Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2016
(unaudited)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
Hooper Holmes, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Hooper Holmes” or the "Company”) provides on-site screenings, laboratory testing, risk assessment, and sample collection services to individuals as part of comprehensive health and wellness programs offered through corporate and government employers. The acquisition of Accountable Health Services, Inc. ("AHS") ("the Acquisition"), which is discussed further in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, allows Hooper Holmes to also deliver telephonic health coaching, a wellness portal, data analytics, and reporting services. Hooper Holmes is engaged by the organizations sponsoring such programs, including health and care management companies, broker and wellness companies, disease management organizations, reward administrators, third party administrators, clinical research organizations, and health plans. Hooper Holmes provides these services through a national network of health professionals.
The Company's screening business is subject to some seasonality, with the second quarter sales typically dropping below other quarters and the third and fourth quarter sales typically the strongest quarters due to increased demand for screenings from mid-August through November related to annual benefit renewal cycles. The Company's wellness services business is more constant, though there are some variations due to the timing of the health coaching programs, which are billed per participant and typically start soon after the conclusion of onsite screening events. In addition to its Screening and Health and Wellness Service operations, the Company generates ancillary revenue through the assembly of medical kits for sale to third parties.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2016.
Financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP require management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and other disclosures. The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of the Company's management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented.
The results of operations for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
and
2015
, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or the full year. See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional information.
On September 30, 2013, the Company completed the sale of certain assets comprising its Portamedic service line. During 2014, the Company sold certain assets comprising the Heritage Labs and Hooper Holmes Services businesses. The operating results of these businesses have been segregated and reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
On June 15, 2016, the Company completed a one-for-fifteen reverse stock split. As a result, the share and per share information for all periods presented in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the impact of the reverse stock split. The reverse stock split did not affect the total number of authorized shares of common stock of
240,000,000
shares or the par value of the Company’s common stock at
$0.04
. Accordingly, an adjustment was made between additional paid-in-capital and common stock in the condensed consolidated balance sheet to reflect the new values after the reverse stock split.
During the second quarter of 2016, it was determined that costs that had been expensed in the first quarter of 2016 related to the modification of the Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements) and the equity issuances. Costs associated with the modification of the Credit Agreement should have been capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the Credit Agreement, while costs associated with the equity issuances should have been recorded as a reduction to equity. The Company recorded these correcting entries during the second quarter of 2016. The net impact of the correcting adjustments decreased reported pretax loss in the second quarter of 2016 by approximately
$0.2 million
. Management
does not believe the impact of these out of period adjustments materially impacts the fair presentation of the Company’s operating results or financial condition for the periods impacted.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)", which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. This new guidance is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date or first quarter of 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern". This ASU requires management to assess and evaluate whether conditions or events exist, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements issue date. This standard will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter; early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-15 will have on the disclosures in Note 2 of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", which requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the debt liability. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 in the first quarter of 2016. The retrospective application of the new standard resulted in a
$0.2 million
reduction to both noncurrent assets and current liabilities as of December 31, 2015. The debt issuance costs associated with the revolving credit facilities remain classified in noncurrent assets in accordance with ASU 2015-15.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)", which is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. This standard requires a lessee to record on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by lease terms of more than 12 months. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718)", which is intended to simplify the accounting for share-based compensation. This standard simplifies the accounting for income taxes in relation to share-based compensation, modifies the accounting for forfeitures, and modifies the statutory tax withholding requirements. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 2: Liquidity
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The uncertainty regarding the Company's ability to generate sufficient cash flows and liquidity to fund operations raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
The Company has taken the following actions toward alleviating the substantial doubt that exists with regard to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern:
|
|
•
|
On January 25, 2016, the Company received
$3.4 million
, net of issuance costs, in additional equity by issuing
2,601,789
shares of its common stock,
$0.04
par value, through a rights offering to current shareholders which is being used to fund working capital;
|
|
|
•
|
On March 28, 2016, the Company received
$1.2 million
, net of issuance costs, in additional equity by issuing
666,667
shares of its common stock,
$0.04
par value, to 200 NNH, LLC, which is being used to fund working capital;
|
|
|
•
|
On March 28, 2016, the Company renegotiated its financial covenants in the Credit Agreement (as defined below) to requirements based on its forecast models; and
|
|
|
•
|
On April 29, 2016, the Company entered into a new Credit and Security Agreement with SCM Specialty Finance Opportunities Fund, L.P. (as defined below) replacing the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement (as defined below). Refer to Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional discussion.
