Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant
’
s Certifying Accountant.
(a) On May 19, 2016, the Board of Directors of UV FLU TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
“
Company
”
) dismissed KMJ | Corbin & Company LLP (
“
KMJ
”
) as the Company
’
s independent registered public accounting firm.
During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, KMJ
’
s reports on the Company
’
s consolidated financial statements did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that the reports contained a modification to the effect that there was substantial doubt as to the Company
’
s ability to continue as a going concern.
During the Company
’
s fiscal years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and through May 19, 2016, there were no disagreements between the Company or KMJ on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KMJ, would have caused KMJ to make reference to the matter in their reports. None of the
“
reportable events
”
described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K of the SEC
’
s rules and regulations have occurred during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and through May 19, 2016.
The Company requested that KMJ furnish a statement as to whether it agrees with the statements made by the Company in response to this item, and if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. The Company hereby files KMJ
’
s letter as an exhibit to this report.
(b) On May 23, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company engaged the firm of Hall & Company (
“
Hall
”
) as the Company
’
s new independent registered public accounting firm, subject to completion of its standard client acceptance procedures. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and as of the date hereof, the Company (or someone on its behalf) has not consulted with Hall regarding either:
(i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company
’
s financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company
’
s or oral advice was provided that Hall concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; nor
(ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K, or a reportable event, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9.01