Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Three and Nine month Periods Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Saleen Automotive, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Saleen,” “we,” “us, “our” and “our Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016, or for any other interim period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2015, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such year filed on July 14, 2015. The consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2015, has been derived from the audited financial statements included in the Form 10-K filed on July 14, 2015.

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF THE BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of the Company

Saleen Automotive, Inc. (formerly W270, Inc.) (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 24, 2011. The Company designs, develops, manufactures and sells high performance vehicles built from base chassis of Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros, Dodge Challengers and Tesla Model S vehicles. The Company is a low volume vehicle design, engineering and manufacturing company focusing on the mass customization (the process of customizing automobiles that are mass produced by the manufacturers (Ford, Chevrolet, Dodge and Tesla) of OEM American sports and electric vehicles. A high performance car is an automobile that is designed and constructed specifically for speed and performance. The design and construction of a high performance car involves not only providing a capable power train but also providing the handling, aerodynamics and braking systems to support it. The Company’s Saleen-branded products include a complete line of upgraded high performance vehicles, automotive aftermarket specialty parts and lifestyle accessories.

Merger

On May 23, 2013, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with Saleen California Merger Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Saleen Florida Merger Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Saleen Automotive, Inc. (“Saleen Automotive”), SMS Signature Cars (“SMS” and together with Saleen Automotive, the “Saleen Entities”) and Steve Saleen (“Saleen” and together with the Saleen Entities, the “Saleen Parties”). The closing (the “Closing”) of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Merger”) occurred on June 26, 2013. At the Closing (a) Saleen California Merger Corporation was merged with and into SMS with SMS surviving as one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries; (b) Saleen Florida Merger Corporation was merged with and into Saleen Automotive with Saleen Automotive surviving as one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries; (c) holders of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive received an aggregate of 554,057 shares of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred Stock, which was subsequently converted into 69,257,125 shares of the Company’s Common Stock and holders of the outstanding capital stock of SMS received no consideration for their shares; and (d) approximately 93% of the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock (on a fully-diluted basis) was owned, collectively, by Saleen (including 341,943 shares of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred Stock, which was subsequently converted into 42,742,875 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, issued to Saleen pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement) and the former holders of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive. As a result of the Merger the Company is solely engaged in the Saleen Entities’ business, Saleen Automotive’s then officers became the Company’s officers and Saleen Automotive’s then three directors became members of the Company’s five-member board of directors. On June 17, 2013, the Company consummated a merger with WSTY Subsidiary Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, pursuant to which the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Saleen Automotive, Inc. In October 2013, SMS effected an amendment to its articles of incorporation to change its name to Saleen Signature Cars. In January 2014, the Company effected an increase in the number of its common shares authorized to 500,000,000 and all the remaining shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock were converted into Common Stock of the Company and the Super Voting Preferred Stock ceased to be a designated series of the Company’s preferred stock.

Consolidation Policy

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Saleen Automotive, Inc., a Florida corporation, Saleen Signature Cars, a California corporation and Saleen Sales Corporation, a California corporation. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. During the nine months ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred a net loss of $2,077,085 and utilized $894,423 of cash in operations. The Company also had a stockholders’ deficit and working capital deficit of $10,664,234 and $7,446,888, respectively, as of December 31, 2015, and as of that date, the Company owed $762,639 in past unpaid payroll and other taxes; $846,004 of outstanding notes payable were in default; $1,317,928 of accounts payable was greater than 90 days past due; and $401,689 is owed on past due rent as of the date of filing of this Form 10-Q. In addition, in May 2015, the Company received a complaint from a bank alleging breach of the loan agreement and breach of a commercial guaranty by Steve Saleen and demanding full payment of principal, interest and fees of $369,302. A default under the loan agreement triggers a cross default under the Company’s 3% Senior Secured Convertible Notes and 7% Convertible Notes (see Note 5) enabling the holders thereof to, at their election until the later of 30 days after such default is cured or otherwise resolved or the holder becomes aware of such cure or resolution, accelerate the maturity of the Company’s indebtedness.

