UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16
OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of March, 2015
Commission File Number: 001-36532
Sphere 3D Corp.
(Translation of registrant's name into English)
240 Matheson Blvd. East
Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 1X1
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
[ ] Form 20-F [ x ] Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [ ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [ ]
SUBMITTED HEREWITH
Exhibits
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
SPHERE 3D CORP. |
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
Date: March 31, 2015 |
By: |
/s/ Kurt Kalbfleisch |
|
|
|
|
|
Kurt Kalbfleisch |
|
Title: |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
SPHERE 3D CORP.
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Sphere 3D Corp. (Sphere 3D) adopted accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) commencing with
the annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are
available under Sphere 3Ds profile on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com
<http://www.sedar.com> and on the EDGAR website at
www.sec.gov <http://www.sec.gov>.
As a result of Sphere 3D adopting U.S. GAAP, Canadian
securities regulations require that the Company refile its 2014 interim
financial statements and notes thereto under U.S. GAAP, together with
accompanying management's discussion and analysis and related certifications.
The previously filed interim financial statements and accompanying management's
discussion and analysis, as well as the previously filed annual audited
consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2013
and accompanying management's discussion and analysis, are available under
Sphere 3Ds profile on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com
<http://www.sedar.com> and on the EDGAR website at www.sec.gov
<http://www.sec.gov>.
SPHERE 3D CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Net revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
revenue |
$ |
824 |
|
$ |
|
|
Service revenue |
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
Cost of service revenue |
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
519 |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
220 |
|
|
48 |
|
Research
and development |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
General and administrative |
|
1,065 |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
642 |
|
Loss from operations |
|
(766 |
) |
|
(642 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(778 |
) |
$ |
(640 |
) |
Net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and
diluted |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
Shares used in computing net
loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and
diluted |
|
21,692 |
|
|
16,114 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
1
SPHERE 3D CORP. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS |
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(778 |
)
|
$ |
(640 |
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments |
|
(278 |
)
|
|
(53 |
)
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
(278 |
) |
|
(53 |
) |
Comprehensive loss |
$ |
(1,056 |
)
|
$ |
(693 |
)
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
SPHERE 3D CORP. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
6,461 |
|
$ |
5,217 |
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
27 |
|
|
128 |
|
Other
current assets |
|
827 |
|
|
1,082 |
|
Total current
assets |
|
7,497 |
|
|
6,427 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
407 |
|
|
288 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
16,742 |
|
|
1,646 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
24,646 |
|
$ |
8,361 |
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
$ |
185 |
|
$ |
132 |
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
467 |
|
|
124 |
|
Accrued payroll and employee compensation |
|
89 |
|
|
194 |
|
Deferred
revenue |
|
310 |
|
|
474 |
|
Total current
liabilities |
|
1,051 |
|
|
924 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
9,702 |
|
|
924 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, no par value, unlimited shares authorized; 23,159 and 21,098
shares issued
and outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
|
|
22,969 |
|
|
14,407 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income |
|
(413 |
) |
|
(136 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
(7,612 |
) |
|
(6,834 |
) |
Total shareholders equity |
|
14,944 |
|
|
7,437 |
|
Total liabilities
and shareholders equity |
$ |
24,646 |
|
$ |
8,361 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
SPHERE 3D CORP. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ |
(778 |
) |
$ |
(640 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net
loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
73 |
|
|
47 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
733 |
|
|
20 |
|
Changes in
operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
(182 |
)
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued liabilities |
|
281 |
|
|
(30 |
)
|
Accrued payroll and employee
compensation |
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
(164 |
)
|
|
|
|
Other assets and liabilities, net
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
(49 |
) |
Net cash used in operating
activities |
|
(283 |
)
|
|
(652 |
)
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of fixed assets |
|
(190 |
)
|
|
(27 |
)
|
Purchase of
intangible assets |
|
(4,012 |
) |
|
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets internally developed |
|
(456 |
)
|
|
(44 |
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(4,658 |
) |
|
(71 |
) |
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from borrowings |
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercised warrants |
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from exercised options |
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
6,183 |
|
|
148 |
|
Effect of exchange rate
changes on cash |
|
2 |
|
|
(28 |
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
1,244 |
|
|
(603 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period |
|
5,217 |
|
|
1,639 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ |
6,461 |
|
$ |
1,036 |
|
Non-cash Investing and
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares
for acquisition of intangible assets |
$ |
6,454 |
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent liability for the acquisition of intangible assets |
$ |
3,647 |
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
SPHERE 3D CORP. |
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS |
(Unaudited, expressed in U.S. dollars)
|
NOTE 1 ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
Sphere 3D Corp. (the Company) was incorporated under the
Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on May 2, 2007 as T.B. Mining
Ventures Inc.
Sphere 3D Corp. is a technology development company focused on
establishing its patent pending emulation and virtualization technology. Over
the last three years, Sphere 3D has designed a proprietary platform, namely
Glassware 2.0, for the delivery of applications from a server-based computing
architecture. Through the creation of Glassware 2.0, software is made available
from a central location irrespective of the device that is accessing the
software. The Company's products enable the integration of virtual applications
and virtual desktops, and allows organizations to deploy a combination of
public, private or hybrid cloud strategies.
The Company may have to raise additional capital to fund
operations until such point that revenues from products and technology are able
to fund operations. If the Company is not able to raise sufficient capital then
there is the risk that the Company will not be able to realize the value of its
assets and discharge its liabilities.
NOTE 2 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been
prepared by management in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), applied on a basis consistent
for all periods. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All
intercompany balances and transactions have been appropriately eliminated on
consolidation.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the 2014 presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring
the use of management estimates relate to the determination of provisions for
litigation claims, deferred revenue, allowance for doubtful receivables,
inventory valuation, warranty provisions, deferred income taxes, impairment
assessments of property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Foreign currency translation
The Company uses the U.S. dollar as its reporting currency and
Canadian dollar for its functional currency. Exchange gains or losses are
included as part of other comprehensive income for the period and accumulated
other comprehensive loss as part of shareholders deficit.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements
establishes a three tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used
in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable
inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other
than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no
market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own
assumptions.
Our financial instruments include cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses and long-term
debt. Fair value estimates of these instruments are made at a specific point in
time, based on relevant market information. These estimates may be subjective in
nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and
therefore cannot be determined with precision. The carrying amount of cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued
expenses are generally considered to be representative of their respective fair
values because of the short-term nature of those instruments. Further, based on
the borrowing rates currently available to us for loans with similar terms, we
believe the fair value of long-term debt approximates its carrying value.
5
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets acquired in a non-monetary exchange, the
estimated fair values of the assets transferred (or the estimated fair values of
the assets received, if more clearly evident) are used to establish their
recorded values. Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach,
income approach and/or cost approach are used to measure fair value.
Purchased intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their economic lives of four to nine years for developed technology,
and eight years for capitalized development costs as we believe this method most
closely reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the assets will
be consumed. When the carrying value is not considered recoverable, an
impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying value of an intangible
asset exceeds its fair value is recognized, with an offsetting reduction in the
carrying value of the related intangible asset. If our future results are
significantly different from forecast, we may be required to further evaluate
intangible assets for recoverability and such analysis could result in an
impairment charge in a future period.
Impairment of Other Indefinite-Lived
Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets
Other indefinite-lived assets are tested for impairment on an
annual basis at December 31, or more frequently if we believe indicators of
impairment exist. Triggering events for impairment reviews may be indicators
such as adverse industry or economic trends, restructuring actions, lower
projections of profitability, or a sustained decline in our market
capitalization. Other indefinite-lived intangible assets are quantitatively
assessed for impairment, if necessary, by comparing their estimated fair values
to their carrying values. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, the
difference is recorded as an impairment.
