UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

 

 

x

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016

 

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from:

 

to

 


Commission File No. 001-14949

 

Implant Sciences Corporation

 

Massachusetts

 

04-2837126

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

500 Research Drive, Unit 3, Wilmington, Massachusetts

 

01887

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

 

 

(978) 752-1700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

 

 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

 Non-accelerated Filer

Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes  No

As of May 6, 2016, there were 79,025,620 shares of the registrant s Common Stock outstanding.









IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS


 

 

 

 

Page

PART I

 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1.

 

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and           June 30, 2015 (audited)

 

3

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)

 

4

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended           March 31, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)

 

5

 

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

6–29

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

30-39

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

39-40

PART II

 

OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

40-41

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

41-42

Item 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

42

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

 

43





- 2 -









Implant Sciences Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands except share and per share amounts)

 

March 31,    2016

 

June 30,

2015

 

(Unaudited)

 

(Audited)

ASSETS

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

   Cash and cash equivalents

$

280 

 

$

1,985 

   Restricted cash and investments

367 

 

367 

   Accounts receivable-trade, net of allowances of $5 and $47,  respectively

6,468 

 

872 

   Inventories, net

5,981 

 

5,244 

   Prepaid expenses and other current assets

1,609 

 

946 

        Total current assets

14,705 

 

9,414 

Property and equipment, net

840 

 

880 

Other non-current assets

98 

 

98 

        Total assets

$

15,643 

 

$

10,392 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

   Senior secured promissory note – BAM

$

20,000 

 

$

20,000 

   Senior secured convertible promissory note – Montsant Partners

5,284 

 

3,184 

   Senior secured promissory note – DMRJ

1,000 

 

1,000 

   Second senior secured convertible promissory note – DMRJ

18,970 

 

12,000 

   Third senior secured convertible promissory note - DMRJ

17,523 

 

12,000 

   Line of credit – DMRJ

17,662 

 

16,662 

   Current maturities of obligations under capital lease

17 

 

45 

   Accrued expenses

13,179 

 

17,080 

   Accounts payable

4,977 

 

2,855 

   Deferred revenue

1,049 

 

3,454 

      Total current liabilities

99,661 

 

88,280 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

   Long-term obligations under capital lease, net of current maturities

12 

 

20 

   Accrued expenses, net of current

 

48 

   Deferred revenue, net of current

539 

 

221 

   Total long-term liabilities

551 

 

289 

      Total liabilities

100,212 

 

88,569 

Commitments and contingencies  (Note 17)

 

 

 

Stockholders' deficit:

 

 

 

   Common stock; $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 79,036,165 and 79,025,620  shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and 75,113,665 and 75,103,120 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015

79 

 

75 

   Preferred stock; no stated value; 5,000,000 shares authorized

 

 

 

      Series G Convertible Preferred Stock, no stated value; 650,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

 

      Series H Convertible Preferred Stock; no stated value; 22,500 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

 

      Series I Convertible Preferred Stock; no stated value; 21,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

 

      Series J Convertible Preferred Stock; no stated value; 6,500 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

 

   Additional paid-in capital

113,883 

 

112,613 

   Accumulated deficit

(197,749)

 

(189,429)

   Deferred compensation

(730)

 

(1,366)

   Other comprehensive income

21 

 

   Treasury stock, 10,545 common shares, at cost

(73)

 

(73)

      Total stockholders’ deficit

(84,569)

 

(78,177)

         Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit

$

15,643 

 

$

10,392 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.



- 3 -









Implant Sciences Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(In thousands except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

March 31,

 

For the Nine Months Ended

March 31,

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government

$

3,932 

 

$

 

$

7,194 

 

$

Commercial

6,816 

 

3,237 

 

27,539 

 

7,155 

 

10,748 

 

3,237 

 

34,733 

 

7,155 

Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government

40 

 

 

465 

 

Commercial

135 

 

68 

 

410 

 

160 

 

175 

 

68 

 

875 

 

160 

Total revenues

10,923 

 

3,305 

 

35,608 

 

7,315 

Cost of revenues

7,691 

 

2,129 

 

22,266 

 

5,157 

   Gross margin

3,232 

 

1,176 

 

13,342 

 

2,158 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Research and development

1,040 

 

1,347 

 

3,024 

 

3,919 

   Selling, general and administrative

3,811 

 

3,318 

 

11,067 

 

9,188 

      Total operating expenses

4,851 

 

4,665 

 

14,091 

 

13,107 

Loss from operations

(1,619)

 

(3,489)

 

(749)

 

(10,949)

Other income (expense), net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Interest income

 

 

 

    Interest expense

(2,477)

 

(2,243)

 

(7,571)

 

(6,402)

    Total other expense, net

(2,477)

 

(2,242)

 

(7,571)

 

(6,401)

Net loss  

(4,096)

 

(5,731)

 

(8,320)

 

(17,350)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

(1)

 

(19)

 

Comprehensive loss

$

(4,096)

 

$

(5,732)

 

$

(8,339)

 

$

(17,349)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per share, basic and diluted

$

(0.05)

 

$

(0.08)

 

$

(0.11)

 

$

(0.25)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares used in computing net loss per common share, basic and diluted

78,878,953 

 

72,677,287 

 

77,871,509 

 

69,454,343 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.




- 4 -








Implant Sciences Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended

March 31,

 

2016

 

2015

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

   Net loss

$

(8,320)

 

$

(17,350)

   Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows used in operating activities:

 

 

 

      Depreciation and amortization

153 

 

126 

      Bad debt expense

(6)

 

48 

      Stock-based compensation expense

982 

 

2,381 

      Loss on disposal of equipment

 

      Warrants issued to non-employees

58 

 

265 

      Common stock issued to consultants

579 

 

68 

      Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

         Accounts receivable

(5,590)

 

(803)

         Inventories

(737)

 

(468)

         Prepaid expenses and other current assets

356 

 

(298)

         Accounts payable

2,122 

 

(615)

         Accrued expenses

9,880 

 

6,047 

         Deferred revenue

(2,087)

 

1,317 

            Net cash used in operating activities

(2,607)

 

(9,282)

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

   Purchases of property and equipment

(117)

 

(341)

            Net cash used in investing activities

(117)

 

(341)

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

   Proceeds from common stock issued in connection with exercise of stock options and common stock purchase warrants

37 

 

262 

   Principal repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations

(36)

 

(34)

   Net borrowings on line of credit

1,000 

 

10,917 

            Net cash provided by financing activities

1,001 

 

11,145 

            Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

18 

 

            Net change in cash and cash equivalents

(1,705)

 

1,523 

            Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,985 

 

391 

            Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

280 

 

$

1,914 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

   Interest paid

$

813 

 

$

2,380 

Non-cash Financing Activity:

 

 

 

   Conversions of senior secured convertible promissory note interest to common shares

$

245 

 

$

799 

   Common stock issued to consultants

579 

 

68 

   Accrued interest converted to debt

13,574 

 

   Prepaid interest added to debt

1,019 

 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.



- 5 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



1.

Description of Business, Liquidity and Going Concern

Implant Sciences Corporation provides systems and sensors for the homeland security market and related industries.  We have developed and acquired technologies using ion mobility spectrometry to develop a product line for use in trace explosives and narcotics detection.  We currently market and sell our existing trace explosives and narcotics detector products while continuing to make significant investments in developing the next generation of these products.

Liquidity, Going Concern and Management’s Plans

On December 10, 2008, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement with DMRJ Group LLC (“DMRJ”) pursuant to which we issued a senior secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $5,600,000 and a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock.  We have entered into a series of amendments, waivers and modifications with DMRJ.  

On May 4, 2015, we entered into an assignment agreement with DMRJ and Montsant Partners, LLC (“Montsant”), wherein DMRJ assigned its rights, title and interest in the senior secured promissory note dated December 10, 2008 and appointed DMRJ as its collateral agent under the promissory note agreement. DMRJ and Montsant are funds managed by Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund LP.

On April 6, 2016,  we amended our credit agreements with DMRJ and Montsant, effective as of March 31, 2016, pursuant to which, amongst other matters, we extended the maturity date of our indebtedness to June 30, 2016 and December 30, 2016, respectively. Please refer to Note 13 for a complete discussion of the amended terms of the credit agreements.

On March 19, 2014, we entered into a note purchase agreement with a group of institutional investors and BAM Administrative Services LLC (“BAM”), an administrative agent for the investors, pursuant to which we issued senior secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $20,000,000. The notes bear interest at 16% per annum.  We used all of the proceeds from the sale of the notes to repay (i) $17,624,000 of principal of our outstanding indebtedness to DMRJ under revolving promissory note (ii) $1,809,000 of interest outstanding under that facility and (iii) $567,000 of interest outstanding under our senior secured convertible promissory note (see Note 13). On April 6, 2016, we amended our credit agreements with BAM, effective as of March 31, 2016,  pursuant to which, amongst other matters, we extended the maturity date of all of our indebtedness from March 31, 2016 to June 29, 2016. Please refer to Note 13 for a complete discussion of the amended terms of this note agreement.

On December 11, 2015, we entered into an Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Republic Capital Access, LLC (“RCA”), pursuant to which we may sell eligible accounts receivable relating to U.S. government prime contracts or subcontracts (as defined in the Purchase Agreement, “Eligible Receivables”) to RCA.  On April 11, 2016, we amended the Purchase Agreement (the “Amended Purchase Agreement”). As amended, the total amount of Eligible Receivables that we may sell to RCA is subject to a maximum limit of $3,500,000 of outstanding receivables at any given time.  The Amended Purchase Agreement terminates on November 30, 2016.

Despite our current sales, expense and cash flow projections and $1,582,000 in cash available from our line of credit with DMRJ, at May 6, 2016, to fund our operations and continue the development, commercialization and marketing of our products will require that we extend our note agreements with DMRJ, BAM and Monstant. There can be no assurance that DMRJ will continue to make advances under our revolving line of credit. Our failure to achieve our projections and/or obtain sufficient additional capital on acceptable terms would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operations and could require us to file for protection under bankruptcy laws.

Our common stock was delisted by the NYSE Amex LLC in June 2009 as a result of our failure to comply with certain continued listing requirements.  Our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board since May 2009 and is also quoted on the OTC Markets Group’s OTCQB tier under the symbol “IMSC”. We believe that trading ‘over the counter’ has limited our stock’s liquidity and has impaired our ability to raise capital.

In addition, while we strive to bring new products to market, we are subject to a number of risks similar to the risks faced by other technology-based companies, including risks related to: (a) our dependence on key individuals and collaborative research partners; (b) competition from substitute products and larger companies; (c) our ability to



- 6 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



develop and market commercially usable products and obtain regulatory approval for our products under development; and (d) our ability to obtain substantial additional financing necessary to adequately fund the development, commercialization and marketing of our products.  For the nine months ended March 31, 2016, we reported a net loss of approximately $8,320,000 and used approximately $2,607,000 in cash for operations.  As of March 31, 2016, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $197,749,000 and a working capital deficit of approximately $84,956,000.  Management continually evaluates operating expenses and cash flow from operations.  Failure of the Company to achieve its projections will require that we seek additional financing or discontinue operations.

As of March 31, 2016, our principal obligations to DMRJ under each of the three promissory notes and a revolving line of credit approximated $18,970,000, $17,523,000, $1,000,000 and $17,662,000, respectively. Further, as of March 31, 2016, our obligation to DMRJ for accrued interest under these instruments approximated $4,603,000 and is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of May 6, 2016, our principal obligations to DMRJ under each of the three promissory notes and a revolving line of credit approximated $18,970,000, $17,523,000, $1,000,000 and $17,662,000, respectively. Further, as of May 6, 2016, our obligation to DMRJ for accrued interest under these instruments approximated $4,883,000.

As of March 31, 2016 and May 6, 2016, our principal obligations to Montsant under a promissory note approximated $5,284,000. Further, as of March 31, 2016 and May 6, 2016, our obligation to Montsant for accrued interest under this instrument was $0.

On September 24, 2015, Montsant converted $245,000 of the accrued interest owed by us under a promissory note into 3,062,500 shares of our common stock, at an adjusted conversion price of $0.08 per share.

As of March 31, 2016, our principal obligations under the senior secured promissory notes for which BAM is the agent were $20,000,000. Further, as of March 31, 2016, our obligation under such notes for accrued interest amounted to approximately $1,600,000 and is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of May 6, 2016, our principal obligations under the senior secured promissory notes for which BAM is the agent were $20,000,000. Further, as of May 6, 2016, our obligation under such notes for accrued interest amounted to approximately $1,920,000.

These conditions raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to comply with our debt covenants in the future depends on our ability to generate sufficient sales and to control expenses, and will require that we seek additional capital through private financing sources.  There can be no assurances that we will achieve our forecasted financial results or that we will be able to raise additional capital to operate our business.  Any such failure would have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial condition and could force us to curtail or discontinue operations entirely.  Further, upon the occurrence of an event of default under certain provisions of our credit agreements, we could be required to pay default rate interest equal to the interest rate per annum under each term note increased by an additional fourteen percent (14%) per annum (pro-rated for partial years), not to exceed the maximum legal rate per annum on the outstanding principal balance outstanding as permitted by applicable New York law. The failure to refinance or otherwise negotiate further extensions of our obligations to our secured lenders would have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial condition and could force us to curtail or discontinue operations entirely and/or file for protection under bankruptcy laws.

Based on current sales, operating expense and cash flow projections, and the cash available from our line of credit, management believes there are plans in place to sustain operations, provided that our credit facilities are extended. These plans depend on a substantial increase in sales of our handheld trace explosives detector product and our desktop explosives and narcotics trade detector product and on the extension of the maturity date of our credit facilities with DMRJ, BAM and Montsant.  However, there can be no assurances that sales will materialize as forecasted, and/or that management will be successful in refinancing or extending our obligations to our secured lenders, which mature on various dates between June 29, 2016 and December 30, 2016. To further sustain us, improve our cash position, and enable us to grow while reducing debt, management plans to continue to seek additional capital through private financing sources. However, there can be no assurance that management will be successful in executing these plans.  Management will continue to closely monitor and attempt to control our costs and actively seek needed capital through sales of our products, equity infusions, government grants and awards,



- 7 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



strategic alliances, and through our lending institutions.

