Service Agreement with two parties, one of which was the Zhiyuan Investment Group
and the other was TEWOO Chemical & Light Industry Zhiyuan Trade Co., Ltd. (“Tewoo”). Thereafter, during the quarter
ended September 30, 2013, we executed a shipping and chartering services agreement with the Zhiyuan Investment Group, pursuant
to which we assisted the Zhiyuan Investment Group in the transportation of approximately 51,000 tons of chromite ore from South
Africa to China; and in September 2013, we executed an inland transportation management service contract with the Zhiyuan Investment
Group pursuant to which we agreed to provide certain advisory services and assist the Zhiyuan Investment Group in attempting to
control its potential commodities loss during the transportation process. On a one time basis, we executed a one year short-term
loan agreement with the Zhiyuan Investment Group, effective January 1, 2014, to facilitate the working capital needs of the Zhiyuan
Investment Group. During fiscal year 2016 and 2015 we continued to provide inland transportation management services to the Zhiyuan
Investment Group. The net amount due to us from the Zhiyuan Investment Group at June 30, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $1.6 million
and $2.6 million of trade receivables, respectively.
As a result of our
business relationship with Mr. Zhang and Mr. Wang, we added shipping and chartering, inland transportation management and ship
management services to our service platform. Such shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management services
generated approximately 66% and 91% of our net revenues and gross profit in fiscal year 2016, respectively, approximately 42% and
75% of our net revenues and gross profit, respectively, for the year ended June 30, 2015.
Based upon the above,
the failure by us to maintain our existing business relationship with Mr. Zhang and Mr. Wang would have a material adverse effect
on our business and results of operations.
The shipping agency business is very
competitive in nature and many of our competitors have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have.
In connection with
shipping agency service, our main competitors include: LBH Group and Gulf Agency Company. These competitors have significantly
greater financial, marketing and other resources and name recognition than we have. In addition, we also face competition from
a large number of smaller, local shipping agents. Our competitors may introduce new business models, and if these new business
models are more attractive to customers than the business models we currently use, our customers may switch to our competitors’
services, and we may lose market share. We believe that competition in worldwide shipping agency industry may become more intense
as more shipping agencies, including Chinese/foreign joint ventures, are qualified to conduct business. We cannot assure you that
we will be able to compete successfully against any new or existing competitors, or against any new business models our competitors
may implement. In addition, the increased competition we anticipate in the shipping agent industry may also reduce the number of
vessels for which we are able to provide shipping agency services, or cause us to reduce agency fees in order to attract or retain
customers. All of these competitive factors could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We believe that our competitors in
the inland transportation management services business, have greater name recognition, significantly more experience, financial,
marketing and other resources than we have and we expect to face intense competition in this business segment.
We launched the inland
transportation management services business in December 2013. Our competitors have greater experience and name recognition than
we do, which is a competitive disadvantage to us. Further, our competitors are larger than us and have greater financial and marketing
resources than we have, which also puts us at a significant competitive disadvantage. Since larger competitors may be able to offer
the same services we offer at lower rates than what we would need to charge to operate profitably, this would have a material adverse
effect on our business and results of operation.
The barriers to enter into the business segments in which
we operate are low and we may face competition from new entrants into these business segments.
The number of competitors
offering the same services that we do may increase in the future since the barriers to entry are low. Increases in competition
could lead to revenue reductions, reduced profit margins, or a loss of market share, any one of which could have a material adverse
effect on our business and results of operations.
Our customers are engaged in the
shipping industry, and, consequently, our financial performance is dependent upon the economic conditions of that industry.
We derive our revenues
from providing services to customers in the business of shipping materials to China and our success is dependent upon our customer’s
shipping needs. Our customers’ shipping needs are intrinsically linked to economic conditions in the shipping industry in
general and trade with China in particular. The shipping industry, in turn, is subject to intense competitive pressures and is
affected by overall economic conditions. Accordingly, demand for our services could be harmed by instability or downturns in the
shipping industry, reductions in trade between China and other countries or a combination of both which could materially lower
demand or cause our customers to forego the shipping agency services we provide by attempting to provide such services in-house.
If any of the foregoing occurs, it would have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.
We may be required to assume liabilities
for our clients in the future.
An increasing number
of companies that require shipping agency services have pressured shipping agents to guarantee their clients’ liabilities.
Some companies have required shipping agents, as a condition of doing business, to pay for tariffs, port charges, and other fees,
or to pay these fees with the promise of reimbursement at a later date. Other companies have sought to include shipping agents
as parties in voyage charter agreements, leading to potential liability for shipping agents in the event of a breach by another
party. We expect that these pressures on shipping agents to accept more liability will increase as competition among shipping agencies
intensifies. While we do not currently pay these liabilities and have no present intention to begin doing so in the future, the
assumption of any of these or other liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are heavily dependent upon the
services of experienced personnel who possess skills that are valuable in our industry, and we may have to actively compete for
their services.
We are a small company
with limited resources, and we compete in large part on the basis of the quality of services we are able to provide our clients.
As a result, we are heavily dependent upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate skilled personnel to serve our clients.
Many of our personnel possess skills that would be valuable to other companies engaged in one or more of our business lines. Consequently,
we expect that we will have to actively compete with other Chinese shipping agencies to retain these employees. Some of our competitors
may be able to pay our employees more than we are able to pay to retain them. Our ability to profitably operate is substantially
dependent upon our ability to locate, hire, train and retain our personnel. Although we have not experienced difficulty locating,
hiring, training or retaining our employees to date, there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain our current personnel,
or that we will be able to attract and assimilate other qualified personnel in the future. If we are unable to effectively obtain
and maintain skilled personnel, the quality of the shipping services that we provide could be materially impaired, which would
have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are substantially dependent upon
our key personnel.
Our performance is
substantially dependent on the performance of our executive officers and key employees. In particular, the services of:
• Mr. Lei Cao,
Chief Executive Officer;
• Ms. Tuo Pan,
Acting Chief Financial Officer; and
• Mr. Zhikang
Huang, Chief Operating Officer
would be difficult for us to replace. While
we have employment contracts with each of our executive officers, such contracts may be terminated in certain circumstances by
the executive officers. Moreover, we do not have any “key person” life insurance policies on any of our employees.
The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could substantially impair our ability to effectively
execute our business and expand our service platform, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations.
We need to maintain our relationships
with local shipping agents.
Our shipping agency
business is dependent upon our relationships with local agents operating in the ports where our customers ship their products.
As a general agent, substantially all of our shipping agency revenues have been derived from services delivered by the local agents
and we believe local agent relationships will remain critical to our success in the future. We have a number of local agents that
account for a significant portion of our business, the loss of one or more of which could materially and negatively impact our
ability to retain and service our customers. We cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain and expand our existing local
agent relationships or enter into new local agent relationships, or that new or renewed local agent relationships will be available
on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to maintain and expand our existing local agent relationships, renew existing
local agent relationships, or enter into new local agent relationships, we may lose customers, customer introductions and co-marketing
benefits, and our business and results of operations may suffer significantly.
We are dependent on third party carriers
and inland transportation companies to transport our client’s cargo.
We rely on commercial
ocean freight carriers and inland transportation companies, for the movement of our client’s cargo. Consequently, our ability
to provide services for our clients could be adversely impacted by: shortages in available cargo capacity; changes by carriers
and transportation companies in policies and practices such as scheduling, pricing, payment terms and frequency of service or increases
in the cost of fuel, taxes and labor; and other factors not within our control. Reductions in ocean freight capacity could negatively
impact our yields. Material interruptions in service or stoppages in transportation, whether caused by strike, work stoppage, lock-out,
slowdown or otherwise, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our profitability depends on our
ability to effectively manage our cost structure as we grow the business.
As we continue to
attempt to increase our revenues through the expansion of our service offerings, we must maintain an appropriate cost structure
to maintain and increase our profitability. While we intend to increase our revenues by increasing the number and quality of the
shipping services we provide by strategic acquisitions, and by maintaining and expanding our gross profit margins by reducing costs,
our profitability will be driven in large part by our ability to manage our agent commissions, personnel and general and administrative
costs as a function of our net revenues. There can be no assurances that we will be able to effectively control our costs and failure
to do so would result in lack of profitability, which would have a material adverse effect our business and results of operations.
Comparisons of our operating results
from period to period are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indicator of future performance.
Our operating results
have fluctuated in the past and likely will continue to fluctuate in the future because of a variety of factors, many of which
are beyond our control. In fiscal year 2016 and 2015 a substantial portion of our revenues was derived from the Zhiyuan Investment
Group whose business we believe are tied closely to economic trends and consumer demand that can be difficult to predict. There
can be no assurance that our historic operating performance will continue in future periods as we cannot assume or provide any
assurance that the Zhiyuan Investment Group will continue to utilize our services, or have the same level of demand for our services
that it had in fiscal year 2016 and 2015. Because our quarterly revenues and operating results vary significantly, comparisons
of our period-to-period results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indicator of future performance.
We have not paid any dividends and
we do not foresee paying dividends in the future.
We have never declared
or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable
future, if ever. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend
upon our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, Virginia and PRC laws, and other factors that our Board
of Directors deems relevant.
Foreign Operational Risks
We do not have business liability
or disruption insurance.
We do not have any
business liability or disruption insurance coverage for our operations. Any business interruption, litigation or natural disaster
may result in our business incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources.
We
rely on contractual arrangements with our VIE for our operations, which may not be as effective in providing control over these
entities as direct ownership.
Although
we have temporarily suspended doing business through our VIE, Sino-China, our operations and financial results might in the future
dependent on it, in which we have no equity ownership interest and must rely on contractual arrangements to control and operate
the businesses of our VIE. These contractual arrangements are not as effective in providing control over the VIE as direct ownership.
For example, the VIE may be unwilling or unable to perform its contractual obligations under our commercial agreements. Consequently,
we would not be able to conduct our operations in the manner currently planned. In addition, the VIE may seek to renew its agreements
on terms that are disadvantageous to us. Although we have entered into a series of agreements that provide us with substantial
ability to control the VIE, we may not succeed in enforcing our rights under them insofar as our contractual rights and legal remedies
under PRC law are inadequate. In addition, if we are unable to renew these agreements on favorable terms when these agreements
expire or enter into similar agreements with other parties, our business may not be able to operate or expand, and our operating
expenses may significantly increase.
In
January 2015, China’s Ministry of Commerce unveiled a draft legislation that could change how the government is regulating
corporate structures, especially for VIEs controlled by foreign investments. Instead of looking at “ownership”, the
draft law focused on the entities or individuals hold control of a VIE. If a VIE is deemed to be controlled by foreign investors,
it may be barred from operating in restricted sectors or the prohibited sectors listed on a “negative list”, where
only companies controlled by Chinese nationals could operate, even if structured as VIEs. As of the report date, no formal legislation
has been implemented.
In
the event that the draft law is implemented in any form, and that the Company’s business was characterized as one of the
“restricted” or “prohibited” sectors, the VIE the Company currently maintains contractual arrangements
with may be barred from operation which may adversely affect our business if the market for shipping agent services turn around
and we intend to resume such business operation with our VIE.
The
economy of China had experienced unprecedented growth. This growth has slowed in the recent years, and if the growth of the economy
continues to slow or if the economy contracts, our financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.
The
rapid growth of the PRC economy had historically resulted in widespread growth opportunities in industries across China. This growth
has slowed in the recent years. As a result of the global financial crisis and the inability of enterprises to gain comparable
access to the same amounts of capital available in past years, there may be an adverse effect on the business climate and growth
of private enterprise in the PRC. An economic slowdown could have an adverse effect on our sales and may increase our costs. Further,
if economic growth continues to slow, and if, in conjunction, inflation is to proceed unchecked, our costs would likely to increase,
and there can be no assurance that we would be able to increase our prices to an extent that would offset the increase in our expenses.
In
addition, a tightening of the labor markets in our geographic region may result in fewer qualified applicants for job openings
in our facilities. Further, higher wages, related labor costs and other increasing cost trends may negatively impact our results.