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and
intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for recoverability
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not
be recoverable. Our consideration includes, but is not limited to, (i)
significant under-performance relative to historical or projected future
operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner of use of the assets
or the strategy for the Company's overall business; (iii) significant decrease
in the market value of the assets; and (iv) significant negative industry or
economic trends.
When the carrying value is not considered recoverable, an
impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying value of a long-lived asset
exceeds its fair value is recognized, with an offsetting reduction in the
carrying value of the related asset.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from sales of products is recognized when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable,
collectability is reasonably assured and delivery has occurred. Under this
policy, revenue on direct product sales, excluding sales to distributors, is
recognized upon shipment of products to customers. These customers are not
entitled to any specific right of return or price protection, except for any
defective product that may be returned under our standard product warranty.
Generally, title and risk of loss transfer to the customer when
the product leaves the Company's dock. Product sales to distribution customers
are subject to certain rights of return, stock rotation privileges and price
protection. Because we are unable to estimate its exposure for returned product
or price adjustments, revenue from shipments to these customers is not
recognized until the related products are in turn sold to the ultimate customer
by the distributor. For products for which software is more than an incidental
component, we recognize revenue in accordance with current authoritative
guidance for software revenue recognition.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development expenses include payroll, employee
benefits, stock-based compensation expense, and other headcount-related expenses
associated with product development. Research and development expenses also
include third-party development and programming costs, localization costs
incurred to translate software for international markets, and the amortization
of purchased software code and services content. Such costs related to software
development are included in research and development expense until the point
that technological feasibility is reached, which for our software products, is
generally shortly before the products are released to manufacturing. Once
technological feasibility is reached, such costs are capitalized and amortized
to cost of revenue over the estimated lives of the products.
During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company capitalized
$0.6 million and $44,000 of development costs.
6
Share-based Compensation
We account for share-based awards, and similar equity
instruments, granted to employees and non-employee directors under the fair
value method. Share-based compensation award types include stock options. We use
the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of its option
awards on the measurement date, which generally is the date of grant. The cost
is recognized over the requisite service period (usually the vesting period) for
the estimated number of instruments for which service is expected to be
rendered.
Compensation expense associated with options with graded
vesting is recognized pursuant to an accelerated method. Compensation expense
associated with restricted stock is recognized over the vesting period using the
straight-line method. We have not recognized, and do not expect to recognize in
the near future, any tax benefit related to share-based compensation cost as a
result of the full valuation allowance of our net deferred tax assets and its
net operating loss carryforwards.
Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by
the FASB that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If
not discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued
standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the
Company's consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of
Financial Statements Going Concern. ASU 2014-15 provides that in
connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim
reporting period, an entity's management should evaluate whether there are
conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt
about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after
the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the
date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable).
ASU 2014-15 will be effective for the annual reporting period ending after
December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early
application is permitted. The impact on our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows as a result of the adoption of ASU 2014-15 has not yet
been determined.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model
for accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes
most current revenue recognition guidance. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to
recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 will
be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016,
including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not
permitted. The impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows as a result of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 has not yet been determined.
In July 2013, the FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-11, Presentation
of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar
Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU No. 2013-11 provides that
an entity is required to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an
unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a
deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or
a tax credit carryforward. If a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax
loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date, the
unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a
liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. ASU No. 2013-11
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning
after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance affected presentation
only and, therefore, did not have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial results.
7
NOTE 3 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table summarizes purchased intangible assets (in
thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Developed technology |
$ |
14,523 |
|
$ |
|
|
Capitalized development costs |
|
2,256 |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
16,779 |
|
|
1,670 |
|
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
(37 |
) |
|
(24 |
) |
Total intangible assets, net
|
$ |
16,742 |
|
$ |
1,646 |
|
Amortization expense of intangible assets was $13,000 and
$1,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. Estimated
amortization expense for intangible assets is approximately $2.9 million for the
remainder of 2014 and $4.8 million, $4.7 million, $4.7 million, $1.4 million and
$0.3 million in fiscal 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.
Asset Purchase
On March 21, 2014, the Company closed an Asset Purchase
Agreement to acquire Virtual Desktop Implementation (VDI) technology of V3
Systems, Inc. On closing, the purchase price for the acquired assets of V3
Systems was $14.4 million, which was paid by way of cash in the amount of $4.2
million and by the issuance of 1,089,867 common shares at $5.92. In addition,
the Company may pay an earn-out, based on the achievement of certain milestones
in revenue and gross margin related to the VDI technology, of up to an
additional $5.0 million. The estimated earn-out liability was $3.7 million as of
March 21, 2014. The earn-out is based on a sliding scale of revenue of up to
$12.5 million from the VDI technology (subject to minimum margin realization),
which will be payable at the discretion of Sphere 3D in cash or common shares
(up to a maximum of 1,051,414 common shares) to be priced at a 20-day weighted
average price calculated at the time(s) the earn-out is realized. The earn-out
period expires on June 21, 2015.
The identified intangible assets as of the date of the purchase
agreement consisted of $14.4 million of developed technology with a useful life
of four years.
NOTE 4 DEBT
Convertible Notes
In March 2014, the Company issued a senior secured convertible
debenture for $5.0 million. Simple interest is payable, in cash or stock, at the
Companys discretion, semi-annually at an annual rate of 8%. The note is
convertible into common shares of the Company, at any time, at the option of the
holders, at a conversion rate of $7.50 per share, with a maturity date of March
21, 2018.
The Company has the option to pay accrued and outstanding
interest either entirely in cash or shares of common stock. If the Company
choses to pay the interest in common stock, the calculation is based upon the
number of shares of common stock that may be issued as payment of interest on
the debenture and will be determined by dividing the amount of interest due by
current market price as defined in the debenture agreement, which is the
weighted average price per common share for the last 10 days on which the common
shares traded, ending on the day before such date, on the exchange. Interest
expense was $12,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
The debenture contains customary covenants, including covenants
that limit or restrict the Company's ability to incur liens, incur indebtedness,
or make certain restricted payments. Upon the occurrence of an event of default
under the debenture, the holder may declare all amounts outstanding to be
immediately due and payable. The debenture specifies a number of events of
default (some of which are subject to applicable grace or cure periods),
including, among other things, non-payment defaults, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to other materials indebtedness,
bankruptcy and insolvency defaults and material judgment defaults. As of March
31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all covenants of the debenture.
8
NOTE 5 SHARE CAPITAL
Issued and Outstanding
The Company had the following share capital issuance activity
(in thousands):
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding |
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance, December 31, 2013
|
|
21,098 |
|
$ |
14,407 |
|
Issuance of common shares on acquisition of
intangible assets |
|
1,090 |
|
|
6,454 |
|
Issued on exercise of
warrants |
|
875 |
|
|
1,121 |
|
Issued on exercise of options |
|
96 |
|
|
62 |
|
Balance, March 31, 2014 |
|
23,159 |
|
$ |
22,044 |
|
NOTE 6 NET LOSS PER SHARE
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss
applicable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the period. Dilutive common stock equivalents
are comprised of options granted under the Company's stock option plan, common
stock purchase warrants, and convertible notes. For all periods presented, there
is no difference in the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted
shares outstanding due to the Company's net loss position.
Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents excluded from the
computation of diluted net loss per share were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Options outstanding |
|
2,760 |
|
|
1,435 |
|
Common stock purchase warrants |
|
1,699 |
|
|
4,262 |
|
Convertible notes |
|
667 |
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes interest |
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
VDI earn-out liability |
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
|
9
NOTE 7 SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Share-Based Compensation Expense
The Company recorded the following compensation expense related
to its share-based compensation awards (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
666 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
$ |
733 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
There was $0.2 million and zero of share-based compensation
capitalized as development costs for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and
2013, respectively.