We have suffered recurring losses from operations.  Our consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

There can be no assurances that our forecasted results will be achieved or that we will be able to raise additional capital necessary to operate our business.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Security product sales tend to have a long sales cycle, and are often subject to export controls.  In an effort to identify new opportunities and stimulate sales, we hired additional sales personnel during fiscal 2013 that have specific industry experience and have retained new distributors. However, there can be no assurance that these efforts will increase revenue.  

We have a history of being active in submitting proposals for government sponsored grants and contracts and successful in being awarded grants and contracts from government agencies. However, we have recorded no revenues from government grants or contracts, due to the expiration of several contracts and our inability to secure new contracts.  Management will continue to pursue these grants and contracts to support our research and development efforts primarily in the areas of trace explosives detection.

On October 16, 2014, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) selected our proposal to develop next generation explosives trace detection screening systems for funding under a statement of work. The project, pending successful negotiations, is potentially worth up to approximately $2 million. Subject to successful conclusion of negotiations with the DHS, we expect the project to commence in the fourth of quarter of fiscal 2016.

We are currently expending significant resources to develop the next generation of our current products and to develop new products.  We will require additional funding in order to continue the advancement of the commercial development and manufacturing of the explosives detection system.  We will attempt to obtain such financing by: (i) government grants, (ii) private financing, or (iii) strategic partnerships.  However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in our attempts to raise such additional financing.

We will require substantial funds for further research and development, regulatory approvals, and the marketing of our explosives detection products.  Our working capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including but not limited to the progress of our research and development programs; the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any intellectual property rights; competing technological and market developments; changes in our development of commercialization activities and arrangements; and the hiring of additional personnel, and acquiring capital equipment. Our failure to achieve our projections and/or obtain sufficient additional capital on acceptable terms would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operations and could require us to file for protection under bankruptcy laws.

2.

Interim Financial Statements and Basis of Presentation

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include our operations in Massachusetts, our former facilities in California and Shanghai, China, and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. On March 25, 2015, our Board of Directors approved restructuring actions to better align costs with current and future geographic revenue sources and to improve efficiencies.  Our San Diego, CA advanced technology office was relocated to our Wilmington, MA facility and our Shanghai office was closed. All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Accounting Principles

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments), which we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position at such date and of the



- 8 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



operating results and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2016 may not necessarily be indicative of results that may be expected for any succeeding quarter or for the entire fiscal year. The balance sheet at June 30, 2015 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.

The information contained in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements, included in our Form 10-K, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2015.

Use of Accounting Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Some of the more significant estimates include allowance for doubtful accounts, allowance for sales returns, inventory valuation, warranty reserves, stock-based compensation and long-lived assets. Management's estimates are based on the facts and circumstances available at the time estimates are made, past historical experience, risk of loss, general economic conditions and trends and management's assessments of the probable future outcome of these matters. Consequently, actual results could differ from such estimates.

Significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 7 of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

Foreign Currency Translation

The assets and liabilities of our Shanghai representative office were translated into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates as of the balance sheet date; expenses were translated at average monthly exchange rates. Net unrealized translation gains or losses associated with the Shanghai office were recorded directly to other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses from foreign currency transactions were not material for any of the periods presented. We had short-term inter-company receivables from our Shanghai office which were adjusted each period for changes in foreign currency exchange rates with a corresponding entry recorded as a component of the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, “ Revenue Recognition”. The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of this updated guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new rule also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods therein, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2018, the first day of our 2019 fiscal year . We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-12, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASU 2014-12”). The FASB issued ASU 2014-12 to provide specific guidance on share-based payment awards that provide for achievement of a specific performance target that could be achieved after the requisite service period. ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. This guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, which is



- 9 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016, the first day of our 2017 fiscal year. Earlier adoption is permitted. ASU 2014-12 may be applied prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this guidance should be recognized in the financial statements as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance to U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is a substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This new rule requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, ASU 2014-15 (1) defines the term substantial doubt, (2) requires an evaluation of every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plan, (4) requires certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) requires an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) requires an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. This guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016, the first day of our 2017 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 was issued to more closely align the measurement of inventory in U.S. GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of this updated   guidance is that an entity should measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The amendments in ASU 2015-11 apply to inventory that is measured using the first-in, first-out or average cost methods. ASU 2015-11 amends some of the guidance in Topic 330 to more clearly articulate the requirements for the measurement and disclosure of inventory, but the clarifications are not intended to result in any changes in practice other than the change in the subsequent measurement guidance from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost or net realizable value for inventory.  There are no other substantive changes to the guidance on the measurement of inventory. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017, the first day of our 2018 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-15, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (“ASU 2015-15”). ASU 2015-15 states that Staff at the Securities and Exchange Commission would not object to an entity deferring or presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing deferred debt issuance cost ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there were outstanding borrowings under the arrangement. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 was issued to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendment requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount under Concepts Statement 6. Debt issuance costs are similar to a debt discount and in effect reduce the proceeds of borrowing, thereby increasing the effective interest rate and improves consistency with IFRS. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016, the first day of our 2017 fiscal year.  We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.




- 10 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Concentration of Credit Risk and Major Customers

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist of trade receivables.

We grant credit to our customers, primarily large corporations, foreign governments and the U.S. government.  We perform periodic evaluations of customer’s payment history and generally do not require collateral.  Receivables are generally due within thirty days.  Credit losses have historically been minimal, which is consistent with our expectations.  Allowances are provided for estimated amounts of accounts receivable which may not be collected.

As of March 31, 2016, we had one irrevocable standby letter of credit outstanding in the approximate amount of $297,000. The letter of credit provides warranty performance security equal to 5% of the contract amount with the India Ministry of Defence. We have amended the letter of credit, extending the expiration date to April 15, 2017.

We have no other significant off-balance sheet risk such as foreign-exchange contracts, option contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements.

We place our cash with financial institutions which we believe are of high credit quality.

Our revenues are derived from both domestic and international sales.  During the nine months ended March 31, 2016, a customer from France and an agency of the U.S. government represented approximately 28% and 22% of our revenue, respectively. During the nine months ended March 31, 2015, a customer from Norway and a customer from Spain represented 12% and 11%, respectively, of our revenue.

At March 31, 2016, two customers accounted for approximately $4,735,000 of accounts receivable, or 73% of accounts receivable outstanding as of that date. At March 31, 2015, four customers accounted for approximately $1,042,000 of accounts receivable, or 80% of accounts receivable outstanding as of that date.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, we had one supplier who provides component parts used in the manufacture of our QS-B220 from whom our aggregate purchases represented approximately 20%  and 11%, respectively, of our component inventory purchases for these periods. The refusal or inability of this manufacture to provide these component parts for a substantial period, or the loss of this manufacturer altogether, could significantly disrupt production as well as increase the cost of production, thereby increasing the prices of our products.  These changes could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

3.

Fair Value Measurement

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value, which are as follows:

Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology are based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are based on unobservable inputs that reflect the company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our financial instruments at March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2015 include cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and borrowings under our senior secured convertible promissory note, senior secured promissory note and a revolving line of credit. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, and accounts payable are representative of their respective fair values because of the short-term maturities or expected settlement dates of these instruments. The fair value of debt, included in Note 13, is based on the fair value of similar instruments.  These instruments are short-term in nature and there is no known trading market for our debt.





- 11 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



The following table provides the non-recurring fair value measurements of assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements as of

March 31, 2016

Description (In thousands)

 

Carrying

Value at

March 31, 2016

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Asset

Level 1

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs

Level 2

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

Level 3

Certificates of deposit

 

$

312

 

$

312

 

$

-

 

$

-

Senior secured promissory note – BAM

 

20,000

 

-

 

-

 

20,000

Senior secured convertible promissory note – Montsant

 

5,284

 

-

 

-

 

5,284

Second senior secured convertible promissory note – DMRJ

 

18,970

 

-

 

-

 

18,970

Third senior secured convertible promissory note – DMRJ

 

17,523

 

-

 

-

 

17,523

Senior secured promissory note - DMRJ

 

1,000

 

-

 

-

 

1,000

Line of credit – DMRJ

 

17,662

 

-

 

-

 

17,662

The following table provides the non-recurring fair value measurements of assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2015:

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements as of

June 30, 2015

Description (In thousands)

 

Carrying

Value at

June 30, 2015

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Asset

Level 1

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs

Level 2

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

Level 3

Certificates of deposit

 

$

312

 

$

312

 

$

-

 

$

-

Senior secured promissory note – BAM

 

20,000

 

-

 

-

 

20,000

Senior secured convertible promissory note – Montsant

 

3,184

 

-

 

-

 

3,184

Senior secured promissory note - DMRJ

 

1,000

 

-

 

-

 

1,000

Second senior secured convertible promissory note – DMRJ

 

12,000

 

-

 

-

 

12,000

Third senior secured convertible promissory note – DMRJ

 

12,000

 

-

 

-

 

12,000

Line of credit - DMRJ

 

16,662

 

-

 

-

 

16,662








- 12 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



4.

Restricted Cash and Investments

As of March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2015, we had restricted cash and investments, with maturities of less than one year, of $367,000. Restricted cash and investments consisted of the following:

(In thousands)

 

March 31,

2016

 

June 30,

2015

Current assets

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

$

312

 

$

312

Cash maintained to secure corporate credit card

 

55

 

55

Total

 

$

367

 

$

367

The restricted investments of $312,000 held in certificates of deposit collateralize our performance under an irrevocable letter of credit issued in April 2010, aggregating to $297,000, in connection with our contract with the India Ministry of Defence, plus the bank required collateralization deposit of $15,000. The letter of credit provides warranty performance security equal to 5% of the contract amount under the terms of the contract with the India Ministry of Defence. We have amended the letter of credit, extending the expiration date to April 15, 2017.

In May 2015, we entered into a corporate credit card agreement with our primary bank, pursuant to which the bank reserves $55,000 of the available cash held in our operating account maintained with the bank to collateralize 105% of the credit limit that is available under the credit card agreement.

5.

Stock Based Compensation

For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss include $314,000 and $1,154,000, respectively, of compensation costs and no income tax benefit related to our stock-based compensation arrangements for employee and non-employee director awards. For the nine months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss include $982,000 and $2,381,000, respectively, of compensation costs and no income tax benefit related to our stock-based compensation arrangements for employee and non-employee director awards, as follows:

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

March 31,

 

For the Nine Months Ended

March 31,

(In thousands)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

Cost of revenues

 

$

14

 

$

71

 

$

75

 

$

172

Research and development

 

33

 

137

 

163

 

379

Selling, general and administrative

 

267

 

946

 

744

 

1,830

Total

 

$

314

 

$

1,154

 

$

982

 

$

2,381

As of March 31, 2016, the total amount of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense was approximately $1,394,000, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.

As of March 31, 2016, there were options outstanding to purchase 20,651,483 shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.08 to $2.30, with a weighted-average exercise price of $1.15.











- 13 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



6.

Related Party Transactions

In April 2011, we entered into an advisory and consulting agreement with Robert Liscouski, our President and a member of our Board of Directors, to assist our U.S. government sales and marketing team with our efforts to advance our interests with the U.S. government. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015, we paid Mr. Liscouski $0 and $105,000, respectively for services performed under this agreement which terminated effective on February 1, 2015, when Mr. Liscouski joined the Company. As of March 31, 2016, we had no obligation to Mr. Liscouski under this agreement.

 

On August 15, 2014, August 29, 2014, September 18, 2014 and October 2, 2014, Roger Deschenes, our Chief Financial Officer, advanced $100,000, $125,000, $125,000 and $100,000, respectively, for general working capital purposes, of which $450,000 of principal and $12,000 of interest was repaid to Mr. Deschenes during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. The advances were payable on demand and bore interest at 15%. As of March 31, 2016 our obligation to Mr. Deschenes was $0.

7.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

(In thousands)

 

March 31,

2016

 

June 30,

2015

Interest

 

$

1,019

 

$

-

Inventory deposits

 

237

 

677

Insurance

 

165

 

87

Bank fees

 

2

 

14

Other prepaid expenses

 

186

 

168

Total

 

$

1,609

 

$

946

On March 31, 2016, we further amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ and Montsant, which were entered into on April 6, 2016 and effective March 31, 2016, pursuant to which we agreed to prepay the interest due on each of the March 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note and the February 2013 Notes from the date of the amendment through June 30, 2016 by increasing the outstanding aggregate principal amount under each such Note. The prepayment of all interest to be accrued from the March 31, 2016 through June 30, 2016, on each of the March 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note and the February 2013 Note amounted to $119,400 on account of the March 2009 Note, $450,000 on account of the September 2012 Note and $450,000 on account of the February 2013 Note, by increasing the outstanding aggregate principal amount under each of the March 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note and the February 2013 Note, respectively.

8.

Inventories, net

We value our inventories at lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, including material, labor and factory overhead. The components of inventories, net of reserves, consist of the following:

(In thousands)

 

March 31,

2016

 

June 30,

2015

Raw materials

 

$

4,040

 

$

3,283

Work in progress

 

1,013

 

1,455

Finished goods

 

928

 

506

Total

 

$

5,981

 

$

5,244

As of March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2015, our reserves for excess and slow-moving inventories were $211,000 and $218,000, respectively.






- 14 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



9.

Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment consist of the following:

(In thousands)

 

March 31,

2016

 

June 30,

2015

Machinery and equipment

 

$

524

 

$

533

Computers and software

 

457

 

415

Furniture and fixtures

 

96

 

83

Leasehold improvements

 

178

 

159

Equipment under capital lease

 

159

 

157

Construction in progress

 

342

 

342

Sub-total

 

1,756

 

1,689

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

916

 

809

Total

 

$

840

 

$

880

For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, depreciation expense was approximately $49,000 and $45,000, respectively.  

For the nine months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, depreciation expense was approximately $153,000 and $126,000, respectively.

10.