|
The Company expects to continue to monitor its liquidity carefully, work to reduce this uncertainty, and address its cash needs through a combination of one or more of the following actions:
|
|
•
|
The Company will continue to aggressively seek new and return business from its existing customers and expand its presence in the Health and Wellness marketplace;
|
|
|
•
|
The Company will continue to implement further cost actions and efficiency improvements;
|
|
|
•
|
The Company expects to continue to carefully manage receipts and disbursements, including amounts and timing, focusing on reducing days receivables outstanding and managing days payables outstanding.
|
The Company's primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents as well as availability under a Credit and Security Agreement (the "2016 Credit and Security Agreement") with SCM Specialty Finance Opportunities Fund, L.P. ("SCM"). At
June 30, 2016
, the Company had
$0.1 million
in cash and cash equivalents and had
$3.3 million
outstanding under the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement, with available borrowing capacity of
$0.3 million
. As of
August 9, 2016
, the Company had
$2.4 million
outstanding with estimated available borrowing capacity of
$0.8 million
. As of
June 30, 2016
, the Company also owed approximately
$4.0 million
under an existing term loan ("the Term Loan"), which is governed by the terms of a credit agreement ("the Credit Agreement") with SWK Funding LLC ("SWK") and was used to fund the cash component of the Acquisition. Each of these agreements contain certain financial covenants, including various affirmative and negative covenants including minimum aggregate revenue, EBITDA, and consolidated unencumbered liquid assets requirements, which the Company did not comply with as of
June 30, 2016
. For additional information regarding the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement, Credit Agreement, and the related covenants, see Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Company incurred a loss from continuing operations of
$5.6 million
during the
six month period ended
June 30, 2016
. The Company’s net cash used in operating activities for the
six month period ended
June 30, 2016
, was
$4.8 million
. The Company has managed its liquidity through availability under a revolving credit facility, raising additional equity, and a series of cost reduction initiatives.
The Company has historically used availability under a revolving credit facility to fund operations. The Company experiences a timing difference between the operating expenses and cash collection of the associated revenue based on Health and Wellness customer payment terms. To conduct successful screenings, the Company must expend cash to deliver the equipment and supplies required for the screenings and pay its health professionals and site management, all of which is done in advance of the customer invoicing process and ultimate cash receipts for services performed. Given the seasonal nature of the Company's operations, which are largely dependent on second half volumes, management expects to continue using a revolving credit facility in 2016 and beyond.
Other Considerations
The Health and Wellness business sells services directly to end customers and also through wellness, disease management, benefit brokers, and insurance companies (referred to as channel partners) who ultimately have the relationship with the end customer. Sales to direct customers offer the full suite of our services while sales of our screenings through channel partners are often aggregated with other offerings from these channel partners to provide a total solution to the end-user. As such, the Company's success is largely dependent on that of its partners.
Additionally, the Acquisition provides new offerings including the wellness portal and telephonic coaching, along with new staff, new systems, and new customers. During the
six month period ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company incurred under
$0.1 million
of costs associated with the ongoing integration of AHS, which are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. Transition costs incurred during the three month period ended
June 30, 2016
, were immaterial. These costs relate primarily to transition services purchased from AHS and the ongoing transition of information technology infrastructure. The Company does not expect to continue to incur material transition costs going forward.
In addition, the Company has contractual obligations related to operating leases and employment contracts which could adversely affect liquidity.
The Company’s ability to satisfy its liquidity needs and meet future covenants is dependent on growing revenues, improving profitability, and raising additional equity. These profitability improvements primarily include expansion of the Company’s presence in the Health and Wellness marketplace through new sales to direct customers, retaining existing customers, and capitalizing on the opportunities presented by its channel partners. The Company must increase screening, telephonic health coaching, and wellness portal volumes in order to cover its fixed cost structure and improve gross profits. These improvements may be outside of management’s control. If the Company is unable to increase volumes or control operating costs, liquidity may be adversely affected.
There can be no assurance that cash flows from operations, combined with any additional borrowings available to the Company, will be obtainable in an amount sufficient to enable the Company to repay its indebtedness, or to fund other liquidity needs. If the Company is unable to comply with financial covenants in 2016 and in the event that the Company were unable to modify the covenants, find new or additional lenders, or raise additional equity, the Company would be considered in default, which would then enable the lenders to accelerate the repayment of all amounts outstanding and exercise remedies with respect to collateral, which would have a material adverse impact on the Company's business.
