ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We design, develop, manufacture
and sell high performance vehicles built from the base chassis’ of Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros, and Dodge Challengers.
We are a low volume vehicle design, engineering and manufacturing company focusing on the mass customization (the process of customizing
automobiles that are mass produced by the manufacturers (Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge)) of OEM American Sports Cars and the production
of high performance USA-engineered racing cars. A high performance car is an automobile that is designed and constructed specifically
for speed. The design and construction of a high performance car involves not only providing a capable power train but also providing
the handling and braking systems to support it. Our Saleen-branded products include a complete line of upgraded muscle cars, high
performance cars, automotive aftermarket specialty parts and lifestyle accessories. Muscle cars are any of a group of American-made
2-door sports coupes with powerful engines designed for high performance driving. We are also planning to develop an American
supercar along with hybrid and zero-emission vehicles for commercial applications and consumer markets. In January 2014, we announced
that we will produce for the first time, a Saleen Tesla Model S sports car. The Saleen Tesla design will be our first effort in
enhancing an existing electric vehicle.
Our customers worldwide
include muscle and high performance car enthusiasts, collectors, automotive dealers, exotic car retail dealers, television and
motion picture production, and consumers in the luxury supercar and motorsports market. We plan to develop a network of company-owned
branded stores to complement our existing retail dealer locations.
We utilize automobile
manufacturers Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge platform vehicles for our muscle and performance vehicle production. All aftermarket parts
and accessory products are engineered and manufactured exclusively by us. Our current retail outlets for our products are authorized
Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge dealers and we also retail our products with exotic car dealers.
We plan to be a global
high performance automotive brand and expand our production, sales and marketing operations extensively within the markets of
the USA and into multiple international markets. In March 2014, we entered into an agreement to distribute and market the full
collection of Saleen automobiles in China. We also plan to open our own retail outlets, market our expertise in specialist engineering
and design services to third party clients, develop our own motorsport program and introduce our American supercar.
History of the Company
Saleen Automotive, Inc.
(formerly W270, Inc., “we,” “us,” “our” and “our company”) was incorporated under
the laws of the State of Nevada on June 24, 2011. We issued 5,000,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Wesley Fry (“Fry”)
at inception in exchange for organizational costs/services incurred upon our incorporation. Following our formation, we issued
an additional 1,000,000 shares of our common stock to Fry, in exchange for a business plan along with a client/customer list related
to his information technology consulting services.
On June 21, 2012, we issued
2,000,000 shares of our common stock for a total of $20,000.
On November 30, 2012,
Fry and W-Net Fund I, L.P. ( “W-Net”), entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”),
pursuant to which Fry sold to W-Net, and W-Net purchased from Fry, an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock (the “Shares”),
which Shares represented 75.0% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, (2) Fry released the Company from any
and all existing claims, (3) Fry settled various liabilities of the Company and (4) Fry indemnified W-Net and our company from
liabilities arising out of any breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or obligation of Fry. The closing occurred on
November 30, 2012. W-Net paid for the Shares with personal funds. Simultaneous with the closing, W-Net sold to Verdad Telecom,
Inc. one half of the Shares. There are no arrangements or understandings by and among members of both the former and new control
groups and their associates with respect to election of directors or other matters of our company.
Merger
On May 23, 2013, we entered
into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with Saleen California Merger Corporation, our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Saleen Florida Merger Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saleen Automotive, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Saleen
Automotive”), SMS Signature Cars (“SMS” and together with Saleen Automotive, the “Saleen Entities”)
and Steve Saleen (“Saleen” and together with the Saleen Entities, the “Saleen Parties”). The closing (the
“Closing”) of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Merger”) occurred on June 26,
2013. At the Closing (a) Saleen California Merger Corporation was merged with and into SMS with SMS surviving as one of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries; (b) Saleen Florida Merger Corporation was merged with and into Saleen Automotive with Saleen Automotive surviving
as one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries; (c) holders of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive received an aggregate
of 554,057 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock and holders of the outstanding capital stock of SMS received no consideration
for their shares; and (d) approximately 93% of the beneficial ownership of our common stock (on a fully-diluted basis) was owned,
collectively, by Saleen (including shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock issued to Saleen pursuant to the Assignment and
License Agreement discussed below) and the former holders of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive. As a result of
the Merger we are solely engaged in the Saleen Entities’ business, Saleen Automotive’s officers became our officers
and Saleen Automotive’s three directors at that time became members of our five-member board of directors. In October 2013,
SMS effected an amendment to its articles of incorporation to change its name to Saleen Signature Cars (“SSC”).
On May 23, 2013, we also
entered into an Assignment and License Agreement with Saleen pursuant to which Saleen agreed, as of the effective time of the
Merger, to contribute certain intellectual property that relates to the “Saleen” brand name and related rights which
are currently owned by him to us, license to us the right to use his image, signature, full name, voice, biographical materials,
likeness, and goodwill associated with the “Saleen” brand, and assign to us all shares of the capital stock of SMS
Retail – Corona, a California corporation, and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc., a Michigan corporation. On June 21, 2013,
we amended the Assignment and License Agreement to terminate the obligation to assign to us all shares of the capital stock of
SMS Retail – Corona and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc. and Saleen agreed to dissolve those entities within 30 days after
the Closing. Concurrently with the Closing, pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended, Saleen assigned certain
intellectual property that relates to the “Saleen” brand name and related rights which are currently owned by him
to us, licensed the right to use his image, signature, full name, voice, biographical materials, likeness, and goodwill associated
with the “Saleen” brand to us, and commenced the process of dissolving each of SMS Retail – Corona and Saleen
Automotive Show Cars, Inc. The aforementioned license may only be terminated in the event we file a petition for relief under
Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or a petition for relief is converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code. In exchange for entering into the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended, we issued to Saleen, as of the effective
date of the Merger, 341,943 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock.
On June 17, 2013, we consummated
a merger with WSTY Subsidiary Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, pursuant to which we amended our articles of incorporation
to change our name to Saleen Automotive, Inc.
We are presently authorized
under our articles of incorporation, as amended to date, to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share,
and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. Prior to January 13, 2014, 896,000 shares were designated
Super Voting Preferred Stock. The rights of our Super Voting Preferred Stock were set forth in a Certificate of Designations,
Preferences, Limitations, Restrictions and Relative Rights of Super Voting Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”)
which became effective on June 17, 2013. As of the Closing, we had 8,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and
896,000 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
Under the terms of the
Merger Agreement, all of the outstanding shares of capital stock held by Saleen Automotive’s former shareholders were exchanged
for 554,057 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock, and under the terms of the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended,
we issued to Saleen 341,943 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock. Each share of our Super Voting Preferred Stock was convertible
into 125 shares of our common stock. Accordingly, as a result of the Merger and the transactions effectuated pursuant to the Assignment
and License Agreement, as amended, Saleen and the former shareholders of Saleen Automotive owned approximately 112,000,000 shares
of our common stock on an as-converted basis, and our existing stockholders owned 8,000,000 shares of our common stock.
On July 9, 2013, holders
of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock voted to amend the Certificate of Designations to
provide that (1) each share of our Super Voting Preferred Stock will immediately and automatically convert into 125 shares of
our common stock at such time that we file, at such time as determined by our board of directors, an amendment to our articles
of incorporation (a) effecting a reverse stock split of our common stock or (b) effecting an increase in the authorized shares
of our common stock, in each case so that we have a sufficient number of authorized and unissued shares of our common stock to
permit the conversion of all outstanding shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock into our common stock, and (2) the holders
of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock may elect to convert less than all but at least 50%
of the outstanding shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock, with the applicable percentage designated by such holders. On July
9, 2013, holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock also voted to convert, upon the effectiveness
of the aforementioned amendment to the Certificate of Designations, 696,000 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock into 87,000,000
shares of our common stock, representing approximately 77.68% of the outstanding shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock. Such
conversion became effective on July 18, 2013, upon the filing of the amendment to the Certificate of Designations. On January
13, 2014, pursuant to an amendment to our articles of incorporation increasing our authorized shares of common stock to 500,000,000,
all of the outstanding shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock automatically converted into shares of our common stock, and
the Super Voting Preferred Stock ceased to be a designated series of preferred stock.
Upon completion of the
Merger and assuming the conversion of Super Voting preferred stock into shares of common stock, the former stockholders of Saleen
Automotive owned approximately 93% of the outstanding shares of our common stock (including shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock
convertible into shares of our common stock) and the holders of the outstanding shares of our common stock prior to the Merger
owned the balance. As the owners and management of Saleen Automotive had voting and operating control of the Company after the
Merger, the transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization with the Saleen Entities deemed the acquiring companies for
accounting purposes, and our company deemed the legal acquirer. Due to the change in control, the consolidated financial statements
reflect the historical results of the Saleen Entities prior to the Merger and that of the combined company following the Merger.
Common stock and the corresponding capital amounts of the Company pre-Merger have been retroactively restated as capital stock
shares reflecting the exchange ratio in the Merger.
Going Concern
During the year ended
March 31, 2014, we incurred a net loss of $11,121,982 and utilized $4,316,576 of cash in operations. We also had a stockholders’
deficit and working capital deficit of $9,296,629 and $3,050,286, respectively as of March 31, 2014, and as of that date, we owed
$630,874 in past unpaid payroll taxes and $967,747 of outstanding notes payable were in default. These factors raise substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our ability to continue
as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and
profitable operations. At March 31, 2014 and May 31, 2014, we had cash on hand in the amount of $1,499,889 and $30,992, respectively.
During the year ended March, 31, 2014, we raised $5,250,000 through the issuance of unsecured convertible notes, including converting
a $500,000 Secured Promissory Note with W-Net originally issued on October 7, 2013 into a long-term unsecured convertible note.
In addition, during the year ended March 31, 2014, we entered into Subscription Agreements with individual accredited investors
(the “Subscribers”) pursuant to which the Subscribers purchased from us an aggregate of 8,793,337 restricted common
shares at a per share price of $0.15 for aggregate proceeds of $1,312,500, net of issuance costs of $24,000. Additional Subscribers
purchased 816,667 and 416,667 restricted common shares in April and May 2014, respectively, at a per share price of $0.15 for
aggregate proceeds of $122,500 and $62,500, respectively, and in April 2014 we received $250,000 from additional issuances of
7% unsecured convertible notes. However, additional funding will be needed to continue operations through September 30, 2014.
In addition, we will need and are currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or equity securities
for cash to operate our business beyond September 30, 2014. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available
or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to us. Even if we are able to obtain additional financing, it
may contain undue restrictions on its operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for its stockholders,
in case or equity financing.
Business of Saleen Automotive
Immediately prior to the
Closing, we were a public “shell” company with nominal assets. As a result of the Merger, we are solely engaged in
the Saleen Entities’ business. With respect to this discussion, the terms “we,” “us,” “our”
and “our company” refer to Saleen Automotive, Inc., a Nevada corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Saleen
Automotive and Saleen Signature Cars.
History and Background
The Saleen brand, started
by former racing driver Steve Saleen, began in 1983. Saleen used his business degree from USC, coupled with experience in his
father’s manufacturing business, to build the Saleen brand. Saleen began auto crossing, then rapidly moved into SCCA pro
series (Formula Atlantic, Trans-Am Championship, Sport Truck racing) and then into Indy car racing.
On July 1, 2008, following
his affiliation with several predecessor automotive companies bearing the “Saleen” brand, Saleen established SMS Signature
Cars. SMS commenced operations in Corona, California, producing high performance automobiles and selling automotive aftermarket
parts. SMS expanded the historical offering of mass customized Mustangs into a broader line of vehicles including Chevrolet Camaros
and Dodge Challengers. SMS also was contracted to produce specialty vehicles for the movie “Bullet” and recently completed
a contract to produce replica supercars for the movie “Need for Speed” a movie that was released by DreamWorks in
March 2014. In October 2013, SMS effected an amendment to its articles of incorporation to change its name to Saleen Signature
Cars.
On July 21, 2011, Saleen
and a group of private investors established Saleen Electric Automotive, Inc., a Florida corporation (“SEA”). SEA
had identified opportunities in the commercial electric vehicle market and was formed to develop a line of electric delivery vans,
automobiles, and high capacity chargers. On April 26, 2012, Saleen Electric Automotive, Inc. changed its name to “Saleen
Automotive, Inc.”
On April 2, 2012, Saleen
announced that after several years of litigation with the former Saleen, Inc., he had successfully regained control of the Saleen
brand and products that he had created. Pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended, we own certain intellectual
property that relates to the “Saleen” brand name and related rights as listed in the Assignment and License Agreement,
as amended, including various design patents for superchargers and trademarks related to the “Saleen” brand, and we
license from Saleen the right to use his image, signature, full name, voice, biographical materials, likeness, and goodwill associated
with the “Saleen” brand.
Our Vehicles, Products
and Services
We currently provide or
intend to provide the following products and services:
High Performance Cars
:
We are an OEM of customized American sports cars, building them into Saleen-branded performance cars through a transformational
process in which every part we incorporate into the vehicle is designed, engineered, tooled, tested, manufactured and certified
by us or under our control for the entire vehicle. We are currently converting Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros and Dodge Challengers.
The current product line of high performance vehicles includes the Saleen 570 and 570X Challenger, the Saleen 302 and 302SC and
S351 Mustang and the Saleen 620 and 620X Camaro. We also produce a line of Heritage Collection Cars which are modern Saleen High
Performance vehicles designed as replicas of past iconic race cars from the SCAA Trans-Am Racing lineage. In addition, we are
currently designing an update to our Saleen Mustang product line in response to the 2015 Ford Mustang new model planned to be
released in late 2014.
Performance Parts
:
We manufacture and distribute specialty automotive aftermarket parts and accessories to our base of over 25,000 loyal Saleen automotive
enthusiasts in the U.S. and overseas. Additionally, many of these parts and accessories are marketed and sold to the owners of
Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros and Dodge Challengers.
American Supercars
:
We are currently designing an American supercar that will be manufactured and sold through our Supercars division and our retail
stores. The term supercar describes an expensive (approximately $250,000 or more), limited production, fast or powerful (capable
of reaching speeds in excess of 180 miles per hour) sports car with a centrally located engine. There are supercar models built
by foreign manufacturers including Lamborghini and Ferrari.
Retail Distribution
Outlets
: While we presently do not have any retail stores in operation, we are actively sourcing store locations and intend
to open a network of retail branded stores that will become a primary sales channel for our high performance vehicles, supercars
and aftermarket parts and accessories. The concept of this store is based on a location inside a major retail mall whereby customers
can see floor models of our vehicles and purchase parts and accessories. Customers interested in purchasing a vehicle may arrange
to test drive vehicles that will be parked nearby. A buyer of our cars will meet with a sales representative to custom select
the vehicle model, colors, upgrades, and place the order. Saleen apparel, presently sold online, is branded under the Saleen Lifestyle,
Saleen Performance, Saleen Racing and Heritage marquees. We intend to operate these stores in high traffic malls in major cities
where Saleen has a customer base, such as Orange County, Los Angeles, San Jose, Miami and other locations.
Saleen Tesla
: We
are currently developing a Saleen Tesla Model S sports car. The Saleen Tesla design is our first effort in enhancing an existing
electric vehicle. Similar to our Saleen line of high performance cars, our design will enhance the level of performance primarily
through aerodynamics, body and suspension changes.
Motorsports & Engineering
Services
: We provide contract design, engineering and product development services. We recently completed a contract for a
major Hollywood movie producer where we developed and manufactured working replicas of high performance racing “supercars”
featured in the Need for Speed movie released in March 2014. As of March 31, 2014, we do not have any contracts for our design,
engineering or product development services.
Battery Electric Vehicles
:
We plan to develop a line of electric battery electric vehicles (or BEVs) for commercial and consumer oriented applications, utilizing
the same mass-customization process used with our high performance vehicles and existing facilities to overlay the BEV design
on selected new OEM automobile chassis designed for internal combustion engines. Our business strategy in this BEV market is to
utilize certain models of Ford, Chevrolet or Dodge vehicles that are mass produced as the base chassis’ of the vehicles
that we will convert into BEV’s by installing electric drive systems. Due to our current funding constraints, we do not
plan to start the development of this product until we are able to raise additional funding from debt or equity sources. The factors
that we may consider in determining whether to pursue this product line are (1) commercial price point for the electric vehicle,
(2) range of the vehicle, (3) market opportunity for the product line, (4) costs of developing a sales distribution network, (5)
market size and growth potential and (6) profitability of the product line. Once we have completed our product development and
testing process, we will further consider what steps we will take, budget we will require, and funding we will pursue to develop
our battery electric vehicle business. There is no guarantee that we will have sufficient funds to develop our battery electric
vehicle business line.
Technology, Design and
Engineering Capabilities
We believe the core competencies
of our company are high performance car design and vehicle engineering. Our core intellectual property is contained within our
supercharger and related performance enhancing products.
Our engineering team is
staffed with experienced and dedicated professionals with a wide range of expertise in providing design, analysis, and prototyping
and validation capabilities to the global vehicle industry. We offer in-house expertise in areas ranging from chassis, body and
power train, NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) engineering, electrical systems, thermal systems and CAE (computer aided engineering).
We provide seamlessly integrated services in a broad range of engineering disciplines through a unique mix of automotive engineering
expertise and motorsports carefully matched to their position specifications. Our engineering team utilizes the most technically
advanced engineering tools available in a results-driven and highly stimulating environment.
Our product development
methodology is designed to ensure a disciplined and quantifiable approach that emphasizes quality and progress accountability
as follows:
|
●
|
Market Definition and Potential
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Product Definition
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Realistic Revenue Targets
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Design and Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Prototyping
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Testing
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Volume Production Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Product Launch
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Success Reporting and Measurement
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Product Enhancement Plan
|
Over a 30-year history,
our founder, Saleen, has developed his core competency in the design, engineering, manufacturing, marketing and sales of high
performance vehicles as well as developed or acquired the technology to apply the same processes to the production of high performance
vehicles. Specifically, we have expertise with respect to the following:
|
●
|
Engineering Capabilities
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Suspension & Chassis
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Powertrain
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Certification
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Engineering Tools
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
CAD Systems
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Data Acquisition Systems
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
ETAS Calibration Tools
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Crash Simulation Software
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Suspension Simulation Software
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
CFD, Fluid Simulation Software
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Design and Prototyping
Capabilities
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Style & Design Center
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Full product development
from the first sketch to final production
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Manufacturing, Assembly
and Production
|
Our manufacturing and
assembly teams collaborate regularly with the engineering development team to ensure that the appropriate processes, tooling,
sourcing and timing is considered early in every program. Sharing of ideas throughout the business ensures that every aspect of
a program is considered and understood by the entire enterprise.
We utilize the most current
design, testing and prototyping systems in our manufacturing process, some of which include: Adams Kinematics - CAD (Computer
Aided Design) - CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) - FEA (Finite Element Analysis) -- CAM (Computer Aided Machining) - Rapid Prototyping
- Machine Tools - Composites Manufacturing - Wind Tunnel – Pam Crash for crash simulation and design of occupant safety
systems.
Vehicle Limited Warranty
Policy
We provide a three-year
or 36,000 miles New Vehicle Limited Warranty with every Saleen 302 and 302SC Mustang, Saleen 570 Challenger, and Saleen 620 Camaro
high performance vehicle. We provide a one-year or 12,000 miles New Vehicle Limited Warranty with every Saleen 351 Mustang, Saleen
570X Challenger, and Saleen 620X Camaro high performance vehicle. The vehicle limited warranty applies to installed parts and/or
assemblies in new Saleen high performance cars. All of the unaltered parts are covered under the original full warranty of the
OEM manufacturer of the base vehicles (Ford, Chevrolet, and Dodge).
Supply Chain
We use over 1,000 purchased
parts which we source globally from over 100 suppliers, many of whom are currently our single source suppliers for these components.
We have developed close relationships with several key suppliers particularly in the procurement of body components and certain
other key system parts. While we obtain components from multiple sources whenever possible, similar to other automobile manufacturers,
many of the components used in our vehicles are purchased by us from a single source. We are currently expanding our supplier
sources to reduce the risk of a single source supplier adversely affecting our operations. To date, we have expanded from one
to two suppliers, the sources from which we obtain one of our automobile body components. We will continue our efforts to reduce
our dependence on single source suppliers.
Research
and development costs, which consist of expenditures for the research and development of new products and technology, were $766,996
and $113,903 during the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Marketing Strategy
Our principal marketing
goals are to:
|
●
|
generate demand for our
vehicles and drive leads to our sales teams;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
build long-term brand awareness
and manage corporate reputation;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
manage our existing customer
base to create loyalty and customer referrals; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
enable customer input into
the product development process.
|
We operate as an Original
Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) producing muscle and high performance cars.
We currently utilize Ford
Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros and Dodge Challengers base chassis and manufacture these vehicles into Saleen-branded high performance
cars through a transformational process in which every part incorporated into the vehicle is designed, engineered, tooled and
extensively tested before being manufactured and moved into the conversion production process. It is our belief that this conversion
process, while not unique, is an important differentiator from our competitors due to the reputation of the Saleen brand.
We also manufacture and
distribute Saleen-branded specialty automotive aftermarket parts and accessories directly to an ever growing base of loyal automotive
enthusiasts in both the U.S. and internationally. Additionally, many of these parts and accessories are marketed and sold to Mustang,
Camaro, Challenger and Ford Truck owners.
Our Saleen-branded high
performance cars are sold through Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge retail dealers and exotic automobile dealers. We currently have arrangements
with approximately 30 dealers located throughout the United States and are growing our dealer distribution network. Our dealer
agreements provide for an exclusive dealer marketing area in which the applicable dealer can promote our products based on our
current product price list. The key terms of our dealer agreements include (a) target dealer product sales goals, (b) exclusive
dealer marketing territories and (c) a one-year term, renewable annually. Our agreements may be terminated if our dealers fail
to meet our target dealer product sales goals. Our dealer territories are generally based on the local dealers’ county geographical
boundaries; however, we may have multiple dealers in densely populated counties such as Los Angeles or San Francisco. Our dealers
earn a markup on the sale of our products at the time that the sale is completed upon delivery of the vehicle. We also have a
strategic relationship with GreenTech Automotive to distribute our products in China.
Our Motorsports and Engineering
Services division previously contributed to our brand awareness through a contract with Dreamworks SKG to provide design, engineering
and product development services to Dreamworks SKG. The contract was completed during January 2013.
While we presently do
not have any retail stores in operation, we are actively sourcing store locations for a network of retail branded stores that
will become a primary sales channel for our high performance vehicles, supercars, aftermarket parts and accessories. We intend
to market and sell to end consumers not only through our existing dealer network but also through our company-owned stores. We
will also be able to better service our dealer network by region as we open retail stores. Initially, we plan to open stores in
southern California, northern California and south Florida. We will conduct a market assessment of cities within the regions listed
above to determine the optimum locations for the stores. The estimated cost to open each store is $1 million. We have yet to determine
the specific steps that we will undertake to open a retail store, the specific budget line items for each store opening, or the
funding we will pursue to open the retail stores. Given our current cash constraints, limited operating history and history of
losses, we have planned for a three year roll out of these retail stores at the rate of one new store per year, however we have
yet to determine the specific time frame in which we will commence the roll out. In addition, there is no guarantee that we will
have the funding necessary to open any retail stores.
Our annual operating budget
includes a commitment to effective marketing, advertising and promotional efforts in order to further strengthen awareness of
our brand and expose our products to a larger audience. We will contract with marketing and advertising businesses with experience
marketing and promoting specialty automotive brands to further promote our business. We utilize various performance-based advertising
metrics to measure the effectiveness of our sales and marketing campaigns. These metrics will include CPM (“Cost per Thousand”),
PPC (“Pay per click”), and “pay per call” for our Internet advertising. Other advertising metrics will
include CPL (“Cost per Lead”), directory assistance call measurement, and print ad coupon responses. CPM is defined
as a “cost per thousand” pricing model whereby the merchant is charged a fee per thousand impressions – the
number of times people view an advertisement. PPC is defined as a “pay per click” pricing model in which the merchant
pays the website owner when the ad is clicked. PPC is also defined as “pay per call” whereby the merchant pays the
service provider a fee per call for connecting the consumer to the advertised number. CPL is defined as “cost per lead”
whereby the merchant pays for an explicit sign-up from an interested consumer interested in the advertised offer.
Events Marketing
:
As a high performance specialty manufacturer, we take pride in attending events on the international auto show circuit such as
in Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit, New York, Pebble Beach, Amelia Island, Paris, Tokyo and Beijing. The major car shows we participated
in during the twelve months ended March 31, 2014 included Detroit, Pebble Beach, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles and Beijing. The
cost of these major shows are approximately $100,000 per show. We also participate in regional car shows that generally cost between
$5,000 to $15,000 per show. Our participation in each event includes securing a trade booth to display our products, holding press
events to announce new models, and networking with attendees and dealers at the shows.
Print Marketing
:
Our print marketing strategy includes purchasing of ad space targeted to our customer base as well as free press through press
releases of newsworthy or entertainment-worthy information. The estimated costs of purchased ad space will vary by target market,
but generally runs from $2,500 to $10,000 per ad. We generally purchase ad space at car show venues from time to time as we determine
and in keeping with our marketing budget in cities where our dealers are actively engaged in promoting our vehicles.
We plan on expanding our
business model internationally by identifying strategic partners in targeted countries throughout the world. Initial targeted
areas are the Middle East, China and India. Once a strategic partner is identified in a particular country, we and our strategic
partner will jointly develop a business plan for that country. In March 2014, we entered into an exclusive agreement with GreenTech
Automotive (GTA) (“GreenTech”), to distribute the full collection of Saleen automobiles in China. In March 2014, GreenTech
purchased Saleen vehicles for immediate sale in China. We will continue to provide GreenTech with the same collection of vehicles
that are available in the North American marketplace.
Given our limited cash
resources, we will need to raise additional capital to continue and expand our marketing initiatives and to realize our plans
regarding domestic and international expansion. There is no guarantee that we will be able to raise this additional capital for
our expansion. In addition, we will encounter significant challenges expanding our business model internationally due to our limited
business experience operating in these markets, the current general economic slowdown in China and India, and uncertainty about
the amount of capital needed to successfully expand internationally.
Sales Strategy
We currently sell our
high performance cars through a network of Ford, Chevrolet, Dodge and exotic automobile dealers. Our dealer sales team is continuing
to increase our base of dealers. We currently have arrangements with 30 dealers located throughout the United States (in the states
of California, Florida, Idaho, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Washington).
We plan to sell and service
our vehicles through our company-owned sales and service network in North America and also through our strategic relationship
with GreenTech. Our intent is to offer a compelling customer experience while gathering rapid customer feedback and achieving
operating efficiencies, warranty service, pricing, and the development of the Saleen brand. Our Saleen-branded stores will not
carry large vehicle inventories and, as a result, will not require corresponding large floor spaces. We believe the benefits we
receive from distribution ownership will enable us to improve the speed of product development and improve the capital efficiency
of our business. Sales through these retail channels will be generated across the following platforms:
New Vehicle Sales
:
Our retail outlets will act as a primary retail channel for all Saleen-branded vehicles and financing programs. All staff will
be thoroughly trained and certified to sell and market the vehicles, products and apparel. Once the new Saleen-branded supercar
model is developed, it will be sold in the stores. We estimate the cost of opening a retail store, including obtaining initial
inventory, is approximately $1 million per store.