NOTE 8 RELATED PARTY
In July 2013, the Company entered into a supply agreement, and
a technology license agreement, with Overland. As consideration for the
transactions contemplated by the technology license agreement, the Company
received $250,000 in cash and shares of common stock with a value at the time of
issuance of approximately $250,000.
In connection with the July 2013 Overland transaction, Eric
Kelly, formerly Overland's President and Chief Executive Officer, was appointed
chairman of the board of directors of Sphere 3D. Mr. Kelly was also awarded an
option to purchase up to 850,000 shares of common stock of Sphere 3D with an
exercise price of approximately $0.63.
The Company recognized $0.3 million of revenue related to the
license agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The Company made
purchases of $0.2 million from Overland related to the supply agreement during
the three months ended March 31, 2014. Amounts included in other current assets
and accounts payable under these agreements was $0.3 million and $26,000 as of
March 31, 2014. Amounts included in other current assets and accounts payable
under these agreements was $0.4 million and $0.1 million as of December 31,
2013.
Legal services of $0.1 million and 17,000 were provided by a
legal firm affiliated with a director of the Company during the three months
ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013,
accounts payable included $0.2 million and $20,000 due to related parties.
NOTE 9 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
From time to time, the Company may be involved in various
lawsuits, legal proceedings, or claims that arise in the ordinary course of
business. Management does not believe any legal proceedings or claims pending at
March 31, 2014 will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on its business, liquidity, financial position, or results of operations.
Litigation, however, is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result
in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm the
Company's business.
10
NOTE 10 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Merger Agreement
On May 15, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive merger
agreement (the Merger Agreement) with Overland Storage, Inc. (Overland),
pursuant to which Overland and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sphere 3D would
combine (the Transaction). After completion of the Transaction, it is expected
that current holders of Overland securities will own approximately 28.8% of
Sphere 3D, on a fully diluted basis, as a result of their exchange of securities
in the Transaction.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company issued a
total of 9,443,882 common shares (Common Shares) on closing, subject to
adjustment, for all of the outstanding share capital of Overland (Overland
Shares) on the basis of one Overland Share for 0.510594 Common Shares of Sphere
3D (the Exchange Ratio). In addition, Sphere 3D issued 1,467,906 warrants,
143,325 options and 505,321 restricted share units, or equivalents, in exchange
for the outstanding convertible securities of Overland, calculated on the basis
of the Exchange Ratio.
On May 14, 2014, the last trading day prior to the announcement
of the transaction, the closing price of the Overland Shares, on the NASDAQ, was
$2.90 and the closing price of the Common Shares of Sphere 3D, on the TSX
Venture Exchange (the TSXV), was C$9.46 (or $8.68) . Based on the closing
price of the Common Shares of Sphere 3D on May 14, 2014, the total consideration
payable to holders of Overland shareholders has an implied value of
approximately $81.13 million or approximately $4.43 per Overland Share.
Both companies boards of directors have unanimously approved
the Merger Agreement. The Transaction is subject customary closing conditions,
shareholder approval of Overland and receipt of all necessary regulatory
approvals, including the approval of the TSXV.
The completion of the financing described below is integral to
the consummation of the Merger Agreement. A minimum of $5 million of the
financing will used to cover advances to Overland as contemplated by the Merger
Agreement. In addition, subject to further board approval, the Company may
advance further funds to support Overlands working capital requirements. To
date the Company has advanced Overland $4.0 million under a secured promissory
note, repayable on May 15, 2018 and bearing interest at prime plus 2%.
The Company has been named as a defendant in actions that arose
as a result of the announcement of the agreement to merge with Overland Storage,
Inc. With respect to these matters, based on the managements current knowledge,
the Company believes that the amount or range of reasonable possible loss, if
any, will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business, consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
The Company has entered into an agreement with a syndicate of
investment dealers led by Cormark Securities Inc., and including Jacob
Securities Inc. and Paradigm Capital Inc. (collectively, the Underwriters)
pursuant to which the Underwriters have agreed to purchase, on a bought deal
basis, 1,176,500 special warrants of the Company (Special Warrants) at a price
of $8.50 per Special Warrants (the Issue Price), resulting in gross proceeds
of $9.4 million to the Company (the Offering). Each Special Warrant is
exercisable into one unit of the Company (a Unit) with each Unit being
comprised of one Common Share of the Company and one-half of a Common Share
purchase warrant of the Company (a Warrant). Each whole Warrant is exercisable
at an exercise price of $10.40 for a period of two years from the closing date.
The Underwriters will have the option (the Underwriters
Option) to arrange for the purchase of up to an additional 15% of Special
Warrants (being up to 176,475 Special Warrants) sold under the Offering at the
Issue Price. The Underwriters Option shall be exercisable, in whole or in part,
until the time of closing. The Underwriters shall be entitled to the same
commission provided for below in respect of any Special Warrants issued and sold
upon exercise of the Underwriters Option.
The Underwriters are entitled to receive a cash commission
equal to 6% of the gross proceeds of the Offering. The Company will also
reimburse the Underwriters for reasonable fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the Offering.
11
The Offering is scheduled to close on or before June 3, 2014.
All securities issued in connection with the Offering are subject to a
four-month hold period from the issuance date in accordance with the policies of
the TSXV and applicable Canadian securities laws. The Offering is subject to all
required regulatory approvals, including the approval of the TSXV.
Sphere 3D intends to file a short-form prospectus in each of
the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario (and such other provinces
and territories of Canada as may be agreed to by Cormark Securities Inc. and the
Corporation) qualifying the Units issuable upon exercise or deemed exercise of
the Special Warrants by July 31, 2014, failing which the holder would be
entitled to receive 1.05 Units upon exercise or deemed exercise of the Special
Warrants.
12
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
FORM 51-102F1
SPHERE 3D CORP.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2014
Sphere 3D Corp. is a virtualization technology solution
provider. Sphere 3D's Glassware 2.0 platform delivers virtualization of many of
the most demanding applications in the marketplace today; making it easy to move
applications from a physical PC or workstation to a virtual environment either
on premise and/or from the cloud. Sphere 3Ds V3 Systems division supplies the
industrys first purpose built appliance for virtualization as well as the
Desktop Cloud Orchestrator management software for VDI.
This Managements Discussion and Analysis includes the
financial results of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, V3 Systems
Holding, Inc., which was incorporated in the State of Delaware on January 14,
2014, Sphere 3D Inc., which was incorporated under the Canada Business
Corporation Act on October 20, 2009, and its wholly owned subsidiary,
Frostcat Technologies Inc., which was incorporated under the Business
Corporations Act (Ontario) on February 13, 2012.
The Company was incorporated under the Business Corporations
Act (Ontario) on May 2, 2007 and is listed on the NASDAQ exchange under the
trading symbol ANY. The Company has its main and registered office at 240
Matheson Blvd. East, Mississauga, Ontario, L4Z 1X1.
ADVISORY
Sphere 3D Corp. (Sphere 3D) adopted accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) commencing with
the annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are
available under Sphere 3Ds profile on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com
<http://www.sedar.com> and on the EDGAR website at
www.sec.gov<http://www.sec.gov>.
As a result of Sphere 3D adopting U.S. GAAP, Canadian
securities regulations require that the Company refile its 2014 interim
financial statements and notes thereto under U.S. GAAP, together with
accompanying management's discussion and analysis and related certifications.
The previously filed interim financial statements and accompanying management's
discussion and analysis, as well as the previously filed annual audited
consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2013
and accompanying management's discussion and analysis, are available under
Sphere 3Ds profile on the SEDAR website at
www.sedar.com<http://www.sedar.com> and on the EDGAR website at
www.sec.gov<http://www.sec.gov>.
This Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) comments
on the financial condition and operations of Sphere 3D Corp. (Sphere 3D or the
Company), for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and updates our MD&A
for fiscal 2013. The information contained herein should be read in conjunction
with the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended
March 31, 2014.
