UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K


CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report:  November 20, 2014
(Date of earliest event reported)


INTEL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 
 
 
 
Delaware
000-06217
94-1672743
(State or other jurisdiction
(Commission
(IRS Employer
of incorporation)
File Number)
Identification No.)
 
 
 
 
 
 
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, California
95054-1549
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
 
 
 
(408) 765-8080
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
 
 
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4c))





 
 
Item 7.01
Regulation FD Disclosure

The information in this report shall not be treated as filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

On November 20, 2014, Intel Corporation presented business and financial information to institutional investors, analysts, members of the press and the general public at a publicly available webcast meeting (the "Investor Meeting").  Attached hereto as Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, and 99.3, and incorporated by reference herein are the Investor Meeting presentations made by Brian Krzanich, CEO; William Holt, Executive Vice President, General Manager of the Technology and Manufacturing Group; and Stacy Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Intel, respectively. During the course of the Investor Meeting, the company's executives discussed Intel's corporate strategy, advancing Moore's Law, and financial performance. The presentations include forward-looking statements and accompanying Risk Factors.  These presentations are among the several presentations made by Intel executives at the Investor Meeting, each of which may be found at intc.com.

 
 
 
Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits

(d) Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Report:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Description
99.1
 
Investor Meeting Presentation by Brian Krzanich, dated November 20, 2014
     
99.2
 
Investor Meeting Presentation by William Holt, dated November 20, 2014
     
99.3
 
Investor Meeting Presentation by Stacy Smith, dated November 20, 2014












SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INTEL CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
November 20, 2014
By:
/s/ Cary I. Klafter
 
 
 
 
Cary I. Klafter
 
 
 
 
Corporate Secretary
 



Please see corresponding attached PDF.
 
     INVESTOR MEETING 2014        SANTA CLARA NOVEMBER 20 
 
 
 Brian Krzanich  CEO 
 
 
   Investor Meeting 2013  What We Said Last Year      Things That We Are Doing Differently  Market driven view of our industryIf it computes, it computes best with Intel from IoT to the DatacenterOpen foundry to any company able to utilize our leading edge SiliconCreate Platforms for Enterprise, notjust SiliconDrive focus on bringing innovation tomarket quickly  Relentless pursuit ofMoore’s Law  Things That Will Not Change           
 
 
           2014Return to Growth  Revenue*  Tablet Volume*  Q3’14 Microprocessor Shipments  One Year Total Shareholder Return**  $55.9B  45%  >100Mu  *Forecast  is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  ~40Mu                  **Intel 1 year TSR calculated as of November 18, 2014 close of market (Source: Factset)           
 
 
       Strategic Vectors  Our highest-shareholder value will come from a strategy that usesour core assets to move into profitable, complementary markets.        MOORE’S LAW  INTEGRATION  SHARED IP                Memory   Graphics      WiFi  I/O 
 
 
 Our Corporate Mission, Vision, Strategy        MISSION  VISION  GROWTH STRATEGY  Utilize the power of Moore’s Law to bring smart, connected devices to every person on Earth.  If it is smartand connected, it is best with Intel.  Our highest shareholder value will come from a strategy that usesour core assets to move into profitable, complementary markets.                  *Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
       CORE ASSETS THAT DRIVE THE PC AND DATA CENTER    IoT    SECURITY    SOFTWARE    WEARABLES    FOUNDRY    MOBILE    PROCESS TECHNOLOGY  Our highest shareholder value will come from a strategy that usesour core assets to move into profitable, complementary markets.                SHARED IP    IA CORES 
 
 
               PC Stabilize & Innovate                                        *Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
     The PC Market is Stabilizing   Source: IDCSource: Gartner, Forecast: PCs, Ultramobiles and Mobile Phones, Worldwide, 2011-2018, 3Q14 Update, Ranjit Atwal, 9/16/14  Mu  Gartner TAM365  IDC TAM291  318  315  Range 
 
 
       $199  Innovating and Differentiating the PC Experience    Enabling New Experiences      New Designs  Options for Everyone  Broad Range of Price Points    Multiple OS                  *Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
   Data Center: Expansion & Growth 
 
 
           Data Center Expansion and Growth  Broad Customer Base & Diversifying Market SegmentsLeadership Products & TechnologiesForecasting 15% CAGRthrough 2018*              *Forecast  is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  *Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
 Software to Silicon:Targeted Integrationfor Specific Workloads    First Intel-OptimizedCloudera ReleaseCustom Integrated Xeon and FPGA Products for our CustomersSoftware Defined Infrastructure/OpenStack  *Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
     Moore’s Law is Our Competitive Advantage    Industry Leadership in Transistors         Moore’sLaw  LOWER POWER  LOWER COST  HIGHER PERFORMANCE                *Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
     Utilize PC Core IP in Other Businesses  ~$11B  Intel R&D (2014)  100%  75%  50%  25%  0%  PC Core: Haswell GT3e  Server Core: Intel® Xeon® E5-2600 V3   Tablet Core: Bay Trail           Core  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  GenXGPU  EmbeddedDRAM    Co-packaged  EmbeddedDRAM  PCIE  IA CPU (Core)  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  DRAM  PCH1  EC2  USB  Display  Audio  PCIE  EmbeddedDRAM  Intel integrated GPU  WiFi  BT  WWAN  PCIE  Security    DRAM  PCH  EC  USB  Display  Audio  IA CPU (Core)  Cache(SRAM)  IA CPU (Core)  IA CPU (Core)  Cache(SRAM)  IA CPU (Core)  UncoreI/O  Memory Controller  ECC3  QPI4  QPI4  40GEthernet  PCIE  Security    I/O  Intel integrated GPU  Memory Controller  IA CPU (Atom)5 incl.Cache  I/O  I/O  USB  Security  Display  Audio  Camera  DRAM  WiFi  BT  WWAN  BT  WWAN  BT  WWAN  Note: 1PCH – Platform Controller Hub; 2EC – Ethernet Controller; 3ECC – Error Correcting Code memory; 4QPI – QuickPath Interconnect; 5Baytrail SoC sharing Core IP with Avoton microserver; Reference server and PC motherboards used are Intel Server Board S2600WT2 and Gigabyte GA-Z87N-WIFI - Source: Intel, lit search 
 