Technical Performance
Sales
: All retail outlet staff members will be highly trained technical staff members, able to educate consumers’ interest
in high performance Saleen-branded products. Our retail store based technical staff will be trained by our engineering and production
staff. Each retail outlet will handle scheduling of installation of our patented performance parts or provide technical guidance
for the more hands-on consumers who want to self-install performance parts.
Lifestyle Performance
Sales
: Each retail outlet’s staff will be the showcase for our diverse range of lifestyle accessories and apparel, including
clothes, driving shoes, watches, eyewear, posters, books and model cars, among others.
We plan to sell our performance
parts, aftermarket parts and accessories, and high performance vehicles through our retail stores and over the Internet. We currently
sell our automotive aftermarket parts and high performance vehicles at our headquarters in Corona, California. We may need to
comply with state regulations or seek waivers from regulatory authorities in various states to facilitate Internet sales of our
vehicles in those states. There is no guarantee that we will have sufficient funds to continue developing our retail stores and
Internet sales platform.
Automotive Aftermarkets
Parts Market
The specialty equipment
and parts market includes products used to modify the performance and appearance, and/or handling of vehicles. There are no guarantees
that we will be able to acquire a sufficient market share of the automotive aftermarkets parts market.
Supercars Market
Based on current sales
of supercars, we believe that there is a solidly growing market globally for dependable, American-made supercars offering demonstrably
superior performance with revolutionary styling and design characteristics.
Regulation—Vehicle
Safety and Testing
Our vehicles are subject
to, and we comply with, or are exempt from, numerous regulatory requirements established by the NHTSA, including all applicable
United States federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS). Our high performance cars fully comply with all FMVSS without the
need for any exemptions. As a manufacturer, we must self-certify that a vehicle meets, or otherwise obtain an exemption from,
all applicable FMVSS before the vehicle can be sold in the United States.
We are also required to
comply with other requirements of federal laws administered by the NHTSA, including the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards,
Theft Prevention Act requirements, consumer information labeling requirements, early warning reporting requirements regarding
warranty claims, field reports, death and injury reports and foreign recalls, and owner’s manual requirements.
The Automobile Information
and Disclosure Act requires manufacturers of motor vehicles to disclose certain information regarding the manufacturer’s
suggested retail price, optional equipment and pricing. In addition, the Act allows inclusion of city and highway fuel economy
ratings, as determined by the EPA, as well as crash test ratings, as determined by the NHTSA, if such tests are conducted.
Regulation—EPA Emissions
& Certificate of Conformity
The Clean Air Act requires
that we obtain a Certificate of Conformity issued by the EPA and a California Executive Order issued by the California Air Resources
Board (“CARB”) with respect to emissions for our vehicles. The Certificate of Conformity is required for vehicles
sold in states covered by the Clean Air Act’s standards and both the Certificate of Conformity and the Executive Order is
required for vehicles sold in states that have sought and received a waiver from the EPA to utilize California standards. The
California standards for emissions control for certain regulated pollutants for new vehicles and engines sold in California are
set by the CARB. States that have adopted the California standards as approved by the EPA also recognize the Executive Order for
sales of vehicles.
Some states have laws
providing that a manufacturer cannot deliver a vehicle to a resident of such state except through a dealer licensed to do business
in that state. We will therefore be required to either obtain a dealer license in such states, partner with a licensed dealer
or obtain an exemption from such requirements in connection with sales of our vehicles over the Internet. We have not commenced
the process to obtain a dealer license in states requiring such licenses, and are currently determining our strategy with respect
to sales of our vehicles in such states.
In addition, some states
have requirements that service facilities be available with respect to vehicles sold in the state, which may be interpreted to
also require that service facilities be available with respect to vehicles sold over the Internet to residents of the state. In
the event that such regulations are applicable to vehicles sold over the Internet, we will be limited in our ability to sell vehicles
in such states to the extent that we do not have qualifying service facilities.
The foregoing examples
of state laws governing the sale of motor vehicles are just some of the regulations we face as we sell our vehicles. In many states,
the application of state motor vehicle laws to Internet sales is largely without precedent, and would be determined by a fact
specific analysis of numerous factors, including whether we have a physical presence or employees in the applicable state, whether
we advertise or conduct other activities in the applicable state, how the sale transaction is structured, the volume of sales
into the state, and whether the state in question prohibits manufacturers from acting as dealers. As a result of the fact specific
and untested nature of these issues, and the fact that applying these laws intended for the traditional automobile distribution
model to our sales model allows for some interpretation and discretion by the regulators, state legal prohibitions may prevent
us from selling to consumers in such state.
Competition
Domestic United States
auto sales are currently at their highest pace in over five years since the financial crisis hit. We believe that the boost in
sales is poised to reverberate through the world’s largest economy with a spillover into production, profits and jobs for
Americans.
Competition in this industry
is in most cases based on reputation, prestige, quality, service and overall price. A strong combination of all these areas tends
to attract repeat and loyal customers and enthusiast. Consumers tend to shop for name brand and expect high customer service levels.
Promptness of service also matters because customers want and need their cars back as soon as possible.
In addition to customer
service, name or brand recognition and reputation play an important role in determining how competitive an auto customization
business is.
The location of retail
outlets is another crucial competitive factor defining this industry. A location is best determined by a combination of population
distribution, average income levels and the number of vehicle registrations and existing competitors. The optimum combination
results in a location that often allows the company to achieve economies of scale in terms of advertising and distribution costs.
Our primary competition
will come from other high-end cars, their manufacturing companies, and third-party companies that specialize in customization
for these cars. These companies include Acura, Aston Martin, Audi, Ferrari, Ford GT, Lamborghini, Lexus, McLaren, and Porsche.
Intellectual Property
Our success depends, at
least in part, on our ability to protect our core technology and intellectual property. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination
of patents, patent applications, trade secrets, including know-how, employee and third party nondisclosure agreements, copyright
laws, trademarks, intellectual property licenses and other contractual rights to establish and protect our proprietary rights
in our technology. Saleen Automotive owns trademarks registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. In addition, we own
the Saleen “brand” registered trademarks as well as other unregistered common law trademarks.
We currently market our
products using the Saleen name and logo, as well as the name and likeness of Steve Saleen, through a royalty free license from
Steve Saleen.
We also have a license
to use Steve Saleen’s image, signature, full name, voice, biographical materials, likeness, and goodwill associated with
the “Saleen” brand in connection with our business. The aforementioned license may only be terminated in the event
we file a petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or a petition for relief is converted to a Chapter
7 proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Seasonality
Sales of our high performance
cars have fluctuated on a seasonal basis with increased sales during the spring and summer months in our second and third fiscal
quarters relative to our fourth and first fiscal quarters. We note that, in general, automotive sales tend to decline over the
winter season and we anticipate that our sales of Saleen 302, 351, 570 and 620 vehicles, and other vehicles we introduce in the
future may have similar seasonality.
Employees
As of June 27, 2014, we
had 31 employees all of whom were full-time employees. Since inception, we have never had a work stoppage, and our employees are
not represented by labor unions. We consider our relationship with our employees to be positive.
Description of Property
Our principal executive
office is located at 2735 Wardlow Road, Corona, California 92882. Our principal engineering office is located across from our
executive office at 2755 Wardlow Road, Corona California 92882. We operate out of leased facilities comprised of a two building
campus that constitutes approximately four acres of industrial and office space. We believe our facilities are adequate to meet
our current and near-term needs.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common
stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all other information contained
in this prospectus before purchasing shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial
condition and/or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common
stock could decline, and you may lose some or all of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have a history of losses and negative
cash from operations and our current cash resources and revenue levels are insufficient to meet our planned business objectives,
operational needs and debt obligations without additional financing. In addition, our independent registered public accounting
firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We may be unable to obtain additional capital
required to implement our business plan, which could restrict our ability to grow and increase stockholder value.
We have a history of operating
losses and may not achieve or sustain profitability.
During the year ended
March 31, 2014, we incurred a net loss of $11,121,982 and utilized $4,361,576 of cash in operations. We also have a stockholders'
and working capital deficit of $9,296,629 and $3,050,286 as of March 31, 2014 and as of that date, we owed $630,874 in unpaid
payroll taxes and $967,747 of outstanding notes payable were in default. In addition, our current cash resources are insufficient
to meet our planned business objectives, operational needs and debt obligations without additional financing.
These and other factors
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As a result, our independent registered public accounting
firm issued a report on our March 31, 2014 financial statements that raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as
a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability
and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability to continue
as a going concern.
Our ability to continue
as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and
profitable operations. At March 31, 2014 and May 31, 2014, we had cash on hand in the amount of $1,499,889 and $30,972, respectively.
Since inception, we have raised funds primarily through the issuance of secured and unsecured notes payable and convertible notes
payable and sale of equity securities. We will need and are currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance
of debt or equity securities for cash to operate our business through and beyond September 30, 2014 and to continue planned product
development. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms
that are satisfactory to us. Even if we are able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations,
in the case of debt financing, or cause substantial dilution for our stockholders, in case or equity financing. If we are unable
to obtain additional funds, our ability to carry out and implement our planned business objectives and strategies will be significantly
delayed, limited or may not occur. We cannot guarantee that we will become profitable. Even if we achieve profitability, given
the competitive and evolving nature of the industry in which we operate, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability
and our failure to do so would adversely affect our business, including our ability to raise additional funds.
We may be unable to sustain our current
level of production or deliveries of our high performance cars both of which could harm our business and prospects.
High performance car production
and deliveries will continue to require significant resources and we may experience unexpected delays or difficulties that could
harm our ability to maintain full manufacturing capacity, or cause us to miss planned production targets, any of which could have
a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. Additionally, sustaining high
volume production and doing so in a manner that avoids significant cost overruns, including as a result of factors beyond our
control such as problems with suppliers and vendors, may be difficult.
Our ability to sustain
volume production and deliveries for our new supercar is subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including:
|
●
|
that our suppliers will
be able to deliver components on a timely basis and in the necessary quantities, quality and at acceptable prices to produce
our supercars in volume and reach our financial targets;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
that we will be able
to complete any necessary adjustments to the vehicle design or manufacturing processes of our supercars in a timely manner
that meets our production plan and allows for high quality vehicles;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
that we will not encounter
parts quality issues before, during or after production of high performance cars;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
that we will be able
to schedule and complete deliveries at our planned volume production;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
that the equipment or
tooling which we have purchased or which we select will be able to accurately manufacture the vehicle within specified design
tolerances and will not suffer from unexpected breakdowns or damage which could negatively affect the rate needed to produce
vehicles in volume;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
that we will be able
to comply with environmental, workplace safety and similar regulations to operate our manufacturing facilities and our business
on our projected timeline;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
that we will be able
to maintain high quality controls as we transition to a higher level of in-house manufacturing process; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
that the information
technology systems that we are currently expanding and improving upon will be effective to manage high volume production.
|
Finally, detailed long-term
testing of systems integration, performance and safety as well as long-term quality, reliability and durability testing are ongoing
and any negative results from such testing could cause production delays in high performance cars, cost increases or lower quality
vehicles.
We have not, as yet, developed
our new supercar and have no obligations regarding volume production and deliveries at this time.
We are dependent on our suppliers, the
vast majority of which are single source suppliers, and the inability of these suppliers to continue to deliver, or their refusal
to deliver, necessary components of our vehicles in a timely manner at prices, quality levels, and volumes acceptable to us would
have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and operating results.
We use over 1,000 purchased
parts which we source globally from over 100 suppliers, many of whom are currently our single source suppliers for these components.
We have developed close relationships with several key suppliers particularly in the procurement of body components and certain
other key system parts. While we obtain components from multiple sources whenever possible, similar to other automobile manufacturers,
many of the components used in our vehicles are purchased by us from a single source. We are currently expanding our supplier
sources to reduce the risk of a single source supplier adversely affecting our operations. To date, we have expanded from one
to two suppliers, the sources from which we obtain one of our automobile body components. We will continue our efforts to reduce
our dependence on single source suppliers.
While we believe that
we may be able to establish alternate supply relationships and can obtain or engineer replacement components for our single source
components, we may be unable to do so in the short term, or at all, at prices or costs that are favorable to us. In particular,
while we believe that we will be able to secure alternate sources of supply for most of our single sourced components in a relatively
short time frame, qualifying alternate suppliers or developing our own replacements for certain highly customized components of
our vehicles may be time consuming, costly and may force us to make additional modifications to a vehicle’s design.
This supply chain exposes
us to multiple potential sources of delivery failure or component shortages for our high performance cars and/or supercars. We
may experience additional delays in the future with respect to high performance cars, supercars and any other future vehicle we
may produce. In addition, because we do not have written agreements in place with all our suppliers, this may create uncertainty
regarding certain suppliers’ obligations to us, including but not limited to, those regarding warranty and product liability.
Changes in business conditions, wars, governmental changes and other factors beyond our control or which we do not presently anticipate,
could also affect our suppliers’ ability to deliver components to us on a timely basis. Furthermore, if we experience significant
increased demand, or need to replace certain existing suppliers, there can be no assurance that additional supplies of component
parts will be available when required on terms that are favorable to us, at all, or that any supplier would allocate sufficient
supplies to us in order to meet our requirements or fill our orders in a timely manner. In the past, we have replaced certain
suppliers because of their failure to provide components that met our quality control standards. The loss of any single or limited
source supplier or the disruption in the supply of components from these suppliers could lead to delays in vehicle deliveries
to our customers, which could hurt our relationships with our customers and also materially adversely affect our business, prospects
and operating results.
Changes in our supply
chain have resulted in the past, and may result in the future, in increased cost and delay. We have also experienced cost increases
from certain of our suppliers in order to meet our quality targets and development timelines as well as due to design changes
that we made, and we may experience similar cost increases in the future. Additionally, we are negotiating with existing suppliers
for cost reductions, seeking new and less expensive suppliers for certain parts, and attempting to redesign certain parts to make
them cheaper to produce. If we are unsuccessful in our efforts to control and reduce supplier costs, our operating results will
suffer. Additionally, cost reduction efforts may interrupt or harm our normal production processes, thereby harming high performance
car and supercar quality or reducing production output.
Furthermore, a failure
by our suppliers to provide the components in a timely manner or at the level of quality necessary to manufacture our high performance
vehicles could prevent us from fulfilling customer orders in a timely fashion which could result in negative publicity, damage
our brand and have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
We are dependent on Ford Mustang, Chevrolet
Camaro and Dodge Challenger platform vehicles for our muscle and high performance vehicle products.
We utilize automobile
manufacturers Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge platform vehicles for our Mustang, Camaro and Challenger muscle and high performance vehicles.
Generally, we procure these vehicles directly from dealers. While we do enter into sourcing agreements with certain of our dealers,
we do not have a supply agreement with Ford, Chevrolet or Dodge and we are limited to the allocation allotted to our source dealers.
Further, all production parts are engineered and manufactured exclusively by us and are designed specifically for current and
past models of these platform vehicles. Any discontinuation of these vehicles, disruption in production or significant major model
changes in these platform vehicles could have a material impact on our sales and ultimately on our business. Minor and major model
changes by Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge require us to re-design, re-tool and change our production, which could result in us incurring
significant costs and production interruptions. Further, we may experience lower sales volume and difficulties in obtaining current
year platform vehicles during the period from when the current year model stops production by the manufacturer to when the new
major model year vehicle is released.
If we are unable to adequately reduce the
manufacturing costs of high performance cars and supercars or otherwise control the costs associated with operating our business,
our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects will suffer.
Our production costs for
high performance cars have been high due to start-up costs at our factory, manufacturing inefficiencies including low absorption
of fixed manufacturing costs, higher logistics costs due to the immaturity of our supply chain, and higher initial prices for
component parts during the initial period after the launch and ramp of the business. As we are now producing cars at our steady
state production volume, manufacturing costs have started to fall. While we expect further cost reduction efforts undertaken by
both us and our suppliers will continue to reduce costs during our fiscal year 2015, there is no guarantee that we will be able
to achieve planned cost reductions from our various cost savings initiatives, and the failure to achieve such savings would negatively
affect our ability to reach our gross margin and profitability goals. Our planned cost reductions include reducing our production
costs by negotiating discounts from our suppliers as we increase our purchasing volume, reducing our engineering and production
costs through more effective hiring practices, and reducing our general & administrative expenses by reducing reliance on
outside services providers. There is no guarantee that our planned cost reductions will be achieved.
We incur significant costs
related to procuring the raw materials required to manufacture our high performance cars, assembling vehicles and compensating
our personnel. We may also incur substantial costs in increasing the production capability of our high performance cars manufacturing
facilities, each of which could potentially face cost overruns. If high performance cars tooling, production equipment and parts
are insufficient for use in supercars, perhaps as a result of a lower level of commonality between the two vehicles than we currently
anticipate, our costs related to the production of supercars may exceed our expectations.
If we are unable to keep
our operating costs aligned with the level of revenues we generate, our operating results, business and prospects will be harmed.
Furthermore, many of the factors that impact our operating costs are beyond our control. For example, the costs of our raw materials
and components could increase due to shortages as global demand for these products increases.
Our long-term success will be dependent
upon our ability to design and achieve market acceptance of new vehicle models, specifically supercars and new vehicle models
such as midline sports cars.
Our long-term success
is dependent on market acceptance of our high performance cars and supercars. There is no guarantee that these new vehicles will
be successfully accepted by the general public in the long-term.
Additionally, there can
be no assurance that we will be able to design future vehicles that will meet the expectations of our customers or that our future
models will become commercially viable. To the extent that we are not able to build future supercars to the expectations created
by the early prototype and our announced specifications, customers may cancel their reservations, our future sales could be harmed
and investors may lose confidence in us. Furthermore, historically, automobile customers have come to expect new and improved
vehicle models to be introduced frequently. In order to meet these expectations, we may in the future be required to introduce
on a regular basis new vehicle models as well as enhanced versions of existing vehicle models. As technologies change in the future
for automobiles in general and high performance vehicles specifically, we will be expected to upgrade or adapt our vehicles and
introduce new models in order to continue to provide vehicles with the latest technology and meet customer expectations. Notwithstanding
Saleen’s prior experience in the automotive industry, our management team, as a whole, has limited experience simultaneously
designing, testing, manufacturing, upgrading, adapting and selling our vehicles.
Our limited operating history makes evaluating
our business and future prospects difficult, and may increase the risk of your investment.
You must consider the
risks and difficulties we face as an early stage company with a limited operating history. If we do not successfully address these
risks, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition will be materially and adversely harmed. Saleen Automotive
was formed in July 2011; however, our volume of vehicles just recently increased significantly year over year starting in the
summer of 2013. As such, it is difficult to predict our future revenues and appropriately budget for our expenses, and we have
limited insight into trends that may emerge and affect our business. In the event that actual results differ from our estimates
or we adjust our estimates in future periods, our operating results and financial position could be materially affected.
Increases in costs, disruption of supply
or shortage of raw materials, in particular superchargers, could harm our business.
We may experience increases
in the cost or a sustained interruption in the supply or shortage of raw materials. Any such increase or supply interruption could
materially negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. We use various raw materials
in our business including aluminum, steel, nickel and copper. The prices for these raw materials fluctuate depending on market
conditions and global demand for these materials and could adversely affect our business and operating results. Substantial increases
in the prices for our raw materials or prices charged to us, such as those charged by our supercharger manufacturers, would increase
our operating costs, and could reduce our margins if we cannot recoup the increased costs through increased vehicle prices. There
can be no assurance that we will be able to recoup increasing costs of raw materials by increasing vehicle prices.
Our distribution model is different from
the predominant current distribution model for automobile manufacturers, which makes evaluating our business, operating results
and future prospects difficult.
Our distribution model
is not common in the automobile industry today, particularly in the United States. We plan to sell our high performance vehicles
in company-owned Saleen stores and over the Internet. This model of vehicle distribution is relatively new and unproven, especially
in the United States, and subjects us to substantial risk as it requires, in the aggregate, a significant expenditure and provides
for slower expansion of our distribution and sales systems than may be possible by utilizing a more traditional dealer franchise
system. For example, we will not be able to utilize long-established sales channels developed through a franchise system to increase
our sales volume, which may harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. Moreover, we will be competing
with companies with well-established distribution channels.
We plan to open Saleen
stores in the United States initially, and expand internationally as opportunities arise. We have only limited experience distributing
and selling our high performance vehicles through our Saleen stores. Our success will depend in large part on our ability to effectively
develop our own sales channels and marketing strategies. Implementing our business model is subject to numerous significant challenges,
including obtaining permits and approvals from local and state authorities, and we may not be successful in addressing these challenges.
The concept and layout of these new stores, which are located in high profile retail centers, is different than what has previously
been used in automotive sales. We do not know whether our new store strategy will be successful, if consumers will be willing
to purchase vehicles in this manner or if these locations will be deemed to comply with applicable zoning restrictions as well
as approval and acceptance from the specific high profile retail centers in which we seek to locate our stores. As a result, we
may incur additional costs in order to improve or change our retail strategy.
You must consider our
business and prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties we encounter as we implement our business model.
For instance, we will need to persuade customers, suppliers and regulators of the validity and sustainability of our business
model. We cannot be certain that we will be able to do so, or to successfully address the risks, uncertainties and difficulties
that our business strategy faces. Any failure to successfully address any of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties related
to our business model would have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
We may face regulatory limitations on our
ability to sell vehicles directly or over the Internet which could materially and adversely affect our ability to sell our vehicles.
We plan to sell our vehicles
from our Saleen stores as well as over the Internet. We may not be able to sell our vehicles through this sales model in each
state in the United States as many states have laws that may be interpreted to prohibit Internet sales by manufacturers to residents
of the state or to impose other limitations on this sales model, including laws that prohibit manufacturers from selling vehicles
directly to consumers without the use of an independent dealership or without a physical presence in the state. For example, some
states provide that a manufacturer cannot deliver a vehicle to a resident of their state except through a dealer licensed to do
business in such state, which may be interpreted to require us to open a store in that state in order to sell vehicles to their
residents. In some states where we have opened a gallery, which is a location where potential customers can view our vehicles
but is not a full retail location, it is possible that a state regulator could take the position that activities at our gallery
constitute an unlicensed motor vehicle dealership and thereby violates applicable manufacturer-dealer laws. In addition, some
states have requirements that service facilities be available with respect to vehicles sold in the state, which may be interpreted
to also require that service facilities be available with respect to vehicles sold over the Internet to residents of the state
thereby limiting our ability to sell vehicles in states where we do not maintain service facilities.
The foregoing examples
of state laws governing the sale of motor vehicles are just some of the regulations we will face as we sell our vehicles. In many
states, the application of state motor vehicle laws to our specific sales model is largely untested under state motor vehicle
industry laws, particularly with respect to sales over the Internet, and would be determined by a fact-specific analysis of numerous
factors, including whether we have a physical presence or employees in the applicable state, whether we advertise or conduct other
activities in the applicable state, how the sale transaction is structured, the volume of sales into the state, and whether the
state in question prohibits manufacturers from acting as dealers. As a result of the fact-specific and untested nature of these
issues, and the fact that applying these laws intended for the traditional automobile distribution model to our sales model allows
for some interpretation and discretion by the regulators, the manner in which the applicable authorities will apply their state
laws to our distribution model is difficult to predict. Such laws, as well as other laws governing the motor vehicle industry,
may subject us to potential inquiries and investigations from state motor vehicle regulators who may question whether our sales
model complies with applicable state motor vehicle industry laws and who may require us to change our sales model or may prohibit
our ability to sell our vehicles to residents in such states. In addition, decisions by regulators permitting us to sell vehicles
may be subject to challenges as to whether such decisions comply with applicable state motor vehicle industry laws.
The automotive market is highly competitive,
and we may not be successful in competing in this industry. We currently face competition from new and established competitors
and expect to face competition from others in the future.
The worldwide automotive
market is highly competitive today and we expect it will become even more so in the future. With respect to our supercars, we
face competition from existing and future automobile manufacturers in the extremely competitive premium sedan market, including
Audi, BMW, Lexus and Mercedes.
Most of our current and
potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing and other resources than we do
and may be able to devote greater resources to the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion, sale and support
of their products. Virtually all of our competitors have more extensive customer bases and broader customer and industry relationships
than we do. In addition, almost all of these companies have longer operating histories and greater name recognition than we do.
Our competitors may be in a stronger position to respond quickly to new technologies and may be able to design, develop, market
and sell their products more effectively.
Furthermore, certain large
automobile manufacturers offer financing and leasing options on their vehicles and also have the ability to market vehicles at
a substantial discount, provided that the vehicles are financed through their affiliated financing company.
The electric vehicle market is highly competitive,
and we may not be successful in competing in this industry. We currently face competition from new and established competitors
and expect to face competition from others in the future.
The worldwide electric
vehicle automotive market is highly competitive today and we expect it will become even more so in the future. There are numerous
obstacles for electric vehicle manufacturers, including the absence of a well-developed supply chain, capacity constraints, high
initial fixed and variable costs, and dependence on large commercial customers who may exert substantial pricing pressures.
Tesla and many established
and new automobile manufacturers have entered or have announced plans to enter the alternative fuel vehicle market. Major manufacturers,
including General Motors, Toyota, Ford and Honda, are each selling hybrid vehicles, and certain of these manufacturers have announced
plug-in versions of their hybrid vehicles. We do not have the significant financial and manufacturing resources of these major
players in the electric vehicle industry.
Most of our current and
potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing and other resources than we do
and may be able to devote greater resources to the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion, sale and support
of their products. Virtually all of our competitors have more extensive customer bases and broader customer and industry relationships
than we do. In addition, almost all of these companies have longer operating histories and greater name recognition than we do.
Our competitors may be in a stronger position to respond quickly to new technologies and may be able to design, develop, market
and sell their products more effectively.
Furthermore, certain large
electric vehicle manufacturers offer financing and leasing options on their vehicles and also have the ability to market vehicles
at a substantial discount, provided that the vehicles are financed through their affiliated financing company.
Demand in the automobile industry is highly
volatile, which may lead to lower vehicle unit sales and adversely affect our operating results.
Volatility of demand in
the automobile industry may materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.
The markets in which we currently compete and plan to compete in the future have been subject to considerable volatility in demand
in recent periods. Demand for automobile sales depends to a large extent on general, economic, political and social conditions
in a given market and the introduction of new vehicles and technologies. As a new automobile manufacturer and low volume producer,
we have less financial resources than more established automobile manufacturers to withstand changes in the market and disruptions
in demand. As our business grows, economic conditions and trends in other countries and regions where we sell our high performance
vehicles will impact our business, prospects and operating results as well. Demand for our high performance vehicles may also
be affected by factors directly impacting automobile price or the cost of purchasing and operating automobiles such as sales and
financing incentives, prices of raw materials and parts and components, cost of fuel and governmental regulations, including tariffs,
import regulation and other taxes. Volatility in demand may lead to lower vehicle unit sales and increased inventory, which may
result in further downward price pressure and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
These effects may have a more pronounced impact on our business given our relatively smaller scale and financial resources as
compared to many incumbent automobile manufacturers.
Difficult economic conditions may negatively
affect consumer purchases of luxury items, such as our high performance vehicles.