Note 3: Acquisition
The Company entered into and consummated the Purchase Agreement on April 17, 2015, among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, Accountable Health Solutions, Inc. (the "Seller" or "AHS") and Accountable Health, Inc. (the "Shareholder"). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired the assets and certain liabilities representing the health and wellness business of the Seller for approximately
$7.0 million
-
$4.0 million
in cash and up to
433,333
shares of the Company’s common stock,
$0.04
par value, with a value of
$3.0 million
, which was subject to a working capital adjustment as described in the Purchase Agreement. At the closing of the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued and delivered
371,739
shares of Common Stock to the Shareholder at closing and issued and held back
21,739
shares of Common Stock for the working capital adjustment, which were subsequently released on October 9, 2015, and
39,855
shares of Common Stock for indemnification purposes.
No
additional shares will be issued under the terms of the Purchase Agreement. The shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, which provides an exemption for private offerings of securities.
In order to fund the Acquisition, the Company entered into and consummated the Credit Agreement with SWK on April 17, 2015. Refer to Note 9 of the condensed consolidated financial statements for discussion of the Credit Agreement and related warrants.
The Acquisition was treated as a purchase in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805,
Business Combinations
, which requires allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction. The allocation of purchase price is based on management’s judgment after evaluating several factors, including a valuation assessment.
The allocation of the purchase price was finalized in the first quarter of 2016 and is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2
|
|
$
|
918
|
|
Inventory and other current assets
|
|
117
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
123
|
|
Customer portal (existing technologies)
|
|
4,151
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
2,097
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
633
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
(743
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
(296
|
)
|
Purchase Price
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
Intangible assets acquired include existing technology in the form of a customer-facing wellness portal and customer relationships. The fair value of the customer relationships acquired was determined using the excess earnings method under the income approach for customer relationships; and the fair value of the wellness portal software was determined using the replacement
cost method. The estimated useful life for the wellness portal and customer relationships is
4 years
and
8 years
, respectively. Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. The Company recorded amortization expense as a component of cost of operations of
$0.3 million
and
$0.5 million
, respectively, and amortization expense as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses of
$0.1 million
and
$0.1 million
, respectively, during the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
. The Company recorded amortization expense of
$0.2 million
as a component of cost of operations and
$0.1 million
as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2015
. The goodwill of
$0.6 million
was recorded in one reporting unit, the Health and Wellness operations, and is deductible for tax purposes.
The consolidated statement of operations for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
,
includes revenue of
$2.7 million
and
$5.2 million
, respectively, attributable to AHS. Disclosure of the earnings contribution from the AHS business is not practicable, as the Company has already integrated operations.
The following table provides unaudited pro forma results of operations for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2015
,
as if AHS was part of operations on the first day of the 2014 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2015
|
Pro forma revenues
|
|
$
|
7,662
|
|
|
$
|
15,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(2,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,856
|
)
|
These pro forma results are based on estimates and assumptions, which the Company believes are reasonable. They are not the results that would have been realized had the Company been a combined company during the periods presented, nor are they indicative of the consolidated results of operations in future periods. The pro forma results for the
six month period ended
June 30, 2015
, include pre-tax adjustments for amortization of intangible assets of
$0.3 million
. Pro forma results for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2015
, include pre-tax adjustments for the elimination of acquisition costs of
$0.6 million
and
$0.7 million
, respectively.
Basic loss per share equals net loss divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share equals net loss divided by the sum of the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period plus dilutive common stock equivalents. The calculation of loss per common share on a basic and diluted basis was the same for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
and
2015
, because the inclusion of dilutive common stock equivalents and the Warrant issued in connection with the Acquisition would have been anti-dilutive for all periods presented. The Company has granted options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock through employee stock plans with the weighted average options outstanding as of
June 30, 2016
and
2015
, being
355,092
and
274,460
, respectively, and a warrant to purchase
543,478
shares issued to SWK was outstanding as of
June 30, 2016
, but are anti-dilutive because the Company is in a net loss position.
Note 5: Share-Based Compensation
Employee
Share-Based Compensation Plans
- On May 29, 2008, the Company's shareholders approved the 2008 Omnibus Employee Incentive Plan (the "2008 Plan") providing for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, non-vested stock, and performance shares. During the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company granted
100,000
and
153,332
options, respectively, for the purchase of shares under the 2008 Plan. During the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2015
, the Company granted
667
and
40,000
options, respectively. As of
June 30, 2016
,
31,659
shares remain available for grant under the 2008 Plan.