Uncertainties with respect to the
Chinese legal system could
have a material adverse effect on us and may restrict the level
of legal protections to foreign investors
China's
legal system is based on statutory law. Unlike the common law system, statutory law is based primarily on written statutes. Previous
court decisions may be cited as persuasive authority but do not have a binding effect. Since 1979, the PRC government has been
promulgating and amending the laws and regulations regarding economic matters, such as corporate organization and governance, foreign
investment, commerce, taxation and trade. However, since these laws and regulations are relatively new, and the PRC legal system
continues to rapidly evolve, the interpretation of many laws, regulations and rules is not always uniform and enforcement of these
laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties, which may limit legal protections available to us.
In
addition, any litigation in China may be protracted and may result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management's
attention. The legal system in China cannot provide investors with the same level of protection as in the U.S. The Company is governed
by laws and regulations generally applicable to local enterprises in China. Many of these laws and regulations were recently introduced
and remain experimental in nature and subject to changes and refinements. Interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the
existing laws and regulations can be uncertain and unpredictable and therefore may restrict the legal protections available to
foreign investors.
You
may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing original actions based
on United States or foreign laws against us, our management or the experts named in the prospectus.
We
conduct substantially all of our operations in China and almost all of our assets are located in China. In addition, almost all
of our senior executive officers reside in China. As a result, it may not be possible to effect service of process on our senior
executive officers within the United States or elsewhere outside China, including with respect to matters arising under U.S. federal
securities laws or applicable state securities laws. Moreover, our PRC counsel has advised us that the PRC does not have treaties
with the United States or many other countries providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of court orders and final
judgments.
Governmental control of currency
conversion may affect the value of your investment.
In the course of providing
services for international shipments, we occasionally require currencies from other countries to conduct our business. While we
believe that we have complied with applicable currency control laws and regulations in all material aspects, we cannot guarantee
you that our efforts will be free from challenge or that, if challenged, we will be successful in our defense of our current practices.
Under our current corporate structure, our income is paid in different currencies, depending on our agreements with individual
customers. We then pay in local currencies the expenses associated with operating a company in several countries. Shortages in
the availability of foreign currency may restrict our ability to pay such expenses unless and until we convert currencies that
we have into those that we require.
One of the currencies
we often convert among is the RMB. The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the RMB into foreign currencies
and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current
account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade-related transactions, can be made
in foreign currencies without prior approval from the PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange by complying with certain procedural
requirements. However, approval from appropriate government authorities is required where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency
and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of bank loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC
government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If
the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currency to satisfy our currency demands, we
may not be able to pay dividends, if any, in foreign currencies to our shareholders.
Changes
in Currency Conversion Policies in China may have a material adverse effect on us.
Renminbi
(“RMB”) is still not a freely exchangeable currency. Since 1998, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange of China
has promulgated a series of circulars and rules in order to enhance verification of foreign exchange payments under a Chinese entity's
current account items, and has imposed strict requirements on borrowing and repayments of foreign exchange debts from and to foreign
creditors under the capital account items and on the creation of foreign security in favor of foreign creditors.
This
may complicate foreign exchange payments to foreign creditors under the current account items and thus may affect the ability to
borrow under international commercial loans, the creation of foreign security, and the borrowing of RMB under guarantees in foreign
currencies. Moreover, the value of RMB may become subject to supply and demand, which could be largely impacted by international
economic and political environments. Any fluctuations in the exchange rate of RMB could have an adverse effect on the operational
and financial condition of the Company and its subsidiaries in China.
Fluctuation in the value of the RMB
may have a material adverse effect on your investment.
The change in value
of the RMB against the U.S. dollar, the Euro and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, changes in China’s political
and economic conditions, among other things. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the
value of the RMB
to
the U.S. dollar. Under the new policy, the RMB is permitted to
fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies. This change in policy has resulted in
an appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar. While the international reaction to the RMB revaluation has generally been
positive, there remains significant international pressure on the PRC government to adopt an even more flexible currency policy,
which could result in a further and more significant appreciation of the RMB against the
U.S. dollar. As a portion of our costs and expenses is denominated in RMB, the revaluation in July 2005 and potential future revaluation
has and could further increase our costs. In addition, any significant revaluation of the RMB may have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition. For example, starting from the second half year of 2015, RMB started to depreciate vs. U.S. dollars
and the trend continued in the beginning of year 2016, which cause our assets depreciated accordingly while we translated our balance
sheet from RMB into U.S. Dollars. And the whole year revenue and net income was also negatively impacted by RMB depreciation.
Changes in China’s political
and economic policies could harm our business.
China’s economy
has historically been a planned economy subject to governmental plans and quotas and has, in certain aspects, been transitioning
to a more market-oriented economy. Although we believe that the economic reform and the macroeconomic measures adopted by the Chinese
government have had a positive effect on the economic development of China, we cannot predict the future direction of these economic
reforms or the effects these measures may have on our business, financial position or results of operations. In addition, the Chinese
economy differs from the economies of most countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or
OECD. These differences include:
|
•
|
level of government involvement in the economy;
|
|
•
|
level of capital reinvestment;
|
|
•
|
control of foreign exchange;
|
|
•
|
methods of allocating resources; and
|
|
•
|
balance of payments position.
|
As a result of these
differences, our business may not develop in the same way or at the same rate as might be expected if the Chinese economy were
similar to those of the OECD member countries.
Since 1979, the Chinese
government has promulgated many new laws and regulations covering general economic matters. Despite this activity to develop a
legal system, China’s system of laws is not yet complete. Even where adequate law exists in China, enforcement of existing
laws or contracts based on existing law may be uncertain or sporadic, and it may be difficult to obtain swift and equitable enforcement
or to obtain enforcement of a judgment by a court of another jurisdiction. The relative inexperience of China’s judiciary,
in many cases, creates additional uncertainty as to the outcome of any litigation. In addition, interpretation of statutes and
regulations may be subject to government policies reflecting domestic political changes. Our activities in China will also be subject
to administration review and approval by various national and local agencies of China’s government. Because of the changes
occurring in China’s legal and regulatory structure, we may not be able to secure the requisite governmental approval for
our activities. Although we have obtained all required governmental approval to operate our business as currently conducted, to
the extent we are unable to obtain or maintain required governmental approvals, the Chinese government may, in its sole discretion,
prohibit us from conducting our business.”
The Chinese government could change its policies toward
private enterprise or even nationalize or expropriate private enterprises, which could result in the total loss of our investment
in that country.
Our business is subject
to significant political and economic uncertainties and may be adversely affected by political, economic and social developments
in China. Over the past several years, the Chinese government has pursued economic reform policies including the encouragement
of private economic activity and greater economic decentralization. The Chinese government may not continue to pursue these policies
or may significantly alter them to our detriment from time to time with little, if any, prior notice.
Changes in policies,
laws and regulations or in their interpretation or the imposition of confiscatory taxation, restrictions on currency conversion,
restrictions or prohibitions on dividend payments to shareholders, devaluations of currency or the nationalization or other expropriation
of private enterprises could have a material adverse effect on our business. Nationalization or expropriation could even result
in the total loss of our investment in China and in the total loss of your investment in us.
As some of our directors, officers and assets are outside
the United States, it will be extremely difficult to acquire jurisdiction and enforce liabilities against us and our officers,
directors and assets based in China.
Some of our directors and officers reside
outside the United States. In addition, many of our assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult
or impossible to effect service of process within the United States upon our directors or officers and our subsidiaries, or enforce
against any of them court judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments relating to United States federal securities
laws. Furthermore, because the majority of our assets are located in China and PRC does not have treaties with the United
States or many other countries providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgment of courts, it would also be
extremely difficult to access those assets to satisfy an award entered against us in United States court.
Our international operations require
us to comply with a number of U.S. regulations.
In addition to the
Chinese laws and regulations with which we must comply, we must also comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
(“FCPA”), which prohibits U.S. companies or their agents and employees from providing anything of value to a foreign
official for the purposes of influencing any act or decision of these individuals in their official capacity to help obtain or
retain business, direct business to any person or corporate entity or obtain any unfair advantage. Any failure by us to adopt appropriate
compliance procedures and ensure that our employees and agents comply with the FCPA and applicable laws and regulations in foreign
jurisdictions could result in substantial penalties and/or restrictions in our ability to conduct business in certain foreign jurisdictions.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (“OFAC”) administers and enforces economic
and trade sanctions against targeted foreign countries, entities and individuals based on U.S. foreign policy and national security
goals. As a result, we are restricted from entering into transactions with certain targeted foreign countries, entities, and individuals
except as permitted by OFAC, which could reduce our future growth.
Risks Related to the Common Stock
The market price for our securities
may be subject to wide fluctuations.
The securities of a
number of companies with substantial operations in China have experienced wide fluctuations in their stock price. Among the factors
that could affect the price of our common stock are risk factors described in this section and other factors, including:
|
•
|
announcements of competitive developments, by our competitors;
|
|
•
|
regulatory developments of our industry affecting us, our customers or our competitors;
|
|
•
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;
|
|
•
|
failure of our quarterly financial and operating results to meet market expectations or failure to meet our previously announced
guidance, if any;
|
|
•
|
changes in financial estimates by securities research analysts;
|
|
•
|
changes in the economic performance or market valuations of our competitors;
|
|
•
|
additions or departures of our executive officers and other key personnel;
|
|
•
|
announcements regarding intellectual property litigation (or potential litigation) involving us or any of our directors and
officers;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Renminbi; and
|
|
•
|
release or expiration of the underwriters’ post-offering lock-up or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding common
stock.
|
In
addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related
to the operating performance of particular industries or companies. In addition,
the market
prices and trading volumes of companies listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market have been volatile. As a result, the trading price
of our common stock is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate significantly in response to many factors, including the following,
some of which are beyond our control:
|
·
|
variations
in our operating results;
|
|
·
|
changes
in expectations of our future financial performance, including financial estimates by
securities analysts and investors;
|
|
·
|
changes
in operating and stock price performance of other companies in our industry;
|
|
·
|
additions
or departures of key personnel; and
future sales of our common stock.
|
Domestic
and international stock markets often experience significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations, as well as general
economic and political conditions unrelated to our performance, may adversely affect the price of our common stock.
We may need additional capital and
may sell additional securities or other equity securities or incur indebtedness, which could result in additional dilution to our
shareholders or increase our debt service obligations.
In the future, we
may require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments
or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If our resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell
additional equity or debt securities or obtain a credit facility. The sale of additional equity securities or equity-linked debt
securities could result in dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service
obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations. We cannot assure you that
financing will be available, if at all, in amounts or on terms acceptable to us.
Substantial future sales of our securities
in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the price of our securities to decline.
Additional sales of
our securities in the public market or the perception that these sales could cause the market price of our securities to decline.
In addition, we may grant or sell additional options, restricted shares or other share-based awards in the future under our share
incentive plan to our management, employees and other persons, the settlement and sale of which may further dilute our shares and
drive down the price of our securities.
If NASDAQ were to delist our securities
from trading on its exchange, such action could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject
us to additional trading restrictions.
Our common stock is currently listed on
The NASDAQ Capital Market. We cannot assure you that our securities will meet the continued listing requirements be listed on NASDAQ
in the future.
If NASDAQ delists our common stock from
trading on its exchange, we could face significant material adverse consequences including:
|
•
|
a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
|
|
•
|
a determination that our common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our common stock
to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market
for our common stock;
|
|
•
|
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for our company; and
|
|
•
|
a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
|
If our shares of common stock become
subject to the SEC’s penny stock rules, broker-dealers may experience difficulty in completing customer transactions and
trading activity in our securities may be adversely affected.
If our common stock
were removed from listing with the NASDAQ Capital Market, it may be subject to the so-called “penny stock” rules. The
SEC has adopted regulations that define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price per share
of less than $5.00, subject to certain exceptions, such as any securities listed on a national securities exchange. For any transaction
involving a “penny stock,” unless exempt, the rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers,
subject to certain exceptions. If our common stock were delisted and determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer
may find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common
stock on the secondary market. Investors in penny stocks should be prepared for the possibility that they may lose their whole
investment.