Accrued Expenses – Current and Long-Term

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

(In thousands)

 

March 31,

2016

 

June 30,

2015

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

Accrued interest

 

$

6,203

 

$

13,264

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

2,961

 

1,774

Accrued warranty costs

 

1,808

 

556

Accrued legal and accounting

 

434

 

257

Accrued taxes

 

249

 

74

Other accrued liabilities

 

1,524

 

1,155

Total

 

$

13,179

 

$

17,080

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term liabilities

 

 

 

 

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

$

-

 

$

48

 

 

$

-

 

$

48

On March 31, 2016, we further amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ and Montsant, which were entered into on April 6, 2016 and effective March 31, 2016, pursuant to which the accrued interest amount due under each of the March 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note and the February 2013 Note, as of March 31, 2016, of $1,980,000, $6,520,000 and $5,073,000, respectively, were added to the outstanding principal amount under each of the notes, as of March 31, 2016.  

On January 16, 2015, Glenn D. Bolduc, resigned his positions as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, as well as his seat on the Company’s Board of Directors and his position as Chairman of the Board. In connection with and prior to Mr. Bolduc’s resignations, Mr. Bolduc entered into a Separation Agreement and Release (the “Separation Agreement”) with the Company.  The Separation Agreement provides that Mr. Bolduc’s resignation will be deemed an involuntary termination without cause pursuant to his Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of June 25, 2013.  In this regard, and subject to the terms contained in the Employment Agreement, Mr. Bolduc is entitled to receive: (i) annual base salary for 18 months on a regular payroll basis; (ii) a pro rata portion of any bonus earned in 2015; (iii) continuation of coverage under and contributions to health care, dental and life insurance benefits for a 12 month period; and (iv) transfer of any key man life insurance.  



- 15 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



In connection with Mr. Bolduc’s resignation, we recorded a non-recurring charge of $725,000 in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended June 30, 2015.  As of March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2015, $177,000 and $480,000, respectively, of separation benefits are included in accrued expenses in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

11.

Deferred Revenues – Current and Long-Term

Deferred revenues are recorded when we receive payments for product or services for which we have not yet completed our obligation to deliver product or have not completed services required by the contractual agreements.

As of March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2015, we had customer advance payments and extended warranty service agreements with maturities of less than one year, of $1,049,000 and $3,454,000, respectively, and extended warranty service agreements, with maturities of more than one year, of $539,000 and $221,000, respectively. Deferred revenues consisted of the following:

(In thousands)

 

March 31,

2016

 

June 30,

2015

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

Customer advance payments

 

$

690

 

$

3,121

Extended warranty service agreements

 

359

 

333

Total

 

$

1,049

 

$

3,454

Long-term liabilities

 

 

 

 

Extended warranty service agreements

 

$

539

 

$

221

Total

 

$

539

 

$

221

12.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus additional weighted average common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants, the proceeds of which are then assumed to have been used to repurchase outstanding common stock using the treasury stock method and assumed conversion of certain convertible promissory notes and convertible preferred stock. In addition, the numerator is adjusted for any changes in income or loss that would result from the assumed conversion of potential shares. As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, potentially dilutive shares are excluded from the earnings per share calculation, because their effect would be antidilutive. Shares deemed to be antidilutive include stock options, warrants, convertible debt and convertible preferred stock.

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

March 31,

 

For the Nine Months Ended

March 31,

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

Basic and diluted loss per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(4,096)

 

$

(5,731)

 

$

(8,320)

 

$

(17,350)

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares

 

78,878,953 

 

72,677,287 

 

77,871,509 

 

69,454,343 

Basic and diluted loss per share

 

$

(0.05)

 

$

(0.08)

 

$

(0.11)

 

$

(0.25)







- 16 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Common stock equivalents excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, were as follows:

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

March 31,

 

For the Nine Months Ended

March 31,

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

Common stock equivalents excluded

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Stock options

 

425,097

 

1,333,193

 

575,792

 

1,900,692

   Warrants

 

-

 

230,624

 

6,191

 

485,997

   Convertible debt

 

40,342,568

 

39,800,000

 

39,983,458

 

50,809,174

 

 

40,767,665

 

41,363,817

 

40,565,441

 

53,195,863


13.

Long-Term Debt and Credit Arrangements

Term Debt and Revolving Credit Facility with DMRJ Group, LLC and Term Debt with Montsant Partners, LLC

We are a party to several loan and credit agreements with DMRJ Group LLC (“DMRJ”), an accredited institutional investor. In December 2008, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement with DMRJ pursuant to which we issued a senior secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $5,600,000 and a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock.  Thereafter, we entered into a series of amendments, waivers and modifications of this facility. The note, which is collateralized by all of our assets, originally bore interest at 11.0% per annum.

The note contains restrictions and financial covenants including: (i) restrictions against declaring or paying dividends or making any distributions; against creating, assuming or incurring  any liens or indebtedness; against creating, assuming or incurring any indebtedness; against merging or consolidating with any other company, provided, however , that a merger or consolidation is permitted if we are the surviving entity; against the sale, assignment, transfer or lease of our assets, other than in the ordinary course of business and excluding inventory and certain asset sales expressly permitted by the note purchase agreement; against making investments in any company, extending credit or loans, or purchasing stock or other ownership interest of any company; and (ii) covenants that we have authorized or reserved for the purpose of issuance, 150% of the aggregate number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of  the warrant; that we maintain a minimum cash balance of at least $500,000; that the aggregate dollar amount of all accounts payable be no more than 100 days past due; and that we maintain a current ratio, defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, of no less than 0.60 to 1.00.

In September 2011, we amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ. Pursuant to those amendments: (i) the maturity of our indebtedness to DMRJ was extended from September 30, 2011 to March 31, 2013; (ii) DMRJ waived our compliance with certain financial covenants in the notes and all related credit agreements through maturity; (iii) our line of credit under the September 2009 credit agreement was increased from $15,000,000 to $23,000,000; and (iv) we were required to repay sufficient amounts of our outstanding indebtedness under the notes and related credit agreements and other amounts owing to DMR such that as of December 31, 2011, the outstanding obligations to DMRJ shall not exceed $15,000,000.

In October 2011, we further amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ, to eliminate the obligation to repay any portion of our outstanding indebtedness to DMRJ by December 31, 2011.

In February 2012, we amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ, to extend the maturity of all of our indebtedness to DMRJ to September 30, 2012.

In September 2012, we further amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ. Pursuant to those amendments: (i) we extended the maturity date of all of our indebtedness from September 30, 2012 to March 31, 2013 and (ii) issued to DMRJ a second senior secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $12,000,000 (the “September 2012 Note”).

The second senior secured convertible promissory note originally gave DMRJ the option to require us to repurchase any or all of the shares of Series H Preferred Stock owned by DMRJ, at the Series H Original Issue Price per share, if we did not (i) by March 31, 2013, have at least one of our products receive qualified or approved status



- 17 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



on the “Transportation Security Administration Air Cargo Screening Technology List (ACSTL) – For Passenger Aircraft” or placed on the Transportation Security Administration’s “Explosive Trace Detector Qualified Product List (QPL)”; or (ii) achieve revenues of at least $7,500,000 per fiscal quarter, commencing with fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2013. As described below, the note was subsequently amended to eliminate this option.

On February 28, 2013, we further amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ. Pursuant to those amendments:

·

the maturity of all of our indebtedness to DMRJ was extended from March 31, 2013 to March 31, 2014;

 

·

DMRJ waived our compliance with certain financial covenants in each of our promissory notes and all related credit agreements through the new maturity date;

 

·

DMRJ’s option to require us to repurchase any or all of the shares of Series H Convertible Preferred Stock ) which may be issued upon conversion of the September 2012 Note was eliminated;

 

·

we issued to DMRJ a third senior secured convertible promissory note dated February 28, 2013, in the aggregate principal amount of $12,000,000. Payment for the February 2013 Note was made by the cancellation of $12,000,000 of principal of the outstanding indebtedness under our credit agreement;

 

·

DMRJ acquired the option to convert the amended and restated senior secured convertible promissory note dated March 12, 2009 (the “March 2009 Note”) into shares of Series J Convertible Preferred Stock in lieu of shares of Common Stock; and

 

·

the March 2009 Note and the September 2012 Note were amended to permit us to prepay any or all of our indebtedness thereunder on 30 days prior notice.

The third senior secured convertible promissory note bears interest at the rate of 15% per annum. The principal balance of this note, together with all outstanding interest and all other amounts owed thereunder, were due and payable on March 31, 2015. The third senior secured convertible promissory note is convertible in whole or in part, at DMRJ’s option, into shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock at an initial conversion rate of $1,000 per share (as adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Series I Preferred Stock, the “Series I Original Issue Price”). We may prepay this note on 30 days prior notice.

On November 14, 2013, we amended each of our credit agreements with DMRJ to extend the maturity date of all of our indebtedness to DMRJ from March 31, 2014 to September 30, 2014.

On March 19, 2014, we further amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ. Pursuant to those amendments:

·

the maturity of all of our indebtedness to DMRJ was extended from September 30, 2014 to March 31, 2015;

 

·

DMRJ waived our compliance with certain financial covenants in each of our promissory notes and all related credit agreements through the new maturity date;

 

·

DMRJ consented to the execution and delivery of the note purchase agreement with BAM and agreed to waive all prepayment limitations and prepayment notice requirements set forth in any of the credit documents to which DMRJ and the company are parties with respect to the repayments and prepayments financed by the sale of the notes; and

 

·

DMRJ agreed to subordinate its first position security interest in all of our assets to BAM.

On March 19 2015, we further amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ, pursuant to which the maturity of all of our indebtedness to DMRJ was extended from March 31, 2015 to March 31, 2016 and DMRJ waived our compliance with certain financial covenants contained in each of our promissory notes and all related credit agreements through the new maturity date.

On May 4, 2015, we entered into an assignment agreement with DMRJ and Montsant Partners LLC ( “Montsant”), wherein DMRJ assigned its rights, title and interest in the senior secured promissory note dated December 10, 2008 and appointed DMRJ as its collateral agent under the promissory note agreement. DMRJ and Montsant Partners, LLC are funds managed by Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund LP .

The note purchase agreement with Montsant contains restrictions and financial covenants including: (i)



- 18 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



restrictions against declaring or paying dividends or making any distributions; against creating, assuming or incurring any liens; against creating, assuming or incurring any indebtedness; against merging or consolidating with any other company, against the sale, assignment, transfer or lease of our assets, other than in the inventory ordinary course of business; against making investments in any company, extending credit or loans, or purchasing stock or other ownership interest of any company; and (ii) covenants that  we maintain a minimum cash balance of at least $500,000; that the weighted average age of all accounts payable be no more than 100 days past due; and that we maintain a current ratio, defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, of no less than 0.60 to 1.00. Montsant waived our compliance with certain financial covenants in our promissory notes through the maturity date, consistent with the financial covenants which have been waived in each of our promissory notes and all related credit agreements with DMRJ.

On March 31, 2016, we further amended each of our credit instruments with DMRJ and Montsant, which were entered into on April 6, 2016 and effective March 31, 2016, pursuant to which:


·

the maturity of all of our  indebtedness to DMRJ under (i) a senior secured promissory note dated July 1, 2009 and (ii) a credit agreement dated September 4, 2009, was extended from March 31, 2016 to June 30, 2016;

·

the maturity of all of our indebtedness to (i) Montsant under an amended and restated senior secured convertible promissory note dated March 12, 2009 (the “March 2009 Note”), (ii) DMRJ under a senior secured convertible promissory note dated September 5, 2012 (the “September 2012 Note”) and (iii) to DMRJ under a senior secured convertible promissory note dated February 28, 2013 (the “February 2013 Note” and together with the March 2009 Note, the July 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note, the “Notes”), was extended from March 31, 2016 to December 30, 2016;

·

the provisions regarding the prepayment of the March 2009 Note were deleted;

·

the “blocker” provisions of the March 2009 Note limiting the number of shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”) to be issued upon the conversion of the March 2009 Note, when aggregated with the all other shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the holder of the March 2009 Note at that time, to 4.99% of the then issued and outstanding shares of the Common Stock outstanding at such time were deleted;

·

the conversion provisions of the March 2009 Note were fixed to remove the limitations on the conversion to only upon prepayment or during the 30-day period ending March 31, 2014;

·

we agreed to make the amendments to our Series H Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H Preferred Stock”),  Series I Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series I Preferred Stock”) and Series J Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series J Preferred Stock” and together with the Series H Preferred Stock and the Series I Preferred Stock, the “Amended Preferred Stock Series”;

·

we agreed to prepay the interest due on each of the March 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note and the February 2013 Notes from the date of the amendment through June 30, 2016 by increasing the outstanding aggregate principal amount under each such Note;

·

all outstanding amounts due to DMRJ and Montsant shall be immediately due and payable if (a) we receive an offer from another person or entity with respect to a Major Transaction, (b) DMRJ notifies us that such offer is satisfactory to DMRJ (in its sole discretion), and (c) either (i) our Board of Directors does not approve such transaction within ten (10) days of our receipt of such notice from DMRJ, (ii) if such transaction is subject to stockholder approval, we do not file a preliminary proxy statement with the SEC within fifteen (15) days of the receipt of such notice from DMRJ or (iii) if such transaction is subject to stockholder approval, our stockholders do not approve such transaction within ninety (90) days of the  receipt of such notice from DMRJ, that we shall be obligated to immediately forward to DMRJ any offer that we receive with respect to any Major Transaction;



- 19 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




·

we shall provide not less than thirty (30) business days’ written notice to DMRJ and Montsant, as applicable, of the our intent to repay all or any portion of the principal, interest and other amounts outstanding under our indebtedness and following receipt of any such notice, DMRJ and Montsant shall have the option to convert all or any portion of their Notes in accordance with the applicable conversion terms of the applicable Note;

·

each Note, plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon at the time of any conversion, may be converted at the option of DMRJ or Montsant, as applicable, at any time and from time to time into such number of shares of the applicable preferred stock of the Company, upon one (1) business days’ notice to us, and upon Montsant’s conversion of the March 2009 Note, the shares of preferred stock shall be issued to Montsant or any designee(s) of Montsant;

·

we agreed that if there is any breach of the Comfort Letter , the interest rate under each term note and advances under the Credit Agreement will be increased by an additional fourteen percent (14%) per annum (pro-rated for partial years), not to exceed the maximum amount of such interest permitted by applicable New York law;

·

agreed that we will not, and will not permit any Subsidiary to, enter into, create, incur, assume, suffer, become or be liable for in any manner, or permit to exist, any indebtedness, or guarantee, assume, endorse or otherwise become responsible for (directly or indirectly), any indebtedness, performance or obligations of any other person, and failure by us to comply with this clause shall be an immediate event of default;

·

we shall be obligated to provide DMRJ and Montsant with written notice of the anticipated record date with respect to any Major Transaction at least five (5) business days prior to such record date, and failure by us to comply with this clause shall be an immediate event of default;

·

we agreed not to amend the terms of any Amended Preferred Stock Series without the prior written consent of the DMRJ and Montsant, and any breach is an immediate event of default; and

·

we agreed not to issue any shares of any Amended Preferred Stock Series other than upon the conversion of the March 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note and the February 2013 Note or with the prior written consent of the Investor, and any breach of this provision is an immediate event of default.