On May 24, 2011, the Company's shareholders approved the 2011 Omnibus Employee Incentive Plan, as subsequently amended and restated, (the "2011 Plan") providing for the grant of stock options and non-vested stock awards. During the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
, there were
no
options for the purchase of shares granted under the 2011 Plan. During the
three month period ended
June 30, 2015
, there were
30,000
options for the purchase of shares granted under the 2011 Plan. During the
six month periods ended
June 30, 2016 and 2015
, the Company also granted a total of
166,665
and
2,778
stock awards,
respectively, to non-employee members of the Board of Directors that immediately vested. As of
June 30, 2016
,
243,693
shares remain available for grant under the 2011 Plan.
The fair value of the stock options granted during the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2016
|
Expected life (years)
|
5.3
|
|
5.1
|
Expected volatility
|
80.0%
|
|
81.0%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
—%
|
|
—%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.3%
|
|
1.4%
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period
|
$1.27
|
|
$1.33
|
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the
six month period ended
June 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Option
|
|
Weighted Average remaining Contractual Life (years)
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
|
Outstanding balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
286,568
|
|
|
$
|
6.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
153,332
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and Expired
|
|
(34,560
|
)
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding balance at June 30, 2016
|
|
405,340
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
|
8.45
|
|
$0
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2016
|
|
147,113
|
|
|
$
|
7.65
|
|
|
7.25
|
|
$0
|
There were
no
options exercised during the
six month period ended
June 30, 2016
. There were
50,000
options with a weighted average exercise price of
$0.45
exercised during the
six month period ended
June 30, 2015
. Options for the purchase of an aggregate of
30,768
shares of common stock vested during the
six month period ended
June 30, 2016
, and the aggregate fair value at grant date of these options was
$0.1 million
. As of
June 30, 2016
, there was approximately
$0.4 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.74
years.
The Company recorded
$0.4 million
and
$0.5 million
, respectively, of share-based compensation expense in selling, general and administrative expenses for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
. The Company recorded
$0.1 million
and
$0.2 million
, respectively, of share-based compensation expense in selling, general and administrative expenses for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2015
.
Note 6: Inventories
Included in inventories at
June 30, 2016
, and
December 31, 2015
, are
$0.4 million
and
$0.3 million
, respectively, of finished goods and
$0.6 million
and
$0.3 million
, respectively, of components.
Note 7: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company recorded Goodwill of
$0.6 million
as of
June 30, 2016
, and
December 31, 2015
.
Intangible assets subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis and are summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
(in thousands)
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Intangibles Assets, net
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Intangibles Assets, net
|
Portal
|
$
|
4,151
|
|
|
$
|
1,251
|
|
|
$
|
2,900
|
|
|
$
|
4,151
|
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
3,419
|
|
Customer relationships
|
2,097
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
Total
|
$
|
6,248
|
|
|
$
|
1,567
|
|
|
$
|
4,681
|
|
|
$
|
6,248
|
|
|
$
|
917
|
|
|
$
|
5,331
|
|
Amortization expense for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
, was
$0.3 million
and
$0.7 million
, respectively. Amortization expense for each of the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2015
, was
$0.3 million
.
Based on the Company's recent financial performance and negative equity, management determined a review of impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill was necessary as of
June 30, 2016
. The analysis indicated
no
impairment charges for long-lived assets or goodwill was required at
June 30, 2016
.
