SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from _________________ to _________________
Commission
File No.: 000-30291
|
QUEST
MINERALS & MINING CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Utah
|
87-0429950
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
18B
East 5
th
Street
Paterson,
NJ 07524
(Address of
principal executive offices)
|
|
Issuer’s
telephone number:
(973)
684-0075
__________________
Check
whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by
Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
¨
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filter
¨
|
|
Accelerated
filter
¨
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filter
¨
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes
¨
No
x
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
As of May
24, 2010, 1,956,466,735 shares of our common stock were
outstanding.
Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes
¨
No
x
PART
1:
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
ITEM
1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
QUEST
MINERALS & MINING CORP.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
91,718
|
|
|
$
|
7,254
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
150,100
|
|
|
|
112,282
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
74,869
|
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
316,687
|
|
|
|
127,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
Mineral Reserves, net
|
|
|
5,180,724
|
|
|
|
5,187,317
|
|
Mine
development, net
|
|
|
84,907
|
|
|
|
113,207
|
|
Equipment,
net
|
|
|
124,162
|
|
|
|
133,184
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
49,074
|
|
|
|
48,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$
|
5,755,554
|
|
|
$
|
5,610,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND DEFICIENCY IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses (Note 3)
|
|
$
|
3,163,792
|
|
|
$
|
3,060,061
|
|
Loans
payable-current portion, net (Note 4)
|
|
|
932,567
|
|
|
|
996,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
4,096,359
|
|
|
|
4,057,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
payable-long term portion, net (Note 4)
|
|
|
1,959,154
|
|
|
|
2,075,927
|
|
Restructured
debt - long term portion, net (Note 4)
|
|
|
1,315,739
|
|
|
|
558,833
|
|
Related
party loans, net (Note 4)
|
|
|
654,488
|
|
|
|
300,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term
Liabilities
|
|
|
3,929,381
|
|
|
|
2,935,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
8,025,740
|
|
|
|
6,992,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note 7)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficiency
in Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, par value $0.001, 25,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERIES
A - issued and outstanding 20,726 shares
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
SERIES
B - issued and outstanding 48,284 shares
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
SERIES
C - issued and outstanding 260,000 shares
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $0.0001, 2,500,000,000 shares authorized (Note 6) issued
and outstanding 1,300,130,661 and 349,144,782 shares as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
130,013
|
|
|
|
34,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock to be issued
|
|
|
5,648
|
|
|
|
5,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
allowance
|
|
|
(587,500
|
)
|
|
|
(587,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
capital
|
|
|
69,967,904
|
|
|
|
69,813,168
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
(71,786,581
|
)
|
|
|
(70,648,386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Deficiency in Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
(2,270,186
|
)
|
|
|
(1,381,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND DEFICIENCY IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
$
|
5,755,554
|
|
|
$
|
5,610,457
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
revenues
|
|
$
|
683,505
|
|
|
$
|
330,313
|
|
Production
costs
|
|
|
(974,300
|
)
|
|
|
(632,730
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit (loss)
|
|
|
(290,795
|
)
|
|
|
(302,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
|
|
223,316
|
|
|
|
338,359
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
43,915
|
|
|
|
40,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
267,231
|
|
|
|
378,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss from Operations
|
|
|
(558,026
|
)
|
|
|
(681,395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
(loss) on debt settlements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,361
|
|
Interest,
net
|
|
|
(580,169
|
)
|
|
|
(140,893
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,138,195
|
)
|
|
|
(787,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
(1,138,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
(787,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
678,909,288
|
|
|
|
4,795,372
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
QUEST
MINERALS & MINING CORP.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(1,138,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
(787,927
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
43,915
|
|
|
|
40,619
|
|
Stock
issued for interest
|
|
|
10,467
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock
issued for services
|
|
|
165,310
|
|
|
|
240,536
|
|
Gain
on debt settlements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(34,361
|
)
|
Amortization
of discount on convertible notes- interest expense
|
|
|
387,796
|
|
|
|
36,432
|
|
Amortization
of deferred issuance costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
Amortization
of royalty costs
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
3,386
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in receivables
|
|
|
(37,818
|
)
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(66,642
|
)
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
Increase
in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
181,696
|
|
|
|
185,672
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(451,349
|
)
|
|
|
(312,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine
development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equipment
purchased
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,000
|
)
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,191
|
|
Security
deposits
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(2,529
|
)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(3,338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment
of borrowings
|
|
|
(668,626
|
)
|
|
|
(9,010
|
)
|
Proceeds
from DIP Financing
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
1,204,527
|
|
|
|
31,659
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
535,901
|
|
|
|
302,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in cash
|
|
|
84,464
|
|
|
|
(12,883
|
)
|
Cash
at beginning of period
|
|
|
7,254
|
|
|
|
13,439
|
|
Cash
at end of period
|
|
$
|
91,718
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
financing activites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Note Conversions
|
|
$
|
431,933
|
|
|
$
|
417,000
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 –
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Basis
of Presentation
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include footnotes
and certain financial information normally presented annually under accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. These financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q
and Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Quest Minerals & Mining Corp. (“we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”) for the
year ended December 31, 2009. Accounting measurements at interim dates
inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year-end. The
results of operations for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2010.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited;
however, the financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals), which, in our opinion, are necessary to present fairly our
consolidated financial position at March 31, 2010, our consolidated results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and cash flows
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and
the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries, Quest Minerals & Mining, Ltd.
(“Quest Ltd.”), Quest Energy, Ltd. (“Quest Energy”), E-Z Mining Co., Inc. (“E-Z
Mining”), and Gwenco, Inc. (“Gwenco”). Significant intercompany
transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
In the
first quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company adopted Accounting Standards
Codification subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC
820-10”). ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. ASC 820-10
delays, until the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the effective date for ASC
820-10 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of
ASC 820-10 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or
operations.
Effective
October 1, 2008, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic
820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”) and Accounting
Standards Codification subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10”),
which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value. Neither of these statements had an impact on
the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial position, results of
operations nor cash flows. The carrying value of current and non-current loans
payable, restructured debt and related party loans, as reflected in the balance
sheets, approximate its fair values.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets
and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business and does
not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the
recoverability and classification of assets or liabilities that might be
necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. . The
Company incurred net losses from operations of $558,026 and $681,395 for the
periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and had a working capital deficit (current
assets less current liabilities) of $3,779,672 and $3,929,293 at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively. These factors indicate that the Company’s
continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain adequate
financing.
The
Company will require substantial additional funds to finance its business
activities on an ongoing basis and will have a continuing long-term need to
obtain additional financing. The Company’s future capital requirements will
depend on numerous factors including, but not limited to, continued progress
developing additional mines and increasing mine production. Currently, the
Company is in the process of seeking additional funding to achieve its
operational goals.
On March
2, 2007, Gwenco filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Kentucky. Management felt this was a necessary step to
further the company’s financial restructuring initiative and to protect Gwenco’s
assets from claims, debts, judgments, foreclosures, and forfeitures of those
creditors and stakeholders with whom both Quest and Gwenco were unable to
negotiate restructured agreements. Prior to October 12, 2009, Gwenco oversaw its
operations as a debtor in possession, subject to court approval of matters
outside the ordinary course of business. In 2007, the Bankruptcy Court approved
Gwenco’s request for debtor-in-possession financing in an amount of up to
$2,000,000 from holders of Gwenco’s existing debt obligations in order to fund
operating expenses. Under Chapter 11, all claims against Gwenco in existence
prior to the filing of the petitions for reorganization relief under the federal
bankruptcy laws were stayed while Gwenco was in bankruptcy.
On
September 30, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed Gwenco’s Plan of
Reorganization (the “Plan”). Secured and non-priority unsecured classes of
creditors voted to approve the Plan, with over 80% of the unsecured claims in
dollar amount voting for the plan, and over 90% of responding lessors supporting
it. The Plan became effective on October 12, 2009.
Even
though the Bankruptcy Court has confirmed the Plan, it is still possible that
the Bankruptcy Court could convert Gwenco’s case to Chapter 7 and liquidate all
of Gwenco’s assets if the Court determines that Gwenco is unable to perform
under the Plan. In the case of a Chapter 7 conversion, the Company would be
materially impacted and could lose all of its working assets and have only
unpaid liabilities. In addition, the Company might be forced to file for
protection under Chapter 11 as it is the primary guarantor on a number of
Gwenco’s contracts.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
January 2010, the FASB issued an accounting standard update, amending disclosure
requirements related to Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, as
follows:
|
1.
|
Significant
transfers between Level 1 and 2 shall be disclosed separately, including
the reasons for the transfers; and
|
|
2.
|
Information
about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements shall be disclosed
separately in the reconciliation of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements.
|
This
accounting standard update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this
accounting standard update did not have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
Effective
January 1, 2010, the Company applied ASU No. 2009-17, which requires
consolidation of certain special purpose entities that were previously exempted
from consolidation. The revised criteria define a controlling financial
interest for requiring consolidation as: the power to direct the activities that
most significantly affect the entity’s performance, and (1) the obligation to
absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the
entity. The initial adoption had no effect on the Company’s financial
statements.