 
     CORE ASSETS THAT DRIVE THE PC AND DATA CENTER    IoT    SECURITY    SOFTWARE    WEARABLES    FOUNDRY    MOBILE    PROCESS TECHNOLOGY              SHARED IP    IA CORES    Utilize our core assets to move intoPROFITABLE, COMPLEMENTARY MARKETS 
 
 
   40M IA Tabletsin 2014*  Tablet Volume (Mu)  *Intel Forecast  *Forecast  is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 Cost Optimization and Feature Differentiation      Good, Better, Best  Feature Differentiation                          
 
 
   Smart Growth in Phones    Long Term Agreements  New Partners      *Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
 Communications Critical Across Platforms  Note: Attach rate calculated based on forecasted WWAN and TAM unit shipments    laptops      Forecast  Range  ‘11  ‘12  ‘13  ‘14  ‘15  ‘16  ‘17  ‘18  ‘19  ‘20  ‘21  ‘22  0  20  40  60  80  100%      Modem attach rate    TABLETS    Forecast  ‘11  ‘12  ‘13  ‘14  ‘15  ‘16  ‘17  ‘18  ‘19  ‘20  ‘21  ‘22  0  20  40  60  80  100%    Range      Modem attach rate  Intel® XMM™7260  *Forecast  is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 Organizational Changes to Drive our Mobile Strategy in 2015     Moved Mobile Hardware teams into newly formed Client Computing GroupMoved Modem and SoFIA (engineering and customer support) teams into Platform Engineering Group 
 
 
     CORE ASSETS THAT DRIVE THE PC AND DATA CENTER    IoT    SECURITY    SOFTWARE    WEARABLES    FOUNDRY    MOBILE    PROCESS TECHNOLOGY              SHARED IP    IA CORES 
 
 
   Internet of Things & Wearables                  
 
 
   Foundry                          *Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
 Leadership Moving Forward      Relentless pursuit of Moore’s LawDevelop products that enable the best computing experienceMarket driven view of our industryOpen foundry to any company able to utilize our leading edge SiliconCreate Platforms for Enterprise, not just SiliconDrive focus on bringing innovation to market quickly 
 
 
     Leadership Moving Forward  Relentless pursuit of Moore’s LawDevelop products that enable the best computing experienceMarket driven view of our industryOpen foundry to any company able to utilize our leading edge SiliconCreate Platforms for Enterprise, not just SiliconDrive focus on bringing innovation to market quicklyContinue growth in the Data CenterIf it is smart and connected, it is best with Intel 
 
 
 Brian KrzanichChief Executive Officer  Renée JamesPresident  Greg Pearson Sales and Marketing Group  Tom KilroyCorporate Strategy  Steven FundGlobal Marketing & Communications  Stacy SmithChief Financial Officer  Steve RodgersLaw & Policy Group  Bill HoltTechnology and Manufacturing Group  Doug FisherSoftware and Services Group  Chris YoungIntel Security Group  Richard TaylorHuman Resources  Arvind SodhaniIntel Capital  Kim StevensonInformation Technology  Rob CrookeNon-Volatile Memory Solutions Group  Kirk SkaugenClient Computing Group  Hermann EulMobile and Communications Group  Diane BryantData CenterGroup  Doug DavisInternet of ThingsGroup  Wen-Hann WangIntel Labs  Amir FaintuchPlatform Engineering Group  Joshua Walden Platform Engineering Group  Mike BellNew DevicesGroup  Wendell BrooksMergers& Acquisitions                              
 
 
     If it is smart and connected, it is best with Intel.    CORE ASSETS THAT DRIVE THE PC AND DATA CENTER    IoT    SECURITY    SOFTWARE    WEARABLES    FOUNDRY    MOBILE    PROCESS TECHNOLOGY              SHARED IP    IA CORES 
 
 
 
 
 Legal Disclaimers  Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary.  You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products.  All dates, forecasts and products specified in this presentation are subject to change without notice.  This presentation will not be updated to reflect any such changes. Copyright 2014 Intel Corporation. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
 Risk Factors  The statements in the presentations and other commentary that refer to plans and expectations for the fourth quarter, the year and the future are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should” and their variations identify forward-looking statements. Statements that refer to or are based on projections, uncertain events or assumptions also identify forward-looking statements. Many factors could affect Intel’s actual results, and variances from Intel’s current expectations regarding such factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Intel presently considers the following to be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the company’s expectations.  Demand for Intel’s products is highly variable and could differ from Intel’s expectations due to factors including changes in the business and economic conditions; consumer confidence or income levels; customer acceptance of Intel’s and competitors’ products;  competitive and pricing pressures, including actions taken by competitors; supply constraints and other disruptions affecting customers; changes in customer order patterns including order cancellations; and changes in the level of inventory at customers.Intel’s gross margin percentage could vary significantly from expectations based on capacity utilization; variations in inventory valuation, including variations related to the timing of qualifying products for sale; changes in revenue levels; segment product mix; the timing and execution of the manufacturing ramp and associated costs; excess or obsolete inventory; changes in unit costs; defects or disruptions in the supply of materials or resources; and product manufacturing quality/yields.  Variations in gross margin may also be caused by the timing of Intel product introductions and related expenses, including marketing expenses, and Intel’s ability to respond quickly to technological developments and to introduce new features into existing products, which may result in restructuring and asset impairment charges. Intel operates in highly competitive industries and its operations have high costs that are either fixed or difficult to reduce in the short term.  The declaration and rate of dividend payments and the amount and timing of Intel’s stock buyback program are at the discretion of Intel’s board of directors, and plans for future dividends and stock buy backs and could be affected by changes in Intel’s priorities for the use of cash, such as operational spending, capital spending, acquisitions, and because of changes to Intel’s cash flows and changes in tax laws.Intel’s expected  tax rate is based on current tax law and current expected income and may be affected by the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed; changes in the estimates of credits, benefits and deductions; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various authorities, including payment of interest and penalties; and the ability to realize deferred tax assets.  Gains or losses from equity securities and interest and other could vary from expectations depending on gains or losses on the sale, exchange, change in the fair value or impairments of debt and equity investments; interest rates; cash balances; and changes in fair value of derivative instruments. Intel's results could be affected by adverse economic, social, political and physical/infrastructure conditions in countries where Intel, its customers or its suppliers operate, including military conflict and other security risks, natural disasters, infrastructure disruptions, health concerns and fluctuations in currency exchange rates.  Intel’s results could be affected by the timing of closing of acquisitions, divestitures and other significant transactions.Intel's results could be affected by adverse effects associated with product defects and errata (deviations from published specifications), and by litigation or regulatory matters involving intellectual property, stockholder, consumer, antitrust, disclosure and other issues. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or an injunction prohibiting Intel from manufacturing or selling one or more products, precluding particular business practices, impacting Intel’s ability to design its products, or requiring other remedies such as compulsory licensing of intellectual property.A detailed discussion of these and other factors that could affect Intel’s results is included in Intel’s SEC filings, including the company’s most recent Form 10-Q, Form 10-K and earnings release. 
 