Note 8: Restructuring Charges
At
June 30, 2016
, there was a
$0.6 million
liability related to Portamedic branch closure costs, which is recorded in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. Charges recorded during the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
, were recorded as a component of discontinued operations. The following table provides a summary of the activity in the restructure accrual for the
six month period ended
June 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Payments
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
Facility closure obligation
|
$
|
657
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
(201
|
)
|
|
$
|
590
|
|
Note 9: Debt
As of
June 30, 2016
, the Company maintained the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement and the Term Loan provided by the Credit Agreement. The following table summarizes the Company's outstanding borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Credit and Security Agreement (2013 Loan and Security Agreement as of December 31, 2015)
|
|
$
|
3,277
|
|
|
$
|
3,278
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
4,046
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Discount on Term Loan
|
|
(1,977
|
)
|
|
(2,785
|
)
|
Unamortized debt issuance costs related to Term Loan
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
(163
|
)
|
Total debt
|
|
5,142
|
|
|
5,330
|
|
Short-term portion
|
|
(5,142
|
)
|
|
(5,330
|
)
|
Total long-term debt, net
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of interest expense for the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016 and 2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Interest expense on Term Loan (interest at LIBOR, plus 14%)
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
154
|
|
Interest expense on 2013 Loan and Security Agreement
|
|
16
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
4
|
|
Interest expense on 2016 Credit and Security Agreement
|
|
48
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accretion of termination fees (over term of Term Loan at rate of 8%)
|
|
45
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
27
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
62
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
280
|
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs related to 2013 Loan and Security Agreement
|
|
282
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of debt discount associated with the warrants
|
|
397
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
244
|
|
Mark to market of the Additional Warrant
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,011
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
709
|
|
2016 Credit and Security Agreement
On April 29, 2016, the Company entered into the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement with SCM. The 2016 Credit and Security Agreement provides the Company with a revolving credit facility, the proceeds of which are to be used for general working capital purposes and capital expenditures. The 2016 Credit and Security Agreement replaced the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement, eliminating the requirement of the Company to issue the Additional Warrant for the purchase of common stock valued at
$1.25 million
to SWK, the holder of the Company’s Credit Agreement (see below for further information about the Additional Warrant). An early termination fee of
$140,000
, approximately
$30,000
of legal fees, and approximately
$107,000
of other ordinary course fees were accelerated due to the termination of the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement and were rolled into the opening outstanding borrowings under the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement with SCM and are reflected in transaction costs in the condensed consolidated statement of operations during the three month period ended
June 30, 2016
, and approximately
$0.3 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement were written off and recorded in interest expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations during the three month period ended
June 30, 2016
Under the terms of the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement, SCM makes cash advances to the Company in an aggregate principal at any
one
time outstanding not to exceed
$7 million
, subject to certain loan balance limits based on the value of the Company’s eligible collateral (the “Revolving Loan Commitment Amount”). The 2016 Credit and Security Agreement has a term of
three years
, expiring on April 29, 2019. As of
June 30, 2016
, the Company had
$3.3 million
outstanding under the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement with available borrowing capacity of
$0.3 million
. As of
August 9, 2016
, the Company had
$2.4 million
outstanding, with estimated available borrowing capacity of
$0.8 million
.
Borrowings will bear interest at a fluctuating rate that when annualized is equal to the Prime Rate plus
5.5%
, subject to increase in the event of a default. The Company paid SCM a
$140,000
facility fee, and monthly, SCM will receive an unused line fee equal to one-half of one percent (
0.5%
) per annum of the difference derived by subtracting (i) the greater of (x) the average daily outstanding balance under the Revolving Facility during the preceding month and (y) the Minimum Balance, from (ii) the Revolving Loan Commitment Amount and also a collateral management fee equal to one-half of one percent (
0.5%
) per annum of the Revolving Loan Commitment Amount. As of
June 30, 2016
, the remaining balance in debt issuance costs recorded in Other Assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet was
$0.3 million
.
The 2016 Credit and Security Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and various affirmative and negative covenants including minimum aggregate revenue, EBITDA, and consolidated unencumbered liquid assets requirements. Minimum aggregate revenue must not be less than
$34.0 million
for the twelve months ending June 30, 2016,
$37.0 million
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2016,
$40.0 million
for the twelve months ending December 31, 2016, and
$45.0 million
for the twelve months ending each fiscal quarter thereafter. Adjusted EBITDA must not be less than negative
$2.0 million
for the six months ending June 30, 2016, negative
$1.1 million
for the nine months ending September 30, 2016,
$0.8 million
for the twelve months ending December 31, 2016,
$0.5 million
for the twelve months ending March 31, 2017,
$0.9 million
for the twelve months ending June 30, 2017, and
$2.5 million
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2017. In addition, consolidated unencumbered liquid assets must not be less than
$0.75 million
on the last day of any quarter. The Company was not in compliance with the covenants under the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement as of
June 30, 2016
,
and has entered into a First Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement and Limited Waiver and Forbearance (“First Amendment”), which provides a waiver related to the
measurement period ended June 30, 2016. If certain conditions set forth in the First Amendment are satisfied as of September 30, 2016, the waiver and an amendment to the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement providing for revised financial covenants will become permanent. If the Company is unable to fulfill the conditions in the First Amendment by September 30, 2016, or fails to comply with, or obtain further waivers to, the financial covenants in the First Amendment in the future, then the lenders would have the option to accelerate the repayment of all amounts outstanding and exercise remedies with respect to collateral, which would have a material adverse impact on the Company's business. The foregoing description of the First Amendment is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the First Amendment, which is attached as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Borrowings under the Agreement are secured by a security interest in all existing and after-acquired property of the Company, including, but not limited to, its receivables (which are subject to a lockbox account arrangement), inventory and equipment.