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Update No. 2010-05 “Compensation—Stock
Compensation—Escrowed Share Arrangements and Presumption of Compensation”
(“2010-05”). 2010-05 re-asserts that the Staff of the SEC has stated the
presumption that for certain shareholders escrowed shares represent a
compensatory arrangement. 2010-05 further clarifies the criteria required
to be met to establish a position different from the SEC Staff’s position.
The Company does not believe this pronouncement will have any material impact on
its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Update No. 2010-04 “Accounting for Various
Topics—Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs” (“2010-04”). 2010-04
represents technical corrections to SEC paragraphs within various sections of
the Codification. Management is currently evaluating whether these changes
will have any material impact on its financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Update No. 2010-02 “Accounting and Reporting for
Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary—a Scope Clarification” (“2010-02”) an
update of ASC 810 “Consolidation.” 2010-02 clarifies the scope of ASC 810
with respect to decreases in ownership in a subsidiary to those of a subsidiary
or group of assets that are a business or nonprofit, a subsidiary that is
transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture, and an exchange of a
group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity to a
non-controlling interest including an equity method investee or a joint
venture. Management does not expect adoption of this standard to have any
material impact on its financial position, results of operations or operating
cash flows. Management does not intend to decrease its ownership in any of
its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Update No. 2010-01 “Accounting for Distributions
to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash—a consensus of the FASB
Emerging Issues Task Force” (“2010-03”) an update of ASC 505 “Equity.”
2010-03 clarifies the treatment of stock distributions as dividends to
shareholders and their affect on the computation of earnings per shares.
Management does not expect adoption of this standard to have any material impact
on its financial position, results of operations or operating cash
flows.
In April
2010, the FASB issued an accounting standard update, amending disclosure
requirements related to income taxes, as a result of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), which became law on March 23, 2010, and was
subsequently amended on March 30, 2010. The adoption of this accounting
standard update did not have a material impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
Other
recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging
Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not, or are not believed by
management to, have a material impact on the Company's present or future
consolidated financial statements.
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
NOTE
2 -
|
PLAN
OF REORGANIZATION
|
In 2009,
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
confirmed Gwenco’s Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) pursuant to Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Kentucky. The Plan became effective on October 12, 2009.
See Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and
2008 and for each of the years then ended, as set forth in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for a description of the Plan
and its effect on our financial statements.
NOTE
3 -
|
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE & ACCRUED EXPENSES
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
1,152,455
|
|
|
|
1,074,035
|
|
Accrued
royalties payable (a)
|
|
|
169,634
|
|
|
|
125,894
|
|
Accrued
bank claim (b)
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
Accrued
taxes
|
|
|
87,315
|
|
|
|
87,315
|
|
Accrued
interest (c)
|
|
|
251,666
|
|
|
|
220,095
|
|
Accrued
expenses (d)
|
|
|
852,722
|
|
|
|
902,722
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,163,792
|
|
|
$
|
3,060,061
|
|
|
(a)
|
The
Company maintains a number of coal leases with minimum lease or royalty
payments that vary by lease as defined in each lease agreement. As a
result of the confirmation of Gwenco’s Plan, Gwenco has assumed all coal
leases and is obligated to pay cure claims due under each lease. In
addition, the Company has granted overriding royalties to third
parties. Unless otherwise provided in the Plan, all accrued amounts
due under the leases and overriding royalty obligations are due on or
before October 12, 2012. As a result, most of the existing
royalties, which accrued up until the effective date, were re-categorized
as Cure Claims totaling $199,213. As of March 31, 2010, the Company
owed approximately $169,634 in current lease and/or royalty
payments.
|
Certain
accrued overriding royalties owed to former owners totaling $319,062 have been
reclassified as allowed unsecured claims under Gwenco’s Plan, to be paid along
with the other allowed unsecured claims under Gwenco’s Plan.
(See Note
4.)
In
addition, the Company accrued $25,544 as an estimated royalty payable in
connection with an August 2008 financing. This amount is currently being
amortized over the life of the underlying note involved in the financing.
(See Note 4.)
|
(b)
|
Community
Trust Bank and its insurer, the Federal Insurance Company, commenced an
action in Pike County Court, Kentucky against Quest Energy alleging that
former employees or associates of Quest Energy engaged in a criminal
scheme and conspiracy to defraud Community Trust Bank, that Quest Energy
is accordingly responsible for the actions of these former employees and
associates, and that Quest Energy obtained a substantial material benefit
as a result of this alleged scheme. Quest Energy has denied these
allegations. As of March 31, 2010, the matter is closed and off the
Court’s docket, and no outcome has been determined. While we believe
that this matter will be resolved without a material adverse impact on our
cash flows, results of operation, or financial condition, it is reasonably
possible that our judgments regarding this matter could change in the
future.
|
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
|
(c)
|
As
a result of the confirmation of Gwenco’s Plan, most of the existing debts,
which included the accrued interest up until the effective date, were
prioritized under various long-term debt classifications and no longer
accrue interest. The Company made an $864,175 adjustment to
re-categorize the existing interest as long-term debt. Most of these
claim amounts are now due on or before October 12,
2014.
|
|
(d)
|
The
Company recorded an accrued liability for indemnification obligations of
$390,000 to its officers, which represents the fair value of shares of the
Company’s common stock, which the officers pledged as collateral for
personal guarantees of a loan to the Company. The Company defaulted
on the loan and the lender foreclosed on the officer’s pledged
shares. In January 2007, the Company satisfied $260,000 of this
accrued liability by issuing 260,000 shares of Series C Preferred
Stock. The Company has accrued the remaining $130,000 due to its
former officer. In addition, during the period ended December
31, 2004, the Company had recorded accrued expenses of $468,585 from its
subsidiaries, E-Z Mining Co. and Gwenco, Inc. as acquisition for mining
expenses recorded on their books and records. The Company continues
to carry these balances until further validity can be
determined.
|
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
Notes
payable consist of the following:
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
QUEST
MINERALS & MINING CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0%
Notes Due on Demand (a).
|
|
$
|
202,864
|
|
|
$
|
202,864
|
|
7%
Senior Secured Convertible Notes Due 2007 (b).
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
5%
Unsecured Advances Due on Demand (c).
|
|
|
130,857
|
|
|
|
130,857
|
|
6%
Convertible Notes Due 2011 (c).
|
|
|
876,418
|
|
|
|
1,044,580
|
|
6%
Convertible Notes Due 2011 (d).
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
6%
Convertible Notes Due 2011 (e).
|
|
|
179,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
0%
Notes Due on Demand (f).
|
|
|
482,171
|
|
|
|
480,434
|
|
10%
Convertible Notes due 2008 (g).
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
6%
Convertible Notes due 2010 (h).
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
27,304
|
|
8%
Convertible Notes due 2010 (i).
|
|
|
31,330
|
|
|
|
117,010
|
|
8%
Convertible Notes due 2011 (j).
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
6%
Convertible Notes due 2014 (k).
|
|
|
57,500
|
|
|
|
90,500
|
|
4%
Convertible Notes due 2011 (l).
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
8%
Convertible Notes due 2011 (m).
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
12%
Notes Due on Demand (n).
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
6%
Notes Due on Demand (o).
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
5%
Convertible Notes due 2012 (p).
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
8%
Convertible Notes due 2012 (q).
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
8%
Convertible Notes due 2011 (r).
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
QUEST
ENERGY, LTD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8%
Summary Judgment (s).
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GWENCO,
INC.: (Restructured Debt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLASS
1 – Secured Claim with conversion option (t).
|
|
|
1,157,104
|
|
|
|
1,753,377
|
|
CLASS
1 – Secured claim with conversion option (u)
|
|
|
2,488,275
|
|
|
|
3,207,376
|
|
CLASS
3 – Unsecured Claims (v)
|
|
|
391,741
|
|
|
|
413,741
|
|
CLASS
3 - Unsecured Claims with conversion option (w)
|
|
|
319,062
|
|
|
|
319,062
|
|
CLASS
5 – Cured Claims (x)
|
|
|
199,213
|
|
|
|
199,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GWENCO,
INC.: (Related-Party Loans)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLASS
3 - Unsecured Claim with conversion option (y).
|
|
|
606,967
|
|
|
|
651,967
|
|
Total
Debt
|
|
|
8,499,801
|
|
|
|
10,035,785
|
|
Current
Portion
|
|
|
992,022
|
|
|
|
1,050,969
|
|
Less:
Unamortized debt discount on Current Portion
|
|
|
(59,455
|
)
|
|
|
(53,974
|
)
|
Total
Notes Payable – Current Portion, net
|
|
|
932,567
|
|
|
|
996,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Debt:
|
|
$
|
7,507,779
|
|
|
$
|
8,984,816
|
|
Less:
Unamortized present value and debt discount on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Debt
|
|
|
(3,578,398
|
)
|
|
|
(6,049,588
|
)
|
Total
Long-Term Debt, net
|
|
$
|
3,929,381
|
|
|
$
|
2,935,228
|
|
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
|
(a)
|
On
December 31, 2005, the Company closed E-Z Mining Co., Inc. These
current notes consist of various third parties related to the former CFO
of the Company. All notes are unsecured and due on demand except
$110,000, which is due from future royalties. All notes are
non-interest bearing.
|
|
(b)
|
From
February 22, 2005 through April 18, 2005, the Company entered into unit
purchase agreements with sixteen third-party investors for a total sale
amount of $1,425,000. Each unit was consisted of a 7% senior secured
convertible note due March 6, 2006 and 3.75 Series A Warrants. The
notes were secured by certain of the Company’s assets and were initially
convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of
$20,000 per share, which conversion price was subject to adjustment.
