BEIJING--Chinese regulators denied allegations made by foreign business groups that China is using its antimonopoly law to unfairly target foreign companies and may be violating its World Trade Organization commitments.

Xu Kunlin, an official at National Development Reform Commission, said at a press briefing Thursday that China treats foreign and domestic companies fairly. The economic planning body found that foreign companies accounted for about 10% of antimonopoly cases in a review of more than 300 instances, Mr. Xu said. He didn't say how long the commission conducted the review.

"We do not target the foreign companies specifically," Mr. Xu said, adding that investigations are conducted fairly and according to law.

Mr. Xu also said that the investigation of U.S. chip maker Qualcomm Inc. is nearing completion and that regulators will meet with the company's executives Friday.

Mr. Xu joined heads of the Ministry of Commerce and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, three of the main entities that have been spearheading probes and fines of the commercial sector in China, in a rare press briefing to defend their actions after international business lobbies complained of unfair treatment

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the U.S. China Business Council, the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China and the American Chamber of Commerce in China all lodged complaints within the last few weeks.

The U.S. Chamber said in a report released on Monday that China's use of its six-year-old antimonopoly law has been subjective and that enforcement agencies have skewed its implementation to favor China's own industrial policy and local companies. It said that discrimination "arguably violates commitments that China undertook when it acceded to the World Trade Organization."

A survey by the American Chamber of Commerce in China released last week shows that 60% of companies f eel less welcome in China than before, a sharp increase from 41% in the previous poll a year ago. In response to a new survey question, 49% of respondents believe that foreign firms are being singled out for attack.

Chinese regulators last month levied fines of $200 million on 10 Japanese auto-part makers for alleged price manipulation and two others probed were exempt from the fine. Audi AG, BMW AG and Mercedes-Benz parent Daimler AG are awaiting possible punishment following similar probes. Microsoft Corp. and Qualcomm Inc. are being investigated for potential monopolistic activity. Regulators earlier this month handed Microsoft a 20-day deadline to explain what they called compatibility and bundling issues with its software.

BMW, Audi and Daimler responded to the investigations by cutting prices. Qualcomm has said it is cooperating with authorities; Microsoft has said that it abides by laws in China and is cooperating with authorities.

Experts believe that Chinese regulators have been trying to curry favor with the general population by tackling high consumer prices in China. But many believe the regulators have used questionable tactics, such as launching probes and advising companies not to seek legal representation, to control product pricing in industries ranging from dairy to auto parts.

Mr. Xu said that some details in the reports by foreign organizations weren't true and that companies have been allowed to bring their own attorneys to meetings. "I welcome you to hire the most famous lawyers in the world," Mr. Xu said, referring to his coming meeting with Qualcomm.

Ren Airong, a director of antimonopoly at the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, said that when probing Microsoft, regulators were frequently outnumbered by the software company's lawyers.

Ms. Ren defended the Microsoft investigation, saying, "Any company, no matter how big or small, if it breaks the law, then we should evenly treat them as those that break the law," Ms. Ren said.

Chinese companies haven't been immune from regulatory enforcement and punitive action. Beijing fined three Chinese cement companies on Tuesday a combined 114 million yuan ($18.6 million) for price fixing.

Yang Jie, Laurie Burkitt

Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Microsoft Charts.
Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Microsoft Charts.