The Company prepares its condensed consolidated financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (US GAAP). All financial information contained in this MD&A and in the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements has been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
The quarterly unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and this MD&A have been reviewed by the Companys Audit Committee
and approved by its Board of Directors.
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements in this MD&A constitute forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements,
without limitation, may contain the words believes, expects, anticipates,
estimates, intends, plans, or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions and Sphere 3Ds actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated. Forward looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates
of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety
of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or
results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. In the context of any forward-looking information please refer to
risk factors detailed herein, as well as other information contained in the
companys filings with Canadian securities regulators (www.sedar.com).
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
General
Sphere 3D is a technology company that delivers solutions that
streamline and simplify computing life. The Companys technology enhances the
user experience of both legacy and current applications and empowers users to
gain access to these applications from devices of their choosing.
Over the last five years, Sphere 3D has designed a proprietary
platform, namely Glassware 2.0, for the delivery of applications from a
server-based computing architecture. The Company has taken a unique approach in
that it has built its technology platform without the use of a hypervisor and
instead has designed its own microvisor. One of the benefits of this approach is
the ability to deliver multiple application sessions on either a single server
or through clusters of servers without the requirement to deliver complete
virtual desktop infrastructure. Through Glassware 2.0, the process for
porting and publishing applications is streamlined to the point that its
practically automated, requiring very little administration input.
On March 21, 2014, the Company acquired the Virtual Desktop
Infrastructure technology (VDI technology) of V3 Systems, Inc. including the
Desktop Cloud Orchestrator® virtualization management software which allows
administrators to manage local, cloud hosted, or hybrid virtual desktop
deployments as well as the V3 Appliances; a series of purpose-built, compact,
efficient and easy-to-manage servers.
The Companys Glassware 2.0 architecture and unique
application only virtualization, coupled with complementary software from its
acquisition of the VDI technology, enables the Company and its partners to
deliver unmatched flexibility within the industry and a wide array of deployment
options.
Since inception, the Company has invested the majority of its
capital in the design, development and testing of its technology, with the
majority of employees and financial resources allocated to such functions. In
2014, the Company has transitioned its focus from entirely a research and design
organization to a commercial enterprise, through an increased investment in
sales and marketing resources.
Business Highlights
|
Completed acquisition of the Virtual Desktop
Infrastructure technology (VDI technology) of V3 Systems, Inc., a
privately held virtualization company, including the V3 Appliances design,
Desktop Cloud Orchestrator (DCO) software and other Intellectual
Property related to the VDI technology. |
|
|
|
Hired certain key individuals including Mr. Stoney Hall,
to head Global Sales, and former founder of V3 Systems, Mr. Peter Bookman,
who is taking on responsibility, amongst other things, for accelerating
the building of the Companys Intellectual Property Portfolio; |
|
|
|
Converted 3 provisional patents to full patent
fillings in Q1 2014; bringing the total number of full patent filings to
12; |
|
|
|
Recognized over $0.9 million in revenue in Q1 from
Glassware 2.0 licenses, V3 Appliances, Professional Services and Desktop
Cloud Orchestrator, including the Companys first Desktop as a Service
(DaaS) agreement, with an international services company; |
|
|
|
Derived revenue from customers in Canada,
United States, Europe and elsewhere; verticals sold to in Q1 2014 include
Government, Construction and Financial Services; |
|
|
|
Finalized partnership with Dell to integrate
the Glassware 2.0 platform and DCO software, with Dell DRIVE; |
|
|
|
Signed a collaboration agreement with Novarad
Corporation. The Collaboration agreement will allow Sphere 3D and Novarad
to offer an on premise appliance for the delivery of Novarad software to
healthcare providers; without the requirement to refresh workstation
hardware. By delivering an Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) offering,
customers can take advantage of a prebuilt solution based on a verified
architecture that reduces deployment risk and accelerates time to
availability. |
|
|
|
Expanded relationship in Q1 2014 with Corel beyond
previously announced VAR and Distribution agreements. Provided Glassware
2.0 as a platform for WordPerfect X7 companion iPad offering. Corel is
estimated to have over 100 million active retail users in 75 countries;
|
|
|
|
Raised USD $5 Million through the sale of a
senior secured 8% convertible debenture, convertible at USD $7.50 per
share. |
Sales and Marketing
The Company intends to focus the majority of sales efforts
through an indirect sales channel in order to achieve the greatest possible
impact with the least possible start-up costs. This indirect channel includes
licensees, resellers, independent software vendors (ISVs) and systems
integrators.
The Companys software is delivered through a Software as a
Service (SaaS) model with maintenance to end-user customers included as well
as under a perpetual license.
In establishing prices for the Companys products, the Company
considers the value of the products and solutions in comparison to other
industry virtualization and hardware solutions and strives to deliver the lowest
total cost of ownership where possible.
Having just recently commenced marketing efforts, the Company
intends to invest throughout 2014 on communicating the benefits of Glassware
2.0 while training Company licensees, resellers, ISVs as well as educating the
media and industry analysts about the unique value proposition associated with
deploying the Companys technology as a virtualization platform.
Subsequent Event
On May 15, 2014, the Company signed an Agreement to acquire all
the securities of Overland Storage, Inc. through the merger of Overland with a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The acquisition is the culmination of
the ongoing expansion of the relationship between Sphere 3D and Overland, which
had included expanding the existing supply and license agreements to include V3
appliances, DCO and collaboration on additional IP creation. Overlands
completed purchase of Tandberg Data in Q1 2014 gives Sphere 3D access to a
combined channel of over 19,000 resellers, multiple distributers and OEMs as
well as a customer install base that exceeds 1,000,000 units.
To support the acquisition of Overland Storage, the Company
signed a $9.4 million bought deal financing with a syndicate of investment firms
lead by Cormark Securities, and including Jacob Securities and Paradigm Capital.
The financing closed on June 6.
Proprietary Protection
Sphere 3D has designed and maintains its virtualization
platform. The Company will be relying on a combination of patents, trademarks,
trade secret and copyright laws, as well as contractual restrictions, to protect
the proprietary aspects of its products and services. Although every effort is
made to protect Sphere 3Ds intellectual property, these legal protections may
only afford limited protection. Sphere 3D intends to continue to selectively
pursue patenting of further technology developed in the future.