Each Series A Warrant was exercisable into one (1) share of common stock
at an exercise price of $20,000 and one (1) Series B Warrant. Each
Series B Warrant was exercisable into one (1) share of common stock at an
exercise price of $40,000. As of March 31, 2010, $25,000 in
principal amount of the original $1,425,000 in notes remains outstanding
and in default. This default should not have any material impact on
the Company.
|
|
(c)
|
Since
2006 through March 31, 2010, a third party investor, and its successor in
interest, has advanced operational funding into the Company. Since
there had been no formal agreement regarding the balance owed, the Company
accrues a 5% annual interest on the principal with the intent that a
mutual arrangement will be resolved between both
parties.
|
On June
26, 2009, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with the successor in
interest, pursuant to which the investor exchanged approximately $1,082,411 of
the evidences of indebtedness, along with $124,195 of accrued interest thereon,
for a new convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of
$1,200,000. The new note is due June 26, 2011, is unsecured, and bears
interest at an annual rate of six percent (6%). The new note was initially
convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of
$0.001 per share. The conversion price has since adjusted to $0.0001
pursuant to rate adjustment terms set forth in the note. During the three
months ended March 31, 2010, the holders have made various conversions to the
principal and interest outstanding.
As of
March 31, 2010, there continues to be no formal agreement regarding the
remaining evidences of indebtedness of $130,857, and the Company continues to
accrue 5% annual interest on the principal with the intent that a mutual
arrangement will be resolved between both parties.
|
(d)
|
On
July 11, 2009, the Company and Gwenco entered into a settlement and
release agreement with the Company’s largest lender to resolve various
disputes that had arisen between the Company and the lender.
Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the lender waived certain defaults
under various debt obligations. In addition, the lender extended the
maturity date on Gwenco’s Debtor In Possession Total Facility to the
earliest of (i) December 31, 2010, (ii) the date of confirmation of a plan
of reorganization or liquidation in the Bankruptcy Case; (iii) the date of
closing of a sale of all or substantially all of Gwenco’s assets pursuant
to the Bankruptcy Code; or (iv) the approval of a disclosure statement in
respect of a plan of reorganization or liquidation not supported by the
lender. In exchange for this consideration, Quest issued the lender
a new convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of
$1,000,000. The note is due July 11, 2011, is unsecured, and bears
interest at an annual interest rate of six percent (6%). The new
note was initially convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock
at a conversion price of $0.001 per share. The conversion price has
since adjusted to $0.0001 pursuant to rate adjustment terms set forth in
the note.
|
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
|
(e)
|
On
July 13, 2009, the Company issued a consulting bonus in the form of a
convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $200,000
to a third party consulting company owned by a stockholder of the
Company. The note is due July 13, 2011, is unsecured, and bears
interest at an annual interest rate of six percent (6%). The new
note was initially convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock
at a conversion price of $0.001 per share. The conversion price has
since adjusted to $0.0001 pursuant to rate adjustment terms set forth in
the note. The Company recorded interest expense for $2,850 as of
March 31, 2010 in relation to the convertible promissory
note.
|
|
(f)
|
Periodically,
the Company receives cash advances from unrelated third party
investors. Since these advances are open accounts, are unsecured,
and have no fixed or determined dates for repayment, the amounts carry a
0% interest rate.
|
|
(g)
|
On
May 1, 2007, the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement
with a third party pursuant to which the Company issued a convertible
secured promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000. The note
was due on May 1, 2008, is unsecured, and bears interest at the annual
rate of ten percent (10%). The note is convertible into the
Company’s common shares at a fixed rate of $160 per share. The
holder may not convert any outstanding principal amount of this note or
accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the extent such conversion would
result in the holder beneficially owning in excess of 4.999% of the then
issued and outstanding common shares of the Company.
As
of March 31, 2010, the Company was in default of this obligation.
This default should not have any material impact on the
Company.
|
|
(h)
|
On
December 8, 2005, the Company issued a convertible secured promissory note
in the principal amount of $335,000. The note was due on December 8,
2006, with an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%), and is
convertible into the Company’s common shares at an initial conversion
price of $20.00 per share, subject to adjustment. As of December 31,
2006, the Company was in default. In January, 2007, the Company
entered into an exchange agreement with the note holder and holders of
150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, under which the holders
exchanged the note and the 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock
for a series of new convertible promissory notes in the aggregate
principal amount of $635,000. The new notes were due on March 31,
2007, with an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%), and are
convertible into the Company’s common shares at an initial conversion
price of the greater of (i) $2.00 per share or (ii) 50% of the average of
the 5 closing bid prices of the common stock immediately preceding such
conversion date. During the first quarter of 2007, the note holders
made partial conversions of the principal and accruing
interest.
|
On April
1, 2006, the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement with
a third party individual pursuant to which the Company issued a
convertible secured promissory note in the principal amount of $300,000.
The note was due on April 1, 2008, with an annual interest rate of eight percent
(8%). The note is convertible into the Company’s common shares at an
initial conversion price equal to the greater of (a) $2.00 per share, and (b)
50% of the average market price during the three trading days immediately
preceding any conversion date. The holder may not convert any
outstanding principal amount of this note or accrued and unpaid interest thereon
to the extent such conversion would result in the holder beneficially owning in
excess of 4.999% of the then issued and outstanding common shares of the
Company.
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
On June
6, 2008, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with the subsequent
holder of these notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $835,000, under
which the subsequent holder exchanged the notes held by such holder for a new
convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $835,000.
The new note is due June 6, 2010, is unsecured, and bears interest at an annual
interest rate of six percent (6%). The new note is convertible into shares
of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.001 per share.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders have made partial
conversions of principal and interest due under these notes.
|
(i)
|
On
August 14, 2008, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with an
unrelated third party where the Company issued a $400,000 convertible
promissory note and granted a three (3) year royalty on future coal
sales. The note is due July 23, 2010, is unsecured, and bears
interest at an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%). The note
is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price of sixty percent (60%) of the average of the five (5) lowest per
share market value during the ten (10) trading days immediately preceding
a conversion date. The royalty is based on sliding scale ranging
from $0.00 to $0.75 per ton, depending on actual sale prices of coal
received by the Company. On August 28, 2009, the Company amended the
conversion price to be forty five percent (45%) of the average of the five
(5) lowest per share market value during the ten (10) trading days
immediately preceding a conversion
date.
|
In
accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company also recognized an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature present in this note. The Company allocated a portion
of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid
in capital. The Company recognized and measured $225,000 of the proceeds,
which is equal to the intrinsic value of the imbedded beneficial conversion
feature, to additional paid in capital and a discount against the note.
The debt discount attributed to the beneficial conversion feature is amortized
over the note’s maturity period as interest expense. On August 28, 2009,
pursuant to the amended conversion feature agreement, the Company deemed the
existing debt extinguished and reissued it according to the new terms.
The discounted amortization was revised to $219,218. As of March 31,
2010, unamortized discount of $10,705 remains.
In
addition, the Company recognized and measured $25,544 of the proceeds, which is
equal to the Company’s estimate of the royalty payable under this agreement, to
accrued royalties and a discount against the note. The debt discount
attributed to the accrued royalty is amortized over the note’s maturity period
as interest expense.
|
(j)
|
On
September 16, 2009, the Company issued a convertible promissory note to a
third party investor for facilitation of a receivables escrow arrangement
pursuant to Gwenco’s Debtor-In-Possession financing. The note is due
September 16, 2011, is unsecured, and bears interest at an annual interest
rate of eight percent (8%). The note is convertible into shares of
the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of forty five percent
(45%) of the average of the five (5) lowest per share market value during
the ten (10) trading days immediately preceding a conversion
date.
|
In
accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company also recognized an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature present in this note. The Company allocated a portion
of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid
in capital. The Company recognized and measured $25,000 of the proceeds,
which is equal to the intrinsic value of the imbedded beneficial conversion
feature, to additional paid in capital and a discount against the note.
The debt discount attributed to the beneficial conversion feature is amortized
over the note’s maturity period as interest expense. As of March 31, 2010,
an unamortized discount of $525 remains.
