ITEM
1. Financial Statements
hopTo
Inc.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
663,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,777,300
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
290,800
|
|
|
|
434,900
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
79,900
|
|
|
|
139,200
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
1,033,900
|
|
|
|
2,351,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized
software development costs, net
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
20,800
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
200,200
|
|
|
|
252,500
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
109,000
|
|
|
|
109,000
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
1,343,300
|
|
|
$
|
2,733,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,078,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,018,000
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
1,844,800
|
|
|
|
2,467,000
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
|
|
60,900
|
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
Capital
lease
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
2,992,900
|
|
|
|
3,514,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
liability
|
|
|
60,200
|
|
|
|
31,600
|
|
Deposit
liability
|
|
|
81,400
|
|
|
|
81,400
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
1,768,700
|
|
|
|
1,465,800
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
|
|
15,100
|
|
|
|
26,700
|
|
Capital
lease
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
4,920,600
|
|
|
|
5,126,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common
stock, $0.0001 par value, 195,000,000 shares authorized, 9,761,782 and 9,731,233 shares issued and outstanding at June 30,
2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
|
|
|
14,600
|
|
|
|
14,600
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
78,417,500
|
|
|
|
78,189,300
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(82,009,400
|
)
|
|
|
(80,596,900
|
)
|
Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
|
|
|
(3,577,300
|
)
|
|
|
(2,393,000
|
)
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
|
|
$
|
1,343,300
|
|
|
$
|
2,733,700
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
hopTo
Inc.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
958,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,358,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,965,900
|
|
|
$
|
2,829,900
|
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
67,400
|
|
|
|
105,800
|
|
|
|
121,200
|
|
|
|
210,300
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
891,200
|
|
|
|
1,253,000
|
|
|
|
1,844,700
|
|
|
|
2,619,600
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
and marketing
|
|
|
253,600
|
|
|
|
453,600
|
|
|
|
570,700
|
|
|
|
953,700
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
614,900
|
|
|
|
771,300
|
|
|
|
1,293,000
|
|
|
|
1,679,100
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
483,600
|
|
|
|
1,101,200
|
|
|
|
1,369,400
|
|
|
|
2,266,100
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
1,352,100
|
|
|
|
2,326,100
|
|
|
|
3,233,100
|
|
|
|
4,898,900
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(460,900
|
)
|
|
|
(1,073,100
|
)
|
|
|
(1,388,400
|
)
|
|
|
(2,279,300
|
)
|
Other
income (expense) - change in fair value of warrants liability
|
|
|
22,200
|
|
|
|
184,400
|
|
|
|
(25,100
|
)
|
|
|
129,300
|
|
Other
income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
Loss
before provision for income tax
|
|
|
(436,700
|
)
|
|
|
(888,400
|
)
|
|
|
(1,410,900
|
)
|
|
|
(2,150,300
|
)
|
Provision
for income tax
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
(437,600
|
)
|
|
$
|
(889,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,412,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,152,900
|
)
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
Average
weighted common shares outstanding – basic and diluted
|
|
|
9,752,821
|
|
|
|
7,556,446
|
|
|
|
9,752,417
|
|
|
|
7,538,441
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
hopTo
Inc.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Preferred
stock – shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common
stock – shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
|
9,731,233
|
|
|
|
7,502,814
|
|
Employee
stock option issuances
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
Vesting
of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
30,549
|
|
|
|
63,694
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
9,761,782
|
|
|
|
7,572,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock - amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
14,600
|
|
|
$
|
11,200
|
|
Vesting
of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
14,600
|
|
|
$
|
11,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
78,189,300
|
|
|
$
|
74,600,700
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
229,700
|
|
|
|
412,400
|
|
Company
payment of employee taxes for stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(1,600
|
)
|
|
|
(10,800
|
)
|
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,900
|
|
Reclassification
of warrants liability to equity (2014 PIPE)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
407,300
|
|
Other
Rounding
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
78,417,500
|
|
|
$
|
75,414,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
(80,596,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,205,800
|
)
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
(1,412,500
|
)
|
|
|
(2,152,900
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
(82,009,400
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78,358,700
|
)
|
Total
Stockholders’ (Deficit)
|
|
$
|
(3,577,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,932,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
hopTo
Inc.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash
Flows Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
(1,412,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,152,900
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
54,800
|
|
|
|
170,400
|
|
Write-down
of capitalized purchased technology
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
229,700
|
|
|
|
412,400
|
|
Company
payment of employee taxes for stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(1,600
|
)
|
|
|
(10,800
|
)
|
Change
in fair value of derivative instruments – warrants
|
|
|
25,100
|
|
|
|
(129,300
|
)
|
Accretion
of warrants liability for consulting services
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
(14,300
|
)
|
Changes
in deferred rent
|
|
|
28,300
|
|
|
|
(20,500
|
)
|
Changes
to allowance of doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(2,400
|
)
|
|
|
(16,700
|
)
|
Revenue
deferred to future periods
|
|
|
630,700
|
|
|
|
1,542,200
|
|
Recognition
of deferred revenue
|
|
|
(950,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,033,300
|
)
|
Changes
in severance liability
|
|
|
(5,900
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest
accrued for capital lease
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
146,500
|
|
|
|
1,746,500
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
59,300
|
|
|
|
(5,300
|
)
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
66,300
|
|
|
|
138,100
|
|
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
|
|
|
(1,113,900
|
)
|
|
|
(372,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows Used In Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of equipment
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,100
|
)
|
Net
Cash Provided by (Used In) Investing Activities
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
(5,100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows Provided By Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment
for capital lease
|
|
|
(4,700
|
)
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,900
|
|
Net
Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities
|
|
|
(4,700
|
)
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Decrease in Cash
|
|
|
(1,114,100
|
)
|
|
|
(377,500
|
)
|
Cash
- Beginning of Period
|
|
|
1,777,300
|
|
|
|
1,557,100
|
|
Cash
- End of Period
|
|
$
|
663,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,179,600
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
hopTo
Inc.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
Basis of Presentation
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of hopTo Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “we”,
“us” or “our”); significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) applicable to interim financial information and the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, such unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements do not include all information and footnote disclosures required in annual financial statements.
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments, which include only normal, recurring
adjustments, that are, in our opinion, necessary to state fairly the results for the periods presented. This Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, which was filed with the SEC on March 30, 2016 (“2015 10-K Report”).
The interim results presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the
full fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 or any future period.
2.
Going Concern and Management’s Liquidity Plans
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, assuming we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of
assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, the condensed consolidated financial statements
do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the
amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
We
have incurred significant net losses since our inception. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred
losses from operations of $437,600 and $1,412,500. At June 30, 2016, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $82,009,400 and
a working capital deficit of $1,959,000. Due to our inability to date to generate meaningful revenue from our hopTo Work business
and our most recent estimation that revenue from this product is unlikely in any reasonable time frame, our cash resources will
not be sufficient to fund our business for the next 12 months. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent
on our ability to continue to generate revenue from our legacy GO-Global business and to raise additional capital through the
issuance of new equity, debt financing, or from the sale of certain assets to meet short and long-term operating requirements.
If
the Company raises additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of
our current shareholders could be reduced, and such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to the Company’s
common stock. Additional financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available
or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company may not be able to take advantage of prospective business endeavors or opportunities,
which could significantly and materially restrict our operations. We are continuing to pursue external financing alternatives
to improve our working capital position. If the Company is unable to obtain the necessary capital, the Company may have to cease
operations.
These
factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
In
order to maintain operations, we previously implemented significant expense reductions, including a limited number of employee
layoffs, and have decided to implement further costs cuts and employment reductions.
We
have worked extensively to explore additional sources of capital including the issuance of new shares, securing debt financing,
and the sale of assets including certain of our software products and patents. Although this process is ongoing and we are in
active discussions with multiple parties, there is no guarantee that they will result in transactions that are sufficient to provide
the Company with the required liquidity to remove the substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. We are
also in discussions with some parties about the possibility of other strategic transactions although there is no guarantee that
these discussions will result in an actual transaction.
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of the
uncertainties set forth above.
3.
Significant Accounting Policies
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements,
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include: the amount of stock-based
compensation expense; the allowance for doubtful accounts; the estimated lives, valuation, and amortization of intangible assets
(including capitalized software); depreciation of long-lived assets; valuation of warrants; post-employment benefits, and accruals
for liabilities. While we believe that such estimates are fair, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
We
market and license our products indirectly through channel distributors, independent software vendors (“ISVs”), value-added
resellers (“VARs”) (collectively, “resellers”) and directly to corporate enterprises, governmental and
educational institutions and others. Our product licenses are perpetual. We also separately sell intellectual property licenses,
maintenance contracts, which are comprised of license updates and customer service access, as well as other products and services.
