UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 8-K

 

 

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): June 1, 2014

 

 

IMMUNOCELLULAR THERAPEUTICS, LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   001-35560   93-1301885

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Commission

File Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

23622 Calabasas Road

Suite 300

Calabasas, California 91302

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (818) 264-2300

 

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

 

¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

 

 


Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure

99.1 ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. posted slides presented by Patrick Y. Wen, MD, Director of the Center for Neuro-Oncology at The Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, and principal investigator on the Phase II clinical trial of ICT-107 in an oral presentation made at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) on June 1, 2014 titled, “A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of dendritic cell (DC) vaccination with ICT-107 in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients,” a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information included in this Item 7.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K shall not be deemed “filed” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under this Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as may expressly set forth by specific reference to this Item 7.01 in such a filing.

 

Item 8.01 Other Events

99.2 Press Release, dated June 1, 2014, entitled “ImmunoCellular Therapeutics Presents Updated ICT-107 Phase II Data in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting,” a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 99.2 and is incorporated herein by reference.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: June 4, 2014     IMMUNOCELLULAR THERAPEUTICS, LTD.
    By:   /s/ David Fractor
      David Fractor
      Principal Accounting Officer


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit    Description
99.1    ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. posted slides presented by Patrick Y. Wen, MD, Director of the Center for Neuro-Oncology at The Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, and principal investigator on the Phase II clinical trial of ICT-107 in an oral presentation made at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) on June 1, 2014 titled, “A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of dendritic cell (DC) vaccination with ICT-107 in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients,” a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.
99.2    Press Release, dated June 1, 2014, entitled “ImmunoCellular Therapeutics Presents Updated ICT-107 Phase II Data in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting.”


A randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled phase 2 trial of dendritic cell
(DC) vaccination with ICT-107 in newly
diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients
Patrick Y. Wen, David A. Reardon, Surasak Phuphanich, Terri
Armstrong, Robert Aiken, Joseph C. Landolfi, William T. Curry,
Jay-Jiguang Zhu, Michael J. Glantz, David M. Peereboom,
James Markert, Renato V. LaRocca, Donald O'Rourke, Karen L.
Fink, Lyndon J. Kim, Michael L. Gruber, Glenn Jay Lesser,
Edward Pan, Santosh Kesari, Elma S. Hawkins, John Yu
June 1, 2014
Exhibit 99.1


Rationale for Immunotherapy in GBM
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
Immunoprivilege of the CNS is
circumvented in diseased brain tissue
such as in brain tumors and MS
Patients with GBM demonstrate
impaired immune function in numbers
and function of cytotoxic and helper T
cells, and dendritic cells have decreased
antigen presentation
DC vaccination removes DCs from
immunosuppressive milieu, increasing
the yield and potency of these antigen
presenting cells
T cells generated from DCs can target
intracranial glioblastoma


ICT-107 is an Autologous Six-antigen
DC Vaccine
Six 9-amino acid antigen epitopes
MAGE-1 (HLA -
A1)
AIM-2 (A1)
gp100 (HLA -
A2)
IL-13R
2 (A2)
HER2/neu (A2)
TRP-2 (A2)
MHC 
Class I
Matured, Activated,
Peptide-loaded DC
Rationale for antigen choice
Targeting multiple antigens minimizes tumor escape
High expression levels for all antigens on GBM samples
Bias toward TAA associated with cancer stem cells
Control used in Ph II
Matured, activated DC without peptide loading
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD


ICT-107 Phase I Highlights from ASCO 2013
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
A 33% immune response rate was
observed in patients  by intracellular
FACS staining of IFNgamma
A 33% immune response rate was
observed in patients  by intracellular
FACS staining of IFNgamma