Please see corresponding attached PDF.
 
 William Holt  Executive Vice PresidentGeneral Manager, Technology and Manufacturing Group 
 
 
 Intel Continues to Deliver the Benefits of Moore’s Law  Key Messages from 2013  True Cost Reduction Remains Possible in a Capital Intensive Environment  The Benefits of Technology Apply Across the Product Portfolio 
 
 
 14nm Status - 2013  Reliability Scorecard at the same point in development  Module  22nm (2 year offset)  14nm  Transistor        Interconnect        Thermo-Mechanical/Moisture        Test Vehicle Yield        ESD/LU        Alpha Particle/Soft Error        Low risk    Meeting all cert goals    Medium risk  Close to meeting goals   High risk    Not yet meeting all goals, needs additional work  Source: Intel. * Forecast  Generally healthy reliability at this stage, on track for Q1 ’14 certification *      Yieldat the same point in development  May  June  July  Aug  Sept  Oct  Nov  Dec  Jan  Feb      Key Parameter Matching% of key process parameters meeting 3-sigma targetsat the same point in development  22nm  14nm  14 nm key process parameter matching on track with 22 nm trend  Weeks      Performance ImprovementSwitching Energy vs. Gate Delay    22nm  14nm  Switching Energy Change (%)  Delay Change (%)  14nm  22nm  Increasing Yield  Increasing Matching  Better  Yield rapidly increasing, on track for matched yield in Q1 ’14 *  ≈ 
 
 
     Reliability Scorecard at the same point in development    Performance ImprovementSwitching Energy vs. Gate Delay  Increasing Yield  14nm  22nm  Yield is now in healthy range with further improvements coming  ≈    22nm  14nm  Switching Energy Change (%)  Delay Change (%)  14nm Status - 2014  Reliability Scorecard at the same point in development  Module  22nm (2 year offset)  14nm  Transistor        Interconnect        Thermo-Mechanical/Moisture        Test Vehicle Yield        ESD/LU        Alpha Particle/Soft Error        Low risk    Meeting all cert goals    Medium risk  Close to meeting goals   High risk    Not yet meeting all goals, needs additional work  14nm PRQ achieved Q2 2014    Increasing Matching  Key Parameter Matching% of key process parameters meeting 3-sigma targetsat the same point in development  22nm  14nm  14 nm key process parameter matching on track with 22 nm trend  Weeks      Better  Yieldat the same point in development  May  June  July  Aug  Sept  Oct  Nov  Dec  Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Source: Intel  
 
 
 14 nm Product Yield Is In Healthy Range  Increasing Yield  14nm Broadwell Yield Trend  22 nm data are shifted to align date of lead product qualDepicts relative health, lines not to scale  22nm Is Intel’s Highest Yielding Process Ever                                  14 nm  22 nm  Forecast  PRQ        Q1 ‘14    Q2 ‘14    Q3 ‘14    Q4 ‘14    Q1 ‘15  Broadwell SoC    Source: Intel  
 
 
         14nm Technology Overview   A True 14 nm Technology 2nd Generation FinFET 52 nm Interconnect Pitch First Use of Air Gaps 
 
 
  22 nm 14 nm Node Node ScaleTransistor Fin Pitch 60 42 .70xTransistor Gate Pitch 90 70 .78xInterconnect Pitch 80 52 .65x nm nm  Intel Has Developed a True 14 nm Technology   
 
 
 14 nm Design Rules + 2nd Generation Tri-gate Transistor Provides Industry-leading SRAM Density   SRAM Memory Cells  .108 um2(Used on CPU products)  .0588 um2(0.54x area scaling)  22 nm Process  14 nm Process 
 
 
 Transistor Fin Improvement  22 nm Process            Si Substrate  60 nmpitch  34 nmheight        14 nm Process      Si Substrate             
 
 
 Tighter Fin Pitch for Improved Density   Transistor Fin Improvement            Si Substrate  42 nmpitch                  Si Substrate  60 nmpitch  34 nmheight        22 nm Process  14 nm Process 
 
 
 Taller and Thinner Fins for Increased Drive Current and Performance   Transistor Fin Improvement            Si Substrate  42 nmpitch  42 nmheight                  Si Substrate  60 nmpitch  34 nmheight        22 nm Process  14 nm Process 
 
 
 Transistor Fin Improvement  Reduced Number of Fins for Improved Density and Lower Capacitance           Si Substrate  42 nmpitch  42 nmheight                Si Substrate  60 nmpitch  34 nmheight        22 nm Process  14 nm Process 
 
 
 Transistor Fin Improvement   22 nm 1st Generation Tri-gate Transistor   14 nm 2nd Generation Tri-gate Transistor                      Metal Gate                        Si Substrate  Metal Gate      Si Substrate 
 
 
 Transistor Fin Improvement   22 nm 1st Generation Tri-gate Transistor   14 nm 2nd Generation Tri-gate Transistor  Source: Intel  
 
 
         Intel Transistor Leadership                                Projected      TSMCGlobalFoundriesSamsungIBM  3 Years   ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 ’17 ‘18   ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 ’17 ‘18        SiGe Strained Silicon  Tri-Gate  High-k Metal Gate  3.5 Years  ~3.5 Years        SiGe Strained Silicon  High-k Metal Gate  Tri-Gate  *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.Source: Dates are based on start of high volume production. Projected dates are based on other company public statements.  
 