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
|
(k)
|
On
October 14, 2009, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with a
third party investor, pursuant to which the investor exchanged
approximately $125,000 of evidences of indebtedness, for a new convertible
promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $125,000. The
new note is due October 14, 2014, is unsecured, and bears interest at an
annual rate of six percent (6%). The new note was initially
convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price of $0.001 per share. The conversion price has since adjusted
to $0.0001 pursuant to rate adjustment terms set forth in the note.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders have made
various conversions to the principal and interest outstanding.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the note was amended to
reduce the interest rate to 5% and to amend certain adjustment terms in
the conversion price.
|
In
accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company recognized an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature present in this note. The Company allocated a portion
of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid
in capital. The Company recognized and measured $125,000 of the proceeds,
which is equal to the intrinsic value of the imbedded beneficial conversion
feature, to additional paid in capital and a discount against the note.
The debt discount attributed to the beneficial conversion feature is amortized
over the note’s maturity period as interest expense. As of March 31, 2010,
the unamortized discount of $52,288 still remains.
|
(l)
|
On
December 14, 2009, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with a
third party investor, pursuant to which the investor exchanged
approximately $30,000 of the evidences of indebtedness through unsecured
cash advances, for a new convertible promissory note in the aggregate
principal amount of $30,000. The new note is due December 14, 2011,
is unsecured, and bears interest at an annual rate of four percent
(4%). The new note is convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at a conversion price of 50% of the average of the per share
market values during the three (3) trading days immediately preceding a
conversion date, subject to
adjustments.
|
In
accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company recognized an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature present in this note. The Company allocated a portion
of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid
in capital. The Company recognized and measured $28,554 of the proceeds,
which is equal to the intrinsic value of the imbedded beneficial conversion
feature, to additional paid in capital and a discount against the note.
The debt discount attributed to the beneficial conversion feature is amortized
over the note’s maturity period as interest expense. As of March 31, 2010,
the unamortized discount of $6,098 still remains.
|
(m)
|
On
October 23, 2009, the Company issued a convertible note to a third party
investor in the amount of 50,000. The note is due October 23, 2011,
is unsecured, and bears interest at an annual rate of six percent
(8%). The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common
stock at a conversion price of 45% of the average of the five (5) lowest
per share market values during the ten (10) trading days immediately
preceding a conversion date.
|
In
accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company recognized an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature present in this note. The Company allocated a portion
of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid
in capital. The Company recognized and measured $31,064 of the proceeds,
which is equal to the intrinsic value of the imbedded beneficial conversion
feature, to additional paid in capital and a discount against the note.
The debt discount attributed to the beneficial conversion feature is amortized
over the note’s maturity period as interest expense. As of March 31, 2010,
the unamortized discount of $24,612 still remains.
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
|
(n)
|
On
August 28, 2009, the Company borrowed $12,500 from an unrelated third
party, and in connection therewith, issued a promissory note that is due
on demand, is unsecured, and bears interest at an annual interest rate of
twelve percent (12%).
|
|
(o)
|
On
January 16, 2009, the Company borrowed $10,000 from an unrelated third
party, and in connection therewith, issued a promissory note that is due
on demand, is unsecured, and bears interest at an annual interest rate of
six percent (6%).
|
|
(p)
|
On
February 4, 2010, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with an
unrelated third party where the Company issued a $95,000 convertible
promissory note for a purchase price of $75,000. The note is due
February 4, 2012 and bears interest at an annual interest rate of five
percent (5%). The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at a conversion price of $0.001 per share, subject to
adjustment. The Company recorded a note discount of $20,000, which
is being amortized over the term of the
note.
|
|
(q)
|
On
February 26, 2010, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with an
unrelated third party where the Company issued a $55,000 convertible
promissory note for a purchase price of $50,000. The note is due
February 26, 2012 and bears interest at an annual interest rate of eight
percent (8%). The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at a conversion price of forty five percent (45%) of the
average of the five (5) lowest per share market value during the five (5)
trading days immediately preceding a conversion date. The Company
recorded a note discount of $5,000, which is being amortized over the term
of the note.
|
|
(r)
|
On
March 22, 2010, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with an
unrelated third party where the Company issued a $50,000 convertible
promissory note. The note is due March 22, 2011 and bears interest
at an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%). The note is
convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price of forty five percent (40%) of the average of the three (3) lowest
per share market value during the ten (10) trading days immediately
preceding a conversion date.
|
|
(s)
|
On
July 10, 2006, the Company entered into a settlement arrangement with an
existing equipment lessor for the bill of sale on two pieces of equipment,
of which the Company had retained possession while in default of prior
lease payments. On October 10, 2006, the Pike County Circuit Court
entered an order enforcing this settlement agreement, and on December 19,
2006, the lessor was awarded summary judgment in the amount of $35,000
plus 8% accrued interest from August 9, 2006. As of March 31, 2010,
the Company remains in default. The lessor has since repossessed the
equipment.
|
|
(t)
|
Under
Gwenco’s Plan of Reorganization, a judgment in favor of Interstellar
Holdings, LLC was classified as a Class 1 Claim and was satisfied by the
issuance to Interstellar Holdings of a 5 year secured convertible
promissory note, which note is convertible into common stock of the
Company at a rate of the lower of (i) $0.001 per share and (ii) 40% of the
average of the three lowest per shares market values of the Company’s
common stock during the 10 trading days before a conversion; provided that
the holder is prohibited from converting if such conversion would result
in it holding more than 4.99% of the Company’s outstanding common
stock.
In
accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company recognized an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature present in this note. The Company allocated
a portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to
additional paid in capital. The Company recognized and measured
$1,093,771 of the proceeds, which is equal to the intrinsic value of the
imbedded beneficial conversion feature, to additional paid in capital and
a discount against the note. The debt discount attributed to
the beneficial conversion feature is amortized over the note’s maturity
period as interest expense. As of March 31, 2010, the
unamortized discount of $993,508 still
remains.
|
|
(u)
|
Under
Gwenco’s Plan of Reorganization, the Court approved an exit facility under
which Interstellar Holdings, LLC will provide up to $2 million in
financing to Gwenco, which Gwenco used to pay off its Debtor In Possession
Total Facility. The exit facility consists of a 5 year secured
convertible line of credit note, which note is convertible into common
stock of the Company at a rate of the lower of (i) $0.001 per share and
(ii) 40% of the average of the three lowest per shares market values of
the Company’s common stock during the 10 trading days before a conversion;
provided that the holder is prohibited from converting if such conversion
would result in it holding more than 4.99% of the Company’s outstanding
common stock.
In
accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company recognized an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature present in this note. The Company allocated
a portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to
additional paid in capital. The Company recognized and measured
$1,968,281 of the proceeds, which is equal to the intrinsic value of the
imbedded beneficial conversion feature, to additional paid in capital and
a discount against the note. The debt discount attributed to
the beneficial conversion feature is amortized over the note’s maturity
period as interest expense. As of March 31, 2010, the
unamortized discount of $1,787,855 still
remains.
|
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
|
(v)
|
Certain
unsecured promissory notes which Gwenco assumed in connection with a
settlement agreement with a former owner were classified as unsecured
Class 3 Claims in Gwenco’s Plan of Reorganization. These claims will
be satisfied by cash payments equal to the value of their claim on the
earlier of (i) October 12, 2014 or (ii) the date on which, in Gwenco’s
sole discretion, proceeds from the exit facility are sufficient to satisfy
the claims. Further, these claimholders shall receive their pro-rata
share of royalty payments to reduce their
claims.
|
|
(w)
|
Certain
accrued overriding royalties owed to former owners totaling $319,062 have
been reclassified as allowed unsecured claims under Gwenco’s Plan, to be
paid along with the other allowed unsecured claims under Gwenco’s
Plan. Each former owner has the right to convert up to $40,000 of
his or her claim into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of
eighty five percent (85%) of the average of the five (5) per share market
values immediately preceding a conversion date, with a minimum conversion
price of the par value of the Company’s common stock.
In
accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company recognized an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature present in this note. The Company allocated
a portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to
additional paid in capital. The Company recognized and measured
$1,634 of the proceeds, which is equal to the intrinsic value of the
imbedded beneficial conversion feature, to additional paid in capital and
a discount against the note. The debt discount attributed to
the beneficial conversion feature is amortized over the note’s maturity
period as interest expense. As of March 31, 2010, the
unamortized discount of $1,389 still
remains.
|
|
(x)
|
Pursuant
to the Plan, most of the existing royalties which accrued up until the
effective date, were re-categorized as unsecured Cure Claims totaling
$199,213. These claim amounts are now due on or before October 12,
2012. (See Note 16.)
|
|
(y)
|
Certain
promissory notes issued to a former stockholder of Gwenco were classified
as unsecured Class 3 Claims in Gwenco’s Plan of Reorganization. The
claims are also guaranteed by the Company and Quest Ltd. and are secured
by 50% of Quest Ltd.’s ownership of Gwenco. The former stockholder
also has the has the right to convert up to $15,000 of the claim each
month into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of eighty five
percent (85%) of the average of the five (5) per share market values
immediately preceding a conversion date, with a minimum conversion price
of the par value of the Company’s common stock. The Company recorded
interest expense of $30,703 as of March 31, 2010 related to the present
value discount of the unsecured
claims.
|
Reclassification
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company revised its methodology of
estimating the fair value of obligations modified as a result of the
confirmation of Gwenco’s Plan of Reorganization. This resulted in a
reclassification of approximately $480,000 from additional paid in
capital to restructured debt.
