Item 1.   Reports to Stockholders.

A copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 follows.

D OMINI S OCIAL E QUITY F UND ^®

I NVESTOR S HARES , C LASS  A S HARES , I NSTITUTIONAL S HARES  & C LASS R S HARES

D OMINI I NTERNATIONAL S OCIAL E QUITY F UND ^SM

I NVESTOR S HARES , C LASS  A S HARES  & I NSTITUTIONAL S HARES

D OMINI S OCIAL B OND F UND ^®

I NVESTOR S HARES  & I NSTITUTIONAL S HARES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

T HE W AY Y OU I NVEST M ATTERS ^®

LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

The six months ending January 31, 2014 witnessed strong stock returns in all developed markets, reminding us that the stock market is not a reflection of what is happening in the world at large, but a reflection of what is expected to happen to corporate earnings. I say this because, despite a number of highly dangerous events that marked the global stage during this period, Wall Street remained cheerful.

Here at home, the ‘just say no’ constituency in Congress forced a federal government shutdown, while the infamous computer glitches of the HealthCare.gov rollout sparked national discouragement.

Meanwhile, we witnessed more bloodshed in Egypt, a terrorist attack at a shopping mall in Kenya and a devastating typhoon in the Philippines. And in early September, we stood on the verge of military action in Syria. The ‘bright red line’ barring chemical weapons use had been crossed and more than 1,400 people, including many children, were killed. Weary as our citizenry is with war, many of us felt that there was no other option. And yet, war was averted and an international effort to destroy the stockpile began.

With all this going on, the U.S. and six other nations signed a preliminary deal with Iran to avert a nuclear weapons buildup. The events in Syria and Iran, along with Secretary of State Kerry’s determination to defuse the Israeli/Palestinian disputes, mark a hopeful shift in Middle East relations.

During this period of hope and fear, the looming threat of climate change was once again brought home. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its latest report, “the most comprehensive and authoritative synthesis of scientific knowledge about global climate change ever generated,” according to John Holdren, a senior advisor to President Obama. Following the fourth warmest year on record, many of us suffered in the grip of the Polar Vortex, an ironic reminder that global warming will bring unexpected and unpredictable changes. Speaking in Indonesia, Secretary Kerry warned: “It will soon be too late for action to prevent the immense costs of doing nothing.”

In the end, investors attempt to read the economic future of the companies in which they invest, which can be influenced by disastrous war or weather. But at least for now, these trends are not dramatically curtailing growth, and a number of areas indicate pretty good news for the economy at large.

2

T HE W AY Y OU I NVEST M ATTERS ^®

In January, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment rates dropped to 6.6%, the lowest level since October 2008. According to Calculated Risk, the Fed’s Household Debt Service Ratio, whether calculated with housing costs included or excluded, is at its lowest level in 30 years. We have also seen a continued gradual increase in housing prices. Housing expansion is a very important driver of the economy because when people buy houses they also buy furniture and appliances. While the recovery is not complete, the trend is comforting and greater discretionary spending is good for corporate growth. These are but a few of the reasons behind the stock market’s strength of late.

The period also included two opportunities to reflect on how far we have come and what we can achieve when we unite against suffering and injustice. On August 28, we commemorated the 50 ^th anniversary of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech. Though the struggle continued, that speech marked a turning of the tide for many Americans.

Then in December, the world paused to praise and to remember the great Nelson Mandela. In many ways, the passion I carry for the field of responsible investing was shaped by the period between 1971, when the board of General Motors was asked by the Episcopal Church to close its factories in South Africa, to 1994 when Mandela was elected President. During those years investors in America put pressure on South Africa’s government through a combination of divestment and shareholder activism. These actions helped to transform South Africa, and they also had a transformative effect here at home, galvanizing a new force for change — socially responsible investing. In this report, we mark the 20 ^th anniversary of the Domini Social Equity Fund’s first shareholder proposal.

In just six short months: The 50 ^th anniversary of the “I Have a Dream” speech celebrated by a black American President; Our first female Fed Chair; An intentional shutdown of the U.S. government; Dramatic reminders that the human race is altering our climate, placing all life at risk; and the passing of one of the twentieth century’s most inspirational leaders, whose life taught us that the impossible is possible.

This was a poignant period for me, and a time for reflection on what can and must be done to secure our children’s future. The civil rights era was a formative period, and the lessons learned in the struggle for freedom in South Africa and the remarkable gentle man who emerged from jail to lead that nation forward shaped my professional life.