These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s independent auditors, in their audit report for the year ended March 31, 2015, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profit from operations. At December 31, 2015, the Company had cash on hand in the amount of $60,850 and is not generating sufficient funds to cover operations. The Company has utilized funding to operate the business during the nine months ended December 31, 2015 with advance royalty payments of $500,000 obtained from an Intellectual Property License Agreement entered into in June 2015 and has received proceeds of $750,000 and $120,000 in secured convertible notes and notes payable from a related party, respectively. However, the Company will need and is currently working on obtaining additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or equity securities to operate its business through and beyond the date of this Form 10-Q filing. As further discussed in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2015 and further in Note 5, on December 2, 2015, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), with SM Funding Group, Inc. (“SM Funding”). Under the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to SM Funding a 12% Senior Secured Convertible Note (“Senior Note”) under which SM Funding may advance to the Company up to $2,000,000. Amounts outstanding under the Senior Note are convertible into Preferred Stock the Company may issue to accredited investors in a private placement of up to $10,000,000, but not less than $8,000,000. Under the Senior Note, the Company agreed that it will not enter into, create, assume or suffer to exist any additional indebtedness for borrowed money. The Company has received aggregate advances from SM Funding of $750,000 as of December 31, 2015 and $960,000 as of the date of this filing of Form 10-Q. However, SM Funding is currently in default of its obligations to make advances to the Company under a Binding Letter of Intent (the “LOI”) the Company entered into with SM Funding on October 21, 2015. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the Company will complete the financing transactions with SM Funding, including obtaining additional advances under the Senior Note, and no assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions and covenants on its operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for its stockholders in the case of convertible debt and equity financing.

Use of Estimates

Financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among other things, management estimates include the estimated collectability of its accounts receivable, the valuation of inventories and long lived assets, warranty reserves, the assumptions used to calculate derivative liabilities, and equity instruments issued for financing and compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820), formerly SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

Authoritative guidance provided by the FASB defines the following levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these financial assets:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that is observable either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 Unobservable inputs based on the Company’s assumptions.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, customer deposits, and notes payable. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the accompanying balance sheets approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term nature. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to any significant currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

As of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets included the fair value of derivative liabilities of $181,565 and $1,268,588, respectively, which was based on Level 2 measurements.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

To determine the number of authorized but unissued shares available to satisfy outstanding convertible securities, the Company uses a sequencing method to prioritize its convertible securities as prescribed by ASC 815-40-35. At each reporting date, the Company reviews its convertible securities to determine their classification is appropriate.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10-25. Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company maintains a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets. The Company established a valuation allowance based upon the potential likelihood of realizing the deferred tax asset and taking into consideration the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the current period. Future realization of the deferred tax benefit depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carry forward period under the Federal tax laws.

Changes in circumstances, such as the Company generating taxable income, could cause a change in judgment about the realizability of any related deferred tax asset. Any change in the valuation allowance would be included in income in the year of the change in estimate.

Stock Compensation

The Company uses the fair value recognition provision of ASC 718, “Stock Compensation,” which requires the Company to expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of such instruments. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to calculate the fair value of any equity instruments on the grant date that vest over a period of time.

The Company also uses the provisions of ASC 505-50, “ Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees, ” to account for stock-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services. Such awards for services are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable, using the measurement date guidelines enumerated in ASC 505-50.

Income (Loss) per Share

The basic EPS is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Outstanding shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock are included in the calculation as they are considered as a common stock equivalent. The diluted EPS is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income or loss available to common stockholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted average number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity securities unless the effects thereof are anti-dilutive, that is inclusion of such shares would reduce the net loss or increase the net income.

For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the basic and diluted shares outstanding were the same, as potentially dilutive shares were considered anti-dilutive. As of December 31, 2015, stock options, warrants, and convertible notes convertible or exercisable into 6,870,333, 13,313,099, and 485,568,933 shares of common stock, respectively, have been excluded from diluted loss per share because they are anti-dilutive.

As of December 31, 2014, stock options, warrants, and convertible notes convertible or exercisable into 7,271,333, 13,313,099, and 139,159,937 shares of common stock, respectively, have been excluded from diluted loss per share because they are anti-dilutive.

Significant Concentrations

Two customers comprised 18% and 10% of sales, respectively, for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and one separate customer comprised 14% of sales for the nine months ended December 31, 2015. One customer comprised 93% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2015.

Sales to three separate customers comprised 28%, 11% and 10%, respectively, and one separate customer comprised 13% of revenues for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014, respectively. Two different customers comprised 63% and 37% of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2014.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers . ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. Entities will be able to transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted.

In November 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-16 (ASU 2014-16), Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity. The amendments in this ASU do not change the current criteria in U.S. GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. The amendments clarify that an entity should consider all relevant terms and features, including the embedded derivative feature being evaluated for bifurcation, in evaluating the nature of the host contract. The ASU applies to all entities that are issuers of, or investors in, hybrid financial instruments that are issued in the form of a share and is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases . ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future condensed consolidated financial statements.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $79,664 and $109,715 for the nine months ended December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

3% Senior secured convertible notes

On June 26, 2013, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement, as amended, the Company issued senior secured convertible notes, having a total principal amount of $3,000,000, to 12 accredited investors (“2013 Notes”). The 3% Notes pay 3.0% interest per annum with a maturity of 4 years from the date of issuance (June 2017 and January 2019) and are secured by all assets and intellectual property of the Company. No cash interest payments will be required, except that accrued and unconverted interest shall be due on the maturity date and on each conversion date with respect to the principal amount being converted, provided that such interest may be added to and included with the principal amount being converted.

