By Michael Wursthorn 

For Wall Street brokers, a promotion to branch manager once was a career-crowning achievement. Now, many shun the job.

Branch chiefs at the biggest brokerages say they are being loaded up with more responsibilities as the banks that own their firms impose tighter controls, cut costs and push advisers to promote commercial-banking services. Even as profits rise, their once-coveted positions are typically less lucrative and less secure, part of a broader industry shift away from its more freewheeling roots.

"Becoming a branch manager was the pinnacle of one's career," said Mindy Diamond, president of Diamond Consultants, a Chester, N.J., recruiting firm for financial advisers. "But unfortunately it's a really tough position today."

The increasing grind of the job is one factor behind an exodus of branch bosses to independent wealth managers, where they are joining advisers who have been recruited from the big brokers. These smaller firms are adding clients rapidly, pushing banks to increase compensation for top producers to keep them from defecting. At the same time, some Wall Street brokers are struggling to fill empty management jobs.

Michael Maurer enjoyed his job when he ran branches in Albany, N.Y., and Washington, D.C., for Smith Barney in the 2000s.

"Every Wednesday morning, I would have a cup of coffee for an hour with three of my advisers or so, and Tuesday mornings, I'd take out some of the support staff," Mr. Maurer said.

But in the wake of the 2008-2009 financial crisis, after Morgan Stanley bought Smith Barney from Citigroup Inc., Mr. Maurer said the number of employees he oversaw tripled to more than 150. Relationships he had worked hard to build suffered.

"That Wednesday cup of coffee turned into a quick nod as I walked," he said.

In 2013, Mr. Maurer left Morgan Stanley and helped launch independent wealth-management firm Steward Partners Global Advisory LLC.

Morgan Stanley declined to comment.

Rank-and-file brokers complain about more routine duties, less autonomy and the disappearance of perks such as generous expense accounts following postcrisis changes in the industry. But unlike their managers, their compensation is rising and workloads are about the same.

At firms such as what is now Bank of America Corp.'s Merrill Lynch, which has about 14,100 brokers, or Wells Fargo Advisors, with roughly 15,200, becoming the manager of a branch or multiple branches traditionally meant a healthy bump in pay, a closer relationship with a firm's leaders and a chance to both lead and advocate for the rank and file. These managers can number in the hundreds at the major firms. Wells Fargo Advisors, a unit of Wells Fargo & Co., for example, employs about 650 of them.

A wave of postcrisis mergers caused a shift in the industry where more brokerages were bought by banks, and companies looked to diversify their cyclical investment-banking and trading revenue with the more-steady cash generated by wealth management. Layers of management were pruned, and those managers that survived had to adapt to overseeing larger staffs, increased bureaucracy and an emphasis on selling banking products such as mortgages and checking accounts, current and former managers say.

"A lot of my time was spent on stuff I didn't necessarily believe in," said Steve Altman, who worked for 16 years at Merrill, with his last eight spent as a manager.

Mr. Altman left the company in 2012 and helped form True Private Wealth Advisors, an independent firm based in Salem, Ore.

A Merrill spokeswoman said that Merrill, which was acquired by Bank of America in 2009, had revamped its manager-training program in 2012 to cast a wider net among brokers and other areas within Bank of America.

Brokerages are also grappling with the rising popularity of independent wealth-management firms such as the ones where Mr. Altman and Mr. Maurer now work. Research firm Cerulli predicts that by 2018, independent firms will edge ahead of the major brokerage firms measured by their share of client assets.

In response, brokerages have offered lavish pay packages that, for the highest producers, can reach into the millions of dollars.

That hasn't benefited managers. Instead, they have seen their bonus pools tightened and new, more subjective factors added to determining their payouts, according to some current and former managers.

"Most [managers] don't even understand how the evaluation and compensation process works," said Chris Dupuy, a top regional executive for Merrill Lynch in the Pacific Northwest until he left last year to join Focus Financial Partners LLC.

One longtime Merrill manager said the introduction of subjective measures to gauge compensation was necessary to reflect the job's increased complexity. He added that metrics, such as new assets brought in, remain a factor in evaluations as well.

It has also become more common for brokers to turn down branch-manager positions when they are offered. Wells Fargo Advisors, for example, has had difficulty attracting managers at the branch level in some markets, despite looking for candidates both within the company and at some competing firms, said people with knowledge of the matter.

Wells Fargo spokeswoman Rachelle Rowe said the firm doesn't "feel the need to rush to fill roles that have been open for a longer period of time." She said Wells Fargo Advisors can "wait to find the right candidate." The company recently created a group dedicated to branch-manager development and training.

One Wells Fargo adviser who was approached to take a manager's position said he declined because it would have required him to give up his clients. "It's a risky proposition to become a pure manager these days," the adviser said. "Your book of business as a broker is gold."

Access Investor Kit for Bank of America Corp.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US0605051046

Access Investor Kit for Morgan Stanley

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US6174464486

Access Investor Kit for Wells Fargo & Co.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US9497461015

Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires

Bank of America (NYSE:BAC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Bank of America Charts.
Bank of America (NYSE:BAC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Bank of America Charts.