Our
business is subject to changing regulations related to corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased both our
costs and the risk of noncompliance.
Because
our common stock is publicly traded, we are subject to certain rules and regulations of federal, state and financial market exchange
entities charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded. These entities,
including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and NASDAQ, have issued requirements and regulations and continue
to develop additional regulations and requirements in response to corporate scandals and laws enacted by Congress. Our efforts
to comply with these regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue resulting in, increased general and administrative
expenses and diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Because new
and modified laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity,
their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This evolution
may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our
disclosure and governance practices.
Risks
Relating to Ownership of Our Securities
Mr.
Lei Cao, our CEO and Chairman of our Board of Directors is the beneficial owner of a substantial portion of our outstanding common
stock, which may enable Mr. Cao to exert significant influence on corporate actions.
Mr.
Cao has 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of September 8, 2016, which could have a substantial impact on matters
requiring the vote of our shareholders, including the election of our directors and most corporate actions. This control could
delay, defer or prevent others from initiating a potential merger, takeover or other change in our control, even if these actions
would benefit our other shareholders and the Company. This control could adversely affect the voting and other rights of our other
shareholders and could depress the market price of our common stock.
The
limitation of monetary liability against our directors, officers and employees under Virginia law and the existence of statutory
indemnification rights of our directors, officers and employees may result in substantial expenditures by our Company and may discourage
lawsuits against our directors, officers and employees.
Our
articles of incorporation do not contain any specific provisions that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages
to our Company and shareholders; however, we are prepared to indemnify our directors and officers to the extent provided for by
Virginia law. We may also have included contractual indemnification obligations in our employment agreements with our officers.
The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in the Company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement
or damage awards against its directors and officers, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may
also discourage our Company from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and
may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our shareholders against our directors and officers even though
such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit our Company and shareholders.
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments.
|
The Company does not have any unresolved or outstanding Staff
Comments.
We currently rent five facilities in the PRC, Hong Kong and
the United States. Our PRC headquarter is in Beijing, and our US headquarter is in New York.
Office
|
|
Address
|
|
Rental Term
|
|
Space
|
Beijing, PRC
|
|
Room 502, Tower C
YeQing Plaza
No. 9, Wangjing North Road
Chaoyang District
Beijing, PRC 100102
|
|
Expires 12/14/2017
|
|
160 m
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai, PRC
|
|
Rm 12B1/12C, No.359 Dongdaming.Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, PRC 200080
|
|
Expires 07/31/2017
|
|
285.99 m
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, USA
|
|
1044 Northern Boulevard,
Suite 305
Roslyn, New York 11576-1514
|
|
Expires 08/31/2019
|
|
179 m
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
20/F, Hoi Kiu Commercial Building, 158 Connaught Road Central, HK
|
|
Expires 05/17/2017
|
|
77 m
2
|
|
|
21680 Gateway Center Drive, Suite 330 Diamond Bar, California 91765
|
|
Expires 04/30/2020
|
|
121.24m
2
|
Los Angeles, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings.
|
From time to time, we may become involved
in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time and may harm our business. However,
we are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate,
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures.
|
This item is not applicable to the Company.
PART II
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Market for Our Common Stock
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ
Stock Market under the symbol SINO. The high and low common stock sales prices per share during the periods indicated were
as follows:
Quarter Ended
|
|
Sep. 30
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock price per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock price per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
4.69
|
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
4.69
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
Approximate Number of Holders of Our Common Stock
As of September 8, 2016 there are 25 holders
of record of our common stock. This number does not include shareholders who hold their shares of common stock in street name.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash
dividends on our common stock. We anticipate that we will retain any earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and
development of our business. Therefore, we do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination
relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors,
including future earnings, capital requirements, financial conditions and future prospects and other factors the Board of Directors
may deem relevant. Payments of dividends by Trans Pacific to our company are subject to restrictions including primarily the restriction
that foreign invested enterprises may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at those banks authorized to conduct foreign
exchange business after providing valid commercial documents.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On December 9, 2015, the Company entered
into a consulting and advisory services agreement with a consulting firm. The agreement is for a period of 12 months, effective
on November 20, 2015. In return for the services, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, 250,000 shares at $1.02
per share of the Company’s common stock were issued to the consulting firm for the first six-months of service. On May 23,
2016, the Company issued the other 250,000 shares of common stock to this consultant at $0.72 per share for the services for the
second six months to November 19, 2016. The shares of common stock were issued pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On October 13, 2015, we announced that
our board of directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $100,000 worth of our common stock in open market transactions or
in privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program shall terminate on the earlier of (a) the date that is twelve months
after October 20, 2015, or (b) upon the termination notice from the Company or the broker that is engaged for the repurchase. The
following table sets forth information regarding shares of our common stock that we repurchased during the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2016:
Period
|
|
(a)
Total number of
shares purchased
|
|
|
(b)
Average price
paid per share
|
|
|
(c)
Total number of
shares purchased as
part of publicly
announced plans or
programs
|
|
|
(d)
Maximum
number (or
approximate
dollar value) of
shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plans
or programs
|
|
April 1 to April 30, 2016
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
50,306
|
|
|
$
|
54,990.00
|
|
May 1 to May 31, 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
June 1 to June 30, 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
50,306
|
|
|
$
|
54,990.00
|
|
In summary, the Company had repurchased a total of 50,306 common
shares at an average stock price of $0.89 per share as of June 30, 2016.
Other Information
Effective February 11, 2016, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) granted an aggregate of 660,000 shares of stock
to its directors and officers under the Company’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), as below: (i)
300,000 shares to Mr. Lei Cao, Chief Executive Officer; (ii) 180,000 shares to Mr. Zhikang Huang, Chief Operating Officer; (iii)
40,000 shares to Ms. Tuo Pan, Acting Chief Financial Officer; (iv) 20,000 shares to Mr. Yafei Li, Chief Technology Officer; and
(v) 40,000 shares to each of Tieliang Liu, Ming Zhu, and Jing Wang, each an independent director (collectively, the “Plan
Stock Grants”). All the stock vests immediately.
In addition, the Compensation Committee
authorized the grant of a total of $300,000 worth of share awards under the 2014 Plan and/or the 2008 Equity Stock Incentive Plan
for each fiscal year going forward to its directors and executive officers in the same proportion as they were granted for the
fiscal year 2016, as set forth above as long as such a director or executive officer is in his position and fulfills his duty.
Pursuant to the Company's 2014 Stock
Incentive Plan, on July 26, 2016, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 150,000 shares of common stock to
two employees with a two-year vesting period, one half of which shall vest on October 26, 2016, and the other half shall vest
on July 26, 2017. The exercise price of such options was $1.10 per share. Please refer to Item 12 for the table on Equity
Compensation Plan Information, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
The Company is not required to provide the information required
by this Item because the Company is a smaller reporting company.
Item 7.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
|
The following discussion and analysis of our company’s
financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements
and the related notes included elsewhere in the Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.
Overview
Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd.
(“Sino”), a Virginia corporation, which was founded in the US in 2001. Sino is a non-asset based global shipping
and freight logistic integrated solution provider. Sino provides tailored solutions and value added services to its customers
to drive effectiveness and control in related aspects throughout the entire shipping and freight logistic chain. Our current
service offerings consist of shipping agency services and inland transportation management services .We temporarily suspended
our ship management services from the fiscal year 2016 primarily due to market condition changes. We also temporarily
suspended our shipping and chartering services primarily as a result of the termination of the vessel acquisition in December
2015.
The Company conducts its business primarily
through its wholly-owned subsidiaries in the U.S., China, Hong Kong, Australia and Canada. Currently, a significant portion of
our business is generated from the clients located in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”).
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in U.S. Dollars
and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
The following table presents summary
information by segment for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
|
|
|
For the Year Ended June 30, 2015
|
|
|
|
Shipping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ship
|
|
|
Shipping and
|
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ship
|
|
|
Shipping and
|
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Chartering
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Chartering
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
2,507,800
|
|
|
$
|
462,218
|
|
|
$
|
4,340,522
|
|
|
$
|
7,310,540
|
|
|
$
|
6,185,653
|
|
|
$
|
349,125
|
|
|
$
|
4,785,850
|
|
|
$
|
11,320,628
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
2,175,109
|
|
|
|
212,510
|
|
|
$
|
1,350,370
|
|
|
$
|
3,737,989
|
|
|
$
|
4,998,030
|
|
|
|
182,650
|
|
|
$
|
755,603
|
|
|
$
|
5,936,283
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
332,691
|
|
|
|
249,708
|
|
|
$
|
2,990,152
|
|
|
$
|
3,572,551
|
|
|
$
|
1,187,623
|
|
|
|
166,475
|
|
|
$
|
4,030,247
|
|
|
$
|
5,384,345
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
13.27
|
%
|
|
|
54.02
|
%
|
|
|
68.89
|
%
|
|
|
48.87
|
%
|
|
|
19.20
|
%
|
|
|
47.68
|
%
|
|
|
84.21
|
%
|
|
|
47.56
|
%
|
Revenues
(1) Revenues from Shipping Agency and Ship Management
Services
l
Shipping
Agency Services
For the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015,
our revenue generated from the shipping agency segment was $2,507,800 and $5,995,565, respectively. The decline in revenues was
mainly due to the decrease in the total number of ships the Company served from 125 ships for the year ended June 30, 2015 to only
19 ships for the year ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in the number of ships served for the year ended June 30, 2016 was largely
due to the general economy slow-down, the rising labor costs in China and intense competition in the industry, with established
and new competitors offering rates that in many cases are lower than we can offer. On the other hand, the rising labor costs and
increased overhead costs also reduced our profitability in this business line. However, Sino-Global still provides the shipping agency service,
and we expect the number of ships we serve would be increase once the market conditions of shipping industry turns positive.
|
|
For the years ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
|
|
Number of ships served
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loading/discharging
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
Protective
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
l
Ship
Management Services
We did not generate any revenue from the
ship management service segment for the year ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the revenue of $190,088 for the year ended June
30, 2015. In connection with our acquisition of Longhe Ship Management (Hong Kong) Co. Limited in 2014, we launched ship management
services in 2014 but considering the market conditions, risk control and the future development of ship management services, and
our costs and profitability of this business segment, the management decided to temporarily suspend the ship management business
from the beginning of fiscal year 2016.
(2) Revenues from Shipping and Chartering Services
In connection with the termination of the acquisition of Rong
Yao International Shipping Limited (“Rong Yao”) on December 7, 2015, the Company realigned its developing strategy
and temporarily suspended the shipping and chartering services. As a result, we reported $462,218 and $349,125 revenue from this
segment for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(3) Revenues from Inland Transportation Management Services
In September 2013, the Company executed an inland transportation
management service contract with Zhiyuan Investment Group (“Zhiyuan”) whereby the Company provides certain solutions
to help Zhiyuan control potential commodities loss during the transportation process. The Company started to provide inland transportation
management services to a third-party customer, Tengda Northwest Ferroalloy Co., Ltd. (“Tengda Northwest”), following
the quarter ended September 2014. As a result, for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the inland transportation management
services generated revenues of $4,340,522 and $4,785,850, respectively, and gross profit of $2,990,152 and $4,030,247, respectively. The
decrease was largely due to the slowing economy in China resulting in decreased shipping demand.