Each 3% Note is convertible at any time into Common Stock at a specified conversion price, which initially was $0.075 per share. In June 2014, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Saleen Automotive, Inc. 3.0% Secured Convertible Note (“3% First Amendment”) and removed all specified adjustments to the conversion price except for standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction, pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. In addition, if a Fundamental Transaction, as defined in the 2013 Note agreement, were to occur the potential liquidated damage was set to a fixed amount. As an inducement for the amendment, the Company issued an aggregate of 389,923 shares of Common Stock with a fair value of $58,488 determined based on the market value of the Company’s Common Stock of $0.15 as of the date of issuance. Further, the Company accounted for this amendment as a modification for accounting purposes, and as such, the derivative liability recorded of when the note was originally issued was deemed extinguished.

On January 23, 2015, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to 3% Senior Secured Convertible Notes whereby the conversion price of the 2013 Notes were amended to be the lesser of (a) $0.075 and (b) 70% of the average of the three lowest VWAPs occurring during the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the applicable conversion date on which the note holders elect to convert all or part of the note. However, in no event shall the conversion price be less than $0.02. In conjunction with this amendment, the Company entered into two additional 3% Senior Secured Convertible Notes in the principal amount of $499,892 with two accredited investors who participated in the June 26, 2013 offering (“2015 Notes” and collectively “3% Notes”) of which $98,708 was converted from a revolver note payable previously entered into with one investor in November 2013.

In May 2015, the Company received a complaint from a bank alleging breach of the loan agreement and breach of a commercial guaranty by Steve Saleen and demanding full payment of principal, interest and fees of $369,302 (see Note 3). A default under the loan agreement triggers a cross default under the 3% Notes enabling the holders thereof to, at their election until the later of 30 days after such default is cured or otherwise resolved or the holder becomes aware of such cure or resolution, accelerate the maturity of the indebtedness under the 3% Notes requiring the Company to pay, upon such acceleration, the sum of (1) 120% of the outstanding principal plus (2) 100% of all accrued and unpaid interest plus (3) all other amounts due under the 3% Notes. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the 3% Notes interest accrues at the rate of 12% per annum. The Company continues to classify the 3% Notes as long term, as a judgment against the Company has not been granted and the Company disagrees with the compliant and plans to defend its position. As of the date of this filing of Form 10-Q, the Company has not received a notice of default from the holders of the 3% Notes.

In June 2015, the Company determined that there was not sufficient authorized and available Common Stock available for issuance upon conversion of the 3% Notes. As a result, the Company determined that the conversion feature of the 3% Notes were not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock pursuant to FASB guidance on “Determining Whether an Instrument Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock,” which indicates that any adjustment to the fixed amount (either conversion price or number of shares) of the instrument regardless of the probability or whether or not within the issuers’ control, means the instrument is not indexed to the issuers own stock. Therefore, the Company characterized the fair value of the 3% Note conversion feature of $106,781 in June 2015 as derivative liability. See Note 6 for further discussion.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company amortized $24,761 and $270,701, respectively, of the valuation discount. The remaining unamortized valuation discount of $49,260 and $74,021 as of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively, has been offset against the face amount of the notes for financial statement purposes. As of December 31, 2015, the principal balance of the convertible Notes outstanding was $2,501,612 and potentially convertible into 133,666,799 shares of Common Stock including accrued and unpaid interest.

12% Senior secured convertible note

As noted above under “Going Concern” on December 2, 2015, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with SM Funding. Under the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to SM Funding a 12% Senior Secured Convertible Note under which SM Funding may advance to the Company up to $2,000,000. Pursuant to the LOI (defined below) SM Funding was required to advance the Company at least $1,000,000 within seven business days after its execution in October 2015. However, as of December 31, 2015, the Company had only received aggregate advances from SM Funding of $750,000 evidenced by the Senior Note. Advances under the Senior Note will mature on October 12, 2016, bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and will be, at the holder’s option, convertible into shares of preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”) that may be issued by the Company in an offering described below. The Company’s subsidiaries have guaranteed the obligations under the Senior Note pursuant to a Subsidiary Guaranty, and the Company’s obligations under the Senior Note and the obligations of its subsidiaries under the Subsidiary Guaranty are secured pursuant to a Security Agreement and an Intellectual Property Security Agreement the Company entered into in favor of SM Funding. In addition, pursuant to a Binding Letter of Intent (the “LOI”) the Company entered into with SM Funding on October 21, 2015, the Company entered into a Subordination Agreement with SM Funding and certain existing holders of the Company’s existing 3% Senior secured convertible notes discussed above and 7% Unsecured convertible notes discussed below (the “Existing Lenders”) to memorialize the senior position of the Senior Note relative to the notes held by the holders of the 3% Notes.