The prepayment by us of all interest to be accrued from the March 31, 2016 through June 30, 2016, amounted to $119,400 on account of the March 2009 Note, $450,000 on account of the September 2012 Note and $450,000 on account of the February 2013 Note. Such prepayments were effected by increasing the outstanding aggregate principal amount under each of the March 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note and the February 2013 Note, respectively.  Further, the accrued interest amount due under each of the March 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note and the February 2013 Note, as of March 31, 2016, of $1,980,000, $6,520,000 and $5,073,000, respectively, were added to the outstanding principal amount under each of the notes, as of March 31, 2016.  Consequently, the new outstanding principal balance under (i) the March 2009 Note was $5,284,000, (ii) the September 2012 Note was $18,970,000 and (iii) the February 2013 Note was $17,523,000, as of March 31, 2016.

As of March 31, 2016, our principal obligations to DMRJ under each of the three promissory notes and a revolving line of credit approximated $18,970,000, $17,523,000, $1,000,000 and $17,662,000, respectively. Further, as of March 31, 2016, our obligation to DMRJ for accrued interest under these instruments approximated $4,603,000 and is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of May 6, 2016, our principal obligations to DMRJ under each of the three promissory notes and a revolving line of credit approximated $18,970,000, $17,523,000, $1,000,000 and $17,662,000, respectively. Further, as of May 6, 2016, our obligation to DMRJ for accrued interest under these instruments approximated $4,883,000.

As of March 31, 2016 and May 6, 2016, our principal obligations to Montsant under a promissory note approximated $5,284,000. Further, as of March 31, 2016 and May 6, 2016, our obligation to Montsant for accrued



- 20 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



interest under this instrument was $0.

On September 24, 2015, Montsant converted $245,000 of the accrued interest owed by us under a promissory note into 3,062,500 shares of our common stock, at an adjusted conversion price of $0.08 per share.

Term Debt with BAM

On March 19, 2014, we entered into a note purchase agreement with a group of institutional investors and BAM Administrative Services LLC (“BAM”), an administrative agent for the investors, pursuant to which we issued senior secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $20,000,000. The notes originally bore interest at 15% per annum and matured on March 31, 2015.  The proceeds from the sale of the notes were used to repay (i) $17,624,000 of our outstanding indebtedness to DMRJ under the amended and restated revolving promissory note dated September 29, 2011 (ii) $1,809,000 of interest outstanding under the amended and restated promissory note and (iii) $567,000 of interest outstanding under our senior secured convertible promissory note dated September 5, 2012.

The notes purchase agreement contains restrictions and financial covenants including: (i) restrictions against declaring or paying dividends or making any distributions; against creating, assuming or incurring any liens; against creating, assuming or incurring any indebtedness; against merging or consolidating with any other company, against the sale, assignment, transfer or lease of our assets, other than in the inventory ordinary course of business ; against making investments in any company, extending credit or loans, or purchasing stock or other ownership interest of any company; and (ii) covenants that  we maintain a minimum cash balance of at least $500,000; that the weighted average age of all accounts payable be no more than 100 days past due; and that we maintain a current ratio, defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, of no less than 0.60 to 1.00. BAM waived our compliance with certain financial covenants in our promissory notes through the maturity date, consistent with the financial covenants which have been waived in each of our promissory notes and all related credit agreements with DMRJ.

Further, upon the occurrence of an event of default under certain provisions of our agreements with BAM, we could be required to pay default rate interest equal to the lesser of 2.5% per month and the maximum applicable legal rate per annum on the outstanding principal balance outstanding.

On March 19, 2015, we extended our credit agreement with BAM pursuant to which, amongst other matters, the interest rate increased to 16% per annum, commencing on April 1, 2015 and we extended the maturity date of our indebtedness from March 31, 2015 to March 31, 2016.

On April 6, 2016, we extended our credit agreement with BAM, effective March 31, 2016 pursuant to which;

·

the maturity of our indebtedness to the investors extended from March 30, 2016 to June 29, 2016; provided that in the event we extend the maturity date on all obligations owed to DMRJ,  to a date past June 30, 2016, the maturity date of the Secured Term Notes shall automatically extend to such business day as is immediately prior to such extended maturity date of the DMRJ obligations;

·

all outstanding amounts due to the under the notes shall be immediately due and payable if (a) we receive an offer from another person or entity with respect to a Major Transaction  (as defined below under the heading “Amendments to Preferred Stock”), (b) BAM, on behalf of the investors, notifies us that such offer is satisfactory to the investors (in their sole discretion), and (c) either (i) our Board of Directors  does not approve such transaction within ten (10) days of receipt of such notice from BAM, (ii) if such transaction is subject to stockholder approval, we do not file a preliminary proxy statement with the SEC within fifteen (15) days of receipt of such notice from BAM or (iii) if such transaction is subject to stockholder approval, our stockholders do not approve such transaction within ninety (90) days of  receipt of such notice from BAM; provided, that we shall be obligated to immediately forward to BAM, on behalf of the investors, any offer that we receive with respect to any Major Transaction;

·

we shall provide not less than thirty (30) business days’ written notice to BAM, of our intent to repay all or any portion of the principal, interest and other amounts outstanding under our obligations to the investors;




- 21 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



·

agreed that we will not, and will not permit any subsidiary to, enter into, create, incur, assume, suffer, become or be liable for in any manner, or permit to exist, any indebtedness, or guarantee, assume, endorse or otherwise become responsible for (directly or indirectly), any indebtedness, performance or obligations of any other person, and failure by us to comply with this clause shall be an immediate event of default;


·

we agreed to make the amendments to our Series H Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H Preferred Stock”),  Series I Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series I Preferred Stock”) and Series J Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series J Preferred Stock” and together with the Series H Preferred Stock and the Series I Preferred Stock, the “Amended Preferred Stock Series”.

As of March 31, 2016, our principal obligations under the senior secured promissory notes for which BAM is the agent were $20,000,000. Further, as of March 31, 2016, our obligation under such notes for accrued interest amounted to approximately $1,600,000 and is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of May 6, 2016, our principal obligations under the senior secured promissory notes for which BAM is the agent were $20,000,000. Further, as of May 6, 2016, our obligation under such notes for accrued interest amounted to approximately $1,920,000.

14.

Convertible Preferred Stock

Series H Convertible Preferred Stock

In connection with the September 7,  2012 amendment to our credit instruments with DMRJ we issued to DMRJ a second senior secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $12,000,000 (the “September 2012 Note”).  The September 2012 convertible promissory note is convertible in whole or in part, at DMRJ’s option, into shares of Series H Convertible Preferred Stock at an initial conversion rate of $1,000 per share (as adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Series H Preferred Stock, the “Series H Original Issue Price”).  The number of shares of our Preferred Stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “Preferred Stock”),  designated as Series H Preferred Stock was 15,000.

The holders of the Series H Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, prior to the payment of any dividends with respect to our Common Stock and/or Series G Convertible Preferred Stock, cumulative dividends on each share of Series H Preferred Stock at a rate equal to 15% of the Series H Original Issue Price per annum, (i) when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors, (ii) upon a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company (a “Liquidation Event”), or (iii) upon the repurchase or conversion of the Series H Preferred Stock All dividends accruing on the Series H Preferred Stock are payable by the issuance of additional shares of Series H Preferred Stock.

Each share of Series H Preferred Stock will be convertible, at the option of the holder, into that number of shares of Common Stock as is determined by (i) dividing the Series H Original Issue Price by the Series H Conversion Price (as defined below) in effect at the time of conversion and (ii) multiply the result by 1,000. The “Series H Conversion Price” will initially be equal to $1,090, and is subject to adjustment in the event that (a) we issue additional shares of Common Stock as a dividend or other distribution on outstanding shares of Common Stock, (b) there is a split or subdivision of outstanding shares of Common Stock, or (c) there is a combination or reverse stock split of outstanding shares of Common Stock into a smaller number of shares of Common Stock. Assuming no adjustments to the Series H Original Issue Price or the Series H Conversion Price, the New Note will be convertible indirectly, at DMRJ’s option, into shares of Common Stock at an effective conversion price of $1.09 per share, which represents a discount of approximately 20% from the daily volume weighted average price of the Common Stock over the 20 trading days preceding the date of the amendment.

Upon a Liquidation Event, the holders of shares of Series H Preferred Stock then outstanding will be entitled to be paid out of the assets of the company available for distribution to its stockholders, before any payment is made to the holders of Common Stock and/or Series G Preferred Stock in respect of such stock, an amount per share equal to the Series H Original Issue Price, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends thereon, whether or not declared. At the option of holders of a majority of the outstanding Series H Preferred Stock, (i) a consolidation or merger of us with or into another entity or person, or any other corporate reorganization, in which our stockholders immediately prior



- 22 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



to such consolidation, merger or reorganization do not hold at least a majority of the resulting or surviving entities’ voting power immediately following such consolidation, merger or reorganization, or (ii) a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of our assets for cash, securities or other property, will be deemed to be a Liquidation Event.

The holders of the Series H Preferred Stock will have no voting rights except as required by applicable law. However, without the consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Series H Preferred Stock, we may not (i) amend, alter or repeal any provision of its Articles of Organization or By-laws in a manner that adversely affects the powers, preferences or rights of the Series H Preferred Stock; (ii) authorize or issue any equity securities (or any equity or debt securities convertible into equity securities) ranking prior and superior to the Series H Preferred Stock with respect to dividends, distributions, redemption rights or rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up; or (iii) consummate any capital reorganization or reclassification of any of its equity securities (or debt securities convertible into equity securities) into equity securities ranking prior and superior to the Series H Preferred Stock with respect to dividends, distributions, redemption rights or rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up.

Series I Convertible Preferred Stock and Series J Convertible Preferred Stock

In connection with the February 28, 2013  amendment to our credit instruments with DMRJ we issued to DMRJ a third senior secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $12,000,000 (the “February 2013 Note”).  The February 2013 Note is convertible in whole or in part, at DMRJ’s option, into shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock at an initial conversion rate of $1,000 per share (as adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Series I Preferred Stock, the “Series I Original Issue Price”). The number of shares of our Preferred Stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “Preferred Stock”), designated as Series I Preferred Stock was 15,000.

As amended, the March 2009 Note is convertible in whole or in part, at DMRJ’s option, into shares of Series J Convertible Preferred Stock at an initial conversion rate of $1,000 per share (as adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Series J Preferred Stock, the “Series J Original Issue Price”). The number of shares of our Preferred Stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “Preferred Stock”), designated as Series J Preferred Stock was 6,000.

Each share of Series I Preferred Stock will be convertible, at the option of the holder, into that number of shares of Common Stock as is determined by (i) dividing the Series I Original Issue Price by the Series I Conversion Price (as defined below) in effect at the time of conversion and (ii) multiplying the result by 1,000. The “Series I Conversion Price” will initially be equal to $1,180.00, and is subject to adjustment in the event that (a) we issue additional shares of Common Stock as a dividend or other distribution on outstanding shares of Common Stock, (b) there is a split or subdivision of outstanding shares of Common Stock, or (c) there is a combination or reverse stock split of outstanding shares of Common Stock into a smaller number of shares of Common Stock. Assuming no adjustments to the Series I Original Issue Price or the Series I Conversion Price, the February 2013 Note will be convertible indirectly, at DMRJ’s option, into shares of Common Stock at an effective conversion price of $1.18 per share, which represents premium of approximately 3% over the closing price of the Common Stock on the trading day preceding the date of the February 28, 2013 amendments.

Each share of Series J Preferred Stock will be convertible, at the option of the holder, into that number of shares of Common Stock as is determined by dividing the Series J Original Issue Price by the Series J Conversion Price (as defined below) in effect at the time of conversion. The “Series J Conversion Price” will initially be equal to $.08, and is subject to adjustment in the event that (a) the Company issues additional shares of Common Stock as a dividend or other distribution on outstanding shares of Common Stock, (b) there is a split or subdivision of outstanding shares of Common Stock, or (c) there is a combination or reverse stock split of outstanding shares of Common Stock into a smaller number of shares of Common Stock. Assuming no adjustments to the Series J Original Issue Price or the Series J Conversion Price, the March 2009 Note will be convertible indirectly, at DMRJ’s option, into shares of Common Stock at an effective conversion price of $.08 per share. Prior to the execution of the amendment, the March 2009 Note was convertible directly into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $.08 per share. Accordingly, we do not believe this change to be material.

The holders of the Series I Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, prior to the payment of any dividends with respect to our Common Stock and/or Series G Preferred Stock, cumulative dividends on each share of Series I Preferred Stock at a rate equal to 15% of the Series I Original Issue Price per annum, (i) when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors, (ii) upon a “Liquidation Event”, or (iii) upon the conversion of the Series I Preferred Stock



- 23 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



All dividends accruing on the Series I Preferred Stock are payable by the issuance of additional shares of Series I Preferred Stock.

The holders of Series J Preferred Stock will be entitled to participate on an “as converted” basis in all dividends or distributions declared or paid on our Common Stock.