 
       Active Power(Includes performance increase)  Generation  1x  .25x  22 nm  32 nm  45 nm  14 nm  Server LaptopMobile  2nd Generation Tri-Gate is the Critical Enabler  Active Power(Includes performance increase)  Performance per Watt  Performance  22 nm  32 nm  45 nm  14 nm  Generation  Performance   1x  Laptop   Mobile   2x  Server   Performance per Watt  Generation  22 nm  32 nm  45 nm  14 nm  1x  10x  Performance Improved  Active Power Reduced  Performance per Watt Improves  14 nm BDW-Y Delivers >2x Improvement in Performance per Watt  Source: Intel  Server   Laptop   Mobile     >2x  Intel Core M processor 
 
 
 Interconnects  52 nm Interconnect Pitch Provides Better-than-normal Interconnect Scaling  80 nm minimum pitch  52 nm (0.65x) minimum pitch  22 nm Process  14 nm Process  Source: Intel  
 
 
 Interconnects  52 nm Interconnect Pitch Provides Better-than-normal Interconnect Scaling  80 nm minimum pitch  52 nm (0.65x) minimum pitch  22 nm Process  14 nm Process  Source: Intel  
 
 
 Interconnects  52 nm Interconnect Pitch Provides Better-than-normal Interconnect Scaling  80 nm minimum pitch  52 nm (0.65x) minimum pitch  22 nm Process  14 nm Process  First Use of Air Gaps to Improve Interconnect Performance                  Source: Intel  
 
 
 Logic Area Scaling Trend(Publicly available scaling information)   Gate Pitch x Metal Pitch (nm2)  Start of Volume Production  45nm: K-L Cheng (TSMC), 2007 IEDM, p. 243 28nm: F. Arnaud (IBM alliance), 2009 IEDM, p. 65120nm: H. Shang (IBM alliance), 2012 VLSI, p.12916nm: S. Wu (TSMC), 2013 IEDM, p. 22410nm: K-I Seo (IBM alliance), 2014 VLSI, p. 14  Others based on published information:    Source: Intel data from shipping products                                          Logic  Cell   Height  Logic Cell   Width    Gate   Pitch  Metal   Pitch    Projected 
 
 
 14nm Enables Cost and Performance Benefits    Broadwell 2 X 2 (14nm)1.3B transistors  Haswell 2 X 2 (22nm)960M Transistors  37% Smaller  35% More Transistors  Broadwell delivers:2.2x increase in transistor densityUp to 40% better 3D graphics perf1 Enables <9mm fanless designs  Industry’s First 14 nm Processor in Volume Production  1 Intel® Core™ M-5Y70 processor compared to Intel® Core™ i5-4302Y processor 
 
 
 * Forecast  X      mm2/transistor  Normalized Area/Transistor Growth (mm2/transistor)  65 nm  45 nm  32 nm  22 nm  14 nm  10 nm*  90 nm  0.13 um  =      $/transistor  Normalized Cost per Transistor ($/transistor)  65 nm  45 nm  32 nm  22 nm  14 nm  10 nm*  90 nm  0.13 um       $/mm2  Normalized Capital Growth ($/mm2)  65 nm  45 nm  32 nm  22 nm  14 nm  10 nm*  90 nm  0.13 um  Cost Reduction On Track  Source: Intel  
 
 
 * Forecast  X      mm2/transistor  Normalized Area/Transistor Growth (mm2/transistor)  65 nm  45 nm  32 nm  22 nm  14 nm  10 nm*  90 nm  0.13 um  =      $/transistor  Normalized Cost per Transistor ($/transistor)  65 nm  45 nm  32 nm  22 nm  14 nm  10 nm*  90 nm  0.13 um       $/mm2  Normalized Capital Growth ($/mm2)  65 nm  45 nm  32 nm  22 nm  14 nm  10 nm*  90 nm  0.13 um  Cost Reduction On Track   7 nm*  Source: Intel  
 
 
 Intel Continues to Deliver Moore’s Law  Summary  True Cost Reduction Remains Possible  Technology Enables Real Product Improvements  
 
 
 Legal Disclaimers  Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary.  You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Intel technologies may require enabled hardware, specific software, or services activation. Check with your system manufacturer or retailer.Tests document performance of components on a particular test, in specific systems. Differences in hardware, software, or configuration will affect actual performance. Consult other sources of information to evaluate performance as you consider your purchase.  For more complete information about performance and benchmark results, visit http://www.intel.com/benchmarks  All dates, forecasts and products specified in this presentation are subject to change without notice.  This presentation will not be updated to reflect any such changes. Copyright 2014 Intel Corporation. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
 Risk Factors  The statements in the presentations and other commentary that refer to plans and expectations for the fourth quarter, the year and the future are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should” and their variations identify forward-looking statements. Statements that refer to or are based on projections, uncertain events or assumptions also identify forward-looking statements. Many factors could affect Intel’s actual results, and variances from Intel’s current expectations regarding such factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Intel presently considers the following to be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the company’s expectations.  Demand for Intel’s products is highly variable and could differ from Intel’s expectations due to factors including changes in the business and economic conditions; consumer confidence or income levels; customer acceptance of Intel’s and competitors’ products;  competitive and pricing pressures, including actions taken by competitors; supply constraints and other disruptions affecting customers; changes in customer order patterns including order cancellations; and changes in the level of inventory at customers.Intel’s gross margin percentage could vary significantly from expectations based on capacity utilization; variations in inventory valuation, including variations related to the timing of qualifying products for sale; changes in revenue levels; segment product mix; the timing and execution of the manufacturing ramp and associated costs; excess or obsolete inventory; changes in unit costs; defects or disruptions in the supply of materials or resources; and product manufacturing quality/yields.  Variations in gross margin may also be caused by the timing of Intel product introductions and related expenses, including marketing expenses, and Intel’s ability to respond quickly to technological developments and to introduce new features into existing products, which may result in restructuring and asset impairment charges. Intel operates in highly competitive industries and its operations have high costs that are either fixed or difficult to reduce in the short term.  The declaration and rate of dividend payments and the amount and timing of Intel’s stock buyback program are at the discretion of Intel’s board of directors, and plans for future dividends and stock buy backs and could be affected by changes in Intel’s priorities for the use of cash, such as operational spending, capital spending, acquisitions, and because of changes to Intel’s cash flows and changes in tax laws.Intel’s expected  tax rate is based on current tax law and current expected income and may be affected by the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed; changes in the estimates of credits, benefits and deductions; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various authorities, including payment of interest and penalties; and the ability to realize deferred tax assets.  Gains or losses from equity securities and interest and other could vary from expectations depending on gains or losses on the sale, exchange, change in the fair value or impairments of debt and equity investments; interest rates; cash balances; and changes in fair value of derivative instruments. Intel's results could be affected by adverse economic, social, political and physical/infrastructure conditions in countries where Intel, its customers or its suppliers operate, including military conflict and other security risks, natural disasters, infrastructure disruptions, health concerns and fluctuations in currency exchange rates.  Intel’s results could be affected by the timing of closing of acquisitions, divestitures and other significant transactions.Intel's results could be affected by adverse effects associated with product defects and errata (deviations from published specifications), and by litigation or regulatory matters involving intellectual property, stockholder, consumer, antitrust, disclosure and other issues. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or an injunction prohibiting Intel from manufacturing or selling one or more products, precluding particular business practices, impacting Intel’s ability to design its products, or requiring other remedies such as compulsory licensing of intellectual property.A detailed discussion of these and other factors that could affect Intel’s results is included in Intel’s SEC filings, including the company’s most recent Form 10-Q, Form 10-K and earnings release. 
 