Amounts outstanding under the Senior Note are convertible into Preferred Stock the Company may issue to accredited investors in a private placement of up to $10,000,000 (the “Target Amount”) but not less than $8,000,000, including the conversion of the principal and interest under the Senior Note (the “Qualified Offering”). Pursuant to the LOI and the Senior Note, upon completion of the Qualified Offering at the Target Amount, the investors in the Qualified Offering will collectively and beneficially own 60.9% of the Company, the Existing Lenders will beneficially own 26.1% of the Company (pursuant to the conversion of their notes into shares of preferred stock), Steve Saleen will beneficially own 10% of the Company (excluding a warrant to purchase 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock), and all other stockholders will beneficially own approximately 3% of the Company. There can be no assurance that SM Funding will make additional advances to the Company under the Senior Note or that the Company will be able to consummate a Qualified Offering with SM Funding or otherwise.

Without the prior written consent of the holder of the Senior Note, the Company is prohibited from (i) entering into, creating, assuming or suffering to exist any additional indebtedness for borrowed money, (ii) entering into, creating, assuming or suffering to exist any additional liens on or with respect to any of the Company’s properties or assets, (iii) repurchasing shares of the Company’s Common Stock or common stock equivalents other than repurchases of common stock or common stock equivalents from departing employees up to an aggregate maximum of $150,000, (iv) paying cash dividends, and (v) entering into transactions with its affiliates that would be required to be disclosed in public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, unless such transaction is expressly approved by a majority of the disinterested directors on the Company’s board of directors.

7% Unsecured convertible notes

In March and April 2014, as amended in June 2014, the Company issued 7% Unsecured Convertible Notes (the “7% Notes”), having a total principal amount of $2,250,000 and $250,000, respectively, to 5 accredited investors of which $2,000,000 was received from 3 investors who participated in the June 26, 2013 offering above. The 7% Notes pay interest at 7% per annum with a maturity of 3 years (March and April, 2017). No cash payments are required, except that unconverted outstanding principal and accrued interest shall be due and payable on the maturity date. Each 7% Note is initially convertible at any time into the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price, which is adjustable to the lower of $0.07 or the three lowest daily volume weighted average prices of the Company’s Common Stock during the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding any conversion date. However, in no event shall the conversion price be lower than $0.03 per share. In addition, the conversion price adjusts for standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction, pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally.

In June 2014, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Saleen Automotive, Inc. 7% Convertible Note whereby effective as of March 31, 2014 or the applicable issuance date for notes issued thereafter, the conversion price would in no event adjust below $0.03 per share. In addition, if a Fundamental Transaction, as defined in the Agreement, were to occur the potential liquidated damages was set to a fixed amount. As an inducement, the Company issued an aggregate of 357,143 shares of its Common Stock with a fair value of $53,571 based on the market value of the Company’s Common Stock of $0.15 as of the date of issuance.

As the initial conversion price of $0.07 reflected a price discount below the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock as of the issuance date of the 7% Notes, the Company determined that there was deemed a beneficial conversion feature associated with these 7% Notes. As such, the Company recorded $2,250,000 and $250,000 in March 2014 and April 2014, respectively, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature at the issuance date of the 7% Notes in additional paid-in capital. The value of the beneficial conversion feature is being amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the 7% Notes, which totaled $544,556 and $422,206 for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the remaining unamortized valuation discount of $904,744 and $1,449,300, respectively, has been offset against the face amount of the notes for financial statement purposes. As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding principal balance of these notes was $2,200,000 and potentially convertible into 82,077,448 shares of Common Stock including accrued and unpaid interest.