As always, thank you for your commitment to responsible investing and for your investment with us.

Very truly yours,

Amy Domini

amy@domini.com

3

T HE W AY Y OU I NVEST M ATTERS ^®

DOMINI NEWS

Introducing the New Domini.com

This winter, Domini was proud to unveil our brand new website at www.Domini.com . With an improved layout and a new user-friendly interface, shareholders should find our new site simpler to use and full of helpful information.

The Domini Insights section of our new site features the new Domini Blog, a regular column written by CEO and Founder Amy Domini, and a multitude of articles and reports written and published by Domini staff to help educate investors, policymakers and the general public about the benefits of responsible investing and greater corporate social responsibility.

Visit our Responsible Investing section to learn more about how we choose our investments and how the Domini Funds are advancing human rights and environmental sustainability.

We hope you will take the time to visit our new website and explore how your investment in the Domini Funds is making a difference. We look forward to receiving your feedback.

De-militarizing Amazon.com

In November, we wrote a letter to Jeff Bezos, Founder and CEO of Amazon.com, raising concerns about the company’s participation in the militarization of the civilian firearms market after we discovered semi-automatic weapon accessories being sold on Amazon that could help gun owners increase the firepower of their weapons. Our letter was signed by 33 institutional investors managing $490 billion, and was covered by Reuters in December.

In a recent conversation with Amazon executives we learned that our letter was taken quite seriously. Most of the products we identified have been removed from Amazon.com and added to the company’s list of prohibited items. The third-party sellers have been notified that they may no longer offer these items for sale on Amazon. We will continue to engage Amazon to ensure that they are doing everything they can to avoid becoming a marketplace for assault weapons.

4

T HE W AY Y OU I NVEST M ATTERS ^®

CELEBRATING TWENTY YEARS OF SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM

At a Goldman Sachs * annual meeting, time was set aside for shareholders to ask questions. A man approached the microphone and announced that he was a guest, not a shareholder, and wondered if he could ask a question. “No,” CEO Lloyd Blankfein quickly responded, “only shareholders can ask questions.” In the corporate world, generally only shareholders have a voice. Shareholder activism provides us with the tools to open up this world to those that are affected by corporate activities.

For the past twenty years, your investment in the Domini Funds has enabled conversations with executives at some of the largest corporations in the world on a wide range of social and environmental issues. As a Domini Funds investor, you can take credit for helping to convince JPMorgan Chase * to hire its first Director of Environmental Affairs and to adopt comprehensive environmental policies. After a five year campaign, you helped convince Emerson Electric to ban discrimination against its gay and lesbian employees. You have helped convince numerous companies to measure their environmental impacts and to adopt strong protections for vulnerable workers in factories around the world.

Since our first shareholder resolution was submitted in 1993, Domini has filed more than 240 proposals at 95 different corporations. The use of social, environmental and governance standards to select investments, combined with a shareholder activism program to help move them further in the right direction, has proven to be a powerful vehicle for change.

Below we discuss some of the ways that the Domini Funds have helped change corporate practices over the past twenty years. Over the course of 2014 and beyond, we look forward to sharing more success stories about how your investments have worked for positive change.

5

T HE W AY Y OU I NVEST M ATTERS ^®

Getting on the Agenda

In 2009, we traveled to North Carolina to present our human rights proposal at the annual meeting for Nucor , the largest producer — and recycler — of steel in America. It was a small meeting, where the CEO referred to shareholders by name and pointed out former board members in the audience. It was clear that it was his show, and he used the meeting, which was broadcast live online, to promote Nucor and his leadership. But for the five minutes we had to present our proposal, attention turned from profit and loss to human rights. We spoke about Nucor’s purchases of Brazilian pig-iron, a product that has been linked to slavery and illegal deforestation, and questioned whether Nucor was doing enough to ensure that they were not purchasing the product of slave labor. Within six months, we reached agreement with management on a strong set of new human rights policies.

From time to time, we have offered affected stakeholders the opportunity to attend meetings as our representatives and to speak for themselves. In 2005, a resident of Canada’s Boreal region spoke as our representative at the L Brands annual meeting, the parent company of Victoria’s Secret, about the dramatic environmental impact of the company’s paper-purchasing policies. Company executives told us that her moving speech was a factor in their decision to adopt more responsible environmental practices.