Software
license revenues are recognized when:
●
|
Persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, (i.e., when we sign a non-cancellable license agreement wherein the customer acknowledges
an unconditional obligation to pay, or upon receipt of the customer’s purchase order), and
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery
has occurred or services have been rendered and there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance (i.e., when title
and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer, which occurs when the media containing the licensed program(s) is
provided to a common carrier or, in the case of electronic delivery, when the customer is given access to the licensed program(s)),
and
|
|
|
●
|
The
price to the customer is fixed or determinable, as typically evidenced in a signed non-cancellable contract, or a customer’s
purchase order, and
|
|
|
●
|
Collectability
is probable. If collectability is not considered probable, revenue is recognized when the fee is collected.
|
Revenue
recognized on software arrangements involving multiple deliverables is allocated to each deliverable based on vendor-specific
objective evidence (“VSOE”) or third party evidence of the fair values of each deliverable; such deliverables include
licenses for software products, maintenance, private labeling fees, and customer training. We limit our assessment of VSOE for
each deliverable to either the price charged when the same deliverable is sold separately or the price established by management
having the relevant authority to do so, for a deliverable not yet sold separately.
If
sufficient VSOE of the fair value does not exist so as to permit the allocation of revenue to the various elements of the arrangement,
all revenue from the arrangement is deferred until such evidence exists or until all elements are delivered. If VSOE of the fair
value does not exist, and the only undelivered element is maintenance, then we recognize revenue on a ratable basis. If VSOE of
the fair value of all undelivered elements exists but does not exist for one or more delivered elements, then revenue is recognized
using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining
portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue.
Certain
resellers (“stocking resellers”) purchase product licenses that they hold in inventory until they are resold to the
ultimate end user (an “inventory stocking order”). At the time that a stocking reseller places an inventory stocking
order, no product licenses are shipped by us to the stocking reseller; rather, the stocking reseller’s inventory is credited
with the number of licenses purchased and the stocking reseller can resell (issue) any number of licenses from their inventory
at any time. Upon receipt of an order to issue a license(s) from a stocking reseller’s inventory (a “draw down order”),
we will ship the license(s) in accordance with the draw down order’s instructions. We defer recognition of revenue from
inventory stocking orders until the underlying licenses are sold and shipped to the end user, as evidenced by the receipt and
fulfillment of the stocking reseller’s draw down order, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
There
are no rights of return granted to resellers or other purchasers of our software products.
Revenue
from maintenance contracts is recognized ratably over the related contract period, which generally ranges from one to five years.
All
of our software licenses are denominated in U.S. dollars.
Deferred
Rent
The
leases for both the Company’s current office in Campbell, California and the subleased former office in Campbell, California
contain free rent and predetermined fixed escalations in our minimum rent payments (See Note 13). Rent expense related to these
leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. Any difference between the straight-line rent amounts
and amounts payable under the leases is recorded as part of deferred rent in current or long-term liabilities, as appropriate.
The monthly rent payments due to the Company for the sublease of the office at 1919 S. Bascom Avenue fully offsets the rent payments
due under the Company’s lease for that space.
Incentives
received upon entering into the lease agreement are recognized on a straight-line basis as a reduction to rent over the term of
the lease. The unamortized portion of these incentives are recorded as a part of deferred rent in current or long-term liabilities,
as appropriate.
Postemployment
Benefits (Severance Liability)
Nonretirement
postemployment benefits, including salary continuation, supplemental unemployment benefits, severance benefits, disability-related
benefits and continuation of benefits such as health care benefits, are recognized as a liability and a loss when it is probable
that the employee(s) will be entitled to such benefits and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The cost of termination benefits
recognized as a liability and an expense includes the amount of any lump-sum payments and the present value of any expected future
payments. An aggregate of $0 and $5,900 is reported as severance liability at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
Software
Development Costs
We
capitalize software development costs incurred from the time technological feasibility of the software is established until the
software is available for general release, in accordance with GAAP. Such capitalized costs are subsequently amortized as costs
of revenue over the shorter of three years or the remaining estimated useful life of the product.
Research
and development costs and other computer software maintenance costs related to the software development are expensed as incurred.
See discussion at Note 11 for an impairment charge taken during the three month period ended June 30, 2016.
Long-Lived
Assets
Long-lived
assets are assessed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may
not be recoverable, whenever we have committed to a plan to dispose of the assets or, at a minimum, annually. Typically, for long-lived
assets to be held and used, measurement of an impairment loss is based on the fair value of such assets, with fair value being
determined based on appraisals, current market value, comparable sales value, and discounted future cash flows, among other variables,
as appropriate. Assets to be held and used (which assets are affected by an impairment loss) are depreciated or amortized at their
new carrying amount over their remaining estimated life; assets to be sold or otherwise disposed of are not subject to further
depreciation or amortization. During the three month period ended June 30, 2016, we determined that an impairment of $15,500 existed
with certain capitalized software development costs associated with our hopTo Work product and recognized that cost as part of
cost of revenue. No such impairment charge was recorded during either of the three or six-month periods ended June 30, 2015.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts that reflects our best estimate of potentially uncollectible trade receivables. The
allowance is based on assessments of the collectability of specific customer accounts and the general aging and size of the accounts
receivable. We regularly review the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts by considering such factors as historical
experience, credit worthiness, and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. We specifically
reserve for those accounts deemed uncollectible. We also establish, and adjust, a general allowance for doubtful accounts based
on our review of the aging and size of our accounts receivable.
The
following table sets forth the details of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016
and 2015:
|
|
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
|
Charge
Offs
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
|
2016
|
|
|
$
|
14,800
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
14,900
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
22,900
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|
|
15,900
|
|
The
following table sets forth the details of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and
2015:
|
|
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
|
Charge
Offs
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
|
2016
|
|
|
$
|
17,300
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(2,400
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,900
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
32,600
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,700
|
)
|
|
|
15,900
|
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
For
the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, we considered the customers listed in the following
tables to be our most significant customers. The tables set forth the percentage of sales attributable to each customer during
the periods presented, and the respective customer’s ending accounts receivable balance as a percentage of reported accounts
receivable, net, as of June 30, 2016 and 2015.
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
As
of June 30, 2016
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2015
|
|
Customer
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
Centric
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Elosoft
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
GE
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
KitASP
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Marvell
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
Siae
Microelecttronica
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Uniface
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Xerox
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
51.8
|
%
|
|
|
69.1
|
%
|
|
|
35.6
|
%
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
As
of June 30, 2016
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30, 2015
|
|
Customer
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
Alcatel-Lucent
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
Centric
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Elosoft
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
KitASP
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Marvell
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
Siae
Microelecttronica
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Thermo
LabSystems
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Uniface
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
42.8
|
%
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
|
|
49.0
|
%
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
We
currently do not have a material exposure to either commodity prices or interest rates; accordingly, we do not currently use derivative
instruments to manage such risks. We evaluate all of our financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives
or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. All derivative financial instruments are recognized in the balance sheet
at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings if they are not eligible for hedge accounting or in other comprehensive
income if they qualify for cash flow hedge accounting.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
fair value of our accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the
relative short maturities of these items.
The
fair value of warrants at issuance and for those recorded as a liability at each reporting date are determined in accordance with
the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820,
“Fair Value Measurement,”
which establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the assumptions (inputs)
to valuation techniques used to price assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value. The hierarchy, as defined below,
gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority
to unobservable inputs. The guidance for fair value measurements requires that assets, liabilities and certain equity instruments
measured at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:
●
|
Level
1: Defined as observable inputs, such as quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
●
|
Level
2: Defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1. This includes quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active,
or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the
assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
●
|
Level
3: Defined as unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include
those whose fair value measurements are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation
techniques, as well as significant management judgment or estimation.
|
As
of June 30, 2016, all of our $60,200 Warrants Liability reported at fair value was categorized as Level 3 inputs (See Note 5).
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
May 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-12—
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients
. The amendments in ASU 2016-12 affect only some of the narrow
aspects of Topic 606 including the collectability criterion, presentation of sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from
customers, noncash consideration, and treatment of certain contract modifications at transition. Similar to ASU 2014-09, the effective
date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. We
are currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-10—
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing to clarify certain aspects of ASU 2014-09
. The amendments in
ASU 2016-10 are expected to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the guidance on identifying promised goods or services
in contracts with customers and to improve the operability and understandability of licensing implementation guidance related
to the entity’s intellectual property. Similar to ASU 2014-09, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year
2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact that adoption
of this new standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09—
Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting
. This update simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payments, including immediate
recognition of all excess tax benefits and deficiencies in the income statement, changing the threshold to qualify for equity
classification up to the employees’ maximum statutory tax rates, allowing an entity-wide accounting policy election to either
estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures as they occur, and clarifying the classification
on the statement of cash flows for the excess tax benefit and employee taxes paid when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding
purposes. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods
within that reporting period. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements upon the adoption
of this guidance.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08—
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations
(Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)
. This update seeks to further clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus
agent considerations under the new revenue recognition standard, ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Similar to
ASU 2014-09, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
. Under this guidance, an entity is required to recognize
right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. This guidance
offers specific accounting guidance for a lessee, a lessor and sale and leaseback transactions. Lessees and lessors are required
to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about leasing arrangements to enable a user of the financial statements to
assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, and requires a modified retrospective
adoption, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements upon
the adoption of this guidance.
In
November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17,
Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
(“ASU 2015-17”).
The ASU is part of the Board’s simplification initiative aimed at reducing complexity in accounting standards and requires
companies to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, as noncurrent on the
balance sheet. Although ASU 2015-17 isn’t required for public companies to implement until fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2016 (and private companies until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017), early adoption is allowed. We
have decided to adopt ASU 2015-17 early and have classified all of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the
balance sheet. We early adopted ASU 2015-17 as the Company considers this change an improvement in the usefulness of information
provided to users of the Company’s financial statements. The Company applied the standard prospectively and did not retrospectively
adjust any prior periods. Retrospective adjustments were immaterial to the Company’s total current assets and the adoption
had no impact on our results of operation.