Credit Agreement
In order to fund the Acquisition, the Company entered into the Credit Agreement with SWK on April 17, 2015, as amended on February 25, 2016, and March 28, 2016. The Credit Agreement provides the Company with a
$5.0 million
Term Loan. The proceeds of the Term Loan were used to pay certain fees and expenses related to the negotiation and consummation of the Purchase Agreement and the Acquisition described in Note 3 and general corporate purposes. The Company paid SWK an origination fee of
$0.1 million
. The Term Loan is due and payable on April 17, 2018. The Company is also required to make quarterly revenue-based payments in an amount equal to eight and one-half percent (
8.5%
) of yearly aggregate revenue up to and including
$20 million
, seven percent (
7%
) of yearly aggregate revenue greater than
$20 million
up to and including
$30 million
, and five percent (
5%
) of yearly aggregate revenue greater than
$30 million
. The revenue-based payment will be applied to fees and interest, and any excess to the principal of the Term Loan. Revenue-based payments commenced in February 2016, and the maximum principal portion of the aggregate revenue-based payment is capped at
$600,000
per quarter. During the
six month period ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company made principal payments to SWK of
$1.0 million
, in addition to
$0.4 million
of interest paid.
The outstanding principal balance under the Credit Agreement bears interest at an adjustable rate per annum equal to the LIBOR Rate (subject to a minimum amount of one percent (
1.0%
)) plus fourteen percent (
14.0%
) and is due and payable quarterly, in arrears, which commenced on August 14, 2015. Upon the earlier of (a) the maturity date on April 17, 2018, or (b) full repayment of the Term Loan, whether by acceleration or otherwise, the Company is required to pay an exit fee equal to eight percent (
8%
) of the aggregate principal amount of all term loans advanced under the Credit Agreement. The Company is recognizing the exit fee over the term of the Term Loan through an accretion accrual to interest expense using the effective interest method.
The Credit Agreement also contains certain financial covenants including minimum aggregate revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and consolidated unencumbered liquid assets requirements. On March 28, 2016, the Company obtained a Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the "Second Amendment") in which the lender modified the existing covenants and replaced them with minimum aggregate revenue covenants of
$34.0 million
for the twelve months ending June 30, 2016,
$37.0 million
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2016,
$40.0 million
for the twelve months ending December 31, 2016, and
$45.0 million
for the twelve months ending each fiscal quarter thereafter. The Second Amendment also modified the minimum adjusted EBITDA covenants for 2016 and replaced them with minimum adjusted EBITDA covenants of negative
$2.0 million
for the six months ending June 30, 2016, negative
$1.1 million
for the nine months ending September 30, 2016,
$0.8 million
for the twelve months ending December 31, 2016,
$0.5 million
for the twelve months ending March 31, 2017,
$0.9 million
for the twelve months ending June 30, 2017, and
$2.5 million
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2017, and each twelve consecutive calendar month period ending on the last day of each fiscal quarter thereafter. In addition, the Company was required to obtain new equity contributions in an aggregate amount of not less than
$0.5 million
between March 23, 2016 and June 30, 2016, which requirement the Company has satisfied through the private offering to 200 NNH, LLC, which is described further in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Second Amendment also required the Company to issue shares of its common stock,
$0.04
par value, with a value of
$100,000
to SWK, which the Company issued during the first quarter of 2016 and recorded as debt issuance costs as a direct deduction to short-term debt on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2016
. The Company was not in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Agreement, as amended, as of
June 30, 2016
, and has entered into a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and Limited Waiver and Forbearance (“Third Amendment”), which provides a waiver related to the measurement period ended June 30, 2016. If certain conditions set forth in the Third Amendment are satisfied as of September 30, 2016, the waiver and an amendment to the Credit Agreement providing for revised financial covenants and an extended period of time to make required principal payments will become permanent. If the Company is unable to fulfill the conditions in the Third Amendment by September 30, 2016, or fails to comply with, or obtain further waivers to, the financial covenants in the Third Amendment in the future, then the lenders would have the option to accelerate the repayment of all amounts outstanding and exercise remedies with respect to collateral, which would have a material adverse impact on the Company's business. The foregoing description of the Third Amendment is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Third Amendment, which is attached as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
The Credit Agreement contains a cross-default provision that can be triggered if the Company has more than
$0.25 million
in debt outstanding under the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement and the Company fails to make payments to SCM when due or if SCM is entitled to accelerate the maturity of debt in response to a default situation under the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement, which may include violation of any financial covenants.