ICT-107 Ph II Trial Design
Surgery
Screen
and
Enroll
SOC
Chemo-
radiation
Eligibility
Confirmation
Patient-Specific
Vaccination
ICT-107 or Control
1/wk for 4 wks
Consent
Randomize
Week –
1
SOC Maintenance TMZ
Week –
2
Rest Week
Week –
3
Clinical Assessments
+ maintenance vaccine
(ICT-107 or Control)
+ tumor assessments
Week –
4
Rest Week
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
Maintenance includes vaccination on a 1, 3, 6, 6…
monthly schedule as long as the patient does not recur
Apheresis


Eligibility Criteria and Objectives
Key INCLUSION Criteria
Complete surgical resection or minimum residual tumor <1 cm3 GBM
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A1, HLA-A2, or HLA-A1/A2
Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of
70%
Key EXCLUSION Criteria
Recurrent disease
Radiosurgery and placement of Gliadel
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
OS
SECONDARY OBJECTIVEs
PFS
Safety and tolerability of ICT-107
Describe the immune response to ICT-107
Determine predictors of response
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD


Patient Disposition
October 2013 and April 2014 Data Analysis
All patients
enrolled
N = 278
All patients
randomized
N = 124
ICT-107
N = 81
Control
N = 43
Patients on study
Oct: N = 14 (17%)
April: N = 12 (15%)
Patients on study
Oct: N = 7 (16%)
April: N = 5 (12%)
Patients off study
Oct: N = 67 (83%)
April: N = 69 (85%)
Reasons:
Progressive Disease
Oct: N = 48 (59%)
Apr: N = 50 (62%)
Other*
Oct: N = 19 (23%)
Apr: N = 19 (23%)
Patients off study
Oct: N = 36 (84%)
April: N = 38 (88%)
Reasons:
Progressive Disease
Oct: N = 29 (67%)
Apr: N = 30 (70%)
Other*
Oct: N = 7 (16%)
Apr: N = 8 (19%)
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
* Other includes treatment completion, withdrawn
consent, investigator withdrawn, etc.


Patient Demographics
Population Characteristic
ICT-107
(N=81)
Control
(N=43)
Total
(N=124)
P-Value
Fishers Exact
Gender [n(%)]
0.082
Male
44 (54.3%)
31 (72.1%)
75 (60.5%)
Female
37 (45.7%)
12 (27.9%)
49 (39.5%)
Age Category [n(%)]
0.830
<50 years
20 (24.7%)
12 (27.9%)
32 (25.8%)
>50 years
61 (75.3%)
31 (72.1%)
92 (74.2%)
MGMT status [n (%)]
0.476
Methylated
28 (34.6%)
18 (41.9%)
46 (37.1%)
Unmethylated
47 (58.0%)
24 (55.8%)
71 (57.3%)
KPS Category [n (%)]
0.241
100
24 (29.6%)
8 (18.6%)
32 (25.8%)
90
36 (44.4%)
18 (41.9%)
54 (43.5%)
<90
20 (24.7%)
17 (39.5%)
37 (29.8%)
HLA Type [n (%)]
0.289
A1=Positive, A2=Negative
33 (40.7%)
14 (32.6%)
47 (37.9%)
A1=Negative, A2=Positive
42 (51.9%)
22 (51.2%)
64 (51.6%)
A1=Positive, A2=Positive
6 (7.4%)
7 (16.3%)
13 (10.5%)
Resection Status
0.834
Complete resection
58 (71.6%)
32 (74.4%)
90 (72.6%)
Subtotal resection
23 (28.4%)
11 (25.6%)
34 (27.4%)
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD


Safety –
Common Adverse Events
A E Category
ICT-107 (N=80)
Control DC (N=43)
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Nervous system
25(31.3%)
14(17.%)
21(48.8%)
7(16.3%)
General
16(20.0%)
6(7.5%)
12(27.9%)
5(11.6%)
Fatigue
9(11.3%)
3(3.8%)
8(18.6%)
3(7.0%)
Gastrointestinal
11(13.8%)
6(14.0%)
Musculoskeletal
10(12.5%)
1(1.3%)
8(18.6%)
Weakness
2(2.5%)
3(7.0%)
3(7.0%)
Investigations
5(6.3%)
4(5.0%)
4(9.3%)
2(4.7%)
WBC Decreased
4(5.0%)
0(0.0%)
Skin/subcut 
7(8.8%)
7(16.3%)
Blood/lymphatic
9(11.3%)
6(7.5%)
6(14.0%)
4(9.3%)
Infections
13(16.3%)
11(25.6%)
Psychiatric
9(11.3%)
6(14.0%)
Metabolism
5(6.3%)
3(3.8%)
7(16.3%)
4(9.3%)
Procedural
complications
9(11.3%)
4(9.3%)
Adverse Events by Body System with an Incidence >5%
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD


Safety –
SAEs Above Grade 3
Active Patients and Control Patients
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
Pt #
SAE
CTCAE
Grade
Resolution
Relationship
to Drug
1
Intracranial hemorrhage
4
Resolved with sequelae
NR
Increase intracranial pressure
5
Fatal
NR
Cardiac arrest
4
Resolved
NR
Retroperitoneal hemorrhage
5
Fatal
NR
Thrombocytopenia
4
Resolved
NR
Neutropenia
4
Resolved
NR
2
Thrombocytopenia
4
Resolved
NR
3
Septic shock
4
Resolved
NR
4
Pulmonary embolism
4
Resolved
NR
5
Pulmonary emboli-bilateral
4
Resolved with sequelae
NR
DVT right lower extremity
4
Resolved with sequelae
NR
6
Thrombocytopenia
4
Resolved
NR
7
Seizure
4
Resolved
NR
Seizure
4
Resolved
NR
Altered mental state
4
Unknown
NR
8
Thromboembolic event
4
Resolved
NR
9
Acute renal failure
5
Fatal
NR


OS (From Randomization) for ITT and PP
Populations
Updated in April 2014
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
DAYS
ITT Population (N=124)
ICT-107
N = 81 (51 events)
Median = 18.3 mo (14.89, 21.14)
HR = 0.87
Age, MGMT stratified P* = 0.643 
Control
N = 43 (28 events)
Median = 16.7 mo (12.33, 23.05)
Numeric
but
not
statistical
treatment
benefit
PP Population (N=117)
ICT-107
N = 75 (46 events)
Median = 18.6 mo (15.32, 23.47)
HR = 0.79
Age, MGMT stratified P* = 0.477 
Control
N = 42 (27 events)
Median = 16.7 mo (12.85, 23.05)
* Two-sided log-rank p-value


PFS for the  ITT and PP Populations
(Central Radiology Review)
Updated in April 2014
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
DAYS
* Two-sided log-rank p-value
ITT Population (N=124)
ICT-107
N = 81 (61 events)
Median = 11.2 mo (8.22, 13.05)
HR = 0.57
Age, MGMT stratified P* = 0.011 
Control
N = 43 (39 events)
Median = 9 mo (5.52, 10.29)
PP Population (N=117)
ICT-107
N = 75 (57)
Median = 11.4 mo (8.68, 13.05)
HR = 0.54
Age, MGMT stratified P* = 0.006 
Control
N = 42 (38)
Median = 9.0 mo (5.00, 10.29)
Statistical
treatment benefit


MGMT Status Creates Two Different Patient Populations
From the Survival Perspective
Per-Protocol Population with April 2014 Survival Data
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
DAYS
PP Population (N=117*)
MGMT –
Methylated (N = 42)
ICT-107
N = 25 (8 events)
Median = not yet defined
HR = 0.797
Age
stratified
P
=0.683
Control
N = 17 (6 events)
Median =  not yet defined
MGMT –
Unmethylated (68)
ICT-107
N = 44 (33 events)
Median =  15.4mo (11.93, 18.94)
HR = 0.765
Age
stratified
P
=
0.347
Control
N = 24 (21 events)
Median =  14.2 mo (10.22, 17.75)
* 110 of 117 in PP population have MGMT defined
Two-sided log-rank p-value
The MGMT methylated control has
at least double the median survival
of the unmethylated control