In
August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14 “
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” – Deferral of
the Effective Date
(“ASU 2015-14”). The purpose of this update is to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09,
detailed below, by one year. Therefore, ASU 2014-09 is now to be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2017, including interim periods within such annual period.
In
April 2015, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-05 “
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use
Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement”
(“ASU
2015-05”). The objective of ASU 2015-05 is to provide guidance to reporting entities in the accounting for fees paid
in a cloud computing arrangement. Specifically, if a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the entity
should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses.
If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the entity should account for the arrangement as a service
contract. The guidance will not change GAAP for an entity’s accounting for service contracts. The amendments in this ASU
are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those annual periods. Therefore,
ASU 2015-05 is now effective. Adoption of this standard has had no impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial
position as the Company has no cloud computing arrangements to which it applies.
In
August 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15 “
Preparation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40)”
.
Under U.S. GAAP, continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements
unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is
commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity’s liquidation becomes imminent, financial
statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting in accordance with Subtopic 205-30, Presentation of Financial
Statements-Liquidation Basis of Accounting. Even when an entity’s liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or
events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial
statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in the update should
be followed to determine whether to disclose information about the relevant conditions and events. The amendments in this ASU
are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Therefore
ASU 2014-15 is now effective. We have evaluated the going concern considerations in this ASU and have determined that it is appropriate
to provide additional disclosure to our financial statements (see Note 2).
In
June 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12
“Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)”
(“ASU 2014-12”).
The objective of ASU 2014-12 is to resolve the diverse accounting treatment being applied in practice by reporting entities in
the accounting for share-based payment awards that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees
to become eligible to vest in the awards, particularly those awards whose terms may provide that the performance target could
be achieved after the employee completes the requisite service period. That is, the employee would be eligible to vest in the
award regardless of whether the employee is rendering service on the date the performance target is achieved. ASU 2014-12 is effective
for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and earlier adoption is
permitted. The share-based payment awards we currently have outstanding which have performance targets do not contain clauses
wherein the performance target could be achieved after the employee completes the requisite service period; accordingly, adoption
of ASU 2014-12 did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In
May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 “
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”
(“ASU 2014-09”).
ASU 2014-09 is the end result of a joint project initiated by FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).
IASB is the body that sets International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The goal of FASB’s and IASB’s
joint project was to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and under IFRS. Specifically, ASU 2014-09:
1.
|
Removes
inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements.
|
|
|
2.
|
Provides
a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues.
|
|
|
3.
|
Improves
comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets.
|
|
|
4.
|
Provides
more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements.
|
|
|
5.
|
Simplifies
the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer.
|
The
core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services
to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods
or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods
within such annual period. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating this ASU in order to determine whether
or not its adoption will have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In
April 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08
“Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment
(Topic 360)”
(“ASU 2014-08”). The objective of ASU 2014-08 is to address issues in Subtopic 205-20,
“Presentation
of Financial Statements – Discontinued Operations”,
that gave rise to complexity and difficulties in practice.
Generally, ASU 2014-08 is effective for discontinued operations that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December
31, 2014, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, but only for discontinued operations that have
not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. We currently have no discontinued operations
to report; consequently, adoption of ASU 2014-08 did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial
position.
4.
Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment was:
|
|
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
Equipment
|
|
$
|
284,900
|
|
|
$
|
313,700
|
|
Furniture
|
|
|
233,900
|
|
|
|
233,900
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
167,600
|
|
|
|
167,600
|
|
|
|
|
686,400
|
|
|
|
715,200
|
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
486,200
|
|
|
|
462,700
|
|
|
|
$
|
200,200
|
|
|
$
|
252,500
|
|
Aggregate
property and equipment depreciation and amortization expense was $23,800 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, and
$49,600 during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016. During the six month period ended June 30, 2016, we disposed equipment
with a combined net book value of $2,700.
5.
Liability Attributable to Warrants
On
January 7, 2014, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with a limited number of institutional
investors, pursuant to which we issued and sold for cash an aggregate 723,333 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of
$4.50 per share (See Note 12). We also issued warrants to the investors for no additional consideration to purchase an aggregate
376,667 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share from January 7, 2014 through January 7, 2019.
Under
certain conditions of the SPA that were to expire on January 7, 2015, we could have been required to issue a variable number of
additional warrants to the investors at a below-market value exercise price. Accordingly, we have concluded that the warrants
issued to the investors are not indexed to our common stock; therefore, the fair value of these warrants was recorded as a liability
of $1,356,000 on January 7, 2014 on our Balance Sheet. Since these conditions did not occur as of January 7, 2015, we have reclassified
the warrant from liability to equity.
Using
a binomial pricing model, we calculated the fair value of the warrants issued to the investors on January 7, 2015 to be $407,300.
We used the following assumptions in the binomial pricing model to derive the fair value: estimated volatility 113%; annualized
forfeiture rate 0%; expected term 4.1 years; estimated exercise factor 3.5; risk free interest rate 1.20; and dividends 0.
Changes
in fair value of the warrants liability are recognized in other income (expense), except for changes in the fair value of the
warrants issued to ipCapital Group, Inc. (“ipCapital”), which are recognized as a component of general and administrative
expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
We
used the exercise price of the warrants, as well as the fair market value of our common stock, to determine the fair value of
our warrants. The exercise price for warrants issued in conjunction with the 2011 Transaction, including those issued to the placement
agent, was either $3.00 or $3.90 per share, and was $3.90 per share for the warrants issued to ipCapital. The warrants issued
to the placement agent included anti-dilution provisions for repricing of the warrants in the event that future issuances of stock
by hopTo met certain conditions. The 2015 Private Placement (Note 12) met those conditions and resulted in the placement agent
warrants being repriced from $3.00 and $3.90 to $2.55 and $3.30, respectively.
The
fair market value of our common stock was $1.30 and $1.80 per share as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We used a binomial
pricing model to determine the fair value of our warrants liability as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the balance sheet
dates, using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
Estimated
Volatility
|
|
|
Annualized
Forfeiture Rate
|
|
|
Expected
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Estimated
Exercise Factor
|
|
|
Risk-Free
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
2011
Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
|
108
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
132
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
ipCapital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
|
125
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
127
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
The
following table is a reconciliation of the warrants liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level
3) for the six months ended June 30, 2016:
Warrants
liability – December 31, 2015 fair value
|
|
$
|
31,600
|
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability recorded in other expense
|
|
|
25,100
|
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability recorded in general and administrative expense
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Warrants
liability – June 30, 2016 fair value
|
|
$
|
60,200
|
|
The
following tables reconcile the total number of warrants outstanding for the periods indicated:
|
|
For
the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Beginning
Outstanding
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
Cancelled
/ Forfeited
|
|
|
Ending
Outstanding
|
|
2011
Transaction
|
|
|
686,833
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
686,833
|
|
2014 Transaction
|
|
|
376,667
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
376,667
|
|
Exercise Agreement
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
ipCapital
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
Consultant
Warrant
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
Offer
to Exercise
|
|
|
10,167
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,167
|
|
|
|
|
1,411,619
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,411,619
|
|
|
|
For
the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2015
|
|
|
|
Beginning
Outstanding
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
Cancelled
/ Forfeited
|
|
|
Ending
Outstanding
|
|
2011
Transaction
|
|
|
686,833
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
686,833
|
|
2014 Transaction
|
|
|
376,667
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
376,667
|
|
ipCapital
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Exercise Agreement
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
Consultant
Warrant
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
Offer
to Exercise
|
|
|
10,167
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,167
|
|
|
|
|
1,411,619
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,411,619
|
|
|
|
For
the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Beginning
Outstanding
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
Cancelled
/ Forfeited
|
|
|
Ending
Outstanding
|
|
2011
Transaction
|
|
|
686,833
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
686,833
|
|
2014 Transaction
|
|
|
376,667
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
376,667
|
|
Exercise Agreement
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
ipCapital
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
Consultant
Warrant
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
Offer
to Exercise
|
|
|
10,167
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,167
|
|
|
|
|
1,411,619
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,411,619
|
|
|
|
For
the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2015
|
|
|
|
Beginning
Outstanding
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
Cancelled
/ Forfeited
|
|
|
Ending
Outstanding
|
|
2011
Transaction
|
|
|
686,833
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
686,833
|
|
2014 Transaction
|
|
|
376,667
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
376,667
|
|
Exercise Agreement
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
ipCapital
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
Consultant
Warrant
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
Offer
to Exercise
|
|
|
10,167
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,167
|
|
|
|
|
1,411,619
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,411,619
|
|
6.
Severance Liability
In
August of 2015 we agreed to provide a terminated employee a lump sum payment of $15,000 and six months of medical coverage payments
which ended on March 2, 2016.
As
of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, an aggregate of $0 and $5,900, respectively, remained outstanding associated with the
severance liabilities. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, we made total payments of $5,900 and $0 to individuals
whom these severance amounts were due.
7.