In May 2015, the Company received a complaint from a bank alleging breach of the loan agreement and breach of a commercial guaranty by Steve Saleen and demanded full payment of principal, interest and fees of $369,302 (see Note 3). If the bank is successful in their claim of default, such default would trigger a cross default under the 7.0% Notes enabling the holders thereof to, at their election, accelerate the maturity of the outstanding indebtedness under the 7% Notes requiring the Company to pay, upon such acceleration, the greater of (1) 120% of the outstanding principal (plus all accrued and unpaid interest) and (2) the product of (a) the highest closing price for the five trading immediately preceding the holder’s acceleration and (b) a fraction, of which the numerator is the entire outstanding principal, and of which the denominator is the then applicable conversion price. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the 7% Notes interest accrues at the rate of 24% per annum. The Company continues to classify the 7% Notes as long term, as a judgment against the Company has not been granted and the Company disagrees with the compliant and plans to defend its position. As of the date of this filing of Form 10-Q, the Company has not received a notice of default from the holders of the 7% Notes.

In June 2015, the Company determined that there was not sufficient authorized and available Common Stock available for issuance upon conversion of the 7% Notes. As a result, the Company determined that the conversion feature of the 7% Notes was not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock pursuant to FASB guidance on “Determining Whether an Instrument Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock,” which indicates that any adjustment to the fixed amount (either conversion price or number of shares) of the instrument regardless of the probability or whether or not within the issuers’ control, means the instrument is not indexed to the issuers own stock. Therefore, the Company characterized the fair value of the 7% Note conversion feature of $13,148 in June 2015 as derivative liability. See Note 6 for further discussion.

Unsecured convertible notes

From September 2014 to December 2014, the Company issued Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes (“Notes”) to eight separate accredited investors with a remaining principal balance of $172,254 and $618,225 as of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively. The original Notes contained interest ranging from 8% to 12% per annum and matured on various dates from April 2015 to December 2016. The notes outstanding as of December 31, 2015 contain interest rates ranging from 8% to 10% and matured on dates prior to December 31, 2015 and as such, were in default as of December 31, 2015. The Company may not prepay the Notes without the Note holder’s consent. Notes under default contain provisions that, as defined in the agreements, the amount owed could increase by amounts ranging from 135% to 150% depending on the event of default. In addition, in the event of non-payment when due, the interest rates would increase to between 20% and 25% per annum from the date due until paid.

The Notes are convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company at the option of the holder commencing on various dates following the issuance date of the Notes and ending on the later of the maturity date or date of full payment of principal and interest. The principal amount of the Notes along with, at the holder’s option, any unpaid interest and penalties, are convertible at price per share discounts ranging from 42% to 38% of the Company’s Common Stock trading market price during a certain time period, as defined in the agreement. Further, the conversion prices are subject to a floor such that the conversion prices will not be less than a certain price, as defined in the agreement, with such floor prices ranging from $0.001 to $0.00005 per share. In addition, the conversion prices are subject to adjustment in certain events, such as in conjunction with any sale, conveyance or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets or consummation of a transaction or series of related transactions in which the Company is not the surviving entity. The note agreements also require the Company to maintain a reserve of Common Stock, as determined based on a formula stated in the note agreements, which, upon request by the note holder, can be adjusted based on the formula and the then share price of the Company’s Common Stock as of the date of request. The note holder can convert up to the number of the then shares reserved for conversion of their related note.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2015, Note holders converted $473,731 of principal and $33,040 of accrued interest into 750,387,791 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In addition, in June 2015, the Company agreed to allow one note holder to assign their then note principal balance of $49,240, which was in default due to non-payment after maturity date and insufficient availability of Common Stock available upon conversion, to a separate note holder, who is also a note holder under the 3% Notes and 7% Notes, for the new note holder’s payment of $77,000 to the original note holder. As a result of this assignment, the Company recorded $27,760 as loss on extinguishment during the nine months ended December 31, 2015 as a result of the increase in principal balance from $49,240 to $77,000. As of December 31, 2015, the principal balance of the convertible Notes outstanding was $172,254 and potentially convertible into 269,824,686 shares of Common Stock including accrued and unpaid interest.

The Company considered the current FASB guidance of “Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock” which indicates that any adjustment to the fixed amount (either conversion price or number of shares) of the instrument regardless of the probability of whether or not within the issuers’ control means the instrument is not indexed to the issuer’s own stock. Accordingly, the Company determined that the conversion prices of the Notes were not a fixed amount because they were subject to an adjustment based on the occurrence of future offerings or events. In addition, the Company determined that instruments with floor prices ranging from $0.001 to $0.00005 were de minimis and in substance not indexed to the Company’s own stock. As a result, the Company determined that the conversion features of the Notes were not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and characterized the fair value of the conversion features as derivative liabilities upon issuance. The Company determined that upon issuance of the Notes, the initial fair value of the embedded conversion feature was $1,306,455. As such, the Company recorded a $1,306,455 derivative liability, of which $638,225 was recorded as debt discount offsetting the fair value of the Notes and the remainder of $668,230 recorded as private placement costs in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended March 31, 2015. The balance of the unamortized discount was $313,507 at March 31, 2015. During the nine months ended December 31, 2015, the Company amortized $313,507 of the valuation discount to interest expense.