As of June 30, 2016, as security for payment and other obligations under the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement, SCM held a security interest in all of the Company's, and its subsidiary guarantors', existing and after-acquired property, including receivables (which are subject to a lockbox account arrangement), inventory and equipment. Additionally, SWK holds a security interest for final and indefeasible payment. The security interest held by SWK is in substantially all of the Company's assets and the Company's subsidiaries.
In connection with the execution of the Credit Agreement, the Company issued SWK a warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase
543,478
shares of the Company’s common stock. The Warrant is exercisable after October 17, 2015, and up to and including April 17, 2022, at an exercise price of
$6.90
per share. The Warrant is exercisable on a cashless basis. The exercise price of the Warrant is subject to customary adjustment provisions for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and the like. The Warrant grants the holder certain piggyback registration rights. The Warrant was considered equity classified, and as such, the Company allocated the proceeds from the Term Loan to the Warrant using the Relative Fair Value Method. Further, pursuant to the Credit Agreement, if the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement was not repaid in full and terminated, and all liens securing the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement were not released, on or prior to April 30, 2016, as amended in the First Amendment to the Credit Agreement dated February 25, 2016, the Company agreed to issue an additional warrant (the “Additional Warrant”) to SWK to purchase common stock valued at
$1.25 million
, with an exercise price of the closing price on April 30, 2016. In accordance with the relevant accounting guidance, the Additional Warrant was determined to be an embedded derivative. The fair value of these warrants at the inception of the Credit Agreement of approximately
$3.6 million
was recorded as a debt discount, and is being amortized through interest expense over the term of the Credit Agreement using the effective interest method. The Company valued both warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model, which utilizes Level 3 Inputs. For the Warrant, the Company utilized volatility of
85.0%
, a risk-free rate of
1.4%
, dividend rate of
zero
, and term of
7
years, which is consistent with the exercise period of the Warrant. For the Additional Warrant, the Company utilized volatility of
80.0%
, a risk-free rate of
2.1%
, dividend rate of
zero
, and term of
7 years
, which is consistent with the exercise period of the Additional Warrant.
As noted above, on April 29, 2016, the Company entered into the 2016 Credit and Security Agreement with SCM, which eliminated the requirement of the Company to issue the Additional Warrant. Accordingly, during the
three month period ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company recorded
$0.9 million
in other income in the condensed consolidated statement of operations related to the write-off of the derivative liability associated with the Additional Warrant.
Note 10: Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases its corporate headquarters in Olathe, Kansas, which includes the Health and Wellness operations center, under an operating lease which expires in 2018. The Company leases its AHS operations centers in Des Moines, Iowa and Indianapolis, IN, under operating leases which expire in 2018. The Company also leases copiers and other miscellaneous equipment. These leases expire at various times through 2017.
The Company is obligated under a lease related to the discontinued Hooper Holmes Services operations center through 2018 and has ceased use of this facility. The Company is still the primary lessee under operating leases for
two
Portamedic branch offices and has recorded a facility closure obligation related to the above mentioned leases for future rent payments not utilized for continuing operations and such related costs are recorded in the reporting for discontinued operations. The Company has recorded a facility closure obligation of
$0.6 million
as of
June 30, 2016
, related to the above mentioned leases.
The Company has employment agreements with certain executive employees that provide for payment of base salary for up to a
one year
period in the event their employment with the Company is terminated in certain circumstances, including following a change in control, as further defined in the agreements.