Deferred Rent
We
amended our office lease during 2013. On February 1, 2014, we moved our corporate offices to a different building within the same
office complex owned and operated by our landlord in Campbell, California, where our corporate offices had been located prior
to February 1, 2014. Since the new space is controlled by the same landlord, we considered the lease amendment to be a modification
to our preexisting lease; accordingly, we are amortizing the remaining balance in deferred rent immediately prior to February
1, 2014 over the remaining term of the modified amended lease. Additionally, our landlord provided us with $106,600 of leasehold
improvements on the new space that we are amortizing over the remaining term of the amended lease. All of the prior leasehold
improvements that had not been previously amortized were accelerated and recognized in their entirety from the time of the amendment
through January 2014, prior to the move.
On
August 11, 2015, we entered into a sublease agreement to sublease the entirety of the South Bascom office space to a third party.
The term of the sublease extends through the end of our office lease term for that space and the monthly rent payments due to
hopTo fully offset the monthly rent payments due to the landlord under hopTo’s lease for that space.
On
August 24, 2015, we entered into a new office lease for our corporate headquarters in Campbell, California which became effective
on October 1, 2015, is better suited to our California operations and results in significant monthly savings. We were required
to pre-pay a portion of the lease commitment in the form of a deposit which was recorded as deferred rent during 2015.
As
of June 30, 2016 deferred rent was:
Component
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
Long-Term
Liabilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Deferred
rent expense
|
|
$
|
21,200
|
|
|
$
|
(37,800
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,600
|
)
|
Deferred
rent benefit
|
|
|
39,700
|
|
|
|
52,900
|
|
|
|
92,600
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,900
|
|
|
$
|
15,100
|
|
|
$
|
76,000
|
|
As
of December 31, 2015 deferred rent was:
Component
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
Long-Term
Liabilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Deferred
rent expense
|
|
$
|
(18,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
(46,100
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,800
|
)
|
Deferred
rent benefit
|
|
|
39,700
|
|
|
|
72,800
|
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,700
|
|
|
$
|
47,700
|
|
Deferred
rent expense represents the remaining balance of the aggregate free rent we received from our landlord and escalations that are
being recognized over the life of the lease as a component of rent expense. Deferred rent benefit relates to the unamortized portion
of the leasehold improvements provided to us by our landlord (i.e., incentives) that we are recognizing on a straight-line basis
as a reduction to rent expense over the term of the lease.
8.
Stock-Based Compensation
The
following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense, net of amounts capitalized, we recorded in our Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, by classification:
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Statement
of Operations Classification
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Costs
of revenue
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,200
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
Selling
and marketing expense
|
|
|
50,300
|
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
64,400
|
|
|
|
58,800
|
|
General
and administrative expense
|
|
|
41,900
|
|
|
|
130,500
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
298,600
|
|
Research
and development expense
|
|
|
51,200
|
|
|
|
28,100
|
|
|
|
67,100
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
143,500
|
|
|
$
|
190,100
|
|
|
$
|
229,700
|
|
|
$
|
412,400
|
|
The
following table presents summaries of the status and activity of our stock option awards for the three-month period ended June
30, 2016.
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Terms (Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding
– March 31, 2016
|
|
|
696,189
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
– June 30, 2016
|
|
|
696,189
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
6.42
|
|
|
$
|
22,400
|
|
The
following table presents summaries of the status and activity of our stock option awards for the six-month period ended June 30,
2016.
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Terms (Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding
– December 31, 2015
|
|
|
705,990
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
|
|
(9,801
|
)
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
– June 30, 2016
|
|
|
696,189
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
6.42
|
|
|
$
|
22,400
|
|
Of
the options outstanding as of June 30, 2016, 560,698 were vested, 134,990 were estimated to vest in future periods and 501 were
estimated to be forfeited prior to their vesting. As of June 30, 2016, there was approximately $77,800 of total unrecognized compensation
cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock options. Such cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of approximately six months.
All
options are exercisable immediately upon grant. Options vest ratably, generally over a 33-month period commencing in the fourth
month after the grant date. We have the right to repurchase common stock issued upon the exercise of an option upon an optionee’s
termination of service to us prior to full vesting at the option’s exercise price.
The
following table presents summaries of the status and activity of our restricted stock awards for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2016. We include the common stock underlying the restricted stock award in shares outstanding once such common stock
has vested and the restriction has been removed (“releases” or “released”). The common stock vests ratably,
generally over a 33-month period commencing in the fourth month after the award date.
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Recognition Period (Years)
|
|
|
Unrecognized
Compensation Cost Remaining
|
|
Unreleased
– March 31, 2016
|
|
|
90,704
|
|
|
$
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Released
|
|
|
(17,274
|
)
|
|
|
2.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unreleased
– June 30, 2016
|
|
|
106,901
|
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
139,300
|
|
The
following table presents summaries of the status and activity of our restricted stock awards for the six-month period ended June
30, 2016.
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Recognition Period (Years)
|
|
|
Unrecognized
Compensation Cost Remaining
|
|
Unreleased
– December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
106,586
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Released
|
|
|
|
(30,549
|
)
|
|
|
2.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
(4,136
|
)
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unreleased
– June 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
106,901
|
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
139,300
|
|
As
of June 30, 2016, there was approximately $139,300 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related
to unreleased restricted stock awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
twenty-four months.
9.
Revenue
Revenue
for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
Over (Under) 2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Software
Licenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows
|
|
$
|
261,600
|
|
|
$
|
442,300
|
|
|
$
|
(180,700
|
)
|
|
|
-40.9
|
%
|
UNIX/Linux
|
|
|
60,800
|
|
|
|
244,100
|
|
|
|
(183,300
|
)
|
|
|
-75.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
322,400
|
|
|
|
686,400
|
|
|
|
(364,000
|
)
|
|
|
-53.0
|
%
|
Software
Service Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows
|
|
|
470,500
|
|
|
|
482,200
|
|
|
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
|
-2.4
|
%
|
UNIX/Linux
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
178,900
|
|
|
|
(23,900
|
)
|
|
|
-13.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
625,500
|
|
|
|
661,100
|
|
|
|
(35,600
|
)
|
|
|
-5.4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
10,700
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
-5.3
|
%
|
Total
Revenue
|
|
$
|
958,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,358,800
|
|
|
$
|
(400,200
|
)
|
|
|
-29.5
|
%
|
Revenue
for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
Over (Under) 2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Software
Licenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows
|
|
$
|
551,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,056,300
|
|
|
$
|
(504,600
|
)
|
|
|
-47.8
|
%
|
UNIX/Linux
|
|
|
145,200
|
|
|
|
414,100
|
|
|
|
(268,900
|
)
|
|
|
-64.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
696,900
|
|
|
|
1,470,400
|
|
|
|
(773,500
|
)
|
|
|
-52.6
|
%
|
Software
Service Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows
|
|
|
922,500
|
|
|
|
968,000
|
|
|
|
(45,500
|
)
|
|
|
-4.7
|
%
|
UNIX/Linux
|
|
|
324,300
|
|
|
|
367,200
|
|
|
|
(42,900
|
)
|
|
|
-11.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
1,246,800
|
|
|
|
1,335,200
|
|
|
|
(88,400
|
)
|
|
|
-6.6
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
22,200
|
|
|
|
24,300
|
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
-8.6
|
%
|
Total
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,965,900
|
|
|
$
|
2,829,900
|
|
|
$
|
(864,000
|
)
|
|
|
-30.5
|
%
|
10.
Costs of Revenue
Costs
of revenue for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
Over (Under) 2015
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Software
service costs
|
|
$
|
36,600
|
|
|
$
|
42,900
|
|
|
$
|
(6,300
|
)
|
|
|
-14.7
|
%
|
Software
product costs
|
|
|
30,800
|
|
|
|
62,900
|
|
|
|
(32,100
|
)
|
|
|
-51.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
67,400
|
|
|
$
|
105,800
|
|
|
$
|
(38,400
|
)
|
|
|
-36.3
|
%
|
Costs
of revenue for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
Over (Under) 2015
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Software
service costs
|
|
$
|
76,000
|
|
|
$
|
84,600
|
|
|
$
|
(8,600
|
)
|
|
|
-10.2
|
%
|
Software
product costs
|
|
|
45,200
|
|
|
|
125,700
|
|
|
|
(80,500
|
)
|
|
|
-64.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
121,200
|
|
|
$
|
210,300
|
|
|
$
|
(89,100
|
)
|
|
|
-42.4
|
%
|
11.
Capitalized Software Development Costs
Capitalized
software development costs consisted of the following:
|
|
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
Software
development costs
|
|
$
|
490,400
|
|
|
$
|
518,800
|
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
|
|
(490,200
|
)
|
|
|
(498,000
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
20,800
|
|
Amortization
of capitalized software development costs is reported as a component of costs of revenue. Capitalized software development costs
amortization aggregated $2,600 and $54,000 during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $5,100
and $108,000 during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
We
recorded $0 capitalized software development costs during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.
During
the three month period ended June 30, 2016, we determined that an impairment of $15,500 existed with certain capitalized software
development cost associated with hopTo Work which may not be monetized during the period in which these costs were scheduled to
be amortized. These impairment costs are in addition to the amortization costs detailed above.
12.
Stockholders’ Equity
2015
Private Placement
On
July 24, 2015 we entered into a securities purchase agreement and subscription agreement, pursuant to which we issued and sold
for cash an aggregate of 2,105,919 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $1.21 per share. We derived gross proceeds
of $2,550,500 from this placement.