Usually companies would prefer not to see these issues raised at their annual meetings, and they are often willing to negotiate to see if agreement can be reached to withdraw the proposal. In addition, shareholder support has risen substantially in recent years. While we once celebrated a 10% vote, votes of 20-30% are now common as many large investors have come around to our way of thinking.

A significant vote on a shareholder proposal can often be sufficient to move the needle. For example, when our proposal asking Verizon Communications to disclose its political contributions received a 33% vote, the company acceded to our request. After several years, AT&T finally agreed to match Verizon’s commitment when our proposal received a 39% vote at its 2012 annual meeting. We continue to press them to expand these disclosures.

The Importance of Transparency

Over the past twenty years, we have seen dramatic changes in how companies address working conditions in their global supply chains. In the late 1990s, it was still possible to hear company executives tell us that they had no responsibility for these factories, because they did not own them. Today, corporate executives ask for advice on how to solve intractable issues like excessive working hours and recurring safety violations. The old denials have largely fallen by the wayside.

6

T HE W AY Y OU I NVEST M ATTERS ^®

How can we ensure that companies pay sufficient attention to working conditions in the factories and farms that produce their products? Quality public reporting can help to ensure accountability, by allowing investors and others to monitor corporate progress over time.

In 2002, we had good information that Gap was a leader in protecting the rights of workers in its global supply chain, but there was no publicly available data to allow us to evaluate these efforts. Our shareholder proposal changed all of that, resulting in an agreement by Gap to produce a transparent report discussing working conditions in its suppliers’ factories. That report was the first time an apparel company had publicly reported on these issues, and it received worldwide media attention. Soon, other companies, including Hewlett-Packard and Nike , began to report this information, building on Gap’s model.

Domini has been pleased to serve as a member of Gap’s “Public Reporting Working Group” (PRWG), advising the company on each of its subsequent reports, each of which includes a statement from the PRWG. The company has repeatedly told us that the process of preparing these reports has helped it to improve its performance and do a better job of protecting workers’ rights.

A Catalyst for Change

Just as our actions can have ripple effects throughout an industry, we also look for opportunities to catalyze progress at key companies. Over the past few years, Apple has been making unwelcome headlines for labor conditions at Foxconn*, a key Chinese supplier to the global electronics industry and the manufacturer of many Apple products.

But Apple was not in the headlines back in 2005 when we first wrote to Steve Jobs, asking how the company ensures that its supply chain is free of child labor and other abusive working conditions. Our shareholder proposal kept the issue on the table through detailed negotiations with Apple executives. We ultimately reached agreement when Apple adopted its first code of conduct applying labor and environmental standards to all factories manufacturing its products, including strong language we proposed on forced labor and union rights. This engagement led to an ongoing dialogue with the company that continues to this day.

The Walt Disney Company provides one case study of how corporations have changed over the past twenty years to embrace sustainability goals. Our engagement with the company began in 1996, in partnership with other investors affiliated with the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR), focusing on sweatshops. This dialogue led to the creation of the company’s International Labor Standards program and significant enhancements to the company’s factory monitoring. We even

7

T HE W AY Y OU I NVEST M ATTERS ^®

visited Disney supplier factories to provide our feedback, as trust between the company and the shareholder coalition solidified. We have raised numerous issues with the company over the years and have witnessed dramatic changes. Disney now publishes a comprehensive sustainability report with clear social and environmental goals.

A Meeting of the Minds

The shareholder proposal is not an end in itself. It is an effective tool to promote dialogue, and dialogue is where the work really gets done. By 2003, overproduction and falling prices led to a crisis in the coffee market, leaving millions of farmers unable to feed, clothe and educate their families. Fair Trade certification guarantees farmers a minimum price for their coffee, protecting farmers from fluctuating market prices and allowing them to plan for the future.

At that time, Procter & Gamble was one of the world’s largest coffee roasters, and the owner of the Folgers brand (it has since spun off its coffee business). The company was not opposed to lending assistance to farmers, but it also was not convinced that Fair Trade was the right solution. It took a series of meetings to finally convince the company that Fair Trade made sense and was a necessary corrective to a clear market failure. After months of dialogue with an investor group co-led by Domini, Procter & Gamble offered its first line of Fair Trade Certified ^® coffee.

Corporations may seem like large monolithic entities, but it often takes a human connection to make progress on these issues. Ultimately, we succeeded with Procter & Gamble — as we have with other companies — because a key executive was willing to seriously listen to our concerns with an open mind.