The
Company recognized no income tax benefit for the loss generated for the periods
through March 31, 2010.
ASC
740-10 requires that a valuation allowance be provided if it is more likely than
not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Company’s ability to realize the benefit of its deferred tax asset will
depend on the generation of future taxable income. Because the Company has
yet to recognize significant revenue from the sale of its products, it believes
that the full valuation allowance should be provided.
The
Company has not filed corporate federal, state, or local income tax returns
since 2002, and believes that, due to its operating losses, it does not have a
material tax liability.
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of
149,300,000 shares of common stock for consulting and legal services.
Expense of $165,310 was recorded related to these shares, which was the
market value of such shares issued at an aggregate price $0.001107 per
share.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of 7% convertible promissory
notes effectuated a final conversion of 6,658,333 shares of common stock at a
conversion price of $0.00084 per share to satisfy the remaining $5,593 of
accrued interest.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of 8% convertible promissory
notes due August 14, 2010, effectuated a series of partial conversions and were
issued an aggregate of 120,000,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price
of $0.00071 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the debt
by $85,680 in principal.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of 4% convertible promissory
notes due December 14, 2011, effectuated a series of partial conversions and
were issued an aggregate of 28,058,312 shares of common stock at a conversion
price of $0.0008 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the
debt by $22,500 in principal.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of 6% convertible promissory
notes due July 13, 2011, effectuated a series of partial conversions and were
issued an aggregate of 58,000,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price
of $0.00036 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the debt
by $21,000 in principal.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of 5% convertible promissory
notes due October 14, 2014, effectuated a series of partial conversions and were
issued an aggregate of 72,000,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price
of $0.00046 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the debt
by $33,000 in principal.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of 6% convertible promissory
notes due June 26, 2011, effectuated a series of partial conversions and were
issued an aggregate of 375,000,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price
of $0.00046 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the debt
by $168,163 in principal and $2,837 in accrued interest.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of 6% convertible promissory
notes due June 6, 2010, effectuated a series of partial conversions and were
issued an aggregate of 27,040,720 shares of common stock at a conversion price
of $0.001 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the debt by
$25,004 in principal and $2,037 in accrued interest.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of a Class 3 Claim under the
Gwenco Plan of Reorganization, due October 12, 2014, exercised its conversion
option pursuant to the Plan to effectuate a series of partial conversions and
were issued an aggregate of 34,928,514 shares of common stock at an average
conversion price of $0.00129 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances
reduced the debt by $45,000 in principal.
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of a Class 1 Claim under the
Gwenco Plan of Reorganization, due October 12, 2014, exercised its conversion
option within the Exit Facility terms pursuant to the Plan to effectuate a
series of partial conversions and were issued an aggregate of 80,000,000 shares
of common stock at an average conversion price of $0.00039 per share. In
the aggregate, these issuances reduced the debt by $31,586 in
principal.
NOTE
7 -
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Valley Personnel Services.
On or about August 25, 2004, Valley Personnel Services, Inc. commenced an
action in the Circuit Court of Mingo County, West Virginia against Quest’s
indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, D&D Contracting, Inc. and Quest Energy,
Ltd. for damages in the amount of approximately $150,000, plus pre and post
judgment interest as provided by law, costs, and fees.
Community Trust Bank.
Community Trust Bank and its insurer, the Federal Insurance Company,
commenced an action in Pike County Court, Kentucky against Quest Energy alleging
that former employees or associates of Quest Energy engaged in a criminal scheme
and conspiracy to defraud Community Trust Bank, that Quest Energy is accordingly
responsible for the actions of these former employees and associates, and that
Quest Energy obtained a substantial material benefit as a result of this alleged
scheme. Quest Energy has denied these allegations. As of March 31,
2010, the matter is closed and off the Court’s docket, and no outcome has been
determined. We have previously recorded an accrual of $650,000 for our
best estimate of probable loss related to this matter. While we believe
that this matter will be resolved without a material adverse impact on our cash
flows, results of operation, or financial condition, it is reasonably possible
that our judgments regarding this matter could change in the
future.
Personal Injury
.
An action has been
commenced in the Circuit Court of Pike County, Kentucky against the Company and
its subsidiaries for unspecified damages resulting from personal injuries
suffered while working for Mountain Edge Personnel, an employee leasing agency
who leased employees to the subsidiaries. The action has since been
dismissed without prejudice.
Fidler
. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, a former attorney for the Company commenced an action alleging
breach of contract for unpaid legal fees. The Company has denied the
allegations and is actively defending the matter. Furthermore, the Company
has filed a counterclaim against the attorney alleging legal malpractice in
connection with the attorney’s representation of the Company in several
matters. The matter is set for trial in June 2010.
Potential SEC Action
.
In October 2008, the Company received a Wells notice (the “Notice”) from the
staff of the Salt Lake Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Commission”) stating that they are recommending an enforcement action be
filed against the Company based on the Company’s financial statements and other
information contained in reports filed with the Commission for the period 2004
and thereafter. The Notice states that the Commission anticipates alleging
that we have violated Sections 10(b), 13(a) and 13(b)(2) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13
thereunder. The Company contends that the Company did not commit any
wrongdoings or the violations referred to in the Notice. The Company
cannot predict whether the Commission will follow the recommendations of the
staff and file suit against the Company. If any enforcement proceeding is
instituted by the Commission, and intends to vigorously defend itself against
the Commission’s claims.
QUEST
MINERALS AND MINING CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
(Unaudited)
The
Company believes that it may incur significant costs and expenses in connection
with this investigation. There can be no assurance that litigation
asserting such claims will not be initiated, or that the Company would prevail
in any such litigation.
The
Company is unable to predict the extent of its ultimate liability with respect
to any and all future securities, bankruptcy, or other litigation matters.
The costs and other effects of any future litigation, bankruptcy proceedings,
government investigations, legal and administrative cases and proceedings,
settlements, judgments and investigations, claims and changes in these matters
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and
operating results.
The
Company is subject to other legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the
ordinary course of its business. Although occasional adverse decisions or
settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such
matters should not have a material adverse effect on its financial position,
results of operations, or liquidity.
NOTE
8 -
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
In
accordance with FASB ASC 855, “Subsequent Events,” the Company has evaluated
subsequent events through May 24, 2010.
From the
period of April 1 to May 24, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of
125,000,000 shares of common stock for consulting and legal
services. The shares were valued at the market price of the common
stock on the date of the stock award.
From the
period of April 1 to May 24, 2010,
the holders of 8%
convertible promissory notes due August 14, 2010, effectuated a series of
partial conversions and were issued an aggregate of 80,000,000 shares of common
stock at a conversion price of $0.00035 per share. In the aggregate,
these issuances reduced the debt by $28,000 in principal.
From the
period of April 1 to May 24, 2010,, the holders of 4% convertible promissory
notes due December 14, 2011, effectuated a series of partial conversions and
were issued an aggregate of 23,076,923 shares of common stock at a conversion
price of $0.00033 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances
reduced the debt by $7,500 in principal.
From the
period of April 1 to May 24, 2010, the holders of 6% convertible promissory
notes due July 13, 2011, effectuated a series of partial conversions and were
issued an aggregate of 50,000,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price
of $0.0001 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the
debt by $5,000 in principal.
From the
period of April 1 to May 24, 2010,, the holders of 5% convertible promissory
notes due October 14, 2014, effectuated a series of partial conversions and were
issued an aggregate of 60,000,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price
of $0.0001 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the
debt by $6,000 in principal.
From the
period of April 1 to May 24, 2010, the holders of 6% convertible promissory
notes due June 26, 2011, effectuated a series of partial conversions and were
issued an aggregate of 100,000,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price
of $0.0001 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the
debt by $10,000 in principal.
From the
period of April 1 to May 24, 2010, the holders of a Class 3 Claim under the
Gwenco Plan of Reorganization, due October 12, 2014, exercised its conversion
option pursuant to the Plan to effectuate a series of partial conversions and
were issued an aggregate of 68,259,151 shares of common stock at an average
conversion price of $0.00044. In the aggregate, these issuances
reduced the debt by $30,000 in principal.
From
the period of April 1 to May 24, 2010, the holders of a Class 1 Claim under the
Gwenco Plan of Reorganization, due October 12, 2014, exercised its conversion
option within the Exit Facility terms pursuant to the Plan to effectuate a
series of partial conversions and were issued an aggregate of 150,000,000 shares
of common stock at an average conversion price of $0.00018 per
share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the debt by $26,600
in principal.