From time to time, the Company is subject to federal and state tax audits and related governmental inquiries into matters such as income tax returns, sales and use tax returns, employment classification of its workers, and wage and hour law compliance. The Company is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) for the calendar years 2013, 2014, and 2015 with respect to its classification of certain of its health professionals as independent contractors rather than employees. This examination could lead to proposed adjustments to its federal employment taxes for the periods in question, but the IRS has not yet issued an assessment. The Company believes that it has properly classified these workers as independent contractors, but there
can be no assurances of a favorable outcome for the Company and given the ongoing status of the examination, we are unable at this time to provide an estimate of the range of loss, if any.
Note 11: Litigation
The Company, in the normal course of business, is a party to various claims and other legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, the Company has substantial legal defenses and/or insurance coverage (subject to deductibles) with respect to all of its pending legal actions. If management believes that a material loss not covered by insurance arising from these actions is probable and can reasonably be estimated, the Company may record the amount of the estimated loss or, if a loss cannot be estimated but the minimum liability may be estimated using a range and no point is more probable than another, the Company may record the minimum estimated liability. As additional information becomes available, any potential liability related to these actions is assessed and the estimates are revised, if necessary. Management believes that the ultimate outcome of all pending legal actions, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position that is inconsistent with its loss reserves or on its overall trends in results of operations. However, litigation and claims are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable outcomes can occur that exceed any amounts reserved for such losses. If an unfavorable outcome were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations in the period in which the outcome occurs or in future periods.
On May 24, 2012, a complaint was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging, among other things, that the Company failed to pay overtime compensation to a purported class of certain independent contractor examiners who, the complaint alleges, should be treated as employees for purposes of federal law. The complaint seeks award of an unspecified amount of allegedly unpaid overtime wages to certain examiners. The Company filed an answer denying the substantive allegations therein. On August 1, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation to conditionally certify the class of all contract examiners from August 16, 2010, to the present. On August 29, 2014, the Company submitted its objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate has suspended ruling concerning those objections while the parties pursue the possibility of a settlement. On April 29, 2016, the Company reached a preliminary understanding with the plaintiffs with respect to a settlement of the lawsuit involving a release of all claims by the plaintiffs and the Company's establishment of a settlement fund of
$0.45 million
. Accordingly, as of
June 30, 2016
, the Company had accrued $
0.45 million
related to this matter versus
$0.3 million
as of December 31, 2015. The litigation accrual for all periods was included in the Accrued expenses line item on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The additional expense of
$0.15 million
recorded during the six month period ended June 30, 2016, is included in the discontinued operations line item on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. This preliminary understanding is subject to approval by the Magistrate and the parties' entry into a definitive settlement agreement. The claim is not covered by insurance, and the Company is incurring legal costs to defend the litigation which are recorded in discontinued operations. This matter relates to the former Portamedic service line for which the Company retained liability.
Note 12: Income Taxes
The Company's income tax expense was not material for any period presented in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. No amounts were recorded for unrecognized tax benefits or for the payment of interest and penalties during the
three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2016
and
2015
. No federal or state tax benefits were recorded relating to the current year loss. The Company continues to believe that a full valuation allowance is required on its net deferred tax assets, with the exception of deferred income tax on the liabilities of certain indefinite-lived intangibles.
The tax years 2012 through 2015 may be subject to federal examination and assessment. Tax years from 2007 through 2011 remain open solely for purposes of federal and certain state examination of net operating loss and credit carryforwards. State income tax returns may be subject to examination for tax years 2011 through 2015, depending on state tax statute of limitations.
As of
December 31, 2015
, the Company had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of
$167.2 million
and
$149.8 million
, respectively. There has been no significant change in these balances as of
June 30, 2016
. The net operating loss carryforwards, if not utilized, will expire in the years
2016
through
2035
.
Since the Company had changes in ownership during 2015 and continuing into the first quarter of 2016, additional limitations under IRC Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 may apply to the future utilization of certain tax attributes including net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, other tax carryforwards, and certain built-in losses. The Company has not yet completed its analysis of any impact of these ownership changes. No tax benefit has been reported since a full valuation allowance offsets these tax attributes. However, limitations could apply even if the valuation allowance was released.
Note 13: Fair Value Measurements
The Company determines the fair value measurements used in our consolidated financial statements based upon the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
|
|
•
|
Level 1 - Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.
|
|
|
•
|
Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
•
|
Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
The Company estimated the fair value of the Term Loan and derivative liability using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which is a Level 3 valuation technique.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Face Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
Face Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
Term Loan
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,590
|
|
|
$
|
1,953
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,837
|
|
|
$
|
2,052
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
|
$
|
828
|
|
|
$
|
828
|
|