2014
Private Placement
During
the three-month period ended March 31, 2014, we issued and sold for cash an aggregate of 753,333 shares of our common stock at
a purchase price of $4.5 per share in the 2014 private placement that resulted in gross proceeds of $3,390,000 (See Note 5).
The
2014 private placement was recorded into the financial statements as follows:
Gross
cash proceeds
|
|
$
|
3,390,000
|
|
Less:
gross proceeds allocated to warrants liability – investors
|
|
|
(1,356,000
|
)
|
Gross
proceeds allocated to additional paid-in capital and common stock
|
|
|
2,034,000
|
|
Less:
cash issuance costs – legal fees
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
Recorded
in additional paid-in capital and common stock
|
|
$
|
2,014,000
|
|
In
conjunction with the 2014 private placement, we recorded a warrants liability of $1,356,000 as of January 7, 2014 on our Balance
Sheet. Certain conditions under the SPA which expired on January 7, 2015 would have required us to issue additional warrants at
below-market value exercise price (see Note 5). These conditions did not occur and ended as of January 7, 2015. Therefore, we
have reclassified the related liability to equity as of January 7, 2015 on our Balance Sheet.
13.
Commitments and Contingencies
On
February 1, 2014, we had previously relocated our corporate offices to a larger suite within our landlord’s office complex
in Campbell, California. We are currently leasing 10,659 square feet under a five-year lease that, unless renewed, will expire
in October 2018.
On
August 11, 2015 we entered into a sublease agreement to sublease the entirety of the South Bascom office space to a third party.
The term of the sublease extends from November 1, 2015 through the end of our office lease term for that space in October, 2018.
The monthly rent payments due to hopTo under this sublease fully offset the monthly rent payments due to the landlord under hopTo’s
lease for that space.
On
August 24, 2015, we entered into a new office lease for our corporate headquarters in Campbell, California which became effective
on October 1, 2015, is better suited to our California operations and results in significant monthly savings. The term of this
lease is from October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2018.
The
following table sets forth the minimum lease payments we will be required to make throughout the remainder of the lease:
Year
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Remainder
of 2016
|
|
|
$
|
56,000
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
114,300
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
68,300
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
238,600
|
|
14.
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
We
disbursed $600 and $700 for the payment of interest expense during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.
We
disbursed $800 and $2,100 for the payment of income taxes during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Such disbursement was made for the payment of foreign income taxes related to the operation of our Israeli subsidiary, GraphOn
Research Labs, Ltd.
During
the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, we increased our warrants liability by $28,600, and decreased by $129,300 for the same
periods in the prior year, which was recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Such increase for the six-month
ended June 30, 2016 reflected the aggregate fair value adjustments we recorded during such period and in addition to reclassifying
our 2014 PIPE warrant to equity. No cash was disbursed in conjunction with these items (See Note 5).
15.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Earnings
or loss per share is calculated by dividing the net income or loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings or loss per share (“Diluted EPS”) is calculated by dividing
the net income or loss for the period by the total of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during
the period plus the effects of any dilutive securities. Diluted EPS considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except
in periods in which there is a loss because the inclusion of such potential shares of common stock would have an anti-dilutive
effect. During all periods presented in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, potentially dilutive securities included
shares of common stock potentially issuable upon exercise of stock options, release of unvested restricted stock awards and exercise
of warrants. Diluted EPS excludes the impact of potential issuance of shares of common stock related to our stock options in periods
in which the exercise price of the stock option is greater than the average market price of our common stock during such periods.
For
the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, 2,214,709 and 2,289,322 shares of common stock equivalents, respectively,
were excluded from the computation of dilutive loss per share since their effect would be anti-dilutive.
For
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, 2,214,709 and 2,289,322 shares of common stock equivalents, respectively,
were excluded from the computation of dilutive loss per share since their effect would be anti-dilutive.
16.
Segment Information
The
Company’s operations have historically been conducted and reported in two segments, GO-Global and hopTo, each representing
a specific product line and dedicated operating resources. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company developed its hopTo
Work product and go to market strategy, and beginning in January of 2015, it reorganized to a functional organization structure
with consolidated decision authority over engineering, product management, sales and marketing resources. Resources in these functional
departments are now shared for the development, sales and support of both the GO-Global and hopTo products. The GO-Global and
hopTo Work products also have similar target customers, distribution channels, and common reseller partners.
Beginning
with the three-month period ended March 31, 2015, the Company will no longer report financial results in two segments. Software
revenue and services revenue for the hopTo Work product will be included in the Windows software and Windows services revenue,
respectively.
Revenue
by country for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
United
States
|
|
$
|
365,600
|
|
|
$
|
616,800
|
|
|
$
|
787,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,368,300
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
155,300
|
|
|
|
246,100
|
|
|
|
295,200
|
|
|
|
415,600
|
|
Other
countries
|
|
|
437,700
|
|
|
|
495,900
|
|
|
|
883,500
|
|
|
|
1,046,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
958,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,358,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,965,900
|
|
|
$
|
2,829,900
|
|
17.
Related Party Transactions
ipCapital
Group, Inc.
On
October 11, 2011, we engaged ipCapital Group, Inc. (“ipCapital”), an affiliate of John Cronin, who is one of our directors,
to assist us in the execution of our strategic decision to significantly strengthen, grow and commercially exploit our intellectual
property assets. Our engagement agreement with ipCapital, which has been amended three times, affords us the right to request
ipCapital to perform a number of diverse services, employing its proprietary processes and methodologies, to facilitate our ability
to identify and extract from our current intellectual property base new inventions, potential patent applications, and marketing
and licensing opportunities.
For
the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no services performed, additional charges incurred or
payments made to ipCapital under the agreement.
In
addition to the fees we agreed to pay ipCapital for its services, we issued ipCapital a five-year warrant to purchase up to 26,667
shares of our common stock at an initial price of $3.90 per share. Half of the warrant (13,333 shares) has a time-based vesting
condition, with such vesting to occur in three equal annual installments. The vesting installments occurred on October 11, 2012
and October 11, 2013, and October 11, 2014, respectively. The remaining 13,333 shares became fully vested upon the completion
to our satisfaction of all services that we requested from ipCapital under the engagement agreement, prior to the signing of the
amendments. Such performance was deemed satisfactory during 2012. We believe that these fees, together with the issuance of the
warrant, constitute no greater compensation than we would be required to pay an unaffiliated person for performing substantially
similar services.
The
exercise price of the warrant issued to ipCapital could be reset to below-market value. Consequently, we have concluded that such
warrant is not indexed to our common stock and should be recorded as a liability. We recognize the warrants liability over their
vesting period, and in accordance with the liability method of accounting, we re-measure the fair value of the accrued warrants
at each balance sheet date and recognize the change in fair value as general and administrative compensation expense (See Note
5). We recognized $(800) and $13,900 as a component of general and administrative expense during the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $3,500 and $14,200 during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively,
resulting from the change in fair value.
ipCapital
Licensing Company I, LLC
In
February 2013, we entered into an IP Brokerage agreement with ipCapital Licensing Company I, LLC (“ipCLC”) (the “IP
Brokerage Agreement”). At the time that we entered into this agreement, John Cronin was a partner at ipCLC. He is no longer
affiliated with ipCLC. Pursuant to the IP Brokerage Agreement, we engaged ipCLC, on a no-retainer basis, to identify and present
us with candidates who may be seeking to acquire a certain limited group of our patents unrelated to our current business strategy.
In June 2016, we determined that the IP Brokerage Agreement is no longer in effect since ipCLC no longer exists as an entity.
18.
Subsequent Event
In
connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we concluded that there is substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern subsequent to the end of the June 2016 quarter.
ITEM
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Update
on hopTo Plans
We
have been developing our hopTo family of products since 2012 and have released several versions of hopTo Work. We believe that
we have provided a unique solution for a problem that has been acknowledged as a significant market opportunity, and we have received
acknowledgment from independent industry experts, prospective customers and partners that our solution to the problem is unique
and has value.
However,
the market for products such as hopTo Work is still in its early stages and despite our best efforts to date with our limited
resources we have not been able to gain sufficient market traction to generate meaningful revenue from our hopTo products. We
have determined that given our capital constraints, it is unlikely that we will realize meaningful revenue from our hopTo products
in the foreseeable future. As we previously disclosed, we sought a business opportunity with Citrix Systems, which would have
been material to us. However, to date such opportunity, and other opportunities we were pursuing, have not materialized, and based
on our most recent contact with these potential partners, we believe it is not likely that these opportunities will occur in any
reasonable time frame. On the other hand, we have also determined, based on discussions to date, that we may be able to extract
value from the technology, intellectual property and software that we have built and are currently working to do so at this time.
Although there is no certainty as to timing or success of these efforts, and shareholders should not place any significant reliance
on the outcome of such efforts unless and until definitive agreements are reached, this may include the sale of certain of our
hopTo software products, the sale of patents, and the monetization of the GO-Global business or some combinations of these transactions
(See Note 2 to our Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
The
following description of our business and business opportunities is expressly qualified by the preceding statement and the going
concern disclosure in Note 2 to our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Introduction
We
are developers of software productivity products for mobile devices such as tablets and smartphones, and application publishing
software solutions. Our newest product line, which is called hopTo, was originally marketed to consumers and is now also marketed
to small and medium sized businesses and enterprise level customers under the name hopTo Work, which is now our primary focus
in the hopTo product line.
hopTo
provides mobile end-users with a productivity workspace for their mobile devices that allows them to manage, share, view, and
edit their documents, regardless of where they are stored. We launched the first commercial version of hopTo through Apple’s
App Store on November 14, 2013. This version was targeted at Apple’s tablet devices, the iPad and the iPad Mini. From the
initial launch through 2015, we made hopTo available for free.