 
 Configuration Information  Intel® Core™ M-5Y70 Processor (up to 2.60GHz, 4T/2C, 4M Cache) On Intel Reference Platform. BIOS: v80.1 Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics (driver v. 15.36.3650) Memory: 4 GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel LPDDR3-1600 SDD: Intel® 160GB OS: Windows* 8.1 Update RTM Prior generation: Intel® Core™ i5-4302Y (up to 2.30GHz, 4T/2C, 3M Cache) on Intel Reference Platform. 4.5W Thermal Design Power. BIOS:WTM 137 Graphics : Intel® HD Graphics (driver v. 15.36.3650) Memory: 4 GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel LPDDR3-1600 SDD: Intel® 160GB OS: Windows* 8.1 Update RTM. System Power Management Policy: Balance Wireless: On and connected. Battery size assumption: 35WHr. 
 
 
 


Please see corresponding attached PDF.
     INVESTOR MEETING 2014        SANTA CLARA NOVEMBER 20 
 
 
 Stacy Smith  Executive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer 
 
 
 Industry Definitions  MOORE'S LAW: The observation that, over the history of computing hardware, the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years.  METCALFE'S LAW: States that the value of a telecommunications network is proportional to the square of the number of connected users of the system (n2).   SIMPSON'S PARADOX: A paradox in probability and statistics, in which a trend that appears in different groups of data disappears when these groups are combined.   STACY’S SHROUD:  The art of using poetry to hide deep insight in plain sight.  A more creative form than the Greenspan Garble.  JEVON’S PARADOX: The proposition that as technology progresses, the increase in efficiency with which a resource is used tends to increase (rather than decrease) the rate of consumption of that resource. 
 
 
   2014 Investor MeetingHaiku  Cloud forms, data shinesTransistor density sproutsClient growth blossoms 
 
 
 
 
   2014 Investor MeetingHaiku  Big Drones, cool robotsIntelligence on the edgeBK Spawns Skynet 
 
 
 Key Messages  Return to growth in 2014  IP and Manufacturing leadership are increasingly valuable advantages  Exquisitely positioned to benefit from cloud and big data  We are investing in our business and returning cash to shareholders 
 
 
 2014 Outlook: Financial Growth  Full Year Revenue at $55.8B  Up 6% from 2013  Full Year Gross Margin at 63%   Up ~3 pts from 2013  YTD Operating Profit at $10.9B  Up 25% from 2013  YTD EPS at $1.58  Up 15% from 2013      *The 2014 forecast  is based on Q1-Q3’14 actuals plus the midpoint of  the Q4’14 forecast.Forecast range is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 Intel Revenue  $B  *The 2014 forecast  is based on Q1-Q3’14 actuals plus the midpoint of  the Q4’14 forecast.Forecast range is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 Our Competitive Advantage 1: IP  Key Segments of Our Business   Our Competitive Advantage 2: Manufacturing  Cash and Shareholder Return 
 
 
   R&D Scale  Source: CapitalIQ   R&D Spending relative to the semiconductor industry Five year history (FY2009 – FY2013)  Intel investing at 2.5x to 10x the industry players  B  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009 
 
 
 Number of suppliers declining across key IP blocks    WWAN  Key suppliers with complete modem stack (2G, 3G, and 4G)  18  7      Complete modem stack    Exited or exit announced    Graphics  16  7  Key suppliers ofgraphics units    LP only      Both    Wireless connectivity  25  16  Key suppliers of WiFi, BT and GPS Si    Exited or exit announced      Partialcomponents only    Full connectivity suite   TI  Freescale  Icera  NEC  Intel Xscale  STMicro  Ericsson  NXP  Si Labs  MediaTek  Analog Devices  Motorola  LSI  Infineon  Nokia  Renesas  Broadcom  Qualcomm  Qualcomm  HiSilicon  Intel  Mediatek  Marvell  Samsung  XGI  Matrox  SiS  VIA  3Dlabs  DMP  Fujitsu  Takumi  Broadcom  Vivante  Falanx  Imagination  BitBoys  ATI  Nvidia  Intel  AMD  Nvidia  Intel  Qualcomm  Imagination  ARM  Vivante  Seiko Epson  GloNav  U-Nav  Global Locate  CPS  NordNav  SiRF  Renesas  Mitsumi  Murata  Toshiba  RF Micro Devices  NXP  Infineon  CSR  Qualcomm  RealTek  Railink  Atheros  Airgo  Intel  Marvell  Broadcom  TI  STMicro  STMicro  Broadcom  Qualcomm  MediaTek  Marvell  Intel  Spreadtrum/RDA  Realtek  Toshiba  Samsung  Murata  Mitsumi  Renesas  Seiko Epson  CSR  TI  6_84 16_84 18_84 13_84  Broadcom  Note: Excludes vendors with low volumes and WWAN excludes LTE vendors with LTE data stack only (e.g., ‘WWAN’ excludes Spreadtrum, Nvidia, GCT, Altair and Sequans; ‘Graphics’ excludes VIA, Takumi, DMP and Broadcom)Source: Company websites, press releases, literature search, and analyst reports 
 