Sphere 3D has filed, or obtained through its acquisition of the
VDI technology, the following patents in the United States, each of which is
pending registration:
|
13/175,766 |
Intermediation of hypervisor file system and
storage device models |
|
13/175,771 |
Virtual Machine Allocation internal and
external to physical environment |
|
13/250,836 |
Migration of Virtual Machine Pool |
|
13/741,884 |
Systems and Methods of Optimizing Resources for
Emulation |
|
13/742,585 |
Systems and Methods of Managing Access to
Remote Resources |
|
13/742,632 |
Systems and Methods for Managing Emulation
Sessions |
|
61/806,048 |
Systems and Methods for Providing an Emulator
|
|
61/806,054 |
Systems and Methods for Managing Emulation
Resources |
|
61/806,059 |
Systems and Methods for Accessing Remote
Resources for Emulation |
Sphere 3D has filed the following patents in Canada, each of
which is pending registration:
|
2,764,283 |
Mobile Device Control Application for Improved
Security and Diagnostics |
|
2,764,354 |
Host-Emulator Bridge System and Method |
|
2,764,362 |
RDP Session Monitor/Control System and
Application |
Sphere 3D has acquired the following PCT patent applications:
|
12/27007 |
Migration of virtual machine pool |
|
12/27010 |
Automated adjustment of cluster policy |
|
12/43187 |
Virtual Machine Allocation internal and
external to physical environment |
|
12/43183 |
Intermediation of hypervisor file system and
storage device models |
Sphere 3D has filed the following trademarks in Canada:
|
1600132 |
GLASSWARE 2.0 |
|
1615670 |
SPHERE 3D |
|
1617275 |
ANY APP, ANY DEVICE, ANYTIME
|
Sphere 3D has acquired the following trademarks in the US:
|
4,086,758 |
V3 |
|
4,135,466 |
V3 (a stylized version) |
|
4,288,340 |
V3 Desktop Cloud Orchestrator
|
Sphere 3D may continue to file for patents regarding aspects of
its platform, services and delivery method at a later date depending on the
costs and timing associated with filing. The Company may make investments to
further strengthen its copyright protection going forward, although no
assurances can be given that it will be successful in such patent and trademark
protection endeavours. Sphere 3D seeks to limit disclosure of its intellectual
property by requiring employees, consultants, and partners with access to its
proprietary platform and information to execute confidentiality agreements and
non-competition agreements and by restricting access to Sphere 3D proprietary
information. Due to rapid technological change, Sphere 3D believes that factors
such as the expertise and technological and creative skills of our personnel,
new services and enhancements to our existing services are more important to
establish and maintain an industry and technology advantage than other available
legal protections
Despite Sphere 3D's efforts to protect its proprietary rights,
unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of its services or to obtain
and use information that Sphere 3D regards as proprietary. The laws of many
countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of
the United States or Canada. Litigation may be necessary in the future to
enforce Sphere 3D's intellectual property rights, to protect Sphere 3D's trade
secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others
or to defend against claims of infringement. Any such litigation could result in
substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse
effect on Sphere 3D's business, operating results and financial condition. There
can be no assurance that Sphere 3D's means of protecting its proprietary rights
will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar
services or products. Any failure by Sphere 3D to adequately protect its
intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on its business,
operating results and financial condition.
SEGMENTED INFORMATION
The Companys product development, sales, and marketing
operations are conducted from its offices in Mississauga, ON, Canada and Draper,
Utah. The Companys operations focus on one market segment, Cloud Computing and
Virtualization, including the development, and sale of Sphere 3Ds Glassware
2.0 virtualization platform the V3 Desktop Cloud Orchestrator management
software and purpose-built VDI servers.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Quarters Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
The table below sets out certain selected financial information
regarding the consolidated operations of Sphere 3D for the periods indicated.
The selected financial information has been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
This information is taken from and should be read in conjunction with Sphere
3D's financial statements and related notes (in thousands, except loss per
share):
|
|
3 Months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
$ |
912 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Cost
of goods sold |
|
393 |
|
|
- |
|
Gross profit |
|
519 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
56.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss for the period |
|
(778 |
) |
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
per share |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
AS AT |
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
$ |
7,497 |
|
$ |
6,427 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
17,149 |
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
$ |
24,646 |
|
$ |
8,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
$ |
1,051 |
|
$ |
924 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
8,651 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
$ |
9,702 |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
$ |
14,944 |
|
$ |
7,437 |
|
Sphere 3D has not declared any dividends since its
incorporation. Sphere 3D does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the
foreseeable future on its Sphere 3D Shares, but intends to retain future
earnings to finance internal growth, acquisitions and development of its
business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the
discretion of the board of directors of Sphere 3D and will depend upon Sphere
3D's financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such
other factors as the board of directors of Sphere 3D deems relevant.
Results of Operations
With first sales of the Companys Glassware 2.0 technology, V3
appliances and DCO software, the Company has moved from a development stage
enterprise into full commercialization. This has provided revenue from hardware,
software and software licensing.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, the Company incurred
Cost of goods sold and operating costs of $1,748,000 compared to $642,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Cost of goods sold for the three months ended March 31, 2014
was $393,000 compared to $NIL for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The
costs relate to hardware, licenses and support costs incurred to generate the
revenue. There were no cost of sales related to the recognition of licensing
fees; which creates higher gross margins than those that may be recognized in
the future.
The Company has met the US GAAP requirements for the deferral
of development expenses and during the three months ended March 31, 2014
capitalized $647,000 in development costs compared to $45,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2013. Research and development costs for the three months
ended March 31, 2014 and for the three months ended March 31, 2013 were at a
comparable level which results in the appearance of a reduction in the growth of
ongoing expenses on a comparative basis.
Salaries and consulting for the three months ended March 31,
2014 were $984,000 compared to $391,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2013. The Company expanded its staff, during the first quarter of 2014, with
additions in sales, marketing and support and expects to add additional staff in
sales, marketing and research & development throughout fiscal 2014.
Professional fees for the three months ended March 31, 2014
were $45,000 compared to $78,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. On
an ongoing basis, Professional fees mainly relate to legal and audit fees,
however during the first quarter of 2013 the Company incurred a significant
charge related to recruiting as it acquired additional development staff.
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended
March 31, 2014 were $145,000 compared to $82,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2013. The increase in general and administrative expenses, during the
first quarter of 2014, was mainly the result of the Companys involvement in
Tradeshows to promote its products. We expect to continue to see growth in these
expenses throughout fiscal 2014.
Regulatory costs for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were
$53,000 compared to $32,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The
Company began trading on the OTC-QX in October of 2013 which resulted in higher
listing and maintenance fees. The Company has applied for a listing on the
NASDAQ which is expected to be approved in the second quarter of 2014. The move
to NASDAQ will increase regulatory costs going forward.
Financial and non-operating income during the three months
ended March 31, 2014 decreased to $(11,000) compared to $1,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2013. The decrease was mainly the result of an increase
in interest expense and a holding loss on investments offset by the
strengthening of the Canadian dollar against the US dollar at the end of the
quarter which resulted in an unrealized foreign exchange gain.
The net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was
$778,000 or $0.04 per share compared with a net loss in 2013 of $640,000 or
$0.04 per share.
Financial Position
Sphere 3D's cash position increased during the three months
ended March 31, 2014 by $1,244,000 compared to a decrease of $603,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2013. Operating activities required cash of
$283,000 (2013 - $652,000), after adjustments for non-cash items and changes in
other working capital balances. Investing activities required cash of $4,658,000
(2013 - $71,000), mostly related to the acquisition of the VDI technology, the
development of Sphere 3Ds technology and the acquisition of property and
equipment to support Sphere 3Ds ongoing development work. Sphere 3D received
net cash of $6,183,000 (2013 - $148,000), after issue costs, from the closing of
its debenture financing and the exercise of warrants and options.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2014, Sphere 3D had cash of $6,461,000 and working
capital of $6,446,000 compared to cash of $5,217,000 and working capital of
$5,503,000 as at December 31, 2013.
Contractual Obligations
The Company entered into a five year lease, for a 6,000 square
foot, free standing building, on May 1, 2011. In addition to the minimum lease
payments, the Company is required to pay operating costs estimated at $24 per
year. The minimum lease payments for the Companys facility in Mississauga, are
as follows:
Contractual Obligation
|
Payments Due by
Period |
Total |
Less than 1 year |
1 3 years |
4 5 years |
After 5 years |
Office Lease |
$ 111,000 |
$ 52,000 |
$ 59,000 |
$ - |
$ - |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING SHARES AND DILUTIVE INSTRUMENTS
The authorized capital of the Company consists of an unlimited
number of common shares, of which 23,414,271 common shares were issued and
outstanding as of the date of this MD&A.