On
November 10, 2014, we launched the first version of hopTo Work, a version of the hopTo workspace made available to businesses
for a fee. hopTo Work expands upon the core capabilities of hopTo by providing mobile access to applications that businesses rely
on for their daily operations.
During
2015, we announced several major enhancements to hopTo Work, including the introduction of the MAX (Mobile App eXperience) feature
set, which allows customers to instantly transform their legacy applications to become touch friendly on modern mobile devices.
We also worked to integrate our hopTo Work product with certain software products offered by Citrix Systems and on November 12,
2015 we launched hopTo Work for Citrix through Apple’s App Store.
On
March 30, 2016, we released hopTo MAX for GO-Global, a new product which delivers the hopTo MAX feature set to customers of our
GO-Global for Windows product. This new product included clients available for both iOS and Android devices.
Over
the years, we have also made significant investments in intellectual property (“IP”). We have filed many patents
designed to protect the new technologies embedded in hopTo.
Corporate
Background
We
are a Delaware corporation, founded in May 1996. Our headquarters are located at 51 East Campbell Ave, Campbell, California, 95008,
our toll-free phone number is 1-800-472-7466, and our phone number for local and international calls is 408-688-2674. We have
an office in Concord, New Hampshire, and we have remote employees located in various states, as well as internationally in the
United Kingdom and Israel. Our corporate Internet Website is http://www.hopto.com. The information on our website is not part
of this quarterly report.
Our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports filed
with or furnished to the SEC under sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are made available free of charge
on our corporate Internet Website (click “Investors” on our home page, click “Financial Reporting” and
then click “SEC Filings”) as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or furnished
to the SEC.
The
hopTo Opportunity
The
adoption of mobile devices, such as smartphones and tablets, in the workplace has revealed the need for a mobile application and
content access platform that addresses a range of mobile productivity challenges for professional/consumer users (“prosumers”),
small and home offices (“SOHO”), small- to medium-sized businesses (“SMB” or “SMBs”), and
Enterprise organizations. We believe a mobile platform that addresses this need will become a critical asset for any size organization,
IT department, and for the most productive end user experience.
Focusing
more specifically on the larger SMB/Enterprise business markets, adoption of mobile devices is reshaping how organizations deliver,
secure, and manage applications and content on these devices. This has also introduced challenges for organizations to integrate
the devices into daily workflows and manage security on both company-owned and employee-owned devices.
From
a workflow standpoint, we believe business users want mobile solutions that enable them to replace or extend their traditional
desktop PC environment with mobile devices, which is often easier said than done. PC users have enjoyed a rich ecosystem of applications
and technologies that has been growing for over 30 years, and have come to expect an exceptional level of power and flexibility
to get their work done. Many solutions have been developed to meet this challenge but generally have failed, in particular for
the iOS and Android devices that dominate both the consumer and business markets.
The
hopTo Work Product
In
March 2014, we announced our hopTo Work product which was subsequently released on November 11, 2014. hopTo Work builds upon the
hopTo product (discussed below), bringing its core mobile productivity features to SMB/Enterprise users, with additional security
and manageability functions. It targets Information Technology (“IT”) departments that are concerned with protecting
and managing access to sensitive data, controlling access to business applications, compliance with internal policies and, in
some cases, government regulations.
With
hopTo Work, IT departments will be able to more easily and safely address these concerns while integrating mobile technology into
their networks and user workflows. The initial version of hopTo Work leverages a customer’s existing Microsoft RDS infrastructure
– a significant portion of Microsoft’s on-premise customer base – which enables an IT department to have a mobile
access for end users in minutes.
It
will further enable business users to make a smooth and simple transition from PCs to mobile devices for all or part of their
work. As with the original prosumer/SOHO version of hopTo, the premise of hopTo Work is that mobile users in SMB/Enterprise businesses
using devices such as the Apple iPad would like to travel with just their tablets but still have the benefits of secure access
and editing capabilities for documents in their corporate cloud or network storage, personal cloud storage, and on their Windows
computers. In addition, hopTo Work delivers the capability to mobilize Windows applications that businesses and organizations
rely on for their daily operation.
hopTo
Work is designed not only to assist users in performing operations on their iPads that typically require a Mac or Windows PC,
but to do so within the data protection and access control policies of their IT organizations. Our view is that current solutions
are limited because of the need to install special applications and procedures that are a hindrance to user productivity. We address
these issues with the following features:
|
●
|
The
ability to access and manage all of the user’s files and documents, no matter where they are stored. This includes enterprise
document management systems, enterprise-class network servers and cloud storage services, or the user’s PC.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability to view, create, edit, manage, and share files through a native touch-screen mobile device interface rather than apps
designed for legacy PC desktops with keyboards and mice.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability to access Windows applications and use them in a touch-friendly manner consistent with end user expectations for mobile
devices.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability to access web applications based on Microsoft Internet Explorer and the additional technologies incorporated into
those apps such as Java, Flash, ActiveX, and Microsoft Silverlight, all of which are not readily operable from iOS or Android
based devices.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability to multitask, which means working with multiple documents and applications at the same time, side-by-side. The iPad
is inherently a single document environment, which we believe is a major shortcoming for most users.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability to view, create, and edit Microsoft Office documents that are 100% compatible with Microsoft Office, thus allowing
users to collaborate with other users who are using Microsoft Office on a Mac or a Windows PC.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability to address the problems of document sprawl, giving users easy access to manage, search, and browse the data they need
across storage devices and cloud services, but without allowing sensitive documents to leave the corporate network undetected.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability for IT departments to implement a “bring-your-own-device” (BYOD) solution that integrates mobile device
use into daily workflows and enhances user productivity without compromising security, requiring additional server infrastructure,
or putting an additional burden on the user experience.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability for IT departments to grant and revoke access to anyone for any data anywhere. Employees must have the ability to
access corporate internal data (documents, files and applications) efficiently but without jeopardizing security.
|
hopTo
Target Markets
We
view hopTo Work, with its additional application mobilization, security and manageability features, as a product that appeals
to the SMB and Enterprise markets. We expect sales strategies for the hopTo Work versions of the product to involve a combination
of strategic partnerships with various relevant enterprise software companies, a sales partner channel, and a direct sales team,
however at the present time we lack resources to execute any such strategies. hopTo Work is a paid offering that is currently
sold on a perpetual license plus maintenance model. Other models such as subscription based pricing might be made available in
the future based on market requirements.
The
hopTo Consumer Product
hopTo
also offers a comprehensive productivity workspace for mobile devices (currently for the Apple iPad) that empowers mobile users
by offering them functionalities similar to what they’ve come to expect from their PCs. For example, hopTo aggregates files
and documents from multiple storage silos (such as Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, or the user’s PC) into
a single touch-friendly workspace. From within this workspace, users are able to search for documents in the workspace (which
includes their cloud storage silos and their PC), view, edit, and share their documents, and import photos from their iPad camera
roll or Google Image from Web.
hopTo
provides powerful document editing capabilities that leverage legacy Windows applications, such as Microsoft Office, to give users
a rich, native editing feature set. Its high degree of compatibility with Microsoft Office enables easy collaboration with other
users running Microsoft Office on Mac or Windows PCs. hopTo is unique in that it both leverages legacy applications for document
editing and provides a touch-friendly user experience that, in our view, none of our competitors have achieved.
The
first commercially available version of hopTo was released on November 14, 2013, through the Apple App Store. hopTo currently
runs on the Apple iPad family of devices, and we may make it available for other devices, such as the Apple iPhone and for devices
based on the Google Android platform. This product is targeted at users who are transitioning from PC to mobile—to provide
access to their content regardless of where it’s stored, along with rich document editing capabilities, multitasking, file
management, and more. The hopTo product is currently offered free of charge. Based on usage patterns and market acceptance we
may, at some point in the future, decide to charge fees for this offering. Our product targeting is suspended currently as we
lack the resources to execute such targeting.
Our
Intellectual Property
We
believe that IP is a business tool that potentially maximizes our competitive advantages and product differentiation, grows revenue
opportunities, encourages collaboration with key business partners, and protects our long-term growth opportunities. Strategic
IP development is therefore a critical component of our overall business strategy. It is a business function that consistently
interacts with our research and development, product development, and marketing initiatives to generate further value from those
operations.
We
rely primarily on patents, trade secret protection, copyright law, confidentiality, and proprietary information agreements to
protect our proprietary technology and registered trademarks. Despite our precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third
parties to copy portions of our products, or to obtain information we regard as proprietary. The loss of any material trade secret,
trademark, trade name or copyright could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We intend to defend our proprietary technology rights; however, we cannot give any assurance that our efforts to protect our proprietary
technology rights will be successful.
We
also currently hold rights to patents. We occasionally file patent applications to protect innovations arising from our research,
development and design, and are currently pursuing additional patent applications.