Operating Costs and Expenses
The following tables set forth the
components of the Company’s costs and expenses for the periods indicated.
|
|
For the years ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
7,310,540
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
11,320,628
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
(4,010,088
|
)
|
|
|
-35.4
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
3,737,989
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
%
|
|
|
5,936,283
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
%
|
|
|
(2,198,294
|
)
|
|
|
-37.0
|
%
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,346,159
|
|
|
|
59.5
|
%
|
|
|
4,304,329
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
|
|
41,830
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
475,619
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
63,219
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
412,400
|
|
|
|
652.3
|
%
|
Total Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
8,559,767
|
|
|
|
117.1
|
%
|
|
|
10,303,831
|
|
|
|
91.0
|
%
|
|
|
(1,744,064
|
)
|
|
|
-16.9
|
%
|
Costs of Revenues
The cost of revenue was $3,737,989 for
the year ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $5,936,283 for the year ended June 30, 2015. The overall cost of revenues as a percentage
of our revenues decreased from 52.4% for year ended June 30, 2015 to 51.1% for the year ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in the
overall cost of revenue in percentage term for the year ended June 30, 2016 was mainly because the majority of our revenue during
the fiscal year 2016 came from more profitable inland transportation business lines rather than from less profitable shipping agency
service segment. As the revenue from shipping agency services has been decreased, the inland transportation service was considered
as our essential revenue source.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses
consist primarily of salaries and benefits, office rent, office expenses, regulatory filing and listing fees, amortization of stock-based
compensation expenses, legal, accounting and other professional service fees. For the year ended June 30, 2016, we had $4,346,159
of general and administrative expenses as compared to $4,304,329 for the year ended 2015, an increase of $41,830 or 1%. The increase
in our general and administrative expense was mainly due to the increased allowance for doubtful accounts as the management
decided to allocate a higher percent of allowance reservation on certain account receivables , increased stock-based compensation
expense, as well as the increased professional service fees. However, the increase was partially offset by the decrease in travelling
expenses and office expenses. As a percentage of revenue, our general and administrative expenses increased from 38.0% to 59.5%
of the revenues for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, respectively. This increase was largely due to our reduced revenue
in fiscal year 2016 as compared to that of fiscal year 2015.
Selling Expenses
The selling expenses consist primarily
of business development costs and commissions for our operating staff to the ports at which we provide services. For the year ended
June 30, 2016, we had $475,619 of selling expenses as compared to $63,219 for the year ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $412,400
or 652.3%. As a percentage of revenue, our selling expenses increased from 0.6% to 6.5% for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2016,
respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2016, we made more efforts on business development to explore new business opportunities
while maintaining our current customer relationship. On the other hand, the rising labor costs also increased our overall selling
expense as compared to fiscal year 2015.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare the consolidated financial statements
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). These accounting
principles require us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions on the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the end
of each fiscal period, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each fiscal period. We continually evaluate these
judgments and estimates based on our own historical experience, knowledge and assessment of current business and other conditions,
our expectations regarding the future based on available information and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable.
There have been no other material changes
during the year ended June 30, 2016 in our significant accounting policies to those previously disclosed in the Company’s
June 30, 2015 annual report.
The selection of critical accounting policies,
the judgments and other uncertainties affecting application of those policies and the sensitivity of reported results to changes
in conditions and assumptions are factors that should be considered when reviewing our financial statements. We believe the following
accounting policies involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue Recognition
|
·
|
Revenues from shipping agency services are recognized upon completion of services, which coincides with the date of departure
of the relevant vessel from port. Advance payments and deposits received from customers prior to the provision of services and
recognition of the related revenues are presented as advances from customers.
|
|
·
|
Revenues from shipping and chartering services are recognized upon performance of services as stipulated in the underlying
contract.
|
|
·
|
Revenues from inland transportation management services are recognized when commodities are being released from the customer’s
warehouse.
|
|
·
|
Revenues from ship management services are recognized when the related contractual services are rendered.
|
Basis of Consolidation
The Company’s consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the parent and its subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances are eliminated
in consolidation. Sino-Global Shipping Agency Ltd. (“Sino-China”) is considered to be a Variable Interest Entity (VIE)
and we are the primary beneficiary. Because of the contractual arrangements, the Company had a pecuniary interest in Sino-China
that requires consolidation of our and Sino-China’s financial statements. The accounts of Sino-China are consolidated in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements pursuant to Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 810-10, “Consolidation”.
As a VIE, Sino-China’s revenues are included in our total revenues, its net loss from operations is consolidated with our
net income (loss) before non-controlling interest. Our non-controlling interest in its net loss is then subtracted in calculating
the net income attributable to the Company. The Company temporarily suspended its business with Sino-China in June 2014, therefore,
there is no net income generated by Sino-China in the present.
Accounts Receivable and Advances
Accounts receivable are recognized at net
realizable value. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the failure of customers
to make required payments in the relevant time period. Management reviews the accounts receivable on a periodic basis and record
general and specific allowances when there is doubt as to the collectability of individual balances. In evaluating the collectability
of individual receivable balances, we consider many factors, including the age of the balance, the customer’s historical
payment history, its current credit-worthiness and current economic trends. Receivables are considered past due after 365 days.
Accounts are written off against the allowance only after exhaustive collection efforts.
Translation of Foreign Currency
The accounts of our company and Sino-China
are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”).
Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar, while Trans Pacific and Sino-China report their financial position and results of operations
in Renminbi. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars. Foreign currency transactions are
translated into U.S. dollars using the fixed exchange rates in effect at the time of the transaction. Generally foreign exchange
gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.
We translate foreign currency financial statements of Sino-China, Trans Pacific, Sino-Global HK and Sino-Global AUS in accordance
with ASC 830-10, “Foreign Currency Matters”. Assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates quoted
by the People’s Bank of China at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates
in effect during the periods.
Taxation
The Company follows
the provisions of ASC 740-10, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, which addresses the determination of whether tax benefits
claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC 740-10, the Company
recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained
on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial
statements from such a position would be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood
of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740-10 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties
on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
The implementation of ASC 740-10 resulted
in no material liability for unrecognized tax benefits and no material change to the beginning retained earnings of the Company.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the Statement
of Operations. We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with US GAAP. Deferred taxes, if any, are
recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the consolidated financial statements. We may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is
more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits
of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position would be measured based on the largest
benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
2017 Trends
China’s economy is declining due to the growing foreign
debt, declining factory activity and devaluation in foreign exchange reserves, which has prolonged negative impact on the shipping
industry. Although we expect China’s economy will have a soft landing, the difficult macroeconomic conditions in fiscal year
2016 will likely continue into fiscal year 2017. On the other hand, recent US economic data paints a picture of an economy in strong
recovery mode and
consumer spending is likely to receive
a positive bounce from low energy prices
. The economy outlook has led us to believe we must continue to diversify our service
platform; reduce our dependency on businesses generated from China; and develop US-based complementary shipping logistics services
to create a new driver to stimulate the development for our business. Furthermore, in the age of “Internet Plus”, we
believe information and communication technologies can be adopted to traditional industries to meet the current challenges of supply
and demand. We will continue to foster strong relationships with our strategic partners and draw upon our technical ability and
in-depth industry knowledge to develop innovative value-added logistic solutions for our customers in the fiscal year 2017.
Results of Operations
Year Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Year Ended June 30,
2015
Revenues
. Total revenues
decreased by $4,010,088 or 35.4% from $11,320,628 for the year ended June 30, 2015 to $7,310,540 for the comparable period in 2016.
The decrease was mainly due to the declined revenues generated from our shipping agency services segment due to the decreased number
of ships served. In addition, due to termination of the vessel acquisition, revenue from our shipping and chartering service segment
was also limited.
|
·
|
Revenues from inland transportation management services decreased by $445,328 from $4,785,850 for the year ended June 30, 2015
to $4,340,522 for the year ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was mainly due to the reduced service orders from both Zhiyuan and
Tengda Northwest Ferroalloy Co., Ltd. because of the economic slowdown in China resulting in overall weak shipping demand.
|
|
·
|
For the year ended June 30, 2016, we recognized revenues
of $2,507,800 from our shipping agency services, as compared to $5,995,565 for the year ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was
mainly due to reduced market demand for imported iron ore because of an across-the-board slowdown in China economy and decreased
manufacturing activities. The number of ships that we served decreased from 125 to 19 for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2016,
respectively.
|
|
·
|
Revenues from ship management service was $nil for the year ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $190,088 for the corresponding
period in 2015. Given the difficult economy situation in China, the Company decided to temporarily suspend the ship management
services because of the increased concern over timely collecting accounts receivable and possible payment default.
|
|
·
|
For the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company generated
revenues of $462,218 from the time charter agreements in connection with the proposed vessel acquisition, as compared to the revenues
of $349,125 for the same period in 2015. As the Company terminated the vessel acquisition on December 7, 2015, we temporarily
suspended this service and no revenue was generated from shipping and chartering services since then.
|
Total Operating Costs and Expenses
.
Total operating costs and expenses decreased by $1,744,064 or 16.9% from $10,303,831 for the year ended June 30, 2015 to $8,559,767
for the year ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in cost of revenues, partially offset by the
increase in selling expenses, as discussed below.
|
·
|
Costs of Revenues.
The cost of revenues decreased by $2,198,294 or 37.0% from $5,936,283
for the year ended June 30, 2015 to $3,737,989 for the year ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in our cost of revenues was mainly
due to significantly decreased revenues from our shipping agency services, which has higher percentage of cost of revenues. In
2016, we only served 19 ships as compared to 125 ships in 2015, and we reported reduced labor costs and port charges associated
with the revenue decrease in this segment.
|
|
·
|
General and Administrative Expenses
.
The general and administrative expenses increased
by $41,830 or 1.0% from $4,304,329 for the year ended June 30, 2015 to $4,346,159 for the year ended June 30, 2016. This increase
was mainly due to the increase in allowance accrued for doubtful accounts caused by the change of accrued bad debts recognition
policy, stock-based compensation; professional service fees incurred in connection with our securities registration activities,
partially offset by decrease in travelling charges and office expenses.
|
|
·
|
Selling Expenses
.
The selling expenses increased by $412,400 or 652.3% from $63,219 for the year ended June 30,
2015 to $475,619 for the year ended June 30, 2016. During the year ended June 30, 2016, we made more efforts on business development to
explore new business opportunities while maintaining our current customer relationship. On the other hand, the rising labor costs
also increased our overall selling expense as compared to fiscal year 2015. These factors led to the increase in our selling expense
for the year ended June 30, 2016.
|
Operating Income (Loss)
.
The
Company had an operating loss of $1,249,227 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to an operating income of $1,016,797 for
fiscal year 2015. The operating loss was mainly due to the declined revenues generated from shipping agency services and the increased
selling expenses as discussed above.
Financial Income (Expense), Net
.
The
Company’s net financial expense was $247,530 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to net financial income of $14,200
for the year ended June 30, 2015. We have operations in the US, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong and China. Our financial expense for
each reporting period mainly reflected the effect of depreciation/appreciation of foreign currencies in terms of USD.
Taxation
.
The income
tax expense was $812,593 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to income tax expense of $427,221 for the year ended June 30,
2015. The increase in income tax expense was due to increased taxable income from our inland transportation management segment,
in which we accrued 15% income tax expense based on China statutory income tax rate. On the other hand, due to the termination
of the proposed vessel acquisition in December 2015, the Company reassessed the possibility of utilization of previously accrued
deferred tax assets and provided 100% valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of $280,600. As a result of the above,
total income tax expense for the year ended June 30, 2016 was $812,593.
Net Income (Loss)
.
As
a result of the foregoing, the Company had net loss of $2,301,522 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to net income of $643,922
for the year ended June 30, 2015. After deduction of non-controlling interest, net loss attributable to Sino-Global was $1,965,929
for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to net income of $717,390 for the year ended June 30, 2015. With comprehensive income
(loss) from foreign currency translation, comprehensive loss attributable to the Company was $2,338,268 for the year ended June
30, 2016, compared to comprehensive income of $784,204 for the year ended June 30, 2015.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows and Working Capital
As of June 30, 2016, we had $1,385,994 in cash and cash equivalents.
We had approximately 3.2% of our cash in banks located in New York, Los Angeles, Canada, Australia and Hong Kong and had approximately
96.8% of cash in banks located in China.