 
 Core  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  DRAM  PCH1  EC2  USB  Display  Audio  GenXGPU  EmbeddedDRAM  WiFi      Intel inte-grated GPU  IA CPU (Core)  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  Co-packaged  DRAM  PCH1  EC2  USB  Display  Audio  WiFi  PC – Haswell GT3e  Cross-platform IP sharing and innovation  135_84 65_84 4_84 27_84 28_84 161_84 167_84 2_84 26_84 23_84 29_84      Segment Specific IP    PC IPReuse    Server - Intel® Xeon® E5-2600 V3   DRAM  PCH  EC  USB  Display  Audio  IA CPU (Core)  Cache(SRAM)  IA CPU (Core)  IA CPU (Core)  Cache(SRAM)  IA CPU (Core)  UnicoreI/O  Memory Controller  ECC3  QPI4  QPI4  40GEthernet  PCIE    I/O  Intel integrated GPU  Memory Controller  IA CPU (Atom)5 incl.Cache  I/O  I/O  USB  Security  Display  Audio  Camera  DRAM  WiFi  BT  WWAN  Mobile – Bay Trail SoC  WiFi  BT  WWAN  BT  WWAN    Mobile IPReuse  EmbeddedDRAM  PCIE  IA CPU (Core)  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  DRAM  PCH1  EC2  USB  Display  Audio  EmbeddedDRAM  Intel inte-grated GPU  IA CPU (Core)  Cache (SRAM)  SA, I/O,Etc.  DRAM  WiFi  IA CPU (Core)  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  DRAM  PCH1  EC2  USB  Display  Audio  PCIE  EmbeddedDRAM  Intel inte-grated GPU  WiFi  BT  WWAN  PCIE  Security  Security  Security  Security  Note: 1PCH – Platform Controller Hub; 2EC – Ethernet Controller; 3ECC – Error Correcting Code memory; 4QPI – QuickPath Interconnect; 5Baytrail SoC sharing Core IP with Avoton microserverSource: Intel 
 
 
 Shared costs are alarge portion of Intel R&D   Note: Shared platforms include PC, Server and Mobile    GenXGPU  Core  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  EmbeddedDRAM  Co-packaged  DRAM  PCH  EC  USB  Clock  Display  Audio  WiFi    Core  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  EmbeddedDRAM  Co-packaged  DRAM  PCH  EC  USB  Clock  Display  Audio  WiFi  GenXGPU    GenXGPU  Core  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  EmbeddedDRAM  Co-packaged  DRAM  PCH  EC  USB  Clock  Display  Audio  WiFi  Core  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  EmbeddedDRAM  DRAM  USB  Clock  Display  Audio  WiFi  GenXGPU  Core  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  DRAM  PCH  EC  USB  Clock  Display  Audio  Core  Cache (SRAM)  Memory Controller  SA, I/O,Etc.  DRAM  PCH  EC  USB  Clock  Display  Audio  ~$11B  Intel R&D (2014)  Shared Platform Investments: Connectivity, WWAN, Graphics IP, etc.  Foundational Investments:Process Development,CPU & Core Design,SOC Integration, Validation & Testing  MCG  IoT  Other  PCCG / DCG 
 
 
 Our Competitive Advantage 1: IP  Key Segments of Our Business   Our Competitive Advantage 2: Manufacturing  Cash and Shareholder Return 
 
 
            
 
 
 Data Center Group2013 vs. 2014 Forecast  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel   ~$14.1B of Revenue:Up ~16% YoY~$7.0B Operating margin:Up ~26% YoY ~50% of revenue  2014 PERFORMANCE  $Billion 
 
 
             Enterprise  Enterprise  Cloud SP  Cloud SP  Telco SP  Telco SP  TechCompute  TechCompute  >20%Growth YoY in non-enterprise market segment  Cloud + Big Data=BIG DEAL      *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 YoY Revenue growth >15% in 2015Operating Profit to grow faster than revenue  Data Center Expectations    *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
            
 
 
 PC Client Group & Mobile and Communications Group2013 vs. 2014 Forecast  $B  MCG Financials  2013  2014F  2013  2014F  $B  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 PC Unit Trend: SOM  *Platform includes both CPU and chipset and excludes netbookForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  PC Annual Unit SOM (excluding netbooks)  Mu  Units are growing. PC up ~9%  F  YoY Growth  
 
 
 *Platform includes both CPU and chipset and excludes netbookForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  PC Platform* ASP    $  0 
 
 
 *Platform includes both CPU and chipset and excludes netbookForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  PC Platform* Cost    $  0 
 
 
 *Platform includes both CPU and chipset and excludes netbookForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  PC Platform* ASP and Cost    $  0 
 
 
 Segmented Costs to Compete Across SegmentsPlatform Costs*  Performance  Mainstream  Value  Forecast  Old  Old  Old  Forecast  Forecast  *Platform includes both CPU and Chipset componentsForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 Segmented Costs to Compete Across SegmentsPlatform Costs*  Performance  Mainstream  Value  *Platform includes both CPU and Chipset componentsForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  Old  Old  Old  New  New  New  Forecast  Forecast  Forecast 
 
 
 Segmented Costs to Compete Across SegmentsPlatform Costs*  Performance  Mainstream  Value  Old  Old  Old  New  New  New  Forecast  Forecast  Forecast  *Platform includes both CPU and Chipset componentsForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 2015 14nm Ramp: Broadwell Cost Curve  Broadwell  Broadwell  Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without notice. Source: Intel 
 
 
 14nm vs. 22nm Cost Curve Comparison  Ivy Bridge  Haswell  Q2 ‘12  Q3 ‘12  Q4 ‘12  Q1 ‘13  Q3 ‘13  Q4 ‘13  Q1 ‘14  Q2 ‘14  Unit Cost Curve by Products  Broadwell  Haswell  Ivy Bridge  Broadwell  Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without notice. Source: Intel  Timing adjusted for volume ramp + 1 quarter. Volume ramp defined as the first quarter shipments exceed 1Mu 
 
 
       PC Segmentation  *Platform includes both CPU and chipset. Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel    YoY Growth 14%  YoY Growth 5%  Mu  Core Mix Ramp over 2014F 
 