We
do not believe our products infringe on the rights of any third parties, but we can give no assurance that third parties will
not assert infringement claims against us in the future, or that any such assertion will not result in costly litigation or require
us to obtain a license to proprietary technology rights of such parties.
ipCapital
Group, Inc.
On
October 11, 2011, we engaged ipCapital Group, Inc., (“ipCapital”) an affiliate of John Cronin, who is one of our directors,
to assist us in the execution of our strategic decision to significantly strengthen, grow and commercially exploit our intellectual
property assets. Our engagement agreement with ipCapital, which has been amended three times, affords us the right to request
ipCapital to perform a number of diverse services, employing its proprietary processes and methodologies, to facilitate our ability
to identify and extract from our current intellectual property base new inventions, potential patent applications, and marketing
and licensing opportunities.
As
a result of ipCapital’s work under the engagement agreement, as amended, as of August 12, 2016, 173 new patent applications
have been filed. Of these 173 applications, 43 patents have been granted by the USPTO. We have also received notice from the USPTO
that 8 additional patent applications have been allowed and will ultimately issue as US patents in the next 60-90 days.
ipCapital
Licensing Company I, LLC
In
February 2013, we entered into an IP Brokerage agreement with ipCapital Licensing Company I, LLC (“ipCLC”) (the “IP
Brokerage Agreement”). At the time that we entered into this agreement, John Cronin was a partner at ipCLC. He is no longer
affiliated with ipCLC. Pursuant to the IP Brokerage Agreement, we engaged ipCLC, on a no-retainer basis, to identify and present
us with candidates who may be seeking to acquire a certain limited group of our patents unrelated to our current business strategy.
In June 2016, we determined that the IP Brokerage Agreement is no longer in effect since ipCLC no longer exists as an entity.
Our
GO-Global Software Products
Our
GO-Global product offerings, which currently are our only revenue source, can be categorized into product families as follows:
|
●
|
GO-Global
for Windows:
Allows access to Windows-based applications from remote locations
and a variety of connections, including the Internet and dial-up connections. The Windows
applications run on a central computer server along with GO-Global Windows Host software.
This allows the applications to be accessed remotely via GO-Global Client software, or
a Web browser, over many types of data connections, regardless of the bandwidth or operating
system. Web-enabling is achieved without modifying the underlying application’s
code or requiring costly add-ons.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
GO-Global
for UNIX:
Allows access to UNIX and Linux-based applications from remote locations and a variety of connections, including
the Internet and dial-up connections. The UNIX/Linux applications run on a central computer server along with the GO-Global
for UNIX Host software. This allows the applications to be accessed and run remotely via GO-Global Client software or a Web
browser without having to modify the application’s code or requiring costly add-ons.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
GO-Global
Client:
We offer a range of GO-Global Client software that allows remote application access from a wide variety of
local, remote and mobile platforms, including Windows, Linux, UNIX, Apple OS X and iOS, and Google Android. We plan to continue
to develop GO-Global Client software for new portable and mobile devices.
|
We
intend to continue to operate Go-Global, as it remains a viable stand-alone business.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We
believe that several accounting policies are important to understanding our historical and future performance. We refer to these
policies as “critical” because these specific areas require us to make judgments and estimates about matters that
are uncertain at the time we make the estimates. Actual results may differ from these estimates. For a summary of our critical
accounting policies, please refer to our 2015 10-K Report and Note 3 to our Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Results
of Operations for the Three and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
The
following operating results should be read in conjunction with our critical accounting policies. See Note 2 to our Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue
Revenue
for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
Over (Under) 2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Software
Licenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows
|
|
$
|
261,600
|
|
|
$
|
442,300
|
|
|
$
|
(180,700
|
)
|
|
|
-40.9
|
%
|
UNIX/Linux
|
|
|
60,800
|
|
|
|
244,100
|
|
|
|
(183,300
|
)
|
|
|
-75.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
322,400
|
|
|
|
686,400
|
|
|
|
(364,000
|
)
|
|
|
-53.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
Service Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows
|
|
|
470,500
|
|
|
|
482,200
|
|
|
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
|
-2.4
|
%
|
UNIX/Linux
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
178,900
|
|
|
|
(23,900
|
)
|
|
|
-13.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
625,500
|
|
|
|
661,100
|
|
|
|
(35,600
|
)
|
|
|
-5.4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
10,700
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
-5.3
|
%
|
Total
Revenue
|
|
$
|
958,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,358,800
|
|
|
$
|
(400,200
|
)
|
|
|
-29.5
|
%
|
Revenue
for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
Over (Under) 2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Software
Licenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows
|
|
$
|
551,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,056,300
|
|
|
$
|
(504,600
|
)
|
|
|
-47.8
|
%
|
UNIX/Linux
|
|
|
145,200
|
|
|
|
414,100
|
|
|
|
(268,900
|
)
|
|
|
-64.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
696,900
|
|
|
|
1,470,400
|
|
|
|
(773,5000
|
|
|
|
-52.6
|
%
|
Software
Service Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows
|
|
|
922,500
|
|
|
|
968,000
|
|
|
|
(45,500
|
)
|
|
|
-4.7
|
%
|
UNIX/Linux
|
|
|
324,300
|
|
|
|
367,200
|
|
|
|
(42,900
|
)
|
|
|
-11.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
1,246,800
|
|
|
|
1,335,200
|
|
|
|
(88,400
|
)
|
|
|
-6.6
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
22,200
|
|
|
|
24,300
|
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
-8.6
|
%
|
Total
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,965,900
|
|
|
$
|
2,829,900
|
|
|
$
|
(864,000
|
)
|
|
|
-30.5
|
%
|
Our
software revenue is currently entirely related to our GO-Global product line, and historically has been primarily derived from
product licensing fees and service fees from maintenance contracts. The majority of this revenue has been earned, and continues
to be earned, from a limited number of significant customers, most of whom are resellers. Many of our resellers (each a “stocking
reseller”) purchase software licenses that they hold in inventory until they are resold to the ultimate end user. We
defer recognition of revenue from these sales (on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet under the caption “Deferred Revenue”)
until the stocking reseller sells the underlying software licenses to the ultimate end user. Consequently, if any of our significant
stocking resellers materially change the rate at which they resell our software licenses to the ultimate end user, our software
licenses revenue could be materially impacted.
When
a software license is sold directly to an end user by us, or by one of our resellers who does not stock licenses into inventory,
revenue is recognized immediately upon shipment, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition are met. Consequently, if
any significant end user customer substantially changes its order level, or fails to order during the reporting period, whether
the order is placed directly with us or through one of our non-stocking resellers, our software licenses revenue could be materially
impacted.
Almost
all stocking resellers maintain inventories of our Windows products; few stocking resellers maintain inventories of our UNIX products.
Software
Licenses
Software
license revenue from Windows products decreased in both three-month periods and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, as compared
with the same periods of the prior year, primarily due to lower license purchases from certain of our OEM partners during the
three and six month period June 30, 2016. Certain of these OEM partners had placed unique large orders during same periods in
the prior year.
Software
licenses revenue from our UNIX/Linux products decreased during three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, as compared with
the same periods of the prior year, primarily due to lower revenue from certain of our U.S. government customers which placed
unique large orders during the prior year period and lower aggregate revenue from our resellers and end users, particularly our
European telecommunications customers.
We
expect aggregate GO-Global software license revenue in 2016 to be lower than 2015 levels due to lower aggregate revenue from our
stocking resellers and our European telecommunications customers. At the same time, we will seek to improve cash flow from the
GO-Global business through cost control and other measures.
Software
Service Fees
The
decrease in software service fees revenue attributable to our Windows products during the three-month and six-month period ended
June 30, 2016, as compared to the same period of the prior year, was primarily due to the timing of customer renewals of maintenance
contacts.
The
decrease in service fees revenue attributable to our UNIX products for the three-month and six-month period ended June 30, 2016,
as compared with the same period of the prior year, was primarily the result of the low level of our UNIX product sales throughout
the current and prior year and a resultant decrease in maintenance contract renewals. The majority of this decrease was attributable
to our European telecommunications customers.
We
expect that software service fees for 2016 will be modestly lower than those for 2015, and will not decrease to the same extent
as GO-Global software license revenue.
Other
The
decrease in other revenue during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the same period in
the prior year was primarily due to lower purchase of private labeling fees.
Costs
of Revenue
Costs
of revenue are comprised primarily of software service costs, which represent the costs of customer service, and software product
costs, which are primarily comprised of the amortization of capitalized software development costs, and costs associated with
licenses for third party software included in our product offerings. We incur no shipping or packaging costs as all of our deliveries
are made via electronic means over the Internet.
Under
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, development costs for new product development, after technological feasibility
is established, are recorded as “capitalized software” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Such capitalized
costs are subsequently amortized as cost of revenue (software product costs) over the shorter of three years or the remaining
estimated life of the product. During the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, we did not capitalize
any software development costs. Amortization of capitalized software development costs was $2,600 and $54,000 during the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $5,100 and $108,000 during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and
2015, respectively. In addition, during the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, we determined that an impairment existed for
certain capitalized development cost of $15,500 associated with the hopTo Work product which were not likely to be monetized during
the period in which they were scheduled to be amortized.