Over the last few years,
the deterioration in the global financial markets and continued challenging condition of the macroeconomic environment has negatively
impacted consumer spending and we believe has adversely affected the sales of our high performance vehicles. The automobile industry
in particular was severely impacted by the poor economic conditions and several vehicle manufacturing companies, including General
Motors and Chrysler, were forced to file for bankruptcy. Sales of new automobiles generally have dropped during this recessionary
period. Sales of high-end and luxury consumer products, such as our high performance vehicles, depend in part on discretionary
consumer spending and are even more exposed to adverse changes in general economic conditions. Difficult economic conditions could
therefore temporarily reduce the market for vehicles in our price range. Discretionary consumer spending also is affected by other
factors, including changes in tax rates and tax credits, interest rates and the availability and terms of consumer credit. Accordingly,
any events that have a negative effect on the United States economy or on foreign economies or that negatively affect consumer
confidence in the economy, including disruptions in credit and stock markets, and actual or perceived economic slowdowns, may
harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
Our financial results may vary significantly
from period-to-period due to the seasonality of our business and fluctuations in our operating costs.
Our operating results
may vary significantly from period-to-period due to many factors, including seasonal factors that may have an effect on the demand
for our high performance vehicles. Generally, sales of our high performance cars have fluctuated on a seasonal basis with increased
sales during the spring and summer months in our second and third fiscal quarters relative to our fourth and first fiscal quarters.
In addition, traditionally from November through mid-January, auto industry production slows due to the holidays and the subsequent
temporary shutdown of plants and shipping for several weeks causing delivery of cars to be interrupted which has had an effect
on our sales. We note that, in general, automotive sales tend to decline over the winter season, especially in snow driven states,
and we anticipate that our sales of high performance vehicles and other models we introduce may have similar seasonality. Also,
any unusually severe weather conditions in some markets may impact demand for our vehicles. Our operating results could also suffer
if we do not achieve revenue consistent with our expectations for this seasonal demand because many of our expenses are based
on anticipated levels of annual revenue.
In addition, we expect
our period-to-period operating results to vary based on our operating costs which we anticipate will increase significantly in
future periods as we, among other things, design, develop and manufacture our supercars, increase the production capacity at our
manufacturing facilities to produce our supercars, incur costs for warranty repairs or product recalls, if any, increase our sales
and marketing activities, and increase our general and administrative functions to support our growing operations. As a result
of these factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results, especially in the short-term, are not
necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of future performance. Moreover, our operating
results may not meet expectations of equity research analysts or investors. If any of this occurs, the trading price of our common
stock after the Merger could fall substantially, either suddenly or over time.
If we are unable to establish and maintain
confidence in our long-term business prospects among consumers, analysts and within our industry, then our financial condition,
operating results, business prospects and stock price may suffer materially.
Our vehicles are highly
technical products that require maintenance and support. If we were to cease or cut back operations, even years from now, buyers
of our vehicles from years earlier might have much more difficulty in maintaining their vehicles and obtaining satisfactory support.
As a result, consumers may be less likely to purchase our vehicles now if they are not convinced that our business will succeed
or that our operations will continue for many years. Similarly, suppliers and other third parties will be less likely to invest
time and resources in developing business relationships with us if they are not convinced that our business will succeed.
Accordingly, in order
to build and maintain our business, we must maintain confidence among customers, suppliers, analysts and other parties in our
liquidity and long-term business prospects. In contrast to some more established automakers, we believe that, in our case, the
task of maintaining such confidence may be particularly complicated by factors such as the following:
|
●
|
our limited operating
history;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our limited revenues
and lack of profitability to date;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
unfamiliarity with or
uncertainty about the our high performance vehicles and supercars;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
uncertainty about the
long-term marketplace acceptance of alternative fuel vehicles generally, or electric vehicles specifically;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the prospect that we
will need ongoing infusions of external capital to fund our planned operations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the size of our expansion
plans in comparison to our existing capital base and scope and history of operations; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the prospect or actual
emergence of direct, sustained competitive pressure from more established automakers, which may be more likely if our initial
efforts are perceived to be commercially successful.
|
Many of these factors
are largely outside our control, and any negative perceptions about our long-term business prospects, even if exaggerated or unfounded,
would likely harm our business and make it more difficult to raise additional funds when needed.
We may not succeed in maintaining and strengthening
the Saleen brand, which would materially and adversely affect customer acceptance of our vehicles and our business, revenues and
prospects including our ability to raise capital.
Our business and prospects
are heavily dependent on our ability to develop, maintain and strengthen the Saleen brand. Any failure to develop, maintain and
strengthen our brand may materially and adversely affect our ability to sell our high performance vehicles and future planned
supercars. If we do not continue to establish, maintain and strengthen our brand, we may lose the opportunity to build a critical
mass of customers. Promoting and positioning our brand will likely depend significantly on our ability to provide high quality
high performance vehicles and we have very limited experience in these areas.
In addition, we expect
that our ability to develop, maintain and strengthen the Saleen brand will also depend heavily on the success of our marketing
efforts. To date, we have limited experience with marketing activities as we have relied primarily on the Internet, word of mouth
and attendance at industry trade shows to promote our brand. To further promote our brand, we may be required to change our marketing
practices, which could result in substantially increased advertising expenses, including the need to use traditional media such
as television, radio and print. The automobile industry is intensely competitive, and we may not be successful in building, maintaining
and strengthening our brand. Many of our current and potential competitors, particularly automobile manufacturers headquartered
in Detroit, Japan and the European Union, have greater name recognition, broader customer relationships and substantially greater
marketing resources than we do. If we do not develop and maintain a strong brand, our business, prospects, financial condition
and operating results will be materially and adversely impacted.
Our plan to develop our network of Saleen
stores will require significant cash investments and management resources and may not meet our expectations with respect to additional
sales of our high performance vehicles. In addition, we may not be able to open stores in certain states.
Our plan to develop our
network of Saleen stores will require significant cash investments and management resources and may not meet our expectations
with respect to additional sales of our vehicles. This planned U.S. expansion of Saleen stores may not have the desired effect
of increasing sales and expanding our brand presence to the degree we are anticipating. Furthermore there can be no assurances
that we will be able to construct additional storefronts on the budget or timeline we have established. We will also need to ensure
we are in compliance with any regulatory requirements applicable to the sale of our vehicles in those jurisdictions, which could
take considerable time and expense. If we experience any delays in expanding our network of Saleen stores, this could lead to
a decrease in sales of our vehicles and could negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
We plan to open Saleen stores with a goal of establishing approximately 12 U.S. stores within the next several years. However,
we may not be able to expand our network at such rate and our planned expansion of our network of Saleen stores will require significant
cash investment and management resources, as well as efficiency in the execution of establishing these storefronts and in hiring
and training the necessary employees to effectively sell our vehicles. Such additional investments may not be available to us
or may not be available on terms reasonably acceptable to us.
Furthermore, certain states
and foreign jurisdictions may have permit requirements, franchise dealer laws or similar laws or regulations that may preclude
or restrict our ability to open stores or sell vehicles out of such states and jurisdictions. Any such prohibition or restriction
may lead to decreased sales in such jurisdictions, which could harm our business, prospects and operating results. See Risk Factor
“
We may face regulatory limitations on our ability to sell vehicles directly or over the Internet which could materially
and adversely affect our ability to sell our vehicles
.”
If we fail to manage future growth effectively
as we rapidly grow our company, we may not be able to produce, market, sell and service our vehicles successfully.
Any failure to manage
our growth effectively could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.
We continue to expand our operations significantly, and additional significant expansion will be required, especially in connection
with the expansion of our network of Saleen stores. Our future operating results depend to a large extent on our ability to manage
this expansion and growth successfully. Risks that we face in undertaking this expansion include:
|
●
|
finding and training new
personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
forecasting production
and revenue;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
controlling expenses and
investments in anticipation of expanded operations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
establishing or expanding
design, manufacturing, sales and service facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
implementing and enhancing
manufacturing and administrative infrastructure, systems and processes;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
addressing new markets;
and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
expanding international
operations.
|
We intend to continue
to hire a significant number of additional personnel, including manufacturing personnel, design personnel, engineers and service
technicians for our high performance vehicles. Because our high performance vehicles are based on a different technology platform
than traditional internal combustion engines, individuals with sufficient training in high performance vehicles may not be available
to hire, and we will need to expend significant time and expense training the employees we do hire. Competition for individuals
with experience designing, manufacturing and servicing high performance vehicles are intense, and we may not be able to attract,
assimilate, train or retain additional highly qualified personnel in the future. The failure to attract, integrate, train, motivate
and retain these additional employees could seriously harm our business and prospects.
If we are unable to attract and/or retain
key employees and hire qualified management, technical vehicle engineering, and manufacturing personnel, our ability to compete
could be harmed and our stock price may decline.
The loss of the services
of any of our key employees could disrupt our operations, delay the development and introduction of our vehicles and services,
and negatively impact our business, prospects and operating results as well as cause our stock price to decline. In particular,
we are highly dependent on the services of Steve Saleen, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors. There
can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully attract and retain senior leadership necessary to grow our business.
Our future success depends upon our ability to attract and retain our executive officers and other key technology, sales, marketing,
engineering, manufacturing and support personnel and any failure to do so could adversely impact our business, prospects, financial
condition and operating results. We have in the past and may in the future experience difficulty in retaining members of our senior
management team as well as technical, vehicle engineering and manufacturing personnel due to various factors, such as a very competitive
labor market for talented individuals with automotive experience. In addition, we do not have “key person” life insurance
policies covering any of our officers or other key employees. Currently in Southern California, there is increasing competition
for talented individuals with the specialized knowledge of high performance vehicles, software engineers and other skilled employees
and this competition affects both our ability to retain key employees and hire new ones. Our continued success depends upon our
continued ability to hire and retain employees. Additionally, we compete with many mature and prosperous companies in Southern
California that have far greater financial resources than we do and thus can offer current or perspective employees more lucrative
incentive packages than we can. Any difficulties in retaining current employees or recruiting new ones would have an adverse effect
on our performance.
Many members of our management team are
new to the company or to the automobile industry, and execution of our business plan and development strategy could be seriously
harmed if integration of our management team into our company is not successful.
Our business could be
seriously harmed if integration of our management team into our company is not successful. We expect that it will take time for
our new management team to integrate into our company and it is too early to predict whether this integration will be successful.
We have recently experienced significant changes in our management team and expect to continue to experience significant growth
in our management team. Our senior management team has only limited experience working together as a group. This lack of long-term
experience working together may impact the team’s ability to collectively quickly and efficiently respond to problems and
effectively manage our business. Although we are taking steps to add senior management personnel that have significant automotive
experience, some members of our current senior management team have limited experience in the automobile industry.
We are subject to various environmental
and safety laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs upon us and negatively impact our ability to operate our manufacturing
facilities.
As an automobile manufacturer,
we and our operations, both in the United States and abroad, are subject to national, state, provincial and/or local environmental,
health and safety laws and regulations, including laws relating to the use, handling, storage, disposal and human exposure to
hazardous materials. Environmental and health and safety laws and regulations can be complex, and we expect that our business
and operations will be affected by future amendments to such laws or other new environmental and health and safety laws which
may require us to change our operations, potentially resulting in a material adverse effect on our business. These laws can give
rise to liability for administrative oversight costs, cleanup costs, property damage, bodily injury and fines and penalties. Capital
and operating expenses needed to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations can be significant, and violations
may result in substantial fines and penalties, third party damages, suspension of production or a cessation of our operations.
Contamination at properties
formerly owned or operated by us, as well as at properties we will own and operate, and properties to which hazardous substances
were sent by us, may result in liability for us under environmental laws and regulations, including, but not limited to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), which can impose liability for the full amount of remediation-related
costs without regard to fault, for the investigation and cleanup of contaminated soil and ground water, for building contamination
and impacts to human health and for damages to natural resources. The costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations
and any claims concerning noncompliance, or liability with respect to contamination in the future, could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or operating results. We may face unexpected delays in obtaining the necessary permits and approvals
required by environmental laws in connection with our manufacturing facilities that could require significant time and financial
resources and negatively impact our ability to operate these facilities, which would adversely impact our business prospects and
operating results.
Our business may be adversely affected
by union activities.
Although none of our employees
are currently represented by a labor union, it is common throughout the automobile industry generally for many employees at automobile
companies to belong to a union, which can result in higher employee costs and increased risk of work stoppages. Our employees
may join or seek recognition to form a labor union, or we may be required to become a union signatory. Additionally, disgruntled
ex-employees may actively encourage unionization of our employees. We are also directly or indirectly dependent upon companies
with unionized work forces, such as parts suppliers and trucking and freight companies, and work stoppages or strikes organized
by such unions could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or operating results. If a work stoppage
occurs, it could delay the manufacture and sale of our high performance vehicles and have a material adverse effect on our business,
prospects, operating results or financial condition. The mere fact that our labor force could be unionized may harm our reputation
in the eyes of some investors and thereby negatively affect our stock price. Additionally, the unionization of our labor force
could increase our employee costs and decrease our profitability, both of which could adversely affect our business, prospects,
financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to substantial regulation,
which is evolving, and unfavorable changes or failure by us to comply with these regulations could substantially harm our business
and operating results.
Our high performance vehicles,
and the sale of motor vehicles in general, are subject to substantial regulation under international, federal, state and local
laws. We have incurred, and expect to incur in the future, significant costs in complying with these regulations. Regulations
related to the automobile industry are currently evolving and we face risks associated with changes to these regulations such
as:
|
●
|
the amendment or rescission
of the federal law and regulations mandating increased fuel economy in the United States, referred to as the Corporate Average
Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, could reduce new business opportunities for our development activities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the amendment or rescission
of federal greenhouse gas tailpipe emission regulations administered by the EPA under the authority of the Clean Air Act could
reduce new business opportunities for our development activities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
increased sensitivity
by regulators to the needs of established automobile manufacturers with large employment bases, high fixed costs and business
models based on the internal combustion engine could lead them to pass regulations that could reduce the compliance costs
of such established manufacturers or mitigate the effects of government efforts to promote alternative fuel vehicles; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
changes to regulations
governing the export of our products could increase our costs incurred to deliver products outside the United States or force
us to charge a higher price for our vehicles in such jurisdictions.
|
To the extent the laws
change, some or all of our vehicles may not comply with applicable international, federal, state or local laws, which would have
an adverse effect on our business. Compliance with changing regulations could be burdensome, time consuming, and expensive. To
the extent compliance with new regulations is cost prohibitive, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results
will be adversely affected.
We may become subject to product liability
claims, which could harm our financial condition and liquidity if we are not able to successfully defend or insure against such
claims.
We may become subject
to product liability claims, which could harm our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. The automobile
industry experiences significant product liability claims and we face inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event our vehicles
do not perform as expected or malfunction resulting in personal injury or death. Our risks in this area are particularly pronounced
given the limited number of vehicles delivered to date and limited field experience of those vehicles. A successful product liability
claim against us could require us to pay a substantial monetary award. Moreover, a product liability claim could generate substantial
negative publicity about our vehicles and business and inhibit or prevent commercialization of other future vehicle candidates
which would have a material adverse effect on our brand, business, prospects and operating results. We insure against the risk
of product liability claims, however, any lawsuit seeking significant monetary damages may have a material adverse effect on our
reputation, business and financial condition. We may not be able to secure additional product liability insurance coverage on
commercially acceptable terms or at reasonable costs when needed, particularly if we do face liability for our products and are
forced to make a claim under our policy.
We may be compelled to undertake product
recalls, which could adversely affect our brand image and financial performance.
Any product recall in
the future may result in adverse publicity, damage our brand and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and
financial condition. In the future, we may at various times, voluntarily or involuntarily, initiate a recall if any of our vehicles
prove to be defective or noncompliant with applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards. Such recalls, voluntary or involuntary,
involve significant expense and diversion of management attention and other resources, which could adversely affect our brand
image in our target markets and could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Our current and future warranty reserves
may be insufficient to cover future warranty claims which could adversely affect our financial performance.
If our warranty reserves
are inadequate to cover future warranty claims on our vehicles, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results
could be materially and adversely affected. We provide a three year or 36,000 miles New Vehicle Limited Warranty with every Saleen
302 and 302SC Mustang, Saleen 570 Challenger, and Saleen 620 Camaro high performance vehicle. We provide a one year or 12,000
miles New Vehicle Limited Warranty with every Saleen 351 Mustang, Saleen 570X Challenger, and Saleen 620X Camaro high performance
vehicle. The vehicle limited warranty applies to installed parts and/or assemblies in new high performance vehicles. All of the
unaltered parts are covered under the original full warranty of the OEM manufacturer of the base vehicles (Ford, Chevrolet, and
Dodge).
We have limited operating
experience with our vehicles, and therefore little experience with warranty claims for these vehicles or with estimating warranty
reserves. Our warranty claims to date have been negligible and we currently do not have reserves recorded for warranty claims.
We could in the future
become subject to a significant and unexpected warranty expense. There can be no assurances that our currently existing or future
warranty reserves will be sufficient to cover all claims or that our limited experience with warranty claims will adequately address
the needs of our customers to their satisfaction.
We may need to defend ourselves against
patent or trademark infringement claims, which may be time-consuming and would cause us to incur substantial costs.
Companies, organizations
or individuals, including our competitors, may hold or obtain patents, trademarks or other proprietary rights that would prevent,
limit or interfere with our ability to make, use, develop or sell our vehicles or components, which could make it more difficult
for us to operate our business. From time to time, we may receive inquiries from holders of patents or trademarks inquiring whether
we infringe their proprietary rights. Companies holding patents or other intellectual property rights relating to our base vehicles
may bring suits alleging infringement of such rights or otherwise asserting their rights and seeking licenses. In addition, if
we are determined to have infringed upon a third party’s intellectual property rights, we may be required to do one or more
of the following:
|
●
|
cease selling, incorporating
or using vehicles that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
pay substantial damages;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
obtain a license from
the holder of the infringed intellectual property right, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all;
or
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
redesign our vehicles.
|
In the event of a successful
claim of infringement against us and our failure or inability to obtain a license to the infringed technology, our business, prospects,
operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, any litigation or claims, whether
or not valid, could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.
We also license patents
and other intellectual property from third parties, and we may face claims that our use of this in-licensed technology infringes
the rights of others. In that case, we may seek indemnification from our licensors under our license contracts with them. However,
our rights to indemnification may be unavailable or insufficient to cover our costs and losses, depending on our use of the technology,
whether we choose to retain control over conduct of the litigation, and other factors.
Our business will be adversely affected
if we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights from unauthorized use or infringement by third parties.
Any failure to protect
our proprietary rights adequately could result in our competitors offering similar products, potentially resulting in the loss
of some of our competitive advantage and a decrease in our revenue which would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial
condition and operating results. Our success depends, at least in part, on our ability to protect our core technology and intellectual
property. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination of patents, patent applications, trade secrets, including know-how, employee
and third party nondisclosure agreements, copyright laws, trademarks, intellectual property licenses and other contractual rights
to establish and protect our proprietary rights in our technology. We have also received from third parties patent licenses related
to manufacturing our vehicles.
The protection provided
by the patent laws is and will be important to our future opportunities. However, such patents and agreements and various other
measures we take to protect our intellectual property from use by others may not be effective for various reasons, including the
following:
|
●
|
our pending patent applications
may not result in the issuance of patents;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our patents, if issued,
may not be broad enough to protect our proprietary rights;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the patents we have
been granted may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented because of the pre-existence of similar patented or unpatented
intellectual property rights or for other reasons;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the costs associated
with enforcing patents, confidentiality and invention agreements or other intellectual property rights may make aggressive
enforcement impracticable;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
current and future competitors
may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our vehicles or design new vehicles in a way that circumvents our
patents; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our in-licensed patents
may be invalidated or the holders of these patents may seek to breach our license arrangements.
|
Existing trademark and
trade secret laws and confidentiality agreements afford only limited protection. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries
do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States, and policing the unauthorized use
of our intellectual property is difficult.
Our patent applications may not result
in issued patents, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from commercially exploiting products
similar to ours.
We cannot be certain that
we are the first creator of inventions covered by pending patent applications or the first to file patent applications on these
inventions, nor can we be certain that our pending patent applications will result in issued patents or that any of our issued
patents will afford protection against a competitor. In addition, patent applications filed in foreign countries are subject to
laws, rules and procedures that differ from those of the United States, and thus we cannot be certain that foreign patent applications
related to issued U.S. patents will result in issued foreign patents. Furthermore, even if these patent applications do result
in issued patents, some foreign countries provide significantly less effective patent enforcement than in the United States.
The status of patents
involves complex legal and factual questions and the breadth of claims allowed is uncertain. As a result, we cannot be certain
that the patent applications that we file will result in patents being issued, or that our patents and any patents that may be
issued to us in the near future will afford protection against competitors with similar technology. In addition, patents issued
to us may be infringed upon or designed around by others and others may obtain patents that we need to license or design around,
either of which would increase costs and may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
Intellectual property
litigation would be costly and could adversely impact our business operations
.
We
may have to take legal action in the future to protect our technology, trade name or to assert our intellectual property rights
against others. Any legal action could be costly and time consuming to us, and no assurances can be made that any action will
be successful. The invalidation of any intellectual property rights that we may own, or an unsuccessful outcome in lawsuits to
protect our technology, could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial position, or results of operations.
Intellectual
property litigation can be expensive, complex, and protracted. Because of such complexity, and the vagaries of the jury system,
intellectual property litigation may result in significant damage awards and/or injunctions that could prevent the manufacture,
use, distribution, importation, exportation, and sale of products or require us to pay significant royalties in order to continue
to manufacture, use, distribute, import, export, or sell products. Furthermore, in the event that our right to license or to market
our technology is successfully challenged, and if we fail to obtain a required license or are unable to design around a patent
held by a third party, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Our facilities or operations could be damaged
or adversely affected as a result of disasters or unpredictable events.
Our corporate headquarters
and factory in Corona are located in southern California, a region known for seismic activity. If major disasters such as earthquakes,
fires, floods, hurricanes, wars, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, pandemics or other events occur, or our information system
or communications network breaks down or operates improperly, our headquarters and production facilities may be seriously damaged,
or we may have to stop or delay production and shipment of our products. In addition, our lease for our Corona facility permits
the landlord to terminate the lease following a casualty event if the needed repairs are in excess of certain thresholds and we
do not agree to pay for any uninsured amounts. We may incur expenses relating to such damages, which could have a material adverse
impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
If our suppliers fail to use ethical business
practices and comply with applicable laws and regulations, our brand image could be harmed due to negative publicity.
Our core values, which
include developing quality high performance vehicles while operating with integrity, are an important component of our brand image,
which makes our reputation particularly sensitive to allegations of unethical business practices. We do not control our independent
suppliers or their business practices. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee their compliance with ethical business practices, such
as environmental responsibility, fair wage practices, appropriate sourcing of raw materials, and compliance with child labor laws,
among others. A lack of demonstrated compliance could lead us to seek alternative suppliers, which could increase our costs and
result in delayed delivery of our products, product shortages or other disruptions of our operations.
Violation of labor or
other laws by our suppliers or the divergence of an independent supplier’s labor or other practices from those generally
accepted as ethical in the United States or other markets in which we do business could also attract negative publicity for us
and our brand. This could diminish the value of our brand image and reduce demand for our high performance vehicles if, as a result
of such violation, we were to attract negative publicity. If we, or other manufacturers in our industry, encounter similar problems
in the future, it could harm our brand image, business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
We may not be able to effectively manage
our growth.
Our strategy envisions
growing our business. We plan to expand our technology, sales, administrative and marketing organizations. Any growth in or expansion
of our business is likely to continue to place a strain on our management and administrative resources, infrastructure and systems.
As with other growing businesses, we expect that we will need to further refine and expand our business development capabilities,
our systems and processes and our access to financing sources. We also will need to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees.
These processes are time consuming and expensive, will increase management responsibilities and will divert management attention.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to:
|
●
|
expand our systems effectively
or efficiently or in a timely manner;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
allocate our human resources
optimally;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
meet our capital needs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
identify and hire qualified
employees or retain valued employees; or
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
incorporate effectively
the components of any business or product line that we may acquire in our effort to achieve growth.
|
Our inability or failure
to manage our growth and expansion effectively could harm our business and materially and adversely affect our operating results
and financial condition.
We will be required to attract and retain
top quality talent to compete in the marketplace.
We believe our future
growth and success will depend in part on our abilities to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, product development,
sales and marketing, and finance personnel. There can be no assurance of success in attracting and retaining such personnel. Shortages
in qualified personnel could limit our ability to increase sales of existing products and services and launch new product and
service offerings.
Our forecasts are highly speculative in
nature and we cannot predict results in a development stage company with a high degree of accuracy.
Any financial projections,
especially those based on ventures with minimal operating history, are inherently subject to a high degree of uncertainty, and
their ultimate achievement depends on the timing and occurrence of a complex series of future events, both internal and external
to the enterprise. There can be no assurance that potential revenues or expenses we project will, in fact, be received or incurred.
We will be subject to evolving and expensive
corporate governance regulations and requirements. Our failure to adequately adhere to these requirements or the failure or circumvention
of our controls and procedures could seriously harm our business.
As a publicly traded company,
we are subject to various federal, state and other rules and regulations, including applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. Compliance with these evolving regulations is costly and requires a significant diversion of management time and
attention, particularly with regard to our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting.
Our internal controls and procedures may not be able to prevent errors or fraud in the future. Faulty judgments, simple errors
or mistakes, or the failure of our personnel to adhere to established controls and procedures, may make it difficult for us to
ensure that the objectives of the control system are met. A failure of our controls and procedures to detect other than inconsequential
errors or fraud could seriously harm our business and results of operations.
We are obligated to develop and maintain
proper and effective internal control over financial reporting. We may not complete our analysis of our internal control over
financial reporting in a timely manner, or these internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely
affect investor confidence in our company and, as a result, the value of our stock.
We are required, pursuant
to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting. This assessment includes disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our
management in our internal control over financial reporting.
Complying with Section 404
requires a rigorous compliance program as well as adequate time and resources. As a result of developing, improving and expanding
our core information technology systems as well as implementing new systems to support our sales, engineering, supply chain and
manufacturing activities, all of which require significant management time and support, we may not be able to complete our internal
control evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion. Additionally, if we identify one or more material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective.
If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective we could lose investor confidence in
the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would have a material adverse effect on the price of our stock.
Our limited senior management team size
may hamper our ability to effectively manage a publicly traded company while developing our products and harm our business.
Our management team has
experience in the management of publicly traded companies and complying with federal securities laws, including compliance with
recently adopted disclosure requirements on a timely basis. They realize it will take significant resources to meet these requirements
while simultaneously working on licensing, developing and protecting our products and intellectual property. Our management will
be required to design and implement appropriate programs and policies in responding to increased legal, regulatory compliance
and reporting requirements, and any failure to do so could lead to the imposition of fines and penalties and harm our business.
The global economy may continue to experience
soft growth over the next several years, reducing demand for our products.
The global economy continues
to experience difficulty in its recovery from the 2008 global recession. In light of the current global economic environment,
there can be no guarantees that the United States, or its trading partners abroad, with whom it is largely interdependent, will
experience a return to pre-recessionary growth and economic performance. Continued lackluster growth and economic figures would
serve to further quell economic demand, and subsequently, growth of the automotive market, reducing demand for our products.