OS
in
the
Unmethylated
MGMT
and
HLA-A2
Subgroup
Per-Protocol Population with April 2014 Survival Data
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
Censored
PP Population (N=38)
ICT-107
N = 24 (19 events)
Median = 15.8 mo (11.38, 18.94)
HR = 0.612
Age, MGMT stratified P* = 0.175 
Control
N = 14 (13 events)
Median = 11.8 mo (8.52, 18.44)
4-month median survival
advantage and indications of
a long-term survival benefit
21% of treated alive
7% of control alive
DAYS
* Two-sided log-rank p-value
includes HLA-A1/A2 dual positives


Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
DAYS
Censored
PFS in the Unmethylated MGMT and HLA-A2 Subgroup
(Central Radiology Review)
Per-Protocol Population with April 2014 PFS Data
PP Population (N=38)
ICT-107
N = 24 (20 events)
Median = 10.5 mo (4.47, 14.04)
HR = 0.758
Age, MGMT stratified P* = 0.442 
Control
N = 14 (14 events)
Median = 6.0 mo (3.39, 10.22)
Non-statistical PFS
treatment advantage of
4.5 months at medians
* Two-sided log-rank p-value


OS in the Methylated MGMT and HLA-A2 Subgroup
Per-Protocol Population with April 2014 Survival Data
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
DAYS
Censored
PP Population (N=31)
ICT-107
N = 17 (6 events)
Median = not yet defined
HR = 0.683
Age stratified P* = 0.508 
Control
N = 14 (6 events)
Median = not yet defined
Median survival not yet defined
Majority of patients still alive
65% of treated alive
57% of control alive
* Two-sided log-rank p-value


Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
PFS in the Methylated MGMT and HLA-A2 Subgroup
(Central Radiology Review)
Per-Protocol Population with April 2014 PFS Data
Censored
PP Population (N=31)
ICT-107
N = 17 (9 events)
Median = 24.1 mo (CI not defined)
HR = 0.259
Age stratified P* = 0.005 
Control
N = 14 (13 events)
Median 8.5 mo (3.58,13.64)
DAYS
Statistical PFS treatment
benefit of 15.6 months at
medians
* Two-sided log-rank p-value


Quality of Life Assessed via FACT-BR and
Performance Status
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
ICT-107 N =
Control N =
P-value* =
66
40
0.004
60
37
0.005
54
33
0.022
48
27
0.047
81
43
0.200
* Signed rank test
One week
prior to first
vaccination
3 weeks post
induction
7 weeks post
induction
11 weeks post
induction
15 weeks post
induction
FACT-BR Findings
Change from baseline in QOL reporting was not different between the experimental and control
arms during the maintenance phase, at progression, or at treatment completion
ICT-107 patients maintained QOL longer as they progressed later
Findings limited by small sample size and attrition at end of study
Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Monitoring


Proportion of Steroid Usage During Trial
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
DAYS –
Time to First Usage of Dexamethasone and Decadron
ITT Population (N=124)
ICT-107
N = 81 (24 events)
30% Steroid Usage
MGMT, Age stratified P* = 0.1395 
Control
N = 43 (19 events)
44% Steroid Usage
* Two-sided log-rank p-value


Relationship between Indicators of Vaccine
Potency and Survival
Cox Proportional Hazards Model –
Assessments of DC Maturity and Activation in
Vaccine Prior to Administration
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
Vaccines for All ICT-107 Patients with Parameter Values –
Overall Survival Model
Vaccines
for
All
HLA-A2
ICT-107
Patients
with
Parameter
Values
Overall
Survival
Model
Correlation of these markers of DC function to survival was present only in the ICT107 group; not control.
Suggests that the maturation of DCs was relevant only when the DCs were loaded with antigen.
* Cox Proportional Hazard Models run with two variables: Il-12 or HLA-DR (both continuous log-transformed variables)
Includes dual HLA-A1/A2 patients
December 2013
April 2014
Parameter*
Coefficient
P-value
Coefficient
P-value
IL-12 secretion
-0.75
0.027
-0.67
0.048
HLA-DR  expression
-1.04
0.024
-1.13
0.006
December 2013
April 2014
Parameter*
Coefficient
P-value
Coefficient
P-value
IL-12 secretion
-1.13
0.012
-1.03
0.021
HLA-DR  expression
-0.95
0.074
-0.883
0.066