Costs
of revenue were 7.0% and 7.8% of total revenue for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and 6.2%
and 7.4% of total revenue for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Costs
of revenue for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
Over (Under) 2015
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Software
service costs
|
|
$
|
36,600
|
|
|
$
|
42,900
|
|
|
$
|
(6,300
|
)
|
|
|
-14.7
|
%
|
Software
product costs
|
|
|
30,800
|
|
|
|
62,900
|
|
|
|
(32,100
|
)
|
|
|
-51.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
67,400
|
|
|
$
|
105,800
|
|
|
$
|
(38,400
|
)
|
|
|
-36.3
|
%
|
Costs
of revenue for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were:
|
|
|
|
|
2016
Over (Under) 2015
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Software
service costs
|
|
$
|
76,000
|
|
|
$
|
84,600
|
|
|
$
|
(8,600
|
)
|
|
|
-10.2
|
%
|
Software
product costs
|
|
|
45,200
|
|
|
|
125,700
|
|
|
|
(80,500
|
)
|
|
|
-64.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
121,200
|
|
|
$
|
210,300
|
|
|
$
|
(89,100
|
)
|
|
|
-42.4
|
%
|
The
decrease in software service costs for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, as compared with the same periods
of the prior year, was primarily due to lower customer support costs associated with GoGlobal. Upon release of the commercial
versions of hopTo and hopTo Work, we began charging costs associated with supporting the products to costs of revenue. We expect
software service costs for 2016 to be lower than those for 2015 as we have been able to reduce headcount costs in this area due
to a lower level of effort required.
The
decreases in software product costs for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, as compared with the same periods
of the prior year, were primarily due to the impairment and resultant write-off of our certain capitalized software development
costs in Q4 2015.
We
expect that software costs of revenue for 2016 will be lower than 2015 levels, due to these items.
Selling
and Marketing Expenses
Selling
and marketing expenses primarily consist of employee costs, outside services, advertising, public relations and travel and entertainment
expense.
Selling
and marketing expenses for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $200,000, or 44.1%, to $253,600, from $453,600
for the same period of 2015, and represented approximately 26.5% and 33.4% of revenue during these periods, respectively. Selling
and marketing expenses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $383,000, or 40.2%, to $570,700, from $953,700
for the same period of 2015, and represented approximately 29.0% and 33.7% of revenue during these periods, respectively.
The
decreases in selling and marketing expenses was due to a combination of lower headcount and a decrease in advertising and promotional
costs associated with hopTo Work as we have focused primarily on our joint marketing efforts with Citrix Systems. As noted above,
we consider it unlikely that we will make progress on our Citrix Systems efforts in any reasonable time frame.
We
expect to essentially eliminate our sales and marketing efforts in 2016 for hopTo Work, and we expect to further reduce our sales
and marketing efforts in 2016 for GO-Global releases to a level that is consistent with our financial resources; accordingly,
we expect 2016 sales and marketing expenses to be lower than 2015 levels.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses primarily consist of employee costs, depreciation and amortization, legal, accounting, other professional
services (including those related to our patents), rent, travel and entertainment and insurance. Certain costs associated with
being a publicly held corporation are also included in general and administrative expenses, as well as bad debts expense.
General
and administrative expenses decreased by $156,400, or 20.3%, to $614,900 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, from
$771,300 for the same period of 2015, and represented approximately 64.1% and 56.8% of revenue during these periods, respectively.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $386,100, or 23.0%, to $1,293,000, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016,
from $1,679,100 for the same period of 2015, and represented approximately 65.8% and 59.3% of revenue during these periods, respectively.
The
decrease in general and administrative expense was primarily due to a combination of decreased rent expense associated with lower
net operating leases, decreased legal expenses associated with activity related to our patents, lower stock compensation expense
associated with the decrease of the stock price, and other lower costs associated with investor relations, and decreased outside
services expense.
In
2016, we intend to continue these cost controls and to benefit from lower rent expense associated with our new headquarters location.
We also intend to further reduce our general and administrative headcount and use of legal service to a level consistent with
our financial resources. We therefore expect that our 2016 general and administrative costs will be lower than those for 2015.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development expenses consist primarily of employee costs, payments to contract programmers, travel and entertainment for all
our engineers, and all rent for our leased engineering facilities.
Research
and development expenses decreased by $617,600, or 56.1%, to $483,600, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, from $1,101,200
for the same period of 2015, and represented approximately 50.4% and 81.0% of revenue for these periods, respectively. Research
and development expenses decreased by $896,700, or 39.6%, to $1,369,400, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, from $2,266,100
for the same period of 2015, and represented approximately 69.7% and 80.1% of revenue for these periods, respectively.
The
decrease in research and development expense is primarily due to lower employee costs associated with lower headcount, lower payments
to contract programmers, and lower operating rent expense.
In
2016, we expect to maintain a level of research and development resource lower than the second half of 2015 and continue to benefit
from the lower rent expense associated with our new headquarters location. We therefore expect 2016 research and development expenses,
net of capitalized software developments costs, to be lower than 2015 levels.
Other
Income/Loss - Change in Fair Value of Warrants Liability
During
the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 we reported non-cash income and loss related to the change in fair value of
our Warrants Liability of $22,200 and $(25,100), respectively, and during the same periods of the prior year, we reported non-cash
income of $184,400 and $129,300, respectively. Such changes resulted from price changes in the market value for our common stock
and can vary from period to period due to the exercise and/or issuance of warrants accounted for under the liability method. For
further information regarding our Warrants Liability, see Note 5 to the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net
Loss
Based
on the foregoing, we reported a net loss of $437,600 and $889,900 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. Additionally, we reported net losses of $1,412,500 and $2,152,900 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016
and 2015, respectively.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our
reported net loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 of $1,412,500 included three significant non-cash items: depreciation
and amortization of $54,800, which was primarily related to amortization of our capitalized software development costs; impairment
of capitalized software development cost of $15,500, stock-based compensation expense of $229,700; and a gain in the change in
value of our warrants liability of $28,600.
We
sold equipment with net book value of $2,700 for $4,500.
See
the Update on hopTo Plans at the beginning of this section for a discussion of our plans.
We
have incurred significant net losses since our inception. For the three and six-months ended June 30, 2016, the Company
incurred losses from operations of $437,600 and $1,412,500. At June 30, 2016, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $82,009,400
and a working capital deficit of $1,959,000. Due to our inability to date to generate meaningful revenue from our hopTo Work business
and our most recent estimation that revenue from this product is unlikely in any reasonable time frame, our cash resources will
not be sufficient to fund our business for the next 12 months. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent
on our ability to continue to generate revenue from our legacy GO-Global business and to raise additional capital through the
issuance of new equity, debt financing, or from the sale of certain assets to meet short and long-term operating requirements.
If
the Company raises additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of
our current shareholders could be reduced, and such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to the Company’s
common stock. Additional financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available
or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company may not be able to take advantage of prospective business endeavors or opportunities,
which could significantly and materially restrict our operations. We are continuing to pursue external financing alternatives
to improve our working capital position. If the Company is unable to obtain the necessary capital, the Company may have to cease
operations.
These
factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern (See Note 2 to our Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements).
In
order to maintain operations, we previously implemented significant expense reductions, including a limited number of employee
layoffs, and have decided to implement further costs cuts and employment reductions.
We
have worked extensively to explore additional sources of capital including the issuance of new shares, securing debt financing,
and the sale of assets including certain of our software products and patents. Although this process is ongoing and we are in
active discussions with multiple parties, there is no guarantee that they will result in transactions that are sufficient to provide
the Company with the required liquidity to remove the substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. We are
also in discussions with some parties about the possibility of other strategic transactions although there is no guarantee that
these discussions will result in an actual transaction.
We
have streamlined our GO-Global operations in order to align its cost structure with its sales. We also pursue and evaluate strategic
partnerships and other opportunities. Should business investment or combination opportunities present themselves to us, and should
such opportunities appear to make financial sense and add value for our shareholders, we will consider those opportunities.
For
the remainder of 2016, we expect to prioritize the investment of our resources into the maintenance of our existing products and
the pursuit of the potential strategic opportunities noted at the beginning of this section. Even with these limited investments,
we expect our cash outflow from operations to continue.
Cash
As
of June 30, 2016, our cash balance was $663,200, as compared with $1,777,300 as of December 31, 2015, a decrease of $1,114,100,
or 62.7%. The decrease primarily resulted from the cash we used in our operations.
Accounts
Receivable, net
At
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we reported accounts receivable, net, of $290,800 and $434,900, respectively. Such amounts
were reported net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, which allowances totaled $14,900 and $17,300 at June 30, 2016 and December
31, 2015, respectively. The decrease in accounts receivable, net, was mainly due to lower sales during the three and six-month
period ended June 30, 2016, as compared same periods ended December 31, 2015. We collect the significant majority of our quarter-end
accounts receivable during the subsequent quarter; accordingly, increases or decreases in accounts receivable from one period
to the next tends to be indicative of the trend in our sales from one period to the next. From time to time, we could have individually
significant accounts receivable balances due us from one or more of our significant customers. If the financial condition of any
of these significant customers should deteriorate, our operating results could be materially affected.
Working
Capital
As
of June 30, 2016, we had current assets of $1,033,900 and current liabilities of $2,992,900, which netted to working capital deficit
of $1,959,000. Included in current liabilities was the current portion of deferred revenue of $1,844,800.