A Global Reach

As the world has changed over the past twenty years, so has Domini. We offered our first mutual fund investing in foreign companies in 2005. Today, the Domini International Social Equity Fund invests in companies based in Europe, the Pacific-Asia region and throughout the world, offering us new opportunities for engagement. Although it is generally not possible to file shareholder proposals outside of the United States, we have exercised influence through letter-writing, direct dialogue and proxy voting.

In 2006, our research uncovered a link between Toyota Motor * and the Burmese military regime, through a Toyota affiliate. Although we have never invested in Toyota, we took action nonetheless. Our three-year engagement, in partnership with Toyota shareholders, ultimately resulted in Toyota’s partner ending its relationship with the military regime. We

8

T HE W AY Y OU I NVEST M ATTERS ^®

also regularly participate in investor dialogues with companies operating in conflict zones, including Syria and Sudan, although these companies are generally excluded from our Funds by our human rights standards.

We have always taken a strong stand on board diversity, voting against all-white, male boards. Japan ranks lowest in the world on board diversity, where only 1.1% of corporate directors are female. In response to this serious problem, each year for the past several years, the Domini International Social Equity Fund has voted against the board for virtually every Japanese company in its portfolio, and we have written letters to these companies to explain the reason for our vote.

Our Current Priorities

Currently, we are working to encourage companies to adopt more stringent policies to protect forests around the world, to disclose their political contributions, and to take greater responsibility for worker health and safety in Bangladesh. We are speaking with several energy companies about their efforts to reduce methane emissions in their operations, a potent greenhouse gas. We also submitted a brand new proposal to Google , asking for a policy to ensure that the company carefully considers the impact of its tax practices around the world on employees and communities. The company has been at the center of a global debate about corporate tax avoidance.

9

T HE W AY Y OU I NVEST M ATTERS ^®

It Takes a Village

We would be remiss if we failed to acknowledge that we frequently collaborate with other investors and NGOs in these efforts. Many of the achievements noted above were products of these important partnerships.

*  *  *

Archimedes, the ancient Greek scientist, once remarked, “Give me a lever and a place to stand and I will move the earth.” For the past twenty years, we have provided “a place to stand” for our mutual fund shareholders, finding as many ways as possible to amplify your voice on some of the most pressing challenges of our time. We thank you for your investment and look forward to another twenty years of transformative change.

*Companies marked with an asterisk are not currently eligible for investment by the Domini Funds.

The holdings discussed above can be found in the portfolios of the Domini Funds, included herein. The composition of the Funds’ portfolios is subject to change.

An investment in the Domini Social Equity Fund and the Domini International Social Equity Fund is subject to market risks such as sector concentration and style risk. Investing internationally involves special risks, such as currency fluctuations, social and economic instability, differing securities regulations and accounting standards, limited public information, possible changes in taxation, and periods of illiquidity. You may lose money.

The preceding should not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the stocks or bonds of any of the companies noted, or a recommendation concerning the merits of any of these companies as an investment.

This material must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. DSIL Investment Services LLC, Distributor. 03/14

10

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

D OMINI S OCIAL E QUITY F UND

Fund Performance and Holdings

The table and bar charts below provide information as of January 31, 2014 about the ten largest holdings of the Domini Social Equity Fund and its portfolio holdings by industry sector:

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS BY INDUSTRY SECTOR (% OF NET ASSETS) (Unaudited)

The holdings mentioned above are described in the Domini Social Equity Fund’s Portfolio of Investments (as of 1/31/14), included herein. The composition of the Fund’s portfolio is subject to change.

12

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The Fund’s returns quoted above represent past performance after all expenses. Investment return, principal value, and yield will fluctuate. Your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Call 1-800-582-6757 or visit www.domini.com for performance information current to the most recent month-end, which may be lower or higher. A 2.00% fee applies to sales/exchanges made less than 30 days after the settlement of purchase/exchange, with certain exceptions. Quoted performance data does not reflect the deduction of this fee, which would reduce the performance quoted. See the Fund’s prospectus for further information.

For the period reported in its current prospectus, during which net operating expenses were capped by the Fund’s Manager, the Fund’s gross annual operating expenses totaled 1.24% (Investor shares), 1.74% (Class A shares), 0.81% (Institutional shares), and 0.90% (Class R shares) of net assets representing each share class, respectively. Until 11/30/14, the Fund’s Manager has contractually agreed to limit certain ordinary expenses to 1.25% (Investor shares), 1.18% (Class A shares), 0.80% (Institutional shares) and 0.90% (Class R shares) of its average daily net assets representing each share class, respectively, absent an earlier modification by the Fund’s Board. The Fund’s total returns may have been lower without these limits.