In addition, as a result of the assignment of note discussed above, the Company recognized a derivative liability of $54,508 in June 2015. The derivative liability is re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations (see Note 6).

NOTE 6 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. Under the authoritative guidance, effective January 1, 2009, instruments, which do not have fixed settlement provisions, are deemed to be derivative instruments. The conversion feature of the Company’s senior secured convertible notes and unsecured convertible notes (described in Note 5 above), did not have fixed settlement provisions because their conversion prices could be lowered if the Company issues securities at lower prices in the future or the ultimate determination of shares to be issued could exceed current available authorized shares. In June 2015, the Company determined that there was not sufficient authorized and available Common Stock available for issuance upon conversion of the 3% senior secured and 7% unsecured convertible notes. In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion feature of the notes was separated from the host contract (i.e., the notes) and recognized as a derivative instrument. The conversion feature of the notes had been characterized as a derivative liability and was re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations.

The derivative liability was valued at the following dates using a Weighted-Average Black-Scholes-Merton model with the following assumptions:

The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company used its own stock’s volatility as the estimated volatility. The expected life of the conversion feature of the notes was based on the estimated remaining terms of the notes. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not customarily paid dividends to its holders of Common Stock in the past and does not expect to pay dividends to holders of its Common Stock in the future.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recognized $540,802 and $2,602,392, respectively, as other income, which represented the difference in the value of the derivative from the respective prior period. In addition, the Company recognized a gain of $720,658 and $2,586,732, which represented the extinguishment of derivative liabilities related to the conversion of the unsecured convertible notes during the nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

In June 2015, the Company determined that there was not sufficient authorized and available Common Stock available for issuance upon conversion of certain of its Notes. As a result, the Company was required to record a derivative liability of $174,437 in June 2015.

NOTE 7 - ADVANCE ROYALTY

In June 2015, the Company entered into an Intellectual Property License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Saleen Motors International, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“SMI”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of GreenTech Automotive, Inc. (“GTA”) and non-affiliated subsidiary of the Company. Pursuant to the License Agreement, the Company granted to SMI an irrevocable, fully paid-up (subject to certain royalty fees), sublicensable license during the term of the License Agreement to use all of the Company’s intellectual property on an exclusive basis worldwide other than in North America, Europe, Middle East and Australia (as applicable, the “Territory”), and to make, promote, sell and otherwise exploit the Company’s intellectual property in the Territory. The License Agreement has an initial term of 10 years, with automatic renewal for periods of five years at SMI’s election provided that the number of Saleen branded vehicles sold by SMI in the prior 12-month period is not less than the average number of Saleen-branded vehicles sold by the Company and subsidiaries in the most recently available three-year period. The License Agreement may be terminated by mutual written agreement, upon a material breach, which remains uncured (with SMI having the right to cure no more than 3 breaches of its obligation to pay royalties) for 15 days after written notice of such breach, or in the event of SMI’s bankruptcy.

In consideration of the license, SMI shall pay royalties, within 15 days after the product shipment date and in all events at least quarterly, based on a fee per Saleen-branded vehicle sold by SMI depending on its sales volume as set forth in the License Agreement, and shall pay royalties based on a percentage of SMI’s gross revenues for parts and merchandise (in each case net of discounts, returns, taxes and similar amounts) received on Saleen-branded non-vehicle products.

As part of the License agreement, SMI agreed to advance to the Company $500,000 in royalties of which $250,000 was applied from loan advances previously made to the Company under the 10% Notes made by GTA pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement and 10.0% First Lien Convertible Note entered into in May 2015; $100,000 was applied from the cancelation of a note entered into between GTA and the Company in March 2015; and $150,000 was paid by GTA in cash to the Company. As of December 31, 2015, the Company recognized a deferred advance royalty of $500,000 and will recognize this amount as revenue based on actual future royalties resulting from sales by SMI under the License Agreement.

Except for the transactions under the agreements described above and the Company’s Joint Branding, Marketing, and Distribution Agreement with WM Industries Corp. (an affiliate of SMI and GTA) dated March 2014, none of the Company or its subsidiaries had any material relationship with SMI, GTA and its affiliates.