ITEM
2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
The
following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Quest’s
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this
report.
This
report and the documents to which we refer you and incorporate into this report
by reference contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, from time
to time, we or our representatives may make such forward-looking statements
orally or in writing. These are statements that relate to future periods
and include statements regarding our future strategic, operational, and
financial plans, anticipated capital expenditures, projected cash flows,
borrowings and other sources of funding, anticipated or projected revenues,
expenses, and operational growth, the adequacy of our current equipment and
supplies as well as our ability to obtain additional equipment and supplies, and
our ability to expand our operations.
The
statements contained in this report that are not historic in nature,
particularly those that utilize terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,”
“expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” “plans,” “target,” “goal,”
“objective,” or comparable terminology are forward-looking statements based on
current expectations and assumptions. Various risks and uncertainties
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in
forward-looking statements.
All
forward-looking statements in this document are based on information currently
available to Quest as of the date of this report, and Quest assumes no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors
that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements, including, but not limited to, the following:
|
(i)
|
our
cash flows, results of operations, or financial
condition;
|
|
(ii)
|
our
ability to continue as a going
concern;
|
|
(iii)
|
the
possibility that the assets of our wholly owned subsidiary, Gwenco, Inc.,
could be liquidated in the future if its bankruptcy case is converted to a
Chapter 7 liquidation;
|
|
(iv)
|
our
need to continue to finance our operations through additional borrowings
or other capital financings, which may not be available as
needed;
|
|
(v)
|
our
substantial indebtedness outstanding and significantly leveraged
operations;
|
|
(vi)
|
our
ability to timely obtain necessary supplies and
equipment;
|
|
(vii)
|
the
impact of the recent mine explosion at the Upper Big Branch mine in West
Virginia;
|
|
(viii)
|
governmental
policies, laws, regulatory actions and court decisions affecting the coal
industry or our customers’ coal
usage;
|
|
(ix)
|
legal
and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims and
the availability of insurance coverage related thereto, including, but not
limited to, any SEC enforcement action that may be brought in the
future;
|
|
(x)
|
our
interpretation and application of accounting literature, including,
but not limited to, literature related to mining specific
issues;
|
|
(xi)
|
our
assumptions and projections concerning economically recoverable coal
reserve estimates;
|
|
(xii)
|
inherent
risks of coal mining beyond our control, including weather and geologic
conditions or catastrophic weather-related
damage;
|
|
(xiii)
|
inherent
complexities which make it more difficult and costly to mine in Central
Appalachia than in other parts of the United
States;
|
|
(xiv)
|
our
production capabilities to meet market expectations and customer
requirements;
|
|
(xv)
|
the
cost and availability of transportation for our produced
coal;
|
|
(xvi)
|
our
ability to obtain and renew permits necessary for our existing and any
future operations in a timely
manner;
|
|
(xvii)
|
our
ability to expand our mining
capacity;
|
|
(xviii)
|
our
ability to manage production costs, including labor
costs;
|
|
(xix)
|
adjustments
made in price, volume, or terms to existing coal supply
arrangements;
|
|
(xx)
|
the
worldwide market demand for coal, electricity, and
steel;
|
|
(xxi)
|
environmental
concerns related to coal mining and combustion and the cost and perceived
benefits of alternative sources of energy such as natural gas and nuclear
energy;
|
|
(xxii)
|
our
reliance upon and relationships with our customers and
suppliers;
|
|
(xxiii)
|
the
creditworthiness of our customers and
suppliers;
|
|
(xxiv)
|
the
lack of insurance against all potential operating
risks;
|
|
(xxv)
|
competition
among coal and other energy producers, in the United States and
internationally;
|
|
(xxvi)
|
our
ability to attract, train and retain a skilled workforce to meet
replacement or expansion needs;
|
|
(xxvii)
|
future
economic or capital market
conditions;
|
|
(xxviii)
|
the
availability and costs of credit, surety bonds, and letters of credit that
we require;
|
|
(xxix)
|
foreign
currency fluctuations;
|
|
(xxx)
|
the
successful completion of acquisition, disposition, or financing
transactions and the effect thereof on our business;
and
|
|
(xxxi)
|
the
successful implementation of our strategic plans and objectives for future
operations and expansion or
consolidation.
|
We
include these cautionary statements in this report to make applicable and take
advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 as well as the “bespeaks caution” doctrine. Any
forward-looking statements should be considered in context with the various
disclosures made by us about our company in our public filings with the SEC,
including, without limitation, the Risk Factors more specifically described in
our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
amended. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof,
and we expressly disclaim any obligation to publicly release the results of any
revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date of this filing unless required by securities law, and we caution
the reader not to rely on them unduly.
General
We acquire
and operate energy and mineral related properties in the southeastern part of
the United States. We focus our efforts on operating properties that
produce quality compliance blend coal, generating revenues and cash flow through
the mining, processing, and selling of the coal located on these
properties.
Quest is
a holding company for Quest Minerals & Mining, Ltd., a Nevada corporation,
or Quest, Ltd., which in turn is a holding company for Quest Energy, Ltd., a
Kentucky corporation, or Quest Energy, and of Gwenco, Inc., a Kentucky
corporation, or Gwenco. Quest Energy is the parent corporation of E-Z
Mining Co., Inc, a Kentucky corporation, or E-Z Mining, and of Quest Marine
Terminal, Ltd., a Kentucky corporation, or Quest Marine.
Gwenco
leases over 700 acres of coal mines, with approximately 12,999,000 tons of coal
in place in six seams. In 2004, Gwenco had reopened Gwenco’s two former
drift mines at Pond Creek and Lower Cedar Grove, and had begun production at the
Pond Creek seam. This seam of high quality compliance coal is located at
Slater’s Branch, South Williamson, Kentucky.
In 2009,
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
confirmed Gwenco’s Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) pursuant to Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Kentucky. The Plan became effective on October 12, 2009.
A description of the Plan and a copy of the Plan are set forth in our Current
Report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 2009.
First
Quarter 2010 Developments
Operations Overview.
In
the first quarter of 2010, we continued to conduct mining operations without
having to shut down our operations for the second consecutive quarter. As
a result, we generated coal revenues of $0.68 million for the first quarter of
2010, compared to $0.33 million for the first quarter of 2009. Although we
did not have to shut down our operations during the quarter, we did encounter
temporary delays and stoppages, due to either breakdowns in equipment, a lack of
necessary supplies, weather-related production issues, or regulatory
inspections. We continue to encounter thicker coal seams as we advance
further into the mine.
While
certain general business conditions continue to improve, the continued effects
of the recent recession, credit crisis, and related turmoil in the global
financial system has had and may continue to have a negative impact on our
business, financial condition, and liquidity. We may face significant
future challenges if conditions in the financial markets do not continue to
improve. Worldwide demand for coal has been adversely impacted by the
global recession, but the steel industry and the global metallurgical coal
markets have shown signs of improvement. If this trend continues, coal
demand should increase and improve our opportunities to sell our coal products
at higher prices.
West Virginia Explosion.
On April 5, 2010, an explosion occurred at the Upper Big Branch mine
in Montcoal, West Virginia, operated by Performance Coal Company, a subsidiary
of Massey Energy. According to news reports, the explosion resulted in 29
fatalities. We are deeply saddened by the loss of these members of the
industry. In response to this tragedy, the Federal Mine Safety and Health
Administration (“MSHA”) conducted inspections of most mines in the region,
including Pond Creek. As a result of these inspections, MSHA issued an
order to Gwenco to take certain precautionary measures, including upgrades to
its ventilation system, CO system, and airlock system. In addition, MSHA
conducted simulated evacuations and conducted underground training
seminars. Gwenco ceased mining operations during this period in order to
allow the inspections, implement the precautionary measures, and conduct the
simulations and training. Gwenco reopened the mining operations
approximately two weeks after the inspections commenced. We are
unable to ascertain or estimate at this time what additional effect the
explosion will have on our current or future operations, or whether our
operations will become subject to additional regulation.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States. The preparation of financial statements requires managers to make
estimates and disclosures on the date of the financial statements. On an
on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those
related to revenue recognition. We use authoritative pronouncements,
historical experience, and other assumptions as the basis for making
judgments. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We
believe the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant
judgments and estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Mineral
Interests
The
purchase acquisition costs of mineral properties are deferred until the
properties are placed into production, sold, or abandoned. These deferred
costs will be amortized on the unit-of-production basis over the estimated
useful life of the properties following the commencement of production or
written-off if the properties are sold, allowed to lapse or
abandoned.
Mineral
property acquisition costs include any cash consideration and the fair market
value of common shares and preferred shares, based on the trading price of the
shares, or, if no trading price exists, on other indicia of fair market value,
issued for mineral property interests, pursuant to the terms of the agreement or
based upon an independent appraisal.
Administrative
expenditures are expensed in the year incurred.