Upon a Liquidation Event, the holders of shares of Series I Preferred Stock and Series J Preferred Stock then outstanding will be entitled to be paid out of the assets of the company available for distribution to its stockholders, pari passu with distributions made with respect to the Series H Preferred Stock but before any payment is made to the holders of Common Stock and /or Series G Preferred Stock in respect of such stock, (i) an amount per share of Series I Preferred Stock equal to the Series I Original Issue Price, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends thereon, whether or not declared, and (ii) an amount per share of Series J Preferred Stock equal to the Series J Original Issue Price, plus any dividends declared but unpaid thereon. At the option of holders of a majority of the outstanding Series I Preferred Stock, (i) a consolidation or merger of the company with or into another entity or person, or any other corporate reorganization, in which the stockholders of the company immediately prior to such consolidation, merger or reorganization do not hold at least a majority of the resulting or surviving entities’ voting power immediately following such consolidation, merger or reorganization, or (ii) a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of our assets for cash, securities or other property, will be deemed to be a Liquidation Event.

Upon any such Liquidation Event, and after all payments described in the preceding paragraph are made in full in respect of the Series H Preferred Stock, the Series I Preferred Stock and the Series J Preferred Stock, the holders of the Series G Preferred Stock will be entitled to be paid out of the assets of the company available for distribution to its stockholders an amount equal to $8.00 per share of Series G Preferred Stock, plus any declared but unpaid dividends, prior to the payment of any amounts to the holders of our Common Stock by reason of their ownership of such stock.

The holders of the Series I Preferred Stock and the Series J Preferred Stock will have no voting rights except as required by applicable law. However, without the consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Series I Preferred Stock or Series J Preferred Stock, as the case may be, with each such series voting as a separate class, we may not (i) amend, alter or repeal any provision of our Articles of Organization or By-laws in a manner that adversely affects the powers, preferences or rights of the Series I Preferred Stock or Series J Preferred Stock, as the case may be; (ii) authorize or issue any equity securities (or any equity or debt securities convertible into equity securities) ranking prior and superior to the Series I Preferred Stock or Series J Preferred Stock, as the case may be, with respect to dividends, distributions, redemption rights or rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up; or (iii) consummate any capital reorganization or reclassification of any of its equity securities (or debt securities convertible into equity securities) into equity securities ranking prior and superior to the Series I Preferred Stock or Series J Preferred Stock, as the case may be, with respect to dividends, distributions, redemption rights or rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up.

In connection with the March 31, 2016  amendment to our credit agreements with DMRJ and Montsant, we agreed to amend certain terms of each of the Amended Preferred Stock Series as follows, which amendments were set forth in Articles of Amendment adopted on April 6, 2016:


·

the number of shares of our Preferred Stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “Preferred Stock”),  designated as Series H Preferred Stock was increased from 15,000 shares to 22,500 shares, Series I Preferred Stock was increased from 15,000 shares to 21,000 shares and Series J Preferred Stock was increased from 6,000 shares to 6,500 shares;    

 

·

the Series J Preferred Stock was amended so that its holders are entitled to receive preferred dividends equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the original issue price (subject to certain adjustments) of such shares of Preferred Stock, which is paid by the issuance of additional shares of Series J Preferred Stock;


·

the Series J Preferred Stock was amended so that it has the same dividend rights as the Series H Preferred Stock and the Series I Preferred Stock wherein we cannot declare, pay or set aside any dividends on any shares of Common Stock unless the holders of the Series J Preferred Stock then outstanding shall simultaneously receive a dividend on each outstanding share of Series J Preferred Stock in an amount at least equal to that dividend per share of Series J Preferred Stock as would equal



- 24 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



the product of (i) the dividend payable on each share of Common Stock and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of a share of Series J Preferred Stock, in each case calculated on the record date for determination of holders entitled to receive such dividend;


·

we agreed that if there is any breach of the Comfort Letter, the preferred dividend rate under each Amended Preferred Stock Series will be increased by an additional fourteen percent (14%) per annum (pro-rated for partial years), not to exceed the maximum amount (if any) permitted by law;


·

each Amended Preferred Stock Series was amended so that in the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company (a “Liquidation Event”), instead of receiving just the original issue price (subject to certain adjustments) of such shares of Preferred Stock, the holders of such Preferred Stock receive the greater of the original issue price (subject to certain adjustments) of such shares of Preferred Stock and the amount that they would have received if all such shares of such Amended Preferred Stock Series were converted into Common Stock in accordance with the terms of such Amended Preferred Stock Series immediately prior to such Liquidation Event;


·

the Series J Preferred Stock was amended so that its holders have the same rights as the holders of Series H Preferred Stock and Series I Preferred Stock to, at the option of the holders of a majority of the outstanding applicable Amended Preferred Stock Series, have a Liquidation Event also include (i) a consolidation or merger of the Company with or into another entity or person, or any other corporate reorganization, in which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such consolidation, merger or reorganization do not hold at least a majority of the resulting or surviving entities voting power immediately following such consolidation, merger or reorganization (solely in respect of their equity interests), or (ii) a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets for cash, securities or other property;


·

each Amended Preferred Stock Series was amended to give their respective holders voting rights on any Major Transaction that is approved by our board of directors and presented to the our stockholders  for their action or consideration at any meeting of our stockholders (or, if applicable, by written consent of stockholders in lieu of meeting) (a “Major Transaction Stockholder Vote”), entitling them to cast the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of Common Stock into which the shares of the applicable Amended Preferred Stock Series held by such holder are convertible as of the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote on such matter (irrespective of whether any such conversion would result in economic gain or loss to the holder) and shall be entitled to notice of any such meeting of stockholders in accordance with our by-laws, which holders of the applicable Amended Preferred Stock Series, except as provided by law or as otherwise provided therein, vote on any Major Transaction Stockholder Vote together with the holders of Common Stock as a single class;


·

the “blocker” provisions of each Amended Preferred Stock Series limiting the number of shares of the Common Stock to be issued upon the conversion of the applicable Amended Preferred Stock Series, when aggregated with the all other shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the holder of such Amended Preferred Stock Series at that time, to 4.99% of the then issued and outstanding shares of the Common Stock outstanding at such time were deleted; and,


·

we shall be obligated to provide each holder of an Amended Preferred Stock Series with written notice of the anticipated record date with respect to any Major Transaction at least five (5) business days prior to such record date, where “Major Transaction” means (i) the consolidation, merger or other business combination by us with or into another entity or person (other than (x) pursuant to a migratory merger effected solely for the purpose of changing the our jurisdiction of incorporation or (y) a consolidation, merger or other business combination in which holders of the Company’s voting power immediately prior to the transaction continue after the transaction to hold, directly or indirectly, the voting power of the surviving entity or entities necessary to elect a majority of the members of the board of directors (or their equivalent if other than a corporation) of such entity or entities); (ii) the sale or transfer of



- 25 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



more than fifty percent (50%) of our assets (based on the fair market value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors) other than inventory in the ordinary course of business in one or a related series of transactions; or (iii) the closing of a purchase, tender or exchange offer made to the holders of more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock in which more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock were tendered and accepted.

As of March 31, 2016, there were no shares of Series H Preferred Stock, Series I Preferred Stock or Series J Preferred Stock outstanding.

15.

Stockholders’ Deficit

Common Shares Authorized

On July 1, 2015, at an Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Restated Articles of Organization to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock by 50,000,000 shares to 250,000,000 shares. We have intentionally delayed the filing of Articles of Amendment to our Restated Articles of Organization with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to effect that increase. As a result of the stockholder approval, we are authorized to issue 250,000,000 shares of our common stock.

Common Stock Options and Stock Purchase Warrants

In connection with various financing agreements and services provided by consultants, we have issued warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.  The fair value of warrants issued is determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.  

Common Stock Options

In December 2004, we adopted the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “2004 Plan”). The 2004 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to employees and affiliates. The exercise price of the options equa1 100% of the fair market value on the date of the grant or 110% of the fair market value for beneficial owners of more than 10% of our stock. Options expire between five and ten years from the date of the option grant and have various vesting periods. Options may be exercised by delivering to the company cash in an amount equal to such aggregate exercise price of the options exercised, or with the consent of the Committee, shares of our common stock having a fair market value equal to such aggregate exercise price, a personal recourse note issued to the company in a principal amount equal to such aggregate exercise price, other acceptable consideration including a cashless exercise/resale procedure, or any combination of the foregoing. A total of 500,000 shares were originally reserved for issuance under the 2004 Plan. In December 2005, our stockholders approved an increase in the 2004 Plan from 500,000 shares to 1,000,000 shares.  In December 2007, our stockholders approved an increase in the 2004 Plan from 1,000,000 shares to 2,000,000 shares. In March 2012, our stockholders approved an increase in the 2004 Plan from 2,000,000 shares to 4,000,000. The 2004 Plan expired in May 2014, as such no further options grants may be issued under this plan. In September 2012, our Board of Directors adopted an amendment to our 2004 Stock Option increasing the total number of shares of our common stock issuable thereunder from 4,000,000 shares to 20,000,000 shares. On July 1, 2015, at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the September 2012 amendment was approved by our stockholders.

On July 2, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted the 2014 Stock Option Plan (the “2014 Plan”). The 2014 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to employees and affiliates. The exercise price of the options equa1 100% of the fair market value on the date of the grant or 110% of the fair market value for beneficial owners of more than 10% of our stock. Options expire between five and ten years from the date of the option grant and have various vesting periods. Options may be exercised by delivering to the company cash in an amount equal to such aggregate exercise price of the options exercised, or with the consent of the Committee, shares of our common stock having a fair market value equal to such aggregate exercise price, a personal recourse note issued to the company in a principal amount equal to such aggregate exercise price, other acceptable consideration including a cashless exercise/resale procedure, or any combination of the foregoing. A total of 15,000,000 shares were originally reserved for issuance under the 2014 Plan. The 2014 Plan was approved by our stockholders on July 1, 2015 at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Company has not filed a form S-8  with the SEC with respect to the 2014 Plan or the options or shares of stock issued or issuable thereunder.  

As of March 31, 2016, there were options outstanding to purchase 20,651,483 shares of our common stock at



- 26 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



exercise prices ranging from $0.08 to $2.30.

We issued 7,000 and 2,500 shares of common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, as a result of the exercise of options by employees and consultants. We issued 90,000 and 491,499 shares of common stock during the nine months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, as a result of the exercise of options by employees and consultants.

Stock Purchase Warrants and Stock Issuances

In connection with various financing agreements and services provided by consultants, we have issued warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.  The fair value of warrants issued is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  

In June 2015, we issued 550,000 shares of common stock having a value of $412,000 to two advisors, in consideration of services rendered to us under two advisory and consulting services agreements. The issued shares were valued at the closing stock price of $0.75 per share at May 6, 2015. The advisory and services agreements provide for the issuance of an additional 1,650,000 shares in equal monthly installments of 110,000 shares commencing in September 2015. For the nine months ended March 31, 2016, we have issued 770,000 shares of common stock having a value of $579,000 to these two advisors for services rendered under the advisory and consulting services agreement.  

As of March 31, 2016, there were warrants outstanding to purchase 3,155,000, shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.54 to $1.22 expiring at various dates between May 25, 2016 and April 1, 2021.

16.

Income Taxes

We are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States.  The preparation of these tax returns requires us to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by us. In consultation with our tax advisors, we base our tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various federal and state taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we file tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the income tax positions taken by us (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, may require us to pay additional taxes. As required under applicable accounting rules, we accrue an amount for our estimate of additional income tax liability, including interest and penalties, which we could incur as a result of the ultimate or effective resolution of the uncertain tax positions. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.  A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

We account for uncertain income tax positions by accruing for the estimated additional amount of taxes for the uncertain tax positions when the uncertain tax position does not meet the more likely than not standard for sustaining the position. We review and update our accrual as more definitive information becomes available from taxing authorities, upon completion of tax audits, upon expiration of statutes of limitation, or upon occurrence of other events.  This requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items and the probability of sustaining uncertain tax positions. The benefits of uncertain tax positions are recorded in our consolidated financial statements only after determining a more-likely-than-not probability that the uncertain tax positions will withstand challenge, if any, from tax authorities. When facts and circumstances change, we reassess these probabilities and record any changes in the consolidated financial statements as appropriate.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of the assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rate in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.  A valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred tax asset as it is more likely than not, based upon our analysis of all available evidence, that the tax benefit of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.



- 27 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



A valuation allowance has been established for our tax assets as their use is dependent on the generation of sufficient future taxable income, which cannot be predicted at this time.  Included in the valuation allowance is approximately $800,000 related to certain operating loss carryforwards resulting from the exercise of employee stock options, the tax benefit of which, when recognized, will be accounted for as a credit to additional paid-in capital rather than a reduction in income tax.

As of March 31, 2016, the Company has the following unused net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards available to offset future federal and state taxable income, both of which expire at various times as noted below:


(In thousands)

 

Net Operating Losses

 

Investment AMT & Research Credits

 

Expiration Dates

 

Federal

 

$

107,818

 

$

1,455

 

2022 to 2035

 

State

 

$

74,879

 

$

983

 

2016 to 2035

 

We have recorded a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets of $49,795,000 as of March 31, 2016, due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize these assets. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable.

Potential 382 Limitation

Our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service.  Our ability to utilize our net operating loss (“NOL”) and alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) and research and development credit (“R&D”) carryforwards may be substantially limited due to ownership changes that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as required by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as well as similar state provisions.  These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL, AMT and R&D credit carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively.  In general, an ownership change, as defined in Section 382 of the Code, results from a transaction or series of transactions over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of more than 50% of the outstanding stock of a company by certain stockholders or public groups.

We have not completed a study to assess whether one or more ownership changes have occurred since we became a loss corporation as defined in Section 382 of the Code, but we believe that it is likely that an ownership change has occurred.  If we have experienced an ownership change, utilization of the NOL, AMT and R&D credit carryforwards would be subject to an annual limitation, which is determined by first multiplying the value of our common stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term, tax-exempt rate, and then could be subject to additional adjustments, as required.  Any such limitation may result in the expiration of a portion of the NOL, AMT or R&D credit carryforwards before utilization.  Until a study is completed and any limitation known, no amounts are being considered as an uncertain tax position or disclosed as an unrecognized tax benefit under ASC 740.  Any carryforwards that expire prior to utilization as a result of such limitations will be removed from deferred tax assets with a corresponding adjustment to the valuation allowance.  Due to the existence of the valuation allowance, it is not expected that any potential limitation will have a material impact on our operating results.