Risks
Related to our Common Stock
We
currently have secured and unsecured convertible notes payable that if converted, would require us to issue approximately 75 million
shares of our common stock which could cause significant dilution to stockholders and adversely impact the market price of our
stock.
On June 26, 2013, we issued
senior secured convertible notes, having a total principal amount of $3,000,000 to 12 accredited investors of which
$75,578 and $337,690 was converted to common stock in November 2013 and January 2014, respectively. The Notes pay 3.0% interest
per annum with a maturity of 4 years (June 25, 2017). Each Note is convertible at any time into common stock at a specified
conversion price, which currently is $0.075 per share. In March and April 2014, we issued principal amounts of $2,250,000
and $250,000, respectively, of unsecured convertible notes to 5 accredited investors of which 3 investors held convertible
notes issued in the June 2013 issuance. The Notes pay 7.0% interest per annum with a maturity of 3 years (March
and April 2017). Each Note is convertible at any time into common stock at a specified conversion price, which currently is $0.07 per
share. The conversion price for all convertible notes are subject to specified anti-dilution adjustments for reorganization transactions,
stock dividends and stock splits. In addition, the March and April 2014 conversion price could reset below $0.07 per share based
on the performance of our common stock below the current conversion price.
To
date, amounts outstanding under the Notes totaled $5,424,422, which if converted at the current conversion prices would result
in our issuance of 74,706,579 shares of our common stock. However, that number of shares could significantly increase if the conversion
price were to reset to prices lower than the current conversion prices. Issuance of these shares could have a significant dilutive
impact on stockholders and negatively impact our stock price.
In
June 2014, in exchange for the issuance in aggregate of 389,923 shares of common stock, we entered into a First Amendment to Saleen
Automotive, Inc. 3.0% Secured Convertible Note to remove all specified adjustments to the conversion price except for standard
anti-dilution provisions whereby if the we consummate a reorganization transaction pay dividends or enter into a stock split of
our common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. In addition, if a fundamental transaction (as defined in the
notes) were to occur, the potential liquidated damages was set to a fixed amount. As a result of this amendment, the conversion
price is no longer subject to fluctuation based on the occurrence of future offerings or events.
In
June 2014, in exchange for the issuance in aggregate of 357,143 shares of common stock, we entered into a First Amendment to Saleen
Automotive, Inc. 7% Convertible Note whereby effective as of the date of the note, the conversion price would in no event adjust
below $0.03 per share. In addition, if a fundamental transaction (as defined in the notes) were to occur, the potential liquidated
damages was set to a fixed amount.
After
June 27, 2014, common stock representing approximately 30 million common shares held by Saleen Automotive’s former stockholders
will become eligible under Rule 144 for sale which could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our stock.
Under
the terms of the Merger Agreement, all of the then outstanding shares of capital stock held by Saleen Automotive’s former
stockholders (other than Saleen), were exchanged for 238,933 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock. Each share of our Super
Voting Preferred Stock automatically converted into 125 shares of our common stock in January 2014; however, such shares were
not eligible for sale under Rule 144 until June 27, 2014. Accordingly, former stockholders of Saleen Automotive (other than Saleen)
received 29,866,625 shares of our common stock, which are eligible for sale under Rule 144 starting on June 27, 2014. The sale
of these shares in the public market could have a materially adverse impact on our stock price.
Our
common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Market’s electronic interdealer quotation QB system (OTCQB) and OTC Bulletin
Board (OTCBB). As such, our securities may be less liquid, be thinly traded, receive less coverage by security analysts, market
makers and news media, and generate lower prices than might otherwise be obtained if they were listed on a national securities
exchange. Our stock price is likely to be highly volatile.
Although
prices for shares of our common stock are quoted on the OTCQB and OTCBB, there is little current trading activity and no assurance
can be given that an active public trading market will develop or, if developed, that it will be sustained. The OTCQB and OTCBB
are generally regarded as a less efficient and less prestigious trading markets than other national markets. There is no assurance
if or when our common stock will be quoted on another more prestigious exchange or market. The market price of our common stock
is likely to be highly volatile because for some time there will likely be a thin trading market for the stock, which causes trades
of small blocks of stock to have a significant impact on the stock price.
Because
our common stock is a “penny stock,” trading therein will be subject to regulatory restrictions.
Our
common stock is currently, and in the near future will likely continue to be, considered a “penny stock.” The SEC
has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks generally
are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges
or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities
is provided by the exchange or system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock
not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, which specifies
information about penny stocks and the nature and significance of risks of the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must
provide the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and any salesperson
in the transaction, and monthly account statements indicating the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s
account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those
rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser
and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure and other requirements may adversely
affect the trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock.
We
have not paid dividends in the past and, except for the dividend paid to our existing stockholders at the closing of the Merger,
do not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future, and any return on investment may be limited to potential future appreciation
on the value of our common stock.
While
we declared a dividend to holders of record of our common stock as of May 23, 2013, we do not anticipate paying dividends in the
foreseeable future and currently intend to retain any future earnings to support the development and expansion of our business.
Our payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors,
including without limitation, the our financial condition, operating results, cash needs, growth plans and the terms of any credit
agreements that we may be a party to at the time. To the extent we do not pay dividends, our stock may be less valuable because
a return on investment will only occur if and to the extent the stock price appreciates, which may never occur. In addition, stockholders
must generally rely on sales of the shares they own after price appreciation as the only way to realize their investment, and
if the price of our common stock does not appreciate, then there will be no return on investment.
Our
officers, directors and principal stockholders can exert significant influence over our business and may make decisions that are
not in the best interests of all stockholders.
After
the Merger our officers, directors and principal stockholders (greater than 5% stockholders) collectively owned approximately
54% of our fully-diluted common stock. In addition, Saleen owns approximately 52% of our fully-diluted common stock. Our directors
will be determined pursuant to the Voting Agreement entered into by Saleen and the purchasers of our 3% Senior Secured Convertible
Notes Together, such parties hold a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock and, under the Voting Agreement, are obligated
to vote for the directors determined as described below. The authorized number of our directors is five. Those directors will
consist of three directors—Steve Saleen, Jonathan Michaels and Jeffrey Kraws—whose replacements will be determined
under the terms of the Voting Agreement by Saleen, one director—Gary Freeman—whose replacement will be determined
under the terms of the Voting Agreement by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares held by purchasers of our 3% Senior
Secured Convertible Notes, and one director, Joe Amato, whose replacement will be determined jointly by the holders of a majority
of the outstanding shares held by Saleen and by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares held by purchasers of our
3% Senior Secured Convertible Notes.
As
a result of such ownership and the Voting Agreement, these stockholders will be able to affect the outcome of, or exert significant
influence over, all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors and any change in
control. In particular, this concentration of ownership of our common stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing a
change of control of our company or otherwise discouraging or preventing a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control
of our company. This, in turn, could have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock. It could also prevent our
stockholders from realizing a premium over the market prices for their shares of our common stock. Moreover, the interests of
this concentration of ownership may not always coincide with the combined company’s interests or the interests of other
stockholders, and accordingly, they could cause the combined company to enter into transactions or agreements that it would not
otherwise consider.
Anti-takeover
provisions may limit the ability of another party to acquire our company, which could cause our stock price to decline.
Our
articles of incorporation, as amended, bylaws and Nevada law contain provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a third
party from acquiring our company, even if doing so may be beneficial to our stockholders. In addition, these provisions could
limit the price investors would be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.
The
requirements of being a public company, including compliance with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, may strain our resources, increase our costs and distract
management, and we may be unable to comply with these requirements in a timely or cost-effective manner.
As
a public company, we need to comply with laws, regulations and requirements, certain corporate governance provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, related regulations of the SEC, and requirements of the principal trading market upon which our common stock may
trade, with which we are not required to comply as a private company. As a result, we will incur significant legal, accounting
and other expenses that a private company would not incur. Complying with these statutes, regulations and requirements will occupy
a significant amount of the time of our board of directors and management, will require us to have additional finance and accounting
staff, may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified officers and members of our board of directors, particularly
to serve on the audit committee, and may make some activities more difficult, time consuming and costly. We will need to:
|
●
|
institute
a more comprehensive compliance function;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
establish
new internal policies, such as those relating to disclosure controls and procedures and insider trading;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
design,
establish, evaluate and maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting in compliance with the requirements
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
prepare
and distribute periodic reports in compliance with its obligations under the federal securities laws including the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”);
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
involve
and retain to a greater degree outside counsel and accountants in the above activities; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
establish
an investor relations function.
|
If
we are unable to accomplish these objectives in a timely and effective fashion for our business, our ability to comply with financial
reporting requirements and other rules that apply to reporting companies could be impaired. If our finance and accounting personnel
insufficiently support our business in fulfilling these public-company compliance obligations, or if we are unable to hire adequate
finance and accounting personnel, we could face significant legal liability, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if we identify any issues in complying with those requirements (for
example, if our company or the independent registered public accountants identified a material weakness or significant deficiency
in our company’s internal control over financial reporting), we could incur additional costs rectifying those issues, and
the existence of those issues could adversely affect, our reputation or investor perceptions of our company.
We
are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and as a consequence of taking advantage of certain exemptions
from reporting requirements that are available to emerging growth companies, our financial statements may not be comparable to
companies that comply with public company effective dates.
We
are an emerging growth company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”). Pursuant to Section 107 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, we may take advantage of the extended transition
period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards, meaning that
we can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We
have chosen to take advantage of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards applicable
to public companies to delay adoption of such standards until such standards are made applicable to private companies. Accordingly,
our financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised
accounting standards.
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
Our
principal corporate office and production facility is located at 2735 Wardlow Road, Corona, California 92882 and our design, engineering
and paint facility is located at 2755 Wardlow Road, Corona, California 92882. We operate out of leased facilities comprised of
a two building campus that constitutes approximately four acres of industrial and office space. Our telephone number is (714)
400-2121. We believe our facilities are adequate to meet our current and near-term needs.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We
are involved in certain legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. We are currently
a party to several legal proceedings related to claims for payment that are currently accrued for in our financial statements
as accounts or notes payable. Except for income tax contingencies (commencing April 1, 2009), we record accruals for contingencies
to the extent that our management concludes that the occurrence is probable and that the related amounts of loss can be reasonably
estimated. Legal expenses associated with the contingency are expensed as incurred. Material legal proceedings that are currently
pending are as follows:
SSC
is a defendant in a case filed by MSY Trading, Inc. on April 13, 2012 in the California Superior Court, Riverside County, that
claims breach of contract related to an engine installed by a third party vendor. The suit claims $200,000 in damages plus interest,
legal fees and costs of litigation. We filed a cross complain against MSY Trading, Inc. for breach of warranty, negligence, and
indemnification. On January 10, 2014, we settled this claim by agreeing to pay of $112,500 over a period of 18 months.
SSC
is the plaintiff in a case filed against Connects Marketing and Eric Hruza on July 2, 2012 in the United States District Court,
Central District of California, Southern Division, for misappropriation of trade secrets, trademark infringement and other related
causes of action. The suit seeks damages in excess of $1,000,000 and is currently pending.
SSC
is the plaintiff in a case filed against Douglas Lopez & Rumm, LLP, Diana Lopez and Dana Douglas on October 16, 2012 in the
California Superior Court, Orange County, for legal malpractice for their failure to adequately represent SSC in its litigation
against Connects Marketing for the installation of defective engines in SSC vehicles. The suit seeks damages in excess of $1,000,000.
The defendants have filed a cross-complaint against SSC and Saleen for payment for legal services rendered in the amount of $10,000.
We have recorded this liability on our books.
In
February 2014, SSC received a Complaint from a bank alleging, among other matters, breach of contract due to non-timely payment
of November and December 2013 principal amounts owed, which were paid as of December 31, 2013, and the occurrence of a change
in control as a result of the Merger. In April 2014, the bank agreed to dismiss the suit in exchange for our payment of $124,000
that was applied towards principal and unpaid fees along with advance loan principal and interest for May, June and July 2014,
and our agreement to pay the remaining recorded balance due of $443,000 to the bank in August 2014.
Although
we currently believe that resolving claims against us, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on
our financial statements, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and our views of these matters may change in the
future.
ITEM
4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not
applicable.
PART
II
ITEM
5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Common
Stock
Our
common stock is currently quoted on the OTCBB. Our common stock has been quoted on the OTCBB since August 9, 2012 under the symbol
“WSTY.” On July 5, 2013, the trading symbol for our common stock changed to “SLNN.” Historical closing
prices for shares of our common stock on the OTCBB are only available from and after May 31, 2013. Therefore, the table below
only reflects the high and low bid prices of our common stock from this date:
Quarter
Ended
|
|
June
30
(1)
,
2013
|
|
|
September 30, 2013
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
(1)
reflects period from May 31, 2013 to June 30, 2013
Stockholders
of Record
As
of June 16, 2014, an aggregate of 142,682,367 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding and were owned by 276 stockholders
of record.
Dividends
On
May 23, 2013, our board of directors declared, for stockholders of record of our common stock as of May 23, 2013, a per share
dividend of $0.035 in cash, subject to (a) the closing of the Merger, (b) our compliance with the applicable requirements of the
Nevada Revised Statutes and (c) our notification to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) of the dividend
and FINRA’s confirmation that it has received the necessary documentation to process the dividend. On June 26, 2013, we
satisfied all of the conditions to payment of the dividend and paid the dividend on June 27, 2013.
Other
than the aforementioned dividend, we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future and currently intend to retain
any future earnings to support the development and expansion of our business. The declaration and payment of dividends is subject
to the discretion of our board of directors and to certain limitations imposed under Nevada statutes. The timing, amount and form
of dividends, if any, will depend upon, among other things, our results of operation, financial condition, cash requirements,
and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not
applicable.
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENTS’ DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the operating results, financial condition and liquidity and
cash flows of our company for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
You should read this
discussion together with the consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included in this
Annual Report
. Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties,
including
those discussed under Part I, Item 1A—“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report,
and are based
upon judgments concerning various factors that are beyond our control.
These risks could
cause our actual results to differ materially from any future performance suggested below.
We
are an emerging growth company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act. Pursuant to Section 107 of the Jumpstart
Our Business Startups Act, we may take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities
Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards, meaning that we can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards
until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have chosen to take advantage of the extended transition
period for complying with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies to delay adoption of such standards
until such standards are made applicable to private companies. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be comparable to
the financial statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
General
Overview
We
design, develop, manufacture and sell high performance cars built from base chassis’ of Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros,
and Dodge Challengers, as well as exotic sports cars. We are a low volume specialist vehicle design, engineering and manufacturing
company focusing on the mass customization of OEM American Sports Cars and the production of high performance USA-engineered sports
and racing cars. Saleen-branded products include a complete line of upgraded muscle cars, high performance cars, automotive aftermarket
specialty parts and lifestyle accessories. We are also planning to develop an American supercar along with hybrid and zero-emission
vehicles for commercial applications and consumer markets. In January 2013, we announced that we will produce for the first time,
a Saleen Tesla Model S sports car. The Saleen Tesla design will be our first effort in enhancing an existing electric vehicle.
Our
customers worldwide include muscle and high performance car enthusiasts, collectors, automotive dealers, exotic car retail dealers,
television and motion picture production, and consumers in the luxury supercar and motorsports market. We plan to develop a network
of company-owned branded stores to complement our existing retail dealer locations.
We
utilize automobile manufacturers Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge platform vehicles for our muscle and performance vehicle production.
All aftermarket parts and accessory products are engineered and manufactured exclusively by us. Our current retail outlets for
our products are authorized Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge dealers and we also retail our products with exotic car dealers.
We
plan to return as a global high performance automotive brand and expand our production, sales and marketing operations extensively
within the markets of the USA and into multiple international markets. In March 2014, we entered into an agreement to distribute
the full collection of Saleen automobiles in China. We also plan to open our own retail outlets, market our expertise in specialist
engineering and design services to third party clients, develop our own motorsport program and introduce our next generation American
supercar.
Merger
On
May 23, 2013, we entered into a Merger Agreement with Saleen California Merger Corporation, Saleen Florida Merger Corporation,
Saleen Automotive, SMS and Saleen. The Closing of the Merger occurred on June 26, 2013. At the Closing (a) Saleen California Merger
Corporation was merged with and into SMS with SMS surviving as one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries; (b) Saleen Florida Merger
Corporation was merged with and into Saleen Automotive with Saleen Automotive surviving as one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries;
(c) holders of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive received an aggregate of 554,057 shares of our Super Voting
Preferred Stock and holders of the outstanding capital stock of SMS received no consideration for their shares; and (d) approximately
93% of the beneficial ownership of our common stock (on a fully-diluted basis) was owned, collectively, by Saleen (including shares
of our Super Voting Preferred Stock issued to Saleen pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement) and the former holders
of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive. As a result of the Merger we are solely engaged in the Saleen Entities’
business, Saleen Automotive’s officers became our officers and Saleen Automotive’s three directors at that time became
members of our five-member board of directors. In October 2013, SMS effected an amendment to its articles of incorporation to
change its name to Saleen Signature Cars.
On
May 23, 2013, we also entered into an Assignment and License Agreement with Saleen pursuant to which Saleen agreed, as of the
effective time of the Merger, to contribute certain intellectual property that relates to the “Saleen” brand name
and related rights which are currently owned by him to us, license to us the right to use his image, signature, full name, voice,
biographical materials, likeness, and goodwill associated with the “Saleen” brand, and assign to us all shares of
the capital stock of SMS Retail – Corona, a California corporation, and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc., a Michigan corporation.
On June 21, 2013, we amended the Assignment and License Agreement to terminate the obligation to assign to us all shares of the
capital stock of SMS Retail – Corona and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc., and Saleen agreed to dissolve those entities
within 30 days after the Closing. Concurrently with the Closing, pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended,
Saleen assigned certain intellectual property that relates to the “Saleen” brand name and related rights which are
currently owned by him to us, and licensed the right to use his image, signature, full name, voice, biographical materials, likeness,
and goodwill associated with the “Saleen” brand to us, and commenced the process of dissolving each of SMS Retail
– Corona and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc. The aforementioned license may only be terminated in the event we file a
petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or a petition for relief is converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding
under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In exchange for entering into the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended, we issued to Saleen,
as of the effective time of the Merger, 341,943 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock.
On
June 17, 2013, we consummated a merger with WSTY Subsidiary Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, pursuant to which we amended
our articles of incorporation to change our name to Saleen Automotive, Inc.
Under
the terms of the Merger Agreement, all of the outstanding shares of capital stock held by Saleen Automotive’s former shareholders
were exchanged for 554,057 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock, and under the terms of the Assignment and License Agreement,
as amended, we issued to Saleen an additional 341,943 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock. Each share of our Super Voting
Preferred Stock is convertible into 125 shares of our common stock in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Designations,
as amended. Accordingly, as a result of the Merger and the transactions effectuated pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement,
as amended, Saleen and the former shareholders of Saleen Automotive at that time owned approximately 112,000,000 shares of our
common stock on an as-converted basis, and our existing stockholders own 8,000,000 shares of our common stock at the time of the
Merger.
The
Merger was accounted for as a reverse merger (recapitalization) with the Saleen Entities deemed to be the accounting acquirers,
and our company deemed to be the legal acquirer. Accordingly, the following represents a discussion of the historical operations
of the Saleen Entities prior to the Merger and that of the combined company following the Merger. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements are prepared as if we will continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements
do not contain adjustments, including adjustments to recorded assets and liabilities, which might be necessary if we were unable
to continue as a going concern.
Critical
Accounting Policies
This
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section is based upon
our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires that we
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses and related disclosures.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to inventories, income taxes, accounts
receivable allowance, fair value derivatives, and reserve for warranty claims. We base our estimates on historical experience,
performance metrics and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results will differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We apply the following
critical accounting policies in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined principally on a first-in-first-out average cost basis. Inventories
consist primarily of parts for both resale and production of high performance vehicles. We will typically buy the base automobile
chassis from dealers and then modify the vehicle as ordered, using our developed parts. We typically have no finished goods inventory,
as we build to order, other than parts for resale.
Intangible
and Long-Lived Assets
In
accordance with ASC 350-30 (formerly SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets), we evaluate
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their net book value may not be recoverable.
When such factors and circumstances exist, we compare the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related
asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based
on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected cash flows,
of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. We had no such asset impairments at March 31,
2014 or 2013. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for our products under development
will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of long-lived assets.
Revenue
Recognition
Sales
of Performance Cars and Parts
. We generate revenues primarily from the sale of high performance vehicles and parts. We recognize
revenue from the sale of completed high performance vehicles and parts when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists,
delivery of the product has occurred and title has passed, the selling price is both fixed and determinable, and collectability
is reasonably assured, all of which generally occurs upon shipment or delivery of our product to the destination specified by
the customer.
We
determine whether delivery has occurred based on when title transfers and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred
to the buyer, which usually occurs when our high performance vehicles and retail parts leave our dock. Except for warranties related
to our high performance vehicles, we have no post-sales obligations.
Contract
Revenue and Cost Recognition on Design Services
. We recognized revenues using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting
by relating contract costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion. This method is used because we consider
costs to be the best available measure of progress. Contract losses are provided for in their entirety in the period that they
become known, without regard to the percentage-of-completion. We also recognize as revenues costs associated with claims and unapproved
change orders to the extent it is probable that such claims and change orders will result in additional contract revenue, and
the amount of such additional revenue can be reliably estimated. During the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, we realized revenue
from a contract with a major Hollywood movie producer to design and build replica supercar racing automobiles for the Need for
Speed movie, which was released in March 2014. We did not have any other design contracts during the twelve months ended March
31, 2014 and 2013.
Warranty
Reserves
We
provide a three-year or 36,000 miles New Vehicle Limited Warranty with every Saleen 302 and 302SC Mustang, Saleen 570 Challenger,
and Saleen 620 Camaro high performance vehicle. We provide a one-year or 12,000 miles New Vehicle Limited Warranty with every
Saleen 351 Mustang, Saleen 570X Challenger, and Saleen 620X Camaro high performance vehicle. The vehicle limited warranty applies
to our installed parts and/or assemblies in new Saleen high performance cars. All of the unaltered parts are covered under the
original full warranty of the OEM manufacturer of the base vehicles (Ford, Chevrolet, and Dodge).
We
provide a warranty reserve for estimated product warranty costs at the time the revenues are recognized. While we engage in quality
programs and processes, up to and including the final product, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, the
cost of the failed product and the inbound and outbound freight costs incurred. We continuously monitor and analyze product returns
for warranty and maintain a reserve for the related warranty costs based on historical experience and assumptions. If actual failure
rates and the resulting cost of replacement vary from our historically based estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty reserve
would be required.
Derivative
Financial instruments
We
evaluate all of our financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as
embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is
initially recorded at its fair value and is re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in fair value reported in the consolidated
statement of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, we use a Monte Carlo pricing model to value the derivatives
instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such
instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument
liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative
instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Share-Based
Compensation
We
use the fair value recognition provision of ASC 718, “Stock Compensation,” which requires us to expense the cost of
employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of such instruments.
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of any equity instruments on the grant date.
We
also use the provisions of ASC 505-50, “Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees,” to account for stock-based compensation
awards issued to non-employees for services. Such awards for services are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered
or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable, using the measurement date guidelines
enumerated in ASC 505-50.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On
May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue
from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under
current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require
that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also
will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer
contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill
a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted.
Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.
Management is currently evaluating the impact, if any, on adopting ASU 2014-09 on our results of operations or financial condition.
In
April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic
205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). ASU 2014-08 amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations
and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic
shift in operations or that have a major effect on our operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations.
This new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Management is currently evaluating
the impact, if any, of adopting ASU 2014-08 on our results of operations or financial condition.
Other
recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact
on our present or future consolidated financial statements.
Year
Ended March 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2013
Our
revenue, operating expenses, and net loss from operations for the year ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended March
31, 2013 were as follows – some balances on the prior period’s consolidated financial statements have been reclassified
to conform to the current period presentation:
|
|
For
the Twelve months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Change
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Inc
(Dec)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles
and parts
|
|
$
|
5,158,387
|
|
|
$
|
1,453,030
|
|
|
$
|
3,705,357
|
|
|
|
255
|
%
|
Design
Services
|
|
|
121,500
|
|
|
|
1,245,985
|
|
|
|
(1,124,485
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
%)
|
Total
revenue
|
|
|
5,279,887
|
|
|
|
2,699,015
|
|
|
|
2,580,872
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Costs
of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles
and parts
|
|
|
4,227,039
|
|
|
|
1,320,061
|
|
|
|
2,956,978
|
|
|
|
224
|
%
|
Design
Services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
859,541
|
|
|
|
(859,541
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
%)
|
Total
Costs of Good Sold
|
|
|
4,277,039
|
|
|
|
2,179,602
|
|
|
|
2,097,437
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Gross
Margin
|
|
|
1,002,848
|
|
|
|
519,413
|
|
|
|
483,435
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
766,996
|
|
|
|
113,903
|
|
|
|
653,093
|
|
|
|
573
|
%
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
1,709,889
|
|
|
|
489,072
|
|
|
|
1,220,817
|
|
|
|
250
|
%
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
4,261,612
|
|
|
|
2,598,616
|
|
|
|
1,662,996
|
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
Settlement costs (including
$385,785 from related parties)
|
|
|
945,401
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
945,401
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
|
|
97,061
|
|
|
|
80,892
|
|
|
|
16,169
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
7,780,959
|
|
|
|
3,282,483
|
|
|
|
4,498,476
|
|
|
|
137
|
%
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(6,778,111
|
)
|
|
|
(2,763,070
|
)
|
|
|
(4,015,040
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
%
|
Other
income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(606,194
|
)
|
|
|
(225,046
|
)
|
|
|
(381,148
|
)
|
|
|
169
|
%
|
Costs
of reverse merger transaction
|
|
|
(365,547
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(365,547
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
in extinguishment of derivative liability
|
|
|
236,158
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
236,158
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
(3,608,288
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,608,288
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
(11,121,982
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,988,116
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,133,866
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
%
|
Revenues
:
Revenue consists of sales of high performance vehicles, aftermarket retail parts and design services. Our revenue from high performance
vehicles generally include the base vehicle, on which we normally obtain a small margin, and production conversion of the base
chassis into a Saleen OEM high performance sports car. Parts represent aftermarket retail sales of Saleen lifestyle accessories
and Saleen-branded products and automotive aftermarket specialty parts sold to our base of over 25,000 loyal Saleen automotive
vehicles in the U.S. and overseas. Additionally, many of these parts and accessories are marketed and sold to the owners of Ford
Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros and Dodge Challengers. Design services relate to design, engineering and product development services,
which are generally performed over a short-term basis.
Total
revenues for the year ended March 31, 2014 were $5,279,887, an increase of $2,580,872 or 96% from $2,699,015 for the year ended
March 31, 2013. Revenue from the sale of automotive vehicles and parts increased $3,705,357 or 255% to $5,158,387 for the year
ended March 31, 2014 from $1,453,030 for the year ended March 31, 2013. The increase reflects sales efforts achieved by our expanded
sales force whereby we sold a higher number of vehicles during the year ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended March
31, 2013. Growth was achieved primarily through expansion with existing dealers as well as the addition of new dealer networks.