Coal
Acquisition Costs
The costs
to obtain coal lease rights are capitalized and amortized primarily by the
units-of-production method over the estimated recoverable reserves.
Amortization occurs either as we mine on the property or as others mine on the
property through subleasing transactions.
Rights to
leased coal lands are often acquired through royalty payments. As mining
occurs on these leases, the accrued royalty is charged to cost of coal
sales.
Mining
Acquisition Costs
The costs
to obtain any interest in third-party mining operations are expensed unless
significantly proven reserves can be established for the entity. At that
point, capitalization would occur.
Mining
Equipment
Mining
equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures that extend the useful lives
of existing plant and equipment or increase the productivity of the asset are
capitalized. Mining equipment is depreciated principally on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range
from three to 15 years.
Deferred
Mine Equipment
Costs of
developing new mines or significantly expanding the capacity of existing mines
are capitalized and amortized using the units-of-production method over the
estimated recoverable reserves that are associated with the property being
benefited.
Asset
Impairment
If facts
and circumstances suggest that a long-lived asset may be impaired, the carrying
value is reviewed. If the review indicates that the value of the asset
will not be recoverable, as determined based on projected undiscounted cash
flows related to the asset over its remaining life, then the carrying value of
the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value.
Revenue
Recognition
Coal
sales revenues are sales to customers of coal produced at our operations.
We recognize revenue from coal sales at the time title passes to the
customer. Under the typical terms of sale, title and risk of loss transfer
to the customer at the mine (or dock, or port) where coal is loaded to the truck
(or rail, barge, ocean-going vessel, or other transportation source) that serves
our mines.
Income
Taxes
We
provide for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial
statements. The provision, if any, consists of taxes currently due plus
deferred taxes related primarily to differences between the basis of assets and
liabilities for financial and income tax reporting. The deferred tax
assets and liabilities, if any, represent the future tax return consequences of
those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets
and liabilities are recovered or settled. As of March 31, 2010, we had no
material current tax liability, deferred tax assets, or liabilities to impact on
its financial position because the deferred tax asset related to our net
operating loss carry forward was fully offset by a valuation allowance.
However, we have not filed our corporate income tax returns since
2002.
Fair
Value
Our
financial instruments, as defined by FASB ASC Topic 825-10-50, “Financial
Instruments”, include cash, advances to affiliate, trade accounts receivable,
investment in securities available-for-sale, restricted cash, accounts payable
and accrued expenses and short-term borrowings. All instruments other than
the investment in securities available-for-sale are accounted for on a
historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity of these financial
instruments, approximates fair value as at March 31, 2010.
Earnings
loss per share
We
adopted FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share”, which provides for the
calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings
per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income available
to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of
securities that could share in the earnings similar to fully diluted earnings
per share; however, the potential dilution becomes anti-dilutive in the case of
a loss and, therefore, basic and fully diluted loss per share are the
same.
Stock
Split
All
references to common stock and per share date have been retroactively restated
to account for the 1 for 10 reverse stock split effectuated on November 4,
2008.
All
references to common stock and per share date have been retroactively restated
to account for the 1 for 100 reverse stock split effectuated on August 4,
2009.
Other
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
We do not
expect that the adoption of other recent pronouncements from the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board to have any impact on its financial
statements.
Results
of Operations
Basis
of Presentation
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain unaudited
selected financial data:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
revenues
|
|
$
|
683,505
|
|
|
$
|
330,313
|
|
Production
costs
|
|
|
(974,300
|
)
|
|
|
(632,730
|
)
|
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
|
|
(223,316
|
)
|
|
|
(338,359
|
)
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
(43,915
|
)
|
|
|
(40,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
(loss)
|
|
|
(558,026
|
)
|
|
|
(681,395
|
)
|
Comparison
of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Coal Revenues.
Our coal
revenues were $683,505 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to
$330,313 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of approximately
107%. Our increase in revenues was due to our increased level of mining
operations in the first quarter of 2010 versus 2009. This increase
resulted from our ability to mine on a more consistent basis as compared to the
prior period. We added and upgraded equipment which allowed us to be in
production more consistently. In addition, as we advanced further into the
mine, the coal seam thickened, which resulted in improved rates of recovery and
a higher percentage of coal per gross ton extracted. Finally, the
completion of the Gwenco bankruptcy allowed us to access additional working
capital that allowed us to obtain necessary labor and supplies for
production.
Production costs.
Production costs were $974,300 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as
compared to $632,730 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of
approximately 54%. As a percentage of sales, our productions cost
decreased from 192% to 143%. In order to increase our mining production,
we needed to contract for additional labor, purchase additional supplies, and
conduct additional repairs, all of which led to an increase in production
costs. Furthermore, we incurred increased shipping charges, as the
shipping distance to our new customers was further than our prior
customers. In addition, we incurred increased royalty expense as we
increased mining production and sales. As a percentage of net sales, our
production costs decreased, as our additional cost expenditures resulted in more
efficient and productive mining operations.
Selling, general, and
administrative.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
decreased to $223,316 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $338,359
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease resulted
from reductions in consulting and professional fees.
Depreciation and
amortization.
Depreciation expense increased to $43,915 for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, from $40,619 for the three months ended March
31, 2009. The increase results from our putting additional equipment into
service in 2009.
Operating loss.
We
incurred an operating loss of $558,026 for the three months ended March 31,
2010, compared to an operating loss of $681,395 for the three months ended March
31, 2009. We had lower operating losses in the first quarter of 2010
as compared to the comparable period of 2009 primarily from increase in coal
revenues as well as a decrease in selling, general, and administrative
expenses.
Interest.
Interest
expense increased to $580,169 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from
$140,893 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Our interest expense
results from various outstanding debt obligations, including obligations that we
assumed in connection with the acquisition of Gwenco and various notes issued in
various financings since October 2004. In addition, it includes expense
associated with the issuance of securities with beneficial conversion
features. The increase results primarily from interest computed in
accruing present values of the principal amounts and future interest
requirements of our restructured debt obligations pursuant to Gwenco’s plan of
reorganization. It also results from additional borrowings which occurred
in 2009.
Gain on debt
settlements.
We recorded no gain or loss on debt settlements in the
three months ended March 31, 2010, as opposed to a gain of $34,361 on loan
settlements from the prior comparable period. The gain on loan settlement
in the first quarter of 2009 resulted from the settlement of an outstanding
litigation.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We have
financed its operations, acquisitions, debt service, and capital requirements
through cash flows generated from operations and through issuance of debt and
equity securities. Our working capital deficit at March 31, 2010 was
$3,779,672. We had cash of $91,718 as of March 31, 2010.
We used
$451,349 of net cash in operating activities for the three months ended March
31, 2010, compared to using $312,194 in the three months ended March 31,
2009. Cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March
31, 2010 was due to our net loss of $1,138,195, an increase in accounts
receivable of $37,818, an increase in prepaid expenses of $66,642. This
was offset by non-cash expenses of $43,915 in depreciation and amortization,
$10,467 of stock issued for interest, $165,310 of stock issued for services,
$387,796 of amortized discount on convertible notes, $2,122 of amortized royalty
costs, and an increase of accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$181,696.
Net cash
flows used in investing activities was $88 for the three months ended March 31,
2010, as compared to $3,338 of net cash flows used in investing activities for
the comparable period in 2009. The net cash flows used in investing
activities in the first quarter of March 2010 resulted from $88 in security
deposits.
Net cash
flows provided by financing activities were $535,901 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, compared to net cash flows provided by financing activities of
$302,649 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. This decrease in net
cash provided by financing activities is due to our borrowings of $1,204,527
under our exit facility in the Gwenco reorganization and other borrowings,
offset by repayment of $668,626 under our exit facility.
Exit
Facility
Under
Gwenco’s Plan of Reorganization, the Court approved an exit facility under which
Interstellar Holdings, LLC will provide up to $2 million in financing to
Gwenco. The exit facility consists of a 12% secured convertible line of
credit note due March 2015. The note is convertible into our common stock
at a rate of the lower of (i) $0.001 per share and (ii) 40% of the average of
the three lowest per shares market values of our common stock during the 10
trading days before a conversion; provided that the holder is prohibited from
converting if such conversion would result in it holding more than 4.99% of our
outstanding common stock. The obligations under the exit facility are
secured and guaranteed by us and our subsidiaries. As of March 31, 2010,
the outstanding balance on the exit facility was approximately $2.49
million.
Pursuant
to the exit facility, Interstellar required Gwenco to assign all of its accounts
receivable to Interstellar and have all payments on the receivables paid into an
escrow account. Interstellar had been making advances under the facility
to Gwenco against the accounts receivable, and the advances were being repaid as
payments are made to the escrow account. In connection therewith, the
Company issued a convertible promissory note to a third party investor for
facilitation of the escrow arrangement. The note is due September 16, 2011
and bears interest at an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%). The
note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price of forty five percent (45%) of the average of the five (5) lowest per
share market value during the ten (10) trading days immediately preceding a
conversion date. In addition, the third-party investors who facilitated
the escrow arrangement received a commission of 2.5% of each advance made.