The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for
the periods indicated:
|
|
For the years ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(121,048
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,798,098
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
$
|
294,376
|
|
|
$
|
593,929
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
$
|
646,589
|
|
|
$
|
967,820
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
655,672
|
|
|
$
|
(172,209
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year
|
|
$
|
730,322
|
|
|
$
|
902,531
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year
|
|
$
|
1,385,994
|
|
|
$
|
730,322
|
|
The following table sets forth a summary of our working capital:
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
June 30, 2015
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
$
|
8,651,985
|
|
|
$
|
8,105,688
|
|
|
$
|
546,297
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,437,382
|
|
|
$
|
1,914,044
|
|
|
$
|
523,338
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
Working Capital
|
|
$
|
6,214,603
|
|
|
$
|
6,191,644
|
|
|
$
|
22,959
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Current Ratio
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
|
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)%
|
We finance our ongoing operating activities
primarily by using funds from our operations. We routinely monitor current and expected operational requirements to evaluate the
use of available funding sources. As reflected in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, the Company had
a net loss for the year ended June 30, 2016. The Company terminated the vessel acquisition agreement in December 2015, which also
reduced the Company’s revenue source from the shipping and chartering service segment in the future.
In assessing its liquidity, management
monitors and analyzes the Company’s cash on-hand, its ability to generate sufficient revenue source in the future and its
operating and capital expenditure commitments. The Company plans to fund continuing operations through identifying new prospective
joint venture and strategic alliance opportunities for new revenue sources, and reducing
costs to improve profitability and replenish working capital. Considering our existing working capital position and our ability
to access other funding sources, management believes that the foregoing measures collectively will provide sufficient liquidity
for the Company to meet its future liquidity and capital obligations.
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was
$121,048 for the year ended June 30, 2016, which included our operating loss of $2.30 million due to our decreased revenue in the
shipping agency service segment and increased selling expenses. In addition, the advances to suppliers increased by $2.14 million
because we prepaid freight fees of RMB 14.58 million (USD$2.2 million) based on our Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”)
with Singapore Metals & Minerals Pte Ltd. (“the Buyer”) and Galasi Jernsih Sdn BHD (“the Seller”),
the accounts receivable decreased by $0.62 million because we strengthened our cash collection efforts and received payment of
RMB 13.4 million (USD$2.0 million) from Tengda Northwest, our major third-party customer of inland transportation services, and
due from related parties decreased by $1.16 million because we collected RMB22.2 million (USD$3.3 million) from our related party
customer, Zhiyuan. The Company’s cash outflows from operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2016 reflected the above
mentioned factors.
Net cash used in operating activities was
$1,798,098 for the year ended June 30, 2015, which included our net income of $0.64 million, offset by an increase in accounts
receivable of $2.63 million because we provided inland transportation services to customer and has not collected the amount as
of June 30, 2015 and an increase in due from related parties of $724,425. Our cash outflows from the operating activities for the
year ended June 30, 2015 reflected the above factors.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities
was $294,376 compared to $593,929 for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The amount was mainly generated by
cash collection from the termination of the vessel acquisition of $326,035 during the year ended June 30, 2016, compared with the collection
of a short-term loan from the related party Zhiyuan of $1,113,599 and installment payments related to the vessel acquisition of
$516,229 during the year ended June 30, 2015.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
was $646,589 for the year ended June 30, 2016, of which $691,600 resulted from the proceeds from the issuance of common stock to
Mr. Weixiong Yang in a private sale transaction on July 10, 2015. During the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company repurchased
50,306 common shares and recorded as treasury stock, with a payment of $45,011. Net cash provided by financing activities was $967,820
for the year ended June 30, 2015, due to the net proceeds from the issuance of 647,000 shares of common stock in July 2014.
Company Structure
We conduct our operations primarily through
our subsidiaries, Trans Pacific Beijing, Sino-Global Shipping LA and Sino-Global Shipping Hong Kong. As a result, our ability to
pay dividends and to finance any debt we may incur depends upon dividends paid by our subsidiaries and management fees paid by
Sino-China. If our subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing their debt may restrict
their ability to pay dividends to us. In addition, Trans Pacific is permitted to pay dividends to us only out of its retained earnings,
if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Under PRC law, wholly foreign-owned enterprises
like Trans Pacific are required to set aside at least 10% of their after-tax profit each year to fund a statutory reserve until
the amount of the reserve reaches 50% of such entity’s registered capital.
To the extent Trans Pacific does not generate
sufficient after-tax profits to fund this statutory reserve, its ability to pay dividends to us may be limited. Although these
statutory reserves can be used, among other ways, to increase the registered capital and eliminate future losses in excess of retained
earnings of the respective companies, these reserve funds are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of a solvent
liquidation of the companies. Other than as described in the previous sentences, China’s State Administration of Foreign
Exchange (“SAFE”) has approved the company structure between the Company and Trans Pacific, and Trans Pacific is permitted
to pay dividends to our company.
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments and Arrangements
We have not entered into any financial
guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative
contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as shareholders’ equity or that are not reflected in our condensed
consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity that serve as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest
in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging
or research and development services with us.
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
Not applicable.
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
The Company’s financial statements and the related notes,
together with the report of Friedman LLP, are set forth following the signature pages of this report.
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.
|
None.
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act
(15 U.S.C. 78a
et seq.
) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's
rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated
to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of June 30, 2016, the Company carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including our Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our company’s disclosure
controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer concluded that
our Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934) were effective in timely alerting them to information required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC
filings.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
There were no changes in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the three
months ended June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that:
|
·
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the Company’s assets;
|
|
·
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, and that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization
of its management and directors; and
|
|
·
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
The Company’s management assessed
the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016. In making this assessment, management used
the
2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the “2013 COSO Framework”). The 2013 COSO Framework outlines the 17 underlying principles and the following fundamental
components of a company’s internal control:(i) control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities,
(iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring. Based on this assessment, the Company’s management believes
that, as of June 30, 2016, its internal control over financing reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The Company is not required to have its
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016 audited by its auditors because it is a smaller reporting company.
Item 9B.
|
Other Information.
|
None.
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS
Founded in the United
States (“US”) in 2001, Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd. (“Sino-Global” or the “Company”)
is a non-asset based global shipping and freight logistic integrated solution provider. The Company provides tailored solutions
and value added services to its customers to drive effectiveness and control in related links throughout the entire shipping and
freight logistic chain. The Company conducts its business primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries in the U.S., China (including
Hong Kong), Australia and Canada. Currently, a significant portion of the Company’s business is generated from the clients
located in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”), and its operations are currently primarily conducted in
the PRC.
The Company’s subsidiary
in China, Trans Pacific Shipping Limited (“Trans Pacific Beijing”), a wholly owned foreign enterprise, invested in
one 90%-owned subsidiary, Trans Pacific Logistics Shanghai Limited (“Trans Pacific Shanghai”). Trans Pacific Beijing
and Trans Pacific Shanghai are referred to collectively as “Trans Pacific”). As PRC laws and regulations restrict foreign
ownership of local shipping agency service businesses, the Company provided its shipping agency services in the PRC through Sino-Global
Shipping Agency Ltd. (“Sino-China” or “VIE”), a Chinese legal entity, which holds the licenses and permits
necessary to operate local shipping agency services in the PRC. Trans Pacific Beijing and Sino-China do not have a parent-subsidiary
relationship. Trans Pacific Beijing has contractual arrangements with Sino-China and its shareholders that enable the Company to
substantially control Sino-China. Through Sino-China, the Company has the ability to provide local shipping agency services in
all commercial ports in the PRC. During fiscal year 2014, the Company completed a number of cost reduction initiatives and reorganized
its shipping agency business in the PRC to improve its operating margin. In light of the Company’s decision not to pursue
the local shipping agency business and as a result of the business reorganization efforts since approximately June 30, 2014, the
Company no longer provides shipping agency services through its VIE structure and has not undertaken any business through or with
Sino-China as of June 30, 2016 since approximately June 2014.
The Company’s shipping
agency business is operated by its subsidiaries in China (including Hong Kong). The Company’s ship management services are
operated by its subsidiary in Hong Kong. The Company’s shipping and chartering services are operated by its company in the
US and subsidiaries in Hong Kong. The Company’s inland transportation management services are operated by its subsidiary
in China and US. In the fiscal year of 2016, affected by the worsening market conditions in the shipping industry, the Company’s
shipping agency business segment suffered a significant decrease due to reduced number of ships served. In addition, in December
2015, the Company temporarily suspended its shipping and chartering services primarily as a result of the termination of its previously
contemplated vessel acquisition. As of June 30, 2016, the Company’s current service offerings consist of shipping agency
services and inland transportation management services.
In January 2016, the Company
formed a new subsidiary, Sino-Global Shipping LA Inc. (“Sino LA”), for the purpose of expanding its business to provide
inland transportation services to importers who ship goods into the U.S. The Company expects to generate increased revenue from
this new service platform in the near future.
Note 2. LIQUIDITY
As reflected in the Company’s
consolidated financial statements, the Company had a net loss for the year ended June 30, 2016. Revenue from the Company’s
shipping agency service business segment was in a decreasing trend due to higher overhead costs and a decreased number of ships
served. In addition, the Company terminated the vessel acquisition agreement in late 2015, which also reduced the Company’s
revenue source from the shipping and chartering service segment for the remaining period of fiscal year 2016.
In assessing its liquidity,
management monitors and analyzes the Company’s cash on-hand, its ability to generate sufficient revenue sources in the future
and its operating and capital expenditure commitments. The Company plans to fund continuing operations through identifying new
prospective joint venture and strategic alliance opportunities for new revenue sources and reducing costs to improve profitability
and replenish working capital.
Management believes that
the foregoing measures collectively will provide sufficient liquidity for the Company to meet its future liquidity and capital
obligations.
Note 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(a) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“US GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all directly, indirectly owned subsidiaries
and variable interest entity. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year
balances were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications have no material impact on the
previously reported financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
(b) Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company, its subsidiaries, and its affiliates. All significant intercompany transactions
and balances are eliminated in consolidation. Sino-China is considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and the
Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company through Trans Pacific Beijing entered into agreements with Sino-China, pursuant
to which the Company receives 90% of Sino-China’s net income. The Company does not receive any payment from Sino-China unless
Sino-China recognizes net income during its fiscal year. These agreements do not entitle the Company to any consideration if Sino-China
incurs a net loss during its fiscal year. If Sino-China incurs a net loss during its fiscal year, the Company is not required to
absorb such net loss.
As a VIE, Sino-China’s
revenues are included in the Company’s total revenues, and its loss from operations is consolidated with that of the Company.
Because of the contractual arrangements, the Company had a pecuniary interest in Sino-China that requires consolidation of the
financial statements of the Company and Sino-China.
The Company has consolidated
Sino-China’s operating results because the entities are under common control in accordance with ASC 805-10, “Business
Combinations”. The agency relationship between the Company and Sino-China and its branches is governed by a series of contractual
arrangements pursuant to which the Company has substantial control over Sino-China. Management makes ongoing reassessments of whether
the Company is the primary beneficiary of Sino-China.
The carrying amount and
classification of Sino-China's assets and liabilities included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
31,128
|
|
|
$
|
59,069
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
129,463
|
|
|
|
189,499
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
7,222
|
|
|
|
19,732
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,222
|
|
|
|
19,732
|
|
(c) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We follow the provisions
of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring
fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1 —
Observable inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement
date.
Level 2 —
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs
derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 —
Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s assumptions based on the best available information.
The carrying value of
accounts receivable, other receivables, other current assets, and current liabilities approximate their fair values because of
the short-term nature of these instruments.
(d) Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of the
consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates are adjusted to reflect
actual experience when necessary. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
include revenue recognition, fair value of stock options, cost of revenues, allowance for doubtful accounts, deferred income taxes,
and the useful lives of property and equipment.
Since the use of estimates
is an integral component of the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.
(e) Translation of Foreign Currency
The accounts of the Company
and its subsidiaries, including Sino-China and each of its branches are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment
in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”). The Company’s functional currency is the US dollar
(“USD”) while its subsidiaries in China, including Sino-China reports its financial position and results of operations
in Renminbi (“RMB”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in US dollars. Foreign currency
transactions are translated into USD using fixed exchange rates in effect at the time of the transaction. Generally foreign exchange
gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company translates foreign currency financial statements of Sino-China, Sino-Global Shipping Australia, Sino-Global Shipping
Hong Kong, Sino-Global Shipping Canada and Trans Pacific Beijing in accordance with ASC 830-10, “Foreign Currency Matters”.
Assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates quoted by the People’s Bank of China at the balance sheet
dates and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the year. Resulting translation adjustments
are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss) and accumulated as a separate component of equity of the Company and also included
in non-controlling interest.
The exchange rates for the
years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Foreign currency
|
|
Balance
Sheet
|
|
|
Profits/Loss
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet
|
|
|
Profits/Loss
|
|
1RMB: USD
|
|
|
6.6487
|
|
|
|
6.4416
|
|
|
|
6.1988
|
|
|
|
6.1877
|
|
1AUD:USD
|
|
|
1.3433
|
|
|
|
1.3755
|
|
|
|
1.2986
|
|
|
|
1.2027
|
|
1HKD:USD
|
|
|
7.7595
|
|
|
|
7.7594
|
|
|
|
7.7520
|
|
|
|
7.7537
|
|
1CAD:USD
|
|
|
1.2992
|
|
|
|
1.3266
|
|
|
|
1.2475
|
|
|
|
1.1740
|
|
(f) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents
consist of cash on hand, and other highly liquid investments which are unrestricted as to withdrawal or use, and which have maturities
of three months or less when purchased. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with various financial institutions mainly
in the PRC, Australia, Hong Kong and the United States. As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, cash balances of $1,333,713 and $65,191,
respectively, were maintained at financial institutions in the PRC, and are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
or other programs.
(g) Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are
presented at net realizable value. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses. The Company reviews
the accounts receivable on a periodic basis and makes general and specific allowances when there is doubt as to the collectability
of individual receivable balances. In evaluating the collectability of individual receivable balances, the Company considers many
factors, including the age of the balances, customers’ historical payment history, their current credit-worthiness and current
economic trends. Receivables are considered past due after 365 days. Accounts Receivable is written off against the allowance after
exhaustive efforts at collection.
(h) Property and Equipment, net
Net property and equipment
are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Historical cost comprises its purchase price and any directly attributable
costs of bringing the assets to its working condition and location for its intended use. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line
basis over the following estimated useful lives:
Buildings
|
20 years
|
Motor vehicles
|
5-10 years
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
3-5 years
|
The carrying value of a
long-lived asset is considered impaired by the Company when the anticipated undiscounted cash flows from such asset is less than
its carrying value. If impairment is identified, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the
fair value of the long-lived asset. Fair value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate
with the risk involved or based on independent appraisals. Management has determined that there were no impairments at the balance
sheet dates.
(i) Revenue Recognition
|
●
|
Revenues from shipping agency services are recognized upon completion of services, which coincides with the date of departure
of the relevant vessel from port. Advance payments and deposits received from customers prior to the provision of services and
recognition of the related revenues are presented as advances from customers.
|
|
●
|
Revenues from shipping and chartering services are recognized upon performance of services as stipulated in the underlying
contract.
|
|
●
|
Revenues from inland transportation management services are recognized when commodities are being released from the customer’s
warehouse.
|
|
●
|
Revenues from ship management services were recognized when the related contractual services have
been rendered.
|
(j) Taxation
Because the Company and
its subsidiaries and Sino-China are incorporated in different jurisdictions, they file separate income tax returns. The Company
uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US
GAAP”). Deferred taxes, if any, are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis
of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. A valuation allowance is provided
against deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the asset will not be utilized in the future.
The Company recognizes
the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination
by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any,
related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. The Company had no uncertain tax positions as of June 30, 2016 and
2015, respectively.
Income tax returns for
the years prior to 2013 are no longer subject to examination by US tax authorities.
PRC Enterprise Income Tax
PRC enterprise income
tax is calculated based on taxable income determined under the PRC Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“PRC GAAP”)
at 25%. Sino-China and Trans Pacific are registered in PRC and governed by the Enterprise Income Tax Laws of the PRC.
PRC Business Tax and Surcharges
Revenues from services
provided by the Company’s PRC subsidiaries and affiliates, including Sino-China and Trans Pacific are subject to the PRC
business tax of 5%. Business tax and surcharges are paid on gross revenues generated from shipping agency services minus the costs
of services which are paid on behalf of the customers.
In addition, under the
PRC regulations, the Company’s PRC subsidiaries and affiliates are required to pay the city construction tax (7%) and education
surcharges (3%) based on the calculated business tax payments.
The Company’s PRC
subsidiaries and affiliates report revenues net of PRC’s business tax and surcharges for all the periods presented in the
consolidated statements of operations.
(k) Earnings (deficit) per Share
Basic earnings (deficit)
per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to holders of common shares by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted earnings (deficit) per share reflect the potential dilution that
could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares. Common share
equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share if their effects would be anti-dilutive.
The effect of 66,000 stock
options and 139,032 warrants for all periods presented were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because they would be
anti-dilutive as the exercise prices for such options and warrants were at least equal to the closing price of our common stock
on June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(l) Comprehensive Income (loss)
The Company reports comprehensive
income (loss) in accordance with the FASB issued authoritative guidance which establishes standards for reporting comprehensive
income (loss) and its component in financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss), as defined, includes all changes in equity
during a period from non-owner sources
.
(m) Stock-based Compensation
Valuations are based upon
highly subjective assumptions about the future, including stock price volatility and exercise patterns. The fair value of share-based
payment awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility
of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee terminations. The expected
term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for
periods within the expected life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.
(n) Risks and Uncertainties
The Company’s business,
financial position and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic, and legal environments in the PRC, as
well as by the general state of the PRC economy. The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to special considerations
and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated
with, among others, the political, economic and legal environment and foreign currency exchange. The Company’s results may
be adversely affected by changes in the political, regulatory and social conditions in the PRC, and by changes in governmental
policies or interpretations with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion, remittances
abroad, and rates and methods of taxation, among other things. Moreover, the Company’s ability to grow its business and maintain
its profitability could be negatively affected by the nature and extent of services provided to its major customer, Tianjin Zhi
Yuan Investment Group Co., Ltd. (the “Zhiyuan Investment Group”).
(o) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2016, the FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition
and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The new guidance is intended to improve the recognition and
measurement of financial instruments. The new guidance makes targeted improvements to existing U.S. GAAP by: (1) Requiring equity
investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee)
to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Requiring public business entities to use the
exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (2) Requiring separate presentation
of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and
receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; (3) Eliminating the requirement for public
business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be
disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; and (4) Requiring a reporting organization
to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting
from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk (also referred to as “own credit”) when the organization has elected
to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. The new guidance is
effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. The Company does not expect this update will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
In February 2016, the FASB
issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which supersedes the existing guidance for lease accounting, Leases (Topic
840). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize leases on their balance sheets, and leaves lessor accounting largely unchanged.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Early application is permitted for all entities. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective approach for all leases existing
at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to elect to use certain transition relief. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-07, “Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying
the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting.” The amendments affect all entities that have an investment that becomes
qualified for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence.
The amendments eliminate the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase
in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained
earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the
investment had been held. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest
in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting
as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method
of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. The amendments require that an entity that has an available-for-sale
equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain
or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The
amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December
15, 2016. The amendments should be applied prospectively upon their effective date to increases in the level of ownership interest
or degree of influence that result in the adoption of the equity method. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2016, the FASB
released ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.”
The ASU includes multiple provisions intended to simplify various aspects of the accounting for share-based payments. While aimed
at reducing the cost and complexity of the accounting for share-based payments, the amendments are expected to significantly impact
net income, EPS, and the statement of cash flows. Implementation and administration may present challenges for companies with significant
share-based payment activities. The ASU is effective for public companies in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016,
and interim periods within those years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its consolidated
financial statements.
In April 2016, FASB issued
Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations
and Licensing.” The amendments clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: (a) identifying performance obligations; and
(b) the licensing implementation guidance. The amendments do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. The effective
date and transition requirements for the amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606.
Public entities should apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting
periods therein (i.e., January 1, 2018, for a calendar year entity). Early application for public entities is permitted only as
of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2016, the FASB issued
ASU 2016-11, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because
of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting”, The
amendments rescinds SEC paragraphs pursuant to two SEC Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
meeting. Specifically, registrants should not rely on the following SEC Staff Observer comments upon adoption of Topic 606: 1)
Revenue and Expense Recognition for Freight Services in Process, which is codified in paragraph 605-20-S99-2; 2) Accounting for
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs, which is codified in paragraph 605-45-S99-1; 3) Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor
to a Customer (including Reseller of the Vendor's Products), which is codified in paragraph 605-50-S99-1; 4) Accounting for Gas-Balancing
Arrangements (i.e., use of the "entitlements method"), which is codified in paragraph 932-10-S99-5, which is effective
upon adoption of ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2016, the FASB issued
ASU 2016-12, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients".
The amendments, among other things: (1) clarify the objective of the collectability criterion for applying paragraph 606-10-25-7;
(2) permit an entity to exclude amounts collected from customers for all sales (and other similar) taxes from the transaction price;
(3) specify that the measurement date for noncash consideration is contract inception; (4) provide a practical expedient that permits
an entity to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications that occur before the beginning of the earliest period presented
when identifying the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, determining the transaction price, and allocating the transaction
price to the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations; (5) clarify that a completed contract for purposes of transition
is a contract for which all (or substantially all) of the revenue was recognized under legacy GAAP before the date of initial application,
and (6) clarify that an entity that retrospectively applies the guidance in Topic 606 to each prior reporting period is not required
to disclose the effect of the accounting change for the period of adoption. The effective date of these amendments is at the same
date that Topic 606 is effective. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial
statements.
In August 2016, the FASB
has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash
Receipts and Cash Payments,
to address diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified
in the statement of cash flows. The amendments provide guidance on the following eight specific cash flow issues: (1) Debt Prepayment
or Debt Extinguishment Costs; (2) Settlement of Zero-Coupon Debt Instruments or Other Debt Instruments with Coupon Interest Rates
That Are Insignificant in Relation to the Effective Interest Rate of the Borrowing; (3) Contingent Consideration Payments Made
after a Business Combination; (4)Proceeds from the Settlement of Insurance Claims; (5) Proceeds from the Settlement of Corporate-Owned
Life Insurance Policies, including Bank-Owned; (6) Life Insurance Policies; (7) Distributions Received from Equity Method Investees;
(8) Beneficial Interests in Securitization Transactions; and Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance
Principle. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption
in an interim period. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If it
is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, the amendments for those issues would be applied
prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its consolidated
financial statements and related disclosures.
Note 4. ADVANCES TO SUPPLIERS
The Company’s advances
to suppliers are as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sainuo Investment Management Ltd (a)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
48,396
|
|
Freight fees (b)
|
|
|
2,192,910
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Others
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,192,910
|
|
|
$
|
50,975
|
|
(a) On November 3, 2014,
the Company entered into an advisory service agreement with Sainuo Investment Management Ltd. (“Sainuo”) whereby Sainuo,
a professional services firm based in the PRC specializing in mergers and acquisitions, business restructuring and appraisal, had
been engaged to assist the Company in the identification of suitable acquisition candidates, performance of required due diligence
and other business advisory services. Pursuant to the service agreement, Sainuo is entitled to a service fee (which amount is calculated
based on 8% of the value of the acquisition but not to exceed RMB 3.5 million). On November 24, 2014, the Company advanced RMB3.5
million to Sainuo in accordance with the service agreement, including RMB 300,000 (US $45,122) as its advance to Sainuo for the
completion of the agreed-upon advisory services, in addition to the offer of the 1.2 million shares issued to the Vessel Seller
in connection with the Company’s decision to acquire Rong Zhou (see note 10), a small oil/chemical product tanker identified
by Sainuo as an acquisition candidate (the “Vessel Acquisition”). Sainuo, Rong Yao International Shipping Limited,
a Hong Kong company (the “Vessel Seller”) and Sino-Global executed an agreement on April 22, 2015 whereby Sainuo shall
collect a service fee of RMB300,000 from the Company and remit RMB3.2 million to the Vessel Seller as Sino-Global’s partial
payment of the Vessel purchase price.
On December 7, 2015, the
Company and the Vessel Seller entered into a supplemental agreement to terminate the proposed Vessel Acquisition. Accordingly,
the advance payment of RMB 300,000 to Sainuo for advisory services was recognized as consulting service charges and reflected in
the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended June 30, 2016.