During the year ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, revenues of $121,500 and $1,245,985 were realized from a contract with a major
Hollywood movie producer to design and build replica supercar racing automobiles for the Need for Speed movie, which was released
in March 2014. We did not have any other design contracts during the year ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
Cost
of Goods Sold
: Cost of goods sold consist of five major categories: base chassis, material, overhead, labor and purchased
process services. Chassis costs relate to the purchase Ford Mustang, Chevrolet Camaro or Dodge Challenger vehicles. Material cost
relates primarily to the purchase of conversion parts used in production of our high performance vehicles, and procurement of
aftermarket parts, which are primarily manufactured by third party suppliers using our proprietary tools and molds developed by
us. Overhead costs include costs associated with manufacturing support, shop and warehouse supplies and expenses, small tools
and equipment and other related warehouse and production costs. Our labor costs include the cost of personnel related to the production
of our high performance vehicles and logistics of warehousing and shipping of our aftermarket parts. Purchased process services
related to the subcontracting of specific manufacturing processes to outside contractors, such as paint. Design services costs
primarily consist of cost of materials used to develop replica race cars and outside subcontracted services.
Total
costs of goods sold for the year ended March 31, 2014 were $4,277,039, an increase of $2,097,437 or 96%, from $2,179,602 of costs
of goods sold for the year ended March 31, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to $2,956,978 of higher costs attributable
to increased vehicle and parts sales during the year ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The
increase was partly offset by the decrease in costs of design services of $859,541 incurred related to a design contract during
the year ended March 31, 2013. We did not incur any design contract costs during the year ended March 31, 2014, as we did not
enter into any new design contracts.
Gross
Margin
: Gross Margin from the sale of vehicles and parts increased $748,378 to $881,347 or 563% for a gross margin of 17%
for the year ended March 31, 2014 from a gross margin of $132,969 or 9% for the year ended March 31, 2013. The improvement in
gross margin reflects both the increase in sales net of an increase in costs of goods sold as a percentage of sales during the
year ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Gross Margin from design services contributed $121,500
and $386,444 for the year ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Research
and Development Expenses
:
Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred
and represent engineering salaries and benefits and costs incurred in the development of new products and processes, including
significant improvements and refinements to existing products and processes.
Research
and development expenses increased by $653,093 or 573% to $766,996 during the year ended March 31, 2014 from $113,903 for the
year ended March 31, 2013. The increase is primarily due to our expanded engineering team and development of our existing and
new and future high performance vehicles including the recent introduction of our George Follmer edition, 30th year anniversary
cars and the Saleen Tesla.
Sales
and Marketing Expense
: Sales and marketing expenses relate to sales and marketing salaries and benefits, including our regional
sales representatives, and costs incurred to promote our existing and new products, such as through car shows and other media
outlets, along with new car sales expenses such as commissions and incentives, and costs related to investor relations.
Sales
and marketing expenses increased by $1,220,817 or 250% to $1,709,889 for the year ended March 31, 2014 from $489,072 for the year
ended March 31, 2013. The increase was primarily comprised of $353,585 of higher salaries expense resulting from our expansion
of our sales and marketing team, including regional new car sales representatives; $364,601 increased marketing efforts to promote
existing and new products, including our increased participation at various car shows and launch of new products such as our George
Follmer and 30th year anniversary cars; $87,326 of new car sales commissions related to increased revenues from sales of high
performance vehicles; and $415,305 related to investor and public relation costs incurred to promote our company. Included in
sales and marketing expenses during the year ended March 31, 2014 is stock compensation expense of $325,700 related to our issuance
of common stock in exchange for investor relation services.
General
and Administrative Expense
: General and administrative expenses include expenses for administrative salaries, including executive,
finance/accounting, information personnel and administrative support staff and benefits and payroll taxes related to our employees.
Other general and administrative costs include occupancy costs, travel and entertainment, auto, insurance, stock compensation,
and other office support costs. We also incur professional fees, including outside accounting/audit, legal, and investor fund
raising advisory services.
General
and administrative expenses increased by $1,662,996 or 64% to $4,261,612 for the year ended March 31, 2014 from $2,598,616 for
the year ended March 31, 2013. The increase is primarily comprised of $364,978 of higher administrative salaries expense resulting
from our expansion of personnel to support the increased sales volume; $212,468 increase in occupancy costs from our expansion
of our campus to support our growth and new engineering and design facilities used to expand development; $504,481 in non-cash
stock compensation primarily related to stock granted in exchange for board services; and $581,069 increase in other general and
administrative expenses incurred to support the growth of our Company.
Settlement
Costs
: Settlement costs consisted of a $385,785 loss incurred to settle related party accounts payable balances with a current
and former board member of $739,572 offset by the forgiveness of amounts owed to Mr. Saleen of $353,787. In addition, we incurred
a loss of $559,616 related to the one-time settlements of previous claims. We did not incur settlement costs during the year ended
March 31, 2013.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
: Depreciation and amortization expense relates to our depreciating and amortizing costs incurred
for leasehold improvements, equipment and tooling. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $16,169 or 20% to $97,061
for the year ended March 31, 2014 from $80,892 for the year ended March 31, 2013.
Interest
Expense
: Interest expense increased by $381,148 or 169% to $606,194 for the year ended March 31, 2014 from $225,046 for the
year ended March 31, 2013. The increase is primarily attributable to $411,675 of non-cash interest expense during the year ended
March 31, 2014 attributable to the amortization of the convertible debt discount on our $3,000,000 of senior secured convertible
notes issued on June 26, 2013.
Expenses
of Reverse Merger Transaction
: During the year ended March 31, 2014, we incurred $365,547 of expenses related to the reverse
merger transaction. This includes $39,547 of liabilities assumed, $46,000 in legal fees, and dividends of $280,000 paid to our
existing stockholders prior to the Merger. We did not have a comparable expense of this type during the year ended March 31, 2013.
Gain
on Extinguishment of Derivative Liability
: Gain on extinguishment of derivative liability of $236,158 resulted from certain
note holders’ request to convert their convertible debt to stock in accordance with the terms of the convertible note. We
did not have a comparable gain during the year ended March 31, 2013.
Change
in Fair Value of Derivative Liability
: In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion feature of our $3,000,000
convertible notes issued on June 26, 2013 was separated from the host contract (i.e., the notes) and recognized as a derivative
instrument. The conversion feature of the notes has been characterized as a derivative liability that is re-measured at the end
of every reporting period with the change in value recognized as a gain or loss in our statement of operations. During the year
ended March 31, 2014, we recorded a $3,608,288 loss due to the change in the derivative liability from issuance date to March
31, 2014. We did not have a comparable loss during the year ended March 31, 2013. In June 2014, we entered into an amendment with
the holders of our convertible notes whereby in exchange for the issuance of 747,066 shares of our common stock, the notes were
amended to remove the derivative nature of the conversion feature and thus, we no longer recognize a derivative liability related
to these notes.
Net
Loss
: Net loss increased by $8,133,866, or 272%, to a net loss of $11,121,982 for the year ended March 31, 2014 from a net
loss of $2,988,116 for the year ended March 31, 2013. This net loss reflects the increased operating expenses, offset somewhat
by higher gross margin discussed above, and a $3,608,288 increase in the fair value of our derivative instrument related to our
$3,000,000 convertible notes issued on June 26, 2013.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our
financial position as of March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 are follows:
Net Working Capital Deficiency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
As
of
March 31, 2013
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$
|
2,230,294
|
|
|
$
|
746,493
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(5,280,580
|
)
|
|
|
(4,722,099
|
)
|
Net Working Capital Deficiency
|
|
$
|
(3,050,286
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,975,606
|
)
|
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
Year
Ended
March 31, 2013
|
|
Net cash used in Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
(4,316,576
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,779,345
|
)
|
Net cash used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(303,666
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Net cash provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
6,115,697
|
|
|
|
1,777,110
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Cash during the Year
|
|
|
1,495,455
|
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
Cash, Beginning of Year
|
|
|
4,434
|
|
|
|
6,779
|
|
Cash, End of Year
|
|
|
1,499,889
|
|
|
|
4,434
|
|
On
May 23, 2013, we entered into the Merger Agreement with Saleen California Merger Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saleen
Florida Merger Corporation, Saleen Automotive, SMS and Saleen. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement
occurred on June 26, 2013. The Merger was accounted for as a reverse merger (recapitalization) with the Saleen Entities deemed
to be the accounting acquirers, and our company deemed to be the legal acquirer. Accordingly, the following represents a discussion
of the operations of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Saleen Automotive and Saleen Signature Cars (Formerly SMS), for the periods
presented.
For
the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013,
our principal sources of liquidity have been obtained
from cash provided by financing, including through the private issuance of notes and sale of equity securities, along with gross
margin achieved from the sales of high performance vehicles and aftermarket parts. Our principal uses of cash have been to finance
operations; develop new products and improve existing products; expand marketing efforts to promote our products and company;
and other capital expenditures.
We anticipate that significant additional expenditures will be necessary to develop and
expand our automotive assets before significant positive operating cash flows will be achieved and funds will be needed in order
to achieve these objectives. As such, our cash resources are insufficient to meet our planned business objectives without additional
financing. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
As
further presented in our consolidated financial statements and related notes, during the year ended March 31, 2014, we incurred
a net loss of $11,121,982 and utilized $4,316,576 of cash in operations. We also had a stockholders’ deficit and working
capital deficit of $9,296,629 and $3,050,286, respectively as of March 31, 2014, and as of that date, we owed $630,874 in past
unpaid payroll taxes and $967,747 of outstanding notes payable were in default. These factors raise substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern.
Our ability to continue
as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and
profitable operations. At March 31, 2014, we had cash on hand in the amount of $1,499,889. During the year ended March, 31, 2014,
we raised $5,250,000 through the issuance of unsecured convertible notes, including converting a $500,000 Secured Promissory Note
with W-Net originally issued on October 7, 2013 into a long-term unsecured convertible note. In addition, during the year ended
March 31, 2014, we entered into Subscription Agreements with individual accredited investors (the “Subscribers”) pursuant
to which the Subscribers purchased from us an aggregate of 8,793,337 restricted common shares at a per share price of $0.15 for
aggregate proceeds of $1,312,500, net of issuance costs of $24,000. Additional Subscribers purchased 816,667 and 416,667 restricted
common shares in April and May 2014, respectively, at a per share price of $0.15 for aggregate proceeds of $122,500 and $62,500,
respectively, and in April 2014 we received $250,000 from additional issuances of 7% unsecured convertible notes. However, additional
funding will be needed to continue operations through September 30, 2014. In addition, we will need and are currently seeking
additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or equity securities for cash to operate our business beyond September
30, 2014. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that
are satisfactory to us. Even if we are able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations,
in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for its stockholders, in case or equity financing.
At
March 31, 2014, we had a working capital deficit of $3,050,286 compared to a working capital deficit of $3,975,606 at March 31,
2013. Current liabilities increased to $5,280,580 at March 31, 2014 from $4,722,099 at March 31, 2013 primarily as a result of
accounts payable, accrued payroll taxes, accrued interest, and increase in current portion of notes payable related to additional
borrowings.
Net
cash used by operating activities for the twelve months ended March 31, 2014 totaled $4,316,576 after the cash used in the net
loss of $11,121,982 was decreased by $5,344,019 in non-cash charges and by $1,461,387 in net changes to the working capital accounts.
This compares to cash used by operating activities for the twelve months ended March 31, 2013 of $1,779,345 after the net loss
for the period of $2,988,116 was decreased by $534,430 in non-cash charges and by $674,341 in changes to the working capital accounts.
Net
cash used in investing activities was $303,666 for twelve months ended March 31, 2014. This compares to $110 of cash used in investing
activities for the twelve months ended March 31, 2013. This increase is primarily related to purchasing of tooling, leasehold
improvements and other equipment.
Net
cash provided by financing activities for the twelve months ended March 31, 2014 was $6,115,697. Of this amount, $5,250,000 came
from the issuance of our senior secured and unsecured convertible notes; $575,000 came from the issuance of note payable to a
stockholder; and $1,312,500 came from the issuance of 8,793,337 shares of common stock. Cash of $318,558 was used to pay principal
on long term notes and cash of $703,245 was used to pay principal on notes payable to related parties. This compares to $1,777,110
in cash provided by financing activities during the twelve months ended March 31, 2013, of which $1,607,072 came from the sale
of common stock; $275,000 came from notes payable to a related party; and $104,962 was used to pay principal on note payable to
a related party.
Secured
Convertible Notes
On
June 26, 2013, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement, we issued senior secured convertible notes, having a total principal
amount of $3,000,000, to 12 accredited investors. The Notes were issued in a private placement, exempt from the Securities Act
registration requirements. The Notes will pay 3.0% interest per annum with a maturity of 4 years (June 25, 2017) and are secured
by all of our assets and intellectual property. No cash interest payments will be required, except that accrued and unconverted
interest shall be due on the maturity date and on each conversion date with respect to the principal amount being converted, provided
that such interest may be added to and included with the principal amount being converted.
Each
Note is convertible at any time into common stock at a specified conversion price, which currently is $0.075 per share. Prior
to June 2014, the Note conversion price was subject to specified adjustments for certain changes in the numbers of outstanding
shares of our common stock, including conversions or exchanges of such and the agreements included an anti-dilution provisions
that allows for the automatic reset of the conversion or exercise price upon any future sale of common stock instruments at or
below the current exercise price. If our shares are issued, except in specified exempt issuances, for consideration which is less
than the then existing Note conversion price, then such conversion price will be reduced by full ratchet anti-dilution adjustments
that will reduce the conversion price to equal the price in the dilutive issuance, regardless of the size of the dilutive issuance.
In June 2014, in exchange for the issuance in aggregate of 389,923 shares of common stock, we entered into a First Amendment to
Saleen Automotive, Inc. 3.0% Secured Convertible Note (“3% First Amendment”) to remove all specified adjustments to
the conversion price except for standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if we consummate a reorganization transaction, pay dividends
or enter into a stock split of our common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. In addition, if a Fundamental
Transaction, as defined, were to occur the potential liquidated damages was set to a fixed amount.
Unsecured
convertible notes
In
March and April 2014, we issued 7% Unsecured Convertible Notes, having a total principal amount of $2,250,000 and $250,000, to
5 accredited investors of which $2,000,000 was received from 3 investors who participated in the June 26, 2013 offering. The Notes
were issued in a private placement, exempt from the Securities Act registration requirements. The Notes will pay 7.0% interest
per annum with a maturity of 3 years (March and April 2017). No cash interest payments will be required, except that accrued and
unconverted interest shall be due on the maturity date and on each conversion date with respect to the principal amount being
converted, provided that such interest may be added to and included with the principal amount being converted. Each Note is initially
convertible at any time into common stock at a specified conversion price, which currently is $0.07 per share. The conversion
price is adjustable to the lower of $0.07 or the three lowest daily volume weighted average price of our common stock during the
twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding any conversion date. In addition, the conversion price adjusts for standard
anti-dilution provisions whereby if we consummate a reorganization, pay dividends or enter into a stock split of our common shares
the conversion price would adjust proportionally.
In June 2014, in exchange
for the issuance in aggregate of 357,143 shares of common stock, we entered into a First Amendment to Saleen Automotive, Inc.
7% Convertible Note whereby effective as of March 31, 2014, the conversion price would in no event adjust below $0.03 per share.
In addition, if a Fundamental Transaction, as defined, were to occur the potential liquidated damages was set to a fixed amount.
Private
Placement Stock Subscriptions
In October 2013, our board
of directors approved our issuance, pursuant to Subscription Agreements, as amended in January 2014, of up to 11,666,66 shares
of our restricted common stock (the “Subscription Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $1,749,999 (the “Subscription
Proceeds”) to accredited investors in a private placement. In addition, our board of directors approved the issuance to
each Subscriber of warrants (the “Warrants” and together with the Subscription Agreements, the “Financing”),
to purchase 100% of the Subscription Shares purchased by such Subscriber in the Financing, having a term of five years and a per
share exercise price of $0.15. During the year ended March 31, 2014, and in April and May 2014, Subscribers purchased Subscription
Shares of 8,743,337, 816,667 and 416,667 shares, respectively, with Subscription Proceeds of $1,278,759, net of costs of $24,000,
$122,500 and $62,500, respectively. In addition, in accordance with the terms of the Financing, we issued Common Stock Purchase
Warrants to purchase 8,743,337, 816,667 and 416,667, respectively, shares of our restricted common stock at an exercise price
of $0.15 per share. In May 2014, one Subscriber exercised their Common Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of our
common stock for total proceeds of $7,500.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
As
of March 31, 2014, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.
Commitments
The following summarizes
our contractual obligations, excluding amounts already recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2014, and the effect
those obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods (in thousands):
Lease
Obligation
We
rent two buildings totaling approximately 76,000 square feet on triple net leases through January, 2018. The current lease amendment
provides for an annual escalation of 3% in the rent each February. Past rent will be made up with the payment of an additional
$5,300 for 20 months starting in June, 2013.
The
future minimum rental payments required under the non-cancelable operating leases described above as of December 31, 2013 are
as follows:
Years
ending March 31:
|
|
|
Lease
Commitment
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
615,154
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
583,671
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
599,689
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
512,172
|
|
Purchase
Obligations
In
April 2014, we entered into an agreement with BASF to exclusively use BASF’s products. The agreement continues from this
date until we purchase in aggregate $4,131,000 of BASF products. If the aggregate purchases of BASF products are less than $1,697,000
over a period of 36 consecutive months, we are required to repay BASF 6.1% of the shortfall between $1,697,000 and the amount
we actually purchased over this period. In consideration for us exclusively using BASF’s products and fulfilling our purchase
commitments, BASF paid us $250,000.
In May 2014, we entered
into an agreement with FinishMaster, Inc. (“FinishMaster”) to exclusively use FinishMaster’s paint and material
supplies. The agreement continues from May 2014 until
we purchase in aggregate
$1,555,000 of FinishMaster products. In consideration for our exclusive use of FinishMaster’s products and fulfilling this
purchase commitments, FinishMaster paid us $25,000 and will pay an additional $25,000 upon the achievement of purchase level milestones.
Should we not complete a set purchase level milestone, we would be required to pay $31,475.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
applicable.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Saleen Automotive, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Saleen Automotive, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audits include consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Saleen Automotive,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their consolidated operations and cash flows the years
then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements
have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1, the Company has suffered
recurring losses, utilized significant cash in operations, and has a stockholders’ deficit. In addition, as of March 31,
2014, the Company is delinquent in payment of its payroll taxes and a significant amount of the Company’s notes payable
are in default. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans in regard to these matters are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Weinberg
& Company, P.A.
|
|
Los
Angeles, California
|
|
June
30, 2014
|
|
Saleen
Automotive, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
March
31, 2013
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,499,889
|
|
|
$
|
4,434
|
|
Cash held in trust by
related party
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
Accounts receivable,
net
|
|
|
198,538
|
|
|
|
5,352
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
433,941
|
|
|
|
538,224
|
|
Prepaid expenses
and other current assets
|
|
|
97,926
|
|
|
|
23,483
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
2,230,294
|
|
|
|
746,493
|
|
Long Term Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment,
net
|
|
|
546,824
|
|
|
|
340,219
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
47,904
|
|
|
|
37,358
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
2,825,022
|
|
|
$
|
1,124,070
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
2,048,310
|
|
|
$
|
666,782
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
148,954
|
|
|
|
709,267
|
|
Current portion of notes
payable
|
|
|
1,275,774
|
|
|
|
1,044,074
|
|
Current portion of notes
payable to Related Parties
|
|
|
209,452
|
|
|
|
360,500
|
|
Payroll Taxes Payable
|
|
|
669,575
|
|
|
|
246,075
|
|
Accrued Interest on
Notes Payable
|
|
|
380,257
|
|
|
|
318,836
|
|
Customer Deposits
|
|
|
193,912
|
|
|
|
942,859
|
|
Other current
liabilities
|
|
|
354,346
|
|
|
|
433,706
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
5,280,580
|
|
|
|
4,722,099
|
|
Accounts to be settled
by issuance of equity securities
|
|
|
470,534
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Notes payable, net of
current portion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
550,258
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
5,032,786
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Convertible
Notes payable, net of discount of $3,498,981
|
|
|
1,337,751
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
12,121,651
|
|
|
|
5,272,357
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $0.001 par
value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 137,710,501 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2014
|
|
|
137,710
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Super Voting Preferred
stock; $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 0 and 883,822 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and
2013, respectively
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,269
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
10,431,175
|
|
|
|
4,584,976
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(19,865,514
|
)
|
|
|
(8,743,532
|
)
|
Total Stockholders’
Deficit
|
|
|
(9,296,629
|
)
|
|
|
(4,148,287
|
)
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
$
|
2,825,022
|
|
|
$
|
1,124,070
|
|
See accompanying notes
which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Saleen
Automotive, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements
of Operations
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles
and parts
|
|
$
|
5,158,387
|
|
|
$
|
1,453,030
|
|
Design Services
|
|
|
121,500
|
|
|
|
1,245,985
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
5,279,887
|
|
|
|
2,699,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles and parts
|
|
|
4,277,039
|
|
|
|
1,320,061
|
|
Design Services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
859,541
|
|
Total costs
of good sold
|
|
|
4,277,039
|
|
|
|
2,179,602
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
1,002,848
|
|
|
|
519,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
766,996
|
|
|
|
113,903
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,709,889
|
|
|
|
489,072
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,261,612
|
|
|
|
2,598,616
|
|
Settlement costs (including
$385,785 from related parties)
|
|
|
945,401
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
|
|
97,061
|
|
|
|
80,892
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
|
7,780,959
|
|
|
|
3,282,483
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(6,778,111
|
)
|
|
|
(2,763,070
|
)
|
Other income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(606,194
|
)
|
|
|
(225,046
|
)
|
Costs of reverse merger
transaction
|
|
|
(365,547
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain in extinguishment
of derivative liability
|
|
|
236,158
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change in fair
value of derivative liability
|
|
|
(3,608,288
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,121,982
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,988,116
|
)
|
Loss per common
share – basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Weighted average
shares outstanding basic and diluted
|
|
|
123,377,666
|
|
|
|
112,000,000
|
|
See accompanying notes
which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Saleen
Automotive, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement
of Stockholders’ Deficit
For the fiscal years
ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
|
|
Common Stock $0.001 Par
|
|
|
Super Voting Preferred
Stock $0.001 Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Additional
Paid In
Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Deficit
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832,745
|
|
|
$
|
10,217
|
|
|
$
|
2,290,078
|
|
|
$
|
(5,755,416
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,455,121
|
)
|
Shares issued for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,835
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
1,607,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,607,072
|
|
Shares issued for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,377
|
|
Shares issued for interest
on loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
99,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Shares issued in settlement
of related party payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
36,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,251
|
|
Shares issued as employment
condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
124,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
Shares issued for in-kind
contribution of automobile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,277
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
249,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Value of founder shares
transferred in settlement of payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,250
|
|
Net loss for the
year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,988,116
|
)
|
|
|
(2,988,116
|
)
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
883,822
|
|
|
|
10,269
|
|
|
|
4,584,976
|
|
|
|
(8,743,532
|
)
|
|
|
(4,148,287
|
)
|
Shares issued upon reverse
merger
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Shares issued for directors
fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,277
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
249,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Shares issued for services
to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
43,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,750
|
|
Shares issued for services
|
|
|
530,000
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
429,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,831
|
|
Shares issued as principal
payments on notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,803
|
|
Shares issued as interest
on notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,697
|
|
Shares issued for payment
of accounts payable
|
|
|
325,128
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,191
|
|
Shares and warrants issued
for payments of accounts payable - related parties
|
|
|
2,508,908
|
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,117,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,120,382
|
|
Shares issued for cash
|
|
|
8,793,337
|
|
|
|
8,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,303,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,312,500
|
|
Adjustment of Super Voting
Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,385
|
)
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Conversion of Super Voting
Preferred to Common Stock
|
|
|
112,000,000
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
(896,000
|
)
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
|
|
(111,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Conversion of convertible
debt to Common Stock
|
|
|
5,553,128
|
|
|
|
5,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,486
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature
associated with convertible debt financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
Net loss for the
period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,121,982
|
)
|
|
|
(11,121,982
|
)
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
137,710,501
|
|
|
$
|
137,710
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10,431,175
|
|
|
$
|
(19,865,514
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,296,629
|
)
|
See accompanying notes
which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Saleen
Automotive Inc.
Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended March 31,
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,121,982
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,988,116
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile
net loss to net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
97,061
|
|
|
|
80,892
|
|
Change in fair value
of derivative liability
|
|
|
3,608,288
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain on extinguishment
of derivative liability
|
|
|
(236,158
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loss (gain) on extinguishment
of accounts payables – Related Party
|
|
|
739,572
|
|
|
|
4,162
|
|
Amortization of discount
on senior secured convertible notes
|
|
|
411,675
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Shares issued for directors
fees to related parties
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Shares issued for interest
on loan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Shares issued as employment
condition
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
Value of founders shares
transferred in settlement of related party payables
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
155,250
|
|
Note payable issued
for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
47,749
|
|
Shares issued for services
|
|
|
473,581
|
|
|
|
21,377
|
|
Changes in working
capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) Decrease
in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash held in trust account
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
(175,000
|
)
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(193,186
|
)
|
|
|
(5,352
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
104,283
|
|
|
|
28,886
|
|
Prepaid expenses and
other assets
|
|
|
(84,989
|
)
|
|
|
(23,482
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease)
in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,484,769
|
|
|
|
(111,894
|
)
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
(179,553
|
)
|
|
|
481,724
|
|
Payroll taxes payable
|
|
|
423,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
89,335
|
|
|
|
235,538
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
(748,947
|
)
|
|
|
79,839
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(79,360
|
)
|
|
|
164,082
|
|
Accounts to
be settled by issuance of equity securities
|
|
|
470,535
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net cash used
in operating activities
|
|
|
(4,316,576
|
)
|
|
|
(1,779,345
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
property and equipment
|
|
|
(303,666
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Net cash used
in investing activities
|
|
|
(303,666
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from senior
secured notes payable
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Proceeds from unsecured
convertible notes - related parties
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from unsecured
convertible notes
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes
payable - related parties
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
Principal payments on
notes payable – related parties
|
|
|
(703,245
|
)
|
|
|
(104,962
|
)
|
Principal payments on
notes payable
|
|
|
(318,558
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Proceeds from
issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1,312,500
|
|
|
|
1,607,072
|
|
Net cash from
financing activities
|
|
|
6,115,697
|
|
|
|
1,777,110
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
1,495,455
|
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
Cash at beginning
of year
|
|
|
4,434
|
|
|
|
6,779
|
|
Cash at end of
year
|
|
$
|
1,499,889
|
|
|
$
|
4,434
|
|
(continued)
Saleen Automotive
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows
(continued)
|
|
For
the fiscal year Ended March 31:
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Supplemental schedule of
non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
liability related to conversion feature
|
|
$
|
1,660,656
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
on conversion of Secured Convertible Notes Payable
|
|
|
416,485
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
on payment of interest on Notes Payable
|
|
|
24,697
|
|
|
|
66,250
|
|
Issuance of common stock
as principal on Notes Payable to related parties
|
|
|
22,803
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of common stock
for automotive asset
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Beneficial conversion
feature
|
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of common stock
as payment of accounts payable – related party
|
|
|
1,120,332
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of
common stock as payment of accounts payable
|
|
|
103,241
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures
of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year
for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
36,412
|
|
|
$
|
32,809
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
See accompanying notes
which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Saleen
Automotive Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
Fiscal Years Ended
March 31, 2014 and 2013
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF THE BUSINESS AND
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of the Company
The Company designs, develops,
manufactures and sells high performance vehicles built from base chassis’ of Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros, and Dodge
Challengers. The Company is a low volume vehicle design, engineering and manufacturing company focusing on the mass customization
(the process of customizing automobiles that are mass produced by the manufacturers (Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge)) of OEM American
Sports Cars and the production of high performance USA-engineered racing cars. A high performance car is an automobile that is
designed and constructed specifically for speed. The design and construction of a high performance car involves not only providing
a capable power train but also providing the handling and braking systems to support it. The Company’s Saleen-branded products
include a complete line of upgraded muscle cars, high performance cars, automotive aftermarket specialty parts and lifestyle accessories.