 
 Extending the Cost Curve in ClientLowest PC Client Platform Cost  ~40%  ~30%  Bay TrailCeleron  Bay TrailCeleron  Forecast  0  $  Forecast  *Platform includes both CPU and chipset .Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 Multi-Comms  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  Revenue $M  Forecast    CUSTOMERS  Forecast  Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
 PC and Tablet Unit Trend: SOM  *Platform includes both CPU and chipset and excludes netbookForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  Annual Unit SOM (excluding netbooks)  Mu 
 
 
 PC and Tablet Unit Trend: SOM YoY Growth  *Platform includes both CPU and chipset and excludes netbookForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  Annual Unit SOM (excluding netbooks)  Mu  20%  10%  0%  -5%  YoY Growth  
 
 
 PC and Tablet Unit Trend: MSS  *Platform includes both CPU and chipset and excludes netbookForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  Annual Unit MSS (excluding netbooks) 
 
 
 2014 Tablet Progress  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel Internal RoadmapCost is defined as full kit cost      Entry  Performance    Cost: ~40% of Bay Trail BOM Delta: >$15  BOM Delta: >$15  Bay Trail  Clover Trail +  Bay Trail Entry  Cost: ~90% of Bay TrailBOM Delta: ~$8  On track to ship 40M Designs – across Android, Windows and ChromeEnabled the ChinaTech ecosystem 
 
 
   2015  BOM Delta: >$15  Bay Trail  SoFIA 3G  Cost: ~40% of Bay Trail BOM Delta: ~$0  SoFIA LTE  Cost: ~25% of Bay Trail BOM Delta: ~$0  2014  2015 Introducing New Products for Value and Entry  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel Internal RoadmapCost is defined as full kit cost 
 
 
 ~$11B  Intel R&D (2014)  Shared Platform Investments: Connectivity, WWAN, Graphics IP, etc.  Foundational Investments:Process Development,CPU & Core Design,SOC Integration, Validation & Testing  MCG  IoT  Other  PCCG / DCG  MCG R&D Breakout Unique vs. Shared Investment    MCG R&D Spending    Phone Spend  Tablet Spend  Shared Investment and Foundational Investments  *The 2014 forecast  is based on Q1-Q3’14 actuals plus the midpoint of  the Q4’14 forecast.Forecast range is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
     PCCG & MCG 2015 Expectations  ~ Flat Units and Revenue slightly downCOGS higher: 10nm start-up costs and elevated Broadwell costs in 1H ’15, better in 2H ‘15  Ramping LTE SoFIA in value and entryOperating margin improvement ~$800M      *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel Internal Roadmap 
 
 
            
 
 
 Internet of Things Group2013 vs. 2014 Forecast  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel   ~$2.1B of Revenue:Up ~18% YoY~$0.6B Operating margin: ~26% of rev  2014 PERFORMANCE  $2B  $0 
 
 
 Design win momentum continues across all segments2015: Expect uptick in growth   2014 PERFORMANCE  Internet of Things Group  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel                          $2B  $0 
 
 
 Software & Services operating segment2013 vs. 2014 Forecast  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel   ~$2.3B of Revenue:Up ~3% YoY~$0.1B Operating margin: ~5% of rev  2014 PERFORMANCE  $2B  $0 
 
 
 Non-Volatile Memory Solutions Group  $0  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  $2B  $0 
 
 
 Our Competitive Advantage 1: IP  Key Segments of Our Business   Our Competitive Advantage 2: Manufacturing  Cash and Shareholder Return 
 
 
             Cost Reduction On Track  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  X    mm2/transistor  Normalized Area/Transistor Growth (mm2/transistor)  65 nm  45 nm  32 nm  22 nm  14 nm  10 nm*  90 nm  0.13 um  =    $/transistor  Normalized Cost per Transistor ($/transistor)  65 nm  45 nm  32 nm  22 nm  14 nm  10 nm*  90 nm  0.13 um     $/mm2  Normalized Capital Growth ($/mm2)  65 nm  45 nm  32 nm  22 nm  14 nm  10 nm*  90 nm  0.13 um   7 nm* 
 
 
 Capex by Peak Wafer Start By Generation  $  0  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  Forecast  Ku  0  Capex / Peak wafer starts per week   Peak wafer starts per week  
 
 
 Weighted Average Die SizePlatform*  mm2  Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSources: Intel*Platform includes CPU and chipset  Forecast  Forecast 
 
 
     The Broadwell Advantage  SUB 5 WATT enables fanless designsUp to 40% higher 3Dgraphics performance1    BROADWELL 2 X 2 (14nm)  HASWELL 2 X 2 (22nm)  37% Smaller  14nm Delivers Cost AND Performance Benefits:  960MTransistors  1.3BTransistors  1 Intel® Core™ M-5Y70 processor compared to Intel® Core™ i5-4302Y processor 
 
 
 Capacity & Loadings  F  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 So hold on there Tex ……Can you tell me again why it takes $11B of Capex to run your business? 
 
 
 2014 Capex Breakout  Capacity  Development  Non-Manufacturing  450mm  ~$7.3B    *The 2014 forecast  is based on Q1-Q3’14 actuals plus the midpoint of  the Q4’14 forecast.Forecast range is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 Capital Trends: 2011 – 2014F  $11B  2011  2012  2013  2014  Forecast  *The 2014 forecast  is based on Q1-Q3’14 actuals plus the midpoint of  the Q4’14 forecast.Forecast range is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 Capital Trends: 2011 – 2015F  $11B  2011  2012  2013  2014  Forecast  2015Capital Spending Range$10.5B(+/- $500M)  *The 2014 forecast  is based on Q1-Q3’14 actuals plus the midpoint of  the Q4’14 forecast.Forecast range is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 So hold on there Tex (part 2)…Even at $7B - $8B of CapEx, won’t the increase in depreciation lower your Gross Margins? 
 
 
 Depreciation Trends        COS Depreciation as a % of Revenue      COS Depreciation as a % of Total Cost of Sales  %  Sources: IntelForecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without notice  %  Forecast  Forecast 
 
 
 Napkin Math    For illustrative purposes only, not a forecast. 
 