The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Total return for the Domini Social Equity Fund is based on the Fund’s net asset values and assumes all dividend and capital gains were reinvested. An investment in the Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured. The Fund is subject to market risks such as sector concentration and style risk. You may lose money.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged index of common stocks. You cannot invest directly in an index.

¹ Class A shares were not offered prior to November 28, 2008. All performance information for time periods beginning prior to November 28, 2008 is the performance of the Investor shares. This performance has not been adjusted to reflect the lower expenses of the Class A shares, but does, where noted, reflect an adjustment for the maximum applicable sales charge of 4.75%.

² Institutional shares were not offered prior to November 28, 2008. All performance information for time periods beginning prior to November 28, 2008 is the performance of the Investor shares. This performance has not been adjusted to reflect the lower expenses of the Institutional shares.

³ Reflects the performance of the Investor shares prior to November 28, 2003, the date the Class R shares were first offered. This earlier performance has not been adjusted to take into account the lower expenses applicable to Class R shares.

13

14

15

(a) Non-income producing security.

(b) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $758,258,805. The aggregate gross unrealized appreciation is $161,222,240 and the aggregate gross unrealized depreciation is $14,102,972, resulting in net unrealized appreciation of $147,119,268.

ADR — American Depository Receipt

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

16

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

D OMINI I NTERNATIONAL S OCIAL E QUITY F UND

Fund Performance and Holdings

The table and bar charts below provide information as of January 31, 2014 about the ten largest holdings of the Domini International Social Equity Fund and its portfolio holdings by industry sector and country:

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS BY INDUSTRY SECTOR (% OF NET ASSETS) (Unaudited)

18

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS BY COUNTRY (% OF NET ASSETS) (Unaudited)

*Other countries include Denmark (0.9%), Russia (0.8%), South Korea (0.7%), Poland (0.6%), Ireland (0.6%), United States (0.5%), New Zealand (0.5%), Indonesia (0.2%), and Taiwan (0.1%).

The holdings mentioned above are described in the Domini International Social Equity Fund’s Portfolio of Investments (as of 1/31/14), included herein. The composition of the Fund’s portfolio is subject to change.

19

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The Fund’s returns quoted above represent past performance after all expenses. Investment return, principal value, and yield will fluctuate. Your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Call 1-800-582-6757 or visit www.domini.com for performance information current to the most recent month-end, which may be lower or higher. A 2.00% fee applies to sales/exchanges made less than 30 days after the settlement of purchase/exchange, with certain exceptions. Quoted performance data does not reflect the deduction of this fee, which would reduce the performance quoted. See the Fund’s prospectus for further information.

For the period reported in its current prospectus, during which net operating expenses were capped by the Fund’s Manager, the Fund’s gross annual operating expenses totaled 1.68% (Investor shares), 2.13% (Class A shares), and 1.25% (Institutional shares) of net assets representing each share class, respectively. Until 11/30/14, the Fund’s Manager has contractually agreed to limit certain ordinary expenses to 1.60% (Investor shares), 1.57% (Class A shares), and 1.27% (Institutional shares) of its average daily net assets representing each share class, respectively, absent an earlier modification by the Fund’s Board. The Fund’s total return may have been lower without this limit.

The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Total return for the Domini International Social Equity Fund is based on the Fund’s net asset values and assumes all dividend and capital gains were reinvested. An investment in the Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured. The Fund is subject to market risks such as sector concentration and style risk. You may lose money.

Investing internationally involves special risks, such as currency fluctuations, social and economic instability, differing securities regulations and accounting standards, limited public information, possible changes in taxation and periods of illiquidity. These risks are magnified in emerging markets.

The MSCI EAFE Index is an unmanaged index of common stocks. You cannot invest directly in an index.

¹ Class A shares were not offered prior to November 28, 2008. All performance information for time periods beginning prior to November 28, 2008 is the performance of the Investor shares. This performance has not been adjusted to reflect the lower expenses of the Class A shares, but, where noted, does reflect an adjustment for the maximum applicable sales charges of 4.75%.

² Institutional shares were not offered prior to November 30, 2012. All performance information for time periods beginning prior to November 30, 2012, is the performance of the Investor shares. This performance has not been adjusted to reflect the lower expenses of the Institutional shares.

20

21