(b) On June 10, 2016, the
Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with Singapore Metals & Minerals Pte Ltd. (the “Buyer”)
and Galasi Jernsih Sdn BHD (the “Seller”), whereby the Buyer will be the bauxite purchaser for the 3,000,000 MT/year,
subject to the results of the tests satisfying the Buyer’s requirements. Both the Buyer and the Seller agree that the Company
shall be appointed as general agent to handle logistics and transportation including ocean shipping and inland transportation for
both sides, and all door to door transportation services for the shipping of the bauxite to be sold by the Seller and to be purchased
by the Buyer as referenced in this MOU. On the same day, the Company signed a supplementary agreement with the Buyer, which states
the Company should assist the Buyer in handling transportation service from the source mine to dock to help the Buyer to fulfill
the delivery favorably and close the deal smoothly. The Company agrees to make advance payment for freight charges on behalf of
the Buyer. As of June 30, 2016, the ending balance of this prepayment was $2,192,910. In late August 2016, the Company collected
approximately $1.5 million such prepaid freight charges from the Buyer.
Note 5. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET
The Company’s net
accounts receivable is as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
2,540,052
|
|
|
$
|
3,559,459
|
|
Less: allowances for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(207,028
|
)
|
|
|
(477,240
|
)
|
Accounts receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,333,024
|
|
|
$
|
3,082,219
|
|
For the year ended June 30, 2016, $365,622 of accounts receivable
were directly written off against previously allowed for doubtful accounts. There was no such write-off for the year ended June
30, 2015.
Note 6. OTHER RECEIVABLES
Other receivables represent mainly prepaid employee
insurance and welfare benefits, which will be subsequently deducted from the employee payroll, guarantee deposits on behalf of
ship owners as well as office lease deposits with the landlords.
Note 7. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT
ASSETS
The Company’s prepaid
expenses and other current assets are as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consultant fees (1)
|
|
$
|
845,420
|
|
|
$
|
1,375,681
|
|
Advance to employees
|
|
|
105,137
|
|
|
|
166,772
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
77,584
|
|
Other
|
|
|
55,056
|
|
|
|
81,923
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,005,613
|
|
|
|
1,701,960
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
826,631
|
|
|
|
1,265,609
|
|
Total noncurrent portion
|
|
$
|
178,982
|
|
|
$
|
436,351
|
|
(1): The Company entered
into management consulting and advisory services agreements with two consultants on June 6, 2014, pursuant to which the consultants
should assist the Company in, among other things, financial and tax due diligence, business evaluation and integration, and development
of pro forma financial statements. In return for their services, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, a total
of 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued to these two consultants. During June 2014, a total of 200,000
shares of the Company’s common stock were issued to the consultants as a prepayment for their services. The value of their
consulting services was determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock of $2.34 per share when the shares
were issued to the consultants. The remaining 400,000 shares of the Company's common stock were then issued to the consultants
on August 29, 2014 at $1.68 per share. Their service agreements are for the period from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016.
In addition, on May 5, 2015,
the Company entered into management consulting and advisory services agreements with three consultants, pursuant to which the consultants
should assist the Company in, among other things, review of time charter agreements; crew management advisory; development of permanent
and preventive maintenance standards related to dry dockings and ship repairs; development of regular technical and marine vessel
inspections and quality control procedures; and development and implementation of alternative remedial actions to address any technical
problems that may arise. In return for their services, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, a total of 500,000
shares of the Company’s common stock were to be issued to these three consultants. Their service agreements are for a period
of 18 months, effective May 2015. The related consulting fees will be ratably charged to expense over the term of the agreements.
The value of their consulting services was determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock of $1.50 per share
when the shares were issued to the consultants.
The Company entered into
management consulting services agreement with a consulting company on November 12, 2015, pursuant to which the consulting company
should assist the Company for regulatory filings during the period from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018. In return for their services,
as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, a total of RMB 2,100,000 ($315,851) was prepaid to this consulting company.
On December 9, 2015, the
Company entered into a consulting and advisory services agreement with a consultant, pursuant to which the consultant will assist
the Company for corporate restructuring, business evaluation and capitalization during the period from November 20, 2015 to November
19, 2016. In return for such services, the Company issued 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to this consultant
for services to be rendered during the first half of the service period. Such shares were issued as restricted shares at $1.02
per share on December 9, 2015. On May 23, 2016, the Company issued additional 250,000 shares of common stock to this consultant
at $0.72 per share to cover the services from the seventh month to November 19, 2016 (see Note 12).
The above mentioned consulting
fees have been and will be ratably charged to expense over the terms of the above mentioned agreements.
Note 8. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities represent mainly payroll and welfare payable, accrued expenses and other miscellaneous items.
Note 9. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
The Company’s net
property and equipment as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and building
|
|
$
|
202,450
|
|
|
$
|
217,144
|
|
Motor vehicles
|
|
|
497,006
|
|
|
|
534,825
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
156,890
|
|
|
|
146,739
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
59,899
|
|
|
|
62,745
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
164,701
|
|
|
|
156,085
|
|
System software
|
|
|
119,964
|
|
|
|
128,286
|
|
Leasehold improvement
|
|
|
64,105
|
|
|
|
68,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,265,015
|
|
|
|
1,314,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,088,648
|
|
|
|
1,100,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
176,367
|
|
|
$
|
214,003
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for the
years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were $59,508 and $165,088, respectively.
Note 10. OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS
The Company’s other
long-term assets are as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment payment related to Vessel acquisition
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,736,229
|
|
Rent deposit
|
|
|
46,810
|
|
|
|
37,679
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,810
|
|
|
$
|
2,773,908
|
|
On April 10, 2015, the Company
entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Rong Yao International Shipping Limited, a Hong Kong company (the “Vessel Seller”),
pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire, subject to a number of closing conditions, “Rong Zhou,” an 8,818 gross
tonnage oil/chemical transportation tanker (the “Vessel”) from the Vessel Seller; and in connection therewith, the
Company issued to the Vessel Seller 1.2 million shares of its restricted common stock representing $2,220,000 of the $10.5 million
purchase price for the Vessel. The Company and the Vessel Seller agreed that each of the 1.2 million shares issued to the Vessel
Seller was valued at $1.85 per share. In connection therewith, the Company filed a registration statement on April 15, 2015 covering
the offer of the 1.2 million shares issued to the Vessel Seller. In addition, the Company previously advanced RMB3.5 million to
third-party Sainuo for identification of a suitable acquisition candidate. In connection with a settlement agreement with Sainuo
as discussed in Note 4, Sainuo transferred RMB3.2 million to the Vessel Seller. As of June 30, 2015, total installment payment
for the Vessel of $2,736,229 was made up of the agreed-upon value of $2,220,000 related to the 1.2 million shares of Sino-Global’s
restricted common stock issued to the Vessel Seller and RMB 3.2 million (US $516,229) remitted by Sainuo to the Vessel Seller as
Sino-Global’s partial payment of the Vessel purchase price. Then the installment payment related to Vessel acquisition was
recognized as other long-term asset as at the end of the previous financial year.
In connection with the termination
of the Assets Purchase Agreement as discussed in Note 4, the Vessel Seller agreed to return the 1.2 million shares to the Company,
and in addition to refund approximately $330,000 in cash after all related charges, which has been accepted by both parties. The
Company received the cash of approximately $330,000 in December 2015 and the 1.2 million shares on May 23, 2016, and accordingly
there was no such deposit balance reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2016.
Note 11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
A summary of the options
is presented in the table below:
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
June 30, 2015
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.88
|
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.88
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Canceled, forfeited or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.88
|
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
$
|
7.19
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
7.37
|
|
Following is a summary of
the status of options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2016:
Outstanding Options
|
|
Exercisable Options
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
|
Average Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
2.0 years
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
2.0 years
|
$
|
2.01
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
1.6 years
|
|
$
|
2.01
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
1.6 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
The issuance of the options
is exempted from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”). The options will vest at a
rate of 20% per year, with 20% vesting initially when granted. The Common Stock underlying the Options granted may be sold in compliance
with Rule 144 under the Act. The term of the Options is 10 years and the exercise price of the 2013 options is $2.01 (10,000 options).
Each Option may be exercised to purchase one share of Common Stock. Payment for the Options may be made in cash or by exchanging
shares of Common Stock at their Fair Market Value. The Fair Market Value will be equal to the average of the highest and lowest
registered sales prices of Company Stock on the date of exercise.
The fair value of share-based
compensation was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The aggregate fair value of $3,880 and $7,760 at June
30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is presented as “Unearned Stock-based Compensation”. The Company amortized stock option
expenses of $3,880 and $3,880 for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In connection with the initial
public offering of the Company’s common stock on May 20, 2008, 139,032 warrants were issued to the underwriter as part of
their compensation. Each warrant has the right to purchase one share of common stock for an exercise price of $9.30 per share with
a term of 10 years.
Following is a summary of
the status of warrants outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2016:
Warrants Outstanding
|
|
|
Warrants Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
|
139,032
|
|
|
|
139,032
|
|
|
$
|
9.30
|
|
|
2.0 years
|
Note 12. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS
On June 27, 2014, the Company entered into
an Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with National Securities Corporation (the “Underwriter”)
relating to the registered offering of 572,000 shares of common stock, without par value per share. The price to the public in
the offering was $1.76 per share. Under the terms of the Underwriting Agreement, the Company also granted the Underwriter an option,
exercisable for 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 85,800 shares of common stock from the Company at the same price to cover
overallotments, if any. The Company closed the public offering on July 2, 2014 and the Underwriter purchased an additional 75,000
shares. The offering was made pursuant to our effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration Statement No. 333-194211)
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2014, as supplemented by an applicable prospectus supplement.
The total number of shares sold in the offering was 647,000. The Company received total cash proceeds of approximately $1 million
from this public offering.
The Company entered into management
consulting and advisory services agreements with two consultants on June 6, 2014, pursuant to which The consultants should
assist the Company in, among other things, financial and tax due diligence, business evaluation and integration, development
of pro forma financial statements. In return for their services, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, a
total of 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were to be issued to these two consultants. During June 2014, a
total of 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued to the consultants as a prepayment for their
services. The value of their consulting services was determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock of
$2.34 per share when the shares were issued to the consultants. The remaining 400,000 shares of the Company's common stock
were then issued to the consultants on August 29, 2014 at $1.68 per share. Their service agreements are for the period July
1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. The related consulting fees have been and will be ratably charged to expense over the term of
the agreements.
On August 22, 2014, the Company issued
50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be held in escrow to Mr. Deming Wang, in connection with the acquisition
of LSM (see Note 3, Acquisition of Longhe Ship Management Company). Pursuant to the satisfaction agreement executed in April
2015, Sino-Global released from escrow to Mr. Wang 20,000 shares of its common stock as full payment for the Company’s
acquisition of LSM. The remaining 30,000 shares that were previously issued but held in escrow were cancelled on June 10,
2015. On April 10, 2015, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Rong Yao International Shipping Limited, a
Hong Kong company (the “Vessel Seller”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire, subject to a number of
closing conditions, the “Rong Zhou,” an 8,818 gross tonnage oil/chemical transportation tanker (the
“Vessel”) from the Vessel Seller; and in connection therewith, the Company issued to the Vessel Seller 1.2
million shares of its restricted common stock. In connection with the termination of the Vessel Acquisition, the Seller
returned the stock certificate for 1.2 million shares to the Company during the year ended June 30, 2016 and the Company's
consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2016 has reflected the reduction of the 1.2 million shares (see Note 10).
On May 5, 2015, the Company entered into
management consulting and advisory services agreements with three consultants, pursuant to which the consultants should
assist the Company in, among other things, review of time charter agreements; crew management advisory; development of
permanent and preventive maintenance standards related to dry dockings and ship repairs; development of regular technical and
marine vessel inspections and quality control procedures; and development and implementation of alternative remedial actions
to address any technical problems that may arise. In return for their services, as approved by the Company’s Board of
Directors, a total of 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were to be issued to these three consultants. Their
service agreements are for a period of 18 months, effective May 2015. The related consulting fees will be ratably charged to
expense over the term of the agreements. The value of their consulting services was determined using the fair value of the
Company’s common stock of $1.50 per share when the shares were issued to the consultants.