Certain common shares of the Company are subject to escrow in
accordance with TSXV policies. There are two separate escrow agreements in place
which are subject to different rates of release. The following table summarizes
the common shares that were issued by the Company and are subject to and held
under each escrow and the dates of release therefrom:
|
|
Surplus
Share |
|
|
Value
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow |
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
% |
|
|
Number |
|
|
% |
|
|
Number |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 21, 2012
|
|
4,655,000 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
4,306,250 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
8,961,250 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Released - December 27,
2012(1) |
|
232,750 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
430,625 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
663,375 |
|
|
7 |
|
Released - June 27, 2013 |
|
232,750 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
645,937 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
878,687 |
|
|
10 |
|
Released - December 27, 2013 |
|
465,500 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
645,937 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
1,111,437 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total subject to escrow at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2014 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
3,724,000 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
2,583,751 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
6,307,751 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future releases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2014 |
|
465,500 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
645,937 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
1,111,437 |
|
|
13 |
|
December 27, 2014 |
|
698,250 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
645,938 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
1,344,188 |
|
|
15 |
|
June 27, 2015 |
|
698,250 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
645,938 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
1,344,188 |
|
|
15 |
|
December 27, 2015 |
|
1,862,000 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
645,938 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
2,507,938 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future releases |
|
3,724,000 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
2,583,751 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
6,307,751 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
(1) |
Date of issuance of TSXV exchange bulletin announcing the
commencement of trading of the Companys stock. |
Escrowed shares are subject to release every six months from
the date of the exchange bulletin, at the rate shown. As well, if the operations
or development of the Intellectual Property or the business are discontinue then
the unreleased securities held in the QT Escrow will be cancelled.
As of the date of this MD&A, the Company has warrants
outstanding to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,483,786 common shares, at a
total exercise price of $3,072,000.
The stock option plan (the Option Plan) of the Company is
administered by the Board of Directors, which is responsible for establishing
the exercise price (at not less than the Discounted Market Price as defined in
the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) and the vesting and expiry provisions.
The maximum number of common shares reserved for issuance for options that may
be granted under the Option Plan is 20% of the number of common shares
outstanding as of the record date of the last Annual and Special meeting of
shareholders , or 3,375,000 Options. As of the date of this MD&A, the Board
of Directors has awarded options under the Option Plan to purchase
up to an aggregate of 3,211,251 common shares, of which 301,251 have been
exercised and 2,910,000 are issued and outstanding.
As part of the Companys acquisition of certain intangible
assets, the Company shall pay an earn-out, based on achieving certain milestones
in revenue and gross margin on the VDI technology, of up to a further USD $5.0
million, payable at the option of Sphere 3D in cash or shares (up to a maximum
of 1,051,414 common shares), to be priced at the 20-day weighted average trading
price preceding the date(s) the earn-out is realized.
Assuming that all of the outstanding options and warrants are
exercised and the maximum number of earn-out shares are issued, 28,859,471
common shares would be issued and outstanding on a fully diluted basis.
Quarterly Information (in thousands)
|
|
Mar |
|
|
Dec |
|
|
Sep |
|
|
Jun |
|
|
Mar |
|
|
Dec |
|
|
Sep |
|
|
Jun |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Revenue |
$ |
912 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Expenses |
|
1,285 |
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
790 |
|
|
550 |
|
|
642 |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
532 |
|
|
349 |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(778 |
) |
$ |
(1,328 |
) |
$ |
(817 |
) |
$ |
( 551 |
) |
$ |
(640 |
) |
$ |
(1,064 |
) |
$ |
(532 |
) |
$ |
(347 |
) |
Loss per share |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
Weighted average number of
shares |
|
21,692 |
|
|
19,868 |
|
|
17,188 |
|
|
16,114 |
|
|
16,114 |
|
|
13,737 |
|
|
11,870 |
|
|
11,051 |
|
|
|
Mar |
|
|
Dec |
|
|
Sep |
|
|
Jun |
|
|
Mar |
|
|
Dec |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
$ |
6,461 |
|
$ |
5,217 |
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
$ |
470 |
|
$ |
1,036 |
|
$ |
1,639 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
24,646 |
|
$ |
8,361 |
|
$ |
2,455 |
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
$ |
3,222 |
|
Working capital |
$ |
6,446 |
|
$ |
5,503 |
|
$ |
1,788 |
|
$ |
535 |
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
$ |
1,735 |
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
Related parties of the Company include the Companys key
management personnel and independent directors. Key management personnel are
those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and
controlling the activities of the Company, directly or indirectly, including any
director (whether executive or otherwise).
The compensation paid or payable to key management personnel is
shown below (in thousands):
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Salaries, fees and benefits
|
$ |
111,000
|
|
$ |
141,000
|
|
Share-based payments management |
|
- |
|
|
18,000 |
|
Share-based payments directors |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
111,000 |
|
$ |
159,000 |
|
Legal services of $104,000 (2013 - $17,000) were provided by a
legal firm affiliated with a director of the Company.
Amounts owing to related parties at year end included in
accounts payable total $159,000 (2013 - $22,000)
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT CHANGES
On March 6, 2014, the Company appointed Mr. Peter Tassiopoulos,
the Companys Chief Executive Officer, to the Companys Board of Directors. To
make room on the Board for this new appointment, Mr. John Morelli stepped down
as a director and officer of the Company. Mr. Morelli continues to focus on his
role of leading the R&D and technology team at Sphere 3D.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS
The carrying value of cash, investments, subscriptions
receivable, sales tax receivable, prepaid and sundry assets and accounts payable
and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values. For more detailed
information please refer to Note 4 in the audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2013.
SUMMARY OF INVESTOR RELATIONS ACTIVITIES
No investor relations activities were undertaken by or on
behalf of the Company during the period.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by
the FASB that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If
not discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued
standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the
Company's consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of
Financial Statements Going Concern. ASU 2014-15 provides that in connection
with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting
period, an entity's management should evaluate whether there are conditions or
events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the
entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date
that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that
the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). ASU
2014-15 will be effective for the annual reporting period ending after December
15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early application is
permitted. The impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows as a result of the adoption of ASU 2014-15 has not yet been determined.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for
accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most
current revenue recognition guidance. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to
recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 will
be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016,
including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not
permitted. The impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows as a result of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 has not yet been determined.
In July 2013, the FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-11, Presentation of
an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar
Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU No. 2013-11 provides that an
entity is required to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an
unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a
deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or
a tax credit carryforward. If a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax
loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date, the
unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a
liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. ASU No. 2013-11
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning
after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance affected presentation
only and, therefore, did not have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial results.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND INTERNAL REPORTING
The Company has evaluated its internal controls over financial
reporting and believes that as at December 31, 2013, its system of internal
controls over financial reporting as defined under NI 52-109 is sufficiently
designed and maintained to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with the Company's GAAP.
Certain weaknesses in its system are apparent. These weaknesses
arise primarily from the limited number of personnel employed in the accounting
and financial reporting areas, a situation that is common in many smaller
companies. As a consequence of this situation it is not feasible to achieve the
complete segregation of duties.
The Company believes these weaknesses are mitigated by the
nature and present levels of activities and transactions within the Company
being readily transparent; the active involvement of senior management and the
Board of Directors in the affairs of the Company; open lines of communication
within the Company and the thorough review of the Company's financial statements
by senior management, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the
Company's auditors.
The senior officers will continue to monitor very closely all
financial activities of the Company until the Company's budgets and workload
will enable the hiring of additional staff for greater segregation.
Nevertheless, these mitigating factors cannot eliminate the possibility that a
material misstatement may occur as a result of the aforesaid weaknesses in the
Company's internal controls over financial reporting. A cost effective system of
internal controls over financial reporting, no matter how well conceived or
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the internal controls over financial reporting are achieved.
RISK AND UNCERTAINTY FACTORS
Risks Related to our Business
Limited Operating History
Sphere 3D is a development stage company which has a limited
operating history and limited non-recurring revenues derived from operations.
Significant expenditures have been focused on research and development to create
the Glassware 2.0 product offering. Sphere 3D's near-term focus has
been in actively developing reference accounts and building sales, marketing and
support capabilities. As a result of these and other factors, Sphere 3D may not
be able to achieve, sustain or increase profitability on an ongoing basis.