From time to time we may be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions, namely the states of Massachusetts and California.  As of March 31, 2016, we had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required. No interest and penalties have been recognized by the Company to date.

Tax years 2012 through 2015 are subject to examination by the federal and state taxing authorities.  There are no income tax examinations currently in process.

Our net operating loss carryforwards are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service and are subject to certain limitations in the event of cumulative changes in the ownership interest of significant stockholders over a three-year period in excess of 50%.

17.

Commitments and Contingencies

On April 1, 2013, we entered into a lease for manufacturing, research and office space in Wilmington, Massachusetts, the lease of which expires on June 30, 2020.  Under the terms of the lease, we are responsible for our proportionate share of real estate taxes and operating expenses relating to this facility.  We leased research and



- 28 -




IMPLANT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



office space in San Diego, California and leased 300 square feet of office space in Shanghai, China.   On March 25, 2015, our Board of Directors approved restructuring actions to better align costs with current and future geographic revenue sources and to improve efficiencies.  In November, 2015, we exited from our lease in San Diego, CA. Total rent expense, including assessments for maintenance and real estate taxes for the nine months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, was $573,000 and $753,000, respectively.

License Agreements

We are obligated under one license agreement, assumed in connection with the acquisition of Ion Metrics, whereby we were granted rights to use certain intellectual property for safety, security and narcotic applications, which we intend to incorporate into future security product offerings for certain minimum guaranteed annual payments. The license agreement expires on September 30, 2016 and as of March 31, 2016, we have no obligation under this license agreement for future minimum guaranteed payments.

18.

Financial Information By Segment

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker or decision making group, in determining how to allocate resources and in accessing performance. Our chief operating decision making group is composed of the chief executive officer and members of senior management. Based on qualitative and quantitative criteria, we have determined that we operate within one reportable segment, which is the Security Products Segment.

19.

  Legal

On March 23, 2015, Bernard Miller (“Mr. Miller”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated shareholders of the company, filed a complaint against Dr. William J. McGann, Messrs. Glenn D. Bolduc, John H. Hassett, John A. Keating, Robert P. Liscouski, Howard Safir and Michael C. Turmelle and the Company in the Suffolk Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, seeking derivative action as a result of director breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.  Amongst other things, the plaintiff requested that the court compel the Company to hold an annual stockholders’ meeting; subject the September 2012 Amendment to the 2004 Plan to a vote at the next annual stockholders’ meeting; rescind the stock option awards granted under the September 2012 Amendment to 2004 Plan in the event that the amendment is not approved by a majority of our stockholders’; impose a trust, in favor of the Company, for any benefits improperly received; and award costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees.

On July 1, 2015 we held our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share available for issuance under the Plan by 16,000,000 shares to 20,000,000 shares and approved the Company’s Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Option Plan.

On May 22, 2015, a motion to dismiss the Complaint with prejudice was served on the plaintiff and subsequently filed with the Court. On July 21, 2015, the Court endorsed an Order of Stipulation the parties entered into. The Stipulation provides, among other things, that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and the Motion to Dismiss is moot. On December 17, 2015, the Court ruled that the Plaintiff’s counsel was entitled to a fee of $70,000 together with costs of approximately $6,000. During the nine months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded a charge of $76,000  in our condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

We are not currently a party to any other legal proceedings, other than routine litigation incidental to our business that which we believe will not have a material effect on our business, assets or results of operations.  From time to time, we are subject to various claims, legal proceedings and investigations covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of our business activities.  Each of these matters may be subject to various uncertainties.

20.

Subsequent Events

We have evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date through the date these financial statements were issued for appropriate accounting and disclosure and concluded that there are no subsequent events requiring adjustment or disclosure in these financial statements.



- 29 -






Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition (“MD&A”) is a supplement to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and provides additional information on Implant Sciences Corporation’s (“Implant Sciences” or the “Company’) business, current developments, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

When we say “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company,” or “Implant Sciences,” we mean Implant Sciences Corporation and its subsidiaries.

Please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 for a complete description of our business.

Overview

We develop, manufacture and sell sophisticated sensors and systems for the security, safety and defense industries. A variety of technologies are currently used worldwide in security and inspection applications. In broad terms, the technologies focus on detection in two major categories: (i) the detection of “bulk” contraband, which includes materials that would be visible to the eye, such as weapons, explosives, narcotics and chemical agents; and (ii) the detection of “trace” amounts of contraband, which includes trace particles or vapors of explosives, narcotics and chemical agents. Technologies used in the detection of “bulk” materials include computed tomography, transmission and backscatter x-ray, metal detection, trace detection and x-ray, gamma-ray, passive millimeter wave, and neutron analysis. Trace detection techniques used include mass spectrometry, gas chromatography, chemical luminescence, and ion mobility spectrometry.

We have developed proprietary technologies used in explosives and narcotics trace detection (“ETD” and “NTD”, respectively) applications and market and sell handheld ETD and desktop ETD and NTD systems that use our proprietary technologies. Our products are marketed and sold to a growing number of locations domestically and internationally. These systems are used by private companies and government agencies to screen baggage, cargo, other objects and people for the detection of trace amounts of explosives and narcotics.

A significant component of our ability to compete in the markets that we serve are the attainment of regulatory approvals.  We have undertaken considerable efforts in the past twelve to eighteen months in this regard and have achieved the following regulatory approvals and customer orders:

·

Our QS-B220 desktop ETD system successfully completed and passed testing requirements for the TSA’s qualification test for aviation checkpoint and checked baggage and has been placed on the TSA’s Qualified Product List (“QPL”) on August 28, 2014. The QS-B220 is the first ETD with a non-radioactive source to be approved by the TSA for use in U.S. airports for passenger and baggage screening. We are now able to participate in TSA tenders for ETD procurements for aviation checkpoint and checked baggage screening.

·

On October 6, 2014, the QS-B220 successfully passed the European Civil Aviation Conference's (“ECAC”) Common Evaluation Process of Security Equipment (“CEP”) for airport checkpoint screening of passengers and baggage. The CEP was established to provide standards for security equipment performance across ECAC's 44 member nations.

·

On October 16, 2014, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) selected our proposal to develop next generation explosives trace detection screening systems for funding. The project, pending successful negotiations, is potentially worth up to approximately $2 million. Subject to successful conclusion of negotiations with the DHS, we expect the project to commence in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

·

On November 10, 2014, we entered into an Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) contract with the United States Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) for our QS-B220 desktop explosives trace detectors. The IDIQ, a necessary prerequisite for competing for TSA’s annual trace detection procurements and establishes contract terms under which the TSA could purchase up to $162 million of equipment and services.

·

On November 10, 2014, we received an initial delivery order from the TSA for 1,170 QS-B220 desktop explosives trace detectors and commenced shipments under the delivery order in December 2015.



- 30 -






·

On December 3, 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors has authorized management to retain financial advisors to explore strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value.

·

On April 6, 2016,  we amended our credit agreements with DMRJ and Montsant, effective as of March 31, 2016, pursuant to which, amongst other matters, we extended the maturity date of our indebtedness to June 30, 2016 and December 30, 2016, respectively. Further on that date,  we amended our credit agreements with BAM, effective as of March 31, 2016,  pursuant to which, amongst other matters, we extended the maturity date of all of our indebtedness from March 31, 2016 to June 29, 2016.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. However, certain of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by our management, and such judgments are reflected in the amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements. In applying these policies, our management uses judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of estimates. Those estimates are based on our historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our observance of market trends, information provided by our strategic partners and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. Actual results may differ significantly from the estimates contained in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 vs. March 31, 2015

Revenues

 

 

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016

 

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Amount

 

Mix

 

Amount

 

Mix

 

Change

Product

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

QS-B220

 

$

9,343

 

85.6%

 

$

1,989

 

60.2%

 

369.7%

QS-H150

 

669

 

6.1%

 

1,088

 

32.9%

 

(38.5%) 

Parts and supplies

 

736

 

6.7%

 

160

 

4.8%

 

360.0%

 

 

10,748

 

98.4%

 

3,237

 

97.9%

 

232.0%

Services

 

175

 

1.6%

 

68

 

2.1%

 

157.4%

Total

 

$

10,923

 

100.0%

 

$

3,305

 

100.0%

 

230.5%

Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $10,923,000 as compared with $3,305,000 for the comparable prior year period, an increase of $7,618,000, or 230.5%. The increase in revenue is due primarily to a 664.6% increase in the number of QS-B220 desktop units sold in the three months ended March 31, 2016, due to the shipments under our delivery order with the U.S. Transportation Security Administration, shipments to the  Canadian  Air Transport Security Authority and increased shipments to Asia in the current three month period, offset partially by a 38.6% decrease in the average unit sales prices, which resulted in a 369.7% increase in QS-B220 revenues. Factors impacting our average unit sales prices are mainly due to the competitive market conditions and $25,000 in early payment discounts in the three months ended March 31, 2016.

QS-H150 handheld units sold in the three months ended March 31, 2016, decreased 32.7 %, compared to the prior period, due to decreased shipments to Europe and by an 8.6% decrease in the average unit sales prices, which resulted in a 38.5% decrease in QS-H150 revenues.  

Sales of parts and supplies and service revenues increased 360.0%  and 157.4%, respectively, in the three months ended March 31, 2016, due primarily to increased sales of consumables and other supplies that shipped with the QS-B220 desktop units and increased training and warranty revenue in the current three month period.

Sales of QS-B220 were favorably impacted in the current period due to the acceptance of the QS-B220 into the “Qualified” section of the TSA’s Air Cargo Screening Technology List and achieving European Civil Aviation Conference (“ECAC”) Common Evaluation Process of Security Equipment for airport checkpoint screening of passengers and baggage. Competitive market conditions are expected to continue to have a negative impact on our average unit sales prices for the foreseeable future.



- 31 -






Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $7,691,000 as compared with $2,129,000 for the comparable prior year period, an increase of $5,562,000 or 261.2%. The increase in cost of revenues recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2016 is primarily due to increased unit sales of our QS-B220 desktop units and an increase in manufacturing overhead costs.

Gross Margin

Gross margin for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $3,232,000 or 29.6% of revenues as compared with $1,176,000 or 35.6% of revenues for the comparable prior year period. The decrease in gross margin as a percent of revenues is primarily due to a decrease in the average unit sales price on sales of our QS-B220 units of 38.6%. and a 8.6% decrease in the average unit sales price on sales of our QS-H150, and an increase in manufacturing overhead costs.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $1,040,000 as compared with $1,347,000 for the comparable prior year period, a decrease of $307,000 or 22.8%. The decrease in research and development expense is due primarily to a $104,000 decrease in stock-based compensation expense, a $48,000 decrease in materials and prototype expense, the relocation of the San Diego, CA advanced technology office, which resulted in a $78,000 decrease in rent expense and a $52,000 decrease in payroll and related fringe benefits. We continue to expend funds to further the development of new products in the areas of explosives and narcotics detection, and to obtain the necessary approvals from the TSA and other non-U.S. government approvals. Spending on research and development will likely increase in the next six to twelve months due to the ongoing development of the QS-B220 desktop detector, the development of the QS-H150E portable explosives and narcotics detector and continued development of a hyphenated system employing conventional ion mobility, differential mobility and quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $3,811,000 as compared with $3,318,000 for the comparable prior year period, an increase of $493,000, or 14.9%. The increase in selling, general  and administrative expenses is due primarily to a $640,000 increase in payroll and related benefits due  primarily to the provision of $487,000 for  incentive compensation, a $284,000 increase in consulting expenses due to the issuance of shares of our common stock to two advisors for services rendered under the advisory and consulting services agreements and investment banker advisor fees, a $263,000 increase in legal fees attributable to our ongoing review of strategic alternatives, a $183,000 increase in variable selling expenses, and a $142,000 increase in travel expenses, partially offset by a $680,000 decrease in stock-based compensation on employee stock options, due primarily to additional stock-based compensation expense resulting from the amendments to Mr. Bolduc’s existing vested stock options and to the accelerated vesting of certain options issued on July 2, 2014 in the prior year period, $274,000 of charges incurred pursuant to our Letter Agreement with Luveti in the prior year period and a $52,000 decrease in rent expense.

  Other Expense

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, other expense was $2,477,000 as compared with other expense of $2,242,000, for the comparable prior year period, an increase of $235,000, or 10.5%. The increase is due to increased interest expense on higher borrowings under our credit facilities with DMRJ and, to a lesser extent, the 1% increase in the BAM interest rate which took effect on April 1, 2015.

Net Loss

Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $4,096,000 as compared with a net loss of $5,731,000 for the comparable prior year period, a decrease of $1,635,000, or 28.5%. The decrease in net loss is primarily due to increased revenues and gross margin, partially offset by increased operating expenses and an increase in interest expense.






- 32 -






Nine Months Ended March 31, 2016 vs. March 31, 2015

Revenues

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2016

 

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2015

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Amount

 

Mix

 

Amount

 

Mix

 

Change

Product

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

QS-B220

 

$

29,391

 

82.5%

 

$

3,906

 

53.4%

 

652.5%

QS-H150

 

3,081

 

8.7%

 

2,879

 

39.3%

 

7.0%

Parts and supplies

 

2,261

 

6.3%

 

370

 

5.1%

 

511.1%

 

 

34,733

 

97.5%

 

7,155

 

97.8%

 

385.4%

Services

 

875

 

2.5%

 

160

 

2.2%

 

446.9%

Total

 

$

35,608

 

100.0%

 

$

7,315

 

100.0%

 

386.8%


Revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2016 were $35,608,000 as compared with $7,315,000 for the comparable prior year period, an increase of $28,293,000, or 386.8%. The increase in revenue is due primarily to a 1,010.2% increase in the number of QS-B220 desktop units sold in the nine months ended March 31, 2016, due to increased shipments to European airports, shipments under our delivery order with the U.S. Transportation Security Administration, shipments to the  Canadian  Air Transport Security Authority and increased shipments to Asia, Africa and South America in the current nine month period, offset partially by a 32.2% decrease in the average unit sales prices, which resulted in a 652.5% increase in QS-B220 revenues. Factors impacting our average unit sales prices are mainly due to the competitive market conditions and our decision to offer early payment discounts to certain distributors to hasten collection of our accounts receivable, which discounts in the aggregate amounted to $325,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

QS-H150 handheld units sold in the nine months ended March 31, 2016, increased 12.6 %, compared to the prior period, due to increased shipments to Asia and Africa, which is partially offset by a 4.9% decrease in the average unit sales prices, which resulted in a 7.0% increase in QS-H150 revenues.  

