TUP Tupperware Brands

Delaware General Corporation Law . Under Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding (i) if such person acted in good faith and in a manner that person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and (ii) with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, if he or she had no reasonable cause to believe such conduct was unlawful. In actions brought by or in the right of the corporation, a corporation may indemnify such person against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if such person acted in good faith and in a manner that person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification may be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which that person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification for such expenses which the Court of Chancery or other such court shall deem proper. To the extent that such person has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defending any such action, suit or proceeding referred to above or any claim, issue or matter therein, he or she is entitled to indemnification for expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith. The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided for or granted pursuant to Section 145 of the DGCL is not exclusive of any other rights of indemnification or advancement of expenses to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled, and a corporation may purchase and maintain insurance against liabilities asserted against any former or current, director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or a person who is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, whether or not the power to indemnify is provided by the statute.

Tupperware Brands Corporation

Certificate of Incorporation . In accordance with Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL, the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that directors will not be personally liable to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breaches of their fiduciary duty as directors except for (i) breaches of their duty of loyalty to the Company or its stockholders, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) certain transactions under Section 174 of the DGCL (which concerns unlawful payments of dividends, stock purchases or redemptions) or (iv) transactions from which a director derives an improper personal benefit.

II-2

While the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides directors with protection from awards for monetary damages for breaches of their duty of care, it does not eliminate their duty of care. Accordingly, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation will have no effect on the availability of equitable remedies such as an injunction or rescission based on a director’s breach of his or her duty of care. The provisions of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation described above apply to an officer of the Company only if he or she is a director of the Company and is acting in his or her capacity as director, and do not apply to the Company’s officers who are not directors.

The Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that each person who is or was, or has agreed to become, a director or officer of the Company, or each such person who is or was serving or who had agreed to serve at the request of the Board of Directors or an officer of the Company as an employee or agent of the Company or as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including a subsidiary of the Company, will be indemnified and held harmless by the Company, in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws, to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL as currently in effect (or, to the extent indemnification is broadened, as it may be amended). In addition, the Company may enter into one or more agreements with any person providing for indemnification greater or different than that provided in the Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

By-laws . The Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws provide that each person who is or was made a party to, or is threatened to be made a party to, any action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer or employee of the Company, or is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another entity, including a subsidiary of the Company, will be indemnified and held harmless by the Company to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL as currently in effect (or, to the extent indemnification is broadened, as it may be amended), against all expense, liability or loss (including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith. The Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws also provide that the right to indemnification conferred thereby is a contract right and will include the right to be paid by the Company for the expenses incurred in defending the proceedings specified above, in advance of their final disposition, except that, if the DGCL so requires, the payment of such expenses incurred by a director or officer in his or her capacity as a director or officer (and not in any other capacity in which service was or is rendered by such person while a director or officer) will be made only upon delivery to the Company by the director or officer of an undertaking to repay all amounts so advanced if it is ultimately determined that such director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified under such provision or otherwise. The Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws further provide that the Company may, by action of its Board of Directors, provide indemnification to its agents with the same scope and effect as the foregoing indemnification of directors, officers and employees.

The Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws provide that persons indemnified thereunder may bring suit against the Company to recover unpaid amounts claimed thereunder, and that if such suit is successful, the expense of bringing such a suit will be reimbursed by the Company. It further provides that while it is a defense to such an action that the person claiming indemnification has not met the applicable standards of conduct making indemnification

II-3

permissible under the DGCL, the burden of proving such defense will be on the Company and neither the failure of the Company’s Board of Directors to have made a determination prior to the commencement of such action that indemnification is proper, nor an actual determination by the Company that the claimant has not met the applicable standard of conduct, will be a defense to the action or create a presumption that the claimant has not met the applicable standard of conduct.

The Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws provide that the right to indemnification and payment of expenses incurred in defending a proceeding in advance of its final disposition conferred therein will not be exclusive of any other right that any person may have or may in the future acquire under any statute, provision of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-laws, agreement, vote of stockholders, vote of disinterested directors or otherwise. The Amended and Restated By-laws permit the Company to maintain insurance, at its expense, on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company, or is serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against any expense, liability or loss, whether or not the Company would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the DGCL.

D&O Insurance . The Company also maintains a standard policy of officers’ and directors’ liability insurance providing coverage to its officers and directors.