Sphere 3D is subject to many risks common to development stage
enterprises, including under-capitalization, cash shortages, limitations with
respect to personnel, financial and other resources, lack of revenues,
technology, and market acceptance issues. There is no assurance that Sphere 3D
will be successful in achieving a return on shareholders' investment and the
likelihood of success must be considered in light of Sphere 3D's early stage of
operations.
Problems Resulting from Rapid Growth
Sphere 3D will be pursuing, from the outset, a plan to market
its platform throughout Canada, the United States and abroad and will require
capital in order to meet these growth plans and there can be no assurances that the Corporations capital resources will enable
Sphere 3D to meet these growth needs. The plan will place significant demands
upon Sphere 3D, management, and resources. Besides attracting and maintaining
qualified personnel, employees or contractors, Sphere 3D expects to require
working capital and other financial resources to meet the needs of its planned
growth. No assurance exists that the plans will be successful or that these
items will be satisfactorily handled, and this may have material adverse
consequence on the business of Sphere 3D.
Additional Financing May be Required
Sphere 3D may need additional financing to continue its
operations. Financing may not be available to Sphere 3D on commercially
reasonable terms, if at all, when needed. There is no assurance that Sphere 3D
will be successful in raising additional capital or that the proceeds of any
future financings will be sufficient to meet its future capital needs.
Impact of Competition
The technology industry, including emulation and virtualization
software, is very dynamic with new technology and services being introduced by a
range of players, from larger established companies to start-ups, on a frequent
basis. Newer technology may render Sphere 3D's technology obsolete which would
have a material, adverse effect on its business and results of operations.
Sphere 3D will be competing with others offering similar products. If Sphere
3D's systems and technology fail to achieve or maintain market acceptance, or if
new technologies are introduced by competitors that are more favorably received
than Sphere 3D's technology, or are more cost-effective or provide legal
exclusivity through patents or are otherwise able to render Sphere 3D's
technology obsolete, Sphere 3D will experience a decline in demand which will
result in lower sales performance and associated reductions in operating profits
all of which would negatively affect stock prices for Sphere 3D.
Information Technology, Network and Data Security
Risks
Sphere 3D faces security risks. Any failure to adequately
address these risks could have an adverse effect on the business and reputation
of Sphere 3D. Computer viruses, break-ins, or other security problems could lead
to misappropriation of proprietary information and interruptions, delays, or
cessation in service to clients.
Reliance on Third Parties
Sphere 3D relies on certain technology services provided to it
by third parties, and there can be no assurance that these third party service
providers will be available to Sphere 3D in the future on acceptable commercial
terms or at all. If Sphere 3D were to lose one or more of these service
providers, it may not be able to replace them in a cost effective manner, or at
all. This could harm the business and results of operations of Sphere 3D.
Investment in Technological Innovation
If Sphere 3D fails to invest sufficiently in research and
product development, its products could become less attractive to potential
clients, which could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations
and financial condition of Sphere 3D.
New Laws or Regulations
A number of laws and regulations may be adopted with respect to
mobile phone services covering issues such as user privacy, "indecent"
materials, freedom of expression, pricing, content and quality of products and
services, taxation, advertising, intellectual property rights and information
security. Adoption of any such laws or regulations might impact the ability of
Sphere 3D to deliver increasing levels of technological innovation and will
likely add to the cost of making its products, which would adversely affect its
results of operations.
Retention or Maintenance of Key Personnel
There is no assurance that Sphere 3D can continuously attract,
retain or maintain key personnel in a timely manner if the need arises, even
though qualified replacements are believed by management to exist. Failure to
have adequate personnel may materially harm the ability of Sphere 3D to operate.
Sphere 3D considers the services of Peter Tassiopoulos, Chief Executive Officer
and John Morelli, who heads the Companys R&D and technology team, to be key
to the operation of Sphere 3D. While there can be no assurances as to the
continued retention of these individuals, Sphere 3D believes that they are
heavily incentivized through stock ownership, options and other compensation, so
that the risk of departure is low.
Conflicts of Interest
Sphere 3D may contract with affiliated parties or other
companies or members of management of Sphere 3D or companies whose members of
management own, or control. These persons may obtain compensation and other
benefits in transactions relating to Sphere 3D. Certain members of management of
Sphere 3D will have other minor business activities other than the business of
Sphere 3D, but each member of management intends to devote substantially all of
their working hours to Sphere 3D. Although management intends to act fairly,
there can be no assurance that Sphere 3D will not possibly enter into
arrangements under terms one could argue are less favorable than what could have
been obtained had Sphere 3D or any other company had been dealing with unrelated
persons.
Proprietary Rights Could Be Subject to Suits or
Claims
No assurance exists that Sphere 3D or any Company with which it
transacts business, can or will be successful in pursuing protection of
proprietary rights such as business names, logos, marks, ideas, inventions, and
technology which may be acquired over time. In many cases, governmental
registrations may not be available or advisable, considering legalities and
expense, and even if registrations are obtained, adverse claims or litigation
could occur.
Lack of Control in Transactions
Management of Sphere 3D intends to retain other companies to
perform various services, but may not be in a position to control or direct the
activities of the parties with whom it transacts business. Success of Sphere 3D
may be subject to, among other things, the success of such other parties, with
each being subject to their own risks.
No Guarantee of Success
Sphere 3D, as well as those companies with which it intends to
transact business, have significant business purchases, advertising, and
operational plans pending and is/are, therefore, subject to various risks and
uncertainties as to the outcome of these plans. No guarantee exists that Sphere
3D, or any company with which it transacts business, will be successful.
Possibility of Significant Fluctuations in Operating
Results
Sphere 3D's revenues and operating results may fluctuate from
quarter to quarter and from year to year due to a combination of factors,
including, but not limited to: access to funds for working capital and market
acceptance of its services.
Revenues and operating results may also fluctuate based upon
the number and extent of potential financing activities in the future. Thus,
there can be no assurance that Sphere 3D will be able to reach profitability on
a quarterly or annual basis.
Sphere 3D has not arranged for any independent market studies
to validate the business plan and no outside party has made available results of
market research with respect to the extent to which clients are likely to
utilize its service or the probable market demand for its services. Plans of
Sphere 3D for implementing its business strategy and achieving profitability are
based upon the experience, judgment and assumptions of its key management
personnel, and upon available information concerning the communications and
technology industries. Management does not have experience in the anti-virus
industry. If management's assumptions prove to be incorrect, Sphere 3D will not
be successful in establishing its technology business.
Financial, Political or Economic Conditions
Sphere 3D may be subject to additional risks associated with
doing business in foreign countries.
Sphere 3D currently operates within Canada, but Sphere 3D
expects to do business in the United States and elsewhere in the world. As a
result, it may face significant additional risks associated with doing business
in other countries. In addition to the language barriers, different
presentations of financial information, different business practices, and other
cultural differences and barriers, ongoing business risks may result from the
international political situation, uncertain legal systems and applications of
law, prejudice against foreigners, corrupt practices, uncertain economic
policies and potential political and economic instability. In doing business in
foreign countries Sphere 3D may also be subject to such risks, including, but
not limited to, currency fluctuations, regulatory problems, punitive tariffs,
unstable local tax policies, trade embargoes, expropriation, corporate and
personal liability for violations of local laws, possible difficulties in
collecting accounts receivable, increased costs of doing business in countries
with limited infrastructure, and cultural and language differences. Sphere 3D
also may face competition from local companies which have longer operating
histories, greater name recognition, and broader customer relationships and
industry alliances in their local markets, and it may be difficult to operate
profitably in some markets as a result of such competition. Foreign economies
may differ favorably or unfavorably from the Canadian economy in growth of gross
national product, rate of inflation, market development, rate of savings, and
capital investment, resource self-sufficiency and balance of payments positions,
and in other respects.