Muscle cars are any of a group of American-made 2-door sports coupes with powerful engines designed for high performance driving.
History of the Company
Saleen Automotive, Inc.
(formerly W270, Inc., the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 24, 2011. The
Company issued 5,000,000 shares of its common stock to Mr. Wesley Fry (“Fry”) at inception. Following its formation,
the Company issued an additional 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to Fry. On June 21, 2012, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares
of its common stock for a total of $20,000.
On November 30, 2012,
Fry and W-Net Fund I, L.P. ( “W-Net”), entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”),
pursuant to which Fry sold to W-Net 75.0% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock
Merger
On May 23, 2013, the Company
entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with Saleen California Merger Corporation, its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Saleen Florida Merger Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Saleen Automotive, Inc. (“Saleen Automotive”),
SMS Signature Cars (“SMS” and together with Saleen Automotive, the “Saleen Entities”) and Steve Saleen
(“Saleen” and together with the Saleen Entities, the “Saleen Parties”). The closing (the “Closing”)
of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Merger”) occurred on June 26, 2013. At the Closing
(a) Saleen California Merger Corporation was merged with and into SMS with SMS surviving as one of the Company’s wholly-owned
subsidiaries; (b) Saleen Florida Merger Corporation was merged with and into Saleen Automotive with Saleen Automotive surviving
as one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries; (c) holders of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive received
an aggregate of 554,057 shares of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred Stock and holders of the outstanding capital stock
of SMS received no consideration for their shares; and (d) approximately 93% of the beneficial ownership of the Company’s
common stock (on a fully-diluted basis) was owned, collectively, by Saleen (including shares of the Company’s Super Voting
Preferred Stock issued to Saleen pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement discussed below) and the former holders of the
outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive. As a result of the Merger the Company is solely engaged in the Saleen Entities’
business, Saleen Automotive’s officers became the Company’s officers and Saleen Automotive’s three directors
became members of the Company’s five-member board of directors. In October 2013, SMS effected an amendment to its articles
of incorporation to change its name to Saleen Signature Cars.
On May 23, 2013, the Company
also entered into an Assignment and License Agreement with Saleen pursuant to which Saleen agreed, as of the effective time of
the Merger, to contribute certain intellectual property that relates to the “Saleen” brand name and related rights
which are currently owned by him to the Company, license to the Company the right to use his image, signature, full name, voice,
biographical materials, likeness, and goodwill associated with the “Saleen” brand, and assign to the Company all shares
of the capital stock of SMS Retail – Corona, a California corporation, and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc., a Michigan
corporation. On June 21, 2013, the parties amended the Assignment and License Agreement to terminate Saleen’s obligation
to assign to the Company all shares of the capital stock of SMS Retail – Corona and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc. and
Saleen agreed to dissolve those entities within 30 days after the Closing. Concurrently with the Closing, pursuant to the Assignment
and License Agreement, as amended, Saleen assigned certain intellectual property that relates to the “Saleen” brand
name and related rights which are currently owned by him to the Company, and licensed the right to use his image, signature, full
name, voice, biographical materials, likeness, and goodwill associated with the “Saleen” brand to the Company, and
commenced the process of dissolving each of SMS Retail – Corona and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc. The aforementioned
license may only be terminated in the event the Company files a petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code,
or a petition for relief is converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In exchange for entering into
the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended, the Company issued to Saleen, as of the effective date of the Merger, 341,943
shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock.
On June 17, 2013, the
Company consummated a merger with WSTY Subsidiary Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, pursuant to which the Company amended
its articles of incorporation to change its name to Saleen Automotive, Inc.
The Company is presently
authorized under its articles of incorporation, as amended to date, to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001
per share, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. Prior to January 13, 2014, 896,000 shares were
designated Super Voting Preferred Stock. The rights of our Super Voting Preferred Stock were set forth in a Certificate of Designations,
Preferences, Limitations, Restrictions and Relative Rights of Super Voting Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”)
which became effective on June 17, 2013. As of the Closing, the Company had 8,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding
and 896,000 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
Under the terms of the
Merger Agreement, all of the outstanding shares of capital stock held by Saleen Automotive’s former shareholders were exchanged
for 554,057 shares of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred Stock, and under the terms of the Assignment and License Agreement,
as amended, the Company issued to Saleen 341,943 shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock. Each share of our Super Voting Preferred
Stock was convertible into 125 shares of the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, as a result of the Merger and the transactions
effectuated pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended, Saleen and the former shareholders of Saleen Automotive
owned at the time of the Closing approximately 112,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on an as-converted basis,
and the Company’s existing stockholders owned 8,000,000 shares of its common stock.
On July 9, 2013, holders
of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred Stock voted to amend the Certificate of
Designations to provide that (1) each share of our Super Voting Preferred Stock will immediately and automatically convert into
125 shares of the Company’s common stock at such time that it files, at such time as determined by its board of directors,
an amendment to its articles of incorporation (a) effecting a reverse stock split of its common stock or (b) effecting an increase
in the authorized shares of its common stock, in each case so that we have a sufficient number of authorized and unissued shares
of its common stock to permit the conversion of all outstanding shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock into its common stock,
and (2) the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock may elect to convert less than
all but at least 50% of the outstanding shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock, with the applicable percentage designated
by such holders. On July 9, 2013, holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred
Stock also voted to convert, upon the effectiveness of the aforementioned amendment to the Certificate of Designations, 696,000
shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock into 87,000,000 shares of its common stock, representing approximately 77.68% of the
outstanding shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock. Such conversion became effective on July 18, 2013, upon the filing of
the amendment to the Certificate of Designations. On January 13, 2014, pursuant to an amendment to the Company’s articles
of incorporation increasing its authorized shares of common stock from 100,000,000 to 500,000,000, all of the remaining outstanding
shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock automatically converted into shares of its common stock, and the Super Voting Preferred
Stock ceased to be a designated series of preferred stock.
Upon completion of the
Merger and assuming the conversion of all the remaining Super Voting preferred stock into shares of common stock, the former stockholders
of Saleen Automotive owned approximately 93% of the then outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (including shares
of Super Voting Preferred Stock convertible into shares of its common stock) and the holders of the outstanding shares of its
common stock prior to the Merger owned the balance. As the owners and management of Saleen Automotive had voting and operating
control of the Company after the Merger, the transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization with the Saleen Entities
deemed the acquiring companies for accounting purposes, and the Company deemed the legal acquirer. Due to the change in control,
the consolidated financial statements reflect the historical results of the Saleen Entities prior to the Merger and that of the
combined company following the Merger. Common stock and the corresponding capital amounts of the Company pre-Merger have been
retroactively restated as of the earliest periods presented as capital stock reflecting the exchange ratio in the Merger. The
amount of debt assumed upon the Merger of $39,547, legal and closing costs of $46,000, and a dividend of an aggregate amount of
$280,000 paid to our stockholders as of May 23, 2013 have been reflected as a cost of the Merger in the statement of operations.
Consolidation policy
The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Saleen Automotive, Inc. a Florida corporation,
Saleen Signature Cars, a California corporation and Saleen Sales Corporation, a California corporation. Intercompany transactions
and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassification of Certain Prior Year
Information
The Company has reclassified
certain prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation, including the reclassification of engineering salaries
of $90,626 to research and development expenses and sales and marketing salaries of $186,403 to sales and marketing expenses from
general and administrative operating expenses. The reclassification of these amounts had no impact on consolidated net loss or
cash flows.
Going Concern
The Company’s combined
financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets
and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. During the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company incurred a
net loss of $11,121,982 and utilized $4,316,576 of cash in operations. The Company also had a stockholders’ deficit and
working capital deficit of $9,296,629 and $3,050,286, respectively as of March 31, 2014, and as of that date, the Company owed
$630,874 in past unpaid payroll taxes and $967,747 of outstanding notes payable are in default. These factors raise substantial
doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any
adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification
of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
The Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable
revenues and profitable operations. At March 31 and May 31, 2014, the Company had cash on hand in the amount of $1,499,889 and
$30,972, respectively. During the year ended March, 31, 2014, the Company raised $5,250,000 through the issuance of convertible
notes, including converting a $500,000 Secured Promissory Note with W-Net originally issued on October 7, 2013 into a long-term
unsecured convertible note. In addition, during the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company entered into Subscription Agreements
with individual accredited investors (the “Subscribers”) pursuant to which the Subscribers purchased from the Company
an aggregate of 8,793,337 restricted common shares at a per share price of $0.15 for aggregate proceeds of $1,312,500, net of
issuance costs of $24,000. Additional Subscribers purchased 816,667 and 416,667 restricted common shares in April and May 2014,
respectively, at a per share price of $0.15 for aggregate proceeds of $122,500 and $62,500, respectively, and in April 2014 the
Company received $250,000 from additional issuances of 7% unsecured convertible notes. However, additional funding will be needed
to continue operations through September 30, 2014. In addition, the Company will need and is currently seeking additional funds,
primarily through the issuance of debt or equity securities for cash to operate its business beyond September 30, 2014. No assurance
can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the
Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on its operations, in the
case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for its stockholders, in case or equity financing.
Use of Estimates
Financial statements prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among other things, management estimates include the estimated collectability
of its accounts receivable, the valuation of the S7 Supercar held for sale, the valuation of long lived assets, warranty reserves,
the assumptions used to calculate its derivative liabilities, and equity instruments issued for financing and compensation. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Fair value of Financial Instruments
The Company adopted ASC
topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820), formerly SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements,”
effective January 1, 2009. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants on the measurement date. There was no impact relating to the adoption of ASC 820 to the Company’s
financial statements.
Financial instruments
consist principally of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and notes payable. The carrying amounts
of such financial instruments in the accompanying balance sheets approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term
nature. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to any significant currency or credit risks arising from
these financial instruments.
Authoritative guidance
provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) defines the following levels directly related to the
amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these financial assets:
Level 1 Quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs, other
than the quoted prices in active markets, that is observable either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs
based on the Company’s assumptions.
The following table presents
certain investments and liabilities of the Company’s financial assets measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s
consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair
value of Derivative Liability at March 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,032,786
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,032,786
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
The Company evaluates
its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives.
For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded
at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements
of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company used a Monte Carlo option pricing model to value
the derivative instruments at inception, and on subsequent valuation dates is using a weighted average Black–Scholes Model.
The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity,
is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current
or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of
the balance sheet date.
Cash held in trust by related party
During the year ended
March 31, 2013, the Company instituted a policy of having new investor funds held a trust account at Michaels Law Group, a law
firm owned by a stockholder and board member. Funds held in trust are released as requested by the Company by agreement of a management
committee. As of March 31, 2013, $175,000 of funds was held in trust by Michaels Law Group. As of March 31, 2014, all funds held
in trust have been disbursed to the Company and the Company no longer utilizes this trust account.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company recognizes
an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure trade receivables are not overstated due to uncollectability. For the most part,
the Company generally requires advance payments for cars and credit card payments for parts. As of March 31, 2014 the Company
had an allowance for doubtful accounts of $46,519. There was no allowance necessary as of March 31 2013.
Inventories
Inventories are stated
at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined principally on a first-in-first-out average cost basis. Inventories consist
primarily of parts for both resale and conversion of automotive chassis. The Company will typically buy the automobile chassis
of the vehicle to be converted from the Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge dealers or directly from the manufacturer and then modify the
vehicle as ordered. The Company typically has no finished goods inventory, as the Company builds to order, other than parts held
for resale.
|
|
March 31,
2014
|
|
|
March 31,
2013
|
|
Parts and work
in process
|
|
$
|
183,941
|
|
|
$
|
288,224
|
|
S7 Supercar held
for sale
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
433,941
|
|
|
$
|
538,224
|
|
Long-lived Assets
In accordance with ASC
350-30 (formerly SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
), the Company evaluates
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their net book value may not be recoverable.
When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the
related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any,
is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected
cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made.
The Company had no such
asset impairments at March 31, 2014 or March 31, 2013. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change
or demand for the Company’s products under development will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment
of long-lived assets.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of High Performance Cars and Parts
The Company generates
revenues primarily from the sale of high performance automobiles and parts. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of completed
high performance cars and parts when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, delivery of the product has occurred
and title has passed, the selling price is both fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured, all of which
generally occurs upon shipment of the Company’s product or delivery of the product to the destination specified by the customer.
The Company determines
whether delivery has occurred based on when title transfers and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the buyer,
which usually occurs when the Company places the cars or products on the carrier. The Company regularly reviews its customers’
financial positions to ensure that collectability is reasonably assured and generally collects before shipment. Except for warranties,
the Company has no post-sales obligations nor does the Company accept returns.
Contract Revenue and Cost Recognition on
Design Services
The Company recognizes
revenues using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting by relating contract costs incurred to date to the total estimated
costs at completion. This method is used because costs are the best available measure of progress on contracts. Contract losses
are provided for in their entirety in the period that they become known, without regard to the percentage-of-completion. The Company
also recognizes as revenues costs associated with claims and unapproved change orders to the extent it is probable that such claims
and change orders will result in additional contract revenue, and the amount of such additional revenue can be reliably estimated.
During the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company realized revenue from a contract with a major Hollywood movie producer
to design and build replica supercar racing automobiles for the Need for Speed movie, which was released in March 2014. The Company
did not have any other design contracts during the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
Warranty Policy
The Company provides a
three-year or 36,000 miles New Vehicle Limited Warranty with every Saleen 302 and 302SC Mustang, Saleen 570 Challenger, and Saleen
620 Camaro high performance vehicle. The Company provides a one-year or 12,000 miles New Vehicle Limited Warranty with every Saleen
351 Mustang, Saleen 570X Challenger, and Saleen 620X Camaro high performance vehicle. The vehicle limited warranty applies to
installed parts and/or assemblies in new Saleen high performance cars. All of the unaltered parts are covered under the original
full warranty of the OEM manufacturer of the base vehicles (Ford, Chevrolet, and Dodge). The Company started providing a warranty
reserve in fiscal year 2014 in conjunction with the increased volume of vehicle sales. Changes in the product warranty accrual
for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of Fiscal
Year
|
|
|
Warranty
Expenditures
|
|
|
Provision for
Estimated
Warranty Cost
|
|
|
Balance at
End
of Fiscal
Year
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(16,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,763
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(14,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Business Segments
The Company currently
has one operating business segment that is converting automobiles into high performance vehicles and selling related parts.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development
costs consist of expenditures for the research and development of new products and technology. Research and development costs
were $766,996 and $113,903 during the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and were expensed as incurred.
Advertising, Sales
and Marketing Costs
Advertising,
sales and marketing costs are expensed as incurred and are included in sales and marketing expenses. During the year ended March
31, 2014, advertising, sales and marketing expenses were $59,993, $110,275, and $644,321, respectively. During the year ended
March 31, 2013, advertising, sales and marketing expenses were $12,337, $1,906, and $86,877, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for
income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered
or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income
in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company maintains
a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets. The Company established a valuation allowance based upon the potential
likelihood of realizing the deferred tax asset and taking into consideration the Company’s financial position and results
of operations for the current period. Future realization of the deferred tax benefit depends on the existence of sufficient taxable
income within the carry forward period under the Federal tax laws.
Changes in circumstances,
such as the Company generating taxable income, could cause a change in judgment about the realizability of the related deferred
tax asset. Any change in the valuation allowance will be included in income in the year of the change in estimate.
Stock Compensation
The Company uses the fair
value recognition provision of ASC 718, “Stock Compensation,” which requires the Company to expense the cost of employee
services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of such instruments. The Company
uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to calculate the fair value of any equity instruments on the grant date.
The Company also uses
the provisions of ASC 505-50, “
Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees,
” to account for stock-based compensation
awards issued to non-employees for services. Such awards for services are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered
or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable, using the measurement date guidelines
enumerated in ASC 505-50.
Loss per Share
The basic loss per share
is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares during the period. The diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss available to common
stockholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The diluted weighted average number
of shares outstanding is the basic weighted average number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. Potentially
dilutive common shares were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation because they were anti-dilutive. As of March
31, 2014, warrants convertible into 11,252,245 shares of common stock, and Notes convertible into 66,632,617 shares of common
stock have been excluded from diluted loss per share because they are anti-dilutive.
Weighted average number
of shares outstanding has been retroactively restated for the equivalent number of shares received by the accounting acquirer
as a result of the reverse merger as if these shares had been outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.
Weighted average shares outstanding include, as of the earliest period presented, the equivalent number of common shares that
were converted upon conversion of all the Super Voting Preferred Stock, as these shares have the same characteristics of common
stock.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consisted primarily of cash, to
the extent balances exceeded limits that were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the equivalent government
body in other countries, and accounts receivable. The Company does not require collateral and maintains reserves for potential
credit losses. Such losses have historically been immaterial and have been within management’s expectations.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment
are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. The cost of property and equipment is depreciated or amortized
on the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Computer equipment
and software
|
|
|
3
years
|
|
Furniture
|
|
|
3
years
|
|
Machinery
|
|
|
3-10
years
|
|
Tooling
|
|
|
10
years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
On May 28, 2014, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace
it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue
based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure
about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant
judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective
for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard
either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management is currently evaluating the
impact, if any, on adopting ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
In April 2014, the FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant
and Equipment (Topic 360). ASU 2014-08 amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures
about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations or that have
a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. This new accounting
guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if
any, of adopting ASU 2014-08 on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
Other recent accounting
pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants,
and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s
present or future consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment
consisted of the following at March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013:
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
March
31, 2013
|
|
Tooling
|
|
$
|
470,399
|
|
|
$
|
384,293
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
264,837
|
|
|
|
121,186
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
203,311
|
|
|
|
129,402
|
|
Total, cost
|
|
|
938,548
|
|
|
|
634,882
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
and Amortization
|
|
|
(391,724
|
)
|
|
|
(294,663
|
)
|
Total Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
|
$
|
546,824
|
|
|
$
|
340,219
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $97,061 and $80,892, respectively.
NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable are comprised
as follows:
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
March
31, 2013
|
|
Senior secured
note payable to a bank, secured by all assets of Saleen Signature Cars, guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration
and personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO, payable in full in August 2014
(1)
|
|
$
|
442,479
|
|
|
$
|
582,258
|
|
Subordinated secured bonds
payable, interest at 6% per annum payable at various maturity dates, currently in default
(2)
|
|
|
414,500
|
|
|
|
414,500
|
|
Subordinated secured note
payable, interest at 10% per annum, payable March 16, 2010, currently in default
(3)
|
|
|
61,046
|
|
|
|
105,312
|
|
Subordinated secured note
payable, interest at 10% per annum payable March 31, 2009, in default as of March 31, 2013, paid in full in 2014
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
124,513
|
|
Subordinated secured note
payable for legal services rendered, non-interest bearing, payable on October 25, 2014, currently in default
(4)
|
|
|
37,749
|
|
|
|
47,749
|
|
Unsecured notes
payable, interest at 10% per annum payable on various dates from July 31 to March 31, 2010, currently in default
(5)
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
Total notes payable
|
|
|
1,275,774
|
|
|
|
1,594,332
|
|
Less: current portion
of notes payable
|
|
|
(1,275,774
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044,074
|
)
|
Notes payable,
net of current portion
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
550,258
|
|
|
(1)
|
On February 6, 2014,
Saleen Signature Cars received a Complaint from the bank filed in California Superior Court, Riverside County alleging, among
other matters, breach of contract due to non-timely payment of November and December 2013 principal amounts owed, which were
paid as of March 31, 2014, and the occurrence of a change in control as a result of the Merger. In April 2014, the Company
entered into a settlement agreement with the bank whereby the bank dismissed this case in exchange for payment of $124,000
that was applied towards principal and unpaid fees along with advance loan principal and interest for May, June and July 2014.
In accordance with the settlement agreement, the Company is required to pay $442,479 to this bank in August 2014 as full settlement
of remaining principal amount owed.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Bonds and notes issued
on March 1, 2008, 2009 and 2010, payable in full upon one year from issuance. The Bonds accrue interest at 6% per annum and
are secured by the personal property of Saleen Signature Cars. As of March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively, the
bonds were in default due to non-payment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On
May 7, 2014, the Company, along with its subsidiaries and Steve Saleen, entered into
a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) with
Thomas Del Franco a holder of a bond payable of $317,500. See further discussion in Subsequent
Events – Note 11.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Note payable issued
on March 16, 2010 due in full on March 16, 2011. The note accrues interest at 10% per annum and was secured by three vehicles
held in inventory by Saleen Signature Cars. On June 7, 2013, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual General
Release by canceling this note and issuing a new unsecured 6% note payable due on or before August 19, 2013. The note was
in default on March 31, 2014 due to non-payment.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Non-interest bearing
note payable dated January 25, 2013 due in full on October 25, 2013 or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events that
have not occurred. The note is secured by interest in certain intellectual property. The note was in default as of March 31,
2014 due to non-payment. The Company made a payment of $10,000 during the years ended March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
On May 7, 2014, the
Company, along with its subsidiaries and Steve Saleen, entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Settlement
Agreement”) with Thomas Del Franco a holder of a note payable of $200,000. In addition, on June 27, 2014, the Company,
along with its subsidiaries and Steve Saleen, entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Settlement
Agreement”) with Jim Marsh, a holder of a note payable of $100,000. See further discussion in Subsequent Events –
Note 11.
|
Total interest expense
was $182,505 and $225,046 for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013,
$380,257 and $318,836, respectively, of interest on notes payable remains unpaid
NOTE 4 – NOTES PAYABLE TO RELATED
PARTIES
Notes payable to related
parties are as follows:
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
Unsecured note
payable to a stockholder, non-interest bearing, due on April 1, 2014, current in default.
(1)
|
|
$
|
102,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,500
|
|
Note payable to a stockholder,
secured by S7 Supercar automobile, interest at 10% per annum payable quarterly, due and paid off on May 23, 2013.
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Unsecured note payable
to a stockholder, interest at 10% per annum payable at various maturity dates, currently in default.
(2)
|
|
|
32,452
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
Unsecured $100,000
revolving promissory note to a stockholder, interest at 12% per annum payable in full on November 14, 2014. $25,000 available
at March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total notes payable,
related parties
|
|
$
|
209,452
|
|
|
$
|
360,500
|
|
|
(1)
|
As of March 31, 2014,
the Company had a bond payable of $63,000 issued to a stockholder on March 1, 2008, 2009 and 2010, payable in full upon one
year from issuance. The bond accrues interest at 6% per annum and is secured by the real and personal property of Saleen Signature
Cars. The Company also had a $37,500 note payable to the same stockholder payable on various dates ranging from September
2008 to August 2010. The bond and the note were in default as of March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Unsecured note payable
to a related party issued on November 3, 2008 for original principal of $60,000 with interest bearing at 10% per annum and
due in full on February 10, 2009. The note was in default at March 31, 2013. On May 22, 2013, the Company entered into a Settlement
Agreement and Mutual General Release by agreeing to pay $35,000, of which $5,000 was due by June 3, 2014, $10,000 due by July
31, 2014, $10,000 due by October 31, 2014, and $10,000 by March 31, 2014. The Company also issued 739 shares of Super Voting
Preferred Stock in conjunction with this Agreement valued at $35,000, of which $22,803 was applied toward the principal balance
of the note and $12,197 was accounted for interest expense. The Company paid $4,745 during the quarter ended March 31, 2014.
The note was in default as of March 31, 2014 due to non-payment. In April 2014, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement
and Mutual General Release with this note holder whereby it agreed to issue 527,520 of common stock along with a five-year
warrant to purchase 527,520 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share in exchange for cancellation
of all amounts owed and mutual general release.
|
NOTE 5 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
CONVERTIBLE NOTES ARE COMPRISES AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
March
31, 2013
|
|
Senior secured
convertible notes payable to private accredited investor group, convertible into 41,777,457 shares of common stock, interest
accrued at 3% per annum, notes mature on June 25, 2017
|
|
$
|
2,586,732
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured convertible
notes payable to private accredited investor group, convertible into 32,142,857 shares of common stock, interest accrued at
7% per annum, notes mature in March, 2017
|
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,836,732
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Less: discount
on notes payable
|
|
|
(3,498,981
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Notes payable,
net of discount
|
|
$
|
1,337,751
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Senior secured convertible notes
On June 26, 2013, pursuant
to a Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued senior secured convertible notes, having a total principal amount of $3,000,000,
to 12 accredited investors. The Notes were issued in a private placement, exempt from the Securities Act registration requirements.
The Notes will pay 3.0% interest per annum with a maturity of 4 years (June 25, 2017) and are secured by all assets and intellectual
property of the Company. No cash interest payments will be required, except that accrued and unconverted interest shall be due
on the maturity date and on each conversion date with respect to the principal amount being converted, provided that such interest
may be added to and included with the principal amount being converted. Each 2014 Note is initially convertible at any time into
common stock at a specified conversion price, which currently is $0.075 per share.
Each Note is convertible
at any time into common stock at a specified conversion price, which currently is $0.075 per share. Prior to June 2014, the Note
conversion price was subject to specified adjustments for certain changes in the numbers of outstanding shares of the Company's
common stock, including conversions or exchanges of such and the agreements included an anti-dilution provisions that allows for
the automatic reset of the conversion or exercise price upon any future sale of common stock instruments at or below the current
exercise price. If the Company's shares are issued, except in specified exempt issuances, for consideration which is less than
the then existing Note conversion price, then such conversion price will be reduced by full ratchet anti-dilution adjustments
that will reduce the conversion price to equal the price in the dilutive issuance, regardless of the size of the dilutive issuance.
In June 2014, in exchange for the issuance in aggregate of 389,923 shares of common stock, the Company entered into a First Amendment
to Saleen Automotive, Inc. 3.0% Secured Convertible Note (“3% First Amendment”) to remove all specified adjustments
to the conversion price except for standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction
pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. In addition,
if a Fundamental Transaction, as defined, were to occur the potential liquidated damages was set to a fixed amount.