Sales of parts and supplies and service revenues increased 511.1% and 446.9%, respectively,  in the nine months ended March 31, 2016, due primarily to increased sales of consumables and other supplies that shipped with the QS-B220 desktop units and increased training and warranty in the current nine month period.

Sales of QS-B220 were favorably impacted in the current period due to the acceptance of the QS-B220 into the “Qualified” section of the TSA’s Air Cargo Screening Technology List and achieving European Civil Aviation Conference (“ECAC”) Common Evaluation Process of Security Equipment for airport checkpoint screening of passengers and baggage. Competitive market conditions are expected to continue to have a negative impact on our average unit sales prices for the foreseeable future.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2016 were $22,266,000 as compared with $5,157,000 for the comparable prior year period, an increase of $17,109,000 or 331.8%. The increase in cost of revenues recorded in the nine months ended March 31, 2016 is primarily due to increased unit sales of our QS-B220 desktop units and, to a lesser extent, increased unit sales of our QS-H150 handheld units and an increase in manufacturing overhead costs.

Gross Margin

Gross margin for the nine months ended March 31, 2016 was $13,342,000 or 37.5% of revenues as compared with $2,158,000 or 29.5% of revenues for the comparable prior year period. The increase in gross margin as a percent of revenues is primarily due to increased manufacturing overhead absorption, due to increased QS-B220 unit volume and lower material costs for the QS-B220 due to volume purchasing price reductions, partially offset by a 32.2% decrease in the average unit sales price on sales of our QS-B220 units and by a decrease in the average unit sales price on sales of our QS-H150 units of 4.9%, and an increase in manufacturing overhead costs.





- 33 -






Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2016 was $3,024,000 as compared with $3,919,000 for the comparable prior year period, a decrease of $895,000 or 22.8%. The decrease in research and development expense is due primarily to the relocation of the San Diego, CA advanced technology office, which resulted in a $303,000 decrease in payroll and benefit costs, a $200,000 decrease in materials and prototype expenses, a $215,000 decrease in stock-based compensation, a $62,000 decrease in regulatory testing expenses, and a $93,000 decrease in rent expense, offset partially by a $41,000 increase in travel expenses incurred in support of the ECAC system deployments in the current period. We continue to expend funds to further the development of new products in the areas of explosives and narcotics detection, and to obtain the necessary approvals from the TSA and other non-U.S. government approvals. Spending on research and development will likely increase in the next six to twelve months due to the ongoing development of the QS-B220 desktop detector, the development of the QS-H150E portable explosives and narcotics detector and continued development of a hyphenated system employing conventional ion mobility, differential mobility and quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2016 were $11,067,000 as compared with $9,188,000 for the comparable prior year period, an increase of $1,879,000, or 20.5%. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses is due primarily to a $1,931,000 increase in payroll and benefit costs, due to the provision of $1,440,000 for  incentive compensation and a $200,000 sign on bonus for Mr. Liscouski, our President, a $1,041,000 increase in variable selling expenses due to increased revenues, a $872,000 increase in consulting expenses due to the issuance of shares of our common stock to two advisors for services rendered under the advisory and consulting services agreements and investment banker advisor fees, a $221,000 increase in travel expense incurred to support QS-B220 system installations domestically and in Europe, the $76,000 charge recorded for the plaintiff’s counsel fee and expenses, resulting from the Miller litigation, a $255,000 increase in legal fees attributable to our ongoing review of strategic alternatives and an $86,000 increase in business insurance, due to increased revenues, offset partially by separation benefits of $725,000 provided to our former CEO due to his resignation in the prior year period, a $1,086,000 decrease in stock-based compensation on employee stock options, due primarily to additional stock-based compensation expense resulting from the amendments to Mr. Bolduc’s existing vested stock options and to the accelerated vesting of certain options issued on July 2, 2014 in the prior year period, $274,000 of charges incurred pursuant to our Letter Agreement with Luveti in the prior year period, a $207,000 decrease in stock-based compensation expense on non-employee warrants, a $54,000 decrease in bad debt expense, and a $98,000 decrease in rent expense.

Other Expense

For the nine months ended March 31, 2016, other expense was $7,571,000 as compared with other expense of $6,401,000, for the comparable prior year period, an increase of $1,170,000, or 18.3%. The increase is due to increased interest expense on higher borrowings under our credit facilities with DMRJ and, to a lesser extent, the 1% increase in the BAM interest rate which took effect on April 1, 2015.

Net Loss

Our net loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2016 was $8,320,000 as compared with a net loss of $17,350,000 for the comparable prior year period, a decrease of $9,030,000, or 52.0%. The decrease in the net loss is primarily due to increased revenues and gross margin, partially offset by increased operating expenses and an increase in interest expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2015, we had cash and cash equivalents of $280,000 and $1,985,000, respectively. We will be required to repay all unpaid principal and interest under borrowings from DMRJ and Montsant, in the aggregate amount of $60,038,000 as of May 6, 2016 under (i) a senior secured promissory note dated July 1, 2009 and (ii) a credit agreement dated September 4, 2009, on June 30, 2016 and will be required to repay our borrowings to (i) Montsant under an amended and restated senior secured convertible promissory note dated March 12, 2009 (the “March 2009 Note”), (ii) DMRJ under a senior secured convertible promissory note dated September 5, 2012 (the “September 2012 Note”) and (iii) to DMRJ under a senior secured convertible promissory note dated February 28, 2013 (the “February 2013 Note” and together with the March 2009 Note, the July 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note, the “Notes”), on December 30, 2016. Our obligations to DMRJ and



- 34 -






Montsant are secured by security interests in substantially all of our assets.

Further, we will be required to repay unpaid principal and interest under our borrowings from a group of institutional investors for which BAM Administrative Services LLC (“BAM”) acts as administrative agent, in the aggregate amount of $21,920,000, as of May 6, 2016, on June 29, 2016. Our obligations to BAM are secured by a security interest in substantially all of our assets. DMRJ and Montsant agreed to subordinate their security interest in all of our assets to the security interest held by BAM (See Note 13).

As of March 31, 2016, our principal obligations to DMRJ under each of the three promissory notes and a revolving line of credit approximated $18,970,000, $17,523,000, $1,000,000 and $17,662,000, respectively. Further, as of March 31, 2016, our obligation to DMRJ for accrued interest under these instruments approximated $4,603,000 and is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of May 6, 2016, our principal obligations to DMRJ under each of the three promissory notes and a revolving line of credit approximated $18,970,000, $17,523,000, $1,000,000 and $17,662,000, respectively. Further, as of May 6, 2016, our obligation to DMRJ for accrued interest under these instruments approximated $4,883,000.

As of March 31, 2016 and May 6, 2016, our principal obligations to Montsant under a promissory note approximated $5,284,000. Further, as of March 31, 2016 and May 6, 2016, our obligation to Montsant for accrued interest under this instrument was $0.

As of March 31, 2016, our principal obligations under the senior secured promissory notes for which BAM is the agent were $20,000,000. Further, as of March 31, 2016, our obligation under such notes for accrued interest amounted to approximately $1,600,000 and is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of May 6, 2016, our principal obligations under the senior secured promissory notes for which BAM is the agent were $20,000,000. Further, as of May 6, 2016, our obligation under such notes for accrued interest amounted to approximately $1,920,000.

Each of these notes and the credit facility are described in Note 13 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, accompanying this Quarterly Report.

On December 11, 2015, we entered into an Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Republic Capital Access, LLC (“RCA”), pursuant to which we may sell eligible accounts receivables relating to U.S. government prime contracts or subcontracts (as defined in the Purchase Agreement, “Eligible Receivables”) to RCA.  The total amount of Eligible Receivables that we may sell to RCA is subject to a maximum limit of $2,000,000 of outstanding receivables at any given time.  The Purchase Agreement terminates on November 30, 2016. On April 11, 2016, we amended the Purchase Agreement (the “Amended Purchase Agreement”). As amended, the total amount of Eligible Receivables that we may sell to RCA is subject to a maximum limit of $3,500,000 of outstanding receivables at any given time

Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, we will receive from RCA, within two business days of the submission of the applicable invoice, an initial payment equal to 90% of the face value of an Eligible Receivable purchased by RCA.  Following payment of such Eligible Receivable to RCA by the relevant customer, RCA shall pay the Company the residual 10% of such receivable, fewer fees payable to RCA by the Company pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. 

We have paid, or will pay, as applicable, the following fees, as applicable, to RCA pursuant to the Purchase Agreement: (i) an initial enrollment fee equal to $5,000.00; (ii) a discount factor equal to 0.35%, for U.S. government contracts (or 0.53% for U.S. government subcontracts), of the amounts of purchased receivables; (iii) a program access fee equal to 0.017% of the daily ending account balance for each day that receivables are outstanding; (iv) a commitment fee equal to 1% of Maximum Amount minus the amount of purchased receivables; and (v) expenses relating to the negotiation of the Purchase Agreement, which amount is not expected to exceed $1,000.  As of March 31, 2016, RCA has purchased $2,931,000 of our receivables pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.

BAM Administrative Services LLC and DMRJ Group LLC consented to the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2016, we had net cash outflows of $2,607,000 from operating activities as compared to net cash outflows from operating activities of $9,282,000 for the comparable prior year



- 35 -






period. The $6,675,000 decrease in net cash outflows used in operating activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2016, as compared to the prior year period, was due to the following changes in working capital: (i) a $5,590,000 increase in accounts receivable, compared to a $803,000 increase in the prior period, due to increased product shipments during the latter part of the quarter ended March 31, 2016; (ii) a $737,000 increase in inventories compared to a $468,000 increase in the prior period, due primarily to increased customer order backlog, compared to the prior period; (iii) an increase in accrued expenses of $9,880,000, compared to a $6,047,000 increase in the prior period, due to primarily to an increase in our accrued interest, due to higher borrowings under our credit facilities with DMRJ and the increase in the BAM interest rate, and to a lesser extent, by an increase in accrued expenses in the current period due provisions for incentive compensation recorded in the nine months ended March 31, 2016 and an increase in our provision for product warranty costs, due to increased unit shipments of our QS-B220 desktop units; (iv) a $2,087,000 decrease in deferred revenue, compared to a $1,317,000 increase in deferred revenue in the prior year period, due primarily to the application of ECAC customer advance deposits received in the quarter ended June 30, 2015, against accounts receivables resulting from shipments in the nine months ended March 31, 2016; and, (v) a $2,122,000 increase in accounts payable, compared to a $615,000 decrease in the prior period, due to increased inventory related payables.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2016, we had net cash outflows of $117,000 from investing activities as compared to net cash outflows of $341,000 from investing activities for the prior year period. The $224,000 decrease in net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2016, as compared to the prior year period, was primarily due to increased purchases of equipment in the nine months ended March 31, 2015.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2016 we had net cash inflows of $1,001,000 from financing activities as compared to net cash inflows of $11,145,000 for the comparable prior year period. The $10,144,000 decrease in net cash from financing activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2016, as compared to the prior year period, was primarily due to $1,000,000 in borrowings under our credit facility with DMRJ, compared to a borrowings of $10,917,000 in the prior fiscal year, and, to a lesser extent, a $225,000 decrease in proceeds received due to the exercise of stock options and warrants.

Credit Facilities with DMRJ Group LLC, Montsant Partners LLC and BAM Administrative Services LLC

In December 2008, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement with DMRJ, pursuant to which we issued a senior secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $5,600,000 and a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock.  Thereafter, we entered into a series of amendments, waivers and modifications of this facility.

On May 4, 2015, we entered into an assignment agreement with DMRJ and Montsant, wherein DMRJ assigned its rights, title and interest in the senior secured promissory note dated December 10, 2008 and appointed DMRJ as its collateral agent under the promissory note agreement. DMRJ and Montsant are funds managed by Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund LP.

We will be required to repay all of our borrowings from DMRJ and Montsant  under (i) a senior secured promissory note dated July 1, 2009 and (ii) a credit agreement dated September 4, 2009, on June 30, 2016 and will be required to repay our borrowings to (i) Montsant under an amended and restated senior secured convertible promissory note dated March 12, 2009 (the “March 2009 Note”), (ii) DMRJ under a senior secured convertible promissory note dated September 5, 2012 (the “September 2012 Note”) and (iii) to DMRJ under a senior secured convertible promissory note dated February 28, 2013 (the “February 2013 Note” and together with the March 2009 Note, the July 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note, the “Notes”), on December 30, 2016.

In March, 2014, we entered into a note purchase agreement with a group of institutional investors and BAM, an administrative agent for the investors, pursuant to which we issued senior secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $20,000,000. The notes bear interest at 16% per annum and mature on June 29, 2016.  We used all of the proceeds from the sale of the notes to repay (i) $17,624,000 of our outstanding indebtedness to DMRJ under revolving promissory note (ii) $1,809,000 of interest outstanding under that facility and (iii) $567,000 of interest outstanding under our senior secured convertible promissory note.

Further, we will be required to repay all of our borrowings from a group of institutional investors for which BAM Administrative Services LLC (“BAM”) acts as administrative agent, on June 29, 2016.



- 36 -






See Note 13 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, accompanying this Quarterly Report. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in refinancing or extending our obligations to our secured lenders .  