 
 Gross Margins  *The 2014 forecast is based on Q1-Q3’14 actuals plus the midpoint of the Q4’14 forecast.Forecast range is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  Forecast    2015Forecast Range60%- 64% 
 
 
   Number of players with a leading edge fab  25  TSMC  Intel  Samsung  AMD  IBM  ST-M  UMC  Panasonic  Fujitsu  Renesas  SMIC  Freescale  Infineon  Sony  Cypress  Sharp  ADI  Atmel  Hitachi  ON  Rohm  Sanyo  Mitsubishi  18  13  13  8  5  TSMC  Intel  Samsung  AMD  IBM  ST-M  UMC  Panasonic  Fujitsu  Renesas  SMIC  Freescale  Infineon  Sony  Cypress  Sharp  TSMC  Intel  Samsung  GF  IBM  ST-M  UMC  Panasonic  Fujitsu  Renesas  SMIC  TSMC  Intel  Samsung  GF  IBM  ST-M  UMC  Panasonic  TSMC  Intel  Samsung  GF  IBM  (130nm)  (90nm)  (65nm)  (45/40nm)  (32/28nm)  (22/20nm)  Si technology is becoming rare  Note: IBM Fabs are currently getting acquired by Global FoundriesSource: Analyst reports; company information  TI  Toshiba  TI  Toshiba  TI  Toshiba  TSMC  Intel  Samsung  GF  IBM  ST-M  UMC  Panasonic  Fujitsu  Renesas  SMIC  TI  Toshiba      TSMC  Intel  Samsung  GF  (16/14nm)  4 
 
 
 Our Competitive Advantage 1: IP  Key Segments of Our Business   Our Competitive Advantage 2: Manufacturing  Cash and Shareholder Return 
 
 
 Strong Cash Generation  $B  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  Cash from Operations  $B  Free Cash Flow 
 
 
  First: Invest in our business   Third: Share Repurchases  Investing and Returning Cash to Shareholders   Second: Dividend 
 
 
 Investing and Returning Cash to Shareholders  $B  Dividend and Share Repurchases$98B since 2004  R & D andCapital Expenditure$153B since 2004  Dividend  ShareRepurchase  CapitalExpenditure  R & D  Source: Intel 
 
 
 Announcing Dividend Increase Starting in Q1 ‘15  Dividend/Share    Dividend / Share Increase$0.06  2015  Forecast  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel  $0.96  $0.90  
 
 
   Buyback History (Q1 ‘04 to Q3 ‘14)  Buyback program in place since 1990Returned ~$98B cash and repurchased 4.6B shares from inceptionLast 5 years returned $29B in cash and repurchased 1.2B shares  Billion Shares  Dilutive Shares  Source: Intel 
 
 
 Revenue Growth in the Mid Single Digits  Gross Margin at 62% (+/- 2 points)  Spending at $20B (+/- $400M)Spending as a Percent of Revenue Down  Capital Spending at $10.5B (+/- $500M)  Putting It All Together2015 Full Year Outlook  *Forecast is based on current expectations and is subject to change without noticeSource: Intel 
 
 
 Key Messages  Return to growth in 2014  IP and Manufacturing leadership are increasingly valuable advantages  Exquisitely positioned to benefit from cloud and big data  We are investing in our business and returning cash to shareholders 
 
 
 Q&A 
 
 
 
 
 Legal Disclaimers  Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary.  You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products.  All dates, forecasts and products specified in this presentation are subject to change without notice.  This presentation will not be updated to reflect any such changes. Copyright 2014 Intel Corporation. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 
 
 
 Risk Factors  The statements in the presentations and other commentary that refer to plans and expectations for the fourth quarter, the year and the future are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should” and their variations identify forward-looking statements. Statements that refer to or are based on projections, uncertain events or assumptions also identify forward-looking statements. Many factors could affect Intel’s actual results, and variances from Intel’s current expectations regarding such factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Intel presently considers the following to be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the company’s expectations.  Demand for Intel’s products is highly variable and could differ from Intel’s expectations due to factors including changes in the business and economic conditions; consumer confidence or income levels; customer acceptance of Intel’s and competitors’ products;  competitive and pricing pressures, including actions taken by competitors; supply constraints and other disruptions affecting customers; changes in customer order patterns including order cancellations; and changes in the level of inventory at customers.Intel’s gross margin percentage could vary significantly from expectations based on capacity utilization; variations in inventory valuation, including variations related to the timing of qualifying products for sale; changes in revenue levels; segment product mix; the timing and execution of the manufacturing ramp and associated costs; excess or obsolete inventory; changes in unit costs; defects or disruptions in the supply of materials or resources; and product manufacturing quality/yields.  Variations in gross margin may also be caused by the timing of Intel product introductions and related expenses, including marketing expenses, and Intel’s ability to respond quickly to technological developments and to introduce new features into existing products, which may result in restructuring and asset impairment charges. Intel operates in highly competitive industries and its operations have high costs that are either fixed or difficult to reduce in the short term.  The declaration and rate of dividend payments and the amount and timing of Intel’s stock buyback program are at the discretion of Intel’s board of directors, and plans for future dividends and stock buy backs and could be affected by changes in Intel’s priorities for the use of cash, such as operational spending, capital spending, acquisitions, and because of changes to Intel’s cash flows and changes in tax laws.Intel’s expected  tax rate is based on current tax law and current expected income and may be affected by the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed; changes in the estimates of credits, benefits and deductions; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various authorities, including payment of interest and penalties; and the ability to realize deferred tax assets.  Gains or losses from equity securities and interest and other could vary from expectations depending on gains or losses on the sale, exchange, change in the fair value or impairments of debt and equity investments; interest rates; cash balances; and changes in fair value of derivative instruments. Intel's results could be affected by adverse economic, social, political and physical/infrastructure conditions in countries where Intel, its customers or its suppliers operate, including military conflict and other security risks, natural disasters, infrastructure disruptions, health concerns and fluctuations in currency exchange rates.  Intel’s results could be affected by the timing of closing of acquisitions, divestitures and other significant transactions.Intel's results could be affected by adverse effects associated with product defects and errata (deviations from published specifications), and by litigation or regulatory matters involving intellectual property, stockholder, consumer, antitrust, disclosure and other issues. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or an injunction prohibiting Intel from manufacturing or selling one or more products, precluding particular business practices, impacting Intel’s ability to design its products, or requiring other remedies such as compulsory licensing of intellectual property.A detailed discussion of these and other factors that could affect Intel’s results is included in Intel’s SEC filings, including the company’s most recent Form 10-Q, Form 10-K and earnings release. 
 
Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Intel Charts.
Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Intel Charts.