On July 10, 2015, the Company sold 500,000
restricted shares of its common stock to Mr. Weixiong Yang in a private sale transaction. The aggregate offering price of the shares
was $691,600, which was paid in cash. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions. The sale of stock was completed pursuant
to an exemption from securities registration afforded by Section 4(a) (2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506
of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The shares were issued on July 13, 2015.
During the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company
issued an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an consultant for services rendered (see Note 7).
Pursuant
to the Company’s 2014 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Company is authorized to issue, in the aggregate, 10,000,000
shares of common stock or other securities convertible or exercisable for common stock. Effective February 11, 2016, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company granted 660,000 shares of common stock to seven directors and executive officers
under the Plan. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Plan and the plan stock award
agreements, these shares vested immediately, with a total value of $349,800, at $0.53 per share based on the Company’s stock
price on February 10, 2016. In addition, the Compensation Committee authorized the grant of a total of $300,000 worth of share
awards under the Plan and/or the 2008 Equity Stock Incentive Plan for each fiscal year going forward to its directors and
executive officers in the same proportion as they were granted for the fiscal year 2016, as long as such a director or executive
officer is in his position and fulfills his duty
.
Note 13. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
The Company’s non-controlling
interest consists of the following:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sino-China:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original paid-in capital
|
|
$
|
356,400
|
|
|
$
|
356,400
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(67,640
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(5,192,191
|
)
|
|
|
(5,018,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,834,747
|
)
|
|
|
(4,728,884
|
)
|
Trans Pacific Logistics Shanghai Ltd.
|
|
|
27,400
|
|
|
|
18,946
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(4,807,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,709,938
|
)
|
Note 14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCY
Lease Obligations
The Company leases certain
office premises and apartments for employees under operating leases through April 16, 2020. Future minimum lease payments under
operating lease agreements are as follows:
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve months ending June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
214,866
|
|
2018
|
|
|
137,576
|
|
2019
|
|
|
111,119
|
|
2020
|
|
|
48,597
|
|
|
|
$
|
512,158
|
|
Rent expense for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $243,374
and $205,838, respectively.
Legal proceedings
During the quarter ended
December 31, 2015, a former Vice President of the Company, Mr. Alexander
Chen, filed a complaint with the U.S. Department
of Labor-Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) against the Company and three current or former executives.
Mr. Chen is seeking $350,000 plus attorney’s fees for the alleged retaliation and a purported breach of his employment agreement.
The Company has responded to the complaint filed with OSHA, providing argument and information supporting the Company’s position
that no violation of law in connection with Chen’s employment. As of the date of this report, the complaint has not been
settled and the Company is unable to predict the outcome or impact of this pending legal proceeding.
Contingency
The Labor Contract Law of the PRC requires employers to insure the
liability of the severance payments if employees
are terminated and have been working for the employers for at least
two years prior to January 1, 2008. The employers will be liable for one month for severance pay for each year of the service provided
by the employees. As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company has estimated its severance payments of approximately $62,500 and $38,100,
respectively, which has not been reflected in its consolidated financial statements, because management cannot predict what the
actual payment, if any, will be in the future.
Note 15. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense for the
years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 varied from the amount computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income before taxes.
Reconciliations between the expected federal income tax rate using the federal statutory tax rate of 34% to the Company’s
effective tax rate are as follows:
|
|
For the years ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. statutory tax rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
U.S. permanent difference
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(105.9
|
)
|
|
|
(109.4
|
)
|
Rate differential in foreign jurisdiction
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
Total tax expense
|
|
|
(54.6
|
)
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
The U.S. temporary difference
was mainly comprised of unearned compensation amortization and provision for allowance for doubtful accounts.
The income tax (expense)
benefit for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
|
|
For the years ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
23,287
|
|
|
|
(23,963
|
)
|
China
|
|
|
(555,280
|
)
|
|
|
(519,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
(531,993
|
)
|
|
|
(543,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
(280,600
|
)
|
|
|
116,700
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(280,600
|
)
|
|
|
116,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(812,593
|
)
|
|
$
|
(427,221
|
)
|
The Company’s deferred
tax assets are comprised of the following:
|
|
For the years ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
248,000
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
735,000
|
|
|
|
382,000
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
3,752,000
|
|
|
|
2,176,000
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,552,000
|
|
|
|
2,806,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(4,552,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,525,400
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets, net - long-term
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
280,600
|
|
Our operations in the
U.S. have incurred a cumulative net operating loss of approximately $8,629,000 and $5,590,560, respectively, as of June 30, 2016
and 2015, which may reduce future taxable income. This carry-forward will expire if not utilized by 2036. As of June 30, 2016 and
2015, major components of our deferred tax assets included net operating loss of our U.S entities, stock-based compensation and
allowance for doubtful accounts.
The Company periodically
evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and reduces the carrying amount of the deferred tax assets
by a valuation allowance to the extent it believes a portion will not be realized. The Company considers many factors when assessing
the likelihood of future realization of the deferred tax assets, including its recent cumulative earnings experience, expectation
of future income, the carry forward periods available for tax reporting purposes, and other relevant factors. Due to the termination
of the proposed vessel acquisition in December 2015, management concluded that the chances for the Company’s U.S. entities
to be profitable in the foreseeable future became remote, and accordingly 100% of the deferred tax assets balance has been provided
a valuation allowance as of June 30, 2016 based on management’s estimate. The net increase in the valuation allowance for the year ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $2,026,600 and $1,050,300, respectively.
The Company’s taxes
payable consists of the following:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAT tax payable
|
|
$
|
475,066
|
|
|
$
|
296,935
|
|
Corporate income tax payable
|
|
|
1,100,380
|
|
|
|
664,132
|
|
Others
|
|
|
61,751
|
|
|
|
35,581
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,637,197
|
|
|
$
|
996,648
|
|
Note 16. CONCENTRATIONS
Major Customer
For the year ended June
30, 2016, two customers accounted for 31% and 27% of the Company’s revenues, respectively. At June 30, 2016, these two customers
accounted for 100% and approximately 70% of the Company’s due from related parties and accounts receivable, respectively.
For the year ended June
30, 2015, two customers accounted for approximately 23% and 20% of the Company’s revenues, respectively. At June 30, 2015,
these two customers accounted for approximately 94% and 71% of the Company’s due from related parties and accounts receivable,
respectively.
Major Suppliers
For the year ended June
30, 2016, three suppliers accounted for 27%, 15% and 10% of the total cost of revenues, respectively. For the year ended June 30,
2015, two suppliers accounted for 51% and 14% of the total cost of revenues, respectively.
Note 17. SEGMENT REPORTING
ASC 280, “Segment
Reporting,” establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments on a basis consistent with the Company's
internal organizational structure as well as information about geographical areas, business segments and major customers in financial
statements for details on the Company's business segments.
The Company's chief operating
decision maker has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer who reviews the financial information of separate operating segments
when making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the group. Based on management's assessment, the
Company has determined that it has three operating segments: shipping agency service, shipping and chartering services, and inland
transportation management services.
The following tables present
summary information by segment for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively:
|
|
For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Shipping Agency
and Ship
Management
Services
|
|
|
Shipping & Chartering
Services
|
|
|
Inland Transportation
Management Services
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
2,507,800
|
|
|
$
|
462,218
|
|
|
$
|
4,340,522
|
|
|
$
|
7,310,540
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
2,175,109
|
|
|
$
|
212,510
|
|
|
$
|
1,350,370
|
|
|
$
|
3,737,989
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
332,691
|
|
|
$
|
249,708
|
|
|
$
|
2,990,152
|
|
|
$
|
3,572,551
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
45,434
|
|
|
$
|
1,410
|
|
|
$
|
12,664
|
|
|
$
|
59,508
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
13,537
|
|
|
$
|
2,854
|
|
|
$
|
15,268
|
|
|
$
|
31,659
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,271,948
|
|
|
$
|
534,896
|
|
|
$
|
7,247,300
|
|
|
$
|
9,054,144
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended June 30, 2015
|
|
|
|
Shipping Agency
and Ship
Management
Services
|
|
|
Shipping & Chartering
Services
|
|
|
Inland Transportation
Management Services
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
6,185,653
|
|
|
$
|
349,125
|
|
|
$
|
4,785,850
|
|
|
$
|
11,320,628
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
4,998,030
|
|
|
$
|
182,650
|
|
|
$
|
755,603
|
|
|
$
|
5,936,283
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
1,187,623
|
|
|
$
|
166,475
|
|
|
$
|
4,030,247
|
|
|
$
|
5,384,345
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
154,000
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
10,912
|
|
|
$
|
165,088
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
84,102
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
84,102
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,961,011
|
|
|
$
|
130,915
|
|
|
$
|
6,718,624
|
|
|
$
|
11,810,550
|
|
Note 18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In June 2013, the Company
signed a five-year global logistic service agreement with TEWOO Chemical & Light Industry Zhiyuan Trade Co., Ltd. and TianJin
Zhi Yuan Investment Group Co., Ltd. (together, “Zhiyuan”). TianJin Zhi Yuan Investment Group Co., Ltd. (the “Zhiyuan
Investment Group”) is owned by Mr. Zhang, the largest shareholder of the Company. In September 2013, the Company executed
an inland transportation management service contract with the Zhiyuan Investment Group whereby it would provide certain advisory
services and help control its potential commodities loss during the transportation process. As a result of the inland transportation
management services provided to Zhiyuan, the Company generated revenue of $2,269,346 (31% of the Company’s total revenue
in 2016) and $2,545,009 (22.5% of the Company’s total revenue in 2015) for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The net amount due from Zhiyuan Investment Group was $2,609,831 at June 30, 2015. During the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company
continued to provide inland transportation management services to Zhiyuan and also collected approximately $3.3 million (RMB 22.2
million) from Zhiyuan to reduce the outstanding accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2016, the net amount due from Zhiyuan was $1,622,519.
The Company subsequently collected back RMB 2.28 million (equivalent to $396,923) from Zhiyuan in August 2016. Management expects
the remaining receivable will be substantially collected in the second half of the calendar year of 2016.
At June 30,
2015, the Company was owed $174,759 from Sino-G Trading Inc. (“Sino-G”), an entity that is owned by the
former brother-in-law of the Company’s CEO. Sino-G previously served as a funds transfer agent for the
Company’s services in Tianjin, PRC. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2016, the Company fully collected the
balance from Sino-G.
Note 19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Pursuant to the
Company's 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, on July 26, 2016, the Company granted the options to purchase a total of 150,000 shares
to two employees with a two-year vesting period, one half of which shall vest on October 26, 2016, and the other half shall
vest on July 26, 2017. The exercise price of such options was $1.10 per share.
In July 2016, the Company
signed a Strategic Cooperation Agreement (the "Agreement") with COSCO Logistics (Americas) Inc. ("COSCO Logistics"),
which belongs to China's largest integrated shipping company, China COSCO Holdings Company Ltd. Pursuant to the Agreement, both
parties will mutually provide logistics services between China and the United States and develop shipping customers as an end-to-end
global logistics service. The Company expects to work with COSCO Logistics to provide inland transportation services in the US
for shipments to and from China. According to the Agreement, the two companies will also assess locations in the US to potentially
establish warehouse / distribution facilities in the coming months and share pricing information for short-haul trucking services
across selected regions of the country.
In August 2016, the Company’s
Board of Directors authorized management to move forward with the development of a mobile application that will provide a full-service
logistics platform between the US and China to short-haul trucking in the US. The decision follows an extensive review by the Company's
management team and Board in identifying Sino-Global's key competitive advantages as an expert in global logistics between the
US and China, and then leveraging that experience to both address the needs of its customer base and provide solutions to current
issues affecting logistics and supply chain. The Company completed a market analysis and feasibility study related to building
a mobile based logistics application for short-haul trucking in US ports to better manage the over 25 million containers, or TEU
moving between China and US each year.