The Company considered
the current FASB guidance of “Determining Whether an Instrument Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” which indicates
that any adjustment to the fixed amount (either conversion price or number of shares) of the instrument regardless of the probability
or whether or not within the issuers’ control, means the instrument is not indexed to the issuers own stock. Accordingly,
the Company determined that the conversion prices of the notes are not a fixed amount because they are subject to fluctuation
based on the occurrence of future offerings or events. As a result, the Company determined that the conversion features are not
considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and characterized the fair value of these conversion features as derivative
liabilities upon issuance. The Company determined that upon issuance on June 26, 2013 notes, the initial fair value of the embedded
beneficial conversion feature of the notes to be $1,660,656. This amount was determined by management with the use of an independent
valuation specialist using a Monte Carlo simulation option pricing model. As such, the Company recorded a $1,660,656 derivative
liability with an offsetting change to valuation discount upon issuance for financial reporting purposes (see note 6). During
the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company amortized $411,675 of the valuation discount, and the remaining unamortized valuation
discount of $1,248,981 as of March 31, 2014, has been offset against the face amount of the notes for financial statement purposes.
As a result of the 3% First Amendment entered into in June 2014, the conversion price is no longer subject to fluctuation based
on the occurrence of future offerings or events and thus, the Company will not recognize a derivative liability related to these
notes after March 31, 2014.
During the twelve months
ended March 31, 2014, certain note holders converted $413,268 of principal and $3,216 of interest for 5,553,128 shares the common
stock.
Unsecured convertible notes
In March 2014, as amended
in June 2014 (See further discussion in Subsequent Events – Note 11) the Company issued 7% Unsecured Convertible Notes,
having a total principal amount of $2,250,000 and $250,000, to 5 accredited investors of which $2,000,000 was received from 3
investors who participated in the June 26, 2013 offering. The Notes were issued in a private placement, exempt from the Securities
Act registration requirements. The Notes will pay 7.0% interest per annum with a maturity of 3 years (March and April, 2017).
No cash interest payments will be required, except that accrued and unconverted interest shall be due on the maturity date and
on each conversion date with respect to the principal amount being converted, provided that such interest may be added to and
included with the principal amount being converted.
Each Note is initially convertible
at any time into common stock at a specified conversion price, which currently is $0.07 per share.
The conversion price is adjustable to the lower of $0.07 or the three lowest daily volume weighted average price of the Company’s
common stock during the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding any conversion date. However, in no event shall
the conversion price be lower than $0.03 per share. In addition, the conversion price adjusts for standard anti-dilution provisions
whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its common shares
the conversion price would adjust proportionally.
In June 2014, in exchange
for the issuance in aggregate of 357,143 shares of common stock, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Saleen Automotive,
Inc. 7% Convertible Note whereby effective as of the date of the note, the conversion price would in no event adjust below $0.03
per share. In addition, if a Fundamental Transaction, as defined, were to occur the potential liquidated damages was set to a
fixed amount (see Note 11).
As the conversion price
of $0.07 reflected a price discount below the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the date of the Notes,
there was deemed a beneficial conversion feature associated with these Notes. As such, the Company recorded $2,250,000 representing
the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature at the date of the Notes in additional paid-in capital. The value of
the beneficial conversion feature will be amortized over the term of the Notes.
NOTE 6 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY
In June 2008, the FASB
issued authoritative guidance on determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock.
Under the authoritative guidance, effective January 1, 2009, instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions are
deemed to be derivative instruments. The conversion feature of the Company’s senior secured convertible notes (described
in Note 5), do not have fixed settlement provisions because their conversion prices may be lowered if the Company issues securities
at lower prices in the future. In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion feature of the notes was separated
from the host contract (i.e., the notes) and recognized as a derivative instrument. The conversion feature of the notes
has been characterized as a derivative liability to be re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value
reported in the statement of operations. As discussed further in Note 5, in June 2014 the Company entered into a First Amendment
to Saleen Automotive, Inc. 3.0% Secured Convertible Note to remove all specified adjustments to the conversion price except for
standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction pays dividends or enters into
a stock split of its common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. As a result of this amendment, the Company
will no longer recognize a derivative liability related to these notes after June 2014.
As of June 26, 2013, the
date of issuance, and March 31, 2014, the derivative liability was valued using a model with the following assumptions:
|
|
June
26, 2013
Date of Issuance
(Using Mote Carlo
Model)
|
|
|
March
31,
2014
(using Black
Scholes Model)
|
|
Conversion feature:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
3.48
years
|
|
|
|
.25
years
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion feature
|
|
$
|
1,694,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,032,786
|
|
The risk-free interest
rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company uses the volatility of five comparable guideline
companies to estimate volatility for its common stock. The expected life of the conversion feature of the notes was based on the
date from March 31, 2014 to the date of the Amendment in June 2014. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the
Company has not customarily paid dividends to its common stockholders in the past and does not expect to pay dividends to its
common stockholders in the future.
NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The amounts of accounts
payable to related parties as of March 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
Related Party:
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
March
31, 2013
|
|
Steve Saleen
(a)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
Miranda & Associates
(b)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
167,222
|
|
Michaels Law Group (c)
|
|
|
23,954
|
|
|
|
242,045
|
|
Top Hat Capital
(d)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,954
|
|
|
$
|
709,267
|
|
|
(a)
|
During the year ended
March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred $131,787 and $340,000, respectively, in officers’ salary expense due its
Director, Chairman and CEO, Mr. Steve Saleen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2013
$300,000 was due Mr. Saleen. In addition, during the year ended March 31, 2014, Mr. Saleen loaned the Company $20,500 payable
on demand. In March 2014, Mr. Saleen agreed to forgive $353,787 of amounts owed, which the Company recognized as a gain and
offset to settlement expenses in the Statement of Operations. As of March 31, 2014 the remaining balance of $100,000 payable
to Mr. Saleen for his unpaid officers’ salary is included in amounts due related parties.
|
|
(b)
|
During the year ended
March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred $259,534 and $297,842, respectively, in accounting advisory and CFO services
with Miranda & Associates, a firm owned by its former Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Robert Miranda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2013,
$167,222 was payable to Miranda & Associates. During the year the Company paid to Mr. Miranda $252,663. In March 2014,
the Company entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release whereby in settlement of all remaining amounts due him,
the Company issued 1,061,408 shares of common stock and five year warrants to purchase 1,061,408 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of $0.15 per share along with cash of $10,000 in exchange for amounts owed as of March 31, 2014. The value
of the common stock issued was $212,282 based on a stock price of $0.20 on date of settlement. The Company valued the warrants
at $169,825 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: (i) fair market value of stock of
$0.20; (ii) dividend yield of 0%; (iii) expected volatility of 100%; (iv) risk free rate of 1.75% and (v) expected term of
5 years. The Company recognized a loss of $218,014 in the Statement of Operations for the year ended March 31, 2014 based
on the difference between the value of the common shares and stock warrants issued plus $10,000 cash paid and the amount owed
of $174,093.
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
During the year ended
March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred $365,251 and $371,357, respectively, in General Counsel Services and legal fees
expense with Michaels Law Group, a firm owned by its Director and General Counsel, Mr. Jonathan Michaels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2013,
$242,045 was payable to Michaels Law Group for these services. During the year the Company paid to Mr. Michaels $330,650.
In March 2014, the Company entered into a Retainer Agreement whereby the Company issued 1,447,500 shares of common stock and
five year warrants to purchase 1,447,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share along with cash of
$36,459 in exchange for amounts owed through February 2014. The value of the common stock issued was $405,300 based on a stock
price of $0.28 on date of settlement.
The Company valued the warrants at $332,491 using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: (i) fair market value of stock of $0.28; (ii) dividend
yield of 0%; (iii) expected volatility of 100%; (iv) risk free rate of 1.75% and (v) expected term of 5 years.
The
Company recognized a loss of $521,558 included in settlement expenses in the Statement of Operations for the year ended March
31, 2014 based on the difference between the value of the common shares and stock warrants issued plus $36,459 cash paid and
the amount owed of $252,692. As of March 31, 2014, $23,954 was payable to Michaels Law Group for March 2014 services.
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
During
the year ended March 3, 2014, the Company incurred $35,000 in investment advisor and
research services from Top Hat Capital, whose owner is a Director. As of March 31, 2014,
$25,000 of this amount was included in due to related parties.
|
Other Transactions
During the year ended
March 31, 2014, the Company issued the equivalent of 5,277 shares of its Super Voting Preferred stock, to Robert J. Miranda and
Jonathan Michaels (2,638.5 shares each). These shares were valued at $47.38 per share for a total value of $250,000. These shares
were issued in consideration of Messrs. Miranda’s and Michaels’ service on the Company’s board of directors
for the period April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014. During the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company recorded $250,000 of these
director’s fees as director’s fee expense.
During the year ended
March 31, 2013, the Company incurred $120,000 in consulting fees with a stockholder for marketing, business development, engineering,
business management, and financial advisory services.
During the year ended
March 31, 2013, we incurred $315,750 in consulting fees with shareholders for marketing, business development, engineering, business
management, and financial advisory services. The amounts incurred with these related parties are as follows:
Related Party:
|
|
March
31, 2013
|
|
Greentech Consulting
|
|
$
|
62,750
|
|
Alexander James LLC
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
Anthony Lanham
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Brian Black
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
RAV Marketing,
LLC
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
315,750
|
|
NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES
As of March 31, 2014,
the Company had net operating loss carry forwards for income tax reporting purposes of approximately $15,600,000 that may be offset
against future taxable income. Current tax laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income
when a substantial change in ownership occurs or a change in the nature of the business. The utilization of the losses is also
limited by the fact that the combined companies prior to the reverse merger file on a separate basis and losses on one cannot
offset profits on the other. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited.
No tax benefit has been
reported in the financial statements for the realization of loss carry forwards, as the Company believes based on the Company’s
past operations that there is no evidence or assurance that the carry forwards will be utilized. Accordingly, the potential tax
benefits of the loss carry forwards are offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
Deferred income tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating
loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
4,773,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,316,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(4,773,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,316,000
|
)
|
Net deferred income
tax asset
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Reconciliation of the effective income tax
rate to the U.S. statutory rate is as follows:
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
Tax expense
at the U.S. statutory income tax
|
|
|
(34.00
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.00
|
)%
|
State tax net of federal
tax benefit
|
|
|
(5.80
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.80
|
)%
|
Increase in the
valuation allowance
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
—%
|
|
|
|
—%
|
|
The Company is primarily
subject to U.S. federal and state income tax. As a result of the implementation of certain provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes,
(formerly FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109), the Company
performed an analysis of its tax liabilities and determined that there were no positions taken that it considered uncertain. Therefore,
there were no unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively.
Future changes in the
unrecognized tax benefit are not expected to have an impact on the effective tax rate due to the existence of the valuation allowance.
The Company estimates that the unrecognized tax benefit will not change within the next twelve months. The Company will continue
to classify income tax penalties and interest, if any, as part of interest and other expenses in its statements of operations.
The Company has incurred no interest or penalties as of March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013.
NOTE 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The Company is authorized
under its articles of incorporation, as amended, to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, all of the outstanding
shares of capital stock held by Saleen Automotive’s former shareholders were exchanged for 554,057 shares of the Company’s
Super Voting Preferred Stock, and under the terms of the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended, the Company issued to Saleen
341,943 shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock. Each share of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred Stock was convertible
into 125 shares of its common stock.
On July 9, 2013, holders
of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred Stock voted to convert, 696,000 shares of
its Super Voting Preferred Stock into 87,000,000 shares of its common stock. Such conversion became effective on July 18, 2013,
upon the filing of the amendment to the Certificate of Designations.
During the twelve month
period ended March 31, 2014, the Company issued the equivalent of 12,178 shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock in exchange
for the settlement of claims, conditions of employment, director’s fees, and payment of information technology services.
These shares were valued at $47.38 per share for a total valuation of $576,981 based on management’s estimate of value of
the shares issued.
On January 13, 2014, pursuant
to an amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation increasing the authorized shares of its common stock to 500,000,000,
all of the remaining outstanding shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock automatically converted into shares of its common
stock, and the Super Voting Preferred Stock ceased to be a designated series of preferred stock.
Issuance of common stock
During the year ended
March 31, 2014, the Company entered into Subscription Agreements with individual accredited investors (the “Subscribers”)
pursuant to which the Subscribers purchased an aggregate of 8,793,337 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock
at a per share price of $0.15 for aggregate proceeds of $1,312,500, net of issuance costs of $24,000. In accordance
with the issuances, the Company issued Common Stock Purchase Warrants to purchase 8,743,337 shares of its common stock at an exercise
price of $0.15 per share.
During the year ended
March 31, 2013, the Company issued the equivalent of 39,835 shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock for cash of $1,607,072.
During the year ended
March 31, 2013, the Company issued the
equivalent of 5,277
shares
of its Super Voting Preferred Stock in exchange for an automobile valued at $250,000 and issued the equivalent of 5,965 shares
of its Super Voting Preferred Stock valued in the aggregate at $282,628 in exchange for interest on a related party note, settlement
of claims, payment of loans, and professional services.
During the year ended
March 31, 2013, founders shares were transferred from two of the founders to a third founder in payment of $142,205 of related
party payables. These founders share transfers were valued at $155,250 based on management’s estimate of value of the common
shares issued and reflected as a cost and as a contribution of additional paid in capital in the accompanying financial statements.
Warrants
The following summarizes
warrant activity for the Company during the year ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual Term
|
|
Outstanding March 31, 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
11,252,245
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding March 31, 2014
|
|
|
11,252,245
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
The intrinsic value of
the warrants as of March 31, 2014 was $787,657.
Omnibus Incentive Plan
In March 2014, the Company's
board of directors approved the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which is administered by the Company’s
board of directors or a committee thereof (the “Administrator”) as set forth in the Plan. The Plan provides for the
granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted share awards and restricted stock units to employees, directors
(including non-employee directors), advisors and consultants. Grants under the Plan vest and expire based on periods determined
by the Administrator, but in no event can the expiration date be later than ten years from the date of grant (five years after
the date of grant if the grant is an incentive stock option to an employee who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting
power of all classes of the Company’s capital stock (a “10% owner”)). Grants of stock options may be either
incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. The per share exercise price on an option, other than with respect to substitute
awards, shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date the option is granted
(110% of the fair market value if the grant is to a 10% owner). A total of 28,905,763 shares of common stock have been authorized
for issuance and reserved under the Plan. The Plan was approved by the Company's stockholders on January 13, 2014. As of March
31, 2014, no options have been issued or granted under the Plan.
In connection with the
appointment of three new board members in October 2013, December 2013 and May 2014, the Company is obligated to each of these
new board members to grant options to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to
the fair market value as of the date of grant, with subsequent grants to each of these new board members of options to purchase
125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to the then fair market value for each subsequent year that
the board members serve as directors.
NOTE 10 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGINCIES
Facilities Leases
The Company rents two
buildings totaling approximately 76,000 square feet on triple net leases through January, 2018. Rent expense during the twelve
months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $508,802 and $348,199, respectively. The current lease amendment provides for an annual
escalation of 3% in the rent each February and provides for one option to extend beyond January 2018 for periods from 36 to 60
months. Past rent will be made up with the payment of an additional $5,300 for 20 months starting in June, 2014.
The future minimum rental
payments required under the non-cancelable operating leases described above as of March 31, 2014 are as follows:
Years
ending March 31:
|
|
Lease
Commitment
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
615,154
|
|
2016
|
|
|
583,671
|
|
2017
|
|
|
599,689
|
|
2018
|
|
|
512,172
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,310,686
|
|
Employment Agreements
On August 1, 2011, Saleen
Automotive entered into an Employment Agreement with Saleen under which he is currently compensated at the rate of $20,000 per
month, which shall not be reduced. The Employment Agreement provides for increased compensation of $27,500 per month, $32,500
per month and $37,500 per month if Saleen Automotive is successful in raising a cumulative gross amount of $5 million, $7.5 million
and $10 million in capital, respectively. The Employment Agreement also provides that Saleen Automotive will establish and maintain
on or before September 30, 2013, a bonus program for Saleen that will compensate Saleen in amounts up to his annual bases salary,
based on objective criteria. Saleen Automotive and Saleen are currently determining the parameters of that bonus plan. The Employment
Agreement provides for Saleen’s service as Saleen Automotive’s Chief Executive Officer, and provides that Saleen Automotive
is disallowed from changing the title of Saleen’s position or from diminishing his responsibilities of overseeing the operations
of Saleen Automotive. The Employment Agreement has a term of eight years, and will automatically continue thereafter for successive
12 month periods unless and until either party gives the other party written notice of termination prior to the end of a term.
In the event Saleen Automotive terminates the Employment Agreement without cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement), or
otherwise materially breaches the Employment Agreement and such material breach remains uncured after 15 days’ written notice,
Saleen will be entitled to a severance payment of 1.50 times his then-current annual salary plus $2 million, payable in cash or
cash-equivalents within 30 days of the date of termination.
Litigation
The Company is involved
in certain legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. The Company is currently a party
to several legal proceedings related to claims for payment that are currently accrued for in its financial statements as accounts
or notes payable. Except for income tax contingencies (commencing April 1, 2009), the Company record accruals for contingencies
to the extent that management concludes that the occurrence is probable and that the related amounts of loss can be reasonably
estimated. Legal expenses associated with the contingency are expensed as incurred. Material legal proceedings that are currently
pending are as follows:
SSC
is a defendant in a case filed by MSY Trading, Inc. on April 13, 2012 in the California Superior Court, Riverside County, that
claims breach of contract related to an engine installed by a third party vendor. The suit claims $200,000 in damages plus interest,
legal fees and costs of litigation. The Company filed a cross complain against MSY Trading, Inc. for breach of warranty, negligence,
and indemnification. On January 10, 2014, the Company settled this claim by agreeing to pay of $112,500 over a period of 18 months.
SSC
is the plaintiff in a case filed against Connects Marketing and Eric Hruza on July 2, 2012 in the United States District Court,
Central District of California, Southern Division, for misappropriation of trade secrets, trademark infringement and other related
causes of action. The suit seeks damages in excess of $1,000,000 and is currently pending.
SSC
is the plaintiff in a case filed against Douglas Lopez & Rumm, LLP, Diana Lopez and Dana Douglas on October 16, 2012 in the
California Superior Court, Orange County, for legal malpractice for their failure to adequately represent SSC in its litigation
against Connects Marketing for the installation of defective engines in SSC vehicles. The suit seeks damages in excess of $1,000,000.
The defendants have filed a cross-complaint against SSC and Saleen for payment for legal services rendered in the amount of $10,000.
The Company has recorded this liability in its books.
In
February 2014, SSC received a Complaint from a bank alleging, among other matters, breach of contract due to non-timely payment
of November and December 2013 principal amounts owed, which were paid as of December 31, 2013, and the occurrence of a change
in control as a result of the Merger. In April 2014, the bank agreed to dismiss the suit in exchange for our payment of $124,000
that was applied towards principal and unpaid fees along with advance loan principal and interest for May, June and July 2014,
and our agreement to pay the remaining recorded balance of $443,000 to the bank in August 2014.
Although
the
Company’s management
currently believes that resolving claims
against the Company, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on its financial statements, these
matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s views of these matters may change in the future.
NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Common stock
In April and May 2014,
the Company entered into Subscription Agreements with certain accredited investors (the “Subscribers”) pursuant to
which the Subscribers purchased from the Company an aggregate of 816,667 and 416,667 restricted shares of its common stock at
a per share price of $0.15 for aggregate proceeds of $122,500 and $62,500, respectively.
Purchase Commitments
In April 2014, the Company
entered into an agreement with BASF to exclusively use BASF’s products for paint work. The agreement continues from May
2014 until
the Company
purchases
in aggregate $4,131,000 of BASF products. If the aggregate purchases of BASF products are less than $1,697,000 over a period of
36 consecutive months,
the Company is
required to repay BASF 6.1% of the shortfall between $1,697,000 and the amount it actually purchased over this period. In consideration
for the Company’s exclusive use of BASF’s products and fulfilling this purchase commitments, BASF paid the Company
$250,000, which will be amortized over 36 months.
In May 2014, the Company
entered into an agreement with FinishMaster, Inc. (“FinishMaster”) to exclusively use FinishMaster’s paint material
supplies. The agreement continues from May 2014 until
the Company
purchases in aggregate $1,555,000 of FinishMaster products. In consideration for the Company’s exclusive use of FinishMaster’s
products and fulfilling this purchase commitments, FinishMaster paid
the Company
$25,000 and will pay an additional $25,000 upon the achievement
of purchase level milestones. Should the Company not complete a set purchase level milestone, the Company would be required to
pay $31,475, which will be amortized over 36 months.
Note Payable Settlement Agreements
In April 2014, the Company
entered into a General Release agreement with James Brakke for an outstanding principal and interest of $32,452 and $2,214, respectively,
in exchange for (1) issuance of 527,520 shares of common stock and (2) issuance of a five year warrant to purchase 527,520 of
common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The value of the common stock issued was $110,779 based on a stock price
of $0.21 on date of settlement. The Company valued the warrants at $122,103 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using
the following assumptions: (i) fair market value of stock of $0.21; (ii) dividend yield of 0%; (iii) expected volatility of 100%;
(iv) risk free rate of 1.75% and (v) expected term of 5 years. The Company recognized a loss of $153,754 in the Statement of Operations
for the year ended March 31, 2014 based on the difference between the value of the common shares and stock warrants issued and
the amount owed.
On May 7, 2014, the Company,
along with its subsidiaries and Steve Saleen, entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Settlement Agreement”)
with Thomas Del Franco and Jason B. Cruz (the “Del Franco Parties”), pursuant to which the Del Franco Parties agreed
to fully and finally settle a claim filed against the Company for outstanding Note and Bond payables to Thomas Del Franco, which
consisted of principal and interest of $517,500 and $186,028, respectively, in exchange for (1) the Company’s payment to
Mr. Del Franco of $250,000 (the “Settlement Payment”) and (2) issuance of 2,500,000 shares of its common stock (the
“Settlement Shares” and together with the Settlement Payment, the “Settlement Amount”). The Settlement
Shares had a value of $425,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on May 7, 2014 of $0.17. The parties
to the Settlement Agreement also agreed to release each other from all claims arising from their prior business dealings. The
Del Franco Parties have agreed to a contractual restriction on the sale of the Settlement Shares whereby for a period of 12 months
from and after the expiration of any applicable restricted periods imposed by applicable federal and state securities laws and
regulations, including Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the Del Franco
Parties will not offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract
to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, more than
200,000 of the Settlement Shares in any given calendar month.
In June 2014, the Company
entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release agreement with Jim Marsh American Corporation for an outstanding principal
and interest of $100,000 and $53,346, respectively, in exchange for (1) issuance of 800,000 shares of common stock and (2) cash
payment of $35,000. The value of the common stock issued was $120,000 based on a stock price of $0.15 on date of settlement.
Convertible Note Amendments
In June 2014, in exchange
for the issuance in aggregate of 389,923 shares of common stock, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Saleen Automotive,
Inc. 3.0% Secured Convertible Note to remove all specified adjustments to the conversion price except for standard anti-dilution
provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its
common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. In addition, if a fundamental transaction, as defined, were to
occur, the potential liquidated damages was set to a fixed amount. As a result of this amendment, the conversion price is no longer
subject to fluctuation based on the occurrence of future offerings or events
and thus, the derivative liability recorded as of March 31, 2014 will be extinguished in the quarter ending June 30, 2014.
In June 2014, in exchange
for the issuance in aggregate of 357,143 shares of common stock, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Saleen Automotive,
Inc. 7% Convertible Note whereby effective as of the date of the note, the conversion price would in no event adjust below $0.03
per share. In addition, if a fundamental transaction, as defined, were to occur, the potential liquidated damages was set to a
fixed amount.
Item
9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item
9A. Controls and Procedures
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures
that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions
and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material
effect on our financial statements.
Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)
and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in the 1992 framework established
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) entitled “
Internal Control—Integrated
Framework
.” Based on the results of this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was not effective as of March 31, 2014 primarily due to the limited size of our staff and budget.
This Annual Report does
not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. We were not required to have, nor have we engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform, an
audit on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit
us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.
Changes in Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in
our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended March 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure
controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information
is accumulated and communicated to our management including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Based on an evaluation
carried out as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our CEO and CFO, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act), are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management believes
that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance and cannot provide absolute
assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met, and no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Further, the design of
an internal control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitation in all internal control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issuers and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART
III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
The following table sets
forth the names, positions and ages of our current executive officers and directors. All directors serve until the next annual
meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified. Officers are appointed by our board of directors
and their terms of office are, except to the extent governed by an employment contract, at the discretion of our board of directors.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
Steve Saleen
(1)
|
|
65
|
|
Chief Executive
Officer, President and Director
|
David Fiene
|
|
43
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary
|
Jonathan A. Michaels
(1)
|
|
45
|
|
General Counsel and Director
|
Gary Freeman
(2)
|
|
45
|
|
Director
|
Jeffrey Kraws
(3)
|
|
49
|
|
Director
|
Joe Amato
(4)
|
|
69
|
|
Director
|
(1)
These
persons were appointed to their respective positions effective June 26, 2013.
(2)
Appointed
October 31, 2013.
(3)
Appointed
December 11, 2013.
(4)
Appointed
May 9, 2014.
Steve
Saleen
,
our founder, Chief Executive Officer, President and one of our directors, has been president and CEO of
SMS since its formation in July 2008. He has been board chairman and CEO of Saleen Automotive since its formation in July 2011.
Mr. Saleen is considered one of the most successful and well known automotive icons in the country, making him a well-qualified
candidate to serve as our CEO and director. Mr. Saleen’s entrepreneurial business plan laid the groundwork for an entire
new industry of design, engineering, manufacturing and sales of high performance vehicles that were race proven and marketed for
sales through new car dealership showrooms nationwide. This included very successful racing programs featuring himself as a lead
driver in vehicles of his design that went on to win numerous national championships. Mr. Saleen is generally recognized for his
expertise in small volume vehicle manufacturing, vehicle transformation processes and mass customization – creating customized
products in an efficient mass – production manner. Mr. Saleen has a bachelor’s degree in business from the University
of Southern California.
David
Fiene
joined us in June 2013 as Vice President of Finance and was later appointed Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
in December 2013. Mr. Fiene has more than 18 years of experience in finance and accounting including with both public and private
entities. He previously served as Managing Director for Advantage Sales and Marketing, as $1 billion consumer products company.
Prior to Advantage Sales and Marketing, he served as Director of Accounting at Multi-Fineline Electronix, Inc., a $750 million
manufacturer of flexible printed circuit boards. Mr. Fiene also spent ten years with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in a variety of
roles, where he participated in numerous audits, corporate finance transactions, IPOs, merger and acquisition transactions, carve
outs, spinoffs, and many different types of public filings for Fortune 100 companies. Mr. Fiene is a licensed Certified Public
Accountant in California and has a bachelor’s degree in Business from Benedictine University.
Jonathan
A. Michaels
, our General Counsel and one of our Directors,
has served as the general counsel for Saleen Automotive
and SSC since their inception. Prior to that, Mr. Michaels served as the general counsel for Saleen, Inc., dating back to 2004.
Mr. Michaels is the founding member of Michaels Law Group, APLC, a business law firm in Newport Beach that focuses on representing
clients in the automotive industry, making him a well-qualified candidate to serve on our board of directors. Mr. Michaels graduated
from the USC Marshall School of Business in 1992 and from Whittier Law School in 1995, finishing in the top 4% of his class. While
in law school, Mr. Michaels served as an editor of the Whittier Law Review, represented his alma mater in several national Moot
Court Honors Board competitions and, among other things, published a winning Law Review article that is permanently housed in
the U.S. Library of Congress. Since 1995, Mr. Michaels has represented clients in complex litigation at all levels of state and
federal court throughout the United States, resulting in substantial verdicts and settlements. In particular, Mr. Michaels has
extensive experience representing clients in the automotive industry against some of the largest auto manufacturers in the world.