Antigen-Specific Vaccine Response
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
All Patients (N = 111)
HLA-A2 Patients (N = 68)
Percent of Patients with at Least One Response to Antigen Challenge in Elispot


Antigen Presentation in Primary Tumors
Percent of Patients Expressing Antigens via qPCR
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
1
2
ICT-107
ICT-107
Control
Control
Percent of All Patients (N = 124) Expressing 6 Antigens in ICT-107
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
ICT-107
Control
Percent of All Patients (N = 124) Expressing HLA
Specific Antigens in ICT-107
HLA-A1* (N = 60) Expressing A1 Antigens
HLA-A2* (N =77) Expressing A2 Antigens
* Includes dual A1/A2 positive patients


Conclusions for ICT-107 Ph II
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
No significant difference in adverse events between ICT-107 and control
The vaccine is biologically active in terms of producing an immune response
PFS was statistically improved for the entire treated population
ICT-107 activity is strongest in the HLA-A2 subgroup clinically, immunologically,
and with regard to antigen expression.  This activity is observed in both the
MGMT methylated and unmethylated subgroups
Extended PFS in the treated group appears to come with commensurate improved
quality of life
Quality of Life, as measured by FACT-BR,  is maintained equally until
progression for ICT-107 and Control patients
ICT-107 patients retain greater performance
capacity, as measured by
KPS,
than controls and tend to be placed on steroids later
Vaccine potency as measured by HLA-DR expression and IL-12 secretion is
predictive of OS
Results support advancement to a phase III trial


Acknowledgements
Presented by: Patrick Wen, MD
The Authors and ImmunoCellular Therapeutics Wish to Thank
Additional Investigators:
Andrew Sloan, Susan C. Pannullo, James Chandler, Jeffrey Raizer,
David Schiff,
Tina Mayer, Will Curry, Jay Grewel
Terri Armstrong for analysis of the QOL data
Trial Sites:
Johns Hopkins University, New York University, University of Texas at Houston,
Northwestern University, Arizona Cancer Center, New Jersey Neuroscience
Institute, UC San Diego, Moffitt Cancer Center, Penn State, University of
Pennsylvania, University of Virginia, Wake Forest
Cornell Presbyterian, Massachusetts General, Kentuckiana Cancer Institute,
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University Hospital Case Medical Center, Rush
University, Overlook Hospital, Baylor University, Cleveland Clinic, University of
Alabama, Thomas Jefferson, Long Island Brain Center
Patients and Families


LOGO   Exhibit 99.2

Contact:

ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd.

Investor Relations

Jane Green

415.348.0010 direct

415.652.4819 mobile

jane@jmgcomm.com

ImmunoCellular Therapeutics Presents Updated ICT-107 Phase II Data in Patients

with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Pre-specified MGMT and HLA Subgroup Analyses Show Potentially Clinically

Meaningful Survival Advantages for ICT-107 Treated Patients

Previously Reported Total Population Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival

Rates Sustained

Data Support Rationale for Phase III; US and EU Regulatory Meetings to Discuss

Registration Strategy Planned for 3Q14

Los Angeles, CA – June 1, 2014 – ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (“ImmunoCellular”) (NYSE MKT:IMUC) announced that updated efficacy and safety data from the phase II trial of dendritic cell-based immunotherapeutic vaccine ICT-107 in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were presented at the 2014 American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting in Chicago.

When overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed in pre-specified patient subgroups, results favored treatment with ICT-107 over control in HLA-A2 patients within each of the two major MGMT subgroups (unmethylated and methylated). While the subgroups were small in size, and not powered to show statistical significance, the numeric advantages in favor of ICT-107 treated patients were shown to be large and clinically meaningful.

HLA (human leukocyte antigens) are cell-surface antigen-presenting proteins. These molecules are on dendritic cells and present the tumor-associated antigens to T-cells to induce the immune response to the ICT-107 vaccine. HLA-A2 was one of two HLA types that were treated in the phase II trial. Of the two types, HLA-A2 is twice as common in the population as HLA-A1, and is the most common HLA type in North America and the EU.


In the per-protocol (PP) analysis of data from HLA-A2 patients with unmethylated MGMT:

 

    The control and treated median OS times were 11.8 and 15.8 months, respectively, indicating about a 4-month or 33% numeric survival increase for treated patients (HR=0.612, log-rank p-value=0.175);

 

    The median PFS times for control and treated patients were 6.0 and 10.5 months, respectively, indicating about a 4.5-month or 75% numeric PFS increase for treated patients (HR=0.758, log-rank p-value=0.442);

 

    There were also signs of a potential long-term survival benefit for ICT-107-treated patients, with 21% of treated patients still alive compared to only 7% of controls.

In the PP analysis of data from HLA-A2 patients with methylated MGMT:

 

    The control and treated groups had still not reached median survival times as of the time of data analysis, with the majority of patients still alive (65% of treated compared to 57% of control patients);

 

    However, the median PFS times for control and treated patients were 8.5 and 24.1 months, respectively, indicating about a 15.6-month or 184% statistically significant PFS increase for treated patients (HR=0.259, log-rank p-value=0.005).

The updated data from the phase II ICT-107 trial were presented in an oral session by Patrick Y. Wen, MD, Director of the Center for Neuro-Oncology at The Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, and principal investigator on the trial. The presentation was titled “A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of dendritic cell (DC) vaccination with ICT-107 in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients.”

“We think that the maturing data from the phase II trial demonstrate a compelling rationale for phase III development of ICT-107 in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma,” said Dr. Wen. “Standard-of-care chemotherapy, temozolomide, has little or no treatment benefit for newly diagnosed GBM patients with unmethylated MGMT, which is the majority of patients. ICT-107 has shown the potential to meaningfully extend both OS and PFS without significant side effects in this patient population which has the poorest prognosis for survival. Furthermore, the early evidence of a potential long-term survival “tail,” even in this small phase II trial, is promising, and indicative of what we would expect to see in a highly active immunotherapeutic agent. As the methylated MGMT group is followed further, I am optimistic that the already very large increase in PFS for treated patients ultimately may translate into a survival benefit.”


“The pre-specified subgroup analyses in our phase II trial indicate the potential value of a targeted population approach going forward, as the demonstration of treatment benefit in HLA-A2 patients presents a favorable case for selecting these patients for the population to be studied in phase III clinical testing,” said Andrew Gengos, ImmunoCellular’s Chief Executive Officer. “HLA-A2 patients comprise the majority of the overall GBM patient population in the US and Europe. These new results will provide a strong basis for conducting registration discussions with US and EU regulatory authorities, which we intend to start within the next few months. We want to express our appreciation to the patients, investigators and clinical teams who have participated in the ICT-107 phase II trial. We look forward to potentially advancing this promising cancer vaccine toward the market.”

Additional Updated ICT-107 Phase II Results

As reported in December 2013, and in the updated data presented at ASCO, OS for the ITT and PP populations showed a numeric, but not statistical, treatment benefit. PFS for the ITT and PP populations showed a statistical treatment benefit.

 

    The data presentation from the 124-patient randomized, controlled phase II trial was based on about 17.6 and 16.2 months of median follow-up for ICT-107 and control patients, respectively. As of April, a total of 79 events (patient deaths) had been recorded, representing 12 additional events since the top-line data from the phase II trial were reported in December 2013. 30 active and 15 control patients were alive for a total of 45 patients available for additional follow-up.