Our ability to comply with our debt covenants in the future depends on our ability to generate sufficient sales and to control expenses, and will require that we seek additional capital through private financing sources.  There can be no assurances that we will achieve our forecasted financial results or that we will be able to raise additional capital to operate our business.  Any such failure would have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial condition and could force us to curtail or discontinue operations entirely.  Further, upon the occurrence of an event of default under certain provisions of our credit agreements, we could be required to pay default rate interest equal to the interest rate per annum under each term note increased by an additional fourteen percent (14%) per annum (pro-rated for partial years), not to exceed the maximum legal rate per annum on the outstanding principal balance outstanding as permitted by applicable New York law. The failure to refinance or otherwise negotiate further extensions of our obligations to our secured lenders would have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial condition and could force us to curtail or discontinue operations entirely and/or file for protection under bankruptcy laws.

Based on current sales, operating expense and cash flow projections, and the cash available from our line of credit, management believes there are plans in place to sustain operations, provided that our credit facilities are extended. These plans depend on a substantial increase in sales of our handheld trace explosives detector product and our desktop explosives and narcotics trade detector product and on the extension of the maturity date of our credit facilities with DMRJ, BAM and Montsant.  However, there can be no assurances that sales will materialize as forecasted, and/or that management will be successful in refinancing or extending our obligations to our secured lenders, which mature on various dates between June 29, 2016 and December 30, 2016. To further sustain us, improve our cash position, and enable us to grow while reducing debt, management plans to continue to seek additional capital through private financing sources. However, there can be no assurance that management will be successful in executing these plans.  Management will continue to closely monitor and attempt to control our costs and actively seek needed capital through sales of our products, equity infusions, government grants and awards, strategic alliances, and through our lending institutions.

Despite our current sales, expense and cash flow projections and $1,582,000 in cash available from our line of credit with DMRJ, at May 6, 2016, to fund our operations and continue the development, commercialization and marketing of our products will require that we extend our credit facilities with DMRJ, BAM and Montsant. There can be no assurance that DMRJ will continue to make advances under our revolving line of credit. Our failure to achieve our projections and/or obtain sufficient additional capital on acceptable terms would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operations and could require us to file for protection under bankruptcy laws. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2016, we had one irrevocable standby letter of credit outstanding in the approximate amount of $297,000. The letter of credit provides warranty performance security equal to 5% of the contract amount with the India Ministry of Defence. We have amended the letter of credit, extending the expiration date to April 15, 2017.

As of March 31, 2016, we did not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, “ Revenue Recognition”. The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of this updated guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new rule also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods therein, which is effective



- 37 -






for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2018, the first day of our 2019 fiscal year . We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-12, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASU 2014-12”). The FASB issued ASU 2014-12 to provide specific guidance on share-based payment awards that provide for achievement of a specific performance target that could be achieved after the requisite service period. ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. This guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016, the first day of our 2017 fiscal year. Earlier adoption is permitted. ASU 2014-12 may be applied prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this guidance should be recognized in the financial statements as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance to U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is a substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This new rule requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, ASU 2014-15 (1) defines the term substantial doubt, (2) requires an evaluation of every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plan, (4) requires certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) requires an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) requires an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. This guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016, the first day of our 2017 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 was issued to more closely align the measurement of inventory in U.S. GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of this updated   guidance is that an entity should measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The amendments in ASU 2015-11 apply to inventory that is measured using the first-in, first-out or average cost methods. ASU 2015-11 amends some of the guidance in Topic 330 to more clearly articulate the requirements for the measurement and disclosure of inventory, but the clarifications are not intended to result in any changes in practice other than the change in the subsequent measurement guidance from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost or net realizable value for inventory.  There are no other substantive changes to the guidance on the measurement of inventory. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017, the first day of our 2018 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-15, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (“ASU 2015-15”). ASU 2015-15 states that Staff at the Securities and Exchange Commission would not object to an entity deferring or presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing deferred debt issuance cost ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there were outstanding borrowings under the arrangement. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.



- 38 -






In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 was issued to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendment requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount under Concepts Statement 6. Debt issuance costs are similar to a debt discount and in effect reduce the proceeds of borrowing, thereby increasing the effective interest rate and improves consistency with IFRS. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016, the first day of our 2017 fiscal year.  We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are “forward-looking” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward looking statements and other information are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made by us using information currently available.

The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “will,” “should” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and are not guaranties of future performance. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended or using other similar expressions.

We are making investors aware that such forward-looking statements, because they relate to future events, are by their very nature subject to many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Report. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from our predictions include those discussed under this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” and under “Risk Factors,” as well as those discussed under “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” and “Business” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. Although we have sought to identify the most significant risks to our business, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks may be realized, nor can there be any assurance that we have identified all possible issues which we might face. In addition, assumptions relating to budgeting, marketing, product development and other management decisions are subjective in many respects and thus susceptible to interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments, the impact of which may cause us to alter our marketing, capital expenditure or other budgets, which may in turn affect our financial position and results of operations. For all of these reasons, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. We assume no responsibility to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise except as required by law. We urge readers to review carefully the risk factors described in this Quarterly Report, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 and in the other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You can read these documents at www.sec.gov .

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

The certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer attached as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, in paragraph 4 of such certifications, information concerning our disclosure controls and procedures, and internal control over financial reporting. Such certifications should be read in conjunction with the information contained in this Item 4 for a more complete understanding of the matters covered by such certifications.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2016.  The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is



- 39 -






accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions to be made regarding required disclosure.  It should be noted that any system of controls and procedures, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met and that management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As a result of material weaknesses described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2016 and further concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Remediation

We are committed to remediating the material weaknesses identified in internal controls over financial reporting and have begun the process to remediate these material weaknesses, however the timing of completing our remediation efforts is uncertain. Our efforts will focus on instituting mitigating controls to address segregation of duties and undertake a thorough review of the finance functions position responsibilities and the hiring of additional staff; implement additional controls to address system access deficiencies; establish independent review and verification procedures for our vendor and customer master files; enhance the documentation to support review occurrences and approval procedures; and, commence regular periodic reviews of our internal controls over financial reporting with our Board of Directors and Audit Committee to address the inadequate risk oversight function and institute procedures to evaluate and report on risks to financial reporting, including the documentation and completion of a comprehensive risk assessment to identify all potential risk areas and evaluate the adequacy of our controls to mitigate these risks.  

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we have implemented additional controls to address system access deficiencies and have begun instituting mitigating controls to address segregation of duty issues. There are no other changes that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

On March 23, 2015, Bernard Miller (“Mr. Miller”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated shareholders of the company, filed a complaint against Dr. William J. McGann, Messrs. Glenn D. Bolduc, John H. Hassett, John A. Keating, Robert P. Liscouski, Howard Safir and Michael C. Turmelle and the Company in the Suffolk Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, seeking derivative action as a result of director breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.  Amongst other things, the plaintiff requested that the court compel the Company to hold an annual stockholders’ meeting; subject the September 2012 Amendment to the 2004 Plan to a vote at the next annual stockholders’ meeting; rescind the stock option awards granted under the September 2012 Amendment to 2004 Plan in the event that the amendment is not approved by a majority of our stockholders’; impose a trust, in favor of the Company, for any benefits improperly received; and award costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees.

On July 1, 2015 we held our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share available for issuance under the Plan by 16,000,000 shares to 20,000,000 shares and approve the Company’s Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Option Plan.

On May 22, 2015, a motion to dismiss the Complaint with prejudice was served on the plaintiff and subsequently filed with the Court. On July 21, 2015, the Court endorsed an Order of Stipulation the parties entered into. The Stipulation provides, among other things, that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and the Motion to Dismiss is moot. On December 17, 2015, the Court ruled that the Plaintiff’s counsel was entitled to a fee of $70,000 together with costs of approximately $6,000. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded a charge of $76,000  in our condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

We may, from time to time, be involved in other actual or potential proceedings that we consider to be in the normal course of our business.  We do not believe that any of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect



- 40 -






on our business. We are not a party to any other legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, which we believe will not have a material effect on our business, assets or results of operations.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Other than as set forth below, there have not been any material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

We will be required to repay substantially all  of our secured borrowings  on various dates between June 29, 2016 and December 30, 3016 to DMRJ, Montsant and BAM.

We will be required to repay all of our borrowings from DMRJ and Montsant  under (i) a senior secured promissory note dated July 1, 2009 and (ii) a credit agreement dated September 4, 2009, on June 30, 2016 and will be required to repay our borrowings to (i) Montsant under an amended and restated senior secured convertible promissory note dated March 12, 2009 (the “March 2009 Note”), (ii) DMRJ under a senior secured convertible promissory note dated September 5, 2012 (the “September 2012 Note”) and (iii) to DMRJ under a senior secured convertible promissory note dated February 28, 2013 (the “February 2013 Note” and together with the March 2009 Note, the July 2009 Note, the September 2012 Note, the “Notes”), on December 30, 2016;

Further, we will be required to repay all of our borrowings from a group of institutional investors for which BAM Administrative Services LLC (“BAM”) acts as administrative agent, on June 29, 2016. Our obligations to BAM are secured by a security interest in substantially all of our assets. DMRJ and Montsant agreed to subordinate their security interest in all of our assets to the security interest held by BAM (See Note 13).

Our obligations to DMRJ are secured by security interests in substantially all of our assets. As of March 31, 2016, our obligations to DMRJ under each of the three promissory notes and a revolving line of credit approximated $18,970,000, $17,523,000, $1,000,000 and $17,662,000, respectively. Further, as of March 31, 2016, our obligation to DMRJ for accrued interest under these instruments approximated $4,603,000 and is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of May 6, 2016, our principal obligations to DMRJ under each of the three promissory notes and a revolving line of credit approximated $18,970,000, $17,523,000, $1,000,000 and $17,662,000, respectively. Further, as of May 6, 2016, our obligation to DMRJ for accrued interest under these instruments approximated $4,883,000.

As of March 31, 2016 and May 6, 2016, our principal obligations to Montsant under a promissory note approximated $5,284,000. Further, as of March 31, 2016 and May 6, 2016, our obligation to Montsant for accrued interest under this instrument was $0.

Our obligations to the investors are secured by security interests in substantially all of our assets. As of March 31, 2016, our principal obligations under the senior secured promissory notes for which BAM is the agent were $20,000,000. Further, as of March 31, 2016, our obligation under such notes for accrued interest amounted to approximately $1,600,000 and is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of May 6, 2016, our principal obligations under the senior secured promissory notes for which BAM is the agent were $20,000,000. Further, as of May 6, 2016, our obligation under such notes for accrued interest amounted to approximately $1,920,000.

If we are unable to repay these amounts as required, refinance our obligations to DMRJ, BAM and Montsant or negotiate extensions of these obligations, DMRJ, BAM and Montsant may seize our assets and we may be forced to file for protection under bankruptcy laws and to curtail or discontinue operations entirely.

Pursuant to our amended credit instruments with DMRJ, Montsant and BAM all of our indebtedness shall become immediately due and payment if we receive an offer from another person with respect to a Major Transaction.

All outstanding amounts due to DMRJ, Montsant and BAM shall be immediately due and payable if (a) we receive an offer from another person or entity with respect to a Major Transaction, (b) DMRJ, Montsant or BAM notifies us that such offer is satisfactory to DMRJ, Montsant or BAM (in their sole discretion), and (c) either (i) our Board of Directors does not approve such transaction within ten (10) days of our receipt of such notice from DMRJ, Montsant or BAM, (ii) if such transaction is subject to stockholder approval, we do not file a preliminary proxy statement with the SEC within fifteen (15) days of the receipt of such notice from DMRJ, Montsant or BAM or (iii) if such transaction is subject to stockholder approval, our stockholders do not approve such transaction within ninety



- 41 -






(90) days of the  receipt of such notice from DMRJ, Montsant or BAM, that we shall be obligated to immediately forward to DMRJ, Montsant or BAM  any offer that we receive with respect to any Major Transaction.

We will require additional capital to fund operations and continue the development, commercialization and marketing of our product. Our failure to raise capital could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Management continually evaluates operating expenses and plans to increase sales and increase cash flow from operations. Despite our current sales, expense and cash flow projections and $1,582,000 in cash available from our line of credit with DMRJ, at May 6, 2016, to fund our operations and continue the development, commercialization and marketing of our products will require that we extend our credit facilities with DMRJ, BAM and Montsant. There can be no assurance that DMRJ will continue to make advances under our revolving line of credit. Our failure to achieve our projections and/or obtain sufficient additional capital on acceptable terms would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operations and could require us to file for protection under bankruptcy laws. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we issued 330,000 shares of common stock, having a value of approximately $248,000, to two advisors, in consideration of services rendered to us under two advisory and consulting services agreements. The issuance of these shares was exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.




- 42 -






Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit No.

 

Description

3.1

 

Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of Implant Sciences Corporation, adopted April 6, 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Implant Sciences Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2016 and filed on April 8, 2016).

10.1

 

Consent and Second Omnibus Amendment to Secured Term Notes, dated as of April 6, 2016 and effective March 31, 2016, between Implant Sciences Corporation, the Guarantors named therein, certain Investors and BAM Administrative Services, LLC, as Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Implant Sciences Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2016 and filed on April 8, 2016).

10.2

 

Omnibus Fourteenth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Sixteenth Amendment to Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2016 and effective March 31, 2016, among Implant Sciences Corporation, the Guarantors named therein, DMRJ Group LLC and Montsant Partners LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Implant Sciences Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2016 and filed on April 8, 2016).

10.3

 

Comfort Letter, dated March 31, 2016, between the Company, DMRJ Group LLC and Montsant Partners LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Implant Sciences Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2016 and filed on April 8, 2016).

10.4

 

First Amendment to Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2016, between Implant Sciences Corporation and Republic Capital Access, LLC.

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

32.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxomony Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.


*

Indicates a management contract of compensatory plan or arrangement.

**

In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K, the certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 hereto are deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.




- 43 -






SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 

Implant Sciences Corporation

 

By:

/s/ William J. McGann

 

 

William J. McGann

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Roger P. Deschenes

 

 

Roger P. Deschenes

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

Dated: May 16, 2016

 

 




- 44 -