During his tenure, Mr. Michaels has litigated cases against General Motors, Nissan North America, American Honda, AM
General, Toyota Motor Sales, DaimlerChrysler, Kia Motors, Land Rover USA, Ford Motor Company, Jaguar Cars and Chrysler Group.
Mr. Michaels has also been recognized by his peers for his outstanding ability. He has received the AVVO rating of “Excellent,”
and has been named to
Southern California Super Lawyers
– a distinction given to no more than 5% of the
attorneys in the state. Mr. Michaels has also been invited to guest lecture at undergraduate and graduate programs at some of
the world’s most prestigious Universities, and he has written extensively in the legal community, with numerous publications
to his credit. In 2012, Mr. Michaels was named “Attorney of the Year” by his law school alma mater. Mr. Michaels is
a member of the California and Colorado State Bars, and is actively involved in the Southern California community.
Gary
Freeman
was appointed as a director in October 2013. Mr. Freeman, is currently a Partner in Beach, Freeman, Lim
& Cleland’s Audit and Accounting services division. In conjunction with various consulting engagements, Mr. Freeman
has assumed interim senior level management roles at numerous public and private companies during his career, including Co-President
and Chief Financial Officer of Trestle Holdings, Inc., Chief Financial Officer of Silvergraph International and Chief Financial
Officer of Galorath Incorporated. Mr. Freeman currently serves as a member of the board of directors of AtheroNova Inc. (AHRO)
and Vantage Associates Inc., and has served as a member of the board of directors of Blue Holdings, Inc., Trestle Holdings, Inc.
and GVI Security Solutions. Mr. Freeman’s previous experience includes ten years with BDO Seidman, LLP, including two years
as an Audit Partner. Mr. Freeman brings to our board of directors his extensive experience in accounting and financial matters
for public companies. Mr. Freeman is an independent board member and also serves on our audit and compensation committees.
Jeffrey
Kraws
was appointed as a director in December 2013. Since 2003, Mr. Kraws has served as Chief Executive Officer
and co-founder of Crystal Research Associates, and since February 2012, he has served as partner and co-founder of TopHat Capital,
LLC. Prior to founding Crystal Research Associates, Mr. Kraws served as co-president of The Investor Relations Group (IRG), a
firm representing primarily under-followed, small-capitalization companies. Previously, Mr. Kraws served as a managing director
of healthcare research for Ryan Beck & Co. and as director of research/senior pharmaceutical analyst and managing director
at Gruntal & Co., LLC (prior to its merger with Ryan Beck & Company). Mr. Kraws served as managing director of the healthcare
research group and senior pharmaceutical analyst at First Union Securities (formerly EVEREN Securities); as senior U.S. pharmaceutical
analyst for the Swedish-Swiss conglomerate Asea Brown Boveri; and as managing director and president of the Brokerage/Investment
Banking operation of ABB Aros Securities, Inc. He also served as senior pharmaceutical analyst at Nationsbanc Montgomery Securities,
BT Alex Brown & Sons, and Buckingham Research. Mr. Kraws also serves on the board of directors of Synthetic Biologics, Inc.
(NYSE: SYN). Mr. Kraws brings to our board of directors significant strategic, business and financial expertise. He holds an M.B.A.
from Cornell University and a B.S. degree from State University of New York-Buffalo. Mr. Kraws is an independent board member
and also serves on our audit and compensation committees.
Joe
Amato
was appointed as a director in May 2014. In 24 years of competition as an owner and driver in the National Hot Rod
Association’s (NHRA) Top Fuel category, Mr. Amato has achieved immense success behind the wheel of a dragster. Mr. Amato
began racing cars as a teenager, when he worked at his family’s auto parts store. He eventually built the business into
Keystone Automotive, a large and successful automotive wholesaler and distributor. His racing career spans from 1983 to 2001 and
in that time he set drag racing records that are so far unparalleled in the 54-year history of the NHRA. Between 1982 and 2000,
he finished in the Top 10 every year. Eye surgery forced him to retire from competitive driving at the end of the 2000 season.
He then participated as a team owner with Amato Racing until selling the business and retiring permanently in 2005. Since 2005,
Mr. Amato currently owns and operates multiple commercial real estate properties through Joe Amato Properties, comprising over
400,000 square feet of rental space, vacant land destined for further commercial development and local housing developments. Mr.
Amato’s experience in the automotive aftermarket parts and racing industry makes him a valuable addition to our board of
directors. Mr. Amato is an independent board member.
Our
directors will be determined pursuant to a Voting Agreement we entered into on June 26, 2013 by Saleen and the Purchasers in the
Capital Raise. Together, such parties hold a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock and, under the Voting Agreement,
are obligated to vote for the directors determined as described below. The authorized number of our directors is five. Those directors
will consist of three directors—Messrs. Saleen, Michaels and Kraws—whose replacements will be determined under the
terms of the Voting Agreement by Saleen, one director—Mr. Freeman—whose replacement will be determined under the terms
of the Voting Agreement by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares held by purchasers of our June 2013 Notes, and
one director—Mr. Amato—whose replacement will be determined under the terms of the Voting Agreement jointly by the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares held by Saleen and by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares held
by purchasers of our June 2013 Notes. The obligations of the parties signatory to the Voting Agreement to vote to set the number
of directors constituting our board of directors at 5 and to vote to elect the directors as designated thereunder terminates on
the 4
th
anniversary of the date of the Voting Agreement.
Director Independence
Our
board of directors currently consists of five members – Messrs. Saleen, Michaels, Freeman, Kraws and Amato – with
no vacancies. We are not a “listed issuer” under SEC rules and are therefore not required to have an audit committee
comprised of independent directors. Currently, Messrs. Freeman, Kraws and Amato are “independent” as that term is
defined in the applicable rules for companies traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market. In addition, Messrs. Freeman and Kraws serve
on our audit and compensation committees.
Our
board of directors is responsible for selecting and engaging our independent accountant, establishing procedures for the confidential,
anonymous submission by our employees of, and receipt, retention and treatment of concerns regarding accounting, internal controls
and auditing matters, reviewing the scope of the audit to be conducted by our independent public accountants, and periodically
meeting with our independent public accountants and our chief financial officer to review matters relating to our financial statements,
our accounting principles and our system of internal accounting controls. Our board of directors also approves our financial statements.
Our board has established audit and compensation committees, whose duties are as follows:
|
●
|
The Audit Committee
has oversight responsibilities regarding risk related to our financial statements and auditing, accounting and related reporting
processes, and systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting, financial reporting, and business practices. In
addition, the Audit Committee has oversight over any material financial risks as designated by management or the independent
auditors.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The Compensation Committee
has oversight regarding the effect of compensation policies and structure on our risk profile. In addition, the Compensation
Committee oversees and advises our board of directors on risks related to executive officer and director compensation as well
as incentive, equity-based, and other compensatory plans.
|
We do not have a nominating
committee for persons to be proposed as directors for election to our board of directors. The duties and functions performed by
such committee are performed by our board of directors. We do not have any restrictions on stockholder nominations under our articles
of incorporation, however, our bylaws do contain advance notice requirements for stockholder nominations for directors. Other
restrictions are those applicable generally under the Nevada Revised Statutes and the federal proxy rules. Currently, our entire
board of directors decides on nominees, on the recommendation of one or more members of our board of directors. We are not a “listed
issuer” under SEC rules and are therefore not required to have a nominating committee comprised of independent directors.
Indemnification
We are a Nevada corporation.
The Nevada Revised Statutes and certain provisions of our articles of incorporation, as amended, and bylaws under certain circumstances
provide for indemnification of our officers, directors and controlling persons against liabilities which they may incur in such
capacities. A summary of the circumstances in which such indemnification is provided for is contained herein, but this description
is qualified in its entirety by reference to our bylaws and to the statutory provisions.
In general, any officer,
director, employee or agent may be indemnified against expenses, fines, settlements or judgments arising in connection with a
legal proceeding to which such person is a party, if that person is not liable due to conduct that constituted a breach of his
or her fiduciary duties and such breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law, and that person’s
actions were in good faith, were believed to be in our best interest, and were not unlawful. Indemnification may not be made for
any claim as to which the person seeking indemnity has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of
all appeals, to be liable to our company unless the court in which the action or suit was brought or another court of competent
jurisdiction determines that in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity
for such expenses as such court deems proper. Unless such person is successful upon the merits in such an action, indemnification
may be awarded only after a determination by independent decision of our board of directors, by legal counsel, or by a vote of
our stockholders, that the applicable standard of conduct was met by the person to be indemnified. Under our articles of incorporation,
as amended, and bylaws , we will advance expenses incurred by officers, directors, employees or agents who are parties to or are
threatened to made parties to any threatened, pending or completed action by reason of the fact that such person was serving in
such capacity, prior to the disposition of such action and promptly following request therefor, upon receipt of an undertaking
by or on behalf of such person to repay such advances if it should be determined ultimately that such person is not entitled to
indemnification.
The circumstances under
which indemnification is granted in connection with an action brought on our behalf is generally the same as those set forth above;
however, with respect to such actions, indemnification is granted only with respect to expenses actually incurred in connection
with the defense or settlement of the action. Indemnification may also be granted pursuant to the terms of agreements which may
be entered in the future or pursuant to a vote of stockholders or directors. The Nevada Revised Statutes also grant us the power
to purchase and maintain insurance which protects our officers and directors against any liabilities incurred in connection with
their service in such a position, and we have obtained such a policy.
A stockholder’s
investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers
as required by these indemnification provisions. At present, except for the legal proceedings described above to which Steve Saleen
is a party, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees regarding which
indemnification by us is sought, nor are we aware of any threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification.
Insofar as indemnification
for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, this indemnification is against public policy
as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Code of Ethics
We have not adopted a
formal written corporate code of ethics that applies throughout our Company; however, the Board is currently considering adopting
a Code of Ethics in the near future.
Meetings of the
Board of Directors and Committees
Our
board of directors held four general meetings during our fiscal year ended March 31, 2014. Each director attended all the meetings
of our board of directors.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table and
related footnotes show the compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and to each of our other two most highly compensated
executive officers whose compensation exceeded $100,000 during the last fiscal year, and information concerning all compensation
paid for services rendered to us in all capacities for our last two fiscal years.
Name
and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards($)
|
|
|
All
Other
Compensation($)
|
|
|
Total($)
|
|
Steve Saleen
(1)
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
335,628
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
335,628
|
|
CEO, President &
Chairman
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Miranda
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
382,107
(
|
3)
|
|
|
197,000
(
|
2)
|
|
|
579,107
|
|
Former Director, CFO
& Secretary
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
297,842
|
|
|
|
297,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Michaels
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
737,791
(
|
5)
|
|
|
204,758
(
|
4)
|
|
|
943,013
|
|
Director & General
Counsel
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
216,250
|
|
|
|
216,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Fiene
(6)
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
117,289
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
180,789
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1)
|
During the years ended
March 31, 2013, we incurred $340,000 in officers’ salary expense with our Director, Chairman and CEO, Mr. Steve Saleen.
As of March 31, 2013 $300,000 was payable to Mr. Saleen for his officers’ salary. Effective March 31, 2013, Mr. Saleen
agreed to defer the $300,000 of unpaid salary for payment on April 1, 2014. In March 2014, Mr. Saleen agreed to forgive this
amount owed.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Represents fees for
CFO services rendered by Mr. Miranda through his accounting firm, Miranda & Associates, A Professional Accountancy Corporation.
Mr. Miranda resigned in November 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
In
March 2014, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release whereby
the Company issued 1,061,408 shares of common stock valued at $212,282 and five year
warrants to purchase 1,061,408 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per
share valued at $169,825, along with cash of $10,000 in exchange for amounts owed as
of March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Represents fees
for legal services rendered by Mr. Michaels through his law firm, Michaels Law Group. We have engagement agreements, as amended,
with Michaels Law Group (“MLG”). Under the terms of the engagement agreements, MLG performed certain litigation,
legal advisory, transaction advisory and other legal services for us including the provision of executive General Counsel
services (including, without limitation, the services of Mr. Jonathan Michaels, our General Counsel). We paid MLG fees for
the services provided by Mr. Michaels and other professional associates of his law firm.
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
In March 2014, the Company
entered into a Retainer Agreement whereby the Company issued 1,447,500 shares of common stock valued at $405,300 and five
year warrants to purchase 1,447,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share valued at $332,491, along
with cash of $36,459 in exchange for amounts owed through February 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
David Fiene joined us
in June 2013 as Vice President of Finance and was appointed Chief Financial Officer on December 11, 2013. In June 2013, Mr.
Fiene was issued 98,939 fully vested restricted common shares.
|
Employee Contracts
On August 1, 2011, Saleen
Automotive entered into an Employment Agreement with Saleen under which he is currently compensated at the rate of $20,000 per
month, which shall not be reduced. The Employment Agreement provides for increased compensation of $27,500 per month, $32,500
per month and $37,500 per month if Saleen Automotive is successful in raising a cumulative gross amount of $5 million, $7.5 million
and $10 million in capital, respectively. The Employment Agreement also provides that Saleen Automotive will establish and maintain
on or before September 30, 2013, a bonus program for Saleen that will compensate Saleen in amounts up to his annual base salary,
based on objective criteria. Saleen Automotive and Saleen are currently determining the parameters of that bonus plan. The Employment
Agreement provides for Saleen’s service as Saleen Automotive’s Chief Executive Officer, and provides that Saleen Automotive
is disallowed from changing the title of Saleen’s position or from diminishing his responsibilities of overseeing the operations
of Saleen Automotive. The Employment Agreement has a term of eight years, and will automatically continue thereafter for successive
12 month periods unless and until either party gives the other party written notice of termination prior to the end of a term.
In the event Saleen Automotive terminates the Employment Agreement without cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement), or
otherwise materially breaches the Employment Agreement and such material breach remains uncured after 15 days’ written notice,
Saleen will be entitled to a severance payment of 1.50 times his then-current annual salary plus $2 million, payable in cash or
cash-equivalents within 30 days of the date of termination.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Neither our company nor
any of our subsidiaries granted options to executive officers during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
Compensation of Directors
We did not compensate
our non-employee directors for services during our fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.
The following table presents
information regarding compensation paid to our non-employee directors for our fiscal year ending March 31, 2014.
Name
|
|
Stock
Awards($)
|
|
|
Total($)
|
|
Robert J. Miranda,
former director
(1)
|
|
|
329,873
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
Jonathan A. Michaels
(1)
|
|
|
329,873
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents the equivalent
of 2,638 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock per share issued to Mr. Miranda on May 12, 2013, for services as a director
during the ensuing year ending March 31, 2014. Mr. Miranda resigned from our board in November 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the equivalent
of 2,638 shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock per share issued to Mr. Michaels on May 12, 2013, for services as a director
during the ensuing year ending March 31, 2014.
|
In connection with the
appointment of three new board members in October 2013, December 2013 and May 2014, we are obligated to each of these new board
members to grant options to purchase 500,000 shares each of our common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value
as of the date of grant, with subsequent grants to each of these new board members of options to purchase 125,000 shares of our
common stock at a price equal to the then fair market value for each subsequent year that the board members serves as a director.
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets
forth certain information regarding our common stock beneficially owned as of June, 2014 for (i) each stockholder known to be
the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each executive officer and director and (iii) all executive
officers and directors as a group.
In general, a person is
deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting
of such security, or the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial
owner of any securities of which the person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days, through the exercise
of a warrant or stock option, conversion of a convertible security or otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, each person in the
table will have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. For purposes of this table, shares not outstanding
which are subject to issuance on exercises of stock options or conversion of a Note that are held by one or more person(s) are
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage(s) of outstanding shares beneficially owned by such person(s)
but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage for any other person. The table assumes a total
of 142,735,701 shares of our common stock outstanding as of June 26, 2014. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of
the executive officers and directors and greater than 5% stockholders named below is c/o Saleen Automotive, Inc., 2735 Wardlow
Road, Corona, CA 92882.
Name
of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Percentage
of Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers
and Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Saleen
|
|
|
82,133,375
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
Jonathan A. Michaels
|
|
|
1,777,296
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
David Fiene
|
|
|
98,939
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gary Freeman
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Jeffrey Kraws
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Joe Amato
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
All directors and executive
officers as a group
|
|
|
84,009,610
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
%
|
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Other than the transactions
described below, since April 1, 2012, there has not been, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar
transactions to which we were or will be a party:
|
●
|
in which the amount
involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed
fiscal years;
and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
in which any director,
executive officer, stockholders who beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock or any member of their immediate
family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
|
During the twelve months
ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $131,787 and $340,000, respectively, in officers’ salary expense due our Director,
Chairman and CEO, Mr. Steve Saleen of which $300,000 was unpaid as of March 31, 2013. In addition, during the twelve months ended
March 31, 2014, Mr. Saleen loaned us $20,500 payable on demand. In March 2014, Mr. Saleen agreed to forgive $352,287 of amounts
owed, which we recognized as a gain in the Statement of Operations. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, the balances of $100,000 and
$300,000, respectively, were payable to Mr. Saleen for his unpaid officers’ salary, and is included in Accounts Payable
– related parties.
During the twelve-month
periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $259,534 and $297,842, respectively, in accounting advisory and CFO services
with Miranda & Associates, a firm owned by our former Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Robert Miranda. During the twelve-month
periods ended March 31, 2014, we paid to Mr. Miranda $252,663. As of March 31, 2013, $167,222 was payable to Miranda & Associates
for these services. In March 2014, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release whereby we issued 1,061,408
shares of our common stock and five year warrants to purchase 1,061,408 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.15
per share along with cash of $10,000 in exchange for amounts owed as of March 31, 2014. The value of the common stock and warrants
was determined to be $382,107. We recognized a loss of $218,014 in the Statement of Operations for the twelve months ended March
31, 2014 based on the difference between the value of the common shares and stock warrants issued plus $10,000 cash paid and the
amount owed of $174,093.
During the twelve months
ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $365,251 and $371,357, respectively, in General Counsel Services and legal fees expense
with Michaels Law Group, a firm owned by our Director and General Counsel, Mr. Jonathan Michaels. During the tweleve-month periods
ended March 31, 2014, we paid to Mr. Michaels $330,650. As of March 31, 2013, $242,045 was payable to Michaels Law Group for these
services. In March 2014, the Company entered into a Retainer Agreement whereby we issued 1,447,500 shares of our common stock
and five year warrants to purchase 1,447,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share along with cash
of $36,459 in exchange for amounts owed through February 2014. The value of the common stock and warrants was determined to be
$737,791. We recognized a loss of $521,558 in the Statement of Operations for the twelve months ended March 31, 2014 based on
the difference between the value of the common shares and stock warrants issued plus $36,459 cash paid and the amount owed of
$252,692. As of March 31, 2014, $23,954 was payable to Michaels Law Group for March 2014 services.
On May 8, 2013, W-Net
and Verdad, formerly our two largest stockholders, and SMS, Saleen Automotive and Saleen, entered a Bridge Loan and Security Agreement
pursuant to which the Lenders loaned to Borrower an aggregate of $500,000 and Borrower issued to the Lenders Secured Promissory
Notes. Following an event of default, the Secured Promissory Notes accrue interest at 10% per annum and had a maturity date of
June 15, 2013. Borrower’s obligations under the Secured Promissory Notes were secured by a first priority security interest,
subject to certain existing indebtedness, on all of the Saleen Entities’ assets. Borrower’s obligations under the
Secured Promissory Notes were also guaranteed by Saleen. Borrower’s failure to pay when due amounts payable under the Secured
Promissory Notes, its failure to observe any covenants under the bridge loan documents, a breach of its representations and warranties
made pursuant to the bridge loan documents or its undergoing a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding would have constituted an event
of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the Lenders could declare all obligations under the Secured Promissory
Notes due and payable and could have foreclosed on the collateral securing such obligations. Upon the consummation of the Capital
Raise, the obligations outstanding under the Secured Promissory Notes were converted into Notes in the same principal amounts.
On May 12, 2013, Saleen
Automotive issued 500,000 shares of its common stock each to two of its new directors, a total of 1,000,000 shares, in payment
of director fees for future service on Saleen Automotive’s board of directors. The total value of these shares is $250,000
based on a per share value of $0.25.
On May 23, 2013, we entered
into an Assignment and License Agreement with Saleen pursuant to which Saleen agreed, as of the effective time of the Merger,
to contribute certain intellectual property that relates to the “Saleen” brand name and related rights which are currently
owned by him to us, license to us the right to use his image, signature, full name, voice, biographical materials, likeness, and
goodwill associated with the “Saleen” brand, and assign to us all shares of the capital stock of SMS Retail –
Corona, a California corporation, and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc., a Michigan corporation. On June 21, 2013, we amended
the Assignment and License Agreement to terminate the obligation to assign to us all shares of the capital stock of SMS Retail
– Corona and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc., and Saleen agreed to dissolve those entities within 30 days after the Closing.
Concurrently with the Closing, pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended, Saleen assigned certain intellectual
property that relates to the “Saleen” brand name and related rights which are currently owned by him to us, and licensed
the right to use his image, signature, full name, voice, biographical materials, likeness, and goodwill associated with the “Saleen”
brand to us, and commenced the process of dissolving each of SMS Retail – Corona and Saleen Automotive Show Cars, Inc. The
aforementioned license may only be terminated in the event we file a petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code, or a petition for relief is converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In exchange for entering
into the Assignment and License Agreement, as amended, we issued to Saleen, as of the effective time of the Merger, 341,943 shares
of our Super Voting Preferred Stock. Based on the agreed upon enterprise value, post closing and funding of the $3,000,000 generated
in the Capital Raise, of $12,000,000, the 341,943 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock had an equivalent value of $3,205,711.
On October 8, 2013, we
entered into a Secured Promissory Note with W-Net pursuant to which W-Net loaned an aggregate of $500,000 to us. The note bears
interest at the rate of 8% per annum, which is payable along with all principal under the note on October 7, 2014, unless earlier
repaid. In March 2014, we converted $519,000 of principal and accrued interest under this note into $519,000 in principal of unsecured
7% convertible notes.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The following table presents
the fees for professional audit services rendered by Weinberg & Company, P.A. for the audit of our annual financial statements
for the year ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. All services reflected in the following fee table for 2014 and 2013 were pre
-
approved,
respectively, in accordance with the policy of the Audit Committee of our board of directors.
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees
(1)
|
|
$
|
100,670
|
|
|
$
|
131,087
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
100,670
|
|
|
$
|
131,087
|
|
NOTES:
(1)
Audit fees consist of
audit and review services, consents and review of documents filed with the SEC.
The Audit Committee of
our board of directors pre-approves all audit (including audit-related) and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our
independent auditors. Our Audit Committee will annually approve the scope and fee estimates for the year-end audit to be performed
by our independent auditors for the fiscal year. With respect to other permitted services, our Audit Committee pre-approves specific
engagements, projects and categories of services on a fiscal year basis, subject to individual project and annual maximums. To
date, we have not engaged our auditors to perform any non-audit related services.
PART
IV
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS
(a) The following
documents are filed as part of this report:
(1)
Financial Statements:
All financial statements
as set forth under Item 8 of this report.
(2)
Exhibits
See
Item 15(b) below.
(b) Exhibits:
The exhibit list
required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page of this report.
(c) Financial
Statement Schedules: None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual
Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
Saleen Automotive,
Inc. a Nevada Corporation
|
|
|
Date: June 30,
2014
|
/S/
Steve Saleen
|
|
Steve Saleen
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
POWER
OF ATTORNEY
KNOW
ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steve Saleen, and each of them,
his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments
to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute
or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/
Steve Saleen
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
Steve Saleen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/
David J. Fiene
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer & Secretary
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
David J. Fiene
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/
Jonathan A. Michaels
|
|
Director
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
Jonathan A. Michaels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/
Gary Freeman
|
|
Director
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
Gary Freeman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/
Jeffrey Kraws
|
|
Director
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
Jeffrey Kraws
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/
Joe Amato
|
|
Director
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
Joe Amato
|
|
|
|
|
Saleen Automotive,
Inc.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
of Exhibit
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated May 23, 2013, among the Registrant, Saleen California Merger
Corporation, Saleen Florida Merger Corporation, SMS Signature Cars, Saleen Automotive,
Inc. and Steve Saleen. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report
on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 30, 2013.
|
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 18, 2011.
|
|
|
|
3.1.2
|
|
Certificate
of Designations, Preferences, Limitations, Restrictions and Relative Rights of Super Voting Preferred Stock.
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 27, 2013.
|
|
|
|
3.1.3
|
|
Articles of Merger effective
June 17, 2013. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2013.
|
|
|
|
3.1.4
|
|
Amendment to Certificate
of Designation After Issuance of Class or Series. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Current Report on Form
8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 24, 2013.
|
|
|
|
3.1.5
|
|
Certificate of Amendment
of Articles of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Preliminary Information Statement on Schedule
14C (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2013.
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 18, 2011.
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
2013 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to the Preliminary Information Statement on Schedule 14C (File No. 333-176388)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Registration Rights
Agreement dated March 13, 2013, among the Registrant, W-Net Fund I, L.P. and Verdad Telecom, Inc. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 18, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Securities Purchase
Agreement dated June 26, 2013, among the Registrant and the purchasers signatory thereto. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27,
2013.
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Registration Rights
Agreement dated June 26, 2013, among the Registrant and the investors signatory thereto. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27,
2013.
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Security Agreement dated
June 26, 2013, among the Registrant, Saleen Automotive, Inc., SMS Signature Cars and the purchasers signatory thereto. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 27, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Intellectual Property
Security Agreement dated June 26, 2013, among the Registrant, Saleen Automotive, Inc., SMS Signature Cars and the purchasers
signatory thereto. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2013.
|
10.6
|
|
Form of
3.0% Senior Secured Convertible Note. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Commercial Lease dated
December 2, 2008, between Larry R. Haupert dba Rexco and SMS Signature Cars. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.8†
|
|
Employment Agreement
dated August 1, 2011, between Saleen Automotive, Inc. and Steve Saleen. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Commercial Lease dated
September 1, 2012, between Larry R. Haupert dba Rexco and Saleen Automotive, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9
to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Assignment and License
Agreement dated May 23, 2013, between W270, Inc. and Steve Saleen. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Secured Promissory Note
entered into on October 8, 2013 by Saleen Automotive, Inc. in favor of W-Net Fund I, L.P. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October
15, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Form of Subscription
Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 15, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Form of Warrant. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 15, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Letter Agreement dated
September 27, 2013, between Saleen Automotive, Inc. and Ascendiant Capital Markets, LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-176388) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October
15, 2013.
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Form
of 7.0% Convertible Note.
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the
Registrant.
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
101.INS**
|
|
XBRL Instance.
|
|
|
|
101.SCH**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Schema.
|
|
|
|
101.CAL**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Calculation.
|
|
|
|
101.DEF**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Definition.
|
|
|
|
101.LAB**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Labels.
|
|
|
|
101.PRE**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Presentation.
|
†
|
Each a management contract or
compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report on
Form 10-K.
|
**
|
XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part
of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these
sections.
|