 

    Median OS in the ITT updated results was 18.3 months for ICT-107 and 16.7 months for control, representing a numeric advantage for the treatment group of 1.6 months (HR=0.89, p-value=0.643). In the PP population, median OS was 18.6 months for ICT-107 and 16.7 months for control, representing a numeric advantage for the treatment group of 1.9 months (HR=0.84, p-value=0.477).

 

    Median PFS in the ITT updated results was 11.2 months for ICT-107 and 9.0 months for control, representing a statistically significant advantage for the treatment group of 2.2 months (HR=0.57, p-value=0.011). In the PP population, median OS was 11.4 months for ICT-107 and 9.0 months for control, representing a statistically significant advantage for the treatment group of 2.4 months (HR=0.54, p-value=0.006).

 

    Both the OS and PFS median results in the ICT-107 phase II trial were measured from the time of randomization (i.e., at the start of vaccination after standard-of-care surgery and chemoradiation). In historical studies of newly diagnosed GBM patients (e.g., Stupp, et al.), OS and PFS measurements were likely assessed from the time of surgery. In the ICT-107 phase II trial, there was an average of about 83 days from surgery to randomization.


    Vaccine potency was assessed via measurements of key dendritic cell indicators of cell maturity and activation and their correlation with survival time. Two key indicators relating to IL-12 secretion and HLA-DR expression were predictive of survival in all treated patients in the results announced in December. In the updated results, IL-12 secretion and HLA-DR expression were again correlated with treated patient survival time in Cox Proportionate Hazards models, with p-values of 0.048 and 0.006, respectively.

Assessment of Additional Trial Parameters

Data on quality of life as well as certain immunological parameters, including vaccine potency and antigen expression, were also presented.

 

    Quality of life was assessed in the phase II trial both by using the FACT-BR assessment tool and through monitoring patient performance levels according to the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). For the FACT-BR, there was no difference in the overall assessment between the treated and control groups from baseline through progression. Because treated patients had a statistically longer PFS, this means that they had more months of similar quality of life compared to the control group prior to progression. Treated patients also maintained a higher KPS from immediately before vaccination started through 19 weeks. The signed rank test p-value was less than 0.05 for each of four KPS assessments between these time points.

 

    Patients were assessed for vaccine response at baseline (pre-vaccination) and at three time points during vaccination. Response was assessed via Elispot, and patients were deemed responders if their T-cells (from blood samples) reacted to any of the six antigens used to challenge the samples. 27% of treated patients were responders as compared with 15% of controls. In the HLA-A2 subgroup, 33% of treated patients were responders as compared with 15% of controls.

 

    The primary tumors of patients were assessed for expression of the six vaccine antigens via qPCR. In all treated patients, 75% expressed at least one antigen and 51% expressed at least four antigens. In the control group, 93% expressed at least one antigen and 65% expressed at least four antigens. In the HLA-A2 subgroup for treated patients, 94% expressed at least one antigen and 85% expressed all four HLA-A2 antigens. For the control patients, 100% expressed at least one antigen and 97% expressed all four HLA-A2 antigens.

Next Steps in the ICT-107 Program

ImmunoCellular plans to consult further with the international neuro-oncology community, and to hold regulatory agency discussions in both the US and EU concerning ICT-107.

The Company is in the process of finalizing the design of the phase III protocol, in anticipation of discussions with the FDA and the European Medicines Agency, or EMA. Plans are underway to request an end-of-phase II meeting with the FDA, anticipated to take place during the summer. Following typical European protocol in preparation for


meeting with the EMA, ImmunoCellular has requested advice meetings at the national level in Germany, the UK and the Netherlands to discuss ICT-107. These meetings are scheduled to take place later in June. In the third or fourth quarter of 2014, the Company plans to seek advice from the EMA on the approval process for ICT-107.