Gwenco, Interstellar, and the third-party investors terminated this escrow
arrangement in March 2010.
Convertible
Notes
On
February 4, 2010, we borrowed $75,000 from an investor, and in connection
therewith, issued a $95,000 5% convertible promissory note due February 4,
2012. The note is convertible into shares of our common stock at a
conversion price of $0.001 per share, subject to adjustment.
On
February 22, 2010, we borrowed $50,000 from an investor, and in connection
therewith, issued a $55,000 8% convertible promissory note due February 22,
2012. The note is convertible into shares of our common stock at a
conversion price of forty five percent (45%) of the average of the five (5)
lowest per share market values during the ten (10) trading days immediately
preceding a conversion date.
On March
22, 2010, we borrowed $50,000 from an investor, and in connection therewith,
issued a $50,000 8% convertible promissory note due March 22, 2011. The
note is convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of
forty five percent (40%) of the average of the three (3) lowest per share market
values during the ten (10) trading days immediately preceding a conversion date.
Capital
Requirements
The
report of our independent accountants for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 states that we have incurred operating losses since inception and require
additional capital to continue operations, and that these conditions raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We
believe that, as of the date of this report, in order to fund our plan of
operations over the next 12 months, we will need to fund our operations and
capital requirements out of cash flows generated from operations and from
borrowings and/or the sale of additional debt, equity, or convertible
securities. We have obtained exit facility financing through the Gwenco
bankruptcy proceedings to fund the capital requirements of Gwenco; however, the
borrowings under this financing may not be sufficient to address all of our
capital requirements for the next 12 months. It is possible that we will
be unable to obtain sufficient additional capital through the sale of our
securities as needed.
Part of
our growth strategy is to acquire additional coal mining operations. Where
appropriate, we will seek to acquire operations located in markets where we
currently operate to increase utilization at existing facilities, thereby
improving operating efficiencies and more effectively using capital without a
proportionate increase in administrative costs. We do not currently have binding
agreements or understandings to acquire any other companies.
We intend
to retain any future earnings to pay our debts, finance the expansion of our
business and any necessary capital expenditures, and for general corporate
purposes.
ITEM
3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a
“smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not
required to provide the information required by this item.
ITEM
4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized,
and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure based on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in
Rule 13a-15(e). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and
procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures.
At the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we carried out
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and our
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were not effective to ensure that all material information required to be
disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q has been made known to them in a
timely fashion.
In
addition, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
identified significant deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of
our internal control over financial reporting that they consider to be “material
weaknesses.” The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has defined a
material weakness as a “significant deficiency or combination of significant
deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented
or detected.” In light of the material weaknesses described below, we
performed additional procedures to ensure that the consolidated financial
statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements
included in this Quarterly Report fairly present in all material respects our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods
presented.
We did
not design and maintain effective entity-level controls as defined in the
Internal Control—Integrated
Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission
(“COSO”). Specifically:
1.
We did not maintain a sufficient complement
of personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge,
experience, and training in the application of generally accepted accounting
principles commensurate with our financial accounting and reporting requirements
and low materiality thresholds. This material weakness contributed to the
restatement of prior financial statements in the past and, if not remediated,
has the potential to cause a material misstatement in the future.
2.
Due to the previously reported material
weaknesses, as evidenced by previous restatements, as well as lack of formal
documentation of systems and procedures, and lack of consistent application of
record keeping procedures, management has concluded that the controls over the
period-end financial reporting process were not operating effectively.
Specifically, controls were not effective to ensure that significant
non-routine transactions, accounting estimates, and other adjustments were
appropriately reviewed, analyzed, and monitored on a timely basis. These
conditions constitute deficiencies in both the design and operation of
entity-level controls. A material weakness in the period-end financial
reporting process could result in our not being able to meet our regulatory
filing deadlines and, if not remediated, has the potential to cause a material
misstatement or to miss a filing deadline in the future.
These
significant deficiencies in the design and operation of our internal controls
include the needs to hire additional staffing and to provide training to
existing and new personnel in SEC reporting requirements and generally accepted
accounting principles. Furthermore, the deficiencies include the need for
formal control systems for journal entries, recording of transactions, closing
procedures, the preparation of financial statements, the need to form an
independent audit committee as a form of internal checks and balances and
oversight of our management, to implement budget and reporting procedures, and
the need to provide internal review procedures for schedules, SEC reports, and
filings prior to submission to the auditors and/or filing with the
SEC.
These
deficiencies have been disclosed to our Board of Directors. Additional
effort is needed to fully remedy these deficiencies and we are seeking to
improve and strengthen our control processes and procedures. We are in the
process of improving our internal control over financial reporting in an effort
to remediate these deficiencies. We have appointed an independent director
as a form of internal checks and balances and to provide oversight over
management. In addition, we are also seeking to improve our internal
control over financial reporting by adding additional accounting personnel,
improving supervision and increasing training of our accounting staff with
respect to generally accepted accounting principles, providing additional
training to our management regarding use of estimates in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, increasing the use of contract
accounting assistance, and increasing the frequency of internal financial
statement review. We will continue to take additional steps necessary to
remediate the material weaknesses described above.
Our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have also evaluated whether any
change in our internal controls occurred during the last fiscal quarter and have
concluded that there were no changes in our internal controls or in other
factors that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, these
controls.
PART
II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Material
developments in legal proceedings affecting us are described in Part I, Item 3 –
Legal Proceedings, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009, and as they relate to the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, are set
forth in Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies,” of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and are
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM
1A – RISK FACTORS
As a
“small reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not
required to provide information required by this item.
ITEM
2 – CHANGES IN SECURITIES
(a)
(1)
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we
issued an aggregate of 686,757,365 shares of common stock upon conversions of
various convertible notes. The aggregate principal and interest amount of these
notes that were converted was $365,814. The issuances were exempt pursuant
to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act as well as Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act.
(2)
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we
issued an aggregate of 114,928,514 shares of common stock pursuant to Gwenco’s
Plan of Reorganization in partial satisfaction of certain claims against Gwenco
in the Gwenco Bankruptcy proceedings. The aggregate amount of claims
satisfied pursuant to these issuances was $75,586. The issuances were
exempt pursuant to Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code.
(3)
On October 14, 2009, we entered into an
exchange agreement with a third party investor, pursuant to which the investor
exchanged approximately $125,000 of evidences of indebtedness for a $125,000 8%
convertible promissory note due October 14, 2011. The evidences of
indebtedness were comprised of investments made into Quest in 2008 which we
agreed to repay upon demand. The note is convertible into shares of
our common stock at a conversion price of $0.001 per share, subject to
adjustment. The holder may not convert any outstanding principal amount of
this note or accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the extent such conversion
would result in the holder beneficially owning in excess of 4.999% of the then
issued and outstanding common shares of Quest. On February 5, 2010, the
interest rate was reduced to 5% and the conversion price adjustments were
modified. The issuance was exempt pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the
Securities Act as well as Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
(4)
On February 4, 2010, we borrowed $75,000 from
an investor, and in connection therewith, issued a $95,000 5% convertible
promissory note due February 4, 2012. The note is convertible into shares
of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.001 per share, subject to
adjustment. The issuance was exempt pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act.
(5)
On February 22, 2010, we borrowed $50,000 from
an investor, and in connection therewith, issued a $55,000 8% convertible
promissory note due February 22, 2012. The note is convertible into shares
of our common stock at a conversion price of forty five percent (45%) of the
average of the five (5) lowest per share market values during the ten (10)
trading days immediately preceding a conversion date. The issuance was
exempt pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
(6)
On March 22, 2010, we borrowed $50,000 from an
investor, and in connection therewith, issued a $50,000 8% convertible
promissory note due March 22, 2011. The note is convertible into shares of
our common stock at a conversion price of forty five percent (40%) of the
average of the three (3) lowest per share market values during the ten (10)
trading days immediately preceding a conversion date. The issuance was
exempt pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
ITEM
3 – DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
ITEM
4 – (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
None.
ITEM
5 – OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6 - EXHIBITS
Item
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Method of Filing
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Amendment
to Convertible Promissory Note
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to Quest’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010.
|
4.2
|
|
5%
Convertible Promissory Note
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to Quest’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010.
|
4.3
|
|
8%
Convertible Promissory Note
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to Quest’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010.
|
4.4
|
|
12%
Convertible Promissory Note
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to Quest’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010.
|
4.5
|
|
12%
Convertible Promissory Note
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to Quest’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010.
|
4.6
|
|
8%
Convertible Promissory Note
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to Quest’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010.
|
10.1
|
|
Loan
and Security Agreement
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to Quest’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010.
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Eugene Chiaramonte, Jr. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
32.1
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
Filed
herewith.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
QUEST
MINERALS & MINING CORP.
|
|
|
May
24, 2010
|
/s/ Eugene Chiaramonte,
Jr.
|
|
Eugene
Chiaramonte, Jr.
|
|
President
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
|