Other Transactions

On June 22, 2015, the Company issued 63,000 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock to Michaels Law Group, APLC (“MLG”) as a retainer for legal services to be provided by MLG in connection with various outstanding claims and suits in which the Company is plaintiff, and for other legal matters. Jonathan Michaels, the founding member of MLG, previously served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and as our general counsel. The per share price of Super Voting Preferred Stock issued to MLG was based on the conversion ratio of Super Voting Preferred Stock into 1,000 shares of Common Stock, multiplied by the per share closing price ($0.0018) of Common Stock as of June 19, 2015, the date the issuance was approved by the Board of Directors. As discussed in Note 9, in October 2015, all shares of Super Voting Preferred stock were converted into shares of Common Stock.

NOTE 9 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Authorized Shares

In June 2015, the board of directors approved an increase in the Company’s authorized shares from 500,000,000 to 2,500,000,000. The increase became effective in October 2015.

Issuance of Common Stock

During the nine months ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 750,387,791 shares of common stock upon conversion of the Company’s convertible notes payable and accrued interest amounting to $506,771 (see Note 5).

During the nine months ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release agreement with a vendor whereby the Company issued an aggregate of 2,380,377 shares of Common Stock with a fair value of $47,607 in exchange for extinguishment of amount owed of $47,607. The value of the Common Stock was based on the market price of the Company’s Common Stock as of the date of the Settlement Agreement.

Designation of Super Voting Preferred

On June 12, 2015, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation designating the rights and restrictions of 1,000,000 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, pursuant to resolutions approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on June 11, 2015. In October 2015, upon the increase in our authorized shares of common stock to 2,500,000,000, all 384,142 outstanding shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock were automatically cancelled and converted into 384,142,000 shares of Common Stock , and the Super Voting Preferred Stock ceased to be a designated class of Preferred Stock.

Issuance of Super Voting Preferred

During the nine months ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 63,000 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock to Michaels Law Group, APLC (“MLG”) as a retainer for legal services to be provided by MLG in connection with various outstanding claims and suits in which the Company is plaintiff, and for other legal matters. Jonathan Michaels, the founding member of MLG, previously served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and as our general counsel. The per share price of Super Voting Preferred Stock issued was based on the conversion ratio of Super Voting Preferred Stock into 1,000 shares of Common Stock, multiplied by the per share closing price ($0.0018) of Common Stock as of June 19, 2015, the date the issuance was approved by the Board of Directors. The Company recorded these fees as general and administrative expense during the nine months ended December 31, 2015.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 220,000 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock to Mr. Saleen in satisfaction of $220,000 of debt owed to Mr. Saleen. The per share price of Super Voting Preferred Stock issued to Mr. Saleen was based on the conversion ratio of Super Voting Preferred Stock into 1,000 shares of Common Stock, multiplied by the per share closing price ($0.001) of Common Stock as of June 11, 2015, the date the issuance was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued to Mollypop, 19,007.777 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock to reimburse Mollypop for $34,214 of merchandise previously purchased by Mollypop on the Company’s behalf and owed to Mollypop as of March 31, 2015. The per share price of Super Voting Preferred Stock issued was based on the conversion ratio of Super Voting Preferred Stock into 1,000 shares of Common Stock, multiplied by the per share closing price ($0.0018) of Common Stock as of June 19, 2015, the date the issuance was approved by the Board of Directors.

In order to make available additional shares of Common Stock to facilitate the conversion of outstanding debt, during the nine months ended December 31, 2015 the Company issued to Steve Saleen, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, 82,133.875 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock in exchange for 82,133,875 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Saleen.

As discussed above, all shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock were automatically cancelled and converted into shares of Common Stock in October 2015.

Omnibus Incentive Plan

The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted. The Company’s assessment of the estimated fair value of stock options is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables and the related tax impact.

Stock option activity is set forth below:

The aggregate intrinsic value shown in the table above represents the difference between the fair market value of the Company’s common stock of $0.0007 on December 31, 2015 and the exercise price of each option.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded stock compensation expense of $160,084 of which $5,782, $120,069, and $34,233 was included in research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses, respectively. Unearned compensation of $143,997 at December 31, 2015, related to non-vested stock options, will be recognized into expense over a weighted average period of .4 years.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded stock compensation expense of $580,933 of which $56,805, $229,305, and $294,822 was included in research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses, respectively.

As of December 31, 2015, 13,313,099 warrants were exercisable and the intrinsic value of the warrants was nil.

NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Purchase Commitments

In April 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with BASF to exclusively use BASF’s products for paint work. The agreement continues from May 2014 until the Company purchases in the aggregate $4,131,000 of BASF products. If the aggregate purchases of BASF products are less than $1,697,000 over a period of 36 consecutive months, the Company is required to repay BASF 6.1% of the shortfall between $1,697,000 and the amount it actually purchased over this period. In consideration for the Company’s exclusive use of BASF’s products and fulfilling this purchase commitment, BASF paid the Company $250,000, which was recorded as deferred vendor consideration. This amount will be recorded as reduction to costs of goods sold in future periods based upon a prorated percentage of the purchased amount over the purchase commitment if the Company determines there is a reasonable certainty in achieving the purchase commitment.