When doing business in foreign countries, Sphere 3D may be
subject to uncertainties with respect to those countries' legal system and
application of laws, which may impact its ability to enforce agreements and may
expose it to lawsuits.
Legal systems in many foreign countries are new, unclear, and
continually evolving. There can be no certainty as to the application of laws
and regulations in particular instances. Many foreign countries do not have a
comprehensive system of laws, and the existing regional and local laws are often
in conflict and subject to inconsistent interpretation, implementation and
enforcement. New laws and changes to existing laws may occur quickly and
sometimes unpredictably. These factors may limit Sphere 3Ds ability to enforce
agreements with its current and future clients and vendors. Furthermore, it may
expose Sphere 3D to lawsuits by its clients and vendors in which it may not be
adequately able to protect itself.
When doing business in foreign countries, Sphere 3D may be
unable to fully comply with local and regional laws which may expose it to
financial risk.
When doing business in foreign countries, Sphere 3D may be
required to comply with informal laws and trade practices imposed by local and
regional government administrators. Local taxes and other charges may be levied
depending on the local needs to tax revenues, and may not be predictable or
evenly applied. These local and regional taxes/charges and governmentally
imposed business practices may affect the cost of doing business and may require
Sphere 3D to constantly modify its business methods to both comply with these
local rules and to lessen the financial impact and operational interference of
such policies. In addition, it is often extremely burdensome for businesses
operating in foreign countries to comply with some of the local and regional
laws and regulations. Any failure on the part of Sphere 3D to maintain
compliance with the local laws may result in fines and fees which may
substantially impact its cash flow, cause a substantial decrease in revenues,
and may affect its ability to continue operation.
Risks Related to Sphere 3D's Intellectual Property
Protection of Sphere 3D's Intellectual
Property
Sphere 3D's products utilize a variety of proprietary rights
that are important to its competitive position and success. Sphere 3D has filed
a number of patent applications and has been protecting its Intellectual
Property through trade secrets and copyrights. To date, Sphere has not been
granted any definitive patents and because the Intellectual Property associated
with the Sphere 3D's technology is evolving and rapidly changing, current
intellectual property rights may not adequately protect Sphere 3D. Sphere 3D may
not be successful in securing or maintaining proprietary or future patent
protection for the technology used in its systems or services, and protection
that is secured may be challenged and possibly lost. Sphere 3D generally enters
into confidentiality or license agreements, or has confidentiality provisions in
agreements with Sphere 3D's employees, consultants, strategic partners and
clients and controls access to and distribution of its technology, documentation
and other proprietary information. Sphere 3D's inability to protect its
Intellectual Property adequately for these and other reasons could result in
weakened demand for its systems or services, which would result in a decline in
its revenues and profitability.
Third Party Intellectual Property Rights
Sphere 3D could become subject to litigation regarding
intellectual property rights that could significantly harm its business. Sphere
3D's commercial success will also depend in part on its ability to make and sell
its systems and services without infringing on the patents or proprietary rights
of third parties. Competitors, many of whom have substantially greater resources
than Sphere 3D and have made significant investments in competing technologies
or products, may seek to apply for and obtain patents that will prevent, limit
or interfere with Sphere 3D's ability to make or sell Sphere 3D's systems or
provide Sphere 3D's services.
Other Risks
Sphere 3Ds Share Price Fluctuations and Speculative
Nature of Securities
The price of the Sphere 3D Shares could fluctuate substantially
and should be considered speculative securities. The price of the Sphere 3D
Shares may decline, and the price that prevails in the market may be higher or
lower than the price investors pay depending on many factors, some of which are
beyond Sphere 3D's control. In addition, the equity markets in general, and the
Exchange in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations
historically that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of those companies. These broad market factors may affect the market
price of the Sphere 3D Shares adversely, regardless of its operating
performance.
Volatility in the Price of Sphere 3D Shares
The market for the Sphere 3D Shares may be characterized by
significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and management
expects that the share price will be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for
the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities
class action litigation against a company following periods of volatility in the
market price of its securities. Sphere 3D may in the future be a target of
similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and
liabilities and could divert management's attention from day-to-day operations
and consume resources, such as cash.
Operating results may fluctuate as a result of a number of
factors, many of which are outside of the control of Sphere 3D. The following
factors may affect operating results: ability to compete; ability to attract
clients; amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures related
to the maintenance and expansion of the business, operations and infrastructure;
general economic conditions and those economic conditions specific to the
internet; ability to keep web access operational at a reasonable cost and
without service interruptions; the success of product expansion; and ability to
attract, motivate and retain top-quality employees.
Dividends
Management intends to retain any future earnings to support the
development of the business of Sphere 3D and does not anticipate paying cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of any future dividends will be at
the discretion of the board of directors of Sphere 3D after taking into account
various factors, including but not limited to the financial condition, operating
results, cash needs, growth plans and the terms of any credit agreements that
Sphere 3D may be a party to at the time. Accordingly, investors must rely on
sales of their Sphere 3D Shares after price appreciation, which may never occur,
as the only way to realize a return on their investment. Investors seeking cash
dividends should not purchase Sphere 3D Shares.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information relating to Sphere 3D Corp. can be found
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
FORM 52-109F2R
CERTIFICATION OF REFILED INTERIM FILINGS
This certificate is being filed on the same date that Sphere 3D
Corp. (the "issuer") has refiled the interim financial report and interim
MD&A for the interim period ended March 31, 2014.
I, Eric Kelly, Chief Executive Officer of Sphere 3D
Corp., certify the following:
1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial
report and interim MD&A (together, the "interim filings") of the issuer for
the interim period ended March 31, 2014.
2. No misrepresentations: Based on my
knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in
light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period
covered by the interim filings.
3. Fair presentation: Based on my
knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report
together with the other financial information included in the interim filings
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial
performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods
presented in the interim filings.
Date: March 31, 2015
(signed) Eric Kelly
Eric Kelly
Chief Executive Officer
NOTE TO READER
In contrast to the
certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument
52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and
Interim Filings (NI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate
does not include representations relating to the establishment and
maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal
control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In
particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making
any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of
i) controls and other procedures designed to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the
issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or
submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation;
and
ii) a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
reports for external purposes in accordance with the issuers GAAP.
The issuers certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that
processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to
support the representations they are making in this certificate. Investors
should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying
officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective
basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 may result in additional
risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim
and annual filings and other reports provided under securities
legislation. |
|
FORM 52-109F2R
CERTIFICATION OF REFILED INTERIM FILINGS
This certificate is being filed on the same date that Sphere 3D
Corp. (the "issuer") has refiled the interim financial report and interim
MD&A for the interim period ended March 31, 2014.
I, Kurt Kalbfleisch, Chief Financial Officer of Sphere 3D
Corp., certify the following:
1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial
report and interim MD&A (together, the "interim filings") of the issuer for
the interim period ended March 31, 2014.
2. No misrepresentations: Based on my
knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in
light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period
covered by the interim filings.
3. Fair presentation: Based on my
knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report
together with the other financial information included in the interim filings
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial
performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods
presented in the interim filings.
Date: March 31, 2015
(signed) Kurt Kalbfleisch
Kurt
Kalbfleisch
Chief Financial Officer
NOTE TO READER
In contrast to the
certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument
52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and
Interim Filings (NI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate
does not include representations relating to the establishment and
maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal
control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In
particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making
any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of
i) controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its
annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under
securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and
ii) a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
reports for external purposes in accordance with the issuers GAAP.
The issuers certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that
processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to
support the representations they are making in this certificate. Investors
should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying
officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective
basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 may result in additional
risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim
and annual filings and other reports provided under securities
legislation. |
|
Sphere 3D (NASDAQ:ANY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Sphere 3D (NASDAQ:ANY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024