ImmunoCellular also plans to continue to monitor patients in the phase II trial and update the data analysis at upcoming scientific meetings, such as potentially the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) meeting in November.

About the ICT-107 Phase II Trial

The ICT-107 phase II trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of the safety and efficacy of ICT-107 in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma multiforme following resection and chemoradiation. ICT-107 is an intradermally administered autologous vaccine consisting of the patient’s dendritic cells pulsed with six synthetic tumor-associated antigens: AIM-2, MAGE-1, TRP-2, gp100, HER-2, IL-13Ra2. The control consists of the patient’s unpulsed dendritic cells.

A total of 124 patients were randomized at 25 clinical trial sites in the US. One third of the patients or 43 patients were treated with placebo (their own dendritic cells not exposed to antigen), and the treatment arm included two thirds or 81 patients who received the ICT-107 vaccine. All patients in the trial received standard-of-care temozolomide. The regimen is four induction doses of ICT-107 after chemoradiation, and then maintenance doses until the patient progresses. The primary endpoint of the trial is OS, defined as the time from randomization until date of death or the last date the patient is known to be alive. Secondary endpoints include PFS, defined as the time from randomization until the date of documented progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first, or the last date the patient is known to be alive and progression-free if progression or death is not observed. Other secondary endpoints include the rates of OS and PFS at six months after surgery, then assessed every three months until the end of the study. Safety and immune response are additional secondary endpoints.

The subgroups analyzed in the phase II trial were based on age, gender, HLA type, MGMT status, performance status and resection status.

HLA-A2 patients comprised about 62% of all patients randomized in the trial, meaning that these numeric and statistical outcome benefits were conveyed to a majority of treated patients.

MGMT status has been demonstrated to be predictive of response to radiation or chemotherapy. The O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, or MGMT, gene is responsible for a DNA repair mechanism in cells. Methylation of MGMT impedes the

DNA repair mechanism in cancer cells, making them susceptible to radiation or chemotherapy, such as temozolomide. The DNA repair mechanism in cancer cells with unmethylated MGMT is intact, enabling them to survive and proliferate. GBM is the most common and aggressive primary cancer of the brain. Patients with this disease have few therapeutic options; temozolomide is currently the only FDA-approved systemic chemotherapy for newly diagnosed GBM.


For patient-related information about the ICT-107 clinical program in glioblastoma, please visit the ImmunoCellular website at www.imuc.com and access the ICT-107 “Frequently Asked Questions.” The email address to contact the company directly is clintrials@imuc.com.

About ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd.

ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. is a Los Angeles-based clinical-stage company that is developing immune-based therapies for the treatment of brain and other cancers. ImmunoCellular is conducting a phase II trial of its lead product candidate, ICT-107, a dendritic cell-based vaccine targeting multiple tumor-associated antigens for glioblastoma. ImmunoCellular’s pipeline also includes ICT-121, a dendritic cell vaccine targeting CD133, and ICT-140, a dendritic cell vaccine targeting ovarian cancer antigens and cancer stem cells. To learn more about ImmunoCellular, please visit www.imuc.com.

Forward-Looking Statements for ImmunoCellular Therapeutics

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the risk that ICT-107 can be further successfully developed or commercialized, the timing and outcome of the post-phase II meeting with the FDA and EU regulatory authorities, the status of the current data and whether further analyses or later studies may confirm the successful PFS results to date, the potential for initiation of phase III trials and possibility of successful results from such studies. Additional risks and uncertainties are described in IMUC’s most recently filed quarterly report on Form 10-Q and annual report on Form 10-K. Except as permitted by law, IMUC undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In this press release, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “potential,” “future,” “intend,” “certain,” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements.

EOM Pharmaceutical (PK) (USOTC:IMUC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more EOM Pharmaceutical (PK) Charts.
EOM Pharmaceutical (PK) (USOTC:IMUC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more EOM Pharmaceutical (PK) Charts.