In May 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with FinishMaster, Inc. (“FinishMaster”) to exclusively use FinishMaster’s paint material supplies. The agreement continues from May 2014 until the Company purchases in the aggregate $1,555,000 of FinishMaster products. In consideration for the Company’s exclusive use of FinishMaster’s products and fulfilling this purchase commitment, FinishMaster paid the Company $25,000, which was recorded as deferred vendor consideration, and FinishMaster will pay an additional $25,000 upon the achievement of purchase level milestones, as outlined in the agreement. Should the Company not complete a set purchase level milestone, the Company would be required to re-pay the $25,000 along with $11,475 compensation to FinishMaster. This amount will be recorded as reduction to costs of goods sold in future periods based upon a prorated percentage of the purchased amount over the purchase commitment if the Company determines there is a reasonable certainty in achieving the purchase commitment.

Litigation

The Company is involved in certain legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business. The Company is currently a party to several legal proceedings related to claims for payment that are currently accrued for in its financial statements as accrued liabilities, accounts or notes payable. Except for income tax contingencies (commencing April 1, 2009), the Company records accruals for contingencies to the extent that management concludes that the occurrence is probable and that the related amounts of loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal expenses associated with the contingency are expensed as incurred. Material legal proceedings that are currently pending are as follows:

The Company is a defendant in a case filed by MSY Trading, Inc. on April 13, 2012 in the California Superior Court, Riverside County, that claimed breach of contract related to an engine installed by a third party vendor. The suit claimed $200,000 in damages plus interest, legal fees and costs of litigation. SSC filed a cross complaint against MSY Trading, Inc. for breach of warranty, negligence, and indemnification. On January 10, 2014, the Company settled this claim by agreeing to pay $112,500 over a period of 18 months, of which we paid $45,500 through August 2014. Subsequent to this date the Company defaulted on these payment obligations. On October 30, 2014, a judgment was entered against SSC in the amount of $68,950, which the Company accrued for in accounts payable.

In December 2014, Saleen Automotive, Inc. (formerly Saleen Electric Automotive, Inc.), the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, received a Complaint from Green Global Automotive B.V. (“GAA”) alleging causes of action for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, related to a European Distribution Agreement entered into in December 2011 between GAA and Saleen Automotive. The suit seeks contract and economic damages of $50,000 along with compensatory damages, restoration, lost profits and attorneys’ fees. The Company believes this case is without merit and that the Company is not liable under the alleged contract.

In December 2014, the Company received a Complaint from Ford of Escondido seeking damages based on 1) claim and delivery of personal property, 2) money due on a contract, and 3) common count. This matter was settled with the Company agreeing to a judgment in the amount of $300,000 and the transfer to the Company of title to four vehicles held by Ford of Escondido. The judgment has been entered, but no collection efforts have started.

In February 2014, SSC received a Complaint from Citizens Business Bank (the “Bank”) alleging, among other matters, breach of contract due to non-timely payment of November and December 2013 principal amounts owed and the occurrence of a change in control as a result of the Merger. In April 2014, the Bank agreed to dismiss the suit in exchange for payment of $124,000 that was applied towards principal and unpaid fees along with advance loan principal and interest for May, June and July 2014, and the agreement to pay the remaining recorded balance due of $443,000 to the Bank in August 2014. From August 2014 to March 31, 2015, in exchange for payments totaling $90,000, the Bank agreed to extend this arrangement through various dates with the last date being March 2015. The Company did not pay the then outstanding principal and interest in March 2015 and the Bank did not agree to an additional extension. In May 2015, the Company was notified of a lawsuit filed by the Bank in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside, alleging breach of the Loan Agreement with the Bank, breach of a commercial guaranty by Steve Saleen and indebtedness for principal and interest of at least $369,302, and seeking appointment, which has not been granted by the court as of the date of this filing, of a limited purpose receiver and a temporary restraining order enjoining the Company from transferring the collateral securing the loan, which related to SSC. The main complaint by the Bank stems from the Company’s reverse merger that occurred in June 2013 whereby the Bank deemed this event to constitute a change in control, as defined in the loan agreement. The Company disagrees with the Bank’s interpretation and believes the claims by the bank are without merit. Although the Company currently believes that resolving claims against the Company, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s views of these matters may change in the future.